g

GER-4206

GE Power Systems

Combined-Cycle Development Evolution and Future

David L. Chase GE Power Systems Schenectady, NY

Combined-Cycle Development Evolution and Future

Contents
Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 Gas Turbine Combined-Cycle Features . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 Gas Turbine Combined-Cycle Development . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 First Generation Combined-Cycle Plants . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 Second Generation Combined-Cycle Plants . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 Third Generation Combined Cycles . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 Fourth Generation Combined-Cycle Plants . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 List of Figures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 List of Tables . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13

GE Power Systems GER-4206 (10/00)

s s

Combined-Cycle Development Evolution and Future

GE Power Systems GER-4206 (10/00)

s s

ii

Combined-Cycle Development Evolution and Future

Introduction
Combined-cycle systems utilizing the Brayton Cycle gas turbine and the Rankine Cycle steam system with air and water as working fluids achieve efficient, reliable, and economic power generation. Flexibility provided by these systems satisfies both utility-power generation and industrial-cogeneration applications. Current commercially available power-generation combined-cycle plants achieve net plant thermal efficiency typically in the 5055% LHV range. Further development of gas turbine, high-temperature materials and hot gas path, metal surface cooling technology show promise for near-term future power generation combined-cycle systems capable of reaching 60% or greater plant thermal efficiency. Additional gas turbine technological development, as well as increases in steam-cycle pressure and temperature and steam-turbine stage-design enhancement, is expected to achieve further STAG combined-cycle efficiency improvement. Current General Electric STAG (trade name designation for the GE product line of combined-cycle systems) product line offerings, combined-cycle experience, and advanced system development are used to demonstrate the evolution of combined-cycle system technology. Combined-cycle systems that utilize steam and air-working fluids have achieved widespread commercial application due to: 1. High thermal efficiency through application of two complementary thermodynamic cycles. 2. Heat rejection from the Brayton Cycle (gas turbine) at a temperature that can be utilized in a simple and efficient manner. 3. Working fluids (water and air) that are readily available, inexpensive, and non-toxic. These combined-cycle systems provide flexibility with features that include: 1. High Thermal Efficiency - Combinedcycle thermal efficiency is higher than that of other conventional power generation systems. 2. Low Installed Cost - Combined-cycle equipment is pre-engineered and factorypackaged to minimize installation time and cost. All major equipment (gas turbine generator, heat recovery steam generator [HRSG], and steam turbine generator) is shipped to the field as assembled and tested components. Auxiliary equipment, such as condensers, can be shipped factory-tubed and hydrotested. This greatly reduces the inventory of parts that must be managed in the field and minimizes installation cost. Combined-cycle equipment cost is higher than that for conventional steam plants due to pre-engineering; however, combined-cycle plant installation costs are significantly lower, resulting from the reduced installation cycle. 3. Fuel Flexibility - Combined-cycle plants operate efficiently by burning a 1

Gas Turbine Combined-Cycle Features

The combination of the gas turbine Brayton Cycle and the steam power system Rankine Cycle complement each other to form efficient combined-cycles. The Brayton Cycle has high source temperature and rejects heat at a temperature that is conveniently used as the energy source for the Rankine Cycle. The most commonly used working fluids for combined cycles are air and steam. Other working fluids (organic fluids, potassium vapor, mercury vapor, and others) have been applied on a limited scale. GE Power Systems GER-4206 (10/00)
s s

Combined-Cycle Development Evolution and Future

wide range of fuels, ranging from clean natural gas and distillate oil fuels to ashbearing crude oil and residual oil fuels. Operation with coal-derived gas fuels has been applied in many commercial-size, combined-cycle systems. 4. Flexible Duty Cycle - Combined-cycle systems provide flexibility in operation for both baseload and mid-range duty with daily startup. Gas turbines in multishaft, combined-cycle configuration can be started quickly, bringing about twothirds of plant power on-line, typically in models, enabling high efficiency operation at part load through reduction in turbine airflow. This is accomplished at nearly constant turbine exhaust temperature, so that design steam conditions and low stack loss can be maintained to provide excellent part-load efficiency. 5. Short-Installation Cycle - Combinedcycle plants can be installed and operated in less time than that required for conventional steam plants. Again, this is primarily due to the pre--engineering

