Von Huegel F (Baron) Eternal Life
Von Huegel F (Baron) Eternal Life
Von Huegel F (Baron) Eternal Life
ETERNAL LIFE
A Study of its Implications and Applications
Friedrich von Hgel
KTK H N A L
1-'
MTiV
H
,
1*1
ETERNAL
A STPPY OK
ITS IMII.K'ATIONh
LIFE
AI'l'LH'ATIONS
AM)
vv
BAKON*
I'WIWH'U VON
HtH;KI,
Sturrr
t
WAS
Nevertheless
Thou
boldest
I
Whom have
Though my
Thou, God,
desire naught
upon
:
earth.
and
for ever.
HEREIN
loved us.
is love,
not that
that
He
We love,
because
He
first
i
loved us.
iv.
JOHN
ro iy.
THOU
and
i.
i. i,
PREFACE
THE
history
simple yet
of the
is
indeed
Dr.
his
his
Rev.
instructions concerning
"
first
of
the articles thus undertaken by me, were to make the paper as long as the -subject-matter might
seem
to
deserve or require.
He
was, in
this,
doubtless thinking primarily of his Encyclopaedia as a whole ; whereas I myself became so engrossed
in
my
grow
it
to become.
The
sent
in,
result,
article,
when
for
&
T.
the publishers of the Encyclopaedia, to my article as a separate book the present Both Dr. Hastings and Messrs. Clark volume,
Clark,
issue
truly generous
in
vi
their dealings with
Preface
throughout these agreements ; and I now beg to thank them cordially. This little private history is recounted here in
me
order to explain
writer possessed of could venture on so beeven average modesty I sincerely doubt wilderingly vast a subject.
I
how any
would ever have dared directly to undertake a volume upon this subject-matter. Yet this task, thus originally undertaken as but
whether
did not, somehow, appear preposterously ambitious ; the work, once it was
articles,
one of several
grow under my hands; and by me has flown so The subject had doubtreadily from my pen. less been occupying my mind and life for many a year; and thus there is some reason to hope
started,
seemed
to
may,
while and that they may, here and there, help some religious students and strugglers.
presumably the right place for saying a few words about certain peculiarities of the book,
is
This
appearance within
its
pages.
The Method
Preface
vii
claiming to begin with the beginnings, or at least with the really early experiences and utterances of mankind. Much is now made of the
savage, the supposedly brute-like beginnings of
and a purely historical, an entirely genetic method and account is now often demanded.
;
man
Yet, as a matter of simple fact, we really know man only as man; and the interior significance
and earliest acts and utterances we understand, where we understand them at all, only from analyses of his more advanced and more articulate condition. I am, of course, fully aware that Buddhism and the Dionysiac
of his
earlier
Cult appeared late in the history of man. Yet at this, comparatively late, stage we are offered
articulation of
in experience, sufficient, the light of still later experiences and articulations, for us to arrive at some sober, reasonably
when explained
certain conclusions;
have
striven
hard
throughout
the book
never to lose sight of the very important element of truth embodied, even, I think, exaggerated, " in the attempts at a purely genetic method," and in such Naturalism in Anthropology. Hence
I
have
endeavoured
to
remain
continuously
viii
Preface
of the body, of the senses, of sensible objects and of the physical environment, within and for
man's
mental,
spiritual,
religious
life.
And
have attempted, on reaching at last the very late period at which this fundamental fact has been systematically recognized even to excess, sincerely to appraise the strength and the
weakness of
this
A strong
these pages upon the Parousza, the Proximate Second Coming upon the Eschatological Ele-
ment operative in the life and teaching of Our Lord and in all genuine and fruitful Christianity. The problem involved is so delicate and so farreaching that we cannot wonder if the great
majority of believers have, ever since the first enthusiastic age, turned away from it with
instinctive
fear
or sickening dismay.
part of their conclusions, will prevent the battle concerning Christianity the testing of its claim
abidingly to supply the full sanity and truth of religion and of life from turning, more and more, in this and the next two or three generations,
Yet no however
in
around
the
precise
significance,
place.
Preface
ix
and range of this element in Christian teaching. In any case, the writer could not, in a serious
study of Eternal Life, pass over
this,
and most operative revelation Temporal and the Eternal ever vouchsafed to man. And here he would take his stand very deliberately
with those
who indeed
who
find
a genuine and
life
full
eschatological
teaching, yet
and
sudden,
apocalyptic,
transcendental, purely
Indeed, the interaction, the religious element tension, between these two elements or moveultimately found to be an essential constituent, and part of the mainspring, of Christianity,
ments,
is
all
the
deepest spiritual
It
is,
life.
surely,
very interesting
to
note
how
that brilliant
writer,
Albert Schweitzer, who insists, more exclusively again than Professor Loisy, upon one single
element, the Eschatological and Apocalyptic, in Our Lord's life and teaching, has found even this
picture of Christ so deeply fascinating for his own soul, that he has abandoned his high posts
and
Preface
Church authorities having refused him a clerical ordination and appointment to labour at winning the heathen to this purely ascetical and transcendental
picture of
This
I
am deeply repulsive to the large convinced, most rightly repulsive majority of believers. And yet the Eschatological element will have to be apprehended, accepted,
Our Lord
is
And
so practised, as an enriching
heroism and wise enthusiasm apprehensive of the Eternal God, it will reawaken Christianity to its
fullest attractiveness
and vigour.
to
where to draw the line between Modern Times and the Present Day as to how to group Kant and his derivaI
tives.
first
together; as already conjointly forming part of our contemporary life. But this arrangement refused to
work well
his four
So then
tried to treat
Kant and
immediate successors as concluding the Historical Retrospect, and to retain Ritschl alone
the
in
Contemporary Survey*
found,
how-
Preface
ever, that especially Schleiermacher
xi
hauer, and
more
copiously
more
directly
operative
again, that Ritschlianism, though it could never have existed without Kant, is, nevertheless, largely
within our
own
lives than is
Kant; and,
determined
by
towards
the
Christian Community.
break
far
between
Kant and
still
those
four
away and so
far
down, of Ritschlianism.
Yet
Kant, those four Kantians, and Ritschl appear thus at last to occupy the places naturally
marked out
affinities.
for
them
by
their
origins
and
Especially does
Ritschlianism really
belong to the group of Institutional Religion, in spite of its largely forced interpretation and its grave impoverishing of the experience and
tradition furnished
by these
Institutions*
There is throughout the book a vigilant attention to the nature, range, and implications of our knowto Epistemology, especially to the ontologithe central cal character and witness of Religion
ledge
and
the
God
xii
Preface
critical
Realism
Ideas but of Organisms and Spirits, of the Spirit, a purified but firm Anthropomorphism are here
full
It is
plain that this difficult subject is indeed inexhaustible, and that much discussion and discrimination
be required in this matter from ourselves and from our successors; yet it is, surely, quite as
will
plain that Subjectivism has had its day for a good long while to come. Certainly, nothing can
well be
more
arid,
more
drearily reiterative
and
useless, in face of the entrancing richness and the tragic reality of life, than is most of the still
copious literature, not seldom proceeding from thinkers of distinction and technical competence,
which attempts to find or to make a world worthy of man's deepest, ever costly and difficult, requirements and ideals, within avowedly mere
projections of himself.
illusions which,
but which, one and all, convey no trustworthy intimation of any trans-subjective, more than merely human validity and reality whatsoever.
utility,
and
The
Problems
our
of
present-day
course,
Social
at
aim
any
Preface
xiii
description or solution of these problems as such, but only endeavours to elucidate the causes at
for
the
experience and
The largely still conception of Eternal Life. but and obscure, abiding deep, instincts and needs of a spiritual kind struggling for expresthe present acute social agitations and troubles appear to fit in well with the Theory of
sion
in
Knowledge articulated in this book, and especially with the Two Movements found here to be
essential to all fully fruitful religion.
And
thus
very agitations and troubles contribute powerful, because quite spontaneous and unthese
expected, additional reasons for holding those analyses of philosophy and of religion to be substantially true
life.
We
and adequate to the central facts of have up to this point simply sought
:
and sincerely followed the lines of the fullest life and of continual rebirth and hence the joys as
well as the pangs of expansion can now be ours, and not the sorry pleasures and dreary pains of
contraction or, at least, of rigidity in face of the the dim future apparently agitated present and
And
all,
expansion
with,
is,
each and
occasioned and sustained by, the the experience of Eternal Life the reality of
and
is
Abiding God.
xiv
I
Preface
much wished
conflicts of
to avoid
and
the present concerning Church Authority, and thus to keep myself and my reader in regions undisturbed by such immediate and
embittering controversies. But I soon discovered that I could only escape the questions concerning
Religious Institutions on the hypothesis that Eternal Life can be vividly experienced and clearly
conceived outside
sane and
full
all
such Institutions.
Epistemology,
and
all
complete, characteristic and fruitful religious experiences and personalities imperatively demand, in the writer's judgment, some genuine Institu*
tionalism.
in
And
the
search
function,
need,
full
and checks of
religious
I nstitu tionalism
within
the
complex, and especially within the experience of Eternal Life as these have been,
and continue to be apprehended by earnest and If man's spirit is awakened by saintly souls.
contact with the things of sense, and if his consciousness of the Eternal and the Omnipresent is aroused and (in the long run) sustained only by
the aid of Happenings in Time and in Space, then the Historical, Institutional, Sacramental must be
allowed a necessary position and function in the full religious life. No cutting of knots however
Preface
difficult,
xv
however
solutions.
the wise integration of the Institutional within the full spiritual life are really sufficient The writer is
no Quaker, but a convinced Roman Catholic and hence, do what he will, he cannot avoid, he cannot even minimize these for himself utterly intrinsic
;
questions.
The
sober
Bibliography has been kept very short and only such works have been mentioned here
as appeared to be of first-rate importance for the elucidation of the subject, and amongst these, generally only such as have been fully assimilated
by the
writer's mind.
pre-
tension to exhaustiveness
and
bibliographies, in
proportion as they are at all complete, readily distract both writer and reader from the experiences
and
I regret, however, not to have found room for the following authors and writings so entirely within my two conditions.
After Kierkegaard,
briefly to
it would have been well and have quoted analysed the utterances
of the
German
first
published
in
1873 and
reprinted
in his
xvi
"
Preface
ed.
Deutsche Schriften,"
is
1886.
Amidst much
that
prejudiced,
get here a poignant sense of the continuous real presence of the Eternal, and of our persistent need and search of the Eternal, within all religious
a sense
all
the
more
proceeds from one engrossed throughout a lifetime in the most minute textual
and
linguistic studies.
There
in
ought
to
the conclusion to
Anthropology, a grateful acceptance of the admirable pages of C. P. Tide, In his " Elements
of the Science of Religion/' 1897, vol. il, concerning the Infinite present within man pages which
sprang so fresh and deep and admirably adequate from the pen of that great scholar and genuine
believer.
It
right,
perhaps in connection
made
appreci-
Philosophic,
in 1895,
Oswald Knife's "Einleitung in die For this little volume, first published
at its fifth edition in 1910, is
and already
a cheering proof that a carefully self-consistent, sober, and non-subjectivist theory of knowledge
of our day, be furnished in a short handbook, and that it can find there a
can, in the
Germany
Preface
xvii
And,
some
careful attention
Feuerbach
section, to
Professor
Paul Natorp's
Grenzen
der Humanitat," 2nd ed. 1908. This exquisitely written booklet is indeed but a variant (distin-
elasticity,
and paeda-
accommodating tact) of the Feuerbachian Yet the attempt to "save " Religion Illusionism.
elimination of
all
by the
Ontology, and by reducing it to a purely human-social Moralism, is too characteristic of the atmosphere of our times, and is
too subtly and completely destructive of religion, not to deserve the most repeated study and refutation.
The
if
at
all,
Contents and Index, on the contrary, err, on the side of over-copiousness yet such
;
if
serviceable at
all,
seemed
any
to require ready aids to its study in almost reasonable direction and combination.
obligations,
as
have very gratefully to thank the friends who have most kindly helped me to make this work
I
less
at University College, b
me
especially
xviii
Preface
in the sections
and
in
remain indeed alone responsible for everything* printed here; yet I am anxious to acknowledge
the support which I have derived from the careful reading of this my fellow- Roman Catholic,
Mr. Clement C.
sity of
J.
Natural and Comparative Religion in the UniverOxford, was of much service on points connected with Plato and Aristotle, in regard to the translations from Spinoza, and also as to
Kant and Schopenhauer, and concerning Epigenesis and Evolution* And two other friends have most patiently and skilfully criticized throughout the form and sequence
of the book
;
and
it is
to their
the reader largely owes such clearness and simplicity as these pages may now show.
And
sions
in the case of
my
Mystical Element,
in
submit these
fail
my
to
conclu-
be at least and imperfect many ways degrees to my fellow-workers, and above all to the test and
judgment of
my
fellow-Christians
and of the
Catholic Church,
CONTENTS
INTRODUT1ON
A generous range and development
study of Eternal Life Eternal Life, an experience and conception latent, and in various degrees patent, throughout all specifically human life ; but fully operative and vividly recognized in re. . ligion alone It involves, in proportion to such fulness and vividness, Simultaneity, a complete Present and Presence Indication of the three parts of this work an Historical
.
. .
.....
. .
PAGES
j
i,
2
2
Conclusions
2,
PART
Rough
HISTORICAL RETROSPECT
division into evidences furnished by the Oriental religions, properly so called, and those supplied by the
Graxo* Roman and the Jewish- Christian worlds and and Modern West European and North American civilization
their intermixtures, inclusive of Mediaeval
CHAPTER
The
Range
.....
xiac
7,
8 8
xx
1.
Contents
Buddhism,
8,
2.
3.
Belief in Nirvana and apprehension of life as sheer flux Lesson of this interconnecstrictly interconnected. 10 . tion, with respect to Eternal Life Hindoo Ism. Ramamtja largely escapes from Monism . 10-12 into Theism and belief in Free- Will and Grace The apprehension and conception of Eternal Life . . . . traceable here Zarathustra : the Gatka-hymns may well &O back to him. Their doctrine profoundly ethical and dualislic.
.
.12
.
The Yasltf-hymm\ad& an
Life
is
Eternal Li&ht
.
I2j 13
apprehended here
13
The
old Egyptian religion articulates or implies with little or nothing concerning Eternal IJIe. certainty Illustration : the God Ra and the souls identified with
him
13, 14
CHAPTER
First of seven chapters
II
ISRAELITISH RELIGION
devoted to the Jewish-Christian, GnxJCQ-Roman, and Modern European revelations, con.
,
ceptions, civilizations
Range
1.
of Israelitish times ; considerably narrower range of the Israelitish utterances concerning Eternal Life 15, 16 Utterances of the Israelitish Jalwist writer, and the . history of Elijahs conflict with the JJaal worship 16, 17 The prophet Amos Israel's special responsibilities and moral dispositions, declared more central than all
:
.15
ritual
observance
:
2.
3.
4.
the vision of his vocation ; his Isaiah of Jerusalem * parable of God and I Us vineyard 17, iB The prophet Micah : the ethical character of God . 1 8 18 Jeremiah : God the fountain of living waters , Deuteronomy man is to love God with all he is and has 18 Esekfal Gocl as the good shepherd ; as re-animating the dead as the boundless healing waters . 19, 30 The Priestly Cod^ akin to Eaekicl's spirit , . 20 Lateness of Israel's awaking to conviction of soul* Reasons full, indeed heightened, life after death. and profound mstructivcness of this fact . .21,22 The Greeks in full contrast with nil thi. Yet the Greeks gradually contribute much towards articulation and completion of the Jewish spiritual outlook 22, 23
*
.17
.....*
>
Contents
xxi
CHAPTER
III
The Orgiastic Cultus of Dionysus, as described by Rohde ecstatic states here awaken apprehension of
.
. .
......
.
PAGES
23
2.
the Non-successive, the Eternal . . 23-25 The soul here felt itself immortal, divine the soul as out of the body, in spite of the body .25, 26 Centre of the experience is here the apparent timeless. ness, eternity of the trance state 27 The Orphics utilize and transform the Dionysiac cult ; their doctrine of the Dionysian and the Titanic
-
. elements in man . . 27, 28 soul's escape from the wheel of births, like yet . unlike here to Buddhism 28, 29 The soul here is to regain memory of her earthly life in the Beyond oblivion is here an evil 29, 30 Two currents of conception in the Orphic Tablets; traces in the mystical current of two characteristics of
.
.
The
. . . . 30, 31 precisely formulates the Totnm Simul of Eternity. The clearest of all purely abstract and monistic, static, and dcterminist professions . 31, 32 4. Plato attains the most vivid apprehension and formula. tion of Eternity as distinct from Time 32 Three stages of his growth and corresponding three groups of his writings. Only last two groups furnish
.
.
ecstatic states
3.
Parmenides
first
, .32, 33 teachings concerning Eternal Life Passages concerning Eternal Life in the Ph&drus in in the the Tke&fetus and Refiitbtic ; ; S&phist ; and in the Parmenides 33, 34 The passages concerning Purgation in this second 35 group the Symposium and (2) Passages in the third group the Tim&vs 35-37 The four great insights, comPlato's two defects. bined in Plato for the first and the last time amongst Gr^co-Roman non- Christian souls the position of philosophy well within a large national and individual life the need of purification and the function of the Thumos ; the continuous search for the organism in all reality ; and a deep sense of an inexhaustible transcendent Beauty, Truth, and Goodness, man's love of which constitutes all * , . . his worth 37 38
.
(1)
...... ..*...
*
,
xxii
Contents
Aristotle drops Plato's Purification and his Thirst after Yet conception of the Unthe Transcendent. moving Energy here a profound contribution to 38 expression of the experiences concerning Eternal Life (1) The Pure Energeia of God, in the Ethics and the Dr. Schiller's analysis of the Metaphysics. . . doctrine 38-40 40, 4 1 (2) Nous and Energeict as operative in human life scheme. of this features abstract Intolerably abiding greatness of intuition that succession not an essential, but a defect, of life. The richness of the life will, however, alone give full worth to the simultaneity, as the simultaneity gives same to the . . * . . richness 41, 42
. . t
.
Yd
CHAPTER
IV
interaction
.
between the
.
.42, 43 Oriental, partly Semitic, origin of all its earlier chiefs and the historical circumstances of its beginnings largely explain its three peculiarities, The system has (1) Its Pantheistic-materialistic basis. no room for Eternal Life . 43~4f> Its Ethical Rigorism and abstractness of outlook . 45, 40 Yet its deeply organic conception of human society prepares and eventually aids articulation of experiences concerning Eternal Life 47, 48 2. The Post-Exilic Biblical, Apocryphal, and Pseudepigraphic Jewish books ? upon the whole less rich and pregnant than the Israehtish writings 48 But there are here series of A in utterances the (r) magnificent Psalms,
.
Stoicism.
(2)
The
most of which probably belong to this period of " Eternal M or " Everfirst explicit mention
;
,
4*S
lasting Life," with a clear enunciation of the resurrection of some souls to it, and of sonic other " souls to everlasting contempt," in the book of
Daniel'; and statements in Jfc&st<tstto4f th Second Rook of Maccabees, the Apocalypse of Bantch and the Psahns of Solomon ; .49, 50
t
.
(3)
Clear indications of the qualitative conception of Eternal Life in the Wisdom of Solomvn* Two
50
Contents
The Alexandrian Jew Philo
the Israelite
his attempt to interpret
.
xxiii
3.
and Jewish religion by means of Platonic, Aristotelian, and Stoic categories outside of (1) God, as Pure Action and as Eternal
Time
(2)
......
.
50, 51
51
in two-fold
God possesses fullest Life ; hence He does communicate it in a lesser degree and kind Or God is above, more than Life He is He Who zs Yet the devoted Jew Philo often pictures God as
. ;
53
insufficient
.
to
53,
himself
(3)
The
54
Stoic
Apathy
this point also, the spontaneity and the Jewish religion predominates
Yet, on richness of
.
.54
CHAPTER V
PRIMITIVE CHRISTIANITY
The
I.
The
actual utterances of Our Lord\h.v three conditions of their right apprehension j their abiding
.
55
power
(1)
55,
foreground here, and nowhere clearly pictured as a pure simultaneity . The Kingdom is future, imminent, sudden, a pure . gift of God (and apparently successive) " " Relation of Life and of " Life Everlasting " to the
of
in the
.
The Kingdom
God
56
56
56,
57
. . . . > Kingdom . 57, 58 Certainty of presence and operativeness of the fourwithin the fold conviction concerning Kingdom Our Lord's life and teaching. Difficulty, since early times, especially concerning the imminence. Yet this teaching of Our Lord, if taken generally, and as one of two essential movements, found to convey the deepest religious experience and truth 58, 59 (2) This purely religious, intensely transcendental outlook certainly prevalent in Our Lord's teaching from Peter's confession at Caesarea Philippi But another, relatively immanental, onwards. on to present, slow, predominantly ethical outlook numanly operative realities, also to be admitted, . earlier period of Jesus's life . 59, 60 especially
xxiv
This results exorcisms
Contents
from
......
His
attitude
concerning
.
the
60
60, 6r
6r,
presence
(3)
62
the Kingdom everywhere as a four sets of indications social organism 62, 63 (4) And the Future Life also to be rich, indeed complete, as to each soul's powers, and social as to each soul's occupation with other souls amidst the same soul's vision and adoration of God . 63, 64
:
(5)
Yet
everywhere, beginning* centre, medium, and end of the entire final life. The
here,
self-donation
to
God
soul's
Him,
effected
in
utter
2.
with fullest actuation of its noblest feelings, motives, passions, 64, 65 supremely exemplified by Our Lord's own life The negative movement thus planted right within even the purest attachments to the best of things; with the whole impelled by, and culminating- in, apprehension and lovingly awed acceptance of the deepest Reality, a holy Love and all-wise Will 65,66 St. Paufo teachings, though affected only by a part of Our Lord's life and revelation, generally more complex or systematic than Jcsus's sayings. Yet
aid, yet
.
most fundamental dishistoric Jesus, and in development of Christian organism gives to St. Paul's speculation a deep experimental content Dominating double fact of St. Paul's life his conversion
enthusiastic
positions
absorption
in
>
66, 67
a present Christ, yet without having known the He turns away from the past, earthly, Jewish Messiah to the present, eternal Christ, the universal Saviour; his dominant category becomes, not Kingdom of God, nor Eternal Life, but PneumO)
to
earthly Jesus.
developed anthropological scheme Psyche and Flesh ; and Pneuma and Body their
:
connotations
(2)
certain
Pauline
(3)
.....
:
67
67-69
though an element
of this, intrinsically eternal, Spirit within us here and now, our surety of immortality and resurrection. The Kingdom of (Joel thus, here also, partly; a present possession . . and maintains tho Christ-Spirit effects (4) This
universal
The presence
69
70
human brotherhood
its
articulation in
Contents
the Christian Church.
far
xxv
71, 72 Stoicism again overcome by an amazing range of experience, and by sense of prevenience and omnipresent holiness and love of God 72 The Johannine Writings Pauline in their central Christian convictions, Philonian in their general contheir free ception of God and of His worship, and , allegorical treatment of O.T. Utilization of the Logos conception the earthly life of Jesus here set in a frame of Eternity .73, 74 (1) All true existence comes from above, as already in St. Paul but heightened stress laid here upon " . . "knowing" and "truth 74> 75 Its (2) Eternal Life here the culminating conviction. meaning, compared with the Synoptic and Pauline sayings 75-77 Eternal Life, an already present possession . 77, 78 of The the of the (3) spirits ; abiding interpenetration Father in the Son, and of the Son in the Father ; and the prevenience of God in His relations with (5)
exceeded
And
-73
.....
.
.
man
. ^
78,
(4)
Range and
variety of perfect life here much restricted, as compared with life actually lived and proposed by Jesus Himself. Yet here everywhere a keen sense of the two great concrete God fully extant and operative indeRealities pendently of our apprehension and action ; and Jesus, who actually lived in the flesh here below, the lowly servant of human souls . . .79, 80
79
CHAPTER
Their range and three representatives
i.
VI
.81
.
Plotinu$\ Instructiveness of conflict throughout his writings between profound religious experiences and . Si, 82 intensely abstract philosophy (1) Thus God, utterly transcendent ; nevertheless the soul consists and breathes in Him, and strives But nowhere here does after contact with Him. the One strive after us 82-84 (2) Plolinus drives home the trend of Greek philosophy, increasingly abstractive from Plato onwards, con.
,
corning*
between
God, man, the extant world, and relations God and man- all in contradiction to
xxvi
Contents
own deep experiences and Plotinus's, . . . intuitions (3) What to retain from Plotinus's teaching : spaceless, timeless nature of God ; His distinct reality and
his,
.85
otherness, and yet immense nearness to, and contact with, human soul ; and priority and excess of all reality over all theory concerning it . 86, 87 2 St. Augustine the historical circumstances of his life . 87 (1) He takes over and deepens Plotinus's apprehensions concerning non-spatial and non-temporal nature, the Eternity, of God 87-89
Experience of Eternity achieved by St. Augustine in time 89, 90 (3) Sense of Eternity, of Beatitude, proceeds from . immediate presence of God within our lives 90, 9* . . Insistence upon God's provenience 91, 92 (4) Keen apprehension of Historical Element of religion the self-humiliation of the Eternal in Time and , . , 92, 93 Space
(2)
. . . .
...,.,
,
(5)
the
;
The Two
Cities
the very
.
.
93, 94
3.
94 Pscudo-DionysiuS) the last great expression of thirst after Eternal Life of ancient European and Near His profound, abiding influence. Eastern world. His country, position, date, character. He takes over Proclus on the largest scale. Neo - Platonist scholastic, a (1) Proclu$) the great hierophant. The circular process of Plotinus here everywhere articulated in triadic development. Beings perfect in proportion to poverty of their attributes. Especially the One is even above Being, But the intermediaries between the One and man's even highest constituents more numerous than in Plotinus . . * 95, 96 But Proclus, as against Plotinus, sometimes censures those who hold that the soul can become the very
Here again our Lord's own statements alone quite full and balanced
One
(2)
Pseudo-Dionysius
assimilates practically all the chief doctrines, terms, similes of Proclus ; and forms a compound of Christian prieatly and sacramental organization and of Proclmn ultratranscendence and abstractiveness. Yet tender truth of Plotinus's experiences and supreme reality of Jesus's life and teaching vivify much of
..*,*,.
amalgam
,
96
this strange
97*99
Contents
xxvii
PAGES
(3)
And in about
one-fourth of his text Dionysius adopts Aristotle's general identification between relative elevation in scale of reality and relative richness of attributes ; and applies this principle, in
full
contradiction
(4)
......
to
Neo-Platonism,
to
God
99
little reserve as Plotinus of Deification " of the perfect soul . . (5) Absence of historic sense, and purely negative character attributed to Evil, here grave defects ; but these partly balanced by Platonist and Christian insistence upon the need of purification by the soul that would experience Eternal Life .
100
100
CHAPTER
VII
Two teachers selected here I. St. Thomas Aquinas His antecedents, times, character, life- work, and fortunes. His strength and limita\
tions
(1)
(2) (3)
..... ......
and
. .
. .
MIDDLE AGES
100
(4)
His usual, and his exceptional but deeper, teaching concerning man's knowledge of God 103, 104 Aquinas follows Boe'thius on Eternity. His position concerning Aevum^ as between Time and Eternity, a groping after Durle 104-106 His two currents of teaching concerning the perfect
life:
(a)
The
solus
cum
Solo, abstractive,
more
intel-
lectualist, Aristotelian
and Neo-Platonist
current
($)
The
is
perfection . . 1 08, 109 deeply Christian current; a deep sense of right and (5) . . . 109 dignity of true individuality (6) Evil mostly held to be negative, in wake of of human nature, milder Dionysius ; the estimate than in Augustine, yet still rather Pauline than
* . . . 107, 108 social, concrete current, which finds in creative power and love, and
Within
latter
Synoptic
\
. His antecedents and character 2 Joannes Eckhart Vivid apprehension of one, and predominant blindness The to other, of two movements of religious life,
.....
109,
no HO
xxviii
>
Contents
PACUS
.
.
.
hence acts destructively no, His fundamental position absolute identity of God 1 u and Being the soul's highest powers touch \z) His anthropology Eternity, the lower touch Time. The Reason more truly God's servant than the Will or Love. This Reason penetrates to the simple, unmoving Divine Being which neither gives nor takes 112, 113 *
. .
,
.
(3)
God and
*
in
more
characteristic
this contrast
(4)
passages.
.
:
Abstractive nature of
.
113, 114
and inadeGod's relation to the world impressive quate representations of it. Time and space here frequently without any function in spiritual life. Monistic conception of Creation, and NeoPlatonist insistence upon mere negativity of
Evil . Eckhart's Ethics
,
115,
16
(5)
. .
partly
116 117
(6)
Completion of Circle by soul's return to its Origin-. the bare Godhead . n 7,118 General considerations. The three thirsts in Eckhart they presuppose a mighty thirster, and a profound Cause or Causer, and a Quencher, of
.
.
ail this thirst The religious thirst by far the deepest, and implies volitional and positive character of Evil. Eckhart drawn away, not by experience but by abstractive logic, from all history and concreteness, from all richness in reality especially the supreme richness of C/o<1 i tB, 119 Rome's condemnation objectively deserved, Indeed the further experiences concerning conditions;
,121
.
fiaruch Spinoxa
12 r
strongest prejudice against hiwtoric and dogmatic: elements of Jewish and Christian religion continuously
operative in his
mind
iai,
Contents
Yet he
xxix
PAGES
is perennially instructive through combination of deeply religious temper, a keen instinct as to man's constant need of purification, and a steady sense of help supplied towards such discipline by Determinist Science, with mistaken conception as to character of deepest Reality apprehended by man, as to means, categories, tests appropriate to this apprehension, and hence as to place and range of such Science within man's Spiritual Life . 122, 123 (1) Ultimate object of philosophy conceived Stoic- wise with strain of Neo-Platonism as directly ethical, practical, individual ; as difficult and of rare attainment 123, 124 (2) Method every where mathematical (geometrical); the . 124,125 test, utter clearness Its Attributes (3) Fundamental category, Substance. 125, 126 varyingly conceived The Attributes apprehended by us in countless Modes, none of which necessarily involve existence or eternity . 126, 127 Eternity, in logic of system, rather a simultaneous infinite spatial extension ; and Time here ever considered as clearly as possible, t.e. as merely Clock-Time. Thus the system as such without depth of life, hence without Eternal Life (4) Utter Determinism and purely negative conception of Evil pervade the system 128,129 (5) Spinoza's self-contradictions concerning the Attributes and Modes, the Human Passions, and . Reality and Perfection admission of ethical (6) Culminating inconsistency 130,131 emancipation by individual soul Spinoza here especially utterly sincere, and driven to acute self-contradiction by facts of deeper
.
.
.....
:
.127
.130
life
and by
ance.
(7)
He
is
also ceaselessly
.....
awake
Spirit,
his sensitiveness to their signific131, 132 to continuous influence human body ; to organic
and importance of and irreplaceable educative worth of human society ; and to necessity for inclusion
character
But
within highest perfection of right self-seeking 132, 133 this self-seeking here far too superficial pene-
tration
Determinist Science useful for purification only in middle distance and as means. And test of truth of convictions, not utter clearness, but richness
.....
and
Christ's
.
Cross badly
133
and
fruitfulness
133, 134
xxx
Contents
Fate and Science to be largely operative within 134, *35 seeking and finding of Eternal Life ImmanuelKant his greatness lies not in Religion, but
.
:
2.
in Epistemology and Ethics, and even here more in detection of precise nature and position of certain crucial problems than in consistency and adequacy of . . . 135, 136 proposed solutions His origin and chief life-dates ; his three periods ; restriction of present study to his critical period 136, 137 . His nobly ethical motive against Hume. 137, 13$ its most important positions (1) Kant's Epistemology for present purpose. (a) Assumption of possibility of conceiving knowledge as independent of an object 139, 140 (b) Contradiction between fundamental principle that reason cannot be used assertively con* cerning any Noumena^ and ceaseless assertive conviction that Reality is en:
tirely
it
*
140, 141
(e)
(tt)
Assimilation of cognition to manufacture or building. 141, 142 Wise admission, with Leibniz, of immeasurable range of our obscure apprehensions, as compared with narrow extent of our
.
(e)
And
. clear apprehensions . 142, 143 fruitful retention of certain parallelism, even at deeper levels of life, between Space and Time ; but failure to discriminate, in each, between the real and the conceptual, and to consider them of any importance in soul's deepest, >. its religious,
.
life
143, 144
(2)
Kant's Ethics bring one great help and two grave obstacles to experience and conception of Eternal
Life.
(3)
here everywhere not privation, or a substance ; but positive, and an act or habit of the will . 144,146 virtue (&) Ethics here formalist, monotonous recognized only where laborious and distasteful, and the affective clement treated with suspicion. Causes of this * 146,147 (c) Excessive individualism of these Ethics arises from same causes . 147, 148 Life's experience far richer than Kant'n , . prescriptions 148, 149 The Critical Kant's Religion, hardly more than hia critical Epistemology and Ethics applied to a
(a) Evil
*
.
Contents
xxxi
PAGES
subject-matter recalcitrant to both, yet which says nothing- specific to him and raises no suspicion in him as to truth or applicability of those tests * (a) Kant's opposition to Ontological Argument for Existence of God, the inevitable consequence of his epistemological principles 1 50, His objections . . 151, Traditional (Anselmian) form of argument, largely unsatisfactory. Yet the argument, at its best, covers three great abiding facts and necessities of life and mind . 152, All knowledge, knowledge of reality. Our knowledge of things, ever accompanied by sense of their contingency, insufficiency, not furnished by themselves, even in their totality. Thorough failure of attempts to explain this sense as mere projection of
.
, .
150
151
152
153
man's empty wishes 153, 154 Kant's position here instructively halting. Continuous inconsistency of scepticism 154, 155 What the Ontological argument, taken alone, does and what it does not prove 155, 156 () Kant's declarations, where he is critically
.
active
156, apprehensions, concerning Grace. 157, Religious Worship Religious History 158, Kant's motives here also understandable and Yet abuses of Religion satisfachigjh. torily curable only by deepening of 159, Religion 160, Religion ever centrally Adoration a Givenness. Is a Certainty, proclaims Hypothesis and Stoicism no equivalents . Kant's objections with regard to Grace, refuted by experience of life also in non.
. .
....
.
160
161
161
. . i6r, 162 religious fields to Religious Worship stand and fall with his Bpistemology 162, 163 And those against History disclose difficulties and dangers of appeal to contingent
.
His objections
happenings, but leave need of concrete 164, 165 persons and events as strong as ever Kant's hostility to treatment of Jesus Christ even as simply unique, again inevitably results from his theory of knowledge. concerning L*essing's self-contradiction religious equivalence and religious uniqueness 165, 1 66
xxxii
Contents
Kant's Nevertheless strivings deepest against an impoKbiblc in u verbal equivalence of religion. Religion deep and . strong only as a particular religion.
167
PART
II
CONTEMPORARY SURVEY
Four Philosophies derivative from Kant, and their main present-day utilizations, to be taken together. Next a great Biological Doctrine, Then Socialism and other now prevalent social problems and conditions. And
lastly Institutional Religion
,
,171
CHAPTER
IX
to
Kant.
His Epistemolo^y
more uniformly conceives knowledge as independent of its object than Kant and his Religion as entirely
;
Categorical Imperative as with Kant. Yet increasingly possesses a deeper religious . . 172, 173 apprehension than Kant
is
.
(1) Fichte's entirely Immanental Critical System articulates wide-spread present-day feelings of constraint from whatever is not somehow own
mind or
(2)
my
*
its
creation
.
(
(3)
Yet he insists upon a Moral Ordering outside finite moral beings, but opposes conception of an Orderer Nevertheless this Ordering is conceived religioubly 174, 175 Deeply religious sayings of his later stage concerning Love, the Blessed Life and Death [75, 176 Close interdependence of souls, and even elfsubsistcnce of the Absolute affirmed ; and Kant's
.
.
.
173, 174
.174
rigorism overcome
176* 177
(4)
Yet mysterious uniqueness attaching to all History never adequately recognized . ,177 Accusation of Atheism against Finhte not altogether unfairHis account in 1792 of origin nncl worth of idea of God as sceptical as anything to be . found in Kaut t 177, 178
.
,
.
Contents
Fichte re-stated by Hugo Munsterberg of Fichtean positions even here Rudolf Eucken blends a Fichtean
. ;
:
xxxiii
PAGES
weaknesses 178,179
.
trend
with
Platonist and Hegelian doctrines and a continuous keen sense of significance of History and of Evil makes him very largely satisfactory. Yet even here Fichte's influence unfortunate upon
two points
2.
Friedriih SchleiennacJier, His nature more aesthetic than religious, and more religious than ethical. His upbringing and career 180, 181 His times. Moravian, then Spinozist influences affect him throughout his two periods, of the Reden and of the Glaubenslehre . . . 181-183 (l) In the Rederi) Intuition and Feeling of (a) Essence of Religion Infinite, of the Universe 183, 184 This Intuition-Feeling, an influence of the universe contemplated . 184, 185 The generative moment of Religion 185, 186 Consideration of these positions. Satisfactory 186 points Yet we still have here an anti-dogmatic 186-188 dogmatist Epistemology And the intuition is hardly religious 188, 189 (&) Intuition ever something simple, separate. Not religion but its systematizers have filled the world with strife 189 Indeed religious feelings naturally paralyse man's energy of action. Yet religious
.
: .
....
.
.
179,
80
......
. .
....
:
feelings also
men
(c)
should do nothing from Religion but everything with Religion. Yet love, compassion, gratitude, humility, contrition, are not . 189, 190 Morality but Religion These positions considered : As to Intuition-Feeling 190,191 .^ and as to Religion and Practical Action 191, 192 sees further Schleiermacher, however, greatly than Kant in that Religion here is also and recollective, and that contemplative the deep worth and religious root of love, . humility, contrition are laid bare History in strictest sense, the highest object . of Religion all here to be organic life 192 Yet God only one of many religious ways of 192, 193 viewing universe And Immortality considered as mostly taken in a spirit directly contrary to Religion 193, 194
. .
.192
xxxiv
Contents
FAC.ES
Here the emphasis upon History shatters Inentire Pantheistic scheme and temper. difference to Theism and Immortality be(2)
come then impossible or affectations 194, The Glaubenslehre its four changes. now the consciousness of our -(a) Religion
:
195
unlimited dependence,
to
(8)
God
3.
196 but the determinations concerning Him are SpinSo too with Sm and with- Prayer ozistic. 197 (c) Now Christ and Christianity enclose, in their past and future, the entirety and finality of Schleiermaeher here goes even religion. beyond average orthodoxy. Double danger . of this intense Christocentrism 197,198 now root of Religion found in the (d?) And the religious community. experience of This change a profound improvement 198 Ernst Troeltsck considers himself largely a sucof his cessor Schlcicrmacher, yet superiority Troeltsch's four profound apprehensions * 199 great. His declarations concerning Eternal Life tension . . and polarity of religion , 199, 2o . O. W.F. Hegel: main dates of his life . . All-important influence of Schclling Change to opposition against the Identity-Philosophy. Yet Hegel adopts an anti-identity principle, but retains two positions of identification 201, 302 Reality not substance (i) His profound, rich principle but subject, system ; it is self-subsisting, definite, 202 self-knowing This a deliberate traversing of the Identity. .
....
i.c*
of our relatedncss
195, 196
God
,201 .201
Philosophy; Hegel's admirable survey and comparison of the categories of the human inind, from emptiest to real bare Being to Spirit fullest, ***. most
..... ,..,..
:
303
(Absolute Spirit and Absolute Knowledge no more belong to this principle) So far, rock-ground^ We know God is at least all our fullest categories carry with them aoj, Thus a Critical Anthropomorphism, the sole selfconsistent escape from sheer mythology 204, Also outside Philosophy, insistent evidences and motives for such Anthropomorphism 205, In any case, sincerity^ demands admission that our
, ,
,
203
204
$05
206
imperishable
Theistic kind
requirements
.
are
.
truly
of
,
thia
,206
Contents
(2)
xxxv
PAGES
anti-identity principle by his two . . positions of identification 206, 207 (a) Identification of Thinking and Reality
.
own
this logical
consequence
(d)
indeed Life . 207, 208 Trendelenburg's analysis of this procedure 208, 209 The crucial passages containing this transition from abstractions to realities. 209, 210 . Impossibility of such a jump 210,211 Identification of human and Absolute Reason and Consciousness . How Hegel arrives at this identification 211, 212 Crucial passages 212, 213 He shrinks from, yet ventures upon, full
.
.211
identification
of
human
.
. 213,215 Absolute Knowledge indeed the system's culmination ; Religion here never more than the penultimate end and standard of man 215, 216 Identification here of two very distinct, even
.
the need and reality of different things history for durational man, and the nature and operation of the Eternal God 216, 217 Accumulation of improbabilities thus introduced 217, 218 T. If. Green, (3) The deceased English Hegelians R. L. Nettleship) John and Edward Caird. How much they owed to Hegel, and how much Hegel 218-220 owed to them Yet even here HegePs influence not simply bene:
essentially ontological character of the religious affirmations adoration and sense of sin 220, 221 Of insistent need of the Institutional in
Of
And
(4) T.
religion.
convictions 223, 224 (a) His declarations concerning The need of metaphysics in Life and in
220
221,222
peculiar
combination
of
Religion
.224
xxxvi
Contents
His declarations concerning
...
224
. . 224, 225 perfect community of spirits as the actual reality and as excluding any . 224, 225 single omnipotent Person Immortality as necessarily coupled with Pre-existence, and lapse of memory as no bar to identity of lives thus separ-
ated
(<5)
Consideration of these declarations. Satisfactoriness of Metaphysical attitude 226, But strange revival here of a Monadism less interior than Leibniz's own 227, The Realized Perfection thus resides at any one moment not in Hegel's highest category, self-consciousness, but in lower category, substance. Reason of this choice 228, Man here great even simply in himself contrary to Christianity and experience The God here refused and the God considered possible, only mannikins, as against God of Christianity and Roman Church who alone penetrates depths of
.
(
227
228
229
229
229, 230
unexplained
and
sense of the Infinite, the Other, of dissatisfaction with all that is merely
human
here
The
Christian consciousness
finds
multi-
(5)
of Persons in God's Unity ; but 'Person' here not as in Dr. M*Taggari\s construction Luffa/if Feuerbach, ablest exponent of destructive Lesson implications of Hegelian Absolutism. fully cogent only by inclusion of contrast between hi Essence of Christianity 1841, and hi Essence . . , of Religion 1851
plicity
(a)
232
233
His main
Our
amadous* *33*34
.
Contents
xxxvii
PAGES
purely human presupposition. Yet that man alone the true Atheist to whom the predicates of the Divine Being Love, Wisdom, Justice are nothing, not he to whom merely the subject of these predicates is nothing But religion knows nothing of anthropomorphisms ; they are pronounced such only by the understanding which reflects on
God a
....
.
.
234
religion
.235
() Consideration of these positions. At last here the human mind unambiguously knows nothing whatsoever but itself, and attains this real self-knowledge by means of no other realities than itself 235, 236 Yet in actual life we never know ourselves alone, but only with, on occasion of, by means of, other realities 236, 237 Our consciousness of Infinite cannot, then, be straightaway declared necessarily
.
nothing but consciousness of Infinity of this our consciousness And the specific.
Reality
awakes only with consciousness of mind and of senses to their several objects and But this true of our every activities. other consciousness and knowledge 238, 239 Man's religious apprehensions never entirely adequate, and often erroneous, as are also
Soul's consciousness of this Infinite
....
:
237, 238
Yet no necessary connection between some error and all illusion in both cases reality from first really apprehended Conditions and effects of religious attestation
. .
239
....
e.g.
.
240, 241
human
Yet
241, 242 apprehension left unexplained this sense, noblest, costliest, most fruitful possessed by man : special intolerable. ness of scepticism here . 242, 243
know
of
(<?)
Feucrbach's
St.
Paul and
.
243
own
xxxviii
Contents
denial of an abiding subject to predicates wisdom, goodness, does mailer most
love,
3.
profoundly
Arthur Schopenhauer^
positions
His antecedents and one single book .245 245, 240 (1) His Epistemology as a Metaphysical Dualism 246, 247 Leading to an Oriental Dreaminess A strangely un-Kantian conclusion from Kantian 247 premises One admirable epistemological instinct here to of intuition abstraction 248 preference (2) His Epistemology as radically inconsistent in its attainment of the Thing-in-itself. This Thin^-ina will bereft of all reason and itself, the will 248, 249 logic.
. .
.
Its reason. insight into special intolerable-ness of Pantheistic Optimism 249 , 249, 250 History everywhere to be driven out * The three self-contradictions of this position 250 Its two truths , 250,251 its : character * general (3) Schopenhauer's Pessimism 251 Opposition to Hegclianism, Judaism, Mohammedanism, as optimistic ; esteem of Christianity
. . 243, 244 to be studied here in four of his 244, 245 character. Practically author of .
....
.
...
.
The
. . . rationalist Christianity Fall, the one valuable doctrine of O.T, . 252, Criticism. Truth and need of a pessimistic and ascetical movement But this movement must
.252
253
Need
253
for
.
awakening
:
. sense of Infinite The asceticism here, not Christian but Gnostic purificablcncss of body, essential to Christianity . Consequent injustice to Judaism and Islam, Fulness* of spiritual life requires both preliminary Pessi-
,254
255
(4)
it
an unutterable Peifect Life jn, . . Reality appear thus at the last And we learn weakness and strength, with respect to religion, of such dim, mostly despairing outlook**faith
after,
.258
358, 259
Contents
The double requirement
xxxix
PAGES
Philosophy here is advantageous to Philosophy Relation to Schopenhauer of Richard Wagner and Leo Tolstoi, but especially of Kierkegaard and Nietzsche
(5)
Soren Kierkegaard. His historic affinities his special interest- combination of deep modernity of
:
^
......
ontplogical religion
.
259
260
260
concerning God's Reality and . Difference, and our utter need of Him Lesson of his life all-importance for Religion of Reality and Difference, but also of Likeness of . God ; the last wanting in Kierkegaard Ibsen's Brand^ suggested by Kierkegaard's figure,
His declarations
.261
262
262
vividly drives
home
this lesson
his great vogue. Which of his writings are likely to live. His anti-religious excesses spring doubtless largely from a thirst for what religion alone can satisfy . . 263-264 e.g. his Super-man
.
Primary causes of
Darwin and the thinkers especi264, 265 by him Charles Darwin's declarations concerning his own
of present study on
Theism
2.
Immortality Conscience, Duty, Sin Study of these declarations and their implications. (1) Profound difference between Evolution proper and
268 268
Rpigenesis
.....
.
.
(2)
His one great obstacle to full continuous adhesion to Theism its probable origin 270, 271 The Sciences recommend some doctrine of Descent ;
. .
but precise
Descent certainly very complex and still predominantly obscure for us. Kernel of the riddle
in continuous presence of the necessary . beginnings of useful variations ( Weissmann) We arc thus thrown back upon some Providing Power, Purely mythological character of the
lies
alternatives
......
271
272
xl
Contents
PACKS
(3)
A.
Wallace on the faculties special to man ; on three stages in development of organic world where some new cause must necessarily have come into action and on icality of these changes, however imperceptible at their origin 272, 273
JR.
:
.
274 274
275
275
challenge
The Huxley-Seth positions alone furnish a home for Darwin's own sense of duty
(5)
.
.....
.
. . . ,
.275
276, 277
,
^
a plurality of
sufficient
,
277
Anthropology and Comparative History of Religions still largely influenced by Naturalism* This all
3.
. but inevitable . 277, 278 R. R* Marretfs "Anthropology" instructively combines all the insights and some of the imperfections here considered 278, 279 The finest of the analytic historical workers apparently penetrate deeper into humanity, present and ** past, than do even the most learned purely , 279 genetic" biological explorers Confirmation and growth brought, in three respects, to apprehension and formulation of religious and
....
. .
The movement,
back from dead or abstract things to concrete, Illustrations from Darwin's own living beings.
. . . life , . 280, 28 x Full adhesion here of all fruitful Epistemology, . . 28t Ethics, Religion, Life in general , This graduated lovo of the graduated realities of the rich, real wox*ld will triumph over the fierce passion for levelling all reality down to abstraction of purely mccnanical causality. Ernst /fiiceMi his
.
main positions
His
cheery
religion
281, 282
/.?
destruction
of
all
"dualism,"
The more
. 383, 283 abstract and unreal the notions, the more they here oust concrete, experienced reality. Throe causes of vogue of such material wrtie
Monism
283
Contents
(2)
xli
Main
positions
Wilson
Insufficiencies
(3)
4.
attempt 285, Continuity and Immediacy of Divine Action involved in adequate doctrine of Creation, allowed, indeed required, by an Epigenesis content to be a process and description The Rev. Philip Waggetfs statements . 286, . Two additions suggested here 287,
..... .....
interest
.
283, 284
284, 285
this
of Tennant
and of Archdeacon
points
and
satisfactory
of
286
....
.
out Grateful acceptance of his central conception Durde as distinct from Clock-time of his more restricted and specially of his insistdescriptions of both ence on essential i*61e played by Duration in man's Here only certain still more fundaentire life. mental applications or conceptions of Bergson to be considered: as to Time and Space, and as to Finalism and place and character of Trans; ;
.......
Essai
formism
(1) lierg son's
.....
:
288, 289
its
fundamental antinomy
.
Durational (Qualitative) and the 289, 290 (Quantitative). Origin of latter . Time as really experienced and Time as clearly . Function of Space . pictured. 290, 291
Considerations. Difference of method pursued . here as to Time and as to Space . 291, 292 " Intense abstractness of the two " realities here
the Extensional
.....
is
: .
292
not
. sheer Becoming 293, 294 has broken our living organic consciousness into two separate worlds, each unreal, and jointly exclusive of personality . 294 its fundamental (2) Bergson's Evolution Crtatrice utter heterogeneity and unpurposive thesis : character of all Duration and Life ; Transformism of dissociation and distinction essentially a elements 294, 295 Yet, here too, indications of persistence, purpose,
He
.....
. ;
. 295,296 graduated worth ^ Nevertheless the system here conceives existence as change or advance strictly for existence only here only in the means, not in the end of life 296, 297
xlii
Contents
General conclusions. Man requires Real Space and Conceptual Space as well as Real Time (Duration) and Conceptual Time; and, in his consciousness of Duration, a
sense of Simultaneity as well as of Succession 297, 298
(3)
Duration at its highest in its clement of Permanence Bergson's conception of Liberty too "pure," />.
artificially
. . .
......
.
. .
298
one-sided 298, 299 facts of consciousness, especially of conation 299 And by insufficiency of reasons tftvcn for his . Act of Free the esteem 299-301 high He has removed the mechanical obstacles to Liberty, but has not disco verod its spiritual conditions 301 As to Eternal Life the distinctive bein^ of personality is inversely as its dependence on successiveness (fiosa/jytref) 301, 302 Religion can and must experience and conceive full Eternity as the characteristic of the Eternal God present and operative within man's
This shown by
durational,
*.*.
quasi-eternal spirit.
302
CHAPTER
XI
r.
. satisfactory for religion KarlMnrx\ his two great discoveries- -the Materialistic of History and the secret of
304
Production. The former derived from Hegel through Feuerbach 304, 305 Yet this conception pushed by Marx and Kneels to the full materialism and anti-religiousness of Pauurbarh's
Capitalist
. .
Conception
last period
304, 305
Capitalistic
Yet requestion here passed over. minder necessary that original Marxist Sorinlinm wages relentless war against all the natural organizations other than the State, omnipotent and
sole
g
306-307
Contents
2.
xliii
PAGES
Three causes generally operative within these classes and movements in direction of Secularism. (1) Man's limited capacity of attention and interests ordinarily extended only by great, unbroken traditions of spiritual experience and training. These traditions practically unknown here ; men absorbed here in other needs which appear to be more immediately important
Baffling
(2)
needs 307, 308 Only a great moral miracle could preserve such a world from all Secularism . 308, 309 A positive revulsion against the Churches and Sects here frequent predominantly social and political
.
in origin, in effect
(3)
peculiar atrophy
Clear
309, 310 superficial abstraction thus wins against . . . reality Leads to highly militant, acutely problematic creed of purely immanental yet apocalyptic millennial
man
307
complexity,
scale,
acuteness
of
these
it is
largely religious
(t.e.
anti-religious)
309
soul.
dimmer deep
.310
character
faction
by entire realization of such purely earthly programme, as against John Mill's deepest insight And, by concentration of entire man upon this
admittedly difficult realization, it greatly increases the Secularism already furnished by the absorption and revulsion already considered Three sets of conditions and dispositions here religiously
,
.
311
312
3.
hopeful.
(1) Certain
general effects operative within all men throughout the countries concerned Our confrontation by masses of men free from the maladies of the more fully educated mind, and possessing a certain sincerity,
:
simplicity, self-sacrifice
312, 313
.
and the awakening of upper classes by the socialist militancy in various much-needed ways
(2)
313
This double general gain can be specially advantageous to religious souls, particularly as regards Eternal Life. For thus we attain insight into large dependence of religion of average man
certain upon "
7>
social
,
and physical
.
conditions.
.
The
poor
Poverdlo
.314
xliv
Contents
PAGES
This dependence parodied by the Socialists and more wisely apprehended by the Christian social workers And thus too we are thrown anew upon the cosily
.
. .
3*5
two-fold movement Christianity's renovative power. For religion thus forced to be more than . ever Temporal Spatial Immanental 315, Yet also more than ever Eternal and Omnipresent Transcendent 316, Only the two movements together of the real, durational soul supported by the real Eternal God here adequate Sir Charles Booth's testimony concerning London 3 17, And only such Transcendence in Immanence can preserve enthusiasm from fanaticism followed by . 318, cynicism
.
316
317
317 318
319
(3)
Symptoms amongst
in
Socialist
perhaps
.
Germany
:
. .
319, 320
Belgium and Italy 320 France M, Georges Sorcl on mystery and pessimism on Pantheism ; and on Institutional Christianity 320, 322 on the Encyclopedists on monastic asceticism on the Christian tradition 322, 323 Sorcl not far from fuller experience awl
; .
; ;
323
CHAPTER
XII
INSTITUTIONAL RELIGION
To be
studied only as home and training ground of Eternal Life- as bringing help or occasioning obstacles, or as itself purified and checked by this life. Throe groups of facts and questions to be studied 323, 325
*
.
1
i.
Increasing clearness as to central position held in religion by Cuttus Social Worship, and by Symbols and Sacraments contacts between spirit and mutter Instances of powerful operation of the institutional 32$! This Social Institutional need really treble ; Need of common ; Professor TroeHc:h*s (z) worship utterances . * * , 336, 327 Our Lord's institutions and the intrinsic needs of
.
religion
327,338
Contents
(2)
xlv
of efficacious sensible signs and contacts weakness of Liberal Protestantism here 328, 329 The an ti- sacramental passion historically understandable ; yet it has not resolved the problem and has exceeded the facts and necessities of
:
Need
signs
;
.
by Our Lord,
intrinsic
.
329
of interrelation between Religion and the other complexes and organizations of human life 330 Wilhelm Hermann here essentially inadequate in his opposition to all Mysticism . 330, 331 And in his reduction of Religion to recognition of and the Historic Jesus 331, 332 Categorical Imperative Impossible for religion to ignore or suppress the other activities, or for these activities to suppress
.
And need
and the
329, 330
religion. Especially impossible for Christianity . Increasing impossibility of such reduction amongst
332
educated
West
Europeans,
Yet the fully developed Institutional Religions losing ground for many a day
in
Germany
United States
of human nature
333, 334
-335
335
334 334
ascribable to perversity
.
. .
2.
335, 336 studied, are we Essential strength and incidental weakness of Institustudied from Roman within Catholic tional Religion, Church, appears in five pairs of closely related power and defect 336 (1) Large continuous utilization by Religion of PhiloIts antiquity and adsophy and Science. 337, 338 vantages Yet two great weaknesses here
.
already
...... .....
:
(2)
. -338 Philosophy essentially free but Theology often oppressive towards Philo338,339 sophy And Aristoteliamsm m particular profoundly in unhistorical 340 temper As to Natural Science a tolerable latitude appears . . 340, 34* finally assured to it Close connection of Religion with History right.
....
: .
342, 343
xliv
Contents
This dependence parodied by the Socialists and more wisely apprehended by the Christian social workers And thus too we are thrown anew upon the costly*
. .
.
.
315
two-fold movement Christianity's renovative power. For religion thus forced to be more than . ever Temporal Spatial Immanental 315, 316 Yet also more than ever Eternal and Omnipresent . . , Transcendent 316, 317
.
Only the two movements together of the real, durational soul supported by the real Eternal God here adequate
.
317
only such Transcendence in preserve enthusiasm from fanaticism followed by cynicism 318, 319 (3) Symptoms amongst Socialist leaders and masses of subsidence of angry Secularism, perhaps also of indifference to religion
in
And
.....
. .
Germany
:
Belgium and Italy 320 France M, Georges Sorel on mystery and pessimism on Pantheism ; and on Institutional Christianity 320, 322 on monastic ascetion the Encyclopedists cism on the Christian tradition 322, 323 Sorel not far from fuller experience and
;
.
,
....
.
319, 320
323
CHAPTER
XII
INSTITUTIONAL RELIGION
To be
studied only as home and training ground of Eternal Life as bringing help or occasioning obstacles, or as
itself purified
and checked by
this
life.
Three groups
325
. . of facts and questions to be studied 323, I. Increasing clearness as to central position held in Social Worship, and by Symbols religion by Cultus and Sacraments contacts between spirit and matter Instances of powerful operation of the Institutional 325, This Social Institutional need really treble : common Need of : Professor Troeltsch's (i) worship utterances 326, Our Lord's institutions and the intrinsic needs of
.....
,
325 320
327
religion
327, 328
Contents
of efficacious sensible signs and contacts weakness of Liberal Protestantism here . 328, The an ti- sacramental passion historically understandable ; yet it has not resolved the problem and has exceeded the facts and necessities of human nature and of religion . . Use and commendation of such signs by Our Lord, St. Paul, the Fourth Gospel ; and the intrinsic . requirements of religion here 329, (3) And need of interrelation between Religion and the other complexes and organizations of human life Wilhelm Hermann here essentially inadequate in . his opposition to all Mysticism 330, And in his reduction of Religion to recognition of Categorical Imperative and the Historic Jesus 331, Impossible for religion to ignore or suppress the other activities, or for these activities to suppress religion. Especially impossible for Christianity . Increasing impossibility of such reduction amongst
(2)
:
xlv
PAGES
Need
329
329
330
330
331
332
332
educated
West
Europeans.
Official
. .
Church
persistently conceives and practises life in an all. . inclusive manner 332, 333 (4) Yet the fully developed Institutional Religions losing a for many day ground in Germany 333, 334
United States
of human nature
.... .....
. .
.
334 334
to perversity
.
-335 -335
2.
already studied, are we to seek 335, 336 Essential strength and incidental weakness of Institutional Religion, studied from within Roman Catholic Church, appears in five pairs of closely related power and defect 336 (1) Large continuous ^utilization by Religion of PhiloIts antiquity and adsophy and Science.
vantages 337, 338 Yet two great weaknesses here . Philosophy essentially free 338 but Theology often oppressive towards Philo. . sophy 338, 339
: .
...... .....
.
.
.
And
Aristoteliamsm
;
in
particular
profoundly
. unhistoricaJ in temper 340 As to Natural Science a tolerable latitude appears . . . . finally assured to it 340, 341 (2) Close connection of Religion with History : right. ness, necessity, fruitfulness of this , 342, 343
xlvi
Contents
PAGES
The
difficulties
of
all
the
Institutional
Religions
343, 344
here
Rome's
special difficulties
Pietism
No
and from her very large and ancient toleration of the uncertain and legendary in history
345
grave intrinsic difficulty with respect to earliest, mostly sober constituents of such beliefs, within But more or less secondary subject-matters. grave trouble surrounds questions concerning
.
factual character of certain constituents of the . . complex of Christian doctrine The Church's abiding insistence apparently covers
346
three points. Limits to reasonable demands of theologians in historical and documentary matters. Parallel of the Heliocentric controversy 346, 347 (3) Insistence upon supreme importance of Religious Truth and Unity. Deep, abidingly precious 348 insight thus manifested The corresponding trouble persecution. Instances . of it throughout Church History 348, 349 Yet contrary current also very real in ancient
.
....
.
.
349, 350
late antiquity
. .
and of Middle
.
350
and Pope Pius IX. . Implications of the Church's solemn self-commitment to entire O.T. as divinely inspired 351 Excommunications. Schisms. Cardinal Mann ing on supernatural grace amongst non-Roman Catholic . Christians 351, 352 And great variety of spiritual types within Roman Church also aids this wider, gentler outlook Permanent predominance of the gentler current would again render the Roman Church fully In any case, sceptkism and indifference lovable. excuse and aggravate bigotry and persecution. only; vigilant sense of Reality of Abiding God are here alone of sufficient avail 352,353 (4) Persistence, consolidation, domination of Canon
. .
. .
de Lugo 350,351
-352
Law.
Religion rightly conceived as also concerned with Law. Christianity contrary to Gnosticism here. Evidence of Acts of the Apostles. Hence only the spirit, position, and effects of such law can reasonably be called in question 353)354
....
Contents
Yet Church's persuasiveness now for long in inverse ratio to her coercive character. Contentions of Lutheran Canonist Rudolf Sohm
:
xlvii
3.
Catholicism essentially the non-discrimination between Church in the religious sense and Church in the legal sense 354) 355 Christians knew from first only one Church, the same Catholic Church; the only change since, an all-pervading interior transformation of this One Church from an entirely free, charismatic body into a predominantly coercive, legalist . 355, 356 organisation Considerations Primitive Christian, average Roman Catholic, Lutheran, and Curialist attitudes towards relation between Visible and Invisible Church. Neither simple identity nor complete independence are primitive or fruitfully possible solutions 356, 357 Here again all superfine Idealism, all " pure " a snare spirituality Yet Canon Law largely late medieval, z>. It was then largely strongly theocratic. checked and completed by other forces still vigorous in those times 357, 358 The Protestant Reformation, still more the French Revolution, have changed habits of mind operative when this part of Canon Law flourished, and yet have also abolished the checks within Church upon this Law's full development. Operative constitution of visible Roman Church now an autocracy . 358, 359 Three reflections and encouragements as to future possibilities 360 (5) Insistence upon connection between Religion and Undeniable as a general principle Politics. . 361 Yet no modern, Western attempt at a direct connection long successful. Hostility of the finest of present-day religious minds to such combination 361, 362 Apparent deathlessness of political ambitions within Roman Curia 362, 363 Hopes with regard to this trouble . 363, 364 and of convictions Eternal Life, How the experiences which Institutions alone fully awaken, can aid against the evils incidental to Institutionalism to be now described and illustrated. Limitations of this double
.
