Diabetes LiverDis
Diabetes LiverDis
Diabetes LiverDis
R E V I E W
Spectrum of Liver Disease in Type 2 Diabetes and Management of Patients With Diabetes and Liver Disease
KEITH G. TOLMAN, MD1,2 VIVIAN FONSECA, MD3 ANTHONY DALPIAZ, PHARMD4 MENG H. TAN, MD5 Toxic; Sulfonylurea Compounds; Thiazolidinediones; Rosiglitazone; Pioglitazone; Troglitazone; Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors; Metformin; Acarbose; and Gembrozil and free-text terms: fatty liver, steatohepatitis, nonalcoholic steatohepatitis, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, drug-induced hepatitis, each drug name and hepat*, and each drug name. When full-text articles were not available in the English language, abstracts were included in the search. Abstracts from national meetings through October 2006 were included. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Web site was searched for hepatotoxicity reports using the free-text terms listed above. SPECTRUM OF LIVER DISEASE IN TYPE 2 DIABETES The liver diseases seen in type 2 diabetes cover virtually the entire spectrum of liver disease. Abnormal liver enzymes Elevation of serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT), while uncommon (0.5%) in apparently normal subjects (7), is common in patients with type 2 diabetes. In four clinical trials involving 3,701 patients with type 2 diabetes, between 2 and 24% of screened patients had liver enzyme tests above the upper limit of normal (ULN) (8). In these studies, investigators noted that 5% of the patients had concomitant liver disease at baseline. In another report involving 13 clinical trials and 5,003 patients with type 2 diabetes, in which patients with serum ALT, aspartate aminotransferase (AST), or alkaline phosphatase 2.5 times ULN were excluded, 5.6% had serum ALT values between 1 and 2.5 times ULN (9). Evaluation of asymptomatic individuals with mild elevations of ALT and AST reveals that 98% have liver disease most commonly, fatty liver disease and chronic hepatitis (10). The most common cause of a mild elevation of serum ALT is NAFLD (11), the most prevalent liver disease in type 2 diabetes.
DIABETES CARE, VOLUME 30, NUMBER 3, MARCH 2007
t is estimated that 20.8 million people, i.e., 7.0% of the U.S. population, have diabetes (1). Type 2 diabetes, with its core defects of insulin resistance and relative insulin deciency, accounts for 90 95% of those with the disease. Another 5.2 million people are estimated to have undiagnosed type 2 diabetes. It is the sixth leading cause of death (1) in the U.S. and accounts for 17.2% of all deaths for those aged 25 years (2). Liver disease is an important cause of death in type 2 diabetes. In the population-based Verona Diabetes Study (3), cirrhosis was the fourth leading cause of death and accounted for 4.4% of diabetesrelated deaths. The standardized mortality ratio (SMR), i.e., the relative rate of an event compared with the background rate, for cirrhosis was 2.52 compared with 1.34 for cardiovascular disease (CVD). In another prospective cohort study (4), cirrhosis accounted for 12.5% of deaths in patients with diabetes. Diabetes, by most estimates, is now the most common cause of liver disease in the U.S. Cryptogenic cirrhosis, of which diabetes is, by far, the most common cause, has become the third leading indication for liver transplantation in the U.S.
(5,6). Virtually the entire spectrum of liver disease is seen in patients with type 2 diabetes. This includes abnormal liver enzymes, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma, and acute liver failure. In addition, there is an unexplained association of diabetes with hepatitis C. Finally, the prevalence of diabetes in cirrhosis is 12.357% (7). Thus, patients with diabetes have a high prevalence of liver disease and patients with liver disease have a high prevalence of diabetes. The management of diabetes in patients with liver disease is theoretically complicated by liver-related alterations in drug metabolism, potential interactions between the drugs, and a low, albeit real, incidence of hepatotoxicity. In this article, we review the spectrum of liver disease found in patients with type 2 diabetes and the management of patients with concurrent diabetes and liver disease. METHODS A Medline search without limitations of date (as of October 2005), language, or humans was carried out by the authors. The following medical subject headings were used: Diabetes Mellitus, type 2; Fatty Liver; Hepatitis,
From the 1Division of Gastroenterology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah; the 2 Department of Pharmacology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah; the 3Division of Endocrinology, Tulane University, New Orleans, Louisiana; the 4Department of Pharmacy, University Hospitals and Clinics, Salt Lake City, Utah; and 5Lilly Research Laboratories, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana. Address correspondence and reprint requests to Keith G. Tolman, MD, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, 30 N. 1900 East, Salt Lake City, UT 84132. E-mail: [email protected]. Received for publication 21 July 2006 and accepted in revised form 20 November 2006. K.G.T. is on the scientic advisory boards for TAP Pharmaceuticals, Takada, Santarus, Merck, Johnson & Johnson, and InterMune and is on the speakers bureau for TAP Pharmaceuticals, Takeda, Schering, Roche, Eli Lilly, Santarus, InterMune, and G.D. Searle. V.F. is a consultant for and on the speakers bureau for Eli Lilly, Novartis, Takeda, Pzer, and Sano-Aventis and has received grants from GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis, Takeda, AstraZenca, Pzer, Sano-Aventis, Eli Lilly, and the National Institutes of Health. Abbreviations: ALT, alanine aminotransferase; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; CVD, cardiovascular disease; FDA, Food and Drug Administration; HCV, hepatitis C virus; NAFLD, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease; NASH, nonalcoholic steatohepatitis; SMR, standardized mortality ratio; TNF, tumor necrosis factor; TZD, thiazolidinedione; ULN, upper limit of normal. A table elsewhere in this issue shows conventional and Syste ` me International (SI) units and conversion factors for many substances. DOI: 10.2337/dc06-1539 2007 by the American Diabetes Association.
