Traditional Theater and the Film in Japan Author(s): Donald Richie and Joseph L.

Anderson Reviewed work(s): Source: Film Quarterly, Vol. 12, No. 1 (Autumn, 1958), pp. 2-9 Published by: University of California Press Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3186070 . Accessed: 06/11/2012 03:47
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp

.
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected].

University of California Press is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Film Quarterly.

http://www.jstor.org

DONALD RICHIE AND JOSEPH L. ANDERSON

Traditional Theater and the Film in Japan

Well, to be brief, there isn't any. All of the parallels, drawn in Japan as carelessly as elsewhere, are forced; all the pigeonholes are wrongly labeled; all the conclusions, so carefully jumped at, are as false as the assumptions upon which they are based. As an opening wedge let us take the celebrated example of Rashomon. One read all sorts of learned nonsense about the influence of Kabuki, and even the Noh. Akira Kurosawa, the director, read it too and eventually made the statement: "I haven't read one review from abroad that hasn't read false meanings. .. ." If pressed, he will then tell the story behind the acting style of Rashomon. One night, in Kyoto just before shooting started, Kurosawa and his staff looked at a print of a Martin and Johnson jungle picture. They were all much impressed by the animals, particularly with a sequence of a lion on the prowl. Kurosawa said: "Well, Mifune, that's Tojomaru. Make the human like an animal." Thus Toshiro Mifune made his role of the bandit Tojomaru as lion-like as possible. A bit later, the head of the studio saw a movie in downtown Kyoto in which a black panther appeared. At his urging everyone went to see it. This is how they came across the model for Machiko Kyo's character in the same film. Kurosawa will at this point observe that, if he is not mistaken, the performances of animals in jungle pictures are

somewhat removed from the Kabuki technique. The truth is that the traditional theater in Japan has given almost nothing to the films. One would think that in a country with one of the most developed theatrical traditions in the world, influences and adaptations would be a natural and common occurrence. This, however, is simply not so. There are, of course, exceptions to this rule. Before going into precisely what these exceptions have been, however, it might be well to define the different categories of Japanese theater. Among the better-known forms are the Noh and the Kabuki and the Bunraku-the Osaka doll-drama. Less familiar are the Shimpa and the Shingeki. The former is a dramatic form designed to express the enlightened emotions of the Meiji era. The latter is the "modern theater" of Japan, originally much influenced by Ibsen, Chekov, and Shaw, and now much given to polemic. What remains are the various kinds of yose or vaudeville. This includes several forms of story-telling, among them the kodan and the naniwabushi. The former is comprised of individual stories, always historical, invariably complicated in plot, and endless in number. Since both kodan and Kabuki share a similar historical background, they very often share similar material. And it is from the story-telling art of the kodan that the Japanese film takes much of its ma-

;.I

* +

terial. Hence the initial confusion. What is assumed to be a filmed Kabuki is often a kodan story on film. All of the kodan material is so well-known, constituting what is in effect a kind of folklore, that the Japanese audience comes to the theater with the basic story memorized. This prior knowledge is assumed by the film-maker and there is no attempt to provide full exposition. These filmed kodan usually concern themselves with underdeveloped phases of a well-known character's life. The picture usually becomes a series of such tidbits; the better-known connecting sections are left out and anyone not familiar with the character is completely baffled. The favorite stories are, naturally, those most often filmed. They usually center around a favorite feudal hero: Mataemon Araki, Chuji Kunisada, the Soga brothers, or Musashi Miyamoto. This latter hero even got himself exported to America where he won himself an Academy Award in the film called Samurai. The movie, called Miyamoto Musashi in Japan, was the remake of a remake and,

NARAYAMA BUSHIKO: The son (Teishi

Takahashi)

carries his mother (Kinuyo Tanaka) to the top of Mount Nara-there to leave her to die of starvation and exposure.

moreover, was merely the first part of a new version of the familiar kodan story-in this case based upon an even further popularization by Eiji Yoshikawa, the Kenneth Roberts of Japan. Its receiving an Academy Award surprised everyone because, strictly speaking, the film wasn't finished yet. In a way it was like giving an award to the first chapter of a Pecos Bill serial. In it, Director Hiroshi Inagaki assumed that his audience would already know all about Musashi and did not feel at all constrained to fill in on anything that happened in between the portions shown. Foreign critics found much to praise in what they thought was "the director's devotion to the essence of a situation, unmindful of the superfluous exigencies of plot" and Inagaki was very surprised.