Figure 1. STAG 209E combined-cycle part load performance less than 60 minutes. Combined-cycle plants also provide efficient operation at part load, particularly for multiple gas turbine combined-cycle systems. This is illustrated by the variation in plant output with variation in plant heat rate curve shown for a General Electric STAG 200 system (See Figure 1). Modulating compressor inlet guide vanes are standard features of many gas turbine GE Power Systems GER-4206 (10/00)
s s

and packaging of major components in the factory. Phased installation of the plant, when gas turbines are installed and op-erated in the simple-cycle mode during the steam-cycle equipment installation, enables the user to generate power and revenue in as little as a year from order date (See Figures 24). A typical combined-cycle plant installation schedule is presented in Figure 5. 2

Combined-Cycle Development Evolution and Future

6. High Reliability/Availability - High reliability operation results from evolutionary design development that improves parts and components, and quality manufacturing programs that offer operational factory testing. High availability is achieved through development of sound operation and maintenance practices, which reside principally with the user. Manufacturer experi-ence and recommendations also contribute to this feature. 7. Low Operation and Maintenance Costs - Low operation and maintenance

Figure 2. Six MS7001B gas turbines

Figure 3. Two STAG 407B combined-cycle steam system installation GE Power Systems GER-4206 (10/00)
s s

Combined-Cycle Development Evolution and Future

Figure 4. Two STAG 407B combined cycle

Figure 5. Typical project schedule costs are achieved through quality design, prudent operation, and equipment design that allow convenient access for component inspection. 8. High Efficiency in Small Capacity Increments - Gas turbine generators are designed and manufactured in discrete frame sizes. For example, the General Electric heavy-duty, gas turbine-packaged power plant product line includes the MS6001B (50 Hz and 60 Hz), MS7001 FA (60 Hz), MS7001B (60 Hz) and the MS9001 FA (50 Hz) units, which cover an output range of approximately 37 MW to 250 MW. Application of these gas turbine models in combined-cycle

GE Power Systems GER-4206 (10/00)

s s

Combined-Cycle Development Evolution and Future

systems as single or multiple gas turbine and HRSG installations can provide from about 50 MW to several thousand megawatts of power generation at essentially constant plant thermal efficiency. tion in 1952. The heat recovery economizers applied in these systems used bare tubes, as was typical of heat exchangers in combined-cycle systems installed prior to 1959. Most combined-cycle power generation systems installed during the 1950s and early 1960s included conventional-fired boilers. These systems were basically adaptations of conventional steam plants with the gas turbine exhaust gas serving as combustion air for the boiler. The efficiency of this type of combined cycle was approximately 56% higher than that of a similar conventional steam plant. These systems could economically utilize bare tubes in the boiler because of the high mean temperature difference between the combustion products and the water/steam. The repowering of steam power plants with gas turbine generators and HRSGs is still attractive in many applications today as evidenced by the recent Colorado Public Service, Fort St. Vrain installation, which was placed in commercial operation in 1999. The summary presented in Table 1 characterizes the first generation combined-cyle systems.

Gas Turbine Combined-Cycle Development

The commercial development of combined-cycle systems has proceeded in parallel with gas turbine development. We are presently in the third generation technology of combined-cycle systems and are at the launch point of the fourth generation.

First Generation Combined-Cycle Plants

The first gas turbine installed in an electric utility in the United States was applied in a combined cycle. This was a 3.5 MW gas turbine that used the energy from the exhaust gas to heat feedwater for a 35 MW conventional steam unit. The gas turbine is shown in Figure 6. A schematic showing the combined-cycle system is shown in Figure 7. This system entered service in June 1949, and a similar system was added to this sta-

Figure 6. Gas turbine in first power generation combined cycle GE Power Systems GER-4206 (10/00)
s s