734
Tolman and Associates NAFLD The most common chronic liver disease in the U.S. is NAFLD (5). It is dened as fatty liver disease in the absence of 20 g alcohol/day. NAFLD, which resembles alcoholic liver disease, consists of a spectrum of liver disease from steatosis (fatty inltration of the liver) to nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), which consists of steatosis plus inammation, necrosis, and brosis. The prevalence of NAFLD in diabetes is estimated at 34 74% (1217) and, in diabetes with obesity, at virtually 100% (18). While once considered a benign process, NASH has been found to lead to cirrhosis and, in some cases, to hepatocellular carcinoma (13,19 21). Of patients with NAFLD, 50% have NASH and 19% have cirrhosis at the time of diagnosis (18,22,23) While these studies are subject to selection bias, the prevalence is undoubtedly very high. The pathogenesis of NAFLD is only partially understood. Hepatic steatosis reects an imbalance between the uptake and synthesis of fatty acids by the liver and their oxidation and export. Patients with type 2 diabetes have dyslipidemia, which is characterized by elevated plasma triglycerides, decreased HDL cholesterol, and predominance of small LDL, a pattern also seen in patients with NAFLD (24). A central abnormality in the pathogenesis of steatosis appears to be insulin resistance resulting in lipolysis, which increases circulating free fatty acids (25), which are then taken up by the liver as an energy source. The fatty acids overload the hepatic mitochondrial -oxidation system, leading to accumulation of fatty acids in the liver (26). Indeed, some investigators suggest NAFLD to be the hepatic manifestation of the insulin resistance syndrome (22,2729). NAFLD does not universally progress to NASH, and the precise pathogenesis of steatohepatitis is yet to be determined. However, dysregulation of peripheral lipid metabolism seems to be important. Lipid metabolism is, in part, regulated by adipokines, including tumor necrosis factor (TNF)- and adiponectin. TNF-, which interferes with insulin signaling thereby favoring steatosis, is elevated in fatty liver disease albeit not specic to type 2 diabetes (30,31). TNF- is also proinammatory and, thus, may play a role in the pathogenesis of the inammation in NASH (32,33). Adiponectin, in contrast to TNF-, is antilipogenic and anti-inammatory and, thus, may protect the liver from lipid accumulation
DIABETES CARE, VOLUME 30, NUMBER 3, MARCH 2007
and inammation. Adiponectin levels are decreased in conditions associated with NAFLD, including insulin resistance (34), obesity (35), type 2 diabetes (36,37), and NAFLD (36). Adiponectin and TNF- therefore have opposing effects. The net effect of increased TNF- and decreased adiponectin is prosteatotic and proinammatory. The mechanism of cell injury remains unclear. Fatty acids in the liver induce formation of free radicals (38), which cause lipid peroxidation and induce proinammatory cytokines (39). The lipid peroxidation leads to the release of malondialdehyde and 4-hydroxynonenal, which in turn causes cell death and protein cross-linkage. This results in the formation of Mallorys hyaline in the hepatocyte (40) and activation of the stellate cells, which leads to collagen synthesis and brosis (41). The net effect of these processes is necrosis, formation of Mallorys hyaline, inammation, and brosisthe characteristic histologic features of NASH. The natural history of NAFLD is similar to that of alcoholic liver disease. The progression from steatosis to steatohepatitis to cirrhosis and, in some patients, to hepatocellular carcinoma over a period of many years is well established (13,42). The prognosis worsens with each stage of disease. Why some patients progress while most do not is not known. The only reliable way, to date, of determining this progression is liver biopsy, which may have signicant economic implications (good or bad) for the management of patients with type 2 diabetes. Cirrhosis in diabetes Cirrhosis is an important cause of death in diabetes. An autopsy study in the U.S. has shown that patients with diabetes have an increased incidence of severe brosis (19). In the Verona study, the SMR for cirrhosis was 2.52, greater than the 1.34 for CVD. If the patient was being treated with insulin, the SMR increased to 6.84 (3). Cryptogenic cirrhosis, primarily diabetes 5, is the third leading indication for liver transplantation in this country (6). The association of cirrhosis and diabetes is complicated by the fact that cirrhosis itself is associated with insulin resistance. Impaired glucose tolerance is seen in 60% and overt diabetes in 20% of patients with cirrhosis. Insulin-mediated glucose disposal has been shown to be reduced by 50% in cirrhotic patients (43). However, the onset of type 2 diabe-
tes in cirrhotic patients is associated with decreased rather than increased insulin secretion (44). This interplay of associations has made it difcult to sort out the pathogenesis of cirrhosis in diabetes. Nevertheless, the association is incontrovertible and has implications for the treatment of diabetes in patients with cirrhosis. Hepatocellular carcinoma in diabetes Numerous studies have conrmed a fourfold increased prevalence of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with diabetes as well as an increased prevalence of diabetes in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (45 48). It is not known whether the increased prevalence of hepatocellular carcinoma is unique to diabetes or the increased prevalence of cirrhosis, the precursor lesion of hepatocellular carcinoma. The pathogenic sequence of events leading to hepatocellular carcinoma appears to be insulin resistance, increased lipolysis, lipid accumulation in the hepatocytes, oxidative stress, and cell damage followed by brosis and cell proliferation, which are procarcinogenic (49 52). Acute liver failure The incidence of acute liver failure appears to be increased in patients with diabetes: 2.31 per 10,000 person-years compared with 1.44 in the background population (53,54). It remains unclear whether it is diabetes, medications, or some other factor that accounts for the increased risk of acute liver failure. Troglitazone was factored out in these studies. Hepatitis C in diabetes The prevalence of hepatitis C virus (HCV) is higher in patients with diabetes than in the general population (55 63). Specically, the prevalence of HCV antibodies is 4.2% in the diabetic population compared with 1.6% in the comparator group. The relative odds of HCV-infected patients developing diabetes is 2.1 (95% CI 1.123.90) (58). Patients with HCV are more likely to develop diabetes (21%) than patients with hepatitis B (10%), suggesting that HCV, rather than liver disease per se, predisposes patients to diabetes. Furthermore, patients who are transplanted for HCV (and universally become reinfected) are more likely to develop diabetes than those who are transplanted for other liver diseases (61). Taken together, these observations suggest that HCV may play a pathogenetic role in type