RASHOMON:

An unused

publicity still satirizing the attitudes of the usual period-film. Toshiro Mifune hams it up with the sword while Machiki Kyo screams by his side.

rh,-4?t -C) ; , ?e * r

--??-c7f;
h? j 3 s?r. ..

Such then is the usual kodan hero when he gets in the movies. There may be new interpretations and new minor characters but the story is assumed to be always the same. These kodan tales are the backbone of the period-filmand are all hardy perennials. It is a rare year that doesn't yield its harvest of new versions, differing from the old versionsonly in that widescreen or color or different actors are used. There is no question of borrowing techniques from the traditionaltheatersince the traditionaltheater is not involved. One of the hardiest of all the perennials, however, just happens to be a Kabuki. This is the famous Chushingura (The Loyal Forty-seven Ronin), new film versions of which are made about twice every year. Here, one thinks at last, is Kabukiinfluence. There is, to be sure, a certain amount. The story is taken directly from the Kabuki, yet anyone seeing any one of these film versions-and there must be near half a hundred of them by now-is not likely to confuse it with the traditionaltheater. The reason is that, like the filmed kodan, they are all rigidly realistic, which the Kabuki as a theatrical form is not. One may be reminded of Errol Flynn's Robin Hood, or Robert Taylor's Ivanhoe; one is not re-

minded of the theatrical style known as Kabuki. Even when well-knownKabukiactors appear (and Chushingurais the only Kabuki play favoredby the films) they usuallymodulate their performancesuntil they are just as matter-of-fact,just as like-you-and-meas everyone else. They may, however, include a bit of Kabukibusiness-for after all, their only reason for inclusion is that they are famous Kabuki actors and are intended to raise the tone of the production. There is, for example, a celebrated Kabuki stance known as the mie. It is used to indicate moments of great emotional stress and consists of an attitude during which the eyes are crossed and the tongue is partially stuck out. In a 1956 version of Chushingura,the featured Kabukiactor indulged in a very modified mie during the letter scene. In the realistic context of the film, the foreign observer might well wonder what had happened, why had the man become cross-eyed,why was he stickingout his tongue in that odd way? The Japanese observer would recognize it as a fugitive glimpse of Kabukitechnique, inserted to let you know that the actor was the real thing, and would disregard it. And this is about all the Kabukiinfluence

there is on the Japanese screen. It gives a few plays to the films and shows itself in small and ratherself-consciousways. There are many reasons for this. One of them is that the content of the Kabukidramais very slight. Everythingdepends upon the actors' performances. It is, in fact, an actors'theater. The audience already knows the story. It goes merely to see so-and-soin such-andsuch. Anotherreason is that the Kabukistyle of acting is simply too big for the film. It incorporates and depends upon dancing and singing, neither of which are appropriateto the realism which the Japanese film has from the first insisted upon. Since the kodan, a story-telling art, has no theatrical style, the Japaneseperiod-filmshave always contented themselves with an absence of style. Films about Musashi Miyamoto and Chuji Kunisada are therefore as much influenced by the Japanesetraditionaltheater as are American films about Billy the Kid and Jesse James. That acting in Japaneseperiod-films seems very grand and expansive to foreign audiences is due more to the blustering way of the samurai and the truly native Japanese inability to hold back emotion than to any influence from the traditional stage. If the Kabuki has any influence at all, if the period-filmhas any historicalprecedent in the traditionaltheater, it is in the Kabuki aragoto, the rough-house plays generally about famous swordsmen. This Kabuki genre is full of action, elaborate posturing and stylized swordplay-the kind of Kabuki that the Japanese love to show foreigners. Some critics,however,thinkthat even this link between Kabukiand filmis suspect.The film critic Tsuneo Hazumi says: "Unfortunately, there has never been any real con-

