Gulf Oil Spill Is Bad, But How Bad?

UNIVERSIDADE DE SO PAULO ESCOLA DE ENGENHARIA DE SO CARLOS PROGRAMA DE PS-GRADUAO EM HIDRULICA E SANEAMENTO Exame de Seleo de Mestrado 2011 Prova de Ingls
s Cdigo =
Gulf Oil Spill Is Bad, but How Bad?

WASHINGTON The oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico is bad no one would dispute it. But just how bad?
Some experts have been quick to predict apocalypse, painting grim pictures of 1,000 miles of irreplaceable wetlands and beaches at risk, fisheries damaged for seasons, fragile species wiped out and a region and an industry economically crippled for years. President Obama has called the spill a potentially unprecedented environmental disaster. And some scientists have suggested that the oil might hitch a ride on the loop current in the gulf, bringing havoc to the Atlantic Coast. Yet the Deepwater Horizon blowout is not unprecedented, nor is it yet among the worst oil accidents in history. And its ultimate impact will depend on a long list of interlinked variables, including the weather, ocean currents, the properties of the oil involved and the success or failure of the frantic efforts to stanch the flow and remediate its effects. As one expert put it, this is just the beginning of the game. No one knows the final score. The ruptured well, currently pouring an estimated 210,000 gallons of oil a day into the gulf, could flow for years and still not begin to approach the 36 billion gallons of oil spilled by retreating Iraqi forces when they left Kuwait in 1991. It is not yet close to the magnitude of the Ixtoc I blowout in the Bay of Campeche in Mexico in 1979, which spilled an estimated 140 million gallons of crude before the gusher could be stopped. And it will have to get much worse before it approaches the impact of the Exxon Valdez accident of 1989, which contaminated 1,300 miles of largely untouched shoreline and killed tens of thousands of seabirds, otters and seals along with 250 eagles and 22 killer whales. No one, not even the oil industrys most fervent apologists, is making light of this accident. The contaminated area of the gulf continues to spread, and oil has been found in some of the fragile marshes at the tip of Louisiana. The beaches and coral reefs of the Florida Keys could be hit if the slick is captured by the gulfs clockwise loop current. But on Monday, the wind was pushing the slick in the opposite direction, away from the current. The worst effects of the spill have yet to be felt. And if efforts to contain the oil are even partly successful and the weather cooperates, the worst could be avoided. Right now what people fear has not materialized, said Edward B. Overton, professor emeritus of environmental science at Louisiana State University and an expert on oil spills. People have 1
UNIVERSIDADE DE SO PAULO ESCOLA DE ENGENHARIA DE SO CARLOS PROGRAMA DE PS-GRADUAO EM HIDRULICA E SANEAMENTO Exame de Seleo de Mestrado 2011 Prova de Ingls Cdigo =
the idea of an Exxon Valdez, with a sticky, smelly black tide looming over the horizon waiting to wash ashore. I do not anticipate this will happen down here unless things get a lot worse. Other experts said that while the potential for catastrophe remained, there were reasons to remain guardedly optimistic. The sky is not falling, said Quenton R. Dokken, a marine biologist and the executive director of the Gulf of Mexico Foundation, a conservation group in Corpus Christi, Tex. Weve certainly stepped in a hole and were going to have to work ourselves out of it, but it isnt the end of the Gulf of Mexico. Engineers said the type of oil pouring out is lighter than the heavy crude spilled by the Exxon Valdez, evaporates more quickly and is easier to burn. It also appears to respond to the use of dispersants, which break up globs of oil and help them sink. The oil is still capable of significant damage, particularly when it is churned up with water and forms a sort of mousse that floats and can travel long distances. Jacqueline Savitz, a senior scientist at Oceana, a nonprofit environmental group, said that much of the damage was already taking place far offshore and out of sight of surveillance aircraft and research vessels. Some people are saying, It hasnt gotten to shore yet so its all good, she said. But a lot of animals live in the ocean, and a spill like this becomes bad for marine life as soon as it hits the