735
Type 2 diabetes and liver disease 2 diabetes. Recent studies suggest that the core protein of HCV impairs insulin receptor substrate signaling, which plays an important role in the metabolic effects of insulin (64,65). There are other peculiarities in the HCV-diabetes connection including HCV genotype specicity. There are six genotypes of HCV, with genotype 1 being the most prevalent in the U.S. The prevalence of fatty liver disease is disproportionately high in HCV genotype 3 (66), presumably secondary to insulin resistance (67,68). Patients with hepatitis C and fatty liver disease have elevated levels of TNF- and reduced levels of adiponectin, which in combination are proinammatory and prosteatotic (69,70), leading to oxidative stress in mitochondria (71) and steatosis in many genotype 3 patients (7274). Finally, there is an association of diabetes with -interferon treatment of HCV infection. Type 1 diabetes occurs more frequently in patients treated with interferon for HCV versus other conditions (75). The latency of diabetes ranges from 10 days to 4 years after starting treatment. The interaction between HCV infection, diabetes, and interferon is the subject of intensive investigation. In the meantime, given the strong epidemiologic evidence for the increased prevalence of HCV in diabetes, it seems reasonable that all patients with type 2 diabetes and persistently elevated serum ALT should be screened for HCV. TREATMENT OF PATIENTS WITH TYPE 2 DIABETES AND LIVER DISEASE The severity of type 2 diabetes and the type and severity of liver disease inuence the therapy. There are few clinical trials that specically target patients with coexistent diabetes and liver disease, and all are limited by small numbers of patients. We will review the management of type 2 diabetes in patients with liver disease as well as the management of liver disease specically associated with type 2 diabetes. MANAGEMENT OF DIABETES IN PATIENTS WITH CONCOMITANT LIVER DISEASE Lifestyle modication Treatment of type 2 diabetes in patients with liver disease may be compromised by poor nutritional status and general health. More than 50% of patients with severe liver disease are malnourished. A
736
number of uncontrolled studies indicate that weight loss decreases hepatic steatosis (76 78). The durability of weight loss on hepatic steatosis remains to be determined (79). Low-glycemic, low-calorie diets with a weight loss of 12 kg/week seem reasonable. Low-fat diets should be avoided (80,81). Some have suggested that a Mediterranean diet (i.e., high complex carbohydrates, high monounsaturated fats, moderate amounts of wine, and low amounts of red meat) is preferred in patients with type 2 diabetes and NAFLD (82,83). Exercise improves peripheral insulin sensitivity (84), albeit not specic to patients with diabetic liver disease. Alcohol should be avoided not only because of its toxic effects on the liver, but also because of its high caloric content and potential interaction with sulfonylureas (85,86). Pharmacologic therapy Pharmacologic therapy of type 2 diabetes in patients with liver diseases is, for the most part, the same as that without liver disease. While there are theoretical concerns about altered drug metabolism and hepatotoxicity, only patients with evidence of liver failure such as ascites, coagulopathy, or encephalopathy have altered drug metabolism. Furthermore, there is no evidence that patients with liver disease are predisposed to hepatotoxicity (87). Underlying liver disease, however, may compromise the diagnosis and increase the severity of drug-induced liver disease. First-line therapy with metformin is appropriate in most patients but not recommended in patients with advanced hepatic disease because of a perceived increased risk of lactic acidosis. Recent trials have shown some benet in patients with fatty liver and type 2 diabetes (88 91). Given that insulin resistance is the core defect in fatty liver disease, the case can be made for thiazolidinediones (TZDs) as front line therapy in these patients. Recent trials with pioglitazone and rosiglitazone have shown improvement in ALT and liver histology (9297). Weight gain is a concern with TZDs, and cost is prohibitive for many patients. If metformin or TZDs are contraindicated, pharmacotherapy can begin with a secretagogue such as a sulfonylurea with rapid advancement to insulin if glycemic control is not achieved. Insulin secretagogues. Sulfonylureas are generally safe in patients with liver disease but may not overcome the insulin resistance and defects in insulin secretion
seen in patients with coexistent alcoholic liver disease and pancreatic damage (84). Sulfonylureas with a short half-life such as glipizide or glyburide are preferred in these patients. Patients with decompensated cirrhosis, i.e., encephalopathy, ascites, or coagulopathy, may have a reduced ability to counteract hypoglycemia, and thus, the response to therapy should be monitored closely. Historically, chlorpropamide (84,98 100) was associated with hepatitis and jaundice. Clinical trials assessing the efcacy of meglitinides in the treatment of patients with liver disease have not been reported. The pharmacokinetics and tolerability of nateglinide in patients with cirrhosis is not signicantly different than in control subjects (101). Repaglinide and nateglinide have not been associated with hepatotoxicity. Biguanides. Metformin may be particularly useful in obese patients in whom it may cause mild weight loss (102). It is relatively contraindicated in patients with advanced liver disease or in binge drinkers because it may predispose to lactic acidosis. It is unclear whether the liver disease or alcohol is the predisposing factor. Metformin has not been reported to cause hepatotoxicity and has shown some benet in patients with NAFLD (88 91). -Glucosidase inhibitors. The -glucosidase inhibitors may be particularly useful in patients with liver disease because they act directly on the gastrointestinal tract to decrease carbohydrate digestion and thus glucose absorption, thereby decreasing postprandial hyperglycemia A randomized double-blind trial evaluated the use of acarbose for the control of postprandial hyperglycemia in 100 patients with compensated liver cirrhosis and type 2 diabetes treated with insulin (103). Glycemic control improved significantly in both the fasting and postprandial state. In a recent placebo-controlled cross-over trial in patients with hepatic encephalopathy, acarbose signicantly decreased fasting and postprandial glucose as well as A1C (104). There was also a reduction in blood ammonia levels, which paralleled an increase in bowel movement frequency. It was speculated that the increased bowel frequency favored the proliferation of saccharolytic bacteria while reducing the proliferation of proteolytic bacteria, resulting in a reduction in intestinal ammonia production. Acarbose frequently causes mild transient elevations of ALT and, on rare occasions, severe liver disease (105107).
