JESUS

&
THE AHMADIYYA MOVEMENT
OF
MIRZA GHULAM QADIANI

Edited By
A. AFTAB

Published By:
KHATME NUBUWWAT ACADEMY
387 KATHERINE ROAD FOREST GATE
LONDON E7 8LT UNITED KINGDOM
PHONE: 020 8471 4434
MOBILE: 0798 486 4668, 0795 803 3404
EMAIL: [email protected]

1
 Preface

This book presents and highlights the inaccurate and

misleading views about Jesus and Mary, held by Mirza Ghulam
A. Qadiani, who claimed to be a Prophet and the Promised
Messiah.

Publishing this disturbing material has been rendered

unavoidable due to the current aggressive missionary activities
of the Ahmadiyya Movement in North America and Europe,
where they are trying zealously to convert people of other faiths
(mainly Christians and Muslims) to their religion.

This exposition is aimed at presenting one troubling facet

of the Ahmadiyya/ Qadiani Movement which the victims might
otherwise discover too late.

2
 CONTENTS

Introduction ………………………………………… 04

Part One:
Jesus According to Mirza Ghulam A. Qadiani

1. Jesus’ Character Belittled by Mirza…….......... 09

2. Jesus’ Teachings Belittled by Mirza……......... 17
3. Jesus’ Miracles and Prophecies
Denied by Mirza………………………… 20
4. Mirza Claims Excellence over Jesus……….... 27
5. Jesus’ Family and Mary Insulted by Mirza….. 29

Part Two:
Conclusions & The Virtues of Jesus

6. Conclusions………………………………….. 35
7. Common Beliefs about Jesus………………... 39
8. The Virtues of Jesus…………………………. 41

Bibliography…………………………………………. 47

3
 Introduction

We are living in troubled and confusing times. Moral

decline is apparent to even the least perceptive. Humanism has
replaced piety as the highest ideal. The consequence of this
attitude is to become soft on falsehood, evil and sin. One learns
instead to accept every individual’s and small group’s point of
view as having validity just because they believe in it, no matter
how erroneous that idea may be.

Many are also chasing after materialistic values. Few can

find any peace in this modern world. And so in most of the major
religious traditions, one awaits the Messiah, the Second Coming,
hoping and believing that this is the only way out of our spiritual
and moral morass.

The Christians and Muslims also, each according to the

understanding of Messiah-ship within their own religious
tradition, are awaiting Jesus’ (peace be upon him) miraculous
reappearance from Heaven. Therefore the terrain is fertile for the
emergence of all kinds of false prophets and spiritual teachers.

Mirza Ghulam A. Qadiani (Mirza) is one of this century’s

self-proclaimed Messiahs. He lived for 68 years and during that
time converted thousands of people to his religion known as
Ahmadiyyat/ Qadianiat. His followers are likewise known as
Ahamdis, Qadianis, Mirzais and Lahoris. Mirza proclaimed
himself as the Promised Messiah and Prophet of God. He has
confused people about the nature of Prophethood and he has
confused people about Jesus.

4
 After Mirza declared himself to be the Promised Messiah,
grave difficulties confronted him in validating a claim rendered
spurious by his not fitting Jesus’ (peace be upon them) foretold
description. He therefore resorted to first denying the miraculous
reappearance of Jesus by suggesting a hitherto unknown history,
according to which Jesus fled to Kashmir after escaping the
scene of his alleged crucifixion, where after hiding for many
years he died and now lies buried in Kashmir.1

By fabricating this story Mirza tried to remove Jesus

from the scene, the problem still remained that the Promised
Messiah was to be none other than Jesus, son of Mary. This
wrinkle was ironed out by Mirza as follows;

God named me Mary in the third volume of Barahin-i-

Ahmadiyyah.2 I was nurtured for a period of two years in a
Mary-like condition and was brought up in womanly seclusion.
Then the spirit of Jesus was breathed into me just as (it was
breathed) into Mary. Thus I was considered to be pregnant in a
metaphorical manner. After a period of several months, not more
than ten, I was made Jesus out of Mary by the revelation
embodied in the last parts of the fourth volume of Barahin-i-
Ahmadiyyah; and thus I became Jesus, son of Mary. But god did
not inform me about this secret during the time of Barahin-i-
Ahmadiyyah. (Kashti-i-Nuh) (Ruhani Khaza’in Vol. 19, p. 50)

Mirza’s future claims of being the recipient of Divine

revelations became an easy matter after this marvellous act of
jugglery. He could now assert:
Footnotes;
1) The now deceased Khalifah of the Ahmadiyyah Movement, Mirza Tahir, in answering the
questions of Irshad A. Ansari, in the Holiday Inn, Monteal, on September 27, 1986, persisted in
the belief that Jesus died in Kashmir. (Apna Watan, Vol. 5, No. 51, November 1986).

5
 I swear by God in whose hands my soul is that it is He
Who has sent me and has named me a Prophet; it is He

Who has called me the Promised Messiah and has shown

big signs to testify me; these signs reach three hundred thousand.
(Haqiqat al-Wali):
Ruhani Khaza’in, Vol. 22 p. 503.

However, another small hurdle came his way. Jesus used

to perform miracles. There was public demand for Mirza to do
likewise to substantiate his claims of being the Promised
Messiah. Having already tested the gullibility of his audience, he
justified his inability in this field by denying all the miracles of
Jesus. After failing to perform miracles, Mirza tried to prove his
superiority over Jesus by accusing him of having a very bad
character. Mirza further thrust the charge of alcoholism and
promiscuity on Jesus (peace be upon them). He accused Jesus of
plagiarizing the teachings of the Old Testament and claimed that
the coming of Jesus ruined the world. Mirza called the great
miracles of Jesus acts of mesmerism, cunning and deceit. Mirza
tried to disgrace Jesus by saying that he evolved from the blood
of prostitutes, and thus had an inclination for harlots.

Mirza’s followers have split into two groups. One

believes that he was a Prophet and the Promised Messiah, while
the other group recognizes him as the Promised Messiah and
Reformer. However, the latter group is likewise guilty of hearsay
and disbelief because the person whom they recognize as a
reformer made the false claim of being a Prophet and the
Promised Messiah. Let it also be remembered that Mirza Qadiani
declared all those who did not believe in him to be the children
of prostitutes.3 Thus, it is clear that the claims of any auxiliary

6
group are no more than a marketing ploy to sell their religion by
camouflaging its more serious implications.

