010121232343455675676787891230124569011231233 9 9 0 1 2 4 4 5 6 9 9 3 8 0 0 2 7878989090112312323434567867801256778978990189 5656767878989090101234534578923445645667856790 3434545656767878901211245690112312334523467867 1212323434545678989012367889089091290134534556 9090101212345656778934556756767867801201223423 787898901232344560122342343453457897898919018 565678909011237898919010121124564565676787679 345676788904565676787898901231232343454566787 343455671232343454565677898909010121233454566 122348909010121232344565676787898900121233453 015676787898909011232343454565677898909120121 343454565676788909010121232344565676787898908 121232343455676787898909011232343454565675676 0 0 1 2 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 2 3 4 4 5 8989089112323434545656767878989191212312323445

6756789090101212323434545656767878989090112312 3456767878978990101212323434545656767878989090 3434545645667878989090101212323434545656767878 1212312334545656767878989090101212323434545656 9089001212323434545656767878989090101212323445 6778989090101212323434545656767878989090112312 5656767878978990101212323434545656767878989090 3434545645667878989090101212323434545656767878 1212312334545656767878989089101212323434545667 9089001212323434545656756778989090101212334556 6778989090101212323423445656767878989001223445 565676787897899019011232343454565677899011235 343454564566786788909010121232344566788902345 121231233453455676787898908911233455679012347 0 0 2 2 4 5 6 7 7 9 2 4

FAO Statistical

Yearbook

2012
World food and agriculture

FAO STATISTICAL YEARBOOK 2012 World Food and Agriculture

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, 2012

The designations employed and the presentation of material in this information product do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) concerning the legal or development status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The mention of specific companies or products of manufacturers, whether or not these have been patented, does not imply that these have been endorsed or recommended by FAO in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. The views expressed in this information product are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of FAO.

ISBN 978-92-5-107084-0

All rights reserved. FAO encourages reproduction and dissemination of material in this information product. Non-commercial uses will be authorized free of charge, upon request. Reproduction for resale or other commercial purposes, including educational purposes, may incur fees. Applications for permission to reproduce or disseminate FAO copyright materials, and all queries concerning rights and licences, should be addressed by e-mail to [email protected] or to the Chief, Publishing Policy and Support Branch, Office of Knowledge Exchange, Research and Extension, FAO, Viale delle Terme di Caracalla, 00153 Rome, Italy.

FAO 2012

CONTENTS

Introduction:
Preface Foreword How to use this book

1
1 2 3

Part 1

The setting:

5
8 12 14 18 22 26 28 32 36 72

People and demography Women in agriculture Land and water resources Labour Capital and investment Inputs Infrastructure Macroeconomy Tables Denitions and sources

Part 2

Hunger dimensions:

81
84 88 92 96 100 104 110 114 116 122 124 163

Risks, hazards and shocks Undernourishment Diets The spectrum of malnutrition Trade, food stability and food security Food prices and food price volatility Poverty and inequality Good governance Education, health and sanitation Food aid Tables Denitions and sources

Part 3

Feeding the world:

171
174 178 182 198 202 208 214 216 218 270

Aggregate agriculture Sources of growth in crop production Trends in the crop sector Trends in the livestock sector Trends in the sheries sector Trends in agricultural trade Urban and peri-urban agriculture Food losses Tables Denitions and sources

Part 4

Sustainability dimensions:

281
284 290 294 300 306 308 312 316 320 344

Land Water Pollution from agriculture Climate change Biodiversity and conservation Organic farming Genetically modied crops Agriculture and the bio-based economy Tables Denitions and sources

Part 5

Concepts and methods Bibliography

Metadata:

353

357 361

iii

iv

Introduction
Preface
There is currently a wealth of statistics on food and agriculture being provided both by FAO and other global data suppliers. Not only are the volume and coverage of data vast, but so is the diversity. This is a reection of the fact that agriculture is now increasingly intertwined with many other sectors, the environment, the wider economy and with society. However, we noticed a clear gap in the knowledge arena in terms of a missing platform that brings together all of the data in a coherent and systematic way, so that readers can easily access and absorb the depth and breadth of agricultures role in the world today. We hope this FAO statistical year book lls such gap. In presenting this publication, the FAO Statistics Division would like to acknowledge the combined efforts of statisticians around the world, in particular staff in ministries of agriculture and statistical ofces, in international institutions and in nongovernmental organizations, whose efforts have made this publication possible. This book has been prepared by a team from the FAO Statistics Division led by Adam Prakash and Matthieu Stigler, with substantial technical assistance from Filippo Gheri. We acknowledge the comments and suggestions from within FAOs Economic and Social Department, including Denis Drechsler, Concepcin Calpe, Piero Conforti, Jelle Bruinsma, Josef Schmidhuber, Seth Meyer, Amy Heyman, Carlo Caero, Nathalie Troubat, Chiara Brunelli, Eve Crowley and Elisenda Estruch. Valuable comments from colleagues in other FAO departments are also acknowledged, especially Tsuji Sachiko, Karen Frenken, Eugenia Serova, Lorraine Williams, John Ruane, Andrea Sonnino and Modibo Traore. We would also like to thank Natalia Ermolaev for editorial assistance. The contribution A of Boris Veytsman in designing and producing book via a dedicated LTEX package is acknowledged and that of Giancarlo de Pol for the graphical concept. Finally, Emmanuel Blondel and Professor Roger Bivand provided precious assistance on the presentation of geo-referenced data, and Guido Barbaglia for the data download API. We would also like to take this opportunity to say a few words about how the FAO Statistical Yearbook was produced. This book has been created with innovative openA source tools, employing a combination of R and LTEX to generate the entire publication: from data retrieval to data processing to indicator construction to a blueprint-ready PDF le for distribution. Our innovation circumvented the traditional route of manual production, involving costly software licenses, signicant labour costs and inefcienA cies associated with a lack of cycle integration. The RLTEX solution also empowered FAO statisticians in managing how their data were to be presented. Adam Prakash, Matthieu Stigler

Foreword
Achieving food security for all is at the heart of FAOs mission, by making sure people have regular access to enough high-quality food to lead active, healthy lives. Our mission is premised on the need to raise levels of nutrition, improve agricultural productivity, better the lives of rural populations and ensure that agriculture can be a sustainable platform for economic growth. Beyond its essential role in food security, sustainable agricultural development is now regarded as pivotal in strategies towards poverty alleviation. In addition, policy makers agree that agriculture will be key to effectively address challenging issues of our time, including climate change, water scarcity, environmental pollution and land degradation. Agriculture has a clear role in providing ecosystem services to protect the environment and preserve our planets natural resource base. With the sector now intertwined with almost every topic in the development agenda, a major challenge is to capture and monitor the multiple roles of agriculture. Providing reliable and timely information on the status of food and agricultural sectors in multiple contexts is an important part of the FAO mandate and in particular of the FAO Statistics Division. In response to the demands for a more comprehensive set of statistics and indicators that are amenable to an ever-widening audience, we have attempted to meet the challenge through radically overhauling the usual FAO Statistical Yearbook format. The revised publication will continue the long tradition of the FAO Statistical Yearbook series as the foremost collection and reference point of statistical data on food and agriculture, but the new publication marks a transition. In rising to the call for a broader and more in-depth examination of the many roles of agriculture, this edition leans towards a thematically-driven, statistical snapshot of the major trends and issues related to world food and agriculture. Divided into four parts and encompassing 34 dimensions of food and agrciulture, the new FAO Statistical Yearbook employs over 350 indicators drawn from data sources within FAO, sister UN agencies, the World Bank and other international organizations. The new Yearbook approach makes us all keenly aware of the need to improve the quality, quantity and scope of agricultural and development statistics. Concerted efforts are, however, being made by FAO and our partners to enhance country capacities in providing better and more statistical information. Though presenting an accessible statistical synthesis of the key issues affecting world food and agriculture, it is our desire that the book raises awareness about the multiple challenges confronting the sector, thereby strengthening FAOs resolve towards ghting hunger and improving the livelihoods of the rural poor.

Pietro Gennari Director, FAO Statistics Division

How to use this book

The 2012 edition of the FAO Statistical Yearbook represents a break away from FAO tradition. Through employing data from global statistical providers, including FAO, the publication presents a visual synthesis of the major trends and factors shaping the global food and agricultural landscape and their interplay with broader environmental, social and economic dimensions. In doing so, it strives to serve as a unique reference point on the state of world food and agriculture for policy-makers, donor agencies, researchers and analysts as well as the general public. The book is subdivided into four thematic parts, where an attempt is made to exhaustively present the spectrum of issues relevant to the subject matter: Part 1 The setting measures the state of the agricultural resource base, by assessing the supply of land, labour, capital, inputs and the adequacy of infrastructure, and also examines the pressure on the world food system stemming from demographic and macroeconomic change Part 2 Hunger dimensions gauges the state of food insecurity and malnutrition, measuring the multitude of dimensions that give rise to hunger and those that shape undernourishment Part 3 Feeding the world evaluates the past and present productive capacity of world agriculture together with the role of trade in meeting changing food, feed and other demands Part 4 Sustainability dimensions examines the sustainability of agriculture in the context of the pressure it exerts on the environment, including the interaction of agriculture with climate change, and how it can provide ecosystem services in relation to the bio-based economy Multiple page spreads are used to present each thematic issue. Each spread contains a visualization of the data by way of maps and charts and is accompanied by text that provides a background to the salient issues as well as an assessment of current trends. Data are made available for virtually all countries in the world, excluding principalities and minor territories. We follow the M49 convention of the United Nations Statistics Division in reporting geographical regions for statistical use. See (http://unstats.un.org/unsd/methods/ m49/m49regin.htm). The most recent data are given, but when country data have not been reported for the reference year, an asterisk (*) is placed on the year label to indicate closest to that year.

How to retrieve Yearbook data

The data used in this book are presented via charts and maps that form the basis of key indicators. A more detailed overview of the data is provided by way of tables located at the end of each thematic part. Documentation about the data, their methodology and sources can be found through the MetaLink key below each indicator. For the web version, the user can simply click on the MetaLink key, and will be directed to information about the data. Furthermore, a small icon allows the user to directly download the data presented in each indicator.

The Webservice API Underlying the direct download is a new Webservice system that gives direct access to the datasets employed by the Yearbook. While most users will simply use the iconbased direct link, those users who regularly use the data will undoubtedly benet from the Webservice facility. The Webservice relies on REST API technology, which offers different ways to access the data, as well as alternative formats for retrieving them. Base link: The base link is http://ldvapp07.fao.org:8030/wds/api?db=faosyb Output format: Users can either visualise the data in the web browser with out=hmtl or download data in csv, Excel xls or xml by specifying the argument: out=csv (or excel, or xml). The content: The Webservice offers different ways to specify the data to download:

By object key as provided in the book: download all the data used
in the given chart/map/table, and is executed by using the argument: object=chart5. For example: http://ldvapp07.fao.org:8030/wds/api?db=faosyb&out=html&object= chart5

By dataset name: download all the data contained in a given dataset (often more than what is provided by the indicator). Executed by using the argument: dataset=x. For example: http://ldvapp07.fao.org:8030/wds/api?db=faosyb&out=html&dataset= P1.DEM.UN.WPP.FER.TOT Finally, a few specic requests are provided that allow users to retrieve:

The list of dataset keys used and their label. Use:

http://ldvapp07.fao.org:8030/wds/api?db=faosyb&out=html&dataset=list

The list of country codes, with their equivalent in ISO2, ISO3, UN and GAUL code.
Use: http://ldvapp07.fao.org:8030/wds/api?db=faosyb&out=html&ndcode=list

Yearbook data directly accessible from within the statistical software R To further facilitate the download and use of the data contained in the Yearbook, the Webservice API will be callable from within R a free and open-source software platform popular worldwide. To keep abreast of updates, readers and users are encouraged to visit the Yearbooks website: www.fao.org/economic/ess/syb

PART

The setting

Introduction
Well over half of the developing worlds population 3.1 billion people, or 45 percent of all humanity live in rural areas. Of them, roughly 2.5 billion derive their livelihoods from agriculture. For many economies, especially those of developing countries, agriculture can be an engine of economic growth. Approximately two-thirds of the worlds agricultural value added is generated in developing countries, and in many of them the agricultural sector contributes as much as 30 percent to the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) and is a source of employment for two-thirds of the labour force. According to the World Bank, growth in the agricultural sector can be up to 3.2 times more effective at reducing US$1/day poverty than growth in other sectors. Importantly, agriculture can provide a haven of resilience against global economic and nancial turmoil, often more effectively than other sectors. A look back through history reveals that growth in agriculture has tended to be the antecedent of wider economic development. From the Industrial Revolution that began in England in the 18th century and spread to other now-developed countries, through to more recent examples of China or Viet Nam, agriculture has always been the precursor to the rise of industry and services. In many poor developing countries, primary activities such as agriculture still constitute the backbone of the economy. Inadequate infrastructure, incomplete markets and a large presence of subsistence producers are

frequent characteristics of these economies. Strategies to promote economic growth must be rmly anchored in agriculture. Increasing productivity in the sector is a necessary condition for resources to migrate towards non-agricultural activities, thus gradually diversifying the economy. Yet, a profound and prolonged lack of investment in agriculture is evident in many countries. Notably, infrastructure is missing or weak in rural areas, agricultural productivity is stagnant and the lack of opportunities for income diversication combines with poor functioning markets to undermine economic growth. These conditions, however, can be changed. There is now a growing recognition among governments and donor agencies that agriculture must be the mainstay of any development agenda and of policies towards economic growth. The reafrmation of the sectors role in this context provides fresh impetus for fostering investment and raising productivity in agriculture.

Key Resources
The State of Food and Agriculture The State of Food and Agriculture, FAOs major annual agship publication, aims at bringing to a wider audience balanced science-based assessments of important issues in the eld of food and agriculture. Each edition of the report contains a comprehensive, yet easily accessible, overview of a selected topic of major relevance for rural and agricultural development and for global food security. This is supplemented by a synthetic overview of the current global agricultural situation. 2009: Livestock in the balance 2010-11: Women in Agriculture: Closing the gender gap for development Publication cycle: Annual Webpage: www.fao.org/publications/sofa Looking Ahead in World Food and Agriculture How will the world feed itself in 2050? This volume, which is a compilation of papers authored by world-class experts, addresses this very question. Agricultural and food demand is expected to slow over the next decades, following slowing population growth and rising incomes. However, population will still grow considerably in the coming decades, and require world agricultural production to increase substantially by 2050. Other areas explored in the volume are natural resources notably land and water as well as capital, investment and technology. Webpage: http: //www.fao.org/economic/esa/esag/en/

PART 1

People and demography

Even though growth rates have been slowing since the late 1970s, the worlds population has nevertheless doubled since that time to 6.9 billion, and is projected to increase considerably over the next decades. In many developing countries, a combination of declining mortality rates, prolonged life expectancy, youthful age structures and high fertility warrant considerable population increases that are likely to continue until the end of the twenty-rst century. Of concern is that where population growth is the highest, income levels are the lowest. For poor population groups, consumption tends to be heavily inuenced by local production. This may lead to the emergence of Malthusian Islands, particularly in parts of sub-Saharan Africa, where population growth is outstripping the current productive capacity of the land. According to the most recent revision of the UNs World Population Prospects, countries with low fertility rates that is, most developed countries and much of East Asia currently account for around 40 percent of the worlds population. In these countries, each woman does not have enough children to ensure that, on average, she will be replaced by a daughter who survives to the age of procreation. Another 40 percent is situated in intermediate-fertility countries, where each woman has, on average, between 1 and 1.5 female offspring. The remaining 18 percent in much of sub-Saharan Africa, parts of the Near East and South Asia is located in highfertility countries where the average woman has more than 1.5 daughters. These countries provide the highest potential for future population growth. The trajectory of the worlds future population rests heavily on assumptions about fertility rates. If rates in high-fertility countries continue to grow unabated, an additional two billion people will need to be fed by the turn of the century. This underscores the importance of empowering women and couples through education and promoting family planning, especially in the poorest countries where population growth rates are currently the fastest. Indeed, though most people would like to and do have smaller families than they did in the past, many in fact have more children than they desire. According to the United Nations Population Fund, approximately 215 million women who would use contraceptives lack access to them. At the same time, there are contexts in which poverty can be a reason for high fertility, given the role of children in providing a labour force for the household and support for the elderly. Worldwide, people can expect to live longer than ever before. In the past two decades alone, global life expectancy has risen approximately ve years to nearly 69 years. In all countries, the wealthy live longer than the poor, and in most populations women usually outlive men. In 2011, people in those least-developed countries characterized by high fertility rates are expected to live on average 58 years, some 20 years less than their counterparts in developed countries. Nevertheless, this average marks a signicant increase when compared to life expectancy in 1990, which stood at only 50 years.

Map 1:

No Data

<0

01

Source: World Population Prospects - the 2010 Revision (UNESA) Metalink: P1.DEM.UN.WPP.POP.TOT, p. 73

6896 million people living in the world

in 2010

Virtually all global population growth

centred in developing countries

However, world population growth today

is half of what it was in the 1960s

PEOPLE AND DEMOGRAPHY

World population growth (% p.a., 19902010) 01 12 2 3.5 > 3.5

Chart 1: Very high fertility rates behind faster population growth in developing regions
Fertility rate (2009)
5 4

Births per woman

3 2 1 0

Developed

East Asia

L.Amer. & Carib.

South Asia

Sub-S Africa

Source: World Population Prospects - the 2010 Revision (UNESA) Metalink: P1.DEM.UN.WPP.FER.TOT, p. 72

PART 1

Improved access to clean water, better nutrition, living and working conditions, and greater access to health services can account for the increase in life expectancy. These factors, in tandem with higher life expectancy, have led to the decline in infant mortality rates. The worlds population is aging. Today, roughly 27 percent is below the age of 15 and approximately 8 percent is 65 years or older. In the past two decades these statistics stood at 33 and 6 percent, respectively. This aging prole is being shaped by rising longevity twinned with low fertility rates in the more developed countries. Unprecedented change has also occurred in where people reside. During 2008, the worlds urban population turned, for the rst time, larger than the rural population. But only part of this trend was caused by increased rural-urban migration. Other reasons include the transformation of rural settlements into urban areas and, most importantly, natural urban population growth. Essentially, much of the global population growth has taken place in less developed countries (LDCs), predominately in poor urban areas and slums. Urbanization rates in LDCs reached 4 percent per annum in the last decade. The three fundamental dimensions of food security: availability, access and utilization differ in urban and rural contexts and across urban socio-economic groups. A greater diversity of both local and imported food products is available in cities although, most of the food is not produced within city boundaries. Access to food in urban areas is dependent on cash exchange, with some exceptions, where urban food production contributes directly to household intake. Reliance on purchased food is a leading factor in household food insecurity of poor urban populations, who lack a xed income. Allied to rising urbanization is an increase in population densities. At the world level, there are on average 50 people living in every square kilometre. At 68 persons per km2 , densities in developing countries are three times as high as those in developed countries. In south East Asia, for instance, population density stands at 132 per km2 . Beside birth and death rates, international migration is the only other factor that directly accounts for a countrys population growth. Immigration from developing to developed countries over the period 1990 to 2010 amounted to 45 million people. Presently, around 214 million people (over 3 percent of the world population) ofcially live outside their home country.

Chart 2: Virtually all population growth centred in developing countries

Population (1960-2010)
Developed Developing

6 5 4

Billions

3 2 1 0

1960

1970

1980

1990

2000

2010

Source: World Population Prospects - the 2010 Revision (UNESA) Metalink: P1.DEM.UN.WPP.POP.TOT, p. 73

Chart 3: ... and in cities

Urban population (1960-2010)

Developed Developing

3.0 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0

Billions

1960

1970

1980

1990

2000

2010

Further reading
World Population Prospects: the 2010 revision (www.
un.org/esa/population/)

Source: World Urbanization Prospects (UNESA) Metalink: P1.DEM.UN.WUP.POP.URB, p. 73

UN Population Fund (www.unfpa.org/) FAO Food and Nutrition Security in Urban Environments (www.fao.org/ag/agn/nutrition/urban_security_ en.stm)

10

PEOPLE AND DEMOGRAPHY

Map 2: Population density highest in Asia and Europe but rising in coastal Africa

Population density (people per km2, 2010) No Data < 40 40 60

60 100

100 250

> 250

Source: World Population Prospects - the 2010 Revision (UNESA) Metalink: P1.DEM.UN.WPP.POP.DEN, p. 72

Chart 4: Rural to urban population shift more prevalent in developing countries

Rural/urban population growth (2000-10)
Developed country Developing country

Chart 5: Populations in developing regions getting younger, but aging in developed regions
Population ages 0-14 and 65 +, share of total (2010)
Old 40 Young

5 30 0

Rural (%)

20 -5

%
10 0

-10

4 Urban (%)

Developed

East Asia

L.Amer. & Carib.

South Asia

Sub-S Africa

Source: World Urbanization Prospects (UNESA) Metalink: P1.DEM.UN.WUP.POP.URB, p. 73

Source: World Population Prospects - the 2010 Revision (UNESA) Metalink: P1.DEM.UN.WPP.POP.AGE, p. 72

11

PART 1

Women in agriculture
Women make signicant contributions to the rural economy in all developing country regions. Roles differ across regions, yet they consistently have less access than men to the resources and opportunities they need to be more productive. Closing the gender gap in agricultural inputs alone could lift 100150 million people out of hunger. Women comprise, on average, 43 percent of the agricultural labour force in developing countries, ranging from 20 percent in Latin America to 50 percent in Eastern Asia and sub-Saharan Africa. Their contribution to agricultural work varies even more widely depending on the specic crop and activity. But a gender gap is found for many assets, inputs and services land, livestock, labour, education, extension and nancial services, and technology and it imposes costs on the agriculture sector, the broader economy and society as well as on women themselves. Closing the gender gap in agriculture would generate signicant gains for the agriculture sector and for society. If women had the same access to productive resources as men, they could increase yields on their farms by 2030 percent. This could raise total agricultural output in developing countries by 2.54 percent, which could in turn reduce the number of hungry people in the world by 1217 percent. The potential gains would vary by region depending on how many women are currently engaged in agriculture, how much production or land they control, and how wide a gender gap they face. No blueprint exists for closing the gender gap, but some basic principles are universal: governments, the international community and civil society should work together to eliminate discrimination under the law, to promote equal access to resources and opportunities, to ensure that agricultural policies and programmes are genderaware, and to make womens voices heard as equal partners for sustainable development. Achieving gender equality and empowering women in agriculture is not only the right thing to do it is also crucial for agricultural development and food security.

Map 3:

No Data

< 10

20

Source: KILM (ILO) Metalink: P1.RES.ILO.LAB.GEND, p. 77

Increasing womens access to land, livestock, education, nancial services, extension, technology and rural employment would boost agricultural productivity inputs alone could lift 100-150 million people out of hunger

Closing the gender gap in agricultural

Further reading
FAO The State of Food and Agriculture 2010-11:
Women in Agriculture - closing the gender gap for development (www.fao.org/publications/en/)

FAO Gender (www.fao.org/gender) en/)

12

WOMEN IN AGRICULTURE

Female share of the agricultural labour force (%, 2010*) 20 30 40 > 40

Chart 6: Stark gender disparities in land holdings are apparent in all regions
Share of male and female agricultural holders in developing regions (2005)
Female 100% 80% 60% Male

40% 20% 0%

L.Amer. & Carib.

N.Africa

S.Asia & SE.Asia

Sub-S Africa

W.Asia

Source: FAO, Gender and Land Rights Database Metalink: P1.RES.ILO.GEND.HLD, p. 77

13

PART 1

Land and water resources

At present, more than 1.5 billion hectares of the globes land surface (about 12 percent) is used for crop production (arable land and land under permanent crops). According to FAO, there is little scope for further expansion of agricultural land. Despite the presence of considerable amounts of land potentially suitable for agriculture, much of it is covered by forests, protected for environmental reasons, or employed for urban settlements. Potentially accessible agricultural land is very unevenly distributed between regions and countries. Some 90 percent is situated in Latin America and sub-Saharan Africa, and half is concentrated in just seven countries (Brazil, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Angola, the Sudan, Argentina, Colombia and the Plurinational State of Bolivia). At the other extreme, there is virtually no spare land available for agricultural expansion in South Asia, the Near East and North Africa. So far, land and water management systems have been able to meet the rapidly rising demands placed on them. This was made possible through gains in yields thanks to increased use of inputs, technology and irrigation. World agricultural production has grown between 2.5 and 3 times over the last 50 years while the cultivated area (permanent cropland and arable land) has grown by only 12 percent. More than 40 percent of the increase in food production came from irrigated areas, which have doubled in surface. These outcomes underscore the steady trend toward precision agriculture and commercialization of all types of food and industrial crops. In the same period, global cultivated land per person gradually declined from 0.44 hectares to less than 0.25 hectares - a clear measure of successful agricultural intensication. But, the distribution of land suitable for cropping is skewed against those countries which have most need to raise production. In low-income countries, cultivated land area per person is less than half of that in high-income countries, and its suitability for agriculture is generally lower. Availability of land for cultivation does not necessarily equate to equitable access in reality, as women, indigenous people and ethnic minorities often lack access to land for farming enterprise. The concentration of high-input irrigated agriculture on prime land has relieved pressure on land expansion to some extent. However, many irrigation systems are performing well below their potential, and there is considerable scope for improving the productivity and the efciency of land and water use in agriculture. While much of the prime agricultural land suitable for irrigation has been developed, the global expansion of irrigated area has virtually stalled to 0.6 percent per year after growing twice as much in the 1990s. Growth remains fractional, even when the stagnation of irrigation-intensive rice cultivation in Asia is taken into account.

Map 4:

No Data

< 0.07

0.0

Source: FAO, Statistics Division (FAOSTAT) Metalink: P1.RES.FAO.ESS.LDAQ.ARL, p. 75

0.2 hectares of arable land available

per person in 2009, less than half the amount 50 years ago est in Near East and many parts of Asia, but higher availability in developed regions and in South America per person is far more scarce, therefore bridging yield gaps will be needed to sustain production with high population growth

Arable land availability per person low-

In many low income countries, cropland

14

LAND AND WATER RESOURCES

Arable land (hectares per person, 2009) 0.07 0.15 0.15 0.3 0.3 0.5 > 0.5

Chart 7: Arable land per person declining in all regions, and at very low levels in developing regions
Arable land (1992-2009)
Developed 0.5 East Asia South Asia Sub-S Africa L. Amer. & Carib.

hectares per person

0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1

1995

2000

2005

Source: FAO, Statistics Division (FAOSTAT) Metalink: P1.RES.FAO.ESS.LDAQ.ARL, p. 75

15

PART 1

Although rainfed agriculture is the worlds predominant agricultural production system, increasing climate variability is bringing greater uncertainty in production levels. Current productivity in rainfed systems is, on average, reaching little more than half of its potential. In the poorest countries, only one-fth of productivity potential is obtainable under conditions where the required agricultural inputs are available and appropriate management is applied. Water availability is a growing constraint in areas where a high proportion of renewable water resources is already used, or where transboundary water resource management cannot be developed because agreements on cooperative use are not in place. Overall, increasing water scarcity constrains irrigated production, particularly in the most highly stressed countries and areas. Because many important food production zones are dependent on groundwater, declining aquifer levels and abstraction of non-renewable groundwater present a growing risk to food production systems. In the coming decades, climate change may bring further risks and unpredictability to harvests, whether from warming and related aridity, shifts in rainfall patterns, or the frequency and duration of extreme weather events. Water availability and its distribution may also be profoundly affected. While warming may extend the frontier of agriculture in higher-latitude areas (both northern and southern hemispheres), it is anticipated that key agricultural systems will have to cope with new temperature, humidity and water stress. This makes the need to increase the efciency of land and water use even more urgent.

Chart 8: Agricultural land availability low in foodinsecure regions

Agricultural land area (2009)
Cropland Pasture Land

600 500 400

Million ha

300 200 100 0

Developed

East Asia

L.Amer. & South Carib. Asia

Sub-S Africa

Source: FAO, Statistics Division (FAOSTAT) Metalink: P1.RES.FAO.ESS.LDAQ.ARPCL, p. 75

Chart 9: But large potential for arable land expansion in Latin America and in sub-Saharan Africa
Arable land potential (2009*)
800

600

Million ha

400

200

Developed

East Asia

L.Amer. & South Carib. Asia

Sub-S Africa

Further reading
FAO The State of the Worlds Land and Water Resources
for Food and Agriculture (SOLAW): managing systems at risk 2011 (www.fao.org/nr/solaw/solaw-home/en/)

Source: FAO, Statistics Division Metalink: P1.RES.FAO.LAN.ALP, p. 76

Bruinsma (2011) FAO Natural Resources and Environment Department

(http://www.fao.org/nr/)

16

LAND AND WATER RESOURCES

Map 5: Per capita renewable water resources lowest in North Africa and the Near East

Water resources, renewable per capita (per capita m3 yr, 2009) No Data < 500 500 1000 1000 1700

1700 5000

> 5000

Source: FAO, Land and Water Division (AQUASTAT) Metalink: P1.RES.FAO.NRL.WTRpc, p. 76

Chart 10: Greater abundance of water resources on a per capita basis in Oceania and the Americas
Water resources, renewable per capita (1992 and 2009)
1992 2009

Chart 11: Africa lags behind other regions in the share of land equipped for irrigation
Total area equipped for irrigation (2008*)
Area equiped for irrigation Cropland

500 30000 400 300 200 100 0 0

Per capita m3 /yr

20000

10000

as Asia a Afric Americ

Million ha

ia d pe Euro Ocean Worl

a Afric

ic Amer

as

Asia

Euro

pe

Source: FAO, Land and Water Division (AQUASTAT) Metalink: P1.RES.FAO.NRL.WTRpc, p. 76

Source: FAO, Land and Water Division (AQUASTAT) Metalink: P1.RES.FAO.NRL.TAEI, p. 76

17

PART 1

Labour
In developing regions, especially those least developed and those experiencing rapidly rising populations, employment growth is driven mostly by demographic changes. The majority of workers of these regions do not enter into formal wage employment, but instead are engaged in self-employment or unpaid family work, such as in agriculture, and especially subsistence farming. Consequently, economic downturns tend to have only a limited impact on overall employment growth in these economies, in contrast to industrialized economies where employment growth is closely linked to the business cycle. Considering that the large share of the working poor are engaged in agriculture, developments in that sector have a major impact on welfare throughout much of the world. Until 2000, agriculture was the mainstay of employment around the world. Since then, the services sector has assumed this mantle and the gap between the two has widened. Although employment growth in agriculture has slowed, the number of workers in this sector reached over one billion in 2009. In sub-Saharan Africa, growth in agricultural employment accounted for half of all employment growth between 1999 and 2009. In South Asia, nearly 33 per cent of all employment growth since 1999 was in agriculture. By contrast, agricultural employment is falling in the developed economies, East Asia and Latin America and the Caribbean regions. At the global level, women are more active in the agricultural sector than men some 38 per cent versus 33 per cent. Labour force participation rates are usually highest in the poorest countries. More people are employed out of necessity than by choice, as only a fraction of the working-age population can afford not to work. In these countries, low unemployment gures in conjunction with high labour participation rates result in large swathes engaged in vulnerable employment and many in working poverty. This holds for many economies in sub-Saharan Africa, where female participation rates feature among the highest in the world. Poverty is the principal driver of the high rate of child labour in agriculture. Around 60 percent of all child labourers 129 million girls and boys work in agriculture. More than two-thirds of them are unpaid family members. The agricultural sector has the highest incidence of both unpaid child labour and early entry into the workforce, which often occurs between the ages of ve and seven.

