Description: Tags: 2005-326g

Archived Information
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION

OFFICE OF SPECIAL EDUCATION & REHABILITATIVE SERVICES
OFFICE OF SPECIAL EDUCATION PROGRAMS
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20202
FISCAL YEAR 2005

APPLICATION FOR NEW GRANTS UNDER THE
INDIVIDUALS WITH DISABILITIES EDUCATION ACT (IDEA)
TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE AND DISSEMINATION TO IMPROVE

SERVICES AND RESULTS FOR CHILDREN
WITH DISABILITIES (CFDA 84.326)
NATIONAL TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE CENTER ON

ASSESSMENT FOR CHILDREN WITH DISABILITIES
(CFDA 84.326G)
DATED MATERIAL - OPEN IMMEDIATELY

CLOSING DATE: September 7, 2005
FORM APPROVED - OMB No. 1820-0028, EXP. DATE: 05/31/06

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Dear Applicant Letter................................….......................................... . .….….……………….A1
Priority (Competition) Description by Program
Technical Assistance and Dissemination to Improve Services and Results for Children with
Disabilities
National Technical Assistance Center on Assessment for Children with Disabilities

(CFDA No. 84.326G) …………………………………………………………………….…B2
Selection Criteria and Format for 84.326G............................................…............……….….B9
General Information on Completing an Application ..........................................………………...C1
Application Transmittal Instructions and Requirements for Intergovernmental

Review (Executive Order 12372). .................................................................……………………D1
Notice to All Applicants (Ensuring Equitable Access) and Application

Forms and Instructions.............................................................................…………………….….E1
Part I: Application for Federal Assistance (ED Form 424)
Part II: Budget Information -- Non-Construction Programs and Instructions

(ED Form 524)
Part III: Application Narrative
Part IV: Assurances and Certifications
Assurances -- Non-Construction Program
Certifications Regarding Lobbying; Debarment, Suspension, and

Other Responsibility Matters; and Drug-Free Workplace Requirements
(ED Form 80-0013)
Certification Regarding Debarment, Suspension, Ineligibility and Voluntary

Exclusion -- Lower Tier Covered Transactions (ED Form 80-0014)
Disclosure of Lobbying Activities
Survey on Ensuring Equal Opportunity for Applicants
Notice to All Applicants: The Government Performance and Results Act (GPRA)
Paperwork Burden Statement
According to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, no persons are required to respond
to a collection of information unless such collection displays a valid OMB control
number. The valid OMB control number for this information collection is 1820-0028.
The time required to complete this information collection is estimated to average 45
hours and 40 minutes per response, including the time to review instructions, search
existing data resources, gather the data needed, and complete and review the information
collection. If you have any comments concerning the accuracy of the time estimate(s) or
suggestions for improving this form, please write to: U.S. Department of Education,
Washington, D.C. 20202-4651. If you have comments or concerns regarding the status
of your individual submission of this form, write directly to: Office of Special Education
Programs, U.S. Department of Education, 400 Maryland Avenue, S.W., PCP 4106,
Washington, D.C. 20202-2600.
Dear Applicant:
This application packet contains information and the required forms for you to use in
submitting a new application for funding under one program authorized by the Individuals with
Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). This packet covers one competition under the Technical Assistance
and Dissemination to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities (CFDA 84.326)
program--National Technical Assistance Center on Assessment for Children with Disabilities (CFDA
No. 84.326G).
An application for an award must be: (1) hand-delivered, submitted electronically, or mailed
by the closing date; and, (2) for paper applications, have an original signature on at least one copy of
the assurances and certifications (Part IV of the application form). It is also important to include the
appropriate Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance (CFDA) numeric and alpha in Item #4 on ED
Form 424 (e.g., CFDA No. 84.326G) for paper applications.
Please note the following:
• APPLICATION SUBMISSION. Based on the precautionary procedures the U.S. Postal

Service is using to process mail, we are experiencing delays in the delivery of mail to the
Department. Therefore, you may want to consider sending your application by overnight
courier or submitting your application electronically.
• GRANTS.GOV APPLICATION SUBMISSION. Applications for grants under this

competition may be submitted electronically using the Grants.gov Apply site
(www.Grants.gov). Please read carefully the document that we have included immediately
following this letter (see page A-4), which includes helpful tips about submitting
electronically using the Grants.gov Apply site. Please note that you must follow the
Application Procedures as described in the Federal Register notice announcing this grant
competition. Information (including dates and times) about how to submit your
application electronically, or by mail or hand delivery, can also be found in section E-1
Application Transmittal Instructions and Requirements for Intergovernmental Review of
this application package.
• MAXIMUM AWARD AMOUNT. In addition to providing detailed budget information

for the total grant period requested, the competition included in this package has a
maximum award amount (See Page B-3 of this package). Please be advised that for the
priority in this package, the maximum award amount covers all project costs including
indirect costs.
• STRICT PAGE LIMITS. The competition included in this package limits the Part III
Application Narrative to a specified number of double-spaced pages. This page limitation
applies to all material presented in the application narrative -- including, for example, any
charts, tables, figures, and graphs. (Please refer to the specific requirements on page limits
A-1
for the priority/competition to which you are submitting an application - i.e., Section B-4 of
this package). The Department will reject, and will NOT consider an application that does
not adhere to the page limit requirements for the competition.
• FORMAT FOR APPLICATIONS. Please note that additional information regarding

formatting applications has been included on Pages C-3 and 4 of the “General Information
on Completing An Application” section of this package.
• PROTECTION OF HUMAN SUBJECTS IN RESEARCH. The discretionary grant

Application Form 424 (ED supplement to the SF 424 on Grants.gov) requires applicants to
indicate whether they plan to conduct research involving human subjects at any time during
the proposed project period. The Protection of Human Subjects in Research Attachment is
an integral part of the ED 424 form (ED supplement to the SF 424 on Grants.gov). It
includes information that applicants need to complete the protection of human subjects item
and, as appropriate, to provide additional information to the Department regarding human
subjects research projects. Additional information on completing the protection of human
subjects item is also available and can be accessed on the INTERNET at:
http://www.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocfo/gcsindex.html
http://www.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocfo/humansub.html
• RESPONSE TO GPRA. As required by the Government Performance and Results Act

(GPRA) of 1993 OSEP has developed a strategic plan for measuring GPRA performance.
The program included in this announcement is authorized under Part D - National
Activities to Improve Education of Children with Disabilities of the Individuals with
Disabilities Education Act. The Office of Special Education Programs (OSEP) will collect
information to assess progress and performance. See Performance Measures included in
the Priority Description section of this application package. Applicants are encouraged to
consider this information, as applications are prepared.
• COPIES OF THE APPLICATION. Current Government-wide policy requires that an

original and two copies need to be submitted. OSEP would appreciate receiving three
additional copies to facilitate the peer review process. This means an original and two
copies are required but we would appreciate your voluntarily submitting an additional three
copies (six applications in all). If you are submitting your application electronically, you
do not need to submit paper copies of the application. Please note: If an application is
recommended for funding and a grant award is issued, we will contact the applicant to
request a copy of the application on a diskette or CD. The Department is moving toward an
electronic grant filing system and an electronic copy of all applications that are being
funded will facilitate this effort.
A program officer is available to provide information to you regarding this competition.

Please refer to the name of the program contact at the end of the priority description. For
information about other U.S. Department of Education grant and contract opportunities, we
encourage you to use the Department's grant information web page which can be accessed on the
INTERNET at:
A-2
We appreciate your efforts to improve the provision of services for individuals with
disabilities.
Sincerely,
Louis C. Danielson, Ph.D.

Director
Research to Practice Division
Office of Special Education
Programs
A-3
IMPORTANT – PLEASE READ FIRST
U.S. Department of Education
Grants.gov Submission Procedures and Tips for Applicants
Please note that the Grants.gov site works differently than the Department of Education’s e-Application
system. This program will be using the Grants.gov APPLY function to accept electronic applications. To
facilitate your use of Grants.gov, this document includes important submission procedures you need to be
aware of to ensure your application is received timely and accepted by the Department of Education.
1) REGISTER EARLY – Grants.gov registration is a one-time process that takes several days to
complete. You cannot submit an application until all of the Get Started steps are complete. For
detailed information on the Get Started Steps, please go to: http://www.grants.gov/GetStarted
2) SUBMIT EARLY – We strongly recommend that you do not wait until the last day to submit
your application. Grants.gov will put a date/time stamp on your application after it is fully
uploaded. The time it takes to upload an application will vary depending on a number of factors
including the size of the application and the speed of your Internet connection. If you start uploading
your application before 4:30 Washington, DC time on the application deadline date, and it does not
finish uploading until after 4:30 pm, your application will be marked late. If that happens, please see
the section below on submission problems.
3) VERIFY SUBMISSION IS OK – You will want to verify that Grants.gov and Education receive
your Grants.gov submission timely and that it was validated successfully. To see the date/time your
application was received, login to Grants.gov and click on the Check Application Status link. For a
successful submission, the date/time received should be earlier than 4:30 pm on the deadline date,
AND the application status should be: Validated, Received by Agency, or Agency Tracking Number
Assigned.
If the date/time received is later than 4:30 pm Washington DC time on the closing date, your
application is late. If your application has a status of “Received” it is still awaiting validation by
Grants.gov. Once validation is complete, the status will either change to “Validated” or “Rejected
with Errors”. If the status is “Rejected with Errors,” your application has not been received
successfully. Some of the reasons Grants.gov may reject an application can be found on the
Grants.gov site: http://www.grants.gov/assets/ApplicationErrorTips.doc. If you discover your
application is late or has been rejected, please see the instructions below. Note: You will receive a
series of confirmations both online and via e-mail about the status of your application. Please do not
rely solely on e-mail to confirm whether your application has been received timely and validated
successfully.
Submission Problems – What should you do?

If you have problems submitting to Grants.gov before the closing date, please contact Grants.gov Customer
Support at 1-800-518-4726 or use the customer support available on the website:
http://www.grants.gov/CustomerSupport.
If electronic submission is optional and you have problems that you are unable to resolve before the deadline
date and time for electronic applications, please follow the transmittal instructions for hard copy applications
in the Federal Register notice and get a hard copy application postmarked by midnight on the deadline date.
A-4
If electronic submission is required, you must submit an electronic application before 4:30 pm, unless you
follow the procedures in the Federal Register notice and qualify for one of the exceptions to the electronic
submission requirement and submit, no later than two weeks before the application deadline date, a written
statement to the Department that you qualify for one of these exceptions. (See the Federal Register notice for
detailed instructions.)
Helpful Hints When Working with Grants.gov

Please note, once you download an application from Grants.gov, you will be working offline and saving data
on your computer. Please be sure to note where you are saving the Grants.gov file on your computer. You
will need to logon to Grants.gov to upload and submit the application. (This is different from e-Application,
where you are working online and saving data to Education’s database.) Please go to
http://www.grants.gov/ForApplicants for help with Grants.gov and click on the links in the lower right corner
of the screen under Applicant Tips and Tools.
MAC Users
If you do not have a Windows operating System, you will need to use a Windows Emulation program to
submit an application using Grants.gov. For additional information, review the PureEdge Support for
Macintosh white paper published by Pure Edge:
http://www.grants.gov/GrantsGov_UST_Grantee/!SSL!/WebHelp/MacSupportforPureEdge.pdf, and/or
contact Grants.gov Customer Support (http://www.grants.gov/CustomerSupport) for more information. If you
do not have a Windows emulation program and electronic submission is required, please follow
instructions in the Federal Register notice to obtain a waiver to the electronic submission requirement
no later than two weeks before the application deadline date. (See the Federal Register notice for detailed
instructions.)
A-5
PRIORITY DESCRIPTION
AND
SELECTION CRITERIA
FOR THE
TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE AND DISSEMINATION TO
IMPROVE SERVICES AND RESULTS FOR
FOR CHILDREN WITH DISABILITIES
B-1
NATIONAL TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE CENTER ON ASSESSMENT
FOR CHILDREN WITH DISABILITIES
(CFDA 84.326G)
DEADLINE: 09/07/05
ABSOLUTE PRIORITY:
Background of Priority: Federal and State education policies, including those based on the No
Child Left Behind Act of 2001 (NCLB), call for the inclusion of students with disabilities in
assessment and accountability programs in order to improve educational results for these
students. A series of recent Federal policies and initiatives are expected to enhance the inclusion
of students with disabilities in assessments and accountability. Among these are the
Department’s regulations in 34 CFR part 200 permitting alternate assessments based on alternate
achievement standards for students with the most significant cognitive disabilities. In addition,
on April 7, 2005, the Secretary announced the intent to provide additional flexibility that will
allow States to develop modified academic achievement standards and use alternate assessments
based on these modified achievement standards for students served under the IDEA who do not
have the most significant cognitive disabilities, but who are not able to participate in the regular
assessment, even with accommodations. The Department is also preparing a “Tool Kit” with
information to help States improve instruction and assessments for students with disabilities. On
June 3, 2005, the Department announced in the Federal Register (70 FR 32583) a competition to
support Comprehensive Regional and Content Centers that will focus on helping States to
implement NCLB and to build their capacity to assist LEAs and schools in implementing NCLB.
The Content Centers, one of which will focus specifically on assessments and accountability, are
intended to work primarily through the Regional Centers in providing technical assistance.
Statement of Priority: This priority supports one cooperative agreement for a Center to provide
technical assistance on improving results for students with disabilities by increasing their
participation rates in high quality assessment and accountability systems, improving the quality
of assessments in which they participate, improving the capacity of States to meet data collection
requirements, and strengthening accountability for results. The Center must accomplish this
mission through a combination of activities in the following areas: (1) needs assessments and
information gathering, (2) technical assistance and dissemination to improve the participation of
students with disabilities in assessments and accountability systems, (3) technical assistance to
improve the capacity of States to meet data collection requirements, (4) collaboration and
leadership, and (5) other functions.
Activity Area (1): The Center's needs assessments and information gathering activities
must include, but are not limited to:
(a) Conducting surveys of States and other entities to determine the status of the
implementation of assessment and accountability policies related to students with disabilities;
B-2
(b) Analyzing State-reported assessment data to track the participation and performance
of students with disabilities in large-scale assessments;
(c) Analyzing State and local policies and practices to determine the best approaches to
improve the participation of students with disabilities in assessment and accountability systems;
(d) Synthesizing research information on relevant topics such as assessment