(We owe thanks to Dr. Jamal Badawi, Dr Sajida S Alvi,

Qari Irshad Ansari, Nisa A. Rochelle ans Aziz-al Ihsan for their kind help in
various phases of this publication).

-- A. Aftab

Footnotes;
2) A book of Mirza Tahir in which he has compiled what he calls Divine Revelations.
3) Ruhani Khaza’in, (A’ina-i-Kamalot): Vol. 5, p. 547.

7
 PART ONE

Jesus According to
Mirza Ghulam A. Qadiani

8
Chapter 1

Jesus’ Character Belittled

by Mirza

In complete defiance of divine revelation, Mirza Ghulam

A. Qadiani (Mirza) invented a new belief and faith, by declaring
that he (Mirza) was the promised Messiah. The true believers
were naturally disgusted by this claim because nothing about
Mirza fit the details prophesised about the return of Jesus (peace
be upon him). People also demanded that he should perform
miracles like the former Messiah (Jesus) to verify his claim. At
this point Mirza began defaming our beloved Jesus and lost no
opportunity to deny the great miracles, mission and the upright
character of Jesus. In trying to prove his own excellence over
Jesus, Mirza wrote the following heart-breaking obscenities that
are being presented to the public as an eye opener.

Mirza Ghulam A. Qadiani made many accusations about

the character of Jesus to improve his own image as the promised
Messiah. Despite the fact that no authentic religious source
suggests that Jesus was foul-mouthed, Mirza had the meanness
to say:

(Jesus) had the habit of uttering obscenities and

frequently using foul language.

(Zamimah Anjam-i-Atham):

9
 Ruhani Khaza’in, Vol. II, p.289
It should be remembered that he (Jesus) had also to some
extent the habit of lying.

(Zamimah Anjam-i-Atham):
Ruhani Khaza’in, Vol. 11, p. 289.

A cunning and wicked (person) who had the soul of the

Messiah from head to toe.

(Zamimah Anjam-i-Atham):
Ruhani Khaza’in, Vol. 11, p. 289.

In the following remarks, Mirza slandered those who

believed in Jesus by deviously thrusting the blame of his obscene
insults on Christians:

What is your opinion about the character of the Messiah?

(It is that Jesus) was an alcoholic and gluttonous person, neither
abstinent nor a pious worshipper, nor a reality seeker. He was a
proud and self-conceited claimant of Divinity.
(Nur Al-Qur’an):
Ruhani Khaza’in, Vol. 9, p. 387.

The root cause of all the damage that alcohol

consumption has had on the Europeans was that Jesus used to
drink alcohol, perhaps because of some disease or an old habit.
(Kashti-i-Nuh):
Ruhani Khaza’in, Vol. 19, p. 71.

Mirza would often engage in self-admiration. For

example, while expressing his own reliance on God for the cure

10
of his aliments he used this occasion as an opportunity to
criticize Jesus. The following remark of Mirza is a testimony of
his evil objectives:

Once a friend advised me that opium is good for diabetes

so there is no harm in taking opium for the purpose of treatment.
I replied, ‘thank you very much for your sympathetic advice. But
if I get into the habit of taking opium, I am afraid the people will
mock that the first Messiah (Jesus) was an alcoholic and the
second a drug addict’.

(Nasim-i Da’wat):
Ruhani Khaza’in, Vol. 19, p. 434.

It is well known that the Messengers of God have often

been accused, defamed and rejected. However, Mirza never
spared an opportunity of capitalizing on these accusations to
prove that Jesus (peace be upon them) was worthless. He singled
out Jesus for mudslinging because Mirza viewed Jesus as the one
competing with him for Messiah-ship. One can witness his
irrational and desperate attempts to improve his own public
image by digging out slanderous remarks to eventually draw the
most negative conclusions. The following demonstrates that
Mirza liberally seconded the false accusations about Jesus.

Jesus could not portray himself as a pious man because

people knew that he was a glutinous alcoholic.

(Satt Bachan):
Ruhani Khaza’in, Vol. 10, p. 296.
In the next two accusations, Mirza’s slanderous
imagination has really run amock. These atrocious and

11
blasphemous remarks clearly demonstrate Mirza’s shameful
distortion of the Biblical episodes as a way to deride our beloved
Jesus:

Jesus had an inclination for prostitutes perhaps due to

his ancestral relationship with them, otherwise no pious man
could allow a young prostitute to touch his head with her filthy
hands, and massage his head with her unclean perfume
purchased with the earnings of adultery, and rub his feet with
her hair. Let the intelligent judge what sort of character such a
person must possess.

(Zamimah Anjam-i-Atham):
Ruhani Khaza-i-n, Vol. 11, p.29.

A beautiful prostitute is sitting so close to him as though

she is embracing him. Sometimes she massages his head with
perfume or holds his feet, and sometimes she lays her beautiful
black hair on his feet and plays in his lap. In this situation Mr
Messiah is sitting in ecstasy. If someone rises to object he is
scolded. Besides his young age, the habit of alcoholism and
being a bachelor, a beautiful prostitute is lying in front of him
touching her body with his. Is this the behaviour of a virtuous
person? And what evidence or proof is there that Jesus did not
get sexually provoked by the touch of the prostitute. Alas Jesus
could not even have the facility of sexual intercourse with any
wife of his own after passing his glance upon that adulteress.
What sexual excitement would have been provoked by the
touching of that wretched adulteress and her playfulness! The
sexual excitement and arousal would have done its work to the
full. This is the reason why Jesus could not even open his mouth
to say, “Oh adulteress! Keep away from me”. It is well

12
established in the Bible that the woman was one of the
prostitutes, notorious for adultery in the entire city.
(Nur Al-Qur’an):
Ruhani Khaza’in, Vol. 9, p. 449.

In the above quotation, Mirza has exposed his true nature.

