Telepsychiatry Citations and Links by Jason Cafer
Telepsychiatry Citations and Links by Jason Cafer
Telepsychiatry Citations and Links by Jason Cafer
org/ICOT/
From
sigtelemental.htm
Chair Vice-Chair
Terry Rabinowitz, MD, FAPA, FAPM Lisa J. Roberts, PhD
Associate Professor of Psychiatry & Family Business Manager,
Medicine Health Innovations and Grants
Director Telepsychiatry Viterion TeleHealthcare
University of Vermont Fletcher Allen Health Care 10042 Main Street, Suite 401
Burlington, VT Bellevue, WA 98004
Phone: 802-847-2112 Phone: 425-417-8209
Fax :802-847-3090 fax Email:[email protected]
Email:[email protected]
The Teledmental Health SIG Listserver acts as a resource for sharing information and
fostering communication between SIG members and working groups. If you are already a
member of the listserver click here ([email protected]) to send a message. If you
are not subscribed to the listserve click here to subscribe. (Please note: you must be a
member of ATA in order to participate on the listserver).
New SIG information coming soon.
If you are interested in participating in the Telemental Health Special Interest Group simply
contact the chair of the SIG or email ATA at [email protected] or call ATA
at 202.223.3333.
Donald M. Hilty, MD
Associate Professor of Clinical Psychology, University of California, Davis, Sacramento,
California.
Weiling Liu, BS, Shayna Marks, BS
Postgraduate Researcher, University of California, Davis, Sacremento, California.
Edward J. Callahan, PhD
Professor of Family and Community Medicine, University of California, Davis, Sacramento,
California.
Abstract: Effectiveness must be determined for each new technology because it may have
advantages and disadvantages over what is currently offered. We reviewed the literature to
synthesize information on whether telepsychiatry is effective. Based on the literature, we
suggest that the effectiveness of telepsychiatry be evaluated on access to care, quality of
care (that is, outcomes, reliability, satisfaction and comparison with in-person care), costs
and empowerment. Further, we discuss other factors that influence effectiveness (for
example, technology, administrative coordination and financial support). Telepsychiatry
appears effective, and recommendations are offered for further evaluation of its
effectiveness.
Key Words: telepsychiatry, effectiveness, rural, mental health, review
Telepsychiatry, in the form of videoconferencing, has been well received in terms of
increasing access to care and user satisfaction (1–4). Questions persist, however, about its
effectiveness; there are few clinical outcome studies, cost data and randomized trials. There
may also be a positive reporting bias in the literature.
“Effectiveness,” from the Latin origin of the word, is defined as “having the power to
produce an effect . . . a decisive effect; efficient; as . . . an effective . . . remedy” (5).
Ideally, effectiveness should be considered for the patient, provider, program, community
and society. In telemedicine and telepsychiatry, authors have rarely discussed the idea of
effectiveness (6,7). However, they have discussed the subject indirectly with respect to
quality of care, clinical outcomes and costs (8).
Frameworks proposed for telepsychiatry assessment have information that applies to the
concept of effectiveness, including what technology is used (9–11), how tele- psychiatry is
integrated with other services (9,11), what it costs (6,7,9–11), how it compares with
previous services and its quality (for example, whether it enhances diagnosis and whether it
compares favourably with in-person care) (9–11).
This article discusses telepsychiatry’s effectiveness for clinicians, clinical educators and
clinical researchers. It focuses individually on the parameters of access, quality of care (that
is, outcomes, reliability and comparison with in-person care), satisfaction, costs, education
and empowerment. It is obvious that the parameters affect the assessment of one another
(6). We offer recommendations for further evaluation.
Methods
Measures of Effectiveness
Access to Care
Access to care is determined by geographic, economic, cultural and (or) social barriers to
needed care. Access to psychiatric care has increased to rural (13,14), suburban (15) and
urban areas (16). Telepsychiatry links academic health centres with health-care
professionals in shortage areas (17). Points of service are theoretically limitless. A full range
of evaluation (general, forensic and neuro- psychological), consultation, treatment
(medication and therapy) and case management services have been provided (2).
Telepsychiatry programs worldwide have been described in surveys (18,19) and in
telepsychiatry research reviews (1,18,19).
Quality of Care
Outcomes. There is a small but growing literature with respect to telepsychiatry
inerventions (Table 1). Most patients are referred for diagnostic evaluation and (or)
treatment recommendations, with the view that two opinions are better than one (6,20,21).
Indeed, in a study of specialty consultation including telepsychiatry, specialists changed the
diagnosis and medications in 91 per cent and 57 per cent of cases, respectively; primary
care interventions led to clinical improvements in 56 per cent of cases (22). Similarly, nurse
telecare improved patient depression, mental health functioning and satisfaction (23).