.
-357
....
.
.
...... ....
study.
xlviii
Contents
(1)
The complex
nected with Eternal Life, fundamentally Double sense of Abidingness Divine Eternity, human Duration
. 365, 366 . 366 Special work effected by this sense . Sense of Otherness in Likeness are like and are unlike the Realized . , Perfection 360 Function of this sense 366, 367 Sense of Other- Worldliness in contrast with This-Worldliness spiritual personality begun
We
. . 367 here, consummated hereafter . . . Effect of this sense 367, 368 Sense of Reality realities environing us, real beings, and the Reality of realities sustaining
.
all
.
368
(2)
. 368, 369 Consequences of this sense Finally, sense of Unity in all multiplicity and of multiplicity in all Unity organisms everywhere in the real world 369, 370 . Operation of this sense 370,371 Illustrations of Institutions awakening, and their
. , .
.
London experiences
Anglican,
.
371
Poignant
.
recent
Jewish,
Greek-Russian
. *
Church writings
Four recent Roman Catholic examples dwelt on in some detail. Father Damien at Antipodes slowly dying
371, 373
B. Vianney God alone, and Suffering 372, 373 Eugenie Smet, Mfcre Marie de la Providence, her heroic life and painful blissful death 373, 374 And the Abbe* Huvelin, His personality and . . life-work . 374,375 HJS saymgs connection with S. Francois de Sales 375, 376
Beatified
J.
The
amongst the
.... ....
.
372
P6re de Condren
M.
Olier
"
'
Raacc
all
concerning
these
377, 378
Contents
xlix
PART
III
CHAPTER
Attempt
1.
XIII
PAGES
FINAL DISCRIMINATIONS
at sketch of lines along
grow
2.
Operative conviction of Eternal Life primarily a matter not of speculation but of characteristically human . experience awakened and illuminated by Religion Not an ultimate cause evolving living subjects, but simply the effect of a living Reality within other
reafities
. . .
.......
.
which consciousness of
381
382
3.
Eternal Life in
4.
5.
sense involves plenitude of all goods and energizings that abide, entire selfconsciousness of Being which constitutes them, and pure activity, non-successiveness, of this Being. It excludes space and clock-time reasons why Eternal Life, in a real but not the fullest sense,
fullest
: .
.382, 383
-383
attributable to
man
Duration
its
true
form
383, 384
Man's apprehension
of Eternal Life ever achieved only more or less in, contrasting with, finite, changing things ; and obscurely, but with immense range of influence. Its ultimate cause the actual presence of the Eternal Living Spirit within man's durational
spirit
6.
7.
Hence necessity of Real Time, Duration, for development of human consciousness of Divine Eternity 386, 387 Necessity also of spatial imagery and concepts
:
......
:
384, 385
, the reasons of this 387, 388 Place of Mathematics in full spiritual life. Preliminary the Ultimate against Pantheism, preservative
. .
Pantheism
8.
.388
Material things also continuously check or stimulate durational human spirits in this life at least. Matter and things a rich, wise contact with them as occasions and means of soul's awaking to Eternal
9.
The
389 such costly acceptance of Eternal Life, a more or less obscure but real and profoundly operative evasion of man's true call, of his deepest requirements a self-stultification and spiritual death 389, 390
sole
self-consistent
Life
alternative
to
Contents
PAGES
10.
Eventual difference of souls thus quantitative as well as qualitative almost fully eternalized spirits and almost entirely phenomenahzed souls 390, 391 Eternal Life requires deep sense of human weakness and sin, and of our constant need of God's provenience and purification, but excludes conceptions of
:
total
corruption of human nature or of essential impurity of human body. Our Lord's own practice and utterances give the normative balance and
xi.
12.
13.
. 391, 392 simply a Moralism plus a reference to God as its source and sanction, but centrally Religious Adoration, a Cultus, and a Finding of God in Art, Speculation, and Analysis, in the Senses and the Body, as well as in Ethics and Heroic Self-dedication 392 All this seems hopelessly to bind us to exclusive ecclesiasticism, indeed to persecution and oppression. But three strong counteractions against this continuously operative in religion as here conceived 392, 393 Religion true in its degree exists and functions here in various 393 stages Religion, even in its totality, here not the only activity . and response of man's spirit . 393, 394 And Religion here ever conscious of a real interdependence between all these various realities and complexes as all caused and sustained by the * Reality of realities, the self-giving Eternal God 394 Apparently intolerable complexity of all this. Parallel and its attempted ever of all simple-seeming life Three essentials of Religion elaborate analysis. . continually bring to it expansion and simplicity 395 Religion social horizontally a division of labour
.
And
not
..... .....
.
,
amongst souls
Social vertically
asustainmcntofthesoulby God 395, 396 And essentially also other- worldly a life beyond the grave for fullest energizing of durational man within the utterly Abiding God, pure Eternal Life 396
-395
......
INTRODUCTION
ETERNAL LIFE
INTRODUCTION
ETERNAL
Life cannot be studied with any
careful,
its fruit,
manyFor study.
Time and
osophical.
Supreme Good,
Nor
is it
nor the
Kingdom
all
Love,
all
thing about
these
all
but
continuously, to be implied, said, and decided here. shall have to begin by roughly assuming and
We
ing,
defining,
force,
which
is,
in
endless
or patent in every and act ; which, in its specifically human life and its most vivid fullest operativeness recoglatent
2
nition,
is
religious
and which,
in
proportion to such fulness and recognition, is found to involve the consciousness, or posses-
and goods sought and the sense (more or after or found by man, less) of non-succession, of a complete Present and Presence, of an utterly abiding Here and Now.
sion, of all the highest realities
Let
us,
then, in a First
Part,
look back, at
some length, upon the chief types and stages of this experience and conception, as furnished by
the great religious revealers and the chief philoPrecise leading sophical formulators of the past
utterances will here be given some precise conLet us next, in a Second sideration or criticism.
round at the present-day situation, the chief needs, forces, aids, and difficulties operative now in religious and philosophical and also in
Part, look
apparently quite non-religious or non-philosophical departments, for or against that experience and
conception.
Here again we
shall
be busy with
specific, characteristic declarations, although we can more confidently attempt to reach back, through
moving the
let
personalities that
in
uttered
them*
And
us
finally,
a Third
Part, attempt a more abiding and systematic elucidation of the elements and realities involved
in Eternal Life,
of,
and some
own words and with a direct reference to practice. Here again we shall have to utilize philosophy; yet what we now, at last, attempt directly to make explicit, and thus to strengthen,
our
appears,
religious
lations,
affinity,
in
this
its
fulness,
as
specifically
re-
sense
of
within
real
of
all
really
known
to
us,
our
finite,
durational
spirit,
and the
infinite,
eternal Spirit,
God.
PART
HISTORICAL RETROSPECT
PART
WE
ally,
HISTORICAL RETROSPECT
can conveniently, though somewhat artificidivide the historical evidences into those
furnished by the Oriental religions, properly so and those supplied by the Grseco-Roman called and the Jewish-Christian worlds and their inter;
mixtures,
inclusive
of
the
Mediaeval
and the
Modern European (and American) civilization and philosophies, which are still so predominantly derived from these two worlds and their manifold conflicts and combinations.
CHAPTER
Introductory
H inclooism
Religion.
Zaralhustri sm
Egyptian
present writer cannot pretend to any firsthand experience, or knowledge of, the Oriental
religions,
THE
and must
restrict
7
himself to a repro-
some
sympathetic specialists in these difficult subjectmatters, with simply the addition of certain
general applications of his own.
strictness,
We
can,
in
its
ignore
Mohammedanism,
seems
to
since
orthodox
clear
type
hardly
contain
any
or vivid apprehension of non-successivewhilst the Sufis and their like exhibit a ness, type of religious life and doctrine, full indeed
of
the sense of
Eternity,
but
most probably
derived from, and certainly closely like, either Vedantic Pantheism, or the Buddhist Nirvana,
or
Neo-Platonism.
We
arrive
thus
at
four,
predominantly original and characteristic, Oriental types of experience and conception which, really
or seemingly, are concerned with Eternal Life.
i.
In Buddhism (Gautama
Buddha died
B.C.
477)
far as
Lehmann
impressively puts
it,
"in
the
Buddhist
colossal dimensions,
tiginous succession of endlessnesses constituting the course of time, everything without beginning
in
process of be*
coming and of passing away. It knows no Brahma, no Atman, as the World-spirit, no Being that consists in itself and through which other things exist. There is here no fixed point for existence, no genuine being." And Professor
Oldenberg says strikingly the Brahmans finds Being
Being,
"
:
The
in all
apparent
nothing
but
Becoming."
Thus
"an
" exists only apparently Ego," declares Lehmann, for the Buddhist; there exists, for him, a
series of concepts
sciousness,
these
conditions
thought"
in this system.
"The Nirvana
life's
is
the
condition in
which the
endless
is
declared to
;
involve the extinction of Desire and of Cognition and though we are not told that it also includes
the extinction of Life, such an extinction would be in the logical consequence of Buddhism, since the
evil
is
to
save himself,
namely, suffering, consists precisely in existence. The Nirvana can," however, "only be defined negatively not Desire, and not Consciousness, not
:
not Death.
Only
this
can be said
that it is the condition positively concerning it, in which the soul is freed from transmigration ;
io
only from the point of view of the endless births, with their life and death and death and life, is
it
Thus, even if the Nirvana still be life of some kind, and even though all succession appears to be eliminated from it, we do not get here any
positive affirmation of Eternal Life.
Yet we arc
here given perhaps the most impressive of all exemplifications of the intolerable horror felt, by the wide-awake human soul, for mere succession of
any kind. The pain of such sheer flux, already simply because it is sheer flux, is hero seen to be
such that the soul, which and sense of such a flux,
the relief afforded
is
Is
prehension of
full
of duration^
and
of perfect Simultaneity, as respectively the ceaseless characteristic and the deepest implication of
that
this
life.
very characteristic
very implication
life.
of the
2.
human
soul's
In Hindooism there
in
the great
Ramanuja
founded a
tier
;
who,
1
the eleventh
in
century A.D.,
Edvin Lehmann,
ReUgiowgeschichte> 3rd ed,, 1905, vol. ii, pp 90, 91, 93, 96, 97 Qldeaberg, Buddh^ 3rd ed, 1897, pp. 304-328.
which indeed conceives the world, as does the orthodox Vedanta, thoroughly monistically.
nothing but the one, all-comprehending Being. Yet this Being is not mere Thought and Existence without qualities Existexists
;
There
ence and Thought are here not the substance, they are simply qualities, of Being the Absolute
;
does not consist of Existence and Thinking, but is a Being which exists and thinks and which
possesses
a way
other qualities, and these in so perfect that they confer upon it absolute power
all
and
absolute
worth.
Thus Brahma
is
here
conceived as an all-penetrating, all-powerful, allknowing, all-merciful Being. He is not an undifferentiated Unity, for
reality
and the material elements form His body but not His nature;
exists
in
;
Him
they are subordinate to Him as our body is to our spirit, and exist in Him with a relative
independence.
All
that
lives
is
knowledge of Brahma, not through good works; the soul is then raised into the world of Brahma, to an eternal, blessed life, and participates in Brahma's divine qualities, except in His power to emit and to rule the world and to receive it back into
Himself.
Sometimes
it
is
even
said, not
that
12
Brahma
dwells
them as
And
the
Brahma and being its own power, absorbed in Him by means but through its learning to know and to conmigration, through recognizing
of
His nature by the gracious aid of Brahma Himself, and thus attaining to the highest condition of eternal liberty and beatitude
template
in
His heaven. 1
Here
own
in
life
may
we
be considered to be non-successive
Life,
its
Zarathustra lived in North- Western Media, and the probably between 700 and 650 B.C.
3.
;
oldest parts of the Avesta, especially the Gatkahymns, may well go back to him or to his im-
mediate
disciples.
God
already qualified
possessing Wisdom,
between Good
1
Edv. Lehmann,
ibid, p. 143.
by G. Thibaut, Oxford, 1904, esp. p. 208: "The Brahman ... is nothing else but the highest Person capable of the thought *of becoming many' by manifesting himself in a world comprising manifold
in his
Commentary
to the Vedanta-Sutras,
tr.
sentient
and non-sentient
creatures,"
he
y<0^-hymns
is
the soul of the departed just man led, by his religion, his own profession of faith,
good thoughts, to his good words, to his good works and, through these three forecourts of Paradise, he arrives at the Eternal Light" 1 Here, in the insistence upon Good and Evil,
;
to his
as equally powerful; upon these positive forces, as productive of abiding consequences ; and upon
fullest
;
in
fruitful
contrast
to the conception of Evil as dominant elsewhere. And so merely negative, Eternal Light may here, apparently, be taken as
tellectualism,
and
non-successive Life, apprehended as such in God, or even lived by the soul itself.
old Egyptian religion, so bewilderingly rich in its habits and conceptions with regard to
4.
1
The
Edv. Lehmann,
14
the dead
and
to
little
to a
life
appears
certainty,
articulate,
or
or nothing of Eternal
here, apparently, all
For
the
Gods are
as
and always,
occupied in purely successive actions and the texts from all periods (right back to the most ancient pyramid-texts), which
;
conceived
represent this individual as occupied, together with or in this God, in such purely successive,
even
monotonously repeated, actions. Thus the dead can be completely identified with RH,
if
the Sun-God, the dispenser of all life but this confers upon them no more than the God himself
;
for the dead man now arises possesses and does, in the heavens, courses through them, descends in
the
West and
East 1
We
H. O. Lange,
)
in Chantepie
de
la
i,
Saussaye's
pp. 124, 200.
LeMuch
der
3rd
Three Stages of
Israelite
Prophetism
15
CHAPTER
II
ISRAELITISH RELIGION
The Jahvist Narratives and the first Prophets
Elijah, Amos, Isaiah, Micah Deuteronomy and Jeremiah Ezekieland the Priestly Code Late appearance of belief in a fulness of life after death, and abiding significance of this fact
:
revelations,
civilizations, in so far as
these are
Life,
we
shall
do so as
constituting seven periods, stages, and conditions of inter-relation, help, and check. Continuing our numeration from our Chapter on the Oriental
Religions
with the
III. Hellenic; following times; II. Israelitish Primitive V. Christian IV. Jewish Hellenistic
; ;
VL
VIII. Modern.
The
Israelitish
times range
first
from,
say,
B.C.
Israelite
B.C.
597, the
Jews and
to Babylon, the indeed to B.C. 538, the return of Jews from But we find little or nothing the Captivity.
their
King Jehoiachin
to
till about B.C. 880 (the Book Covenant in its present form, Exodus 850 (the Jahvist xxi.-xxiii.), and about B.C. document of the Pentateuch), the times of King Omri's building of Samaria and of the and the great prophets activity of Elijah
of the
Elisha.
the beautiful story of Hagar's desolation in the wilderness, of "the " well of the Living One who seeth me (Gen.
i.
The Jahvist
tells us, in
xvi.
14,
the occasion of
the
may be
previous, pagan, proper name of the well, the Jahvist writer himself is evidently full of the
Indeed Ezekicl^
I
still
have no pleasure
(xxxiii.
wicked"
n): God's power and His merciful The love are thus bound up with His livingness.
magnificent account of Elijah (i Kings xvilxix., xxi.) doubtless goes back, by oral tradition, to eye-witnesses, and, even in its written form,
must be almost
entirely as old as
about
"
B.C,
790.
And
here
we
see
how
for Elijah
there existed
everywhere only one holy, only one mighty Power, that revealed Itself, not like Baal, in the life of
mere nature,
but,
like
Jahveh,
in
the ethical
Elijah,
Amos>
Isaiah, upon
*
God
17
In the great ordeal requirements of the spirit." upon Carmel, Jahveh is apprehended by Elijah as so alive and active, and Baal as so dead and
thoughout that long day, the prophet mockingly invites the throng of Baal-priests to invoke Baal and to sacrifice to him (i Kings
inert, that,
25-29). oldest of the literary prophets, Amos, with his eyes fixed upon the approach of the Assyrians
xviii.
The
(about
Jahveh announce to the Israelites only have I known of all the it is you I will families of the earth therefore " Seek all And for your iniquities." again punish good and not evil, that ye may live." And finally " Though ye offer Me burnt offerings and your
B.C.
: :
meat
let
offerings,
will
Me
Take
.
but
judgment roll along as waters, and righteousness as a mighty stream" (iii. 2, v. 14, 22-24). Here the Israelite's special privileges are made
the very ground of special responsibilities, and the living God is one to whom moral dispositions
are above
all ritual
observance.
then the great Isaiah of Jerusalem tells us how, in about B.C. 740, he "saw the Lord sitting upon a throne, high and lifted up, and the hems
1
J.
And
und Judas,
1884,
P*33*
of His garment filled the temple. Seraphs stood With twain before Him, each with six wings.
And
is
Jahveh of
Isaiah
I
lands
"
His glory
is
"
fills.
And
;
exclaims
Woe
me,
"
am undone
1-3,
5).
for
am
impure
lips
(vi.
The
living
man God
of
is
manent, and man, in His presence, feels himself And then the prophet, painfully weak and sinful.
with his
lips purified,
angel of God, addresses, in God's name, a parable " Now judge, I pray you, betwixt to God's people :
Me
in
and
"
My
(v.
vineyard.
What more
I
could have
been done to
it ?
My
God
vineyard, that
4).
Thus
this
overflowingly living,
for
all-powerful
truly
cares
man.
" Will Micak, in about 696 B.C., exclaims the Lord be pleased with thousands of rams?
:
.
shall
perchance give
my
firstborn
penance for my life ? He hath told thee, O and what doth Jahveh man, what is good demand of thee, but to do justice, and to love
in
;
mercy, and to walk humbly before thy God? The ethical character of the all7, 8). (vi.
powerful, living
1*
One
is
emphasized
19
Jeremiah, called to the prophetical office in 628 B.C., makes God declare Himself "the
His people have forsaken; and insists that "the Lord is the living God and an everlasting King at His
fountain of
living
waters,"
which
shall
tremble"
(ii.
13,
x.
n).
clearly appears as One possessing the reason of His existence within Himself, and
who, as
is
ceaselessly,
perfectly
active.
And
then Deuteronomy reasserts, and interprets by means of some two and a half centuries of prophetic teaching, and closely in the spirit of
Jeremiah, the earlier (Mosaic, Covenantal, Jahvist,
and Ephraimite) teachings, and exhorts Israel; "Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thine heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy might" (vi. 5), and thus strenuously insists, as central to man's life, upon the most living of
relations with the Living One.
finally, at
3.
And,
the
his
593,
book completed in 573 B.C.) announces in the name of Jahveh " Behold, I am against the shepherds, and I will require My flock at their
;
hands.
I
Behold,
Myself
in
will search
all
My
sheep.
will deliver
them out of
2O
I
will feed
My
.
flock
will
lost,
and
will
Ye
are
My flock,
1 6,
and
am
it
your
God
"
(xxxiv.
10-12,
31).
full
And
the valley
lasting,"
of bones,
who
they shall
his
And
finally,
in
the prophet is shown waters that issue from under the threshold
vision of the
new
temple,
of the temple-house, and these, flowing eastward, " a river that could not be crossed rapidly become And the interpreting angel explains to over."
These waters go down into the Araba, " and when they come into the sour waters of the
Ezekiel
:
"
Dead
And
everything that liveth, whithersoever the waters and there shall be a very shall come, shall live they shall be as the fish great multitude of fish,
;
i,
5,
8,
9,
10).
Thus
ex-
life,
purity,
health,
pansion, self-donation, moves out to the weak, the impure, the stricken and contracted, and
Himself
fructifies
vivifies,
all
heals,
purifies,
and
infinitely
He
touches.
The
too
contains,
amidst
much
and dry schematism, passages of magnificent insight and outlook, akin to those of the priest
EzekieL
Attention to Immortality
4.
',
late in Israel
21
especially impressive to note how, these throughout eight centuries, the emphasis and the detail of the religious experience and teaching are ever upon God, not upon man, and, nevertheIt
is
less,
upon this
life,
The various
heathen round about had, indeed, much of necromancy, animism, preoccupation with a temporal
beyond of
all
kinds,
and
little
a very slender spiritual and ethical sense. But Israel, in spite of not a few still lingering traces
and and a and fierce social largely hard storm-god) the to made abstain from code, is, by prophets, all such animistic practices and indeed from any
of analogous worship (here, of a mountain-
active
beyond
and nevertheless
it
is
made
to realize,
purity,
power and
the Other Life of God, present somehow within the soul, here and now, and the unique joy and selfrealization, to
to
Him
be found by man's soul, in belonging alone in all its acts and states. And we
it
these spiritual-ethical "thisKfe" experiences and teachings, and not those naturalistic-magical guesses and practices as to
shall find that
is
a subsequent life, which heralded, prepared, and entered into the substance of, whatever was fully
fruitful
and abiding
22
"next-life,"
In a word,
and the
spiritual-ethical
spiritual-ethical soul in
man, and of
this
soul's
God the reality of a spiritualethical kind, already within this life before the body's death that are the root of every sane and And spiritual apprehension of Eternal Life.
relation to that
though these convictions involve logically, and in the long run are developed by, the faith in the soul's non-diminished life after the body's
death,
that
it
is,
it
is
is
the basis of these great convictions, but contrariwise, these great convictions that
1
support and postulate that faith. And yet, as our third Chapter will
now
show,
how much
thrown upon the light workings of man's mind and spirit, and how much noble, at bottom deeply religious, aspirahas
been
concerning Eternal Life, has been Indeed how much, contributed by the Greeks
tion, precisely
!
and fever of their earlier experiences and speculations had been dropped and
1
For an admirable account of the long abstention of the Jewish world from all other-life speculations and practices, and of the causes and effects of this strikingly persistent religious concentration and reserve, see Dr. R. H. Charles's Critical History of tfe Doctrine of a Future Life^ 1899 or his quite short "Rise and Development in Israel of the Belief in a Future Life,"
religious
;
Maladif Beginnings of
saints
and seers
to articulate
!
and
to complete their
spiritual outlook
CHAPTER
The Dionysiac
III
Hellenic experiences here considered range, from about 550 B.C., to the deaths of Alexander
the Great and Aristotle, 323, 321
i.
THE
B.C.
The
and
precise local and temporal antecedents occasions of Orphism are still, in some
measure,
matters of debate.
these questions, follow chiefly Miss Jane Harrison and Professor Gilbert Murray. But the psychic
disagreeably maladif or even immoral though they doubtless largely were, can be securely traced and in this, the point that
experiences,
;
alone directly concerns us, Erwin Rohde's great Psyche book remains a guide, unsurpassed in
delicate
re-evocation,
It
is,
any
case, certain
that
the orgiastic
24
worship of Dionysus, was one of the occasions of Orphism, so largely different in its attitude and
spirit.
Rohde
worship in the change that came over Greek " The thought in the sixth and fifth centuries B.C.
:
of the soul, which the cultus of the dead presupposes and guarantees, is," so far,
continuous
life
memory
of the survivors
upon
earth,
to
may choose to devote to the soul of the predeceased ancestor. If this memory ceases, if the
withdrawn
tence.
reverent care of the living relaxes, the element is from the soul of the departed, in
which alone
Not
still
arise
soul,
of
its
persistent
own
energy.
its
is,
He
who,
amongst the Greeks, says immortal^ says God] the conceptions are interchangeableAnd, in the religion of the Greek people, it is a fundamental principle
world, humanity
that, in the divine
order of the
and Divine Being are locally essentially separate and distinct, and are intended to remain so. The religious relation of man to the Divine is essentially based upon this the ethics of the Greek popular condifference
and
Orgiastic
Night-Worship of Dionysm
25
sciousness are rooted in willing resignation to the limitation and relativity of human capacity
to happiness and power, all this as essentially different from the life and lot of the world of the Gods." And yet, " since
appears in Greece, and nowhere so early in such clear articulation as in Greece, the thought of the divinity of the human soul, and of the immortality resulting from this,
certain
time there
its
but
little
noticed
by the popular
religion, created
a
to
in
and was
West and convey the East the doctrine of the essential unity,
to far-away posterity in the
of the union to be striven for by religion, between the divine and the human spirit of the divine
its
eternity."
The
the
more
etc
easily
observed,
:
"possession,"
/ear6%6f*evot
rov
Oeoij, fyOeot,
mind,
1/01)9
out, standing
Ikfeno,
&ora<w
(Plato,
is
here 534 B). a sacred madness, in which the soul unites itself
99
Ion,
This ecstasy
26
with
Eternal Life
the
Historical Retrospect
lepofidvia (Clemens Alex., Phadr. 253 D). And this
Godhead
Protrept. 9
Plato,
experience could not fail strongly to aid a peculiar development of belief in the immortality, indeed
in the eternity, of the soul.
others
tell
of
Terai ol aQavaTl&vrG? (4. 93, 94). Transmigration of souls appears to have been
taught.
its
it
is
the cultus
itself,
its
aim and
return-effect
conviction,
that
The
its
aim, indeed
ecstasy/
to
tear
their
their ordinary,
humanly
limited,
mode
to
of existence,
and
to raise them, as
free gods,
communion
God and his satellites. This experience could be gained in ecstasy by the soul, but by it the spiritual being living invisibly within alone,
with the
man,
of
of
by the entire human being, composed body and soul The feeling of its own divinity, its eternity, which, in the ecstasy, had revealed
not
as in a lightning-flash, to the soul, could develop into the abiding conviction that this soul
itself,
is
life,
as
soon as the body leaves it free as in ecstasy for a short while, so in death for even" 1
1
32, 33.
The
ed., 1898, vol. ii. pp. x, 2, xx, 12, 28, entire section, pp. 1-37, is a classic of the purest water.
27
would only
insist,
all
notoriously
appear
to
the
simultaneous, hence as
eternal.
They appear
thus to the soul, if not during, at least soon And hence the eternity of after, the experience. the soul is not, here, a conclusion drawn from the
apparent God-likeness, in other respects, of the soul when in this condition, but the eternity, on
the contrary,
itself,
is
and
is
the very centre of the experience the chief inducement to the soul for
be divine. The soul's immortality holding cannot be experienced in advance of death, whilst its eternity, in the sense indicated, is, or seems to
itself to
"
this-life
"
states
is
primary.
sect
2.
It
was the
religious
of the
Orphics
in
and the
and
disposi-
communities
in
550
B.c,
certainly
28
a community in Athens, under the Peisistratidee, about 530-510 B.C., and presents the Orphic
poetry and cultus of the sect a long genealogy of the Gods ended with Dionysus or Zagreus, the son of
doctrines
in
poetic
form.
In
the
Zeus and Persephone, entrusted by his father The Titans, Zeus's with the rule of the world
enemies, attack Dionysus,
disguises
;
but at
is
last,
who
overcome, torn to pieces, and Dionysus devoured by his savage enemies. Zeus destroys the Titans with a thunderbolt and out of their
;
human
race,
which descends from Dionysus, mixed up with Thus the the evil derived from the Titans.
good, in the several human souls, is so many fragments of one single soul, broken up by a crime and man's task is to free himself from
;
the
Titanic
to
element
his
in
his
present
part
it
nature,
and
to
bring
Dionysian
back
the
God
of whom,
soul
will
essentially,
pure forms a
part.
Thus the
necessity,"
7ez>&j6a>9,
escape
"the
circle
of
-rifr
"the wheel of
births,"
;
o rpo^oy
endless transmigrations here we have a truly Buddhist feeling. But this escape can only be brought by Orpheus and his Bacchic
initiations.
It is
Adwo-o?
\vo-to?,
6eol \vcnot,,
and
Orpkism
not man's
like
and
unlike
Buddhism
29
own
here
teaching.
Orphic cultus and life are full of abstinence and purification, and are as intensely
dualistic
is
Now
in their
attitude towards
the
body as
o-w^a-cr^a play-uponwords, the body, the soul's grave, is Orphic, as Plato tells us, Cratylus^ 400 C. Yet the Orphics
Buddhism
itself.
The
not only very certainly believed in a future life, but the remains of their actual cultus and practice
(as distinguished
from
literary
utilizations
and
eclectic transformations of their teachings, such as those of the largely sceptical Euripides) show us how important, how alive and intense an
element
in their religion
was
this belief,
and
also
how
decidedly not a Nirvana, not an unconsciousness or lowered consciousness, this future life
to be.
Thus, in the absolutely authentic, contemporary Orphic Tablets the soul, on coming, at its death, " I am son of into the Beyond, declares that
" and of starry Heaven," Zeus, " through Dionysus that out of the pure," from " Orphic purification, I come, pure queen of them " below," Persephone; and that I have "in con" flown out of the sorrowful weary sequence
i For all in Prothis, see Miss Jane Harrison's careful account legomena to the History of Greek Religion, 1908, pp. 478-496.
30
wheel" of
utterly
and transmigration.
is
non-Buddhist
the
life
here,
Beyond, is a not to approach certain Well-spring there, but is to draw near to another, "by the lake
soul,
For the
of
it
Memory," and
"
Lo,
am
give quickly the cold water flowing forth from The first well is doubtless Lethe, the lake."
Forgetfulness, since already Hesiod, in about 720 B.C., holds Lethe to be bad (Theog. 227); and in Plato the river Ameles or Lethe brings pollution
to those
who do
to
cessfully (Rep.
refuses
soar,
earth
"full" simul1
taneously "of forgetfulness (Xjfft?) and vice (JPh&dr. 2484* The world presented by these tablets is a complicated one, since the soul, in spite of its divinity, requires, even when freed from the body, first to
find
'
and to
of
utilize certain
its
means
it
memory
own past
when
seems thus,
even
memory, to
1
and
ibid.
Jane Harrison, op. cit. pp. 572-599, and Prof. Gilbert Murray, 659-673, give a most careful and full account and elucidation of these eight tablets, the former not, I think, without a considerable over-estimate of the elevation of religion here attained*
the
memory
here intended
to
its
is
re-awakening
knowledge.
pre-natal
so,
Yet, even
we
consciousness, not of its own past or future, but of a present Reality, and any non-successiveness or eternity in this its consciousness. I take it that
the popular, non-mystical Greek religion, with its conception of a merely shadowy continuance after
death, has been strongly operative here, and has been respectively reinforced and overcome by the
characteristics of all
an apparent ob-
even including the object fixed by the mind, and a finding of delightful freshness both in this object and in all other
things,
Parmenides, who owes so much to and the Orphics Pythagoreans (he was born in Greek Southern Italy about 544 B.C.) that we get the first quite plain and precise discrimination, still accessible to us, between an Eternal Now and all
3.
It is in
Succession.
ftovvos
8'
\ehrerai
e?<nw ravrfji
8' eTrl
o'T^ar
Ham
TTO\\^
ftd\', cb?
ayewqrov eov
teal
avcekeffpov
32
JKternal Life
Historical Retrospect
T6 Kdl a
vSe TTOT
f]v
Harw
of^ov irav,
"
still
only to give an
exists indeed.
account of
One way
that
Being
directing posts stand upon it : because unborn, it is also indestructible, entire, only-
Many
begotten, unshakable, and without end. was and it will never be, since it is,
It
all
never
of
it
together, only present in the Now, one and indivisible." Thus the first clear promulgation of
the of
is
purely abstractive
and Monistic,
faith,
static
and,
like
Mathematical
transparency
lucid spatial picturings as to of the realities, and directly applicable deepest as the test and measure of our attaining to the
and
4.
But
B.C.,
it
is
in Plato (born in
Athens about
died there in 347) that the apprehension of an Eternal Now, and the conception of a Totum Simul^ attain their greatest vividness and
427
clearness,
though
far
of content, so far
8. 1-3, 5, 6. Diels, 1906, vol L pp, Ji 8, 119.
1
33
now
main
outlines,
the three stages of Plato's growth, and the three corresponding groups of the Platonic writings.
The
first,
work, and hardly more articulated than it the second, beginning with the Gorgias and ending with the Ph&drus, turns away from the Here
to the
There
and the
third,
Symposium and ending with the Laws, is a compromise between the later orientation towards the Beyond and the earlier position in the visible Hence only in the second and third world. groups do we find teachings to our purpose. The
Republic
periods.
is
all
three
In the second group, then, we get the passages in the Ph&drus and Republic, which are
(i)
already mentioned as hostile to forgetfulness, and so strongly insist upon how Remembering- Again,
avdfivrjo-rt (like
and not Unmindfulness or Forgetting, is the lot of In the The&tetus the purified soul in the Beyond
" It behoves us to (1760, 6) Socrates affirms attempt to escape hence thither, as swiftly as
:
possible; likeness to
and
this
flight
thither consists
in
a
;
God (o/*o*W*9
and
34
Thus the soul is not identical holy and wise." with God it can attain to some likeness to
:
possessed of ethical qualities in a supreme degree and way. Indeed in the Sophist (248^, 2490), the Eleatic stranger breaks
;
Him
and
He
is
out with
"
:
Can we,
heavens, ever be
life
made
to
and
Absolute Being? Can we imagine Being to be devoid of life and mind, and to remain a venerable, holy, mindless, unmoving
are not present in
fixture (aKivrjrov Icrros)
"
?
The
empty ^abstraction of Parmenides has, here at least and for a little while, been replaced by a
vivid,
life
warm
full
of
and energy and as rich in self-communication. And the Parmenides vigorously criticizes, surely,
as a reductio or of the
all multiplicity
and thus
criticizes
it
also in respect to its view of Time. The cannot exist in Time at all," it is argued (141
"
One
Time
are each
is not is," simply the form of Time when now present?" (141 E) and hence, these forms of Time being the only possible modes of Being, " " the One of Parmenides, it is concluded, " cannot
"
"
is
possibly partake of
Intrinsic
35
It is in this
of Plato's utterances and picturings as to an afterdeath purification from bad habits in souls that
are
good
in their active,
dominant intention at
the
moment
chosen by such
sary purifications, freely willed by the soul itself, most advantageously replace the quite un-intrinsic
delay in attaining to a blissful consciousness noted by us in the Orphic Tablets. These chief purgatorial passages occur in the Gorgias, pp. 525^, c,
526^, d\ the Phcedrus, p. 249$; the Republic, x. pp. 6170, 6190, 9200; and the Ph&do, pp.
ii
no-
4^
(2) It
is,
however, in the third period and group of writings that Plato most strenuously strives after, and most nearly attains to, a way
from
the
and
In
contrast
between,
Time and
the Symposium, Diotima, in her great speech as to the soul's mounting up, by
1 For the sequence of the Dialogues, see Prof. Henry Jackson's "Plato's later Theory of Ideas," The Journal of Philology, CamI have accepted the three stages bridge, vols. 3C.-xv., 1882-1886. in the composition of the Republic demanded by Rohde, Psyche, ed. 1898, vol. i. pp. 266, 269 note, and E, Pfleiderer, Socrates
und Plato,
see
For
my
pp. 123-126,
205-211.
36
ever greater purification and abstraction, to the momentary vision of, and union with, Eternal
Beauty,
"
us how, when the purified seeker comes towards the end, he will suddenly perceive
tells
a Nature of wondrous beauty, neither growing nor but Beauty absolute, . decaying separate,
. .
"
&&
ov
teal
ovVe <yi<yvon$vov
(sioE, 2ii
A).
Here we have
indeed an Eternal that truly w, and indeed that is Yet not all even, somehow, supremely beautiful.
the rapture of the loving soul can prevent that Eternal from here appearing cold and unattractive
;
for
it
it
is
not
here
possessed,
as,
for
moment,
was
by
in the Sophist\ of
energy and
life
and, at least
implication, of self-communication.
movement up
is
to the
Eromenon,
but
the
beloved
One,
indeed
here;
Eromenon is not an Eron, there is no previous movement down to the soul from the One; no
longing for our longing, no "He hath first loved us," hardly the dawn of Agape, is as yet discoverable here.
It is in
the
Timaus
that
Plato achieves
the
clearest
extant contrast
Time.
world
the world,
we
see
how
the Father
who begat
the
made,
Gods Utter
eternal
Simultaneity, in Plato
37
image moving according to number, even we have named Time. Days and and months and are all nights years, portions of Time and was and shall be are forms of Time that have come to be, although we are wont
that which
. . . ;
wrongly to ascribe them to the Eternal Essence. For we say that It was and shall be, yet, in truth,
" alone belopgs to It" (37 E). Is," taken thus is here no more one of the forms of Time, strictly,
is
but
is
Hence
Eternity
distinct
essentially
simultaneous,
and quite
at
his
best,
remains
the
first
and
last
of the
thinkers
especially
also
in his
thirst
and search after Eternal Life, four things never to be disunited without a great impoverishment of
Philosophy with him experience and outlook. stands in the midst of a great social and political
as well as individual
life,
it
and
strives to understand
and
1
to aid this
life
1880.
38
practice
of purification, whilst enlisting in this struggle all the nobler passions, the Thumos as well as the Reason, against the lower passions it
;
ever strives to find multiplicity in all unity, and unity in all multiplicity and it never ceases to be
;
kept profoundly alive, and very largely humble and sweet, by the sense of an inexhaustible,
transcendent Beauty, Truth, and Goodness, our love of which constitutes all our worth.
In Aristotle, Alexander the Great's great tutor, 384-322 B.C., we miss much of what, in
5.
Plato,
deep souls
will
never
let
die,
especially
the icddapew, the turning of the whole soul, a& ever the essential condition for its attainment of
spiritual truth
and
life
and
the,
all
more than
contingent,
things and
Energy,
has
and permanent contribution to the expression and stimulation of the experiences and problems
involved in Eternal Life.
(i)
1680, 3)
that
to "
39
their
(x.
1
lives,
;
for
upon energeia
1750, 9)
and
held the gods to be alive and to energize, and not to be asleep like Endymion" God alone is always completely (x. 11783, 7).
men have
and
He
can be
up inexhaustively, and ever generates the supreme pleasure of self-contemplation (vorjcrt,? voycrew) which constitutes the divine
energeia
kept
happiness.
or
It follows, as
this evepryeia is
rjpfyia.
above
fcivrja-is
evepyeia atcwr\<ria$
Hence
"if
always enjoys a single and simple pleasure for there is not only an activity of motion but also one void
it.
;
And
why God
of motion, and pleasure is rather in constancy than in motion. And change of all things is sweet" to us men "because of a certain defect"
in us (vii. H54<5).
in the Metaphysics we have the account of " And life subsists there for the the divine life
: ;
And
activity
of pure
is
reason (eVepyeta
votf<rea>$)
is
life
sheer activity (17 evtyyua); and His His activity, ever busy with itself, constitutes
and
He
perfect
God
is
We
say,
then,
life,
that
being, so that
and
4O
continuous and eternal duration (al&v <FWG)$<$ teal " atSios), pertain to God, for God is indeed all this
(xi.
io72<).
We
have
" constancy," important translation of fipfyia by been following Dr. F. C. Schiller, in his admirable study of the amoving Energy. And it
is
how
he also who, most instructively, points out "Aristotle does not, as we commonly do,
' ' '
function' (evepyeia) as a sort of process or try, materialistically, to reduce all things (7^60-^9),
regard a
to
*
matter
in 'motion.
He
Instead of classifying ev^pye^a under telmjer^ he simply makes evtyyeia, the wider and supremcr notion, and subsumes /ctvrj<n<s under it as a par* ticular species, viz. an imperfect &pyeto"
posite.
(2)
1
Applying
his principles of
life,
geia to
life*
human
Aristotle
(of philosophy, as described by him) " would be a life superior to ordinary human life ; for it cannot be lived in so far as man is merely
man, but only in so far as a divine element (ffettv ri) subsists in him/' This element is pure intelligence
and in proportion as such Nous exceeds ; as a composite being, in the same proportion does the activity of this element exceed the activity
(o vov$)
man
1
Humanism,
1903,
pp. 204-227
Simultaneity
directed "
to
and Richness
the
virtues
entirely Compatible 41
of
the
practical
life.
in so far as
we
can,
we must live
the
to
"
(aOava-rl^eiv)
(Ethics, x.
Especially the
thin
Christian revelation
and ex-
how
and shadowy,
is this
in
this
entire
intolerably Aristotelian
this
scheme,
isolating of
intelligence from
activities
the emotive
interests of
and operative
the soul.
is
and outgoing
not essential
but a defect
and
that
the perfect human life will approximate to such non-successiveness, prove all the more, indeed only then really, satisfactory, when we keep
life
as
rich as
possible
picturing,
reasoning,
cognizing,
and when we hold that the and final objects of all that is fundamental causes truest and best in these our experiences and
sufferings,
and joys
present in God, in a most real, though for us quite unpicturable, The simultaneity of ten thousand manner*
necessities
are
somehow
myriads upon is no more creatures of mutually differing myriads than is the incredible, no more anthropomorphic,
different
activities
applied
to
42
simultaneity of a sheer thinking of sheer thought and only such an infinitely rich content gives its true value to the simultaneity, just as the simultaneity, in
its
worth to that
But only an immense increase of light richness. as to man's spiritual needs and miseries, and as
to the nature of the deepest ethical perfection,
could break up, to any advantage, the thin, deistic constituents of this Aristotelian outlook and this
;
light
was not
to
CHAPTER
Introductory
Stoicism
IV
experiences and conceptions range, in strictness, from the death of Alexander at Babylon (323 B.C.), to our Lord's
pre-Christian
Hellenistic
THE
Let us, public ministry in Galilee (about A.D. 30). however, here take the Pagan and the Jewish
developments (even though these latter begin already with the return from the Exile, in
538
of
B.C.) in close
the
and
at
this
because
after
least
Stoicism, Semitic
and
Pantheistic
43
upon the
other.
And
let
cessively Stoicism, the Old Testament Apocrypha, and Philo, as the most important sources for our
present purpose.
i.
The
Oriental,
partly
Phoenician,
hence
Semitic, origin of all the earlier Stoic chiefs especially Zeno, the founder (Cyprus), about 342-
270 B.C.; Cleanthes (Troas), about 331-251 B.C.; and Chrysippus (Cilicia), about 281-208 B.C. is very striking. And the rapid up-building, and the
as rapid break-up, of Alexander's world-empire occurs at this time. The ethnic origin and the
materialistic Pantheism, a deep moral earnestness, an intuitive, prophetic habit of mind, and a both sad and enthusiastic, largely
emphatically
most
part,
" The described by Diogenes Laertius (vii. 40) : Stoics liken philosophy to a living creature the
in
and nothing
44
be other than a body." The First Principle is ether or fire, a fiery ether or warm fluid and this moves through a regular change from fire to air,
;
air to water,
fi
a conflagration (eWvjooxw) which, at the end of each age of the world, destroys all that has been produced between whiles, inclusively of
re
to
all
souls
and of
all
consciousness.
Thus pure
matter without any quality, fire, is, after each such inevitable crisis, all that exists (Diog. Laert.
vii.
The
living
indeed, call
God "an
reason
immortal,
(\oyifc6v),
being,
endowed with
with forethought for the world and for all things But all this, in the world" (Diog. Laert 147).
taken as part of the system, means no more than the necessity, the law, entirely immanent in
the material universe. the Universe is God.
God
is
Hence we
Eternal Life, in the sense of an abiding consciousness on the part of the human soul, or
even of a momentary consciousness on the part of the First Principle, of the Infinite God. The finite spirit here survives the at body, longest,
up
to
Spirit,
exists
and an Infinite self-conscious and distinct from the world, at no time, since, when implicit, such
Ecpyrosis
only;
the
45
allowed at
all
is
and,
when
moves through
these
material
changes,
or
itself
constitutes
changes, having, during part of this time, selfconscious finite minds for its concomitants and
effects.
and
is, indeed, introduced through the conception of the First Principle as also the Logos, as Reason, which permeates, conjoins, sustains
richness
all
things,
resembles
Plato's
World-Soul, but
Platonic supreme Idea, conceived as outside of all movement and becoming. Yet the identification
of this Logos with material immanence in the world, and
fire,
its
complete
its
lack of con-
sciousness effectually disqualify it from acceptance as the sufficient bearer, cause, and object of
Eternal Life, in the fuller sense of the word. (2) And the Ethical Rigorism also takes us
farther
Life than
was
Plato, if
we hold such
the
development,
harmony
and
organization of all man's nobler passions and emotions, or of their deepest roots and equivalents. "Whilst the earlier philosophers did not abolish
range,
Zeno required
all,
his
sage
to
as so
many
diseases
46
The of the soul/ says Cicero (Acad. i. 10, 38). also objects to be striven after or avoided are
for the greatly restricted: "Good things consist Stoics in the virtues," prudence ((frpovrje-is) standing
first;
opposite," the things thoughtlessness coming first; that are neither good nor evil are those that
"evil
things
consist
in
the
"and
neither
benefit
.
.
nor
damage
us,
such
as
life,
health
ease
.
and
their
opposites,
life
death,
dis-
."
and
its
acts
have here
contrast,
variety, dramatic
and
fruitful
tension.
"The
all
Stoics
declare
in
is
the virtues that the sage practises each one of his acts, since his entire activity perfect," Stobseus tells us (Eel. ii. p. 116).
The
"
outlook on mankind
is
terribly simplified
Zeno holds
of men, the class of the earnest (the good) and that of the worthless and that, throughout their
;
respective lives, the former practise the virtues, the latter the vices" (Stobseus, EcL ii. p. 198). And above all, there is no deep richness of
relation
between
spirits,
because
there
is
no
sufficiently intimate
dependence of spirit upon "monstro Spirit: quod ipse tibi possis dare," "I here prescribe what you yourself can give
says Juvenal,
truly
Stoically,
yourself,"
of the
The
(3)
Stoic
World-City
47
And
profound
its
it
yet the system nobly preaches the necessity of self-control and of the
all
renunciation of
And, in petty or low desires. deeply organic conception of human society, directly prepares, and eventually aids, the
powerful articulation of the requirements and of the conception of Eternal Life as effected by
Christianity.
and state of men and of Gods, and that each one of us constitutes a part of that world, whence it follows that we
as
it
were, a
"They common
should put the common advantage above our own," says Cicero (de Fin. iii. 19, 64). And the " are members of one Stoic Seneca tells us
:
We
great body"; "it behoves thee to live for thy neighbour, if thou wouldst live for thyself" From Zeno's work, the (Ep. 95, 52, 47, 3).
Politeia,
Cicero,
up to the
in
school's
culmination,
as to
tenderness,
Epictetus, and as
of
human
most
fruitful percharacter of
its
human
society,
and
insistence
upon finding
image in the human body, which is constituted by, and which still more constitutes, the several, yet interdependent and mutually complementary,
48
parts
experiences and conceptions of the Jews since the return from the Exile, 538 B.C., and especially since their submission to Alexander
the Great, 332 B.C., and to his successors, are, upon the whole, less rich and pregnant than are the deepest of the previous Israelitish prophetic
teachings.
The
indeed, a series of magnificent utterances in the Psalms, of which the greater part
(i)
is,
There
probably belong to this period, such as, "With Thee is the fountain of Life, and in Thy light we
shall see light
"
(xxxvi. 9)
?
and
"
Whom Have
I
in
delight not
My flesh and my heart aught that is on earth. faileth, but God is the rock of my heart and my
portion
for
ever"
(Ixxiii.
25,
26).
Thus
time
here,
without
eternity,
Eternal Life, the human spirit finding its peace and support in the Divine Spirit, its origin and home.
1
E.
Zeller's
voL i., ed, 1880, has been the chief help here* Von Arnim's Stoicorum Veterum Fragmenta gives Zeno in vol. i., 1905, See also James Adam in pp. 1-71, and Cleanthes, pp. 103-139. The Vitality of Platonism, 1911, pp. 104-189, for a beautiful
part
iii.
account of Stoicism at
its best.
Ecclesiasticus
upon Life 49
of Daniel (an apocalyptic consolatory address, which but little resembles the pre-Exilic prophecies, written between 168 and
The Book
165 B.C.) gives a description of the era of sal" vation Many of them that sleep in the dust
:
to everlasting contempt (xii. 2) the only passage in the Old Testament which " eternal" explicitly speaks of "everlasting" or
life.
and some
"
to
"
resurrection extends here as yet only many "-^-apparently only to the Jewish
The
martyrs and to their persecutors; and still we cannot press the "everlasting" as involving
simultaneity.
Amongst
in
Hebrew between
190
and
170
B.C.,
still
God
is
;
"He
and
ever
"
(o
%&v
el?
rov al&va)
He
gave the
i).
law of
life
for
an inheritance"
(xviii.
The
Second Book of Maccabees (about 100-80 B.C.) has "the Lord of life and spirit" (xiv. 46); and
the Apocalypse of JBaruch, possibly as late as
A.D.
40-70, has
full
"Thy
that are
of life"
5O
also
Eternal Life
Historical Retrospect
:
have the quantitative conception " the life of the just lasteth forever" (xiii. n); "the law
which
He
life."
(3) It is in the
written in Egypt, probably between 100 and 50 B.C., that, in addition to the quantitative conception, endless duration
:
"the just
live for
ever"
(efe
rbv
we find also clear indications al&va ?<w<), v. 45, Thus God created of the qualitative conception. " " man unto incorruption (aQOdpo-La), ii. 23; "to " know Thy power is the root of immortality
xv. 3; and, above to God," vi. 20. us near maketh
(adavda-ia),
all,
"incorruption
qualitative
a conception as
is
succession by
itself
it
and
to note
how
is
to,
Him
Eternal Life.
Alexandrian Jew Philo, who lived from about 30 B.C. to A. a 50, is deeply interesting in his attempt to retain, indeed to
3.
And
lastly the
propagate, the
1
intensely personalist,
racial
and
and
51
and Jewish,
religion, within
and
Greek philosophy those of Platonism, so largely imespecially personal, and those of Stoicism, so strongly
categories of
materialist, pantheistic,
by means of the
and cosmopolitan.
adopting
Aristotle's
;
(1)
Philo,
then,
insists,
as
property is to burn, so God's property is to act"; indeed "He is the origin of the of all things." And He ceases not from activity
fire's
the
this
3,
His
;
even on the Sabbath (Leg. Alleg. Cohn and Wendland's ed. of Philo, vol. i.,
activity
And, following Plato, 1896, pp. 62, 65). describes God's Eternity as exclusive of
succession
"
:
he
all
God
is
of Time.
not so
much Time
as
Eternity
the
archetype
and pattern of
is
Time.
And
;
in
Eternity there
nothing past
and nothing future, but only present" (Quod Dens CW. ii. 63). sit Immut. 6 (2) As to Life, Philo is subject to two currents
of thought. 'Along one current God is possessed of the fullest life, and, because of this, can and
does communicate
"
it,
in
life
as
;
it
concerns
God
life
as
it
and a third,
intermediate
life,
it
Now
life
as
concerns
God
52
to us,
the body."
The
second kind of
life
is
"life
according to sense/' "life as resident in the blood But only those who live the (fay evaifios)"
" " for Moses third kind of life are truly living " tells us that the soul's nature is double : that of
:
the soul generally is blood, that of its most leading And Philo part is divine spirit" (irvevpa ffeiov).
finds,
here following
the
Stoics,
this
Pneuma
to
be
Logos.
"
Hence
of
men
those living
are
reason
(Xoyto/ufc),
and those
living
by the blood
div.
and the
9,
(Quis
rer.
heres,
n, 12;
CW.
iii.
n,
13, 14).
"God"
Himself
"breathed into man's earthly mind the power of the true life; thus it is that man becomes a
Hence God mental, a .truly living soul." fountain of reason, and such a reasonable
a
life
is
the
is
life
i.
of
God
(Leg. Alleg.
i,
12;
CW.
69;
CW.
ii.
15).
Indeed
this divine
even as
life,
man
still
holy
and
Beyond,
sometimes characternon-successive,
" Is
i.e.
not the flight to true Being (TO fo) Life Eternal ? " To such souls " Moses promises incorruption Ye shall live to-day,' for 'to-day is boundless and " inexhaustible
'
:
eternity (aUw)."
They
participate
Pkilo upon
in
God and
Life
life
53
of the
Unbegotten
126 CW. CW. 3
iii.
;
and
;
Yet
ii.^44).
Philo
another
current
in
which, fully adopting and pushing home certain tendencies of Plato, he already largely anticipates the exclusive transcendence and excessive abstraction of Plotinus, perhaps
here,
is
"God" He is,
For
even of Proclus. God, indeed "the cause of soul and life"; but Himself "is something more than life;
as
He
says
Himself,
the ever-flowing
CW.
iii.
152).
more
strictly philosophical
mood,
God
is
not the
He
Who
yet this devoted Jew is too sensitively religious with the great, historical religion of the
And
is
itself.
Thus
'"
often,"
beyond
in spite of all
man's temptations and corruption, "God, by His grace, pours a sweet flood of
its
waters, in place of
"it
is
the soul
"
;
54
whither
that,
He chooses "
its
not
good, but
for this
iiL
own power has effected the moral He who vouchsafed to it its very love
(Leg. Alleg.
143).
ii.
good"
46;
9,
21
CW.
i.
97,
107,
CW.
Stoic Apathy, again, influences Philo far Thus " Moses considers it necessary too much.
(3)
The
that
all
desire shall be
excised from
the
soul,
since he loves not a moderation of the passions but a complete apathy." Yet on this point also
the spontaneity and richness of the Jewish religion mostly predominates, e.g., "virtue is naturally a
who
iii.
possesses
it
i.
rejoices
46;
CW,
143
de
MutaL nom.
1
31
CW.
iii.
18 5).*
James Drumtnond's Philo Judcsus, 2 vols., 1888, remains the and an excellent, account " Time and Eternity," i, 292295 "The Two Conceptions of God," i. 1-64; "Apathy and the Higher Anthropology," ii. 320-324. J. Grill, Untersuchungen iiber Entstehung des vierten Evangeliums^ 1902, "'Life* in Philo,"
fullest,
; :
207-211,
its
Character 55
CHAPTER V
PRIMITIVE CHRISTIANITY
The
utterances of Jesus : the KingdomTeachings of St. Paul : the Spirit Conceptions of the Johannine writer Eternal Life.
:
THE
into
chief
Primitive
Christian
as
teachings
fall
they proceed
Paul, or
from the
The
still
actual utterances of
find
Our Lord,
as
we
Synoptic Gospels, cannot be rightly estimated unless they are first taken as entirely occasional hence are interpreted
within their context of special circumstances ; as homely words addressed to the utterly exoteric
can
them
in
the
homely
spiritual and ethical experiences and needs of simple unlettered folk, or to the (almost as homely) preachers' requirements of His apostolic
little
band
and as
Studied, above
practised thus, as far as possible in the spirit of their first enunciation, they reveal, across the
experience of
the
56
a tension of apparently irreconcilable antinomies; which keep them, in their substance, as operative and soul-transforming now as on the day when
He
uttered
His sacred
in
spirit
through them.
teaching, of God
is
(i)
Now
Jesus'
personal
not
is
Eternal
Life,
but the
the foreground.
directly
in
presented,
future
and emphatically, as, not present but not gradual, not distant, but imminent
;
but sudden
not as at
all
as simply given by God. Nor is this Kingdom presented as consisting, for man, when it does
come
life
to him, of
an Eternal
is
Now
indeed, the
clearly pictured as a pure Simultaneity. The Kingdom is future: "many shall come
.
of
God Himself
here
nowhere
and
shall recline
...
in the
Kingdom
of
heaven"; "ye shall sit upon twelve thrones"; "then shall the just shine like the sun in the " Kingdom of their father" and I shall drink the
;
generation
of the
anew
xix.
is
in
the
28, xiil
:
imminent
say unto you, there are some here standing who shall not taste of death until they
I
"Amen
Son
I
of
Man
coming
in
His Kingdom"
Amen
pass
yntil
xxvi.
64).
The Kingdom
sudden: "as
the lightning cometh forth from the east and shineth unto the west," " as men in the days of Noah knew not till the flood came," " so shall the
coming," the presence, irapovvia, "of the Son of Man be " and " if the master of the house knew
;
what hour the thief would come, he would watch" (Matt xxiv. 27, xxxix. 43). Everywhere, here and in other places, the Kingdom is
at
not a
human achievement
but a pure
gift of
God,
as also in the
"New
husband"
And
:
"many
"
shall recline
Jacob
own
life
seems
to
be
includes
the very feeding of the fowls of the air, and the clothing of the grass of the field (Matt viii. n,
vL
26,
30).
occurs in
"life" or
sayings,
it
"
"
life
everlasting
is
ever placed in
the future, as a reward for previous virtue, and expresses the totality of good to be conferred in " Good master, what shall the Kingdom of God.
I
do, that
may
askeci
And He
answers,
"Thou knowest
the
58
commandments," and "sell all thou hast and give to the poor, and thou shalt have treasure in heaven"; and declares "how hardly shall they that have riches enter into the Kingdom of
God!" (Mark
x.
17,
19,
21,
23).
Nothing can well be more certain than the presence and deep operativeness of this conas to the futurity, imminence, suddenness, and pure God-givenness of the Kingdom
viction,
of God,
within
our Lord's
life
and teaching.
One
look
especially
amongst the features of this outthe imminence has, almost from the first,
been a grave difficulty for those whom reason and conscience constrain to combine a frank
acceptance of the textual evidences with a deep conviction of Our Lord's profound spiritual
supreme normality. And yet this His mind and will, if taken generally, and as one of two essential spiritual movements, is found, by the spiritually fully awake and earnest soul, to inflict upon it, and ever anew to awaken
insight and attitude of
within
an easily overlooked or forgotten, yet most necessary, utterly abiding, element and reit,
Detachquirement of the deepest spiritual life. even from the to which also ment, very things we owe attachment the irremediable inadequacy
;
of even the
of
up
a
to,
presence,
to
satisfy
the
souPs wants
Spirit,
our utter dependence upon a Will, distinct from our own, Who precedes,
and from
for good,
in
Whom
proceed,
all
"
an order of pure creative donation, indeed of self-donation: all this and more, of specifically
religious truth
And it fact, is given us here. with so a forcible dramatic vividpresented ness, and with such richness of Jewish details, as
and
is all
even religious
spirits, in
our
own lands and times, the sobriety in sublimity of the abiding substance thus conveyed.
the purely religious, intensely transcendent and dualistic, outlook, with its apocalyptic
(2)
Now
form, as just described, appears to have been attained and developed by Our Lord's humanity
violent death
it
and
Certainly
confession
viii.
is
from the
xvi. 21
at Caesarea
onwards (Mark
31
= Matt
Luke
ix.
teaching.
22) that this outlook prevails in His Nevertheless, especially in the earlier
is,
relatively,
im-
manental,
monistic,
and
ethical,
and possesses
60
Eternal Life
Historical Retrospect
we
texts
would, more or
away
no
less certain
than those of the transcendental and apocalyptic kind, and would thus artificially unify His life.
"
first
.
public appearance,
the impure spirits i. 27); whilst Jesus declares, even considerably later, "if I cast out devils in the spirit of God,
the
Kingdom
lcj>
of
God
((j>0a<r6v
fyiS?)
"
then
tell
His
disciples,
who
assure
Him
"the
devils also
fall like
" obey us in Thy name," I saw Satan lightning from heaven" (Luke x. 17, 18).
thus in process of establishment, in proportion as the kingdom of Satan is driven back and broken up. Hence the
is
The Kingdom
of
God
x.
Luke
x. 9).
of this
first,
relatively
peaceful,
period
second,
corre-
of the
full
of
sponding conceptions. The fundamental parable, that of the Sower (Mark iv. 3-9 and
parallels),
indicates
of
God
is
subject,
growth, to laws analogous to those obtaining in the natural world ; since the results of the preaching of the Kingdom depend upon
in
its
the differing dispositions of the hearers' hearts, much as the results of sowing plant-seed depend
soil
sown upon.
And
the
(Mark
iv.
26-29) lays
the stress of the comparison upon the gradual unfolding and prosperity of the seed which takes
time to grow. Thus similarly the Kingdom of God, once it is planted, rises slowly but surely to
an ever-richer development, and reaches maturity simply through the divine power immanent
within it
And
finally,
Jesus's
messengers as to whether He is the Messiah a simple reference to the cures, awakenings, preachings they see Him perform (Matt xi. 4) also implies that the Kingdom is already present.
Indeed, Jesus's very presence involves, in a very real degree and way, the presence of the Kingdom.
"
is
The
acceptable year of the Lord (Luke iv. 19) itself already present ; the disciples cannot fast,
"
since "the bridegroom is" already now "with them" (Mark ii. 19); and "blessed are the eyes
that see
x.
23).
Hence
62
"shall
Kingdom
ix.
i),
of
God coming
in obscurity
in
power" (Mark
the
in
contradistinction
to
Kingdom
1
as already
come
and
weakness.
(3)
The Kingdom
of God,
whether insisted
upon apocalyptically or prophetically, is throughout conceived by Our Lord as a social organism. For the Kingdom of God, present wheresoever God's will is done on earth as in heaven (Matt,
vi.
10,
of
u), evidently coincides with the totality those through whom God's will is ac-
complished
we have
it
thus,
is
many.
If the
Kingdom
must
disposition,
contain
many
differently
since only
thus can there be lesser and greater (Matt. v. And if the perfection of the xi. 19, n).
Kingdom consists in the greatest within he who is the servant of all (Matt. xx.
it
it
being
26, 27),
must again be an organized community. indeed Jesus forms and sends out a special
1
And
little
H.
J.
1911; vol.
Holtzmann's Lehrbuch der N.T. Theologie, 2nd ed. i. pp. 284-295, in its admirable sobriety as to the
Kingdom of God, lias, after much independent study of my own, been chiefly followed above. Brilliant, very instructive, but, I
think, too exclusive, insistence
upon the apocalyptic element, in Albert Schweitzer's Von JReimarus su Wrede^ 1907 ; Eng. trans., The Quest of the Historic Jesus, 1909 ; and even in Alfred Loisy's
Les Evangiles Synoptiques, 2 vols., 1901, a work of quite extraordinary penetration, in most of its treatment of the discourses.
Jes^t,ss
63
band of apostles to aid them in winning this - x. 16, and larger community (Matt. ix. 35 These apostles are, in the future parallels).
world, to
of Israel
to
sit
(Matt
salt
be the
leaven the Jewish people (Matt. v. 13, xiii. 33).* (4) And the future, final life of souls is to
more than ever to become, not only social as between soul and soul, but also complete as regards each soul's powers. Nowhere is there a trace, in Our Lord's conception of this ultimate life, of the solus cum solo, or of the survival of the abstractive intellect alone, as we found the latter in Aristotle, and as we shall find the former in Thus the very angels who "see in Plotinus.
remain, and
simultaneously attentive
their
to
any contempt
earth
shown towards
(Matt, xviii. 10); and "there is joy before the angels of God over one sinner doing penance"
Indeed, everywhere these popular sayings, with their current imagery of the Messianic banquet and the thrones and
xv. 10).
other strongly spatial pictures, vividly portray and insist on the great fact and truth that the
inner spiritual
1
See H.
J.
be deep and genuine, perHoltzmann, LeWuch der N.T* Theologie> pp. 265-268.
life,
to
64
manently requires a rich variety and organization within a strongly social life with fellow-souls.