The disgusting statements and accusations contained in the
above quotations are not to be found in the Holy Bible. By
ridiculing Jesus (peace be upon them), Mirza has tried to
improve his won image as the Promised Messiah. We shall quote
the actual passages from the Bible to enable the general public to
assess the extent of slander and falsehood perpetrated against
Jesus Christ (peace be upon them) by the false Messiah namely
Mirza Qadiani. According to the New Testament this episode is
written as follows:

And one of the Pharisees desired him that he would eat

with him. He went into the pharisee’s house and sat down to
meat. And, behold, a woman in the city, which was a sinner,
when she knew that Jesus sat at meat in the Pharisees house,
brought an alabaster box of ointment and stood at his feet behind
him weeping, and began to wash his feet with tears and then
wiped them with the hairs of her head, and kissed his feet and
anointed them with the ointment. Now when the pharisee which
had bidden him saw it, he spake within himself, saying, this man
if he were a prophet would have known who and what manner of
woman this is that toucheth him for she is a sinner. And Jesus
answering said unto him, Simon, I have somewhat to say unto
thee. And he said, Master say on. There was a certain creditor
which had two debtors; the one owed 500 pence and the other
50. And when they had nothing to pay, he frankly forgave them
both. Tell me therefore, which of them will love him most? Simon

13
answered and said, I supposed that he, to whom he forgave most.
And he said unto him, thou hath rightly judged. And he turned to
the woman and said unto Simon, seeth thou this woman? I
entered into thine house, thou givest me no water for my feet; but
she hath washed my feet with tears and wiped them with the
hairs of her head. Thou givest me no kiss; but this woman since
the time I came in, has not ceased to kiss my feet. My head with
oil thou didst not anoint; but this woman has anointed my head
with ointment. Therefore, I say unto thee, her sins which are
many, are forgiven; but she loved much; but to whom little is
forgiven, the sane loveth little. And he said unto her, thy sins are
forgiven. And they that sat at meat with him began to say within
themselves, who is this that forgive sins also? And he said to the
woman, thy faith hath saved thee; go in peace.
The New Testament
St. Luke, Ch. 7: 36-50.

The above is confirmed in the Gospel according to John

as follows:

Then took Mary a pound of ointment of Spikenard, very

costly, and anointed the feet of Jesus and wiped his feet with her
hair; and the house was filled with odour of the ointment. Then
said one of the disciples, Judas Iscariot, Simon’s son, which
should betray him, why was not this ointment sold for 300 pence
and given to the poor? This he said, not that he cared for the
poor; but because he was a thief and had the bag and bare what
was put therin. Then said Jesus, let her alone; against the day of
my burying has she kept this. For the poor always Ye have with
you; but me Ye have not always.
The New Testament
St. John, Ch. 12:3-8.

14
 And according to Mathew the story is narrated in the
following manner:

Now that Jesus was in Bethany, in the house of Simon the

leper, there came unto him a woman having an alabaster box of
very precious ointment and poured it on his head as he sat at
meat. But when his disciples saw it, they had indignation, saying,
to what purpose is this waste? For this ointment might have been
sold for much, and given to the pour. Then Jesus understood it,
he said unto them, why trouble Ye the woman? For she hath
wrought a good work on me. For Ye have the poor always with
you; but me Ye have not always. For in that she had poured this
ointment on my body, she did it for my burial. Verily I say unto
you, wheresover this Gospel shall be preached in the whole
world, there shall also this, that this woman hath done, be told
for a memorial of her.
The New Testament
St. Mathew, Ch. 26:6-13

We have quoted the actual episodes from the Bible. The

immoral woman came to Jesus crying and weeping, seeking
forgiveness for her sins. Hence, Jesus said, ‘your sins are
forgiven’. Mirza’s insulting distortions which he has highlighted
in his writings are as follows: - as though she is embracing him; -
she is playing in his lap- Mr. Jesus is sitting in ecstasy; - a
beautiful prostitute is lying in front; - her body is touching his
body; - Jesus’ sexual provocation, etc.

The Bible certainly does not contain such base episodes

nor does it depict Jesus in these terms. By these insults, Mirza
tried to thrust the blame on the Bible to achieve his evil
objectives.

15
Chapter 2

Jesus’ Teachings Belittled

by Mirza
Following are the views of Mirza about the teaching of
Jesus:

(Jesus, The Messiah) came to a particular nation and

alas! the world did not get any spiritual benefit from him. He left
an example of such a Prophethood whose harm proved to be
greater than its good. Sufferings and conflict increased due to
his coming.

(Ittimam al-Hujjat):
Ruhani Khaza’in, Vol.8, p.308.

It is extremely shameful that the Sermon of the Mount

that from the core of the New testament was plagiarized by
(Jesus, the Messiah) from the Jewish book, the Talmud, and then
he pretended as if it were his own teachings. But since the time
this plagiarism has been discovered the Christians have been
suffering a great shame. Jesus committed this act (of forgery) to
perhaps gain influence by presenting some good teachings. The
unfortunate thing is that these teachings are an affront to the
rules of wisdom and upright conscience.

(Zamimah, Anjam-i-Atham):
Ruhani Khaza’in, Vol.11. p290.

16
 The teachings of Jesus ruined the whole of Europe due to
permitting unrestrained liberty and unconditional
(licentiousness. So much so that this (looseness) resulted in all
(being involved) in adultery and fornication like pigs and dogs.
And (this) immorality has spread to such an extent that it is even
written on the wrappers of foreign (European) sweets and
candies: ‘Kiss me, o my sweetheart’. Now who is responsible for
these sins? The burden of these sins is undoubtedly on Jesus.

(Nur al-Qur’an)
Ruhani Khaza’in, Vol.9, p.416.

Although the Messiah (Jesus) kept healing physical

ailments by this practice (of mesmerism), in terms of instilling
firm belief and guidance in the hearts regarding the Oneness of
God and in establishing religious steadfastness, his
achievements were so poor that he was almost a failure.
(Azalah-I Auham):
Ruhani Khaza’in, Vol.3, p.258.

Mirza’s following remark not only belittles Jesus’

teachings, but it also refutes the established religious beliefs that
Jesus is alive and is destined to return to earth.

It is unjustly said about the person (Jesus) who is buried

in the locality of Khanyar, Sirinager, Kashmir that he is sitting in
the heavens. Alas! How great an injustice God, in keeping to His
promises has the power over everything. But he can never send a
person to this world the second time whose first coming caused
so much harm that it ruined the world.
(Daji’ al-Bala):
Ruhani Khaza’in, Vol. 18, p. 235.

17
 Don’t you know that manliness and virility are
praiseworthy attributes of men. Being impotent is not a
commendable quality just as being deaf and dumb are not
commendable. Yes, this objection is indeed very great, that the
Messiah being completely deprived of the greatest of them
masculine qualities (viz. virility) could not leave a practical
example of a perfect and upright social life with his wives.
Therefore, the European women took advantage of the extremely
shameful laxity and crossed the limits of moderation whose
consequences were the unspeakable acts, fornication and
adultery.
(Nur al-Quran):
Ruhani Khaza’in, Vol. 9, pp. 392-393.