Map 6:

No Data

<5

5 20

Source: KILM (ILO) Metalink: P1.RES.WBK.WDI.LAB.EAT, p. 78

Over 1 billion people are employed in

world agriculture, representing 1 in 3 of all workers the entire workforce are involved in agriculture

In sub-Saharan Africa over 60 percent of

18

LABOUR

Employment in agriculture, share of total employment (%, 2010*) 5 20 20 40 40 60 > 60

Chart 12: Employment in agriculture falling worldwide, but the sector still accounts for more than half of total employment in sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia
Employment in agriculture, share of total employment (1990-2010)
Developed 60 50 40 30 20 10 East Asia South Asia Sub-S Africa L. Amer. & Carib.

1995

2000

2005

2010

Source: KILM (ILO) Metalink: P1.RES.WBK.WDI.LAB.EATx, p. 78

19

PART 1

High rates of child labour are also caused by lack of access to education, poor quality of education, limited supplies of affordable agricultural technology and adult labour, hazardous practices, and the dominance of traditional attitudes towards childrens participation in agricultural activities. However, in the context of family farming not all participation of children in productive activities is considered child labour. For instance, ageappropriate tasks that do not interfere with a childs compulsory schooling and that are not hazardous can be important contributions to the household food security and can provide children with agricultural and other skills for their future. In the overall labour market, world unemployment in 2010 stood at 205 million (a rate of 6.2 percent), which was virtually unchanged from the previous year, but over 15 percent higher than the pre-recession level of 2007. Well over half of the increase in global unemployment between 2007 and 2010 arose in the developed economies, even though this group comprises only oneseventh of the world labour force. The employment-to-population ratio, which indicates the employment-generating capacity of an economy, globally stood at 61 per cent in 2010, around a percentage point lower than at the onset of global economic turmoil. Put simply, this means that economies around the world are not generating sufcient employment opportunities to absorb additions to the working-age population.

Chart 13: Wide variation in the depth of womens participation in agriculture, but their role more prominent in developing countries
Women in agriculture, % of female employment (2010*)
Female Male

60 50 40

30 20 10 0

Developed

East Asia

L.Amer. & Carib.

South Asia

Sub-S Africa

Source: KILM (ILO) Metalink: P1.RES.WBK.WDI.LAB.GENDAG, p. 79

Chart 14: The need for paid employment is much higher in developing countries and among women
Gender employment to gender population ratio (2010*)
Developed country Developing country

80

Female (%)

70

60

50

20

30

40

Further reading
Global Employment Trends 2011 (www.ilo.org/
empelm/what/WCMS_114243)
Source: KILM (ILO)

50 Male (%)

60

70

80

Metalink: P1.RES.WBK.WDI.LAB.EPRF, p. 78

Key Indicators of the Labour Market (KILM) (www.ilo.

org/kilm)

FAO Gender, Equity and Rural Employment Division

(www.fao.org/economic/esw/)

Food, Agriculture & Decent Work (www.fao-ilo.org)

20

LABOUR

Map 7: High rates of unemployment afict many regions, except Asia

Unemployment rates (%, 2009*) No Data <5

58

8 12

12 25

> 25

Source: KILM (ILO) Metalink: P1.RES.WBK.WDI.LAB.UNFT, p. 79

Chart 15: Agriculture forms the bedrock of employment in the poorest regions
Employment type (2010)
Agriculture 100% Industry Services

Chart 16: Considerably less women participate in income generating activities than men
Labour force participation rate by gender, ages 15+ (2009)
Female Male

80

80% 60 60% 40 40%

%
20 0

20%

0%

Developed

East Asia

L.Amer. & South Carib. Asia

Sub-S Africa

E.Asia L.Amer. & & Pac. Carib.

South Asia

Sub-S Africa

World

Source: KILM (ILO) Metalink: P1.RES.WBK.WDI.LAB.EATx, p. 78

Source: KILM (ILO) Metalink: P1.RES.WBK.WDI.LAB.PTRF, p. 79

21

PART 1

Capital and investment

Investment drives growth and development. Additional net investment in capital goods (capital formation) such as expenditure on new machinery, infrastructure and technology enables an economy to produce more, and more efciently in the future. Investment is vital to promoting long-run economic growth by improving productivity and productive capacity. Given its strong impact on welfare, investment is particularly important in agriculture: countries that performed best in terms of reducing poverty and hunger are also those that achieved higher net investment rates per agricultural worker. However, there has been a global slowdown in the rate of capital formation in primary agriculture. While the rate grew annually at 1.1 percent in the period 19751990, the rate of capital formation was only 0.5 percent during 19912007. This reduction was recorded in both developed and developing countries. As a consequence, in sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia that is, regions where many countries experience the highest prevalence and greatest depth of hunger the growth of the population active in agriculture has outstripped growth of agricultural capital stock. Government expenditure on agriculture is positively and highly correlated with capital formation, conrming the decisive role of such expenditure in creating an enabling environment for infrastructure and sustainable access to natural resources. It also has a signicant positive impact on productivity: research has shown that increasing public spending on agriculture by 10 percent leads to a 0.34 percent increase in a countrys agricultural total factor productivity. Poorer developing countries have less capacity to ll the investment gap. The share of public spending on agriculture has fallen to an average of approximately 7 percent in developing countries and even less in Africa. Agricultural Ofcial Development Assistance (ODA) decreased by some 58 percent in real terms between 1980 and 2005, even though total ODA increased signicantly by 112 percent over the same period. This means that the share of ODA going to the agricultural sector fell from 17 percent in 1980 to between 5 and 6 percent in 2009, with the same downward trend observed in national budgets. In the absence of national funding channels, nancing for the rural agenda has been bolstered by increased donor funding. Such assistance represents a large part of the agricultural budget in most rural-based economies. For 24 sub-Saharan countries, ODA averages 28 percent of total agricultural spending, and for Mozambique, Niger, and Rwanda, ODA averages more than 80 percent.

Map 8:

No Data

<0

0 0.

Source: FAO & World Bank Metalink: P1.RES.FAO.ESS.CAP.STK, p. 75

Around USD 100 billion dollars of invest-

ment was put into agriculture globally in 2007 lars added to world GDP in that year

But this is a fraction of the 5 trillion dol Growth in investment also lags behind
population growth in many developing countries

22

CAPITAL AND INVESTMENT

Annual change in agricultural capital stock (% of GDP, 2006 2007) 0 0.5 0.5 1 12 >2

Chart 17: Investment in agriculture as a share of GDP extremely low

Change in agricultural capital stock (1987 - 2007)
Developed 3.0 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 -0.5 East Asia South Asia Sub-S Africa L. Amer. & Carib.

% of GDP

1990

1995

2000

2005

Source: FAO & World Bank Metalink: P1.RES.FAO.ESS.CAP.STK, p. 75

23

PART 1

Investments in agricultural research and development (R&D) have shown to have very high rates of return, and thus can play an important role in alleviating hunger and poverty. While global private funding is commonplace in high-income countries, it is limited in most developing countries owing to a lack of nancing opportunities and incentives for private research, and to uncertain returns. Even though the benets of public research initiatives such as the Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research (CGIAR) and afliated organizations (which have contributed enormously to the global pool of available agricultural technology and knowledge) have been recognized, the question of how to increase and sustain the nancing of such bodies is not straightforward. Governments are often hesitant to make substantial contributions towards entities whose benets will be spread well beyond the scope of their constituents or borders. Commercial bank lending to agriculture in developing countries is also low; it is less than 10 percent, for example, in sub-Saharan Africa. While the growth in private investment funds targeting African agriculture is an interesting recent development, these current investments remain minor. Given the limitations of alternative sources of investment nance, Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) in developing country agriculture could make a signicant contribution to bridging the investment gap. FDI is also found to positively impact productivity growth, but only when governance is sound. Given the limitations of alternative sources of investment nance, many developing countries are making strenuous efforts to attract and facilitate foreign investment into their agriculture sectors. For them, FDI is seen as a potentially important contributor to lling the investment gap and providing developmental benets, for example through technology transfer, employment creation and infrastructure development. Whether these potential developmental benets are actually likely to be realized is a key concern, as FDI has also the potential to harm host countries. Care must be taken in the selection and formulation of business models that are capable of meeting the needs of both host countries and investors. In addition, appropriate policy and regulatory frameworks need to be in place to ensure that development benets are maximized and the risks minimized. FAO promotes responsible investment in agriculture, including building international consensus on Principles for Responsible Agricultural Investment (RAI Principles).

Chart 18: Investment relative to GDP highest in Asia among developing regions
Gross capital formation (2009)
40

30

% of GDP

20

10

Developed

East Asia

L.Amer. & Carib.

South Asia

Sub-S Africa

Source: World Bank Metalink: P1.RES.WBK.WDI.GCF.GDP, p. 77

Chart 19: Developed economies attract the lions share of foreign investment
Foreign direct investment, Balance of Payment net inows (2009)
1989 2009

700 600

Current US$ (billion)

500 400 300 200 100 0

Developed

East Asia

L.Amer. & South Carib. Asia

Sub-S Africa

Further reading
FAO Investment Centre (www.fao.org/tc/tci) FAO How to Feed the World in 2050: Investment Brief
(www.fao.org/wsfs/forum2050/)

Source: UNCTAD Metalink: P1.RES.WBK.WDI.FDI.INF, p. 77

FAO Foreign Invetment in Agriculture

(www.fao.org/economic/est/investments/)

von Cramon-Taubadel et al. (2011) Schmidhuber et al. (2011)

24

CAPITAL AND INVESTMENT

Chart 20: Investments in mechanization low in food-insecure regions

Share of components in capital stock (2007)

Land development 100% Livestock Machinery Plantation

80%

60%

40%

20%

0%

Developed

East Asia

L.Amer. & Carib.

South Asia

Sub-S Africa

Source: FAO, Statistics Division Metalink: P1.RES.FAO.ESS.CAP.STK, p. 75

Map 9: Sub-Saharan Africa beneciary to highest rates of ofcial development assistance

Net ODA received per capita (current US$, 2009) No Data 1.13 01

1 50

50 250

> 250

Source: UNCTAD Metalink: P1.RES.WBK.WDI.ODA.PCP, p. 80

25

PART 1

Inputs
Throughout Asia and in parts of Latin America, expanding seed and fertilizer use has been accompanied by corresponding investments in irrigation, rural roads, marketing infrastructure and nancial services that have subsequently paved the way for dynamic commercial input markets. Developing such markets is vital for agricultural productivity growth. This is the case for subSaharan Africa, where large commercial input enterprises have yet to emerge. High transaction costs, risks, and the major economies of scale involved in producing, importing, and transporting inputs, such as fertilizer, are to blame; but a key factor for the regions low input uptake is that it is generally cheaper to expand cropland to achieve production targets. As a consequence, chemical fertilizer usage is much lower in sub-Saharan Africa than elsewhere. Today, Asian farmers are the major users of fertilizer. Indeed, one-third of the increase in cereal production worldwide and half of the increase in Indias grain production during the 1970s and 1980s has been attributed to increased fertilizer consumption. The increased use of fertilizer is becoming even more crucial in light of other factors, such as the impact of more intensive cultivation practices and shorter fallow periods on soil fertility. Pesticides can increase agricultural productivity, but when handled improperly, they are toxic to humans and other species. Usage can be reduced through Integrated Pest Management (IPM), which uses information on pest populations to estimate losses and adjust pesticide doses accordingly. IPM has brought about tremendous benets to farm protability, the environment, and human health. Adoption has often been limited because of its complexity, but results can be extraordinarily successful. For instance, the successful control of the cassava mealybug in East Africa, which hitherto caused signicant losses, was achieved by introducing a parasitoid wasp that is the mealybugs natural enemy. Plant breeding also plays an important role in bolstering productivity by adapting cultivated varieties to local conditions and making them more resilient to biotic (e.g. insects, diseases, viruses) and abiotic stresses (e.g. droughts, oods). Studies estimate that the global yield loss due to biotic stresses averages over 23 percent of the estimated attainable yield across major cereals.

Map 10:

No Data

< 100

100

Source: FAO, Statistics Division Metalink: P1.RES.WBK.WDI.FER.HA, p. 77

119 kg of fertilizer applied on average to

every hectare of cropland in the world

Fertilizer use lowest in sub-Saharan

Africa but exploiting land potential holds the key to higher production in the region

Further reading
Schmidhuber & Bruinsma (2011) FAO Agriculture Department (www.fao.org/ag/)

26

INPUTS

Fertilizer use (kg per ha of arable land, 2008) 100 300 300 500 500 1000 > 1000

Chart 21: Herbicides - to control unwanted plants - are the most widely used form of pesticide in the world
Global pesticide usage (2007)
800

thousand tonnes

600 400 200 0

Fungicides

Herbicides

Insecticides

Other

Source: United States EPA Metalink: P1.RES.FAO.ESS.PES.TYPE, p. 80

27

PART 1

Infrastructure
One of the key factors holding back agricultural development is the absence of adequate rural infrastructure. Improvements to basic rural infrastructure, particularly roads, electrication and storage are a prerequisite for agricultural sectors to thrive. Considerable synergies can enhance infrastructure. Investments in cold storage, for instance, are only viable with reliable and sufcient rural electrication. Likewise, investments in milling facilities must be planned with adequate dry storage, electrication and feeder roads. Roads, storage and processing facilities together foster the creation of value chains that increase efciency and minimize losses. Rural roads and transportation link farmers to markets and reduce transactions costs. By lowering transportation costs to urban areas, farmers will earn higher returns for their produce and consumers benet through potentially lower prices. Shorter transportation times also help in preserving product quality and in reducing losses. At the same time, better transport infrastructure reduces prices for inputs, such as seeds and fertilizer, and allows farmers to step up production intensity and use their resources more fully and efciently. High transaction costs matter enormously in many developing countries. For instance, while it costs only USD 40 to ship a tonne of fertilizer 9 000 km from the United States of America to coastal Mombasa (Kenya), it costs another USD 120 to take it from there to Kampala, a distance of 1 000 km. High shipping costs have the same effect as a high import tariff. High transaction costs make inputs expensive for farmers, and is part of the reason for the very low rates of input usage and ultimately the very low yields in sub-Saharan Africa. On the output side, high transaction costs work like an export tax, squeezing prot margins for farmers and lowering their competitiveness relative to overseas famers. In developing countries, there has been little investment in rural infrastructure that leads to improvements in roads, electricity and post-harvest technologies. Those who have invested, however, have reaped considerable rewards. This holds for several countries in East Asia, where China, for instance, increased expenditures on roads by almost fourfold at the beginning of the last decade, with the result that by 2006, 62 percent of villages were connected to their towns by paved roads.

Map 11:

No Data

<2

2 2.

Source: World Bank Metalink: P1.RES.WBK.WDI.INF.IX, p. 77

Poor infrastructure hampers economic

development importance

Roads and electrication are of special Much of Africa lags behind other regions
in terms of quality of infrastructure

28

INFRASTRUCTURE

Quality of infrastructure (score (1 = lowest to 5 = highest), 2010) 2 2.5 2.5 3 3 3.5 > 3.5

Chart 22: Among developing regions quality of infrastructure highest in East Asia and in Latin America
Quality of infrastructure (2010) Score (1 = lowest to 5 = highest)
5 4 3 2 1 0

Developed

East Asia

L.Amer. & Carib.

South Asia

Sub-S Africa

Source: World Bank Metalink: P1.RES.WBK.WDI.INF.IX, p. 77

29

PART 1

Not only rural roads but also rural electricity grids are unavailable and unreliable in many poor developing countries. For example, only 5 percent of Africas rural population has access to electricity, while in South Asia electricity consumption per person is the lowest of all regions. In developing countries, post-harvest losses alone account for an estimated 25-40 percent of total agricultural production. Losses can even be higher when bumper harvests overwhelm limited storage capacities. Reducing losses ultimately means reducing pressure to raise output, and leads to less input usage and reduced pressure on scarce natural resources. Better storage also buffers against production shortfalls and thus helps reduce price swings. And nally, when marketing is subject to delay, adequate storage improves the quality of farm produce and allows farmers to fetch a higher price. Although improved export capacity in delivering surpluses to decit countries has been a positive development, it is particularly important to improve productivity and resilience of production systems in countries with limited import capacity and poor physical market integration. In addition to investment in physical infrastructure, efforts are needed to design and build new rural institutions, enhance rural markets for inputs, outputs and capital, equip small-scale farmers with appropriate technologies and facilitate non-agricultural enterprises in rural areas. The returns to society from rural investments are high, but because of the public good nature of most of the investments needed, funding is likely required from the public sector, including governments of poor countries themselves, regional development banks and international development institutions.

Chart 23: Access to electricity considerably lagging behind in poorer regions

Electricity access (2008)
Electrication Rate Rural Urban

80

60

% access

40

20

China & Latin East Asia America

South Asia

Sub-S Africa

World

Source: WEO Metalink: P1.RES.IEA.WEO.ELEC.AC, p. 76

Chart 24: Large agricultural labour force and small holdings negate the need for mechanized agriculture in poorer regions
Agricultural tractors per 100 sq. km of arable land (2009)
400

300

Number

200

100

Developed

East Asia

L.Amer. & South Carib. Asia

Sub-S Africa

Source: FAO, Statistics Division Metalink: P1.RES.WBK.WDI.TRA.SKMr, p. 80

Further reading
Schmidhuber & Bruinsma (2011) FAO Rural Infrastructure and Agro-industries Division
(www.fao.org/ag/ags/rural-infrastructure/en/)

30

INFRASTRUCTURE

Map 12: A lack of paved roads reduces supply chain efciency

Roads, paved (% of total roads, 2009*) No Data < 15 15 40

40 60

60 80

> 80

Source: World Bank Metalink: P1.RES.WBK.WDI.RD.PV, p. 80

Chart 25: More than twice the number of days needed to trade in sub-Saharan Africa than in developed countries

Lead time to trade (2009*)

Exports Imports

6 5

Days (median)

4 3 2 1 0

Developed

East Asia

L.Amer. & Carib.

South Asia

Sub-S Africa

Source: World Bank Metalink: P1.RES.WBK.WDI.EXP.DAY, p. 77

31

PART 1

Macroeconomy
Changes in the wider economy and macroeconomic policies affect the performance of the agricultural economy. Higher economic growth raises incomes and hence demand. Changing interest rates inuence capital investments, land values and storage, while ination affects real interest rates, as well as input, commodity and land prices. Exchange rate uctuations have an important bearing on international competitiveness and trade ows. Given the growing integration of the global economy, macroeconomic policies are playing an increasingly important role in determining the performance of agricultural sectors. Around four years have elapsed since the onset of the fastest and deepest slowdown in global economic activity since the Great Depression of the 1930s. The seeds of turmoil were sown when the seemingly containable sub-prime mortgage-linked banking crisis in the United States of America escalated into a full-scale global economic crisis. Sharp contractions in output, employment, investment and trade prompted governments and central banks around the world to respond swiftly with an unprecedented array of monetary and scal stimulus measures. Such depth of intervention was required that budget decits and government debt levels in the economies of many developed countries (particularly in the Euro area), which were already high before the crisis, are now regarded as unsustainable. With rising sovereign risks, the price of ensuring against sovereign debt default has increased alarmingly, and these economies are facing pressures from nancial markets to quickly enact farreaching scal austerity measures. As a result, these economies face the prospect of prolonged downgraded growth, while deterioration in market condence in the Euro could impair funding conditions for banks and corporations and thus thwart capital ows to developing economies. Moreover, the scale of budget decits in many important donor countries may negatively impact future aid ows. After expanding by just over 5 percent in 2010, global GDP growth in real terms is expected to slow to around 4 percent in 2011. With real growth in developed economies foreseen to rise by 1.6 percent in that year, global prospects are underpinned by an expected 6 percent rise in the economies of developing countries. The recovery is mostly complete in all developing regions, with the pace of growth increasingly dictated by rapidly improving global trade, robust domestic demand and increasingly binding capacity constraints.

Map 13:

No Data

<5

5 10

Source: World Bank Metalink: P1.MAC.WBK.WDI.AGV.GDP, p. 74

Agriculture merely contributes 3 percent

to global GDP decades ago

This is one third of the contribution a few However, more than 25 percent of GDP
is derived from agriculture in many least developed countries

32

MACROECONOMY

Share of agriculture in GDP (%, 2009*) 5 10 10 15 15 20 20 30 > 30

Chart 26: Farmers in Latin America generate more agriculture value added than in other developing regions
Agriculture value added per worker (1990 - 2009)
E.Asia & Pac. L. Amer. & Carib. South Asia Sub-S Africa World

Constant 2000 US$ thousand

3500 3000 2500 2000 1500 1000 500

1990

1995

2000

2005

Source: World Bank Metalink: P1.MAC.WBK.WDI.AGV.PWK, p. 74

33

PART 1

The agriculture sector, buoyed by very high commodity prices, has demonstrated astonishing resilience during the global economic turmoil. In 2009, the most recent year for which data are available, agricultural value added at the world level rose by 4 percent, which can be contrasted to a 5 percent fall in global sector-wide GDP. In developing countries, the increase in agricultural GDP over this period was far more pronounced at 8 percent. The economic recovery in developing countries has also been facilitated by a large inux of capital ows from developed economies. Growth prospects have diverged in the two regions, as higher relative returns can be found in developing countries, especially in emerging economies. At the same time, many developed economies have experienced downward pressure on their exchange rates vis--vis developing countries, particularly the United States Dollar, thus reinforcing the trend of capital ight. Rising commodity prices, especially for food and fuel, combined with the rapid closing of output gaps and strong capital inows have contributed to an acceleration of ination in many developing countries. Although the extent of increase and its underlying factors differ across countries, headline ination approached 7 percent on average in 2011, representing a year-on-year increase of round 1 percentage point. By contrast in developed countries, ination rose to almost 3 percent in 2011, allaying the fears of deation that had begun to surface during the peak of the crisis. However, monetary authorities in many developing countries are responding to ination pressures and the narrowing of output gaps by tightening monetary policy through increasing interest rates. After strongly rebounding in 2010, world merchandise trade grew at a more modest pace in 2011. International purchases by developing countries are expected to account for over half of the increase in the volume of world imports, with developed countries as the main beneciaries of an expanding global marketplace. Exporters in developing countries have also recorded an overall strong performance, as exemplied by Asias ability to meet regional demand. Depending on trade prole and exposure, commodity price upswings have differential terms-of-trade impacts on economies. Sustained rises in food and fuel prices have profoundly changed the terms-of-trade of many developing countries. Wide gains have been registered among oil exporters often exceeding 8 percent of GDP and losses of resource- and food-insecure oilimporting countries as much as 6 percent of GDP.

Chart 27: US Dollar exchange rate volatility has brought uncertainty to international commodity markets
Monthly USD trade weighted index (Sep-08 - Sep 11)
92 90 88

2000 = 100

86 84 82 80 78

2008

2009

2010

2011

Source: US Federal Reserve Metalink: P1.MAC.USA.FR.EXR.MAJ, p. 74

Chart 28: Trade plays an increasingly important role in most economies, particularly in East Asia, but has taken a downturn in 2009
Merchandise trade (1960-2009)
Developed East Asia L.Amer. & Carib. South Asia Sub-S Africa

70 60 50

% of GDP

40 30 20 10

1960

1970

1980

1990

2000

Source: World Bank Metalink: P1.MAC.WBK.WDI.MCH.GDP, p. 74

Further reading
World Bank:
Global Economic Prospects (wwwr. worldbank.org/prospects/)

International Monetary Fund: World Economic Outlook

(www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/weo/)

34

MACROECONOMY

Map 14: Economic growth in many developing countries outperforming growth in developed countries

Real GDP growth, annual (%, 2010) No Data <0 03

46

7 10

> 10

Source: World Bank Metalink: P1.MAC.IMF.WEO.GDP.RGR, p. 73

Map 15: ... but often accompanied by high ination

Inflation, consumer prices, annual (%, 2010) No Data <2 25

69

10 17

> 17

Source: World Bank Metalink: P1.MAC.IMF.WEO.INF.PER, p. 74

35

TABLE 1: Population and structure

Population total millions 2000 WORLD DEVELOPING REGIONS AFRICA North Africa Algeria Egypt Libya Morocco Tunisia Sub-Saharan Africa Angola Benin Botswana Burkina Faso Burundi Cameroon Cape Verde Central African Republic Chad Comoros Congo Cte dIvoire Congo, Dem. Rep. Djibouti Equatorial Guinea Eritrea Ethiopia Gabon Gambia Ghana Guinea Guinea-Bissau Kenya Lesotho Liberia Madagascar Malawi Mali Mauritania Mauritius Mozambique Namibia Niger Nigeria Rwanda Senegal Seychelles Sierra Leone Somalia Sudan South Africa Swaziland Tanzania, Utd. Rep. Togo Uganda Zambia Zimbabwe millions 2010 growth % p.a. 1990-99 % p.a. 2000-10 % 2010 Age composition between 0-14 65 + % 2010 years 2010 millions 2010 % 2010 % p.a. 1990-2000 Median age total Agricultural population share growth

6 121.8 4 927.0 811.1 142.0 30.5 67.6 5.2 28.8 9.5 669.1 13.9 6.5 1.8 12.3 6.4 15.7 0.4 3.7 8.2 0.6 3.1 16.6 49.6 0.7 0.5 3.7 65.6 1.2 1.3 19.2 8.3 1.2 31.3 2.0 2.8 15.4 11.2 11.3 2.6 1.2 18.2 1.9 10.9 123.7 8.1 9.5 0.1 4.1 7.4 34.2 44.8 1.1 34.0 4.8 24.2 10.2 12.5

6 894.8 5 651.5 1 022.2 165.9 35.5 81.1 6.4 32.0 10.5 856.3 19.1 8.8 2.0 16.5 8.4 19.6 0.5 4.4 11.2 0.7 4.0 19.7 66.0 0.9 0.7 5.3 83.0 1.5 1.7 24.4 10.0 1.5 40.5 2.2 4.0 20.7 14.9 15.4 3.5 1.3 23.4 2.3 15.5 158.4 10.6 12.4 0.1 5.9 9.3 43.6 50.1 1.2 44.8 6.0 33.4 13.1 12.6

1.5 1.7 2.5 1.7 1.9 1.8 1.9 1.5 1.5 2.7 3.0 3.2 2.5 2.8 1.3 2.6 2.4 2.4 3.2 2.5 2.8 2.9 3.2 2.7 3.4 1.3 3.1 3.0 3.0 2.6 4.0 2.0 3.0 1.9 2.7 3.1 1.7 2.6 2.8 1.2 3.0 3.0 3.4 2.4 0.7 2.8 1.1 0.1 1.0 2.6 2.0 2.2 3.0 2.7 3.2 2.6 1.9

1.2 1.4 2.3 1.6 1.5 1.8 2.0 1.0 1.0 2.5 3.2 3.1 1.3 3.0 2.8 2.3 1.3 1.7 3.2 2.7 2.6 1.8 2.9 2.0 3.0 3.7 2.4 2.0 2.9 2.4 1.8 2.0 2.6 1.0 3.4 3.0 2.9 3.1 2.7 0.8 2.5 1.9 3.6 2.5 2.8 2.7 1.0 3.5 2.3 2.5 1.1 1.1 2.8 2.3 3.3 2.5 0.0

26.5 28.8 40.1 29.1 26.9 31.3 30.2 27.8 23.2 42.2 46.5 43.5 32.4 45.3 37.7 40.4 31.5 40.2 45.3 42.5 40.4 40.8 46.2 35.7 39.1 41.5 41.3 35.2 43.9 38.4 42.7 41.1 42.3 37.1 43.4 42.9 45.7 47.1 39.8 21.6 43.9 36.2 48.9 42.7 42.5 43.6 43.0 44.8 39.9 30.0 38.2 44.5 39.5 48.3 46.2 38.6

12.3 9.5 5.9 8.5 7.5 8.6 7.1 8.9 11.0 5.4 4.2 5.0 6.6 3.9 4.9 5.8 8.2 6.4 4.8 4.6 6.0 6.3 4.5 5.8 4.8 4.3 5.6 7.2 3.6 6.4 5.4 5.6 4.5 7.0 4.6 5.1 5.3 3.7 4.6 12.2 5.5 6.2 4.0 5.6 4.7 4.1 3.6 4.6 6.0 7.9 5.5 5.2 5.6 4.2 5.0 6.6

29.4 26.9 19.2 25.0 26.1 23.6 25.8 26.2 28.4 18.1 16.3 17.4 22.4 16.7 20.2 18.5 22.4 18.7 16.8 18.2 18.8 18.4 16.4 21.2 20.3 18.3 18.0 21.5 17.2 20.5 17.7 18.3 17.9 20.3 17.6 17.6 16.5 16.1 18.8 32.2 17.3 21.1 15.4 17.9 18.0 17.3 17.7 17.1 18.8 25.0 18.6 17.1 18.8 15.6 16.4 18.6

2 619.0 2 565.7 513.4 40.8 7.4 22.7 0.2 8.3 2.2 472.6 13.2 3.9 0.8 15.2 7.5 8.0 0.1 2.8 7.4 0.5 1.3 7.5 37.7 0.7 0.5 3.9 64.2 0.4 1.3 13.1 8.0 1.2 28.6 0.8 2.5 14.5 10.9 11.5 1.7 0.1 17.8 0.9 12.9 39.4 9.5 8.7 0.1 3.5 6.1 22.4 4.9 0.3 32.9 3.2 24.6 8.3 7.1

32.3 40.5 50.2 24.6 20.9 27.9 3.0 25.9 20.6 55.2 69.2 44.3 42.1 92.1 89.2 40.9 16.9 63.2 65.7 69.4 31.9 37.9 57.2 74.0 64.3 73.8 77.3 25.7 76.0 53.8 79.8 79.3 70.6 38.9 62.0 70.1 72.9 74.9 50.3 8.0 76.0 41.0 82.9 24.9 89.4 70.2 73.6 60.0 65.6 51.5 9.8 28.8 73.3 53.4 73.5 63.2 56.3

0.5 0.6 2.1 0.4 0.5 0.4 4.1 1.1 0.1 2.4 2.7 1.3 1.6 2.9 1.9 0.1 1.2 0.9 2.0 2.1 0.6 0.0 2.2 1.8 2.5

1.1 2.6 2.1 2.3 1.6 2.2 0.8 2.4 2.5 1.7 2.3 2.3 2.5 2.5 0.7 3.2 0.3 1.9 2.3 0.4 1.1 1.1 1.0 1.8 0.4 2.3 1.5 2.6 1.8 0.1

36

TABLE 1: Population and structure (continued)

Population total millions 2000 ASIA Central Asia Kazakhstan Kyrgyzstan Tajikistan Turkmenistan Uzbekistan East Asia Brunei Darussalam Cambodia China Indonesia Korea, DPR Korea, Republic of Lao, PDR Malaysia Mongolia Myanmar Philippines Singapore Thailand Viet Nam South Asia Afghanistan Bangladesh Bhutan India Iran (Islamic Rep.) Maldives Nepal Pakistan Sri Lanka West Asia Armenia Azerbaijan Bahrain Cyprus Georgia Iraq Jordan Kuwait Lebanon Occupied Palestinian Territory Saudi Arabia Syrian Arab Republic Turkey United Arab Emirates Yemen LATIN AMERICA & THE CARIBBEAN Argentina Bahamas Barbados Belize Bolivia (Plur. State) Brazil Chile Colombia Costa Rica millions 2010 growth % p.a. 1990-99 % p.a. 2000-10 % 2010 Age composition between 0-14 65 + % 2010 years 2010 millions 2010 % 2010 % p.a. 1990-2000 Median age total Agricultural population share growth