DIABETES CARE, VOLUME 30, NUMBER 3, MARCH 2007
Tolman and Associates While the labeling of acarbose has a warning for patients with liver disease, it appears to be safe and effective in patients with hepatic encephalopathy and type 2 diabetes. Miglitol, another -glucosidase inhibitor, has not been associated with hepatotoxicity. TZDs. TZDs may be especially useful because they enhance insulin sensitivity, the underlying defect in NAFLD. There has been concern about their potential hepatotoxicity because of the experience with troglitazone (since withdrawn from the U.S. market). However, in pre-approval clinical trials of rosiglitazone and pioglitazone, threefold elevations of ALT were seen with the same frequency for rosiglitazone (0.26%), pioglitazone (0.2%), and placebo (0.2 and 0.25%) (Physicians Desk Reference 2005, Avandia Tablets and Actos Tablets). Lebovitz et al. (9) have reported that there was no difference in the incidence of liver abnormalities in patients treated with rosiglitazone, placebo, metformin, or a sulfonylurea in trials involving 5,000 patients. Rosiglitazone, in fact, decreased serum ALT by a mean of 5 units/l (9), as did pioglitazone in another trial (8). Furthermore, in the latter trial (8), serum ALT three times ULN occurred less frequently in the pioglitazone group (0.9%) than in the metformin (1.9%) or gliclazide (1.9%) groups. The risk of acute liver failure with rosiglitazone and pioglitazone is much less than that with troglitazone (108,109). At the time of that review (109), 68 cases of hepatitis or acute liver failure due to rosiglitazone and 37 cases due to pioglitazone had been reported to the Food and Drug Administration (110 116). However, attestation as to cause was not provided, and many cases were confounded by concomitant medications and cardiovascular events (uid retention and heart failure). It is currently recommended that serum ALT levels be evaluated before the initiation of rosiglitzone and pioglitazone therapy and that therapy not be initiated if there is evidence of active liver disease or if the serum ALT level exceeds 2.5 times ULN (product labeling, 2005). Monitoring is recommended periodically thereafter as clinically indicated rather than every 2 months as previously recommended. Paradoxically, TZDs are emerging as the treatment of choice for NASH (9297). Insulin. Insulin treatment is frequently required in patients with diabetes and liver disease. Insulin requirements, however, may vary. For example, in patients
DIABETES CARE, VOLUME 30, NUMBER 3, MARCH 2007
with decompensated liver disease, the requirement may be decreased due to reduced capacity for gluconeogenesis and reduced hepatic breakdown of insulin. However, patients with impaired hepatic function may have an increased need for insulin due to insulin resistance (43). Thus, careful glucose monitoring and frequent dose adjustments of insulin may be necessary. In patients with hepatic encephalopathy who require high-carbohydrate diets, resulting in postprandial hyperglycemia, rapid-acting insulin analogs such as insulin lispro, aspart, or glulisine may be particularly useful. Other drugs used in the management of disorders associated with type 2 diabetes Statins are frequently used in patients with type 2 diabetes to treat hyperlipidemia and prevent cardiovascular events. Statin therapy, like all cholesterollowering therapy including bariatric surgery (117,118), causes minor but transient elevations in liver enzymes (119). However, the liver adapts with continuing therapy, and there are no long-term consequences of these abnormalities. Severe liver damage and liver failure are very rare (119). Paradoxically, statins are currently used to treat NAFLD (120,121), and recent studies suggest that statins are hepatoprotective in patients with HCV (122). All of the ACE inhibitors have been implicated in hepatic injury including fulminant hepatic failure (123126). The reactions are mostly hepatocellular, but cholestatic reactions have also been reported. Although losartan has been associated with hepatotoxicity (127) it has also been used to treat fatty liver disease (128). There are no current recommendations for hepatic monitoring of these idiosyncratic events. Even aspirin is potentially hepatotoxic albeit at very high doses. Hepatotoxicity has not been described at doses used for cardioprotection. MANAGEMENT OF LIVER DISEASE IN PATIENTS WITH CONCOMITANT TYPE 2 DIABETES AND LIVER DISEASE Abnormal liver function tests Given the fact that at least 50% of patients with type 2 diabetes have NAFLD, all patients with type 2 diabetes should have an
ALT and AST test done as part of their initial evaluation. At least 95% of patients with a conrmed minor elevation of ALT or AST have chronic liver disease independent of the degree of elevation. Thus, it is always necessary to obtain a specic diagnosis (10). The most likely etiologies of minor elevations of ALT/AST are NAFLD, hepatitis C, hepatitis B, and alcohol. Moderate social drinking, i.e., 20 g/day, does not cause an elevation of liver enzymes. The initial workup should include testing for hepatitis C (anti-HCV or HCV PCR), hepatitis B (HBV surface antigen), hemochromatosis (iron and iron saturation), and an abdominal ultrasound. Patients with hepatitis C, hepatitis B, and increased iron saturation need referral for further workup and treatment. Ultrasound has a positive predictive value of 96% for detecting NAFLD in the absence of other liver diseases (129). Unfortunately the negative predictive value is only 19%; thus, patients with a negative ultrasound will also need referral. The impact of this approach on cost of care and manpower is not known, and the costeffectiveness of screening ALT has not been established, although the American Association for the Study of Liver Disease is now recommending yearly ALT screening for everyone. Fatty liver disease The diagnosis of NAFLD or NASH should be suspected in any patient with type 2 diabetes, especially if there are abnormal liver function tests. It should be specically looked for in all obese patients with type 2 diabetes. ALT is typically elevated two- to threefold above ULN but is often normal. Mild elevations of serum alkaline phosphatase and glutamyl transferase may be present. Serum ferritin levels are frequently elevated, while iron and ironbinding capacity are normal (42,130). Ultrasound studies may reveal a diffuse increase in echogenicity, so-called bright liver. The sensitivity of ultrasound in patients with elevated ALT is 89% with a specicity of 93% for detecting steatosis (131). If the ultrasound reveals fatty liver, it is appropriate to look for etiologies other than diabetes such as dyslipidemia. There are shortcomings to this approach. The sensitivity of ultrasound decreases greatly as hepatic steatosis decreases to 30% or less (132). Most patients with NAFLD found incidentally or by screening ultrasound have a normal ALT. These observations suggest that the sensitivity of ultrasound overall is really
737
