New Brain Science - QuickStart 4
New Brain Science - QuickStart 4
New Brain Science - QuickStart 4
nicabm
N a t i o n al I n s t i t u t e f o r the Clinical Application of Behavioral Medicine
This is very serious clinically, too, if we start thinking of human beings, our patients, as infinitely adaptable and we start blaming them, or attempting to blame them if they dont get better in the ways we think they ought to get better.
The National Institute for the Clinical Application of Behavioral Medicine www.nicabm.com
There is an American link to this, though, that I think is very, very important which was introduced to the American founders. Benjamin Franklin introduced Thomas Jefferson to the notion of perfectibility, and Jefferson said things like, I think people are extremely perfectible I cant remember if he used the term infinite but the idea was we could all become perfect. Today, theres a strong attitude of perfectibility the idea that you can always better yourself and along with that is this feverishness to do so. For example, What are you doing today to better yourself? This very much defines aspects of the American character in a way that doesnt define the character of other nations or nearly as much. This is a profound source of plasticity the discovery of plasticity: We can understand that human plasticity is a great gift and now we would say that plasticity is a gift of evolution but it also raises problems. (p. 6-7)
Experience changes the brain for better or worse. Norman Doidge explains how bad habits can negatively affect our brains reward structure.
Plasticity gives rise to a lot of things we dont like about ourselves. Our bad habits are a function of the fact that our brains are plastic. While the human brain is far, far, far more resilient than most people ever imagined, especially in its response to injury and illness, its also far more vulnerable than we imagined in so far as the brain can be changed by experiences for better or for worse. When we develop bad habits and we use our brain over and over in a bad way, its not just that we are thinking the wrong thoughts but were actually changing the structure of our brains and altering the brains reward system to some degree. We now have this new circuitry, which takes on a demon life of its own, if you will. That is just one of the examples of the dark side of plasticity. There are other examples of the dark side of plasticity. For instance, it is very common in musicians, where they are practicing all the time and then they lose control of their fingers thats a function of plasticity.
Some Parkinsons symptoms are a function of plasticity going awry because they start using their bodies in different ways and that gets reinforced. (p. 7-8)
The National Institute for the Clinical Application of Behavioral Medicine www.nicabm.com
Typically, they dive thirty feet underwater. They actually learn to slow their heart rate slow down their vital system so that they can stay under the water. Its now been shown, interestingly, that they can actually see perfectly clearly underwater without goggles Now, thats not supposed to be possible because human beings, as you know, when you go into a pool, everything looks kind of blurry and that has to do with the refraction of light passing through water. When we were fish, we could see clearly in water presumably, but as evolution occurred, we learned to function on land and see clearly in the air. It was thought that the pupillary reflex and our control over the lenses of our eyes were involved here. But the sea gypsies, in fact, learn how to change their focus so that they can see clearly underwater. This is an example of plasticity culture changing the brain. This is an example of something we thought was built into human beings that you cant see underwater, and this turns out to be teachable. (p. 8)
The National Institute for the Clinical Application of Behavioral Medicine www.nicabm.com
So Barbara said, Maybe I can train my brain. and since she couldnt read a wristwatch, she and Joshua Cohen basically wrote out clock faces on cue cards, showing different times. But to make it simpler they just put the hour-hand on, and on the back they wrote the time. She also devised the idea of adding something for the week and the month and the year, and by the end of it, she had these really complicated clocks. She got tenhanded clocks; shed be flipping these cards over and now she could, of course, tell the time and do it very fast. One day, when she was at her home, she walked past the television and 60 Minutes was on, and she listened to the program and she realized that she had, for the first time in her life, understood what the announcer said, in real time Her problems with logic and grammar and relating symbols and prepositions basically disappeared because she found the function that had gone awry she didnt just work on the symptoms, but the function and exercised it. (p. 12-14)
The National Institute for the Clinical Application of Behavioral Medicine www.nicabm.com
The cortical real estate you have will be devoted to the activities that you do, and the activities that you do will be the ones that are most necessary for survival. Imagine a small child, who can barely see for the first year of her life and barely move around, and can only speak its going to be speech that she has to do. So the right hemisphere took over speech. But because she probably has compromised visual input and because she wasnt moving around in space as much as a child with two hemispheres would, her visual spatial processing was compromised. (p. 18-19)
It seems that part of the function is to just put the limb or the area in a state where it might be better healed, but its not a perfect system that has evolved. If that T4 keeps getting triggered, then the brain learns that there is a problem, and it just gets better and better at receiving a pain reaction. This, again, increases its catchment area over time in chronic neuropathic pain and increases how long it lasts. So learning is going on because we are seeing this increase this change and the question is: Can we help a person unlearn? (p. 24-25)
What they say is this: the way a formation gets started is to imagine a chariot driver driving his chariot across a dusty plain. The first time he picks a route, the route will be somewhat arbitrary. But the second time he goes, if he encounters the tracks that he had the first time, hes likely to fall into and follow those tracks. If you do that several times, youre likely to have deep ruts and then, as you head off, youre very likely to follow the same pathway. This is really what happens in terms of the idea that neurons that fire together wire together. They create these pathways that predispose us to go in a certain direction. That is why in so many spiritual traditions you have people deliberately trying to practice what they consider wholesome habits of mind rather than the unwholesome ones its knowing that just practicing a habit is going to get you going in that direction. Many things are self-reinforcing if I practice a habit of generosity, lets say, or I practice a habit of letting go, it actually feels good to be generous and it feels good to let go. Theres a kind of positive reinforcement that comes from that. Then again, if I practice drinking (alcohol) when Im anxious or I practice hitting somebody when Im angry, that also feels good and has a tendency to be self-reinforcing.