3 586.4 55.4 15.0 5.0 6.2 4.5 24.8 1 893.4 0.3 12.4 1 298.3 213.4 22.9 46.0 5.3 23.4 2.4 45.0 77.3 3.9 63.2 78.8 1 460.2 22.9 129.6 0.6 1 053.9 65.3 0.3 24.4 144.5 18.7 177.4 3.1 8.1 0.6 0.9 4.7 23.9 4.8 1.9 3.7 3.2 20.0 16.0 63.6 3.0 17.7 521.4 36.9 0.3 0.3 0.3 8.3 174.4 15.4 39.8 3.9

4 029.2 60.7 16.0 5.3 6.9 5.0 27.4 2 040.8 0.4 14.1 1 372.1 239.9 24.3 48.2 6.2 28.4 2.8 48.0 93.3 5.1 69.1 87.8 1 704.1 31.4 148.7 0.7 1 224.6 74.0 0.3 30.0 173.6 20.9 223.5 3.1 9.2 1.3 1.1 4.4 31.7 6.2 2.7 4.2 4.0 27.4 20.4 72.8 7.5 24.1 590.1 40.4 0.3 0.3 0.3 9.9 194.9 17.1 46.3 4.7

1.6 1.0 1.0 1.2 1.6 2.2 2.0 1.2 2.7 2.8 1.1 1.5 1.3 0.7 2.5 2.6 1.0 1.4 2.3 2.7 1.0 1.7 2.0 6.1 2.1 0.1 1.9 1.8 2.3 2.5 2.6 0.8 2.2 1.5 1.2 2.7 2.1 1.4 3.2 3.7 1.3 2.5 4.5 2.2 2.6 1.6 5.4 4.1 1.7 1.3 1.5 0.3 2.8 2.3 1.6 1.6 1.8 2.5

1.2 0.9 0.7 0.7 1.1 1.1 1.0 0.8 2.0 1.3 0.6 1.2 0.6 0.5 1.5 1.9 1.3 0.6 1.9 2.6 0.9 1.1 1.6 3.2 1.4 2.4 1.5 1.2 1.5 2.1 1.8 1.1 2.3 0.1 1.3 7.1 1.6 0.9 2.9 2.5 3.5 1.2 2.4 3.2 2.5 1.3 9.5 3.1 1.2 0.9 1.4 0.2 2.2 1.8 1.1 1.0 1.5 1.7

26.1 28.7 24.2 29.8 36.7 29.0 29.1 21.4 25.9 31.8 19.1 26.8 22.6 16.1 34.3 30.2 27.4 25.4 35.3 17.1 20.2 23.3 30.9 46.4 31.1 29.4 30.4 22.7 26.5 36.0 35.2 24.5 31.6 19.7 20.7 20.0 17.4 16.1 43.0 37.3 26.6 24.5 42.4 30.2 36.7 26.1 17.0 44.1 27.5 24.3 22.5 17.0 35.0 35.8 25.1 21.7 28.4 24.6

10.1 7.9 11.0 7.2 5.5 6.8 7.0 12.4 6.7 6.6 13.6 8.8 14.7 17.4 6.4 8.2 6.5 8.6 6.1 15.5 14.3 9.5 7.9 3.9 7.3 7.5 8.2 8.4 6.9 6.7 7.0 13.6 7.3 16.8 9.8 3.7 18.3 21.6 5.1 6.3 4.4 11.4 4.7 5.0 6.5 9.8 1.1 4.4 11.2 16.7 11.2 18.8 6.4 7.7 11.6 14.9 9.6 10.8

28.8 24.5 28.5 23.2 20.4 23.7 23.5 32.8 28.4 22.4 35.1 27.4 32.7 37.8 21.3 26.0 25.5 27.8 21.8 37.6 33.7 27.8 24.6 16.3 23.5 23.7 25.3 26.9 23.6 21.2 21.5 30.9 24.4 32.4 28.9 30.2 33.9 37.8 17.7 20.7 27.6 28.6 17.5 25.9 21.0 27.8 30.1 17.0 27.4 30.9 30.9 37.7 21.5 21.5 28.6 32.3 26.7 28.1

1 953.1 12.9 2.5 1.1 1.9 1.5 5.9 1 098.0 0.0 9.3 834.5 89.6 5.7 2.2 4.6 3.4 0.5 32.2 31.3 0.0 28.4 55.5 806.2 18.8 67.4 0.7 592.3 15.9 0.1 27.8 74.2 9.0 36.0 0.3 2.1 0.0 0.1 0.7 1.7 0.4 0.0 0.1 0.3 1.4 4.1 14.5 0.2 9.3 93.2 3.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 4.0 21.1 2.3 7.0 0.7

42.1 21.2 15.6 20.8 27.4 29.7 21.4 39.4 0.3 65.9 37.3 23.3 4.6 74.9 12.0 17.9 67.1 33.5 0.1 41.1 63.2 47.3 59.7 45.4 92.8 48.4 21.5 18.4 93.0 42.7 43.3 16.1 9.4 22.8 0.6 5.3 15.1 5.5 6.3 1.0 1.8 8.0 5.1 20.0 19.9 3.1 38.8 15.8 7.7 2.3 2.6 23.7 39.9 10.8 13.3 15.1 15.8

0.3

0.0 7.7 1.4 0.0 0.2 1.5 5.6 1.8 1.6 1.7 0.6 0.5 6.3 0.7 0.7 0.8 3.8 0.1 1.3 0.8 0.5 2.0 2.3 1.2 0.3 0.2

1.1 2.8 2.1 0.9 0.8 4.9 0.9 3.9 0.4 1.4 2.5 1.6 1.1 1.4 2.4 4.3 0.8 1.3 2.5 0.4 1.2 0.5

37

TABLE 1: Population and structure (continued)

Population total millions 2000 Cuba Dominica Dominican Republic Ecuador El Salvador French Guiana Grenada Guatemala Guyana Haiti Honduras Jamaica Mexico Netherlands Antilles Nicaragua Panama Paraguay Peru St. Kitts & Nevis St. Lucia St. Vincent & Grenadines Suriname Trinidad & Tobago Uruguay Venezuela (Boliv. Rep. of) OCEANIA Fiji French Polynesia New Caledonia Papua New Guinea Samoa Solomon Islands Tonga Vanuatu DEVELOPED REGIONS NORTH AMERICA Bermuda Canada United States of America ASIA & OCEANIA Australia Israel Japan New Zealand EUROPE Albania Belarus Bosnia & Herzegovina Croatia European Union Iceland Macedonia, FYR Montenegro Norway Republic of Moldova Russian Federation Serbia Switzerland Ukraine millions 2010 growth % p.a. 1990-99 % p.a. 2000-10 % 2010 Age composition between 0-14 65 + % 2010 years 2010 millions 2010 % 2010 % p.a. 1990-2000 Median age total Agricultural population share growth

11.1 0.1 8.6 12.3 5.9 0.2 0.1 11.2 0.7 8.6 6.2 2.6 100.0 0.2 5.1 3.0 5.3 25.9 0.0 0.2 0.1 0.5 1.3 3.3 24.3 8.1 0.8 0.2 0.2 5.4 0.2 0.4 0.1 0.2 1 194.8 313.3 0.1 30.7 282.5 154.8 19.2 6.0 125.7 3.9 726.8 3.1 10.1 3.7 4.5 481.6 0.3 2.0 0.6 4.5 4.1 146.8 10.1 7.2 48.9

11.3 0.1 9.9 14.5 6.2 0.2 0.1 14.4 0.8 10.0 7.6 2.7 113.4 0.2 5.8 3.5 6.5 29.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.5 1.3 3.4 29.0 10.0 0.9 0.3 0.3 6.9 0.2 0.5 0.1 0.2 1 243.3 344.5 0.1 34.0 310.4 160.6 22.3 7.4 126.5 4.4 738.2 3.2 9.6 3.8 4.4 500.6 0.3 2.1 0.6 4.9 3.6 143.0 9.9 7.7 45.4

0.5 0.2 1.8 1.9 1.1 3.5 0.6 2.3 0.1 2.0 2.5 0.9 1.7 0.6 2.2 2.0 2.4 1.8 1.0 1.3 0.1 1.4 0.6 0.7 2.2 2.3 1.2 2.0 2.3 2.6 0.9 2.8 0.2 2.3 0.4 1.1 0.5 1.0 1.1 0.5 1.1 3.0 0.3 1.3 0.1 0.8 0.2 2.0 0.1 0.2 1.0 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.5 0.1 0.7 0.7 0.5

0.1 0.3 1.5 1.6 0.4 3.4 0.2 2.5 0.3 1.5 2.0 0.6 1.3 1.1 1.3 1.8 1.9 1.2 1.2 1.0 0.1 1.2 0.4 0.1 1.8 2.1 0.6 1.3 1.7 2.5 0.3 2.8 0.6 2.6 0.4 1.0 0.3 1.0 0.9 0.4 1.5 2.1 0.1 1.2 0.2 0.4 0.5 0.2 0.2 0.4 1.3 0.3 0.0 0.8 1.4 0.3 0.3 0.7 0.7

16.8 30.6 29.9 31.5 33.2 27.6 41.2 33.4 35.8 36.5 28.5 28.7 20.6 34.2 28.6 33.2 29.6 25.4 25.9 28.1 20.3 21.7 29.2 37.0 28.9 25.1 25.1 38.9 37.3 39.6 37.1 38.1 15.9 19.0 15.8 19.3 14.2 18.3 26.5 12.6 19.8 14.8 22.3 14.5 14.7 14.4 14.8 20.3 17.3 18.8 17.9 16.3 14.6 17.1 14.5 13.7

19.2 10.2 10.1 11.0 7.3 10.5 7.1 7.0 7.0 7.0 12.3 10.2 17.2 7.1 10.8 8.5 9.8 11.3 10.2 10.5 11.7 21.1 9.5 5.9 8.3 10.5 12.9 4.9 8.1 5.4 8.6 5.9 24.9 21.6 23.0 21.4 31.7 21.9 17.2 34.6 21.0 24.9 14.6 20.9 21.3 26.1 26.7 19.7 18.4 19.6 24.6 17.7 20.1 22.1 26.3 23.3

38.4 25.4 25.7 22.9 23.6 25.2 18.2 23.2 21.3 20.9 27.2 26.6 37.5 21.8 27.2 22.7 25.7 27.4 27.2 27.4 30.9 34.0 26.1 21.5 26.2 28.5 30.5 20.4 21.0 19.0 21.2 20.6 40.6 38.0 41.0 37.6 44.5 37.6 30.9 46.7 37.3 40.9 30.5 38.5 40.2 42.3 42.0 35.7 36.3 36.4 40.2 35.8 38.1 37.9 42.3 40.4

1.5 0.0 1.1 2.9 1.6 0.0 0.0 6.1 0.1 5.9 2.0 0.5 20.3 0.0 0.9 0.6 1.9 7.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.3 1.8 6.1 0.3 0.1 0.1 5.0 0.1 0.4 0.0 0.1 53.3 5.8 0.0 0.6 5.1 4.0 0.9 0.1 2.7 0.3 43.5 1.3 0.9 0.1 0.2 21.7 0.0 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.5 11.5 1.3 0.4 5.2

12.9 20.6 11.2 19.8 26.2 13.0 20.2 42.1 14.6 58.8 26.5 17.5 17.9 0.5 15.4 17.8 29.9 24.0 21.2 20.1 20.2 16.8 6.6 9.9 6.2 61.4 35.9 26.9 30.3 72.7 27.3 67.7 26.9 30.4 4.3 1.7 1.5 1.9 1.7 2.5 3.9 1.7 2.1 7.7 5.9 41.8 8.9 2.4 4.4 4.3 6.2 7.5 12.8 3.7 14.9 8.1 12.8 5.0 11.5

2.2 1.8 2.7 1.0 0.9 0.7 1.2 1.0 1.8 0.9 0.3 1.0 1.1 0.0 1.5 0.7 0.6 0.2 0.4 0.4 1.5 0.2 2.1 0.7 2.3 1.6 0.3 0.6 0.2 1.9 1.6 2.2 1.9 0.7 0.8 2.0 3.4 2.3 1.9 4.5 0.4 1.8 5.6 0.1 0.1 1.5

3.2 1.7

2.4

1.9

38

TABLE 2: Demographic change and indicators

Population rural share % 2010 WORLD DEVELOPING REGIONS AFRICA North Africa Algeria Egypt Libya Morocco Tunisia Sub-Saharan Africa Angola Benin Botswana Burkina Faso Burundi Cameroon Cape Verde Central African Republic Chad Comoros Congo Cte dIvoire Congo, Dem. Rep. Djibouti Equatorial Guinea Eritrea Ethiopia Gabon Gambia Ghana Guinea Guinea-Bissau Kenya Lesotho Liberia Madagascar Malawi Mali Mauritania Mauritius Mozambique Namibia Niger Nigeria Rwanda Senegal Seychelles Sierra Leone Somalia Sudan South Africa Swaziland Tanzania, Utd. Rep. Togo Uganda Zambia Zimbabwe growth % p.a. 2000-10 share % 2010 urban growth % p.a. 2000-10 per km2 2010 years 2010 density life expectancy Mortality and fertility mortality per 1000 people 2010 infant mortality per 1000 live births 2010 births per woman 2009 women % 2009* thousands 2010 fertility contraceptive use Net migration

49.6 55.0 60.0 45.9 33.5 56.6 22.1 41.8 32.7 62.7 41.5 58.0 38.9 74.3 89.0 41.6 38.9 61.1 72.4 71.8 37.9 49.4 64.8 23.8 60.3 78.4 83.3 14.0 41.9 48.5 64.6 70.0 77.8 73.1 52.2 69.8 80.2 64.1 58.6 58.2 61.6 62.0 82.9 50.2 81.1 57.6 44.7 61.6 62.5 59.9 38.3 78.6 73.6 56.6 86.7 64.3 61.7

0.4 0.5 1.7 1.0 0.3 1.8 1.4 0.1 0.2 1.8 0.8 2.7 0.5 2.4 2.5 0.4 0.2 1.6 2.6 2.3 1.2 0.9 2.1 1.8 2.6 3.1 2.4 1.5 1.0 0.8 1.4 2.3 2.3 0.1 3.1 2.4 2.3 1.3 2.3 1.0 1.3 1.1 3.6 1.0 2.0 2.3 0.5 2.8 1.7 1.1 0.0 1.2 2.3 1.4 3.2 2.2 0.6

50.4 45.0 40.0 54.1 66.5 43.4 77.9 58.2 67.3 37.3 58.5 42.0 61.1 25.7 11.0 58.4 61.1 38.9 27.6 28.2 62.1 50.6 35.2 76.2 39.7 21.6 16.7 86.0 58.1 51.5 35.4 30.0 22.2 26.9 47.8 30.2 19.8 35.9 41.4 41.8 38.4 38.0 17.1 49.8 18.9 42.4 55.3 38.4 37.5 40.1 61.7 21.4 26.4 43.4 13.3 35.7 38.3

2.1 2.7 3.4 2.2 2.6 2.0 2.2 2.1 1.5 3.8 4.7 4.3 2.8 7.2 5.7 4.0 2.9 2.2 4.9 2.3 2.8 3.8 4.6 1.9 3.0 5.7 3.8 2.7 4.8 3.8 3.4 2.5 3.9 4.0 4.6 3.9 5.6 4.8 3.0 0.6 4.9 3.6 4.3 4.0 5.9 3.2 1.4 4.1 3.6 4.0 2.0 0.5 4.6 4.4 4.3 2.7 1.4

199.8 217.2 78.9 60.8 14.9 81.0 3.6 71.6 64.1 82.4 15.3 78.6 3.5 60.1 301.2 41.2 123.0 7.1 8.7 394.8 11.8 61.2 28.1 38.3 25.0 44.7 75.1 5.6 153.0 102.3 40.6 41.9 69.8 71.5 35.9 35.3 125.8 12.4 3.4 636.8 29.2 2.8 12.2 171.5 403.4 63.2 190.1 81.8 14.6 17.4 41.1 68.3 47.4 106.2 138.7 17.4 32.2

68.9 67.0 56.2 72.3 72.3 72.3 74.0 71.2 73.9 53.1 49.6 54.6 53.3 53.9 48.8 50.0 73.5 45.9 48.5 59.6 56.0 53.0 47.4 56.6 50.1 60.0 57.2 61.3 57.3 62.7 52.4 46.8 55.0 46.0 54.4 65.8 51.5 50.0 57.5 72.8 48.8 61.1 53.1 50.3 53.9 58.2 46.3 50.2 60.3 51.2 47.4 55.4 55.7 52.2 46.9 46.6

8 8 12 5 5 5 4 6 6 13 15 12 13 13 15 15 5 18 17 9 12 13 17 10 15 8 10 9 10 8 14 17 11 17 12 7 14 15 10 7 15 9 14 15 12 10 17 15 9 15 15 11 11 13 17 15

35 42 73 27 25 26 15 34 21 82 104 85 41 79 101 94 21 105 131 72 72 77 116 82 102 54 72 51 74 50 93 119 65 77 89 45 95 101 77 13 88 38 96 96 100 55 114 107 64 55 76 64 74 79 95 59

2.5 2.8 4.7 2.6 2.3 2.8 2.6 2.3 2.0 5.1 5.6 5.4 2.8 5.8 4.5 4.5 2.7 4.7 6.1 3.9 4.3 4.5 5.9 3.8 5.3 4.5 5.2 3.2 5.0 3.9 5.3 5.7 4.9 3.3 5.8 4.6 5.5 6.5 4.4 1.5 5.0 3.3 7.1 5.6 5.3 4.7 2.3 5.2 6.3 4.1 2.5 3.5 5.5 4.2 6.2 5.7 3.4

61.1

79 13 658 2 706 905

61.4 60.3 45.2 63.0 60.2 6.2 17.0 52.8 17.4 9.1 29.2 61.3 19.0 2.8 25.7 44.3 12.9 20.6 22.5 8.0 14.7 32.7 17.5 23.5 9.1 10.3 45.5 47.0 11.4 39.9 41.0 8.2 9.3 75.9 16.2 55.1 11.2 14.6 36.4 11.8 8.2 14.6 7.6 59.9 50.6 26.4 16.8 23.7 40.8 64.9

140 340 20 425 20 1 801 80 50 15 65 323 19 12 5 75 10 50 145 100 0 10 55 300 5 15 51 300 12 189 36 248 5 20 202 10 0 20 1 28 300 15 100 60 250 135 700 6 300 5 135 85 700

39

TABLE 2: Demographic change and indicators (continued)

Population rural share % 2010 ASIA Central Asia Kazakhstan Kyrgyzstan Tajikistan Turkmenistan Uzbekistan East Asia Brunei Darussalam Cambodia China Indonesia Korea, DPR Korea, Republic of Lao, PDR Malaysia Mongolia Myanmar Philippines Singapore Thailand Viet Nam South Asia Afghanistan Bangladesh Bhutan India Iran (Islamic Rep.) Maldives Nepal Pakistan Sri Lanka West Asia Armenia Azerbaijan Bahrain Cyprus Georgia Iraq Jordan Kuwait Lebanon Occupied Palestinian Territory Saudi Arabia Syrian Arab Republic Turkey United Arab Emirates Yemen LATIN AMERICA & THE CARIBBEAN Argentina Bahamas Barbados Belize Bolivia (Plur. State) Brazil Chile Colombia Costa Rica growth % p.a. 2000-10 share % 2010 urban growth % p.a. 2000-10 per km2 2010 years 2010 density life expectancy Mortality and fertility mortality per 1000 people 2010 infant mortality per 1000 live births 2010 births per woman 2009 women % 2009* thousands 2010 fertility contraceptive use Net migration

58.8 58.1 41.5 65.4 73.7 50.5 63.8 53.6 24.3 79.9 53.0 55.7 39.8 17.0 66.8 27.8 38.0 66.4 51.1 66.0 69.6 68.3 77.4 71.9 65.3 70.0 29.2 59.9 81.4 64.1 85.7 33.9 35.8 48.1 11.4 29.7 47.3 33.8 21.5 1.6 12.8 25.9 17.9 44.3 30.4 16.0 68.2 20.4 7.6 15.9 55.5 47.6 33.5 13.5 11.0 24.9 35.6

0.3 1.0 0.0 1.2 1.4 0.7 1.3 0.7 0.3 1.3 1.2 0.8 0.3 1.3 0.2 1.3 0.0 0.0 1.7 0.5 0.4 1.2 3.2 1.0 1.0 1.2 0.9 0.5 1.4 1.8 1.0 1.2 0.2 0.8 1.9 0.6 1.2 3.0 2.8 2.1 0.3 2.6 1.2 2.3 0.2 1.6 2.1 0.6 1.6 0.0 0.9 1.3 0.6 2.2 1.4 0.4 0.3

41.2 41.9 58.5 34.6 26.3 49.5 36.2 46.4 75.7 20.1 47.0 44.3 60.2 83.0 33.2 72.2 62.0 33.6 48.9 34.0 30.4 31.7 22.6 28.1 34.7 30.0 70.8 40.1 18.6 35.9 14.3 66.1 64.2 51.9 88.6 70.3 52.7 66.2 78.5 98.4 87.2 74.1 82.1 55.7 69.6 84.0 31.8 79.6 92.4 84.1 44.5 52.4 66.5 86.5 89.0 75.1 64.4

2.7 1.0 0.9 1.0 1.3 2.2 0.8 2.9 2.7 3.4 3.4 1.8 0.6 0.9 6.1 3.4 2.1 2.7 2.1 1.9 1.8 3.5 2.5 4.7 3.3 5.6 2.4 2.1 5.3 5.4 3.1 0.2 2.5 0.0 1.1 2.2 1.4 1.2 2.2 3.0 3.2 1.4 3.7 2.6 3.9 2.1 4.3 4.9 1.8 1.2 1.5 1.6 3.2 2.6 1.8 1.4 1.9 2.6

276.7 37.9 5.9 26.7 48.1 10.3 61.3 207.8 69.2 78.1 188.8 125.9 202.0 484.1 26.2 86.1 1.8 70.9 310.9 7 447.2 134.7 264.9 390.5 48.2 1 032.6 15.4 372.5 44.9 1 060.0 203.6 218.1 317.9 102.3 103.8 106.1 1 818.2 119.3 62.4 72.3 69.3 153.6 406.5 671.0 12.8 110.2 92.8 89.9 45.6 53.8 14.5 24.7 635.7 13.6 9.0 22.9 22.6 40.6 91.2

68.8 66.6 65.8 66.7 66.4 64.7 67.4 71.9 77.5 61.5 72.9 67.9 68.4 80.0 66.1 73.4 67.3 63.5 67.8 80.6 73.6 74.3 64.8 47.3 67.8 65.8 64.2 72.1 75.5 67.4 64.6 74.2 71.4 73.7 70.1 74.6 78.9 73.0 67.3 72.9 74.2 72.0 72.2 73.1 75.3 73.0 75.9 63.9 73.5 75.3 74.8 76.2 75.3 65.6 72.2 78.7 72.9 78.9

7 8 11 8 6 8 7 7 3 8 7 7 10 5 7 5 7 9 6 5 7 5 8 17 6 7 8 5 4 6 8 7 5 9 7 3 7 11 6 4 3 7 4 4 4 5 1 7 6 8 5 9 4 7 6 5 5 4

37 43 27 36 56 50 49 23 5 62 22 29 27 4 44 8 36 55 23 2 12 20 54 136 49 44 53 27 10 39 71 12 27 26 41 7 5 29 35 21 8 23 22 19 15 24 7 53 21 13 16 14 17 46 23 7 19 10

2.3 2.7 2.6 2.8 3.4 2.4 2.6 1.9 2.0 2.9 1.8 2.1 1.9 1.3 3.4 2.5 2.0 2.3 3.0 1.2 1.8 2.0 2.8 6.5 2.3 2.6 2.7 1.8 2.0 2.8 3.9 2.3 2.9 1.8 2.3 2.2 1.5 1.6 3.9 3.4 2.1 1.8 47.3 49.8 59.3 50.2 58.0 53.1 51.1 61.8 15.0 52.6 35.4 54.0 78.9 34.7 48.0 29.6 68.4 56.6 68.6 79.6 38.4 54.5 55.2 41.0 50.7 62.0 76.7 79.5 40.0 50.7 47.8 37.1 48.0 64.9

5 642 800 100 75 200 25 400 3 084 4 5 1 567 730 0 30 75 130 10 500 900 500 300 200 2 880 1 000 570 10 1 000 500 0 100 1 420 300 1 121 75 50 20 25 250 577 250 120 12

3.0 3.1 2.1 1.9 5.1 2.2 2.2 2.0 1.5 2.8 3.4 1.8 1.9 2.4 1.9

23.8 58.3 73.0 27.5 27.7

150 800 44 343 135 5 246

78.3 44.6 55.0 34.3 60.6 80.6 58.4 78.2 80.0

30 2 1 1 100 229 30 120 30

40

TABLE 2: Demographic change and indicators (continued)

Population rural share % 2010 Cuba Dominica Dominican Republic Ecuador El Salvador French Guiana Grenada Guatemala Guyana Haiti Honduras Jamaica Mexico Netherlands Antilles Nicaragua Panama Paraguay Peru St. Kitts & Nevis St. Lucia St. Vincent & Grenadines Suriname Trinidad & Tobago Uruguay Venezuela (Boliv. Rep. of) OCEANIA Fiji French Polynesia New Caledonia Papua New Guinea Samoa Solomon Islands Tonga Vanuatu DEVELOPED REGIONS NORTH AMERICA Bermuda Canada United States of America ASIA & OCEANIA Australia Israel Japan New Zealand EUROPE Albania Belarus Bosnia & Herzegovina Croatia European Union Iceland Macedonia, FYR Montenegro Norway Republic of Moldova Russian Federation Serbia Switzerland Ukraine growth % p.a. 2000-10 share % 2010 urban growth % p.a. 2000-10 per km2 2010 years 2010 density life expectancy Mortality and fertility mortality per 1000 people 2010 infant mortality per 1000 live births 2010 births per woman 2009 women % 2009* thousands 2010 fertility contraceptive use Net migration

24.8 32.8 30.8 33.1 35.7 23.7 60.6 50.5 71.4 47.9 48.4 48.0 22.2 7.0 42.7 25.2 38.5 23.1 67.3 71.8 50.5 30.7 86.2 7.5 6.6 77.4 48.1 48.5 42.5 87.5 79.9 81.5 76.9 74.4 24.8 17.9 19.4 17.7 28.4 10.9 8.2 33.2 13.8 27.2 48.1 25.3 51.4 42.3 26.1 6.7 40.7 38.6 20.6 53.0 26.8 43.9 26.4 31.2

0.3 0.0 0.7 0.7 1.0 3.0 0.3 1.7 0.1 1.3 0.8 0.6 0.3 2.5 0.7 1.3 0.4 0.3 1.2 1.0 0.7 0.2 0.0 1.2 2.4 2.2 0.2 1.7 2.1 2.6 0.4 2.2 0.5 2.1 0.6 0.6 0.4 0.7 0.4 0.5 1.3 0.5 0.7 0.6 1.6 2.2 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.2 1.3 0.7 1.8 0.4 1.0 0.4 1.2

75.2 67.2 69.2 66.9 64.3 76.3 39.4 49.5 28.6 52.1 51.6 52.0 77.8 93.0 57.3 74.8 61.5 76.9 32.7 28.2 49.5 69.3 13.8 92.5 93.4 22.6 51.9 51.5 57.5 12.5 20.1 18.5 23.1 25.6 75.2 82.1 80.6 82.3 71.6 89.1 91.8 66.8 86.2 72.8 51.9 74.7 48.6 57.7 73.9 93.3 59.3 61.4 79.4 47.0 73.2 56.1 73.6 68.8

0.1 0.2 2.6 2.2 1.3 3.6 1.0 3.4 0.0 5.6 3.3 0.7 1.5 1.4 1.8 3.1 3.0 1.8 1.3 1.1 1.0 1.9 2.9 0.3 2.1 1.8 1.4 1.2 1.4 2.0 0.8 4.3 0.4 4.4 0.7 1.4 0.3 1.1 1.4 0.6 1.4 1.9 0.3 1.1 0.4 2.5 0.2 1.4 0.2 0.7 1.7 0.1 0.1 1.2 0.8 0.5 0.3 0.6 0.5

101.6 90.2 204.6 51.0 294.3 2.6 303.7 132.1 3.5 360.1 67.8 249.4 57.9 250.9 44.5 46.6 15.9 22.6 200.8 323.3 281.8 3.2 261.5 19.2 31.8 35.9 47.1 67.7 13.5 14.8 64.7 18.6 160.1 19.7 120.5 29.6 1 225.3 3.4 32.2 280.2 2.9 335.0 334.9 16.1 128.2 111.5 46.2 73.4 77.9 168.8 3.1 80.1 45.7 12.7 105.5 8.4 111.5 185.6 75.3

78.5 72.5 75.0 71.4 75.9 75.3 70.3 68.7 61.0 72.1 72.2 76.2 76.1 73.0 75.5 71.7 73.2 73.9 71.6 69.7 69.4 76.4 73.7 64.0 68.8 74.5 75.3 61.5 71.5 66.4 71.8 70.0 77.4 78.2 80.5 78.0 82.4 81.4 80.7 82.7 80.1 75.9 76.4 69.4 75.1 76.0 79.1 81.3 74.2 74.0 80.5 68.2 67.7 74.0 81.8 67.5

7 6 5 7 4 6 6 6 9 5 7 5 7 5 5 6 5 6 7 7 8 9 5 7 7 5 6 8 5 6 6 5 10 8 7 8 9 7 6 9 7 11 6 14 9 12 10 6 9 10 9 13 14 12 8 17

5 30 21 22 14 15 30 42 63 28 24 17 13 21 18 32 21 13 24 22 27 13 17 42 18 8 5 50 22 43 22 29 6 7 5 7 3 5 4 3 5 7 18 7 13 6 5 2 15 9 3 16 11 12 4 13

1.5 2.6 2.5 2.3 2.3 4.0 2.3 3.4 3.2 2.4 2.1 2.0 2.7 2.5 3.0 2.5 2.0 2.1 2.4 1.6 2.0 2.5 3.7 2.7 2.2 2.2 4.0 3.9 3.8 3.9 3.9 1.7 2.0 1.8 1.6 2.0 1.5 1.9 3.0 1.4 2.1 1.6 1.9 1.5 1.2 1.5 1.6 2.2 1.4 1.6 2.0 1.5 1.6 1.4 1.5 1.5

77.8 50.0 72.9 72.7 72.5 54.0 54.1 42.5 32.0 65.0 69.1 72.9 72.4 58.2 79.4 73.2 54.0 47.0 48.0 45.6 42.5 78.0 76.8 43.1

194 140 350 280 5 200 40 140 100 100 2 430 8 200 11 40 625 1 5 5 20 50 40 64 35 0 6

32.4 42.6 27.0 23.9 38.4

0 16 0 9 0 13 579 6 100

74.0 72.9 70.8 68.0 54.3 74.9 69.3 72.6 35.7 69.0

1 050 5 050 785 500 85 150 50 6 694 75 0 10 10 6 560 20

13.5 39.4 88.4 67.8 79.5 41.2 82.0 66.7

10 5 135 172 250 0 100 80

41

TABLE 3: Land availability

Total land area agricultural thousand ha 2009 WORLD DEVELOPING REGIONS AFRICA North Africa Algeria Egypt Libya Morocco Tunisia Sub-Saharan Africa Angola Benin Botswana Burkina Faso Burundi Cameroon Cape Verde Central African Republic Chad Comoros Congo Cte dIvoire Congo, Dem. Rep. Djibouti Equatorial Guinea Eritrea Ethiopia Gabon Gambia Ghana Guinea Guinea-Bissau Kenya Lesotho Liberia Madagascar Malawi Mali Mauritania Mauritius Mozambique Namibia Niger Nigeria Rwanda Senegal Seychelles Sierra Leone Somalia Sudan South Africa Swaziland Tanzania, Utd. Rep. Togo Uganda Zambia Zimbabwe % 2009 Share of land area permanent crops % 2009 arable % 2009 pasture % 2009 ha 2009 growth % p.a. 1970-2009 Arable land per person