The above is an example of Mirza’s heartbreaking and

insulting statements in which he openly slandered accused and
defamed Jesus, the Messiah. Because of sheer antagonism, Mirza
Qadiani harboured extreme malice against Jesus (peace be upon
them), therefore he went as far as accusing him of being an
alcoholic. Thrusting the sin of promiscuity on Jesus is most
absurd and childish.

18
Chapter 3

Jesus’ Miracles and Prophecies

Denied by Mirza

As explained in the Introduction, miracles were another

obstacle for Mirza in his attempts to substantiate his claim of
being of the Promised Messiah. So to justify his inability to
perform miracles, he adopted the following irrational approach to
deny the miracles and prophecies of our beloved Jesus, despite
the Biblical and Qur’an affirmation of the same. Mirza says:

The Christians have written about many miracles of

(Jesus), but the fact is that he performed no miracle.

(Zamimah Anjam-I Atham):

Ruhani Khaza’in, Vol. 11, p. 290.

It is no wonder that God Almighty might have given Jesus

some intellectual know-how so that by pressing a trigger or by
somehow blowing on it, the clay-toy took flight like a bird, or if it
didn’t fly it might have walked. Because the Messiah, son of
Mary, had also been working as a carpenter with his father
Joseph for twenty two years and it is obvious that carpentry is a
skill in which the faculty for inventing different sorts of machines
and instructions is sharpened.
(Azalah-i Auham):
Ruhani Khaza’in, Vol. 3, p. 254.

19
 Besides this, it is also conceivable that such miracles
might have taken place by the way of mesmerism, for play and
entertainment, rather than as a reality, because in mesmerism
there are such marvels which come about by the expert
practitioner casting the heat of his own spirit on (lifeless things)
to make them appear as living being. However, Jesus was
inferior to (the Prophet) Elisha (in acts of mesmerism), because
even the corpse of Elisha performed the miracle of reviving the
dead person whose bones it touched. But Jesus’ dead body could
not at all revive the thieves who were crucified along with Jesus
despite their bodies being in contact with Jesus’ body.

(Azalah-I Auham):
Ruhani Khaza’in, Vol. 3, p. 255.

It is clear that Mirza regarded the great miracles of Jesus

as being merely the acts of mesmerism. It should be pointed out
that mesmerism was practiced by jugglers and magicians.
Nowadays, hypnotism is also used by health professionals and
crime investigators. In fact, this was precisely what Mirza
intended, namely to prove that the role and achievements of
Jesus were not extraordinary. In the above quotation, Mirza
renders Jesus inferior to the Prophet Elisha, whereas in the
following remark Mirza professes his won superiority over Jesus
by saying that he remained aloof from (what Mirza calls) the
demeaning and hateful practice of mesmerism.

Let it be known that this practise (of mesmerism) is not as

honourable as it is deemed by the public. If this humble one
(Mirza) had not regarded this practice as hateful and detestable.
I had a strong hope from the grace of God Almighty, that this

20
humble one (Mirza) would not have been inferior to the Messiah,
son of Mary, in showing wonderful acts (of mesmerism).
(Azalah-I Auham):
Ruhani Khaza’in, Vol. 3, p. 257.

The number of objections and doubts about the miracles

and prophesies of the Messiah are so great that no other
Prophet’s miracles or prophecies have been doubted so much.
Doesn’t the story of the Pond belittle the Messiah’s miracles.
(Azalah-I Auham):
Ruhani Khaza’in, vol. 3, p. 106.

Mirza has taken the reference about the pool from what is
regarded as a debatable verse of the Bible (John 5:3,4). These
verses are not to be found in the ancient manuscripts such as
Codex Vaticanux, Codex Sinaiticus, Codex Bezac, Codex Syriac
and the Latin Vulgate. Therefore the modern versions such as the
Revised Standard, New American Standard, etc., have deleted
these verses and put them in the footnotes.

However, Mirza’s remark is not tenable even in the light

of the Biblical verses in question, because the sick man described
in the Bible had the infirmity for thirty eight years without
getting cured. Jesus cured this lame person by the word of mouth
and the man walked immediately. This is not an isolated example
of Jesus healing others without any physical means. For
example, Lazarus was revived by Jesus without even touching
his body or his grave. Mirza had the least concern about the
actual details concerning the great miracles of Jesus. He was
merely fishing for excuses and whenever he found any remote or
vague episode he abused it as a justification for making all sorts

21
of horrendous conclusions. The following will prove how Mirza
draws evil conclusions to accuse Jesus of cunning and deceit:

Perhaps he (Jesus, the Messiah) may have healed some

blind and cured some other ailments by ordinary means. Due to
(Jesus’) bad luck, during his time there was a pond which was a
source of great miracles. It can be assumed that he also used
(the miraculous) clay of the same pond. The complete reality of
his miracles is unfolded by this pond. And a categorical
inference drawn from the existence of this pond is that if at all he
performed any miracles they were not his won, but rather
attributable to this pond and he had nothing to his credit except
cunning and deceit.
(Zamimah Anjam-I Atham)
Ruhani Khaza’in, Vol. 11, p. 291.

The Messiah’s miracles were worthless and insignificant

due to the pond which was a source of wonders even before the
Messiah’s birth. All kinds of sick, the lepers and the crippled
etc., used to be cured by one dip in this pond.
(Azalah-I Auham)
Ruhani Kaza’in, Vol. 3, p. 263.

It is also possible that the Messiah used to bring the clay

of the pond which had the spiritual effect of the Holy Spirit.
Anyhow this miracle (of creating birds and making them fly) was
merely a kind of play.
(Azalah-i Auham)
Ruhani Khaza’in, Vol. 3, p. 263.

The foregoing are the horrendous teachings professed by

Mirza. The great miracles that the Bible and the Qur’an have

22
attributed to Jesus, have been reduced to the level of mesmerism
by Mirza. As pointed out earlier, the reason behind the denial of
miracles was that the opponents of Mirza demanded that if he
was a true similitude of Jesus, then why could he not perform
miracles like the former Messiah. Since his claims of Messiah-
hood were based on falsehood, he did not have the slightest
ability of performing miracles. Therefore to quieten this demand
he thought it suitable to deny the miracles of Jesus by
interpreting them as being metaphoric expressions – the spiritual
effect of clay – mesmerism – obscene tricks etc. This he did to
cast doubts upon their magnificence, as Mirza himself writes:

The fact is that (Jesus) did not perform any miracle.

(Zamimah Anjam-i Atham)
Ruhani Khaza’in, Vol. 11, p. 290.

