Brown Cuellar Etal
Brown Cuellar Etal
Brown Cuellar Etal
Sara Brown, [email protected] Cynthia Cuellar, [email protected] Rosann Hollinger, [email protected] Laura Maly, [email protected] Paige Prichard, [email protected]
Wisconsin Mathematics Council Annual Meeting Pre-Conference Presented by the Milwaukee Mathematics Partnership April 30, 2008
The Milwaukee Mathematics Partnership (MMP), an initiative of the Milwaukee Partnership Academy (MPA), is supported with funding from the National Science Foundation under Grant No. EHR-0314898.
The Milwaukee Mathematics Partnership (MMP), an initiative of the Milwaukee Partnership Academy (MPA), is supported with funding from the National Science Foundation under Grant No. EHR-0314898.
Step 5:Effective Feedback Summary form As you analyze student work, sort student work according to category (all correct, same misconceptions, wrong strategy, etc). Once all student work is sorted, create the descriptive feedback statement you would give each category. Complete the Effective Feedback Summary form identifying the descriptive feedback given for each category. List the students who will receive that descriptive feedback. These will be the descriptive feedback statements that students will be asked to match their own work to. Students should complete their Assessment Summary Sheet in their Assessment Portfolio. Step 6:CABS Class Summary Report form This form is completed for teachers use. What did my kids do well? What challenges do they still have? Next Steps: use the information to help guide what to do next in your teaching process. You may want to use this form to share CABS data at grade level meetings, Department meetings and Learning Team meetings. Step 7:Assessment Feedback Summaries form (only when 2+ teachers are analyzing student work) Discuss each level for each category. Decide what level is appropriate for the student work sample you analyzed. Comment on the groups consensus or lack of agreement.
Joe had three test scores of 78, 76, and 74, while Mary had scores of 73, 83, and 75. What is the minimum score Joe would have needed on his third test to have a higher mean than Marys mean? ________________
School Self-Assessment and Guide Learning Teams Continuum of Work for Mathematics
Stage 2: Unpack & Align Targets with State Framework Understand importance Develop meaning for of identifying and the math embedded in articulating big ideas in the targets and the mathematics to bring alignment to state consistency to a standards/descriptors schools math program. schools math program. Tools Tools Grade level lists of Target-descriptor 9-11 big ideas per alignment worksheets grade WKCE Depths of Horizontal list of Knowledge Framework targets by content Pacing Guides across grades
Stage 3: CABS Level 1: Select/Design CABS Provide a measure of consistency around student achievement based on the targets. Tools WKCE data on student achievement Assessing the Assessment Guide District Model CABS WKCE Depths of Knowledge Framework
Stage 4: CABS Level 2 Student work Examine student work to monitor achievement and progress toward the targets. Tools MMP Protocol for analysis of student work DVD of the MMP protocol in use Descriptive Feedback
Stage 5: CABS Level 3 Formative Feedback Use student work for instructional decisions, and appropriate. continuous, feedback to students. Tools Descriptive Feedback Class and Student Feedback Summary CABS Class Summary Report
Learning Team: Where is our staff on the continuum of work for mathematics in regards to Learning Targets and classroom assessments and what is our evidence? Stage 5. Level 3 CABSFormative Feedback Goal: To use student work from common classroom assessments (CABS) to drive instructional decisions on what do we do next in the classroom and to provide appropriate and continuous feedback to students. 1. Can teachers give a specific example of a way they have used results from CABS to inform and modify classroom practice? 2. How do teachers use the CABS Class Summary Report to share the successes, challenges, and next steps for student learning? 3. How do teachers give students descriptive feedback that prompts them to self-reflect on ways to improve their work? 4. How do teachers use the Class Student Feedback Summary to make instructional decisions based on descriptive feedback to students?