13 003 468 8 096 847 2 964 679 600 439 238 174 99 545 175 954 44 630 15 536 2 364 240 124 670 11 062 56 673 27 360 2 568 47 271 403 62 298 125 920 186 34 150 31 800 226 705 2 318 2 805 10 100 100 000 25 767 1 000 22 754 24 572 2 812 56 914 3 036 9 632 58 154 9 428 122 019 103 070 203 78 638 82 329 126 670 91 077 2 467 19 253 46 7 162 62 734 237 600 121 447 1 720 88 580 5 439 19 981 74 339 38 685

37.6 43.5 39.2 17.6 17.4 3.7 8.8 67.3 63.0 44.7 46.8 29.8 45.6 43.7 83.7 19.8 21.8 8.4 39.2 83.3 30.9 63.8 9.9 73.4 10.9 75.2 35.0 19.9 66.5 68.1 58.0 58.0 48.1 77.0 27.1 70.2 59.1 33.7 38.5 48.3 62.7 47.1 34.6 81.8 81.1 49.4 6.5 47.7 70.2 57.5 81.7 71.0 40.1 62.1 69.9 31.5 42.4

1.2 1.6 1.0 0.9 0.4 0.8 0.2 2.2 14.3 1.0 0.2 2.7 0.0 0.2 13.6 3.0 0.7 0.1 0.0 32.2 0.2 13.5 0.3 2.5 0.0 1.0 0.6 0.5 12.3 2.8 8.9 1.1 0.1 2.2 1.0 1.3 0.1 0.0 2.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 3.3 11.3 0.3 4.3 1.8 0.0 0.1 0.8 0.9 1.7 3.3 11.3 0.0 0.3

10.6 10.4 7.6 3.8 3.1 2.9 1.0 18.0 17.4 8.5 3.2 22.1 0.4 21.6 35.0 12.6 14.9 3.1 3.4 43.0 1.5 8.8 3.0 0.1 4.7 6.8 13.9 1.3 40.0 19.3 11.6 10.7 9.5 11.0 4.2 5.1 38.2 5.2 0.4 42.9 6.4 1.0 11.8 37.3 52.7 20.0 2.2 15.1 1.6 8.5 11.8 10.2 11.3 40.4 33.0 4.5 10.8

25.8 31.5 30.6 12.9 13.8 7.7 47.1 31.2 35.1 43.3 5.0 45.2 21.9 35.0 4.2 6.2 5.1 35.7 8.1 29.3 41.5 6.6 73.3 3.7 68.3 20.0 18.1 26.0 36.5 43.5 38.4 37.4 65.9 20.8 64.1 19.6 28.4 38.1 3.4 56.0 46.2 22.7 41.2 17.0 29.1 30.7 68.5 49.0 69.1 60.0 27.1 18.4 25.6 26.9 31.3

0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.1 0.4 0.1 0.3 0.1 0.5 0.4 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.4 1.0 0.2 0.1 0.3 0.0 0.2 0.1 0.5 0.3 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.2 0.3 0.3

1.5 1.3 1.8 1.9 1.9 1.9 2.9 1.5 2.2 1.6 2.1 1.0 3.8 0.1 2.3 2.4 0.3 1.9 1.8 2.6 2.8 2.0 2.8 2.5 2.0

1.1 0.4 0.1 2.6 1.8 2.1 2.1 2.3 1.9 1.2 1.0 1.9 1.5 0.7 2.2 2.4 2.0 0.3 2.2 1.3 0.5 2.2 1.3 1.6 2.0 2.0 2.1 1.7 2.4 0.7

42

TABLE 3: Land availability (continued)

Total land area agricultural thousand ha 2009 ASIA Central Asia Kazakhstan Kyrgyzstan Tajikistan Turkmenistan Uzbekistan East Asia Brunei Darussalam Cambodia China Indonesia Korea, DPR Korea, Republic of Lao, PDR Malaysia Mongolia Myanmar Philippines Singapore Thailand Viet Nam South Asia Afghanistan Bangladesh Bhutan India Iran (Islamic Rep.) Maldives Nepal Pakistan Sri Lanka West Asia Armenia Azerbaijan Bahrain Cyprus Georgia Iraq Jordan Kuwait Lebanon Occupied Palestinian Territory Saudi Arabia Syrian Arab Republic Turkey United Arab Emirates Yemen LATIN AMERICA & THE CARIBBEAN Argentina Bahamas Barbados Belize Bolivia (Plur. State) Brazil Chile Colombia Costa Rica % 2009 Share of land area permanent crops % 2009 arable % 2009 pasture % 2009 ha 2009 growth % p.a. 1970-2009 Arable land per person

3 054 019 392 679 269 970 19 180 13 996 46 993 42 540 1 543 949 527 17 652 932 749 181 157 12 041 9 710 23 080 32 855 155 356 65 352 29 817 70 51 089 31 007 639 977 65 223 13 017 3 839 297 319 162 855 30 14 335 77 088 6 271 477 413 2 848 8 262 76 924 6 949 43 432 8 878 1 782 1 023 602 214 969 18 363 76 963 8 360 52 797 2 024 065 273 669 1 001 43 2 281 108 330 845 942 74 353 110 950 5 106

53.5 72.1 77.2 55.4 33.9 69.4 62.6 49.8 2.2 31.5 56.2 29.6 24.1 19.1 10.2 24.0 74.5 19.0 40.1 1.0 38.7 33.1 48.3 58.1 70.3 13.2 60.5 29.8 26.7 29.6 34.1 41.6 57.0 61.6 57.6 10.3 13.5 36.1 20.1 11.5 8.5 67.3 61.0 80.7 75.7 50.6 6.8 44.4 35.7 51.3 1.4 44.2 6.7 34.1 31.3 21.2 38.3 35.3

2.5 0.2 0.0 0.4 1.0 0.1 0.8 3.4 0.9 0.9 1.5 10.5 1.7 2.1 0.5 17.6 0.0 1.7 16.9 0.3 7.2 10.8 2.6 0.2 7.5 0.7 3.9 1.1 10.0 0.8 1.1 15.5 1.2 1.9 2.7 3.3 3.7 1.7 0.6 0.9 0.2 14.0 19.4 0.1 5.4 3.8 2.4 0.5 1.0 0.4 0.4 2.3 1.4 0.2 0.9 0.6 1.4 5.9

15.3 8.0 8.7 6.7 5.3 3.9 10.1 11.9 0.6 22.1 11.8 13.0 22.0 16.4 5.9 5.5 0.6 16.9 18.1 0.7 29.9 20.3 33.5 11.9 58.1 2.0 53.1 10.6 13.3 16.7 26.5 19.1 8.0 16.1 22.7 1.7 9.4 6.4 10.4 2.3 0.6 14.2 16.6 1.5 25.4 27.7 0.8 2.2 7.4 11.3 0.8 37.2 3.1 3.4 7.2 1.7 1.6 3.9

35.7 63.9 68.5 48.3 27.7 65.3 51.7 34.5 0.6 8.5 42.9 6.1 0.4 0.6 3.8 0.9 73.9 0.5 5.0 1.6 2.1 12.2 46.0 4.6 10.6 3.5 18.1 3.3 12.1 6.5 7.0 47.8 43.6 32.1 5.3 0.5 27.9 9.2 8.4 7.6 39.1 24.9 79.1 44.9 19.0 3.6 41.7 27.3 39.6 0.2 4.7 2.2 30.5 23.2 18.8 35.3 25.5

0.1 0.5 1.5 0.2 0.1 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.2 0.1 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.0 0.1 0.3 0.8 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.3 0.1 0.0 0.0

1.4

1.1 4.6 0.8 1.0 1.1 0.8 1.8 0.3 0.7 1.3 1.3 2.0 7.3 1.0 1.4 2.1 2.4 2.4 3.1 2.0 2.1 0.8 1.8 2.5 0.3 2.5

3.6 1.8 3.0 4.1 3.0 2.6 3.2 1.7 3.4 2.2 3.0 3.7 1.0 0.9 1.4 0.3 0.8 0.1 0.4 4.2 3.7 3.2

43

TABLE 3: Land availability (continued)

Total land area agricultural thousand ha 2009 Cuba Dominica Dominican Republic Ecuador El Salvador French Guiana Grenada Guatemala Guyana Haiti Honduras Jamaica Mexico Netherlands Antilles Nicaragua Panama Paraguay Peru St. Kitts & Nevis St. Lucia St. Vincent & Grenadines Suriname Trinidad & Tobago Uruguay Venezuela (Boliv. Rep. of) OCEANIA Fiji French Polynesia New Caledonia Papua New Guinea Samoa Solomon Islands Tonga Vanuatu DEVELOPED REGIONS NORTH AMERICA Bermuda Canada United States of America ASIA & OCEANIA Australia Israel Japan New Zealand EUROPE Albania Belarus Bosnia & Herzegovina Croatia European Union Iceland Macedonia, FYR Montenegro Norway Republic of Moldova Russian Federation Serbia Switzerland Ukraine % 2009 Share of land area permanent crops % 2009 arable % 2009 pasture % 2009 ha 2009 growth % p.a. 1970-2009 Arable land per person

10 644 75 4 832 24 836 2 072 8 220 34 10 716 19 685 2 756 11 189 1 083 194 395 80 12 034 7 434 39 730 128 000 26 61 39 15 600 513 17 502 88 205 54 085 1 827 366 1 828 45 286 283 2 799 72 1 219 4 905 673 1 865 166 5 909 351 914 742 833 175 768 230 2 164 36 450 26 331 2 207 347 2 740 20 282 5 100 5 596 418 174 10 025 2 522 1 345 30 547 3 289 1 637 687 8 746 4 000 57 932

62.5 32.7 51.1 30.3 74.5 0.3 36.8 41.0 8.5 66.8 28.5 41.5 52.9 10.0 42.8 30.0 52.6 16.8 21.2 18.0 25.6 0.5 10.5 84.6 24.3 4.3 22.9 12.2 13.7 2.5 23.7 3.0 43.1 15.3 27.9 25.3 14.8 7.4 44.1 51.1 53.2 24.1 12.6 43.6 21.4 44.0 44.0 41.7 23.2 45.1 22.8 40.2 38.2 3.3 75.2 13.2 57.8 38.1 71.2

3.5 22.0 9.7 5.4 11.1 0.0 26.5 8.8 0.1 10.9 3.7 9.2 1.4 1.9 2.0 0.3 0.6 0.8 11.5 7.7 0.0 4.3 0.2 0.7 2.1 4.5 6.0 0.3 1.5 13.8 2.1 15.3 10.3 0.5 0.5 0.8 0.3 0.1 0.0 3.6 0.9 0.3 0.7 3.2 0.6 2.0 1.6 2.9 1.4 1.2 0.0 9.2 0.1 3.4 0.6 1.6

34.3 8.0 16.6 4.8 32.7 0.1 7.4 14.0 2.1 38.1 9.1 11.1 12.9 10.0 15.8 7.4 9.6 2.9 15.4 4.9 12.8 0.4 4.9 10.7 3.1 1.0 8.8 0.7 0.4 0.6 8.8 0.6 22.2 1.6 11.0 11.1 14.8 5.0 17.8 6.3 6.1 14.1 11.8 1.8 12.6 22.3 27.3 19.5 15.5 26.0 0.1 16.7 12.9 2.7 55.2 7.4 37.7 10.2 56.1

24.7 2.7 24.8 20.1 30.7 0.1 2.9 18.2 6.2 17.8 15.7 21.1 38.6 25.1 20.6 42.8 13.3 5.0 1.6 5.1 0.1 1.4 73.7 20.4 1.3 9.6 5.5 13.1 0.4 1.1 0.3 5.6 3.4 16.4 13.6 1.7 26.0 44.7 47.1 6.5 41.6 8.1 18.4 16.1 20.2 6.1 16.2 22.7 22.1 24.2 0.6 10.8 5.6 16.7 27.4 13.6

0.3 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.6 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.3 0.2 0.6 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.6 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.2 0.1 0.4 0.6 0.0 1.3 0.5 0.3 2.2 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.4 0.2 0.6 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.5 0.9 0.3 0.1 0.7

0.5 0.3 2.0 3.1 0.2 2.4 2.0 1.6 0.3 1.5 3.2 1.4 1.6 0.6 0.7 1.5 1.6 1.1 2.1 2.6 1.0 0.8 2.9 0.3 2.6 0.5 1.0 1.7 2.2 0.2 0.7 1.8 0.7 1.8 0.2 1.3 1.3 1.0 1.4 0.6 1.1 2.5 1.0 5.6 1.0 0.6

0.5 1.1

0.5

0.3

44

TABLE 4: Water resources and irrigation

Water resources irrigation potential Irrigation total area equipped for irrigation thousand ha 2008* % of equip. area irrigated by groundwater % 2008* % of equip. area actually irrigated % 2008*

per capita m3 /yr 1992 WORLD DEVELOPING REGIONS AFRICA North Africa Algeria Egypt Libya Morocco Tunisia Sub-Saharan Africa Angola Benin Botswana Burkina Faso Burundi Cameroon Cape Verde Central African Republic Chad Comoros Congo Cte dIvoire Congo, Dem. Rep. Djibouti Equatorial Guinea Eritrea Ethiopia Gabon Gambia Ghana Guinea Guinea-Bissau Kenya Lesotho Liberia Madagascar Malawi Mali Mauritania Mauritius Mozambique Namibia Niger Nigeria Rwanda Senegal Seychelles Sierra Leone Somalia Sudan South Africa Swaziland Tanzania, Utd. Rep. Togo Uganda Zambia Zimbabwe

per capita m3 /yr 2009

thousand ha 2008*

7 878

6 242

304 398

38

439 971 133 1 129 539 13 451 5 166 8 355 1 270 2 149 22 161 822 46 807 6 731 2 609 330 159 6 063 32 527 505 65 000

334 719 96 917 443 7 976 3 068 6 176 782 1 535 14 889 610 33 441 3 932 1 676 211 114 4 193 19 983 344 38 179 1 236 1 503

510 4 420 40 1 664 560 3 700 322 13 165 215 290 3 1 900 335 0 340 475 7 000 2 30 188 2 700 440 80 1 900 520 281 539 13 600 1 517 162 566 250 33 3 072 47 270 2 331 165 409 1 807 240 2 784 1 500 93 2 132 180 90 523 366

569 3 422 470 1 485 394 80 12 1 25 21 26 3 0 30 0 2 73 11 1 22 290 4 2 31 95 23 103 3 2 1 086 56 236 45 21 118 8 74 293 9 120 0 29 200 1 863 1 498 50 184 7 9 156 174

64 10 99 46 59 20 18 46 12 0 4 14 0 20 4 0 0 0 100 24 1 0 1 20 0 22 1 2 1 0 0 0 11 25 1 22 2 23 1 9 0 1 5 4 9 2 9 1 1 4 12

80 100 67 98 100 29 10 100 100

66 51 87 65 11 92 76 38 62

165 489 7 737 3 398 34 952 29 273 1 226 1 779 112 950 28 142 1 785 11 018 5 408 2 526 15 163 11 712 4 054 2 794 1 472 5 047 40 201 2 247 2 315 1 294 4 967 3 535 3 845 3 485 12 718 1 817

110 961 4 756 2 233 23 153 20 889 778 1 406 60 480 16 746 1 197 6 707 3 375 2 129 9 497 7 904 2 248 1 853 921 3 205 27 879 1 612 1 518 1 005 3 861 2 212 2 491 2 039 8 268 1 603

65 90 100 100 94 3 100 96 75 51 98 34 100 89 75 97 77

43 100 90 86 64 100 71

45

TABLE 4: Water resources and irrigation (continued)

Water resources irrigation potential Irrigation total area equipped for irrigation thousand ha 2008* % of equip. area irrigated by groundwater % 2008* % of equip. area actually irrigated % 2008*

per capita m3 /yr 1992 ASIA Central Asia Kazakhstan Kyrgyzstan Tajikistan Turkmenistan Uzbekistan East Asia Brunei Darussalam Cambodia China Indonesia Korea, DPR Korea, Republic of Lao, PDR Malaysia Mongolia Myanmar Philippines Singapore Thailand Viet Nam South Asia Afghanistan Bangladesh Bhutan India Iran (Islamic Rep.) Maldives Nepal Pakistan Sri Lanka West Asia Armenia Azerbaijan Bahrain Cyprus Georgia Iraq Jordan Kuwait Lebanon Occupied Palestinian Territory Saudi Arabia Syrian Arab Republic Turkey United Arab Emirates Yemen LATIN AMERICA & THE CARIBBEAN Argentina Bahamas Barbados Belize Bolivia (Plur. State) Brazil Chile Colombia Costa Rica

per capita m3 /yr 2009

thousand ha 2008*

6 670 5 156 2 895 6 368 2 345 31 835 46 649 2 362 10 598 3 708 1 594 75 197 30 202 15 453 28 893 7 408 188 7 533 12 632 4 201 11 132 173 993 2 100 2 409 129 10 487 2 091 2 976 2 252 4 658 223 974 11 846 4 105 246 10 1 438 370 140 1 286 3 813 74 159

6 919 4 379 2 356 4 964 1 858 21 684 34 061 2 080 8 504 3 183 1 453 54 565 20 752 12 832 24 537 5 223 121 6 384 10 174 2 126 8 345 133 053 1 582 1 880 96 7 142 1 448 2 555 2 518 3 825 99 716 14 479 2 461 155 8 1 073 213 90 838 2 973 22 90

3 768 2 247 755 2 353 4 915

3 556 1 077 719 1 744 4 223 1 354

5 1 9 3 6 0 0 30 1 14 6 0 8 43 5 14 9 1 18 74 0 64 62 0 20 31 1 19 7 90 58 0 6 53 61 52 100 97 68 33 100 64

65 100 100 100 100 100 90 86

70 000 10 886 1 782 600 414 518 10 500 3 126 12 245 9 400

62 938 6 722 1 460 880 310 363 84 2 110 1 879 6 415 4 585 3 199

87 100 75 100 95 79 100

6 933 139 500 15 000 2 178 21 300 570 666 3 200 4 37 725 5 554 85 25 178 80

5 050 28 66 334 8 132 0 1 168 19 990 570 274 1 426 4 46 433 3 525 79 9 90 20 1 731 1 439

88 100 94 100 0

84 64 100 68 63 55 82

69 87 82

8 500

4 983 227 680

24 270 75 307 91 832 89 260 53 260 67 408 61 802 34 853

20 319 59 293 60 820 63 696 42 604 54 376 46 699 24 483

6 128 4 2 000 29 350 2 500 6 589 430

1 550 5 3 128 2 878 1 900 900 103

22 90 22 7 19 3 5 17 100 100 100

46

TABLE 4: Water resources and irrigation (continued)

Water resources irrigation potential Irrigation total area equipped for irrigation thousand ha 2008* % of equip. area irrigated by groundwater % 2008* % of equip. area actually irrigated % 2008*

per capita m3 /yr 1992 Cuba Dominica Dominican Republic Ecuador El Salvador French Guiana Grenada Guatemala Guyana Haiti Honduras Jamaica Mexico Netherlands Antilles Nicaragua Panama Paraguay Peru St. Kitts & Nevis St. Lucia St. Vincent & Grenadines Suriname Trinidad & Tobago Uruguay Venezuela (Boliv. Rep. of) OCEANIA Fiji French Polynesia New Caledonia Papua New Guinea Samoa Solomon Islands Tonga Vanuatu DEVELOPED REGIONS NORTH AMERICA Bermuda Canada United States of America ASIA & OCEANIA Australia Israel Japan New Zealand EUROPE Albania Belarus Bosnia & Herzegovina Croatia European Union Iceland Macedonia, FYR Montenegro Norway Republic of Moldova Russian Federation Serbia Switzerland Ukraine

per capita m3 /yr 2009

thousand ha 2008*

3 554 2 805 39 571 4 589 1 063 492 11 910 332 873 1 890 18 573 3 922 5 224 45 478 58 800 75 252 84 822 585

3 385 2 144 29 757 4 096 595 556 7 931 320 053 1 422 12 877 3 443 4 081 34 431 42 750 52 980 66 504 462

2 700 710 3 136 200

870 270 863 45 6 0

45 22 12 7 5 0 22 0 15 8 90 39 70 4 10 28 50 0 0 10 8 2 10

85 100 71

0 100 72 75 100 88 83 81

2 620 143 500 188 9 766 700 187 6 411

130 150 92 73 25 6 320 61 35 67 1 196 0 3 1

291 169 3 112 44 071 59 753 38 374

234 615 2 874 41 406 43 233 33 509 30 1 760 1 700

51 4 181 570 3

100 85 100 54

183 337 136 280

119 499 85 305

36

102 233 11 883 28 068 370 3 491 93 349 12 764 5 632 9 540 22 995 653 846 3 309 89 127 2 660 30 276 7 850 2 703

86 177 9 974 22 464 245 3 398 75 642 13 060 6 019 9 952 23 917 537 975 3 111 79 024 3 233 31 510 7 020 3 054 5 500 1 500 29 000

784 24 722 2 545 225 3 128 285 340 131 3 3

7 59 23 49 9 32 1 15 30 37 100 87

128 115 312 4 346 25 731

4 100 6 0 20 10 22 0 79 38

47

TABLE 5: Labour force structure

Labour force Employment in agriculture millions 2010* WORLD DEVELOPING REGIONS AFRICA North Africa Algeria Egypt Libya Morocco Tunisia Sub-Saharan Africa Angola Benin Botswana Burkina Faso Burundi Cameroon Cape Verde Central African Republic Chad Comoros Congo Cte dIvoire Congo, Dem. Rep. Djibouti Equatorial Guinea Eritrea Ethiopia Gabon Gambia Ghana Guinea Guinea-Bissau Kenya Lesotho Liberia Madagascar Malawi Mali Mauritania Mauritius Mozambique Namibia Niger Nigeria Rwanda Senegal Seychelles Sierra Leone Somalia Sudan South Africa Swaziland Tanzania, Utd. Rep. Togo Uganda Zambia Zimbabwe millions 2010* % 2010* Share of employment in Agricultural employment by gender

agriculture

services % 2010*

industry % 2010*

female % 2000*

male % 2000*

female % 2010*

male % 2010*

3 176.4

14.8 26.5 2.3 11.8 3.8 8.0 3.5 1.0 7.4 4.5 7.6 0.2 2.0 4.2 0.3 1.7 7.6 0.4 0.3 2.2 40.1 0.7 0.7 10.9 4.7 0.6 18.7 1.0 1.5 9.8 6.0 4.1 1.4 0.6 10.9 0.8 4.8 49.6 5.1 5.2 2.2 3.5 13.2 18.9 0.5 21.3 2.6 14.1 4.7 5.1

1.6 7.1 0.2 4.2 0.5 0.0 1.1 0.2 2.4 3.2

20.7 31.6 19.7 40.9 25.8 5.1 42.7 29.9 84.8 92.2 61.3

26.0 23.0 30.0 21.7 33.6 20.6 9.5 15.2 3.1 2.2 9.1

53.1 45.3 50.2 37.2 39.1 66.6 46.2 54.9 12.2 5.6 22.6 17.0 21.9 34.2 41.4 39.4 27.4

22.3 43.3 60.2

20.4 28.3 34.8

24.3

35.1

68.4

53.1

1.8 0.4

83.0 35.4

2.1 20.6

14.5 42.2

85.9

80.3

0.1 25.2 0.1 0.3 2.6 7.7 0.4 0.5 6.9 3.0 0.0 6.4 1.9 18.3 3.4 1.1 1.3

76.3 79.3 24.2 64.7 57.2 76.0 61.1 72.3 48.9 80.4 66.0 8.7 80.5 56.9 44.6 78.8 33.7 68.5

4.8 6.6 11.8 6.1 13.6 5.9 6.7 9.3 9.2 3.7 5.6 28.2 3.4 11.1 11.5 3.8 14.8 6.5

17.6 13.0 64.0 27.8 29.1 18.1 32.2 18.3 41.9 15.8 28.3 63.1 16.1 29.1 31.1 41.7 16.6 36.1 25.0 33.0 71.1 34.1 66.0 32.8 8.2 22.7 10.6 12.9 82.5 29.9 7.6 81.5 49.8 9.9 64.9 78.2 60.8 76.5 50.3 78.8 25.6 53.7 59.8 72.9 10.3 8.7

0.7 12.7 1.3 7.2 3.0 3.3

5.1 76.5 54.1 65.6 72.2 64.8

25.0 4.3 6.8 6.0 7.1 9.3

69.8 19.2 37.5 28.4 20.6 15.3

16.1

15.3

3.4 78.0 75.7

5.4 71.2 61.8 65.2

78.6 69.5

65.2 50.9

78.6

48

TABLE 5: Labour force structure (continued)

Labour force Employment in agriculture millions 2010* ASIA Central Asia Kazakhstan Kyrgyzstan Tajikistan Turkmenistan Uzbekistan East Asia Brunei Darussalam Cambodia China Indonesia Korea, DPR Korea, Republic of Lao, PDR Malaysia Mongolia Myanmar Philippines Singapore Thailand Viet Nam South Asia Afghanistan Bangladesh Bhutan India Iran (Islamic Rep.) Maldives Nepal Pakistan Sri Lanka West Asia Armenia Azerbaijan Bahrain Cyprus Georgia Iraq Jordan Kuwait Lebanon Occupied Palestinian Territory Saudi Arabia Syrian Arab Republic Turkey United Arab Emirates Yemen LATIN AMERICA & THE CARIBBEAN Argentina Bahamas Barbados Belize Bolivia (Plur. State) Brazil Chile Colombia Costa Rica millions 2010* % 2010* Share of employment in Agricultural employment by gender

agriculture

services % 2010*

industry % 2010*

female % 2000*

male % 2000*

female % 2010*

male % 2010*

8.5 2.5 2.8 2.4 12.6 0.2 7.5 786.4 118.8 12.3 24.7 3.1 12.0 1.4 26.0 37.6 2.6 39.6 46.9 10.6 70.8 0.3 459.4 29.6 0.2 13.3 59.4 8.4 1.6 4.4 0.6 0.6 2.3 7.3 1.8 1.3 1.4

2.3 0.7 1.4 3.4 0.0 5.0 306.5 41.5 1.6 1.8 1.5 0.4 11.5 12.3 0.0 15.9 24.4

29.4 34.0 55.5 38.5 1.4 72.2 39.6 38.3 6.6 85.4 13.5 40.0 62.7 35.2 1.1 41.5 51.7

18.9 20.6 17.9 19.4 21.4 8.6 27.2 19.3 17.0 3.5 27.0 14.9 12.0 14.6 21.8 19.5 20.2

51.7 45.3 26.2 35.2 77.2 19.2 33.2 42.3 76.4 11.1 59.5 45.0 25.1 50.3 77.1 38.9 28.2

17.6 54.8

33.3 51.7

32.0 35.4 75.1

34.9 36.9 41.8

1.6 74.9 46.7 12.2 89.3 14.0 46.5 24.5 0.4 47.3 66.3

2.2 72.4 44.4 9.5 81.2 20.7 50.6 45.3 1.2 49.5 64.2

0.3 69.7 41.4 8.3 10.0 34.8 22.5 0.5 40.0 60.0

2.1 70.8 41.1 6.7 17.5 40.6 41.9 1.6 43.3 55.9

22.8 0.2 191.2 4.3 0.0 6.5 21.9 2.5 0.5 1.6 0.0 0.0 0.9 1.8 0.0

48.1 65.4 51.1 21.2 11.5 65.7 44.7 32.6 44.2 38.6 0.8 3.8 53.4 23.4 2.0 2.7

14.5 6.4 22.4 32.2 24.3 13.4 20.1 25.1 16.8 12.9 15.0 20.8 10.4 18.2 18.7 20.6

37.4 28.2 26.5 46.5 60.0 20.7 35.2 39.6 39.0 48.5 84.2 75.3 36.2 58.3 79.2 76.0

76.9

53.3

68.1 63.0

41.8 32.6 20.5 14.0 60.2 36.4 28.4 46.3 39.5 1.9 5.6 50.5 14.0 3.8

16.7 5.4 85.2 72.9 48.8

23.9 17.9 67.1 44.4 37.7

33.1 7.1 72.8 72.4 36.8 46.1

46.1 0.0 4.8 57.5 3.6

36.4 2.9 5.6 47.0 5.1

38.0 0.2 2.8 56.6 32.6 2.0

10.1 6.3 24.6 4.5 6.1

0.3 0.8 5.4 0.1 2.0

4.1 14.9 23.7 4.2 54.1

20.4 32.2 26.2 24.3 11.1

75.5 52.8 50.1 71.2 34.7

2.0 61.7 60.5 0.1 87.8

6.7 26.2 27.0 9.0 43.1

0.2 49.1 41.7 0.1

4.7 22.6 18.2 5.6

19.5 0.2 0.2 0.1 4.5 101.2 7.5 19.0 2.1

0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.7 15.7 0.7 3.1 0.2

1.2 2.9 3.3 19.5 36.1 17.0 11.2 17.9 12.3

23.1 16.0 17.3 17.9 19.7 22.1 23.2 20.0 21.6

75.2 80.8 69.7 61.9 44.2 60.7 65.6 62.0 62.2

0.2 0.9 3.3 6.4 35.3 10.6 4.6 5.4

1.0 6.7 4.1 36.9 37.9 23.2 19.3 27.3

0.3 0.2 2.5 3.3 36.2 15.0 5.6 6.4 5.1

1.2 4.2 4.2 28.0 42.3 22.5 16.1 26.7 17.9

49

TABLE 5: Labour force structure (continued)

Labour force Employment in agriculture millions 2010* Cuba Dominica Dominican Republic Ecuador El Salvador French Guiana Grenada Guatemala Guyana Haiti Honduras Jamaica Mexico Netherlands Antilles Nicaragua Panama Paraguay Peru St. Kitts & Nevis St. Lucia St. Vincent & Grenadines Suriname Trinidad & Tobago Uruguay Venezuela (Boliv. Rep. of) OCEANIA Fiji French Polynesia New Caledonia Papua New Guinea Samoa Solomon Islands Tonga Vanuatu DEVELOPED REGIONS NORTH AMERICA Bermuda Canada United States of America ASIA & OCEANIA Australia Israel Japan New Zealand EUROPE Albania Belarus Bosnia & Herzegovina Croatia European Union Iceland Macedonia, FYR Montenegro Norway Republic of Moldova Russian Federation Serbia Switzerland Ukraine millions 2010* % 2010* Share of employment in Agricultural employment by gender

agriculture

services % 2010*

industry % 2010*

female % 2000*

male % 2000*

female % 2010*

male % 2010*

5.0 4.4 6.2 2.5

0.9 0.0 0.5 1.8 0.5 0.0

18.6 21.0 14.5 28.7 20.9 13.8 33.2 21.4 50.5 34.6 20.2 13.1 1.1 29.5 17.9 26.5 0.8 0.2 14.8 15.4 8.0 3.8 11.0 8.5

