Kaine
Kaine
Kaine
Robert Quinn
18 Lakeview Drive South
Haines City, Fla. 33844
Prior to the voters of Florida being given the right to vote for the various presidential candidates the electors
had standing and during the electoral college meeting, in which all candidates and electors, Democrat,
Republican and Independent alike, were all in attendance, they could make cross party demands for
verifiable proof of constitutional eligibility, prior to the electoral college vote, not after and those found
to be ineligible could be exposed and discarded before the vote took place.
Our system today is completely backwards and a denial of due process to the voters. The entire vetting
process of the candidates US Constitutional eligibility has been totally turned over to the individual private
political parties, the Secretary of State now blindly accepts the private party selection, ballots are printed,
elections are held, the votes are counted, the electors are already committed as to whom they must vote,
state certifications are made and sent to the electoral college, the official electoral votes are counted and
only then, after the official electoral votes have been counted, does an elector have the opportunity to even
raise an eligibility question and that must be submitted in writing. (And it’s in question whether this
opportunity was even allowed in the 08 elections)
Our current election process is unconstitutional because it is denying the voters due process in that
we have no standing to verify eligibility prior to voting as did the electors under the original system.
According to the response I received from my letter of 2/3/09 our Secretary of State, in spite of his
oath of office to defend the US Constitution, states this US Constitutional vetting responsibility
has been totally and completely turned over to the political parties (Chapter 103) and he now has no
responsibility or authority to ask anyone anything on behalf of the public. He further states that if a
citizen chooses to challenge the qualifications of a candidate it is the citizen’s responsibility to bring
forth a suit in a court of competent jurisdiction while he knows full well that we have no standing to
do so. When the media is already in the tank for its favorite candidate, the public is simply screwed.
This process promotes fraud upon the voters in that, unlike the original electoral process, we voters,
Democrat and Republican alike, are forced to vote for candidates that no Government Official has
verified eligible. It is grossly unconstitutional and a clear denial of due process by our states refusal
to factually verify, on behalf of the public and before the first primary election, that the political
party appointed candidates are eligible according to the US Constitution.
1
For the first time in the history of this country we have an individual who has succeeded in becoming
Commander in Chief of our military forces who has something so serious in his past records he has totally
sealed his original vault copy birth, passport, foreign citizenship and educational records from everyone,
including his own party officials and especially the military personnel who have good reason to question
his loyalty and allegiance to this country. Much evidence exists, due to this secrecy, that very likely he may
not have factually been born in the USA and very likely carries citizenship and a passport from a foreign
country since he traveled to Pakistan and Indonesia before ever obtaining a US passport and at a time when
US citizens were not allowed into their countries.
I have no interest in trying to overturn the results of the 2008 elections. The Quo Warranto process was
established by congress many years ago to provide for the investigation and removal of a sitting president if
he is determined to be a usurper and it is my understanding the petition for this process to begin has already
been made.
My efforts here are strictly limited to understanding precisely how the current process of electing a president
is carried out and precisely who is responsible to see to it that every presidential candidate that is placed
upon the ballot is eligible to hold the office.
The DNC document submitted to our Secretary of State here in Florida says only that Obama and Biden are
their nominees. It says nothing about them having been found eligible and our Secretary of State says that it
is of no concern to him as it’s totally up to the political parties to do that. In that regard I ask for the
following;
1- A copy of that portion of the official 2008 DNC rules and regulations that states it is the DNC’s
responsibility to verify constitutional eligibility of your party’s presidential candidates for the
general election as well as for the primaries.
2- A copy of the document that officially states who your candidates were for the 2008 general
election and that they were found to be eligible. A copy for the primary election candidates also.
3- A copy of the document you used to verify US Constitutional eligibility as each being a natural
born citizen.
Obama publicly announced his candidacy for the US Presidency back in early 2007. Since that time there
have been many serious questions publicly raised about Obama’s eligibility to hold the office of president
and these questions have been publicly addressed by popular Democrat supported web sites such as
Snopes.com, Factcheck.org and Obama’s very own site Fightthesmears.com.
In this regard, as it’s totally your responsibility to verify the constitutional eligibility of your nominated
presidential candidate, I ask the following;
1- Did the DNC ask to see proof of citizenship? If so what did he produce?
2- Did the DNC ask to see the passport he used to travel to Pakistan and Indonesia back in the early
80’s when US citizens were not allowed in? If so what did he produce?
3- Did the DNC ask Obama if he was ever an Indonesia Citizen known as Barry Soetoro, his
adopted name while living and attending school there? If he answered yes, did you ask how he
regained his US citizenship?
4- Did the DNC ask Obama if he was perhaps spending those hundreds of thousands of dollars to
keep his Occidental College records sealed because he might have attended this school under his
Indonesian Citizenship name Barry Soetoro? Government aid to foreign students you know.
2
These were well-publicized and serious questions of eligibility long before the DNC vetted Obama to be
eligible to hold the office of president.
If we were still operating under the system that existed before the right to vote for president was turned over
to the people and the exclusive right to vet the candidates was turned over to the individual private
nominating party only, all of these eligibility questions would have been cross party debated, between all of
the electors who each had individual standing to ask and demand answers (without suing in a court of
competent jurisdiction) and the answers would have been found and exposed within the electoral college
before the electoral vote was ever taken. Thus, the Obama Secrecy Loophole was born.
As Chief Justice Marshall said back in 1803 in Marbury v. Madison, ”It cannot be presumed that
any clause in the constitution is intended to be without effect; and therefore such construction
is inadmissible, unless the words require it.”
The Democratic National Committee owes the voters of this country an explanation and answer to each and
every request laid out above. The words Natural Born were not placed into the US Constitution to have no
effect; and to claim otherwise is inadmissible. Willful ignorance does not amend the US Constitution.
One further request, does the DNC nominating committee require an oath of office? If so please include a
copy with your response.
We will all be looking forward to your response at your earliest possible convenience.
Sincerely
Robert Quinn
Realtor