Combined-Cycle Development Evolution and Future

BOILERS

STEAM TB GAS TB GEN STACK COND G.T. EXHAUST G G GAS TB

STEAM TB

GEN

COND

FEEDWATER HEATERS BF PUMPS

LP HEATER

Figure 7. OG&E Belle Isle feedwater heating repowering system cycle diagram

Second Generation Combined-Cycle Plants

Equipment that made it economically feasible to weld continuous spiral fins to tubes was introduced to boiler manufacturers in 1958. Heat recovery combined cycles, using the sensible heat in the gas turbine exhaust gas, were made feasible by the enhanced gas-side heat transfer using finned tubes. Combined-cycle systems with finned tube boilers entered service in 1959. During the 1960s the application of the heat recovery type of combined-cycle systems became more prevalent. Its initial application was in power and heat applications where its power-to-heat ratio was more favorable. Also, a small number of the heat recovery type combined cycles were installed in utility power generation applications during the 1960s. Application of these systems in the 1970s and 1980s established the heat recovery feedwater heating combined-cycle as a mature technology for baseload and mid-range service. The summary presented in Table 1 characterizes

the first generation systems. Table 2 and Table 3 represent second generation characteristics and experience. The requirements for stack gas NOx emission control was initially legislated during the late 1970s. The first systems utilized gas turbine water or steam injection to meet new source performance standards of 75 ppmvd at 15% oxygen with efficiency and fuel-bound nitrogen adjustments. Combined-cycle plants utilized steam from the steam cycle for NOx control because this had the least impact on plant efficiency. As emission requirements became more stringent, it was necessary to apply SCR to augment NOx abatement (TEPCO Groups I and II). Application of SCR systems became common in Japan and in the USA in the mid-1980s.

Third Generation Combined Cycles

The first and second generation combinedcycles were configured using gas turbine designs that were optimized for simple-cycle output and efficiency. Gas turbine design optimization for simple-cycle and for combinedcycle output and thermal efficiency is illustrated

GE Power Systems GER-4206 (10/00)

s s

Combined-Cycle Development Evolution and Future

Gas Turbine Application Steam Cycle Emission Control Fuel Small Size ( Frame 3000 & 5000) Repowering & Cogeneration from 1949 - 1968 Non-reheat, Single or Two Pressure None Distillate Oil / Natural Gas

Table 1. Gas turbine in first power generation combined cycle

Gas Turbine Application Steam Cycle Emission Control

50-90 MW Capacity (MS6000B, MS7000B/C/E and MS9000B/E Heat Recovery Feedwater Heating CC from 1968-1999 Non-reheat, Single, Two & Three Pressure GT Water and Steam Injection plus Selective Catalytic Reduction System (SCR) Installed in the HRSG Gas Path for NOx Control Natural Gas / Distillate Oil / Low Btu Gas / Oils

Fuel Heavy

Table 2. Second generation combined-cycle system characteristics in Figure 8 performance maps as a function of firing temperature and pressure ratio parameters. Specific power (i.e., output per pound of airflow) is important since the higher the value, the smaller the gas turbine required for design power output. The importance of thermal efficiency is obvious since it directly impacts the operating fuel cost. Figure 8 illustrates a number of significant points. 1. Where simple-cycle efficiency is the goal, high pressure ratio is desirable. 2. Where combined-cycle efficiency is the objective, more modest pressure ratios are selected. 3. Firing temperature has a greater impact on combined-cycle efficiency than simple-cycle efficiency. Fuel price escalation in the 1970s and 1980s further increased the need for more efficient power plants for base- and mid-range service. This led to gas turbine designs in the late 1980s that were optimized specifically for combinedcycle efficiency.

GE Power Systems GER-4206 (10/00)

s s

Combined-Cycle Development Evolution and Future

Country USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA Korea USA Taiwan USA Mexico Trinidad USA Japan USA USA Korea USA Saudi Arabia Saudi Arabia Second Generation 60 Hz. STAG Combined Cycle Experience Installation Configuration COD Total (MW) Wolverine Electric S105 * 1968 21 City of Ottawa S103 * 1969 11 City of Clarksdale S105 * 1972 21 City of Hutchinson S103 * 1972 11 Duquesne Power & Light S307B 1974 330 Houston Power & Light 2 x S407B 1994 574 Salt River Project 4 x S107B * 1974 290 Ohio Edison S207B 1974 225 Jersey Central S407B 1974 340 Arizona Public Service 3 x S107C * 1976 250 Iowa Illinois G&E Co. S405LA * 1977 105 Puerto Rico WRA 2 x S407B * 1977 606 Western Farmers 3 x S107E 1977 278 Portland GE S607B 1977 550 Korea Electric 2 x S407B 1979 640 MMWEC S307E 1983 360 Taiwan Power Co. 2 x S307E 1983 570 SCE Cool Water IGCC S107E 1984 120 CFE Mexico S407E 1984 375 Trinidad and Tobago S207E 1995 198 City of Fayetteville S605P 1988 189 Chubu Electric Power Co. 5 x S107E * 1988 577 Ocean States Power 2 x S207EA 1990 480 TECO Power Services S207EA 1992 250 Pyong Taek S407EA 1994 531 Mission Gordonsville 2 x S107EA 1995 240 PP9 4 x S407EA 1999 1284 Rabigh S407EA 2000 383