18.1 19.8 21.9 18.8 20.7 23.9 22.8 24.5 10.8 22.2 16.6 25.5 17.6 20.2 19.1 18.9 24.4 48.9 16.1 19.6 23.0 32.2 21.7 23.0

63.3 58.8 59.8 52.5 58.4 58.6 44.0 50.5 38.7 43.2 63.2 60.6 81.3 49.8 63.0 54.5 74.8 42.1 59.4 60.6 64.3 63.8 67.2 68.3

14.2 16.1 2.6 4.4 3.8 9.7 15.3 16.3 37.3 8.9 9.2 6.9 0.2 1.7 19.8 3.9 14.3 13.9 1.8 2.9 1.5

34.3 34.3 22.7 11.1 33.9 16.5 48.1 33.5 62.5 49.8 28.8 23.2 2.0 24.7 37.7 8.9 26.1 30.6 8.4 9.8 15.1

8.6 8.3 2.1 4.3 4.8

25.0 29.4 21.0 11.0 29.3

5.5 0.3 4.4 2.8 1.2 48.5 2.3 1.6 3.0 13.4 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.7 1.7 13.2 0.4 0.1 0.1 3.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.1

1.8 0.1 1.4 1.0 0.2 5.8 0.0 0.6 0.3 0.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 1.0

16.0 7.2 13.1 8.3 4.4 0.2 8.4 3.4 23.5 5.7 9.8 7.6 4.5 1.7 4.8 1.8

43.8 27.2 51.3 25.6 18.9 2.0 41.7 21.3 33.3 12.3 18.8 20.2 9.9 6.1 15.6 13.1

0.0 0.0 1.7 0.0 0.0 0.1

9.4 2.7 72.3 39.9 31.8 60.5

17.9 22.4 3.6 19.7 30.6 7.0

72.7 43.0 22.7 38.7 37.5 31.1 4.1 9.2

5.3

12.0

4.6

50.6

0.0 19.1 159.4 11.6 3.1 65.7 2.3 1.5 4.9 2.0 2.0 242.0 0.2 0.9 2.6 1.5 75.8 4.4 23.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.4 6.5 0.6 0.1 3.3 0.2 1.0 0.4 2.2 0.4 0.0 2.3 0.1

1.7 2.4 1.6 3.3 1.7 3.7 6.6 44.1 21.2 14.9 5.5 19.7 8.6 2.5 31.1 9.7 24.0 3.3 15.8

12.1 21.5 16.7 21.1 20.4 25.3 20.9 19.9 34.9 27.3 17.9 31.3 19.2 19.7 19.7 27.9 25.1 21.1 23.4

86.2 76.5 81.2 75.5 77.1 69.7 72.5 36.0 40.0 57.6 75.2 49.1 72.1 77.6 49.3 62.3 50.9 70.9 60.7

0.2 1.9 1.4 3.5 0.9 5.5 5.8

2.4 4.5 3.5 6.1 3.2 4.7 11.0

0.2 1.5 0.7 2.4 0.6 4.3 5.0

2.4 3.4 2.0 4.3 2.5 4.2 9.0

8.6 15.3 7.3 4.4 13.9 8.2 11.7 15.1 3.9 2.5 17.3 1.0 2.3 49.8 11.7 3.7 6.0 52.0 17.1 5.2 1.3 30.1 6.9 19.5 2.8

15.3 12.9 5.3 8.8 18.9 2.0 4.1 35.5 11.0 21.7 4.8

50

TABLE 6: Employment
Employment to population ratio age 15+ female age 15+ male age 15+ total Labour participation rate age 15+ population female % 2010* WORLD DEVELOPING REGIONS AFRICA North Africa Algeria Egypt Libya Morocco Tunisia Sub-Saharan Africa Angola Benin Botswana Burkina Faso Burundi Cameroon Cape Verde Central African Republic Chad Comoros Congo Cte dIvoire Congo, Dem. Rep. Djibouti Equatorial Guinea Eritrea Ethiopia Gabon Gambia Ghana Guinea Guinea-Bissau Kenya Lesotho Liberia Madagascar Malawi Mali Mauritania Mauritius Mozambique Namibia Niger Nigeria Rwanda Senegal Seychelles Sierra Leone Somalia Sudan South Africa Swaziland Tanzania, Utd. Rep. Togo Uganda Zambia Zimbabwe % 2010* % 2010* % 2010* age 15+ Children economically active age 7-14 % 2010* % 2010* % 2010* Unemployment female total

male % 2010*

48.6

72.5

60.4

51.8

6.6

32.1 19.3 23.5 22.0 21.2 70.3 58.2 38.5 76.7 84.1 49.4 43.9 63.8 67.1 60.3 52.6 38.3 50.8 40.3 52.2 73.1 52.1 66.5 64.2 77.1 50.1 67.3 47.9 53.0 79.8 69.3 34.9 42.4 36.1 83.0 37.7 37.8 37.4 81.1 56.3 65.4 51.2 28.1 34.6 46.4 75.8 48.7 78.1 53.9 57.4

66.6 67.2 71.9 71.9 60.9 82.8 85.0 53.6 87.3 84.3 69.0 69.4 81.9 72.3 78.5 76.8 81.2 83.3 85.8 80.1 88.3 64.4 78.0 66.1 85.3 84.5 78.7 61.6 79.4 86.9 75.1 59.9 51.9 72.2 72.3 48.5 82.6 66.5 79.5 76.1 64.2 82.4 66.5 48.1 54.8 80.3 81.1 87.8 68.7 73.3

49.4 43.2 48.6 46.1 41.0 76.4 71.6 46.0 81.9 84.2 59.1 55.7 72.6 69.7 69.4 64.6 60.4 66.7 62.6 65.6 80.6 58.2 72.1 65.2 81.2 66.9 73.0 54.1 65.9 83.3 72.1 47.0 47.2 53.8 77.9 42.9 59.8 51.8 80.3 66.0 64.8 66.5 47.3 41.1 50.4 78.0 64.6 83.0 61.2 64.9

37.2 22.4 24.7 26.2 25.6 74.5 67.4 72.3 78.2 91.0 53.5 53.5 71.6 62.7 73.7 62.9 50.8 56.5 61.5 39.7 62.5 80.7 70.0 70.6 73.8 79.2 59.6 76.4 70.8 66.6 84.2 75.0 37.6 59.0 40.8 84.8 51.8 38.9 39.2 86.7 64.8 65.4 56.5 30.8 47.0 53.1 86.3 63.6 78.3 59.5 60.0

79.6 75.3 78.9 80.1 70.6 88.4 77.9 80.9 90.8 87.5 80.7 81.3 86.7 78.2 85.4 82.6 82.1 78.7 92.0 83.4 90.3 81.1 85.2 75.2 89.2 83.8 88.1 77.7 75.8 88.7 78.8 67.0 81.0 74.8 86.9 87.5 73.4 85.1 88.6 67.5 84.7 73.9 63.4 74.9 90.6 85.7 90.6 79.2 74.3 7.5 18.5 14.9 43.5 19.1 27.7 11.2 31.1 38.7 38.2 34.4 14.3 1.8 15.4 47.1 43.5 48.9 48.3 50.5 37.7 2.6 37.4 26.0 40.3 23.0 56.0 30.1 45.7 39.8 67.0 60.4 42.1 11.7 43.4 30.1 74.4 13.2 7.9

10.1 22.9 10.5 17.3

11.3 9.4 10.0 14.2

0.4 19.9 2.6 0.3 3.3 22.6 0.3 16.9

0.7 17.6 2.4 0.5 2.9 23.0 0.7 20.0 4.1

68.6 18.5 6.3 29.9 16.1 10.7 1.7

59.5 24.2 14.5 20.5 17.8 10.4 3.1 9.8

33.1 4.2 3.5 10.0 10.9 41.2 12.3 1.3 43.0 0.9 4.4 0.4 13.6 4.8 2.3

27.3 5.5 2.6 7.8 8.8 33.0 7.3 2.2 37.6 1.5 3.9 0.6 10.0 5.5 3.4

25.9 26.0 5.8 3.9 11.3 4.1

23.8 22.5 4.3 3.2 12.9 4.2

51

TABLE 6: Employment (continued)

Employment to population ratio age 15+ female age 15+ male age 15+ total Labour participation rate age 15+ population female % 2010* ASIA Central Asia Kazakhstan Kyrgyzstan Tajikistan Turkmenistan Uzbekistan East Asia Brunei Darussalam Cambodia China Indonesia Korea, DPR Korea, Republic of Lao, PDR Malaysia Mongolia Myanmar Philippines Singapore Thailand Viet Nam South Asia Afghanistan Bangladesh Bhutan India Iran (Islamic Rep.) Maldives Nepal Pakistan Sri Lanka West Asia Armenia Azerbaijan Bahrain Cyprus Georgia Iraq Jordan Kuwait Lebanon Occupied Palestinian Territory Saudi Arabia Syrian Arab Republic Turkey United Arab Emirates Yemen LATIN AMERICA & THE CARIBBEAN Argentina Bahamas Barbados Belize Bolivia (Plur. State) Brazil Chile Colombia Costa Rica % 2010* % 2010* % 2010* age 15+ Children economically active age 7-14 % 2010* % 2010* % 2010* Unemployment female total

male % 2010*

57.7 47.9 50.7 53.7 52.5 55.4 69.1 44.0 55.8 47.3 77.3 43.2 50.6 66.5 46.0 50.9 64.5 65.3 25.1 53.9 42.6 32.4 28.0 42.9 54.7 19.8 39.1 32.1 55.9 31.6 49.7 47.2 12.5 13.3 41.8 22.6

70.3 69.4 60.4 63.2 62.7 70.7 80.6 80.0 72.6 69.5 78.2 77.4 52.7 83.0 74.2 72.4 78.8 73.8 83.0 81.6 77.0 77.4 69.1 71.4 68.7 81.3 71.2 45.6 64.5 80.8 66.1 62.7 61.9 61.2 79.5 70.9

63.5 58.3 55.4 58.3 57.5 63.3 74.6 61.8 63.9 58.1 77.7 60.5 51.6 74.4 60.1 61.6 71.5 69.4 55.2 67.9 61.1 55.6 48.9 57.3 61.5 51.5 54.7 38.1 60.0 61.0 57.5 54.3 37.1 37.9 65.3 45.9

65.7 54.8 57.0 62.4 58.4 59.7 73.6 67.4 52.0 55.1 50.1 77.7 44.4 67.8 63.1 49.2 53.7 65.5 68.0 33.1 58.7 53.4 32.8 31.9 57.1 63.3 21.7 34.2 59.6 59.5 32.4 54.3 55.1 13.8 23.3 45.4 22.3

76.3 79.1 77.7 74.0 71.0 74.8 85.6 79.7 86.0 77.5 72.0 78.9 79.2 78.2 85.1 78.5 75.6 80.7 76.0 84.5 82.5 70.6 81.1 73.0 77.0 80.3 84.9 75.1 74.6 66.8 85.0 70.8 73.8 68.9 73.9 82.5 71.5

3.6 5.2 8.9 5.1

7.5 9.4

6.6 8.2

6.7 48.9 8.9 2.0 8.5 3.0 1.4 3.7 10.1 13.3 15.1 21.3 3.6 8.8 7.4 6.5 1.1 2.4 9.4 16.2 4.2 7.0 3.3 5.1 16.8 23.8 47.2 17.0 10.7 8.7 8.1 35.0 5.2 5.0 10.5 5.5 31.8 14.7 16.1 22.5 24.1 1.8 10.1

4.7 1.7 4.3 7.9 3.6 1.4 3.7 3.3 6.0 7.5 5.9 1.2 2.4 8.5 4.2 3.7 4.4 10.5 14.4 8.8 5.0 7.6 28.6 6.0 5.5 5.2 16.5 17.5 12.9 1.9 9.0

18.0 16.9 21.7 38.0 20.4

75.6 72.5 63.0 91.3 57.5

47.2 44.8 42.3 75.9 39.0

17.4 21.1 24.0 41.9 19.9

79.8 79.5 69.6 92.1 18.3 6.6 2.6

15.9 25.7 14.3 12.0 40.9

5.4 8.4 14.0 4.0 15.0

43.9 59.4 57.1 38.8 62.2 52.8 34.9 53.5 39.1

70.3 71.9 72.6 74.8 79.5 75.8 65.2 71.2 74.9

56.5 65.4 64.4 56.9 70.7 63.9 49.6 62.0 57.2

52.4 68.3 65.8 47.4 62.1 60.1 41.8 40.7 45.1

78.4 78.7 78.0 80.6 82.0 81.9 73.4 77.6 79.9

12.9

9.8 14.0 9.4 13.0

8.7 14.2 8.1 8.2 5.2 8.3 9.7 12.0 4.9

32.1 5.2 4.1 3.9 5.7

6.0 11.0 10.7 15.8 6.2

52

TABLE 6: Employment (continued)

Employment to population ratio age 15+ female age 15+ male age 15+ total Labour participation rate age 15+ population female % 2010* Cuba Dominica Dominican Republic Ecuador El Salvador French Guiana Grenada Guatemala Guyana Haiti Honduras Jamaica Mexico Netherlands Antilles Nicaragua Panama Paraguay Peru St. Kitts & Nevis St. Lucia St. Vincent & Grenadines Suriname Trinidad & Tobago Uruguay Venezuela (Boliv. Rep. of) OCEANIA Fiji French Polynesia New Caledonia Papua New Guinea Samoa Solomon Islands Tonga Vanuatu DEVELOPED REGIONS NORTH AMERICA Bermuda Canada United States of America ASIA & OCEANIA Australia Israel Japan New Zealand EUROPE Albania Belarus Bosnia & Herzegovina Croatia European Union Iceland Macedonia, FYR Montenegro Norway Republic of Moldova Russian Federation Serbia Switzerland Ukraine % 2010* % 2010* % 2010* age 15+ Children economically active age 7-14 % 2010* % 2010* % 2010* Unemployment female total

male % 2010*

42.7 41.8 46.7 42.6

66.2 64.8 74.5 68.4

54.4 53.3 60.5 54.3

40.9 50.5 47.1 45.9

66.9 79.8 77.7 76.7 5.8 14.3 7.1

2.0 9.5 22.8 8.4 3.6 10.9

1.6 11.0 14.2 6.5 5.9 10.2 1.8 11.8 7.2 2.9 11.4 5.2 10.3 5.0 5.8 5.6 6.8 5.1 21.0 20.2 9.5 5.2 7.3 7.6 8.6 11.7 18.6 7.7 5.0 31.9 1.1

44.1 41.5 35.0 34.4 45.1 39.1 45.3 36.0 42.6 65.1 60.5

82.8 73.4 77.2 78.8 68.4 76.2 59.3 82.0 74.7 80.5 77.1

62.4 57.8 55.4 56.3 56.2 57.1 51.6 58.3 58.7 72.8 68.8

48.1 44.7 57.5 40.1 56.1 43.2 57.0 47.1 48.4 57.0 58.2 51.0 56.0

87.9 81.2 82.9 80.2 74.0 80.6 78.4 80.7 86.6 76.0 75.8 78.8 66.0 78.1 75.5 80.3 78.4 66.1 69.9 74.2 75.4 50.0 74.7 88.3

18.2 33.4 8.7 9.8 12.2 10.1 8.9 15.3 42.2

2.4 15.3 8.3 2.9 14.8 4.8 12.5 5.1 7.9 7.5 8.3 5.9 25.0 21.4 13.7

32.4 49.3 45.1 47.2 36.6

60.8 73.1 69.3 75.6 75.7

46.5 60.7 56.4 61.3 56.3

38.5 55.1 53.8 51.7 38.7 48.0 44.1

3.9 5.1

6.2 9.7 8.1 12.9 13.4 22.2 1.3 6.2 33.7 7.4

68.5 50.9

72.0 77.3

70.2 64.5

71.6 37.9 24.2 54.6 79.3

2.3 56.4 52.9 52.7 45.4 43.2 56.0 34.4 47.0 35.7 38.1 43.1 66.5 26.5 57.7 43.7 51.3 53.6 48.3 66.4 66.0 66.5 55.8 66.4 69.9 59.0 58.8 48.0 54.8 58.5 75.8 43.3 67.1 45.8 63.5 69.4 60.0 61.2 59.2 59.4 50.4 54.2 62.7 46.2 52.3 41.5 43.3 50.4 71.2 34.8 62.3 44.7 56.7 44.4 61.2 53.5 60.6 52.0 73.7 65.4 17.3 62.7 58.4 58.4 51.9 47.9 61.8 49.3 54.8 54.9 46.3 49.7 71.7 42.9 63.0 46.5 57.5 83.1 65.2 71.0 53.1 69.2 6.9 33.5 11.8 73.0 71.9 72.2 62.5 71.8 75.7 70.4 66.5 68.3 60.3 22.0 11.7 10.6 27.1 10.2 8.8 5.7 33.0 35.5 2.6 4.9 7.9 18.4 4.5 6.1 7.0 8.1 5.4 7.7 4.7 6.1 28.4

2.7 8.3 9.3 5.6 7.6 5.0 6.1 12.7 23.9 9.1 8.9 7.2 32.2 30.3 3.1 6.4 8.2 16.6 4.1 8.8

53

TABLE 7: Capital and investment in agriculture: total

Agricultural capital stock change Constant 2005 US$ million 1980 WORLD DEVELOPING REGIONS AFRICA North Africa Algeria Egypt Libya Morocco Tunisia Sub-Saharan Africa Angola Benin Botswana Burkina Faso Burundi Cameroon Cape Verde Central African Republic Chad Comoros Congo Cte dIvoire Congo, Dem. Rep. Djibouti Equatorial Guinea Eritrea Ethiopia Gabon Gambia Ghana Guinea Guinea-Bissau Kenya Lesotho Liberia Madagascar Malawi Mali Mauritania Mauritius Mozambique Namibia Niger Nigeria Rwanda Senegal Seychelles Sierra Leone Somalia Sudan South Africa Swaziland Tanzania, Utd. Rep. Togo Uganda Zambia Zimbabwe Constant 2005 US$ million 1990 Constant 2005 US$ million 2000 Constant 2005 US$ million 2007 % of GDP 2006 - 2007 % p.a. 1990-09 % p.a. 2000-07 growth

3 740 211 1 995 041 321 495 69 452 9 154 22 483 4 612 22 984 6 813 252 043 4 171 2 838 1 972 3 294 1 123 4 600 1 435 1 220 4 261 164 1 882 1 546 3 604 4 176 129

4 166 338 2 347 083 367 513 80 046 11 782 25 714 7 005 23 654 7 932 287 467 4 290 3 001 2 259 5 103 1 132 5 570 1 794 1 639 4 299 201 2 270 1 983 4 316 6 299 132

4 889 201 2 814 936 461 851 91 659 12 997 32 377 6 944 25 436 9 429 370 192 5 055 3 295 2 405 7 451 1 000 6 260 1 815 2 108 5 585 275 1 742 2 323 4 095 6 891 135 3 449 31 594

5 077 178 3 061 589 519 668 97 509 14 080 35 991 7 308 25 486 9 962 422 159 5 351 3 629 2 230 9 931 1 421 6 413 1 888 2 409 6 912 301 1 728 2 261 4 072 7 589 136 3 285 47 083 3 131 497 4 323 6 411 3 484 17 304 2 534 345 9 807 9 243 10 650 5 576 431 4 056 3 945 12 606 50 899 1 813 9 963 1 108 1 725 11 413 38 968 42 667 9 801 17 905 3 778 7 010 4 997 8 789

0.0 0.2 0.7 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.3 1.0 0.1 0.8 0.3 6.0 10.1 0.0 0.8 1.8 5.0 0.0 0.0 1.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 1.4 14.2 2.0 1.1 0.9 6.6 5.2 1.7 5.0 1.8 0.5 7.2 8.2 1.1 0.1 3.3 0.8 9.4 0.5 0.8 0.9 0.2 0.1 0.4 0.1 0.2 0.5 2.7 1.6 0.4 0.5

1.7 1.9 2.5 1.3 1.1 2.6 0.1 0.1 1.8 2.8 1.5 1.1 0.5 3.8 1.5 0.7 0.2 2.6 2.7 3.4 2.9 1.6 0.5 1.0 0.2

0.5 1.2 1.7 0.9 1.1 1.5 0.7 0.0 0.8 1.9 0.8 1.4 1.1 4.2 5.1 0.3 0.6 1.9 3.1 1.3 0.1 0.4 0.1 1.4 0.1 0.7 5.9

2 420 359 2 266 2 699 2 497 11 819 1 948 278 9 993 5 484 6 650 2 693 436 2 342 3 588 8 342 25 591 1 090 6 697 564 651 10 525 16 975 42 867 8 900 12 571 2 382 3 597 3 577 7 689

2 430 385 2 950 2 645 2 766 16 468 2 098 294 10 104 7 785 6 114 3 156 455 2 865 3 584 7 142 33 091 1 153 7 994 858 852 11 701 19 516 42 810 9 450 14 019 3 021 4 664 4 669 9 529

2 724 421 3 687 4 526 3 253 15 134 2 428 313 10 095 8 663 8 045 5 190 432 3 630 3 862 10 154 42 132 1 248 9 296 978 971 11 363 34 773 43 349 9 713 16 720 3 358 5 704 4 518 9 037

1.3 0.9 2.3 5.4 1.7 0.2 1.7 0.6 0.1 1.0 2.7 4.9 0.6 2.6 0.2 3.6 2.4 0.9 1.4 0.9 1.4 0.5 6.3 0.2 0.3 2.1 0.8 2.0 0.4 0.1

2.0 2.4 2.3 5.1 1.0 1.9 0.6 1.4 0.4 0.9 4.1 1.0 0.0 1.6 0.3 3.1 2.7 5.5 1.0 1.8 8.6 0.1 1.6 0.2 0.1 1.0 1.7 3.0 1.4 0.4

54

TABLE 7: Capital and investment in agriculture: total (continued)

Agricultural capital stock change Constant 2005 US$ million 1980 ASIA Central Asia Kazakhstan Kyrgyzstan Tajikistan Turkmenistan Uzbekistan East Asia Brunei Darussalam Cambodia China Indonesia Korea, DPR Korea, Republic of Lao, PDR Malaysia Mongolia Myanmar Philippines Singapore Thailand Viet Nam South Asia Afghanistan Bangladesh Bhutan India Iran (Islamic Rep.) Maldives Nepal Pakistan Sri Lanka West Asia Armenia Azerbaijan Bahrain Cyprus Georgia Iraq Jordan Kuwait Lebanon Occupied Palestinian Territory Saudi Arabia Syrian Arab Republic Turkey United Arab Emirates Yemen LATIN AMERICA & THE CARIBBEAN Argentina Bahamas Barbados Belize Bolivia (Plur. State) Brazil Chile Colombia Costa Rica Constant 2005 US$ million 1990 Constant 2005 US$ million 2000 Constant 2005 US$ million 2007 % of GDP 2006 - 2007 % p.a. 1990-09 % p.a. 2000-07 growth

1 051 243

1 299 492

1 634 679 95 066 43 093 6 260 5 700 16 496 23 517

1 777 559 103 149 46 002 6 216 6 295 18 639 25 997 761 139 55 4 600 366 322 128 256 50 181 15 043 12 681 5 475 22 683 17 097 14 941 28 224 54 915 674 902 30 398 58 888 7 197 238 479 82 642 34 024 14 586 75 581 133 107 238 369 2 879 12 984 57 1 141 5 410 31 127 1 491 307 2 774 675 23 239 25 030 123 247 3 670 3 980 712 608 73 735 29 84 1 702 10 446 203 683 21 946 101 641 2 608

0.2 0.1 0.3 1.1 2.5 0.8 0.3 0.1 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.5 0.0 2.6 0.1 30.3 2.8 0.4 0.2 0.8 0.7 2.7 1.6 20.7 0.5 0.4 75.3 2.9 1.2 1.4 0.1 0.5 1.4 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.5 0.1 0.0 0.0

2.4

1.2 1.2 0.9 0.1 1.4 1.8 1.4

470 423 19 1 610 244 926 83 923 28 025 4 892 7 675 3 320 15 165 11 395 10 338 25 254 23 788 440 534 26 818 42 025 3 116 174 930 46 136 16 145 7 275 40 970 83 119 140 286

587 118 16 3 595 296 964 98 265 40 331 7 973 8 662 4 489 18 385 12 279 10 879 27 415 34 322 528 054 27 213 48 478 4 237 198 450 67 143 20 257 9 579 51 886 100 811 184 320

699 660 37 4 150 350 665 112 546 44 071 12 936 10 520 5 029 22 337 14 588 12 784 26 173 49 400 613 677 30 437 52 044 5 447 216 355 74 309 28 024 12 529 62 547 131 985 226 276 2 656 12 418

1.7 8.0 1.4 1.5 1.5 0.9 5.5 1.6 1.2 2.1 1.5 1.7 0.1 3.9 1.4 1.5 0.7 2.7 0.8 1.0 3.6 2.7 1.9 2.2 2.1

1.2 5.8 1.5 0.6 1.9 1.9 2.2 2.7 1.2 0.2 2.3 2.3 1.1 1.5 1.4 0.0 1.8 4.1 1.4 1.5 2.8 2.2 2.7 0.1 0.7 1.2 0.6

24 814 18 143 793 130 2 487 363 9 053 10 919 94 817 769 2 060 583 788 70 660 29 93 1 591 8 207 137 989 17 883 88 645 2 088

40 954 30 847 1 155 129 2 600 421 21 277 14 167 108 747 1 031 2 854 637 968 71 492 23 125 1 150 8 732 163 965 18 619 93 703 2 825

57 1 091 6 056 30 642 1 387 235 2 748 640 23 126 21 163 117 001 3 309 3 365 669 899 69 746 27 107 1 460 8 909 182 098 21 986 96 805 2 548

4.4 1.3 0.1 1.6 6.2 0.4 4.2

0.0 0.6 1.6 0.2 1.0 3.9 0.1 0.8 0.1 2.4 0.7 1.5 2.4 0.9 0.8 1.0 3.4 2.2 2.3 1.6 0.0 0.7 0.3

0.0 0.5 0.1 0.0 0.5 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.0 2.8 1.5 0.1 0.2 1.2 0.2

0.9 4.4 0.5 13.6 1.6 0.5 0.2 1.8 1.1 2.5 0.0 1.0 1.9 0.3 1.5

55

TABLE 7: Capital and investment in agriculture: total (continued)

Agricultural capital stock change Constant 2005 US$ million 1980 Cuba Dominica Dominican Republic Ecuador El Salvador French Guiana Grenada Guatemala Guyana Haiti Honduras Jamaica Mexico Netherlands Antilles Nicaragua Panama Paraguay Peru St. Kitts & Nevis St. Lucia St. Vincent & Grenadines Suriname Trinidad & Tobago Uruguay Venezuela (Boliv. Rep. of) OCEANIA Fiji French Polynesia New Caledonia Papua New Guinea Samoa Solomon Islands Tonga Vanuatu DEVELOPED REGIONS NORTH AMERICA Bermuda Canada United States of America ASIA & OCEANIA Australia Israel Japan New Zealand EUROPE Albania Belarus Bosnia & Herzegovina Croatia European Union Iceland Macedonia, FYR Montenegro Norway Republic of Moldova Russian Federation Serbia Switzerland Ukraine Constant 2005 US$ million 1990 Constant 2005 US$ million 2000 Constant 2005 US$ million 2007 % of GDP 2006 - 2007 % p.a. 1990-09 % p.a. 2000-07 growth

27 790 51 7 401 14 057 2 517 20 40 5 258 973 3 918 3 600 1 736 98 776 13 4 231 2 966 4 676 19 148 42 53 32 566 427 24 426 20 829 38 515 32 274 799 536 609 2 742 183 240 126 1 745 170 671 068 88 391 582 672 411 261 112 505 2 297 236 526 59 933 662 841 5 072

26 991 69 8 780 18 501 2 586 43 33 5 638 1 001 3 666 4 157 2 044 110 154 10 4 206 3 075 6 599 19 548 25 64 34 711 358 21 435 25 564 42 110 34 707 886 595 661 3 094 124 265 141 1 819 255 649 751 91 793 557 953 477 868 111 469 2 355 307 544 56 500 691 636 5 743

24 344 73 9 036 19 139 2 575 42 32 6 706 1 027 4 786 3 661 2 144 116 094 10 5 738 3 206 7 536 22 070 21 66 28 749 294 22 124 27 528 48 507 39 940 966 595 907 3 475 127 282 141 2 074 265 660 355 91 089 569 261 446 450 115 218 2 357 274 751 54 124 967 460 5 018 16 773 1 891 1 713

23 251 81 10 266 18 362 2 768 40 36 9 165 1 023 4 860 4 265 2 241 117 184 10 5 994 3 525 8 318 23 349 16 55 27 661 310 24 971 28 954 51 754 42 988 960 624 1 043 3 386 138 301 161 2 015 589 673 244 94 170 579 069 435 964 111 963 2 377 265 379 56 245 906 381 5 033 14 322 1 931 2 015 642 666 935 1 447 8 269 4 705 161 586 7 982 56 618 0.0 0.2 0.2 1.2 2.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.6 0.3 0.4 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.4 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.4 0.1 1.8 0.2 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.2 0.0 1.3 0.0 6.0 19.4 0.0 2.2 0.6 1.6 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 1.9 1.3 0.2

0.6 0.3 0.5 0.8 0.0 0.8 0.3 1.6 0.4 2.3 0.8 0.5 0.5 1.2 3.2 0.5 1.4 1.2 1.4 0.5 1.4 0.6 1.9 0.5 0.7 1.5 1.5 0.9 0.0 3.6 1.1 0.3 0.7 1.1 1.6 0.2 0.0 0.2 0.5 0.0 0.1 0.8 0.4 3.9 1.5

0.7 1.5 1.8 0.6 1.0 0.7 1.7 4.6 0.1 0.2 2.2 0.6 0.1 0.0 0.6 1.4 1.4 0.8 3.8 2.6 0.5 1.8 0.8 1.7 0.7 0.9 1.1 0.1 0.7 2.0 0.4 1.2 0.9 1.9 0.4 0.3 0.5 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.1 0.5 0.6 0.9 0.0 2.2 0.3 2.3

640 569 1 006

667 926 954

660 631 809 1 297

0.2 1.6

0.4 2.1 1.6

8 226

9 076

8 467 5 392 185 688

0.6

0.3 1.9 2.0

8 769

8 877

8 112 64 497

0.9

0.2 1.8

56

TABLE 8: Capital and investment in agriculture: components

Share of components in capital stock land livestock machinery & equipment structure % 2007 % 2007

development % 2007 WORLD DEVELOPING REGIONS AFRICA North Africa Algeria Egypt Libya Morocco Tunisia Sub-Saharan Africa Angola Benin Botswana Burkina Faso Burundi Cameroon Cape Verde Central African Republic Chad Comoros Congo Cte dIvoire Congo, Dem. Rep. Djibouti Equatorial Guinea Eritrea Ethiopia Gabon Gambia Ghana Guinea Guinea-Bissau Kenya Lesotho Liberia Madagascar Malawi Mali Mauritania Mauritius Mozambique Namibia Niger Nigeria Rwanda Senegal Seychelles Sierra Leone Somalia Sudan South Africa Swaziland Tanzania, Utd. Rep. Togo Uganda Zambia Zimbabwe

plantation % 2007

xed assets % 2007

inventories % 2007

31.7 35.5 31.4 59.1 42.5 73.8 65.3 63.2 41.0 25.0 26.3 43.7 5.5 10.0 19.8 26.7 11.7 16.4 17.1 72.4 16.0 37.2 44.8 8.4 83.8 10.7 4.3 59.2 17.9 23.5 7.0 35.8 12.5 35.8 42.9 9.3 73.5 17.9 27.3 74.0 30.8 33.8 25.6 41.9 12.9 7.0 92.2 40.9 7.6 14.0 34.0 92.1 26.1 41.8 15.5 19.0 7.4