(5)
Yet
it
is
not
man
or men, but
God Who,
here as everywhere in Jesus's experience and teaching, is the beginning, centre, medium, and " Have the whole of this final life.
end of
you
not read what was said to you [Ex. iii. 6] by God I am the God of Abraham and the God
' :
of Isaac
'
'
He
is,
then,
'
not the
God
"
living
doubtless
Simultaneity, as well as of the intensely living God here implied, as alone upholding,
The
because exceeding and enclosing, the minor aliveness and successiveness of the generations of men. The soul's perfection is thus practised and
proclaimed by Jesus as
to the service of
its
complete self-donation
of
God
in
man.
And
depend-
and yet with the fullest the feelings, motives, and passions
and humility, homely heroism, joy in love of our very enemies, sense of and God,
and
trust in
God's fatherly care even in deep desolation and an agonizing death. The expansive happiness of His early ministry
contrition for sin,
;
and
bird, sky,
fulness to publicans and sinners ; the standing in the midst of the disciples as a servant (Luke xxii.
27) the emphatic anger in purifying the temple ; the sadness of the Last Supper the craving for
;
the disciples' sympathy and the terror of death the lofty silence before Caiaphas in Gethsemane and Pilate; the cry of desolation on the Cross : are
;
here
constituents, occasions,
of Eternal Life.
Thus
and
even
voted
not
outside
of,
but
so
wise and
warm
is
impelled,
asceticism
here
concomitant and guardian, though never the first motive or last end, of the entire life, in precise
proportion
to
this
life's
depth
and
richness.
wide acceptance of the Tkumos is here far surpassed by the delicacy, elasticity, and depth with which the entire gamut of the soul's
Plato's wisely
impulsions and necessities is utilized, cultivated, and the Stoic renunciation is and organized
;
66
Eternal Life
Historical Retrospect
difficult practised here, within a boundless, richly material, with infinite variety, tension, and fruit-
fulness.
both the acceptance and the renunciation, each in and through and with the other, are not here caused by, nor do they here
And
end
the sorry superficiality of a mere selfculture, but they follow upon, or lead up to, the vivid apprehension and awed acceptance of the
in,
deepest Reality as Spirit, a holy Love and all- wise All here comes from, or leads to, a life Will.
lived, within
our
own mode
1
and
Eternal.
2.
St.
and
formal
and occupied with, only a part of the immense range and depth of Our Lord's life and
affected by,
revelation, are mostly far
more complex or
sys-
They
are, in their
where
at
all
doctrinal,
utterances of a
rabbinically trained theologian, in which Philolike, Platonic, and Stoic ingredients are often not
The above insistence upon two complementary movements, as equally necessary to the deepest religion and Christianity, has been largely learnt from Ernst Troeltsch's great writings, especially his "Was ist Wesen des Christeuthums ? in Die ChristlicJu
Welt,
1903,
i.,
6V.
67
difficult to trace.
And
yet
it
is
the
manner and
with the
degree
in
is
filled
love and reproduction of the most fundamental of the dispositions and aims of the historic Jesus,
which give to these and to the other currents of his reflective thought an experimental content
and
by
his
rich
The dominating
double
conversion to enthusiastic faith in a present Christ, yet this without ever having known the
the earthly, the past, the Jewish Jesus, upon the heavenly, the present and eternal Christ, the Saviour of Man-
him
to
concentrate
all
his
away from
Indeed, in the earthly life only the Passion and Death and the Resurrection of Jesus were retained, as constituting, respectively, the sowing
kind.
and death, and the up-springing and life, of the Seed of the Second Adam, the heavenly Man. And since Christ had revealed Himself to Saul
on
the
way
to
Damascus,
in
a substantially
pneumatic manner, the convert Saul's, Paul's dominant category is, henceforth, not the Kingdom
of God, not Eternal Life, but Pneuma, the Spirit^ St. Paul's fully developed scheme as to
(i)
68
man's natural endowments and supernatural gifts says relatively little about man's highest natural
endowment, his vow, or Mind, but insists much upon two strongly contrasted, indeed mutually exclusive, couples: a couple of natural, strictly
human, incurably mortal constituents, -f vyy, the sensual soul, and adp^ the flesh; and a couple consisting of Ilz/efyta, Spirit, which is essentially divine and eternal, and of <r&iJLa> Body, which is
y
potentially immortal, ever capable of being rewoven, of being raised to life, by the Pneuma
it Thus "the psychic not the of the Spirit of God, man receiveth things for they are a foolishness unto him neither can
which
first
constituted
he know them, because they are (only) spiritually But he that is pneumatic judgeth all discerned. things, yet he himself is judged of no man"
(i Cor.
ii.
14, 15).
"Ye
in the Spirit, since the Spirit of God dwelleth in " you (Rom. viiL 9). Only where certain compari-
sons require
it,
and
in loosely
spirit,
worded popular
attributed
to
also
pneuma
of
man knows
the
things of man and the Pneuma of God knows the but here things of God/' is said in r Cor. ii. we find also the even looser terms, irvevpa rov "the spirit of the world" (ver. 12) (like ic6<rfu>v
"the
God
St.
and vow
it
Kvpiov,
6).
(2)
Although
and character of the historic Jesus of Nazareth, and their specific effect upon the dispositions of
particular
witnesses which gave its richness and tenderness to St. Paul's image of the
Christ, the special circumstances of his conversion
certain depersonaliza-
human
same
Christ.
Thus
that, in
His
resurrection, Christ,
life-giving
"the
Second
Spirit" (i Cor. xv. 45); man, living no more for the flesh or the psyche, can, by and with that
quickening
Spirit,
become
spirit too.
And
Spirit
and
spirit,
unlike
Human
"
spirits
can be "in
Christ" (Rom. viii. i), or Christ," "the Spirit of " " God," can be in them (Rom. viii. 10, 9). This
formula, eV Xpio-T<p, parallel to
& TTVGV/JUITI,
is
often
used by St. Paul in a pregnant mystical sense, with a strongly local suggestion Christ-Spirit
here the element by which the human spirit is surrounded and penetrated, as man is by the air
is
lives.
we
27
are baptized, dipped, into Christ, can drink Christ, the Spirit (Rom. vi. 3; Gal.
;
Thus Spirit; we
iii.
Cor.
x. 3, 4).
7O
the
presence of
this
intrinsically
our surety of immortality, ever accompanied, in St. Paul's conviction, by the resurrection of the
"If the Spirit of Him that raised Jesus from the dead dwelleth in you, He ... will give
body.
life
our mortal bodies through His Spirit that dwelleth within you" (Rom. viii. n); "I
to
we bear about
in
our bodies
the death of Jesus, in order that," in a measure already here and now, "also the life of Jesus may be manifested in our bodies" (i Cor. xv. 31
;
u).
of
The Kingdom
also,
God
is
thus,
with
"
;
St.
Paul
a present possession the Kingdom of God consists not in word but in power," "it is justice and peace and joy in the Holy
in part
Spirit"
still
(i
Cor.
is it
iv.
more
a future
17); yet "flesh and blood," gift: "shall not inherit the King-
20;
Rom.
xiv.
whether
"
;
we
"
to
Cor. xv. 50, vi. 9). Hence live or whether we die, we are the
Lord's
I
me
to live
is
Christ
"
;
"
already
;
not
i.
Cor.
if.
20).
"
Phil.
Chris-
tians can
" within
(4)
you"
it
5).
And
in
and through
this
element and
The
Bond
71
medium
tained
:
of the Christ-Spirit that the universal brotherhood of mankind is effected and main-
"there
is
not
or Gentile,
for all of
28).
you
are one
in Christ
"
Jesus
(Gal.
viii.
And this
and
functions,
of selfless
and
constitutes,
as
the
The
Stoic
conception of the
human
body-politic, constituted
by, constituting, the several sexes, orders, capacities of mankind, has here attained the
and
greatest
vitality.
possible
elasticity,
tenderness,
and
For an all-embracing self-conscious the Spirit of one who loved, and immoSpirit is here lated Himself, wholly and to the end
the link and
spirits,
medium by and
in
which
all
human
proportion to their awakeness and And acceptance, are bound and fitted together. further, the conception presupposes throughout,
in
not the self-sufficingness of the individual spirit, but the utter, pressing need, for each human
spirit,
of
human
the others, and, for the totality of God spirits, of the Christ, the Spirit,
all
of His initiation, purification, sustainment, and crowning of it all "As the body is one and
72
hath
all
the
members
of
that one
also
Christ
';
"ye
body of Christ, severally"; and "whether all the members suffer with
are the
or one
member
(i
is
honoured,
xii.
all
the
members
Cor.
12,
27,
26).
The
cosmopolitanism has here widened and deepened to an outlook into the Invisible and
Stoic
Eternal:
iii.
"our
citizenship
is
in
heaven"
(Phil,
20),
(5)
And we have
here,
amidst some
Stoic
terms, an amazing range and richness of volitional and emotional attitude and experience anger,
scorn, pity, tenderness, zeal, joy, rapture, contrithe whole steeped in a tion, sadness, loneliness
creatureliness,
and
in
and
I
love, of
God
I
circumstances
"
have
all
strength
power."
Christ's,
"All
and
1 1
giveth are and yours, things ye are Christ is God's." "Christ is all
iv.
in
Him who
me
n,
13
Cor.
iii.
22, 23
1
).
iii.
J. Holtzmann, Lehrbttch der N.T< Thcologie^ vol. ii. pp. 88-90, 218, 219, 260. The Pauline section of this great work Is, in spite of Albert Schweitzer's vivid criticisms, probably the most
See H.
The Johannine
writings
may be
briefly de-
scribed as
and emotions, and as Philonian in their general conception of God and of the worship of God, and in their, reverential yet astonishingly free,
allegorical
Old Testament "God is a Spirit" "neither have ye ever heard " His voice nor seen His shape (iv. 24, v. 37) " " My Father worketh until now ever, even on the Sabbath (v. 17, 16); "the hour cometh when
treatment
;
of
the
men
will
this
mount,"
Gerizim, "nor in Jerusalem," "the true adorers will adore Him in spirit and in truth" (iv. 21, 23).
All
sole
this,
in
spite
legitimate
in
God,
Genesis
and
Deuteronomy.
Indeed
one great organ of divine revelathe pattern and leader upwards of souls
is
a true
literary precursor of
the utilization, and development to full personality, of the Heracleitean, then Stoic, and
lastly
And by
Alexandrian conception of the Logos, the earthly life of Jesus is here set in a frame and
before, behind,
after this our earthly
and
Fo'r
world of space and time. us the Eternal Son of shows the Prologue
74
bosom
of the invisible
18),
as,
representative of all Christ's genuine followers, rests in the bosom of Jesus, the Logos
hidden under
human form
(xiii.
23).
We
get
thus a development of such Pauline passages as " Christ, the image of God," and "the image of " the invisible God, the first-born of all creation
(2 Cor. iv. 4; Col.
i.
15).
(i) All true existence, all "truth," thus comes from above, where is the real world, down to us
is
copy: a
(iii.
man
"
is
"born"
"from above
to
"
3).
My
came
its
voice"
(xviii.
Me
back
is
whence
All this
to
conformable,
in
St.
intellectual
framework,
Plato
and
to
Paul But a heightened stress is laid here upon "knowing" and "truth" thus ywdxrfcew appears,
in the short First Epistle alone, twenty-five times,
My
disciples,
ye
shall
know
"
;
the
shall
make you
all
I
free"; "the
truth
this I
came
"for
might witness
37).
31, 32,
xviii.
This
is
apparent hegemony given to truth and knowing the feature which approximates this, otherwise
St.
John
75
upon
7z/<Scr9.
And
knowing
is
taken to be
intuitive, as
0a<r6at, y P\e7reiv,
Stoic principle that "like is apprehended by like" (Sextus Empiricus, 7. 92). "Only He who is with the Father, hath seen the Father "
;
"he who
(vi.
is
46,
Hi.
31).
it is
not Knowledge, however intuitive, nor Truth, however heavenly, but Life, Eternal
(2)
Life,
Yet
Johannine convictions.
am
the
the Life," in an
this is the inner
meaning of the raising of Lazarus, the greatest and last of the seven great miracle-symbols of
this gospel of
Eternal Life
(xi. 25).
True, in the direct teaching of Jesus, Eternal Life depends upon the observance of the twin
commandments
(Luke
is
of the love of
God and
of
man
x,
eternal
true
men may know Thee the one God, and Jesus Christ whom Thou hast
that
(xvii. 2, 3).
Yet the great saying, " If any man willeth to do His will, he shall know of the doctrine whether it is of God" (vii. 17), is the
sent"
76
Eternal Life
Historical Retrospect
precise equivalent of Jesus's actual words, "Blessed are the pure of heart, for they shall see God"
The Johannine doctrine of Life has (Matt. v. 8). indeed taken over and refashioned the Synoptic
conceptions of Life and of the Kingdom of God the latter term appearing here in one passage
though this gospel begins " " Life with the Logos conception, and attaches
only,
iii.
3,
5.
And
to that conception (i. i, 4), yet, in the progress of the work, a richness of content is given to
"Life" which
it
derives,
not from
the
Stoic-
Philonian categories, but from the life of Jesus, as actually lived by Him, and from this Jesus's teachings concerning the Kingdom of God and
the conditions for entering it, as these teachings had reached the writer through persons who had
actually heard them.
itself,
Thus
indissolubility,
though
not
as
a conse-
quence, but as a presupposition, of the resurrection "that every one who seeth the Son and
:
Him, may have eternal life and I " will raise him up at the last day For (vi. 40). its possessor's consciousness, such Life means
believeth in
;
beatitude:
"that they
may have
life
and may
its
have
acts
it
relation,
In
pleasing to
life"
(xii.
God
"His commandment
is
eternal
50).
And
with
respect
to
77
is
it
is
enlightenment: "This
eternal
that they
may know"
"
(xvii. 3).
all shall
In Christ
be made
"As
them
the
Son maketh
Spirit
it
alive
whom
He
willeth";
for
"the
is
that
maketh
alive," and "the words you are spirit and are hearkeneth to My word
that
life."
.
have spoken to
and hath passed over from death to life" (v. 21, vL 63, v. 24). Such believer already here and
possesses eternal life already here and now has accomplished the transition from death to
now
life;
he "has" already "tasted the powers of the coming age" (Heb. vi. 5). The believer
"will not die for ever," will not die at
all,
whilst
Martha, the ordinary Palestinian Jew, affirms that "he," her brother, "will rise again at the " " " This already " is eternal last day (xi. 26, 24).
life,"
that men may know God and the Christ; " these . your things have I spoken to you, that
.
.
n). The emphasis in the pre-Exilic Old Testament lies upon the past, upon the absence of all beginning
fulfilled" (xv.
in
God
in Jesus's teaching
it lies
upon the
future,
78
Eternal Life
Historical Retrospect
the coming of the Kingdom, and upon the direct, explicit preparations for it; in the specifically
Johannine passages,
it lies
Thus
but
ness: "
Christ, as
God,
is
free
successiveI,"
" before
Abraham was
58).
It is in
(became),
not was,
am
"
(viii.
we
move-
the bodily ment, an insistence upon the future, resurrection and the increase of the soul's stability
and joy
(3)
in the
beyond.
interconnected and
life
The
social, organically
all
in
Spirit,
and God, so deeply embedded in our Lord's own teaching and so clearly articulated by
:
here explicitly insisted on by Christ Himself "I am the true vine, ye are the branches, and My Father is the husbandman " (xv. i, 5).
St. Paul, is
And
the
the interpenetrability, of spirits appears here in fullest force: "I am in the Father and " " he who abideth in Me Thou, Father, art in
spatiality,
Me
and
in
him
"
;
"I
in
in
Me " (xiv.
spirit's utter
need of God, and the prevenience of God in the relations between man and God, are mjagnificently
emphasized.
"Not we
loved
God
(first),
but
He
The
(first)
Spirit's
loved us"; "let us love Him, because He first loved us" (r John iv. 10, 19) "no man can come to Me, unless the Father draw him " (vi. 44).
;
And
this
effects
(iv.
a hunger and
vi.
thirst for
14,
35).
Thus man's
spirit, so largely merely potential, can respond actively to the historic Jesus, because it has been
already touched by, and thus made hungry for, the all-actual, eternal Spirit-God who created
that
human
spirit
(4) Yet, finally, the range and variety of the perfect life is, in these writings, much restricted,
as compared with the inexhaustible richness and spontaneity actually lived and proposed to us by
passes through
in
profoundly real
individual experience
His
Baptism and Temptation prays alone on the mountain-side suffers an agony of fear and seeks His disciples' sympathy in Gethsemane and dies
; ;
In the with a cry of desolation upon Calvary. " " Fourth Gospel the Logos's watchword is I am
;
no Baptism and no Temptation He has deliberately to stir up emotion in Himself; He prays only for others and in the Garden and on
there
is
;
;
the Cross
He
self-possession.
although, besides the "knowing" it includes the loving of God and believing,
8o
Nevertheless,
all
through
work's apparent thinness and abstractness, pulses the sense and the effect of the two great concrete Realities God, the already
this great
fully extant
and operative
this
;
infinite Personality
and
Spirit,
Who
is
all
and Jesus, Who actually lived here below amongst us, the lowly
souls.
servant of
tells
human
Thus here
the Christ
that
us
"God
He
gave His only-begotten Son, so that whosoever have everlasting believeth in Him should " " and that the Father will give you another life ; Helper, the Spirit of Truth, who will abide with
.
you for ever (iiL 16, xiv. 15). And perhaps the most solemnly introduced, and the most deeply
felt,
"
the scenes here given, is that of Christ washing the disciples feet, and inculcating a similar service of each to all the others, a passage
of
all
1
which expands words actually spoken in a parable by Jesus (Luke xii. 35~37) into an appealing summary and picture of the aim and disposition
of His entire
1
is
life
and teaching
(xiii.
I-I7).
discussion of all the above and allied Holtzmann's Lehrbuch d. JV.T, Tkeologie, especially in the greatly improved 2nd ed. 1911, vol. ii. pp. 390437. The above sketch, after much personal study of the texts,
points
H.
J.
Plotinus
81
CHAPTER
Plotinus
St.
VI
CHRISTIAN-HELLENISTIC TIMES
Augustine
Pseudo-Dionysius (Proclus).
next take the three most typical and influential teachers of Eternal Life that flourished
will
WE
between the appearance of the Johannine literature and the closing of the Pagan schools of philfrom about A.D. 100 to A.D. 529, sophy,
Plotinus, St. Augustine, Pseudo-Dionysius.
i.
taught during his last twenty-five years in Rome, has left us, in his ever succinct, though generally obscure writings, utterances of the most delicate
spiritual experience
and of the noblest religious and tenderness. They are deeply inpassion
structive
also
conflict
and with certain value-judgments of my own, is based almost throughout upon these pages. Careful work is to be found also in Bp. Westcott's The Efistles of St. John, 1886, pp. 214-218 ; in A. Loisy's extraordinarily rich and suggestive Le Quatrtime Evangile, 1903, pp. 151-199, 420-481; hi Pere Th. Calmes's UEvangile selon S. Jean, 1904, pp. 81-144, 239-262 ; and in E. F. Scott's The Fourth Gospel^ 1906, pp. 234-294 (the most incisive and clear of the English books upon the subject).
6
82
within them between the formal principles of the philosopher, which indeed are themselves in part
determined by a sensitively
distinct reality
and
qualitative difference of
God,
religious soul.
The
philosopher Plotinus here leaves the First, God, without qualities, internal activities, or outgoing action whatsoever, and conceives man's
approach to Him as a literal emptying of himeven down to his ethical qualities. But self,
Plotinus, the religious soul, ever turns to, thirsts after, and loves, that God Whom, in spite of
those
principles,
he
also.
continuously
discovers
as
Love
"
:
(i)
we
are told
The
it
First
there was, too, nothing whatever extant, to which It might stretch Itself." "If anything is the
simplest of all things, It will not think Itself, for otherwise It would possess multiplicity . nor " can there be any thinking of It." say what " It is not; what It is we do not say" It
.
We
is
neither
Intellect
still,
.
It is
form,
before
all
movement, before
rest
"
(v.
3,
12;
vi.
9.
3),
be experienced by man indeed, the real contact of man's spirit with, and his self-surrender to, It,
constitute that spirit's very
life
and
in spite of the philosopher's insistence the emptiness of God, and the corresponding upon need of emptiness in the soul that would approach
fact,
In
mystical experience speaks, really convey or imply the very opposite the unspeakable richness of God in
life,
Him,
Plotinus's words,
where
his
own
and joy His ever immediate, protective closeness to man's soul and this soul's discovery of Him, the Lover, by becoming aware of, and by completely willing, His actual contact, when it
love,
;
the narrow
self,
life.
whole being, away from to Him, its root and its true,
only
/caret,
overflowing
"
irap-
an
"
;
immediate contact,
above knowledge a simplification, and a selfby "an ecstasy, donation, a striving after contact (<M), a quiet,
which
is
and a musing upon union with It." "Bodies cannot enter into real communion with each
other, but incorporeal things from each other, if at all, not
. .
difference
difference
and antagonism.
is
When
therefore this
84
to
And
as to the One,
"we
are
always gathered around It, but we do not always gaze upon It. When, however, we do so gaze, we attain to the end of our desires and to the
rest of our souls."
"We
It
not give and then withdraw, but ever bears and directs us (%op<weT) as long as It is what It is. ... There the soul
since It does
free " there."
rests
from
evils
life
is
For
since
the soul
different after
9.
from
God, but springs from Him, it longs " (vi. by a necessity of its nature
8;
9).
Him
1 1
;
Yet we cannot accept the following as an adequate explanation of this supreme attraction and lovableness of God, and of the supreme joy thus imparted by His real touch of man's soul.
does not strive after us, so that would encircle us, but we have to strive after
so that
"The One
It
It,
we may
circle
It,
around
this
It."
"
If
something
to be,
came
to be, after
something came
by the
First remaining in Its own being." And "since the One is perfect, since It neither seeks
nor possesses nor requires anything, it was, so to speak, an overflow of the One, Its overfulness,
that brought forth other things"
(vi. 3.
12
2.
9.8).
85
(2) Thus Plotinus the philosopher drives home the increasingly abstractive trend of Greek philosophy from Plato onwards. Aristotle's God only
thinks,
and
tcivel
only
c&9
thinks
is
Himself;
in
Aristotle's
world, loved by
epwpevov,
motion,
not as
But Plotinus's Thinker, by abstractive thought God does not even think at all, and Plotinus's
man
since
One by
And
con-
shrinks
even though a purely spiritual one resulting from His own nature, he has to treat the undeniably
extant world as a quasi-physical, an automatic, and result of God, unknown, unwilled by Him
;
although love is evoked by Him in man, has nothing corresponding to itself in God.
entire
relations
this love
The
here, in reality,
only,
from
to
is
man up
ment or
relation is
down
man.
God
thus in Plotinus's philosophy exiled from His world and His world
Plotinus's experiences
And
and
in-
God
to
home
of
all souls.
86
Eternal Life
(3) It
is,
Historical Retrospect
religious motive operative in the very excesses of his negation, that demand retention and development, whilst his
abstractive
method and
is
sponding check or
specially valuable
rejection.
What
is
here so
vivid sense of the spaceless, timeless character of God of God's distinct reality and otherness,
;
and yet of His immense nearness of the real contact between the real God and the real soul, and of the precedence and excess of this contact before and beyond all theories concerning this, the actual ultimate cause of the soul's life and
;
healing.
Indeed,
as
reality
of
all
kinds
here
exceeding our intuirightly appears tion of it, and our intuitions as ever exceeding
ever
our discursive reasonings and analyses. And, on the other hand, the one-sided abstractiveness of
the
method
leads
to
his
profoundly unsocial
and of the
exclusion,
moments when
alone
and
to
the
from
souFs
deepest,
ultimate
life,
of
all
and discursiveness of thought, and of all distinct acts and productiveness of the will Here we have grave omissions, and here Plotinus
multiplicity
5V.
87
social
blessed, here
1
and
2.
in the beyond, in
Our
Lord's
own
preaching.
The
born in
A.D.
and an impure life in 386, wrote his Confessions He had lived to see the Roman Empire in 397.
united, for the last time, under Theodosius the
And
came
the capture and sack of Rome by the Visigoth It was under the impressions of these Alaric.
immense events the clear dissolution of a mighty past and the dim presage of a problematical future that he wrote his great work, The City of God, in 413-427, and died in 430 at Hippo,
his
episcopal
it.
city,
whilst
the
Vandals
us
i.e.,
were
besieging
(i) St.
Augustine himself
"
he owes to
the
Platonists
tells "
how much
quite pre-
dominantly, to Plotinus
his final
emancipation
concepof
materialistic,
The
Confessions
especially
are
full
the
88
Eternal Life
Historical Retrospect
dispositions,
of God, of the
relations
place
is
.
my God
can
all, unless Thou "Thou wast never a wert already within me." we place, and yet we have receded from Thee have drawn near to Thee, and yet Thou wast "Are we submerged and do we never a place." emerge ? Yet it is not places into which we are plunged and out of which we rise. What can be
come ?
would not
exist at
yet,
more unlike
For here
;
the affections are in case" (Conf. i. 2. i ; x. 26 "The spiritual creature can only be xiii. 7). changed by times," by a succession within duration,
or
will.
The
bodily creature
can be changed by times and places, say from "That thing is not moved east to west."
through space which is not extended in space the soul is not considered to move in space,
.
be held to be a body" (De Genesi ad litteram, viii. 39; 43;,ed. Ben., col. 3876, vol.
except
it
iii.
389 A).
Augustine has gone much deeper than Plotinus, and indeed still remains
to
As
time,
St.
"Thou,
God, precedest
all
past times
St.
89
by the height of Thine ever-present Eternity; and Thou exceedest all future times, since these
are future and, once they have come, will be Thy years neither come nor go past times.
.
.
but these years of ours both so they may all come. All
together, because they abide
.
come and
go, that
Thy
.
years will all be, only when they will all have ceased to be. Thy years are but one day ; and
this
Thy day
is
This
hold
for
Thy
"Who
shall
it
may
abide,
and may
of ever-abiding Eternity, and may compare it with the never-abiding times, and may thus see
how
Eternity
xi.
is
not comparable
of
;
with
is
them?"
present
(Conf.
13.
is
2).
"True Eternity
where there
nothing
xxxiii.
time" (Tract, in
ed. 9 Ben., vol. iii. Joann. Evang. col. 1953 A). a vivid apprehension, of a (2) Yet moments of real experience, of Eternity do occur, even in this
life.
autumn
rise (in
and
his
mother Monica
in reality
the deepest constituents of their actual experiences and necessities) to a vivid apprehension of Eternal
go
" And we transcended our Life in the beyond. very minds, so as to touch the region of unfailing
plenty,
the Wisdom,"
that both
the Word,
"
by Which all
be, yet
things become
Which, Itself, does not become, but Which is as It was and ever will be, And we touched It since It is eternal.
. . . . .
.
slightly,
toto ictu
by an impulse of all our heart (modice, cordis] and we sighed, and returned to
;
own
voices, to
where the
"
human
ends.
Lord, that
like
unto
and yet
re-
neweth
all
things
."
And
"
if
by our
Wisdom which
to be continued
abideth above
be
like that
... moment
that be the
enter thou meaning " Lord? ix. 10. 2, 3). (Conf. Hence "perchance when 'we shall be like Him/ our thoughts will no more ... go from
7
.
.
would not
*
one thing to another, but we shall see all we know simultaneously, in one intuition" (De Trinit. xv. 26 ed. Ben., vol. viii. col. 1492 D).
;
Eternity, of Beatitude,
generally, proceeds, at
own weakness, or sin, or " or This day of ours support, profoundest peace. does not pass within Thee, and yet it does pass within Thee, since all these things have no means
ness concerning our
of passing, unless,
them
all
all."
"
In
Thee abide
and
in
changing things
all
Thee
i.
reasons of
"
. .
.
of
2).
Behold Thou wast within, and I was without Thou wast with me, but I was not with
Thee."
"Thou
hast
made
Thee."
life
"
Is
all
life
precisely that
which
men desire? We evidently possess that life, I know not in what manner and there is another manner in which a man possesses it when he is Yet even those who only hope truly blessed.
;
to
be blessed, would
not, unless
they, in
some
frianner, already possessed the blessed life, desire to be blessed as, in fact, it is most certain that
they desire to be" (Conf. x. 27 xiii. i). Hence a strenuous insistence here u
;
92
venience of
"
need of Him.
who have forgotten I call Thee into my soul which Thou hast Thee. prepared to receive Thee by means of the desire for Thee which Thou Thyself instillest into it Before I was, Thou wast; and here I am, the whole of me that Thou hast made, and everything out of which Thou hast made me, springing
Thou
hast not forgotten me,
.
from
There liveth prevenient goodness." in Thee, without any diminution, our Good which Thou art Thyself, O God we need not fear to
Thy
"
have nowhere whither we can return, after we have fallen away from thence. For whilst we were
away from
it,
our
home has
not
fallen,
Thy
"My
;
soul
is
it
cannot enlighten,
'
cannot
'
or by itself. Thus with Thee is the fountain of life/ since in Thy light we " " shall see light.' God, forsake not Thine own
satiate, itself
from
itself
gifts" (Conf.
(4)
xiii.
i; iv. 16.
is
And
then there
Historical Element,
Infinite in time and space, and of the irreplaceable appropriateness and greatness of humility in the finite spirits thus taught and loved. ''Thy
Word, the
this
eternal
Truth
lower world, a dwelling of our clay healthus inflation our and feeding our love." ing
.
*
St.
"Where,"
"was
that charity that builds itself up on that foundation of humility which is Christ Jesus? These
the salvation of
people, the bridal city, the first-fruits of the Holy Spirit, the chalice of our
Thy
ransom" (Conf.
2).
thus also the Social Organism, result(5) ing from, and in return aiding and in part constituting, such a rich, strong life of the soul,
And
becomes more and more developed and emphasized in his writings. The City of God is directly
devoted to
here are,
influenced by the
its
massive coercion, now broken up before the writer's very eyes, than by the Kingdom of
with
as preached to Galilaean fishermen and And yet it is from that deathless peasants.
life
Heaven
and preaching that this, in part fierce, hard, and gloomy African, derived his melting
tendernesses, humility, fullest spiritual fruitfulness,
"Two cities and splendidly perennial youth. were built for themselves by two loves, an
earthly city
by the love of
self,
up
to the
contempt
94
of
by the love of God, This entire time up to the contempt of self. from which men withdraw at death and to which men succeed at birth, is but the evolution of
;
God
.
and a heavenly
city
.
(De
28
xv.
i).
Great yet terribly dangerous conception, applied one set with the of to entire men, directly groups thus easily assumed to be all angelic and ever
if
right, the
other set
all
diabolic
interpreted,
distrust of
owing
to this
!
human nature great convert's profound Thus, when facing St. Augustine, we once more cannot but recognize that it is Jesus Our Lord
alone gives us the quite full and costingly balanced statement within which the experiences and doctrines as to the social organism
Himself
Who
and as
to sin
have to
and
level.
And
yet a deep sense of the need of such an organism and of the reality of sin will constantly
be necessary to a sane and solid conception and practice of Eternal Life; and such a sense is
excessively though not uniformly, 1 operative within the vast scheme of St. Augustine.
ever,
3.
even
The
last great
expression,
by
the ancient
thirst
Index
For
St.
still
most
useful
Life, and which proinfluenced the whole course of Mediseval, foundly and hence largely of Modern thought, are the
and search
after Eternal
Pseudo-Dionysian writings. Composed probably in Syria, certainly by a Christian cleric, presumably by a bishop, somewhere between A.D. 490500, they constitute the most wholesale adoption
of non-Christian philosophy ever, so far, endorsed by the official Christian Church. It is especially
Proclus the last of the greater Hellenistic philosophers (A.D. 410-485, born in Constantinople,
>
is
thus taken
Now
systematizer
the
Plotinus, and far more dominated, not by experiences and necessities of the human spirit, but by
formal logic, an uncriticized philosophical tradition, and the latest Hellenistic theosophy. Genuine favourite sayings of his are that he would, were
'*
he master, leave only the collection of the Divine Oracles" (Delphic, Orphic, and such-like sayings) "and Plato's Tim&us in general circulation"; and
behoves the philosopher to be the hierophant Plotinus's conception of the of the whole world."
it
"
Many moving
One, is rigorously carried out by Proclus, throughout, and for every stage
to the
96
and province
^oz>??,
in its triadic
development of
thzgoing-fortkoitht prodifference;
and lirurrpofyfi,
assimilation,
beings are perfect and powerful in proportion to the poverty of their the pyramid of our abstract thinking attributes
here,
too, all
And
and regressive
f
condition of reality. Thus here especially the First, the One, TO 'Ev, is above all reason, life, goodness, even, strictly, eireicewa rov
It
is,
"
elvcu,
above being
"
;
Cause, yet not Cause" (In Republic* 429 middle). But the realities intermediary between the One and man's even highest
too, az/am'o>9 CUTWV,
"
constituents are
more numerous than in Plotinus, and both those intermediaries and these constituents are almost endlessly, most subtly
here
sub-divided.
On
is
there
a greater sobriety than in Plotinus; indeed, we get here some sense of a glaring Neo-Platonist
inconsistency for Proclus at times censures those who hold that the soul, forsaking all that is lower, becomes the very One and the Intelligible (In
:
1881,
ill.
3,
pp. 774-793,
823-826.
The
Circle
and Transcendence
in Dionysius 97
(2) Pseudo-Dionysius assimilates practically all the chief doctrines, terms, similes, of Proclus, far
more than he takes from Aristotle or even from Plato or Plotinus and forms a curious compound of Christian priestly and sacramental organization and of Proclian ultra-transcendence and abstractYet the tender truth and beauty of iveness. Plotinus's experiences, and the supreme reality of Jesus's life and teaching, vivify much of this
;
strange amalgam.
Thus
also in
Dionysius
"the super-essential
Illimitability is placed above things essential, and " the Unity above mind is placed above the minds "and the Good above word is un(the angels)
;
and the Cause of being to " To none who are lovers all, Itself is not being." of the Truth above all truth is it permitted to
utterable
.
by word
celebrate the supremely divine Essentiality, either as word or as power, as mind, life, or essence, but
only as pre-eminently separated from every consurmise dition infinitude, all things
.
.
* .
whatsoever."
"
There
it
is
no contact
"
(eVa$?;)
with
things participating in
\.
5).
Yet here
(arvvaTTTopeda)
also
"
known,
7
in
98
"
All thingsaspire to It things intellectual, by means of knowledge ; things inferior to these, through the
and other things, by living movement, or " by substantial and habitual aptitude." And the Divine Love whirls round, as it were an everlasting circle, because of the Good, from the Good, in the Good, and to the Good, ever advancing and remaining and returning" (ibid, i, i 5 iv. 14).
senses
;
But the Christian here, in various degrees and ways, colours or modifies, in the direction of deliberate self-revelation and of direct preoccupation with His creatures, the PlotinianProclian concept of God's automatic overflowing.
"
all
very being, enlightens of able to its light in their own partake things degree, so too the Good, by Its very existence, sends,
to all things that be, the rays of Its
ness, according to their capacity." . moved Itself to creation." .
.
Even
as our sun,
by
its
whole good-
iv.
10
10).
" for all existing things (ibid. in return and And, imitation,
is,
themselves."
"
By
Good
is
loved
Its sake,
pliandy
their fellows
99
lesser,
consider-
"
ately/
The
together
13; 10
indeed, Dionysius, in, say, one-fourth of his text, adopts the Aristotelian identification between relative elevation of position In the scale of reality and relative richness of attributes, and applies
this
principle,
in
Platonism, to
God
He finds, indeed,
that
Being has a wider application than Life, and Life a wider than Wisdom. " For what reason, then,
Wisdom to
"
"
above those that merely live, . The and things rational above these last things that participate more in the One, the
boundless-giving God, are more near to Him ... than those that come behind them" (in gifts). "Are not Life and Goodness more cognate
(a-vyyeveo-Tepov) to
is
God
And
He
wrath than
He
is
prehensibility ?"
2; Myst*
TheoL
iii.).
ioo
(4)
important theological, indeed soul's relation religious, matter as to the perfect to God, Dionysius, following here many of the
in the
But
less
little
reserve than
as Plotinus.
31 ;
"The Deification (<9e*S<?) from Itself many who become Gods (0o)"; "the
tion of those that turn to
is
"the
Deifica-
Him (De
"
Div.
Nom.
It ii. though the initial excess of n). distance avenged itself, at the end, in an excess of closeness.
as
(5)
The absence
of any
intrinsic
and necessary
of apparently contingent happenings, and life, the purely negative character attributed to Evil
are as prominent here as in the entire Platonist tradition, and this in spite of certain orthodox
saving
tion
and
of
the
Eternal Life. 1
1 On Dionysius and Proclus : Hugo Koch, Pseudo-Dionysius Areopagita in semen Beziehungen zum Neuplatonismus und Mysteriemuesen^ 1900, Is a very careful, thoroughly conclusive
study.
5V.
101
CHAPTER
St.
VII
MIDDLE AGES
Thomas Aquinas
: the two currents in his teaching Eckhart's two tendencies.
the Middle Ages, let us take St. Thomas and Eckhart, as specially influential and instructive
teachers concerning Eternal Life.
i.
FOR
Thomas
(A.D.
noble, of
Norman
Rocca
Secca, near Aquino, educated by the Benedictines of Monte Cassino, and early won to the Dominican
life
(now
Christian
against the sapping, then proceeding apace, of Mohammedan- Aristotelian science and philosophy.
His adoption of Aristotle is almost as complete as A sensible, that of Proclus by Pseudo-Dionysius. solid, capacious, balanced mind, a sane, pure,
equitable,
and
laborious soul, which ever possessed, never lost nor gained, the Christian and
Catholic faith, and which embraced and embodied, in fullest sincerity, all the best knowledge and
IO2
method of
he most
adoption as dominant exponent of Roman Catholic orthodoxy, from soon after his death onwards.
traditional
tenure,
such
systematization of
what, some eight centuries earlier, had been forced to prove the superiority of its very sub-
agonizing wrestlings with the most formidable forces, and such peaceful, ingenious
stance
in
accommodation, have necessarily limited his helpfulness, as the ages have moved on. Especially
no adequate sense as to the intrinsic, ultimate trend and affinities of Aristotle, the least religious among the greater Greek philosophers, or as to the precise contexts and differences surrounding, and observable between, Synoptic and other New Testament sayings. And Eternal
is
there here
upon the whole, with less consistency and depth by Aquinas than by Augustine, yet, on one point, With additional
Life, in particular, is conceived,
richness.
primarily concerned with carrying through his fundamental, precise delimitation between doctrines of Natural Religion,
(i)
Everywhere Aquinas
is
and demonstrable
by, reason,
and doctrines of Revealed Religion, capable only of being proved by reason to be actually revealed by God, and to be not contrary to reason. In
103
articulation
and
its
true,
complete assuage-
ment.
Hence
a
hast
"
static
quality.
Augustine
cries
"Thou
is
made us
it
for Thyself,
rests
and
restless
in
Thee"; Thomas
exists, in
reflects
To know
is,
that
God
is
a certain
connatural to us,
man's beatitude, and what man But this naturally desires, man naturally knows.
since not simply to know that God exists of consist man's beatitude to hold riches, many
is
. .
.
God
things" (Confessiones,
L qu.
ii.
i.
i. i.
Summa
Theologica,
art. i,
ad
i).
"Reason
know what
whether
It is
It
is
Form
IO4
art
ad i, and often elsewhere). Yet, also " generally, he allows that the names that we give to God and to creatures, are predicated of God according to a certain" real "relation of the creature to God, as its Principle and Cause, in
Which the
perfections of all things pre-exist in an excellent manner" (ibid. i. qu. xiii. art 5, This still seems to exclude concl. et in corp.).
all real
contact,
the soul
however little analysable, between and God. But in an important direct disis
im-
exists,
unless
"with a confused knowledge"; whence "also with regard to God, we could not know whether He exists," which we do know, "unless we somehow knew, even though confusedly, what He is" (In Librum Boethii De Trinitate D. Thomae, Opera, ed. veneta altera,
nature," at least
:
It
is
Middle Ages generally, derives his conception of Eternity predominantly from the same Boethius,
who, in his Consolatio Philosophic, written in prison at Pavia about A.D. 524, gives us the
definition
"
Tkcologica (i. qu. x. art. i, ad i), opens the discussion concerning the Eternity of God
Summa
with the quotation of this strongly Platonist passage from that monument of late classical
antiquity,
so perplexing in
all
an interesting fashion, upon a mode of existence lying between Time and Eternity, which he calls Aevum. "Even
insists, In
And Aquinas
supposing
Time
to
last
for ever,
we can
still
distinguish within it a beginning and an end, by Eternity, on the other noting various parts of it.
hand, is all together (tota simul)" But "Aevum is intermediate between Time and Eternity, participating in each ; since, whilst Time has a before and an after," and " Eternity neither has, nor can " the Aevum has not/' suffer, a before nor an after/'
of necessity,
"
either
a before or an
it."
after,
although
Now
"spiritual
creatures, as regards their affections and intellections, in which there exists succession, are measured
by Time ; as regards their natural being, they are measured by the Aevum and as regards their
;
vision of glory,
io6
(Summ.
ad
i).
TheoL
i.
qu.
x.
art.
5,
in
corp.
et
have here an interesting groping after what M. Bergson now describes under the designation of Dur$e, the succession which is never
all
We
change, since
its
constituents,
in
varying
degrees, overlap and interpenetrate each other; a succession which can be anything from just above the chain of mutually exclusive, ever equal moments, artificial, clock-time, to just below
the entire interpenetration and Totum Simul of Taken thus, the conception appears Eternity.
all
For
it
indicates that
beyond, will pace St. Thomas still remain more or less subject to duration, though there he will
'
more penetrated by, or aware of, that Eternal God, Who already here and now supports and penetrates him through and through. And this same conception suggests that even here and now, in his deepest experibe
indefinitely
that Eternity,
ences,
by means
eternity.
contrasting with,
own
duration^ his
quasi-
life,
in
God and
for
man.
107
There
is, first,
the solus
in
its
cum
solo current,
compound, varying
lectualist
proportions,
of the
Aristotelian, abstractive,
more or
and contemplative
ideal,
and
the,
still
more
with
abstractive
nist aspiration.
Thus
many
things, there
the contemplative life, busy with one thing only " " the contemplation of truth beatitude consists
;
essentially
in
intellect,
will."
only
accidentally in
intelligence
is
" God's
His substance"
whereas "volition
cannot but be in God, since there is intelligence in Him," and "love has to be there, since there
is
volition
there."
understands
own
things other than Himself by understanding His essence, so also does God will things other
His own goodness." "God enjoys Himself alone." Hence, corre" he who knoweth Thee spondingly among men, and creatures/ as Augustine says, is not happier
than Himself by willing
'
than
of
"
if
he knew them
1
not,
but
is
happy because
Thee alone.
"
"
essential to our beatitude, only with respect to the love of God, not with respect to the love of
our neighbour
were there but one soul only to would be blessed, even if it had
whom
it
could love
"
io8
(Summ. TheoL
qu.
HI.
art.
2,
;
ad 4
art.
4,
i,
concL-i. qu. xiv. art 4 in corp. qu. xix. art. concl. ; qu. xx. art I, concl.~i. qu. xix. art
2,
3,
ad 2 ad 4
i.
i.
ii.
qu.
iii.
art
2,
xii.
art.
(b)
But there
also
absolute essentials of
true perfection.
"To
understand something merely in general, not in particular, is to know it imperfectly" ; and "since
that
"A
make another
like
unto
itself.
Hence everything
tends to be like God, in proportion as it tends to be the cause of other things." And "everything in
its
own
as possible and this applies, in a supreme degree, to the Divine Goodness, from which all perfection
is
derived"
dicated of
God"
own
own self." "He, the very cause of all moves out of Himself by the abundance
qu.
;
art.
8,
Hi.
iii.
8,
in corp.;
;
art.
n,
;
contra et concl.
concl.
c.
art.
1 1,
concl.
;
Contra Gentiles,
xxi.
4,
i,
in
;
fine
Summ.
art. 2,
TkeoL
2,
n.
ii.
qu.
art.
ad 4 i. ad i ad
;
in corp.
ad
i).
And
further,
Aquinas
Christian current, a deep sense of the right and "The multitude dignity of true individuality.
and
diversity of natures in the universe proceed directly from the intention of God, brought
Who
them
ness to
And
since this goodness could not be sufficiently represented by one creature only, He produced
many and
the
other."
may
is wanting be supplied by
Hence "the
multiplication
of the
each of whom constitutes a separate " adds more to the nobility and perfection species, does the multiplication of than of the universe,
angels,"
men,"
species
corp.
c.
;
who
differ
only as
i.
individuals
qu.
xlvii.
ii.
of one
i,
(Summ.
TkeoL
art
xciv.
in
;
Contra Gentiles,
lib.
c.
init.
xciii.).
negative character of Evil is, for the most part, maintained, in the wake of the PseudoThe estimate of human nature is Dionysius.
(6)
The
no
milder than in
St
Augustine,
1
but
still
rather
z.Joannes Eckkart (b. about A.D. 1260; d. 1327), the son of a noble near Gotha, still an immediate disciple of Albert the Great, St. Thomas's master, is a Dominican, as pure of life,
as ceaselessly active in teaching, and as unworldly And precisely in character, as Aquinas himself.
Angel of the Schools. And again, Eckhart's deep religiousness, and his sincere conviction that his positions were fully compatible with, indeed
that they only developed, the Christian, Catholic, Scholastic experiences and traditions, cannot be
doubted.
life
and
eloquent
German Sermons,
lies
full
elsewhere.
For
method
1
two
d. patristischen
an admirdoctrine.
able
digest, elucidation, and criticism of Aquinas's Schiitz's Thomas-Lexikon, ed. 1895, is most useful.
his
Life
in
and movements of and faith, and the deepest religious terrible blindness and destructiveness of that same philosophy (if taken as complete and ultimate) as
apprehensions
life
still
deeper, apprehension
faith.
life
and
And
way
special
in
which
the distinctively modern passion for utter logical clearness and consistency the hunger of the mind
which seeks
its
largely takes the place of the spirit's thirst after the Spirit, God, and gives a tragic intensity and substance to
here
that
negative
current.
The
Monistic
instinct,
even
for religion,
when
it
functions in
proper place, here appears, largely, as the first and last word of life, and hence as impoverishing and destructive. (1) Eckhart's fundamental position is: "God and Being are one and the same thing. AH
things have being from Being Itself, as 1 things are white from whiteness."
(2) In
all
white
Psychology he tells us: "The soul is created a thing between a first and a second. The first is Eternity, which ever holds itself
1 Eckhart's LateiniscJie Schriften^ ed. Denifle, Archil/ f. Utteratur- u. Kirchen-geschichte des Mittelalters^ 1886, ii. p. 537.
H2
within
and
is
uniform
is
the second
is
Time,
manifold.
With
will,
its
highest
unto powers (memory, understanding, the Father, Son, and Holy Ghost) the soul touches Eternity, that is God and with its lower
like
;
powers (apprehension, temperament, desire) it touches Time, and thus the soul becomes changeable and inclined to bodily things, and loses her
nobility."
More
"
characteristically
is
:
The
;
little
spark of reason
found only in God in Him its birth occurs, and this not once in a year, or in a month, or in a day, but at all times
according to the 'Time' above, in which there is neither Here nor Now." With intense,
abstractive
intellectualism
"
:
Reason
is
truly God's servant than will or love. and love are directed to God, in so far as
is
He
good, and, were He not good, they would not but reason penetrates into His approach Him
;
Being, before considering whether this Being is goodness, power, wisdom, or this or that which,
Indeed, applicable to God." Being and Cognition are entirely one: what is not, that one does not know ; and what has
accidentally,
is
"
Hence
"Man
to him."
is
And
grow
in under-
Eckharfs
standing
Intellectualism
out of nothing into something (into being), and has united you with the divine nature. But, if you cannot thus
how God
has
made you
believe in
Christ
"The
as
light
in
the
soul
which
is
increate
veil,
apprehends God
without
.
He
is
in
Himself.
without
is
not
satisfied with
(knowledge
in its difference,
nor
with the unity of a fruitful kind in the Divine Nature, nor with the simple, unmoving Divine
Being that neither gives nor takes; but it is determined to know whence this Being comes,
to penetrate into the Simple Ground, into the Silent Desert within which never any difference
has lain
it
and there
*
it
is
more
at
one than
ever
(3)
is
in itself."
all
" So terminology is not always carried through. long as thy soul has any image, it is without
simplicity
it
and as long as
I
it is
How then am
Thou
1
Him
as
He
a non-God, a
320;
221
no;
H4
non-spirit,
as a sheer
pure One; and in this One we are eternally to sink from nothing to nothing, so help us God." "The soul receives, from the Trinity, all that
can be measured by the powers of the soul (but) from the sheer Godhead, a simple light shines into the simple being of the soul, which the soul's
;
And "when
the soul"
man "comes
it
to the sheer
all
head,
"
knoweth
creature."
God
are Eternal, they are in no wise creatures, since they have no before nor after," and "wherever
God is, there He must act and speak His Word" (Pfeiffer, pp. 320, 540, 541, 677; n). Hence, after all, we have but a mere abstraction in that conception of the "desert
Godhead,"
emphasizes,
however one-sidedly, the very real difference (in likeness) between the immensely rich and harmonious Spirit, God, and ourselves, the relatively ever poor, and now largely chaotic human
spirits,
and
their
unpurified
apprehension
is
of
Him.
(4)
represented
in correspondingly
As
to
saying:
"The Now
which
God made
the
115
is
the
now
is
within which
am
as near to that
Now
With
strong intellectualism and depreciation of history he says " Reason" ( Vernunftigkeif) severs us from
:
touches must go." "'Here' is indeed a small but must . it Space go, if I am to see God." "Temporal becoming ends in eternal dissolution
. .
(un-becoming) ; and the Eternal Becoming is a work of the Eternal Nature, and hence has
And Neobeginning nor ending." Platonist and Monistic Inadequacies in face of creation and of Evil appear strikingly in the
neither
,
startling sayings
The prophet (Ps. Ixi. 2) says 'God said one thing, and I heard two things.' Thus when God speaks, it is God (only); but
:
"
here,"
in
man's
and) creature."
God Himself." "God alone has The soul is all things God is one."
"Evil
being. "
is
*
.
Since God, in a certain way, also wills that I shall have committed sins, I do not wish not
to
(Pfeiffer,
pp.
207,
Pfeiffer, 426).
1 1
6
(5)
The
rich,
mated by Monism to vanishing-point. " The (a) That is beautiful which is well-ordered.
lower powers, to be ordered under the higher, and, with the higher, under God." " The right and perfect state of the soul
soul ought, with
its
would
be, not
all
but that
"
I
simply that it should practise virtues, the virtues should constitute her state,
Yet
love,
Some men
if I I
like
stand this saying. For so long as you are capable of doing anything that is against God and His
command, thou
"
love."
And
In proportion as thou hast love for Him, art thou certain that He has, out of all comparison,
more love
Also "It
for thee,
and
is
He
is
a genuine necessity, to do the works of the outer man, in compassion towards oneself or others, than to place oneself in a condition of interior liberation
better,
when
from
there
all
particular
knowledge and
:
desire."
And
the deep saying " An interior work (of the soul) is one that neither Time nor Space can
is
limit or
comprehend, and in
this
such a work
is
like to
God"
Eckhart partly
(<$)
117
But then there are also sayings which, pressed, would dissolve all human endeavour, contrition, special work, and social contribution. "He who is still mounting and increasing in graces and in light, never comes to God, for
not an increasing light" " Follow your bare nature, and seek no other abode than the
God
is
God, who created thee undesiring Nothing. out of nothing, will Himself be thine abode, in
His desireless Nothing and in His Unmovingness. There thou shalt become more immoveable than nothingness itself." "We are wont to say, 'this man is not that man, / am not you, and you are not // But lay aside the nothing," your individu" and we are all One. What is this One ? ality,
It
is
the
is
Son,
not
whom
God)
;
the
Father
"
There
of Sonship (in
... ye
must be an only Son, not many Sons, but one Son." Hence "As little as the Heavenly Father can forsake His Son, can He forsake the soul He generates His Son" (Pfeiffer, in which
pp.
5H;
5io; 620;
157; 652.
(6)
The
completion
by
it
the
came.
stood bare and empty, increate, in God ; God created all things and I" was "with Him."
I
"
n8
"
Can God understand Himself without my soul ? No ... I stand in the ground of the Eternal Godhead where He works out all His works,
understandingly, through me, and
all
is
that
is
thus
.
.
.
understood
that
"
it
am."
"The
soul
created
may
it
of the
forth,"
bottomless
whence
itself
it
flowed
where
it
will
occupy
it
as
little
with anything
;
as
did before
511; 242).
thus find in Eckhart a deeply impressive and instructive combination of a religious, Platonist
We
and
and
union with
Proclian,
God a
;
scientific, still
predominantly
simplicity
;
thirst
for
intellectual
utter
and clearness, for the logical ladder and pyramid and an apparent thirst, of a more or less Buddhist Yet all three kind, for an utter Nothingness.
presuppose a mightily thirsting, hence an intensely real, and a richly endowed and exthirsts
still
more
real
this
thirst
And
especially the religious thirst, as it is by far the deepest, so is it also much the richest in content, and doubtless implies the positiveness, the volitional character, of Evil,
Reality
119
perience, but the abstractive process of logical regression from, and the artificial, ever-increasing,
impoverishment
of, this
real experience,
and the
subsequent attempt to explain reality and experience in terms of mere scheme and skeleton,
take Eckhart away from
creteness,
all
history
and con-
and from the sense of their abiding value and necessity; and from all richness in reality, especially from the supreme richness in the Godhead. No wonder that Rome, in 1329, condemned
twenty-eight
such
propositions,
as
objectively
incompatible with the Catholic faith. But, indeed, the further experiences, since then, of mankind
and the various attempts that have been made to discover and describe, as precisely and unforcedly as possible, the fountains and channels of spiritual fruitfulness
in
the
spiritual
life,
away
or any other such abstraction, as first, either in For we ever find more existence or in value.
and more
definition
richness,
in
reality,
ultimate
find the
'
this
reality
and,
contrariwise,
we
of
or
more poverty,
clearness,
and
facility
definition,
ultimate,
own
I2O
minds,
reality,
genuine
its
or
supposed,
may
be.
practice
and con-
ception, can but suffer from any attempt to restrict the spirit's action to one of its two movements
to abstraction
religion
or to cut
loose
mysteriously
mighty
stimulation accruing to it, in and through the very tension and difficulties, from historic personalities
and the happenings and operations in time and space or, above all, from the full, vivid
;
own spirits,
life
1
and of the supreme, stupendous richness, of the 1 of the Spirit of God, the Godhead.
by
On Eckhart generally, see the admirable digest of his teaching j Prof. A. Lasson, in Ueberwig s Grundriss der Geschichte der
Philosophie^^ 1898, pp. 314-331 ; and the important elucidation of the even excessively scholastic character of his teaching by Fr. Denifle, in Archiv f, Lifterattir- tend Kirchen-geschichte des MittelalterS) 1886, ii. pp. 417-669.
Spinoza's Antecedents
and Character
121
CHAPTER
Introductory
VIII
MODERN TIMES
gory
;
Spinoza, his object, method, and fundamental catehis utter determinism ; his primary inconsistencies ;
life
and teaching
Kant,
and
and weakness.
LET us Kant as
take
Baruch Spinoza and Immanuel the two thinkers who, in their very
paralogisms or insensibilities, are probably, for these modern times, the most typical, influential,
and
and con-
Baruch Spinoza was born in 1632, In Amsterdam, of Jewish immigrants, from Spain and its Inquisition, into relatively free, largely was excommunicated by the Deistic Holland Synagogue for his doctrines in 1656; and died, amidst loneliness, poverty, and patient toil, at The Hague, in 1 677. Within his great, pure, strong soul and throughout a strangely inadequate method there move, beneath a baffling clearness and
i.
;
122
part, of
Thus
Stoicism
;
is
of the soul
is
rather Neo-Platonist
its
And Neo-
Platonism
negative, abstractive trend and in its mystical attrait yet the general mental affinities are rather with Stoicism, especially
is
adopted, in
in the high
And
the
time fully and calmly, reinforced, supplemented, and permeated, by the method and ideal, taken as universally applicable, of absolutely clear,
first
unrestrictedly determinist Mathematical Physics, as these had now been developed by distinguished natural philosophers.
rigorously
deductive,
And
strongest prejudice, a coldly angry contempt is, unlike the Stoics, here everywhere at work, and occasionally patent, against the
the
historic
the Jewish and Christian religion and theology feelings all but inevitable in one already naturally so devoid of the sense for the need and use of
history,
so
largely
the
child
of a
profoundly
age, and so near to the terrible, apparently logical, consummation of those elements in the prisons and fires of the Inquisition, Yet Spinoza is rendered perennially pathetic
unhistorical
by
a rare
combination
of
insights
and
in-
adequacies.
There
is
Religious Temper of soul, a delicately true instinct as to man's constant and immense need of Purification from his petty self, and a remarkable sense as to the helps towards such a discipline to be
found
And
in
the nature of the deepest Reality apprehended by man, as to the means, categories, and tests
appropriate to this apprehension and to its expression, and hence as to the place and range to
spiritual life of
man, to
Now
the
ultimate
object
of
Spinoza's
philosophy is conceived predominantly Stoichence as wise, with a strain of Neo-Platonism " individual. The
;
things which, for the most part, are considered amongst men as the Highest Good are reducible to three
:
And by
think of any other good." And "happiness or unhappiness resides alone in the quality of the
object to which we adhere by love. Sadness, envy, all these affections occur in the love fear, hate
;
of perishable things. But the love of what is Eternal and Infinite feeds the soul with joy
124
alone
(De
IntelL
Emend.
-
Opera, ed.
Van Vloten
et
Land, 1895, vo1 * P* 3)And the noble conclusion of his Ethics warns
us
:
liberty
appears as
And excessively arduous, yet it can be found. that indeed must be arduous which is so rarely found For how could it happen, were salvation
should be neglected by almost everyone? But, in truth, all things great are as difficult as they are rare" (ibid. p. 266).
easy, that
it
(2)
believes himself to
vividly
I
be
described
same wont
inquire into the matters of this science with the liberty of mind as that with which we are
to treat things mathematical, not to ridicule,
in the
same way as
to
the
ed V.
nature of the atmosphere" (Tract Polit. iv., et L. i. p. 270). "the truth" Indeed,
"
might for ever have remained 'hidden human race, had not Mathematics,
125
final
cause of figures,
but to their essential nature and to the properties attaching to it, revealed another type of
truth to
p.
man"
His
"
App M
is
V. et L.
i.
68),
last
work
entitled
Ethics
demonstrated in
consequently Geometrical
Order."
Everywhere
utter Clearness
is thus,
following
and measure of
truth;
and
of the system's logic, as itself a proof or corAnd yet, as we shall see, roboration of truth.
a motive springing from depths utterly beyond the ken of mathematics is largely determining
what he has come to think are mere feelings and prejudices, or fantastically apprehended facts and happenSpinoza thus persistently to
sacrifice
ings,
to
such
entirely
clear,
spatially
figured,
abstractions.
(3)
The fundamental
not
Substance
characteristically, " I
By
itself,
and whose concept does not involve the concept of another thing; and by Attribute I understand the same thing, except that 'Attribute'
sard with respect to the intellect that attributes such a nature to the Substance"
is
126
= Here (Ep. xii. olim xxix., V. et L. ii. p. 230)the Attributes seem to be merely refractions, within
our minds, of a Substance free in
Attributes;
"
itself
from
all
yet Spinoza's dominant doctrine is certainly that Attributes are intrinsic to the Substance.
the more
The more
more Attributes
am
Substance, God, only possesses, or at least is not known by us to possess more than, two Attributes it is a res cogitans and a res
extensa\
absolutely Attributes of equal, co-present, simply parallel, God, All single thoughts anywhere have God
as a thinking being for their cause, as all single bodies have Him, as an extended being, for their
cause; the thoughts are never caused by perceived things, nor are things ever caused by
thoughts. the Ideas
And
is
the
"
same
;
of the Things
for
of the
et L.
each series follows, necessarily express the being One Substance (Etk. ii. props. L-vii., V.
i.
pp. 73-77)*
again, are apprehended by us in various Modes, and these Modes do not, anywhere
The Attributes,
>
cotmtless
Modes 127
or
Spinoza,
necessarily
involve
Existence
conceive the Existence of SubEternity. stance as altogether different from that of the Modes whence arises the difference between
;
"We
Eternity and Duration, since it is only the Existence of the Modes that we can explain by Duration, but the Existence of Substance we
explain by Eternity that is, the infinite fruition of existing or of being" (Ep. xii. = olim xxix., V. et L. ii. p. 230). And to such Modes belong
all
our imagination, " divisible, finite, composed of parts and manifold ; "quantity, as it is in our intellect, being found
"Quantity, as
it
is
in
there
infinite,
indivisible,
unique";
all
Measure,
Time,
(ibid.
and
p.
Number
;
and
ibid.
all
Configuration
361).
231
Ep.
L,
p.
Note
how
not
ness,
Eternity
is
a Simultaneity of
but
ever,
Self-Conscious-
more or
;
a simultaneous
and how Duration here infinite Spatial Extension is never differentiated from Time, which latter is
as clearly as possible, i.e. under the Spatial imagery of a chain of equally long, mutually exclusive moments. Thus here too it is
also conceived
the res extensa, as the more clearly conceived, that dominates even where the res cogitans would have
special claims.
such, no depth of
128
(4)
everywhere present here, that "all determination is negation," and the resolution
position,
The
of
all
of categories, necessarily empty God, Free-will, and Evil of all reality, and find everything equally
perfect, in its precise place
and parcel of the one necessary, utterly determined and utterly determining Whole.
and
time, as part
Thus
"
do not assign to
will, is
attributes,
such as
intelligence,
Indeed, "it
to
certain that he
who
ii.
declares
God God"
L,
(Ep.
= olim
Iviii.,
V. et L.
p.
370; Ep.
ibid. p. 361).
" If
we assume a
little
worm
to live in blood,
and capable of discerning the several particles of blood, lymph, etc., and the reactions of each particle under the impact of the others, such a worm would live in the blood, as we live in this part of the universe, and could not know that certain motions and changes in the blood spring
really
it.
... Yet
is
the
not limited, as
that of
is absolutely infinite, and hence its are in infinite ways. affected parts And, as One substance, each part of the universe has a still
= olim
xv.;
ibid. pp.
310, 311).
129
a state of privation and privation is named with respect to our human intelligence,
not with respect to that of God. single things of the same kind/' say
visible
We comprise all
all
individual
;
men,
and we
then judge all these things to be equally capable of the highest perfection deducible by us from our
find one such thing a which conflicts with such perfection, we judge it to be deprived of this perfection, and as erring from its nature. ... But God does not attribute
definition.