From the above quotations it is clear that Mirza Qadiani

had no regard for Jesus. While it was perfectly normal and
acceptable to Mirza that the clay of the pond had miraculous
powers, he raised a great hue and cry about the possibility of
Jesus being gifted with the ability to perform miracles. Mirza
then went on to deny and belittle Jesus’ prophecies.

23
 Mirza Accuses Jesus of False Prophecies

Mirza has written about the prophecies of Jesus in a

demeaning manner. As before, Mirza first thrust the blame for
his accusation on others and then regarded this as an unbridled
license allowing him to draw defamatory conclusions as
becomes clear from his writings:

Alas! To whom can we express our mourning that three

prophecies of the Messiah proved to be false!
(Ajaz-i-Ahmadi)
Ruhani Khaza’in, Vol. 19, p. 121

Doesn’t the story of the pond dwindle the glamour of the

Messiah’s miracles? And the state of his prophecies is worse
than that! What kind of prophecies are these that there will be
earthquakes, lives will be destroyed, wars will be fought, famine
will befall? And the thing that is more sorrowful than this is the
fact that the number of the prophecies of Mr. Messiah which did
not come true is more than those which did.
(Azalah-I Auham)
Ruhani Kaza’in, Vol. 3, p. 106.

The prophecies of this helpless man (Jesus) were merely

that there will be earthquakes, famines and wars….
Why did this Israelite term these common occurrences as
prophecies?
(Zamimah Anjam-I Atham)
Ruhani Khaza’in, Vol. 11, p. 288.

The above illustrates Mirza’s outright denial of Jesus’

prophecies. The prophecies of Jesus, the Messiah were never

24
false. Since this article addresses those who believe in this
fundamental premise, the need was not felt to pursue Mirza’s
allegations by stating the prophecies in question.

These were just a few examples to illustrate

Mirza’s relentless mission to belittle Jesus. To achieve this sad
objective, Mirza did not rely only on the issue of miracles and
prophecies. As a matter of fact, he utilised diverse tricks such as
his attempts to run down Jesus by comparing him with other
Prophets. As an example, Mirza has written the following:

Jesus, peace be upon him, repented for his sins at the

hands of John the Baptist and became one of his select disciples.
This decides the excellence of John the Baptist over Jesus,
because it is not proven that John the Baptist ever repented at
the hands of anyone.
(Dafi’ al-Bala)
Ruhani Khaza’in, Vol. 18, p. 220.

25
Chapter 4

Mirza Claims Excellence

over Jesus
Mirza’s objective in belittling Jesus was simply to
declare his own excellence over Jesus. After having disgraced
Jesus, Mirza could now assert:

God sent the promised Messiah (Mirza) amongst this

community who is better in all his glory than the first Messiah
(Jesus).
(Dafi’ al-Bala)
Ruhani Khaza’in, Vol. 18, p. 233.

Onto this nation God sent His promised Messiah (Mirza),

who is better than the first Messiah in all his glory. I swear by
God in whose hands my soul is that if the Messiah, the son of
Mary, were my contemporary he could not have done the works
that I can do, and the signs (miracles) which I am bringing about
he could never have performed.
(Haqiqat al-Wahi)
Ruhani Khaza’in, Vol. 22, p. 152.

After all when God and His Apostle and all the Prophets
have declared the supremacy of the second Messiah
(Mirza) of this last period because of his great
achievements, then it is a devilish temptation to say, Why do you
proclaim yourself superior to the first Messiah, the son of Mary?
(Haqiqat al-Wahi)
Ruhani Khaza’in, Vol. 22, p.159.

26
 Give up the mention of the son of Mary. (For) superior to
him is Ghulam Ahmed.

(Dafi’ al-Bala)
Ruhani Khaza’in, Vol. 18, p. 240.

Mirza proclaimed his superiority over Jesus who was

gifted with a revealed book and was honoured with magnificent
miracles, and whose qualities and miracles have been stated by
God at numerous places in the Bible and the Qur’an.

27
Chapter 5

Jesus’ Family and Mary Insulted

by Mirza

Mirza has not even spared Mary, the illustrious mother of

Jesus, nor his grandparents. Mirza launched these verbal assaults
sometimes under the pretence of argument and debate and
sometimes as concluding issues.

Mirza adopted the most base and disgusting style of

discourse. He justified this meanness by making the accusation
that Jesus also had a very abusive manner of speech. Mirza thus
departed from the clean and polite manners of communication
taught in Divine Revelations.1

Following are the heartbreaking and disgraceful remarks

Mirza made about Jesus’ family:

The family of Jesus was perfectly holy and immaculate.

Jesus’ three paternal and maternal grandmothers were

fornicators and prostitutes, from whose blood and body of Jesus
came into existence.
(Zamimah Anjam-i Atham)
Ruhani Khaza’in, Vol. 11, p. 291.

It is obvious that Mirza has spared no effort to malign the

perfection of Jesus by linking him with evil. It should be

28
remembered that Jesus did not have a parental genealogy like
other human beings. Thus the possibility of Jesus having paternal
grandmothers does not arise. By saying that Jesus had paternal
grandmothers Mirza is implying that Joseph was the biological
father of Jesus. Hence, this assertion of Mirza is tantamount to a
denial of the virgin birth as will also be demonstrated later in
other references.

The following quote will illustrate Mirza’s relentless

mission to prove that Jesus was worthless:

You may have tried to find a solution to the objection

(raised) about the Messiah’s paternal and maternal
grandmothers. I am tired of thinking (of a justification of this).
Up to now no nice solution has occurred to me. What a glorious
god he is whose paternal and maternal grandmothers are of such
repute!
(Nur al-Qur’an)
Ruhani Khaza’in, Vol. 9, p. 394.

As pointed out earlier, Jesus’ miraculous birth precludes

the possibility of his having any paternal grandmothers. But
these far reaching implications were neither important nor an
impediment for Mirza. Once he had concocted a framework for
debate with his contemporise, it did not matter to him whether
making such debasing accusations was sanctioned by Divine
teachings or not. Mirza could not restrain himself from making
these blasphemous remarks anyway, because these accusations
were well planned and thought out to enable him to eventually
portray himself as being superior to Jesus.