Quality of care may also be defined as avoiding unnecessary evaluations, procedures and
transfers in emergencies (24), as reducing waiting times (25) and as more appropriately
using psychiatric intensive care units (26). Cognitive-behavioural therapy for children with
depression was as successful at 128 kilobytes (KBS) per second by telepsychiatry as in-
person care (27). No difference was found between Global Assessment of Function over 6
months by telepsychiatry at 128 KBS and a control group (28). Similarly, no improvement
occurred over the course of 12 months in another study (29).
Table 1 Quality of care: summary of outcome and cost studies
Study n Patients KBS/frames Location Comment(s)
Outcome
Doze and others (20) 90 Adult outpatients 128–384/NS Canada Specialists assisted with
diagnosis and treatment; no
outcomes measured
Graham (75) 39 Adult outpatients 768/NS U.S. Reduction in hospitalizations
Haslam and McLaren(26) 2 Adult and geriatric 128/NS U.S. More appropriate use of inpatient
outpatients services
Hunkeler and others (23) 302 Adult outpatients in NS U.S. Nurse telecare improves
primary care depressive symptoms,
functioning and satisfaction vs.
usual care
Johnston and Jones (76) 40 Nursing facility residents 128/adjusted U.S. Elimination of travel and more
to 5-inch contact between patients and
square staff
Kennedy and Yellowlees (29) 32 Adult patients 128/NS U.S. No improvement
Lyketsos and others (58) NAP Geriatric dementia NS/20 U.S. Reduction in psychiatric
patients hospitalization
Nelson and others (27) 28 Childhood depression 128/NS U.S. Substantial clinical change,
equivalent to in-person care
Nesbitt and others (22) 164 Adult patients with 128–384/30 U.S. Change in diagnosis in 91% of
specialist consultations cases and clinical improvement in
including psychiatry 56% of cases
Zaylor (28) 49 Adult outpatients with 128/NS U.S. No difference in GAF scores at
depression or schizo- 6-month follow-up vs. in-person
affective disorder
Cost
Alessi and others (53) NAV Adult forensic inpatients NAV/NAV U.S. Telepsychiatry is cost-effective
Doze and others (20) 90 Adults 336–384/NS Alberta Costs break even at 7.6
consultations
Hailey and others (9) NAP Adults NAP/NAP U.S. Reduced costs to rural patients
Mielonen and others (55) 14 Adult inpatients NS Finland Savings in health-care costs,
reduction in travel and ease and
speed of consultation
Simpson and others (38) 379 Adult outpatients 128–384 Canada Costs break even at 224
consultations/year; less if also
used for administration
Trott and Blignault (54) 50 Adult and child NS Australia Substantial savings in health care
outpatients costs from reduction in travelling
and patient transfers
KBS = kilobytes per second; NAV = not available; NAP = not applicable; NS = not specified.
Reliability. Studies on the reliability of telepsychiatry have been conducted—almost all with
good results— generally at transmission speeds of 128 KBS to 384 KBS (1,2). Diagnoses
have been made reliably, with good interrater reliability, for a wide range of psychiatric
disorders for children, adults and geriatric patients. Limitations have included patients’
difficulties in hearing and decreased attention (30).
Comparison with In-person Care. Telemedicine’s ability to simulate real-time experiences in
terms of audio and video quality is important. Terrestrial transmission at 128 KBS provides
a good picture with a 0.3-second signal delay, but words are “cancelled out” if spoken
simultaneously. Satellite transmission involves a delay of 0.5 to 1.0 second, as seen on
worldwide broadcasts. Low KBS (that is, 56 KBS plus or minus 128 KBS) and satellite use
may interfere with the building of rapport, detection of nonverbal cues (31) and
depersonalized content (32), a task-oriented focus and a turn-taking conversation (33). No
problems, however, were found with development of rapport in a small cohort comparing
signal delays of 0, 0.3 and 1.0 second (34). Transmission at 384 KBS to 768 KBS has little-
to-no delay. A review of randomized controlled trials, comparing telemedicine (not
telepsychiatry) with in-person care showed no detrimental effects in outcomes and
satisfaction (35).
Patient and Provider Satisfaction
A systematic review of the satisfaction literature in tele- medicine (not telepsychiatry)
revealed limitations that included small sample sizes, informal evaluations and a lack of
randomized trials (36). Table 2 summarizes tele- psychiatry satisfaction. Patients have
expected a less satisfactory interaction than in a traditional physician–patient encounter
(37), but overall satisfaction has been very high (2,36). Interestingly, high satisfaction has
been reported despite equipment problems (38). Thus far, reduced time to travel (8,20,39),
less absence from work (20), reduced waiting time (25,36) and more patient choice and
control (20) have been reported. Other potential predictors are frames per second (FPS)
(for example, 30 FPS is television quality) (40), demographic factors (for example, age, sex
or ethnicity) (41), state- and trait-dependent factors (for example, acute depression vs.
depression in remission) (41), cost, satisfaction with and availability of local services (42),
and provider qualities (43).