And when we
more of reality than the divine intelligence and power has implanted in them" (Ep.
to things
xix.
In a word, "by 254). and I understand Perfection one and the Reality " The whole of Nature is one and same thing." the same Individual whose parts, that is, all bodies,
olim xxxii. p.
in infinite
vary
"All things, if viewed in themselves, or related to God," the whole, "are I do not know neither beautiful nor deformed. in what respect spirits express God more than do other creatures the difference between the most perfect finite creature and God, the Infinite, is no other than that obtaining between God and the least creature" (Ethica, ii. Defin. vi., V. et L. i.
Individual."
;
p.
73
Lemma
ibid.
ii.
vi.
Schol., ibid.
Ep.
liv.
= olim
Ixviii.,
30
(5)
ethical
Yet precisely with respect to these greatest and spiritual matters, Spinoza's self-contradictions, in detail and in principle, are the most glaring, though all are quite unconscious and
were doubtless produced by the pressure of the actual nature of reality upon his fine nature and
Thus the two Attriquite inadequate system. butes are ever to remain parallel, each closed to the other ; yet the human minds, mere Modes of
the one Attribute (of Thinking), here clearly and continuously conceive also the other Attribute
(of Extension),
with
its
various
Modes.
The
in
human
classic
power
Book of the
as terribly, powerfully extant; and though all that is at all is assumed, by the system, to be in so far perfect, they are not treated as perfect, and
to be accepted if we would be perfect, but, on the contrary, as to be combated, and as somehow so
real that
such combat
is
And though no
presses Reality,
"
one thing,
Perfection,
system, ex-
yet God's Eternal Wisdom, which has manifested itself in all things, has done so most in the human
mind, and supremely in Christ Jesus (Ep. Ixxiii. = olim xxl, V. et L. ii. 412). (6) But the inconsistency which, above all, introduces an element of grave unreality into the
"
system precisely at its culminating, crucial point, the admission of victory by the individual soul,
is
by but one amongst countless fleeting Modes of one of the Attributes of the Infinite Substance, a
Substance bereft of
ness.
all
soul, thus utterly determined, already necessarily perfect for and in its place within the Whole, somehow does achieve emancipation
For the
from
for
lot
somehow keenly
felt to
be
attains identification
while
with, now, a
somehow
all-wise
and
At
least,
the rapturous, partly Christian, partly Neofinal outlook and appeal of the Platonist,
in
its
system,
vibrating sincerity, doubtlessly or implies all this, since otherwise it would be but empty words. "Even if we knew that
means
our mind
is
not eternal,
we
first
place to piety, religion, and generally to all things that are connected with greatness and generosity " The free man thinks of of soul." nothing less
than of death; his wisdom consists in a medi1 And "the tation, not of death but of Life/
mind's intellectual love of
God
iv.
is
with which
xli.,
God
;
V. et L. L
264;
prop.
Ixvii.,
The
fact
is,
very
132
In order to
win toleration
here
for his
Mathematical
Pantheism,
prudently
adopts
life
an
ethical
and
rich
theistic
own
sincerest
far too
is
to
be
beyond the
limits
system.
this
lesson,
Spinoza can teach us, than the Stoics, on points where the
There
is,
then,
ceaseless
sense
of
the
presence and the immense, continuous importance of the human Body, for good as well as for evil. Not all the materialistic, and yet also dualistic,
inadequacies of his formulations can rob Spinoza of the glory of this deep, wholesome, terribly
neglected insight. There is, too, the sense of the organic character, and of the irreplaceable educative worth, for all
human
beings,
of
human
Society.
"Men
can
desire nothing more helpful towards the preservation of their own being, than that the minds and
bodies of
all
men
shall
compose, as
it
were, one
133
xviii.
iv.
prop,
And, above all, there is the constant sense that, somehow, the highest perfection must include
a wise, right Self-seeking; that the initial selfand seeking requires an arduous Purification
;
that
Yet here
especially
the inadequacies of his execution readily obscure the delicate truth of his fundamental instincts.
The
after
Self-seeking, for
far
all,
from the
"
To
than to
act,
in us
what
tion
reason directs, and that on the principle of seeking is useful to the self" (Etk. iv. prop. xxiv.
;
V. et L.
God, Spirit, p. 198). and support of our spirit in its search for its own depth in Him, and the Cross, a practice of
death in
life
life,
are badly
utter
wanted
here.
its
instruments of
if
they
remain means and do not become quite ultimate ends if we accept and practise, as the deepest
;
134
experiences of the soul, not perfect clearness but rich vividness, not interchangeableness but more or less of uniqueness, not automatic happenings
but
Physics but History, not Determinism and Abstraction, not the principle that "all determination is negation," but
effortful
doings,
not
Libertarianism and Concrete Apprehension, and the sense that all Reality involves Determination.
And,
in that case,
a
it
life
will
ever more requires to be built up, developed and defended anew, with never complete success ; it will contain a sense of
Sin and of
venience.
its
utter
need of
will
feel
God
its
of God, not
Substance but
Spirit,
deepest convictions to be inadequate, not because they are not clear, but because they are not sufficiently rick,
soul
The
will
be
their fruitfulstill
their
power of
practically explaining,
more of
effectuating, things
and growths
in
and
most disparate fields. all such an ever-repractised and reapprehended culmination in a more than purely
for life in the
And
yet not
Libertarianism, will, of itself, suffice to us from our immediate, less than nobly purify
human
Kanfs
Greatness
135
human, wilfulness and selfishness, unless there ever flow, between that noble background or groundwork and this petty foreground, a river of cleansing pain and discipline, such as, especially for some ages and civilizations, the absolutely clear,
determinist
Mathematical
In this
way
means
growth
in likeness, not to
Fate, but to God, Free-willing Spirit; and that strict Determinism, ready Interchangeableness, utter Clearness can, and ought to, find a large
and search
2.
of,
well
conclude
our
and minds which, in the past, have best or worst understood, and have most aided, deflected, or checked, the experiences and conceptions of Eternal Life. For Kant was the first, and remains still the most powerful, formulator of certain presumptions and of a frame of mind,
series of characters
Probably
"
still
Is
Dr. E.
Cartesianism," Essays Literary and Philosophical^ 1890, vol. ii. On the subtly swift transition from servitude to liberty in the Ethics, see V. Delbos' delicate study, La Morale de Spinoza^
Caird's
1890.
On
Stoic constituents,
W.
des
Human
Life^
Eng.
tr.
136
most largely operative, and which deprive those religious experiences and conceptions of most of
their native character,
their
function
and vigour.
lies,
undoubtedly
not in Religion, but in Epistemology and Ethics ; and, even in these, more in his acute detection of the precise nature and
whereabouts of certain crucial problems and complications, than in the consistency and satisfactory
character of the solutions proposed.
Three or
more, mutually inconsistent, principles are often operative in what claims to be a single, selfconsistent solution
prejudices,
;
and
unbeknown
be traced as largely deciding the starting-point. And then these epistemological, and other more
or
less
inadequate
solutions,
confirm
him
in
and
insensibilities,
when he comes
his
matters,
and
render
attitude
to religious as regards
Eternal Life particularly unsatisfactory. Kant was born, the son of a saddler of Scottish
descent and
of
a purely German
mother,
at
Konigsberg in 1724; was brought up in strict Lutheran pietism, and was tutor for a while in a
Calvinist pastor's family; taught as Professor at
Konigsberg University,
that far-away
little
in
His
Kans
137
rationalist period, as
up to 1762, and his empirical time, up to 1769, were followed by his, alone fully characteristic, critical years and works. His chief work, the
Kritik der reinen Vernunft, took twelve years of thinking but only some five months of writing,
His 1781, second edition 1787. Religion innerhalb der Grenzen der blossen Verfirst
edition
nunft,
1793,
and
his
Metaphysik der
Sitten,
1797, are applications of these critical principles to Religion and Ethics respectively. For our
purpose,
we
main passages in these three works, although any such selection is rendered specially
to certain
difficult,
The already given. Ethics shall stand between the Epistemology and
for
the
reason
the Religion.
First,
however,
we must
fully realize,
never to
sincere,
and deeply
the nobly ethical, motive of Kant's bewilderingly complex, in a sense intensely scholastic, system-
This Metaphysic was, once for all, to put an end to all Metaphysic, as the arch-imof all Knowledge, all periller, the arch-perverter,
building.
in his overmastering desire
Bishop Berkeley (1685-1753), once for all to abolish the very possibility of materialism, had attained to the conviction that percipient minds alone are
Ethics,
all
Faith.
138
real, whilst
were but so many floating ideas utterly dependent upon these minds their very essence consists
in
being perceived. Berkeley, thus extending Locke's conviction as to the purely mental and subjective nature of the secondary qualities of
material objects (light, heat, colour,
objects'
etc.),
to these
primary
And
so also
Kant believed
demolished Hume, tentions that all our ideas are but copies of per-
ceptions ; that the mere association and complex of these impressions and ideas constitutes our
soul-life,
and
to
that
which thus requires no unitary substrate no -conclusion from the empirically given
;
entire
range of sensible
Immortality,
is
experience, admissible,
God and
to trace, in refuta-
tion, the intense operativeness of the Mind in its elaboration of sense-impressions, and to seek
exclusively in this mind, so immensely productive of order, harmony, unity within the unordered
and requirements of Moral Obligation, the motives and reasons for belief in Freedom, Immortality, and God.
implications
As
to
amongst
often
seem
considerably varying, parallel positions be the most important for our purpose. (a) The question which appears to Kant as
is
:
meant by an Object corresponding to " And Knowledge and therefore distinct from it ? " he answers : It is easy to see that this object must
is
What
be thought of as something in general, as #, since we have nothing outside our knowledge that we can place opposite to this our present
knowledge, as corresponding to it"
say,
That
only
is
to
of
Things-in-themselves we
know
in
#,
case, as
Knowledge to
it
some-
thing of necessity, since this Object is regarded as what prevents our knowings (Erkenntnisse)
from being determined at random, since, in that they are to relate to an Object, they must have
that unity which constitutes the conception of an
r.
Vern. 1781, p.
104= Werke>
Academy, 1903, Kant thus assumes the possibility of conceiving Knowledge as independent of an Object, and of studying such Knowledge as a sufficiently complete subject-matter of research. Yet Knowledge
140
simply unthinkable, hence not a legitimate subject of inquiry at all. The true " Can I know?" or "How can I question is not
thus independent
introduce an Object into
"
How do
know ?
"
my Knowledge?"
"
?
I
but
"
What
constituents In all
my
knowledge
is
can but
in
analyse
such knowledge as
actually
my
the Thing-in-itself appears here to be somehow known, since the unity of its parts is known to us as such, and somehow constitutes the unity of our knowledge of it.
or otherwise.
And
not really possible for the mind to get, self-consistently, beyond the given complex of a somehow knowing subject and a
fact
is,
The
it
is
somehow known
and
state
and every act and Kant himself Knowledge; manages to break up this given trinity, only at the cost of the most varied, subtle inconsistencies.
object,
in all
of
"
(K)
then,
"
the conception of a
thus simply a limiting conception (Grenzbegriff), fit to keep within bounds the preis
Noumenon
tensions
of the senses,
my
reason
cannot be
the
used assertively concerning any objects outside = JVerke ed field of sense" (ibid. p. *5$
t
The
Berlin
Human Mind
Academy,
vol.
apprehends Reality
iv.
141
p.
166).
Yet Kant
reality
it.
habitually knows,
is
most
assertively, that
Thus
1772
we
find the
view "that
God
has
human mind
categories and
concepts of a kind spontaneously to harmonize with things" to be "the most preposterous " solution that we could possibly choose (Briefe,
ed. Berlin
Academy, 1900,
vol.
i.
p. 126).
Thus
ing,
evidence be forthcom-
should be reckoned only the Epistemological Difference between Presentation and the Thing-in-
becomes, prior to any such evidence or even inquiry, a Metaphysical Exclusion of each thus get an Exclusive Subby the other.
itself,
We
" " dogmatic kind from the strongly jectivism of a " Kant and this, although there anti-" dogmatic
;
is
no what
fact of experience or of
is
thought to prevent
my
such a presentation. Indeed, Epistemology has increasingly obliged us to abandon such excessive,
indeed gratuitous, dualism. order and conformity to law in the (c) "The
phenomena which we call Nature, we introduce ourselves and we could not find them there, had not we, or the nature of our mind (Gemiiffi), Thus "without our originally placed it there."
;
142
of the manifold of
(ibid. pp. 125,
P- 92).
Here cognition
assimilated to manufacture
or construction, the synthesis being limited by the nature of the constructive mind, and by the
of sense; and consequently much stress is laid " " upon the recognition of the synthesis, and upon
self-consciousness in the act of knowledge.
Yet
we know
already extant, even where we 1 happen ourselves to make what we know. (d) It is but fair to Kant, otherwise so readily
is
classable with Descartes as regards the demand and esteem for direct and clear apprehensions and
concepts, to
in
full
remember
established
"We
be mediately conscious of an apprehension as " to which we have no direct consciousness ; and "the field of such obscure apprehensions is immeasurable, whereas clear apprehensions constitute
Immanuel Kanfs Erkenntnissand H. A. Prichard's sane and solid Kants Theory of Knowledge 1909, esp. pp. 114, 124; 233-236.
See
J. 1
Volkelt*s penetrating
;
Concrete
143
but a very few points within the complete extent of our mental life." *
yet fundamentally important, questions as to the nature of Time and of Space, and as to their precise function and worth in the spiritual awakening of the soul, and hence in
(e)
difficult,
The
the growth of the sense of Eternal Life, have been undoubtedly much advanced since Kant's
examination of them.
only
insist
In this place
we would
Time
life,
upon the importance of keeping both and Space vigorously apprehended in our
;
and
Time
and Space, as actually perceived and experienced, and Time and Space, as abstractively conceived by us. Not only the vivid perception of Time, but also that of Space (one or the other or both
ever actually experienced, in various degrees and ways, in all the finite things or realities which we apprehend at all), turns out to
of them,
of abstract
"
135, 136. G. W. Leibniz, "Nouveaux Essais sur PEntendement," in Die pkilosofhischen Schriften von G. W. Z., ed. Gerhardt, 1882, vol. v. pp. 45> 69 ; 100 ; 121, 122.
144
artificial
out to be, in different ways yet similar degrees, necessary to the greatest possible adequacy and
clearness of philosophy. According to this, Kant was Indeed right, as against such of his modern
critics
even and Space but he was wrong in not discrimthem as perceived and as inating between conceived, and in treating even the perception of them predominantly as indeed necessary but empty forms of the mind, and hence in refusing all importance to these experiences and categories when he came to the soul's deepest, i.e. to its
;
as
Bergson, in
religious
life.
by one and two serious by profound help towards, obstacles to, the experience and conception of
(2) Kant's
Eternal Life.
(a) Kant's imperishable service is that, strangely
some
anticipations
on
the part of Plato, first amongst professed philosophers, has everywhere conceived Evil, not in
in,
the
See the
Evil
light,
Positive,
Volitional,
Radical
145
and hence as [an act or habit of the Will. Here he indeed rises, head and shoulders", above
the previous or subsequent Enlightenment, above the entire Neo-Platonist strain,
all
indeed
present, in strange contrast with their deep Christian and directly personal experience in even St. teaching, Augustine's and Aquinas's
pages. outside
is
any reservation, excepting the good will alone," he exclaims, with an impressive one-sidedness.
And,
contrariwise, "that
a corrupt inclination to
man, does not require formal proof, in view of the clamorous examples furnished to all men by the experience of human
evil is rooted in
behaviour.
If
" the unprothe so-called state of nature,", take voked cruelties enacted in New Zealand or
"if you prefer to study civilized humanity, you will have to listen to a long string of accusations, of secret treachery, even amongst friends; of an inclination to hate
Or
him
to
so that you
will prefer to turn away your look from nature altogether, lest you fall yourself into "
human
another
Berlin
vice
("
Grundlegung
"Religion
Academy,
10
1903,
vol.
iv.
p.
393;
146
innerhalb
Grenzen
ibid.
der
blossen
vol.
vl.
Vernunft,"
pp. 32-34).
Erstes St.
1907,
virile
truthful, insight was unfortunately lost again by such post- Kan tians as Hegel and Schleiermacher, who, in this deep matter, revert to Spinoza. Yet, without such an insight, there is wanting a sufficiently imperative motive
This nobly
turning utterly
away from
other
self to
God,
its
strength
are
and
purifier.
(ft)
On
the
hand,
Kant's
Ethics
distressingly
formalist
in
and
doctrinaire,
remarkably lacking
richness
motivation, especially in any consciousness that the highest virtue may be indeed easy and delightful to
a spontaneously high nature or to a "A man can laboriously acquired disposition. advance his own happiness, not from inclination,
but from the motive of duty and only in such a case his behaviour possesses moral worth." And
;
Love, as inclination, cannot be commanded but benevolence, from a sense of duty, even when no
;
"
man to it, and indeed when and insuperable repulsion is struggling against it, is practical and not pathological love, and this can be commanded" ("Grundlegung zur
inclination drives a
natural
Werke,
ed
Berlin
Academy,
Kanfs
There
Ethics^ Formalist
is
and Doctrinaire
147
here a painful lack of spontaneously affective as well as effective love, of the beautiful tenderness of Our Lord or of St. Francis,
where there
absorption
is
no thought of a
realities,
law, but
a joyous
loving
in
spirits,
persons,
The general loved, serving and served. thinness and formalism of Kant's moral outlook proceeds indeed largely from the artificiality of his Epistemology and the slightness of his For thus he is ever specifically religious sense. fearful lest, by any moving away from Ethics,
and
consciously willed as so
much
costly Categorical
Imperative, we fall into Sentimentality and Subjectivism, since here it is not spiritual realities
other than ourselves, and the certainty of our relatedness to them, which constitute for us a
world prior to our moral acts and life but, on the contrary, it is our sense of ethical obligation alone upon which our assurance of, and approach to,
;
any such world is built up. doubtless for the same is also, (c) There reasons, an excessive individualism In Kants In one of the Fragments he declares Ethics. "There can be nothing more terrible than that the actions of a man should be required to be
:
subject
to
the
will
of another.
For the
like
is
become embittered,
will,
if it
do what others
without their
having
148
striven to
make
it."
And
indeed in his Metapkysic of Morals, 1797, he defines the Ends of action, which are at the same
time Duties, as "our
own
neighbour's Happiness." And he explains "all men indeed possess the End of their
End
"it
Duty, since Duty is a compulsion to an " and how which is accepted without liking
;
is
fection of another
my
its
furtherance as
consists the
my
is
Perfection of
my
person, that he
his
own End
Duty; and hence I cannot consistently be required to do what no other than he himself
of
iv.,
Werke>
Academy,
Such systematic non-interference would, however, render all education of children impracticable.
Indeed, throughout life, there is no deep spiritual advance possible, without a break-up, not only of
break-up
"
will
often be
"
interference
of another soul,
in short, is
Man
assumes
love and
149
indefinitely richer
;
and
depends
upon our
ability really to know and to love, to to know in this case, our fellow-souls.
Monica and Augustine, Clare and Francis of Assisi, and analogous minor experiences in the lives of
us
all,
any necessary
limitation,
in one soul's knowledge of another, to impressions, of a simply hypothetical evidential value, made and received by each upon and from the other.
get to know myself, ever incompletely yet in various degrees really, in the same act by which I get to know others really.
For
here" again
And
is
in this really
known world
of realities there
serving and commanding, as well as self-defensive equality and thwarting, as well as careful abstention from all checks. Indeed, Kant himself
;
was too
full
than the principles here considered would logically permit; and these principles themselves are, in
part,
certain
contrary extremes.
1
On
Kant's Ethics,
see
the
excellent short
annotations in
Ueberweg-Heinze, Grundriss der Geschichte der Philosophic der Neuzeity 1880, pp. 228-238 ; and James Seth's A Study of Ethical Principles, 1894, nth ed. 1910, with its instructive contrast between Eud&monism, retentive of the Supreme Good and
finding Happiness in the elaboration of the raw material of sense at the one extreme, Hedonism^
150
(3)
treats
Now
it
the
ex professo,
strangely
little
of what history at large, and our own souls, where these are spiritually awake, show us as " " is then Religion specifically religious ; Kant's but the Kantian Epistemology and Ethics applied
to a subject-matter
specific
to him,
and which, hence, cannot awaken any suspicion within him as to the intrinsic truth,
or as to the applicability here, of the tests thus
ruthlessly applied
material.
by him
to
a strongly
recalcitrant
following are probably the chief of such applications to be found in Kant, qua
The
the critical philosopher of Religion. (#) Among the three main arguments for the
Existence of God, in the Kritik der reinen Vernmift, the Ontological, the Cosmological, and the
Physico-Theological (or Argument from Design), Kant, in strict consistency with his fundamental
epistemological principles, cannot but the Ontological argument as especially
ing,
consider
demandhis
and as
especially
succumbing
if
to,
de-
structive criticism.
For
is
ever, for
appearance
engrossed in the sensational Material to the neglect of the Form, and, at the other end, Rigorism or Rationalism (Kant), neglecting the Material whilst engrossed in the Moral Form and End of
action,
151
and of the elaboration of this appearance by our minds if of Reality we only know, somehow, that it exists distinct from our senses and minds, and, somehow, that it is radically from these our apprehensions and different
;
elaborations;
the
Existence
of
an
Infinite,
Necessary a normative manner, be absolutely unreachable from any amount or kind of impressions or
in
Reality will, in
For here implications to that effect. the supreme application of, and trust
we have
in,
that
minimum of a
difficulties
in continuous
of various kinds, and, at this point, the elementary experience and affirmaup tion of religion by the roots.
"
There
irrational
that the
Given Existence generally," i.e. a Being than whom no greater can be conceived, "to an unappears to be urgent and correct," since otherwise we could think of a greater Being "and yet that we have
conditionally
Necessary
Existence,
all
the conditions of our understanding, which are necessary for our conceiving the idea of such
Tree,
"the
152
which
do not
generate contradictions, cannot be denied to a Supreme Being"; such a conception "is" even, "in many respects, a very useful idea": but,
"precisely because a mere idea, it is quite incapable, by itself, of enlarging our knowledge concerning the Extant." For "if I think of a
Being as the highest Reality, there still remains the question whether it exists or not; since, even if nothing be lacking in my conception of
the possible real content of a thing, there may still be a lack with respect to the condition which underthinking, namely, that the knowledge of an object shall also be possible a posteriori" " all
lies all
my
Now
our consciousness of
Existence belongs
entirely to the
Unity of our Experience ; and an Existence outside of this field cannot, indeed, be
is
a supposition
which we cannot
justify
by anything."
mian) form of the Ontological Argument has, indeed, been largely unfortunate, and that Kant has taken full advantage of this. The addition
of
to
predicate of Existence does not add the content of the thing affirmed to exist;
the
and
our
certainly not
own
part to think
Immense
Significance
of Ontological Sense
153
volves that thing's Existence. Yet, this argument, at its best, covers three great abiding facts,
general experiences and strict necessities of life and mind, which, taken together, remain unrefuted
influence
by Kant, and
which
all
indeed
strongly
him throughout
his work.
simply knowledge of or knowledge, knowledge of phenomena which hide or travesty reality; there is knowledge of
reality.
As
Knowledge there
is
All
of Subject,
which simultaneously includes knowledge of the Object and of itself, the Subject. We do not
know know
we
do
not, of course, know the Thing as outside our Knowledge of it But we do know the Thing
in our
Knowledge
of
it,
it
Again, in all our there is ever conof knowledge Single Things currently, in contrast with, and entering into, the
totality,
each and
all
can and do
furnish only endless varieties of such Contingency. It is not that we contrast a permanence, or an
54
endless succession,
contingent objects,
with the fleetingness of any one of them; but that all mere Succession and Fleetingness is
keenly apprehended and felt as contrasting with (and it spontaneously awakens) a sense of
and Abidingness, as somehow superior to and normative of, as somehow alone giving dignity and worth to, all that flux and
Simultaneity
relativity.
And
undisciplined wishes, and at ridiculing it from out of all serious consideration, have certainly not succeeded, even in the limited sense of
having been consistently practised by the very protagonists of such explanation and ridicule.
Indeed, Kant's
instructively
own
halting.
Halting
in
theory
;
for
God, Things in themselves certainly exist Freedom, Immortality must be postulated yet we can never know what the Things are, and we can
;
as more than practically necessary and intellectAnd halting in ually admissible as hypotheses.
practice : for his deep awe before the starry heavens and the voice of conscience is quite obviously more than a contented ignorance, or even than a doubt,
character of
concerning the more than human yet still ethical more than human Spiritual Reality*
Kanfs
155
most
disinterested,
an elementary belief and trust in a World and Reality more than even universally human. Only through and with such conviction does man become fully himself. And it is a useless ingenuity and a perverse excess of caution to try
up any ultimate philosophy upon an assumption of the actual (or even the possible) illusion of that which, even to be sufficiently in earnest in affirming such illusion, we have to assume as true. Kant, however, is no doubt right in refusing
to build
to accept the Ontological
Argument
as,
of
itself,
It does not, alone, prove more proving Theism. than that, in all our knowledge of beings as finite and contingent, a contrasting knowledge of
and Necessary Reality is involved. And the more precise nature of this Reality will have to be revealed to us, at all fully and vividly, by the experience and testimony of the positive religions, where these latter, by their fruitful illumination and enrichment of the other stages of life, prove themselves to be authentic expressions of
an
Infinite
the deepest Knowledge of the deepest Reality : pamely, of the Religious Knowledge of prevenient
156
Spirit.
And
is
one
far
consists in
an
multipliable
in all
Knowledge
the ceaseless elevating operation of this Religious Knowledge within our human lives. So far and
no further philosophy seems both to be able to supply, and to be reasonably bound to accept, reasons for a first step towards Theism, and for
a conviction which, apart from any such support, contributes much towards the faith in and practice
of Eternal Life.
(V)
1
Again, where Kant is critically active and unchecked by his deeper, more religious apprehensions,
we must
expect a non-understanding
of Grace, of Waiting upon God, of Religious Worship, of Religious History and Institutions. Indeed, all these things have to go, except in
so far as they can be affirmed as demonstrably harmless or useful hypotheses, or can be practised
as transparently
human
expressions of the
all-
devouring Moral Imperative. Thus as to Grace. " Whether over and above
all
1
that we can do, there may not exist something See the still admirably fresh " Die Selbstandigkeit der Religion "
of Professor E, Troeltsch, Zeitschrtft /. Theologie u. Kirche* 1895, ; my paper, "Experience and Transcendence," Dublin Review^ April 19016 ; and Clement Webb's clear and firm discussion, in Problems in the Relations beween God and Man^ 1911,
pp. 361-436 pp. 157-159, 179-188,
Kant
which
into
inadeq^late as to
157
us
make
to Himself,
not herewith
decided negatively";
movements, operative
occur within ourselves, as to which our ignorance Is forced to confess that 'the wind bloweth
whither
it
listeth,
but
we know
not
whence
it
Yet "the persuasion that we are cometh.'" able to distinguish between the effects of Grace and those of Nature (Virtue) or even to produce
the former within ourselves,
is
fanaticism, since
neither recognize a super-sensible object our within experience, nor exercise an influence ua feeling of the immediate upon It"; and
we can
every other, even moral, feeling, would mean a capacity for a perception, for which there is
As
to
our actions as though they took place in the service of God is the spirit of praying without But to incorporate this wish, even ceasing/
*
Interiorly, in
words
have the
value of a means for the repeated awakening of 1 " that disposition within us.' Indeed, any devout
158
but
backward man, whom another would surprise even simply in the attitude indicative of praying aloud" would be expected "at once to become confused, as over a condition of which he has to be ashamed." In short, " It is a superstitious illusion to attempt to become pleasing to God
by confessions
of
statutory
articles
of
etc.,
faith,
observance of ecclesiastical
discipline,
since
merely natural, non-moral means have here been selected, which can effect simply nothing with
respect to
what
is
is,
the morally
good."
as to Religious History. "It is reasonable to assume that, not only the wise
And,
finally,
according to the flesh/ but also what is foolish before the world' should be able to lay claim to such a saving instruction and interior conviction,
Now there
exists
requiring no historical information, lies, nevertheless, as near even to the simplest of men as
if it
were
literally written
it
on
his heart,
a law
which
carries with
law of morality.
least
it
Moreover,
God, or at
Him
as
Nobility of
of a moral law-giver
;
Kanfs
Motives
159
man"
blossen (" Religion innerhalb d. Grenzen Viertes Stuck, 2, 3, Vernunft," Werke, ed.
Berlin
Academy, pp. 170, 174, 175, 190, 194, and n., 181, 182). 195 Here again let us be fair to Kant's motives, and not forget the terrible abuses ascetical, and the checks, conflicts mystical, hierarchical, and oppressions introduced or furthered by them in the racial, political, social, and scientific life
of mankind, such as Kant himself, with fairly complete oblivion of the immense beneficence
of the positive religions, yet in large part truly and with deeply sincere indignation, describes
here (in the second division of the Third Piece, Werke, ed. Berlin Academy, vol. vi. pp. 130, 131). To have done away for ever with the very
possibility of religious pressure
and persecution,
and and
of attempts to force
insincerity towards
insincerity towards cast-iron detailed professions of Historic faith ; and yet to retain Ethics
pure and universally benevolent Ethics) and this still with the background, indeed the sanction, of God, Freedom, Immortality this,
(increasingly
;
Kant
And
160
yet those abuses of Religion must evidently be met by a deepening of Religion as such whereas
;
here
we
get,
unmistakably, a thinning
out,
and
cern the experience of Eternal Life and the habits of mind favourable to such experience. Religion, indeed, has ever been, at its fullest
and deepest, Adoration, hence apprehension and affirmation of, and joy in, what already is ; and the
Prevenience of God, His part in the religious act, has consequently, by the Prophets and Psalmists,
by Jesus and
of our
central
St. Paul, by St. Augustine and been dwelt Pascal, upon almost to the exclusion
own part
difficulty
and
rightly
rejects
ex-
clusively divine acts within our souls; doubtless the Divine Action must be conceived as ever
where an act pleasing accompanied by some our human, presumably own, activity. Yet that divine environment and prevenience, the all-in-all
of God,
Who
liberty
He
own
Himself has deigned to limit Himus the kind and degree of has chosen for us the great fact, not
;
of our
action, but of
possible, especially in
Kant
ignores
161
or of unaided nature
Kant's view remains religious, and he is reasoning ex professo^ he at once becomes hypoBut who ever found the religious soul thetic.
hypothetic
?
Where
The
it
and
And, indeed,
hypothesisdoubtless this grand sense of Givenness, of Grace, which, as much as anything, won the humanity of the Roman Empire from
is
Calvary imply
not
Stoicism, with
its
"
Monstro quod
its
"
Our
from God."
thus any and every Stoicism, Kant's included, comes too late. As a matter of fact, we daily, in a lesser degree, experience, in
And
any and every deep and pure human intercourse, the soul-enlarging mystery of the awakening of our mind and will, to fuller life and fruitfulness, by minds and wills stronger, where they are also more
devoted, than our
own; hence
there
is
nothing
unreasonable, nothing even simply without experimental parallel for us, in belief in an action of
Nor
at
is
infallibly,
particular
thought or act, whether it is of Grace or of Nature, decisive, as Kant assumes; unless my inability to pick out infallibly precisely what I
62
owe
to my friend's influence Is decisive against the reality of that influence, and stamps my belief in it as superstitious or unwholesome.
Of
for
course,
this
Nature
with
Grace will, to any pure Moralist, readily appear a superfluity. And yet the Givenness, and the sense of Givenness, will Infuse a special character
into
all
the virtues.
There
are, too,
such heroic
which postulate
and require precisely such a realm of Divine Prevenience and generosity. Again, our very
acceptance of never more than trust, than moral certainty, as to the supernatural character of any
states
outlook.
And
finally,
between
Nature and Grace as are given, say, by Thomas & Kempis, remain founded upon an experience
safe against all final overthrow. As to Religious Worship, it is, of course, plain J that without a God, the Spirit of Spirits of
Theism, and a certainty of His Reality and Presence amongst us, it would no doubt be superstitious and indeed we can hardly find any
;
place for it in a world of phenomena that alone are certain and known, and of noumena known, at
to
Religion 163
But
in
a world of
diversely deep realities, from stone and tree up to animal and man, with a Supreme Reality up-
holding and penetrating it all, a world known really to one of these its real constituents, man,
there
is
nothing necessarily superstitious in, there indeed a need for, Cultual Acts. For if each
is
and
all finite
objects
and
acts
awaken
in
our souls
we cannot
but expect
and
of specifically religious requirements and dispositions, and specially introduced by and com-
memorative
revealers,
of
great
religious
teachers
and
will
(though
never
alone,
but only
where used and spiritually willed by human souls, in and with a religious society) be the means, occasions, and vehicles of a more precise, deep, and expansive religious enlightenment and volition.
Only
if,
if
sense
close
is
and
say,
contact
ing and disciplining of the human soul, can we rule out non-moral things and acts as necessarily
incapable of mediating spiritual benefit. Ceras such and tainly, neither stocks nor stones can,
separately, profit
my
of
soul
impersonal
164
totality of
my
life,
even of
my
spiritual life
and,
my
life,
and
still
a mere natural
individual in the foreground, I can touch and pass through that element, ever again, as through an
awakening and purifying river, out on to the background and heights, having become thus, more and more, a spiritual person. And, finally, History most certainly introduces endless difficulties as to the evidence for, and as to the abiding applicability of, its facts, and many
Yet temptations to oppression and insincerity. in fact broad remains the that, every department
of experience,
but
supremely so
deepest, in that of religion, we men truth and goodness, not abstractly, as Laws, but
concretely, as
qualities
of Persons.
And what
all,
we
and
of
and humble
Those utterly docility of soul to us the learners. concrete, ever more or less unique, experiences and revelations of the Infinite Spirit are thus offered
and accepted, never automatically or compulsorily, but ever freely and expensively. And those great teachers and revealers, qua religious, ever enlighten and win us primarily with regard to God's
reality,
character, claims,
and approachableness.
65
For, even though, in proportion as the religion thus lived and announced is high and developed,
the ethical requirements become increasingly exacting and continuous, they in no wise oust God
from the
entire
life
but this
life
remains,
stream or tendency; they are now, not less but more, conceived as expressive of the religious Personality which lived them, and such a Personality
again
.is
is
easy to trace, throughout his book on Religion (in spite of his deeply Christian attitude towards Evil, and of his finely suggestive ideal
It
"
the
Son
of
God "),
Kant's angry
hostility to
any
we
will
not say as
Buddha, we get an apparently But this primitive Buddhism is, I think, most correctly taken as an extraordinarily imrnanental, self-absorbed, estimate of, and attitude towards, life, and as a spiritually attuned moralism j and not as directly a religion at alL All human life, all life, apprehended as a sheer wheel of generation and mere change such a conception can but issue in the desire for a complete cessation of all life. A more healthy and adequate
Certainly, in the case of the
this rule.
complete exception to
perception of the real content and evidences of human life has ever to precede, accompany, or succeed the religious sense, where this is at all fully awake.
66
somehow, unique.
But
we
should carefully note that Kant's quarrel with orthodoxy here lies far further back, and extends
much
and Chalcedon.
position,
What
to,
objects
first
and foremost,
is
the
assumption of man's ability to know Reality of any kind in and through phenomena of any kind Even, the most general incarnational doctrine,
that Reality, especially Spirit, and supremely God, manifest their true natures to us, precisely in and through and on occasion of Sense, must, then, be
Judaism and
Mohammedanism, indeed Brahmanism and the later, theistically enriched, Buddhism cannot fail,
for this general reason, to
be also obnoxious to
Indeed, the three golden rings in Lessing's Nathan, symbolizing the utter equivalence of
him.
the
three
great
Theistic
faiths,
Christianity,
not,
logically,
Judaism,
Mohammedanism, ought
to satisfy Kant, except with an evisceration which would leave each unrecognizable to itself and to
but he would have to exclaim, as does Sultan Saladin in that great play which, on this
the others
;
its
central
point,
is
so
:
interestingly,
because
ust
unconsciously, inconsistent
"
If
satisfied
with being
167
And
yet,
no.
Kant himself
Is
deep ever consciously to work, or to wish, for such a sheer, fortunately impossible, naturalization of
sists
Indeed, his whole philosophy conone long, heroic attempt to regain, for and by the Practical Reason, those certainties of more than human realities and destinies which the Pure Reason had to abandon, yet
in
man.
which
deepest
remain
man
of no particular religion would be no more typically a man, than is the savage wearing no
particular clothes, using no particular tools, owning to no particular family ties or sexual
these cases, not to have these things in particular, is not to have them at alL And especially as to the soul's sense of the
traditions.
In
all
Infinite
and
Abiding,
its
these
will
be,
c&teris
and keenest, in the soul's most loving familiarity, its most heroic struggles, with and for the Concrete,
1 Historical manifestations of such Eternal Life.
Kant's attitude towards Grace, see Clement Webb, op. cifof Cultus in religion, Ernst Troeltsch, ; on the necessity Die Bedeutung der Geschichtlickkeit Jcsu fur den Glauben> 1911, pp. 25-33 5 ^d. n the need of History, the same deep thinker's Das Historiscfa in KanfsPeligionsphilosophie^ Kant Studien, 1904. On Kant's "ignoring of religion, >. of the reality which historically is thus denominated," see the vivid picture and incisive criticism
pp. 92-117
in
On
PART
II
CONTEMPORARY SURVEY
169
PART
II
CONTEMPORARY SURVEY
INTRODUCTION
LET us now attempt some characterization of such amongst the chief movements in philosophy,
have come to their full expansion and are still at all powerfully among us, and as express or aid or hinder the experience and conception of Eternal Life. We will here take, first, four Philosophers and their main present-day followers next, a great Scientist and a mighty biological doctrine; and Socialism (so lastly, those two massive things still averse from all Transcendence) and largely
life,
religion, as
thus again move Religion. as as far possible, in historical order, throughout, although we keep for the last what, though
Institutional
We
doubtless
still
the
home and
number
indefinitely larger
by
all
the
is>
nevertheless,
all.
172
CHAPTER
Introductory
IX
Troeltsch
Hegel, his
fruitful anti-
and
J.
his
English Hegelians,
hauer, his two
main epistemological positions, his pessimism and asceticism, his Nirvana Kierkegaard, Nietzsche.
LET
these
us
first,
then,
consider
Fichte,
Schleier-
macher,
in nature
Hegel, and
Schopenhauer.
We
take
men
from each other and from Kant, they each and all build philosophically upon Kant's
most characteristic assumptions. And we take them as influences of our own times, because all
four are
still,
if
mostly through repulsion, especially by means of now living writers and movements of vast, though
often veiled, present-day importance.
Gottlieb Fichte, born in poverty, the
i.
Johann
and
in
1790,
away from
173
Spinoza's Determinism to Kant's Criticism, in order here to find room for Free Will. But whilst,
(i)
itself,
philosophy
is still
"
dogmatic
thing as equal to, or as contrasted with, the Ego. In the (true) Critical System, the Thing is posited in the Ego in the Dogmatic System, the Thing is
;
Ego
itself is
posited
hence the
Critical System is immanent, placing everything within the Ego, the Dogmatic System is tranSo does Fichte scendent, going beyond the Ego.
most
unknown
to the
ancient and mediaeval worlds, but so characteristic still of large tracts of modern life, of constraint
from, and irritation against, whatsoever is not somehow his own mind or the creation of this
his mind, empirical
the
174
mind and
its fellows.
1798 and 1800 he insists upon the existence of "a Moral or Intelligible Order, con(2) True, in
tradistinguished from the Order of Nature and outside of finite moral beings; and says that " and demand of in this
here,
"
necessary thought
an
Intelligible Order,
through which
:
all
genuine
morality has necessary consequences, is \heplace But he adds " This faith is of Religious Faith."
faith full
and
entire
Order
is
itself
that living
we
1
cannot apprehend, any other" (Sammtlicke Werke, 8 vols., 1845, 1846; vol. v. pp. 392, 394;
86).
Yet
it
is
not simply
(ibid. p.
"the demands
of an
empty system"
and
find
it
beyond
if it
this
would
room
knowledge of
the fundamentals
terated
warmth
of religion from the unadulIndeed, Fichte's religious sense itself. of conviction that "without this active
is in
my
p. 188), undoubtedly proceeds from Religion, as distinct from Ethics and And, if such a belief is accepted Philosophy.
(ibid.
An
175
from Religion by Philosophy at all, it also invites Philosophy to admit Religion's conjoint affirmation of a self-conscious Orderer, an affirmation
more
one not
less
Plainly here in Fichte there is no irritation against the conception of a Reality distinct from
any apprehending spirit, so long as this Reality is a spiritual law and not a Spirit expressing Himself in a law, and so long as this law is conceived as fundamentally moral only, and as apprehensible
by moral
Yet, especially his in his later stage, deep religious instinct allows Fichte and his readers often to forget his vehement,
all
of a system that would make man, as subject, find the entire objective world simply by producing
it
and through the purest self-activity, of, at deepest, an exclusively ethical kind. For we then
in
get sayings which, taken separately, reveal a tender religious insight beyond the range of Kant
Thus, in the Directions for a Blessed Life, of 1806, we hear: "Thou, O Soul, art what thou
lovest
"
;
and
"
become
something of universal
176
and eternal validity can, according to him, ever be destroyed. And he here adds strikingly: " True, blessedness exists also beyond the grave, for the man for whom it has already begun here and it exists there in no other way and kind than as it can begin on this side of the grave at any moment by the mere getting oneself buried, one
;
"
(S.
W.
vol. v. pp.
ofMan,
801 he
,
had impressively proclaimed the close interdepend" The individual finds and underence of souls
:
in
another,
and
every
spirit
develops
"
;
life
which binds
spirits
with spirits
intelligif
world
(S.
W.
And
such
expressions in this apologetic, exoteric work cannot be pressed, we get, in his Thatsacken des
Bewusstseins, amongst much of contrary import, the description of God as "the Absolute, the
Self-Subsistent, that
(S.
W.
voL
ii.
p. 687).
Rigorism
"
:
The
inclinations
which
'
have
man, are
Subjectivist
not really my inclinations, but are inclinations which are directed against myself and my higher
they are my enemies that cannot die too soon'" (S.W. vol. viL p. 234). It is, however, instructive to note how Fichte's
being
usual identification
souls with
God
fails
tends to hinder, a sufficient recognition of the uniqueness of historical personalities. Thus, in the Anweisung, the Eternal Word becomes
"
flesh,
in entirely the
Christ,
in every
one who vividly recognizes his unity with and who truly and actually abandons his God,
entire individual life to the Divine Life
"
(S.
W.
vol.
v.
p.
patriotism,
Nation,
does
he
somewhat
more
the mysterious
and he
is
so
largely
and
sensitively Christian tradition it is easy to be unfair to his that feeling, adversaries in their accusations of Atheism,
moved by
especially in their expulsion of him from Jena in 1799, 1800; and to forget the deliberately hypothetic and subjectivist foundation and limitation
For he of his entire Philosophy of Religion. never appears to have fully and finally abandoned,
12
178
or to have pushed deeper down than, the position of his Versuch einer Kritik aller Offenbanmg of 1792 "The idea of God, as lawgiver
:
by means of the moral law within us, is based upon a transference of something subjective within us, to a being without us, and this projection
(Entausserung)
in so far as
will "
it
is
is
to
be used
for
determining our
It is plain that here we (S. W. vol. v. p. 55). have Kant in his most hypothetic, indeed sceptical, mood that, here again, we get simply the inevitable culmination of a complete attitude of mind
;
a conclusion inevitable if, but only if, that general attitude is held to be complete. It is plain
too that
it
of the elements of the religious consciousness, to deny more flatly, and reverse more violently, the
sense attached to
consciousness,
all
those elements
utterly
by
or
more
to
this
evidential value, from the deepest of truths, to a double-dyed error of the most childish kind.
Professor
now made
carefully
Hugo Munsterberg
Hugo
a
179
great
Law nowhere
and experimental
sciences,
doctrinaire superiority to, or forcing of, evidence, in that here something Is alone to be authentic,
Fichtean trend in Professor Rudolf Eucken remains much less provocative, since it is blended
with Platonist and Hegelian doctrines, and especially since it is checked by a continuous deep
sense of the character and significance of History and of Evil. And indeed Eucken is ever nobly Insistent on Religion as precisely our need and on
;
The
trials
and
sufferings,
and
in
all
(always so largely
Yet even
the
irritation against
ignoring of the necessity of the mind's contact with thing, for the mind's awakening even to religion, remain,
acknowledges
and the
resolute
we
180
S^i^rvey
noble intention and large effectiveness of Eucken's virile stand against all Naturalism and sceptical
1
Subjectivity.
strength and
inadequacy,
to
the
combinations
presented by Spinoza, Kant, and Fichte, even though it is these three powerful personalities, especially Spinoza, who everywhere suggest, and indeed for the most part determine, the theories and analyses of Schleiermacher. Born at Breslau, the son of a Calvinist minister, Schleiermacher was brought up, 1783-86, by the Moravian brethren, the nearest German equivalent
to our English Quakers,
And
1 There is a good short account of Fichte in Ueberweg-Heinze, Grundriss <L Geschichte d. Philosophic der Neu-Zeit^ 1880, pp. 258-269. H. Rikert's Fich&s AtJieismusstreit, 1899, is a finely balanced estimate ; and A. Seth's "Fichte," in his Hegelianism and Personality^ ed. 1893, pp. 42-78, a sound criticism. E. Lask's FichtJs Idcalismus und die Geschichte^ 1902, is very careful ; and Fritz Medicus's /. G. Fichte^ 1905, a reasonably
H. Miinsterberg's Philoenthusiastic, useful popular account. sofhie der Werte> 1909 (which exists also in English), especially in its last two chapters, and R. Eucken's Der Kamff um einen geistigen Lebensinhalt, 2nd ed. 1907, have been taken as the most Fichtean amongst these authors1 works. Eucken is particu" Philoconcerning the Eternal and History, in his der Kultur der L Geschichte," sophic Gegenwari^ 6, 1907 ; and in The Truth ofReligion y 1911, pp. 270-273.
larly striking
Sckleiermacker ^Esthetic,
religious,
and rather
received, amongst these pure, simple, out-of-the world and other-worldly souls (in however one-
sidedly mystical, even fantastically individualist a form), the most precious insights of his rich a life, for the rest, almost entirely beset by life,
and non-moral, by pantheistic and determinist, and by variously subjectivist or even A student at Halle sceptical minds and moods. 1788-89, tutor in a WestUniversity in
artistic
Prussian Calvinist noble family in 1790-93, he was, from 1796 to 1802, a Calvinist minister and
pedagogue, and afterwards, from 1806 to the end, lived as a Professor of the University in Berlin,
varied
life
covered,
the first period, years of that " Beautiful Soul," the Moravian-minded Susanna
the
last
von Klettenberg
modified
"
curiosity,
1
in
his
Wilhelm
796
from habits of prayer, church-going, and Christian Theism generally, to a SpinozistPantheistic habit of
prevent his attainment, in maturity, of a wide range of moral and even religious insight, yet
his utterances
;
on
re-
and (unknown
82
to
Lessing
much
influenced
Jacobi's letters
learnt to
794 he writes
criticism of Kant, in which (finding that Kant considers the world of sense merely a product of the world of the understanding and of man) he
of
Noumena
is
same way cause of the world of sense, as Spinoza's Infinite Thing is cause of finite things."
he even asks
:
And
a
" Is
it
underlies
every
several
ness
extends
only
(Erscheinung)" There is now in Schleiermacher both an interior antagonism against any scientific
or demonstratively philosophical completion of the
world In which
we live by a
second,
more
valuable,
and harmonious world, and a deep enthusiasm for the person and power of Christ, as the awakener
of the religious life of the moments "expressive of the highest feeling in our whole being." 1
results in his
Rcden
W.
Scklciermacher $
ilber die Religion, 1799,
Two
Periods
183
and the Monologen, 1800, the former the religious, the latter the moral, manifesto of his early enthusiastic manhood
from 1806 onwards we have his second period, in which his later, more sober mind
develops and expresses
cautious,
itself
And
in the
in
relatively
institutionally
respects compromise-loving, tempered work, Der ckristlicke Glaube nach den Grundsatzen der Evangelischen
It is the
some
Kircke, 1821.
second of the romantically eloquent and boundlessly daring Reden, "On the Nature
and the corresponding, very Religion," technical and dry, first chapter of the Introduction to the Glaubenslehre, "Towards the
of
Elucidation
of
1
concern
us.
(i) In the Reden, then, the following passages well express Schleiermacher's position towards the
neither
Intuition
and Feeling,
Religion desires to contemplate the Universe, devoutly to overhear it, in this Universe's own
representations and actions
;
to let itself
be seized
this
and
filled,
in
childlike passivity,
Edition
by
Uni-
1 Critical
by
Piinjer, 1879.
184
Metaphysics start from the finite nature of man, and desire deliberately to determine, from that nature's simplest
verse's
immediate influences.
concept, from
the range of its powers and its receptivity, what the Universe can be for man,
necessity,
and how, of
Religion lives out its the Infinite Nature of the Whole, the
All.
One and
Morality starts
Freedom, and desires to enlarge its kingdom to infinity and to subject all things to it. Religion
breathes where
Freedom
itself
Nature;
particular
it
seizes
man beyond
powers and personality, and views him from whence he must of necessity be what he is,
whether he so
"
wills or
not"
(pp.
50-52).
Thus
Religion
is
opposed to Metaphysics
Practical Life
is
is
and Morals,
Science
Religion
is
Hence "the
the Universe
determine
of Religion, from which you can most precisely its essence and its limits" (p. 55).
Now
from an influence
;
of the thing contemplated upon the contemplator it is an original, independent action of the
former, received, collected,
Religion, as Sense
latter,
for
the Infinite
185
Did not according to the latter's nature. the efflux of light, quite without action of your own, touch your visual organ, you would see
nothing; yet what you see is not the nature of things, but these things* action upon you and
;
what you know or believe concerning these things lies far beyond the domain of intuition. So with
Religion.
The Universe
;
is
In ceaseless activity
and
self-revelation
it,
every
form,
its
being,
event
us,
produced by
is
an action of
own upon
And
thus to take every single thing as part of the Whole, everything limited as a representative
of the Infinite
this is Religion
;
and substance
if it
upon being considered such, will ably sink back into empty Mythology" (p.
inevit55).
descriptions daringly the reality of this contact, in undifferentiated intuition and feeling, between the Object and
And
vivid
then drive
home
Intuition without Feeling, and Feeling without Intuition, are both nothing; only then
*'
Subject.
and
therefore
are
they something,
because they are one and indivisible. mysterious moment., which occurs
every
sensible perception, before intuition and feeling sense and its object have separate, and where I lie at the . become one, is indescribable.
.
,
86
bosom
the
Infinite
I
World
am, in that
life
feel all
her infinite
as
my
my
all
in that
moment,
my
it
body, for
penetrate her
.
frame as though
is
were
of
own.
that
This
the generative
"
moment
is
living in Religion
experimental
knowledge of certain characteristics of Religion, its intuitive-emotional quality and its difference
from Speculation and Practice. The insistence on Religion, as a sense both of contact between
finite realities
and of the
and
indeed admir-
experience.
Yet even
at
this
crucial
largely
and unconsciously inconsistent, prevents these perceptions from attaining, in two all-important
respects, to
adequate expression.
For one thing, Metaphysics are here reduced " to an Epistemology of the anti - " dogmatic dogmatist type. Here man knows indeed that
the Universe gua Universe exists distinct from his perception and conception of it ; yet Schleier-
so haunted by the, somehow necessary, unlikeness of this Universe itself to the per-
macher
is
ception and conception through which we know it, that he dares not affirm anything ontological
187
about
True, Religion seems, at first sight, to contrast with such " Metaphysics," not only as to
it.
its
intuitive
and emotional,
conceptual, as to its reach
as against Metaphysics,
analytic, speculative), but,
is
so
largely
all,
above
upon as Contact between (for Religion Realities), with intuition and feeling as consequences of this contact And so far we have
insisted
checks the testimony directly furnished by the And as sense he has so vehemently endorsed.
in the critical
only of from the objects through knowing which alone we have any knowledge, so here we are, correspond-
a genuine feeling only of human feeling generally, without the unequivocal acceptance of any object distinct from, and the cause of,
ingly, shut
up
in
such feeling.
question
is,
And
Reality as distinct from, as prior and subsequent to, as indefinitely more than, and as the cause of,
In the activities through which we apprehend it this sense, not of the affirmation of a detailed
system, or of an abstract principle, but of an elementary instinct and affirmation of Reality,
Religion
is
88
Dogmatic
Religion
and
if all
Ontology
is illusion,
then
all
is
so likewise.
And
we
part.
The
strictly religious
sense
however, of a depth of Reality greater and other than any and all of these parts, or than the
whole, in so far as
it
is
made up
of them.
is
True,
condition for the awakening of this the Infinite ; the Infinite, however, to which
we are
then, as far as the experience is religious, not simply a boundless extension, in space or even in time, of that Finite of life at
is
thus awakened
its
of such
surface or middle depths, or even of the totality but of a Reality contrasting with, life
in,
those finitudes,
that
Itself possessing,
all
acknowledged exponents of Religion, as distinct from those of Metaphysics and Ethics, have thus articulated this sense of the Infinite;
Augustine's great cry,
until
it
"Restless
in
is
our heart
a spiritual Reality present always and everywhere, but not simply the sum-total of the various parts of the
rests
in
Thee,"
The Religious
world,
sense.
Infinite,
a Spiritual Reality
189
well
"
(d)
separate
to place
is
an
immediate
Thus does
immediate experiences,
single intuitions and feelings ; derivation and connection are the things most repugnant to its
nature.
system of
intuitions,
can anything be
more
fittest
is
fantastic?
The
:
Infinite
Chaos
of
is
the
the
58).
And
it
is
the
systematizers, "the adherents of the dead letter " have filled the world rejected by religion," who
true contemplators
souls, living
alone
by themselves with the Infinite ; or, if they looked about them, granting to every one, provided he " knew the great word, his own way (pp. 64, 65). Indeed, "the religious feelings, by their very
nature, paralyse man's energy of action, and invite him to a still, engrossed enjoyment; whence the
lacked other motives for action, and nothing but religious, forsook the world
go
and completely abandoned themselves to idle conYet " quiet and deliberateness are templation/'
lost, if
man
by the vehement and shatteringfeelingsof Religion." " All action, properly so called, should be moral and can indeed be such but the religious feelings should (only) accompany all man's actions as a
;
sacred music
man
should do
all
things with
(pp. 69, 68).
Religion, nothing
from Religion"
from
its
but only for action proceeding entirely own law ; condemns as impure acts pro;
by compassion or gratitude despises a and contrition waste treats as of time. humility And indeed none of these feelings aim at action,
;
duced
they end in themselves, as functions of our inner" most, highest life ; they are Religion (p. 1 1 1 ).
Here we have deeply instructive inconsistencies and insights. For the intuition here considered, whether or no it acts separately within the soul's
according to Schleiermacher, precisely not an intuition of separate things, as such, but of
life, is,
is
connection, of a whole; although the connection thus have, not perceived and not derived.
We
indeed a system of intuition, but still an intuition of a system. Indeed, Schleiermacher is himself
steeped in a particular philosophical system that of Spinoza as shown by his enthusiastic apostrophe:
91
me
of the holy, repudiated Spinoza his sole, eternal love" (p. 55).
is
Indeed, Schleier-
predominantly Spinozist : Contemplate nothing separately, but rejoice over everything at the spot where it stands" (p. 91). And already St Paul
ular philosophical systems for the articulation of
their deepest, abidingly religious experiences.
"
constituents,
and
still
more
by any and every derivation, connection, system and speculation, is paradoxical and unworkable. Rather do each of the faculties of man's wondrous
range aid
all
to
be violent and
to require exclusion
sober-minded Mystics, e.g. St Teresa, have ever taught; at another moment it is held to be so
peaceful, that only the system-building of reason is to blame for the spirit of persecution. Yet, here
also, the just
balance
is,
for
192
mated only within and through the obstacles and not outside of them, and especially not at the cost
of a denial of the reality of Evil. Certainly the Johannine and the Augustinian writings contain
many a
fierce
amongst the
And
sick
and cleansing of the Temple were, surely, as religious as His night-watches and His Transfiguration,
Schleiermacher,
however, pierces to
the very core of the facts by representing religion as normally occupied also (he attempts to make it
only) with contemplation
as alone furnishing sufficiently deep motives, and sufficiently vivid environment, for the steady
persistence of such difficult, precious dispositions as love, humility, contrition. immensely
How
"History,
in
the
strictest
sense,
is
the
In this territory lie highest object of Religion. " its loftiest intuitions." Nothing/' in the intention of Religion, "is to be a dead mass, moved
only by a dead impact, and resisting only by unconscious friction all is to be genuine, organic,
;
Godhead can only be one out of many religious ways of viewing things;
the
But "for
me
and from
my
standpoint there
is
no such alterna-
Aloofness
tlve
193
no God, no Religion/" "For most men, God is evidently merely the Genius of manBut mankind is only an infinitely small kind. part, only one of the passing forms, of the can then such a God be what is Universe in highest religion? A God conceived as an Individual entirely distinct from Mankind, a single specimen of a special genus, would still, as every genus with its individual, be subordinated to the Universe." No: "to possess
as
*
;
" means to Religion" simply contemplate the and on the manner in which you Universe contemplate it, and on the principle which you
;
find
in
its
actions,
Religion.
And
God accommo-
every such manner of contemplation, a religion without a God may be better than another religion with a God" (pp. 125, 126).
dates
itself to
And "as to Immortality, it is taken by most men in a spirit directly contrary to Religion.
For Religion
strives,
above
all,
cut outlines of our personality shall gradually be lost in the Infinite that, by the contemplation of
the Universe, we may, as far as possible, become one with it ; whilst those men oppose the Infinite
and want
"
be nothing but just themselves." Immortality has no right to be a wish, if it has not previously been a task which you have
to
194
resofred.
to
To become
in
Infinite
is
and
be Eternal
a moment,
the true
Immortality of Religion
(pp. 130,
131; 133).
Here
\ve
have an
interesting
For
this
utterly
shatters
not
the Universe, but self-conscious Spirit revealing Itself, in various degrees and ways, throughout the Universe, yet with the greatest
specifically
fulness in
human
History.
And
indifference
to
Theism, and hostility to Immortality, then become impossible or affectations; since DeterExtension, Spatial Concepts cannot accepted as the Richest known to us
tinction
now be
the dis-
to
empty being now admitted and fundamentally important. Personality and its attainment by the soul have
of rich and
be
intrinsic
be admitted as higher than all these determinisms and their admission however higher,
to
;
now
in their turn,
may be
in,
than
mere
that
Individuality.
and through
all
vidualism can
195
be won, by the human spirit's abandonment of self and the development of its true self; by seeking,
God
(2)
The
four
Glaubenslehre
of
1821,
made
changes, of which two apparent than real, and two are real, one of these indeed being a pure gain.
The Essence of Religion or of Piety is now "that we are conscious of our unconditional
(a)
ness presupposes, besides the self, still something else, without which it would not be this particular
self-consciousness,"
indeed,
"
not
self-conscious-
ness at
we are, and that somehow from within, is our Feeling of Freedom the sense that we have become thus from elsewhere, still more, that we could not become thus except from elsewhere, is
all."
"The
sense that
we become,
ourselves
self,
" such an freedom supposes a given object, and object never comes about absolutely through our
own
"
activity
196
ing of Unconditional Dependence is possible, and indeed is actually present in our self-consciousness,
which accompanies our entire self-activity and our entire existence, and contradicts all absolute
Whence of our receptive and self-active being is expressed by the term God" "This Whence is not the world, in the
freedom."
the
Now
"
sense of the totality of temporal being, still less " " nor is this sense of of any one of its parts
;
dependence conditioned by any previous know" ledge of God." But the feeling of unconditional
dependence and the consciousness of one's re" latedness to God, are one and the same thing u consciousness of God and self-consciousness are
;
"
"
inseparable
primitive
God
is
given us in feeling, in a
i.
way"
upon a Feeling of Unconditional Dependence, whereas the Reden emphasize the Intuition of the Infinite. But each
doubtless conceived as involving the other. And if the Feeling avoids the spatial connotation
is
there
is
The
(<$)
"
Glaubenskhre
"
.tfz//
Everywhere
in the
Glaubenskhre we have
concern-
now
ing
God
yet
the
determinations
Him
is
God
can readily be traced back to Spinoza. just the unity of the multiplicity which
is,
and becomes,
and
its
natural
connection (since
everything),
through
everything
is
and becomes
entirely
through the
Divine Omnipotence (since everything consists undividedly through the One); and all distinctions, attributes,
and
in our
consciousness of God, and have no foundation in the Divine Being Itself. Again,
human
is
the predominance of the divine consciousness over the sensuous or sensual consciousness, and
thus
Sin is not here a contradiction of the spiritual law within the mind itself. And Prayer, indeed the
soul's entire doings, affect only itself, not
God
in
any way.
We
Pantheistic doctrine
198
yet
immensely
diverse,
self -differentiation
of
religion,
we now
enclosing, within their past and future experience and development, the entire and final culmination
of
all
religion.
Indeed, Schleiermacher
here
goes even beyond average orthodoxy, and insists upon the Johannine picture as so entirely
historical
and with the patent presence of various lights and graces in the Old Testament and in the different ethnic religions and spiritual philosophies.
instead of basing all the individual consciousness, he
(d)
And
religion
upon
now
finds the
root of religion in the experience of the religious community, whence his high estimate of Church
life.
This
fourth
change
gives
now an
breadth
imto
mensely heightened
cogency
and
Schleiermacher's appeal to experience, and only requires to be combined with genuinely Theistic
conceptions as to the first two points, and with less Christocentric position as to the third, in
order to
1
show
5
W. Dilthey s Leben ScJikiermacher^s^ 1870, voL i., unfortunately reaching only to 1802, is a most brilliant, indeed exquisite, See presentation of the very soul of Schleiermacher's life.
especially pp. 78-87, 365-377, 377-413Mostly very sensible criticism of Schleiennacher can be found In O. Pfleiderer's Ent-
Professor Ernst Trocltsch considers himself as yet it is impossible not to realize (in face of the abiding forces and necessities of religion and of life, and
largely
;
a successor of Schleiermacher
documentary evidence,
historical criticism,
and
of
psychological and epistemological analysis since Schleiermacher's day) the great superiority of Troeltsch. For here we get a sensitive richness
in the apprehension
religious
experience,
this
ing a double polarity, of ot/ier-worldtiness and detachment, and of this-worldliness and attach-
ment; a courageous persistence of the OntoTheistic sense; a continuous rememlogical, brance that God's Spirit works also outside of Christendom (even though we find here but an
imperfect insight into the finer special gifts of Catholic Christianity) ; and a strenuous insight
into the abiding
worship for a vigorous religious life. Such a profound declaration as the following ** The formula for directly concerns Eternal Life
:
the specific nature of Christianity cannot fail to " be complex ; it will be but IC the special Christian " of the fundaform," articulation and correction,
mental thoughts concerning God, World, Man, Redemption, which are found existing together,"
2OO
with indefinite variations of fulness and worth, " in all the And the tension present in religions. this multiplicity of elements is of an importance
equal to that of the multiplicity itself indeed in this tension resides the main driving-force of " resembles, Christianity," in particular, Religion.