29
 Mary’s Pregnancy before Marriage

To disgrace Mary, Mirza writes:

And Mary’s eminence is such that she put off her

marriage for a long time, but then at the insistent pressure of the
leaders of the community, due to pregnancy, she married.
However people raise objections about how she could get
married while pregnant, (such marriages) being against the
teachings of the Torah. And people also question why (Mary)
breached the oath of celibacy. People also argue about why the
foundations of polygamy were laid (by this marriage). In other
words why did Mary agree to marry Joseph, the carpenter,
despite his already having a wife. But I would say (i.e. Mirza)
that all these were compelling circumstances. In this situation
they were to be pitied instead of considering their actions as
objectionable.
(Kashti-i Nuh)
Ruhani Khaza’in, Vol. 19, p. 18.

It should be pointed out that according to Christianity and

Islam, the birth of Jesus was not the result of Mary’s union with
any man. Therefore all the above mentioned hue and cry about
pregnancy before marriage is simply an attempt by Mirza to
accuse Mary of a great sin. Secondly, according to Christianity
Joseph was not already married as claimed by Mirza.

While coining another far-fetched theory about the

Afghans being in fact Israelites, Mirza cunningly blended in the
following remark that evidently disgraces Mary due to its
obvious implications. Mirza’s devious grafting of Biblical issues

30
to his vague theories and his subsequent concluding remarks and
inferences give rise to a heinous portrait of Jesus and his
illustrious mother. Mirza has clearly stated in his allegations,
that:

Mary’s going out with her fiancée Joseph before wedlock

is a strong witness of this Israelite custom. Going out with
fiancés amongst the noble ones in some frontier tribes has
exceeded the limits to such an extent that sometimes pregnancy
comes before wedlock, but is not looked down upon.
(Ayyam al-Sulh)
Ruhani Khaza’in, Vol. 14, p. 300.

Mirza has clearly implied in the above allegations that:

a. Mary the truthful, had an intimate relationship with her

fiancée before marriage, and used to go out with him and thus
became pregnant before marriage.
b. Mary was not a perfect believer because she broke her
pledge with God to remain a virgin. Not only did she break her
covenant but her marriage was also unlawful (according to
Mirza’s assertion) having been performed in the state of
pregnancy.
c. Mary’s engagement to Joseph, the carpenter, and her
marriage to him were unlawful (because of his already being
married). Therefore the conclusion that derives from Mirza’s
statement is that all four sons and both daughters of Mary the
Truthful were illegitimate (God forbid).

It should be pointed out that there is no Biblical reference

which proves that Joseph was already married. According to
Islam, Mary was never engaged or married Joseph whether or

31
not he had a wife. Jesus was the only offspring of Mary,
according to Christianity and Islam. Any Biblical reference to
Jesus’ brothers and sisters does not refer to real brothers and
sisters as claimed by Mirza. In order to prove that Mary was
unchaste and breached her covenant to remain celibate, Mirza
attributed six children to Mary:

Jesus the Messiah, had four brothers and two sisters; all
of them were his real brothers and real sisters. I mean that they
were the offspring of Joseph and Mary.
(Kashti-i-Nuh)
Ruhani Khaza’in, Vol. 19, p. 18.

Footnote
1. For example, God has revealed; Invite (people) to your Lords way with discretion and
kindly instruction, and discuss things with them in a polite manner (Qur’an 16: 125).
The life of the Prophet (s.a.w.) was a living example of this injunction. Despite many serious
accusations made by his contemporaries, he never retaliated by saying anything obscene in any
context. So much so that he never used foul language concerning idol worshippers or their false
deities.

32
 PART TWO

Conclusions &
The Virtues of Jesus

33
Chapter 6

Conclusions
When the Christians and Muslims objected to the
blasphemous writings and claims of Mirza Qadiani, he adopted
different positions to deceive the masses. By sometimes praising
Jesus and in the very next instant becoming downright
blasphemous; Mirza has tried to confuse the public. Therefore
much in the same way that Mirza had coined the theory of Jesus’
death in Kashmir, he concocted another hoax to explain that he
was insulting an imaginary Jesus. Sometimes he thrust the blame
for his insults on the Jews and at other times he justified his
meanness by saying that his insults were based on the Biblical
portrait of Jesus. He therefore cunningly misused1 the various
episodes of the Bible to arrive at horrendous conclusions. For
example, after a lengthy discussion of a Biblical commentary (as
outlined in Mathew 4:1-11 and Luke 4:1-13), Mirza had the
audacity to conclude:

Jesus had become insane due to epilepsy.

(Satt Bachan)
Ruhanim Khaza’in, Vol. 10, p. 295.

After elaborating the promiscuity of Europeans, Mirza

held Jesus responsible for it and said:

I wish such a person (Jesus) had not come to the world.

(Nur al-Qur’an)
Ruhani Khaza’in, Vol. 9, p. 417.

34
 In view of their heretical beliefs, the Muslim World has
unanimously declared ** the Ahmadiyya and Qadianis to be
non-Muslims. They are not to be confused with any sect within
Islam. They are therefore debarred from making the pilgrimage
to the Holy Ka’abah (the House of Worship in Makkah
constructed by Abrahim and Ismael (as)).

The followers of Mirza Qadiani maintain missionary

organisations in Europe and North America, where they wrongly
pose as Muslims to invite people to Islam. But what they actually
invite to has nothing to do with Islam and is no more than patent
disbelief. Mirza and his followers have themselves declared their
disassociation from Muslims and have conceded their total
departure from Islamic articles of faith.

It is clear beyond the shadow of a doubt that, regardless

of their verbal claims and attempts at outward hoax and disguise,
Mirza and his followers follow neither the teachings of
Christianity nor Islam.

They are confusing the public about Jesus in particular by

spreading the claims of Mirza Qadiani. The intelligentsia of
North America and Europe is therefore urged to understand this
problem and guard against this degrading and offensive Qadiani/
Ahmadiyya religion, whose followers are spreading in cites like
London, Paris, Los Angeles, San Francisco, New York, Toronto,
Montreal, Edmonton etc.

Footnote Continued

1. Another example is given here to give the reader an idea about the devious tricks of
Mirza. In this statement Mirza has attempted to justify his insults in another way:

The righteousness of Jesus in his time does not prove to be above that of the other righteous ones.
In fact the Prophet John the Baptist is superior to him, because he did not consume alcohol, nor

35
is it ever heard about him that any prostitute massaged his head with perfume purchased from,
her earnings, or touched his body with her hands and with her hair, or that any unrelated woman
served him. This is the very reason why God names John the Baptist as ‘Circumspect’ (Quran
3:39). But He did not give the Messiah this name because such (inglorious) episodes were
obstacles to giving him such a name.
(Dafi’ al-Bala)
Ruhani Khaza’in, Vol. 18, p. 220.