Table 2 Summary of telepsychiatry key satisfaction studies
Study n Patients KBS/frames Location Comments
Baer and others (77) 26 Patients with 128/NS U.S. Average to better than in-
obsessive–compulisve person care
disorder
Baigent and others (78) 63 Adult state hospital inpatients 128/NS Australia Many patients were satisfied
and preferred it instead of in-
person
Ball and McLaren (30) 6 Adult inpatients Low-cost system/NS U.K. Also measured satisfaction
with in-person, telephone,
and hands-free telephone
Blackmon and others (45) 43 Child outpatients NS/NS U.S. Parent satisfaction was also
very good
Bratton and Cody (48) 20 Geriatric patients in a 128/NS U.S. Satisfied despite hearing and
retirement community poor image problems
Callahan and others (44) 93 Adult primary care 128/15 U.S. Satisfaction equal to a
outpatients nonpsychiatric population
Chae and others (79) 30 Adult outpatients 33/NS Korea Equal to usual, in-person
care
Clarke (80) 32 Nurses and providers in rural 128/NS Australia Nurse satisfaction was
clinics greater than physician
satisfaction
Dongier and others (46) 50 Adult, child outpatients Closed circuit TV/NS Canada Equal to usual, in-person
care
Doze and others (20) 90 Adult outpatients 128–384/NS Canada Positive because of less
travel and less absence from
work; negative perceptions
Elford and others (32) 23 Children 336/NS U.S. Diagnosis and treatment
recommendations equal to
usual, in-person care
Graham (75) 39 Adult outpatients 768/NS U.S. Positive patient acceptance of
telepsychiatry aftercare (90%
positive ratings)
Hilty and others (41) 40 Adult primary care 384/15 U.S. Satisfaction equal for in-
outpatients person and telepsychiatric
care, if patient given the
choice
Johnston and Jones (76) 40 Nursing facility 128/NS U.S. Patients and families
residents expressed appreciation for
the service
McCloskey (39) 236 Adult outpatients 128/NS U.S. Rural Montana; would have
had to travel significantly
Mielonen and others (55) 14 Adult inpatients NS/NS Finland High patient satisfaction (80%
considered it to have been
useful)
Ruskin (81) NAV Geriatric outpatients NAV U.S. Geriatric satisfaction similar
to adult satisfaction
Simpson and others (25) 230 Adult outpatients 384 Canada High level of satisfaction with
the service and equipment
Simpson and others (38) — Adult outpatients 384 Canada High level of satisfaction with
the service and equipment
despite equipment problems
in 17% of cases
Trott and Blignault (54) 50 Adult and child outpatients NS/NS Australia High level of acceptance by
patients and mental health
professionals
Dongier and others (46) NS Primary care providers and Closed circuit Canada Lower satisfaction in terms of
psychiatrists ease, ability to express
oneself, and quality of the
relationship
Hilty and others (49) NS; 200 Primary care providers 128–384/30 U.S. High satisfaction (for
pts example, 4.5 on 5-point
scale) on all parameters;
improved over time with
increased use
Elford and others (32) 2 Child psychiatrists 336/NS U.S. High satisfaction except for
rare technical problems
McCloskey (39) 1 Adult psychiatrist 128 KBS U.S. High satisfaction (for
example, 6.6 on 8-point
scale)
Hilty and others (21) 3 Adult psychiatrists 128–384/30 U.S. High satisfaction (for
example, 6.8 on 8-point
scale)
Doze and others (20) NS Adult psychiatrists 128–384/NS Canada Generally pleased to evaluate
patients before condition
became more severe;
efficient
Several interesting themes have emerged from the literature. First, most patients speak
freely when using tele-psychiatry, will use it again, and rate their experiences with providers
as positive. Satisfaction with telepsychiatry is similar to other specialty care provided via
telemedicine (44). For evaluation and follow-up care, satisfaction with telepsychiatry care
equalled that for in-person consultation (41). Patients of all ages have reported high
satisfaction (32,45,46), even those with occasional trouble hearing or discomfort using the
equipment (47,48).