Number of gas turbines Installed Capacity

= 115 Units = 9,809 MW

Country Argentina Japan China Pakistan Japan Egypt Austria Indonesia Egypt Indonesia Turkey Malaysia China Pakistan Ghana

Second Generation 50 Hz. STAG Combined Cycle Experience Installation Configuration COD Total (MW) EMSA S205P 1984 65 TEPCO, Futtsu #1 7 x S109E * 1986 1155 MPI Lama Dien II S106B * 1986 50 WAPDA 2 x S209E 1986 623 TEPCO, Futtsu #2 7 x S109E * 1988 1155 Egyptian Electric Authority 2 x S 405P 1988 300 ESG Linz S206B 1993 77 PLN-Maura Karang S309E 1995 500 EEA Cairo South S109E 1994 180 PLN-Tambrok Lorok 2 x S309E 1996 1000 Colakoglu S209E 1996 370 TNB/Melaka S209E 1998 340 Wenzhou S209E 1999 313 Uch S309E 2000 560 Vra/Takaradi S209E 2000 337

Number of gas turbines Installed Capacity

= 52 units = 7,052 MW

Table 3. Second generation combined-cycle experience The GE F Technology gas turbine designed in the 1980s, with pressure ratio of about 14:1 and 2400F firing temperature was the result of a design effort aimed at optimization for combined-cycle peak efficiency rather than simplecycle peak efficiency. The fleet leader F Technology gas turbine entered commercial operation in 1990 in a combined-cycle installation at the Virginia Power Chesterfield site and launched the third generation of combined-cycle systems.

GE Power Systems GER-4206 (10/00)

s s

Combined-Cycle Development Evolution and Future

Figure 8. Gas turbine performance thermodynamics The third generation F Technology combined-cycle experience is summarized in Table 4 and system characteristics are defined in Table 5. The trend of combined-cycle plant efficiency improvement is illustrated by Figure 9, which shows the performance of selected STAG plant installations as a function of commercial operating date. Gas turbine development has had the greatest impact on improved combinedcycle efficiency due primarily to the increase in firing temperature made possible through the development of high-temperature oxidation/ corrosion-resistant metals and coatings, and advanced metal surface cooling techniques. Another important factor is that the gas turbine contributes about two-thirds of the combinedcycle plants power. Advances in steam system technology have also contributed to improved combined-cycle efficiency. The significant steam-cycle developments include: 1. Technology to weld continuous spiral fins on HRSG heat transfer tubes (1959). 2. Application of larger annulus area steam turbine designs for low exhaust pressure applications. GE Power Systems GER-4206 (10/00)
s s

3. Application of reheat steam cycle with F Technology gas turbines. The current STAG product line ratings, which represent third generation combined-cycle capability, is summarized in Figure 10.

Fourth Generation Combined-Cycle Plants

Further gas turbine materials development and hot gas path cooling technology advances, as well as higher temperature and pressure steam cycles, will continue the trend for more efficient combined-cycle systems in the future. Gas turbines installed in the first, second and third generation combined-cycle plants are configured with open-loop cooling of the turbine hot gas path and cooling air supplied from the compressor. Hot gas path components are in large part cooled by film cooling. As a result, there is significant exhaust gas temperature drop across the first stage nozzle, and significant chargeable air required to cool down the steam turbine stages. The drop in exhaust gas temperature across the first stage nozzle and the increase in chargeable cooling loss due to increases in turbine firing temperature may diminish efficiency gains to the point of being uneconomical. For this reason, the GE fourth 9