Type 2 diabetes and liver disease not very high. In patients with abnormal ALTs and other diseases ruled out, the positive predictive value of ultrasound is 96% but the negative predictive value only 19% (129). Magnetic resonance spectroscopy is capable of quantitative assessment of steatosis (133) but is not indicated for routine clinical practice. Thus, the gold standard for diagnosis of NAFLD remains the liver biopsy. Furthermore, the diagnosis of progressive liver disease (i.e., NASH), the precursor of cirrhosis, can only be made by liver biopsy. However, certain patients including those with reversed ALT-to-AST ratio, hypertriglyceridemia, and thrombocytopenia are at high risk for progressive disease (134,135). Treatment of NAFLD Most patients do not need to be treated. Only patients with biopsy-proved NASH or the risk factors listed above should be treated. Whether or not all patients need a liver biopsy is controversial in that the sensitivity of the risk factors for progressive disease is not known. It is also not known whether treatment, other than bariatric surgery, affects the ultimate prognosis. The treatment consists of measures to lose weight as well as pharmacologic intervention. There are no FDAapproved treatments and, in fact, no FDA guidelines for approving drugs for NAFLD. Exercise and weight reduction. The initial treatment of NASH consists of weight loss and exercise, which enhance insulin sensitivity and result in reduction of steatosis (136 141). Rapid weight reduction, however, may increase necrosis, inammation, and brosis (117,118,142). This paradoxical effect is thought to be due to an increase in circulating free fatty acids due to increased lipolysis seen with fasting. The ideal rate of weight loss is not known, but l.5 kg/week has been recommended (143). The ideal content of the diet is not known. However, saturated fatty acids increase insulin resistance, and for that reason a Mediterranean diet, i.e., a diet enriched with monounsaturated fatty acids and lowglycemic carbohydrates, seems reasonable (82,83). Recent studies have demonstrated that bariatric surgery either improves or completely reverses steatosis in patients with obesity with or without diabetes (141,144). Pharmacologic therapy. Pharmacologic therapy of NAFLD is evolving. While many studies have shown improvement in steatosis, there are neither long-term
738
studies to determine whether they alter the natural history of the disease nor studies to indicate whether relapse occurs after treatment withdrawal. Gembrozil (145), vitamin E (146), metformin (88 91), betaine (147), pioglitazone (9296), rosiglitazone (97), atorvastatin (120, 121), losartan (128), orlistat (148), and pentoxifylline (149) have all been tried and have all been shown in small trials to improve liver enzymes. Modest histologic improvement over 6 12 months is seen with some of the agents. Long-term outcome trials with the various treatment modalities are yet to be completed. Given that insulin resistance is central to the pathogenesis of NAFLD, insulinsensitizing agents should have utility (even in the absence of diabetes), and there is increasing evidence that they do (80 90,9297). Five studies using pioglitazone from 16 to 48 weeks have been published, and a large multicenter placebo-controlled trial is near completion (94). All have shown improvement in serum ALT and most in histology (9296). One study showed an increase in adiponectin, a decrease in A1C, enhanced insulin sensitivity, and improved hepatic histology including steatosis, inammation, and brosis (150). There have been three trials including a placebo-controlled trial with rosiglitazone (97,151,152). A 24week study with rosiglitazone showed histologic improvement (97). In another study of 30 patients treated with rosiglitazone 8 mg/day for 48 weeks, there was signicant improvement in ALT, AST, -glutamyl transferase, and insulin sensitivity. Of the 22 patients who had histologic evaluation, steatosis improved in 13, and brosis improved in 8 (152). This study was confounded by the use of statins. Interestingly, in the recently presented French multicenter trial known as FLIRT (French Multicenter Trail), 50% of the patients had ALT and/or histologic improvement, but nondiabetic patients were more likely than diabetic patients to respond (153). Metformin has shown mixed results in human trials (88 91) with some improvement in ALT but not in histology. Two long-term trials initiated by the National Institutes of Health are underway. At this time, treatment with metformin is not recommended outside of clinical trials. In the meantime, it seems reasonable to treat patients with NASH and type 2 diabetes with TZDs, recognizing that the patients may gain weight. In the absence of a histologic diagnosis of NASH, only
those with risk factors for progressive disease as mentioned above should be treated. TZDs, despite shortcomings, are emerging as the treatment of choice even in the absence of diabetes. Three prospective controlled studies using ursodeoxycholic acid, which reduces apoptosis and has cytoprotective properties, have been conducted. The results have been mixed (121,154,155). There is increasing interest in this agent because of its antiapoptotic effect as nonspecic or add-on therapy. Statins may reduce hepatic fat content in patients with hyperlipidemia and NASH (120,121). Atorvastatin and ursodeoxycholic acid were evaluated in a small comparative trial of 44 obese adults with NASH, including 10 patients with diabetes. Normolipidemic patients received ursodeoxycholic acid, 1315 mg kg1 day1, and hyperlipidemic patients received atorvastatin, 10 mg daily for 6 months. Liver chemistries improved in both groups; however, an increase in liver density, suggesting a decrease in fat content, occurred only in the atorvastatin group. Oxidative stress has been shown to be important in the pathogenesis of NASH. It seems reasonable, therefore, to try therapy with antioxidants. Pilot studies with vitamin E have been conducted (146,156 158) with promising results, but a meta-analysis of high-dose vitamin E revealed an increase in overall mortality (159). TNF- is proinammatory and increased in NASH. Pentoxifylline is a methylxanthine compound that inhibits TNF-. It is used in the treatment of alcoholic hepatitis. A pilot study (149) has shown improvement in liver enzymes in patients with NASH. However, the high incidence of side effects led to early withdrawal in many patients, and it seems unlikely that it will nd a place in the treatment of NASH. In summary, the ideal therapy for NAFLD is yet to be identied, and no evidence-based recommendations can be made. Outside of clinical trials, therapy should be directed toward the underlying etiology. Hepatitis C. The most effective treatment of HCV is a combination of pegylated -interferon and ribavirin (160). Interferon, however, affects insulin sensitivity and glucose tolerance. Studies in nondiabetic patients report that interferon impairs glucose tolerance (161 163). A recent trial, however, failed to
DIABETES CARE, VOLUME 30, NUMBER 3, MARCH 2007
Tolman and Associates detect a difference in insulin sensitivity and glucose tolerance after 6 months of interferon treatment (164), while another study reported that fasting plasma glucose and fasting immunoreactive insulin decreased during interferon treatment (72). The practical implications of the observed changes in glucose homeostasis in patients being treated with interferon are not known. Given the unpredictable effect of interferon in diabetes, it is reasonable to monitor diabetes carefully when using interferon. SUMMARY Type 2 diabetes is associated with a large number of liver disorders including elevated liver enzymes, fatty liver disease, cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma, and acute liver failure. In addition, there is an unexplained association with HCV. The SMR for cirrhosis is higher than that for CVD in type 2 diabetes. Many consider NAFLD to be part of the insulin resistance syndrome. However, the presence of liver disease (unless decompensated) has little implication for the specic treatment of diabetes, and the presence of diabetes has little implication for the specic treatment of liver disease. Patients with decompensated liver disease are more susceptible to hypoglycemia and require careful monitoring. There continues to be a need for long-term placebocontrolled trials for the treatment of NAFLD and for the treatment of diabetes in patients with liver disease.