accommodations, alternate assessments, data analysis and reporting, and other related areas; and
(e) Collecting research and technical information from the Technical Workgroup on
Large Scale Assessment for Children with Disabilities, the National Alternate Assessment
Center, the Research Institute on Progress Monitoring, research projects funded under the
Research on Accessible Reading Assessments competition, and other federally funded projects
as appropriate.
Activity Area (2): The Center's technical assistance and dissemination activities to
improve the participation of students with disabilities in high-quality assessments and
accountability systems must include, but are not limited to:
(a) Preparing and disseminating reports and documents on research findings and related
topics;
(b) Maintaining a Web site with relevant information and documents in a format that
meets a government or industry-recognized standard for accessibility;
(c) Conducting national and regional meetings and teleconferences, in collaboration with
other centers such as the Federal and Regional Resource Centers and the Comprehensive
Regional and Content Centers, to assist SEAs and LEAs and other relevant audiences in
continuing the implementation of assessment and accountability policies for students with
disabilities;
(d) Working directly with States and other stakeholders in collaboration with the
Comprehensive Regional and Content Centers to increase the participation of students with
disabilities in State and local assessment and accountability systems, and improve the quality of
assessment procedures;
(e) Disseminating information to specific audiences, including teachers, families,

administrators, policymakers and researchers, in collaboration with other technical assistance
providers, organizations, and researchers; and
(f) Collaborating with the Comprehensive Content Centers, particularly the Center on
Assessment and Accountability, to assist the Comprehensive Regional Centers in providing
technical assistance to States by supplying them with research-based information, products,
guidance, analyses, and tools.
B-3
Activity Area (3): The Center’s technical assistance activities to improve the capacity of
States to meet data collection requirements must include, but are not limited to:
(a) Conducting needs assessments and analyzing State reports to evaluate the capacity of
States to collect data on the participation and performance of students with disabilities on large-
scale assessments and to identify areas requiring technical assistance;
(b) Collecting information on best practices for State data collection;
(c) Developing technical assistance materials and resources that can be used to evaluate
and improve the capacity of States to collect data on the participation and performance of
students with disabilities on large-scale assessments; and
(d) Delivering and evaluating technical assistance to States to improve their capacity to
collect data on the participation and performance of students with disabilities on large-scale
assessments. Specific attention must be given to States engaged in large-scale assessment
planning or implementation projects funded under the Office of Special Education Programs’
(OSEP) General Supervision Enhancement Grant (GSEG) competition.
Activity Area (4): The Center's collaboration and leadership activities must include, but
are not limited to:
(a) Participating in a community or communities of practice related to the Center's

mission. The community or communities may include research experts, other federally funded
projects (such as the Regional Resource Centers, the Federal Resource Center, the Center to
Improve Access to the General Education Curriculum for Students with Disabilities at the
Elementary and Middle School Levels, and the Comprehensive Regional and Content Centers),
professional organizations (such as the National Association of State Directors of Special
Education, the Council for Exceptional Children, and the Council of Chief State School
Officers), and other projects and organizations (such as organizations representing parents or
disability organizations); and
(b) Convening topical meetings, at the request of OSEP, to study issues and develop
proactive recommendations for addressing challenges related to the participation of students with
disabilities in assessment and accountability systems.
Activity Area (5): The Center must also:
(a) Develop a strategic plan and submit it to OSEP for review and approval. The plan
must include, among other things, how the Center will collaborate with other Department of
Education technical assistance centers, including the Comprehensive Regional and Content
Centers. The plan must be revised and approved periodically as needed;
(b) Establish, maintain, and meet at least annually with a technical work group (TWG) to
ensure that the highest standards of scientific rigor are maintained in the Center’s work.
Members of this TWG must be approved by OSEP and must include membership from the
B-4
Technical Workgroup on Large Scale Assessment for Children with Disabilities and other
research experts in the areas of large scale assessments, instructional improvement and reform,
and instruction for students with disabilities;
(c) Establish, maintain, and meet at least annually with an advisory committee consisting
of representatives of SEAs and LEAs, individuals with disabilities, parents, educators,
professional organizations, advocacy groups, researchers, and other appropriate groups to review
and advise on the Center's activities, accomplishments, and strategic plan. The committee must
include membership that represents urban schools and underrepresented populations;
(d) Budget for three annual two-day meetings in Washington, DC to attend two Project
Directors' meetings and an OSEP Leadership Conference; and
(e) Budget for at least one trip monthly to attend meetings organized by projects and
organizations such as the Assessing Special Education Students State Collaborative on
Assessment and Student Standards (ASES SCASS), the National Association of State Directors
of Special Education, and Federal offices, on topics relevant to the Center's mission.
In deciding whether to continue this project for the fourth and fifth years, the Secretary
will consider the requirements of 34 CFR 75.253(a), and in addition--
(a) The recommendation of a review team consisting of experts selected by the

Secretary. The review will be conducted in Washington, DC during the last half of the project's
second year. Applicants must budget for the travel associated with this one-day intensive
review;
(b) The timeliness and effectiveness with which all requirements of the negotiated
cooperative agreement have been or are being met by the Center; and
(c) The degree to which the Center is making a positive contribution to the participation
of students with disabilities in State and local assessment and accountability systems.
PROGRAM AUTHORITY: 20 U.S.C. 1463 and 1481(d).
PERFORMANCE MEASURES: Under the Government Performance and Results Act

(GPRA), the Department is currently developing measures that will yield information on various
aspects of the quality of the Technical Assistance to Improve Services and Results for Children
with Disabilities program. The measures will focus on: the extent to which projects provide
high quality products and services; the relevance of project products and services to educational
and early intervention policy and practice; and the use of products and services to improve
educational and early intervention policy and practice.
Once the measures are developed, we will notify grantees if they will be required to
provide any information related to these measures.
B-5
Grantees will also be required to report information on their projects’ performance in
annual reports to the Department (34 CFR 75.590).
APPLICATIONS AVAILABLE: August 8, 2005.
DEADLINE FOR TRANSMITTAL OF APPLICATIONS: September 7, 2005.
DEADLINE FOR INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVIEW: September 19, 2005.
ESTIMATED AVAILABLE FUNDS: $1,000,000.
ESTIMATED AVERAGE SIZE OF AWARDS: $1,000,000.
MAXIMUM AWARDS: The Secretary does not intend to fund an application that proposes a
budget exceeding $1,000,000 for a single budget period of 12 months.
ESTIMATED NUMBER OF AWARDS: 1.
Note: The Department is not bound by any estimates in this notice.
PROJECT PERIOD: Up to 60 months.
PAGE LIMITS: If you are an applicant, Part III of an application submitted under this notice,
the application narrative, is where an applicant addresses the selection criteria that are used by
reviewers to evaluate the application. You must limit Part III to the equivalent of no more than
70 pages, using the following standards:
• A "page" is 8.5" x 11", (on one side only) with 1” margins (top, bottom, and
sides).
• Double-space (no more than three lines per vertical inch) all text in the
application narrative, including titles, headings, footnotes, quotations, references, and
captions, as well as all text in charts, tables, figures, and graphs.
• Use a font that is either 12-point or larger or no smaller than 10 pitch (characters
per inch).
The page limit does not apply to Part I, the cover sheet; Part II, the budget section,
including the narrative budget justification; Part IV, the assurances and certifications; or the one-
page abstract, the resumes, the bibliography, references, or the letters of support. However, you
must include all of the application narrative in Part III.
We will reject any application if --
• You apply these standards and exceed the page limit; or

• You apply other standards and exceed the equivalent of the page limit.
B-6
GENERAL REQUIREMENTS:
(a) Projects funded under this notice must make positive efforts to employ and advance
in employment qualified individuals with disabilities in project activities (see section 606 of
IDEA); and
(b) Applicants and grant recipients funded under this notice must involve individuals
with disabilities or parents of individuals with disabilities in planning, implementing, and
evaluating the projects (see section 682(a)(1)(A) of IDEA).
APPLICABLE REGULATIONS:
(a) The Education Department General Administrative Regulations (EDGAR) in 34 CFR

parts 74, 75, 77, 79, 80, 81, 82, 84, 85, 86, 97, 98, and 99; and (b) The selection criteria for this
program are drawn from EDGAR in 34 CFR 75.210.
Note: The regulations in 34 CFR part 79 apply to all applicants except federally recognized
Indian tribes.
Note: The regulations in 34 CFR part 86 apply to institutions of higher education only.
ELIGIBLE APPLICANTS: State educational agencies (SEAs), local educational agencies

(LEAs), public charter schools that are LEAs under State law, institutions of higher education
(IHEs), other public agencies, private nonprofit organizations, outlying areas, freely associated
States, Indian tribes or tribal organizations, and for-profit organizations.
INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVIEW:
The program in this notice is subject to the requirements of Executive Order 12372 and
the regulations in 34 CFR part 79. One of the objectives of the Executive Order is to foster an
intergovernmental partnership and a strengthened federalism. The Executive order relies on
processes developed by State and local governments for coordination and review of proposed
Federal financial assistance.
This document provides early notification of our specific plans and actions for this
program.
B-7
For further information about this priority contact:
David Egnor, Competition Manager

Research to Practice Division
Office of Special Education Programs
Telephone: (202) 245-7334
FAX: (202) 245-7615
Internet: [email protected]
TTD: 1-800-877-8339
B-8
SELECTION CRITERIA AND FORMAT FOR THE NATIONAL TECHNICAL
ASSISTANCE CENTER ON ASSESSMENT FOR CHILDREN WITH DISABILITIES
(CFDA 84.326G) COMPETITION
Part III of the application form requires a narrative that addresses the selection criteria that will
be used by reviewers in evaluating individual proposals. Applications are more likely to receive
favorable reviews by panels when they are organized according to the format suggested below.
This format was published in the FEDERAL REGISTER as an appendix to the program
regulations, and it addresses all the selection criteria used to evaluate applications required by
regulations. If you prefer to use a different format, you may wish to cross-reference the sections
of your application to the selection criteria to be sure that reviewers are able to find all relevant
information.
The selection criteria that will be used to evaluate applications submitted to the National
Technical Assistance Center on Assessment for Children with Disabilities (CFDA 84.326G)
competition are the selection criteria for new grants required by the EDGAR general selection
criteria menu. The maximum score for all of the criteria is 100 points.
A one-page abstract should precede the application narrative. The application narrative should
include the following sections in this order:
(a) Significance (15 points)
(1) The Secretary considers the significance of the proposed project.
(2) In determining the significance of the proposed project, the Secretary considers the
following factors:
(i) The potential contribution of the proposed project to increased knowledge or

understanding of educational problems, issues, or effective strategies;
(ii) The likelihood that the proposed project will result in system change or improvement;
(iii) The extent to which the proposed project is likely to build local capacity to provide,
improve, or expand services that address the needs of the target population;
(iv) The likely utility of the products (such as information, materials, processes, or
techniques) that will result from the proposed project, including the potential for their being used
effectively in a variety of other settings; and
(v) The importance or magnitude of the results or outcomes likely to be attained by the
proposed project.
(b) Quality of project services (30 points)
(1) The Secretary considers the quality of the services to be provided by the proposed
project.
B-9
(2) In determining the quality of the services to be provided by the proposed project, the
Secretary considers the quality and sufficiency of strategies for ensuring equal access and
treatment for eligible project participants who are members of groups that have traditionally been
underrepresented based on race, color, national origin, gender, age, or disability.
(3) In addition, the Secretary considers the following factors:
(i) The extent to which the services to be provided by the proposed project are
appropriate to the needs of the intended recipients or beneficiaries of those services;
(ii) The extent to which entities that are to be served by the proposed technical assistance
project demonstrate support for the project;
(iii) The extent to which the services to be provided by the proposed project reflect
up-to-date knowledge from research and effective practice;
(iv) The likely impact of the services to be provided by the proposed project on the
intended recipients of those services;
(v) The extent to which the services to be provided by the proposed project involve the
collaboration of appropriate partners for maximizing the effectiveness of project services; and
(vi) The extent to which the technical assistance services to be provided by the proposed
project involve the use of efficient strategies, including the use of technology, as appropriate, and
the leveraging of non-project resources.
(c) Quality of project personnel (20 points)
(1) The Secretary considers the quality of the personnel who will carry out the proposed
project.
(2) In determining the quality of project personnel, the Secretary considers the extent to
which the applicant encourages applications for employment from persons who are members of
groups that have traditionally been underrepresented based on race, color, national origin,
gender, age, or disability.
(3) In addition, the Secretary considers the following factors:
(i) The qualifications, including relevant training and experience, of key project
personnel; and
(ii) The qualifications, including relevant training and experience, of project consultants
or subcontractors.
B-10
(d) Quality of the management plan (25 points)
(1) The Secretary considers the quality of the management plan for the proposed project.
(2) In determining the quality of the management plan for the proposed project, the
Secretary considers the following factors:
(i) The adequacy of the management plan to achieve the objectives of the proposed
project on time and within budget, including clearly defined responsibilities, timelines, and
milestones for accomplishing project tasks;
(ii) The adequacy of procedures for ensuring feedback and continuous improvement in
the operation of the proposed project;
(iii) The adequacy of mechanisms for ensuring high-quality products and services from
the proposed project;
(iv) The extent to which the time commitments of the project director and principal
investigator and other key project personnel are appropriate and adequate to meet the objectives
of the proposed project; and
(v) How the applicant will ensure that a diversity of perspectives are brought to bear in
the operation of the proposed project, including those of parents, teachers, the business
community, a variety of disciplinary and professional fields, recipients or beneficiaries of
services, or others, as appropriate.
(e) Adequacy of resources (10 points)
(1) The Secretary considers the adequacy of resources for the proposed project.
(2) In determining the adequacy of resources for the proposed project, the Secretary
considers the following factors:
(i) The adequacy of support, including facilities, equipment, supplies, and other
resources, from the applicant organization or the lead applicant organization;
(ii) The extent to which the budget is adequate to support the proposed project; and
(iii) The extent to which the costs are reasonable in relation to the number of persons to
be served and to the anticipated results and benefits.
B-11
GENERAL INFORMATION
ON COMPLETING
AN APPLICATION
C-1
GENERAL INFORMATION ON COMPLETING AN APPLICATION
Potential applicants frequently direct questions to officials of the Department regarding

application notices and programmatic and administrative regulations governing various direct grant
programs. To assist potential applicants, the Office of Special Education Programs staff have
assembled the following most commonly raised issues. In general, this information applies to the
grant competitions covered by this application package.
• EXTENSION OF DEADLINES
Waivers for individual applications are not granted, regardless of the circumstances. Under very
extraordinary circumstances a closing date may be changed. Such changes are announced in the
Federal Register.
• COPIES OF THE APPLICATION
Current Government-wide policy is that only an original and two copies need to be submitted.
OSEP would appreciate receiving three additional copies to facilitate the peer review process.
This would mean an original and two copies need to be submitted and we would appreciate your
voluntarily submitting an additional three copies (six applications in all). Copies of the
application may be bound, but it is not necessary or required. If bound, one copy should be left
unbound to facilitate electronic scanning and any necessary reproduction. Applicants should not
use colored paper, foldouts, photographs, or other materials that are hard to duplicate.
Please Note: If an application is recommended for funding and a grant award is issued, we will
contact the applicant to request a copy of the application on a diskette or CD. The Department
is moving toward an electronic grant filing system and an electronic copy of all applications that
are being funded will facilitate this effort.
• MAKING APPLICATIONS MORE ACCESSIBLE TO REVIEWERS WHO ARE BLIND OR

