Economic and Social Council: United United Nations Nations

UNITED
NATIONS E
Economic and Social Distr.
GENERAL
Council
E/CN.4/1996/169
23 April 1996
Original: ENGLISH
COMMISSION ON HUMAN RIGHTS

Fifty-second session
Agenda item 10
QUESTION OF THE VIOLATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS AND FUNDAMENTAL FREEDOMS

IN ANY PART OF THE WORLD, WITH PARTICULAR REFERENCE TO COLONIAL
AND OTHER DEPENDENT COUNTRIES AND TERRITORIES
Letter dated 22 April 1996 from the Chargé d’affaires, a.i. of

the Permanent Mission of the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia to
the United Nations Office at Geneva addressed to the Chairman
of the Commission on Human Rights
I have the honour to transmit, enclosed herewith*, "Comments of the

Government of the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia on the draft resolution of
the fifty-second session of the Commission on Human Rights ’Situation of human
rights in Bosnia and Herzegovina, the Republic of Croatia and the Federal
Republic of Yugoslavia’" (E/CN.4/1996/L.75) and to request you kindly to
circulate it as an official document of the fifty-second session of the
Commission, under item 10.
(Signed): Miroslav MILOŠEVIĆ

Counsellor
Chargé d’affaires, a.i.
* The annex is circulated as received, in the language of submission

only.
GE.96-12739 (E)
E/CN.4/1996/169
page 2
Annex
COMMENTS OF THE GOVERNMENT OF THE FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF YUGOSLAVIA

ON THE DRAFT RESOLUTION OF THE FIFTY-SECOND SESSION OF THE
COMMISSION ON THE "SITUATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS IN BOSNIA AND
HERZEGOVINA, THE REPUBLIC OF CROATIA AND THE FEDERAL REPUBLIC
OF YUGOSLAVIA" (E/CN.4/1996/L.75)
The Government of the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia is addressing the

fifty-second session of the Commission on Human Rights, desirous to emphasize
its sustained efforts to honour the Commission as the most prestigious
United Nations body directly involved in the promotion and protection of human
rights.
The Federal Republic of Yugoslavia has manifested its readiness to

proceed with a most active and open cooperation with all those sincerely
wishing to promote and ensure respect for human rights, as pointed out in the
Report of Ms. Elisabeth Rehn. However, we must again reiterate our stand
concerning the inappropriate and biased draft resolution, primarily in view of
the spirit prevailing in it, discerned in the positions it reflects.
The Government of the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia is profoundly

concerned with the letter and spirit of the proposed draft resolution on the
situation of human rights in Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia and the Federal
Republic of Yugoslavia, which is far from reflecting and/or even taking into
account the actual human rights situation in these territories.
There is no mention of the positive developments and concrete results

accomplished in implementing the Peace Agreement. Instead of being
future-oriented, and making a contribution of its own to the peace efforts (in
particular concerning respect and promotion of human rights), the resolution
renders support to the forces which oppose reconciliation and building of
confidence in these territories, by its resorting to biased, partial and
politically motivated conclusions and allegations, in contravention of the
"spirit of Dayton".
The Government of the FRY considers it inadmissible that the appraisals

made by Ms. Elisabeth Rehn in her Reports (A/50/727-S/1995/933 and
E/CN.4/1996/63), and heard in the discussions held in the Commission on this
issue virtually are not taken into account. We deem it necessary that the
authors of the resolution give specific explanations, along with the reasoning
behind such attitude. Since, indirectly, the above-mentioned approach calls
into question the need for pursuing activities of special rapporteurs,
missions etc., whose task is to provide the Commission with particular
information.
The fact that the resolution practically ignores massive, the most severe
human rights violations committed against the Serbs is an evidence of the
extent to which the above approach is totally inappropriate.
The most severe violations of human rights against Serb civilians are
being committed ever since Croatia’s aggression on Western Slavonia and
Krajina (in May and August 1995). This fact is not at all mentioned in the
E/CN.4/1996/169
page 3
draft, despite the United Nations official reports (Secretary-General,