Consultee and psychiatrist satisfaction has been less consistently positive. Consultee (that
is, nurse and psychologist) satisfaction with telepsychiatry was lower than for in-person
consultation with respect to ease with the process, ability to express oneself and quality of
the interpersonal relationship (46). Satisfaction, however, with another consultation-liaison
service was high (that is, over 4.5 on a scale of 1 [poor] to 5 [excellent]) and increased
after 2 or more consultations over a 1-year period. Rural primary care providers had
significantly higher satisfaction than did suburban or urban providers (49). Although
problems were rare, child psychiatrists indicated that technical problems (for example,
unclear picture and video freeze) affected their ability to assess patients (32). One study
raised concerns about the ease of the process, the ability to express oneself and the quality
of the interpersonal relationship (46). Two other studies rated overall satisfaction with
telepsychiatry highly (for example, 6.6 on a scale of 8) (21,39).
Cost Studies
This article reports cost studies briefly, because little information has been collected in a
standard, prospective fashion (9). Ideally, both direct and indirect costs should be
considered for patients, clinics, providers and society at large. Direct costs include
equipment, installation of lines and other supplies. Fixed costs also include the rental of
lines, as well as salary and wages and administrative expenses. Variable costs include data
transmission costs, fees for service, and maintenance and upgrades of equipment.
Studies have reported cost data (Table 1), and recommendations have been made to
improve evaluation. A meta-analysis of cost data found that only 38 of 551 articles
contained any quantifiable data, leading to a conclusion that it was premature to assume
that telemedicine is cost-effective (50). Telepsychiatry is cheaper than travel for patients
(8,25,51,52). With respect to programs, tele- psychiatry service has been shown to be
cheaper (14,52–55), equivalent (9) and more expensive than outreach in-person services
(42,48,56,57). When expensive transfers are involved, it may be cost-effective
(26,53–55,58). Break-even analyses demonstrated that a telepsychiatry service needs
approximately seven consultations weekly (20,38,51). Guidelines offer suggestions to
improve data that are related to costs (9,10,59–62), mainly through cost-effectiveness and
cost–benefit analysis (63,64).
Education
Telemedicine has been used for several educational initiatives, including provider education
(65,66), clinical consultation (15) and supervision (67). It has successfully linked academic
centres with rural areas for continuing medical education in North America and
internationally (17,65). Clinical consultations also reduce provider isolation, provide case-
based learning (68,69) and help with decision support (70), particularly when providers sit
in for the evaluation (71). Outcomes of interventions by telepsychiatry have been assessed
in only one study (22).
Empowerment
Patients have reduced travelling time (8,20,39), less time absent from work (20), reduced
waiting time (25) and more choice and control (20). Primary care providers have access to
specialists for patient care and education, are able to “keep” treating their patients, rather
than referring (49), and feel good about their practice. Communities have “kept” their
patients, reduced costs for transfers (54,55) and retained dollars that would otherwise have
been lost to suburban centres upon referral (72).
Communities presumably also benefit from providing a higher quality of care, from having
more opportunities for staff education, from experiencing greater ease with recruitment and
from having greater ease with accreditation.
Other Factors Affecting Effectiveness
Technology. The most important issue is having adequate bandwidth for the task at hand
and alternative plans if a limitation exists. The transmission speed in KBS and picture
quality in FPS are important determinants of the interaction quality between the provider
and the patient (2,73).
Administrative Coordination. Coordination is necessary to initiate and maintain a
telepsychiatry program, particularly for clinical protocols, staffing time and technical
assistance. Financial support is necessary from within the institution or from local, regional
or federal agencies.
Telepsychiatry appears effective, based on the preliminary data on access to care, quality of
care (that is, outcomes, diagnosis and ability for users to communicate), satisfaction and
education. It also empowers patients, providers and communities. It is premature to claim
that telepsychiatry is cost-effective (21). Technology and program coordination are
important determinants to its short- and long-term viability.
The results of this article appear similar to a review of 66 studies that compared
telemedicine with a comparison group with respect to administrative changes, patient
outcomes and economic issues (8). Thirty-seven (56 per cent) suggested that telemedicine
had advantages over the alternative approach; 24 (36 per cent) found negative issues or
were unable to draw conclusions, and five (eight per cent) found alternatives to be superior.
Further assessment of telepsychiatry’s effectiveness is needed (1,2,6,8,35,51,52). However,
frameworks have been proposed (6,7,9–11), and Table 3 summarizes key aspects according
to the parameters discussed in this article with regard to effectiveness. All parameters could
benefit from further assessment, particularly in terms of outcomes and costs. RCTs with
telemedicine are feasible, enable recruitment of patients and maintain enrolment (74). It is
desirable to include a cost–effectiveness or cost–benefit analysis.