HAVE LOW VISION
The Department will accept one copy of the application in an accessible format (i.e., IBM PC
compatible WordPerfect or ASCII code diskette) along with the original and two print copies of
the application. The accessible format copy can be used with available software to convert the
text of the application into Braille, or with text to voice applications. If there are any differences
in the print original provided on the disk and in print, the print original is assumed to be the
correct version. Please note that it is not a requirement that one copy of the application be in an
accessible format.
• MISSED DEADLINES AND SUBMISSION UNDER OTHER COMPETITIONS
Should an application miss the deadline for a particular competition, it may be submitted to
another competition. However, if an application is properly prepared to meet the specifications
of one competition, it is extremely unlikely that it would be favorably evaluated under a
different competition.
• SUBMISSION TO MORE THAN ONE PROGRAM
C-2
Applications may be submitted to more than one Federal program if you are unsure of the most
appropriate program. Each application should be prepared following the instructions for that
particular program as closely as possible (which may require some reformulation). It is very
helpful if each program is notified that an identical or similar application is being submitted to
another program.
• HELP PREPARING APPLICATIONS
We are happy to provide general program information. Clearly it would not be appropriate for
staff to participate in the actual writing of an application, but we can respond to specific questions
about our application requirements and evaluation criteria, or about the announced priorities.
Applicants should understand that such previous contact is not required, nor does it guarantee the
success of an application.
• NOTIFICATION OF FUNDING
The time required to complete the evaluation of applications is variable. Once applications have
been received staff must determine the areas of expertise needed to appropriately evaluate the
applications, identify and contact potential reviewers, convene peer review panels, and
summarize and review the recommendations of the review panels. You can expect to receive
notification within 3 to 6 months of the application closing date, depending on the number of
applications received and the number of competitions with closing dates at about the same time.
The requested start date can be no later than January 1 of the year following the closing date of
the competition.
• POSSIBILITY OF LEARNING THE OUTCOME OF REVIEW PANELS PRIOR TO

OFFICIAL NOTIFICATION
Every year we are called by a number of applicants who have legitimate reasons for needing to
know the outcome of the review prior to official notification. Some applicants need to make job
decisions, some need to notify a local school district, etc. Regardless of the reason, we cannot
share information about the review with anyone until the Assistant Secretary has approved a slate
of projects recommended for funding. You will be notified as quickly as possible either by
telephone (if your application is recommended for funding), or through a letter (if your
application is not successful).
• FORMAT FOR APPLICATIONS
The application narrative (Part III of the application form) should be organized to follow the
exact sequence of the components in the selection criteria used to evaluate applications. (The
selection criteria for the competitions covered by this packet are listed following the specific
competition information in section “B” of this packet.) A table of contents, list of priority
requirements, and a one-page abstract summarizing the objectives, activities, project participants,
and expected outcomes of the proposed project should precede the application narrative. If you
prefer to use a different format, you may wish to cross-reference the sections of your application
to the selection criteria to be sure that reviewers are able to find all relevant information.
C-3
To aid in screening and reviewing the application, applicants should list in Part II and prior to the
abstract, all general, special, and other requirements for the priority and corresponding page
number (s) where requirements are addressed within the application. Page limits do not
apply to this list. (All requirements are found in each priority description included in this
application package.) The format included below is an example of how you might provide this
information in your application.
Page # Requirements
______ (a) Projects funded under this notice must make positive efforts to employ
and advance in employment qualified individuals with disabilities in project
activities. (See Section 606 of IDEA)
______ (b) Applicants and grant recipients funded under this notice must involve
individuals with disabilities or parents of individuals with disabilities in
planning, implementing, and evaluating the projects.
(See Section 661(f)(1)(A) of IDEA)
______ (c) Applicant must describe steps to ensure equitable access to, and
participation in, its program for students, teachers, and other program
beneficiaries with special needs. (See Section 427, GEPA)
______ (d) Projects funded under these priorities must budget for a two-day
Project’s Directors’ meeting in Washington, D.C. during each year of the
project.
• BEST WAY TO PREPARE PROGRAM ABSTRACT
The program abstract should be one page in length. It would be helpful if it included; the title of
the program, the name of the Absolute Priority, and the CFDA Number (e.g., 84.326G, etc.).
• PAGE LIMITS
Please note that all applications submitted under the competition in this application package must
adhere to the Part III - Application Narrative page limit requirements that are specified under
each priority/competition description. Your application should provide enough information to
allow the review panel to evaluate the importance and impact of the project as well as to make
knowledgeable judgments about the methods you propose to use (design, subjects, sampling
procedures, measures, instruments, data analysis strategies, etc.). It is often helpful to have:
(l) Staff Vitae--They should include each person's title and role in the proposed project and
contain only information that is relevant to this proposed project's activities and/or
publications. Vitae for consultants and Advisory Council members should be similarly
brief.
(2) Instruments--except in the case of generally available and well known instruments.
(3) Agreements--when the participation of an agency other than the applicant is critical to the
project. This is particularly critical when an intervention will be implemented within an
agency, or when subjects will be drawn from particular agencies. Letters of cooperation
C-4
should be specific, indicating agreement to implement a particular intervention or to
provide access to a particular group of students.
The items listed above are not included under page limits.
• MAKING SURE APPLICATION IS ASSIGNED TO THE CORRECT COMPETITION
Applicants should clearly indicate in Item 3 on the application (ED Form 424) the CFDA number
of the program priority (e.g., 84.326G, etc.) representing the competition in which the application
should be considered. If this information is not provided, your application may inadvertently be
assigned and reviewed under a different competition from the one you intended.
• RETURN OF NON-FUNDED APPLICATIONS
We do not return original copies of applications. Thus, applicants should retain at least one copy
of the application. Copies of reviewer comments will be mailed to all applicants.
• PROPOSED STAFF AVAILABILITY TO PROJECT
For each staff person named in the application, please provide documentation of all internal and
external time commitments. In instances where a staff person is committed on a federally
supported project, please provide the project name, Federal office, program title, the project
Federal award number, and the amount of committed time by each project year. This information
(e.g., Staff: Jane Doe; Project Name: Succeeding in the General Curriculum; Federal office:
Office of Special Education Programs; Program title: Field Initiated Research; Award number:
H324C980624; Time commitments: Year 1—30%; Year 2—25% and Year 3—40%) can be
provided as an Appendix to the application.
In general, we will not reduce time commitments on currently funded grants from the time
proposed in the original application. Therefore, we will not consider for funding any application
where key staff are bid above a time commitment level that staff have available to bid. Further,
the time commitments stated in newly submitted applications will not be negotiated down to
permit the applicant to receive a new grant award.
• USE OF PERSON LOADING CHARTS
It is important for applicants to include proposed time commitments for all project personnel.
Also, program officials and applicants often find person loading charts useful formats for
showing project personnel and their time commitments to individual activities. A person loading
chart is a tabular representation of major evaluation activities by number of days spent by each
key person involved in each activity, as shown in the following example.
C-5
Table #
Person Loading Chart - Time in Day(s) by Person*
Time in Day(s) by Person
Activity Person A Person B Person C Person D
Library Research 15 20 0 0
Hire Staff 0 0 0 5
Prepare Materials 5 25 0 0
Train Raters 0 2 0 0
Data Collection 60 60 0 0
Data Analysis 0 0 25 5
Dissemination 0 1 0 10
(manuscripts, etc.)
*Note: All figures represent FTE for the academic year.
• DELIVERING/SENDING APPLICATIONS TO THE COMPETITION MANAGER
Applications can be mailed or hand delivered, or submitted electronically but in either case must
go to the Application Control Center at the address listed in the Application Transmittal
Instructions. Delivering or sending the application to the competition manager in the program
office may prevent it from being logged in on time to the appropriate competition and may result
in the application not being reviewed.
• ALLOWED TRAVEL UNDER THESE PROJECTS
Travel is allowed if the travel specifically relates to the expressed goals of the project. Travel by
students to further their education under the project's goals is also allowed. Travel to conferences
is the travel item that is most likely to be questioned during negotiations. Such travel is
sometimes allowed when it is for purposes of dissemination, when there will be results to be
disseminated, and when it is clear that a conference presentation or workshop is an effective way
of reaching a particular target group.
• FUNDING OF APPROVED APPLICATIONS

It is often the case that the number of applications recommended for approval by the reviewers
exceeds the dollars available for funding projects under a particular competition. When the panel
reviews are completed for a particular competition, the individual reviewer scores and
applications are ranked. The higher ranked, approved applications are funded first, and there are
often lower ranked, approved applications that do not receive funding. Sometimes, one or two
applications that are approved and fall next in rank order (after those projects selected for
funding) are placed on hold. If dollars become available as a result of negotiations, or if a higher
ranked applicant declines the award, the projects on hold may receive funding. If you receive a
C-6
letter stating that you will not receive funding, then your project has neither been selected for
funding nor placed on hold.
• INDIRECT COST RATE
There is no maximum indirect cost for the competitions in this application package. An
organization’s current effective indirect cost rate is the rate that should be reflected in your
proposed budget.
• ISSUES RAISED DURING DISCUSSIONS PRIOR TO AWARD
If your application is recommended for funding, discussions may be held prior to award to clarify
technical or budget issues. These are issues that have been identified during panel and staff
review. Generally, technical issues are minor issues that require clarification. Alternative
approaches may be presented for your consideration, or you may be asked to provide additional
information or rationale for something you have proposed to do. Sometimes, concerns are stated
as "conditions". These are concerns that have been identified as so critical that the award cannot
be made unless those conditions are met. Questions are also raised about the proposed budget
during the discussion phase. Generally, budget issues are raised because there is inadequate
justification or explanation of the particular budget item, or because the budget item does not
seem critical to the successful completion of the project. A Federal project officer will present
the issues to you and ask you to respond. If you do not understand the question, you should ask
for clarification. In responding to discussion items you should provide any additional
information or clarification requested. You may feel that an issue was addressed in the
application. It may not, however, have been explained in enough detail to make it understood by
reviewers, and more information should be provided. If you are asked to make changes that you
feel could seriously affect the project's success, you may provide reasons for not making the
changes, or provide alternative suggestions. Similarly, if proposed budget reductions will, in
your opinion, seriously affect the proposed activities, you may want to explain why and provide
additional justification for the proposed expenses. Your changes, explanations, and alternative
suggestions will be carefully evaluated by staff. In some instances, an applicant may again be
contacted for additional information. An award cannot be made until all issues have been
resolved and conditions met.
• TREATING A PRIORITY AS TWO SEPARATE COMPETITIONS. In the past, there have

been problems in finding peer reviewers without conflicts of interest where applications are made
by many entities throughout the country. The Standing Panel requirements under the IDEA
Amendments of 1997 have also placed additional constraints on the availability of reviewers.
Therefore, The Department has determined that, for some discretionary priorities, applications
may be ranked and selected for funding in two or more groups, which will ensure the availability
of a much larger group of reviewers without conflicts of interest. This procedure will increase the
quality, independence and fairness of the review process and will permit panel members to
review applications under discretionary priorities to which they have also submitted applications.
C-7
• SUCCESSFUL APPLICATIONS AND ESTIMATED/PROJECTED BUDGET AMOUNTS IN
SUBSEQUENT YEARS
There is a maximum award amount specified for the priority/competitions included in this
package. The Department rejects and does not consider an application that proposes a budget
exceeding the maximum amount for any single budget period of 12 months for the priorities
included in this package. Please refer to the priority description to determine the maximum
award for any one particular competition. Since the yearly budgets for multi-year projects will be
negotiated at the time of the initial award, applicants must include detailed budgets for each year
of their proposed project. Generally, out-year funding levels most likely will not exceed 1st year
budgets. However, budget modifications during the negotiation process, the findings from the
previous year, or needed changes in the study design can affect your budget requirements in
subsequent years, but in no case will out-year budgets exceed the maximum award amount.
• REQUIREMENT TO REPORT THE RESULTS OF GRANT ACTIVITIES
The Department shall, where appropriate, require recipients of all grants, contracts and
cooperative agreements under Part D of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act to prepare
reports describing their procedures, findings, and other relevant information. The Department
shall require their delivery to the Department of Education and other networks as The Department
may determine appropriate. (20 U.S.C. 1461)
• DIFFERENCE BETWEEN A COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT AND A GRANT
A cooperative agreement is similar to a grant in that its principal purpose is to accomplish a

public purpose of support or stimulation as authorized by a Federal statute. It differs from a grant
in the sense that in a cooperative agreement substantial involvement is anticipated between the
executive agency (in this case the Department of Education) and the recipient during the
performance of the contemplated activity.
• DIFFERENCE BETWEEN AN ABSOLUTE PRIORITY, AN INVITATIONAL PRIORITY,