To conclude, the allegations Mirza has slandered against Jesus (as);

2. The Messiah was addicted to alcohol.

3. The prostitutes massaged his feet with perfume brought with the earnings of adultery.
4. The prostitute touched the Messiah’s body with her hands and hair.
5. An unrelated young woman served him.

In the words of Mirza, the Messiah was involved in these sins, and therefore was not
named Circumspect. The evil designs of Mirza against Jesus become obvious from the fact that
none of the exalted Prophets, e.g. Adam, Noah, Abraham, Isaac, Ismael, Solomon, David, Moses,
Jesus, Muhammad (Peace be upon them all) have been called Circumspect. What sins (God
forbid) were an obstacle to their being named Circumspect? By singling out Jesus, Mirza’s sin
was to demonstrate his own superiority over Jesus.

Even prior to this declaration of the Muslim World, Mirza and his successor have
always regarded those who did not believe in Mirza as disbelievers. Regardless of their verbal
clamis and hoax, it becomes clear from the statements of Mirza and his followers that they have
nothing to do with Islam and Muslims.

In a speech published in Al-Fadl dated July 30, 1931, Mirza Qadianii said: “It is
wrong to say that our differences with others are confined to the problem of the death of the
Messiah or to a few others doctrinal issues only”.

In another speech published in the same journal on August 21, 1917, under the caption
“Advice to Students”, Mirza Bashir-ud-Din son and successor of Mirza Qadiani told the students:

The Promised Messiah declared that their (Muslims) Islam is difference than that of
ours (Qadiani/ Ahmadis). Their God is different from our God. Our pilgrimage (too) is different
from their pilgrimage. In the same manner we (Qadiani/ Ahmadis) differ from them (Muslim) in
each and everything.

He further explained that the beliefs of the Ahmadiyya, Qadiani or Lahoris were
diametrically opposite to those of Muslims, by saying:

All Muslims who do not enter into allegiance with the Promised Messiah (Mirza
Qadiani) are disbelievers (kaffirs) and are outside the pale of Islam even though they might never
have heard of him.
(Aina-i-Sadaqat, p. 35)
(Dafi’ al-Bala)

36
 It is obligatory on us (Qadianis, Ahmadis and Lahoris) to consider non-Ahmadis as
non-Muslims and not to offer prayers behind them, because we consider them to be the
repudiators of one of the Prophets of God (i.e. Mirza Qadiani).

(Anwar-i-Khalifat, p. 90)

37
Chapter 7

Common Beliefs about Jesus

The emergence of false Messiahs and false
Prophets has been foretold both in the Christian and Islamic
sources. This helps us recognise pretenders by comparing them,
with the prophesied details about the Promised Messiah. Listed
below are the warnings about false prophets and Anti-Christs
according to Christianity and Islam:

Then if a man shall say unto you. Lo here is Christ, or

there; believe it not. For there shall arise false Christs and false
prophets, and shall show great signs and wonders; in so much
that if it were possible, they shall deceive the very elect.
St. Mathew Ch. 24:23, 24

And when he had spoken these things, while they beheld,

he was taken up; and a cloud received him out of their sight. And
while they looked steadfastly toward heaven as he went up,
behold, two men stood by them in white apparel; which also
said: Ye men of Galilee, why stand ye gazing up into heaven?
This same Jesus, shall so come in a like manner as ye seen him
go into heaven.
Acts of the Apostles Ch. 1: 9-11

God’s Messenger, Muhammad (S.A.W.) said: The

Doomsday will not befall till thirty Anti-Christs appear, each one
asserting to be the Prophet of God.

38
 God’s Messenger (S.A.W.) said: God will send the
Messiah, son of Mary. He will come down near the white tower
to the east of Damascus dressed in two red clothes, placing his
hands upon the wings of two angels…
Muslim, Tirmidhi

God’s Messenger (S.A.W.) said: Jesus has not died so far

as is.
Ibn Katheer

39
Chapter 8

The Virtues of Jesus:

The Beloved Messenger of God
No religion in the world, outside Christianity, makes it an
article of faith to believe in, love and honour, Jesus (peace be
upon him) except Islam. Indeed, a Muslim who renounces the
belief in Jesus (peace be upon him) renounces his faith as a
Muslim.

Lo! Those who disbelieve in God and His Messengers,

and seek to make distinction between God and His Messengers,
and say: We believe in some and disbelieve in others, and seek to
choose a way in between; Such are disbelievers in truth; and for
disbelievers We prepare a shameful doom.
(Qur’an 4:150-151)

Say: We believe in God and what is revealed to us and

what was revealed to Abraham and Ismael and Isaac and Jacob
and the tribes, and what was entrusted to Moses and Jesus and
the prophets from their Lord. We make no distinction between
any of them, and to Him we have surrendered.
(Qu’ran 3:84)

According to the Qu’ran (the word of God revealed

to His last Messenger, Prophet Muhammad (sallallahu alayhi
wasallam), Jesus (peace be upon him) was one of the greatest
five Messengers of God (Qu’ran 33:7 and 42:13).

40
 The story of Jesus (peace be upon him) in the Qu’ran
begins with praise for his mother and his family.

God selected Adam and Noah, Abraham’s House and

Imran’s House over (everyone in) the Universe. They were
descendants one of another. God is Alert, Aware. (Remember)
when the wife of Imran said: My Lord! I have vowed for You
whatever is within my womb. Accept it from me. See! You, only
You are the Hearer, the Knower! When she gave birth she said:
”My God I have given birth to a daughter.” - God was quite
Aware of what she had given birth to, for a male is not like a
female –“ I have named her Mary, and ask You to protect her
and her offspring from, Satan the Outcast”.