4.0 3.8 3.2 5.6 6.8 2.2 5.5 4.8 25.2 2.8 0.0 9.2 15.7 0.0 3.1 6.3 79.6 0.1 1.2 11.3 64.1 2.6 1.4 86.7 0.0 5.0 0.0 35.9 24.5 0.1 26.4 40.4 2.1 27.3 1.4 2.6 6.4 1.2 2.5 2.8 0.1 9.7 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.4 7.2 0.2 2.4 0.1 8.1 2.9 0.1 32.0 1.8 0.0 0.1

36.3 40.2 45.9 20.3 29.7 15.4 15.9 23.4 19.8 50.8 52.9 34.8 55.1 67.1 55.4 47.9 7.0 57.9 59.1 9.6 14.7 39.5 33.9 3.7 8.8 65.5 71.8 3.2 38.6 57.3 50.0 18.6 63.2 27.6 38.0 65.5 14.5 61.1 55.1 15.5 47.4 41.3 56.2 43.8 63.6 74.6 0.3 44.5 68.9 62.8 29.2 3.7 52.1 20.3 57.1 60.7 69.8

6.4 7.1 8.1 3.6 5.2 2.7 2.8 4.1 3.5 9.0 9.3 6.1 9.7 11.8 9.8 8.5 1.2 10.2 10.4 1.7 2.5 6.9 6.0 0.6 1.5 11.5 12.7 0.5 6.6 10.1 8.8 3.3 11.1 4.9 6.7 11.6 2.6 10.8 9.7 2.6 8.4 7.3 9.9 7.7 11.2 13.2 0.0 7.8 12.2 11.1 5.1 0.7 9.2 3.6 10.1 10.7 12.3

5.5 5.4 6.0 1.7 1.4 2.3 0.5 1.2 0.9 6.8 7.1 4.7 10.1 8.6 3.8 8.7 0.2 13.7 10.7 1.7 0.7 5.4 2.4 0.4 0.0 5.7 9.2 0.1 8.0 3.7 5.8 1.5 7.4 2.9 1.4 8.5 1.1 7.7 4.9 0.5 3.9 6.0 7.3 3.7 5.5 3.6 0.0 4.1 8.1 10.6 17.9 0.5 9.2 1.1 9.8 5.2 5.6

19.3 14.7 4.4 6.4 14.3 3.6 10.0 3.3 9.5 4.0 4.3 1.4 3.8 2.4 8.0 1.9 0.1 1.6 1.3 2.3 1.8 8.2 11.4 0.1 4.4 1.6 2.0 0.9 3.6 5.3 1.9 0.4 3.6 1.5 9.0 2.6 2.0 1.4 0.5 3.9 9.3 1.8 1.0 2.8 6.6 1.3 0.1 2.3 0.8 1.4 5.7 0.1 3.1 1.2 5.6 4.3 4.7

57

TABLE 8: Capital and investment in agriculture: components (continued)

Share of components in capital stock land livestock machinery & equipment structure % 2007 % 2007

development % 2007 ASIA Central Asia Kazakhstan Kyrgyzstan Tajikistan Turkmenistan Uzbekistan East Asia Brunei Darussalam Cambodia China Indonesia Korea, DPR Korea, Republic of Lao, PDR Malaysia Mongolia Myanmar Philippines Singapore Thailand Viet Nam South Asia Afghanistan Bangladesh Bhutan India Iran (Islamic Rep.) Maldives Nepal Pakistan Sri Lanka West Asia Armenia Azerbaijan Bahrain Cyprus Georgia Iraq Jordan Kuwait Lebanon Occupied Palestinian Territory Saudi Arabia Syrian Arab Republic Turkey United Arab Emirates Yemen LATIN AMERICA & THE CARIBBEAN Argentina Bahamas Barbados Belize Bolivia (Plur. State) Brazil Chile Colombia Costa Rica

plantation % 2007

xed assets % 2007

inventories % 2007

39.7 60.3 74.0 63.5 55.9 48.5 44.9 25.0 3.6 36.2 15.3 76.6 2.4 5.3 75.1 49.4 3.6 29.4 15.5 20.7 11.1 44.7 80.3 7.5 65.2 28.1 64.1 0.0 62.0 14.1 96.7 63.7 60.0 50.3 61.4 48.3 41.0 83.5 51.4 26.1 73.5 22.5 87.5 74.5 56.3 75.6 13.1 24.3 16.0 27.6 17.9 2.4 17.8 21.6 44.9 7.7 19.6

3.3 2.5 1.0 3.2 6.2 1.3 2.6 5.9 0.0 0.3 0.1 0.2 91.0 4.5 4.4 4.6 49.5 0.0 23.3 43.2 43.1 0.2 0.4 0.0 32.3 0.0 1.7 100.0 0.1 0.5 2.2 3.8 8.0 5.6 5.3 5.1 7.8 0.8 7.2 1.3 16.5 17.9 1.6 4.2 4.0 9.7 0.0 8.1 1.5 27.6 1.2 3.1 3.3 6.8 4.9 5.2 21.8

38.1 22.5 14.8 18.7 26.8 20.0 27.2 41.4 80.0 43.0 49.5 12.6 3.0 36.9 15.4 29.8 37.5 46.4 44.6 23.2 20.9 37.2 15.1 73.1 1.6 31.9 18.5 0.0 23.8 62.8 0.7 19.4 20.6 22.2 22.8 18.7 26.7 9.0 27.8 58.6 6.6 21.8 8.1 11.5 13.0 11.3 64.3 44.4 52.2 27.6 47.6 79.3 59.4 43.0 31.4 71.1 39.3

6.7 4.0 2.6 3.3 4.7 3.5 4.8 7.3 12.7 7.6 8.7 2.2 0.5 6.5 2.7 5.3 6.6 8.2 7.9 4.1 3.7 6.6 2.7 12.9 0.3 5.6 3.3 0.0 4.2 11.1 0.1 3.4 3.6 3.9 3.5 3.2 4.7 1.6 4.9 10.1 1.2 3.7 1.4 2.0 2.3 2.0 11.4 7.8 9.2 3.4 8.3 14.0 10.5 7.6 5.5 12.5 6.9

5.2 2.0 1.4 2.1 2.2 1.0 2.5 2.8 0.0 7.8 3.0 1.0 0.2 1.5 1.7 1.5 2.5 8.0 3.8 2.5 1.6 8.8 1.5 4.6 0.5 10.4 1.1 0.0 7.2 7.4 0.1 1.3 1.9 1.7 1.8 0.6 1.8 0.5 0.8 1.3 0.4 0.7 0.3 0.5 0.8 1.0 5.5 5.3 6.4 0.0 1.2 0.4 7.0 8.8 1.6 2.5 4.3

18.4 13.2 6.3 9.2 4.1 25.7 18.0 19.4 0.0 5.0 23.4 7.4 2.9 45.2 0.6 9.4 0.3 8.0 4.9 6.3 19.6 18.3 0.0 1.9 0.1 24.0 11.3 0.0 2.7 4.0 0.1 11.7 5.8 16.3 0.0 23.8 17.9 4.6 7.8 2.0 1.8 32.7 1.1 7.4 23.6 0.3 5.6 7.4 14.7 6.9 22.6 0.6 1.9 12.3 11.6 1.0 7.9

58

TABLE 8: Capital and investment in agriculture: components (continued)

Share of components in capital stock land livestock machinery & equipment structure % 2007 % 2007

development % 2007 Cuba Dominica Dominican Republic Ecuador El Salvador French Guiana Grenada Guatemala Guyana Haiti Honduras Jamaica Mexico Netherlands Antilles Nicaragua Panama Paraguay Peru St. Kitts & Nevis St. Lucia St. Vincent & Grenadines Suriname Trinidad & Tobago Uruguay Venezuela (Boliv. Rep. of) OCEANIA Fiji French Polynesia New Caledonia Papua New Guinea Samoa Solomon Islands Tonga Vanuatu DEVELOPED REGIONS NORTH AMERICA Bermuda Canada United States of America ASIA & OCEANIA Australia Israel Japan New Zealand EUROPE Albania Belarus Bosnia & Herzegovina Croatia European Union Iceland Macedonia, FYR Montenegro Norway Republic of Moldova Russian Federation Serbia Switzerland Ukraine

plantation % 2007

xed assets % 2007

inventories % 2007

21.9 2.5 23.8 37.1 26.8 30.0 13.9 25.2 71.2 17.2 25.7 9.6 48.1 30.0 41.9 12.8 20.6 34.0 12.5 23.6 22.2 80.0 14.5 5.9 20.1 86.6 98.6 76.6 0.3 7.7 1.5 3.6 2.7 6.8 26.0 29.2 24.5 30.0 10.5 27.4 42.2 4.2 5.4 31.1 67.6 22.0 22.4 31.2 23.5 0.3 48.1 12.3 45.7 55.2 3.5 52.1

3.5 40.7 15.6 21.9 24.9 17.5 58.3 30.0 4.3 11.4 25.4 13.0 7.0 0.0 16.5 8.6 1.8 7.9 0.0 23.6 18.5 4.8 15.8 0.2 7.7 11.8 0.0 19.4 6.1 0.4 95.3 66.7 74.4 30.4 4.6 3.6 22.9 1.5 0.9 1.0 9.9 0.4 0.5 6.0 15.2 2.8 14.1 16.0 6.2 0.0 7.9 0.2 25.5 4.3 0.9 6.4

55.8 43.2 48.9 31.0 32.0 35.0 19.4 32.8 14.1 56.2 31.7 60.5 32.3 50.0 29.4 57.1 52.1 45.9 68.8 41.8 40.7 9.7 45.5 74.2 51.7 53.1 0.9 2.7 73.4 69.1 2.6 21.0 18.6 44.1 18.1 15.1 9.4 15.7 24.5 40.3 17.1 20.7 67.5 18.2 11.9 38.2 27.7 37.8 17.2 22.0 14.1 14.5 11.5 19.6 32.1 15.7

9.8 7.4 8.6 5.5 5.6 5.0 2.8 5.8 2.4 9.9 5.6 10.7 5.7 10.0 5.2 10.1 9.2 8.1 6.2 7.3 7.4 1.7 7.7 13.1 9.1 9.3 0.2 0.4 12.8 12.2 0.4 3.6 3.0 7.5 3.2 2.7 1.7 2.8 4.3 7.1 3.0 3.6 11.9 3.2 2.1 6.7 4.9 6.7 3.0 3.9 2.5 2.6 2.0 3.5 5.7 2.8

1.6 1.2 2.5 2.4 4.6 0.0 0.0 3.2 1.0 3.8 5.6 1.8 2.9 0.0 5.5 4.2 11.2 2.3 0.0 1.8 0.0 0.6 1.0 4.4 5.2 0.8 0.1 0.0 1.6 0.8 0.1 0.7 0.7 8.1 6.2 9.4 8.0 9.5 3.2 13.2 8.8 0.9 8.9 5.4 1.2 2.5 2.3 2.1 7.1 8.1 1.7 5.9 0.7 1.2 10.5 1.0

7.4 2.5 0.5 2.1 6.1 5.0 0.0 3.0 6.7 1.4 5.9 4.4 4.0 0.0 1.4 7.2 5.1 1.8 0.0 0.0 3.7 3.0 14.5 2.2 6.3 7.2 0.1 0.5 5.3 9.7 0.0 2.9 0.3 1.2 40.4 39.8 33.5 40.5 57.9 11.0 18.9 70.3 5.8 36.8 2.0 27.8 28.5 6.2 44.7 65.5 25.6 64.6 14.6 16.1 47.3 22.0

59

TABLE 9: Additional investment indicators

Gross capital formation share of GDP Foreign direct investment net inows current % 2000 WORLD DEVELOPING REGIONS AFRICA North Africa Algeria Egypt Libya Morocco Tunisia Sub-Saharan Africa Angola Benin Botswana Burkina Faso Burundi Cameroon Cape Verde Central African Republic Chad Comoros Congo Cte dIvoire Congo, Dem. Rep. Djibouti Equatorial Guinea Eritrea Ethiopia Gabon Gambia Ghana Guinea Guinea-Bissau Kenya Lesotho Liberia Madagascar Malawi Mali Mauritania Mauritius Mozambique Namibia Niger Nigeria Rwanda Senegal Seychelles Sierra Leone Somalia Sudan South Africa Swaziland Tanzania, Utd. Rep. Togo Uganda Zambia Zimbabwe % 2009 US$ million 2000 current US$ million 2009 % of GDP 2009* per million people 2008* % of GNI 2009* US$ 2009* Research and development expenditure number of persons Net ODA received share of GNI current per capita

22.3

19.0

1 610 000.0 229 226.1 9 613.4 2 792.0

1 160 000.0 390 017.9 45 667.8 14 840.0 2 850.0 6 710.0 1 710.0 1 970.0 1 600.0 30 827.8 2 210.0 92.5 252.0 171.0 0.3 340.0 120.0 42.3 462.0 9.1 2 080.0 381.0 951.0 96.9 1 640.0 0.0 221.0 32.8 39.4 1 680.0 49.8 14.0 141.0 62.9 218.0 543.0 60.4 109.0 38.3 257.0 881.0 490.0 739.0 5 790.0 119.0 208.0 249.0 74.3 108.0 2 680.0 5 350.0 65.7 415.0 50.1 604.0 699.0 60.0

2.1

1 280.0

0.2

18.8 15.3 42.0 16.0

25.0 19.6 13.4 25.5 27.3 15.1 18.9 31.8 16.8 6.1 16.7 19.7 9.5 23.3 10.1 22.6 10.8 3.5 8.8 61.3 23.8 20.3 21.9 17.4 24.0 19.7 11.3 17.4 44.2 15.0 13.6 24.6 19.4 26.1 31.0 17.1 11.4 18.3 20.5 25.2 6.9 18.3 15.9 17.4 16.8 17.8 19.5 17.4 13.6

41.2 19.3 36.0 26.8 14.8 25.0 24.0

438.0 1 240.0 141.0 221.0 752.0 6 821.4 879.0 59.7 57.2 23.1 11.7 159.0

0.1 0.2 0.6 1.0

170.0 617.0 647.0 1 590.0

0.2 0.5 0.1 1.0 1.3 0.4 10.3

9.2 11.1 6.1 28.5 45.4 47.1 12.9 76.4 143.0 68.8 66.1 33.3 388.0 53.6 50.1 76.8 76.8 112.0 35.6 188.0 46.7 28.5 46.1 52.6 75.1 66.4 21.3 90.3 44.7 59.5 128.0 22.7 50.6 75.7 87.1 122.0 87.9 150.0 30.7 10.7 93.5 81.2 264.0 76.8 72.4 54.1 21.8 48.9 67.1 75.4 54.6 98.1 58.8

0.5 0.1

2.5 13.5 41.2 2.9 132.0 13.1 11.9 9.2 9.5 33.5 65.9 4.1 10.6 23.9 14.5 0.5 7.8

53.8 10.6 33.9 12.4 24.6 11.2 29.8 39.7 22.4 28.4 25.9 19.6 21.6 20.9 31.4 32.6 24.9 25.2 21.4 21.0 27.1

33.4 0.8 115.0 0.1 166.0 235.0 72.0 3.3 154.0 27.9 135.0 42.6 166.0 9.9 0.7 111.0 118.0 20.8 83.0 26.0 82.4 40.1 266.0 139.0 119.0 8.4 1 140.0

0.5

0.2

20.5

13.4 0.8 18.5 6.1 5.8 17.6 6.1

0.1 0.1

10.1 50.4 42.3

6.4 78.3 5.2 16.6 11.0 9.4 1.8

0.4 0.5 15.8 7.7

20.8 3.6 8.9 1.0 18.0

21.8 27.9 24.2 15.1 25.2 19.4 16.9 29.8 23.8 22.1 2.2

8.3 62.9 24.3 39.0 0.3 392.0 969.0 90.7 463.0 41.9 161.0 122.0 23.2

0.1 0.3

276.0 157.0

8.0 3.5 23.0 58.9

0.3 0.9 393.0

4.7 0.4 2.0 13.7 34.3 17.5 11.4 52.5 11.1 14.1

0.4 0.0

60

TABLE 9: Additional investment indicators (continued)

Gross capital formation share of GDP Foreign direct investment net inows current % 2000 ASIA Central Asia Kazakhstan Kyrgyzstan Tajikistan Turkmenistan Uzbekistan East Asia Brunei Darussalam Cambodia China Indonesia Korea, DPR Korea, Republic of Lao, PDR Malaysia Mongolia Myanmar Philippines Singapore Thailand Viet Nam South Asia Afghanistan Bangladesh Bhutan India Iran (Islamic Rep.) Maldives Nepal Pakistan Sri Lanka West Asia Armenia Azerbaijan Bahrain Cyprus Georgia Iraq Jordan Kuwait Lebanon Occupied Palestinian Territory Saudi Arabia Syrian Arab Republic Turkey United Arab Emirates Yemen LATIN AMERICA & THE CARIBBEAN Argentina Bahamas Barbados Belize Bolivia (Plur. State) Brazil Chile Colombia Costa Rica % 2009 US$ million 2000 current US$ million 2009 % of GDP 2009* per million people 2008* % of GNI 2009* US$ 2009* Research and development expenditure number of persons Net ODA received share of GNI current per capita

264 065.4 1 506.8 18.5 20.0 9.4 34.7 16.3 13.1 17.5 35.1 22.2 30.6 28.3 26.9 29.0 12.4 21.2 33.3 22.8 29.6 21.8 38.1 14.6 14.5 50.2 21.3 47.7 31.0 25.9 149.0 100 299.2 4 550.0 9 280.0 33.9 3 790.0 53.7 258.0 2 240.0 16 500.0 3 370.0 1 300.0 4 392.7 0.2 23.0 48.2 24.2 33.0 26.3 24.3 17.2 28.0 18.6 20.7 10.3 18.3 26.6 22.4 10.7 20.4 30.2 12.1 14.8 29.7 19.0 24.5 31.3 21.9 24.4 53.9 36.5 3 580.0 39.0 13.0 0.5 308.0 173.0 104.0 130.0 364.0 855.0 131.0 3.1 913.0 16.3 280.0 30.4 22.1 21.7 11.4 26.1 1 280.0 2.4 23.5 131.0 74.7 15 914.8 13 600.0 189.0 15.8 1 360.0 750.0 173 462.0 326.0 530.0 132 230.0 4 880.0 1 510.0 319.0 1 390.0 624.0 323.0 1 950.0 16 800.0 4 980.0 7 600.0 41 459.6 185.0 674.0 36.4 34 600.0 3 020.0 112.0 38.2 2 390.0 404.0 777.0 473.0 257.0 5 910.0 658.0 1 070.0 2 380.0 145.0 4 800.0 0.3 0.1 1 950.0 166.0 0.5 0.2 1 030.0 0.7 0.2 0.2 0.2 58.7 152.0 93.0 0.8 0.7 137.0 706.0 45.7 1.3 9.5 0.2 0.0 2.4 6.7 1.7 1.7 5.9 0.6 0.5 0.2 8.6 4.5 3.0 0.0 1.8 0.0 0.0 1.4 0.0 3.2 0.0 0.6 0.2 0.2 0.1 2.5 0.2 0.2 17.7 80.7 6 090.0 311.0 115.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 4.1 281.0 16.9 1 070.0 205.0 4 630.0 15.5 372.0 0.2 0.0 7.2 0.1 9.4 0.1 7.3 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.3 7.1 8.3 0.2 0.6

8.3 20.5 18.7 59.1 58.8 7.8 6.8 4.2 48.8 0.8 4.6 2.8 66.5 5.2 139.0 7.1 3.4 1.1 42.9 8.7 204.0 7.6 180.0 2.1 1.3 107.0 29.1 16.4 34.7 46.0 171.0 26.5

213.0 88.6 128.0 152.0

18.7 17.3 20.8 23.2 19.5

26.1 16.3 14.9

1 880.0 270.0 982.0 6.4 79 763.8

10 500.0 1 430.0 8 400.0 129.0 78 473.1 3 900.0 655.0 298.0 95.4 423.0 25 900.0 12 700.0 7 210.0 1 350.0

0.0 0.7 680.0

0.0 0.5 0.2 0.0 2.0 21.2 13.0 11.6 18.2

16.2 35.5 18.5 28.7 18.1 18.3 21.9 15.0 16.9

20.9 22.4 17.0 16.5 19.0 22.5 19.7

10 400.0 250.0 19.4 23.3 736.0 32 800.0 4 860.0 2 440.0 409.0

0.5

980.0

0.0 0.1 0.1 2.0

3.2 47.7 83.6 73.6 1.8 4.7 23.2 23.9

0.3 1.1 0.7 0.2 0.3

120.0 694.0 833.0 126.0 122.0

4.4 0.0 0.1 0.5 0.4

61

TABLE 9: Additional investment indicators (continued)

Gross capital formation share of GDP Foreign direct investment net inows current % 2000 Cuba Dominica Dominican Republic Ecuador El Salvador French Guiana Grenada Guatemala Guyana Haiti Honduras Jamaica Mexico Netherlands Antilles Nicaragua Panama Paraguay Peru St. Kitts & Nevis St. Lucia St. Vincent & Grenadines Suriname Trinidad & Tobago Uruguay Venezuela (Boliv. Rep. of) OCEANIA Fiji French Polynesia New Caledonia Papua New Guinea Samoa Solomon Islands Tonga Vanuatu DEVELOPED REGIONS NORTH AMERICA Bermuda Canada United States of America ASIA & OCEANIA Australia Israel Japan New Zealand EUROPE Albania Belarus Bosnia & Herzegovina Croatia European Union Iceland Macedonia, FYR Montenegro Norway Republic of Moldova Russian Federation Serbia Switzerland Ukraine % 2009 US$ million 2000 current US$ million 2009 % of GDP 2009* per million people 2008* % of GNI 2009* US$ 2009* Research and development expenditure number of persons Net ODA received share of GNI current per capita

12.5 28.1 23.3 20.1 16.9 41.8 17.8 23.8 27.3 28.3 23.9 30.2 24.1 18.9 20.2 50.1 25.7 27.0 12.4 20.0 14.5 24.2 17.3 17.9 24.8 29.5 14.8 32.2 13.1 23.2 13.1 26.6 27.4 19.6 21.3 22.4 23.5 24.8 15.5 22.5 39.6 23.7 34.8 17.6 953.0 23.4 173.0 37.4 230.0 67.1 13.3 382.0 468.0 18 100.0 0.6 267.0 624.0 104.0 810.0 96.2 53.7 37.7 148.0 680.0 269.0 4 700.0 110.1 0.6 40.6 21.9 6.6 21.7 19.3 26.1 19.9 95.9 1.5 13.0 4.8 20.3 1 375 918.9 50.3 2 070.0 316.0 431.0 90.9 600.0 144.0 38.0 500.0 541.0 14 500.0 117.0 434.0 1 770.0 205.0 4 760.0 134.0 156.0 110.0 93.4 709.0 1 260.0 3 110.0 1 811.6 56.0 10.2 1 150.0 423.0 3.0 118.0 14.6 34.6 765 239.0

0.5

0.2 10.1 0.3

10.4 492.0 11.9 15.3 44.9 463.0 26.8 228.0 112.0 61.2 55.4 1.7 135.0 19.0 23.4 15.2 111.0 239.0 285.0 302.0 5.2 15.1 2.4 128.2 83.7

0.1 0.1

69.3 49.3

0.4 1.4 8.3

0.1

29.1

1.0 8.5

0.0 0.1 0.4 0.0 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.4 0.1 0.1 0.6 346.0 187.0 353.0 70.1 144.0 71.0

3.3 1.3 0.0 5.8 13.1 0.3 1.1 0.4 1.1 4.7 5.5 3.7 0.0 0.2 0.0 2.5 9.3 10.3 5.3 16.1 42.9 12.4 16.5

61.4 433.0 394.0 380.0 431.0 36.8

0.1 20.2 20.6 24.4 21.0 25.4 21.3 24.7 25.4 20.6 19.1 21.3 23.2 22.3 22.4 20.4 23.9 18.7 8.8 23.2 19.6 16.4 20.4 18.1 29.0 38.3 22.1 26.7 17.9 13.8 24.3 27.1 20.0 27.1 18.7 23.9 19.7 17.1 6 960.0 128.0 2 710.0 51.9 19 800.0 595.0 21.0 14.2 66 100.0 321 000.0 13 600.0 8 050.0 8 230.0 1 480.0 957 458.9 143.0 119.0 146.0 1 110.0 926 000.0 155.0 215.0 19 900.0 135 000.0 22 600.0 3 890.0 11 800.0 1 260.0 573 309.0 978.0 1 880.0 235.0 2 950.0 489 000.0 60.8 248.0 1 320.0 11 300.0 128.0 36 800.0 1 920.0 27 600.0 4 820.0 1.0 0.0 0.9 1.8 2.7 0.2 1.1 1.6 0.5 1.0 0.4 2.9 0.9 5 470.0 726.0 3 190.0 1 200.0 3 440.0 1 460.0 197.0 1 510.0 2 880.0 7 320.0 521.0 1.8 2.8 2.1 4.9 3.4 1.2 5 570.0 4 360.0 4 260.0 4 660.0 4 220.0

0.1

2.3

36.8 3.0 0.2 2.4 0.3 113.0 10.1 110.0 38.2

2.1 1.8 4.3 1.4 0.6

94.7 121.0 68.0 83.1 14.5

62

TABLE 10: Inputs and infrastructure

Fertilizer consumption per ha of arable land kg kg Pesticide consumption per ha of arable land kg kg Quality of infrastructure Score 1 = lowest to 5 = highest 2010 Agricultural machinery tractors per 100 km2 of arable land number number Lead time to trade export days import days % of all roads 2009* Roads paved

2002 WORLD DEVELOPING REGIONS AFRICA North Africa Algeria Egypt Libya Morocco Tunisia Sub-Saharan Africa Angola Benin Botswana Burkina Faso Burundi Cameroon Cape Verde Central African Republic Chad Comoros Congo Cte dIvoire Congo, Dem. Rep. Djibouti Equatorial Guinea Eritrea Ethiopia Gabon Gambia Ghana Guinea Guinea-Bissau Kenya Lesotho Liberia Madagascar Malawi Mali Mauritania Mauritius Mozambique Namibia Niger Nigeria Rwanda Senegal Seychelles Sierra Leone Somalia Sudan South Africa Swaziland Tanzania, Utd. Rep. Togo Uganda Zambia Zimbabwe

2008

2000

2009

1990

2008

2009*

2009*

106.0

119.0

3.1 3.6

3.8

4.6

49.0

9.6 433.0 66.3 65.6 25.2 1.7 16.4 0.4 1.3 5.9

6.8 724.0 27.3 53.8 32.1 0.3 8.3 0.0 3.9 2.2 8.6 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.8 0.2 0.4

2.1 2.2 2.2 2.6 1.7 2.5 2.1 1.9 2.1

129.1 249.6 184.3 45.0 82.4

139.6 372.1

4.6 1.3 3.2 2.0

7.1 3.1 10.0 3.2 7.0 8.0 7.0 14.0 8.9

73.5 86.9 57.2 67.8 75.2 10.4 9.5 32.6 4.2 10.4 8.4 69.0 2.7

142.6

1.7 6.0

1.0 140.5 2.4 1.8 0.9 7.1 134.8

3.0 4.0 3.4

2.0 1.8 0.0 31.0 0.0 1.1 18.9 0.9 1.6 2.4 2.3 2.3 6.2 16.9 5.6 0.0 3.8 1.6 27.1 0.0 7.7 14.1 2.6 6.4 1.5 33.3 0.7 1.0 0.0 2.0 0.3 0.1 1.4 1.8 2.1 2.2 2.5 2.1 1.6 2.1 2.0 2.1 29.7 0.0 298.0 6.0 3.9 0.6 5.2 0.0 11.6 0.0 4.3 1.7 9.0 210.0 0.0 0.3 0.4 13.3 8.3 2.4 29.0 1.6 1.5 3.5 56.8 3.5 4.9 1.5 33.8 39.7 3.6 49.7 6.0 4.9 3.4 50.1 27.9 0.0 3.4 1.8 3.4 2.0 1.8 2.4 1.8 60.1 4.1 15.9 7.2 107.9 228.9 8.2 0.5 0.5 12.4 0.3 0.3 0.0 0.0 15.7 26.8 0.1 0.4 2.0 2.3 2.0 1.7 2.3 2.4 1.6 2.6 0.2 4.7 1.0 1.6 10.2 8.4 2.6 4.9 7.1 45.0 0.8 20.0 57.7 80.0 19.9

74.0

35.0

0.8 76.5 7.1

1.0 2.0

1.0 3.0

7.9 1.8 45.0

3.0 5.0 4.3 4.6 2.9 3.5 3.0 4.0 4.2 5.0 2.0 3.0 3.0 2.5 1.4 2.0 39.0 2.3 3.2 5.5 9.2 25.0

3.0 6.0 13.0 3.5 6.8 3.9 5.9 5.0 3.7 4.0 3.0 2.4 3.0 4.1 2.6 32.0 5.0 3.2 7.1 14.0 4.0 18.0

21.8 13.7 10.2 19.3 14.9 9.8 27.9 14.1 18.3 6.2 11.6 45.0 19.0 26.8 98.0 20.8 12.8 20.7 15.0 19.0 29.3 96.5 8.0 11.8 36.3 17.3 30.0 7.4 21.0 23.0 22.0 19.0

63

TABLE 10: Inputs and infrastructure (continued)

Fertilizer consumption per ha of arable land kg kg Pesticide consumption per ha of arable land kg kg Quality of infrastructure Score 1 = lowest to 5 = highest 2010 Agricultural machinery tractors per 100 km2 of arable land number number Lead time to trade export days import days % of all roads 2009* Roads paved

2002 ASIA Central Asia Kazakhstan Kyrgyzstan Tajikistan Turkmenistan Uzbekistan East Asia Brunei Darussalam Cambodia China Indonesia Korea, DPR Korea, Republic of Lao, PDR Malaysia Mongolia Myanmar Philippines Singapore Thailand Viet Nam South Asia Afghanistan Bangladesh Bhutan India Iran (Islamic Rep.) Maldives Nepal Pakistan Sri Lanka West Asia Armenia Azerbaijan Bahrain Cyprus Georgia Iraq Jordan Kuwait Lebanon Occupied Palestinian Territory Saudi Arabia Syrian Arab Republic Turkey United Arab Emirates Yemen LATIN AMERICA & THE CARIBBEAN Argentina Bahamas Barbados Belize Bolivia (Plur. State) Brazil Chile Colombia Costa Rica

