Indian Premier League Case Study
Indian Premier League Case Study
Indian Premier League Case Study
AGENDA
INTRODUCTION TO INDIAN PREMIER LEAGUE CONCEPT BOARD OF CONTROL FOR CRICKET IN INDIA (BCCI) COMPOSITION OF THE BCCI ANALYSIS OF INCOME GENERATION & DISTRIBUTION IPL AND MAURITIUS CONNECTION TAX EXEMPTIONS TO THE BCCI TAX BENEFITS TO BCCI FORMATION OF IPL TEAMS- FRANCHISES AND RULES TAX EXEMPTIONS TO ICC TAXABILITY OF THE IPL INCOME TAX ASSESSMENT OF IPL IMPLICATIONS AS A RESULT OF IPL-2 SHIFTING TO SOUTH AFRICA 2013 INDIAN PREMIER LEAGUE FUNDING PATTERNS OF TEAMS
How does IPL make money? Auction of broadcasting rights Title sponsorship and corporate sponsorship Sale of tickets (20% of tickets allocated to IPL) Auction of franchisees rights Official umpires sponsorships
The franchises' lifeline is their share of the central revenue generated by the IPL from the collective sale of broadcast and sponsorship rights. Central sponsorship is distributed to teams through a complex formula a team's league standing has a bearing on what the franchise receives - and the average annual figure is approximately Rs 50 crores ($9m) per franchise. Given that there is a difference in revenue distribution of approximately Rs 1 crore (about $180,000) between each of the nine ranks in the league standings, the margin of earnings between the IPL winners and the bottom-placed team works out to about Rs 9 crore. A franchise team has to strenuously work the assets available to it. Selling branding space on team uniforms is a major revenue stream. Logo branding has obvious media value, given live television coverage; everything starts with the team shirt. Each franchise sells as many as ten properties on its team uniform. If marketed well, this could raise close to Rs 60 crores ($10m). The big money comes from the main team sponsor slot - the 206 square cm space across the front of the shirt, which can fetch about Rs 20 crores ($3m) per year. The six other logo spaces on a team jersey are expensive; the ones on the trousers and helmet fetch lower prices. Other licensing arrangements - which involve the use of the franchise's logo - come at more affordable prices (around 50 lakh or $92,000 a year). Ticket revenue from home matches form another chunk of revenue. Some teams, Mumbai, Chennai and Delhi among them, will target ticket sales in excess of Rs 40 crores ($725,000) this season. (This is after 20% of the ticket inventory has already been given, as part of the franchise contract, to the IPL.).
How is the IPL income distributed? Share of broadcasting money with franchisees Share of sponsorship money with franchisees Share of ticket money with franchisees Inauguration expenses Prize money: $5 million ($3 million for winner; $2 million divided among others)
What are the sources of income for an IPL Franchisee (ROI)? Share in revenue from broadcast rights (equal share for all franchisee after IPLs share) Share in sponsorship money (60% of the amount distributed equally) Share in revenue from sale of tickets Revenue from in-stadium advertising Sale of players to other franchisee Revenue from own sponsorship and corporate sponsorship How is the Franchisee income distributed? Franchisee fees 10% of total franchisee costs every year to IPL Players cost (Each franchise have paid around $4-6 million per year, $9 million this year) Match fees and Inauguration expenses Rent of stadium (expense of around Rs.2.5mn per match) Marketing and promotional cost (around $3-4mn per team) Fee for coaches, physiotherapists and other members. Administrative cost
Returned Income: Rs. (-) 57, 71, 81,762 (After claiming Exemption of Rs.216, 64, 24,924/- , u/s 11 of the Income Tax Act) On being asked by the Committee as to when the process for withdrawing the exemption was initiated and what the genesis for initiating these proceedings was, the Ministry of Finance (Department of Revenue) in their written replies submitted as follows: The genesis or the trigger for initiating the proceeding of withdrawal of exemption was a proposal dated 12.11.2009 from Addl. DIT (E), Range -1, Mumbai to the Director of Income Tax (Exemptions), Mumbai. This proposal, for withdrawal of registration u/s 12A, was based on the information, received during the assessment proceedings for A.Y. 2007-08, that there were changes in the objects of BCCI. On 28.12.2009 the Department came to the conclusion that the registration granted to BCCI u/s 12A of the Income tax Act, 1961 did not survive from the date on which the objects were changed i.e. 01.06.2006. The Committee further desired to know as to when the BCCI intimated the changes in its objects to the Ministry and why did Department not initiate the action immediately thereafter. In this regard, in their written information furnished to the Committee, the Ministry of Finance (Department of Revenue) replied as under: BCCI did not intimate the changes in its objects in 2006 or 2007. These changes were detected during the course of assessment proceedings for the A.Y. 2007-2008 which were finalised in December 2009. It was only after issue of a show cause notice dated 30.11.2009 for withdrawal of registration granted u/s 12A to the BCCI, that the Honorary Secretary of BCCI submitted letters dated 2.12.2009 and 14.12.2009 stating that there were amendments in the objects of BCCI and inadvertently these amendments were not informed to the office of DIT (E), Mumbai. Intimating about the chronology of the withdrawal proceedings, the Ministry further submitted as follows: Chronology of the withdrawal of proceedings by D irector of Exemptions (Mumbai) 12.11.2009: A proposal for withdrawal of registration u/s 12A of the I.T Act is received from Addl. DIT (E), Range -1, and Mumbai 30.11.2009: A show cause for withdrawal of registration u/s 12A of the Act is issued.