References 1. http://diabetes.niddk.nih.gov/dm/pubs/ statistics. Accessed 30 July 2005 2. Geiss LS, Herman WH, Smith PJ: Mortality in non-insulin dependent diabetes. In Diabetes in America. 2nd Edition, 1995 p. 233252 (NIH publ. no. 95-1468) 3. de Marco R, Locatelli F, Zoppini G, Verlato G, Bonora E, Muggeo M: Cause-specic mortality in type 2 diabetes: The Verona Diabetes Study. Diabetes Care 22:756 761, 1999 4. Balkau B, Eschwege E, Ducimetiere P, Richard JL, Warnet JM: The high risk of death by alcohol related diseases in subjects diagnosed as diabetic and impaired glucose tolerant: the Paris Prospective Study after 15 years of follow-up. J Clin Epidemiol 44:465 474, 1991 5. Caldwell SH, Oelsner DH, Iezzoni JC, Hespenheide EE, Battle EH, Driscoll CJ: Cryptogenic cirrhosis: clinical characterization and risk factors for underlying disease. Hepatology 29:664 669, 1999 6. The U.S. Organ Procurement and TransDIABETES CARE, VOLUME 30, NUMBER 3, MARCH 2007
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14. 15.
16.
17.
plantation Network and the Scientic Registry of Transplant Recipients: OPTN/ SRTR annual report: table 9.4a: transplant recipient characteristics, 1995 to 2004: recipients of deceased donor livers [Internet], 2 May 2005. Available from http:// www.optn.org/AR2005/904a_rec-dgn_ li.htm. Ann Arbor, MI. Accessed on 1 September 2006 Trombetta M, Spiazzi G, Zoppini G, Muggeo M: Review article: type 2 diabetes and chronic liver disease in the Verona diabetes study. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 22 (Suppl. 2):24 27, 2005 Belcher G, Schernthaner G: Changes in liver tests during 1-year treatment of patients with type 2 diabetes with pioglitazone, metformin or gliclazide. Diabet Med 22:973979, 2005 Lebovitz HE, Kreider M, Freed MI: Evaluation of liver function in type 2 diabetic patients during clinical trials: evidence that rosiglitazone does not cause hepatic dysfunction. Diabetes Care 25:815 821, 2002 Hultcrantz R, Glaumann H, Lindberg G, Nilsson LH: Liver investigation in 149 asymptomatic patients with moderately elevated activities of serum aminotransferases. Scand J Gastroenterol 21:109 113, 1986 Harris MI, Flegal KM, Cowie CC, Eberhardt MS, Goldstein DE, Little RR, Wiedmeyer HM, Byrd-Holt DD: Prevalence of diabetes, impaired fasting glucose, and impaired glucose tolerance in U.S. adults: the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1988 1994. Diabetes Care 21:518 524, 1998 Ludwig J, Viggiano TR, McGill DB, Oh BJ: Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis: Mayo Clinic experiences with a hitherto unnamed disease. Mayo Clin Proc 55:434 438, 1980 Powell EE, Cooksley WG, Hanson R, Searle J, Halliday JW, Powell LW: The natural history of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis: a follow-up study of forty-two patients for up to 21 years. Hepatology 11:74 80, 1990 Lee RG: Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis: a study of 49 patients. Hum Pathol 20:594 598, 1989 Itoh S, Yougel T, Kawagoe K: Comparison between nonalcoholic steatohepatitis and alcoholic hepatitis. Am J Gastroenterol 82:650 654, 1987 Diehl AM, Goodman Z, Ishak KG: Alcohol-like liver disease in nonalcoholics: a clinical and histologic comparison with alcohol-induced liver injury. Gastroenterology 95:1056 1062, 1988 Pinto HC, Baptista A, Camilo ME, Valente A, Saragoca A, de Moura MC: Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis: clinicopathological comparison with alcoholic hepatitis in ambulatory and hospitalized
patients. Dig Dis Sci 41:172179, 1996 18. Silverman JF, OBrien KF, Long S, Leggett N, Khazanie PG, Pories WJ, Norris HT, Caro JF: Liver pathology in morbidly obese patients with and without diabetes. Am J Gastroenterol 85:1349 1355, 1990 19. Wanless IR, Lentz JS: Fatty liver hepatitis (steatohepatitis) and obesity: an autopsy study with analysis of risk factors. Hepatology 12:1106 1110, 1990 20. Teli MR, James OF, Burt AD, Bennett MK, Day CP: The natural history of nonalcoholic fatty liver: a follow-up study. Hepatology 22:1714 1719, 1995 21. Matteoni CA, Younossi ZM, Gramlich T, Boparai N, Liu YC, McCullough AJ: Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: a spectrum of clinical and pathological severity. Gastroenterology 116:14131419, 1999 22. Marchesini G, Bugianesi E, Forlani G, Cerrelli F, Lenzi M, Manini R, Natale S, Vanni E, Villanova N, Melchionda N, Rizzetto M: Nonalcoholic fatty liver, steatohepatitis, and the metabolic syndrome. Hepatology 37:917923, 2003 23. Silverman JF, OBrien KF, Long S, Leggett N, Khazanie PG, Pories WJ, Norris HT, Caro JF: Liver pathology in morbidly obese patients with and without diabetes. Am J Gastroenterol 85:1349 1355, 1990 24. Cassader M, Gambino R, Musso G, Depetris N, Mecca F, Cavallo-Perin P, Pacini G, Rizzetto M, Pagano G: Postprandial triglyceride-rich lipoprotein metabolism and insulin sensitivity in nonalcoholic steatohepatitis patients. Lipids 36:1117 1124, 2001 25. Marchesini G, Brizi M, Morselli-Labate AM, Bianchi G, Bugianesi E, McCullough AJ, Forlani G, Melchionda N: Association of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease with insulin resistance. Am J Med 107:450 455, 1999 26. Angulo P: Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. N Engl J Med 346:12211231, 2002 27. Chitturi S, Abeygunasekera S, Farrell GC, Holmes-Walker J, Hui JM, Fung C, Karim R, Lin R, Samarasinghe D, Liddle C, Weltman M, George J: NASH and insulin resistance: insulin hypersecretion and specic association with the insulin resistance syndrome. Hepatology 35: 373379, 2002 28. Crespo J, Cayon A, Fernandez-Gil P, Hernandez-Guerra M, Mayorga M, Dominguez-Diez A, Fernandez-Escalante JC, Pons-Romero F: Gene expression of tumor necrosis factor alpha and TNF-receptors, p55 and p75, in nonalcoholic steatohepatitis patients. Hepatology 34:1158 1163, 2001 29. Hui JM, Farrell GC: Clear messages from sonographic shadows?: links between metabolic disorders and liver disease, and what to do about them. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 18:11151117, 2003
739
40.