AND A COMPETITIVE PRIORITY
An absolute priority is a priority that an applicant must address in order to receive an award. If
an applicant does not address an absolute priority, their application will be returned as being non-
responsive to the priority.
An invitational priority is a priority that reflects a particular interest of the Department, and an
applicant is encouraged to address the invitational priority along with the required
absolute priority. However, an applicant choosing to address an invitational priority, will not
receive any competitive preference over other applications.
A competitive priority is like an invitational priority in that it reflects a particular interest of the
Department, and an applicant is encouraged to address the competitive priority along with the
required absolute priority. A competitive priority may be handled in one of two ways: (1) an
application may be awarded additional points depending on how effectively it addresses the
C-8
competitive priority; or (2) an application that meets a competitive priority may be selected over
an application of comparable merit that does not address the competitive priority. The type of
competitive priority for a particular competition is always included in the FEDERAL REGISTER
announcement.
• OBTAINING COPIES OF THE FEDERAL REGISTER, PROGRAM REGULATIONS AND

FEDERAL STATUTES
Copies of these materials can usually be found at your local library. If not, they can be obtained
by writing to:
Superintendent of Documents
U.S. Government Printing Office
Washington, D.C. 20402
Telephone: (202) 512-1800.
Information about the Department's funding opportunities, including copies of application

notices for discretionary grant competitions, can be viewed on the Department's grant information web
page which can be accessed on the INTERNET at:
However, the official application notice for a discretionary grant competition is the notice published in
the FEDERAL REGISTER.
C-9
APPLICATION TRANSMITTAL INSTRUCTIONS
AND
REQUIREMENTS FOR INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVIEW
E-1
Application Transmittal Instructions
ATTENTION ELECTRONIC APPLICANTS: Please note that you must follow the Application
Procedures as described in the Federal Register notice announcing the grant competition.
Some programs may require electronic submission of applications, and those programs
will have specific requirements and waiver instructions in the Federal Register notice.
If you want to apply for a grant and be considered for funding, you must meet the following
deadline requirements:
Applications Submitted Electronically
You must submit your grant application through the Internet using the software provided on the
Grants.gov Web site (http://www.grants.gov) by 4:30 p.m. (Washington, DC time) on the
application deadline date.
If you submit your application through the Internet via the e-Grants Web site, you will receive an
automatic acknowledgment when we receive your application.
For more information on using Grants.gov, please refer to the Notice Inviting Applications that
was published in the Federal Register, the Grants.gov Submission Procedures and Tips document
found in the application package instructions, and visit http://www.grants.gov.
Applications Sent by Mail
You must mail the original and two copies of the application on or before the deadline
date to. To help expedite our review of your application, we would appreciate your
voluntarily including an additional 3 copies of your application.
Please mail copies to:

Application Control Center
Attention: CFDA# 84.326G
400 Maryland Avenue, SW
Washington, DC 20202 - 4260
You must show one of the following as proof of mailing:
(1) A legibly dated U. S. Postal Service Postmark.

(2) A legible mail receipt with the date of mailing stamped by the U. S. Postal Service.
(3) A dated shipping label, invoice, or receipt from a commercial carrier.
(4) Any other proof of mailing acceptable to the Secretary.
If you mail an application through the U.S. Postal Service, we do not accept either of the
following as proof of mailing:
(1) A private metered postmark.
D-1
(2) A mail receipt that is not dated by the U.S. Postal Services.
An applicant should note that the U.S. Postal Service does not uniformly provide a dated
postmark. Before relying on this method, an applicant should check with its local post
office.
Applications Delivered by Commercial Carrier:
Special Note: Due to recent disruptions to normal mail delivery, the

Department encourages you to consider using an alternative delivery method
(for example, a commercial carrier, such as Federal Express or United Parcel
Service; or U. S. Postal Service Express Mail) to transmit your application for
this competition to the Department. If you use an alternative delivery method,
please obtain the appropriate proof of mailing under “Applications Sent by
Mail,” then follow the mailing instructions under the appropriate delivery
method.
Applications that are delivered by commercial carrier, such as Federal Express, United
Parcel Service, etc. should be mailed to the:

Application Control Center – Stop 4260
7100 Old Landover Road
Landover, MD 20785-1506
Applications Delivered by Hand
You or your courier must hand deliver the original and number of copies requested of the
application by 4:30 p.m. (Washington, DC time) on or before the deadline date. To help
expedite our review of your application, we would appreciate your voluntarily including an
additional 3 copies of your application.
Please hand deliver copies to:

550 12th Street, SW
PCP - Room 7041
Washington, DC 20202 – 4260
The Application Control Center accepts application deliveries daily between 8:00 a.m. and
4:30 p.m. (Washington, DC time), except Saturdays, Sundays and Federal holidays.
D-2
Appendix
Intergovernmental Review of Federal Programs
This appendix applies to each program that is subject to the requirements of Executive Order 12372
(Intergovernmental Review of Federal Programs) and the regulations in 34 CFR part 79.
The objective of the Executive order is to foster an intergovernmental partnership and to strengthen
federalism by relying on State and local processes for State and local government coordination and review
of proposed Federal financial assistance.
Applicants must contact the appropriate State Single Point of Contact to find out about, and to
comply with, the State's process under Executive Order 12372. Applicants proposing to perform activities in
more than one State should immediately contact the Single Point of Contact for each of those States and
follow the procedure established in each of those States under the Executive order. A listing containing the
Single Point of Contact for each State is included in this appendix.
In States that have not established a process or chosen a program for review, State, areawide,
regional, and local entities may submit comments directly to the Department.
Any State Process Recommendation and other comments submitted by a State Single Point of
Contact and any comments from State, areawide, regional, and local entities must be mailed or hand-
delivered by the date indicated in the actual application notice to the following address: The Secretary, EO
12372--CFDA# [commenter must insert number--including suffix letter, if any], U.S. Department of
Education, room 7W301, 400 Maryland Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20202.
Proof of mailing will be determined on the same basis as applications (see 34 CFR 75.102).
Recommendations or comments may be hand-delivered until 4:30 p.m. (Washington, DC time) on the date
indicated in the actual application notice.
PLEASE NOTE THAT THE ABOVE ADDRESS IS NOT THE SAME ADDRESS AS THE ONE TO
WHICH THE APPLICANT SUBMITS ITS COMPLETED APPLICATION. DO NOT SEND APPLICATIONS
TO THE ABOVE ADDRESS.
D- 3
STATE SINGLE POINTS OF CONTACT (SPOCs)
It is estimated that in 2004 the Federal Government will outlay $400 billion in grants to State and
local governments. Executive Order 12372, "Intergovernmental Review of Federal Programs," was issued
with the desire to foster the intergovernmental partnership and strengthen federalism by relying on State
and local processes for the coordination and review of proposed Federal financial assistance and direct
Federal development. The Order allows each State to designate an entity to perform this function. Below is
the official list of those entities. For those States that have a home page for their designated entity, a direct
link has been provided on the official version: http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/grants/spoc.html.
States that are not listed on this page have chosen not to participate in the intergovernmental review
process, and therefore do not have a SPOC. If you are located within one of these States, you may still
send application materials directly to a Federal awarding agency.
Contact information for Federal agencies that award grants can be found in The Catalog of Federal
Domestic Assistance Catalog Contents Page. You can access Appendix IV by Agency
[http://12.46.245.173/CFDA/appx4_web.pdf] or by State [http://12.46.245.173/CFDA/appx4_web_state.pdf].
ARKANSAS CALIFORNIA
Tracy L. Copeland Grants Coordination
Manager, State Clearinghouse State Clearinghouse
Office of Intergovernmental Services Office of Planning and Research
Department of Finance and Administration P.O. Box 3044, Room 222
1515 W. 7th Street, Room 412 Sacramento, California 95812-3044
Little Rock, Arkansas 72203 Telephone: (916) 445-0613
Telephone: (501) 682-1074 FAX: (916) 323-3018
FAX: (501) 682-5206 [email protected]
[email protected]
DELAWARE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Sandra R. Stump Marlene Jefferson
Executive Department DC Government Office of Partnerships
Office of the Budget and Grants Development
540 S. Dupont Highway , 3rd Floor 414 4th Street, NW
Dover, Delaware 19901 Washington, DC 20001
Telephone: (302) 739-3323 Telephone: (202) 727-6518
FAX: (302) 739-5661 FAX: (202) 727-1652
[email protected] [email protected]
FLORIDA GEORGIA
Lauren P. Milligan Barbara Jackson
Florida State Clearinghouse Georgia State Clearinghouse
Florida Dept. of Environmental 270 Washington Street, SW, 8th Floor
Protection Atlanta, Georgia 30334
3900 Commonwealth Boulevard Telephone: (404) 656-3855
Mall Station 47 FAX: (404) 656-7901
Tallahassee, Florida 32399-3000 [email protected]
Telephone: (850) 245-2161
FAX: (850) 245-2190
[email protected]
D- 4
ILLINOIS IOWA
Roukaya McCaffrey Kathy Mable
Department of Commerce and Iowa Department of Management
Economic Opportunities State Capitol Building Room G12
620 East Adams, 6th Floor 1007 E Grand Avenue
Springfield, Illinois, 62701 Des Moines, Iowa 50319
FAX: (217) 558-0473 FAX: (515) 242-5897
[email protected] [email protected]
KENTUCKY MAINE
Ron Cook Joyce Benson
The Governor’s Office for Local State Planning Office
Development 184 State Street
1024 Capital Center Drive, Suite 340 38 State House Station
Frankfort, Kentucky 40601 Augusta, Maine 04333
Telephone: (502) 573-2382 / (800) 346-5606 Telephone: (207) 287-3261
FAX: (502) 573-2512 (direct): (207) 287-1461
[email protected] FAX: (207) 287-6489
[email protected]
MARYLAND MICHIGAN
Linda C. Janey, J.D. Richard Pfaff
Director, Capital Planning and Southeast Michigan Council of Governments
Development Review 535 Griswold, Suite 300
Maryland Department of Planning Detroit, Michigan 48226
301 West Preston Street, Room 1104 Telephone: (313) 961-4266
Baltimore, Maryland 21201-2305 FAX: (313) 961-4869
Telephone: (410) 767-4490 [email protected]
FAX: (410) 767-4480
[email protected]
MISSISSIPPI MISSOURI
Mildred Tharpe Federal Assistance Clearinghouse
Clearinghouse Officer Office of Administration
Department of Finance and P.O. Box 809
Administration Truman Building, Room 840
1301 Woolfolk Building, Suite E Jefferson City, Missouri 65102
501 North West Street Telephone: (573) 751-4834
Jackson, Mississippi 39201 FAX: (573) 522-4395
Fax: (601) 359-6758
D- 5
NEVADA NEW HAMPSHIRE
Michael Stafford MaryAnn Manoogian
Department of Administration Director, New Hampshire Office of
State Clearinghouse Energy and Planning
209 E. Musser Street, Room 200 Attn: Intergovernmental Review Process
Carson City, Nevada 89701 Benjamin Frost
Telephone: (775) 684-0209 57 Regional Drive
FAX: (775) 684-0260 Concord, New Hampshire 03301-8519
[email protected] Telephone: (603) 271-2155
FAX: (603) 271-2615
[email protected]
NEW YORK NORTH DAKOTA
Linda Shkrell Jim Boyd
Office of Public Security ND Department of Commerce
Homeland Security Grants Coordination 1600 East Century Avenue, Suite 2
633 3rd Avenue P.O. Box 2057
New York, NY 10017 Bismarck, North Dakota 58502-2057
FAX: (212) 867-1725 FAX: (701) 328-2308
[email protected]
RHODE ISLAND SOUTH CAROLINA
Joyce Karger SC Clearinghouse
Department of Administration Budget and Control Board
One Capitol Hill Office of State Budget
Providence Rhode Island 02908-5870 1201 Main Street, Suite 950
Telephone: (401) 222-6181 Columbia, South Carolina 29201
FAX: (401) 222-2083 Telephone: (803) 734-0494
[email protected]
TEXAS UTAH
Denise S. Francis Sophia DiCaro
Director, State Grants Team Utah State Clearinghouse
Governor’s Office of Budget and Planning Governor’s Office of Planning and Budget
P.O. Box 12428 Utah
Austin, Texas 78711 Capitol Complex
Telephone: (512) 305-9415 Suite E210, P.O. Box 142210
FAX: (512) 936-2681 Salt Lake City, Utah 84114-2210
[email protected] Telephone: (801) 538-1027
FAX: (801) 538-1547
[email protected]
D- 6
WEST VIRGINIA WISCONSIN
Fred Cutlip, Director Jeff Smith
Community Development Division Section Chief, Federal/State Relations
West Virginia Development Office Wisconsin Department of Administration
Building #6, Room 553 101 East Wilson Street, 6th Floor
Charleston, West Virginia 25305 P.O. Box 7868
Telephone: (304) 558-4010 Madison, Wisconsin 53707
FAX: (304) 558-3248 Telephone: (608) 266-0267
[email protected]
AMERICAN SAMOA GUAM
Pat M. Galea'i Director
Federal Grants/Programs Coordinator Bureau of Budget and Mgmt. Research
Office of Federal Programs/Office of the Office of the Governor
Governor P.O. Box 2950
Department of Commerce Agana, Guam 96910
American Samoa Government Telephone: 011-671-472-2285
Pago Pago, American Samoa 96799 FAX: 011-671-472-2825
Fax: (684) 633-4195
[email protected]
NORTH MARIANA ISLANDS PUERTO RICO
Ms. Jacoba T. Seman Jose Caballero / Mayra Silva
Federal Programs Coordinator Puerto Rico Planning Board
Office of Management and Budget Federal Proposals Review Office
Office of the Governor Minillas Government Center
Saipan, MP 96950 P.O. Box 41119
Telephone: (670) 664-2289 San Juan, Puerto Rico 00940-1119
FAX: (670) 664-2272 Telephone: (787) 723-6190
VIRGIN ISLANDS
Ira Mills
Director, Office of Management and
Budget
# 41 Norre Gade Emancipation Garden
Station, Second Floor
Saint Thomas, Virgin Islands 00802
Telephone: (340) 774-0750
FAX: (787) 776-0069
[email protected]
Changes to this list can be made only after OMB is notified by a State’s officially designated
representative. E-mail messages can be sent to [email protected]. If you prefer, you may send
correspondence to the following postal address:
Attn: Grants Management