Table 3 Recommendations for evaluating the effectiveness of telepsychiatry
Access
Assessment of whether or not there was increased access to care and a description of the kind of care
Services specific to the need (for example, consultation-liaison to primary care)
Quality of Care
Study methods Studies: randomized controlled trials with prospective data collection
Longitudinal data collection, as applicable and feasible
Comparison group and (or) baseline data
Systematic collection of surveys and other data
Large sample size
Reliabililty Diagnostic ability
Detection of limitations, if any
Outcomes Diagnostic quality
Changes in clinical health status
Changes in disease management
Effect on patient quality of life
Satisfaction
Systematic collection of patient (lack of travel and lost work time), provider (assistance or education for decision-making) and
specialist (potential lack of travel) satisfaction related to service: baseline, longitudinal, compared with alternative service options
Costs
Complete analysis with inclusion of all key components and broad focus: patient costs (lack of travel and lost work time), provider
costs (application of skills to other patients), specialist costs (potential lack of travel, increased orders for tests), initial program
investment costs (increased treatment costs), operational costs (including staff time) and societal costs
Realistic estimates of costs
Presence of a cost analysis, preferably cost-effectiveness or cost–benefit analysis: short-term (period of study or project) and long-
term (estimated, if not literally collected)
Education
Interventions: didactics, case-based teaching and (or) others
Change in knowledge and (or) skill set at time of intervention; whether or not the change, if any, is preserved on follow-up
Change in patient outcomes
Empowerment
Patients: reduced time to travel, less absence from work, reduced waiting time and more choice and control
Primary care providers: access to specialists, education and able to “keep” their patients
Community: able to “keep” their patients, higher quality of care, more opportunities for staff education, greater ease with recruitment
and greater ease with accreditation
Miscellaneous
Technology Adequate description of equipment, bandwidth, frames per second, and other parameters used
Data on failures, problems (for example, reliability)
Administration Coordination to initiate and maintain a program at each site and between sites
Financial support from institutional, local, regional, or federal grant agencies
Other Reporting of positive and negative findings in the literature
Acknowledgement of need to publish positive findings and other potential biases
Sensitivity analysis to “fit” findings of one study or program to others
References
1. Frueh BC, Deitsch SE, Santos AB, Gold PB, Johnson MR, Meisler N, and others. Procedural
and methodological issues in telepsychiatry research and program development. Psychiatr
Serv 2000;51:1522–7.
2. Hilty DM, Luo JS, Morache C, Marcelo DA, Nesbitt TS. Telepsychiatry: an overview for
psychiatrists. CNS Drugs 2002;16:527–48.
3. Urness D. Canadian Psychiatric Association. Discussion Paper on telepsychiatry.
Telepsychiatry guidelines and procedures for clinical activities. Ottawa, Canadian Psychiatric
Association; 2003.
4. American Psychiatric Association. Resource document on telepsychiatry by
videoconferencing [online]. 2001. www.psych.org.
5. Webster’s Revised Unabridged Dictionary. Volume 2003. dictionary.reference.com.
Plainfield: MICRA Inc.; 1998.
6. Bashshur RL. Telemedicine effects: cost, quality, and access. J Med Syst
1995;19(2):81–91.
7. Grigsby J, Kaehny MM, Sandberg EJ, Schlenker RE, Shaughnessy PW. Effects and
effectiveness of telemedicine. Health Care Financ Rev 1995;17:115–31.
8. Hailey D, Roine R, Ohinmaa A. Systematic review of evidence for the benefits of
telemedicine. J Telemed Telecare 2002;1(Suppl 8):1–30.
9. Hailey D, Jacobs P, Simpson J, Doze S. An assessment framework for telemedicine
applications. J Telemed Telecare 1999;5:162–70.
10. Drummond MF, O’Brien BJ, Stoddart GL, Torrance GW. Critical assessment of economic
outcomes. Methods for economic evaluation of health care programmes. Oxford: Oxford
University Press; 1988. p 27–51.
11. Ohinmaa A, Halley D, Roine R. Elements for assessment of telemedicine applications. Int
J Technol Assess Health Care 2001;17:190–202.
12. Ryan GW, Bernard RH. Data management and analysis methods. In: Denzin NK, Lincoln
YS, editors. Handbook of qualitative research.. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage Publications;
2000.
13. Preston J, Brown FW, Hartley B. Using telemedicine to improve health care in distant
areas. Hosp Community Psychiatry 1992;43(1):25–32.
14. Brown FW. Rural telepsychiatry. Psychiatr Serv 1998;49:963–4.
15. Hilty DM, Servis ME, Nesbitt TS, Hales RE. The use of tele- medicine to provide
consultation-liaison service to the primary care setting. Psychiatr Ann 1999;29:421–7.