;
with one centre, but an ellipse with two focuses. It is" unchangeably "an Ethic of
not a
circle
Redemption, with a conception of the world both optimistic and pessimistic, both transcendental
and immanental, and an apprehension both of a severe antagonism, and of a close interior union, between the world and God. Neither of these poles may be completely absent, if the Christian outlook is to be maintained. Yet the original germ of the whole vast growth and movement
ever remains an intensely, abruptly Transcendental Ethic, and can never simply pass over into a purely
Immanental Ethic.
classical
And
Ing back the human heart, away from all Culture and Immanence, to that which lies above both." 1
**Was
hetsst
CJiristlzche
work so
far is his
Wefy "Die
Selbstandigkeit der Religion" (Ztitschrifi /. Theologie u.Kirche, 1895, 1896); "Geschichte u. Metaphysik" (ibid. 1898); the as" tonishingly rich and vivid Protestantisches Christen thum u. Kirche in der Neuzeit" {Kultur der Gegenwart: "Geschichte der Christlichen Religion," 2nd ed. 1909} ; and his very lengthy but profound Die Sosutllekren der Cfoistiicfan Kircfafy 1912.
201
In
Georg W. F. Hegel^ born at Stuttgart 1770, the son of a Government official, studied
at
Tubingen
in
University
1788-93,
was
Lecturer
first
in Heidelberg,
all-important influence in Hegel's life was doubtless that of Schelling (1775-1854), in the
direction
The
of
the
latter's
Identity
Philosophy,
especially whilst the two men were together at Tubingen and at Jena. Thus, in his Disserta-
tion
"On
Schelling's Philosophical Systems," Hegel declares : " In philosophy the reason recognizes, and deals
alone"; "the essence of knowledge consists in the Identity of the Given under the two forms of Thought and of Being"; and
with,
its
own
self
genuine speculation, the Identity of Subject and Object," has been "expressed, with all clearness, in Kant's deduction
all
"the principle of
of the forms of the understanding." Gradually, from 1803 onwards, a sense of acute difference from Schelling arose in Hegel's
mind, and, from the publication of the Phenomenology of the Spirit in 1806, Schelling looked
Hegel indeed upon Hegel as his antagonist most freshly in this amazingly rich insists, Phenomenology, but most fully in his longer
2O2
Logic,
opposite
Identity-Philosophy.
still
more
in
he
is
in part
positions
which
place within Hegel's own anti-identity principle. Certainly the principle allows, and as certainly the positions refuse, room and expression for the
and
especially of
rich, immensely ap"the True" (Reality) "is to be apprehended, not as Substance, but
profoundly
as Subject ; God is self-conscious ; and " since Form is as essential to Being as is Being itself, the Absolute must be conceived equally as Form,
indeed as possessing the full richness of the developed Form ; only thus is it apprehended as
Real."
Absolute
It
is
"
For-Itself, is
Its
own
Object;
It
knows
12,
Itself"
(Phaenontenologie, ed.
1907, pp.
13,
For Hegel's early writings and publications, see G. Lasson's interesting introduction to the Phaenomenologie des Gcistes, ed. 1907, especially pp. bdv, bcv,
Hegel
All
this
doitbly contradicts
Himself
the
203
directly
traverses
Identity-
" takes monotony and abstract Philosophy, which " holds the universality for the Absolute," and
to
and determined be the true mode of speculation. In such an Absolute, A = A, we have the night in which all cows are black" (ibid. p. 12).
dissolution of the discriminated
*
And then Hegel undertakes a systematic survey and comparison of the fundamental Categories of the human mind, studying them simply from within and trusting them all equally, without Kant's hopeless attempt to get outside the mind and to discriminate between objectively true and only regulatively useful categories. And he takes
the Categories in the order from the emptiest, least real and least "true," to the fullest, most
real
and "most
in
true,"
to
Spirit,
Religion.
Absolute Spirit
not belong to this principle.) Now so far, with Hegel's deep sense here of the Concrete, of History, of Inner Experience
and such
a systematic survey of the Categories allows us to realize clearly their varying fulness and worth
some are " truer," i.e. more adequate to the deeper and deepest Realities. And thus we are preserved
204
from conceiving
simply as Being or Infinite Substance, or as the First Mover or even the First Cause ; for, though we cannot indeed
God
adequately
categories
know God, we have richer, deeper than those, hence we know that God is
He
is
them.
We thus, here as
everywhere, deliberately
Reality by its all omission of
essential
whole
truth.
this
the question of Anthropomorphism, since we here see that we cannot but be nearer to, not further from, an adequate
settles
And
apprehension of
distinct,
all
God, by conceiving
self-conscious,
attributes.
Him
as
seif-subsistent,
eliminating
istics in
such
We
than by remain
He
somewhat as, in the opposite direction, we are sure that animals, and indeed plants, possess a consciousness or vitality not all unlike to, yet
very different from, our own.
everywhere,
to our own
In both cases, as
we apprehend and elucidate in and what we are ourselves yet now we do through
;
so, very deliberately, by the highest that we are and know. And if the world in which we find
Critical
is
Anthropomorphism
inter-connected,
Jlfan's
if
Limit 205
is
ourselves
and
philosophy
essentially an understanding of the less known and the lower (as far as this is possible) by the best
known
to,
by, the
philosopher, such a procedure cannot fail to leave us, or to put us, in touch with reality, and to be
truly philosophical.
;
We
can
in
no case escape
Anthropomorphism but by this procedure we can and do escape an uncritical Anthropomorphism, and a superfine and unconscious, hence quite
unchecked, Anthropomorphism, indeed Mythology, such as we shall find in the huge mythical constructions of the Hegelians of the Left.
Indeed, also outside of Philosophy, the evidences and motives for such a critical Anthropomorph-
most
tempt for
testifying
this evidence, if
taken as in any
way
which
is
the ethical, practical necessities of man, at his deepest, press strongly in the same direction.
And
For
it
man
abandon himself
a world and a power, as the end of his being, and as and very ground, home,
206
most difficult virtues and heroisms, if he sees it to be no more than, indeed to be a mere abstraction formed by, himself; and " Being," impossible for him not to note that mere
"Substance,"
"
Totality,"
In truth, even
if all
sincerity
would
still
demand our admission that our requirements, hence these our human facts and experiences, are truly Those abstractions and of the kind described.
half-truths doubtless derive such persuasiveness
perinfluence the of old, sisting (though unperceived) rich Theistic convictions; or from the clearness,
possess, either
from the
still
and the fruitfulness in other the Mathematical and Physical fields, of such abstractions; or, lastly, from a most understandable yet excessive (possibly an all but unconscious) fear of, and reaction against, the dangers and abuses apparently inseparable from Theism and Institutional Religion. Our sections on Schopenhauer, Darwin, and
Institutional Religion
will
respectively
consider
these points.
(2)
1
logical
development of his
See, in Prof, A. Seth's Hegelianism and Personality^ ed. 1893, the admirable pages 73-78 ; 84-94 ; 103, 104 ; 235.
Hegel
identifies
207
own fundamental
prevented by
positions.
And by
full
in
their
Hegel,
doubtless
much
against
his
prevailing
his
intention,
became
shortly
after
death
(through the ablest of his followers, the Hegelians of the Left) one of the fountain-heads of the
indifference,
hostility,
and contempt, so
largely
We
have,
of
and
Reality,
Metaphysic,
the analysis of
immanent
to the
human mind
of the forces productive and constitutive of the real Universe. Thus Hegel is, indeed, aware, even to
contemptuousness, of the artificial (i.e. abstractive) origin, and of the poverty of content, of such concepts as
"Pure Being."
the categories (instituted for the very purpose of giving us a full sureness in the use of the richer categories for the
explanation of the poorer, and in resistance to all inversion of this procedure) he is also haunted by
what (even according to this, his root-principle and motive) is a delusion, and destructive of that For in his practice he comes to hold principle.
2oS
even caused by, a combination of the poorer, indeed that this world of the categories, which
(in
is
instrumental,
mood, he thinks himself deter" the mined solely by coldly progressing necessity of the subject-matter itself"; "the difference
in this
When
between the philosophical systems appears here as "the progressive development of the Truth,
of Reality, itself" (Phaenomenologie^ ed. 1907, And thus step by step the Dialectic is pp. 7, 4).
"
and becomes something in itself alive, in itself Yet Trendproductive of "Truth," of Reality. elenburg has fully shown how the notions of this
logic are but
the instruments of daily thought, ranged in the inverse order of their richness and adequacy ; how the earlier, more abstract notions
here seem to
live,
and to
insist
upon
their
own
" growth by the incorporation of their contradictory," simply because the man who thinks them is
aware of
their abstract
(i.e. artificial)
character,
and
;
complements
and
these complements are not (as finally Hegel describes them) logical contradictories, but
of, and within, the For example, "Pure
how
209
Nothing, also
Out
of these
admitted abstractions
it
is
shall
and death." 1
Indeed, Hegel himself admits that "every beginning has to be made with the Absolute, and all
advance
forward
is
is
but
its
movement Ground of
64).
abstractions
living forces, productive of, indeed the constituents of, the concrete realities and simultaneities of which
they were admittedly but the pale shadows and ever partial generalizations. Thus "the Ethical
World, the World torn asunder into a Here and a Beyond, and the Moral conception of the World are the spirits whose outward' movement and
*
develop into the simple life " lived for Itself by the Spirit (Phaenomenologu^
inward' return
ed. 1907, p. 287).
And
with the transition from thought to Reality as the highest follows: "The Absolute Idea," " is still only logical. But inasmuch as category,
a
i.
p.
38
A. Seth, op.
tit*
pp. 95-100,
14
2io
Swvcy
still
thus
is
shut up
impul-
a kind of
subjectivity,
so
much
sion to
remove
this limitation
truth becomes, in
of another sphere and science. The Idea, by taking itself as the absolute unity of the pure notion and its reality, hence by concentrating
immediately into Beings is, in the Totality of this form, Nature. This determination of itself is not, however, a process of becoming or a transition/' such as the
itself
(sick
zitsammcnnimmi)
" " Rather the has hitherto described. Logic Idea freely lets itself go> absolutely sure of itself,
"
and
And "on
account of
is like-
form of
its
determination
wise unconditionally free namely, the externality of space and time, extant absolutely for itself
without
subjectivity."
We
v.
have
here
"the
as
resolve of the
itself
and Seth,
We
to Reality,
yet those critics and disciples of Hegel are, surely, right, who take such production of concrete existence
thinker,
as
element of Hegel's (thus profoundly Face to face with such inconsistent) system.
essential
an
Human and
211
make
(ibid.
it;
It
finds"
(6)
Hegel
still
ampler Identity
trace
that of the
human and
and Consciousness.
Thus in the Phelargely opposite Intentions. " " " and in the his fundanomenology Logic
mental object
is
to
richness of content
(correspondence to reality) In the various categories successively described but the descriptions
of
the
elements,
as
though so
are
many
stages
in-
not
originally
tended for necessarily more than logically ordered analyses of the, presumably simultaneous, mental
constituents of these mental
conceptions.
And
of
we know how
above
all
severe
is
Hegel's
criticism
categories,
Hegel
systematic
many historic accounts; and since Thinking now not only apprehends but produces Reality,
212
higher and fuller, Thinking in general produces Absolute Thinkand such Absolute Thinking produces ing,
thinking
produce
the
the
Absolute
Reality.
is,
On
looking back,
this
Absolute Reality
in
been
present
from
Spirit,
Idea, Absolute
and
spirit,
and
any of their corresponding stages) ever one and the same. And since Hegel's sense
are (at
man
is
admirably
over-
he
ambitious attempts to take the successive stages of human history as so many manifestations of
those categories of the human mind, and thus as so many tests of their respective " truth." Indeed,
the very range and slowness of such an immense, assumedly necessary, foretellable evolution further
helps him to identify this continuous growth in richness of content with the self-explication, the
attainment to
Itself.
full
"
:
The
living
Substance
not an original unity as such, but a division of the simple, and again the negation of this difference a Becoming
truly real,
only in so far as
it is,
of
Itself,
and begins
The Neo-Platonist
with, Its
Circle in
Hegel
is
213
end as
cit.
its
real only
by
the
execution
p.
and
13).
its
end"
ologie,
ed.
We
so
of Neo-Platonist treble
Self-Consciousness
unlimited in
could,
taken
as
range and as complete and nonsuccessive "from the first", i.e. as an Eternal
Present), be well attributed to God,
alone.
and
to
God
But the
identification
of
the
Absolute
Reason and Consciousness with the admittedly historical, temporal doings, sufferings, and growth The Life of mankind is here nearly complete. and Knowledge of God may doubtless be exf'
pressed as Love's playing with Itself but this idea sinks to triviality, if the seriousness, the pain, the patience, the labour of the Negative are absent
;
therefrom.
In Itself that life may well be the untroubled equality and union with Itself, Which has no serious concern with being other and overcoming such otherness. But such In Itself is but the abstract generality, in which we have
ignored that Life's nature of being For Itself, and, therewith, the Self-Movement of the Form."
All
" existent Reality
"
is
becoming;
Self
(Phaenomenologie, ed cit pp. 14, 15). Yet even Hegel does not venture entirely
human
history into
214
God
our
doing.
In
the
Philo-
sophy of Religion he does, indeed, outline an identification of his Neo-PIatonist treble move-
ment of
the
all
reality
Persons of
not
dare
Christian
Trinity;
he does
and complete human history as In the the simple self-expression of the Son. Absolute the Spirit is History of Philosophy
to take our actual
both in time and out of time, hence evolving "As to the slowness of this slowly in time!
" achieving for itself a philoWorld-Spirit" in that it has no need to us remember let sophy,"
" a thousand years are before Thee as one day ; it has time enough, precisely because
'
hurry,
'
it
is
out
xiiL
of
p.
time,
because eternal
in
"
(
Werke>
And, 49). Philosophy of Preface (Berlin, 1820) even angrily insists upon the immediately divine character
vol.
the
Law*
the
and work of and within the Prussian State as then and there extant "Philosophy, as the
penetration of the Rational, is, already therewith, a comprehension of the Present and Actual, and not the putting up of a Beyond supposed to be
God
alone
the Real ; " those who live in the reality of the State,
knows where." "The Rational is and the Real is the Rational." Indeed,
and
215
bottom,
all
the
in-
"
Spirit
"( Werke,
17;
9; 428, 431).
" attempts to restrict philosophy to the recognition, within the appearances of the temporal and transitory, of the Substance and the Eternal, there
And as to the crucial to how discriminate between the two, this is point " The infinitely manifold haughtily waved aside
immanent and present"
:
circumstances, formed in this externality through the irradiation of the Substance, this infinite
material
and
its
regulation,
^
"
The Hegelian
system, indeed, in
in,
its parts,
Absolute
Know-
The
end,
as
in in
Eckhart,
its
"the
Spirit's
Self-Knowledge
pure,
transparent Unity not simply the contemplation of the Divine, but the Divine's own Self-Con" " Truth/' Reality, is here not only templation." completely coextensive with" the mind's "certainty,
216
peculiarly
in the
own
It
exists, for
the
knowing spirit,
form of
this spirit's
own
self-knowledge."
"
Is
But
from the
"
In Itself;
In "
Becoming what it and only this Becomis" (In full truth then till the World-
ing,
in Its reflection
Itself,
or reality)
Spirit
is
Spirit."
Not
complete in Itself can it attain completeness as Self-Conscious Spirit"; and "Comprehended History forms both the memorial and
that without the calvary of the Absolute Spirit, which It would be Lifeless Solitude" (Phaenocit. pp. 511, 514, 516, 521). as Here, practically everywhere in Hegel, we have what, I take it, both life and thought per-
menologic, ed.
sistently
of two very distinct and largely different things. There is a magnificent sense of the fundamental
man
of the mysterious
throughout such history; and of the presence, within this durational history, of a Concrete Reality, giving to this history
"dying to
live,"
Its
full
And there is everywhere more or meaning. less an assumption, and sometimes a formal
" affirmation, that this history, this
dying to
live,"
and
this
indeed in the
the
life
in
And
this:
we
an accumulation of
that a
Especially was Self-Consciousness Completed to be the centre, the measure, and the moving
incompatibilities.
and
directing force
this
but
Completed Self-Consciousness, supbe the prius and cause, Is seen posed really to be the posterius and effect, of all this
to
history.
now
And
be taken simply as indications that the Reality sought after is more than our thought can comFor here we have an Absolute System prehend.
we
think
the
Absolute,
because
but analyse Self-Consciousness is nothing without Personality ; and what gave Berkeley, Kant, Fichte their
Absolute
we
passion and momentum was precisely the maintenance and development of Personality, as
against
its
dissolution
by
Materialism
and
But Hegel begins with the proScepticism. duction, by mere categories of thinking, of Self-Consciousness and Personality ; and he ends
with
an extension of the
Self-Consciousness,
2i8
and most ambitious, but again the thinnest and most unworkable, of categories. From abstraction, through the richest and most back into, costly of Concretions, on to, indeed
into the widest
abstraction
is
such
Wheel
of
Generation
and worth its terrible expense? Does such a scheme correspond to the deepest of Hegel's own convictions, to what is really
reasonable
Impelling him, and us, take It, decidedly
to
our divine
unrest?
We
(3) Probably
the
most
impressive
re-inter-
pretation presented, In
direction
a predominantly positive and characters, since Hegel's death, of Hegel's doctrine, has been and
in entire lives
1
The
excellent
analyses
and
criticisms
in
Andrew
Seth's
Hegttianism and Personality^ ed. 1893, pp. 188-193, J 99- 2O 3> have, after careful study of Hegel's texts, been accepted above, except where Seth appears to the writer to fall into certain " In extremes. Thus Seth declares : we are
contrary
religion
altogether on
204).
postulate, we think, a dim but most real experience of that intensely actual and operative, prevenient Infinite Spirit to which
those stammerings are the utterly inadequate response. And * again Seth says: "The only sense which the term eternal' can bear to us," even with reference to the Divine Being, "is the abidance or persistence of the Ego through time" (p. 236, a.). Yet the Simultaneity of God, as against the Duration (the approximation to simultaneity) of Man, seems to the writer to
be simply necessary in explanation and defence of the deepest experiences of the soul But Professor A. S. Pringle Pattison himself appears fully to have outgrown both these positions in his
admirable later writings Theism, 1897, and "Martineau's Philosophy," in Tke Philosophical Radiccds^ 1907.
219
especially by Thomas Hill and R. Lewis Ncttleship (1836-1882) (1846-1892) at Oxford, and by the brothers John Caird (1820-1898) and Edward Caird (1835-1908) at Glasgow and Oxford. All who ever had the honour of learning much from, or
England
Green
how much Hegel was to them how much their specifically English and
Hegelianism. The nobly moving Memoirs of Green, Nettleship, and John Caird, respectively Bradley, and Edward Caird, by Nettleship, A.
ELS
in their heroes,
Hegel's continuous search of the whole in every part of life and thought, and of parts in every
whole ; his profound respect for history, and continuous search for an orderly evolution of truth
within and through it; and his deeply spiritual sense of man's continuous need of "dying to
and they do so with a massively impressAnd such work as ive measure and reticence.
live
;
"
Green's
Letters,
Prolegomena
to
Ethics,
Nettleship's
John
Caird's
Edward
Caird's
22O
Evolution of Theology in the Greek Philosophers, his paper, Christianity and the Historic Christ
(1897), and several of his Lay Sermons\ bring home to us still further the fine spiritual insight
And
even here.
its
For man's
life
is,
after
all,
throughout of the supply of materials for his thinking and of the very actuation of his consciousness and selfconsciousness, and thus also of the awakening and persistence of his religious sense) profoundly dependent, not simply upon the activity and categories of his reason, but on the stimulation of his senses, on the action upon him, upon his body, of
And
the Infinite
Mind and
be
in
must be taken as somehow causing, and to some degree traceable by our minds within,
is
what
lower
we
as
shall
real, distinct
unless
we
from, and higher than, our own, allow realities distinct from, and
own
minds.
Be
superfine
be
sceptical
and you
your mind's range and informations. And, after all, religion, in its most articulate and
221
for,
the
Whole
still
less
a finding of
in general, within or
after self-realization
nor a sense that nothing really matters, except as merely out of place, or only for a time. But religion is, in such utterances, a sense, a love,
an adoration, by spirits, conscious of their own distinctness and reality, of an Infinite Self-Conscious Spirit, a Reality distinct from and prior to
themselves, though their original, infinitely penetrative, source ; a seeking of conformity by these
real
minds and
a consciousness
and
wrong
is
volition
and character-building.
Especially
thus neither
there
is
God
nor
man
is
a complete
whole
nowhere a
full
self-consciousness
or personality.
And
from
require,
Religion as, after all, in a special possession, as the irreplaceable means of vigour and concreteness, and as furnishing that
Institutional
bond of
socially
spiritual
intercommunion with
222
our fellows, of higher and lower social and educational grades than our own, which is so profound a need for the fullest health of philosopher as
of peasant
?
I
think,
life,
it
does not do
all,
so.
its
And
finally,
after
at
deepest,
is a stretching out of faith and love to God Into the dark. Philosophy ends, surely, with
certain desiderata
and
possibilities,
which religion
meets, exceeds, traverses, re-states; and religion is a circle of experience, possessed of its own
character,
contents,
man's
indeed
but
first
and
last
fall
detailed articulation.
we
get in religion
final light
and word
are dealing with finite man's ultimate apprehensions of the Infinite) astonish-
we
and
completeness
dominant,
from being held the " truer," because the clearer and completer, form of outlook. And yet how
can philosophy, or such a philosophy, be man's ultimate faith, an outlook that ignores or minimizes
temptation, doubt, sin
;
that
knows so
little
of
/.
the homeliness alone truly appropriate to man, the created and the weak; that is not centrally love seeking and finding Love in trial and in
darkness?
truly,
fully
E. M'Taggarfs positions as to Eternal Life have special interest in that they proceed from a mind which (in spite of its
(4)
Dn
J.
intense conviction of the unique importance and strict duty of Metaphysics and of consistency in
general,
main
positions in particular) is still largely dominated by certain conceptions, and by the temper
of mind, of the Enlightenment. Thus the category, not of Self-Consciousness but of Substance,
is
supreme at the
critical
points;
all
Theism
is
a family of interdependent
(eternal
but
finite)
spirits are finally taken as the true determinations and sole constituents of the Absolute, yet with an
and finally, a very careful, largely original apprehension of the nature and inter-relations of Time
fail,
in General," see
13-38,
224
simply through the Hegelian refusal to allow more than one (the simply human) centre and kind
of consciousness.
insists (a) Dr. M'Taggart, then, impressively comas other that "all questions are abstract,
pared with metaphysical problems ; and most, as compared with these, are unpractical. It will
beliefs
whether we
can regard the troubles of the present, and the uncertainties of the future, with the feelings of a
mouse towards a
father."
is
cat,
or of a child towards
its
"
The world
us than
it
used to be, for though it has doubtless improved, it has not kept pace with our increasing demands
for
declared
universe
good on the whole" (pp. 1-32, n). And "the self is not a mere delusion, nor a mere collection of adjectives referring to no subexcept
the
Absolute.
right.
It
is
stance
substance
existing In its
own
it
substance
identity"
1901, pp.
lies,
seems to
in
(Studies
36, 37).
The
M'Taggart
omnipotent,
appreciable
universe,"
is,
requires a Perfect
Community
"
225
non-creative
God,
importance
in contrast
as
against
"If
we make God
possible that
less
He
should be good.
sufficiently certain
that
His wisdom and power would excel our own " Yet there is no need (S. D. of R. p- 258). even of such a God if (as indeed it does) " reality " consists in a system of selves." The perfect
community is the true kingdom of the spirit God, if represented adequately, is a community. A perfect community may be as complete a unity But a community cannot be a as any person. person and the fact that it is a perfect community and a perfect unity does not make it at all more " possible for it to be a person (S. D. of R. p. 247 H.C. p. 210).
;
Immortality is considered to require coupling " with Pre-Existence. "It is," indeed, certain that
we remember no previous lives." Yet " exact similarity of attributes is always sufficient For "if the same to prove personal identity."
in this life
self passes
"
through
several
**
lives,
any change
happening to it any time must affect its state," directly or indirectly, "in all future time"; and
this is
15
identity
between
226
"
memory,
it
is
the same
D. of R.
I
pp.
130,
129,
cannot regard the question of unending existence with the contempt with which it is sometimes treated." Now, "in
as to
:
And
Time
"
all,
But, though
" whatever
considers
is
temporal
(Lotze
indeed
that
"time
Dr.
an
M'Taggart holds that also "timeless existence is "to exist and to be in time," he possible" " seem to me two characteristics, strikingly insists,
each quite distinct from the other
"
(" Relations of
Time and
Chronicle^
differences
Eternity,"
1908, pp.
and relations between Time and Eternity are most carefully, in part very originally, developed, on the supposition of the reality of both. But Dr. M'Taggart's own final position is
that,
difficulties
of the
theory that
existence
"
is really
timeless,
it
must
be accepted as true
n).
the above positions we can but (&) admire the keen sense of man's need of Metain
physics,
ligion
;
Now
in re-
religion
and
general, of existent,
it is
even of
eternal, Reality.
But
strange, at
first
sight, to note
of Metaphysics
and
spirit
and, surely, only of such, are here made to seek and apparently to find, their satisfaction, not
in Self-Consciousness,
but in Substance.
Indeed, even here, we have all reality still largely conceived under the lurking image and connotations of an immense mirror, composed of an indefinite
not only distinct but mutually impenetrable parts is, so far, less interior,
Leibniz's
they are all really immortal, indeed, at bottom, they are eternal; they are all really parts of one Whole, and howall really exist,
The parts
ever
to vary under the varying conditions, their substances ever remain the same : what more can we
possibly want ? And we cannot, of course, have those parts, thus constitutive of the entire mirror,
and another
distinct
mirror, not
first
made up of
parts,
and
from the
For
in all
mirror and any of its parts. these cases we have substances, and
does not any one substance exclude another? True, these substances are all purely minds, not exist anywhere ; and (as spirits matter does
228
against the Esse of supposed Matter, which which percipi) we have here the only true Esse,
perciperC)
activities held to
be
sidered to exist.
are primarily not centres of self-consciousness, but substances spirits certainly of a strange kind.
For these
spirits
have
their self-consciousness
and memory,
;
their inter-
penetrativeness and
spirituality
and
in
their eternal
thus the Realized Perfection, which Hegel required in the Universe, lies here, both as to
reality
And
the persistence
perfection (even if we admit perfection of this society of spirits), not, at any one moment and continuously, in their self-consciousness, the highest of
and as
to
and
Hegel's categories, but in their substance, a lower amongst these same categories. The Absolute
here
exists,
Indeed, without a Spirit of spirits other than, though penetrating and sustaining, these lesser
spirits,
is
doubtless this grim alternative that has forced Dr. M'Taggart to find the
inevitable.
it is
And
persistence
and
Man
for
is
GW
and
4<
229 thought
truest"
all
Again, what a demand upon our belief, against our evidences, all our instincts, is the absolute
little
happy family of us
poor
men Nor let it be said that Chrisfor it does nothing of tianity places man as high the sort. Whenever it places man high, it never
little
!
;
places
as,
him thus
and
in so far
penetrated
the
God and
;
only in so far as
fully
will vividly
apprehend, and
and Reality
And all through, Dr. M'Taggart takes God, not only as a person in the ordinary, human sense of the word, but indeed without any of that inand penetrable quality, that power of embracing and stimulating other minds and lives, which we know, from daily experience, constitutes the very character, actuation, and worth The God here refused, and of these our spiritsdefinitely penetrative
the
here considered possible, are not even men, they are but mannikins. At least the concept of God here nowhere gets beyond that of an
orderer of matter from without,
"
God
"a
directing
person
(S.
D. of R.
p.
245)
230
where
since
He He
amongst
artificer,
things,
nowhere conceived according to the deepest of what we really know and really want. The Roman Church has ever impressively taught what is here so strangely overlooked for she who
;
or of evil spirits, or the authority of ecclesiastical persons, has continuously insisted that One, and
access
to,
and en-
moving power over, the depths of the human mind and will the Spirit of spirits, God
alone.
Thus
this
scheme leaves
unutilized,
indeed un-
explained (except violently as a pure illusion), the sense of the Infinite, the Other, of Dissatisfaction in all
sense that
human souL
eternalizing,
and the Reality it indicates, is of any avail ; the best and the most vital in man will ever overleap
all
such
artificial limitations.
of the operative presence within our spirits (as indeed everywhere) of such a Spirit of spirits can alone, we think,
consistently explain the entirety of man's experi-
And
Experience as
to
Time, Treble
231
ences and requirements with respect to Time, For thus, and thus only, do we find full recognition of our actual experience and necessity. appears to be treble and as follows.
This
recognize, then, phenomenal Time, the equable succession of mutually exclusive, ever
We
equally
long
moments
clock-time^
artificial
;
very clear
real Time, succes-
more
or
less
interpenetrating,
never equally long parts duration, obscure or vivid and deep, but never very clear; and
Eternity^ this latter not owned, as such,
by the
human
Spirit
subject, yet
human
Time
(that
is,
in duration)
directly experiences
some
simultaneity, that
quasi-eternity.
In this
ideal
Abidingness
is
accounted for by
man's
-real,
however obscure,
diffused,
and pre-
dominantly
fanaticism
this full
is
indirect, experience
of it
And
all
admissions, that
will be,
man's
and also that such experience as he has of it is never pure and separate, but ever of it only in, through, and over against, his various.
own
232
ever more or less successive, directly human exBut no "orderer of matter," no "directperiences.
ing person," would here be of any avail certainly the deeper religious consciousness does not itself, especially here, suggest to the religious mind such
;
a curiously external and limited cause for such immense and profoundly interior effects.
only add, finally, that the Christian consciousness has notoriously, and ever more explicitly
We would
Unity so that there is here a deep recognition of what Dr. M'Taggart so reasonably thirsts for,
richness in Unity, indeed a
labouring this point, since God remains, in any case, for the deeper religious consciousness,
so
Dr. M'Taggart's category of Substance, see Professor The Philosophical Radicals, 1907, pp. 200-205. On his conception of Person, see Clement Webb's Problems in the Relations between God and Man^ 1911, pp. 145-154. The above conception of real time was first clearly learnt from M. Bergson, Essaisurles Donnfes Immfdiates de la Conscience, ed. 1898, but also from Dr. James Ward see now The Realm of Ends^ 1911, pp. 306, 307. On the quasi-eternity of time, as really experienced by us, see also the fine passage in Dr. Bosanquet's The Principle
Pringie Pattison's
On
p. 339.
233
The most
velopment ever
and
terrible cost of
life's
tive implications
Absolutism and indeed of the preceding Idealisms, is doubtless furnished by Ludwig Feucrbach
(1804-1872).
Especially
is
if
consider and contrast, as two successive conclusions of the same mind from the same premises, Feuerbach's still ethically Christian, and psychologically often most penetrating and delicate, Essence of Christianity, 1841, 1843; and his completely naturalistic and cynical Lectures on
the Essence
we
of Religion,
1851.
Our
quotations
from the
finer, earlier
work
in
George
life of man is the life which (a) has relation to his general, as distinguished from Man thinks* that is, he his individual, nature.
"The
inner
"The
essential nature
not only the ground, it is also the object But religion is consciousness of the of religion.
is
man
and can be, nothing else than the consciousness which man has of his own not "The finite and limited, but infinite nature."
Infinite
;
thus
it is,
is,"
then,
"nothing
234
consciousness" (pp. i, 2). Thus "The Absolute, " " Conthe God of Man, is man's own nature ;
sciousness of
God
is
self-consciousness,
.
know-
But ignorledge of God is self-knowledge. the to fundamental ance of this identity is peculiar "Man first of all sees his nature of religion.'*
. .
nature as
himself.
humanity; a man is then an object to himself, Hence the under the form of another man.
historical
this,
that
by an earlier religion, was regarded as objective, was worshipped as God, is now recognized as subjective, is perceived to be something kitnian. The antithesis of divine and human is
what,
human
nature
12,
(pp.
And
are
again,
God
are
anthropomorphisms,
human
attributes,
so
which you suppose here, the existence of God, the belief that there is a God, an anthropomorphism, a presupposition purely human."
"
Yet he alone
is
whom
the
predicates of the Divine Being e.gm love, wisdom, are nothing, not he to whom merely the justice
subject of these predicates
is
nothing.
And
in
Positions
of
tfie
Middle Period
235
the negation of the subject necessarily also a negation of the predicates considered in themselves. These have an intrinsic, independent
is
nowise
reality
they force their recognition upon man by The idea of God is dependent
.
. .
Religion,"
;
however,
to
it
"
17, 21,
At
have still
impulsions and ideals, with the bearer of them left uncertain within the human range; and the " " divine bearer of with divine
them
any predicates, In both cases the Hegelian habits denied. i.e. the of intense abstraction are still at work,
power and determination to give independent reality and prodigious operativeness to demonstrable abstractions, and to evade the question of
who, or whether anything, is, after all, the bearer And here again of such ideals and qualities.
man
consists essentially of
mind
alone.
penetrate and be penetrated by, it can really know, nothing whatsoever but itself; and it attains
236
by means, or on
occasion,
of
other realities
race,
than
man
himself
the
as distinct from
Yet
beyond reasonable
;
doubt, that
man
Is
mind
itself
not simply abstractive and discursive, but inthat the human personality, when tuitive as well
;
and harmonizes
all
these
one
personality are
developed,
and slowly
built up,
by by means, and on
their possessor
manhood only
other minds, other living beings, other things, and through the interaction between himself and them
however superior or inferior he may be to these other realities, and however different he may be from them, he ever achieves some real knowledge of them, whilst thus attainThe mind, ing some real knowledge of himself. a live force, finds itself in closest contact with
all
;
and
that,
human
the
first
subject;
this
entire subject
is
ever,
in
Man
237
And it is the from, though not all unlike, itself. action of all that objective, variously interrelated world upon this human subject, itself a world within
that world,
his senses
and
this
up
secondary and instrumental, and necessarily never fully overtakes those primary
abstracting activity
informations.
lated
is
The more
and the more real the object " " inside does stimulating and acting, the more each possess, and the more rich, and the more
and
reacting,
difficult clearly to
on occasion of the
Finite
is
or
is not,
as
own
we
cannot,
with
Feuerbach, straightaway decide that "it cannot be anything else." For we certainly, concomitantly with our awakening to self-consciousness, acquire varyingly
real,
dim or
vivid,
but very
experiences of the existence (indeed, to some other beings as well degree, of the inner life) of
And, as a matter of
the specifically religious consciousness cannot, even when thus challenged, discover in Itself merely the prolongation (even
fact,
if this
238
individual's, or
human
it
species',
own
an
achieveInfinite,
ments or
efforts.
But
finds, instead,
not the soul's owu> present and operative here and now in the world and in the soul ; an Infinite
kind from any mere prolongation, since the soul rests on It on an actually present and
different in
" On ne s'appuie operative Perfect Reality. sur ce qui r&iste," said Napoleon ; we cannot,
que and
indeed
we do
it
not, lean
upon a
flux.
True,
appears
certain
that
man
has no
mind and senses are awake to their several objects and their activiI But this applies all round have to ties* apprehend trees and stones or the like before, of simultaneously with, my awareness of, and my
religious consciousness, until his
;
actual
I
love
of,
my
fellow-men.
Every
all
faculty
possess,
within
my
range, stimulates, feeds, checks everything else. And especially with regard to the Infinite Spirit,
all
the ultimate ground and most intimate bond of that is real at all, we cannot, from the nature
of the case, expect to be able, apart from a review of the totality of our life's requirements and im-
more than contrasting glimpses and impulsions, on occasion of the awakening and awakeness of all that life within and around us. But my consciousness of God is no more, because
plications, to catch
of
this,
simply
my
self-consciousness, than is
my
239
consciousness of
friend.
a pebble, of a
plant,
of
my
Man's
will
able inadequacy, mostly even of the avoidable kind, and with much evil passion and positive
error
;
hence at the
later stages
he considers the
earlier
stages as full of, sometimes as sheer, delusion. And these developments have, so far,
moved,
inner
chiefly,
life
of
away from external nature to the man. Yet also the much easier, be-
cause less deep, physical sciences have admittedly maintained, for millenniums, the most far-reaching,
most
if
we
on
this
fact,
as sheer, incorrigible
rightly maintain them,
illusions
nevertheless
we
as increasingly true and as possessed, from the And first, of some real connection with Reality.
much
and
points to man's again finding, in the future, then with indefinite increase of precision,
Spirit at
work
Unless the
Irishman's argument was sound that, because a certain stove would save him half his fuel, two
such stoves would save it all, there is no necessary consequence, from the admission of such an adtruth, to the negation of some reality within this of the operative presence long series of human apprehensions,
240
And
religious
strongly point
away
from such a theory of all-illusion. For in this theory not any one particular impression, nor even
persistent
concomitant of
one held by
deepest, is declared to be a sheer projection, by of the the individual man, of his mind's contents,
general, but purely immanental, human requirements and ideals ; and this whilst the projector is
so entirely unaware of his own action as to consider himself (the projector) as the creation of this (his
is
certain
that man,
or apparently even the whole, of his present religion, does not necessarily and pari
passu lose faith in trans-subjective, superhuman Also note how, in Feuerbach's Reality as such.
scheme,
it alone*
it
is
power.
in its
same content which, when "true" place and character, leaves man
when
the
to
seen in
its
"false"
place
and
character,
most
all
terrible, force
known
And
yet not
3Ian
241
ligions of the world, can permanently obscure the magnificent, indeed unique, services of religion.
How can we retain Plato and Leibniz, Pheidias and Michael Angelo, Homer and Shakespere in
highest honour, as revealers of various degrees and kinds of reality and truth, if Amos and Isaiah,
be treated as pure illusionists, in precisely that which constitutes their specific power and attestation ? It is, of course, most certain that our conceptions both of God's predicates, and of God
of
to
their bearer, are
Arc are
anthropomorphic; as Aquinas " Omne quod recipitur (with Aristotle) ever insists " in aliquo, recipitur in eo per modum recipientis
:
cannot jump out of his skin* Yet this decides nothing as to how much the skin may
hold or stretch, nor
really affects him,
man
admitted to be genuinely known by him. No one, certainly, has ever explained how, if man is
completely shut up within a
mode of apprehension
bearing no real relation to reality, and hence without any ontological worth, he possesses a sense of the inadequacy of all merely human ap-
prehension so
very
Whence,
242
generally
human
claim
categories, as
made
sense
to
is
trans-human truth?
And
this
that
it
is
than gratuitously suicidal for man on principle to declare this sense mere illusion, or, equivalently, no more than the sheer projection
no
less
of the simply human race-instinct are thus face to face with the least tolerable
We
all
scepticisms.
Well,
subjectivist Idealism, simply against admit the real existence and influence of countless
we
first
though lower than, or equal to, ourselves, and we contend that only by and in real contact with these realities do we ever awake to a consciousness and knowledge
realities,
more or
of ourselves. require now to continue and to complete this apprehension and interpretation of life and existence. admit, then, the real
We
We
existence of
the
cause
a Perfect Reality which, prior to, and present throughout, those of,
realities
other
is
non-human
and our
real
selves,
us for us to be (dimly and contrastingly yet most really) aware of this its
sufficiently like
And this Reality is thus, presence and action. in ever and only though through these lesser
characteristic
and with
things merely contingent and finite. Religion thus, precisely as the sense of the Infinite, does know of anthropomorphisms; the
all
consciousness of the depth and mysteriousness of life and reality is ever with it, as religion, from " How unsearchable are God's first to last.
"
!
and
of the greatest favours bestowed on the soul in this life" (thus like to the blessed in
"One
it
to see so distinctly,
it
and
God."
logical
St.
Paul and of the Spanish peasant John of the Cross, merely express, respec-
tively,
the very soul of religion and a delicate concomitant of all its deepest experiences. And finally, Feuerbach's own history is one (^r)
more tragic proof that It does matter whether or no we deny a subject as bearer of the predicates
wisdom, goodness/ For, in his latest of the earlier time two abstractions the stage, man-in-general, and "divine" predicates con"love,
sidered as possessing a separate reality of their own fall away only empirical, individual men remain
;
1
244
as real,
to
Feuerbach as
to
all
far too
weak, vain,
cruel to
bear and to
those vices a
exemplify (unless
we add
such ghastly hypocrisy in this our estimate) must now exalted virtues and ideals. These ideals
be declared sheer
illusions
a declaration
is
concerning man.
Arthur
Schopenhauer
of his glaring inconsistencies and inadequacies, on account of certain of his convicin spite
of these, primarily epistemological, are concerned with the world as we find it, and
tions.
Two
human
self
and the
denial of this
self,
and with
1 The above is mostly extracted from a paper by the writer, which appeared (in Italian) as "Religione ed Illusione," in the Ccenobium, Lugano, March-April 1911. The writer has learnt most from Professor Troeltsch's profound analysis of the true and the false " in Feuerbach, in his Die Selbstandigkeit der Religion," Zeitsckrift
f. Thcologie u. Kirche^ 1895, pp. 392-427. Das tenthums has appeared excellently re-edited
JodPs Ludivig Feuerbach^ a useful precis and description of the, still variously rich, psychology of Feuerbach's middle period; but is intemperately
1904, is
enthusiastic,
its
and
significant
difference,
leaves practically unnoticed his last period, and yet development, from that middle
period-
and Weak
245
indeed
quite another
in
life
and
pessimistically, scep-
tically,
inclined,
with a nature as
strongly sensual as aspiring, early left without a father and sent adrift by a clever, unprincipled
mother,
leisure,
Schopenhauer, with ample means and turned to philosophy and art for at least
occasional escape, from his clamorous lower self, into regions of abiding peace. The World as
Will and as Idea, its first volume published in 1819, its second volume (as a commentary to the first) in 1844, is practically his sole work, since
his other writings are simply preparations for, or
elucidations
artistic
of,
this
and
literary
one book. And our present world is even now once more
extolled, in
impossible thinker. (i) In his Epistemology Schopenhauer opens with Kant's Subjectivism and also with the same
Kant's ready, though unconscious, transformation of this Subjectivism into a Metaphysical Dualism ; but he promptly conceives this Dualism in a quite un- Kantian, Oriental, indeed Buddhist, fashion.
246
"Our
is
immediate
everything else is conditioned by it, and hence dependent on it." "Everything, in being in and for itself is neces,
same thing, in the perception sarily subjective , of another, is as necessarily objective ; a difference
this
which can never be completely resolved, for the thing has thus radically changed its entire nature,
having entered into forms alien to its own essence, since these new forms belong to that alien subject,
whose cognition of
this thing
things-in-themselves
Grisebach,
**
Reclam
ii.
Vorstelhmg, vol.
render the world so strange and alarming to man, is that, infinite and massive as may appear its
existence,
it
hangs on a single
fine thread
the
particular consciousness in which, at the time, it stands. Thus the same cerebral function which, as
such purely subjective categories as "causes or motives is but the Ma/a, the" Buddhists* "veil
Buddhist literature generally, "breathe in Indian and in a primitive world akin to nature. How
is
the mind
Jewish superTheism, Optimism, "and " of all the philosophy that does it slave's service This literature "has been the consolation of my
stition," Libertarianism,
!
all
life,
and
will
i.
be that of
38, 39;
my
death"
(ibid.
voL
ii.
520;
vol.
"Zur
Sanskrit-Litteratur,"
We
as
in its content,
that,
because,
my perception,
it
my perception,
the content of
my perception
cannot exist independently of this perception. A critical Realism alone appears to be here fully
adequate to the facts. But then a turn a quite un- Kantian, un -" practical," an aesthetic and
Eastern, strangely floating and sentimental, turn
given to this Metaphysical Dualism reality, which Kant set out to find by Idealism, has here the (as far as reality is to be apprehensible by
is
;
reason or to be reasonable in
itself)
been dissolved
by
Idealism into
a dream.
248
Yet
is
ought to work not from them, but " In most books the author has into them."
thought,
"
(
Werke>
ii.
87, 84).
for intuition
and
direct
experience is one source of the perennial fresh1 ness of so much of Schopenhauer's work.
(2)
some of
its
roots
in the Will,
Schopenhauer finds the Thing-in-itself a Will bereft of all reason and logic,
and
well
known
all
to
is,
us within our
it,
own
selves.
"The
Will alone
the source of
mation or
"
for the Will itself, nor for the Idea," the World at " in which this Will adequately large, objectifies
1
See
J.
64-127.
Pantheism
itself;
249
an endless
flux,
boundless
i.
are
of
its
common
Indeed, his predominant vehemence against the designation of "Pantheist" doubtless proceeds
from his antipathy to Theism, and this again from his all-devouring subjectivism and pessimism.
Since these
latter
excesses
prevent his
and
operative,
ously,
within
least
superficially)
often
still
more emphatically
could
"
God
one before us
which
all
one devouring the other" (Werke, iL 757, 758; "Ueber den Pantheismus," ibid. v. 112).
Hegel was determined to find fullest richness and life in supreme Reality, and knew
if
And
not
how
Reality,
driven out.
Time
250
whereas "the true philosophy asks not after the Whence, the Whither, the Why, but ever only after the What, the ever Self-Identical Essence
of the world, which appears in all relations, but is not itself subject to them" (Werke, i. 358,
359)-
have here three fundamental self-contraFor man was to be utterly incapable dictions. of reaching the Thing-in-itself ; but now he knows
it
We
thoroughly, in
Reason.
Will,
Thing-in-itself
is
and manifests
of
all
itself
And
held to be bereft
are found to
yet now some of its appearances be beautiful and reasonable. But indeed, as a question of fact, an absolutely ir-
Reason
unknown
to us
men, since
our various soul-forces never exist in this purely separate and entirely contradictory form.
We
have thus simply a projection of Schopenhauer's abnormally divided and unhappy interior life.
Yet two points are profoundly valuable here the sense of the impossibility of an immediate,
pure Optimism, since Pantheism turns out to be
intolerable, precisely in the matters
where already
;
Theism
and, again,
Ultimate Reality must be as conceived Eternal. The Simultaneous, rejection of Theism, as the truth of the Ultimate Reality, and the denial of all reality to Time,
the sense that the
even concrete Time, that quasi-eternity, prevent these two admirable points from here attaining to
their full power. " There is, in (3)
1
life,
no
final
end of the
;
striving,
is
hence no
all life
essen-
"Thus
is,
paid for, by the persistent Will to live, with many deep sufferings and finally with a bitter death/'
"
As
little
as
suppress
this
it
alter
or
exterior
free
life
from the tortures which proceed which is the appearance of this same
;
416
417
421).
"This
fostered
poor
by men
which
into
and
legislation,
will
nor steam-
engines
and telegraphs
ever
make
something essentially
of history are
1
better.
Thus the
glorifiers
252
Philistines.
Christians
of
Buddhism
tianity
is
much more
than
is
optimistic Judaism
and
its variety,
Islam."
And
"Protestantism,
by
its
elimination
of
asceticism
and of
its
of celibacy, has, at bottom, abandoned the innermost kernel of Christianity. This has now
become evident by
its
gradual transformation
into a flat rationalism, modern Pelagianism." " the contrary, all times, peoples, languages
On
have
ever sharply discriminated between a virtuous life and a reasonable one. Thus we would consider
the designation of the sublime founder of Chris' the most reasonable of men to be a tianity as
'
most unworthy, indeed blasphemous, expression, and similarly if men said that his maxims are the
best instruction as to
'
an
'
"
(Werke, ii. 521, 736; L 653). Indeed "the myth of the Fall
in the
is
reconciles
me
to
it
resembles nothing so
much
as a
Schopenhatter s Pessimism
myth, without which it would have found nothing to which to cling in Judaism"
(Werke,
ii.
683).
nothing can be more true and necessary than a continuous keen sense of the suffering, misery, and guilt to be found in life
Certainly
;
of the shoddy Philistinism of most journalistic, " and of some philosophical, " progressiveness
and
"enlightenment";
fruitfulness
irreplaceable
self-
essential place
in primitive, indeed in all authentic, Christianity. The future is doubtless only with such convictions
and practices of life as will find work for these virile truths and
;
full
room and
of
spirit of
His
closest followers.
Yet
all
be on one
by Schopenhauer.
within a larger whole, and be but one of two movements. For the other movement that of
seeking, of occupation with, of learning from and of teaching, of being stimulated by and of leavening
and transforming, in a word, of loving, the actual world of time and space around us and within us, is
also essential to Christianity, to
all
all spirituality,
life.
to
254
movement is thus necessary, not only because we have duties to others and
to things in time, which are co-ordinate to our duties to ourselves and to God, to things eternal ;
And
but also, and more fundamentally, because only through such occupation with the temporal, wake up our spatial, finite can we thoroughly
sense and
Infinite
outward-going and
time-and-space
occupation
to recollection, detachment,
abandonment to God. For the fact is that somewhat as, in all our genuine knowledge, we have a given world of rethe real knower and the lations between realities and we have our concrete apprehenreal known sion and abstractive reason and deductive reasoning rendered possible, and supplied with materials, by those previous realities, and made fully effective by our acceptance of, and belief in, their operations
;
so here, in all the deeper life in general, we have indeed an important, even an irre:
and intimations
placeable, negative,
self-renunciatory
movement,
extant,
movements
at
temporal things,
Spirit,
God.
Thus
also,
and
especially,
is,
as
at
to
asceticism
it
aims
and at the
by means of the
right use, as well as by the heroic continence, of the body, but at the entire suppression of the
Even use, and at the extinction of, the body. the bodily functions essential to the race are here intrinsically impure and utterly incapable of being
spiritualized.
We
thus
leave
behind
all
sane
Monasticism, indeed the fundamental principle of every incarnational doctrine only dervishes and
;
would keep Schopenhauer company. And this same excess renders him unjust to Judaism and Islam which, if insufficiently alive
fakirs
of religion, strongly realize the positive movement, and thus escape such dangerous parodies of Asceticism. The
to the negative
fact is that
movement
fulness
of
the
full
presence, and the deepest interaction, of both these movements and indeed only thus will there be,
;
in
any and every life, a sufficient other- worldliness without fanaticism, and a sufficient this-worldliness
without philistinism. And this again involves, at bottom, a difficult, heroic, an ultimate, yet
thus
all
the
256
and
is
indeed
point
accord with
Schopenhauer
full
1
de-
man's
satisfaction
And
this brings us to
"No
absolute
is
Nothing
is
even thinkable
reference
to
this other."
every nothing
something, and thus presupposes Doubtless " with the free abandon-
ment of the
even the general forms of Time and Space, indeed Subject and Object no But that we so loathe Will, no Idea, no World.
;
Nothing," this Nothing, "only means that we so intensely will life, and know nothing but Yet if we turn our gaze away to just this will.
the those
freely
the world,
who have
trace
we
find,
in
place of
all
that
restless
pushing, that never-satisfied yet ceaseless expectation, which composes the life-dream of man, a
1
See Volkelt,
257
peace which is higher than all reason, an Oceancalm of the soul, whose bare reflection upon the
countenance
Knowledge
vanished."
is already a full and sure Evangel alone has remained, the Will has " For this contrast " with our present
;
world " we are without image, concept, or word since all those we have are derived from the objectivation of the will, and hence they can in
;
nowise express its absolute contrary, which latter thus remains standing as a simple negative." can but use such terms as "Ecstasy, Illumina-
We
tion,
it
"
is
Philosopher, proceeds positively and indeed from hence onwards there remains to us nothing but
ii.
717; L 525,
ii.
Here, at
last,
we
see
clearly
real
how
a
intense
in,
yearning
persists
after,
indeed
in
how
this
faith
a an
unutterable
Perfect
Reality
and works
is
which on the
For his conviction that there is such a Life and Reality appears here, although shy and indirect,
surface
so
bitter, sceptical,
and pessimist
be almost as strong as that, if it is at all, it utterly differs from all and everything we are
to
able to think or to imagine. And here we can grasp more plainly in what, as concerns religion,
258
such dim and despairing outlooks, when compared with the clear and confident (such as that of Hegel),
are weak,
and
in
Such an outlook as Schopenhauer's is weak. For it is certainly unnecessary, and, in the longrun, impossible, to seek and to find the religious
realities
thus entirely outside of all this visible world and of all our reason and its categories.
Unless
all
the different departments of life and the different levels of our own activity and
all
experience, variously, in some degree and way, prepare, Imply, contain, or show spiritual realities
and
facts
spiritual necessities as
and
final
somehow
entire
is
movement and
untrue.
And
its
untrue,
with
incarnational
conviction,
its
matter, for
the social hierarchy, for spirit in God in the soul. So far, then, a
*'
civilized" out-
look and philosophy is favourable to religion, provided there is here no doubt or denial of spirit
as distinct from, and higher than, matter; of the Spirit, God, as distinct from, and
than, the world
and
higher
and man.
other
Yet,
on
the
hand,
unless
Dim and
259
all
themselves, and
still
leaves some-
real,
and
produce, religion
to
full
Something prophetic,
a great yearning and pictorial, deeply personal a disquieting excess beyond our demontrust
strative processes
rightly, necessarily
will
man, and such attempts of man to articulate his deepest experiences and certainties. And,
to
so
provided it is not genuinely sceptical, and does not seriously weaken the necessary crispness of, and the friction between, the concrete
religion,
facts
and
necessities of
life.
And
also.
this
For thus philosophy need not be asked to do more than lay certain foundations than discover certain necessities for, and the place of, religion, and analyse, synthesize, and so far utilize, as carefully and loyally as possible, the
materials
offered
1
by the
tit.
religious
experience
and
history.
1
See Volkelt,
op.
260
is
Richard Wagners enthusiasm for Schopenhauer And Leo Tolstots affinity with well known.
is
Schopenhauer
Yet doubtless the T)&nzSdrenKierkegaard(i%i3-5$) and Friedrick Nietzsche (active as a philosophical writer 187188) are, respectively, the religiously deepest, and the most widely (if probably not lastingly)
influential,
among
the
to,
an outlook akin
Schopenhauer.
uous, utterly
uncompromising Danish religionist, is a spiritual brother of the great Frenchman, Blaise Pascal, and of the striking English
Tractarian,
Hurrell
Froude,
well.
who
died
young
and
still full
of crudity, yet
left
an abiding mark
upon
all
Kierkegaard is a modern
as massively ontological in his religion as any ancient ; and that the tension of his spiritual life arises, not from any doubt as
to whether or
of the moderns,
what God
is,
God
this
261
"What
eternal
beatitude,
to
effect
in
man
is
that
he
to
his
its
shall
it;
entire
element when
upon
the
sand,
so
is
the religious man caught in his absolute conception of God; for such absoluteness is not
directly
the
element
of
finite
being.
No
wonder, then, if, for the Jew, to see God meant death ; and if, for the Heathen, to stand in For if the relation to God portended madness.
conception of God is our one absolute help, it is also the sole conception capable of absolutely
Crumbs/
"
to
the
'Philosophical
How
tude be based upon an Historical Knowledge?" German translation of the Gesammelte Werke,
Jena, 1910, vol. vii. pp. 170, 171). And this vivid sense of both the Reality and the Difference
(most consistently) combined with the strongest (indeed an excessive because exclusive)
of
is
God
movement
Our Lord's
all ecclesiastical
organization, as
262
Eternal Life
Contemporary Survey
mag-
and
life
and heroic
given us by his friend, the clear and elegant, over-immanental, yet here sympathetic and mostly
very
just,
Professor
Harald
Hoffding,
Soren
Stuttgart, fresh are given admirably experiences 1896), and warnings concerning " Eternal Life." For
Kierkegaard
(German
translation,
we
we
for
yet
also
of Likeness.
Thus
it
is
Kierkegaard's profound apprehension of the tology and the Difference which renders
religiously
Onhim
the
all
and
Ibsen's
was admittedly suggested by the great Dane, and gives a vivid picture of his intense other-worldliness, and heroic straining and one-sidedness. Christ's selfrenunciation is here, but not His expansive
by
Dr.
tenderness,
263
his recently
on the contrary, doubtless owes immense, and now still great, vogue
still
less
to anything religious, but (probably even than his original idol Schopenhauer) to his
his brilliant
more
form
and
French
to the ceaseless intensity, and style paradox, and transformations of his thought and, not a little, to his piquant combination of
esprit
;
an
aristocratic aloofness
men
"
heroic
and
"
superior"
works,
The Twilight of
and
TJie
and vulgarly
upon Christianity; but by many an exquisite saying or half-page in his booklets on Strauss, on the Use and Drawback of History,
and on Schopenhauer; in his Human, aH-tooHuman\ and on to his Zarathustra. Even
these writings we everywhere come upon excesses, yet excesses which, if often (in form) vehemently anti-religious, or even anti-moral,
in
spring doubtless largely from a thirst and search for what religion alone can give. Especially is
this
the
Super-man,"
264
Swvey
application of our instinctive need of adoration, in which Professor Aloys Riehl, himself for
so
long
finds
(because utterly sincere, indeed as yet unconscious) reawakenings of the religious passion and con1 viction in these our times.
CHAPTER X
BIOLOGY AND EPIGENESIS
Introductory Darwin's declarations concerning religion Discussion of these declarations Three religious gains from Evolution, conceived as a means and method Bergson.
THE immense, seemingly all-pervading influence of such ideas as Descent, Selection, Struggle for
Existence, indeed of Biology generally, as articulated
is
is
admitted by
all
greater, for
good or
And
again, the
The most
is
Nietzsche
ed.
1898.
instructive and just of the countless studies of probably A. RiehPs Friedrich Nietzsche^ Stuttgart, 2nd William Wallace's two essays on' Nietzsche, in his
and Essays on Natural Theology and Ethics, ed. by Caird, 1898, pp. 511-541, are, I think, wanting in sufficient sympathy for the good and true richly present in that wayward, chaotic man of letters.
Lectures
Edward
Uarwtn's
265
touching greatness of Charles Darwin's character, the range and depth of his achievement In detailed
observation and
stimulation given
wheresoever
we
and
instinctive
Here, however,
orientation of
we have
but to
consider the
mind of Darwin, and of intellects specially influenced by his ideas and work, with respect to the facts, experiences, and necessities
which we have found to
constitute,
or to be
Direct essentially connected with, Eternal Life. from Darwin himself shall quotations give us our
and then developments and criticisms of our own and of others shall bring out the special truths, mistakes, helps, and hindrances
first
material,
Charles
Darwin,
surgeon,
traveller,
winningly homely autobiography and letters, as carefully published by his son, Mr. Francis Darwin,
writes of his
own
capabilities,
in regard to
our
subject-matter, In 1876
"
:
religious sentiment was ever strongly developed in me"; yet "formerly" he had "the firm con-
viction
of
the
existence
of
God and
in 1881
of the
:
And
he notes
266
"
Up
age of
I
thirty, or
beyond
it,
poetry of
many
kinds gave
as a schoolboy
speare.
me
me
considerable,
for
But
many
:
cannot endure to read a line of poetry years have tried lately to read Shakespeare ...
nauseated me.
for
I
I it
lost
my
taste
music and pictures. The loss of these tastes may possibly be injurious to the intellect, and
to
the moral character, by enHe feebling the emotional part of our nature." " also declares, in 1861 I am not at all accustomed
:
more probably
to metaphysical trains of thought" ; and in 1879 : " What my own views may be," on the subject of " is a question of no consequence to anyreligion,
one but myself" (Charles Darwin^ by Francis Darwin, 1902, pp. 55 60; 62 50; 51 62 55). As regards Theism, he writes (in 1876) of
;
;
"the extreme
of
difficulty,
or rather impossibility,
conceiving
far
this
immense
and
his
wonderful
''universe,
including
man
with
capacity for
looking the result of blind chance or necessity. When thus reflecting, I feel compelled to look to a
First Cause, having
backwards and
an
intelligent
mind
in
some
degree analogous to that of man ; and I deserve to be called a Theist. But then arises the doubt
Darwin on Theism,
Can
the
mind of man, developed, I fully believe, from a mind as low as that possessed by the lowest animals, be trusted when it draws such " And at other times " There grand conclusions ? seems to be no more design in the action of
:
in the course
which the
wind blows."
I am aware that if we Again, admit a First Cause, the mind still craves to
"
know whence
can
I
it
it
arose.
Nor
overlook the difficulty from the immense " and amount of suffering throughout the world
;
"the number of
men
improvement
sufferings.
such as
men may
own
sufferings
("I never pass twenty-four hours without many hours of discomfort when I can do nothing
whatsoever"), he declares:
"
According to
my
judgment, happiness decidedly prevails" in the "In my extreme fluctuations I have world.
never been an Atheist, in the sense of denying
the existence of God.
as
I
I
(and
be the more
mind."
my
state of
His
59; 55, 65
268
With
Immortality and
"the view
held by most physicists that the sun with all the planets will in time grow too cold for life," he
now
exclaims: "Believing as
distant future, will be
than he
now
all
is, it
is
other sentient beings are doomed to complete annihilation after such long-continued To those who fully admit the slow progress.
he and
immortality of the human soul, the destruction of " our world will not appear so dreadful (ibid. p. 61).
And
1879
:
finally,
:
writes in 1873
believe that
rightly in devoting
my
life
to Science.
no
remorse for having committed any great sin, but have often and often regretted that I have not done more direct good to my fellow-creatures "
(ibid. pp. 57, 328).*
following points appear to be specially here important (i) Nothing can well be more different than
2.
:
The
in
part already
by
W.
and
in his booklet,
Evolution^ 1911.
Conf^t,sion
Cardinal
Logical
Nicolas of Goes
(d.
Hegel, on the one hand, and the Darwinian " " Evolution on the other. The former is simply
the latter
parts
its
is
an integraare
tion
of a
plurality,
the
here
not
present, in the
first,
organism or
but are gradually superadded and organized, one after the other. With the great anatomist
1658), who prophetically (d. the anticipated conception and coined the term, and with Professor James Ward, thus carefully
William
Harvey
discriminative,
we
shall
call
this
latter process,
not
Evolution but
Epigenesis
(J.
Ward, The
Realm of Ends,
Darwin, in his misgivings as to the range of man's mind, confounds, and uses with strange
inconsistencies
Now
and
cross-purposes, "
Evolution."
these "
two
is
Man
developed from the lower animals" seems here " man's mind is still somehow to imply for him, Yet Darwin's limited by that starting-point." own " the
Evolution/' Epigenesis, postulates integration of new organs and powers ; and Leibnizian- Hegelian Evolution (rightly according
270
S^t>rvey
not to the beginning, of the unfolding for the Thus true revelation of each organism's content. his own here Darwin follows, not Epigenesis
(for
Epigenesis is indeed descended from the monkey, yet is not now a monkey, but a
in
man
creature
which,
in
the
is
course
of
into
ages,
has
integrated
much
it
that
new
what has
descended to
through the monkey), but the Leibnizian Evolution (where man is now what
And yet Darwin here first). the Leibnizian Evolution adopts only directly to contradict the logic of this Evolution, which
requires,
it come to hold man to be a from creature which in the past developed seemed to be no more than a monkey, that the apparent monkey was really a man, and not that
should
the
latter
fully
explicitated
being
is
no more
than a monkey.