nection between Kabuki and films.... The Kyugeki [the earliest word for periodfilm], a poor substitute for genuine Kabuki, was given by rural troupes which had no connectionwith the great Kabukitradition, and none of its art. The film star, Matsunosuke, was essentially an imitator of Kabuki rather than a performer of it." And even Matsunosuke-Japan'sfirst full-fledged star -though his filmswere little more than photographed theatrical tableaux, was in full revolt against the traditional theater. Thus, while Kabukiand the kodan-based period-filmsometimesshare similarmaterial and often share similar themes (since both were brought to their present form entirely in the feudal Tokugawa eras) they share little else. This, one might observe, does not at all disturb the Japanese filmgoer. Fully ninety percent of the people in Japan have never seen the Kabuki. They know it exists, they have heard about it, they vaguely approve of it, but they don't understand it and they aren't curious about it. Along with the Noh and the Bunraku it is a part of the cultural heritage. It is takenfor granted-that is, it is ignored. One even hears Noh defined as simply something that foreignerssee when they come to Japan. There have, however, been isolated experimentsin adapting Kabukito the screen. At least three of them have been highly successful films artisticallyand deserve the attention of the West. The firstof these was Kurosawa's Tora no 0 o Fumu Otokotachi(The Men Who Tread on the Tail of the Tiger) which was a film version of the Kabuki play Kanjincho. It was finished just before the end of the war in 1945but not released until 1953. The reason for the delay was that the Occupation was using both the Kabukiand the periodfilm as whipping boys-in the meantime in-

stituting such "healthy and democratic" genresas the brutalgang-film. Thus, though the Kurosawafilm is in essence antifeudal, it was banned. The picture followed the Kabuki plot rather closely, though the style of the film was realistic,and inserteda subplotin which the comedianEnnokenbecame the embodiment of the commonman. The comic irony of the film lay in the plot parallelsbetween the inflated and sententious sentimentality of tile Kabukiheroes and the sly burlesque of the comedian. The director'saim-as in most of his films-was to show the equality of all humanemotionsdespite artificialclass or social barriers, and he succeeded brilliantly. Anothersuccessful experimentwas Kimisaburo Yoshimura'sBijo to Kairyu (The Beauty and the Dragon), a 1955 film based on one of the eighteen chief Kabuki plays. Yoshimurahad already richly satirized the period-filmhero in Mori no Ishimatsu (Ishimatsuof the Forest) in which he maintained that the famous and blustering Ishimatsu owed his reputation mostly to good public relations. Now he used Kabukias a vehicle for satirizing contemporary Japanese society. Japan is shown suffering a terrible drought; the priest who controls a dragon who controlsthe rain is so convinced of his own virtue that he is unapproachable. Finally a princess decides that the only way to save the country is to tempt the priest until he falls from virtue. This, she reasons, will release the dragon. The film was made as a spirited attack on contemporary self-righteousness and bigotry: by inferencethe priests were the modern politicians and intellectuals. The princess, though very period-film-correct, really had the mind of a modern postwar girl. Like all good Japanese period-filmsit was