Office of Management and Budget
New Executive Office Building, Suite 6025
725 17th Street, NW
Washington, DC 20503
Please note: Inquiries about obtaining a Federal grant should not be sent to the OMB e-mail or postal address
shown above. The best source for this information is the Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance or CFDA
http://www.cfda.gov and the Grants.gov website (http://www.grants.gov).
D- 7
NOTICE TO ALL APPLICANTS
(ENSURING EQUITABLE ACCESS)
AND
APPLICATION FORMS AND INSTRUCTIONS
E-0
OMB Control No. 1890-0007 (Exp. 11/30/2007)
NOTICE TO ALL APPLICANTS
The purpose of this enclosure is to inform you about you may provide a clear and succinct description of
a new provision in the Department of Education's how you plan to address those barriers that are
General Education Provisions Act (GEPA) that applicable to your circumstances. In addition, the
applies to applicants for new grant awards under information may be provided in a single narrative, or,
Department programs. This provision is Section 427 if appropriate, may be discussed in connection with
of GEPA, enacted as part of the Improving America's related topics in the application.
Schools Act of 1994 (Public Law (P.L.) 103-382).
Section 427 is not intended to duplicate the
To Whom Does This Provision Apply? requirements of civil rights statutes, but rather to
ensure that, in designing their projects, applicants for
Section 427 of GEPA affects applicants for new grant Federal funds address equity concerns that may affect
awards under this program. ALL APPLICANTS the ability of certain potential beneficiaries to fully
FOR NEW AWARDS MUST INCLUDE participate in the project and to achieve to high
INFORMATION IN THEIR APPLICATIONS standards. Consistent with program requirements and
TO ADDRESS THIS NEW PROVISION IN its approved application, an applicant may use the
ORDER TO RECEIVE FUNDING UNDER THIS Federal funds awarded to it to eliminate barriers it
PROGRAM. identifies.
(If this program is a State-formula grant program, a What are Examples of How an Applicant Might
State needs to provide this description only for Satisfy the Requirement of This Provision?
projects or activities that it carries out with funds
reserved for State-level uses. In addition, local The following examples may help illustrate how an
school districts or other eligible applicants that apply applicant may comply with Section 427.
to the State for funding need to provide this
description in their applications to the State for (1) An applicant that proposes to carry out an adult
funding. The State would be responsible for ensuring literacy project serving, among others, adults with
that the school district or other local entity has limited English proficiency, might describe in its
submitted a sufficient section 427 statement as application how it intends to distribute a brochure
described below.) about the proposed project to such potential
participants in their native language.
What Does This Provision Require?
(2) An applicant that proposes to develop
Section 427 requires each applicant for funds (other instructional materials for classroom use might
than an individual person) to include in its describe how it will make the materials available on
application a description of the steps the applicant audio tape or in braille for students who are blind.
proposes to take to ensure equitable access to, and
participation in, its Federally-assisted program for (3) An applicant that proposes to carry out a model
students, teachers, and other program beneficiaries science program for secondary students and is
with special needs. This provision allows applicants concerned that girls may be less likely than boys to
discretion in developing the required description. enroll in the course, might indicate how it intends to
The statute highlights six types of barriers that can conduct "outreach" efforts to girls, to encourage their
impede equitable access or participation: gender, enrollment.
race, national origin, color, disability, or age. Based
on local circumstances, you should determine We recognize that many applicants may already be
whether these or other barriers may prevent your implementing effective steps to ensure equity of
students, teachers, etc. from such access or access and participation in their grant programs, and
participation in, the Federally-funded project or we appreciate your cooperation in responding to the
activity. requirements of this provision.
The description in your application of steps to be

taken to overcome these barriers need not be lengthy;
E-1
Estimated Burden Statement for GEPA Requirements
According to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, no persons are required to respond to a collection of information unless such collection
displays a valid OMB control number. The valid OMB control number for this information collection is 1890-0007. The time required to
complete this information collection is estimated to average 1.5 hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing
data resources, gather the data needed, and complete and review the information collection. If you have any comments concerning the
accuracy of the time estimate(s) or suggestions for improving this form, please write to: Director, Grants Policy and Oversight Staff, U.S.
Department of Education, 400 Maryland Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 20202-4250.
E-2
APPLICATION FORMS AND INSTRUCTIONS
The application is divided into four parts. These parts are organized in the same manner that the submitted application
should be organized. These parts are as follows:
Part I: Application for Federal Education Assistance (ED 424) and Instructions.
Part II: Budget Information -- Non-Construction Programs (ED Form 524) and Instructions.
Part III: Application Narrative.
Part IV: Assurances and Certifications --
Assurances -- Non-Construction Programs (Standard Form 424B).
Certifications Regarding Lobbying; Debarment, Suspension and Other Responsibility Matters; and
Drug-Free Workplace Requirements (ED Form 80-0013).
Certification Regarding Debarment, Suspension, Ineligibility and Voluntary Exclusion -- Lower Tier
Covered Transactions (ED Form 80-0014) and Instructions.
Disclosure of Lobbying Activities.
An applicant may submit information on a photostatic copy of the application and budget forms, the assurances, and the
certifications. However, the application form, the assurances, and the certifications must each have an original signature.
No grant may be awarded unless a completed application form has been received.
Application for Federal U.S. Department of Education
Form Approved
Education Assistance (ED 424) OMB No. 1890-0017
Exp. 04/30/2008
Applicant Information Organizational Unit

1. Name and Address
Legal Name:________________________________________________________________
Address: __________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________ _______ ______________________ ____________ - ________

City State County ZIP Code + 4
2. Applicant’s D-U-N-S Number |___|___|___|___|___|___|___|___|___| 6. Novice Applicant ___Yes ___No
3. Applicant’s T-I-N |___|___| - |___|___|___|___|___|___|___| 7. Is the applicant delinquent on any Federal debt? ___Yes ___No
(If “Yes,” attach an explanation.)
4. Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance #: 84.____|____|____|____|
Title: ____________________________________________________ 8. Type of Applicant (Enter appropriate letter in the box.) |____|
____________________________________________________ A - State F - Independent School District

B - Local G - Public College or University
5. Project Director:___________________________________________ C - Special District H - Private, Non-profit College or University
D - Indian Tribe I - Non-profit Organization
Address:_________________________________________________ E - Individual J - Private, Profit-Making Organization
K - Other (Specify): ______________________________________

_____________________________ ______ _________ _______
City State Zip code + 4
Tel. #: ( ) _______-________ Fax #: ( )_______-________
9. State Application Identifier _______________________________
E-Mail Address: __________________________________________
_____________________________________________
Application Information
10. Type of Submission: 13. Are any research activities involving human subjects planned at
-PreApplication -Application any time during the proposed project period?
___ Construction ___ Construction ___ Yes (Go to 13a.) ___ No (Go to item 14.)
___ Non-Construction ___ Non-Construction
13a. Are all the research activities proposed designated to be
11. Is application subject to review by Executive Order 12372 process? exempt from the regulations?
___ Yes (Date made available to the Executive Order 12372 ___ Yes (Provide Exemption(s) #): _______________________
process for review): ____/____/_________
___ No (Provide Assurance #): __________________________
___ No (If “No,” check appropriate box below.)
___ Program is not covered by E.O. 12372. 14. Descriptive Title of Applicant’s Project:
___ Program has not been selected by State for review.
________________________________________________________
12. Proposed Project Dates: ____/____/________ ____/____/_________
Start Date: End Date: ________________________________________________________
Estimated Funding Authorized Representative Information

16. To the best of my knowledge and belief, all data in this preapplication/application are true
15a. Federal $ ________________. 00 and correct. The document has been duly authorized by the governing body of the applicant
b. Applicant $ ________________. 00 and the applicant will comply with the attached assurances if the assistance is awarded.
c. State $ ________________. 00 a. Authorized Representative (Please type or print name clearly.)
d. Local $ ________________. 00 ________________________________________________________________________________
e. Other $ ________________. 00 b. Title: _________________________________________________________________________
f. Program Income $ ________________. 00 c. Tel. #: ( ) ________-____________ Fax #: ( ) ________-____________
d. E-Mail Address: _______________________________________________________________
g. TOTAL $ ________________. 00 e. Signature of Authorized Representative
_____________________________________________________________ Date:___/____/______
Instructions for Form ED 424
1. Legal Name and Address. Enter the legal name of ED 424” attached. Check “Yes” if the application is
applicant and the name of the primary organizational subject to review by E.O. 12372. Also, please enter
unit which will undertake the assistance activity. the month, day, and four (4) digit year (mm/dd/yyyy).
Otherwise, check “No.”
2. D-U-N-S Number. Enter the applicant’s D-U-N-S
Number. If your organization does not have a D-U-N- 12. Proposed Project Dates. Please enter the month, day,
S Number, you can obtain the number by calling 1- and four (4) digit year (mm/dd/yyyy).
800-333-0505 or by completing a D-U-N-S Number
Request Form. The form can be obtained via the 13. Human Subjects Research. (See I.A. “Definitions”
Internet at the following URL: http://www.dnb.com. in attached page entitled “Definitions for Form ED
424.”)
3. Tax Identification Number. Enter the taxpayer’s
identification number as assigned by the Internal If Not Human Subjects Research. Check “No” if
Revenue Service. research activities involving human subjects are not
planned at any time during the proposed project period.
4. Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance (CFDA) The remaining parts of Item 12 are then not applicable.
Number. Enter the CFDA number and title of the
program under which assistance is requested. The
If Human Subjects Research. Check “Yes” if
CFDA number can be found in the federal register
research activities involving human subjects are
notice and the application package.
planned at any time during the proposed project period,
either at the applicant organization or at any other
5. Project Director. Name, address, telephone and fax
performance site or collaborating institution. Check
numbers, and e-mail address of the person to be
“Yes” even if the research is exempt from the
contacted on matters involving this application.
regulations for the protection of human subjects. (See
I.B. “Exemptions” in attached page entitled
6. Novice Applicant. Check “Yes” or “No” only if
“Definitions for Form ED 424.”)
assistance is being requested under a program that
gives special consideration to novice applicants.
Otherwise, leave blank. 13a. If Human Subjects Research is Exempt from the
Human Subjects Regulations. Check “Yes” if all the
Check “Yes” if you meet the requirements for novice research activities proposed are designated to be
applicants specified in the regulations in 34 CFR exempt from the regulations. Insert the exemption
75.225 and included on the attached page entitled number(s) corresponding to one or more of the six
“Definitions for Form ED 424.” By checking “Yes” exemption categories listed in I.B. “Exemptions.” In
the applicant certifies that it meets these novice addition, follow the instructions in II.A. “Exempt
applicant requirements. Check “No” if you do not Research Narrative” in the attached page entitled
meet the requirements for novice applicants. “Definitions for Form ED 424.” Insert this narrative
immediately following the ED 424 face page.
7. Federal Debt Delinquency. Check “Yes” if the
applicant’s organization is delinquent on any Federal 13a. If Human Subjects Research is Not Exempt from
debt. (This question refers to the applicant’s Human Subjects Regulations. Check “No” if some
organization and not to the person who signs as the or all of the planned research activities are covered
authorized representative. Categories of debt include (not exempt). In addition, follow the instructions in
delinquent audit disallowances, loans and taxes.) II.B. “Nonexempt Research Narrative” in the page
Otherwise, check “No.” entitled “Definitions for Form ED 424.” Insert this
narrative immediately following the ED 424 face page.
8. Type of Applicant. Enter the appropriate letter in the
box provided. 13a. Human Subjects Assurance Number. If the
applicant has an approved Federal Wide (FWA) or
9. State Application Identifier. State use only (if Multiple Project Assurance (MPA) with the Office for
applicable). Human Research Protections (OHRP), U.S.
Department of Health and Human Services, that covers
10. Type of Submission. See “Definitions for Form ED the specific activity, insert the number in the space
424” attached. provided. If the applicant does not have an approved
assurance on file with OHRP, enter “None.” In this
11. Executive Order 12372. See “Definitions for Form case, the applicant, by signature on the face page, is
declaring that it will comply with 34 CFR 97 and program funding, use totals and show breakdown
proceed to obtain the human subjects assurance upon using same categories as item 15.
request by the designated ED official. If the
application is recommended/selected for funding, the 16. Certification. To be signed by the authorized
designated ED official will request that the applicant
representative of the applicant. A copy of the
obtain the assurance within 30 days after the specific
governing body’s authorization for you to sign
formal request.
this application as official representative must be
Note about Institutional Review Board Approval. ED on file in the applicant’s office. Be sure to enter
does not require certification of Institutional Review Board the telephone and fax number and e-mail address
approval with the application. However, if an application of the authorized representative. Also, in item
that involves non-exempt human subjects research is 15e, please enter the month, day, and four (4) digit
recommended/selected for funding, the designated ED year (mm/dd/yyyy) in the date signed field.
official will request that the applicant obtain and send the
certification to ED within 30 days after the formal request. Paperwork Burden Statement. According to the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, no persons are
14. Project Title. Enter a brief descriptive title of the required to respond to a collection of information
project. If more than one program is involved, you
should append an explanation on a separate sheet. If
unless such collection displays a valid OMB control
appropriate (e.g., construction or real property number. The valid OMB control number for this
projects), attach a map showing project location. For information collection is 1875-0106. The time
preapplications, use a separate sheet to provide a required to complete this information collection is
summary description of this project. estimated to average between 15 and 45 minutes per
response, including the time to review instructions,
15. Estimated Funding. Amount requested or to be search existing data resources, gather the data needed,
contributed during the first funding/budget period and complete and review the information collection. If
by each contributor. Value of in-kind you have any comments concerning the accuracy of
contributions should be included on appropriate the estimate(s) or suggestions for improving this
lines as applicable. If the action will result in a form, please write to: U.S. Department of Education,
dollar change to an existing award, indicate only Washington, D.C. 20202-4700. If you have comments
the amount of the change. For decreases, enclose or concerns regarding the status of your individual
the amounts in parentheses. If both basic and submission of this form write directly to: Joyce I.
supplemental amounts are included, show Mays, Application Control Center, U.S. Department of
breakdown on an attached sheet. For multiple Education, Potomac Center Plaza, 550 12th Street SW,
Room 7076, Washington, DC 20202-4260.
Definitions for Form ED 424
Novice Applicant (See 34 CFR 75.225). For

discretionary grant programs under which the Executive Order 12372. The purpose of Executive
Secretary gives special consideration to novice Order 12372 is to foster an intergovernmental
applications, a novice applicant means any applicant partnership and strengthen federalism by relying on
for a grant from ED that— State and local processes for the coordination and
review of proposed Federal financial assistance and
• Has never received a grant or subgrant under direct Federal development. The application notice,
the program from which it seeks funding; as published in the Federal Register, informs the
applicant as to whether the program is subject to the
• Has never been a member of a group requirements of E.O. 12372. In addition, the
application, submitted in accordance with 34 application package contains information on the State
CFR 75.127-75.129, that received a grant Single Point of Contact. An applicant is still eligible
under the program from which it seeks to apply for a grant or grants even if its respective
funding; and State, Territory, Commonwealth, etc. does not have a
State Single Point of Contact. For additional
• Has not had an active discretionary grant from information on E.O. 12372 go to
the Federal government in the five years http://12.46.245.173/pls/portal30/catalog.REQ_FOR_
before the deadline date for applications under 12372.show
the program. For the purposes of this
requirement, a grant is active until the end of PROTECTION OF HUMAN SUBJECTS IN
the grant’s project or funding period, including RESEARCH
any extensions of those periods that extend the
grantee’s authority to obligate funds. I. Definitions and Exemptions
In the case of a group application submitted in A. Definitions.