Security Council), as well as Special Rapporteur Ms. Elisabeth Rehn, the
UNHCR, the ICRC and many other non-governmental organizations. This time
again, Croatia is protected from the justified international public
condemnation by shifting the public attention towards the allegedly "grave
situation" of human rights in the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia.
Referring to alleged efforts aimed at favouring the rights of minorities,

democratic freedoms etc. in the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia, while ignoring
mass killings of Serb civilians, setting ablaze of Serb houses, expelling
400,000 Serbs from Croatia, evicting them from their dwellings throughout
Croatia, and bestowing with decorations the Croats for the crimes committed on
Serbs, etc., is sheer cynicism.
The resolution’s double standards and partiality are also visible, on the
one hand, by its reference to the unestablished evidence of mass graves in the
places where, allegedly, Croats and Moslems have been buried (Srebrenica,
Zepa, Prijedor, Sanski Most and Vukovar), and by its deliberate overlooking
the mass graves of Serb civilians, discovered in Mrkonjic Grad (Bosnia and
Herzegovina), Krajina, Western Slavonia (Croatia) and elsewhere, on the other.
To single out the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia, particularly "Kosovo"

in the resolution, implies inviting separatist forces in that Autonomous
Province of the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia to forceful secession (the
objective publicly proclaimed by separatist leaders). It is a fact that
concern for the human rights situation in other parts of the former Yugoslavia
is explicitly mentioned in the Reports of the Special Rapporteur. Hence, the
resolution should either make reference to all these parts, or voice its
concern for the territory of the former Yugoslavia on a broader scale. At
present, violation of human rights, as well as conflicts between Moslems and
Croats (e.g. Mostar), the extremely difficult plight of the remaining Serbs
and the violation of their human rights are of special concern of the
international community.
The Federal Republic of Yugoslavia is resolutely rejecting the charges on

its alleged violation of the rights of minorities. In the Federal Republic of
Yugoslavia, which is a state of all the citizens, as stipulated by its
Constitution, there is every historical, legal and other precondition for
coexistence of all its inhabitants, regardless of their national, ethnic or
religious origin.
The status of all the minorities in the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia is

determined under respective federal and republican constitutions, and relevant
laws, in compliance with the United Nations’, the Organization on Security and
Cooperation in Europe or the Council of Europe documents in the minority
rights field.
The allegation that the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia’s "legislation is

discriminatory towards minorities" is sheer falsehood, and the demand for its
cancellation, contained in the resolution is nothing but the dangerous
political game.
E/CN.4/1996/169
page 4
We recall that it is incumbent upon the authors of the draft resolution

to give evidence for their allegations by explicitly indicating the titles of
specific laws, thus making it possible for the government involved to take
measures for their cancellation or improvement. However, since these
allegations are pure falsehoods aimed at engineering proof for accusations
against the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia, the Commission’s regular practice
and procedure are, once again, being violated.
As regards Kosovo and Metohija - which is the name of this region of the
Republic of Serbia - and the objective problems persisting there, the
Government of the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia, has so far submitted large
volumes containing explanatory facts on the situation in that region to all
relevant international governmental and non-governmental organizations. This
time, again, we should like to emphasize the irrefutable fact that no
violation of human rights of the Albanian minority has been practised by the
authorities of the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia in Kosovo and Metohija; the
bare truth is that the political leaders of this minority are trying to secede
from the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia and to bring about annexation of a
part of its territory to Albania, while ignoring the legitimately elected
bodies of government and its institutions and refusing cooperation and
dialogue.
If the aim is to reach practical results, there must be a moderation in

language and description of facts, for example: why the Albanians do not
participate in the political life, why the Albanian minority children do not
go to school? - Because they do not recognize the state educational system,
not even the State itself (Elisabeth Rehn, Report E/CN.4/1996/63).
The authorities of the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia are completely open