2.12.2009: A letter is received from Sri. N. Srinivasan, Honorary Secretary, intimating the amendment in Memorandum of Association made on 1/06/2006 3.12.2009: A second show cause for withdrawal of registration u/s 12A of the Income Tax Act due to amendment in objects is sent to BCCI 15.12.2009 & 16.12.09: Written submissions dated 14/12/2009, signed by Sri. N. Srinivasan, Hon. Secretary is filed before the DIT (Exemptions). 28/12/2009: The registration granted to the BCCI u/s.12A of the Income Tax Act is withdrawn w.e.f. 1.6.2006.
Having observed that registration U/s 12 to BCCI has been withdrawn in 2009 with retrospective effect, the Committee desired to know about the justification for the same. In response, the Ministry of Finance (Department of Revenue) in their written information replied as under: The communication to the BCCI, that the registration granted u/s 12A of the Act did not survive from the date on which the objects were changed i.e. 01.06.2006, was based on the basic principle of law that registration u/s. 12A of the Act is granted on the basis of the objects mentioned in the deed submitted at the time of registration. In a case where the assesse changes its objects after registration, such changes are required to be intimated to the Director of Income Tax, (the authority granting registration) so that the changed object can be examined. However, where the objects of the trust or institution, which were the basis of grant of registration, are altered and not intimated to the registering authority, the registration would not survive since the very foundation of the registration had been removed by a voluntary act of the assesse. This is based on the decision of Honourable Allahabad High Court in the case of Allahabad Agricultural Institute and Another v. Union of India and Others, 291 ITR 116. During the evidence of the representatives of BCCI/IPL held on 12.01.2011, the Committee sought to know as to why were the amendments to BCCIs objects not filed with the Income Tax Department. In response, the BCCI in their written submission stated as follows:
BCCI amended its objects in 2006 to contribute to other sports. Contribution to other sports is also charitable as per the CBDT circular of 1984. It was never the intention of the BCCI to conceal the amendment from the Department. As a matter of fact, every year during the course of assessment, the latest copies of the constitution of BCCI containing the amendments have been filed with the Assessing officer. The Department was in possession of amended constitution at all times. The Department has withdrawn the exemption for the reason that the amendments were not filed. The BCCI has been legally advised that the exemption cannot be withdrawn for nonfiling of amendment of objects. The BCCI is in appeal against the withdrawal of exemption before the Income Tax Tribunal. On being asked as to whether the exemption granted to BCCI during the A.Y. 2007-08 has been withdrawn, the Ministry of Finance (Department of Revenue) in their written information stated as under: While finalizing the assessment for A.Y. 2007-08, due cognizance of withdrawal of registration u/s 12A was taken, which resulted in denial of exemption u/s 11 and raising of demand of Rs. 118 crore which otherwise would have been exempt u/s 11 of the Income Tax Act. It was also held that BCCI is no longer promoting cricket as a `charitable activity. It was held that major income a rises not from the game of cricket but from the business of cricket. In this assessment, the claim of exemption was denied and demand of Rs.118.00 crore was raised. Out of such demand, Rs. 92.00 crore had already been recovered during the FY 2009-10. In response to a query as to whether BCCI was really involved in charitable activities during the year 2008-09 and 2009-10 and whether exemption is being allowed to it for these years, the Ministry of Finance (Department of Revenue) in their replies stated that for A.Y. 2007-08 it has already been held by the Department that BCCI is not eligible for any exemption of Income as it is carrying on a commercial activity. However, BCCI has claimed exemption from tax for the A.Y.2008-09 and 2009-10. The case of A.Y. 2008-09 has been selected for scrutiny assessment. The scrutiny assessment for A.Y. 08-09 is in progress, and the activities of BCCI during this year will be examined in these proceedings. Asked during evidence as to whether the CBDT analysed the tax exemptions to BCCI/IPL on the basis of some complaint or it was suo-motu, the Chairman, CBDT in his deposition stated that No, they have filed their Memorandum. During evidence, the Committee expressed the view that the Ministry of Finance (Department of Revenue) did not analyze the aims and objects of the BCCI annually. They only analyze their balance-sheets annually. Replying to this, the representative of the Ministry of Finance (Department of Revenue) deposed before the Committee that
What happened in this case is that during the assessment stage, the change in the objects was detected and then a notice was issued.