41.
42.
46.
47.
48.
49.
50.
droxynonenal, malonaldehyde and related aldehydes. Free Radic Biol Med 11: 81128, 1991 Zatloukal K, Bock G, Rainer I, Denk H, Weber K: High molecular weight components are main constituents of Mallory bodies isolated with a uorescence activated cell sorter. Lab Invest 64:200 206, 1991 Leonarduzzi G, Scavazza A, Biasi F, Chiarpotto E, Camandola S, Vogel S, Dargel R, Poli G: The lipid peroxidation end product 4-hydroxy-2,3-nonenal upregulates transforming growth factor beta1 expression in the macrophage lineage: a link between oxidative injury and brosclerosis. Faseb J 11:851 857, 1997 Bacon BR, Farahvash MJ, Janney CG, Neuschwander-Tetri BA: Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis: an expanded clinical entity. Gastroenterology 107:11031109, 1994 Petrides AS: Liver disease and diabetes mellitus. Diabet Rev 2:218, 1994 Baig NA, Herrine SK, Rubin R: Liver disease and diabetes mellitus. Clin Lab Med 21:193207, 2001 Adami HO, Chow WH, Nyren O, Berne C, Linet MS, Ekbom A, Wolk A, McLaughlin JK, Fraumeni JF Jr: Excess risk of primary liver cancer in patients with diabetes mellitus. J Natl Cancer Inst 88:14721477, 1996 Wideroff L, Gridley G, Mellemkjaer L, Chow WH, Linet M, Keehn S, BorchJohnsen K, Olsen JH: Cancer incidence in a population-based cohort of patients hospitalized with diabetes mellitus in Denmark. J Natl Cancer Inst 89:1360 1365, 1997 Fujino Y, Mizoue T, Tokui N, Yoshimura T: Prospective study of diabetes mellitus and liver cancer in Japan. Diabetes Metab Res Rev 17:374 379, 2001 El-Serag HB, Tran T, Everhart JE, Kaserer K, Fiedler R, Steindl P, Muller CH, Wrba F, Ferenci P, Rubbia-Brandt L, Leandro G, Spahr L, Giostra E, Quadri R, Male PJ, Negro F, Hui JM, Kench J, Farrell GC, Lin R, Samarasinghe D, Liddle C, Byth K, George J, Castera L, Hezode C, Roudot-Thoraval F, Lonjon I, Zafrani ES, Pawlotsky JM, Dhumeaux D, Lonardo A, Adinol LE, Loria P, Carulli N, Ruggiero G, Day CP: Diabetes increases the risk of chronic liver disease and hepatocellular carcinoma. Gastroenterology 126:460 468, 2004 Kazachkov Y, Yoffe B, Khaoustov VI, Solomon H, Klintmalm GB, Tabor E: Microsatellite instability in human hepatocellular carcinoma: relationship to p53 abnormalities. Liver 18:156 161, 1998 Macdonald GA, Greenson JK, Saito K, Cherian SP, Appelman HD, Boland CR: Microsatellite instability and loss of heterozygosity at DNA mismatch repair
51.
52.
53. 54.
55.
56.
57.
58.
59.
60.
61.
62.
gene loci occurs during hepatic carcinogenesis. Hepatology 28:90 97, 1998 Morgan DO, Edman JC, Standring DN, Fried VA, Smith MC, Roth RA, Rutter WJ: Insulin-like growth factor II receptor as a multifunctional binding protein. Nature 329:301307, 1987 Kishimoto Y, Shiota G, Wada K, Kitano M, Nakamoto K, Kamisaki Y, Suou T, Itoh T, Kawasaki H: Frequent loss in chromosome 8p loci in liver cirrhosis accompanying hepatocellular carcinoma. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 122:585589, 1996 El-Serag HB, Everhart JE: Diabetes increases the risk of acute hepatic failure. Gastroenterology 122:18221828, 2002 Chan KA, Truman A, Gurwitz JH, Hurley JS, Martinson B, Platt R, Everhart JE, Moseley RH, Terrault N, Ackerson L, Selby JV: A cohort study of the incidence of serious acute liver injury in diabetic patients treated with hypoglycemic agents. Arch Intern Med 163:728 734, 2003 Gray H, Wreghitt T, Stratton IM, Alexander GJ, Turner RC, ORahilly S: High prevalence of hepatitis C infection in Afro-Caribbean patients with type 2 diabetes and abnormal liver function tests. Diabet Med 12:244 249, 1995 Simo R, Hernandez C, Genesca J, Jardi R, Mesa J: High prevalence of hepatitis C virus infection in diabetic patients. Diabetes Care 19:998 1000, 1996 Allison ME, Wreghitt T, Palmer CR, Alexander GJ: Evidence for a link between hepatitis C virus infection and diabetes mellitus in a cirrhotic population. J Hepatol 21:11351139, 1994 Ozyilkan E, Arslan M: Increased prevalence of diabetes mellitus in patients with chronic hepatitis C virus infection. Am J Gastroenterol 91:1480 1481, 1996 Lonardo A, Adinol LE, Loria P, Carulli N, Ruggiero G, Day CP: Steatosis and hepatitis C virus: mechanisms and signicance for hepatic and extrahepatic disease. Gastroenterology 126:586 597, 2004 Mason AL, Lau JY, Hoang N, Qian K, Alexander GJ, Xu L, Guo L, Jacob S, Regenstein FG, Zimmerman R, Everhart JE, Wasserfall C, Maclaren NK, Perrillo RP: Association of diabetes mellitus and chronic hepatitis C virus infection. Hepatology 29:328 333, 1999 Knobler H, Stagnaro-Green A, Wallenstein S, Schwartz M, Roman SH: Higher incidence of diabetes in liver transplant recipients with hepatitis C. J Clin Gastroenterol 26:30 33, 1998 Mehta SH, Brancati FL, Sulkowski MS, Strathdee SA, Szklo M, Thomas DL: Prevalence of type 2 diabetes mellitus among persons with hepatitis C virus infection in the United States. Ann Intern Med 133:592599, 2000
74.