and willing to have a dialogue, in contrast to the ethnic Albanian minority’s
representatives, who are openly advocating confrontation and secession.
The so-called "Sandzak" region does not exist under that name as an
official geographical term; its actual name is Raska. The inhabitants of this
part of Serbia, heterogeneous in terms of their ethnic composition and
religious affiliations, used to live in peace and harmony for many years, and
they would have continued to do so if there were not political interference
from the outside. On various occasions, we have also submitted precise data
testifying to the equality of and equal opportunities for all the citizens,
regardless of their ethnic origins ("Comments of the Government of the Federal
Republic of Yugoslavia on the report of Ms. Elisabeth Rehn, Special Rapporteur
of the Commission on Human Rights on the situation of human rights in the
territory of the former Yugoslavia" (E/CN.4/1996/160)).
As for Vojvodina, all the national minorities living in this Province are
fully cooperating with the Republican and Federal Authorities, viewing them as
legitimate authorities of their own state, participating in their activities
on a footing of equality. There are Hungarians first - the largest national
minority in Vojvodina, and their comprehensive relations with their country of
origin, the Republic of Hungary, are telling proof of the further promotion of
their status in the FRY in all the relevant fields.
E/CN.4/1996/169
page 5
When the rights of the ethnic Bulgarian minority are concerned, no action
has ever been taken that would imply threatening their minority rights
inscribed in the constitutions of the Republic of Serbia and the Federal
Republic of Yugoslavia.
The Government of the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia recalls that, under

an OSCE decision, a suspension has been imposed on Yugoslavia’s cooperation
with it. Thus, against Yugoslavia’s will! The Federal Republic of Yugoslavia
is not in a position to deal with this organization as long as the OSCE does
not change its decision.
The Federal Republic of Yugoslavia has its own state legislative and
political system. Appealing to the whole international community to support
the "efforts" and the "establishment" of democratic institutions in Yugoslavia
is absolutely unacceptable. It is an example of overt and flagrant
interference in internal affairs, whereby someone from the outside should act
and judge what is and what is not "democratical" there.
The Government of the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia shares the view that
the Commission will carry out a detailed study of the draft resolution on the
"Situation of Human Rights in Bosnia and Herzegovina, the Republic of Croatia
and the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia", and that it will persist in inserting
the indispensable and crucial changes in it, thus reaffirming its genuine
concern and rendering its contribution to the protection and development of
human rights in these territories.
The Government of the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia reiterates again its

openness and willingness to cooperate with the Commission on Human Rights, for
the benefit of protecting and developing human rights.
Belgrade, 22 April 1996
-----

Economic and Social Council: United United Nations Nations

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Economic and Social Council: United United Nations Nations

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Economic and Social Council: United United Nations Nations

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

UNITED

COMMISSION ON HUMAN RIGHTS

QUESTION OF THE VIOLATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS AND FUNDAMENTAL FREEDOMS

Letter dated 22 April 1996 from the Chargé d’affaires, a.i. of

I have the honour to transmit, enclosed herewith*, "Comments of the

(Signed): Miroslav MILOŠEVIĆ

* The annex is circulated as received, in the language of submission

COMMENTS OF THE GOVERNMENT OF THE FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF YUGOSLAVIA

The Government of the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia is addressing the

The Federal Republic of Yugoslavia has manifested its readiness to

The Government of the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia is profoundly

There is no mention of the positive developments and concrete results

The Government of the FRY considers it inadmissible that the appraisals

draft, despite the United Nations official reports (Secretary-General,

Referring to alleged efforts aimed at favouring the rights of minorities,

To single out the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia, particularly "Kosovo"

The Federal Republic of Yugoslavia is resolutely rejecting the charges on

The status of all the minorities in the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia is

The allegation that the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia’s "legislation is

We recall that it is incumbent upon the authors of the draft resolution

If the aim is to reach practical results, there must be a moderation in

The authorities of the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia are completely open

The Government of the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia recalls that, under

The Government of the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia reiterates again its

Belgrade, 22 April 1996

You might also like