The National Institute for the Clinical Application of Behavioral Medicine www.nicabm.com
So, its interesting to see that not only is this neurons that wire together fire together going on, but also these practices are self-reinforcing. We dont have to seek particular reinforcements for our practices often all we have to do is steer our chariot in a given direction, do that repeatedly, and the chariot will tend to go that way. (p. 28-29)
I joined the drama club in school and talking about those chariots going into new territory and leaving tracks again and again and again there I was learning my lines, standing up in front of people even when I felt awkward, saying the lines, and getting the positive reinforcement of an audience standing up and clapping. I might not have been perfect, but I made an effort, and I gradually improved. I obviously built totally new neural circuits. I will say, too, that the act of reading plays, reading fiction, and understanding character when perhaps you have been protected in your youth and you havent had the exposure to so much character development is very, very helpful, too, in terms of social awkwardness. (p. 29)
had been the emphasis in most chronic pain treatment for a very long period of time, to How do I get function back? In other words: How do I get to live my life? Instead of directing my focus with vigilant anxiety on pain sensations, how do I direct my focus on the sensations of walking, sitting, or engaging in normal life activities? That does two things: it mitigates the fear and fear plays a huge role. Heres a quick aside: when they test the role of fear in pain, they use a cold pressor test where you put your subjects hands in ice water, and you frighten your subject by saying, Youre going to have to keep your hand there for ten minutes. If you ask them to rate their pain after twenty seconds, theyll say, Its excruciating Im not doing this for ten minutes. But if you reassure them and say, Youll only have to keep your hands there for thirty seconds, and you ask them (the same question) after twenty seconds, theyll say, Oh, its a little cold its not a problem. Just the thought that this is going to be a big problem amplifies it tremendously.
If you can get people back into their life activities, then they get the reassurance that, Im not going to be disabled by this. Im going to be able to live a life, even though it hurts. This mitigates the fear, which also retrains the brain to not focus vigilantly on the pain. There are a number of different factors that all come together when we shift peoples emphasis from, How do I get the symptom to go away? to How do I get my full life back and focus instead on engagement and normal activity?
10
and so identifying those cues as people, places, times, negative emotions or something like that. And then understanding and teaching how the habit works. And so maybe there is that cue that comes in but then a routine gets set into place because of the grooves, the deep grooves that have been set into the brain over time, and then there is usually a reward that comes up from that: some sort of relief or something like that when you first meet that Big Mac, there is maybe a form of relief that comes before the shame kind of sets in. And when we are able to do that someone is able to recognize that habit loop there is a space between their awareness and the experience itself, and in that space lies choice and possibility, and there is a feeling there that is happening in the present moment. (Next Week in Your Practice #4)
One of my mentors was Milton Erickson, the late psychiatrist who died in 1980, and I studied with him in the seventies and he I think I was a plastic therapist for a long time because he believed everybody was changeable: their emotions, their neurology. And he cured himself, if you will, from paralysis, which was they gave him a bad diagnosis and said, Youll never walk again. And so he proved them wrong; he learned to walk again in very unusual ways. And then, when he would tell me stories, he would tell me stories about working with, again, impossible cases of aphasia after people had had strokes and teaching them to talk again. When, again, the doctors had said, Theyll never talk again that part of their brain was damaged Erickson wouldnt buy it. He would have them do nursery rhymes, play Pat-a-Cake to rehab their brains, like people are doing now now that the scientific evidence is coming in saying, Youd better work with their brains and get other parts of the brains to compensate. So I saw this early on, both with Erickson and with some of the cases he talked about and they seemed impossible. But now we know the science says brains can change all through life, which we thought to be impossible in the seventies. I remember learning it in neurological psych, you know, all the stuff that Norman talked about. And things have changed but he gave me that. I called my therapy possibility therapy; my approach changed because I just thought, You dont know what the limits of possibility are.
I am sure there are some physical limits but I have seen some impossible cases where people changed. (Next Week in Your Practice #4)
The National Institute for the Clinical Application of Behavioral Medicine www.nicabm.com