accordance with 34 CFR 75.127-75.129, a group
includes only parties that meet the requirements listed A research activity involves human subjects if the
above. activity is research, as defined in the Department’s
regulations, and the research activity will involve use
Type of Submission. “Construction” includes of human subjects, as defined in the regulations.
construction of new buildings and acquisition,
expansion, remodeling, and alteration of existing —Research
buildings, and initial equipment of any such buildings,
or any combination of such activities (including The ED Regulations for the Protection of Human
architects’ fees and the cost of acquisition of land). Subjects, Title 34, Code of Federal Regulations, Part
“Construction” also includes remodeling to meet 97, define research as “a systematic investigation,
standards, remodeling designed to conserve energy, including research development, testing and
renovation or remodeling to accommodate new evaluation, designed to develop or contribute to
technologies, and the purchase of existing historic generalizable knowledge.” If an activity follows a
buildings for conversion to public libraries. For the deliberate plan whose purpose is to develop or
purposes of this paragraph, the term “equipment” contribute to generalizable knowledge it is research.
includes machinery, utilities, and built-in equipment Activities which meet this definition constitute
and any necessary enclosures or structures to house research whether or not they are conducted or
them; and such term includes all other items necessary supported under a program which is considered
for the functioning of a particular facility as a facility research for other purposes. For example, some
for the provision of library services. demonstration and service programs may include
research activities.
—Human Subject civil liability or be damaging to the subjects’ financial
standing, employability, or reputation. If the subjects
The regulations define human subject as “a living are children, exemption 2 applies only to research
individual about whom an investigator (whether involving educational tests and observations of
professional or student) conducting research obtains public behavior when the investigator(s) do not
(1) data through intervention or interaction with the participate in the activities being observed.
individual, or (2) identifiable private information.” Exemption 2 does not apply if children are surveyed
(1) If an activity involves obtaining information about or interviewed or if the research involves observation
a living person by manipulating that person or that of public behavior and the investigator(s) participate
person’s environment, as might occur when a new in the activities being observed. [Children are
instructional technique is tested, or by communicating defined as persons who have not attained the legal age
or interacting with the individual, as occurs with for consent to treatments or procedures involved in the
surveys and interviews, the definition of human research, under the applicable law or jurisdiction in
subject is met. (2) If an activity involves obtaining which the research will be conducted.]
private information about a living person in such a
way that the information can be linked to that (3) Research involving the use of educational tests
individual (the identity of the subject is or may be (cognitive, diagnostic, aptitude, achievement), survey
readily determined by the investigator or associated procedures, interview procedures or observation of
with the information), the definition of human subject public behavior that is not exempt under section (2)
is met. [Private information includes information above, if the human subjects are elected or appointed
about behavior that occurs in a context in which an public officials or candidates for public office; or
individual can reasonably expect that no observation federal statute(s) require(s) without exception that the
or recording is taking place, and information which confidentiality of the personally identifiable
has been provided for specific purposes by an information will be maintained throughout the
individual and which the individual can reasonably research and thereafter.
expect will not be made public (for example, a school
health record).] (4) Research involving the collection or study of
existing data, documents, records, pathological
B. Exemptions. specimens, or diagnostic specimens, if these sources
are publicly available or if the information is recorded
Research activities in which the only involvement of by the investigator in a manner that subjects cannot be
human subjects will be in one or more of the identified, directly or through identifiers linked to the
following six categories of exemptions are not subjects.
covered by the regulations:
(5) Research and demonstration projects which are
(1) Research conducted in established or commonly conducted by or subject to the approval of department
accepted educational settings, involving normal or agency heads, and which are designed to study,
educational practices, such as (a) research on regular evaluate, or otherwise examine: (a) public benefit or
and special education instructional strategies, or (b) service programs; (b) procedures for obtaining
research on the effectiveness of or the comparison benefits or services under those programs; (c) possible
among instructional techniques, curricula, or changes in or alternatives to those programs or
classroom management methods. procedures; or (d) possible changes in methods or
levels of payment for benefits or services under those
(2) Research involving the use of educational tests programs.
(cognitive, diagnostic, aptitude, achievement), survey
procedures, interview procedures or observation of (6) Taste and food quality evaluation and consumer
public behavior, unless: (a) information obtained is acceptance studies, (a) if wholesome foods without
recorded in such a manner that human subjects can be additives are consumed or (b) if a food is consumed
identified, directly or through identifiers linked to the that contains a food ingredient at or below the level
subjects; and (b) any disclosure of the human and for a use found to be safe, or agricultural chemical
subjects’ responses outside the research could or environmental contaminant at or below the level
reasonably place the subjects at risk of criminal or found to be safe, by the Food and Drug
Administration or approved by the Environmental (3) Recruitment and Informed Consent: Describe
Protection Agency or the Food Safety and Inspection plans for the recruitment of subjects and the consent
Service of the U.S. Department of Agriculture. procedures to be followed. Include the circumstances
under which consent will be sought and obtained, who
II. Instructions for Exempt and Nonexempt will seek it, the nature of the information to be
Human Subjects Research Narratives provided to prospective subjects, and the method of
documenting consent. State if the Institutional
If the applicant marked “Yes” for Item 13 on the ED Review Board (IRB) has authorized a modification or
424, the applicant must provide a human subjects waiver of the elements of consent or the requirement
“exempt research” or “nonexempt research” narrative for documentation of consent.
and insert it immediately following the ED 424 face
page. (4) Potential Risks: Describe potential risks
(physical, psychological, social, legal, or other) and
A. Exempt Research Narrative. assess their likelihood and seriousness. Where
appropriate, describe alternative treatments and
If you marked “Yes” for item 13 a. and designated procedures that might be advantageous to the subjects.
exemption numbers(s), provide the “exempt research”
narrative. The narrative must contain sufficient (5) Protection Against Risk: Describe the procedures
information about the involvement of human subjects for protecting against or minimizing potential risks,
in the proposed research to allow a determination by including risks to confidentiality, and assess their
ED that the designated exemption(s) are appropriate. likely effectiveness. Where appropriate, discuss
The narrative must be succinct. provisions for ensuring necessary medical or
professional intervention in the event of adverse
B. Nonexempt Research Narrative. effects to the subjects. Also, where appropriate,
describe the provisions for monitoring the data
If you marked “No” for item 13 a. you must provide collected to ensure the safety of the subjects.
the “nonexempt research” narrative. The narrative
must address the following seven points. Although no (6) Importance of the Knowledge to be Gained:
specific page limitation applies to this section of the Discuss the importance of the knowledge gained or to
application, be succinct. be gained as a result of the proposed research.
Discuss why the risks to subjects are reasonable in
(1) Human Subjects Involvement and relation to the anticipated benefits to subjects and in
Characteristics: Provide a detailed description of the relation to the importance of the knowledge that may
proposed involvement of human subjects. Describe reasonably be expected to result.
the characteristics of the subject population, including
their anticipated number, age range, and health status. (7) Collaborating Site(s): If research involving
Identify the criteria for inclusion or exclusion of any human subjects will take place at collaborating site(s)
subpopulation. Explain the rationale for the or other performance site(s), name the sites and
involvement of special classes of subjects, such as briefly describe their involvement or role in the
children, children with disabilities, adults with research.
disabilities, persons with mental disabilities, pregnant
women, prisoners, institutionalized individuals, or Copies of the Department of Education’s Regulations for
others who are likely to be vulnerable the Protection of Human Subjects, 34 CFR Part 97 and
other pertinent materials on the protection of human
(2) Sources of Materials: Identify the sources of subjects in research are available from the Grants Policy
research material obtained from individually and Oversight Staff, Office of the Chief Financial
identifiable living human subjects in the form of Officer, U.S. Department of Education, Washington, D.C.
20202-4250, telephone: (202) 245-6120, and on the U.S.
specimens, records, or data. Indicate whether the
Department of Education’s Protection of Human
material or data will be obtained specifically for Subjects in Research Web Site at
research purposes or whether use will be made of http://www.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocfo/humansub.html
existing specimens, records, or data.
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION OMB Control Number:
BUDGET INFORMATION 1890-0004
NON-CONSTRUCTION PROGRAMS Expiration Date: 10-31-2007
Applicants requesting funding for only one year should complete the column
Name of Institution/Organization under "Project Year 1." Applicants requesting funding for multi-year grants
should complete all applicable columns. Please read all instructions before
completing form.
SECTION A - BUDGET SUMMARY
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION FUNDS

Budget Categories Project Year 1 Project Year 2 Project Year 3 Project Year 4 Project Year 5 Total
(a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f)
1. Personnel
2. Fringe Benefits
3. Travel
4. Equipment
5. Supplies
6. Contractual
7. Construction
8. Other
9. Total Direct Costs (lines
1-8)
10. Indirect Costs*
11. Training Stipends
12. Total Costs (lines 9-11)
*Indirect Cost Information (To Be Completed by Your Business Office):
If you are requesting reimbursement for indirect costs on line 10, please answer the following questions:
(1) Do you have an Indirect Cost Rate Agreement approved by the Federal government? ____Yes ____ No
(2) If yes, please provide the following information:
Period Covered by the Indirect Cost Rate Agreement: From: ___/___/______ To: ___/___/______ (mm/dd/yyyy)
Approving Federal agency: ____ ED ____ Other (please specify): __________________________
(3) For Restricted Rate Programs (check one) -- Are you using a restricted indirect cost rate that:
___ Is included in your approved Indirect Cost Rate Agreement? or ___ Complies with 34 CFR 76.564(c)(2)?
ED 524
Applicants requesting funding for only one year should complete the column
Name of Institution/Organization
under
"Project Year 1." Applicants requesting funding for multi-year grants should
complete all applicable columns. Please read all instructions before completing
form.
SECTION B - BUDGET SUMMARY
NON-FEDERAL FUNDS
Project Year 1 Project Year 2 Project Year 3 Project Year 4 Project Year 5 Total
Budget Categories (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f)
1. Personnel
2. Fringe Benefits
3. Travel
4. Equipment
5. Supplies
6. Contractual
7. Construction
8. Other
9. Total Direct
Costs
(Lines 1-8)
10. Indirect Costs
11. Training
Stipends
12. Total Costs
(Lines 9-11)
SECTION C – BUDGET NARRATIVE (see instructions)
ED 524
Instructions for ED 524
General Instructions 34 CFR 76.564(c)(2). Note: State or Local government applied and the total indirect expense. Depending on
agencies may not use the provision for a restricted indirect the grant program to which you are applying and/or
This form is used to apply to individual U.S. Department cost rate specified in 34 CFR 76.564(c)(2). Check only your approved Indirect Cost Rate Agreement, some
of Education (ED) discretionary grant programs. Unless one response. Leave blank, if this item is not applicable. direct cost budget categories in your grant
directed otherwise, provide the same budget information application budget may not be included in the base
for each year of the multi-year funding request. Pay Section B - Budget Summary and multiplied by your indirect cost rate. For
attention to applicable program specific instructions, if Non-Federal Funds example, you must multiply the indirect cost rates of
attached. Please consult with your Business Office prior “Training grants" (34 CFR 75.562) and grants under
programs with “Supplement not Supplant”
to submitting this form. If you are required to provide or volunteer to provide requirements ("Restricted Rate" programs) by a
matching funds or other non-Federal resources to the “modified total direct cost” (MTDC) base (34 CFR
Section A - Budget Summary project, these should be shown for each applicable budget 75.563 or 76.563). Please indicate which costs are
U.S. Department of Education Funds category on lines 1-11 of Section B. included and which costs are excluded from the base
Lines 1-11, columns (a)-(e): For each project year, for to which the indirect cost rate is applied.
All applicants must complete Section A and provide a which matching funds or other contributions are provided,
When calculating indirect costs (line 10) for
breakdown by the applicable budget categories shown in show the total contribution for each applicable budget
"Training grants" or grants under "Restricted Rate"
lines 1-11. category.
programs, you must refer to the information and
Lines 1-11, column (f): Show the multi-year total for examples on ED’s website at:
Lines 1-11, columns (a)-(e): For each project year for
each budget category. If non-Federal contributions are http://www.ed.gov/fund/grant/apply/appforms/appfor
which funding is requested, show the total amount
provided for only one year, leave this column blank. ms.html .
requested for each applicable budget category.
You may also contact (202) 377-3838 for additional
Lines 1-11, column (f): Show the multi-year total for Line 12, columns (a)-(e): Show the total matching or information regarding calculating indirect cost rates
each budget category. If funding is requested for only one other contribution for each project year. or general indirect cost rate information.
project year, leave this column blank. Line 12, column (f): Show the total amount to be
contributed for all years of the multi-year project. If non- 4. Provide other explanations or comments you deem
Line 12, columns (a)-(e): Show the total budget request necessary.
for each project year for which funding is requested. Federal contributions are provided for only one year,
leave this space blank.
Line 12, column (f): Show the total amount requested for Paperwork Burden Statement
all project years. If funding is requested for only one
year, leave this space blank. Section C - Budget Narrative [Attach separate sheet(s)] According to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, no
Pay attention to applicable program specific instructions, persons are required to respond to a collection of
Indirect Cost Information: if attached. information unless such collection displays a valid OMB
If you are requesting reimbursement for indirect costs on control number. The valid OMB control number for this
line 10, this information is to be completed by your 1. Provide an itemized budget breakdown, and information collection is 1890-0004. The time required to
Business Office. (1): Indicate whether or not your justification by project year, for each budget category complete this information collection is estimated to vary
organization has an Indirect Cost Rate Agreement that listed in Sections A and B. For grant projects that from 13 to 22 hours per response, with an average of 17.5
was approved by the Federal government. (2): If you will be divided into two or more separately budgeted hours per response, including the time to review
checked “yes” in (1), indicate in (2) the beginning and major activities or sub-projects, show for each instructions, search existing data sources, gather the data
ending dates covered by the Indirect Cost Rate budget category of a project year the breakdown of needed, and complete and review the information
Agreement. In addition, indicate whether ED or another the specific expenses attributable to each sub-project
collection. If you have any comments concerning the
Federal agency (Other) issued the approved agreement. If or activity.
accuracy of the time estimate(s) or suggestions for
you check “Other,” specify the name of the Federal improving this form, please write to: U.S. Department of
2. If applicable to this program, provide the rate and
agency that issued the approved agreement. (3): If you Education, Washington, D.C. 20202-4651. If you have
base on which fringe benefits are calculated.
are applying for a grant under a Restricted Rate Program comments or concerns regarding the status of your
(34 CFR 75.563 or 76.563), indicate whether you are 3. If you are requesting reimbursement for indirect individual submission of this form, write directly to
using a restricted indirect cost rate that is included on your costs on line 10, this information is to be completed (insert program office), U.S. Department of Education,
approved Indirect Cost Rate Agreement or whether you by your Business Office. Specify the estimated 400 Maryland Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20202.
are using a restricted indirect cost rate that complies with amount of the base to which the indirect cost rate is
PART III - APPLICATION NARRATIVE
This narrative section of the application requires applicants to address the selection criteria
that will be used by reviewers in evaluating individual applications. Please refer to the “Selection Criteria
and Format” sections in this package for the competition to which you wish to submit an application.
Also, all of the competitions covered by this package have page limitations for the
application narrative. Please refer to the “Page Limits” information for the competition to which you wish
to submit an application.
OMB Approval No. 0348-0040
ASSURANCES - NON-CONSTRUCTION PROGRAMS
Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 15 minutes per response, including time for reviewing instructions,
searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of
information. Send comments regarding the burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing
this burden, to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0348-0040), Washington, DC 20503
PLEASE DO NOT RETURN YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET.
SEND IT TO THE ADDRESS PROVIDED BY THE SPONSORING AGENCY.
Note: Certain of these assurances may not be applicable to your project or program. If you have questions, please contact the
awarding agency. Further, certain Federal awarding agencies may require applicants to certify to additional assurances. If such is
the case, you will be notified.
As the duly authorized representative of the applicant I certify that the applicant:
1. Has the legal authority to apply for Federal assistance, and the Prevention, Treatment and Rehabilitation Act of 1970 (P.L. 91-
institutional, managerial and financial capability (including funds 616), as amended, relating to nondiscrimination on the basis of
sufficient to pay the non-Federal share of project cost) to ensure alcohol abuse or alcoholism; (g) §§ 523 and 527 of the Public
proper planning, management, and completion of the project Health Service Act of 1912 (42 U.S.C. §§ 290 dd-3 and 290 ee
described in this application. 3), as amended, relating to confidentiality of alcohol and drug
abuse patient records; (h) Title VIII of the Civil Rights Act of
2. Will give the awarding agency, the Comptroller General of the 1968 (42 U.S.C. § 3601 et seq.), as amended, relating to
United States, and if appropriate, the State, through any nondiscrimination in the sale, rental or financing of housing; (i)
authorized representative, access to and the right to examine all any other nondiscrimination provisions in the specific statute(s)
records, books, papers, or documents related to the award; and under which application for Federal assistance is being made;
will establish a proper accounting system in accordance with and (j) the requirements of any other nondiscrimination statute(s)
generally accepted accounting standards or agency directives. which may apply to the application.
3. Will establish safeguards to prohibit employees from using their