There needs to be a minimum of 16 players in each of the eight teams. Each team will have one physiotherapist and a coach. At least two players in each team will be from BCCI under-22 pool. A minimum of eight local players will be there in each team. The number of foreign players in a team cannot exceed 10 (8 in the first season). Amongst the playing 11 members of a team, no more than four can be foreign players. Sachin Tendulkar, Rahul Dravid, Sourav Ganguly, Yuvraj Singh and Virender Sehwag are the players with icon status.
Through annual auction Buying domestic players Signing uncapped players Buying Replacements (for players not available) Trading
Telecasting Rights: The television rights for the IPL Twenty20 Cricket are with Sony Entertainment Television Network and World Sport Group (Singapore). They secured the highest bid for broadcast rights at $1.026 million, for 10 years. Other Rules:
At least seven bowlers will be there for completing the 20 overs of a match. Of the seven bowlers in the game, six will bowl 3 overs each and seventh one will bowl the remaining 2 overs. For a match to be declared complete, full 40 overs should have been bowled and batted on. The batting team can call all of their extra players to bat, till the end of 20th over. However, only the first 11 players have the right to bowl and/or field.
The batting team can continue to bat till the end of the last over, even if it has reached the winning target.
FUNCTIONAL TEAMS-2013:
NAME CITY OWNER N. Srinivasan (India Cements) GMR Group PRICE US$91 million US$84 million CAPTAIN MS Dhoni HEAD COACH Stephen Fleming
Chennai Chennai Super Kings Delhi Daredevils Kings XI Punjab New Delhi
Mohali (Chandigarh) Preity Zinta, US$76 Ness Wadia (Bombay million Dyeing), Mohit Burman (Dabur) Karan Paul (Apeejay Surendera Group),The Oberoi Group Kolkata
Shahrukh Khan (Red US$75.09 Gautam Chillies million Gambhir Entertainment) Juhi Chawla, Jay Mehta(Mehta Group) Mukesh Ambani (Reliance Group) Subrata Roy (Sahara India Pariwar)
Trevor Bayliss
Mumbai
US$111.9 Ricky Ponting John million Wright US$370 million Angelo Mathews Allan Donald
Pune
Jaipur
Lachlan US$67 Murdoch (Emerging million Media) Shilpa Shetty, Raj Kundra(UK Tradecorp Ltd) Vijay Mallya (UB Group) Sun TV Network
DEFUNCT TEAMS:
NAME
CITY
OWNER
PRICE
CAPTAIN
Kochi
US$333 million
Mahela Jayawardene
Deccan Chargers
Hyderabad
US$107 million
Kumar Sangakkara
Darren Lehmann
Countries
India
Administrator
BCCI
Format
Twenty20
First tournament
2008
Next tournament
2014
Tournament format
Number of teams
Current champion
Most successful
Qualification
Most runs
Most wickets
Section 10(39) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 in respect of the income which was arising in India from the ICC World Cup, 2011 to the subsidiaries of the ICC only where the contractual obligation to bear the income-tax liability is on these entities. The Cabinet has considered the matter in its meeting on 31.3.2011 and approved the exemption of Income to be granted only on the income on which the tax burden is required to be borne by the subsidiaries of the ICC and not contracted to be paid by a third party. The total tax effect of the proposed exemption after such restriction would be approximately Rs. 45 crore as against a tax effect of Rs. 443 crore that would have been forgone if the exemption was granted on the total projected revenue to these subsidiaries of Rs. 1476 crore.