16. Straker N, Mostyn P, Marshall C. The use of two-way TV in bringing mental health
services to the inner city. Am J Psychiatry 1976;133:1202–5.
17. Nesbitt TS, Hilty DM, Kuenneth CA, Siefkin A. Development of a telemedicine program:
a review of 1,000 videoconferencing consultations. West J Med 2000;173:169–74.
18. Brown FW. A survey of telepsychiatry in the USA. J Telemed Telecare 1995;1(1):19–21.
19. Allen A, Wheeler T. Telepsychiatry background and activity survey. The development of
telepsychiatry. Telemed Today 1998;6(2):34–7.
20. Doze S, Simpson J, Hailey D, Jacobs P. Evaluation of a tele- psychiatry pilot project. J
Telemed Telecare 1999;5(1):38–46.
21. Hilty DM, Nesbitt TS, Kuenneth TA, Hales RE. Development of a successful
telepsychiatry program: a look at the first 200 consultations at UC Davis. J Rural Health.
Forthcoming.
22. Nesbitt TS, Marcin JP, Alexander RM, Hilty DM, Siddiqui J. Clinical outcomes: the impact
of telemedicine. Annual Meeting of the American Telemedicine Association; May 2002; San
Diego (CA).
23. Hunkeler EM, Meresman JF, Hargreaves WA, Fireman B, Berman WH, Kirsch AJ, and
others. Efficacy of nurse telehealth care and peer support in augmenting treatment of
depression in primary care. Arch Fam Med 2000;9:700–8.
24. Chodroff PH. A three-year review of telemedicine at the community level—clinical and
fiscal results. J Telemed Telecare 1999;5 (Suppl 1):S28–S30.
25. Simpson J, Doze S, Urness D, Hailey D, Jacobs P. Telepsychiatry as a routine
servicet—he perspective of the patient. J Telemed Telecare 2001;7:155–60.
26. Haslam R, McLaren P. Interactive television for an urban adult mental health service:
the Guy’s Psychiatric Intensive Care Unit Telepsychiatry Project. J Telemed Telecare
2000;6(Suppl 1):S50–S52.
27. Nelson EL, Barnard M, Cain S. Treating childhood depression over videoconferencing.
Telemed J E Health 2003;9:49–55.
28. Zaylor C. Clinical outcomes in telepsychiatry. J Telemed Telecare 1999;5 (Suppl
1):S59–S60.
29. Kennedy C, Yellowlees P. A community-based approach to evaluation of health
outcomes and costs for telepsychiatry in a rural population: preliminary results. J Telemed
Telecare 2000;6(Suppl 1):S155–S157.
30. Ball C, McLaren P. The tele-assessment of cognitive state: a review. J Telemed Telecare
1997;3:126–31.
31. McLaren P, Ball CJ, Summerfield AB, Watson JP, Lipsedge M. An evaluation of the use of
interactive television in an acute psychiatric service. J Telemed Telecare 1995;1:79–85.
32. Elford R, White H, Bowering R, Ghandi A, Maddiggan B, St John K, and others. A
randomized, controlled trial of child psychiatric assessments conducted using
videoconferencing. J Telemed Telecare 2000;6:73–82.
33. Tickle-Degnen L, Rosenthal R. The nature of rapport and its non- verbal correlates.
Psychological Inquiry 1990;1:285–93.
34. Manning TR, Goetz E, Street RL. Signal delay effects on rapport in telepsychiatry.
Cyberpsych Behav 2000;3:119–27.
35. Currell R, Urquhart C, Wainwright P, Lewis R. Telemedicine versus face-to-face patient
care: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes. Cochrane Database System
Rev 2: CD002098; 2000.
36. Mair F, Whitten P. Systematic review of studies of patient satisfaction with telemedicine.
BMJ 2000;320:1517–20.
37. Brick JE, Bashshur RL, Brick JF, D’Alessandri RM. Public knowledge, perception, and
expressed choice of telemedicine in rural West Virginia. Telemed J 1997;3:159–71.
38. Simpson J, Doze S, Urness D, Hailey D, Jacobs P. Evaluation of a routine telepsychiatry
service. J Telemed Telecare 2001;7:90–8.
39. McCloskey AT. Rural psychiatric collaborative care via telemedicine. Syllabus of the
150th Annual Meeting of the American Psychiatric Association; 1997. p 106.
40. Jones BN 3rd, Ruskin PE. Telemedicine and geriatric psychiatry: directions for future
research and policy. J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol 2001;14:59–62.
41. Hilty DM, Nesbitt TS, Hales RE, Anders TF, Callahan EJ. The use of telemedicine by
academic psychiatrists for the provision of care in the primary care setting. Medscape
Mental Health 2000;5:1–11.