2008

2000

2009

1990

2008

2009*

2009*

5.2 0.2 5.4 7.0 0.0 3.1 19.0 0.0 0.2 0.5 0.2 2.7 2.1 2.0 2.2 2.5 11.4 0.0 15.4 371.0 124.0 412.0 661.0 4.9 1.6 146.0 111.0 305.0 3.8 195.0 8.7 101.0 78.7 4.2 23.6 141.0 305.0 34.5 10.4 200.0 33.0 0.0 98.3 22.7 468.0 189.0 480.0 930.0 8.2 3.3 131.0 131.0 287.0 3.2 165.0 9.1 153.0 90.9 5.2 7.7 163.0 284.0 1.7 18.1 20.9 3.3 116.0 37.1 43.8 0.2 4.0 358.0 56.2 4.5 20.0 18.7 0.6 2.3 2.2 3.4 2.9 2.2 1.7 2.7 3.3 3.0 65.8 340.4 220.0 174.9 366.8 95.6 3.2 2.0 3.4 4.6 3.0 2.1 45.0 1 377.4 327.8 116.1 7.0 1.0 1.0 3.0 2.0 2.0 90.5 50.6 81.5 64.6 94.1 84.3 100.0 85.0 84.9 2.5 2.0 0.7 0.1 9.8 2.1 2.0 0.4 1.9 2.5 1.8 2.9 2.4 2.2 1.8 2.1 1.9 21.9 129.7 122.9 0.2 2.4 3.8 60.7 141.5 10.6 2.3 2.6 2.0 1.8 2.3 1.3 5.3 28.3 2.0 6.3 1.6 2.5 1.2 2.0 1.4 4.0 1.4 29.3 9.5 62.0 49.3 73.3 100.0 55.9 65.4 81.0 0.5 13.4 0.0 0.0 19.4 27.6 2.1 3.5 2.5 3.6 1.9 3.5 1.9 1.9 2.6 4.2 3.2 2.6 33.0 47.0 152.9 80.3 13.6 65.2 38.0 10.9 2.6 14.0 4.6 1.8 2.2 1.6 1.4 2.8 12.0 8.4 5.0 1.8 2.6 1.7 3.2 66.6 2.2 211.0 1 632.5 11.8 277.1 1.3 2.8 2.1 1.6 4.0 2.6 5.3 2.0 77.2 6.3 53.5 59.1 2.8 78.5 13.5 82.8 3.5 11.9 9.9 100.0 98.5 47.6 191.1 216.1 2.8 2.0 7.0 3.0 1.4 2.0 11.5 89.9 91.1 82.7 81.2 87.3

56.5 68.4 70.5 672.0 8.2

75.2 88.0 88.7 336.0 14.2 1.5 2.9 0.6 1.2 2.5

3.3 2.5 3.1 3.8 2.4

19.2 128.1 279.8 51.4 39.0 233.9 488.5

2.3 2.5 2.2 2.5 3.1

6.3 3.2 3.8 2.0 3.6

21.5 91.0 34.0 100.0 8.7

29.9 40.1 60.0 4.3 126.0 308.0 309.0 537.0

38.8 111.6 110.0 49.8 5.5 166.0 589.0 492.0 707.0 33.4 105.6 13.1 0.0 1.9 20.0 15.3

2.8 2.4

100.2 141.2

3.7

3.8

30.0 57.4 100.0 17.0

2.2 3.1 2.9 2.6 2.6

24.8 143.8 127.6 96.8

15.0 2.8 3.5 7.0 2.0

28.3 3.9 3.0 7.0 2.0

7.0 5.5 20.2 14.4 25.3

64

TABLE 10: Inputs and infrastructure (continued)

Fertilizer consumption per ha of arable land kg kg Pesticide consumption per ha of arable land kg kg Quality of infrastructure Score 1 = lowest to 5 = highest 2010 Agricultural machinery tractors per 100 km2 of arable land number number Lead time to trade export days import days % of all roads 2009* Roads paved

2002 Cuba Dominica Dominican Republic Ecuador El Salvador French Guiana Grenada Guatemala Guyana Haiti Honduras Jamaica Mexico Netherlands Antilles Nicaragua Panama Paraguay Peru St. Kitts & Nevis St. Lucia St. Vincent & Grenadines Suriname Trinidad & Tobago Uruguay Venezuela (Boliv. Rep. of) OCEANIA Fiji French Polynesia New Caledonia Papua New Guinea Samoa Solomon Islands Tonga Vanuatu DEVELOPED REGIONS NORTH AMERICA Bermuda Canada United States of America ASIA & OCEANIA Australia Israel Japan New Zealand EUROPE Albania Belarus Bosnia & Herzegovina Croatia European Union Iceland Macedonia, FYR Montenegro Norway Republic of Moldova Russian Federation Serbia Switzerland Ukraine

2008

2000

2009

1990

2008

2009*

2009*

38.1 86.6 168.0 74.9 0.0 99.8 33.1 0.6 94.7 60.3 28.4 40.4 47.7 84.0 0.0

39.7 44.4 7.7 214.0 118.0 0.0 92.0 56.8 0.0 108.0 51.3 44.7 32.3 35.3 66.8 81.6 13.3 2.3 3.8 2.8 2.3 1.2 2.9 2.8 7.2 4.5 8.8 3.6 12.0 7.6 7.2

1.9 2.3 2.4 2.4

226.2 25.9 54.2 2.2 2.1 2.0 80.0 3.5 3.4 2.0

49.0 50.4 49.4 14.8 19.8 61.0 2.6 3.4 5.3 3.2 10.0 2.5 3.2 1.4 4.0 3.8 34.5 7.4 24.3 20.4 73.3 35.3 12.0 38.1 50.8 13.9 42.5 70.0 206.7 222.3 3.0 9.4 3.0 12.1 33.6 49.2 26.3 51.1

2.4 2.0 2.2 2.3 2.1 3.0 2.2 2.6 2.4 2.7 123.5 20.0 102.0 71.6 36.3 131.2 240.0 222.5 55.0 61.5 2.6 30.9

4.2 2.4 10.0 2.1 3.2 1.4 1.0 2.0

92.2 797.0 64.8 144.0 71.5 334.0 354.0 159.0 0.4 12.9

526.0 2 340.0 118.0 233.0 46.6 307.0 169.0 78.6 1.8 67.4

5.3 5.2

30.4 2.6 2.4 2.0 3.7 2.7 1.9

194.2 1 238.9 260.3

418.8 975.0 1 477.8 59.4 25.3 7.3 81.2

351.9

3.5 14.2 9.0 11.0 2.4 27.0 23.9

0.2 2.2

2.3 2.3

1.0 470.0

57.6 111.0 47.4 252.0 334.0 1 840.0 85.3 150.0 32.7 257.0 165.0 30.9 206.0 8.1 13.6 196.0 15.9

56.9 103.0 33.9 253.0 278.0 1 720.0 38.4 237.0 11.9 388.0 143.0 56.2 219.0 12.5 15.9 115.0 226.0 32.8 7.2 10.1 0.8 5.2 0.9 0.5 0.8 1.3 0.2 0.0 1.3 1.1 3.2 33.1 4.7 2.2 1.4 26.5 3.0 3.1

4.0 4.2 3.8 3.6 4.2 3.5 2.1 2.2 2.4

164.8 238.4

2.8 2.8 2.6

3.7 4.0 2.8 2.0 1.0 1.6 2.0 2.0 1.0 2.9

39.9 67.4 38.7 100.0 79.6 65.9 39.0 88.6 52.3 86.9 89.1 36.6 56.5

798.8 4 492.9

705.3

2.0 1.0 1.3

212.4

121.9 89.8

1.7 2.0 1.0

791.9 3.3 2.5 2.5 4.2 2.0 2.4 2.3 4.2 2.4 2 783.1 103.3 1 779.1 197.5 30.0 17.7

2.1

1.0 4.0 2.0 2.6 1.7

2.0 2.9 3.0 2.6 7.0

80.5 85.8 80.1 47.7 100.0 97.8

65

TABLE 11: Macroeconomic environment

Gross domestic product total current billion US$ 2010 WORLD DEVELOPING REGIONS AFRICA North Africa Algeria Egypt Libya Morocco Tunisia Sub-Saharan Africa Angola Benin Botswana Burkina Faso Burundi Cameroon Cape Verde Central African Republic Chad Comoros Congo Cte dIvoire Congo, Dem. Rep. Djibouti Equatorial Guinea Eritrea Ethiopia Gabon Gambia Ghana Guinea Guinea-Bissau Kenya Lesotho Liberia Madagascar Malawi Mali Mauritania Mauritius Mozambique Namibia Niger Nigeria Rwanda Senegal Seychelles Sierra Leone Somalia Sudan South Africa Swaziland Tanzania, Utd. Rep. Togo Uganda Zambia Zimbabwe per capita current US$ 2010 % 2008-09 % 2009-10 % 2009* % 2008-2009 US$ 2008 US$ 2009 real growth share of GDP Agriculture value added annual change constant US$ per worker

62 859.1 20 566.3 1 730.1 600.7 160.3 218.5 74.2 103.5 44.3 1 129.3 85.3 6.6 14.0 8.8 1.5 22.5 1.7 2.0 7.8 0.5 11.5 22.8 13.1 1.1 14.5 2.1 29.7 13.1 1.1 31.1 4.6 0.8 32.2 2.1 1.0 8.3 5.1 9.3 3.8 9.7 9.9 11.9 5.6 216.8 5.6 12.9 0.9 1.9 68.4 357.3 3.6 22.7 3.2 17.0 16.2 7.5

9 237.9 3 721.6 1 720.8 3 647.9 4 435.4 2 788.8 11 314.1 3 248.9 4 200.5 1 344.0 4 477.6 689.5 7 627.5 597.5 180.1 1 100.6 3 156.6 436.0 767.7 802.5 2 983.5 1 036.2 186.3 1 383.0 11 033.3 397.7 350.4 8 724.2 616.6 1 311.6 448.5 508.7 809.3 836.9 226.0 391.8 321.9 691.6 1 194.8 7 593.3 458.3 5 651.7 381.2 1 389.3 562.3 980.9 10 681.9 325.8 1 705.3 7 157.8 3 061.1 548.3 458.8 500.6 1 221.4 594.3 2.4 2.7 3.7 3.2 3.5 1.9 3.6 1.7 0.3 1.8 7.5 3.8 2.8 5.0 5.7 3.9 10.0 1.4 6.7 4.7 0.3 3.0 2.6 3.0 4.6 3.7 7.6 4.5 1.2 3.0 6.3 0.8 0.9 7.0 4.1 2.2 0.7 3.2 6.0 1.7 1.2 6.7 3.2 7.2 6.4 6.0 1.6 2.5 8.6 5.8 3.9 3.0 5.4 3.3 5.1 2.1 9.1 2.6 7.2 4.5 0.8 2.2 8.0 5.7 5.7 5.7 1.9 3.5 5.0 2.4 5.1 2.0 6.6 4.5 4.7 4.0 7.0 4.4 7.5 8.4 6.5 4.2 6.2 5.0 5.1 2.8 2.0 6.5 3.4 5.2 7.6 9.0 2.4 4.7 2.3 4.9 3.1 3.3 5.1 4.2 3.1 3.7

2.9

1 070.0

998.0

11.7 13.7 1.9 16.4 7.8 10.2 32.2 3.1 33.3 34.8 19.5 9.2 55.5 13.6 46.3 4.5 24.4 42.9 3.9 3.5 14.4 50.7 5.1 27.5 31.7 17.2 57.3 22.6 8.4 61.3 29.1 30.5 36.5 20.6 4.3 31.5 9.3 39.6 32.7 34.2 16.6 2.0 51.4 65.5 29.7 3.0 7.3 28.8 43.7 24.7 21.6 17.9

69.1 3.8 12.3 20.4 53.6 66.7

2 160.0 2 930.0 2 520.0 3 500.0 249.0 467.0

2 180.0 3 020.0 3 310.0 3 600.0 313.0 597.0

0.5 4.9 1.1 21.9 2.4 6.7 73.9 0.0 15.8 24.6 3.5 2.3 30.9 7.6 7.3 17.3 1.3 9.0 3.4 3.3 0.2

2 130.0

2 220.0

443.0 892.0 166.0 993.0 65.4 208.0 1 860.0 271.0 321.0 349.0 199.0 183.0 145.0 411.0 4 920.0 202.0 1 700.0

453.0 926.0 168.0 1 000.0 66.1 215.0 1 870.0 275.0 225.0 334.0 207.0 192.0 162.0 408.0 5 560.0 220.0 1 640.0

5.2 7.1 4.3 2.4 13.4 5.0 0.0 3.0 8.8 14.3 11.4 891.0 3 660.0 1 150.0 281.0 202.0 220.0 116.0 922.0 3 640.0 1 180.0 283.0 203.0 216.0 141.0 235.0 691.0 245.0 725.0

66

TABLE 11: Macroeconomic environment (continued)

Gross domestic product total current billion US$ 2010 ASIA Central Asia Kazakhstan Kyrgyzstan Tajikistan Turkmenistan Uzbekistan East Asia Brunei Darussalam Cambodia China Indonesia Korea, DPR Korea, Republic of Lao, PDR Malaysia Mongolia Myanmar Philippines Singapore Thailand Viet Nam South Asia Afghanistan Bangladesh Bhutan India Iran (Islamic Rep.) Maldives Nepal Pakistan Sri Lanka West Asia Armenia Azerbaijan Bahrain Cyprus Georgia Iraq Jordan Kuwait Lebanon Occupied Palestinian Territory Saudi Arabia Syrian Arab Republic Turkey United Arab Emirates Yemen LATIN AMERICA & THE CARIBBEAN Argentina Bahamas Barbados Belize Bolivia (Plur. State) Brazil Chile Colombia Costa Rica per capita current US$ 2010 % 2008-09 % 2009-10 % 2009* % 2008-2009 US$ 2008 US$ 2009 real growth share of GDP Agriculture value added annual change constant US$ per worker

13 988.7 187.7 138.4 4.6 5.6 39.0 9 400.2 13.0 11.6 6 533.8 706.7 1 007.1 6.3 238.0 6.1 43.0 188.7 222.7 318.9 103.6 2 259.4 15.6 104.9 1.4 1 538.0 357.2 1.9 15.8 174.9 49.7 2 141.5 9.4 54.4 22.7 23.2 11.7 82.2 27.5 131.3 39.2

3 545.5 3 454.9 8 883.0 863.7 740.5 3 939.2 1 380.2 4 667.3 31 238.6 813.8 4 760.3 3 015.4 20 591.0 984.2 8 423.2 2 227.0 702.0 2 007.4 43 116.7 4 991.5 1 173.5 1 328.5 517.2 637.9 1 978.3 1 264.8 4 740.9 5 841.3 561.9 1 049.8 2 435.1 10 479.8 2 845.8 6 008.2 20 474.8 28 237.0 2 658.0 2 563.5 4 499.8 36 412.0 10 044.2 14.2 9.3 3.1 1.7 3.8 4.2 2.3 5.2 8.5 2.6 5.0 4.1 1.0 6.4 0.8 3.1 2.0 7.5 20.7 8.2 0.9 2.1 9.6 8.6 2.9 0.5 5.3 21.5 37 200.0 41 000.0 12.0 2 560.0 3 030.0 2.2 10 100.0 1 920.0 1 870.0 16.3 30.8 5 000.0 1 270.0 5 050.0 1 340.0 20.9 5.8 8.7 6.8 0.1 4.8 4.9 3.4 3.8 8.2 6.0 6.7 10.4 1.0 8.0 4.6 4.8 9.1 32.5 18.7 17.6 17.8 10.2 5.0 33.8 21.6 12.6 15.0 0.3 6.4 6.0 2 710.0 240.0 892.0 903.0 2 230.0 238.0 903.0 926.0 14.0 1.6 5.9 1.1 418.0 495.0 471.0 435.0 486.0 468.0 1.8 2.0 9.2 4.6 0.2 7.6 1.7 1.3 5.1 1.1 0.8 2.3 5.3 4.1 6.0 10.3 6.1 6.1 7.7 7.2 6.1 5.3 7.3 14.5 7.8 6.8 11.6 20.9 0.0 5.9 0.7 35.3 10.3 15.8 2.6 34.7 9.5 23.5 48.4 14.8 0.7 1 210.0 49 900.0 705.0 354.0 708.0 356.0 1 200.0 6.7 11.4 7.5 3.0 1.1 388.0 504.0 706.0 17 700.0 516.0 6 400.0 1 820.0 6 530.0 1 890.0 401.0 525.0 734.0 19 100.0 1.2 2.9 3.9 6.1 8.1 7.0 1.4 6.5 9.2 8.5 6.4 29.2 22.4 12.3 19.5 9.3 0.0 8.9 12.6 1 770.0 1 040.0 525.0 2 680.0 2 440.0 542.0 2 930.0 2 580.0 2 030.0

443.7 59.3 741.9 301.9 31.3 4 832.3 370.3 7.5 4.0 1.4 19.4 2 090.3 203.3 285.5 35.8

16 995.8 2 877.3 10 398.7 59 716.8 1 281.8 8 521.0 9 138.2 21 878.6 14 326.5 4 158.7 1 858.1 10 816.5 11 828.0 6 273.4 7 842.9

0.6 6.0 4.7 3.1 3.9

3.7 3.2 8.2 3.2 8.0

2.9 21.0 9.3 1.8 14.3

27.8 5.0 8.5

19 400.0 4 540.0 3 330.0

20 400.0 4 720.0 3 490.0

0.8 4.3 4.7 0.0 3.4 0.6 1.7 1.5 1.3

9.2 0.5 0.5 2.0 4.2 7.5 5.3 4.3 4.2

7.5 1.6 3.8 12.2 13.8 6.1 3.3 7.5 7.1

23.8

11 800.0

9 990.0

4 730.0 2.2 3.1 5.7 2.9 2.9 723.0 3 840.0 6 570.0 2 860.0 5 460.0

4 480.0 733.0 3 760.0 6 620.0 2 860.0 5 230.0

67

TABLE 11: Macroeconomic environment (continued)

Gross domestic product total current billion US$ 2010 Cuba Dominica Dominican Republic Ecuador El Salvador French Guiana Grenada Guatemala Guyana Haiti Honduras Jamaica Mexico Netherlands Antilles Nicaragua Panama Paraguay Peru St. Kitts & Nevis St. Lucia St. Vincent & Grenadines Suriname Trinidad & Tobago Uruguay Venezuela (Boliv. Rep. of) OCEANIA Fiji French Polynesia New Caledonia Papua New Guinea Samoa Solomon Islands Tonga Vanuatu DEVELOPED REGIONS NORTH AMERICA Bermuda Canada United States of America ASIA & OCEANIA Australia Israel Japan New Zealand EUROPE Albania Belarus Bosnia & Herzegovina Croatia European Union Iceland Macedonia, FYR Montenegro Norway Republic of Moldova Russian Federation Serbia Switzerland Ukraine per capita current US$ 2010 % 2008-09 % 2009-10 % 2009* % 2008-2009 US$ 2008 US$ 2009 real growth share of GDP Agriculture value added annual change constant US$ per worker

5.0 0.4 51.6 58.9 21.7 0.7 41.5 2.2 6.6 15.3 13.7 1 039.1 6.6 26.8 18.5 152.8 0.5 1.0 0.6 3.7 20.6 40.3 290.7 15.3 3.1 11 997.9 9 960.5 1 742.8 3 517.8 3.0 0.1 13.2 4.7 3.7 9.7 0.6 0.7 0.4 0.7 42 292.8 16 231.9 1 574.0 14 657.8 7 048.0 1 235.5 213.1 5 458.9 140.4 19 012.9 11.8 54.7 16.8 60.6 16 282.2 12.6 9.1 4.0 414.5 5.8 1 465.1 38.7 523.8 136.4 84 443.6 1 630.4 10 437.5 5 233.2 67 246.0 2 999.6 1 340.4 3 518.3 2 896.3 34 075.2 47 178.1 0.8 46 214.9 47 283.6 43 647.7 55 589.6 28 685.6 42 820.4 32 145.2 25 867.1 3 676.9 5 800.4 4 318.7 13 720.2 32 606.4 39 025.7 4 431.1 6.9 0.9 5.7 1.4 6.0 7.8 3.1 1.9 14.8 3.5 0.7 1.1 0.4 6.9 4.0 1.8 2.6 4.2 3.3 0.2 3.1 5.8 3.5 7.6 0.8 1.4 20.8 9.6 8.0 6.7 1.5 6.4 11.3 10.0 1.2 10.0 4.7 12.9 1.2 8.2 3.7 7.2 0.8 6.5 6.8 0.8 7.1 1.3 2.5 1.9 12.0 4.5 9.3 1.3 0.8 6.3 2.1 2.7 4.6 3.9 1.5 1.5 5.6 2.5 2.5 2.6 3.1 2.8 1.6 1.2 0.2 1 488.0 5.5 5.1 1.3 0.3 3.5 7.0 0.0 5.6 0.3 2.2 35.9 11.9 38.9 19.6 21.6 6.8 1.7 5.6 1.6 9.6 5 167.4 5 228.2 3 983.8 3 700.8 6 542.6 2 887.6 2 868.1 672.9 2 015.6 5 039.4 9 566.0 1 126.5 7 592.5 2 885.8 5 171.6 9 636.0 5 668.0 5 228.6 6 975.4 0.3 3.5 0.4 3.5 7.6 0.5 3.3 2.9 2.1 3.0 6.1 1.5 3.2 3.8 0.9 9.6 3.6 1.1 3.1 3.5 2.6 3.3 1.0 7.8 3.2 0.7 1.4 2.6 3.6 5.1 2.8 1.1 5.5 4.5 7.5 15.3 8.8 1.5 0.8 2.3 4.4 0.0 8.5 1.9 12.5 6.2 4.3 19.0 5.8 19.3 7.3 2.8 4.9 7.5 4.7 0.4 9.8 4.0 18.6 11.8 7.4 14.7 16.7 10.8 9.2 18.2 1.2 0.4 1.5 1.6 19.5 6.2 6.2 12.5 6.5 12.4 20.6 7.1 1.6 6.7 0.8 18.2 3.3 8.0

3 650.0 6 850.0 3 990.0 2 090.0 2 810.0 2 710.0 2 780.0 3 430.0 1 980.0 2 370.0 3 250.0 2 460.0 4 460.0 2 500.0 1 530.0 1 860.0 1 640.0 2 780.0 3 180.0 1 550.0 8 840.0 8 040.0 2 110.0 1 500.0 9 060.0 7 940.0 1 860.0 7 240.0 4 580.0 1 770.0 2 780.0 2 990.0 2 780.0 3 540.0 1 960.0 2 720.0 3 360.0 2 500.0 4 190.0 1 340.0 1 550.0 1 730.0 1 500.0 2 820.0

663.0 2 120.0 1 980.0 3 560.0 1 930.0

672.0 1 940.0 1 780.0 3 510.0

36 600.0 48 700.0 46 100.0 29 300.0 52 100.0 25 400.0

33 600.0 44 800.0 49 500.0

4 910.0 13 300.0 13 900.0 16 200.0 55 400.0 5 170.0 2 500.0 41 900.0 1 630.0 2 950.0 25 600.0 2 390.0

5 180.0 14 300.0 15 100.0 17 900.0 5 810.0 2 660.0 40 700.0 1 530.0 3 030.0 26 700.0 2 460.0

68

TABLE 12: Prices, trade and debt

Ination USD Exchange rate Real exchange rate change Real interest rate Government debt Merchandise trade exports % 2010 WORLD DEVELOPING REGIONS AFRICA North Africa Algeria Egypt Libya Morocco Tunisia Sub-Saharan Africa Angola Benin Botswana Burkina Faso Burundi Cameroon Cape Verde Central African Republic Chad Comoros Congo Cte dIvoire Congo, Dem. Rep. Djibouti Equatorial Guinea Eritrea Ethiopia Gabon Gambia Ghana Guinea Guinea-Bissau Kenya Lesotho Liberia Madagascar Malawi Mali Mauritania Mauritius Mozambique Namibia Niger Nigeria Rwanda Senegal Seychelles Sierra Leone Somalia Sudan South Africa Swaziland Tanzania, Utd. Rep. Togo Uganda Zambia Zimbabwe per LCU 2010 % 2009 - 2010 % 2009* % of GDP 2010 % of GDP 2010 % 2008 - 2009 Trade performance

imports % 2008 - 2009

terms of trade % 2008 - 2009

42.8

3.9 1.3 11.9 16.2

4.3 11.7 2.4 1.0 4.4 14.5 2.1 7.0 0.4 6.4 1.3 2.1 1.5 1.0 2.7 5.0 1.4 23.5 4.0 7.5 12.7 2.8 0.6 5.0 10.7 15.5 1.1 3.9 3.8 7.3 9.0 6.9 1.2 6.1 2.9 12.7 4.5 0.9 13.7 2.3 1.2 2.4 17.8 13.0 4.3 4.5 10.5 3.2 9.4 8.5 3.0

74.4 5.6 1.3 8.4 1.4 91.9 495.3 6.8 495.3 1 230.7 495.3 83.3 495.3 495.3 371.5 495.3 495.3 177.7 495.3 15.4 14.4 495.3 28.0 1.4 0.0 495.3 79.2 7.3 71.5 2 089.9 150.5 495.3 275.9 30.8 34.0 7.3 495.3 150.3 583.1 495.3 12.1 3 978.1 0.0 2.3 7.3 7.3 1 409.3 495.3 2 177.6 4 797.1 0.0

2.5 1.3 1.6 4.5 5.9 15.9 4.9 5.2 4.9 0.0 4.9 4.9 4.9 4.9 4.8 4.9 4.9

19.2 1.1 57.8 73.8 0.0 49.9 40.4 22.8 20.6 0.4 6.9 31.4 30.6 13.2 27.7 47.5 12.9 80.3 32.8 36.1 5.7 51.9 17.4 67.2 27.0 29.5 58.3 7.5 144.8 36.7 21.3 24.1 57.4 41.2 88.7 47.7 7.6 9.2 6.3 33.8 15.6 50.5 37.7 118.7 35.0 42.9 28.3 85.6 17.5 12.0 4.4 19.1 50.5 32.0 18.5 17.6 16.4 23.9 38.0 10.3 83.0 57.3 68.0 4.1 5.5 7.1 3.8 8.3 35.7 18.5 43.8 28.2 25.4 26.9 56.3

60.1 36.1 73.4 51.2 84.8 75.6 45.7 69.2 36.0 35.2 32.7 48.1 20.9 69.5 30.4 88.7 64.2 63.4 46.2 137.0 29.6 33.5 66.0 43.5 52.1 58.7 41.2 49.8 171.0 80.1 51.1 55.4 52.7 92.6 66.0 60.4 93.6 44.6 52.9 27.2 53.8 163.0 38.7 32.1 47.6 103.0 44.2 80.6 42.3 63.3 91.9

43.1 12.1 47.6 26.1 25.2 43.2 12.6 29.1 7.7 20.4 17.3 4.5 21.4 38.8 27.8 22.0 12.5 19.0 8.7 40.7 0.0 0.9 37.4 7.8 3.3 29.2 7.5 10.5 27.7 38.9 34.2 3.9 5.7 21.9 19.5 19.1 9.6 0.9 38.0 25.2 0.5 13.0 4.8 3.8 36.5 23.0 18.9 13.8 4.4 0.2 15.4 34.1

0.5 7.7 7.0 19.3 22.3 24.9 1.9 9.6 0.3 0.0 2.4 14.2 13.6 16.0 11.5 5.0 10.4 19.6 28.5 38.4 6.0 8.1 20.5 7.4 22.6 29.5 3.3 7.8 6.4 30.7 17.9 8.8 8.2 17.1 20.4 6.1 15.1 4.5 20.0 2.4 27.6 27.5 5.3 17.9 11.1 22.3 12.0 11.2 1.8 4.8 25.1 24.3

32.1 11.7 31.0 3.0 0.8 9.6 32.1 3.6 12.1 2.4 3.8 12.2 23.6 4.1 23.2 9.0 31.0 1.4 22.8 9.4 33.2 4.3 8.0 30.2 2.5 7.9 16.4 0.2 13.8 10.1 7.5 6.0 23.6 17.9 1.3 6.7 9.9 5.8 5.6 31.0 6.1 5.5 14.7 21.7 1.0 33.0 3.8 13.5 12.0 5.9 13.2 8.8 8.1

0.0 4.9 0.0 11.0 4.9 2.3 1.4 4.9 2.3 13.6 4.7 6.6 6.4 4.9 0.4 3.8 23.6 13.6 4.9 0.0 2.5 4.9 11.0 15.0 3.0 13.6 13.6 6.8 4.9 0.0 5.0

69

TABLE 12: Prices, trade and debt (continued)

Ination USD Exchange rate Real exchange rate change Real interest rate Government debt Merchandise trade exports % 2010 ASIA Central Asia Kazakhstan Kyrgyzstan Tajikistan Turkmenistan Uzbekistan East Asia Brunei Darussalam Cambodia China Indonesia Korea, DPR Korea, Republic of Lao, PDR Malaysia Mongolia Myanmar Philippines Singapore Thailand Viet Nam South Asia Afghanistan Bangladesh Bhutan India Iran (Islamic Rep.) Maldives Nepal Pakistan Sri Lanka West Asia Armenia Azerbaijan Bahrain Cyprus Georgia Iraq Jordan Kuwait Lebanon Occupied Palestinian Territory Saudi Arabia Syrian Arab Republic Turkey United Arab Emirates Yemen LATIN AMERICA & THE CARIBBEAN Argentina Bahamas Barbados Belize Bolivia (Plur. State) Brazil Chile Colombia Costa Rica per LCU 2010 % 2009 - 2010 % 2009* % of GDP 2010 % of GDP 2010 % 2008 - 2009 Trade performance

imports % 2008 - 2009

terms of trade % 2008 - 2009

1.3 7.4 7.8 6.5 4.4 9.4 0.5 4.0 3.3 5.1 3.0 5.4 1.7 10.2 7.3 3.8 2.8 3.3 9.2 8.0 8.2 7.1 13.2 12.5 5.0 9.3 11.7 5.9 8.2 5.7 2.0 2.6 7.1 5.1 5.0 4.1 4.5 9 090.4 1 156.1 8 258.8 3.2 1 357.1 5.6 45.1 1.4 31.7 18 612.9 46.5 69.6 45.7 45.7 10 254.2 12.8 73.2 85.2 113.1 373.7 0.8 0.4 0.0 1.8 1 170.0 0.7 0.3 1 507.5 6.6 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 3.5 28.1 61.5 1.1 12.5 9.4 1.8 8.5 5.6 1.3 5.5 6.2 7.6 8.2 7.2 0.9 5.6 5.6 4.5 0.0 5.5 4.3 1.7 3.0 0.1 0.0 4.3 11.3 6.2 3.6 4.6 9.5 17.1 44.2 39.4 10.8 32.0 61.7 39.1 112.3 60.5 10.5 136.7 69.2 12.0 65.3 35.5 56.8 5.9 7.4 3.9 3.8 36.1 7.6 12.6 21.3 43.0 47.3 97.2 44.1 52.8 52.3 283.0 109.0 131.0 31.3 41.3 80.3 29.9 38.8 77.1 41.5 30.5 41.8 45.9 64.2 93.1 36.1 51.3 116.0 81.5 75.9 60.1 30.4 16.1 42.2 5.9 4.1 13.4 27.9 1.1 30.5 1.7 33.0 7.9 31.4 32.6 14.9 147.4 46.0 4.4 0.0 0.0 1.4 4 184.9 6.2 1.4 6.0 5.6 2.2 0.0 7.2 5.8 20.5 8.5 11.4 63.0 36.7 7.4 10.0 0.0 30.3 17.7 26.9 30.9 60.5 54.2 62.1 97.8 71.9 66.9 61.5 6.2 81.2 99.5 44.3 39.1 82.5 37.0 146.0 96.0 33.7 12.4 15.9 19.0 24.7 14.3 4.9 24.9 25.1 3.1 22.3 20.0 12.0 10.9 25.2 2.1 4.6 16.3 29.9 50.8 5.9 13.8 13.5 24.8 17.6 11.3 28.3 42.5 25.8 5.3 24.9 41.0 2.2 23.9 23.1 24.6 16.3 10.5 8.2 1.9 22.3 16.6 30.3 5.1 25.4 30.2 31.3 5.3 7.6 2.8 9.7 10.1 6.3 4.1 7.1 2.5 6.4 0.6 3.0 3.0 3.5 7.7 8.4 8.4 0.6 29.0 31.7 5.8 10.1 13.6 15.8