The massive transport arrangement that would have benefited the transport sector failed to materialize. All the entertainment locations that these tourists would have visited all over India as an extension of their visit to India also came to nought. Each of the above events, had they materialized would have resulted in massive realization of entertainment tax, service tax, sales tax etc. Unfortunately all this tax earning vanished into thin air due to the shifting to South Africa.
Sponsorship
PepsiCo replaced DLF Ltd as the title sponsor starting with the 2013 season. DLF did not renew their contract after their initial five-year contract, for 250 crore, ended with the previous season. PepsiCo's contract is 396.8 crore for five years, ending with the 2017 season. In response to questions about the higher sponsorship costs compared to DLF's, a representative of PepsiCo said, "Our estimate is that we will get five to six times the value of the money we paid." However, Brand Finance had assessed the IPL's brand value to have fallen from $4.1 billion in 2010 to $2.9 billion in 2012, attributed to the decline in television ratings over the two years.
Personnel changes
In October 2012, the teams were allowed to release any number of their players from their contracts to reduce their player costs. The released players would have the option of entering the auction. The players' auction was held on 3 February 2013, where 37 players were sold.
Overseas participation
Availability of Bangladeshi players was put in doubt when the Bangladesh Cricket Board considered not issuing the players with the No Objection Certificates they needed to participate in the tournament. Their deliberation was due to the tournament's dates clashing with the Bangladesh cricket team in Zimbabwe in 2013. Regardless, both affected players, Shakib Al Hasan and Tamim Iqbal, missed the start of the tournament due to injury. Despite the progress on the restoration of cricketing relations between India and Pakistan after the Pakistan national cricket team toured India in December 2012 and January 2013, no Pakistani players were included in the auction. Several South Africans missed the start of the tournament to play in the knockout stage of the Ram Slam T20 Challenge. Shortly before the start of the season, the IPL governing council ruled that Sri Lankan cricketers and match officials will not participate in any matches held in Chennai. This was a result of the growing political tensions concerning the ethnic conflict between the Sinhalese and Sri Lankan Tamils. The anti-Sinhalaese sentiments from the people of Tamil Nadu raised security concerns for Sri Lankan involvement. The decision was
made after Jayalalithaa, the chief minister of Tamil Nadu, wrote to the Prime Minister of India requesting the ban. Other than the Chennai Super Kings, the franchises were not in support of the decision as they believed it offered Chennai an added advantage in their home matches. Chennai's Sri Lankan players hold secondary positions in their team while some Sri Lankans in other teams play key roles and their absence in those matches would affect their team strategies. Another concern was with how the decision did not follow the precedence of moving the matches to a different venue. However, the playoff matches originally scheduled to be held in Chennai were later relocated to Delhi.
"We are confident of making this edition of the Pepsi IPL the most thrilling and engaging event this year and in the years to come," Warrier added. The company also plans to come out with a '500 ml Fan Can', priced at Rs 35 during the IPL season. The IPL season for 2013 ends on May 26.
CONCLUSION:
I sincerely thank our Professor Mr Dinesh Agarwal, for giving me a chance to work on this case study. This case study helped me to understand the functional structure, tax implications & exemptions and the business flow of Indian Premier League. Though Indian Premier League is to entertain people, it has flow of cash hence can be related to a huge business. As every business is associated with protocols and tax policies, IPL is also governed under structured policies.
BIBLIOGRAPHY/ REFERENCES:
1. 38TH REPORT: STANDING COMMITTEE ON FINANCE (2010-11) FIFTEENTH LOK SABHA MINISTRY OF FINANCE (DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE) TAX ASSESSMENT/EXEMPTIONS AND RELATED MATTERS CONCERNING IPL/BCCI . 2. NDTV: Sports 3. dreamcricket.com: IPL and the Mauritius connection 4. IBN LIVE-SECTIONS: Winning is not the only thing for IPL franchises 5. Indian Premier League A Dummies Guide (http://www.labnol.org/tag/ipl/) 6. Wikipedia- Indian Premier League 7. Cricket World 4 U