But indeed, even if the logic of Darwin's argument be self-consistent, it is impossible to see what the kind or degree of intelligence
possessed by man's earliest ancestors has to do with the nature and range of man's present intelligence, any more than Newton's capacity
apprehending the law of gravitation is called in doubt by our remembering his animal-like
for
early
infancy.
take
this
difficulty,
which
evidently
was
and
The Problem
lies
in the
Varying
271
continuous adhesion to Theism, to have attained to its great power over his mind, through his
immense absorption
in,
of,
the supposed earlier stages of living organisms. This absorption would, when he turned to those
great, largely metaphysical questions,
make him
as
still
involuntarily
conceive
human beings
facing these problems with powers not differing in kind, and hardly in degree, from those of the
animals from which they sprang. (2) If the evidence of Botany, Zoology, Anthropology, amply endorsed and extended within each of these sciences by Palaeontology, have more and
more recommended some degree and doctrine of Descent, the immense and varied observations and thought devoted to these questions since The Origin of Species (1859) have, ever more shown how complex, and still conclusively,
predominantly
obscure
for
us,
has
been
the
precise character and mechanism of this Descent. " Natural Selection " and the " Certainly Struggle
for
Existence" are
not to
suffice as
explanations.
And
if
mann
we adopt
"
it,
"ties
the necessary in the varying" in the fact that " beginnings of a useful variation are always present
272
We
It
does not
in
Indeed,
Descent, we similar with conditions, and mately confronted are driven to choose between this or that form
whatever form
we adopt
are ulti-
of Descent, as simply the mechanism and means provided and used by Creative Intelligence and
Power; or the
direct
attribution
or,
to
Matter of
of the
Consciousness and
Mind;
at
least,
Spontaneous Generation of these. And by such attributions we are landed in pure Mythology.
of the beautifully generous friendship that existed between A. R. Wallace
(3)
all
We
know
and Darwin, and how the former, admittedly a simultaneous and independent elaborator of
"Darwinism/' has, ever increasingly, combined " with this his " Darwinism a full and deliberate
Theism.
tribution
And
patiently probing and sincere biologist to the religious philosophy of the question is his elucidation of how man
of this
most
possesses
faculties
certain
faculties,
the
cannot have been developed under the law of Natural Selection; and how no breach
273
man,
living
tion,
of
new
causes
into
the
continuity
last
of
beings.
Indeed,
at
as to
this
least
three stages
in
objecthe
development of the organic world when some new cause or power must necessarily have come
into action
the stage from inorganic to organic from a mere complexity, however great, of
:
"
chemical compounds, to living protoplasm, the first plant-cell, a new thing in the world, with
its
the stage of reproduction, variation, vitality sensation or consciousness, a thing, the animal,
that feels
its
own
existence;
full self-consciousness,
And
the
"may
be none the
less real
because absolutely
imperceptible at their points of origin, as is the change that takes place in the curve in which a
body
is
new
force
altered" (Darwinism, reprint 1905, pp. 469-476). would only add to man's special character-
We
istics
full
the sense of the Infinite, the non-contingent, Reality, the Perfect ; and we would so frame
18
274
our
as
perhaps,
after
all,
some
super-conscious,
non-" personal"
require
is
Spirituality, since
what we here
a family of
In any case, Dr. Wallace's example is an impressive direct demonstration of how little even
lifelong
devotion
to,
and
Biology
and
Epigenesis
Atheism or even Agnosticism indeed how much some such workers find their researches point to,
and
and
explanation, Spiritualism
(4)
and Theism.
still
Many
of
us
personally
remember
Professor
and
Huxley s Romanes Lecture, Evolution Ethics, in 1893, the original main position
(though practically retracted by the author in one of his notes added to the published
text,
of which
and
plentifully
Naturalistic
refuted.
Is,
there
not,
"a
sanction
"
for
;
morality in the ways of the cosmos ? he asks any justification there for the artificial world built
up by man within
may
teach us
how
the good
and the
evil tendencies of
275
but in
itself it is
incompetent to furnish
any
better
reason
why what we
preferable to what we call evil, " Cosmic nature is no school of virtue, before."
call
but
the headquarters
"
;
of the
enemy
hence "the ethical progress of society depends, not on imitating the cosmic process, still less in running away from it, but in
nature
and
"
combating
it
(pp. 31
27
34).
striking contrast, and yet a frame and bulwark, to the deep and delicate ethical sense of Darwin
himself.
direct
nothing short of a the inevitable challenge consequence, indeed concomitant, of every doctrine of Descent
It
was,
however,
to
and Evolution which would insist upon itself as exhaustive and self-explanatory, and upon earlier and shallower stages of life as the true and complete explanation of the later and richer ones.
Professor
Andrew
and guarded Professor Huxley's appeal. Especially does he finely discriminate between the two meanings of " " the word nature and their continual confusion and identification in all naturalistic thinking and
admirably
illustrated,
feeling
happens
activities of
known world except the responsible human beings," and the higher and
276
wider sense of "the entire nature of things/' And he insists that, "since the true nature of the
cause only becomes apparent in the effect," we must, when we pass from one order of facts to
another, ever be careful not to press the account of the preceding set of facts, out of which a fact of
and
full
identify
by the natural-
are not the causes of the consequents, since here the antecedents are taken in abstraction
from tlieir consequents^ as we might suppose them to be if no such consequents had ever issued from
them.
explain
to
Hence the futility of all attempts to human life in terms of the merely animal,
life
terms of the inorganic, and ultimately to find a sufficient formula for the cosmic process in terms of the redistribution of
explain
in
And yet we have no means a satisfactory conviction both of the world's unity and of an intrinsically worthy end explana-
end which we recognize as alone worthy of attainment is also the end of existence as such (A. Seth's Man's Place in the Cosmos, 1897, PP- X 4> *5> 3 2 )-
Here we would only ever keep it abundantly plain that we thus in no wise exclude the possibility,
Pringle Pattison:
277
which
is,
surely,
a great probability,
that, in other
planets and stars, quite other, higher beings than man may, simultaneously or subsequently, exist, who know and practise indefinitely more of Reality
will do.
home and
justification for
Darwin's own touching sense of duty, of obligaeven of sin as possible, and above all, tion,
little
perhaps, of the sacredness of careful veracity in Naturalism has really no logical things.
room
these difficult and magnificent things, " however sincerely individual " Naturalists may
for
practise
in
consistent
doing
(5)
Anthropology and the Comparative History of Religions is, most understandably, still largely, though perhaps no longer increasingly,
influenced
by the
Cl
Naturalism
"
just considered,
fine sense of
all
human,
things,
discriminate,
theoretically,
between
accounts and ultimate explanations. And indeed the earlier, ruder manifestations of man's social,
ethical,
and
religious instincts
and requirements
278
have been so much neglected and are so interestnature is so ing, and man's mental and spiritual
continuously and so closely awakened, nourished,
limited,
deflected
by
his
race, into
which he
is
importance to
in these
still
Such a pregnant little book as Mr. R. jR. Maretfs Anthropology, 1912, seems to us an instructive combination of all the insights and advantages, and of some of the imperfections, "We anthropologists," he tells just indicated.
us,
"
that
there shall
principle
running
is
right
through
for
all
men,
civilized
and
life
past."
"Anthropology
human
:
human
students of life than, say, the life of plants." And again " Let us look upon ourselves as if we were so many bees and ants, not forgetting, of
use of the inside information that, in the case of the insects, we so conspicuously
course, to
make
lack" (pp. u, 12 These passages seem 13, 1 8). not free from the mistakes signalized above. But
;
Naturalism in Anthropology
the following
finds
is
279
"
that
it
" the reference to time," nor treat living things as machines"; "Anthropology is a history of vital
merely physical"; and "the more you take in, the better your chance of really understanding"
(pp. 14,
I
1 6,
17).
will
impression of the greater penetration and sympathetic evocation of present or past, civilized or barbarous, humanity offered by such work as that
of
Rohde,
compared
or,
with
of
that
of
the later
or
Nietzsche;
again,
Paul
Wendland
Willamowitz Mollendorff, contrasted with that of " " workers and of the delicate biological justice of such criticisms as Professor Loisy
more
bestows upon thought as brilliant as that of M. Salomon Reinach, and upon certain theses so learnedly maintained by Professor J. G. Frazer.
these and similar cases the superiority, such as it is, appears to proceed from a more
In
all
For Rohde-Nietzsche, see specially O. Crusius, Erwin RoJtde^ For P. Wendland, his Die HelhnistischRomiscke Kultur^ 1907. For Willamowitz-Mollendorff, the beautiful preface to his Grieckisches Lesebuch, i. I, ed 1907, p. viii. For
1
y,
166-217.
280
3.
Yet the increase of light furnished by the movement so predominatingly initiated by Darwin, concerning the closeness of the relations between man's spirit and man's body, between man and other living beings, and between the whole living world and its inorganic environment, has also
brought, as
all
fail
to bring,
much
and growth
to our apprehension, analysis, and formulation of the facts and requirements constitutive of our
religious
We take this to
has brought the
The movement,
best,
scientific attention
chemical facts
to living beings. And in such living beings we have inevitably a wondrous increase of significance and reality. Thus the young traveller Darwin
already especially absorbed in "the singular relations of the animals and plants in the several
is
Galapagos Islands, and of all of these to the " inhabitants of South America ; he ever loves
to exalt plants in the scale of organized beings ; as to Buckle's and materialist and, monistic
"
"
History of Civilization, he "doubts whether his generalizations are worth anything" (Charles
Darwin, pp.
'29,
49,
35).
The
close intercon-
281
and the deep difference between living organisms and all mere matter and its mechanical
laws, are thus vividly apprehended here.
Religion,
Life in general, and all balanced and circumspect Epistemology, combine in insisting upon precisely these mysterious differences, superiorities, and And especially Religion, above all connections. and develops its strength awakens Christianity,
in contact with the visible, especially the organic
;
and, in
life,
instinct,
increasingly like as
Here Darwin's
lives of plants
rapt
interest
insects,
interrelated
bird's
grandly self-oblivious outgoing to the humble and the little, most genuine flowerings of the delicate Christian spirit in this
fierce,
love,
rough world of ours. Without such real bridging over such real differences between
possessed of varyingly deep inner
lives,
realities
such studies instantly become impossible, or dry and merely ingenious, or weakly sentimental.
graduated glow of love for the graduated realities of our real world will succeed in withstanding the fierce flare of the ruinous
this deep,
And
282
passion for abstraction and for the logical pyramid as now again manifested in Professor Haeckel's Here " the vehement monistic propaganda.
great abstract law of mechanical causality rules the entire universe, as it does the mind of man/' Here, with the beginning of all things, we have
"
the
at
matter,
;
prothyl,
cooling of
heavenly
with the
we know,
evolved
;
is
life,"
is
bacteria,
arise, "by spontaneous generation from the nitrocarbonates" of those stars; "the radiation of
heat into space gradually lowers the temperature that is the end until all water is turned into ice,
"At length the moons fall organic life." upon the planets, and the planets upon the sun. The collision again produces an intense heat
of
all
.
.
.
Darwin,
we
"
"
monism of Buckle
and
the
to
be of doubtful
worth,
"Over
this 'perpetual
motion/" continues
Professor,
unconquerably
cheerful
"rules
We
283
we have evolved
and
'
substance
"
;
"
the
monism of
cosmos
which we establish thereon proclaims the absolute dominion of the great eternal iron laws throughout the universe," and "shatters the three central
of the dualistic philosophy the personality of God, the immortality of the soul, and the freedom of the Will" (The Riddle of the
dogmas
Universe,
?
8th
impression,
1911,
pp.
129-132,
i34 135)Thus, the more abstract and unreal the notions, the more they here oust and destroy the concrete,
the experienced, the real
;
and man
is
invited to
admire
own
Such
perversely
clever
feats
are
still
very
thrive, not on any intrinsic popular. adequacy or fruitfulness, but on the faults and excesses committed by the representatives of the
Yet they
richer
great triumphs, at shallower levels, of mechanical and especially upon the plausibility of science
;
"clear" thoughts.
(2)
interesting attempt of the Rev. F. Tennant, in his Origin and Propagation of Sin,
1 See the wise and firm discussion of Evolution in Professor Eucken's Geistige Stromungen der Gegenwart, $rd ed. 1904,
The
pp. 185-225.
284
1902, to elucidate the moral and religious experiences of Temptation and Guilt, and the theological
definitions of these experiences,
least
not only raises or intensifies difficulties, but can also resolve some of the obscurities attaching to
these profoundly important matters. "The further back we trace man, the less,"
we
;
find
"the
ceded the 'personal self"; personality, in terms of which theology has been wont exclusively to formulate its doctrine of the
origin of sin,
emerged extremely
origin
late in
human
thought."
"The
of
sin,
like
other so-
rather than an abrupt, inexplicable plunge; and the first sin, instead of being the most heinous
and the most momentous in the race's history, would rather be the least significant of all." And
"
if
is
necessarily
endowed
with instincts, appetites, impulsions, it contains abundance of raw material for the production of
as soon as these native propensities are brought into relation with any or restraining condemning
sin,
influence/'
The
to
universality of sin, in
at least
many
of
its
attributed
285
with
all
their
priority
in
time and
fixity in instinct
and
and superposition of a higher nature' which demands their subordination to less immediate and tangible ends." Hence "the human infant is simply a non-moral animal"; and "our lowest
appetites are
means of
self-realization
in
the
highest sense," whilst they are also "the fateful rocks on which so many human lives make
Indeed, it is because the mastery shipwreck." of appetite and emotion by the moralized man has always proved so difficult that human thought
"
has generally considered the animal side of our nature to be positively evil" Or, as Archdeacon
Wilson
"
tersely
is
believer sin
puts it, "to the" evolutionist not an innovation, but the survival
earlier stage of
an
whose
"this
sinfulness lies
conflict
of
"
The
deepest root of sin, and the deeper and deepest kinds of sin (such as self-centredness, pride of intellect, self-adoration) are surely appre-
The
hended or explained here only very inadequately. Yet it is certain that, of all the Christian Symbols
concerning Original
Sin,
286
Council of Trent (1546) is the least in conflict with such a conception. And, in any case, it is clear that there is nothing here to weaken our
sense of the profound duty and Tightness of virtue, our conviction concerning the grim reality and
or our longing for grace help against sinfulness and self. (3) And finally, as regards Epigenesis
wrongfulness of
sin,
and
and
Creation,
richer,
conception of Creation, especially a concentration upon, and vivid apprehension of, the continuity and immediacy of the Divine Action involved in
to leave
room within Creation for all probable forms of Epigenesis, provided always that such Epigenesis or Evolution is content to be, not the
all-sufficient
strikingly to
in
and
"
in
whatsoever Science
may
find this adaptation, it must always be opposed to the conception of a Divine Power here and
there, but not everywhere, active.
For Science
every-
where and in every quality and power, in environment and in organism, in stimulus and in
287
And
be
"
this is
and in struggle, ... in wonder of life and the world. exactly what the Divine Power must
variation
And
'
whereas
God
rested
the sense that God's activity, with respect to the formation of living creatures, ceased at some
point in past time," "Creation, in the reformed language of religion, comes now specially to
mean
for
us
the
relation
between
and
and
permanent
the
finite,
between the moving changes we know in part, and the Power, after the fashion of that observaunknown, which is itself 'unmoved all tion,
motion's source
'
"
Science,
489, 49o). 1909, pp. 491, 492 I will but add that, in proportion as we move up in the scale of reality, the more we have to
Action as bafflingly rich and varied in the manner, the degree, and the and that, in restraint of its operation and aid
conceive the
;
Divine
proportion as we insist upon God's Immanence within the sensible and the human world, in
the
same proportion does the problem of Evil and difficulty. Yet both these mysteries appear to be intrinsic to life, and
increase in urgency
religion,
which has not caused or imagined them, can bear them; indeed only religion can, if not
a88
and surmount, the wondrous and dread capabilities and realities thus experienced by us in our lives and in
theoretically explain, at least practically utilize
the world.
philosophers, both largely followers of Darwin, but otherwise strikingly different in their
4.
Two
entire orientation of
with Spencer, his Unknowable, and Henri Bergson, with his Durie. will, however, restrict ourselves to
be
considered
here
We
M, Bergson, as by
most
likely to live,
far the
his
and
his
and
Spirit-
uality are so evident and so worthy of respect, that it is difficult, for one who has long loved and learnt
these ways, to take up an attitude towards him that is at all critical. And then, in spite of his admirable form, he is far from easy to
all
from him in
analyse or to understand.
would once more gratefully accept his cardinal distinction between Concrete Time (Duration) and Conceptional Time (Clock-Time),
first
But
restricted
amongst
his descriptions
289
especially his insistence upon the essential, indeed immense, rdle played by Duration
and
Other philosophers the entire life of man. have indeed adumbrated these facts, but no one has so continuously and so profitably elucidated Let us here, then, only consider certain them. other, still more fundamental and original, applicain
the two
rough headings of Time and Space, and of Finalism and the place and character of Transformism.
Our
texts shall
come almost
Dannies Immtdiates de la Conscience^ 2nd ed. 1898, and from his most recent, largest, and most Darwinian work, revolution Crdatrice, 1907. My
fundamental book, the
quotations are made directly from the originals. (i) As concerns Bergson's fundamental anti-
Ess&i sur
of the Durational, Temporal, and Qualitative, and the Extensional, Spatial, and Quantitative, the Essai, in its first chapter, warns us
nomy
that
"we
is
love
language
simple things, and hence our but ill constructed for rendering the
subtleties of psychological analysis"; and then attempts to show, in exquisitely developed ex-
is
never
quantitative, in kind.
Thus
successive (muscular and other) reactions, the " intensity of pain would be a constantly varying
19
290
But "in propor"quality, and not a quantity." tion as the sensation ceases to be affective and
the reactions disappear, we come to perceive the And this external object, the sensation's cause.
cause
is
extensive,
i.e.
measurable
hence we now
associate the idea of a certain quantity in the cause with a certain quality in the effect and we finally
;
put that quantity into this quality." Yet in reality "there exists no contact between the unextended,
quality,
"
and the extended, quantity," although Physics, which calculates the exterior causes of
our internal states, deliberately confounds the two, and thus even exaggerates the illusion of commonsense in this matter" (pp. 10; 28 ; 31, 32 ; 52). And then the second chapter attempts to
establish that the sole reality experienced
is
by us
Quality, with mutual penetration of its as parts, against Time Quantity, with multiplicity " of juxtaposition ; that " every clear idea of
"
Time
Space," whilst "a complex feeling contains indeed a considerable number of simpler elements, but, as soon as the consciousness distinctly perceives them, the psychic
vision
in
state,
number implies a
will, for
that
not only
virtual,
apperception
is
of sub-
divisions In
call
the individual
precisely
objectivity."
Thus, then,
differently treated
291
the one" purely orders, the of Sensible Qualities ; reality heterogeneous, " the other purely " homogeneous, which is Space.
of different
"
It is
Space which,
clearly conceived
by the
in-
telligence, enables us to
make precise distinctions, to count, to abstract, perhaps also to speak." And " in Duration there is never anything homohence
geneous, except what does not endure, namely, Space, in which alone simultaneities appear drawn
and " in Movement there is nothing up in line homogeneous, except the Space which has been
;
"
traversed, that
is,
Immobility.
Hence Science
operates upon Time and Movement only after first eliminating from Time Duration, and from Movement Mobility." In a word, "our perceptions, sensations, emotions, ideas are either clear
and
but then they are impersonal; or they are confused and infinitely mobile, but then " they are inexpressible (ibid. pp. 57, n. i ; 60
precise,
;
63,
86,
first
87;
of
97).
all,
Now
we
are,
struck
by the
strange difference of method pursued with regard For Time here to Time and with regard to Space.
is
most real when most concrete Space most real when most abstract. Again, Time here is real only when full of its characteristics, successions Space is real only when empty of its characterAnd again, Time here is istics, simultaneities.
;
292
real only
when
it
effects
;
Space is real only as a passive medium against which we, concrete beings, can project the thin ghosts of our real
real
experiences, and can thus discriminate into clear simultaneities the obscure successions of our
actual lives.
Nor
is it
is
and Space secondary and everywhere subjective; but both are to be real, and yet they are to answer to directly conhere primary and alone
tradictory standards of reality.
And, again, we are baffled by the intense abstractness of both these two sole realities. For
pure homogeneous Space and pure heterogeneous Becoming are entirely beyond all human ex-
which only knows Spatial and Temporal Objects, in which the Space is never purely homogeneous and the Becoming never purely
perience,
heterogeneous. Certainly such wholesale Spatialization of Science would be the ruin of Science ;
would then -hover completely outside of the concrete reality which it would still claim to interpret. And such a complete Fluidification
for Science
of
Human
spiritual
no
or end which
and trouble, the joy and sadness, above sheer, blind happenings and soulless things.
could
lift
the
toil
293
us
But indeed
indications that
Bergson
himself
gives
two
as the
sheer Change and Becoming which he usually For Duration ever consists declares it to be.
with him in the interpenetration of its various Take away all these parts (however parts.
obscurely discriminated and intimately interpenetrative) and the Succession of Duration has be-
come
Space
whole,
as homogeneous as
which
is
the Simultaneity of precisely what the entire system Yet parts are ever parts of a
and sheer Becoming has no room for And again, wholes, and hence none for parts. Bergson himself sometimes clearly realizes that
Metaphysics cannot simply consist in innumerable,
utterly
independent and
differing,
intuitions
of
an
utterly disjointed, chaotically creative reality. " Introduction k la M&aphysique," Thus, in the
he says
unless
it
"
:
Metaphysics
itself
is
never fully
stiff
itself,
emancipates
from
and ready-
made
concepts, and
(Revue
1903, p.
de
9).
Mdtaphysique
de
Morale, Janv.
Here
again,
then,
we
are
after
will-o'-the-wisp,
unless
is
the
reality
thus
to be conceptualized, contains
some permanence,
294
some
itself.
requirement,
or
end
within
The
up
doubtless, that Bergson has broken the opposites, which together constitute our
is,
two separate worlds ; which worlds, then, are each unreal and excessive, and refuse to come together again. For I, my Self, am not more a sheer Becoming or a sheer
consciousness and
life,
into
am a mere Fixity or a mere Result indeed my manhood consists precisely in the permanence, and in my consciousness of the permanence, of my one Self throughout its changes, and in the upbuilding of my abiding perCreator than
;
sonality
by means of these
vicissitudes.
Doubt-
less without
such changes there would be for me, and for human beings in general (as these are
to us in this earthly
life),
known
is
no upbuilding of the
spiritual
not simply those changes, nor simply their result, nor merely their contemplator ; but it is I,
myself, who, in and through those changes, maintain and build up this my personality.
(2) In
the
Evolution
Cr&atrice,
the
utter
unaccountableness, heterogeneity, unpurposive character of all Duration and Life, in precise proportion
to
its
depth,
;
is
vehemently emphasized
or as
Spirit,
Reality
is
295
makes or unmakes
itself,
but
in
it is
never something
made"
(p.
295).
But
attempts to enforce this his means of various, often exquisite, studies in biological adaptation
and animal
tending
to
show
followed,
and
still
follows, that
is
course of utter
heterogeneity.
He
attracted to Transformism,
it
from Duration against all mere Mechanism and because he finds it to show that "life does not
proceed by association and addition of elements, " but by dissociation and distinction (pp. 40, 97).
Indeed, his entire second chapter here is devoted " The Divergent Directions of the Evolution to
of Life."
And
tends
yet
to
we read here
establish
that
"
this entire
that
the
Vital
is
in
study the
And
as to our
all
human
But
faculties,
Kant indeed
sensible,
considers
i.e.
our intuitions
to
be only
infra-intellectual.
Bergson proposes to find "Science increasingly symbolical, in proportion as it proceeds from the
physical to the psychical through the vital
"
;
so
296
that,
must, in some manner, perceive a thing if we are to be able to symbolize it, there would exist an Intuition of the psychical, and more
since
we
generally of the
vital,
indeed transpose and translate, but which, neverwe would theless, would exceed the Intelligence"
thus possess
"a
which
and as most precious where most concentrated and most nearly a simultaneity, an Eternity. Yet
here again, and on a larger scale than in the Essai, we usually find that the immense stress and
struggle of life, and its various, simultaneous forms or successive stages (inert, instinctive, rational),
only changes and growths in the means to exist, and in the degree and kind of liberty and are
all
for such existence. There is absolutely no change or advance in the end striven for and no wonder, for, from first to last, no end is striven for at all,
self-creation
;
their self-concentration
and
except existence, ever increasingly free indeed from all compulsion, yet bereft throughout of all
rational, ethical, spiritual
Man
to
Exist
297
however obscure and inchoate. Thus in Bergson's predominant view we struggle, suffer, live, and if we die, in order to exist, and only to exist seek anything in and through our existence besides an ever more concentrated, an ever more
;
are supposed to court a Finalism less directly determinist than is Mechanism, but which, in the long-run, is as ruinous to
existing, existence,
liberty,
we
and hence
to
life,
as
is
Mechanism
itself.
are deeply grateful to up. (3) M. Bergson for his great central discrimination
To sum
We
for his
penetration
into
performed by Real
activity
Time
human
But we must demand a similar discrimination between Conceptual and Real Space, and especially the admission of
and consciousness.
the strictly
"
artificial
Real
"
(i.e.
modify Bergson's usual not his occasional admissions, definitions, though For Real concerning Real Time (Duration). Time will then be no more sheer Heterogeneity
changes
will necessarily
and
Creation,
will
be sheer
And
thus
we can
;
ever discover, in our consciousness and activity, real Simultaneity as well as real Succession and
the
first will
not be pure
fixity,
298
fluidity.
But our
life will
the present, as well as back Into the past and on into the future; and it will have a variety in
ever revivify the old, and the And ever steady and extend the new.
will
position
alone will be
fully
justifiable
by
do we systematically
richest,
best-known,
consists
in
of our categories,
ality
But even
However
real,
however
simply ultimate (for man) may be Duration (and this book strongly holds that Duration is indeed
thus real and ultimate), Duration is, surely, at highest, not in its element of Change, but in
its
its
element of Permanence.
clusively insists
boundless,
ceaseless
Change
its
can,
to
his mind,
free operativeness
is
and
And he
but
programme
fixed
of the facts
Yet a
consideration of Bergson s own position, show plainly, I think, that here again, in his idea of
Conation absent
from
Bergsoris
World
299
artificial,
all
its
admirably
own
and
perpetuation, but
to explain them,
he
fails fully
to penetrate
to describe
them
in
of
Professor G. F. Stout's persistent conviction that "any specific activity must be thought of in
relation to
some
it is
result
either maintains
in existence or tends to
an
end to which
1909,
vol.
i.
directed
(Analytic Psychology,
p. 126); and nothing of his fine preoccupation with the relations between Interest and Attention (ibid. pp. 224-240). Indeed, the
primary importance of
Conation, and of the essentially teleological character of all Conation, is wholly absent from And this absence is truly the mind of Bergson.
strange in a mind so delicately alert to all the lesser characteristics of life, and so keenly anxious
to elucidate
life's
as to the final result of Bergson's own general position, it is doubtless his too simple (because, in great part, only negative and naturalistic)
And
300
aversion to
his
admirable
imattaining their own requirements. it goes), is, in the pressive, for instance (as far as Essai (pp. 175, 176), the account of the Free
Act, as an unusually extensive and close interpenetration of the successive parts of Duration
How
as a momentary, almost complete, Concentration and Simultaneity of the Agent's entire Succession.
Yet the same writer will find the essence of this same Duration in an utterly heterogeneous flux,
bereft of
all
all
parts or
any wholeness ;
will
oppose
Simultaneity, as so much Spatialization and hence as the destruction, of the living soul ; and,
(even in such otherwise exquisite descriptions) ignore the most fundamental of all the characteristics of full human self-consciousness,
all,
above
will
according to which the self-concentration of the soul is never sought as admirable or precious
apart from the realization thereby of some end or ideal other than such self-concentration. If, in
this free act, there is
self
moved by
;
necessities
and
ideals, ultimately
by
realities,
of a rational,
can, in endits
ethical, spiritual
if it
own
life,
indestructible necessities
and realities
effects this
and
if
such
self s
a spontaneous affirmation
human
301
depth and happiness then, indeed, can such a self-concentration be a fully moving spectacle for
the
human mind
Bergson has thus, we feel, stopped half-way he has removed the mechanical obstacles to Liberty,
but he has not discovered the spiritual conditions and requisites for the same Liberty. Indeed, by his strenuous exclusion of all permanence, and of
ideal,
as of so
many
abstractions
has,
hostile
to
Freedom, he
most
when
it
masqueraded as a
sheer Mechanism.
And
most
brilliant
mind,
in
his
as
to the active nature, the rich variety, the range, and the successiveness, essential to all life ;
insensibility to
its
purposive
simultaneity.
ning crowned by a naturalistic conclusion, a certain warmth with coldness, and depth with
shallowness.
And
finest
especially
Bergson's
302
central conception are probably those of Professor " Succession and Continuity are/' Bosanquet : " the two inseparable factors of a reality indeed,
which
fundamentally temporal"; but once the dual nature of time is thoroughly admitted, " Durte is" seen to be "one with the relative
is
timelessness
finite
of a finite
self/'
"The
finite
inversely as
its
and
and duty of Religion to experience and conceive full Eternity and Simultaneity, not
simply as an ideal limit to which our quasi-eternity can ever increasingly approach, but as already as the characteristic of the Spirit fully extant
of
spirits,
God,
eternal spirits,
Who acts within these our quasiand Who thus both awakens and
of Eternal Life. 1
Philosophy 1911, pp. 205-254, 300, 301 ; and Mr. Boyce's Gibson's wise and " probing study, The Intuitionism of Henri Bergson," The Quest,
',
On most of the points considered above, see J. Stewart's excellent Critical Exposition of Bergsorts
1
M'Kellar
Jan. 1911.
New
303
CHAPTER
XI
WE are,
and yet also different Eternal as Life, from those directly helps, regards presented or supplied by the philosophers, singly This world, and these difficulties or collectively.
world, different difficulties,
and helps, are, in their special intensity, range, and complication, a genuinely new experience in
the history of mankind.
It is
West-European and North-American workmen, with their special requirements, passions, and
have been developed within the last sixty years. The advent of machinery, especially of steam and electricity; the huge
mentality, as these
increase of population and its concentration in great cities ; the amazing swiftness and continu-
ousness
of
international
communication
the
immense
increase in the pace and range of men's the gigantic organizaliving, thinking, desiring ;
304
tions of capital
stimulative
and of labour the influence, both and repellent, of the great French
;
the attempt of the boitrgeois to remodel society and the State in accordance with the ideas of the sceptical Encyclopaedists; and,
Revolution,
in
more, the propagandist force of the Marxist, utterly immanentist or directly irreligious, Socialstill
ism:
this,
and the
like,
and
difficulty
human
past Here,
we
of troubles and aspirations, now seething all around Let us, only in so far as it affects Eternal Life.
consider briefly the attitude of Marx to our group of experiences and convictions ; let us next elucidate how and why not only Socialus, then, first
unfavourable,
or
;
directly
hostile,
generally, to that
deepest religious life and, finally, what are the elements in this situation generally, and what are the symptoms observable amongst Socialists in
particular,
which
are
already
satisfactory
or
i.
in
Karl Marx (born in Treves in 1818; died London in 1883), as his collaborator Friedrich
tells us,
Engels
made
" the
Marxs
Conception of History
305
of the Materialistic Conception of History, and of the Secret of Capitalist Production ; and
through
Science."
became a
is
simply
of
the
affirmation
the
continuous
process
Development of
this eternal
permanent except
Becoming and
tell
Dissolution, as
it
Marx
But
and Engels
us they found
in
Hegel.
they hailed with joy Feuerbach's elimination of the dualism (still retained by Hegel) between
Spirit
latest,
life
frank proclamation of the entire spiritual of man as the product of mere matter. For
for
is
Feuerbach, there thus exists no not essentially distinct from the God; man brute ; thinking is only a chemical process ; death
Marx, as
is
the
end of
all.
Yet Marx and Engels consider that they have apprehended the evolutionary process more
deeply, again, than Feuerbach, through their dis" covery that production, and, next to producthe tion, exchange of the products, is the basis " " of all social order ; that in every society which arises in history the distribution of the products,
depends upon what, and how, men produce in such a society, and upon how these
306
Thus the final products are exchanged therein. causes of all social and political changes are to be sought, not in Philosophy, but in Economics/'
And
of
this
vital
all
itself
and
with mankind's recognition of the fundamentally economic character of its entire life, a new social
new law and a new morality whilst religion disappears when man, thus fully awake, enters upon the Socialist period of human
order
arises,
with a
history.
a moment, remind ourselves how this system, in its original, Marxist form, wages a relentless war against all the natural organizations
the one (here sole and For the omnipotent) organization of the State. State here does not simply represent, co-ordinate,
which are
not
and supplement the narrower, yet deeper and more primitive, organizations of the family,
regulate,
class,
but ob-
viously supplants them all, since it possesses, distributes, regulates, commands simply everything.
And
:
cording to rigidly equalitarian, strictly secularist standards marriage becomes a shifting, temporary union; the family, a co-ordination of so-many
citizens of the all-providing
State;
and educa-
Man 3
tion,
307
a training
1
the State.
2.
Now
I
if
the classes,
in view,
we
think,
varyingly,
even angrily,
so predominant. (i) Man's capacity of attention and of persistent operative interest is essentially limited
and only
great, unbroken traditions of spiritual experience and of mental training are, in ordinary
circumstances,
limits.
able
somewhat
to
extend these
are, for
the
most
we
are
here,
whatever
may be
their
deepest require-
now-
adays and especially in these classes, dependent, and are vividly seen to be dependent, upon national and international, financial and social con1 The quotations are from F. Engels' Die Enfiwicklung des Socialismus von der Utofie zur WissenscJiaft^ 4th ed. 1891, pp. I take these 26, 23 ; and from his D&hrings Umvalzung^ p. 253. quotations, and most of my description, from the very careful discussion, "Der Socialismus," in Victor Cathrein's
ie^
vol.
ii.
pp. 117-219
306
Thus the final products are exchanged therein. causes of all social and political changes are to be sought, not in Philosophy, but in Economics."
And
of
this
vital
itself
and
with mankind's recognition of the fundamentally economic character of its entire life, a new social
order arises, with a
new law and a new morality disappears when man, thus fully
;
human
;
but must, for a moment, remind ourselves how this system, in its original, Marxist form, wages
a relentless war against all the natural organizations which are not the one (here sole and
For the omnipotent) organization of the State. State here does not simply represent, co-ordinate,
and supplement the narrower, yet deeper and more primitive, organizations of the family,
regulate,
class,
but ob-
supplants them
regulates,
since
it
possesses,
distributes,
thing.
And
State;
and educa-
Mans
tion,
307
the State.
2.
Now
I
if
the classes,
the necessities,
find,
in view,
we
think,
varyingly,
of the insistently, even angrily, tfAw-world attitude here still so predominant of Secularism
(i)
sistent operative
essentially limited
and only
great,
unbroken
traditions of spiritual
experience and of mental training are, in ordinary circumstances, able somewhat to extend these
limits.
traditions
are, for
the
most
we
are
here,
whatever
may be
their
deepest
require-
more immediate-seeming,
needs.
adays and especially in these classes, dependent, and are vividly seen to be dependent, upon
national
1
and
international, financial
and
social con-
quotations are from F. Engels* Die Entwicklung des Socialismus von der Utopie zur Wissenschaft^ 4th ed. 1891, pp. I take these 26, 23 ; and from his Diihrings Uwwahungi p. 253.
quotations,
discussion,
The
and most of
my
"Der
2nd
Socialismus/'
ii.
philosophic^
pp. 117-219
308
ditions of the
and hardly calculable character. And again, all Two years ago, the this is on a gigantic scale. railway workers of France almost succeeded in suspending the entire traffic of the country, and
were stopped only by the Army ordered on to the railway lines by an ex-Socialist Premier even
more
revolution.
This year
in
Germany
if
the Socialists
Reichstag;
and,
Germany possessed
proportional representation, they would avowedly occupy double that number of seats. And at the
present moment England is in the throes of a coal strike with over one million miners idle, with all
the mines at a standstill for a fortnight, and with already nearly a million of other workmen deprived of employment.
the problem of the chronically unemployed in all the great cities is
And
more anxious
still,
practically insoluble.
wonder, then, that those who find themselves the very subjects of such crushing necessities and of such immense excitements necessities and excitements all well within the range of the senses and of the least-developed mentality show little or no ethical or spiritual experience and requirement? We should be face to face
What
Growth
309
And
and away from the dimmer depths of life, is added a revulsion against the great Churches, and largely even against the Chapels and Sects, on grounds of political and social grievances,
The bourgeois 's old hatred of real or imaginary. the noble has, here, been in part continued, in part replaced, by the worker's hostility to the capitalist ;
and both these incensed classes in the Church the ally of the
still
largely see
Castle,
and
in
the Clergy the paid apologists of the exploiters and oppressors of labour. And such an alienation
from organized religious worship and instruction, even where it is almost entirely political or social
in its origin, cannot
gravely to weaken the The religious inclinations of those concerned. comparative ease and peace which characterized
fail
Church
in
France
nor the
this point.
revulsion suffices fully to explain the phenomenon ; we only get to its bottom if we add a widespread
ignorance, often a grave misunderstanding, of the nature and history of religion and of mankind,
and
of the perennial character and necessities of All that excited absorption in soul. the
human
310
the
ally
men
to
materialistic,
mechanical
True, these
views,
the deepest
demands of the
in
soul.
demands have,
necessities,
the past, time after time, all lesser victoriously surmounted, or swept away,
howsoever tangible and urgent they may have seemed and these same demands still appear in man's universal restlessness until he
;
reaches those unfailing fountains of Eternal Life. Yet meanwhile, and on the surface, the majority of the men in question are still satisfied by such
clever
and
by
Indeed, the
inevitably
fail
men
of this mentality
must
also
human
society
social arrange-
ments, although these are the very things in which they are so absorbed. Thus they offer us, in doctrinaire Socialism, a distinct, indeed a highly
militant
A time of universal peace and plenty, of absolute equality and entire contentment, is here* quite certainly to come, and quite certainly by means of the Social Revolution alone and all this is to be here below, entirely
millennial character.
;
human powers
311
and earthly lives. It is a sort of Kingdom of God, but without a King and without a God an awakening of man to all his wants a finding that these wants are all sublunar and a satisfying of
;
all
these sublunar wants by purely sublunar means. And all this is to be achieved with a complete-
ness demanding a faith more difficult than any of the great religious faiths. For here we are
not simply to achieve an amelioration of man's earthly lot, an insight into the spiritual utility of
suffering
final
and of
trial,
and peace can only find their preparation here, and their full achievement only hereafter but this our earthly life alone, and its
perfection
;
non-religious elements alone, are to satisfy man, by the sheer perfection of their development and
John Stuart Mill could ask himcultivated young man of self, when a richly " twenty Suppose that all your objects in life were realized that all the changes in institutions and opinions which you are looking forward to, could be completely effected at this very instant would this be a great joy and happiness to you ?"
harmonization.
:
And "an
answered 'No
1875, pp,
But here we have souls, of much 133, 134). less development and self-knowledge, which proclaim an unhesitating "yes."
312
Eternal Life
finally,
Contemporary Stwvey
since happiness is here to arise entirely from the perfection of exclusively earthly
And
conditions achieved by exclusively earthly means, it is plain that all other-worldly, invisible, eternal
and seekings, even if any logical basis remained for them here, have to be rigorously suppressed. For that earthly perfection, and the conseinclinations
quent happiness, are indeed completely achievable, but they are very difficult to achieve. Hence no
no waste of energy, are permissible here. Man, even in his holiday dreamings, is no more to be an amphibious creature, longing
distractions,
somehow
he
is
to be a denizen of
no more between
them; but he is ever to be simply, exclusively, a land-animal, a creature of earth alone. We thus get an immense further enforcement of the
secularism
Yet we can also trace three ditions and symptoms, in this great
3.
sets of consocial
move-
ment, which are full of promise for religion. (i) First, there are certain general effects which
various degrees and ways, reach throughout the countries concerned.
in
all
men
all
We
of
of us are here put face to face with great masses men who, if without the strength, are yet also
313
without the maladies, of full education who are, thus, without the dainty, dreamy scepticism so
largely prevalent
amongst the
leisured classes
and who frequently manifest a crude and violent, yet sincere and simple, even self-sacrificing faith, however materialistic and anti-religious most of its form, and much of its substance, may still,
unfortunately, be.
Certainly, the perfection of the
Socialist organization
the presence of
much
all
And
tainly
Socialist
again,
this
does
some
real
it
ranks,
since
complete
dis-
appearance of some such incitement would probably be almost as noxious as would be its
triumph.
substance,
Our
social
problem indeed
is,
in
its
inevitable;
this
and
its
the
Socialists
substance than they could cure it The Socialists, however, can and do call the forcible attention of
the classes, and of the bureaucrats, ever so averse to facing reality, to the grave troubles and re-
quirements of the masses. (2) And this double gain, in reality of mind and in public-spiritedness, brought by the Social
Problem
is,
or can be, a
314
special
and
for the
Churches,
and
here
the experience
The advantage
brings home, even to the sleepy traditionalist or recalcitrant official, with demonstrative clearness
and clamorous
intensity, how large is the dependence of the growth and power of the religious
experiences and requirements, amongst average human beings, upon a certain security and
means and circumstances of physical existence, and especially upon some family life and leisure. The cases of the Galilean "poor," i.e. small fishermen and husbandmen, whom Our Lord declared to be blessed, or, again, the Umbrian peasantry and workmen addressed
stability
in
the
by the Poverello of
discourses,
Assisi in his
homely open-air
point.
are
here
nowise
in
The
not simply intensified for us, it is radically changed ; and this change has made us realize, more clearly than ever before, the
problem
is
great dependence of the chances and articulation of religion upon the various social conditions of
the average human beings addressed by it This we now see to apply even to the Primitive
Christian
it is
religion,
and
O^t,r
This indeed
parodied,
Socialists,
because
and almost as keenly, but more wisely, apprehended by the various Christian Social For the latter, with whatever excesses workers.
strongly realize the necessity, for average man, of some social and sanitary
all
or even errors,
roominess and decency, some home life, some assurance concerning the morrow, and some little leisure, as preliminaries for the growth within him
of the religious
religious appeals.
instincts
and of an echo
to
Cardinal
in
Manning
in
England,
the
dis-
Bishop
Ketteler
Germany,
and
Play in France, all vividly apprehended this truth, as indeed did Pope Leo And the late Bishop the Thirteenth himself.
tinguished
le
M.
And
and
close occupa-
and with
these social problems, brings, in the long run and in the most unexpected, overwhelming ways,
an admirable further revelation and example, to believers and unbelievers alike, of the costly twofold source of Christianity's perennial youth and
renovative
power.
For
Christianity
is
thus
obliged to be,
316
Temporal and
since
and Psychical,
according to
now
it
has to be
all
this
sciences,
and
and
on a scale, unknown even a century ago so that, more than ever, any exclusive Other- Worldliness, all quietistic suffering and listless waiting, would be treason against both man and God. Thus less than ever is the Immanentism and the Incarnational Doctrine of Christianity
an empty theory
indeed,
its
penetrate
awaken and
develop its own self, has never in the history of the world had so gigantic a field, and such immense
difficulties,
in
to develop its
In reality only a power, as it possesses now. vivid faith in the utterly real and perfect God, only
the experience and love of Eternal Life, are able, in the long run, to supply a sufficiently deep, steady, and tender love and service of our fellowcreatures, precisely where, in their actual condition,
they most require, because they least deserve, such selfless devotion. No wise regulations, no scientific
insi'ght
are here,
for this
most
difficult
creative, disposition.
will
And
union
will
Sufficient here
317
and will produce, a profound selfknowledge and self-hatred within the devoted lover of his fellows a deep, genuine, daily turning away of the whole soul from the shallow, naturalistic self. Asceticism, in its noblest and widest sense and forms, will thus again operate as the great instrument of love; and will ever purify and replenish that expansive outgoing to creatures And the second, the and intimacy with them. Other- World movement, the sense of Eternal Life, will precisely correspond to, and continue, that Transcendence in Our Lord's life and teaching
;
historical criticism
is
again dis-
covering as one (indeed as the chief) of the two driving forces operative there, and which ever
anew reawakens the life of Christianity. Yet it is only the two movements together,
Immanence, and the Eternal in the Temporal only this tension and duality in harmony and union, which constitute And the Christian spirit's flower and strength. surely never was there a finer field for the heroically joyous practice of these two movements
the Transcendence
in the
together, for the fructification of each by the other, and for the full power of the Christian spirit
which
is
their origin
and
before us now.
summing
up
318
the poorer
and working
classes of
London,
"
:
tells
and celibacy
The
a St. Martin, sharing his cloak with the beggar, is incompatible with family duties. But the saintly, self-sacrificing life is that which
strikes the imagination of the
does.
To
do
effective
working classes from the Churches, Booth can " declare The Secularist propaganda is not a very
:
the last twenty years have powerful influence The witnessed a notable change in this respect. successes at the polls (for the Board of Guardians,
;
etc.)
of
who, in the
name
of
religion, are giving their lives to the service of the people, is one of the noteworthy facts of demo-
of voluntary poverty seems to be the only road to the confidence of the people in this matter" of religion
cratic rule."
life
(Life
and Labour of
Summary,
And
viction
let
us note
how
this
same
religious con-
can alone save our enthusiasms, more necessary and more difficult than ever before, from
Symptoms of
into indifference
faith
Religioiis
Reawakening
319
and cynicism. For only by such do we obtain a motive for the most heroic action and devoted love, free from any denial or evasion of the dread facts of human life and
a
human
nature,
insincere idealization
Man here is to do of the past, present, or future. his utmost to improve his fellow-man's earthly lot; but that lot, whilst greatly improvable with
time and care, is deliberately held to find its comAnd, in this faith, pletion in another life alone.
such completion can become real and abiding for each soul whereas, in the Secularist systems, the
;
perfection which they offer would (if attained) be, even as regards the entire race, only for that 1 race's limited duration.
(3)
There
are, indeed,
Socialistic leaders
especially in the working-class world generally, that certainly the angry secularism, perhaps also the
Thus
1
life,
in
Revisionist
As
to the
his
organ,
the
and the irreplaceableness of Christianity, with its Transcendence and Immanence, precisely in our present Social troubles, see Professor E. Troeltsch's great book, Die Soxiallehren der Christlichen Kirchen^ 1912, pp. 975~977, 974, 978, 979. Sensible admissions appear and distinctions in V. Cathrein's article, "Sociale
xi, coll.
431-436.
320
Sozialistische Monatshefte>
now
modifies
Marx-
ism in a more
idealist
and
religious
direction.
German
view of
" The element in thought, can declare Marx's doctrine which constituted a particular
:
life, is
now
"
;
decomposition
very probable
its
dreams of progress and its enthusiasm over development are damped by the facts of life and by disillusions, will hand over its believers to the Christian Sects since the Socialists have presumably lost for ever towards the great all trust and all attraction Churches" ("Die Kirche im Leben der GegenSocial Democracy, the
more
wart," in Weltanschauung^ 1911, pp. 447, 436). In Belgium, M. Van der Velde is certainly
friendly to religion, although
he
still
treats
it
as
is
;
the exponent of
an ethico-religious Socialism
and Dr. Angelo Crespi, who lives as much in England as in Italy, has moved out of the Socialist system into an organic and spiritual conception of Society, and an
And
in France,
calist leader,
and
M. Georges
321
of thought and not a few crudities and injustices as to past events and still living persons) with
La
The
and
he
tells
us
"
:
strictly
allied to
the unfailing pessimism ; " source of ceaseless religious renovation ; indeed, " amongst ourselves to-day, the feeling of mystery
is
and pessimism
continues highly adapted to excite the desire for the very highest activities, since a man's conviction
strong in proportion to the domination exercised within his soul by this feeling of mystery." And
is
Sorel is alertly opposed to all Pantheism. Thus " The religious man understands life only by referring it to a Power, superior to Nature, with
into relation."
"
The problem
of the relations between Religion and Science will, without doubt, ever more passionately interest " One of the
our successors."
of the
Pantheistic
tendencies
indeed, even
as we have
it
attenuated the old teachings as to Grace and Sin." " Modern piety would be quite content to find the
And
he
respects
Institutional
322
Christianity:
live
will,
without doubt,
undergo large there will be only a limited number " of believers, but these will be genuine Christians
restrictions
;
on
in
France,
will
La
Religione
$ Oggi,
1911, pp. 8-10 14, 15; 125). In his Les Illusions du Progres^ second edition, 1911, we have a striking hatred of the Encycloptdistes,
for self-renunciation
:
and
spiritual greatness.
Eighteenth Century the terror of Sin, the respect for Chastity, and Pessimism, disappeared more or less simultaneously hence Christianity disappeared
;
also."
must tend to prevent the bourgeois ideas from poisoning the class which is now rising we can never do too much to break
"All our
efforts
;
every link between the people and the literature of " Catholicism the Eighteenth Century." Again
:
can regain its youth only if a crisis occurs within it, under the action of men formed to the spiritual
life
in the
monastic
institutions.
History proves
effects
provoke prodigious
"The present hour," not the idea of greatness favourable to indeed, is but other times will come, since history tells us
of"
spiritual "greatness."
"
that greatness cannot indefinitely be lacking to that portion of humanity which possesses the
incomparable treasures of
classical culture
and of
Institutional Religion
the Christian tradition" (pp. 32, 286, 329,335). And in the Reflections sur la Violence, 1909, he
admits that
efficacious
no
historical
its
movement
is
is
truly
unless
end
here
accepted
far
as
an
absolute
finality.
Altogether,
we
are
not
from the
Life, its
bracing costliness and its irreplaceable greatness, as operative within the creaturely soul, the
servant of the Perfect Reality, God. 1
CHAPTER
Introductory
XII
INSTITUTIONAL RELIGION
Strict necessity, yet apparently fatal decline, of Institutional Religion Causes of this decline Institutional Religion and Eternal Life.
WE
have reserved,
of our
survey,
the consideration
of
the
Institutional
Religions, in so far as these are the homes and training-grounds of the experiences and convictions concerning Eternal
Life,
and
in so far
much
to the
324
these convictions,
are themselves
checked and purified by these convictions, Let us, then, first show clearly that religious
Institutions are indeed the
normal requirements,
expressions, and instruments of the religious sense that Religion and its Institutions cannot, if
;
in
own
human
;
life,
with their corresponding organizations and that, nevertheless, there are numerous, broad symptoms
all
around us of a deep-seated, widespread, and Institutional still spreading, alienation from all
Religion.
Let
us,
next, explain
and
aids,
sensibilities
operative at present,
ism.
Here we
the religious Church, as by far the oldest, most widespread, and most consistent of all such bodies and as
;
shall take, as
alone,
so
it
well
known
finally show how and why the exand convictions periences concerning Eternal Life surround, penetrate, supplement, purify, and check
let
And
us
Religions
Need of
Institutions,
Treble
325
and let us illustrate such an unconquerably deep and all-fructifying sense of the Eternal, Perfect God, as developed within and through such Institutions, by the life and utterances of a few recent spiritual seers and heroes at work
and aids
;
i.
now
ever increasingly
clear,
to
all
deep, impartial students, that Religion has ever primarily expressed and formed itself in Cultus,
in social organization, social worship, intercourse
between soul and soul and between soul and God; and in Symbols and Sacraments, in contacts
between
spirit
life, we always find either that this soul's religion has constantly been weak or that the soul is suffering under a reaction from some religious
;
excess,
and
of
is
losing
its
process
is
gaining
finally, that
its religion,
though non-institutional,
was
awakened
in this soul
by some fervent
find
institutional
religionist
We
certainly
the
and as
effect
more powerfully because everywhere assumed rather than anywhere formally expressed), in the great Israelitish and Jewish
(often all the
326
Prophets in our Lord and the Apostles, especially St. Paul in Origen, Augustine, Aquinas but also in Luther and Calvin; especially again in St. Teresa, in Pascal, Bossuet, F&ielon and in
;
;
Laud,
And
Nicolas of Goes, Leibniz, and Berkeley and, in our own times, in Rosmini, Trendelenburg,
Fechner,
the
Cairds.
is,
of
in
Institutionalism
of
observable
post-Christian
Judaism, in
in
Mohammedanism,
in
Brahmanism,
institutional
Buddhism.
And
this
social-
threefold.
(i)
There
the need of
Common
Worship.
Professor Troeltsch has admirably shown that this necessity is rooted in the very nature of man
religion,
and hence
is
logically
more general than, any and every positive incorporation by the founders of "It is a law of the great historical religions. social psychology that nowhere can men exist
feelings
relations
that,
alongside of
each other, with merely parallel and thoughts, but that thousandfold
subsist
arise
327
require a
concrete centre.
And
this
general law applies also to the religious life." " Indeed, one of the clearest results of all religious
history
and
all
religious
psychology
is
that
the
Religion is, not the Dogma and the and Communion, the living but Cultus Idea, intercourse with the Deity an intercourse of the
essence of
entire community having its vital roots in Religion and deriving its ultimate power of thus conjoining individuals from its faith in God." And hence
bring us, we cannot expect a certainty and force of the knowledge of God and of His redemptive power to subsist
"
may
without
Communion and
Cultus.
And
so long as
a Christianity of any kind shall exist at all, it will be conjoined with a Cultus, and with Christ
holding a central position in this Cultus." Indeed, " the absence of Communion and of Cultus is the
malady of modern Christianity and of " modern Religion generally (Die Bedeutung der Geschicktlichkeit Jesu fur den Glauben, 1911, pp.
specific
Our Lord instituted a Preaching of Band Apostles, and that St. Paul (carrying out Our Lord's spirit and the necessities of His work)
organized the Church with all the main outlines of the Institution as we have them still. But, in
We know that
any
case, the
is,
328
necessary consequence and necessary instrument of Christianity; the two, in the long run, ever
rise
and
sink, stand
and
fall,
together.
(2)
But
religious
history testify,
another,
closely
which
Pro-
Like Harnack,
Eucken, and modern German Liberal Protestants generally, Troeltsch is unfortunately very ready
to see Magic, and exclusively Heathen Rites and Mysteries, in the attribution of any productive
efficacy
effects
(as
distinct
from a representation of
spirits) to
And yet our study of the Idealist philosophers has probably already convinced us of the artificiality of every Theory of Knowledge which ignores or minimizes
the essential, persistent contribution furnished by sense-stimulations and non-mental causes and
knowledge and our most would no It elementary self- consciousness. doubt be Materialism were we to attribute a
objects to our entire
direct,
exclusive
efficacy,
in
the attainment of
and
to material things
throughout.
we
And
is
Need of
Sensible Signs
and
Contacts
329
things any direct and exclusive efficacy ; and if we ignore the action and intention of the individual
soul, or of the
community of
souls,
which experi-
ence or apply such contacts. But, in either case, to ignore the body is, surely, as little in accord-
it
is
to
passion,
indeed,
as
it
shows
itself,
in its origin,
eg. in Wycliffe, seems to have been and to have had as its very underof,
and domination by a priestly caste, especially in matters social and political and a conviction that the priestly power stands and falls with
;
and
things, as joint-awakeners and of joint-vehicles spiritual life, has against it all the analogies of the various departments of human
and of sensible
In any case, the appeal to psychology and history, as decisive in favour of Cultus, carries logically with it the admission of some
existence.
Signs as contributing, when used by souls in and with this Cultus, to the spiritual
Sensible
awakening and
and
33O
signs in
explicit
Our Lord's
life
and we
find
them most
and prominent in St. Paul's life and writings, and everywhere implied or taught in the Fourth Gospel. Yet, in any case, such Signs belong to the necessities and fruitful functioning and hence, in of general human psychology
;
the third generally human, and specifically religious, necessity, which Professor Troeltsch again sees with admirable vividness
(3)
And there is
the
itself
need
a
for
Religion
as
its
a whole (although
distinct,
and
in
way
complete,
ex-
perience, life, and organization) ever to keep aware of, to accept or to combat, to assimilate or to
reject,
presented by the other complexes and organizations of human life. Religion, indeed, is not
directly either Ethics or Philosophy,
or Art
it
has to
move
out
all
into, to learn
and to teach,
activities.
Here
it is
that Ritschlianism,
still
so vigorously
essentially
Professor
Hermann
jectivism
a mere sub-
which
is
the acknowledgment of this mediation need no more render me self-engrossed or conceited than
thus influenced by my awareness that a particular sense of vision, in my diminutive eyes,
I
am
is
essential to
the sun.
my
and
their supplies
can love
Him in these His ordinations and gifts. And then Hermann insists upon Religion being
complete in two experiences and acceptances alone
those of the Categorical Imperative of the Moral Conscience; and those of the Historical Jesus, as
the uniquely perfect realization of this Imperative, and hence as the unique revelation of the
depths of Reality, and the unique means towards the human soul's execution of that Imperative.
Yet
which
Kant.
it is
History,
in
and
to
the
affinities
and genius of
emphatic
Christianity
itself,
who
explicitly
332
earthly
were larger
Inquisitors
The
indeed the
to
man
keep
of any religion,
who wishes
to
make and
his religion strong, will doubtless have to live it with all he is and has ; but that Christians, and
indeed religionists of any kind, cannot (all of them and in the long run) ignore the other activities of
unable to do
life.
God
;
soul
the
God
and Theory as of Fact and Reality. in the long run and upon the whole,
And man
thus,
will,
even qua spirit, have to grow and to be through conflict and temptation, through darkness and
humiliation,
Assuredly countless
of
these questions and conflicts, have nevertheless become great friends of God the Poverello of
and Joan of Arc, what did these glorious But the conditions of spirits know of such trials ? Western Europe have radically changed since those ages, and proofs are accumulating, with saddening rapidity, to show that religion cannot remain a joyous possession and a strong influence
Assisi
The
Official
333
in these countries
and
the
part
of
its
educated
on and representatives
criticism,
scientific,
followers,
or
rejection of current
economic
True,
the
and
other influences
and
positions.
apparently most characteristic, trend of the Saints has been towards an exclusive absorption in the direct relations
predominant, and
between the soul and God and the soul and other souls. Yet we have already seen how large has been the occupation, of precisely some of the
greatest of the Saints, with Philosophy, with the
larger
and with Economic questions. And the official Church especially has, from very early times, persistently conceived and practised life, not pietistically, but in a Catholic, i.e. an allPolitics,
inclusive manner.
(4)
have developed specially strong religious Organizations and Sacraments, and that have largely adopted or combated Philosophy and Science, lost ground now for many a
day,
and are they not now losing it very rapidly ? Thus there are now South German Catholic
Concerning Professor Hermann's positions, see my Mystical Element of Religion, 1908, vol. iL pp. 263-275, and the references there given. Dr. Hermann's book, specially considered in this work and in the present book, has now been translated into English as The Communion of the Christian with God^ London, 1910,
334
towns, where at most 30 per cent, and North German Protestant towns, where only 3 per cent,
of the population,
go
to
Church
more than a
population In clings by conviction to Church and Clergy. Westphalia and the Rhineland, in the Bavarian
German
Highlands and the Austrian Tyrol, strongholds of immemorial, patriarchal faith, Socialism or
other Secularisms are admittedly gaining ground. In France, of the forty million Catholics only
all
Creeds.
The
number of students for the Priesthood is continuously and greatly diminishing; and the number
of Catholic clerics
for
some Deism
who
And
and
especially in Portugal, but also in Spain, to a considerable extent in Italy, the anti-
clerical
current
is
largely anti-Christian or
even
in-
radically anti-spiritual,
transigent, alert.
In the United States of America only some of the seventy-six millions appear to fifty out
335
as to England, there is a marked decline in the social origin and the scholarship of the average Anglican cleric; the Nonconformist
And
appear, in considerable part, carried with their flocks, from all deeper and away,
ministers
more
"
and
Pleasant
versions to
between 1845-70, have notably diminished, in both respects, especially during the last decade. 1
Now
and
that
all
the
be
symptoms
one
and
wickedness of
human
nature.
For
it is
obvious
nature remains essentially what it was in the ages when the most institutional of the Churches now still extant was the most popular
human
influential
of
all
the
organizations within the very lands and races which now show the alienation just indicated
And
least of all
can a
Roman
his
Catholic attempt
accepted, indeed has solemnly condemned, the doctrine of a total corruption and blindness of
human
But
1
nature.
if
Institutions, Sacraments,
and
relations,
The figures for the continental countries given here are taken " from the very careful article, Die Zukunftsaufgaben der Religion,"
by the
vol.
ii.
late Professor
H.
J.
Holtzmann,
in
2nd
336
towards
the
various
life,
are right and necessary for Religion ; if Religion is the deepest truth and the ultimate joy of life
and if men still everywhere possess some glimpses of truth and experiences of grace and of goodness, and some aspirations after more of such preveniences of
God
where
lies
the mischief?
the present writer has long and profoundly benefited by Institutional Religion, and
2.
Now
he watches
and
the most powerful, and the richest of such Institutions, the Roman Catholic
Church
and he
is fully
certain that
what he may
accurately diagnose here applies, mutatis mutandis, to all Institutional Religions throughout the
world.
He
and
attraction,
and the
actual
weakness
and
repulsiveness, of such Institutional Religion are closely intertwined; and that they can be pre-
sented in five pairs of nearly related power and The first two pairs are primarily condefect cerned with intellectual matters the last three pairs,
;
with moral
affairs.
mately in the order of their increasing influence with the majority of men.
Religion
(i)
and Philosophy
Catholic
interrelated
337
The Roman
Church
continues
the immemorially ancient tradition of a large and continuous utilization, discussion, acceptance of Philosophical or Systems and rejection
Scientific
What was
Wisdom,
Fourth
this
right for the author of the Book of Paul, and for the author of the
for
Gospel,
It
Augustine,
is
the
Pseudofor
Dionysius, and
Aquinas,
is
right
and good
Church.
-
Christian
largely accounts for the relative success of Roman Catholicism in Germany, against the Socialists, with their unified, materialistic outlook. And the
future will (with a provisional and relative pacification of our modern, storm-tossed world) bring also,
a great increase of this desire for some such coherency of thought. And, again, the maintenance of this Scholastic tradition has
sure,
we may be
rendered more easily possible that sympathetic penetration and presentation of mediaeval thought,
which are so necessary for the clear understanding and it has of our modern ideals and impulsions
;
also helped men to unveil the very real insufficiencies of the Idealist Epistemology and other
kindred
weaknesses
Denifle
of
in
modern
philosophy.