an experiment,an exception to the general rule. Technicallythe film was very interesting. Somewhat like Henry V, it began with a of a performanceof the play, reconstruction an accuratelycreatedhistoricalperformance in the properclassicalstyle, and then moved on, as a film,into a more cinematicinterpretation. It was highly praised by the Kabuki authorities,not because it was a literal reproduction but because it was a freely adapted modern version made completely in the spirit of the original. The third, and perhaps the most successful experiment is Keisuke Kinoshita's1958 film NarayamaBushiko (The Song of Narayama), based on ShichiroFukazawa'sprizewinning short story of a mountain community, so short of food that they traditionally thin out the populationby exposing the village elders to the elements on the top of MountNara. This storyhad been extremely successful in a Kabuki version in the summer of 1957, and although Kinoshita took his adaptationdirectly from the original,he deliberately chose a theatrical manner of presentation in order to heighten the dramatic effect. The film opened in the manner of a Kabuki with one of the maskedassistantsbanging the wooden hyoshige which heralds the beginningof the play, and then the runningcurtain was drawn to expose the first scene of the film. Throughout,the Kabukinagauta was used, that vocal samisen accompaniment which describes and comments upon the action. The samisen not only provided the backgroundmusic, it was also used for sound effects. At one point it was heard instead of the natural noises of a storm; at another, it was the sound of snow falling. At yet another point it was used to create the sound of the aged heroine as she pur-

posely breaksher teeth so that she will look more presentablyold. The visuals in the film were handled with an effortless virtuosity. Divisions between scenes, for example, often consisted of sudden light changes at which whole sections of the scenery slid away; intimate conversations were accented by careful spotlighting; bushes and branches were parted to reveal a set piece behind; often the entire background would suddenly drop to reveal the new set, the new actors. Yet, with all this stagecraft, Kinoshita remained constantly aware that he was making a film and hence there was nothing stagy about the finished picture. The moving camera was used to superlative effect, and color was most imaginativelydesigned: pistachio skies, blue snow, and sunsets which looked like forest fires. The pacing and general tempo of the film revealed the art of cinema at its most creative.
Shochiku 1956 version of CHUSHINGURA: the moment before the final raid in a typical period drama. The man in the milddle is from the Kabuki and that is about all the Kabuki influence in the film.

Thus, all three directors-Kurosawa, Yoshimura,and Kinoshita-have pointed ways in which the Kabuki could actually enrich the film and make "Kabukiinfluence"more than an empty critical phrase. Still, however, no one follows their lead. The other forms of traditional theater have, if possible, had even less influence on the Japanese film. The Bunraku shares its materialwith the Kabukiand, very occasionally, with the kodan and the naniwabushi. Both share the same repertoire,and occasionally films like Mizoguchi's Chikamatsu Monogatari (A Tale from Chikamatsu) use one of the plays. It is perhaps indicative of the self-consciousness of this use that Mizoguchi did not call his excellent film by its proper name, that is, the name of the play upon which it was based. It is a bit like calling Othello, in a film version, A Tale from Shakespeare. The Shimpa has given even less. Originally it dealt with Meiji problems in Meiji settings and, with no vital creative impulse of its own, had to look elsewhere for its inspiration. After 1890, Shimpa playwrights relied more and more on popular novels or

KUMONOSU-JO: The messenger

Finally, one may at last think, there is the Noh. But, here again, no there isn't. There have been very, very few film adaptions of Noh plays and the Noh has had almost no influenceon the film art of Japan. One of the reasons is that the form of the drama could not be further removed from the requirementsof the film. A total adaptation would be necessary. Another is that only a relatively few Japanese have ever seen or care much about seeing the Noh. If one out of ten has seen the Kabuki,only about one out of a hundred has ever seen the Noh. Despite all the nonsense about the influence of the Noh on the Japanesefilm (written, one might add, in Japan as well as abroad) the leading Noh critic, Michizo Toita, has rightly said: "One must look hard, almost invent influencesif writing on stages were often cheap imitations of Kabuki but althoughNoh is greaterin its stage art, I know of no instance of its theories and techniques having been really utilized by film-makers." If there is any Noh influenceat all it tends to be oblique. In Kumonosu-Jo (The Castle of the Spider's Web), shown abroad as Throne of Blood, Kurosawa makes conscious use of elements of Noh. Scenes with the witch (this film version of Macbeth uses one instead of Shakespeare'sthree) were reconstructed from the director's recollections of a Noh he had once seen. The makeup of Isuzu Yamada-who played the role equivalent to Lady Macbeth, the background music, the movements, the general timing of the intimate scenes were all caught by Noh fans but by no one else. And all of these elements were consciously and experimentallyincluded. Their appearance was most unusual.
this subject. . . . Movies in their early

brings the head of Duncan.

