Cost Saving in Cutting Section of Apparel Industry
Cost Saving in Cutting Section of Apparel Industry
Cost Saving in Cutting Section of Apparel Industry
com
www.fibre2fashion.com
www.fibre2fashion.com the industry for 3 months fabric rolls received in metres was used to evaluate Suppliers performance. Results and Discussion Table 1 show the total time taken for each garment to complete the process of operation from fabric received in cutting till cut audit operation and the same Table shows segregation of value added and non value added activities. Table 1: Value and Non Value added activities in cutting section Style No. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Time (min) taken 730 617 585 675 740 685 Time (min) VA activities 541 490 480 540 580 560 Time (min) NVA activities 189 127 105 135 160 125
which are due to waiting, negligence of operators, no proper identification, zigzag movement due to improper lay out, no standard operation followed by operator etc., Some of the improvements required to reduce waiting are sufficient numbers of measurement tape can be provided for measuring layers, pressure bar and stand for all spreading table should be provided, stickers can be used for identification, cutters show no. of plies and manual counting is not required, Correct roll, shade, length, width of the fabric should be issued by proper identification, CAD sheet and slip to be same, proper allocation of manpower is necessary, books to note production to be given to all panel checkers as one common book is used, the cut audit parts needs proper identification style wise. These recommendations were implemented in the cutting section. It was observed that time was saved and cost related to time is utilized properly (reduced by eliminating NVA) as shown in Figure 1. Figure 1: Style, Cost Savings & NVA
189 160 127 105 59 50 135 125
The average cost savings/month: `43.82# x 25 x 26 = `28483 #Approx.cost/worker/month is 0.3125, (e.g. for style 1,189x0.3125= `59) (avg. no. of lays/day = 25 and no. of working days=26) Cost save/annum = ` 3, 41, 796
40
33
42
39
3 Style
Figure 2 shows the vendor evaluation report based on NVA (min) Cost (Rs) supplier performance. Acceptance and rejection of fabrics is done based 4-point system inspection which is generally carried out in garment industry. It can be observed that some of the companies are supplying (i.e.,
www.fibre2fashion.com Raymond, Auro textile etc) good quality of fabrics compared to other companies. This indicates that rework on these fabrics are nil resulting in save of time and cost. Figure 2: Supplier v/s Fabric Rejection
100 80 60 40 20 0
S Knits GSI China J Intl Sarala Golden Raymond Shrenuj Sun Inds. Clothing Vidhya impex Auro T extile
Rejection %
Supplier
Conclusion The study clearly indicates that by eliminating NVA activities in cutting section time as well as cost are saved and also improves internal throughput time. Vendors evaluation to identify proper supplier to get 0 % rejection of fabrics is vital to save cost. References: 1. www.fibre2fashion.com 2. www.asiantextilejournal.com 3. Saroj Bala, Factors influencing costing of woven fabrics, Indian Textile JournalJune 2003 4. Dr. P. Khanna-work study, time and motion study (P.21) The authors are associated with the Dept. of Textile Technology, GSKSJTI, K. R. Circle, Bengaluru, Karnataka