positions for a purpose that constitutes or presents the 7. Will comply, or has already complied, with the requirements of
appearance of personal or organizational conflict of interest, or Titles II and III of the uniform Relocation Assistance and Real
personal gain. Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 (P.L. 91-646)
which provide for fair and equitable treatment of persons
4. Will initiate and complete the work within the applicable time displaced or whose property is acquired as a result of Federal or
frame after receipt of approval of the awarding agency. federally assisted programs. These requirements apply to all
interests in real property acquired for project purposes regardless
5. Will comply with the Intergovernmental Personnel Act of 1970 of Federal participation in purchases.
(42 U.S.C. §§4728-4763) relating to prescribed standards for
merit systems for programs funded under one of the 19 statutes 8. Will comply, as applicable, with the provisions of the Hatch Act
or regulations specified in Appendix A of OPM's Standards for a (5 U.S.C. §§1501-1508 and 7324-7328) which limit the political
Merit System of Personnel Administration (5 C.F.R. 900, activities of employees whose principal employment activities
Subpart F). are funded in whole or in part with Federal funds.
6. Will comply with all Federal statutes relating to

nondiscrimination. These include but are not limited to: (a) Title
VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (P.L. 88-352) which prohibits
discrimination on the basis of race, color or national origin; (b)
Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, as amended (20
U.S.C. §§1681-1683, and 1685-1686), which prohibits
discrimination on the basis of sex; (c) Section 504 of the
Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended (29 U.S.C. §794), which
prohibits discrimination on the basis of handicaps; (d) the Age
Discrimination Act of 1975, as amended (42 U.S.C. §§ 6101-
6107), which prohibits discrimination on the basis of age; (e) the
Drug Abuse Office and Treatment Act of 1972 (P.L. 92-255), as
amended, relating to nondiscrimination on the basis of drug
abuse; (f) the Comprehensive Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism
9. Will comply, as applicable, with the provisions of the Davis- 12 Will comply with the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act of 1968 (16
Bacon Act (40 U.S.C. §§276a to 276a-7), the Copeland Act (40 U.S.C. §§1721 et seq.) related to protecting components or
U.S.C. §276c and 18 U.S.C. §§874) and the Contract Work potential components of the national wild and scenic rivers
Hours and Safety Standards Act (40 U.S.C. §§ 327-333), system.
regarding labor standards for federally assisted construction
subagreements. 13. Will assist the awarding agency in assuring compliance with
Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as
10. Will comply, if applicable, with flood insurance purchase amended (16 U.S.C. §470), EO 11593 (identification and
requirements of Section 102(a) of the Flood Disaster Protection protection of historic properties), and the Archaeological and
Act of 1973 (P.L. 93-234) which requires recipients in a special Historic Preservation Act of 1974 (16 U.S.C. §§469a-1 et seq.).
flood hazard area to participate in the program and to purchase
flood insurance if the total cost of insurable construction and 14. Will comply with P.L. 93-348 regarding the protection of human
acquisition is $10,000 or more. subjects involved in research, development, and related activities
supported by this award of assistance.
11. Will comply with environmental standards which may be
prescribed pursuant to the following: (a) institution of 15. Will comply with the Laboratory Animal Welfare Act of 1966
environmental quality control measures under the National (P.L. 89-544, as amended, 7 U.S.C. §§2131 et seq.) pertaining to
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (P.L. 91-190) and Executive the care, handling, and treatment of warm blooded animals held
Order (EO) 11514; (b) notification of violating facilities pursuant for research, teaching, or other activities supported by this award
to EO 11738; (c) protection of wetlands pursuant to EO 11990; of assistance.
(d) evaluation of flood hazards in floodplains in accordance with
EO 11988; (e) assurance of project consistency with the 16. Will comply with the Lead-Based Paint Poisoning Prevention
approved State management program developed under the Act (42 U.S.C. §§4801 et seq.) which prohibits the use of lead-
Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972 (16 U.S.C. §§1451 et based paint in construction or rehabilitation of residence
seq); (f) conformity of Federal actions to State (Clear Air) structures.
Implementation Plans under Section 176(c) of the Clear Air Act
of 1955, as amended (42 U.S.C. §§7401 et seq.); (g) protection 17. Will cause to be performed the required financial and
of underground sources of drinking water under the Safe compliance audits in accordance with the Single Audit Act
Drinking Water Act of 1974, as amended, (P.L. 93-523); and (h) Amendments of 1996 and OMB Circular No. A-133, “Audits of
protection of endangered species under the Endangered Species States, Local Governments, and Non-Profit Organizations.”
Act of 1973, as amended, (P.L. 93-205).
18. Will comply with all applicable requirements of all other Federal
laws, executive orders, regulations and policies governing this
program.
SIGNATURE OF AUTHORIZED CERTIFYING OFFICIAL TITLE
APPLICANT ORGANIZATION DATE SUBMITTED
Standard Form 424B (Rev. 7-97) Back

CERTIFICATION REGARDING LOBBYING
Certification for Contracts, Grants, Loans and Cooperative Agreements.
The undersigned certifies, to the best of his or her knowledge and belief, that:
(1) No Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid, by or on behalf of
the undersigned, to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer
or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress,
or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with the awarding of any Federal
contract, the making of any Federal grant, the making of any Federal Loan, the
entering into of any cooperative agreement, and the extension, continuation, renewal,
amendment, or modification of any Federal contract, grant, loan or cooperative
agreement.
(2) If any funds other Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid to
any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any
agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a
Member of Congress in connection with this Federal contract, grant, loam or
cooperative agreement, the undersigned shall complete and submit Standard Form – LLL,
“Disclosure of Lobbying Activities,” in accordance with its instructions.
(3) The undersigned shall require that the language of this certification be included
in the award documents for all subawards at all tiers (including subcontracts,
subgrants and contracts under grants, loans, and cooperative agreements) and that all
subrecipients shall certify and disclose accordingly. This certification is a
material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed when this transaction
was made or entered into. Submission of this certification is a prerequisite for
making or entering into this transaction imposed by section 1352, title 31, U.S.
Code. Any person who fails to file the required certification shall be subject to a
civil penalty of not less than $10,000 and not more than $100,000 for each such
failure.
Statement for Loan Guarantees and Loan Insurance.
The undersigned states, to the best of his or her knowledge and belief, that:
If any funds have been paid or will be paid to any person for influencing or
attempting to influence an officer or employee or any agency, a member of Congress,
an officer or employee of Congress or an employee of a Member of Congress in
connection with this commitment providing for the United States to insure or
guarantee a loan, the undersigned shall complete and submit Standard Form-LLL,
“Disclosure of Lobbying Activities,” in accordance with its instructions. Submission
of this statement is a prerequisite for making or entering into this transaction
imposed by section 1352, title 31, U.S. Code. Any person who fails to file the
required statement shall be subject to a civil penalty of not less than $10,000 and
not more than $100,000 for each such failure.
Applicant’s Organization
Printed Name of Authorized Representative Printed Title of Authorized Representative

Signature Date
ED 80-0013 08/05
Certification Regarding Debarment, Suspension, Ineligibility and
Voluntary Exclusion -- Lower Tier Covered Transactions
This certification is required by the Department of Education regulations implementing Executive Order 12549, Debarment and
Suspension, 34 CFR Part 85, for all lower tier transactions meeting the threshold and tier requirements stated at Section 85.110.
Instructions for Certification transaction, unless authorized by the department or agency

with which this transaction originated.
1. By signing and submitting this proposal, the prospective
lower
tier participant is providing the certification set out below. 6. The prospective lower tier participant further agrees by
submitting this proposal that it will include the clause titled
ΑCertification Regarding Debarment, Suspension, Ineligibility,
2. The certification in this clause is a material representation of and Voluntary Exclusion-Lower Tier Covered Transactions,≅
fact upon which reliance was placed when this transaction was without modification, in all lower tier covered transactions and
entered into. If it is later determined that the prospective lower in all solicitations for lower tier covered transactions.
tier participant knowingly rendered an erroneous certification,
in 7. A participant in a covered transaction may rely upon a
addition to other remedies available to the Federal certification of a prospective participant in a lower tier covered
Government, the department or agency with which this transaction that it is not debarred, suspended, ineligible, or
transaction originated may pursue available remedies, voluntarily excluded from the covered transaction, unless it
including suspension and/or debarment. knows that the certification is erroneous. A participant may
decide the method and frequency by which it determines the
3. The prospective lower tier participant shall provide eligibility of its principals. Each participant may but is not
immediate written notice to the person to which this proposal is required to, check the Nonprocurement List.
submitted if at any time the prospective lower tier participant
learns that its certification was erroneous when submitted or 8. Nothing contained in the foregoing shall be construed to
has become erroneous by reason of changed circumstances. require establishment of a system of records in order to render
in good faith the certification required by this clause. The
4. The terms, covered transaction, debarred, suspended, knowledge
ineligible, lower tier covered transaction, participant, person, and information of a participant is not required to exceed that
primary covered transaction, principal, proposal, and which is normally possessed by a prudent person in the
voluntarily excluded, as used in this clause, have the meanings ordinary course of business dealings.
set out in the Definitions and Coverage sections of rules
implementing Executive Order 12549. You may contact the 9. Except for transactions authorized under paragraph 5 of
person to which this proposal is submitted for assistance in these instructions, if a participant in a covered transaction
obtaining a copy of those regulations. knowingly enters into a lower tier covered transaction with a
person who is suspended, debarred, ineligible, or voluntarily
5. The prospective lower tier participant agrees by submitting excluded from participation in this transaction, in addition to
this proposal that, should the proposed covered transaction be other remedies available to the Federal Government, the
entered into, it shall not knowingly enter into any lower tier department or agency with which this transaction originated
covered transaction with a person who is debarred, may pursue available remedies, including suspension and/or
suspended, declared ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from debarment.
participation in this covered
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Certification
(1) The prospective lower tier participant certifies, by submission of this proposal, that neither it nor its principals are presently
debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment, declared ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from participation in this transaction by
any Federal department or agency.
(2) Where the prospective lower tier participant is unable to certify to any of the statements in this certification, such prospective
participant shall attach an explanation to this proposal.
NAME OF APPLICANT PR/AWARD NUMBER AND/OR PROJECT

NAME
PRINTED NAME AND TITLE OF AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
SIGNATURE DATE
ED 80-0014, 9/90 (Replaces GCS-009 (REV.12/88), which is obsolete)