42. Hilty DM, Ingraham R, Yang S, Anders TF. Psychiatric consultation to primary care
physicicans by phone and email for the care of persons with developmental disabilites in
rural California, poster. 154th Annual Meeting of the American Psychaitric Association; May
2001; New Orleans (LA).
43. Malagodi M, Smith S. Prospective role for telemedicine as a communication tool for rural
rehabilitation practice. Work 1999;12:245–59.
44. Callahan EJ, Hilty DM, Nesbitt TS. Patient satisfaction with telemedicine consultation in
primary care: comparison of ratings of medical and mental health applications. Telemed J
1998;4:363–9.
45. Blackmon LA, Kaak HO, Ranseen J. Consumer satisfaction with telemedicine child
psychiatry consultation in rural Kentucky. Psychiatr Serv 1997;48:1464–6.
46. Dongier M, Tempier R, Lalinec-Michaud M, Meunier D. Telepsychiatry: psychiatric
consultation through two-way television. A controlled study. Can J Psychiatry
1986;31:32–4.
47. Montani C, Billaud N, Tyrrell J, Fluchaire I, Malterre C, Lauvernay N, and others.
Psychological impact of a remote psychometric consultation with hospitalized elderly people.
J Telemed Telecare 1997;3:140–5.
48. Bratton RL, Cody C. Telemedicine applications in primary care: a geriatric patient pilot
project. Mayo Clin Proc 2000;75:365–8.
49. Hilty DM, Nesbitt TM, Kuenneth TA. Development of a successful telepsychiatry
program: a look at the first 200 consultations at UC Davis. Poster, Academy of
Psychosomatic Medicine; November 2000. Palm Springs (CA) .
50. Whitten P, Kingsley C, Grigsby J. Results of a meta-analysis of cost-benefit research: is
this a question worth asking? J Telemed Telecare 2000;6(Suppl 1):S4–S6.
51. Håkansson S, Gavelin C. What do we really know about the cost-effectiveness of
telemedicine? J Telemed Telecare 2000;6(Suppl 1):S133–S136.
52. Roine R, Ohinmaa A, Hailey D. Assessing telemedicine: a systematic review of the
literature. CMAJ 2001;165:765–71.
53. Alessi N, Rome L, Bennett J, Davis MC, Fischre R, Perdue E. Cost-effectiveness analysis
in forensic telepsychiatry: prisoner involuntary treatment evaluations. Telemed J
1999;5:17.
54. Trott P, Blignault I. Cost evaluation of a telepsychiatry service in northern Queensland. J
Telemed Telecare 1998;4(Suppl 1):S66–S68.
55. Mielonen ML, Ohinmaa A, Moring J, Isohanni M. The use of videoconferencing for
telepsychiatry in Finland. J Telemed Telecare 1998;4:125–31.
56. Roland M. Measuring referral rates. In: Roland MO, Coulter A, editors. Hospital referrals.
Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1992. p 62–75.
57. Werner A, Anderson LE. Rural telepsychiatry is economically unsupportable: the
Concorde crashes in a cornfield. Psychiatr Serv 1998;49:1287–90.
58. Lyketsos CG, Roques C, Hovanec L, Jones BN 3rd. Telemedicine use and the reduction
of psychiatric admissions from a long-term care facility. J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol
2001;14:76–9.
59. McIntosh E, Cairns J. A framework for the economic evaluation of telemedicine. J
Telemed Telecare 1997;3:132–9.
60. Telemedicine: a guide to assesssing telecommunication in health. Washington, DC:
National Academy Press; Institute of Medicine. 1996.
61. Mair FS, Haycox A, May C, Williams T. A review of telemedicine cost-effectiveness
studies. J Telemed Telecare 2000;6(Suppl 1):S38–S40.
62. Lobley D. The economics of telemedicine. J Telemed Telecare 1997;3:117–25.
63. Weinstein MC, Stason WB. Foundations of cost-effectiveness analysis for health and
medical practices. N Engl J Med 1977;296:716–21.
64. Weinstein MC, Siegel JE, Gold MR, Kamlet MS, Russell LB. Recommendations of the
Panel on Cost-effectiveness in Health and Medicine. JAMA 1996;276:1253–8.
65. D’Souza R. A pilot study of an educational service for rural mental health practitioners in
South Australia using telemedicine. J Telemed Telecare 2000;6(Suppl 1):S187–S189.
66. Craig J, Loane M, Wootton R. Does telemedicine have a role to play in disease
management? Dis Manage Health Outcomes 1999;6:121–30.