Combined-Cycle Development Evolution and Future

60 Hz. STAG Combined Cycle Experience with F Technology Gas Turbine Country Installation Configuration COD Output (MW) USA Virginia Power #7 S107F 1990 214 USA Virginia Power #8 S107F 1992 218 Korea KEPCO Seo-Inchon #1 & #2 8 x S107F 1992 1887 USA Sithe Independence 2 x S207FA 1995 1062 USA Tampa Electric, Polk Co. S107FA 1996 313 Korea KEPCO Seo-Inchon #3 & #4 2 x S207FA 1996 1004 USA US Gen. Co., Hermiston 2 x S107FA 1996 425 USA Crockett Cogen S107FA * 1996 202/248 Mexico CFE Samalayuca 3 x S107FA * 1998 506 USA Cogentrix, Clark Co. S107FA * 1998 254 USA Ft. St. Vrain S207FA 1999 487 Korea KEPCO, POSCO S207FA 1999 498 Columbia EPM LaSierra S207FA 2001 478 USA Bucksport Energy S107FA 2001 176 USA Westbrook S207FA 2001 528 USA Santee Cooper S207FA 2001 600 Korea Pusan 4 x S207FA 2003/4 2000

Number of gas turbines Installed Capacity

= 2 Units = 12,411 MW

50 Hz. STAG Combined Cycle Experience with F Technology Gas Turbine Country Installation Configuration COD Output (MW) Japan TEPCO, Yokahama 8 x S109FA * 1996/7 2800 China China Power & Light 8 x S109FA * 1996/72 2731 Japan TEPCO, Chiba 4 x S109FA * 1998 1440 India Enron, Dabhol I S209FA 1998 698 Chile Renca S109FA 1998 370 Netherlands AKZO, Delesto S109FA * 1999 364 U.K. Sutton Bridge S209FA 1999 800 Thailand Ratchaburi 3 x S209FA 2000 2130 Argentina Central Puerto S209FA 2000 769 Japan Hitachi Zosen S106FA 1999 106 U.K. Tri-Energy S209FA 2000 700 U.K. Great Yarmouth S109FA * 2001 407 India Enron, Dabhol II 2 x S209FA 2001 1600 Japan TEPCO, Futtsu 3 4 x S109FA * 2002 1590 Spain Castellon S209FA 2002 285 * Single-shaft Combined Cycle

Number of gas turbines Stalled capacity

= =

50 units 17,795 MW

Table 4. Third generation combined-cycle experience

Gas Turbines Application Steam Cycle Emission Control

70-250 MW (MS6001FA, MS7001FA, MS9001EC and MS9001FA) Heat Recovery Feedwater Heating CC in the 1990s Reheat, Three Pressure DLN Combustion with Natural Gas and Water / Steam Injection with Oil Fuels plus SCR Installed in the HRSG Natural Gas / Distillate Oil / Low Btu Gas

Fuel

Table 5. Third generation combined-cycle system characteristics GE Power Systems GER-4206 (10/00)
s s

10

Combined-Cycle Development Evolution and Future

Combined-Cycle Illustration
1. City of Clarksdale (S105) 2. Houston L&P, Wharton Station (S407B) 3. Salt River (S107E) 4. Western Farmers (S107E) 5. MMWEC (S307E) 6. CFE Mexico (S307E) 7. Chubu (S107E) 8. VP Chesterfield (S107F) 9. KEPCO, Seo Inchon (S107F) 10. Sithe, Independence (S207FA) 11. Sutton Bridge (S209FA) 12. KEPCO, Seo Inchon (S207FA)

Combined Cycle Plant Efficiency (Percent)

60 55 50 45
40

(12) (9) (8) (7) (6) (4) (5) (10)

(11)

(2) 35 (1) 30 1970

(3)

1980

1990

2000

Plant Commercial Operation Date

Figure 9. Combined-cycle system efficiency trend

Notes: 1. Site Conditions: 59F, 14.7 Psia , 60% Rh 2. Fuel is Natural Gas 3. Steam Turbine Exhaust Pressure: 1.2 inches Hg,a

60 59 58 57 56 55 54 53 52 51 50 49 48 47 46 0

Net Efficiency (percent LHV)

Third Generation F F Technology Gas Turbines Reheat, Three Pressure Steam Cycle

S107FB (60Hz) S107FA (60Hz) S109FA (50Hz)

