Aleksandra Posarac, Lead Economist, World Bank: May 7 - 11, 2012 Washington, D.C
Aleksandra Posarac, Lead Economist, World Bank: May 7 - 11, 2012 Washington, D.C
Aleksandra Posarac, Lead Economist, World Bank: May 7 - 11, 2012 Washington, D.C
What do we know?
Globally, the evidence on the socioeconomic status of persons with disabilities is limited, because good quality data on persons with disabilities is limited The situation greatly differs between developed and developing countries Most of the evidence pertains to developed countries, as overall they have much better data (well established and regular data collection) As of lately, the situation has somewhat improved in developing countries (WHS, SINTEF, disability specific surveys, household surveys)
3
A word of caution/caveats Disability measurement remains a perennial challenge; With rare exceptions, data is cross-sectional, providing a snapshot picture at one particular point in time) One can only talk about associations between disability and poverty (both income/consumption and non-income), but NOT about causality. For causality, one needs panel data. Except for WHS, no internationally comparable data
4
Overall, in developed countries, the empirical evidence suggests that on average, as a group when compared to persons without disabilities, disabled people have:
lower educational attainment, worse health status and less access to health services lower employment and higher unemployment rates and have lower wages when employed, and are more likely to be poor than persons without disabilities
OECD 2010, Saunders 2007, Gannon and Nolan 2004, Parodi and Sciulli 2008, Meyer and Mok 2008).
In developing countries, available literature (for a review of literature see: Mitra, Posarac, Vick 2011) based on rigorous data and statistical analysis, suggest that on average, as a group, when compared to non-disabled peers, persons with disabilities are: less likely to be employed, more likely to have lower educational attainment, and children with disabilities are less likely to be in school. The evidence is mixed on disparities in household economic well-being across disability status as measured by assets, living conditions, and household expenditures. Recent studies using multi-dimensional poverty methods find that people with disabilities are more likely to experience multidimensional poverty than persons without a disability.
6
Deriving any definitive conclusions on the association between disability and poverty from this literature is not advised:
studies use different methods the household survey data used in these studies are not comparable across countries, often because of their different measures of disability the well-being status is significantly influenced by country specific policies and they vary widely
As a result, there still remains little empirical certainty whether and to what extent on average, as a group, persons with disabilities and their families in developing countries are more likely to face adverse socioeconomic outcomes than those without disabilities. More and better data and more research is needed.
7
10
wealth quintiles
22 20 18 13 18 16 12 9 7 12 13 18
21 17 16 14 11 16
11
Disability prevalence by wealth quintiles
50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 Q1
Based on World Health Survey, population 18+, see World Report on Disability, pp. 28, standardized for age and sex
22 18
21
20 17 13
18 16 12 9 7 16 14 13 11 12
18 16
All 59 countries Q5
Total
12
13
5.0 4.5 4.0 3.6 3.5 3.0 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.1 1.0 0.5 0.0 Q1 Q2 Higher income countries Q3 Q4 Lower income countries Q5 All 59 countries Total 0.8 0.5 2.4 2.5 2.3 2.1 1.8 1.8 1.7 1.6 1.2 2.3 2.0 2.3 2.2 3.2
Based on WHS, see: WRD pp. 28, standardized for age and sex
14
From Mitra, Posarac and Vick, 2011, non-health per capita expenditure
Disability
No Disability
15
Disability
No Disability
16
Primary school completion rates for disabled and non-disabled persons 18+ (Mitra, Posarac, Vick, 2011, based on WHS)
18
% share of health expenditure in total per capita HH expenditure (Mitra, Posarac, Vick, 2011; based on WHS)
0.20 0.18 0.16 0.14 0.12 0.10 0.08 0.06 0.04 0.02 0.00
Disability No Disability
19
20
Cost of disability
Economic and social cost assumed to be significant Difficult to quantify Rarely done because of:
lack of agreed methodology (for example GDP loss because of low labor force participation of disabled people whom to take into account only those who want to work, and could have been hired but denied employment based on discrimination? Or the excess unemployment among disabled persons (i.e. the differential between unemployment of disabled and non-disabled people? no-one calculates lost GDP because of general unemployment!); lack of data (reliable estimates of lost productivity require accurate estimate of wages across gender, age, occupation, education very difficult for disabled people out of employment for a long time); definitions of disability vary, even within the same country (compiling the data from various sources technically questionable)
21
Direct cost of disability Extra cost of living with a disability
range from 11-69% of income in UK, 20-37% of income in Ireland, 9% in Bosnia &Herzegovina and 14% in Viet Nam little agreement on methodology could play an important role in calibrating social assistance benefits to ensure horizontal equity of beneficiaries
Public spending on programs that benefit disabled persons and their households
1.5% of GDP in OECD in 2007 (2% when sickness benefits added) have increased during the last decade creating fiscal pressure and concerns over affordability and sustainability
22
Indirect cost of disability Economic:
lost productivity due to underinvestment in skills/education of disabled children lost productivity when adults leave employment or reduce work after the onset of disability (6% of working age population in OECD out of employment and on disability benefits in 2007); Associated loss of taxes