Baumker and
Mercier in
338
Walker, and Joseph Rickaby in England, are names genuinely respected by all competent
workers.
yet two great weaknesses and dangers are here intertwined with these considerable advan-
And
tages.
For the absolute need (on the part of Religion) of Philosophy in general, and the
need (on the part of the Church, at
practical
its existence) of some particular of Philosophy, have here nearly coalesced system with the still deeper, far more delicate, and ever
different, necessities
and authority of the religious Experience and Tradition, and of the Church, their chief witness and interpreter. Philosophy,
Philosophy may and does simply follow its own specific requirements and self-criticisms, or it is nothing. This liberty of Philosophy leaves to the Church
in itself, is essentially free
;
i.e.
Authority the fullest right and duty to criticize, discountenance, or condemn, this or that philosophical doctrine, or even system, as incompatible with the Christian Faith. And it leaves this
same Authority entirely untrammelled in the maintenance of some particular system of PhiloPhilosophers constantly each other, on the ground that this or that particular conception or system does notcriticize
starting-point
its
adequately recognize some general and persistent Should not then the experience of mankind.
of the religious and Christian life possess the, right and duty of a far more authoritative criticism and condemnation ?
chief
And as to
hesitation,
indeed, be a bold
insist,
without
or of Descartes or Leibniz,
more adequate to the abiding necessities of the human mind and of the religious and Christian experience, and as more appropriatively penetrative of the Christian theology
throughout the
indeed incom-
centuries, than is
an
intelligent Neo-Scholasticism.
is
But the
liberty of Philosophy
simply and
directly
because of
its
imposition
it
by
that
Church Authority.
the
And
yet
is
apparent
is
eternity
and
sanctity
plain of
against all Ontology in Philosophy and all Institutionalism in Religion, are, in considerable part,
determined by this
34O
And
with
by Scholasticism) is profoundly unIt historical, in its entire temper and outlook. this to be would certainly defect, remedy possible now so dangerous, by the study of the most living parts of Plato, Aristotle, and Plotinus, and of the
modified
Ethics and spirituality of Aquinas,
pathetically historical
in
a sym-
and
critical
manner.
Such
how
to trace
philosophical thought and the development of the Christian consciousness, and how to criticize and value the stages and formu-
of
lations in
and substance of each. And these principles and this substance would be laid bare by a study of
growth and development, and would be known and relished in the daily practice
their entire historical
As
regards
discoveries
and
hypotheses
in
Physical and Natural Science, it is highly instructive to note how entirely silent concerning them the recent most strenuous papal campaign " " has remained against all and every Modernism Thus neither the Inquisition's throughout
Decree Lamentabili, condemning sixty-five propositions, nor the Papal Encyclical Pascendi,
probably the longest Encyclical ever issued, says one word about them. Yet there lay, for
centuries,
the
most
"
dangerous
"
Modernism."
is
Thus
Galileo's proposition,
the sun
the centre
and therefore immovable," was in 1616 unanimously condemned by the Inquisition, as " foolish and absurd in philosophy and formally heretical"; and in 1633 Galileo was obliged solemnly to abjure that doctrine before the same tribunal. And not till 1820 was permission given to teach that proposition as simply true and only in 1835 did the Congregation of the Index withdraw Heliocentric books from its list. Mental Pathology and Biological Evolution have, indeed, also had their troubles since then but, upon the
of the world,
;
;
workers have, since (and outside whole, of) the Heliocentric controversy, suffered comWe can then reasonably assume paratively little.
scientific
assured to PhysicoMathematical, perhaps also to Biological, research and science, in the Roman Catholic Church, now
is
and
1
hereafter.
Roman
Olld-Laprune,
especially pp.
La
Philosophie et le
;
333-360 and Professor Maurice Blondel, Lettre sur les Exigeances de lapensfa contemporaine enmatiere dtapologe'tique etsur la mtthode de laphtlosophie dans Vtiude duprobleme religieux^ 1896. And for Science and Church Authority, see Dr. F. X. Funk's
very careful "Zur Galilei- Frage," in his Kirchengeschichtliche Abhandlungen und Untersuchungen^ 1899, vol. ii. pp. 444-476
;
342
(2)
This is next pair concerns History. doubtless, with the pair immediately to follow, the crux of every Institutional Religion, and especially
of one so deeply Historical as is the Roman Yet here again, indeed here Catholic Church.
particularly,
The
there
can
be
no
Religions,
and Rome
;
general principles
History, only
in time
since
by means
and
space, does
man awaken
does he
apprehend, Eternal Life and God, and do they Nor will any systematic penetrate and win him.
or radical
distinction
penings and Dogmatic "Facts" or Doctrines For not only Rome, but all really suffice here.
Religion absolutely requires, at every stage, Ontology, a really extant God, and really Indeed, happened Historical Facts and Persons.
genuine
especially
in its
;
all-pervasive
and
since
God, the Eternal Spirit, here reveals Himself to us, and touches us, in Duration and
Indeed,
it
through Matter.
influence
of this same
Christianity
man's
and, generally, Andrew White's copious History of the Warfare of Science with Theology in Christendom^ 1903, 2 vols., especially
vol.
ii.
pp. 97-167*
in
Important reflexions suggested by the latter " George Tyrrell's The Rights and Limits
1906,
Religion
and History,
has,
inevitably connected
343
apprehension
slowly
but
surely,
been
deepened and refined concerning the difference between Historical Facts and purely Ideal Symbols and that man, nevertheless, feels, in his
;
Religion, the need, as imperiously as ever, of some assured instances of such Facts. And thus Rome,
the chief representative of Christianity, which is itself so nobly Ontological and Factual, cannot
to
be as
follows.
The
more
Religions, as we are now getting more and to know them in their historical growth,
always indeed proceed from some actual Happenings; and the faith of the votaries of the
Religions always necessarily includes a continuous conviction as to the historical character of these
Happenings.
live,
the
Religions also and live still more, by their penetration of Spiritual Substance and Meaning of these
But
these
same
Happenings, by their sense of the Eternal's Selfmanifestation in these temporal events and here
;
of fact-like historical pictures which (once a keen discrimination between factual and nonfactual
means
becomes
simply
irresistible)
cannot be taken as
directly,
factual in the
344
in
which those Happenings can be taken. The later documents of the Hexateuch, and certain scenes in the Fourth Gospel, are probably the
best illustrations of this process.
Now
great,
Rome's
difficulties
here
are
specially
is splendidly aware of Religion's absolute a Real God, manifesting Himself in Real of need
Rome Rome
yet they are so, in large part, because Thus sees so firmly and so very far.
Happenings and Effects. And Rome is finely free from all Fideism or Pietism; it appeals to taken as common sense and historical documents allow them as historically know and faith good
cogent proofs of the historical Happenings whose
historical character is
this religion.
Happenings, qua Happenings ; nor can it, without a deeply uncatholic pietism, withdraw these
Happenings, qua Happenings, from the cognizance and criticism of historians. Yet, on the
other hand,
Rome
cannot
make
;
the historical
it,
;
it is
nor appeal to
all
it
above
discussion
nor change the simple, broad facts that men in the past were but little alive to the difference
between Factual Event and Symbolical Narrative, and that men in the present are keenly sensitive
to this difference.
And
upon
the
strict
Factualness of
all
demonstrative force of the documents concerned, would already, no doubt, be a serious modification
of the very ancient,
traditional theologians.
predominant
attitude
of
Again,
following
tolerated,
there
in
is
our
or so
even encouraged, so
many
or
large,
local
legends,
much
floating,
uncertain,
still
even
spurious
in
history.
And
the
and
relatively ever
more
is
the Church
And besides, considerable such secondary beliefs. vested interests have grown around such, now
mostly severely
refer
fixed, traditions.
We need
supposed Apostolic Origin of France, and to the legend of Sees Episcopal the Transference of the Holy House from
Nazareth to Loretto,
beliefs
to the
only of the
which are
late
and
root, yet the challenging of which has required great courage, on the part of such thorough scholars as Monseigneur
even
French Sees was already conclusively settled, in the critical sense, by the great Maurist Benedictines two centuries ago.
346
In
Authorities,
when
against the return to the earliest constituents or forms of such beliefs, forms which are generally
the sub-Apostolic origin of the Churches of Lyon and of Vienne, and a very ancient picture of the Madonna
(as, e.g^ here,
venerated at Loretto), and the encouragement of But as to the far more those constituents alone.
difficult
and important matters connected with Biblical, and especially with New Testament and Primitive Christian documents and evidences, the
upon the
need for the reasonable and reasoned certainty as to the factual character of a nucleus in the
Christian
complex of
doctrines,
faith
in
Church, of a full conviction that He will never deprive us of such certainty concerning that
the great Christian doctrines as finally true, as interconnected, and as all either directly descriptive of actual spiritual Realities and
nucleus
;
upon
all
Persons and factual Events, or as closely interpretative and protective of those Realities, Persons,
upon the possession by the Church, and by the Church alone, of the grace and the right fully to penetrate, and finally to
;
or Events
and,
finally,
Catholic
upon historians finding more, or different, historical Happenings in documents put forward as historical proofs, than these documents will yield to careful And though this and candid critical analysis. us now be far to more difficult to may appear than were the discriminations so painfully and
so slowly effected
Astronomy,
it
may
us now, than their difficulties appeared to the astronomers and theologians of 1616 and 1633, and that some of
these historical troubles of ours
may
last less
long
full toler-
The
weakness
nothing of Philosophy or of Historical Criticism. 1 On the general question of the Catholic position as to Holy
Scripture (qua historical document) and Biblical Criticism, see Mgr. Mignot, Archbishop of Albi, Lettres sur les Etud&s Eccttsiastiques^ Also the friendly controversy between 1 908, especially pp. 29 1-324. " Histoire et " Maurice BJondel, Dogme," and F. von Hugel, Le Christ Eternel et les Christologies Successives," both in La Quinzaine of Paris, 1904. On the legendary element in Church
History, see the excellent monograph of Pere Hippolyte Delehaye, the Bollandist, Les Legendes Hagiographiques> 1905 (English translation, 1910) ; Mgr. Louis Duchesne's Pastes Episcopaux de
PAncienne Gaule^ 3
vols.,
1894-99
Chevalier,
Wdtre-Dame $e
Lorette^ 1906,
348
increasingly rare, yet immensely true and precious, emphasis, upon the supreme importance of Re-
Truth and Religious Unity, and upon the profound loss and wrong of religious error. Certainly the careless accommodation, the easy tolerance and indifference, the horror of all persecution on the ground that it deals with "merely" religious opinions, which is all around
ligious
word or true
ideal for
man.
For man,
if
Life, for
and,
but regard every further ray of religious light as And indifference precious beyond all other gifts.
about religion ever tends either to render such a soul shallow and hard in its other interests and
insights ; or else to make in sublunar matters, since
it
feverish
will
it
yield.
this fervour
found
expression, throughout the centuries and throughout entire countries, in awful cruelties ? There is
Charlemagne's wholesale enforcement of Baptism upon the heathen Saxons; the extermination of
the Waldensians and Albigensians the Spanish Inquisition, with its thousands of executions ; the
;
Religion
349
Dragonnades of the Huguenots. And we know how already St. Augustine (who died in A.D. 430) vehemently insisted upon the Church's right and
conviction
duty to use physical force in matters of religious how Pope Gregory ix., the friend of St.
;
how numerous
as a specifically, jealously ecclesiastical tribunal and how the Roman Church, as such, has never
;
renounced
applies
it,
this
attitude,
in so far as the
such application.
Can we wonder,
men
Here, however, we can readily trace also another current in the Church's history, which
admirably combines the deepest zeal and fervour with a sensitive shrinking from the application of
physical
force
in
spiritual
things.
(A.D.
Thus
the
307-37) held,
quite generally, that to force consciences to the truth is immoral and unchristian ; and the Church
Father Lactantius, well on in that reign, still " Let the Heathen imitate us Christians insists
:
no one
dying
retained amongst us against his will " religion is to be defended, not by killing, but by " to defend and " if
is
;
"
you
try
religion
by
350
blood,
you violate
it
for
is
nothing
"
is
so
much a
religion
(Div. Instit.,
The
385
;
execution for heresy occurs in A.D. but St. Martin of Tours and St. Ambrose
first
And St. Gregory of Milan protest against it. the Great (d. 604), perhaps the greatest of all the Popes, peremptorily forbids certain Neapolitan
zealots to interfere with
of
their
feasts,
and
Bishops of Southern Gaul for compelling Jews to submit to Baptism (Epist xiii. 12, viii. 27,
ix.
6).
And
protect
still
the
in
Jews.
Indeed,
up
to
1284,
and even
Jews were
allowed,
ization
by Church and
observance of
their civil
and
religious laws.
then as to modern high theological pronouncements, Cardinal de Lugo, the great Jesuit theologian (he died in 1660), insists that the
And
members of the various Christian sects, of the Jewish and Mohammedan communions, and of
the heathen philosophical schools,
their salvation,
who
achieve
do
so, ordinarily,
Two
those elements in their respective community's cultus and teaching which are true and good and originally revealed by God (De
practice
of,
Fide, Disp. xix, Nos. 7, 10; xx. Nos. 107, 194). And Pope Pius ix., the least " liberal " of Doctors, " It is known to us and to assures his Cardinals
:
you
that
those
who
ignorance concerning our most holy religion, and who zealously observe the Natural Law written
by God
of the divine light and grace, attain to Eternal " will dare to draw the limits of Life" and
;
Who
such ignorance, in view of the existing immense variety of peoples, minds, and so many other circumstances?" (Recueil des Allocutions de Pie
IX., Paris, 1865, pp. 480, 340), Indeed, the Church's grandly bold inclusion of
the entire Old Testament in the Christian Canon, against the powerful and protracted hostility of
the Gnostics, involves the admission that polygamy and the Lex talionis can b'e practised and
proclaimed, at rudimentary stages of Revelation, by God's own Saints and Revealers ; and hence
that the various degrees of God's truth and light, and the difference of value between them, are
nearly as unspeakable as is that truth itself. Again, the Church's excommunications are ad-
352
mittedly fallible hence exclusions and consequent schisms are not, of necessity, simply the fault of
And
clear,
takable evidences of various degrees of truth and of grace In the souls that grow up in these separate
organizations.
Cardinal
Manning,
as
is
well
years, with regard to Anglicans. And finally, the very great variety amongst the types of spirituality represented, well within the
Roman
also
Church,
religious orders,
aids towards
essential,
It
gentler, and deeply Christian current shall become universal and instinctive, for Roman Catholicism (thus most fervent without fanaticism and universally just and encouraging without indifference) once again, and more than ever, to become fully lovable and entirely trusted. In any case, not even bigotry and persecution must drive us into
scepticism; since these latter of the soul, amidst other great evils, furnish ready excuses, or provocatives for those
diseases
indifference
or
contrary extremes,
quite unchecked
or, at
them a
career.
Law
353
God
in
man and
of
man
will,
in
and
constructive.
is,
The next
pair
in
parts,
hardly
dis-
tinguishable from
the preceding one, and has, indeed, largely produced the peculiarities just considered. This pair concerns the Canon Law.
rightly
conceives
Religion as also concerned with Law, and as having the need and right to some legal organization,
amidst the
civil
Certainly the idea that everything legal is essentially evil is but a sorry Gnosticism, or a pathetic excess understandable as occasioned by
world.
For the
spirituality
and
and to show, their full force in contact with, and through the transformation of, matter and
law.
And
indeed
there
are
entirely
conclu-
the community of goods amongst the Christians was never universal, and that it
Inquisition, 4 vols., 1906, 1907, especially vol. i. pp. 71-211 ; vol. ii. pp. 470, 471, 548-550 ; vol. iii. pp. 183-190 ; and vol. iv. good short account is to be found in the Abb6 pp. 516-534.
23
354
the free retention and use, of private property amongst those Christians. Not, then, the exclusion of the very idea of law, or even only of its actual application, but simply the spirit, character,
position,
and
effects of
called in question.
of the
strongly
day, the persuasiveness of the Church is in inverse ratio Thus it is to her coercive character and action.
It is plain,
many a
most instructive to follow the admissions and varying emotions of such a strongly anti-sacerdotal,
jurist
but deeply religious and highly competent, as is the Lutheran Professor Rudolf Sokm.
that
its
He
insists
"the essence
of
Catholicism
discriminating between the Church in the religious sense (the Church of " and Christ), and the Church in the legal sense
consists
in
not
he opposes Rome precisely on this ground. Yet he has to admit that St. Augustine, and indeed
numerous other Catholic authorities up to Luther, fully possessed the idea of the Invisible Church, and of its non-identity with the Visible Church ;
that a legal
and
is
fully asserted
by Pope
(in
about
355
220 A.D.)
alone amongst extant bodies, possesses the exterior connection with the legal organization which arose
out of Primitive Christianity/' Above all, Sohm shows, with a fine insistence, how Christianity, from the first, owned "the concep-
a community which, conjoined by love, forms a unity, a body, the body of Christ" Thus Primitive Christians knew "only the
one Church of Christ, which energizes and appears 7 (to the faithful) in countless 'Churches, assemblies of
tion of a
Christendom
Christendom, manifestations of the life of Christ." This Church is the Catholic Church, and
"wherever
the
Christ's
there
is
Christendom,
Ecclesia,
And
the
precisely this fact, according to Sohm, is v reason why scholars have been unable to
show how and when the primitive communities (supposed by them to have alone existed at first and to have at that time existed independently of each other) came to coalesce, or to be absorbed
by one
in
of them,
history as
Church.
the
first,
alone
and
356
disposition,
body,
into
a predominantly
organization
sprung des Katkolizismus, Leipzig, 1909, pp. 12, 14, 15, 24 n., 35; 14, 26, 27; 42).
Here the apprehension of the central quality of Christianity and of the Church, and of the excesses
in its juridical development,
doubtless very true and deep. But it is certainly inexact to conceive even present-day Roman Catholicism as teaching
is
(either officially or in the higher or even average belief of its adherents) the simple identity of the
Sohm
admits
Christians
saw the
Invisible
dis-
Church
in the Visible,
Well, the tinguish between the two (pp. 23, 24). later Catholic Christians saw and see the Invisible
Church
it,
in the Visible
extensive with it
the Visible
Invisible
but certainly not as simply identical or co" There are many souls within
Church that do not belong to the Church and there are many souls not
;
Church
"
is still
common
positions,
saying.
where they become fully polemical, are as distinctly non-primitive, in their exclusion of
Visible
all
and
357
Churches, as
more exclusive
Catholic theologians as, say, Cardinal Torquemada and some of the (now dominant) Italian and German Jesuit Canonists.
Legalism of such
Roman
The
doubtless depended as truly upon those Christians not making the absolute distinction, insisted upon by Luther, as upon their not making
viction
then,
we have
to
beware
of
of "pure" spirituality, superfine Idealism and again of "pure," "simple," "easy" counter-
For everywhere, and hence particularly here, we have to watch and to maintain the friction, the pain, and the cost of the Spiritual in and around the Material, and of the Eternal in the Temporal and Spatial, within man's quasitheories.
eternal, durational
life.
We
Emperors,
Cities, Bishops,
358
Church
and,
by
a centri-
in fugal direction, they justified or excused, and, either case, they mostly checked or balanced, any
And the centralizing excesses in this Canon Law. all in the air, then presuppositions of this Law were
and deeply ingrained
in the
by the Roman
Byzantine and early Mediaeval copies, during a millennium and more. But since the Protestant Reformation, and much more since the great French Revolution, those
Empire and by
its
powerful checks, and those habits and instincts, have ever increasingly disappeared. And yet it is the strange but undeniable fact that not since the
later
Middle Ages has the Papacy, or rather the Curia, aimed so persistently, and never with so
interior
little
check
or
hindrance,
at the
full
development, codification, and detailed enforcement of this Canon Law. Such an address as
that of the learned jurist, Dr. Fleiner, "
On Law in
the the
Nineteenth Century" (an address welcomed by German Catholic Canonists as very accurate and
penetrating), brings vividly
home
to us the un-
hasting and unresting absorption or elimination of all non-Papal, non-Curialist powers and activities
by Rome throughout
Vatican
Church's doctrinal
359
and disciplinary powers in the hands of the Monarch Pope. Since the accession of Pius x.
1903 the energetic execution of this policy appears, with startling plainness, in such acts as
in
and
in the
concerning Mixed Marriages and the Immunity of the Clergy from the civil tribunals. Indeed,
Rome's action in the matter of the Separation of Church and State in France, and in the numberless
men
Here we can
It
mostly laymen and non-Italians, such as de Maistre and Chateaubriand, Stolberg and Gorres, Veuillot and W. G.
was zealous
Ward, who (keenly suffering under the dreary emptiness and ignorant contempt of Deism and
Secularism, or under the insufficiencies of Pro-
And testantism) pressed this policy upon Rome. zealous believers, perhaps again mostly laymen
and non- Italians, may
aid the return
Catholic, action.
its
arise
who
and
will successfully
to a wider
richer,
a truly
After
all,
Rome
subjects
depends upon
subjects as truly as
;
its
will live,
360
again, the Curialist presentation of the situation, as a simple alternative between anarchy
And
or autocracy, revolt or self-stultification, will not for ever terrify into nonentity or goad into scepticism the freely docile children of Jesus
and of His Vicar, the Servant of the servants of God. They will, on the contrary, come to feel with Rosmini the holy, and with Newman the far-sighted, and with many a great
Christ
acutely saddening times, and despotism are ever the fruitful parents of each other, and that no fellowmortal, even if he truly represents, to the fullest
that revolution
Saint
down
to -our
own
degree possible amongst frail men, the authority and power of God, can ever come to be beyond
and receiving from men and through those very men to whom he has so much to teach, and so much to give.
learning
men
And
and
finally,
if
we choose
to
look
we
shall
find, still
and
and dignified Catholic loyalty and submission, and genuine, because humble and creaturely, freedom, operative
cratic acts
and
claims,
much
sincere
amongst numberless
souls, cleric
and
lay, persist-
Roman
Church. 1
* Professor Fritz Fleiner's address : Ueber die Entwicklung des Katholischen Kirchenrechts im ig. fahrhundert^ 1902. For
Politics
361
There remains a
probably more keenly than any other large Christian body, maintains that Religion cannot remain utterly unconcerned with
Politics; but that Religion
to
And
For
in
this
generality,
proves that
Rome
'
is right.
everything in
man hangs
together; and
Politics,
which, adequately conceived, are so profoundly and widely important, cannot stand utterly outside Religion. Edmund Burke, de Tocqueville, did not think that they do. Economics Ranke,
do not; and can we draw any sharp line between Religion and Ethics, Ethics and Economics and Politics? Did Economics, Lorenzo de' Medici's intrigues against the
certainly
think
we can maintain
of
this.
Yet none
the
attempted theocracies, in
*
Rosmini and Newman, see the Rev. William Lockharfs Life of Antonio Rosmini, 2 vols., 1890; and The Life of Cardinal Newman, by Wilfred Ward, 2 vols., 1912. And as to the relations between obedience to God and obedience to His representa" From God or from Men ?" tives, see the Rev. George TyrrelPs
in his
1907.
362
modern times and in the West, have been long successful; and the evils they have provoked have probably outweighed the good which they have produced. And then, any persistent and direct mixing up of politics and religion becomes
intolerable in proportion to the limited number, to the unchecked power, and to the secrecy of
procedure, of the religious officials thus operating. It is precisely the most earnest and promising of
the religious minds of our day that are the most sensitive concerning the very suspicion of the operation of strong sublunar motives in claims of
a transcendental kind.
And
yet
all
the world
incapable of dying is the Roman Curia's thirst for the old Temporal Power over the Roman
States,
and
its
hunger for
external,
political
recognition and influence amongst the governments of the world. Thus many Italians, in
knew (like Dante) combine a devoted Catholicism with an heroic patriotism witness Rosmini and Manzoni, Pellico and d' Azeglio yet their successors still
the middle of last century,
to
how
best intermittently and but live, half - acknowledged, and, in the long run, disavowed and condemned, by the Roman Curia in
at
have to
Nevertheless,
any
Church any
Ruinous
363
and
political
perhaps
still
for ever,
And similarly, the political enjoys in Italy. system of Papal Nuncios, and even, recently, of semi-secret political agents of small capacity and
denunciatory procedure, has more and more crippled the authority of the Bishops in times and countries most in need of such an undisputed,
public, essentially spiritual, authority representative
best,
and
trust
God and
when
the interconnection (ever so real even most obscure) of all men and classes and
wondrous
existence.
Providence
mankind
Or
it
may
utilize this
very power,
finally
omnipo-
some Papa
still
who
will
know how
to
conjoin with
genuinely amongst us, a sensitive sympathy, as yet lacking or angrily suspected, with all that is true and generous in the very troubles
and dim aspirations of our greatly altered world. Such a figure would in some way severely check,
364
and perhaps
for ever repress all directly political ambitions, through a great increase, in the
Servant- Mistress of
all
and
3.
Let us attempt to show how the experiences, conceptions, and habits concerning Eternal Life, which the Saints in especial teach
cult endeavours.
us,
mitigate,
found to be closely intertwined with the benefits And let us try to illustrate, of Institutionalism.
by some recent examples, the supreme delicacy, vividness, and operative force of those experiences and convictions, where they have been awakened,
deepened,
and
guarded,
in
heroic
souls,
by
Institutional Religion.
But
an antidote to
tutionalism.
with the Eternal- Life complex, only as this is the evils incidental to Insti-
Again, the account thus attempted deals, not with the vague and intermittent aspira1 On the above matters, see the delicately balanced, highly competent La Politique de Pie X, 1906-1910, by Maurice Fernet, 1910 ; the rougher, yet still honest and well-informed La Separation des figliscs et de l>tat> by M. de Narfon, 1911 ; and the deeply religious study, so frankly adverse to all easy solutions, Die Trennung von Stoat und Kirche, by Professor Troeltsch,
1907.
less)
common
thirst
to
all
of
the
human
thirst
keenly awakened
and
clearly articu-
lated by
And,
But we shall only strive to advanced here. put together, and clearly to show, the experiences
is
question, as these
(to the writer's
have been
very certain
knowledge or direct observation) in fully awake and deeply spiritual souls within the greatest of
the Christian Institutions.
(i) The complex, then, of vivid, operative convictions connected with Eternal Life, as we have
gradually
victions
come
to understand
it
in this book, is
fundamentally
fivefold.
And
awakens and feeds special habits and capacities, which are so many true and potent
There
is,
first,
Abidingness
abidingness,
an
Abidingness,
in
pure
Simultaneity, Eternity, in
God; and a
relative
a quasi-eternity, Duration,
man
(qua personality). And the Eternity is always experienced by man only within, together with, and in contrast to, the Duration. And both
Eternity
and
Duration
stand
out,
in
man's
366
deepest consciousness, with even painful contrast, against all mere Succession, all sheer flux and
change.
Here the
sense that
trated,
special
value
lies
in
the
double
we
and
yet that
we
be more than quasi-eternal, durational. For only this double sense will save us from the perilous alternatives of an uncreaturely sheer
hereafter,
fixity
and an animal mere flux and change. We thus gain a perennial source of continuity and
calm.
There
is,
next, the
are genuinely like, and we are genuinely unlike, God, the Realized Perfection. Hence there is ever a certain tension, a feeling
in Likeness.
We
of limitation or of emptiness, a looking for a centre outside of, or other than, our own selves.
Here again
this
double sense
will
be profoundly
For thus we are never helpful in our troubles. free to lose reverence for the deepest of what we are, since it is like God, and actually harbours
God.
a
And
yet
we may never
lose humility
and
thirst for
purification, since
and best of ourselves never is, and since all that we actually are
ness and of manifold
sins
is full
of weakhabits.
and
faulty
Otherness,
and Other-Worldliness
a continual
reason
for
367
self-
And
so
we
find
contrition, each aiding and respect, humility, penetrating the other ; and for a faith and certainty,
which will never be arrogant, and for a diffidence, which will never be sceptical. There is, thirdly, the keen sense of Other- Worldliness in contrast
is
with This-Worldliness.
There
here a lively conviction that our spiritual personality, and its full beatitude, can never be attained
but only in the other life, after death and yet that the other life can be begun in this life, indeed that we are, all of us, more or less
in this
life,
solicited,
that
we
it
here and now, by that other life, and cannot consummate it there> unless we
here.
And, in this case, as everywhere, the greater and ultimate has to awake and to grow within us, in and through, and in contrast with, the lesser and (eventually) secondary. This double sense is again, a deep help in
begin
3
For thus we are pricked on to all our trials. labour energetically at the improvement of man's earthly lot, in all its stages and directions but we do
;
so without philistinism, impatience, or fanaticism, since we are fully convinced (even before begin-
ning) that these attempts, could they all succeed, would not, could not, ever satisfy man, when once
he
is fully
awake.
And
even to our
spirituality,
even
to the
Church.
368
these are, in considerable part, preparatory, educative, during this our short schooltime, our
Even
a necessary and
is
fundamentally
rooted in Him Who Abides and in the quasieternal within ourselves; yet one which (taken as it stands here on earth) is not throughout an
end, the end, but is a mean, or, at best, the means.
We
thus find perpetual escape from all pedantry or feverishness, and this through the gain of an
unconquerable, because sober, optimism. There is, fourthly, the keenest sense of Reality. Our analyses, theories, hypotheses, our very denials
and
scepticisms,
all
presuppose
realities
;
which
environ and influence us, real beings realities which, together with us real men, constitute one
real
world.
And
God.
apprehended by us ever with, and in, and through, and over against, those other, various realities
that impinge upon our many-levelled lives. thus our highest certainties awaken with, require, our lower and lowest ones.
And
and
This double sense again will greatly aid us. For it will make us profoundly concrete, historical,
this
Reality
',
and
the
Organism
369
will
fill
And
it
us
with dauntless
also
faith,
with
the
creaturely temper
;
with respect
us ever averse to
all
schemes.
the keen sense of Unity in of the Multiplicity and of Multiplicity in Unity Organism. Everywhere we find in the real world
finally,
And
there
is
nowhere
sheer,
mere unity or
;
God Himis
a
;
Trinity of Persons Christ is a Duality of Natures the Humanity of Christ and of all men is a Trinity
of Powers.
and the two together form an organization of an even more marvellous unity in multiplicity. And yet it is not even such a single man who is
the true, fundamental social unit, but the family, in which the father, mother, and child are each
sui generis and essential, as non-interchangeable Thus from a lichen parts of this rich organism.
or seaweed
up to God Himself the unspeakable Richness (because the incomprehensibly manifold Unity and complete Organization) we find ever
rich,
increasingly
organized
unities.
And
the
great social 24
370
of
similarly
They possessed of specific laws of organization. are strong and beneficent only as special wholes
possessed of special parts, which wholes again
have
and conflict with other such complexes without, and the ever more or less disorderly elements within,
to
grow and
themselves.
an immense help. For thus we are all taught Reverence for each other's spiritual individuality, and for the characteristics
Here, again,
find
we
of
all
gain in sary Public Spirit ; since we feel keenly that no individual or organization, however essential and
for
since each
is
neces-
And we
sacred,
can live
fully
and
for
fruitfully
except by
the re-
and
organizations.
ligious passion
more and more scientific, and the other of For here man has mankind. noble, passions to grow with and through other men and other
require and seek the
never simply within and through himself. thus his very religion here drives him to find checks and obstacles even to his standards
things,
And
and
ideals
sure, as
he
is,
that
Who
has ordered
things to
With regard
with man, within the authoritative Institutions, in these our times, we can again point to the impartial testimony of Sir Charles
God
Booth.
"
us,
have no
authority that is recognized, but their professional and their manner is character remains
somewhat
resented.
Roman
we
professionalism and authority, resting not on the individual but on the Church
combination of
he serves; and where most nearly approached, it is by the lives of some of the High Church
"
clergy
(pp. cit. p.
generally
we
where real ways) by Religious Traditions and InstiThus we get Claude Montefiore's moving tutions.
pages upon Prayer, in his Liberal Judaism, 1907 Frederick Robertson's great sermon on "The
Loneliness of Christ'
1
;
the sense of
God
Dean
372
with,
and many an address in Vedas Newman's Parochial and Plain Sermons J. H. Then and Sermons to Mixed Congregations.
for
Russian Church, we have the striking extracts from the Diary of Father John (Sergieff)
the
My
Life
And Roman
for
deep
spirituality
and heroism
present
in the
writer's
Catholic
Church, the
mind dwells ever specially upon four examples. There is the rough uncultured Belgian, Father Damien, deliberately contracting and dying the
loathsome, slow death
of a leper, from love of
utterly without claims of any other kind upon him, away in an island lost in the ocean at the Antipodes, as Robert Louis
in
God
men
again, Jean
now
How
Abb6
simple impressive are the accounts by the Monnin, an eye-witness of the Curb's
beatified
utter absorption in
God and
inciting the other, and the joyous expansion of his entire nature through this keen sense and love
!
And in the " Spirit of the Cur6 d'Ars," me). chronicled by the same, we find numberless
The Cnrg
<Ars
on Eternal Life
373
:
deeply spontaneous sayings, such as the following " Time never seems long in prayer. I know not
for
heaven
"
!
Yet
off,
the fish
swimming
is in its
because
it
element
but
it
is still
better
in the sea."
"
When we
"
wave coming."
If
it
Do
you
see,
my
is
children,
!
is solid
nothing, nothing
;
passes
if it is
it
away
if
it
it
fortune,
it
crumbles away
it is
health,
is
reputation,
is
attacked.
We
is
"You
it
say
it
hard to suffer?
No,
it
is
easy;
is
happiness.
Only we must
love while
we
suffer,
and
suffer whilst
we
love.
On
the
way
my
children,
Our greatest cross only the first step is painful. is the fear of crosses" (English translation,
pp. 28, 40,
114).
is
And
then there
M&re
Marie de la Providence, founded an Order of devoted women, at work, even before her death, as far as India and China; who insisted upon remaining in Paris throughout the siege and the Commune, 1870-71 and who slowly died there,
;
absorbed with joy in God, the Eternal and utterly Real, and with
374
tender and unceasing activity towards His poor and In the midst of these immense sick around her.
" Let us feel that she was wont to say Eternity is begun whatever pain we are going through, let us make joy out of that thought."
trials
:
;
things I can only see God alone and, after all, that is the only way to be happy. If once we begin to look at secondary causes,
And
"
In
all
there
ton,
is
an end of peace
"
4th
ed.,
before
my
mind, with
all
the vividness resulting from direct personal intercourse and deep spiritual obligations, the figure of
the
Abb6
Huvelin,
who
gentleman by birth and breeding, a distinguished Hellenist, a man of exquisitely piercing, humorous mind, he could readily have become a great editor or interpreter of Greek philosophical or
a remarkable Church historian. But this deep and heroic personality deliberately preferred "to write in souls," whilst occupying,
patristic texts, or
during thirty-five years, a supernumerary, unpaid post in a large Parisian parish. There, sufferfrom in the and and ing gout eyes brain,
usually lying prone in a darkened room, he served souls with the supreme authority of selfpblivious love,
and brought
light
375
peace to countless troubled, sorrowing, or sinful His Cur, of St. Augustin, has spoken souls.
Duchess of Bedford, a devoted Anglican, has published a vivid, and almost entirely accurate, sketch of him and now three volumes have been issued
well of this great figure
;
Adeline,
containing the careful reports, taken down by certain of his hearers, of familiar addresses which
are
full (at least
for those
some
of the
Spiritual Guides of the Seventeenth Century," he says, in connection with Saint Fran?ois de Sales
:
"
When
once
we
we
are
not an enfeebled spirituality." the " There exist And, in criticism of Jansenism: families of souls which are determined to find the
principle of tranquillity within their they want to cast anchor within their
own own
selves
depths.
But we have to
it
above
His goodness, that we have to found our hope." And finally " God, who might have created us directly, employs, for this work,
is in
God,
in
our parents, to whom He joins us by the tenderest He could also save us directly, but He ties.
saves
us, in fact,
by means of
certain souls,
which
376
to us,
because they
says
"He
"
;
he wrote
in souls
interior derelictions
and
strange obscurities a man is not called to form " other souls without having to suffer much ; and "his call was not to live for himself, but to live
utterly for
Him who
of
gave him
all
things."
In
claims
speaking
"
:
M.
Olier,
M. Huvelin
ex-
men
what are
Strip yourself of self, love God, love all these other things that seem
"
:
And he declares of such importance to you ? " The world sees, in this or that soul, the passions, the bitter waters which fill it ; but we priests, we
seek, beneath these bitter waters, the
little
little
spring thread of
which,
is
hidden,
:
though deeper down and more nevertheless most truly there." And
The true means to attract a soul, is not again to attenuate Christian doctrine, but to present it in its full force, because then we present it in its
For beauty is one of the proofs of truth." beauty. As to Saint Vincent de Paul, he tells us : " See the reason why, in this life so devoted to
his
"
fellow-creatures,
you
in
will
;
find
is
something
Austere,
and shut up
God
it
377
to re-immerse, to
source of
all
love."
And
lastly,
Abbd de Ranc4 he
very high and inaccessible is put before human nature it feels itself impelled to attain to that
height, by something mysterious and divine which God infuses into the soul." And: "There is
ever something mysterious in every conversion we never succeed in fully understanding even
our own"; nevertheless, "the voice of God does not speak in moments of exaltation. Such converted
souls
I
when
It was in the hour would say was most mistress of myself, most re*
an heroic spiritual life within great religious traditions and institutions, attain to a rare volume and vividness of religious insight, conviction, and reality. They can, at their
souls,
God/" Thus
who
live
who
are not
all
unworthy of
such training, to a depth and tenderness of full and joyous union with God, the Eternal, which utterly surpasses, not only in quantity but in quality, what
e
"The Abb
The English
Huvelin," by Adeline, Duchess of Bedford, in Church Review^ London, Jan. 1911 ; Quelques
Directeurs cPAmes au
XVII. Silde
(Paris,
6,
12, 37, 38, 50, 64, 76, loi, 102, 113, 121, 201, 230, 234.
378
we can and do
Institutions,
amongst souls outside all such or not directly taught by souls trained
find
And
thus
we
find here,
any philosopher as such, that Eternal Life consists in the most real of relations between the most living of realities the human and in the spirit and the Eternal Spirit, God keen sense of His Perfection, Simultaneity and
;
more
clearly than in
Prevenience, as against our imperfection, succesAnd we find that this siveness and dependence.
sense
is
awakened
;
in,
and
of our nature
by
things as well as by persons. In such souls, then, we catch the clearest glimpses of what, for man
is
Eternal Life.
PART
III
379
PART
III
CHAPTER
XIII
FINAL DISCRIMINATIONS
Eternal Life, a religious experience and conception Not a cause, but an effect a relation between realities The three things involved by Eternal Life ; in their fulness they exist only in God, the Eternal Eternal Life in man, only quasi-eternal, Durational Man's highest ideals and deepest unrest caused by this his likeness in unlikeness to God The sense of the Eternal is "developed in the Durational In the Spatial In the Material Eternal Life and Eternal Death of the human soul Eternal Life, in man, requires sense of both weakness and of sin, in our Lord's way of conceiving both Eternal Life requires a Cultus, and various outgoings into other depart:
ments Three characteristics of deepest Religion at work to prevent its becoming oppressive Three causes of simplification ever at work in practice of Eternal Life.
As regards the development of the consciousness of Eternal Life, and a fully fruitful conviction
concerning
it,
we
and the deepest experiences and revelations vouchsafed to us, indicate the true lines to be as follows. (We here adopt, not the historical or psychical, but the logical order.)
382
1.
Eternal Life, in its pregnant, concrete, onto the operative conviction of its logical sense,
reality,
is
not, primarily,
a matter of Speculation
and Philosophy, but reveals itself clearly only in the course of ages, and even then only to riper, deeper souls, as having been all along (in some manner and degree) experienced and postulated in
all
do,
It is
man
concrete experience and conviction of permanent ethical and spiritual value. Philosophy, as such,
has not been able to do more than analyse and clarify this religious conviction, and find, within
its
level, certain
intimations
and
requirements converging towards such a conviction. It has not itself been able vividly to
experience,
or
unshakably to
affirm,
corre-
sponding Reality as
tions
actually present
and ever
and requirements.
Eternal Life, as thus operative in man's life and discovered for us there by Religion, is not
2.
an ultimate cause, a
self-subsisting entity,
which
(accidentally or necessarily) evolves a living subject or subjects ; but it is simply the effect, the action,
effect,
the interaction,
how ctmsed
383
Life
is
Hence Eternal
or
no substitute
for either
God
man
but
it is
the
Eternal Life, in the fullest thinkable sense, involves three things the plenitude of all goods
3.
and of
energizings that abide the entire selfconsciousness of the Being Which constitutes, and
all
;
these goods and energizings and the pure activity, the non-successiveness, the simultaneity, of this Being in all It has, all It
all
;
is.
Eternal Life, in this sense, precludes not only that artificial chain of space, not only clock-time
mutually exclusive, ever equal moments, but even duration, time as actually experienced by man, with its overlapping, interpenetrating successive
stages.
clock-time because of the very intensity of its life. The Simultaneity is here the fullest expression of
the
Supreme Richness, the unspeakable Concreteand is ness, the overwhelming Aliveness of God at the opposite pole from all empty unity, all mere
;
being
4.
any or
all
abstractions whatsoever.
Eternal Life, in a
fullest sense, is
eternal
appears to have its range between the pure Simultaneity of God, and mere Clock-Time,
life
384
Eternal Life
Prospects
and Conclusions
and to have its true form in Duration an ever more or less overlapping succession, capable of
being concentrated into quasi-simultaneities.
this lesser eternal
life,
And
never
although unending,
it
is
boundless
nor does
(here below at
least) ever
become
entirely actual.
5.
Now, owing
It,
to
this
likeness to
own) can be, and is, continuously apprehended by us since that Spirit really penetrates us and all Its
necessarily
incomprehensible by our
our apprehension occurs, not separately, abstractively, clearly, statically; but ever more or less in, or contrasting with, finite,
creatures.
this
And
and it does so changing things with an obscurely, yet immensely far-reaching dynamic operativeness. From hence alone can
contingent,
;
spring our unquenchable thirst after the Eternal and Abiding, the Objective, the Final ; and our
intolerable
pain
at
the
very
idea
of
being
entirely confined to the merely fleeting, subjeca pain which persists even if we tive, momentary
extend the validity and permanence of our life's experience to all humanity, taken simply as such.
and pain could not be so ineradicable and so profoundly operative, and could not constitute so decidedly the very flower and test of
this thirst
For
385
manhood, did
it
Reality or Realities deeper than any exclusively human projection or analysis whatsoever.
Nor will
it
experience to the
operation, within us, of Spirit in the making to the gradual and painful coming to self-conscious-
we
form
spirits
an
integral
part)
and
their growth.
stance of an unrealized perfection producing such pain and joy, such volitions, such endlessly varied
and all by means of just this and persistent impression that this Becoming is an already realized Perfection. Religion would thus deceive us precisely in the conviction and act which are central in all its higher forms and stages Adoration. And the noblest root and flower of the Jewish-Christian religion and of
and
real results
;
vivid
European
civilization,
and higher than ourselves, singly or collectively would also have to go. For such a habit of mind requires (logically, and in the long run also practically) my belief in a Reality not less but more
self-conscious than myself a Living One lives first and lives perfectly, and Who, touching
Who
me, the
live
can cause
me
to
for
His
sake.
386
6.
Simultaneity will be developed by man within, and in contrast to, duration. And it will be
strengthened
this (for
in
proportion as
man
effects,
in
others and in himself, results spiritually real within him) real duration ; and as he collects his
spirit (in alternation to
such action) away from all particular strivings, and concentrates it, more the exclusively, upon the Divine Living One
ever-present Background and Support of his little life. Time then, in the sense of duration (with the spiritual intercourse and the growth in spiritual character which we develop and consolidate in
such time), is, for us men, not a barrier against Eternal Life, but the very stuff and means in and by which we vitally experience and apprehend
life
;
is
thus neither a
automatically unrolls
itself.
hand,
is
it,
even at
its
But man's life is one long, and wide, rich and close, tissue of variously deep (ever more or less volitional) acts and habits
experienced by man.
instinctive, rational,
ings, friction, conflict, suffering, harmony, and joy and of variously corresponding permanent effectuations in and by the spirit thus active. And hence man's life is full of cost, tension, and drama. Yet
Fztnction
387
never experiences, indeed never is constituted by, itself alone but it is ever endlessly affected by the environment and stimu;
such an individual
and
ever
itself
realities.
And
upheld, penetrated, stimulated, and articulated by the one Infinite Spirit, God.
realm of
spirits is
Thus a
very means in and through which man apprehends increasingly (if only he thus loves and wills) the contrasting yet sustaining Simultaneity, Spontaneity, Infinity, and pure Action of the Eternal Life of God.
also spatial concepts important rdles in the full
7.
But
two
man
in
the
Beyond,
in this
earthly
life
at least
he cannot
persistently and vividly apprehend even the most spiritual realities, as distinct and different from each other, except by picturing them as disparate
in
space.
Now
deep
distinction
and
and closeness of intercourse) between God and man, and the continuous, keen sense that all man has, does, and is of good is ever, in
real affinity
388
its
of God, constitutes
Hence
imagery, which, by picturing God soul and Heaven as above the earth, helps to enforce this fundamental truth, is highly valuable
as valuable, indeed, as the imagery (spatial still) which helps to enforce the complementary truth
of God's likeness to the soul and His penetration of it, by picturing God as within the soul and
Heaven
as in this room.
And
upon
all
and picturings
their insistence
of Mathematics
ruthless
interchangeableness of
and flawless determinism) have a very certain place and function in the full For they provide that spiritual life of the soul.
individual instances,
preliminary Pantheism, that transition through fate and utter dehumanization, which will allow
the soul to affirm, ultimately and as ultimate, a Libertarianism and Personalism free from all
sentimentality or slovenliness, and immune against the attacks of ultimate Pantheism, which can now
be vanquished as only the caricature of the Yet for the poorer half of a far richer whole.
sufficient
operativeness
of
that
Mathematico-
outlook,
vivid
389
Finally,
seemingly dead) and abstract propositions (however empty if taken alone) can, and do, continually
thwart or stimulate
at least.
is spirit
human
spirits
within this
life
Because God is Spirit, and because man and is more and more to constitute himit
self
a personality,
man
is to
by means of spirits and personNor does man require alities, divine and human. material things only for the expression and comeffect this solely
is
always, somewhere, the element of the stimulation of the senses, so also does the spirit awaken to its
own
conflict
and powers, on occasion of contact and with material things. Hence Eternal Life will (here below at least) not mean for man
life
and the bodily senses, nor even a restriction of their use to means of spiritual self-expression but it will include also a rich and wise contact with, and an awakening by means of, matter and things.
aloofness from matter
;
All this costly acceptance and affirmation of Eternal Life will be found to form the sole self9.
consistent alternative to a (more or less obscure, but none the less real and immensely operative)
man's true
call,
(always easier) course of evading the soul's deepest This evasion will longings and requirements.
strengthen
the
animal
instincts
and
chaotic
will impulsions of the man's complex being ; weaken those higher claims of human reason and of spiritual organization and transfigurement. And
and
the soul
may
at
integration
and
arrive at
only in a superficial, distracted degree and way. And this shrinkage and pain of self-contradiction
and
self-stultification,
itself
has (at
would be the
soul's death.
In any case,
it
seems
Total Annihilation
effects of
such
full self-
good and
for
evil, but that they differ not only in quality, but also in intensity. Thus, though no soul would
itself, be as had not the contrast between been, though they the saved and the lost soul would be between two
in
their effects
as qualities, of
life*
And
in the
most
fully
eternalized of human spirits, would be so Durational as almost to lapse into Simultaneity, the sense of
Time
almost
Time
matter.
to the mechanical
movement of
soulless
This
here
we
certainly the case in this life ; are merely assuming that what already
is
ts, as the deepest of our experiences, will continue to obtain as long as we last at all
10.
found to include and to require a deep sense of human Weakness and of man's constant need of
the Divine Prevenience, and again of the reality of Sin and of our various inclinations to it but
;
also to exclude
tion of
all
human of the human body, or of the utter debilitation of The Pauline, Augustinian, Lutheran, the will.
Calvinist, Jansenist trend, impressive
will
corrective of
rest,
it
some contrary
excess
will
have to
more common-
yet in reality indefinitely richer the doctrine and practice of Jesus Christ Himself.
392
"
my
flesh abideth
indeed
is willing,
is
weak."
Eternal Life will not be simply a Moralism, with just the addition of a theoretical or practical reference to God, as the sanction and
11.
lastly,
And
Such a Religion has, fortusource of morality. nately, never existed except in the heads of some In its central consciousness and Philosophers,
action, this Life will
be indeed
religious,
hence
Adoration, a Cultus
but
Cultus
still.
the outgoing movement will not only discover God as hidden in the deepest ideals, necessities, and impulsions of
recollective
movement
And
Ethics, but also in the fullest strivings of Art and in the widest and most delicate attempts of the
speculative
less
and
analytical
reason.
God
is
no
End
truly the ultimate Source, Sustainer, and of perfect Beauty and of utter Truth than
of complete
Self-
Donation.
12.
The
for
its
normal,
general,
ment,
393
away from
all
of,
and
Eternal Life
all
or re-instate
the dread oppressions and persecutions of the past. The bitterest of all earthly hatreds would thus seem to be an essential condition of heavenly
love.
very certain and most grave dangers. Religion is here assumed, -on the evidence of
undeniable history, to exist and to function in various stages and degrees of depth, purity, and articulation, and with variously intense and true
revelations from
by Himself.
truer,
purer stages and degrees may increasingly learn to recognize, in the positive and fruitful
and effects of other religions, something good and from God fragments and preconstituents
Again
Religion, even
in
its
totality,
is
here
supposed to be indeed the deepest, yet not the only activity of man's spirit and each of these
;
several
activities
is
taken to possess
its
own
and
rights.
And
yet quite feasible and supremely fruitful, task of ever respecting, whilst
difficult,
ever more and more harmonizing, purifying, and all of these various realms, utilizing, each and
under penalty of finding, otherwise, that itself is more and more bereft of necessary material and
stimulation,
and that
all
man's many-levelled nature escape more and into a wilderness of rank secularism.
more
And
finally, in this
scheme of
life
the
first
cause,
found in
self-
rich, self-revealing,
giving Eternal Life. This ultimate Living Unity is trusted, and, in the long run, is mysteriously
found, to permeate
kinds of goodness, even though apparently most distant or most contrary. And it is just because of
this fundamental, ineradicable interconnection,
and
home
it, that man's spirit can this or that research or interest, and
immanent
necessities
subject-matter) something of abiding value to the other departments and levels of man's energizings, and, ultimately, to his
its
further seeking
Life.
395
The many
fail
cannot
to
to appear
attempt to stand aloof from all Religion, and to those who, with little or no analysis or theory, are directly absorbed in
those
its
who
practice.
Like
all
living
realities,
living
Religion possesses a sovereign spontaneity and rich simplicity which seem to render all attempts
at analysis
an
insult.
which continually
its
tension and
Religion is essentially Social horizontally in the sense that each several soul is therefore
;
own
in
special gifts
and for, that larger organism of the human family, which other souls are as fully to develop their own differing' gifts and attraits, as so many supple-
The ments and compensations to the others. be can thus peaceful, since striving of any one soul limited in its range to what this particular soul, at its best, most really wants and loves.
Religion is essentially Social vertically It is unchangeindeed here is its deepest root
And
from
its
fellows,
it
can
to recollect itself in
a simple
sense of God's presence. Such moments of direct preoccupation with God alone bring a deep refreshment and simplification to the soul.
And
Religion,
in
its
fullest
development,
little
essentially requires, not only this our earthly years, but a life beyond.
span of Neither an
known
ments.
But only an Eternal Life already begun and truly known in part here, though fully to be
achieved and completely to be understood hereafter, corresponds to the deepest longings of man's spirit as touched by the prevenient Spirit, God.
And
hence,
again,
a peace and
simplification.
For that doubly Social life I (though most real, and though
already
its
all,
own exceeding
ampler,
more
expansive,
more
utterly
blissful
energizings in and for man, the essentially durathe utterly Abiding, tional, quasi-eternal,
and^od,
INDEX
[Subject-matters and Authors discussed in the text at some length are printed in Italics ; ordinary type indicates such Subjects and Authors as appear only in shorter references or remarks mostly in the notes alone.]
SUBJECT-MATTERS
PAGES
a twofold degree of . 365, 366 Above, all true existence is, in Johannine writings . 74 God . Absolute, the, as, sporadically affirmed by Fichte 176 . . 112, 113 ; 117, 118 Knowledge in Eckhart in Hegel . . .2035211-213 . . .215 Philosophy, the, in Hegel . 202, 203 Spirit, m Hegel Abstract character of Parmenides philosophy 31 32 ; 34 of middle period of Plato 36, 37
AbidingnesS) sense
ofj
.
.....
. .
5 . .
of God in Aristotle . . of one current in Philo . 53 of Greek philosophy from Plato onwards 85 . of much in Plotinus of parts of the Fourth Gospel 79 80 of form of St Augustine's great experi. 89, . . ences . 90 predominant in Proclus . . and in Pseudo-Dionysius 97 . of one current in St. Thomas 107, 108 112 ; 118, 119 predominant in Eckhart . in Spinoza . . of Kant's fundamental epistemological . . .139,1405153 question . . of his Ethics 146, 147 Intuitionof Schleiermacher's pure . . 189-195 Feeling of Hegel's identification of Thinking with . 207-211 Reality and of human with the Absolute
.
.41
.85
.96
.134
Reason
397
211-216
398
Index
Abstract character of T. H. Green's "consciousness in general" 215 . . of much in Feuerbach 223 248 Schopenhauer's fight against intensely, of Haeckel's propaganda 281-283 largely, of Bergson's conception of Duration and of Space . , 291,292 of Life 299 of Liberty 301
. . .
Fourth Gospel
. .
PAGES
38-40
.
.
and macher
-73
.
.48
.
17, 18
63,
64
Aevum
in St.
Thomas
Aristotle Stoics
.
in
of St. Paul
73 .89, 90
98, 99 158-160
.
by author, of
.
-392
26 28 38
40, 41 45, 46
105, 106
.
52, 54 .65, 66
75
79,
68 80
Darwin 266, 267 ; 270 Anthropomorphism^ excessive reaction against, in Fichte 174, 178 a critical, urged against Hegel . 204-206 found everywhere by Feuerbach 234, 235 . . . Apathy, theJStoic 45, 46
.
....
.
.
132, 133
.
220
233-236
243, 244
in Philo
54
unhistorical temper utterances and
.
Aristotelianism,
its
Asceticism in
in
Our Lord's
340
life
.
65
Schopenhauer
favoured by Sorel . its abiding importance its true place and measure
253 253-255
Index
. . Atheism, Fichte accused of of Feuerbach, profoundly important
.
399
PAGES
.
ofHaeckel
Attention, man's Socialism
..... .......
234, 235
;
281-283
307
limited capacity
of,
seen in Secularist
Becoming, everything sheer, not Being, in Primitive Buddhism 8-10 all Reality without any, in Parmenides . . 31, 32 a pure, in Bergson . 289-291 ; 293, 294 Biology and Epigenesis, Darwin's confessions regarding, in . relation to religion 265-268 consideration and criticism of 268-279 three religious gains from recent 280-288 Bergson's utilization of, its strength . and weakness . 288-302 freedom of research in, within
Roman
Catholic Church
341 26 29
47, 48 71, 72
high importance in Spinoza . Brahma, his nature and relations to world and single
its
related 8-10 . 28, 29 Orphic constituents akin to . 1 13, 1 14 . Eckharfs affinity to primitive, a spiritually attuned moralism, not
.
...... .....
strictly
.
.
68
10-12
inter-
yet
in
religion
. .
Schopenhauer
Buddhism
Becoming
in Zarathustrism : two Coequal Positive Forces of Good and of Evil 12, 13 in Israelitish religion : the SpiritualEthical "This-life" Experiences 21, 22 . . in Aristotle : Energeia 38-41
56
. in St. Paul : Pneuma, the Spirit 67 in Fourth Gospel : Eternal Life 75 ; 77, 78 . . in Spinoza : Substance 125 in Schleiermacher's Reden : Intuifor Infinite tion-Feeling 183, 184 in his Glaubenslehre : Feeling of
Unconditional Dependence
in IB
195, 196
, .
400
Categories, HegePs ordering Change, see Becoming.
in
Index
PAGES
203
Christocentrism in Schleiermacher
197, 198
.
Wilhelm Hermann
its
its
97
Thomas
.
.
101, 102
110,119
. .
.261
.
.
. .
.
. .
Troeltsch
Sohm
is in
326-328 354-358
367, 368
means
Circle, the,
inEckhart.
in Spinoza in Hegel
Circle, the,
Buddhism Orphism
for,
Schopenhauer
Clearness,
95,
44 96 98
117, li&
"
8-10
passion
as
test
.
.
and measure
.
in Descartes in Spinoza
,125
125
inEckhart
its
Kant
ruinous thirst
for, in
its fascination for the half-educated contrasted with Richness . . . . . Conation, no sense of, in Bergson's philosophy 299 Consciousness, stage of, was introduced by creative act, according to A. R. Wallace 273 " Consciousness in general," in T. H. Green . Contact between soul and God, in Plotinus . * 83, 84
.
.... ....
.
111-113
by Leibniz and
142, 143
.
Haeckel
281-283
.310 .134
.221
97,
90 98 184-188
.
.
163-185
Index
401
Contact between soul and material things insisted on against Fichtean school 179,
.
80
Feuerbach 236, 237 apprehended even excessively by Naturalistic Anthropologists 277-279 persistently demanded by Institutional Re328-330 ligions . 389 required by this book
.
.
Council of Nicoca
.... ...
.
272-274
286, 278
Waggett
.
weak
in
72
,
222, 223
absent from M*Taggart , , 229 . 373 expressed by Cure* d'Ars present in experience of Eternal Life 368, 369 final insistence upon . 385 ; 387 ; 391, 392 . Critical Philosophy> the, as founded by Kant . 137-144 rendered more radical by Fichte 173, 174 developed by Schopenhauer 245-248 modified by Itargson 295, 296 criticism of, in Kant 139-144 \ 146-149 ; 153-155 ; 161-166 Schleiermacher 186-188 Feuerbach . 235-243 Curialism its predominance in Roman Catholic Church 358, 359 ; 364 n. medircval checks upon * 357, 358 present-day hopes for its limitation 359, 360
.
of Institutional Religion
.
Germany
France
333, 334
England
its
causes
human
402
Index
.....
.
44
. .
.129
23-26 27
58, 59
of,
in spiritual life
1337135? 388
their
258, 259
,
author's additional observations Dissatisfaction with all things finite . keen in Our Lord
St.
on
.
Augustine
weaker
wanting
in
its
M'Taggart Feuerbach
operation in Schopenhauer
Kierkegaard
Nietzsche absent from Secularist Socialism acutely experienced by John S. Mill persistently felt by the Curs' d'Ars
.
.
.311
311 373 140, 141 245, 246
,
.
. . .
"Dogmatic"
subjectivism in
Kant Schopenhauer
.
. .
.
men
in Stoicism
Philo
St.
.
.
.29 46 .52
.
.
.12,13
Augustine
. .
metaphysical, in Kant
. .
.
.
.141
.
.
93,
94
Schopenhauer
Duration^ no sense of, in primitive Buddhism . gropings after, in St. Thomas not recognized by Spinoza .
.
245, 246
io
105, xo6
.
.
Kant
specially discriminated
.127
143, 144
. 100 ; 288-291 criticism of his positions concerning 297, 298 j 299301 ; 301, 302 distinguished from Time and frpm Eternity 231, 232 final insistence upon 383, 384 ; 386, 387 390, 391
,'
Ecstasy) as sense of Non-Succession, Eternity, in Dionysiac . experience 24-27 God's love for the creature an, in Johannine writings 73 the creature's love for God an, in Pseudo-Dionysius 98 the Egyptian Religion, old, articulates little or nothing concerning Eternal Life 14
Index
Energeia, the Unmoving, in Aristotle . Philo Efigenesis, very different from Evolution proper
.
403
38-41
51
latter
I73>
Schopenhauer's, a metaphysical dualism criticism of . . Darwin's fluctuations in . . criticism of a supra-intellectual Bergson's, tends to
Intuition
. Eternal Life, a certain indirect sense of, in Buddhism apprehension of, in Ramanuja's Brahmanism
....
. .
295, 296
hardly articulated in ancient Egyptian religion roots of sane apprehension of, Israehtish
religion
of God, and man's approach to it, in Aristotle 39, 40 no logical room for, Stoicism . 43-45 . of God, in Philo 51
.....
m
.13
10 12 14
22
.
,
57, 64, 65
.
75-78 89,90
127
in Spinozi
m
179,
i
123, 124
So and #*
.
Schleiermacher Troeltsch
189
M'Taggart
threefold constituents of the experience found to be five * couples of intuitions and feelings . 364 Abidingness, absolute and relative . 365, 360 . . Otherness in Likeness 366, 367 Other- Worldlincss contrasting with ThisWorldliness . . . 367, 368 . Reality of two degrees 368, 369 of all reality within infinitely Organization rich Concretion of God . . 369-37 x
il
377,37^ 371-378
404
Eternity in Orphics
Plato Philo
St.
.
Index
.
Parmenides
-
3r
25-27 32 36, 37
>
Augustine Boethius
.
St.
"/,
Thomas
.
.
105, 106
.
13 .18
12,
of, in
Orphism
.
. .
.
.
in Plato
. . positive in Jesus's preaching . in St. Paul in one current of St. Augustine . negative in Pseudo-Dionysius . . mostly negative in St. Thomas . . . simply negative in Eckhart
. .
.63
.
.
29 35 70
68, 93,
. . .
. .
Spinoza
positive,
.
.
94
even
of,
radical, in
Kant
problem
increases in difficulty with insistence upon God's immanence within sensible and human
. .
.
worlds Evolution in strict sense and E^igenesis^ different yet confounded by Darwin
.
.....
.
Creative acts (Wallace) . Ethics (Huxley-Seth) . Anthropology (Marrett and others) . brings three aids to religion a graduated love of graduated reality 280, 281 suggestions as to origin and nature of
.
.
sex-sins
no
the Absolute of Ramanuja not mere . the Fourth Gospel emphasizes the, of God and of Christ. of the First keenly realized by Plotinus qua
.
.... ....
Buddhism
. . .
9,
10
.80
82-84
religious soul
of God, sense of, all-pervasive in St. Augustine 88-92 Proclus declares the First to be above . 96 of God, St Thomas on man's knowledge concerning 104 of Substance, in Spinoza, different from existence of Modes 126, 127 Ontological argument for, of God, Kant's oppo.
...... ....
.
sition to
its
Index
Existence^ Onlological argument
tions
for,
.
405
PAGES
of God,
.
its
and
limits
as central certitude of religion, insisted 160, 161 upon in discussion of Kant irritation against very idea of, where proposed as not somehow the human mind itself or this . mind's creation, strong in Fichte
of
.