75.
76.
77.
78.
79.
80.
81.
82.
83.
with HCV infection before and after 4 months therapy with interferon-alpha. Eur J Clin Invest 30:111121, 2000 Castera L, Hezode C, Roudot-Thoraval F, Lonjon I, Zafrani ES, Pawlotsky JM, Dhumeaux D: Effect of antiviral treatment on evolution of liver steatosis in patients with chronic hepatitis C: indirect evidence of a role of hepatitis C virus genotype 3 in steatosis. Gut 53:420 424, 2004 Fabris P, Floreani A, Tositti G, Vergani D, De Lalla F, Betterle C: Type 1 diabetes mellitus in patients with chronic hepatitis C before and after interferon therapy. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 18:549 558, 2003 Huang MA, Greenson JK, Chao C, Anderson L, Peterman D, Jacobson J, Emick D, Lok AS, Conjeevaram HS: One-year intense nutritional counseling results in histological improvement in patients with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis: a pilot study. Am J Gastroenterol 100:10721081, 2005 Suzuki A, Lindor K, St Saver J, Lymp J, Mendes F, Muto A, Okada T, Angulo P: Effect of changes on body weight and lifestyle in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. J Hepatol 43:1060 1066, 2005 Petersen KF, Dufour S, Befroy D, Lehrke M, Hendler RE, Shulman GI: Reversal of nonalcoholic hepatic steatosis, hepatic insulin resistance, and hyperglycemia by moderate weight reduction in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes 54:603 608, 2005 Douketis JD, Feightner JW, Attia J, Feldman WF: Periodic health examination, 1999 update. I. Detection, prevention and treatment of obesity: Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care. Cmaj 160:513525, 1999 Kang H, Greenson JK, Omo JT, Chao C, Peterman D, Anderson L, Foess-Wood L, Sherbondy MA, Conjeevaram HS: Metabolic syndrome is associated with greater histologic severity, higher carbohydrate, and lower fat diet in patients with NAFLD. Am J Gastroenterol 101: 22472253, 2006 Solga S, Alkhuraishe AR, Clark JM, Torbenson M, Greenwald A, Diehl AM, Magnuson T: Dietary composition and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Dig Dis Sci 49:1578 1583, 2004 Esposito K, Marfella R, Ciotola M, Di Palo C, Giugliano F, Giugliano G, DArmiento M, DAndrea F, Giugliano D: Effect of a Mediterranean-style diet on endothelial dysfunction and markers of vascular inammation in the metabolic syndrome: a randomized trial. JAMA 292:1440 1446, 2004 Musso G, Gambino R, De Michieli F, Cassader M, Rizzetto M, Durazzo M, Faga E, Silli B, Pagano G: Dietary habits and their relations to insulin resistance
84.
85. 86.
87.
88.
89.
90.
91.
92.
93.
94.
95.
and postprandial lipemia in nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Hepatology 37:909 916, 2003 Petrides AS, Vogt C, Schulze-Berge D, Matthews D, Strohmeyer G: Pathogenesis of glucose intolerance and diabetes mellitus in cirrhosis. Hepatology 19:616 627, 1994 Marks V, Teale JD: Drug-induced hypoglycemia. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am 28:555577, 1999 Burge MR, Zeise TM, Sobhy TA, Rassam AG, Schade DS: Low-dose ethanol predisposes elderly fasted patients with type 2 diabetes to sulfonylurea-induced low blood glucose. Diabetes Care 22:2037 2043, 1999 Zimmerman HJ: Drug-induced liver disease. In Hepatotoxicity: The Adverse Effects of Drugs and Other Chemicals on the Liver. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, Lippincott Williams and Williams, 1991, p. 430 Nair S, Diehl AM, Wiseman M, Farr GH, Jr., Perrillo RP: Metformin in the treatment of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis: a pilot open label trial. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 20:2328, 2004 Marchesini G, Brizi M, Bianchi G, Tomassetti S, Zoli M, Melchionda N: Metformin in non-alcoholic steatohepatitis. Lancet 358:893 894, 2001 Uygun A, Kadayifci A, Isik AT, Ozgurtas T, Deveci S, Tuzun A, Yesilova Z, Gulsen M, Dagalp K: Metformin in the treatment of patients with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 19: 537544, 2004 Nair S, Diehl AM, Perille R: Metformin in non-alchoholic steatohepatitis: efcacy and safety: a preliminary report (Abstract). Gastroenterology 122 (Suppl. 2) 2002 Bajaj M, Suraamornkul S, Pratipanawatr T, Hardies LJ, Pratipanawatr W, Glass L, Cersosimo E, Miyazaki Y, DeFronzo RA: Pioglitazone reduces hepatic fat content and augments splanchnic glucose uptake in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes 52:1364 1370, 2003 Freedman R, Uwaifo G, Lutchman G, Kittichaipromrat., Park Y, Kleiner D, Yanovski J, Hoofnagle J: Changes in insulin sensitivity and improvements in liver histology in patients with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) treated with pioglitazone (PIO) (Abstract). Diabetes 52 (Suppl. 1):A76, 2003 Harrison S, Belfort R, Brown K, Darland C, Finch J, Fincke C, Havranek R, Hardies J, Dwivedi S, Berria R, Tio F, Schenker S, Cusi K: A double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of pioglitazone in the treatment of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) (Abstract). Gastroenterology 128 (Suppl 2):A681, 2005 Acosta R, Molina E, OBrien C, Cobo M, Amaro R, Neff G, Schiff E: The use of pioglitazone in non-alcoholic steato741
96.
126.
127.
97.
128.
98. 99.
129.
130.
100.
131.
101.
132.
102. 103.
133.
134.
104.
135.
136.
137.
138.
742
149.
157.
150.
158.
151.
159.
152.
160.
153.
161.
162.
154.
163.
155.
164.
156.
743