water. You have endangered sea turtles, the larvae of bluefin tuna, shrimp and crabs and oysters, grouper. A lot of these are already being affected and have been for 10 days. Were waiting to see how bad it is at the shore, but we may never fully understand the full impacts on ocean life. The economic impact is as uncertain as the environmental damage. With several million gallons of medium crude in the water already, some experts are predicting wide economic harm. Experts at the Harte Research Institute for Gulf of Mexico Studies in Corpus Christi, for example, estimated that as much as $1.6 billion of annual economic activity and services including effects on tourism, fishing and even less tangible services like the storm protection provided by wetlands could be at risk. And thats really only the tip of the iceberg, said David Yoskowitz, who holds the endowed chair for socioeconomics at the institute. Its still early in the game, and theres a lot of potential downstream impacts, a lot of multiplier impacts. But much of this damage could be avoided if the various tactics employed by BP and government technicians pay off in the coming days. The winds are dying down and the seas are calming, allowing for renewed skimming operations and possible new controlled burns of oil on the surface. BP technicians are trying to inject dispersants deep below the surface, which could 2
reduce the impact on aquatic life. Winds and currents could move the globs of emulsified oil away from coastal shellfish breeding grounds. The gulf is not a pristine environment and has survived both chronic and acute pollution problems before. Thousands of gallons of oil flow into the gulf from natural undersea well seeps every day, engineers say, and the scores of refineries and chemical plants that line the shore from Mexico to Mississippi pour untold volumes of pollutants into the water. After the Ixtoc spill 31 years ago, the second-largest oil release in history, the gulf rebounded. Within three years, there was little visible trace of the spill off the Mexican coast, which was compounded by a tanker accident in the gulf a few months later that released 2.6 million additional gallons, experts said. The gulf is tremendously resilient, said Dr. Dokken, the marine biologist. But weve always got to ask ourselves how long can we keep heaping these insults on the gulf and having it bounce back. As a scientist, I have to say I just dont know.
Source: NY Times - http://www.nytimes.com/2010/05/04/us/04enviro.html
Questions:
1 What have some experts predicted about the spill? What did President Obama call the spill? 2 Translate:
As one expert put it, this is just the beginning of the game. No one knows the final score. The ruptured well, currently pouring an estimated 210,000 gallons of oil a day into the gulf, could flow for years and still not begin to approach the 36 billion gallons of oil spilled by retreating Iraqi forces when they left Kuwait in 1991. It is not yet close to the magnitude of the Ixtoc I blowout in the Bay of Campeche in Mexico in 1979, which spilled an estimated 140 million gallons of crude before the gusher could be stopped. And it will have to get much worse before it approaches the impact of the Exxon Valdez accident of 1989, which contaminated 1,300 miles of largely untouched shoreline and killed tens of thousands of seabirds, otters and seals along with 250 eagles and 22 killer whales.
3 - What did Prof. Overton have to say about what people are afraid of? What is the opinion of other experts? 4 How did engineers compare this spill to the one from Exxon? 5 What does Jacqueline Savitz say about the impacts of the spill? 6 What are the economic impacts that can be seen due to the spill? 7 What does the article say about the conditions of the gulf? 8 What is Dr. Dokkens opinion about the gulf?

Gulf Oil Spill Is Bad, But How Bad?

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Gulf Oil Spill Is Bad, But How Bad?

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Gulf Oil Spill Is Bad, But How Bad?

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

UNIVERSIDADE DE SO PAULO ESCOLA DE ENGENHARIA DE SO CARLOS PROGRAMA DE PS-GRADUAO EM HIDRULICA E SANEAMENTO Exame de Seleo de Mestrado 2011 Prova de Ingls

Gulf Oil Spill Is Bad, but How Bad?

Source: NY Times - http://www.nytimes.com/2010/05/04/us/04enviro.html

You might also like