The Cost Reduction Challenge - April 09
The Cost Reduction Challenge - April 09
The Cost Reduction Challenge - April 09
The Market
• Credit crunch
• Recession
• Declining revenues
• Tighter margins
• Fixed cost base
• Negative returns for shareholders
• Cash flow
The Challenge
• Increase revenue/margin
• Reduce cost
• Generate cash
• Cost is the top challenge for CEO’s, followed by growing market share and
financing the business
• The turmoil has impacted investment plans and access to finance the most
• Survey reveals that businesses will have taken decisive action by the end of
2009 (this combines action taken in 2008 and planned action in 2009):
• Cost management is now the priority issue for the foreseeable future - fundamental re-
thinking regarding business strategies, operating models and cost structures will all be
necessary
• The baseline for cost analysis must be aligned to current forecast revenues
• An understanding of the true profitability of each business is essential
• The cost focus must be enterprise wide
• Many organizations confuse “cost postponement” with total cost management
• A well organized end-to-end program is needed
• Consistent investment in cost control is required
• The tone at the top is key
• An executive dashboard is required to monitor results
April 23, 2009
PricewaterhouseCoopers Slide 4
Cost Reduction Cost Control Culture
Agenda Strategy
KPIs’ / Metrics
Role of Finance
Profit & Loss
Balance Sheet
Revenue
Funding
Cost of Sales Sourcing
Receivables
Margin structures
Payables
Procurement
Inventory
Op Ex
VAT
Tax
End-to-end processes
IT Systems
• Revenue / Margin
• People Costs
• Supply Chain
• Procurement Spend
• Finance
• Cash Management
• IT
• Structures
• Metrics
• Project Management
REVENUE / MARGIN:
PEOPLE COSTS:
2. Procure to Pay
1. Supplier 2. Raise 3. Receive 4. Receive 5. Pay 6. Manage 7. Pay
Set-up requisition Goods Invoice Invoice Supplier Expenses
3. Record to Report
1. Financial 2. Record & 3. Journalise 4. Run period 5. Prepare
Data Mgt Validate Data transactions end procedures Financial &
MI reports
10 minutes
Process
Work Time
NoTime
Deadline? Yes
Wait
To add new PID
To PAP meeting
agenda
4 days
Tuesday
PAP meeting
10 minutes
assigned
And reviews
ASD request
7 days
Review of ASD
Capacity Review
10 minutes
Pi deletes
PID in
Milestone
and notifies
client
5 minutes
1213
hours
days26
Cancel
PID
2 hours
minutes
7 days
Yes
No
Direction given
By
PAP Board
PAP Board
Review PID
No ASD Capacity
Review
Complete?
Approval? Yes
Pi submits Yes
PID is reviewed PID status
ASD Capacity PID to local CIT
Updates Board for At Weekly PID approved? Changed to
CIT Board Approved in
Demand plan review
meeting Milestone
55 minutes
minutes No
5 minutes 2 days
5 minutes
PID Cancel PID
Update PID to be
Returned to
PI for updated Or
Requested cancelled?
updates
April 23, 2009
PricewaterhouseCoopers 15 minutes Slide 11
New Process Flow
ASD gathers
Time Removed
PI reviews PID request PI sends
Information No back to ASD
And requests PID request Meets PID
initiation requesting to ---11
18
20 Days
Days
4 Days
a complete required
Requirements?
PID be opened information
Via email 15 minutes - -26
36min
15
16 min
60 minutes Yes 1 minute
Pi submits Yes
PID is reviewed PID status
ASD Capacity PID to local CIT
Updates Board for At Weekly PID approved? Changed to
CIT Board Approved in
Demand plan review
meeting Milestone
5 minutes No
5 minutes 2 days
5 minutes
PID Cancel PID
Update PID to be
Returned to
PI for updated Or
Requested cancelled?
updates
April 23, 2009
PricewaterhouseCoopers 15 minutes Slide 12
New Process Flow
No 5 minutes
PID
Returned to to be
PI for updated Or
Requested
updates Time Saved
Update PID cancelled?
Pi deletes
PID in ASD Capacity
Updates
Milestone
and notifies Demand plan
client
5 minutes
5 minutes
SUPPLY CHAIN:
No clear visibility of the value chain – sales to cost of sales to inventory to margin;
PROCUREMENT / SPEND:
No external
benchmarking
Procurement of practices or
Conflicting does not costs
priorities in the Procurement
follow best
business activities are
practice
not aligned
How do we
manage
Strategy People Process Systems procurement
more
efficiently?
A lot of effort is
being drained …
• Strategy/vision is not • No alignment of • No formal supplier • Procurement processes
aligned with overall Procurement assessment are supported by
business accountabilities • Lack of consistent manual, paper based
• Limited strategic • Central procurement processes across the systems
partnerships with initiatives are not business • Procurement not
suppliers supported locally • No formal receipting of integrated with other
• No leverage of group • Limited capabilities for goods or services to business systems
purchasing power procurement best support invoice matching • Procurement system
• Procurement has low practice • Large supplier base (for does not provide access
to key data
profile, viewed as safety) including ‘one-time Procurement
tactical vendors’
Efficiency
FINANCE:
Lack of cost transparency – visibility of profitability; value for spend; hidden cost?;
To bring a greater focus on delivering insight to the business the roles that are undertaken by a high
performing Finance function are changing from that of Scorekeeper to Caretaker and from Commentator to
Business Partner
Business Skills
Commentator Value adding activities
Business Partner
Reactive Proactive
eg Automate &
Seek process efficiency eg Monitor Service Level Agreements
Current Profile
Target Profile
April 23, 2009
PricewaterhouseCoopers Slide 19
Key Challenges
CASH MANAGEMENT:
IT:
STRUCTURES:
•Deploy IT Systems
• Create Center of
Excellence •Retain Capability to
Meet Business Needs
• Eliminate Duplicate Job
Activities •Enhance Control
Environment
• Leverage Scale
Centralize Standardize •Provide Consistent &
• Allow Business to Accurate Information
Focus on More
Strategic Needs •Strengthen Business
Colleague Continuity Plan
Engagement
People & Satisfaction
• Value added
Realize the Implement
• Increase Automation
Reporting Benefits Best Practices • Utilize Benchmarking
• Enhance Customer Focus
• Deploy desk
• Share Support for Technology/ Tools
Mergers & Acquisitions
• Implement Major
• Provide Risk Mitigation Process Improvements
• Flawless Control • Leverage Multiple
Environment Locations
April 23, 2009
PricewaterhouseCoopers Slide 23
Why choose Outsourcing?
si n
st
Increased control
Bu
During turbulent economic
Share Risks conditions
Agility
Function May Be
Difficult
To Manage
rce
Se
Access To World-Class
vi c
ou
Improve Services Capabilities
s
r
e Re
Transparent
Service Standards
Resources Not
Available Internally
METRICS:
Dynamic?
- indicators to guide the reader
- focussed rather than full detail
- simple graphics
PROJECT MANAGEMENT:
• Involve everyone
• No ‘sacred cows’
• Spend every dollar as if it were your last – get value from money spent
Thank You!
Garrett Cronin
01 792 8807
[email protected]