God
.173
174
in traceable in
Munsterberg
Eucken
.
.
.
179, 180
sense
for, in
Schleiermacher
184-186
186-189 religious imperfection of this sense his aloofness from affirmation of, of . God in the Reden 192, 193
.
of
God
treated
Feuerbach's own history shows profound im. . 243, 244 portance of the belief . finally affirmed by Schopenhauer 256, 257 260-262 intense realization of, of God, by Kierkegaard Darwin's fluctuations as to, of God 266, 267 keen sense for, within Roman Catholic Church 342, 345 strong instinct of, as part of experience of Eternal Life 368 final affirmation of . . . 382-387 ; 394-396
. ,
.
Factual
Happenings and fact-like historical pictures, necessity (yet difficulty) of admission of this distinction
. .
343-347
hauer
Feeling,
religious,
252, 253
in
;
two
contradictory estimates of, Schleiermacher's Rcden 183-185 estimate of, in the Otaubenslehre classical Christian estimate of.
Fideism rejected by
Fierceness, religious^see
in
Roman Church
ds&
344
94 192 Schleiermacher's obtuseness concerning 189,192 Final Discriminations of book Eternal Life, an effect from interaction of Realities 382, 383 three things involved in fullest, /.*. in God's 383 still real, but no more full, in man * 383, 384 effect from operation of full, within our slighter. 384,385 Time, as Duration, no barrier, but necessary means to human sense of 386, 387
,
.
St Augustine
:
.19
93,
;
406
Index
PAGES
continued
Eternal Life, Spatial concepts and imagery also required for full human consciousness of 387, 388 Material things also necessary for development of this sense achieved as alternative to Spiritual Death probable characteristic of latter, as to
.
.
-389
:
(Duration) 389-391 of, requires with respect to consciousness of human weakness, need of God and sense of sin and with regard to conceptions of total 391, 392 corruption of human nature . 299-302 Finalism^ Bergs on's aversion to all . in Kant Formalism, in Ethics, 146, 147 Freedom^ Bergson removes mechanical obstacles, but fails fully to apprehend spiritual requisites of 299-302
.
.
^
Time
what experience
Gnosticism, apparent approximation yet vehement antagonism to, of Fourth Gospel . . 74, 75 in Schopenhauer as regards marriage . . 255 . . . . is untrue to life its rejection of (XT. condemned by Catholic
.
Godm
.....
essentially evil
.
. .
.332
351
353 48
64, 65 68, 69 73, 74 83, 84
Philo
Jesus's personal utterances
"
-
Plotinus
Pseudo-Dionysius
St.
Thomas
Eckhart
without reality in Spinoza's system . . precarious position of, in Kant's critical system
. . only sporadically admitted by Fichte 174,175,176 indifference to, in Schleiermacher's Reden . 192, 193 conceived Spinozistically in his Glaubenskhre 197 . . , Hegel carries history into
MTaggart and
a non-omnipotent, non-creative
.
213-215
224, 225
Feuerbach finds, to be man's own nature 233-235 Schopenhauer even more opposed to, of Pantheism than to God of Theism . 249, 250
. ,
Kierkegaard's profound sense of Reality and Difference, but not of Likeness, of 260-262 place of, in doctrine of Selection and Descent . . 272
.
Index
God, love
of,
47
man where
-
latter
most required
.
.
. . . the unspeakable Richness of . . . the Cure" d'Ars on . . . Abbe* Huvelin on cause, and sole full possessor, of Eternal Life . adoration of, the centre of religion 160, 161 . . Godhead and God contrasted in Eckhart . Grace, sense of, absent from Gautama's teaching . . present in Ramanuja in Isaiah Ezekiel
.....
.
to us
-373
;
Orphism
..... .....
.
.
12 18
.
. .
28,
its presence doubtful in Plato absent from Stoicism . . . in the Psalms Philo . Jesus's teaching St. Paul Fourth Gospel
.
Plotinus
St.
Augustine
Thomas . . 108, 109 Kant's suspicious attitude towards . 156, 157 . criticism of 160-162, 167 . obscure in, or absent from, Schlcicrmachcr 196, 197 256, 257 approximation to, in Schopenhauer ,
St.
.
.
.46 .48
53,
34,
20 29 36
54
57, 59,
261, 262
.321
385
,
.....
. .
.
344
.
insensibility of
Kant
.
,
158, 159
,
.
.
179, 180 n*
Schlcicrmacher
keen
instinct of
Roman
Catholic
difficulties in
...
Church
*
.192
342, 343 344
for
343-345
346, 347
342
408
Index
PAGES
.
criticism of this . driven out everywhere by Schopenhauer . conceived materialistically by Marx . the element of truth present here Scholasticism without sense of achieved by Durational man with aid of Eternal
. .
'
...
. .
34~3O7
340
314, 315
.312
201, 207-211
.
. .
late
....
Hegel
.
all
Jews
its
21, 22
apprehension as Eternity . . in Greece 23-26 conceived as accojnpanied by . memory, in Orphic Tablets 29-31
first
.
. . in Fichte in Schleiermacher's Reden
.
.
.176
193, 194
conviction
of,
wholesome where
. .
in God 21, 22 Individualism^ excessive, in Kant's Ethics 147-149 . Individuality dignity of right, in St. Thomas 109 , finally affirmed 395 188 Infinite, the, in Schleiermacher, rather the Spatial Infinite . in Feuerbach, man's own nature 233, 234 . Inquisition, the General 349 the Spanish 348, 349 Institutional Religion, how far here considered 323-325 threefold necessity of 325-333
',
...
.
present-day movement away from 333-335 five pairs of aids and difficulties
brought by
as to Philosophy
Law and
Politics
Initiative
.
.
.
awakens, and yet is checked and supplemented by, Eternal Life, in five ways . , 364-371
Index
409
FACES
Institutional Religion, contemporary examples of beforewithin mentioned operation Roman Catholic Church 371-378 . . . 40, 41 Intellectualisni) in Aristotle . . . in Eckhart 112, 113
in
Hegel comes
how
Intuition, a sudden,
in St.
Augustine
macher.
.
.
.
.
90
....
Bergson
.
15,
16
16-20
21,
upon
God
as
ex.
Psalms of Daniel Ecclesiasticus, Second Book of Maccabees, Apocalypse . of Baruch, and Psalms of Solomon
Book
Wisdom
its
of Solomon
perienced in this
life
22
48 49
49,
merits here
-255
Kingdom of God,
characteristics
in
its
prophetic,
.
immanental presentment Troeltsch on this double presentation how both these two presentations
59-^3
199, 200
or
315-317 Knowledge, the Pneuma of God alone has, of the things of God, in St. Paul taken as intuitive and akin to physical sight in Fourth Gospel is apprehension of like by like in Sextus , Empiricus 75 the One is apprehended through a Presence
, , .
still
.68 -75
.
above, in i'lotinus
God known
we
fusedly
soul because He Himself is . * present within it, in St. Augustine 91, 92 know clearly that God exists, we know conto
.83
.
what He
is,
in St.
Thomas
104
4io
Index
PAGES
Knowledge^ man blessed because he knows how near God is .112 to him, in Eckhart can be conceived as independent of an object, 129, 140 according to Kant of Nouinena impossible, yet we know they are utterly heterogeneous to our conceptions of
.
. . .
.
is
140, 144 them, according to Kant mind's recognition within object of what itself has placed there, according to Kant 141, 142 man's, ever only of himself, according to
. .
Feuerbach
of
its
criticism of this
own
denied
criticism
our
233, 234
continuous
to religion
as
to
range
.
of man's
.
268-271
the
stimulation of
382-394
Law,
the Mosaic, its growth . . . . 1 6, 19, 20, 50 the Canon> and the ChurcJi . . . 353-360 very ancient and wise acceptance of Law in general by Church . . 353, 354 rights and excesses of later developments of Canon Law studied in connection with Sohm's contentions . 354~357
in
Middle Ages
357, 358
as
and
358, 359 359, 360
Legalism, largely present in Priestly Code . Logic, position of, in Stoic system Hegel's jump from, to Reality, criticised
Logicalfyramid) the, taken as representing actual condition of Reality in Proclus Eckhart Haeckel not always so taken by Pseudo-Dionysius , .
rejected in his personal
Fourth Gospel
as
Longing
...
described
20 43
and 207-20
n8
96
work by Darwin
present
in
man,
affirmed
84
Index
Longing after God, affirmed by St. Augustine less vividly apprehended by St. Thomas Loretto, legend as to transference of Holy House of
.
411
91 103
345, 346
Magic and Sacraments, weakness of Liberal Protestantism 328, 329 concerning. 233, 234 Man, object as well as ground of religion, in Feuerbach criticism of this position 235-243 . Materialism of Stoics 43-45
Hume
Feuerbach Marx and Engels Haeckel Material things^ position of Locke concerning
last stage of
.
.
... ...
of Berkeley.
.....
.
138
.282
.
reality of
.
138
137,138
in
. .
158
Troeltsch
affirmed by Primitive Christianity Roman Catholic Church final determinations of book concerning . Mathematical Physics are found a place and function within
Spiritual Life,
by Spinoza
.
Metaphysics
. .
,
.
.
.
. .
St.
Thomas
position of
Kant towards
.
....
.
133-135 51, 53 71, 72 ; 191 73~75 ; 191 87 93 97, 99 roi, 103, 107
. ;
.
.
.
137, 138
of Schleicrmacher
in
according to
book "Modernism," Heliocentrism formerly a . Modes, the, in Spinoza . Monism^ a modified, in Rarnanuja a pure, in Parmenides in one current of Eckhart a pure materialist, in Haeckel Moravian Brethren, the Movements, the two, in Religion in Our Lord's life and teaching insisted upon by Trocltsch only one of, in Schopenhauer
.
. . . .
.....
final
.
Roman
...
.
.
184-191
223, 224
266
Catholic
337, 338
discriminations of this
392
. . ,
....
.
31, 32
. *
rn-rao
281-283
180, 181
.
64-66
*
,
199, 200
253-256
412
Index
Movements^ the two^ alone a match for present-day social 315-3*9 problem insisted upon as part of experience of . Eternal Life 3^7
.
.
....
',
PAGES
Multiplicity in Unity and Unity in Multiplicity . in experience of Eternal Life Mysticism of Fourth Gospel in Plotinus .
.
sense
.
of,
Schopenhauer by Wilhelm Hermann where we sink back into, according to SchleierMythology, macher the sole alternative to a Critical Anthroposeen in constructions morphism, as
rejected
.....
. . .
.
.
369-3?* 73 83 257
185
Haeckel
Natural and Revealed Religion first systematically distin102, 103 guished in Christian theology by St. Thomas Naturalism in Anthropology 277-279 33, 34 ; 37, 38 Negative Movement^ the, in Plato absent from Aristotle 38 in Our Lord's teaching 58, 59 ; 65, 66 St. Paul Plotinus. . . 82, 86 . Pseudo-Dionysius Eckhart. . . 115, 117 . , Spinoza , 123, 133 . Hegel . 213, 216
. . . . . .
.
....
. . .
.70
.100
Schopenhauer
251-2535256,257
criticism of . 253-256 ; 257-259 absent from secularist Socialism . 311 in with necessary struggle presentsocial . 1 day problem 3 6, 3 r 7 part of experience of Eternal Life 367 present in writings of Institutional
.
Religionists
in the Cure" d'Ars
371, 372
.
373
Neo-Platonism, anticipations
its richest
of,
.
.
its
95,
96
in Pseudo-Dionysius
Augustine Eckhart
.
St.
87, 88
"5
122, 131 212, 213
.
Spinoza
Hegel Schopenhauer
257
Index
Neo-Scholasticism, its strength and Nirvana, the, of Gautama
.
413
PAGES
its
.
.
weakness
. .
.
337-340
.
.
.
.
9,
10
Nothing,
the,
256, 257
.
.114
256 363
by Schopenhauer
.
.
.
God,
its
weakness and
ligion
.... .....
. .
.
.104
142
91
its
Church's
.
inclusion of, in
.
Christian
.
Argument\
its
the,
for
God's
existence,
.
Augustine
.....
.
83
88, 91
.
.
.
. ,
.
and weak
173-175
Eucken 179, 1 80 its vivid, yet limited and inconsistent, operation in Schleiermacher's Reden 184-189 treated as illusion by Fcuerbach 233-238 j 241-243
.
.
.
260-262
342, 343
Roman
.
Catholic Church
insistence
upon
to
fundamental
. .
much immediate
.
,
133
Kant opposed
immediate
144-146
Eucken's opposition to
. Schleiermacher's, largely immediate Troeltsch discovers, to be final, not preliminary, in . * . Christianity 199, 200 found to be too predominant even in the religious
.
.179 .197
, .
.
.
. crude, of secularist Socialism 311,320 Orderer, a non-omnipotent, held to be a reasonable belief by M'Taggart 224, 225 Ordering, a cosmic active, but not an Orderer, accepted by . . . . Fichte , 174, 175 Organic, apprehension of reality as, in proportion to depth of the reality, in experience of Eternal Life . 369-371 , . Organic conception of human society by Stoics 47, 48
.
.....
414
Index
PAGES
in
same
Paul
. .
Church
world
in St.
of
Spirits
.
in
human
writings . society
62,
and Church
.
.
.
in
St.
Augustine Pseudo-Dionysius
St. Thomas human society
.
. .
.93, 94 .98, 99
.
. .
.109
132, 133 225, 232 be,
in
Spinoza
M'Taggart
Organic life, everything in intention according to Schleiermacher Organic^ love of the, strong in Darwin
. . .
of religion to
.
.192
280, 281
eliminated by Haeckel
Origin of Episcopal sees in ancient Gaul, question of . Sin, according to Tennant and Wilson . . reflexions on theory
S)
appearance
doctrine
like
...
.
the tablets of . various constituents and probable experimental origin of doctrine of 30,31 Otherness, sense of, of God, strong in Israelitish religion 21, 22
Other- Wvrldliness
Eternal Life . 366, 367 This- Worldliness^ double sense of, in Troeltsch . 199, 200 part of experience of Eternal
and
Life
finally insisted
367, 368
on in
.
.
this
.
book
One
in Plotinus
.84 ,98
98,
396
velation
by Pseudo-Dionysius
99
43-45
Schleiermacher in his
life
Reden
188
190-193
197
Glaubenslehre
. .
Papa Angelica,
possibility
and power of a
I34 , 135
.
Index
:
415
Parables of Our Lord, the, two kinds parables of immediate expectancy 57 of slow growth 60, 6 1 Penetration, power of, possessed by spirits, supremely by God taught by St. Paul 7 emphasized by Fourth Gospel insisted upon by Roman Catholic Church 229 ignored by M'Taggart 227, 229 final affirmation concerning, in this book 386, 387 Permanence, as highest element of Personal Life, insisted
.
. . .
.38-41
indicated
. . .
.64
St.
Augustine
. ,
taught by
St.
Thomas
.
.
.
.
Eckhart
Permanence^
Persecution Catholic Church 348, 349 ; 349-353 Personality its dignity insisted upon, as diversity of natures,
',
insufficiently apprehended by Bergson . fully understood by Bpsanguet . 301, . final insistence upon, in this book 383, and Patient Zeal^ two currents in Roman
....
Thomas
.
.
302 384
by
is
St.
.109
217, 218 in
j
;
insufficiently
guarded by Hegel
without
memory
.
of
its
own
j
past
,
Pessimism
in
Gautama's teaching
Our Lord's
St.
life
and preaching
.
.
.
. . Paul . St. Augustine absence of a sufficient, in Spinoza as to man's ethical dispositions and doings, in Kant 144-146 . * insufficient^ in Schleiermacher . strongly operative in Trocltsch 199, 200 slight, in M'Taggart 229
.
excessive, of Schopenhauer . entirely absent in Hacckel insufficient, in secularist Socialism a preliminary, insisted upon by author
',
.... ....
. .
230 232 294-298 8-10 165 392 59, 60 391 392 .93, 94 ; 391 . *33~ 1 35
;
.,
;
.391,
.197
2495251,252
281-283 309-311 253-255 ; 315-319
,
249
its
r,
,.
t;o,
51
St.
Thomas
takes
first
place in Eckhart
416
Philosophy takes
',
Index
PACES
first
place in Hegel
. .
.215
222, 223
.
Hegelians
its
vicissitudes within
Roman
Catholic Church
,
Pietism,
its
influence
upon Schleiermacher
.
not Catholic
. Prayer, vocal, rejected by Kant held to affect only man, by Schleiermacher . Claude Montefiore on the Cure d'Ars upon final insistence upon, as essential to Religion Presence of God within human soul in this life concentration of Israelitish religion upon . . . insisted upon by St. Paul Fourth Gospel
.
..... .....
,
.
. .
337-
.197
.68 .78
.
21, 22
of his . . 83, 84 philosophy proclaimed by St. Augustine 90, 91 sense of, weakened by doctrine of Deification of human soul in Dionysius eliminated by Monism, in Eckhart . affirmed as against Kant , . 153, 154
vividly
apprehended by Plotinus,
.
^
in
.
.
spite
.100 .115
M'Taggart Feuerbach
. .
.
.
.
229-232
242, 243
311 sense of, a constituent of experience of Eternal Life 366, 367 upon 384, 385 Provenience of God absent from Plato . , . . , operative in Philo 53, 54
final insistence
secularist Socialism
....
. . . , . .
.36
insisted
184-186 vividly realized by Roman Catholic Church 342-344 by Abbe* Huvelin 375, 376 insisted upon by author 368 ; 382, 383 ; 385 ; 387, 388 ; 391 ; 396 Protestantism, Schopenhauer on, in so far as anti-ascetical 252 Purification of the Soul
,
proclaimed in Johannine writings absent from Plotinus qua philosopher continuously operative in St. Augustine sense of, weak in Kant . . . its rudiments strong in Schleiermacher
,
.
.
.160
in
Orphism
29,
'fill 100 Pseudo-Dionysius Spinoza 122, 123 ; 134, 135 sense of its need, a constituent of experience of Eternal Life , 366, 367
.
30
Index
Realised Perfection
centre of Our Lord's experience and teaching . insistence upon, by Fourth Gospel
417
PAGES
sense
of, slight in
Kant
demanded by Hegel
furnished by M'Taggart eliminated by Feuerbach criticism of this elimination final insistence upon, as fundamental
riot
211
228, 229 233, 234
m religion
J
235-243
244 385
Reality^
man's
is
;
knowledge
141, 142
;
of,
5
as
. .
against
149
. .
15, 151
as
keen sense
Feuerbach
graduated love
Darwin
m Eckhart penultimate
in Kant in Schleiermacher's
.....
.
against
243
graduated, characteristic
of
281, 282
involved in experience of
368, 369
1 12,
Reden
.
.
Glaubcnslehre
.
,
.
222, 223 . 314 partial dependence of, upon Social Conditions with other of intercourse as life, requires complexes
.
m English
in
Hegel penultimate
Hegelians
.215
330-333
337, 338
History
Law
Politics
its
....
. ,
required in struggle with the present-day social problem 315-318 characteristics whlcn operate against its three fanaticism . 392-394 the two constant causes of simplification at work within 394-39<3 Richness in Attributes as co-related to degree of elevation in scale of Reality exceptionally affirmed, generally denied, by Plato 34-36 denied, as regards God, by Aristotle .39, 40 admitted also as to God in lesser part of Pseudo-
two movements according to Our Lord $8, insisted upon by Troeltsch as against Schopenhauer
Dionysius
..... ......
.
.
99
27
418
Index
Thomas sometimes
ignores
. . .
.
.
sometimes proclaims
Spinoza generally denies
-
.
.
126,129
. yet occasionally affirms . .202,2035211 Hegel proclaims principle of . but then denies this principle in his positions 207, 208 217, 218 . . . affirmed against Feuerbach 236, 237
.130
insisted
upon by Wallace
by Darwin
.
281-283
. intermittent affirmation of, by Bergson 295, 296 sense of, is part of experience of Eternal Life . 369, 370 . . . final affirmation of 383 ; 386, 387 ; 395 . . . . 45, 46 Rigorism^ Ethical^ in Stoicism
....
.
Roman
St.
Thomas
. .
as
its
101, 102
.
119
its
Sorel
its
Georges 321-323
. .
present-day position
.
attitude to wards
.
337-340
340, 341
Law Sohm on
.
342-347 347-353
3S3~3<x> 354, 355
. . . antiquity of its attitude towards Politics . . witnesses to Eternal Life within, in recent times
.
361-364 372-377
no place
162-164
328, 329
.
and necessity Our Lord and St Paul and Fourth Gospel and
their place
*
....
. ,
329
330 330
137, 138
;
150,
;
160
operation of, in Kant's
107
Epistcmology
Ethics
Religion
. *
140, 141
150, 151
;
.147
154,
Index
Scepticism^ operation
of, in
419
PAGES
In Fichte
Schleiermachcr
criticism
.
185
;
;
Schopenhauer's
Sorel's hatred of
....
. .
186-188
.
245-248
321, 322 154, 155
. .
.
.
.
.
.
pure, impossible
Roman
its
236-243
its
Church,
.
strength and
life
its
weakness
. .
338-340
Science, Mathematico-Physical,
place
in
.
.122 .388
.271
307-312 3*9-323
Selection, Natural, and Struggle for Existence, insufficient . . as explanations of Origin of Species . -consciousness) loss of, in the Ni7~vana of Gautama 9, 10 Self regaining of, in the Beyond, according to . . 29, 31 Orphic tablets denied and attributed to the First by
.
Plotinus
82,
84
, ; 131 treated lightly and yet strictly required by Schleiermacher's JReden 192-195 implications of human, according to his
Glaubenslchre . . 195, 198 of God, Hegel's fundamental principle 202-204 insistence upon fruitfulness of this
principle
.
204-206
Hegel's identification of
human and
. Divine, ruins his principle 215-218 man's awaking to, described as against . Feuerbach 236-239 Schopenhauer's unhappy, affects his philo244, 245 ; 247-256 256, 257 sophy Darwin's high esteem of 268, 280 stage of, due to a Divine, creative act, * 272, 273 according to Wallace Haeckel's contempt for . 281-283 final affirmation of high worth of 383, 384
.
133 . 10 . Simultaneity > no sense of, in Primitive Buddhism sense of, as central in Dionysiac experience , 27 central in Aristotle's Pure Energeia . 38-40, 41 . of God, in Our Lord's teaching . 64
.
.
Self-seeking, in Spinoza
42O
',
Index
PAGES
.
.
77> 78
human
. .
.
soul's
.
knowledge,
in St. St.
Augustine
90
Thomas
, . {
105, 106
.
215-217 226 249, 250 insisted upon by Bosanquet against Bergson 301, 302 final propositions concerning 382-385, 396 . 65, 391, 392 Sin, doctrine and practice of Our Lord as to . . St. Paul. 39i>393 . St. Augustine 94 ; 391 Eckhart in sense of, imperfect Schleiermacher 252, 253 profound sense of man's impurity in Schopenhauer 268, 277 conception of, still retained by Darwin 283, 284 origin of, according to Tennant 321, 323 reality of, affirmed by Sorel sense of, affirmed as part of experience of Eternal Life 366, 367 . final insistence uoon reality of 391, 392 Social Conditions, their influence upon chances of religion with average men . . Social Element in Plato . 37, 38 Stoic teaching . . 47, 48 Our Lord's preaching . . .63, 66 St Paul 70-72 Fourth Gospel . . . 78, 79 St. Augustine . . . 93, 94 Pseudo-Dionysius 98, 99 St. Thomas denies . , 107, 1 08 affirms . . 108, 109 in Spinoza 132, 133 insufficiently apprehended by Kant 147-149 fully realized by Schleiermacher in his
affirmed of
all real
denied by Hegel
existence
by M Taggart by Schopenhauer
.
.
.
.115 .197
.
.
.
.
.
.
.314
..... ....
. . . . .
.
.
.
Glaubenslehre
. .
recognized by M'Taggart exaggerated and travestied by Marx as practised by Institutional Religion in Religion, double . Socialism^ doctrinaire and secularist, formulated by
. .
.198 .225
304, 306 326, 327
304-307 306-312 double general gain to be derived from'militant 312, 313 element of profound truth parodied by 314, 315 religion, in its two movements, alone sufficient to cure 315-319 indications of the abatement of 319-323 Social Problem^ the Present-day, in its relation to sense of
its
and Engels
three causes
....
. .
294-396
Marx
.....
. .
Eternal Life
303-323
Index
Social Problem^
its
....
.
42 1
PAGES
303, 304
.
.
.
upon
.
religion
.
Social workers, Christian Soul) the sensual, distinguished by St. Paul from the Mind, and still more from the Spirit the human^ separated, in Plotinus, from other souls, not . by Space but by Difference 83, 84 and longs after God by necessity of its nature ,
.
.
.66
87,
.84 88
.
little
the ever
. .
89,
90
possesses the blessed life and God in a . real, though obscure manner 91, 92 . and necessarily longs after God 91 higher and lower powers of, respectively touch Eternity and Time, in Eckhart 1 1 1, 1 12 the little spark, the increate light of 112, 114 is all things , , God generates His Son in . 117 . .83, 84 Spacey the soul and God without, in Plotinus . St. Augustine . 87, 88 Eckhart. 115 sense of, allotted no function in spiritual life by Kant 143, 144 188 sense of, keen in Schleiermacher . treatment of, by Bergson 291-294 ; 297, 298 insistence upon need of distinguishing between Con.
.
.115
ceptual
and Real
of important r61e played by concepts and imagery of, in consciousness of Eternal Life 387, 388 67-72 Spirit^ the, in St. Paul. Absolute, in Hegel 202, 203, 209
final affirmation
.
....
.
.....
. .
297, 298
.212
.
.
Stages of Revelation, an
Church
...
...
of
Catholic
*
Hegel.
Marx
. Stoicism^ Oriental origin of earlier chiefs of , materialistic Pantheism of 43-4. ethical Rigorism of 45, organic conception of human society entertained
by
its
47,
43
and
.
65,
66
422
Stoicism^ traces of influence
Index
PAGES
of, in
Philo
St.
52,
.
.
Kant
its self-sufftcingness
161
;
Subject, a self-subsisting, absent from primitive Buddhisrn , no transition possible between, and object in
Schopenhauer
hauer
Subjectivism of Kant
the general form of, and object abolished with renunciation of Will, according to Schopen.
.
..... .....
139-144
J
rejected
161
385 9, 10
246
criticism
139, 140
.
141
.
142
257 158
161 178
Schopenhauer
Roman
States
religion
Ramanuja approaches
Israeli tish
excludes speculations as to Beyond . 21-23 intermittent, imperfect glimpses of, in Plato 35, 34 ; 35-37 Aristotle distant from, in all but the conception of
.
PnreExergeza
asticus,
to,
over
362, 363
;
8-10
165 n.
.10-12
16-20
38-42
Wisdom
.
of
Solomon
in Philo
51
.
of Our Lord's teaching St. Paul . Fourth Gospel approach to, of Plotinus of St. Augustine Pseudo-Dionysius
.
48-50 53,54 64
68, 72
St.
Thomas
.
.
largely supplanted by
124-129 130-132 150-159 criticism . 159-166 Fichte generally falls short of 174-176; 177, 178 Schleiermacher indifferent to, in the Reden 192, 193
of Kant,
Criticism
*95
Index
423
PAGES
Theism^ Schleicrmacher still predominantly Pantheistic in the Glaubcnslehre ofTroeltsch Hegel is full of, in his fundamental principle 202-206 206-211 contradicts, in his two identifications of deceased English Hegelians 220,221
. .
.
.197 .199
opposition of M'Taggart to
criticism
.
.
,
.
.
227-230 2 33~ 2 35 criticism 235-244 . . 249 Schopenhauer's antipathy to criticism 253, 254 his shy implication of 256, 257 Nietzsche's groping after 263, 264 Darwin's fluctuations as to 266, 267 criticism 268-271 Doctrine of Descent and . 271, 272 of Wallace 272-274 " <c Haeckcl's cheery refutation of 281-283 Marx's elimination of all . 304-306 criticism 307-312 Sorel's trend towards 320-323 implied in full experience of Eternal Life . 368-369 final affirmation of . 382-387 ; 395, 396 Theocracies, Modern and Western, never long successful 361, 362 Things^ material^ necessity of mind's contact with, imperfectly 163, 164 apprehended by Kant
.
224, 225
.
.
....
. .
. . .
its
Rcden
. , ignored by Feuerbach 235-239 affirmed for Religion as against Liberal . , Protestants 328-330 . , . final insistence upon 389 in Kant, unknown to us yet somehow Thing*in-it$elf) the,
....
Eucken
.
.179
194, 195
known
to
be
utterly unlike
,
.
what
.
it
appears to us
criticism
This principle applied by Kant to Religion . Grace, Worship, History 156-159 criticism , , 159-166 . in Fichte , 173, 174
, .
,
. .
1 77,
178
.
,
184, 185
criticism
in
186-188
245-247, 248-249
.
upon
21,
22
424
This-
Index
World religious
experiences . the Psalms upon Philo 53, 54 insisted upon in one of Our Lord's two outlooks 59-62 ; 64, 65
.
......48
. .
.
in St. Paul
.
.
68,
70
Fourth Gospel
Plotinus
St.
St.
.
. . . .
.
.77? 78
.
.
. . .
.84
89,
.
Augustine
Pseudo-Dionysms
Thomas
Eckhart
Spinoza
criticism
haltingly affirmed
.
....
.
.104
;
92 97-99
115 115
.112, 113
by Kant
.
in Fichte
. . Schleiermacher . Troeltsch Feuerbach, illusions in so far as they claim to intimate transub233-235 jective realities
.
. 235-244 Schopenhauer's Nirvana256, 257 aspiration massive in Kierkegaard 261,202 Nietzsche and 263, 264 apparently never strong in Darwin 265 deeply respected by Sorel 320-323 required by Roman Catholic Church 342, 343 vigorously flourish within 372-377 a keen sense of, enters into complex of Eternal Life 367, 368 final affirmation as to need of 396 . in Plato the, 37, 38 in Our Lord's and life present teaching 65, 66 in St. Paul 72 largely absent from Fourth Gospel 79, 80 present in Plotinus, the living soul, absent from his system 82-84 abundant in St. Augustine 88-92 active in temper of Pseudo-Dionysius, excluded by his predominant theory 97, 90 absent from one current of St. Thomas 107, 108 present in other current 108, 109 Eckhart in his Monistic mood limits, to
. .
in criticism
a touch
of, in
....
.
intellectual
110-114 Spinoza introduces, in contradiction to his system, at culmination of his course 130-132
clearness
....
thirst
after
utter unity
and
Index
S)
425
PAGES
.
,
.
the,
Kant eliminates, from Ethics . and largely from Religion . reintroduced by Fichte by Schleiermacher, as
.
146, 147
159-161
. pertaining to Religion 190 insufficiency of, in deceased English Hegelians 222, 223 in M'Taggart . . . 229
284, 285
.
Time, meaning of its exclusion, in Dionysiac ecstasy completely excluded by Eternity, . according to Parmenides
Plato Philo
27
31, 32
36,37
r
Augustine Boethius
St.
St.
88,
104
.
.
Thomas
Kant
abstract, in
of,
226 according to M'Taggart utterly unreal, according lo Schopenhauer 249-25 1 discriminations as to, in 33ergson 288-291 criticism of 291-294 ; 297-299 301, 302 human experience of, threefold . 231, 232 sense of concrete, Duration, part of experience of Eternal Life 365, 366 discriminations concerning Abstract Time, final Concrete Time (Duration), and Eternity 382-384 ; 386, 387; 390, 39 1 To turn Simut) the, of Eternity in Parmenides . 31, 32 . Plato 37
existence really outside
.
....
.
.
Aristotle
39,40
89-91
105 105
Philo
St.
St.
Augustine
Bo&hius
Thomas
of, enters into experience of Eternal Life 365, 366 final insistence upon, as directly character-
sense
....
.
383
34,
36
53
of
Kingdom
in
Our Lord's
and teaching
56-59
426
Transcendence
of
Index
Kingdom
of God, insisted upon Troeltsch maintained here thus
. .
by
199,
200
against Schopenhauer
Transformism
Triadic
in
Bergson
......96
.
secularist Socialism
.
in Proclus
Pseudo-Dionysius
98
Hegel
.
.
.
.
.
212, 213
.
74, 75 Truth) in the Johannine writings tests of, not clearness but richness and fruitfulness 125, 134 religious, its supreme importance realized by Roman Catholic Church 348
.....
. . .
Uniqueness as attaching to all History and Personality admitted by St. Thomas in one current of his teaching . . denied and admitted by Spinoza 129, 130 . mostly combated by Kant 165, 1 66 . imperfectly recognized by Fichte even excessively apprehended by Schleicr-
.109
.177
macher
in his
Reden
189, 192
Variations, useful, constant presence of, kernel of riddle in . . Selection . . , . Variety of spiritual types within Roman Catholic Church
,
,172
352
n.
Washing of the feet, the, in Fourth Gospel Wheel of Generation^ the, in Buddhism
.
.
. .
.
,80
8-ro; 165
Orphism .28, 29 Schopenhauer . .251 Worship^ Religious, not understood by Kant 157, 158 ; 162-164 men and religions replete with 325, 326 law of human soul which necessitates 326, 327 historical foundation and abiding need f 337,328 , ,.; final insistence , upon \ . 392
.
.
.
its
.13 ,12
13
13
Index
427
II
Adam, James, on
Clcanihcs)
.
Hymn
.
of
.
Alexander il., Pope, protects the Jews Ambrose, St., of Milan, protests against
48 n. 350 350
17
first
.
execution for
.
. . , . . heresy . Amos, tJw prophet, his deeply ethical Theism Andrews, Lancelot, Anglican Bishop, as religious Insti-
tutionalist
.......
. .
.
326
37 n.
41, 42
.
.
.
,
.38-41
.
his insight
and
limitations
.241
.
99
Thomas
.
. .
.
and the
103, 107
temper of mind of Arnim, Johannes von, his edition of Fragments of Stoics Augustine, St., of Hippo . conditions of his life and times
unhistorical
.
......87
.
337~34<>
.
340 48 n.
87-94
his great indebtedness to Plotirms . 87, 88 on God, the soul, and their inter-relations as
. non-spatial 87, 88 Eternity of God as excluding Time 88, 89 yet as vividly apprehensible
. .
.
by man in Time 89, 90 God's immediate presence in men's souls 90-92 his sense of Historical Element of Religion 92, 93 ; 326 of Organic Character of Society and . Church 93, 94 of Sin 93, 94 and between Visible Invisible distinguishes Church 354 yet at times insists upon a practical identity . . between the two 93, 94 his attitude towards human nature demands mitigation and completion by Oar Lord's . 39 r, 392 fully balanced, richer outlook Azeglio, Massimo d', as a zealous Catholic and Italian 362 patriot
. . .
......
.
.
Baumker, Clemens, his valuable studies in Mediaeval Philo337, 338 sophy Bedford, Adeline Duchess of, on the Abbd Huvelin 375, 377 n.
.
.....*. ......
428
Index
94
n.
. . Benedictine edition of St. Augustine, its Index Benedictines, the Maurist, on Origin of French Episcopal
Sees 345 . 288-302 Bergson^ Henri^ on Zfom^and on Liberty Clockand distinguishes between Duration Time 106, 232 n. . finds Duration alone real 288, 289 excesses and defects in presentation of this great doctrine in the Essai 289-294 . in the Evolution Cr/atrice 294-297 at his best demands by implication three modifications of his ordinary contentions : Space to be discriminated into Real and Conceptual, in same manner as Time is already . discriminated . 297, 298 highest element in Duration to be ever found in Permanence or Quasi-Perman. ence, not in Change 298, 299 a wide, elastic Finalism to be accepted, as alone giving Content, Aim, and Steadi. ness to Libertarianism 299-302 Berkeley, George, Anglican Bishop central motive of his 137*138 philosophy . as a religious Institutional . 326 his Socialism more idealist modified, Bernstein, Eduard, 319, 320 within Roman Catholic Blondel, Maurice, upon Philosophy
....
. .
^
Church
relations
Dogma
104, 105 in St. Thomas 104, 105 Booth) Sir Charles^ on Christian self-sacrifice as sole cure for
. . popular Secularism . 317, 318 unique value, in face of acute social
.... ....
.
.
341 n.
347 n.
trouble,
of
.
strongly Institutional
.
371, , Bossuet, Bishop J. B., as a religious Institutionalist , A. of R. L. Nettleship . Bradley, C., his Memoir Buckle, H. T., Charles Darwin's opinion concerning views of his popularity amongst secularist Socialists . Burke, Edmund, ever conscious of connection between
.
Religion
,361
.
,
Edward^ on
Plotinus
.
.
.
.
,
. .
.
87
135 n.
;
.221, 222
.
Index
Callixtus, Pope, his Edict concerning
429
. Marriage 354, 355 81 n. . Calmes, Pere Th., on doctrine of Fourth Gospel a as , Calvin, John, religious Institulionalist 326 his attitude towards human nature found
. . .
,
.
.
391, 392
.
307 n.
345, 347 n. Lpretto Chrysippus, the Stoic 43 Church, Dean R. C., as example of deepening of religious life through Institutionalism . 371, 372 . . Cicero, M. Tullius, on the Stoic doctrines 43-47 Cleanthes, the Stoic 43 Clement, St., of Rome, First Epistle of, already shows legal
.
-359
organization strongly at
work
354
Clement vi., Pope, protects the Jews 350 Clement of Alexandria on Dionysiac worship 26 Charles Abbe* Huvelin Condren, de, Pere, 376 upon Crespi, Dr. Angelo, moves away from secularist Social . ism 320, 323 n.
.
....
.
.
Daniel^ the
. Damien, Father /., the Missionary to the lepers Book of^ on Everlasting Life . . Dante combines Catholicism and patriotism Darwin^ Charles^ on Theism, Immortality, Conscience
.49
362 265-268 268-271
.
372
his
passion for reduction of all things to . . emptiest abstraction 280-283 Delbos, Prof. Victor, on the surreptitious self-contradiction of Spinoza's Ethics 135 . Delehaye, Hippolyte, Bollandist, upon the legends of the . . . Saints * 347 . in 120 n. Denifle, Father H. S., upon Eckhart * ., his studies in mediaeval thought in . general 337,338 Deuteronomy author of Book of^ insists upon man's entirety as called to love of God 19 Dilthey, Wilhelm, on Stoic constituents of Spinoza's philo 135 . sophy * . Schlciermachcr 198 n. . . . 43, 44 Diogenes Laertius, on the Stoics
......
. .
',
.... ...
.
430
)
Index
Pseudohis times
...
. .
94-100
.
.
.
,
94, 95 95, 96
. transcendental outlook -97} 98 Christian and Aristotelian, as against Neo98, 99 Platonist, constituents of Deification of human soul in absence of historic sense and attribution of purely negative character to Evil as defects of insistence upon need of purification by soul that would experience and obtain Eternal Life nobly 100 distinguishes 54 n. Drummond, Dr. James, upon Philp the Jew . Duchesne, Mgr. Louis, on Origin of Episcopal Sees in
...
. .
.100 .100
....
-
France
EcclesiasticuS)
345, 346
.
.
Book
of^
.
. Eckhart, Joannes . his circumstances and tendency little spark of reason Psychology, the " " God and Godhead sharply contrasts . his monistic drift two currents in his Ethics .
;; .
110-120
1
.49
10,
1 1 1
.
.
"
.
.
.
. the circle and its triadic development 117, 1 18 the three thirsts in Eckhart ; causes of his turning away from all history and concreteness . 118,119
his
condemnation by Rome objectively deserved experience since his time has still further rendered
;
his abstractiveness
unworkable
119,120
. especially as concerns Eternal Life , Elijah^ the prophet) witnesses to One Holy Power . 16, 17 Marx's collaborator in secularist Engels, Friedrich,
Socialism
.....
.
.120
.
his
own
7*.
Fichtean influences which somewhat limit it . 179, 1 80 ; 1 80 n. on Evolution , . . 283 n. . . Ezekiel, theprophet^ on the Living God 16 God the Good Shepherd . 20 God as the Healing Waters , 20 the "Priestly Code," its kinship with . . .
. . .
.20
326
Fechner, G. T., the philosopher, as religious Institutionalist F&ielon, Archbishop F. de Salignac Lamotte, as religious
Institutionalist
Feuerbach,
Ludwig
.... .....
.
Index
Feuerbach,
43 1
PACKS
Ludwi^ two
....
. .
.
upon Marx and Engcls Fleiner, Prof. Fritz, on steady development of Canon Law and centralization within Roman Catholic Church in
.
significance
. .
358, 359
.
360 n*
Frazcr, Prof. J. G, naturalistic attitude towards man . anthropological works of Froude, Richard Hurrell, the Tractarian, his affinity to Kier-
.......
. .
375, 376 in
.279
260
341 #.
.
. . Galilei, Galileo, his condemnation Gatha Hymns, the, teaching of, concerning the . . and their creations ,
311,3417?.
Spirits
two
.
Gautama,
the
.8-10
.12,13
the concomitant of this doctrine ; significance of die complex a spiritually attuned moralism, not yet directly a religion . 165 n. . Gibson, Prof. W. R. Boyce, upon Berg-son's Intuitionism 302 n. Goerres, Joseph von, as one of the lay influences towards . intense centralization of Church , Goethe, Wolfgang von, his change from Institutional Christi. . 181, 182 anity to Spinozist habits . Gore, Charles, Anglican Bishop, as Christian social worker . 315 . Green, Thomas Bill, as an 218-223 " English Hegelian his . consciousness in general " 221 Gregory I., the Great, Pope St., condemns interference with the Jews' practice of their religion, and forbids com* 350 pulsory baptism of Jews . Gregory IX., Pope, founds the General Inquisitii 349 . Life in Philo . 54 n. Grill, Prof. J., on
.10;
-359
281-283 283 his popularity with secularist Socialists 310 n. Harrison. Jane, upon Orphism 23 29, 29 ; 30, 30 n. first the the to conceive Anatomist, clearly Harvey, William, . . , , and name Epigenesis 269 201-218 tt profound early influence of Schelling's Philo. . 201, 202 sophy of Identity upon this Philosophy deliberately contradicted by 202-206' fundamental principle of but admitted in two positions of 207-21 1 211-218
.
HaecM,
Monism
.
of
criticism of
G.WF.
432
Hege^
G.
Index
W.
F.^ like
Herford,
of
215, 216 English 218-223 Hegelians. 228 . 223, 224 M'Taggart Feuerbach 233, 235 249, 250; 251, 252 opposed by Schopenhauer and Evolution and Epigcnesis 268, 269 his influence in Marx and Engels 305 262 H., his translation of Ibsen's Brand
place
his
....
the
.
PAGES
in penultimate
deceased
.
. .
Categorical Imperative and Jesus . artificiality of this restriction Herodotus on the Dionysiac worship . Hesiod upon Lethe as evil
....
St
of
the
Historical
.
Hoeffding, Prof. Harald, upon Kierkegaard Holtzmann, H. J., on the" Kingdom of God in
Our Lord's
.
62
kingdom
6s, 63
Paul's teachings as to the Spirit. . . Christ . 72 . doctrine of Fourth Gospel 80 ;/. . decline of Institutional Religion 335 n. Huegel, F. von, in works other than the present, on Plato's Purgatorical teaching . 35 w. . , Ontological Argument .150x1. . . , 244 //, Religion and Illusion
,
Wilhelnx Hermann's theology 333 ;/* Factual and Symbolical constituents of Scripture 347 n. the Abb 374-377 his character and influence 374, 375 sayings concerning Eternal Life 375-377, 377 n.
.
. .
.... .....
. .
.
262 Ibsen, Hendrik, his -#ra#</suggested by figure of Kierkcg asird Isaiah ofJerusalem^ theprophet^ the vision at vocation of, 17, j 8 his simile of God and His vineyard , 18
Jackson, Prof. Henry, upon sequence of Plato's Dialogues 35 n, 182 Jacobi, Friedrich W., writes against Spinoza. fa/wist^ the, writes full of sense of God's living presence 16 Jeremiah^ the prophet^ upon God as fountain of living waters 19 the Lord, the Living God 19 Jesus Christ^ actual earthly life and utterances of 55-66 their general occasion and character 55,56 the Kingdom of Godits four characteristics in the transcendental movement ,
56-59
Index
Jesus Christ^ actual earthly life and utterances of the Kingdom
its
433
-continued
characteristics in the
in
....
the
immanental
59-62
social
Kingdom a
.
and
.
.
.62, 63
.
63,
64
64, 65 65, 66 institutes a Preaching Band . . 327, 328 uses and commends efficacious sensible signs 329, 330
. .
interaction of the
391, 392
67
69 73, 74
;
; j
.
79, 92,
Kant
.113 .130
165, 166
.
70-72 80 93
Fichte . Schlcicrmachcr
177 182
.214
.
252
Hermann
Jocll, Prof, F.,
upon Fcucrbach
. /o/tannina Writings, the theirgeneral antecedents and character " " . Truth and " Knowing " in their culminating category and con. viction : Eternal Life
.
75-78
their insistence
upon interpcnetration
78, 79
between God, Christ, the souls of the faithful, and upon God's prevenience their limitation of range yet profound sense of the two great concrete
Realities, the living historic Jesus *
God and
. ,
the
-
79,
80
* , 344 great symbolic pictures in , of the Cross, St, on incomprehensibility of God 243 as of of Cronstadt, example deepenolm. Father, Scrgierc John . . , Institutionalism by life 372 ing of religious . 268 n. , Tudd, J)n J. W. t on Charles Darwin's character 46 Juvenal, hi Stoic teaching
A~ant>
hnmanutt
'
*n 135-168
and
dominating motive of
434
Kan^ Immanucl)
his
Index
PAGES
Epistemology
:
five
.
positions
.
dis-
their formalism ; their ex; cessive individualism 144-149 Religious Philosophy as regards
guilt
.
.
.
150-156 156-167
173> *74
. ,
.
.
.183,
245-248 297, 298 295, 296 331, 332 final positions against the Critical 387, 388 ; 389 39*, 392 ; 395, 396 Kautzsch, Prof. E., on Apocrypha and Pscudo-cpigraphic 50 #, Writings of Old Testament Kettelcr, W. E. von, Bishop, as Christian social worker 315 260-262 Kierkegaard^ Speren 260 his affinities and special complex of insights keen sense of Reality and of Difference of
.
.217
.....
. .
.
God
Koch, Dr. upon Proclus
.261
insufficient sense of the Likeness . . . . the original of Ibsen's firattti . Hugo, on Pseudo-Dionysius and his dependence
.
.
,
262 262
120 #,
Lactantius, the African Father of the Church, forbids application of force in religion 349i 35
.
14 Lange, Prof. H. O., upon Ancient Egyptian religion 180 n. Lask, Dr. E*, on Fichte's attitude towards History on . Eckhart Prof. . .120 n. Lasson, A., 202 n* Lasson, Dr. G., on Hegel's early life . Laud, William, ^the Anglican Archbishop, as a religious Institutionalist 326 Law, William, the Non-Juring Divine, as a religious
>
.*,.*
.
......
.
Institutionalist
.326
*
Lehmann,
Leibniz, G,
Prof.
Edv, upon
Nirvana Ramanuja
Isuddhist
,
,
.
,
353 n, 8 -to
n,
*
12
/CarathuHtrism
.
.
t2, X3
W., on obscure apprehensions his Monadism compared M'Taggart his Evolution no Epi^cnesis
. ,
142, 143,
143^.
with
.
that
,
of
.227
268*270 326
.
* .
* *
as a religious Institutionalbt
Index
Leo Xin., Pope, his social teaching . . Le Play, Fre*de*ric, as sociological thinker Lessing, G. E., the contradiction in main theme of Nathan
. .
435
PAGES
-315
315
his
. 167 Locke, John, his denial of secondary qualities of Matter as half-way house to Berkeley's Idealism 138 . Lockhart, Rev. W., on Antonio Rosmini 361 n.
.
.
.166,
.
on Kingdom of God
.
62 n.
81
good
Church
......
S.J.,
method
279, 279 n.
faith are
326
his attitude towards human nature requires correction and completion by Our Lord's
own
teaching
391, 392
.
335
0/j
<
instructiveness doctrines
S.J.,
Nco-Scholastic School
.
Maistrc, Count Joseph de, as one of the lay founders of . * . recent Curialism . Manning, H, ., Cardinal, as a Christian social worker
49 223-232
of
223, 224
combination
226-232
359 315
Mane
patriot
Marie de
Jlfarrett,
....... ....
Anglicans
,
upon supernatural
amongst
-352
362
361
and the
inter-relateddis-
positions
Dr.
logical
Martin,
St.,
MafXi Karl
. * derivation of his philosophy his formulation of secularist Socialism . Medici, Lorenzo de', and the inter-relatedncss of politics
religion
...... .......
first
and
436
Medicus, Dr. Fritz, upon
.
Index
PAGES
J.
. .
180 w. . G. Fichte. Mercier, De'sire', Cardinal, his important labours in philo337, 338 sophy tS Micah) the prophet, upon the ethical character of God Mignot, E. J., Archbishop, upon the Church and Biblical Criticism 347 311 Mill) John Stuart, his vivid experience of Eternal Life Moellendorff, Prof. Ulrich von Willamowitz, his anthro279, 279 pological method Montefiore, Claude G., as example of religious life 371 strengthened by In stitutionalism 178, 179, 180 j!^5^^r^,Pr^//^^,hisNeo-Fichtcanism . . on Tablets Prof. 23, 30 n* Gilbert, Murray, Orphic
.......
.
. . 364 n. Narfon, E. de, on policy of Pope Pius x. . 218-223 Netthship) R. Lout's, as an English Hegelian Newman, J. H., Cardinal, as combining self-respect to Church with loyalty . . 326 authority example of deepening of religious life by Institutionaiism 360, 367 n. Nicolas (Kryffs), Cardinal, of Goes, and Evolution . 268, 269
.
Nietzsche^ Friedrich
..... ....
as
^a religious
tionalist
.
Institu.
326
263, 364
;
263,
.
.
264
9,
263 279
Oldenberg, Prof. H., upon the Buddhist Nirvana Olier, M. Jean Jacques, Abb Huyelin upon , Olle'-Laprune, L^on, upon Philosophy within
Catholic Church , Origen, as a religious Institutional
,
,
ro n.
Roman
,
.
376
34 r n. 326
the first clear formulator of the Totum Rimul of Eternity , 31, 32 spatial, abstract, monistic character of his outlook 33 262 . Pascal, Blaise, as spiritually related to Kierkegaard *
S)
.
a
Paitl,SA
.
religious Institutionalist
-
Pneumatic anthropology
the
.....,67
.
of,
interaction between experiences and conceptions of the Christ and of the Spirit in
future in
Kingdom of God
69
partly
present,
,
partly
t ,
70
Index
Paul)
St.,
437
PAGES
the Christ-Spirit in, is medium of universal brotherhood of mankind ; profoundly organic character of this brotherhood . 70-72 amazing range of volitional and emotional life in 72 his attitude towards human nature requires incorporation within, and mitigation by, larger and richer teaching of Our Lord . 391, 392 Pellico, Silvio, as fervent Catholic and ardent Italian patriot 362 Peniet, Maurice, on policy of Pope Pius X. . 364 n. on Dr. and three of Plato's Pfleidcrer, E., sequence periods . . . Dialogues 35 n. Pfleiderer, Otto, upon the Pantheistic trend of Schleier.
.
machcr PhilO)theJew
constituents of his philosophy ; deeply religious, theistic motive of his entire teaching . -50,51 God conceived by> in accordance with Aristotle, as
.
.
.......
. .
.
198 . 50-54
.51
as exclusive of Time . . . 51 God as above Life, and God as Life . 51-53 in his abstractive current largely anticipates Plotinus, . . perhaps even Proclus . God's prevenicnt operation in man's soul affirmed
.
-53
by 53> 54 spontaneity and richness of Jewish religion mostly predominate in, over Stoic apathy and general Hellenistic abstractiveness 54 . ingredients like the teachings ot, in Su Paul 66, 67 Fourth Gospel . 73 Pius v., St., Pope, aids consolidation of Spanish Inquisition 349 of on and wide rius /.v., Popt) reality range good faitla, grace . and salvation outside Visible Church . 351 . Pius x., Pone, his Motu Proprio pronouncements 359, 364 n. . 25, 26 PlatQ) his description of the Dionysiac ecstasy . . the Orphics 29, 30 . his own conceptions concerning Eternal Life . 32-38 three stages of his mental growth and three corre. . 32, 33 ; 35 sponding groups of his writings , . , Eternal Life in his second stage 33-35 , . in his third stage 35~37 his doctrine of the soul's purgation 35 thus four abidingly great convictions tinicjue within one soul throughout pre-Christian
,
. .
37>
3<8
St Augustma
89,
Pseudo-Dionysius
Ptotinus
74 93 97 8x-87
438
)
Index
his strength as
a religious
soul, his
weakness as an
.
. over-abstractive philosopher 81, 82 God here utterly transcendent yet experienced 82-84 by human soul in an immediate contact . non-spatiality, interpenetration ol souls 83, 84 the soul longs for God, God longs not for the . soul 85 86 what to retain in
...
.
. .
.
what
in St.
to
abandon
in
Augustine
.
87,
Pseudo-Diony sins
Prichard, H. A., on Kant's theory of knowledge . Priestly Code^ the, its kinship with Ezckiel Pringle Pattison^ Andrew Setft, on Fichte .
85-87 88 97
142 n.
20 (344)
,
180 n.
*
206 n.j 209 **., 218 w. Hegel 232 M'Taggart Naturalism two senses of the term "Nature" 275-277
. .
. .
.
.
.95, 96 95
rigorously carries out circular process of all things, as conceived by Plotinus, in its triadic develop-
ment
95,
. , places First even above being but increases number of realities intermediate between man and the One, and number of man's own constituents denies that the soul can ever become the very One
.
in Pseudo-Dionysius 94, 95 ; 97, . Psalms^ the, upon (spiritual) Life Psalms of Solomon^ the upon Life 49, 50 Piinjcr, Dr. G. Ch. B., his critical edition of Schloiermaoher's Reden in their successive texts .183/1.
. . ?
.
..... ...
. .
*
96 96
.....48
* . .
96 96 98
.
.
Ratnanuja
.10-13
10,
r
.14
i
.
his significant modification of Vedaniic as to Brahma, the World, the Soul how far Eternal Life is to be found in Ranee", A. le
Monism
, .
n,
12 12
Abbd Huvclin
.
* upon Ranke, Leopold von, and inter-relation between Politics and Religion . , , Reinach, Solomon, his attitude in anthropology Rensi, G,, his religiously tempered Socialism Rickaby, Rev. Joseph, SJ., as a helpful expositor of St
. . t
-377
361
Thomas
......
.
279 320
337, 338
n.
Index
439
Riehl, Prof. Aloys, upon^Nietzsche as indication of reawakin# of religious passion 264,264;*. Robertson, Frederick W., as example of strengthening of
religious
^
....
.
life
Erwin,
by_Institutionalism . his Psyche upon Dionysiac Cult 23-26, 26 composition of Plato's Re-
.371
.
public
his attitude in anthropology Rosmini, Antonio, as a religious Institutionalist
35*279, 279 n.
.326
.
combining self-respect and loyalty towards Church authority 360, 361 a saintly Catholic and ardent Italian
patriot
.
. .
.362
180-198
:
Schelling, F,
W.
J.,
his influence upon Hegel 201-20 upon Aristotle's Unmoving Energeia 38-40, 40 n*
.
SchUicnn&cher) Vricdrich
Retfm
is
Religion
.... ....
two periods
, .
.
.
of the
180-183 183-195
criticism
186-189
Philo189,
Religion
is utterly distinct
.
from
all
.
.
190 190-192
History is emphasised ; belief in God and Immortality is treated with indifference . 192-194
.
criticism
in his Glaubenslehre
.
*
.
.
.
.
194, 195
195-198 Unconditional 195, 196 Dependence God now everywhere accepted but Spinozistically conceived 198 Religion now intensely Christo-centric . and religious experience now sought in and through Community Professor Troeltsch's very limited succes. ion to, and great superiority over 199 . 244-259 Schopenhauer^ Arthur* four sets of his convictions to Ixs considered 244, 245 nature, circumstances, practically single work of 245 turns Kant's Epistcmology into an Eastern 245-248 Mctaphysic finds the Thing-in-itself in a Will bereft of al reason and logic, yet vehemently protests against being designated a Pantheist, and yet again is athirst for Absolute Identity and Rest 248-251
Religion
now Sense
.
of
.197
.198
44
Schopenhauer
insists
Index
PAGES
quite
Gnostic Asceticism
251-256
and culminates, in his Nirvana^ in a shy yet deep conviction of an utterly other, ultimate, timeless, mystical Life and Union 256, 257 shows weakness and strength for religion of
.
his influence
affinity with, of
.....
. .
257-259
Soren Kierkegaard
and of Friedrich Nietzsche .now. Schutz, Dr. Ludwig, on terminology of St. Thomas . Schweitzer, Dr. Albert, on Kingdom of God in personal . . 62 n. teaching of Our Lord on origin and character of St. Paul's conceptions . . 72 #. . . 81 n. Scott, Prof. E. F., on teaching of Fourth Gospel Seneca, Lucius Annceus, expresses Stoic belief in inter. 47 dependence and organic structure of human society Seth) Prof. Andrew see Pringh Pattison* . Kant's Ethics Prof, Seth, 149, 150 n. James, upon Sextus Empiricus, his doctrine that like is only apprehended
by
like
.......
',
Rudolf
his
354~358 positions concerning relations between and Invisible Church, the Visible
Catholic
criticism
.....
known
75
167
n.
to us in real life
Churches.
Georges^ the Syndicalist, his sympathy with Mystery, . . Theism, Christianity, Asceticism 320- 323 . Spencer, Herbert, as a follower of Darwin .
....
Church
.
and
the
local
354-356 35^-35 8
.288
S$inostO) Baruch
121-135
con-
X21-X23
X23-I27 128,129
130- 132
* .
. *
132-135
iHr, 182
. , Lessing . 181, 182 Schleiermacher 181, 182; 190, 191 j 197 Stevenson, R. 3L, on Fr* Damien 372 Stewart, Dr. J. M'Kellar, on Bergson's Philosophy 144 #., 302 iv, Stobaeus, Joannes, fragment preserved by, concerning the Perfect Sage, according to the Stoic 46
.
....
Index
Stolberg, Friedrich Leopold, Count, as layman who helped on intense centralization of Roman Catholic Church . Stout) Prof. G. F* y upon all specific activity as always . directed to an end .
.
441
PAGES
359
299
upon
relation
Attention
299
283-285
. criticism . . 286, 287 Teresa, St., as expressing classical Christian attitude towards religious feelings and decisive motives of . . action .
.
.191
. . . a religious Institutionalist 326 Thibaut, G., his translation of Ramanuja's commentary on . . the Vedanta-Sutras . 12 n. . . toi-no Thomas^ $t^ Aquinas
, . .
.
circumstances and character of . . 101, 102 . contrasted with St. Augustine 102, 103 admits possession by soul of confused knowledge of what God is 103, 104 . on Eternity, Aeyum, Time 104-106 current of a solitary and current of a social character in teaching of . 106-109 right and dignity of true individuality according . . to social current of . 109 Evil predominantly treated as negative by . his estimate of human nature 109,110
. .
.
on anthropomorphism
.109 .241
326 337
as a religious Institutionalist . . . as a Saint who utilized in largest measure . . philosophy in service of religion possibility ana advantage of treating especially Ethics and Spirituality of, in sympathetically
historical
ana
critical
manner
.
340
Tolstoi,
* .361 higher Politics and Religion 260 . Count Leo, his affinity with Schopenhauer . Toniolo, Professor, Dr., as helpful worker in ancient and . mediaeval philosophy 337, 338 Torqueraada, John, Cardinal, his profoundly legalist con. * ception of the Church Adolfi on Hegel's surreptitious transition from Logic to Reality 208, 209, 209 n. as a religious Institutionalist 326 Prqf* Ernst, upon the two interdependent and mutually compensatory movements of Christianity 66 n. Ontological Argument for existence of God , 156 n.
.
Tocqueville,
.357
.
442
Troeltsch) Prof. Ernst^
Index
PAGES
re.;
167
need of History
for religion
and
.
.
. .
200 n. 244 n.
n.
.317
irreplaceableness of Christianity in our present social . troubles . . 319 n. prospects ofsecularist Socialism 320 readily sees Magic in attribution of any productive efficacy to any sensible Sign or Sacrament 199, 328
criticism
.
328, 329
. .
Tyrrell,
upon separation of Church and State in France 364 Rev, George, on conflict between Science and Theology 342 obedience to God and obedience
. .
. .
n.
to His representatives
361 n.
Max
.
Heinze
. .
.
.
no
.
, .
149 x8o n.
Van
der Velde, E., his Socialism Cur Vianney^ /. #., the beatified
sayings 372, 373 . . Vincent de Paul, St., Abb Huvelin upon 376, 377 Volkelt, Prof. Johannes, upon Kant's Theory of Knowledge 142 n. Schopenhauer's Epistemology
-....,
is
353 n. 320
Dim and
251 n,
359 259
#.
n.
in
-
on continuous Creation t) Rev* Pbittft Wagner, Richard, the musical composer, as enthusiast Schopenhauer Walker^ Rev, Leslie J,, S.J<, his distinguished work
Epistemology
.
.,...,
in
260
337, 338
Index
443
Wallace^ Dr. Alfred Russet, on the three stages of life where Creative action has to be postulated 272, 273
and fervent Theism . 274 Wallace, William, upon Nietzsche 264 n. . Ward, Prof. James, on Real Time 232 n. as contrasted with Epigenesis Evolution in strict sense . 269 . Ward, Wilfrid, his Life of Cardinal Newman 361 n. Dr. W. as worker for intense centralization of Ward, G., lay
.
.
....
. .
.
Roman
Webb, Clement
Catholic Church 359 C, V., upon Ontological Argument for existence of God . . 156 n. Kant's attitude towards Grace . 167 n of M'Taggart's conception
.....
Person
.
.
232 n.
in the theory of
.
272 religious significance of this point Wenclland, Prof. Paul, penetrative character of his anthropological method 279, 279 n.
Wcstcott,
B.
F,,
.....
upon
.
.271
81 n.
315
;
Wdlhausen, Prof.
*
Julius,
.
character
. .
of
Elijah's
.
10,
17
.
17
Conflict
.
f
between
.
.
Science
.
g
and
.
Theology
Wilson,/* M.) Archdeacon, upon Sin as an anachronism Wisdom of Solomon^ the Book of> upon incorruption and
immortality
.
.
342 n. 285
.50
329
12, 13
.
Zarathustra
>
parts of the Avesta which . may reach back to him main doctrines of these parts traces of apprehension and conception of Eternal Life in Eduard, upon the Stoics
his probable date
;
12 13
o 48 n. 96 n. 43
Proclus
MORRISON