S106FA (50Hz & 60Hz) S107EA (60Hz)

S109EC (50Hz) S109E (50Hz) Second Generation B And E Technology Gas Turbines Non-Reheat, Three-Pressure SteamCycle

S106B (50Hz & 60Hz)

Net plant Output (MW) 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500

Figure 10. Current STAG product line ratings generation plants with H Technology gas turbines will be configured with an integrated closed-loop steam cooling system (See Figure 11). This system allows higher turbine firing temperature to be achieved without increasing combustion temperature. This is because exhaust gas temperature drop across the first stage nozzle is significantly reduced as outlined in Figure 12. Another important benefit of the integrated closed-loop steam cooling system is the elimination of chargeable cooling air for the first and second stage rotating and stationary airfoils. This GE Power Systems GER-4206 (10/00)
s s

technology is expected to provide two percentage points thermal efficiency improvement. The H platform gas turbine combined-cycle plants are expected to achieve 60% LHV thermal efficiency in the first half of this decade. The application of ceramic hot gas path parts and coatings show promise for further future performance gains. Steam cycle improvements that include increased steam pressure and temperature with supercritical steam cycles have near-term applica11

Combined-Cycle Development Evolution and Future

Fue l

Fu el He a tin g S ys te m

H e at Re c ov e ry S te a m G e ne r ato r

To S ta ck

C oo lin g A ir C oo ling S y st e m

A ttem p

F il te r

HP

IP

LP

LP

G en er a tor

F e ed w a ter Pu m p

G a s Tu rb in e
L E G E ND S te a m W a te r E x ha u s t Air Fu e l
A ir T re atm en t

S te a m Tu rb in e C oo lin g W a te r

Deaerating Condenser
Filter A

Ai r Co nd en sa te P u m p

Filter B C on de ns a te Fil te r

G la n d S ea l Co nd e n se r

Figure 11. S107H/S109H cycle diagram tion. Current economic analysis indicates, however, that the thermodynamic gain associated with steam cycles that have steam temperatures and pressures above the current levels (1050F and 1400 PSIG to 1800 PSIG) cannot be justified in most cases because of the added costs. As in the past, operating cost (fuel price) and the cost of new technology development will dictate the trend for increased combined-cycle efficiency.

Figure 12. Impact of stage one nozzle cooling method GE Power Systems GER-4206 (10/00)
s s

12

Combined-Cycle Development Evolution and Future

References
D.L. Chase and P.T. Kehoe, Combined-Cycle Product Line and Performance, GER-3574F. C.E. Maslak and L.O. Tomlinson, Combined-Cycle Experience, GER-3651E. H.E. Miller, F Technology - The First Half Million Operating Hours, GER-3950. Frank Brooks, GE Heavy-Duty Gas Turbine Performance Characteristics, GER-3567G. P.W. Schilke, Advanced Gas Turbine Materials and Coatings, GER-3569F. J. Cofer, J.K. Reinker and W.J. Sumner, Advances in Steam Path Technologies, GER-3713D. D.L. Chase and L.B. Davis, Current Review of Combined-Cycle Technology - Pacific Coast Electrical Association, 1988.

List of Figures
Figure 1. STAG 209E combined-cycle part load performance Figure 2. Six MS7001B gas turbines Figure 3. Two STAG 407B combined-cycle steam system installation Figure 4. Two STAG 407B combined cycle Figure 5. Typical project schedule Figure 6. Gas turbine in first power generation combined cycle Figure 7. OG&E Belle Isle feedwater heating repowering system cycle diagram Figure 8. Gas turbine performance thermodynamics Figure 9. Combined-cycle system efficiency trend Figure 10. Current STAG product line ratings Figure 11. S107H / S109H cycle diagram Figure 12. Impact of stage one nozzle cooling method

List of Tables
Table 1. Gas turbine in first power generation combined cycle Table 2. Second generation combined-cycle system characteristics Table 3. Second generation STAG power generation experience Table 4. Third generation combined-cycle experience Table 5. Third generation combined-cycle system characteristics

GE Power Systems GER-4206 (10/00)

s s

13

Combined-Cycle Development Evolution and Future

GE Power Systems GER-4206 (10/00)

s s

14