Approved by OMB
0348-0046
Disclosure of Lobbying Activities
Complete this form to disclose lobbying activities pursuant to 31 U.S.C. 1352

(See reverse for public burden disclosure)
1. Type of Federal Action: 2. Status of Federal Action: 3. Report Type:

a. contract a. bid/offer/application a. initial filing
____ b. grant _____ b. initial award _____ b. material change
c. cooperative agreement c. post-award
d. loan For material change only:
e. loan guarantee Year _______ quarter _______
f. loan insurance Date of last report___________
4. Name and Address of Reporting Entity: 5. If Reporting Entity in No. 4 is Subawardee, Enter Name
____ Prime _____ Subawardee and Address of Prime:
Tier______, if Known:
Congressional District, if known: Congressional District, if known:

6. Federal Department/Agency: 7. Federal Program Name/Description:
CFDA Number, if applicable: __________________
8. Federal Action Number, if known: 9. Award Amount, if known:
$
10. a. Name and Address of Lobbying Registrant b. Individuals Performing Services (including address if
(if individual, last name, first name, MI): different from No. 10a)
(last name, first name, MI):
11. Information requested through this form is authorized by

title 31 U.S.C. section 1352. This disclosure of lobbying activities Signature: __________________________________
is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was
placed by the tier above when this transaction was made or Print Name:_________________________________
entered into. This disclosure is required pursuant to 31 U.S.C.
1352. This information will be reported to the Congress semi-
Title:______________________________________
annually and will be available for public inspection. Any person
who fails to file the required disclosure shall be subject to a civil
penalty of not less than $10,000 and not more than $100,000 for Telephone No.: ________________ Date: _______
each such failure.
Federal Use Only Authorized for Local Reproduction

Standard Form - LLL (Rev. 7-97)
INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLETION OF SF-LLL, DISCLOSURE OF LOBBYING ACTIVITIES
This disclosure form shall be completed by the reporting entity, whether subawardee or prime Federal recipient, at the initiation or receipt of a
covered Federal action, or a material change to a previous filing, pursuant to title 31 U.S.C. section 1352. The filing of a form is required for
each payment or agreement to make payment to any lobbying entity for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any
agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with a covered
Federal action. Complete all items that apply for both the initial filing and material change report. Refer to the implementing guidance
published by the Office of Management and Budget for additional information.
1. Identify the type of covered Federal action for which lobbying activity is and/or has been secured to influence the outcome of a
covered Federal action.
2. Identify the status of the covered Federal action.
3. Identify the appropriate classification of this report. If this is a followup report caused by a material change to the information
previously reported, enter the year and quarter in which the change occurred. Enter the date of the last previously submitted report by
this reporting entity for this covered Federal action.
4. Enter the full name, address, city, State and zip code of the reporting entity. Include Congressional District, if known. Check the
appropriate classification of the reporting entity that designates if it is, or expects to be, a prime or subaward recipient. Identify the
tier of the subawardee, e.g., the first subawardee of the prime is the 1st tier. Subawards include but are not limited to subcontracts,
subgrants and contract awards under grants.
5. If the organization filing the report in item 4 checks “Subawardee,” then enter the full name, address, city, State and zip code of the
prime Federal recipient. Include Congressional District, if known.
6. Enter the name of the federal agency making the award or loan commitment. Include at least one organizational level below agency
name, if known. For example, Department of Transportation, United States Coast Guard.
7. Enter the Federal program name or description for the covered Federal action (item 1). If known, enter the full Catalog of Federal
Domestic Assistance (CFDA) number for grants, cooperative agreements, loans, and loan commitments.
8. Enter the most appropriate Federal identifying number available for the Federal action identified in item 1 (e.g., Request for Proposal
(RFP) number; Invitations for Bid (IFB) number; grant announcement number; the contract, grant, or loan award number; the
application/proposal control number assigned by the Federal agency). Included prefixes, e.g., “RFP-DE-90-001.”
9. For a covered Federal action where there has been an award or loan commitment by the Federal agency, enter the Federal amount of
the award/loan commitment for the prime entity identified in item 4 or 5.
10. (a) Enter the full name, address, city, State and zip code of the lobbying registrant under the Lobbying Disclosure Act of 1995
engaged by the reporting entity identified in item 4 to influence the covered Federal action.
(b) Enter the full names of the individual(s) performing services, and include full address if different from 10(a). Enter Last Name,
First Name, and Middle Initial (MI).
11. The certifying official shall sign and date the form, print his/her name, title, and telephone number.
According to the Paperwork Reduction Act, as amended, no persons are required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a valid OMB
control Number. The valid OMB control number for this information collection is OMB No. 0348-0046. Public reporting burden for this collection of
information is estimated to average 10 minutes per response, including time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and
maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding the burden estimate or any other aspect of
this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0348-
0046), Washington, DC 20503.
Do not enter information below unless instructed to do so.
Survey on Ensuring Equal
Opportunity OMB No. 1890-0014 Exp. 1/31/2006
FOR APPLICANTS
Purpose: This form is for applicants that are nonprofit private organizations (not including private
universities). Please complete it to assist the Federal government in ensuring that all qualified applicants,
small or large, non-religious or faith-based, have an equal opportunity to compete for Federal funding.
Information provided on this form will not be considered in any way in making funding decisions and will
not be included in the Federal grants database.
Instructions for Submitting Survey
If submitting hard copy, please place the completed survey in an envelope labeled “Applicant Survey.” Seal
the envelope and include it with your application package.
If submitting electronically, please include the PR Award Number assigned to your e-application in the box
1. Does the applicant have 501(c)(3) status? 4. Is the applicant a faith-based/religious

organization?
Yes No
Yes No
2. How many full-time equivalent
employees does the applicant have?
(Check only one box). 5. Is the applicant a non-religious
community-based organization?
3 or Fewer 15-50
Yes No
4-5 51-100
6-14 over 100
6. Is the applicant an intermediary that will
manage the grant on behalf of other
3. What is the size of the applicant’s organizations?
annual budget? (Check only one box.)
Yes No
Less Than $150,000
$150,000 - $299,999 7. Has the applicant ever received a

government grant or contract (Federal,
$300,000 - $499,999
State, or local )?
$500,000 - $999,999
$1,000,000 - $4,999,999 Yes No
$5,000,000 or more 8. Is the applicant a local affiliate of a

national organization?
Yes No
Survey Instructions on Ensuring Equal Opportunity for Applicant
1. 501(c)(3) status is a legal designation Paperwork Burden Statement

provided on application to the Internal
Revenue Service by eligible According to the Paperwork Reduction Act of
organizations. Some grant programs 1995, no persons are required to respond to a
may require nonprofit applicants to have collection of information unless such
501(c)(3) status. Other grant programs do collection displays a valid OMB control
not. number. The valid OMB control number for
this information collection is 1890-0014. The
time required to complete this information
2. For example, two part-time employees collection is estimated to average five (5)
who each work half-time equal one full- minutes per response, including the time to
time equivalent employee. If the review instructions, search existing data
applicant is a local affiliate of a national resources, gather the data needed, and
organization, the responses to survey complete and review the information
questions 2 and 3 should reflect the staff collection. If you have any comments
and budget size of the local affiliate. concerning the accuracy of the time
estimate(s) or suggestions for improving
this form, please write to: U.S. Department
3. Annual budget means the amount of of Education, Washington, D.C. 20202-4651.
money your organization spends each If you have comments or concerns
year on all of its activities. regarding the status of your individual
submission of this form, write directly to:
Joyce I. Mays, Application Control Center,
4. Self-identify. U.S. Department of Education, Room 7067
Potomac Center Plaza, 550 12th Street,
5. An organization is considered a Washington, DC 20202.
community-based organization if its
headquarters/service location shares the
same zip code as the clients you serve.
6. An “intermediary” is an organization that

enables a group of small organizations to
receive and manage government funds
by administering the grant on their
behalf.
7. Self-explanatory.
8. Self-explanatory.
NOTICE TO ALL APPLICANTS:
Program Performance Measures Under The Government Performance
And Results Act (GPRA)
What is GPRA
The Government Performance and Results Act of 1993 is a straightforward statute that requires all
Federal agencies to manage their activities with attention to the consequences of those activities.
Each agency is to clearly state what it intends to accomplish, identify the resources required, and
periodically report it’s progress to the Congress. In doing so, it is expected that GPRA will
contribute to improvements in accountability for the expenditures of public funds, improve
Congressional decision-making through more objective information on the effectiveness of Federal
programs, and promote a new government focus on results, service delivery, and customer
satisfaction.
How has the United States Department of Education responded to the GPRA Requirements?
As required by GPRA, the United States Department of Education (the Department) has prepared
a strategic plan for 2002-2007. This plan reflects the Department’s priorities and integrates them
with its mission and program authorities and describes how the Department will work to improve
education for all children and adults in the United States. The Department’s goals, as listed in the
plan, are:
Goal 1: Create a Culture of Achievement: Create a culture of achievement throughout the
nation's education system by effectively implementing the new law, the No Child Left
Behind Act of 2001, and by basing all federal education programs on its principles:
accountability, flexibility, expanded parental options and doing what works.
Goal 2: Improve Student Achievement: Improve student achievement for all groups of
students by putting reading first, expanding high-quality mathematics and science
teaching, reforming high schools, and boosting teacher and principal quality, thereby
closing the achievement gap.
Goal 3: Develop Safe Schools and Strong Character: Establish disciplined and drug-free
education environments that foster the development of good character and
citizenship.
Goal 4: Transform Education into an Evidence-based Field: Strengthen the quality of
education research.
Goal 5: Enhance the Quality of and Access to Postsecondary and Adult Education:
Increase opportunities for students and the effectiveness of institutions.
Goal 6: Establish Management Excellence: Create a culture of accountability throughout
the Department of Education.
DUNS Number Instructions
D-U-N-S No.: Please provide the applicant's D-U-N-S Number. You can obtain your D-U-N-S
Number at no charge by calling 1-800-333-0505 or by completing a D-U-N-S
Number Request Form. The form can be obtained via the Internet at the following
URL:
http://www.dnb.com/dbis/aboutdb/intlduns.htm
The D-U-N-S Number is a unique nine-digit number that does not convey any information about
the recipient. A built in check digit helps assure the accuracy of the D-U-N-S
Number. The ninth digit of each number is the check digit, which is mathematically
related to the other digits. It lets computer systems determine if a D-U-N-S Number
has been entered correctly.
Dun & Bradstreet, a global information services provider, has assigned D-U-N-S numbers to over
43 million companies worldwide.
GRANT APPLICATION RECEIPT ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
If you fail to receive the notification of application within fifteen (15) days
from the closing date, call:

(202) 245-6288
GRANT AND CONTRACT FUNDING INFORMATION
The Department of Education provides information about grant and

contract opportunities electronically in several ways:
ED Internet Home Page http://www.ed.gov/ (WWW address)

Description: Tags: 2005-326g

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Description: Tags: 2005-326g

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Description: Tags: 2005-326g

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Archived Information

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION

FISCAL YEAR 2005

TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE AND DISSEMINATION TO IMPROVE

NATIONAL TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE CENTER ON

DATED MATERIAL - OPEN IMMEDIATELY

FORM APPROVED - OMB No. 1820-0028, EXP. DATE: 05/31/06

Dear Applicant Letter................................….......................................... . .….….……………….A1

Priority (Competition) Description by Program

National Technical Assistance Center on Assessment for Children with Disabilities

Selection Criteria and Format for 84.326G............................................…............……….….B9

General Information on Completing an Application ..........................................………………...C1

Application Transmittal Instructions and Requirements for Intergovernmental

Notice to All Applicants (Ensuring Equitable Access) and Application

Part I: Application for Federal Assistance (ED Form 424)

Part II: Budget Information -- Non-Construction Programs and Instructions

Part III: Application Narrative

Part IV: Assurances and Certifications

Assurances -- Non-Construction Program

Certifications Regarding Lobbying; Debarment, Suspension, and

Certification Regarding Debarment, Suspension, Ineligibility and Voluntary

Disclosure of Lobbying Activities

Survey on Ensuring Equal Opportunity for Applicants

Please note the following:

• APPLICATION SUBMISSION. Based on the precautionary procedures the U.S. Postal

• GRANTS.GOV APPLICATION SUBMISSION. Applications for grants under this

• MAXIMUM AWARD AMOUNT. In addition to providing detailed budget information

• FORMAT FOR APPLICATIONS. Please note that additional information regarding

• PROTECTION OF HUMAN SUBJECTS IN RESEARCH. The discretionary grant

• RESPONSE TO GPRA. As required by the Government Performance and Results Act

• COPIES OF THE APPLICATION. Current Government-wide policy requires that an

A program officer is available to provide information to you regarding this competition.

Louis C. Danielson, Ph.D.

Submission Problems – What should you do?

Helpful Hints When Working with Grants.gov

TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE AND DISSEMINATION TO

IMPROVE SERVICES AND RESULTS FOR

FOR CHILDREN WITH DISABILITIES

(d) Synthesizing research information on relevant topics such as assessment

(e) Disseminating information to specific audiences, including teachers, families,

(b) Collecting information on best practices for State data collection;

(a) Participating in a community or communities of practice related to the Center's

Activity Area (5): The Center must also:

(a) The recommendation of a review team consisting of experts selected by the

PROGRAM AUTHORITY: 20 U.S.C. 1463 and 1481(d).

PERFORMANCE MEASURES: Under the Government Performance and Results Act

APPLICATIONS AVAILABLE: August 8, 2005.

DEADLINE FOR TRANSMITTAL OF APPLICATIONS: September 7, 2005.

DEADLINE FOR INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVIEW: September 19, 2005.

ESTIMATED AVAILABLE FUNDS: $1,000,000.

ESTIMATED AVERAGE SIZE OF AWARDS: $1,000,000.

ESTIMATED NUMBER OF AWARDS: 1.

Note: The Department is not bound by any estimates in this notice.

PROJECT PERIOD: Up to 60 months.

We will reject any application if --

• You apply these standards and exceed the page limit; or

(a) The Education Department General Administrative Regulations (EDGAR) in 34 CFR

ELIGIBLE APPLICANTS: State educational agencies (SEAs), local educational agencies

David Egnor, Competition Manager

___________________________________________ _ ____________ -

2. Applicant’s D-U-N-S Number |_|_|_|_|_|_|_|_|_| 6. Novice Applicant _Yes ___No