67. Gammon D, Sorlie T, Bergvik S, Hoifodt TS. Psychotherapy supervision conducted by
videoconferencing: a qualitative study of users’ experiences. J Telemed Telecare
1998;4(Suppl 1):S33–S35.
68. Greenberg WE, Paulsen RH. Moving into the neighborhood: preparing residents to
participate in a primary care environment. Harv Rev Psychiatry 1996;4:107–9.
69. Servis ME, Hilty DM. Psychiatry and primary care: new directions in education. Harv Rev
Psychiatry 2000;8:206–9.
70. Armstrong IJ, Haston WS. Medical decision support for remote general practitioners
using telemedicine. J Telemed Telecare 1997;3:27–34.
71. Hawker F, Kavanagh S, Yellowlees P, Kalucy RS. Telepsychiatry in South Australia. J
Telemed Telecare 1998;4:187–94.
72. Dimand RJ, Marcin JP, Struve S, Traugott C, Nesbitt TS. Financial benefits of a pediatric
care unit based telemedicine program to a rural adult intensive care unit: impact of keeping
acutely ill and injured children in their local community. Telemed J E-Health. Forthcoming.
73. Hilty DM, Nesbitt TS, Marks SL, Callahan EJ. How telepsychiatry affects the doctor-
patient relationship: communication, satisfaction, and additional clinically relevant issues.
Primary Psychiatry 2002;9(9):29–34.
74. Wallace PG, Haines A, Harrison R, Barber J, Thompson S, Jacklin P. Design and
performance of a multicentre, randomized controlled trial of teleconsulting. J Telemed
Telecare 2002;8(Suppl 2)S94–S95.
75. Graham MA. Telepsychiatry in Appalachia. Am Behav Sci 1996;39:602–15.
76. Johnston D, Jones III BN. Telepsychiatry consultations to a rural nursing facility: a
2-year experience. J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol 2001;14:72–5.
77. Baer L, Cukor P, Jenike MA, Leahy L, O’Laughlen J, Coyle JT. Pilot studies of
telemedicine for patients with obsessive–compulsive disorder. Am J Psychiatry
1995;152:1383–5.
78. Baigent MF, Lloyd CJ, Kavanagh SJ, Ben-Tovim DI, Yellowlees PM, Kalucy RS, and
others. Telepsychiatry: ‘tele’ yes, but what about the ‘psychiatry’? J Telemed Telecare
1997;3(Suppl 1):S3–S5.
79. Chae YM, Park HJ, Cho JG, Hong GD, Cheon KA. The reliability and acceptability of
telemedicine for patients with schizophrenia in Korea. J Telemed Telecare 2000;6(2):83–90.
80. Clarke PH. A referrer and patient evaluation of a telepsychiatry consultation-liaison
service in South Australia. J Telemed Telecare 1997;3(Suppl 1):S12–S14.
81. Ruskin PE. Efficacy of telepsychiatry in treatment of depression (abstract). Veterans
Administration HSR&D Service 18th Annual Meeting; March 22, 2000; Washington (DC).
www.atmeda.org/news/2004_presentations/
t3a2.Schmun...
File Format: Microsoft Powerpoint - View as HTML
Disparities between urban and rural care; Lack of mental health expertise in rural settings ...
Implement Telemental Health in Rochester and Chippewa Valley ...
Similar pages - Note this
[PDF]
TELEMENTAL HEALTH:
File Format: PDF/Adobe Acrobat - View as HTML
Telemental Health: Delivering Mental Health Care at a Distance – A Guide for Rural. Communities, which is
available from the Office for the Advancement of ...
ftp://ftp.hrsa.gov/telehealth/mental.pdf - Similar pages - Note this
GovTrack: S. 633: Text of Legislation
(8) Telemental health is an effective tool for diagnosing and treating some mental health conditions. For
rural and remote areas, telemental health offers ...
www.govtrack.us/congress/billtext.xpd?bill=s110-633 - 25k - Cached - Similar pages - Note this
Rural telepsychiatry.
Rural telepsychiatry. Brown FW. Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA. [email protected]
Telepsychiatry is the use of telecommunications ...
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=9661235&dopt=Abstract -
Similar pages - Note this
About the Telemedicine and Telehealth Bibliographic
Database
For instance, using terms such as 'telepsychiatry practice rural' will not be as successful as 'telepsychiatry
rural', since there are likely few articles ...
tie.telemed.org/biblio/about.asp - 25k - Cached - Similar pages - Note this
[PDF]
Tele-Mental Health:
File Format: PDF/Adobe Acrobat - View as HTML
it deals with, as the title suggests, telepsychiatry in a rural setting. ... went on to report that “rural
telepsychiatry is ideally suited to provide ...
_____________________________________________________________________