sensationalnews items from the daily press. Originally the Japanese screen was cluttered with filmed Shimpa but nowadays, though the Shimpa attitude of sentimentality for its own sake has found a secure place for itself in the Japanese films, relatively few pictures use Shimpa stories. Of these, foreignershave seen at least one, the lachrymose Konjiki Yasha (The Golden Demon), based on a Shimpa version of a popular novel. Actually, at present the majority of Shimpa plays are based upon successful films. Shingeki offers even less. Though it furnishes a few plays to the screen it is much more concerned with static discourse than visual action or even characterization.It is, in fact, an unhealthy little theater of pure polemic. Like the Shimpa it now adapts novels or gives foreign plays and is completely separate from the films.

One may perhaps understandbetter why the traditionalJapanese theater, one of the richesttheatricaltraditionsin the world, has given so little to the Japanesefilm by looking at the parallel reluctance to use Japanese music in films. (Narayama Bushiko is an exception.) It is used if it has a place in the plot: lonely girl finds solace in her koto; celebrated geisha shows off with her samisen;couple in love attend local festival. One of Japan's better-known composers, Yasushi Akutagawa, claims that he finds a positive reluctance on the part of many directors to accept film music in any way related to the Japanese traditionalforms. One of the reasonsfor this is that in Japan, Japanese traditionalmusic is taken entirely for granted. There are at least a dozen nationally known magazines devoted to Western-style music in all of its various forms, but there is not one widely,distributedpublication of any repute devoted to Japanese traditionalmusic. Another reason is that, no matter how exotic the style and action of the periodfilm appears to foreign audiences, to' the Japanesethis film style is a part of the realist tradition,adopted from the West and therefore without connectionto the classical Japanese drama. Because so much Japanese classical music exists only in relation to the classic drama,the use of this music in films must present a severe stylistic clash. The music is identified with classical acting but the acting on the screen is not classical. Therefore many film producers in Japan find satisfying combinations which would chill most foreignersto the bone. In a 1934 version of Chushingura,the mranwho did the music used Schubert's"unfinished" symphony to back the climactic scene where the ronin attack their lord's enemy. This use

continues to be highly praised by certain critics for its "perfectunion" of a Japanese dramatic classic with a Western musical classic. A more famous example is the music for Rashomon,during which surprisedforeigners found themselves listening to something depressinglylike Ravel'sBolero. Some have said that the film was made primarily for export and that the music was composed accordingly. This is not so: Rashomonwas a self-conscious experiment and was made over everyone's dead body, including Daiei's. The fact that it was sent into competition at all was only because the Japanese representativefor Italiafilmhappened to know a good film when she saw one. Actually, Rashomon'scomposer-the late Fumio Hayasaka-was one of Japan'smost original composers, filled with an integrity rare in any country and rarerin Japan. He was ordered to write something like the Bolero because Kurosawafelt that it would be closer to the style of the film, a style which was never once intended to be "Japanese" in the period-filmsense of the word. The critics-more astute than usual-agreed entirely,findingRashomonto be "Kurosawa at his most Western." This, then, is the real reason why the Japanese theater has had so little influence on the Japanese film. They are thought of as being entirely separate. The Noh, the Kabuki, are thought of as being entirely Japanese. And so they are, in a way. At least, those theatrical elements from other countries which originally helped inspire the Japanese forms have long ceased to exist. Movies, however, are only half a century old. The art of the film is still considered foreign to traditionalJapanese theatrical art.