Her Lord accepted her in a handsome manner and

caused her to grow like a lovely plant, and appointed Zachariah
to take care of her. Every time Zachariah entered the sanctuary
to ‘see’ her, he found she had already been supplied with food.
He said: “Mary, Whence cometh unto you this (food)?” She
said: “It comes from god, for God provides for anyone He
wishes without any reckoning.”
(Qu’ran 3:33-37)

And when the angels said: O Mary! See! God has chosen
you and made you pure, and has preferred you above (all) the
women of creation. O Mary! Be obedient to your Lord, prostrate
yourself and bow with those who bow (in worship).
(Qur’an 3:42, 43)

The entire Qur’an is free from any statement that

may be constructed in any way to reflect negativity on Jesus
(p.b.u.h.). On the contrary, the Qur’an is replete with praises for

41
him as one of the greatest Prophets of God. His virgin birth is
clearly stated:

(And remember) when the angels said: O Mary! God

gives you glad tidings of a word from Him, whose name is a
Messiah, Jesus, son of Mary, illustrious in the world and the
Hereafter and one of those brought near (unto God).
He will speak to mankind in his cradle and in his
manhood, and he is of the righteous. She said: “My Lord, how
can I have a child while no human being have ever touched me?
“He said: So (it will be). God creates anything He wishes.
Whenever He decides upon some matter, He merely tells it:
“Be”, and it is.
(Qur’an 3:45 – 47)

The story is also told in the Surah of ‘Mary’ as follows:

And make mention of Mary in the Book, when she had

withdrawn from her people to a chamber looking East, and had
chosen seclusion from them. Then We sent to her Our spirit* and
it assumed for her the likeness of a perfect man. She said: I seek
refuge in the Compassionate One from you, if you are God-
fearing. He said: I am only a messenger of Your Lord, that I may
bestow on you a faultless son. She said: How can I have a son
when no mortal has touched me, neither have I have unchaste?
He said: So (it will be) Your Lord says: It is easy for Me. And (it
will be) that We may make of him a revelation for mankind and a
mercy from Us, and it is a thing ordained. And she conceived
him and she withdrew with him to a far place. And the pangs of
childbirth drove her to the trunk of a palm tree, She said: Oh,
would that I had become a thing of naught, forgotten! Then (one)
cried to her from below her, saying: Grieve not! Your Lord has

42
placed a rivulet beneath you. And shake the trunk of the palm
tree towards you. You will cause ripe dates to fall on you. So eat
and drink and be consoled. And if you meet any mortal, say: I
have vowed fast to the Compassionate, and may not speak this
day to any person.

She carried him back to her family. They said: Mary you
have brought something hard to believe! O sister of Aaron! Your
father was no evil man, nor was your mother a loose woman, She
pointed to him. They said: How can we talk to someone who is a
child in the cradle? He said: I am God’s servant. He has given
me a book and made me a Prophet. He has made me blessed
wherever I may be, and has enjoined on me prayer and aims-
giving so long as I remain alive. And (has made me) dutiful
toward her who bore me, and has not made me arrogant,
unblessed. Peace on me the day I was born, and the day I die,
and the day I shall be raised alive!
(Qur’an 19:16-32)

His miraculous birth is compared with that of John the

Baptist (Qur’an 19:19) and the creation of Adam from neither
male nor female intervention:

Jesus’ case with God was the same as Adam’s. He

created him from dust; then told him: ‘Be’ and he was.
(Qur’an 3:59)

Jesus is called a word from God (Qur’an 3:45), an

expression used to refer to John the Baptist and others (Qur’an
3:39; 2:117).

43
 He is called a spirit from God (Qur’an 4:171), a term
which is used elsewhere in the Qur’an to refer to others (e.g.
15:29 and 32:9). He is called a ‘pure child’ (Qur’an 19:19), a
term similar to that used in reference to another great Prophet;
John the Baptist (19:13). He is described as one who is honoured
in this life and in the hereafter and among those nearest to God
(Qur’an 3:45), that he was strengthened with the holy spirit,
Archangel Gabriel (2:87, 253; 16:102). The Qur’an indicates that
Jesus (p.b.u.h.) performed miracles with the permission of God.

I have brought you a sign from your Lord. I shall create

something in the shape of a bird for you out of clay, and blow
into it so it will become a ‘real’ bird with God’s permission. I
shall cure those who are blind from birth and lepers, and revive
the dead with God’s permission. I shall announce to you what
you eat and what you store up in your houses. That will serve as
a sign for you if you are believers.
(Qur’an 3:49)

The mission of Jesus (p.b.u.h.) was intended specifically

to the Israelites (3:39, 5:75, and 61:6). His teachings were the
same as all other Prophets, to worship God alone and to associate
none with Him in His Divine Attributes.

It is true that Muslims do not agree with their Christians

brethren that Jesus (p.b.u.h.) was God-Incarnate (God forbid).

It is also true that such honest differences are shared with

Muslims by many modern Christian theologians, multitudes of
lay Christians (privately), and even by some clergy men.

44
 What is not true, however, is that any of such differences
should be construed to express any disrespect to Jesus (peace be
upon him) or to belittle him. Any person claiming any allegiance
to Islam who believes otherwise is severing his relationship to
Islam and can no longer be part of the Muslim Ummah
(Community of believers). He (or she) would be violating the
clear word of God (the Qur’an) and disobeying the universal
Messenger to all mankind, Prophet Muhammad (p.b.u.h.) who
said:

I am closest (in love) to Jesus, the son of Mary in this life

and the hereafter.

Footnote:
* This refers to the Angel Gabriel.

45
 Bibliography
The New Testament
The Qur’an
A’ina-i-Kamalat (Ruhani Khaza’in*) by Mirza G. A. Qadiani
A’jaz-i-Ahmadi (Ruhani Khaza’in) by Mirza G. A. Qadiani
Anwar-i-Khalifat (Ruhani Khaza’in) by Mirza G. A. Qadiani
Ayyam al-Sulh (Ruhani Khaza’in) by Mirza G. A. Qadiani
Azalah-i-Auham (Ruhani Khaza’in) by Mirza G. A. Qadiani
Chahma-i-Masihi (Ruhani Khaza’in) by Mirza G. A. Qadiani
Dafi’ al-Bala (Ruhani Khaza’in) by Mirza G. A. Qadiani
Ittimam al-Hujjat (Ruhani Khaza’in) by Mirza G. A. Qadiani
Kashti-i-Nuh (Ruhani Khaza’in) by Mirza G. A. Qadiani
Haqiqat al-Wahi (Ruhani Khaza’in) by Mirza G. A. Qadiani
Nasim-i-Da’wat (Ruhani Khaza’in) by Mirza G. A. Qadiani
Nur al-Qur’an (Ruhani Khaza’in) by Mirza G. A. Qadiani
Satt Bachan (Ruhani Khaza’in) by Mirza G. A. Qadiani
Zamima Amjam-i-Atham (Ruhani Khaza’in) by Mirza G.A. Qadiani

* This 23 volumes set of the writings of Mirza Ghulam A. Qadiani was recently printed by Unwin
Brothers Limited. The Greesham Press, Old Woking, Surrey, England. Miza is addressed as The
Promised Messiah on the cover of each of threse books.

46