5.4 4.4 8.6 0.9 12.1

3.8 11.2 1.5 3.7 219.6

0.0 0.0 3.2 0.0 8.9 23.1 19.0

10.8 27.5 41.7 21.0 40.6

76.6 51.2 39.5 137.0 53.5

44.0 17.2 22.5 26.9 34.5

24.1 14.4 30.2 18.0 27.8

34.1 2.1 4.2 22.9 24.0 4.2

10.5 1.7 5.1 0.5 2.5 5.0 1.5 2.3 5.7

3.9 1.0 2.0 2.0 7.0 1.8 510.2 1 898.6 525.8

5.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 12.0 9.1 12.4 7.9

5.2

47.8 47.1 113.7

30.7 52.0 50.8 67.8 53.4 18.0 58.8 28.1 69.0

20.5 30.1 16.3 14.6 25.2 22.6 22.0 14.3 9.1

32.0 20.1 22.1 20.6 12.1 26.7 32.9 16.4 25.7

5.3 1.0 5.2 4.7 4.9 1.8 1.2 17.4 6.7

14.5 15.1 36.8 2.9 7.7 9.9

81.7 37.4 66.1 8.8 36.5 39.4

70

TABLE 12: Prices, trade and debt (continued)

Ination USD Exchange rate Real exchange rate change Real interest rate Government debt Merchandise trade exports % 2010 Cuba Dominica Dominican Republic Ecuador El Salvador French Guiana Grenada Guatemala Guyana Haiti Honduras Jamaica Mexico Netherlands Antilles Nicaragua Panama Paraguay Peru St. Kitts & Nevis St. Lucia St. Vincent & Grenadines Suriname Trinidad & Tobago Uruguay Venezuela (Boliv. Rep. of) OCEANIA Fiji French Polynesia New Caledonia Papua New Guinea Samoa Solomon Islands Tonga Vanuatu DEVELOPED REGIONS NORTH AMERICA Bermuda Canada United States of America ASIA & OCEANIA Australia Israel Japan New Zealand EUROPE Albania Belarus Bosnia & Herzegovina Croatia European Union Iceland Macedonia, FYR Montenegro Norway Republic of Moldova Russian Federation Serbia Switzerland Ukraine per LCU 2010 % 2009 - 2010 % 2009* % of GDP 2010 % of GDP 2010 % 2008 - 2009 Trade performance

imports % 2008 - 2009

terms of trade % 2008 - 2009

30.9 2.9 6.3 3.5 1.2 5.0 3.9 3.7 4.1 4.7 12.6 4.2 5.5 3.5 4.7 1.5 2.5 1.8 1.5 6.9 10.7 6.7 28.2 5.4 2.7 36.9 0.0 8.8 2.7 8.1 203.6 39.8 18.9 87.2 12.6 1.8 21.4 1.0 4 735.5 2.8 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7 6.4 20.1 2.6 1.9 0.0 0.0 6.6 0.2 1.0 4.0 2.8 2.7 2.5 8.1 1.9 96.9 1.4 8.8 0.0 5.9 7.5 14.2 10.3 6.6 13.8 1.4 25.8 0.0 0.0 1.2 0.0 3.6 0.0 0.7 6.7 0.0 5.4 0.0 4.4 6.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.6 11.1 20.5 2.0 32.8 8.9 10.6 7.5 2.0 4.0 28.4 17.5 4.6 10.9 6.0 82.3 40.9 15.0 24.3 200.4 77.2 82.2 21.6 39.8 55.3 38.7 55.9 12.0 11.2 13.1 13.3 14.4 9.3 2.7 0.0 2.5 8.2 14.7 85.5 29.0 20.4 50.8 114.6 24.0 61.3 15.7 26.3 139.7 42.7 66.0 37.9 50.5 52.4 49.6 50.2 95.0 40.5 90.7 52.9 53.9 336.0 79.3 35.4 71.0 37.3 58.7 73.1 65.7 100.0 75.8 39.0 30.1 75.0 34.6 57.0 95.4 43.5 66.0 51.1 54.3

21.5 14.5 21.3 25.5 16.8 5.5 6.3 3.8 20.7 37.8 45.7 21.1 25.6 6.5 24.1 29.0 14.7 9.7 0.8 5.8 16.9 50.9 15.7 39.4 32.0 24.4 31.1 31.8 36.2 22.3 4.9 2.3

37.4 5.4 23.1 19.1 25.4 22.4 20.6 11.5 8.1 45.5 40.2 24.2 15.0 20.8 13.8 23.2 30.0 6.2 17.8 10.8 10.9 27.6 30.6 22.2 36.4 21.1 21.6 1.9 19.7 27.4 5.1 6.9 6.6 3.4 11.3 7.8 6.5 6.8 18.1 13.7 6.8 8.2 1.9 6.4 11.6 7.6 1.9 5.8 3.5 6.5 0.0 1.9 16.6 4.7 24.9 3.0 22.0 8.3 3.2 4.7 10.3 1.0 19.0 14.3 6.6 6.2

0.0 1.8 1.6 2.8 2.7 0.7 2.3 3.6 7.7 2.1 1.0 5.4 1.5 0.5 2.4 7.4 6.9 6.2 0.7 9.4 1.0 7.9 6.0 12.4 30.4 1.0 1.0 1.1 3.7 87.8 1.4 103.9 2 978.5 1.5 5.5 122.2 46.5 9.6 0.0 14.8 4.8 6.2 13.1 9.5 6.8 5.0 4.2 1.6 5.4 4.9 4.0 11.7 4.1 14.9 4.6 1.9 4.6 2.3 1.0 1.4 2.7 8.6 10.1 7.5 8.0 8.0 9.6 7.1 6.8 8.7 18.1 12.5 1.6 2.5 6.6 84.0 91.6 22.3 77.9 220.3 31.6 59.7 22.4 36.9 40.0 96.6 24.8 44.1 54.3 29.8 9.9 44.0 55.0 40.5

19.0 48.4 18.8 34.6 49.8 22.3 39.8 46.9 102.0 74.5 50.3 56.3 62.8 83.9 59.3 49.8 84.5 40.2 55.7 66.8 75.0 12.3 13.8 7.6 29.6 21.6 17.8 22.1 38.5 3.7 11.1 34.7 27.5 11.0 29.9 18.7 23.4 19.4 27.5 18.4 22.4 26.2 17.0 27.3 29.4 25.7 9.4 7.8 14.5 6.9 10.9 20.0 8.3 3.2

71

PART 1

Denitions and sources

Agricultural population

Death rate, crude (per 1000 people)

P1.DEM.UN.WPP.MOR.CDR
Page: table 2 (p. 41). Crude death rate indicates the number of deaths occurring during the year, per 1000 population estimated at midyear. Subtracting the crude death rate from the crude birth rate provides the rate of natural increase, which is equal to the rate of population change in the absence of migration. Source: World Bank (WDI) Owner: UNPD World Population Prospects 2010 Life expectancy at birth, total (years)

P1.DEM.FAO.POP.AGR
Page: table 1 (p. 38). Agricultural population is dened as all persons depending for their livelihood on agriculture, hunting, shing and forestry. It comprises all persons economically active in agriculture as well as their non-working dependents. It is not necessary that this referred population exclusively come from rural population. Source: Statistics Division (FAOSTAT) Owner: FAO Contraceptive prevalence (% of women ages 15-49)

P1.DEM.UN.WPP.MOR.EXP
Page: table 2 (p. 41). Life expectancy at birth indicates the number of years a newborn infant would live if prevailing patterns of mortality at the time of its birth were to stay the same throughout its life. Source: World Bank (WDI) Owner: UNPD World Population Prospects 2010 Infant mortality rate

P1.DEM.UN.WPP.FER.CON
Page: table 2 (p. 41). Contraceptive prevalence rate is the percentage of women who are practicing, or whose sexual partners are practicing, any form of contraception. It is usually measured for married women ages 15-49 only. Source: World Bank (WDI) Owner: UNICEF Fertility rate

P1.DEM.UN.WPP.MOR.IMR
Page: table 2 (p. 41). Infant mortality rate is the number of infants dying before reaching one year of age, per 1000 live births in a given year. Source: World Bank (WDI) Owner: UNICEF, WHO, World Bank and UNPD Population age structure

P1.DEM.UN.WPP.FER.TOT
Page: table 2 (p. 41), chart 1 (p. 9). Total fertility rate represents the number of children that would be born to a woman if she were to live to the end of her childbearing years and bear children in accordance with current age-specic fertility rates. Source: World Bank (WDI) Owner: UNPD World Population Prospects 2010 Net migration

P1.DEM.UN.WPP.POP.AGE
Page: table 1 (p. 38), chart 5 (p. 11). Population is based on the de facto denition of population. Young population refers to people between 0 and 14, while old population refers to people 65 and above. Source: World Bank (WDI) Owner: World Bank Population density

P1.DEM.UN.WPP.MIG.NET
Page: table 2 (p. 41). Net migration is the net total of migrants during the period, that is, the total number of immigrants less the annual number of emigrants, including both citizens and noncitizens. Data are ve-year estimates. To derive estimates of net migration, the United Nations Population Division takes into account the past migration history of a country or area, the migration policy of a country, and the inux of refugees in recent periods. The data to calculate these ofcial estimates come from a variety of sources, including border statistics, administrative records, surveys, and censuses. When no ofcial estimates can be made because of insufcient data, net migration is derived through the balance equation, which is the difference between overall population growth and the natural increase during the 1990-2000 intercensal period. Source: World Bank (WDI) Owner: UNPD World Population Prospects 2010

P1.DEM.UN.WPP.POP.DEN
Page: table 2 (p. 41), map 2 (p. 11). Population density is midyear population divided by land area in square kilometres. Population is based on the de facto denition of population, which counts all residents regardless of legal status or citizenshipexcept for refugees not permanently settled in the country of asylum, who are generally considered part of the population of their country of origin. Land area is a countrys total area, excluding area under inland water bodies, national claims to continental shelf, and exclusive economic zones. In most cases the denition of inland water bodies includes major rivers and lakes. Source: World Bank (WDI) Owner: FAO and World Bank

72

DEFINITIONS AND SOURCES

Population, total

Real effective exchange rate index

P1.DEM.UN.WPP.POP.TOT
Page: table 1 (p. 38), chart 2 (p. 10), map 1 (p. 8). Total population is based on the de facto denition of population, which counts all residents regardless of legal status or citizenshipexcept for refugees not permanently settled in the country of asylum, who are generally considered part of the population of their country of origin. The values shown are midyear estimates. Source: World Bank (WDI) Owner: UNPD World Population Prospects 2010

P1.MAC.IMF.IFS.EXR.REEXR
Page: table 12 (p. 71). Real effective exchange rate is the nominal effective exchange rate (a measure of the value of a currency against a weighted average of several foreign currencies) divided by a price deator or index of costs. Source: International Financial Statistics Owner: IMF GDP (current US$)

Population of Urban Agglomerations with 750 000 or more Inhabitants

P1.MAC.IMF.WEO.GDP.NOM
Page: table 11 (p. 68). GDP at purchasers prices is the sum of gross value added by all resident producers in the economy plus any product taxes and minus any subsidies not included in the value of the products. It is calculated without making deductions for depreciation of fabricated assets or for depletion and degradation of natural resources. Data are in current US dollars. Dollar gures for GDP are converted from domestic currencies using single year ofcial exchange rates. For a few countries where the ofcial exchange rate does not reect the rate effectively applied to actual foreign exchange transactions, an alternative conversion factor is used. Source: World Bank (WDI) Owner: IMF, World Bank and OECD GDP per capita (current US$)

P1.DEM.UN.WUP.POP.750
Page: chart 96 (p. 215). Population in urban agglomerations of more than one million is the countrys population living in metropolitan areas that in 2009 had a population of more than one million people. Source: World Bank (WDI) Owner: UNPD World Urbanization Prospects 2009 Rural population

P1.DEM.UN.WUP.POP.RUR
Page: table 2 (p. 41), chart 4 (p. 11). Rural population refers to people living in rural areas as dened by national statistical ofces. It is calculated as the difference between total population and urban population. Source: World Bank (WDI) Owner: UNPD World Population Prospects 2010 Urban population

P1.MAC.IMF.WEO.GDP.NPC
Page: table 11 (p. 68). GDP per capita is gross domestic product divided by midyear population. GDP is the sum of gross value added by all resident producers in the economy plus any product taxes and minus any subsidies not included in the value of the products. It is calculated without making deductions for depreciation of fabricated assets or for depletion and degradation of natural resources. Data are in current US dollars. Source: World Bank (WDI) Owner: IMF, World Bank and OECD Real growth rate in GDP

P1.DEM.UN.WUP.POP.URB
Page: table 2 (p. 41), chart 3, 4 (p. 10, 11), map 52 (p. 214). Urban population refers to people living in urban areas as dened by national statistical ofces. It is calculated using World Bank population estimates and urban ratios from the United Nations World Urbanization Prospects. Source: World Bank (WDI) Owner: UNPD World Population Prospects 2010 US$ Exchange rate

P1.MAC.IMF.WEO.GDP.RGR
Page: table 11 (p. 68), map 14 (p. 35). Annual percentages of constant price GDP are yearon-year changes; the base year is country-specic. Expenditure-based GDP is total nal expenditures at purchasers prices (including the f.o.b. value of exports of goods and services), less the f.o.b. value of imports of goods and services. Source: World Economic Outlook Owner: IMF

P1.MAC.IMF.IFS.EXR.AVE
Page: table 12 (p. 71). Ofcial exchange rate refers to the exchange rate determined by national authorities or to the rate determined in the legally sanctioned exchange market. It is calculated as an annual average based on monthly averages (local currency units relative to the US dollar). Source: International Financial Statistics Owner: IMF

73

PART 1

Central government debt, total (% of GDP)

Agriculture value added per worker (constant 2000 US$)

P1.MAC.IMF.WEO.GOV.DBT
Page: table 12 (p. 71). Debt is the entire stock of direct government xed-term contractual obligations to others outstanding on a particular date. It includes domestic and foreign liabilities such as currency and money deposits, securities other than shares, and loans. It is the gross amount of government liabilities reduced by the amount of equity and nancial derivatives held by the government. Because debt is a stock rather than a ow, it is measured as of a given date, usually the last day of the scal year. Source: World Bank (WDI) Owner: IMF, World Bank and OECD Ination, consumer prices (annual %)

P1.MAC.WBK.WDI.AGV.PWK
Page: table 11 (p. 68), chart 26 (p. 33). Agriculture value added per worker is a measure of agricultural productivity. Value added in agriculture measures the output of the agricultural sector (ISIC divisions 1-5) less the value of intermediate inputs. Agriculture comprises value added from forestry, hunting, and shing as well as cultivation of crops and livestock production. Data are in constant 2000 US dollars. Source: World Bank (WDI) Owner: World Bank and FAO Real interest rate (%)

P1.MAC.WBK.WDI.INT.RL
Page: table 12 (p. 71). Real interest rate is the lending interest rate adjusted for ination as measured by the GDP deator. Source: World Bank (WDI) Owner: IMF and World Bank Merchandise trade (% of GDP)

P1.MAC.IMF.WEO.INF.PER
Page: table 12 (p. 71), map 15 (p. 35). Ination as measured by the consumer price index reects the annual percentage change in the cost to the average consumer of acquiring a basket of goods and services that may be xed or changed at specied intervals, such as yearly. The Laspeyres formula is generally used. Source: World Bank (WDI) Owner: IMF Price-adjusted major currencies US Dollar Index

P1.MAC.WBK.WDI.MCH.GDP
Page: table 12 (p. 71), chart 28 (p. 34). Merchandise trade as a share of GDP is the sum of merchandise exports and imports divided by the value of GDP, all in current US dollars. Source: World Bank (WDI) Owner: WTO and World Bank Import value index (2000 = 100)

P1.MAC.USA.FR.EXR.MAJ
Page: chart 27 (p. 34). The major currencies index is a trade-weighted average of the foreign exchange values of the US dollar against currencies that circulate widely outside the country of issue. These are the euro, Canadian dollar, Japanese yen, British pound, Swiss franc, Australian dollar, and Swedish kroner. The base year for the index is 2003. Source: United States Federal Reserve Owner: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System Agriculture, value added (% of GDP)

P1.MAC.WBK.WDI.MVAL.IX
Page: table 12 (p. 71). Import value indexes are the current value of imports (c.i.f.) converted to US dollars and expressed as a percentage of the average for the base period (2000). UNCTADs import value indexes are reported for most economies. For selected economies for which UNCTAD does not publish data, the import value indexes are derived from import volume indexes (line 73) and corresponding unit value indexes of imports (line 75) in the IMFs International Financial Statistics. Source: World Bank (WDI) Owner: UNCTAD and IMF Net barter terms of trade index (2000 = 100)

P1.MAC.WBK.WDI.AGV.GDP
Page: table 11 (p. 68), map 13 (p. 32). Agriculture corresponds to ISIC divisions 1-5 and includes forestry, hunting, and shing, as well as cultivation of crops and livestock production. Value added is the net output of a sector after adding up all outputs and subtracting intermediate inputs. It is calculated without making deductions for depreciation of fabricated assets or depletion and degradation of natural resources. The origin of value added is determined by the International Standard Industrial Classication (ISIC), revision 3. Note: For VAB countries, gross value added at factor cost is used as the denominator. Source: World Bank (WDI) Owner: World Bank and OECD

P1.MAC.WBK.WDI.TOT.IX
Page: table 12 (p. 71). Net barter terms of trade index is calculated as the percentage ratio of the export unit value indexes to the import unit value indexes, measured relative to the base year 2000. Unit value indexes are based on data reported by countries that demonstrate consistency under UNCTAD quality controls, supplemented by UNCTADs estimates using the previous years trade values at the Standard International Trade Classication three-digit level as weights. To improve data coverage, especially for the

74

DEFINITIONS AND SOURCES

latest periods, UNCTAD constructs a set of average prices indexes at the three-digit product classication of the Standard International Trade Classication revision 3 using UNCTADs Commodity Price Statistics, international and national sources, and UNCTAD secretariat estimates and calculates unit value indexes at the country level using the current years trade values as weights. Source: World Bank (WDI) Owner: UNCTAD and IMF Export value index (2000 = 100)

Arable and permanent cropland

P1.RES.FAO.ESS.LDAQ.ARPCL
Page: chart 8 (p. 16). See arable land and cropland denitions. Source: Statistics Division (FAOSTAT) Owner: FAO Total land area

P1.RES.FAO.ESS.LDAQ.LAND
Page: table 3 (p. 44). Land area is the total area of the country excluding area under inland water bodies. Possible variations in the data may be due to updating and revisions of the country data and not necessarily to any change of area. Data are expressed in 1000 hectares. Source: Statistics Division (FAOSTAT) Owner: FAO Agricultural area

P1.MAC.WBK.WDI.XVAL.IX
Page: table 12 (p. 71). Export values are the current value of exports (f.o.b.) converted to US dollars and expressed as a percentage of the average for the base period (2000). UNCTADs export value indexes are reported for most economies. For selected economies for which UNCTAD does not publish data, the export value indexes are derived from export volume indexes (line 72) and corresponding unit value indexes of exports (line 74) in the IMFs International Financial Statistics. Source: World Bank (WDI) Owner: UNCTAD and IMF Share of components in capital stock

P1.RES.FAO.ESS.LDAQ.LDAG
Page: table 3 (p. 44). Agricultural area, this category is the sum of areas under a) arable land - land under temporary agricultural crops (multiple-cropped areas are counted only once), temporary meadows for mowing or pasture, land under market and kitchen gardens and land temporarily fallow (less than ve years). The abandoned land resulting from shifting cultivation is not included in this category. Data for "Arable land" are not meant to indicate the amount of land that is potentially cultivable; (b) permanent crops land cultivated with long-term crops which do not have to be replanted for several years (such as cocoa and coffee); land under trees and shrubs producing owers, such as roses and jasmine; and nurseries (except those for forest trees, which should be classied under "forest"); and (c) permanent meadows and pastures - land used permanently (ve years or more) to grow herbaceous forage crops, either cultivated or growing wild (wild prairie or grazing land). Data are expressed in 1000 hectares. Source: Statistics Division (FAOSTAT) Owner: FAO Permanent cropland

P1.RES.FAO.ESS.CAP.STK
Page: table 7, 8 (p. 56, 59), chart 17, 20 (p. 23, 25), map 8 (p. 22). The estimate of capital stock in agriculture refers to a value that is attached to the total physical capital capacity available for repeated use in the production of other goods, in existence at specic point in time in the economy of agriculture sector. The estimates of investment in agriculture have indirectly been derived by the FAO Statistics Division using physical data on livestock, tractors, irrigated land and land under permanent crops etc., and the average prices for the year 1995. These data enabled the derivation of the capital stock in agriculture which is the gross, and the annual change in the latter is taken to reect investment in agriculture. Source: Statistics Division (FAOSTAT) Owner: FAO Arable land

P1.RES.FAO.ESS.LDAQ.ARL
Page: table 3 (p. 44), chart 7 (p. 15), map 4 (p. 14). Arable land is the land under temporary agricultural crops (multiple-cropped areas are counted only once), temporary meadows for mowing or pasture, land under market and kitchen gardens and land temporarily fallow (less than ve years). The abandoned land resulting from shifting cultivation is not included in this category. Data for "Arable land" are not meant to indicate the amount of land that is potentially cultivable. Data are expressed in 1000 hectares. Source: Statistics Division (FAOSTAT) Owner: FAO

P1.RES.FAO.ESS.LDAQ.PCL
Page: table 3 (p. 44). Permanent crops is the land cultivated with long-term crops which do not have to be replanted for several years (such as cocoa and coffee); land under trees and shrubs producing owers, such as roses and jasmine; and nurseries (except those for forest trees, which should be classied under "forest"). Permanent meadows and pastures are excluded from land under permanent crops. Data are expressed in 1000 hectares. Source: Statistics Division (FAOSTAT) Owner: FAO

75

PART 1

Pasture land

Irrigation potential

P1.RES.FAO.ESS.LDAQ.PSTL
Page: table 3 (p. 44), chart 8 (p. 16). Permanent meadows and pastures is the land used permanently (ve years or more) to grow herbaceous forage crops, either cultivated or growing wild (wild prairie or grazing land). Data are expressed in 1000 hectares. Source: Statistics Division (FAOSTAT) Owner: FAO

P1.RES.FAO.NRL.IP
Page: table 4 (p. 47). Area of land which is potentially irrigable. Country/regional studies assess this value according to different methods. For example, some consider only land resources, others consider land resources plus water availability, others include economical aspects in their assessments (such as distance and/or difference in elevation between the suitable land and the available water) or environmental aspects, etc. If available, this information is given in the individual country proles. The gure includes the area already under agricultural water management . Source: Land and Water Division (AQUASTAT) Owner: FAO

Pesticide consumption

P1.RES.FAO.ESS.PES.TON
Page: table 10 (p. 65). Data refer to quantities of pesticides applied to crops and seeds in the agriculture sector. Figures are generally expressed in terms of active ingredients. Data are expressed in tonnes (t). However, due to some country reporting practices, the data may be reported by: consumption in formulated product (including diluents and adjuvants); sales; distribution or imports for use in the agricultural sector. In these cases it is specied in the country notes. Source: Statistics Division (FAOSTAT) Owner: FAO

Total area equipped for irrigation

P1.RES.FAO.NRL.TAEI
Page: table 4 (p. 47), chart 11 (p. 17). Area equipped to provide water (via irrigation) to crops. It includes areas equipped for full/partial control irrigation, equipped lowland areas, and areas equipped for spate irrigation. Source: Land and Water Division (AQUASTAT) Owner: FAO

Arable land potential

P1.RES.FAO.LAN.ALP
Page: chart 9 (p. 16). Calculations based on Bruinsma (2011). Source: Agricultural Development Economics Division Owner: FAO Water resources, renewable per capita

P1.RES.FAO.NRL.WTRpc
Page: table 4 (p. 47), chart 10 (p. 17), map 5 (p. 17). Total annual internal renewable water resources per inhabitant. Source: Land and Water Division (AQUASTAT) Owner: FAO

Area equipped for irrigation, actually irrigated

P1.RES.FAO.NRL.EAAI
Page: table 4 (p. 47). Percent of area equipped for irrigation that is actually irrigated in any given year, expressed in percentage. Irrigated land that is cultivated more than once a year is counted only once. Source: Land and Water Division (AQUASTAT) Owner: FAO

Electricity access

P1.RES.IEA.WEO.ELEC.AC
Page: chart 23 (p. 30). There is no single internationally-accepted denition for electricity access. The denition used covers electricity access at the household level, that is, the number of people who have electricity in their home. It comprises electricity sold commercially, both on-grid and off-grid. It also includes self-generated electricity for those countries where access to electricity has been assessed through surveys by government or government agencies. The data does not capture unauthorised connections. The national, urban and rural electrication rates shown indicate the number of people with electricity access as a percentage of the total population. Source: World Energy Outlook 2010 Owner: IEA

Area equipped for irrigation, irrigated by groundwater

P1.RES.FAO.NRL.EAIG
Page: table 4 (p. 47). Area equipped to provide water (via irrigation) to crops that is irrigated from wells (shallow wells and deep tube wells) or springs. Source: Land and Water Division (AQUASTAT) Owner: FAO

76

DEFINITIONS AND SOURCES

Share of male and female agricultural holders in developing regions

P1.RES.ILO.GEND.HLD
Page: chart 6 (p. 13). Number of women land holders in relation to the total number of holdings. Source: Gender and Land Rights Database Owner: FAO Female share of the agricultural labour force

P1.RES.ILO.LAB.GEND
Page: map 3 (p. 12). The female share of the agricultural labour force is calculated as the total number of women economically active in agriculture divided by the total population economically active in agriculture. Regional averages are weighted by population. Source: Statistics Division (FAOSTAT) Owner: FAO Lead time to export, median case (days)

per unit of arable land. Fertilizer products cover nitrogenous, potash, and phosphate fertilizers (including ground rock phosphate). Traditional nutrientsanimal and plant manuresare not included. For the purpose of data dissemination, FAO has adopted the concept of a calendar year (January to December). Some countries compile fertilizer data on a calendar year basis, while others are on a split-year basis. Arable land includes land dened by the FAO as land under temporary crops (double-cropped areas are counted once), temporary meadows for mowing or for pasture, land under market or kitchen gardens, and land temporarily fallow. Land abandoned as a result of shifting cultivation is excluded. Source: Statistics Division (FAOSTAT) Owner: FAO Gross capital formation (% of GDP)

P1.RES.WBK.WDI.GCF.GDP
Page: table 9 (p. 62), chart 18 (p. 24). Gross capital formation (formerly gross domestic investment) consists of outlays on additions to the xed assets of the economy plus net changes in the level of inventories. Fixed assets include land improvements (fences, ditches, drains, and so on); plant, machinery, and equipment purchases; and the construction of roads, railways, and the like, including schools, ofces, hospitals, private residential dwellings, and commercial and industrial buildings. Inventories are stocks of goods held by rms to meet temporary or unexpected uctuations in production or sales, and "work in progress." According to the 1993 UN System of National Accounts (SNA), net acquisitions of valuables are also considered capital formation. Source: World Bank (WDI) Owner: World Bank and OECD Lead time to import, median case (days)

P1.RES.WBK.WDI.EXP.DAY
Page: table 10 (p. 65), chart 25 (p. 31). Lead time to export is the median time (the value for 50 percent of shipments) from shipment point to port of loading. Data are from the Logistics Performance Index survey. Respondents provided separate values for the best case (10 percent of shipments) and the median case (50 percent of shipments). The data are exponentiated averages of the logarithm of single value responses and of midpoint values of range responses for the median case. Source: World Bank (WDI) Owner: World Bank Foreign direct investment, net inows (BoP, current US$)

P1.RES.WBK.WDI.FDI.INF
Page: table 9 (p. 62), chart 19 (p. 24). Foreign direct investment are the net inows of investment to acquire a lasting management interest (10 percent or more of voting stock) in an enterprise operating in an economy other than that of the investor. It is the sum of equity capital, reinvestment of earnings, other long-term capital, and short-term capital as shown in the balance of payments. This series shows net inows (new investment inows less disinvestment) in the reporting economy from foreign investors. Data are in current US dollars. Source: World Bank (WDI) Owner: IMF and UNCTAD

P1.RES.WBK.WDI.IMP.DAY
Page: table 10 (p. 65), chart 25 (p. 31). Lead time to import is the median time (the value for 50 percent of shipments) from port of discharge to arrival at the consignee. Data are from the Logistics Performance Index survey. Respondents provided separate values for the best case (10 percent of shipments) and the median case (50 percent of shipments). The data are exponentiated averages of the logarithm of single value responses and of midpoint values of range responses for the median case. Source: World Bank (WDI) Owner: World Bank Quality of infrastructure score

Fertilizer consumption (kilograms per hectare of arable land)

P1.RES.WBK.WDI.INF.IX
Page: table 10 (p. 65), chart 22 (p. 29), map 11 (p. 28). Quality of infrastructure refers to the World banks Logistics Performance Index. The overall score reects perceptions of a countrys logistics based on efciency of customs clearance process, quality of trade- and

P1.RES.WBK.WDI.FER.HA
Page: table 10 (p. 65), map 10 (p. 26). Fertilizer consumption (100 grams per hectare of arable land) measures the quantity of plant nutrients used

77

PART 1

transport-related infrastructure, ease of arranging competitively priced shipments, quality of logistics services, ability to track and trace consignments, and frequency with which shipments reach the consignee within the scheduled time. The index ranges from 1 to 5, with a higher score representing better performance. Data are from Logistics . Source: World Bank (WDI) Owner: World Bank Employees, agriculture, female (% of female employment)

categories A and B (ISIC revision 3) and includes hunting, forestry, and shing. Source: World Bank (WDI) Owner: ILO Regional employment in agriculture (% of total employment)

P1.RES.WBK.WDI.LAB.EATx
Page: chart 12, 15 (p. 19, 21). Regional employment in agriculture. Employees are people who work for a public or private employer and receive remuneration in wages, salary, commission, tips, piece rates, or pay in kind. Agriculture corresponds to division 1 (ISIC revision 2) or tabulation categories A and B (ISIC revision 3) and includes hunting, forestry, and shing. Source: Key Indicators of the Labour Market (KILM) 7th edition Owner: ILO Employment in industry (% of total employment)

P1.RES.WBK.WDI.LAB.AGRF
Page: table 5 (p. 50). Employees are people who work for a public or private employer and receive remuneration in wages, salary, commission, tips, piece rates, or pay in kind. Agriculture corresponds to division 1 (ISIC revision 2) or tabulation categories A and B (ISIC revision 3) and includes hunting, forestry, and shing. Source: World Bank (WDI) Owner: ILO Employees, agriculture, male (% of male employment)

P1.RES.WBK.WDI.LAB.EITx
Page: chart 15 (p. 21). Regional employment in industry. Employees are people who work for a public or private employer and receive remuneration in wages, salary, commission, tips, piece rates, or pay in kind. Industry corresponds to divisions 2-5 (ISIC revision 2) or tabulation categories C-F (ISIC revision 3) and includes mining and quarrying (including oil production), manufacturing, construction, and public utilities (electricity, gas, and water). Source: World Bank (WDI) Owner: ILO Share of employment in industry

P1.RES.WBK.WDI.LAB.AGRM
Page: table 5 (p. 50). Employees are people who work for a public or private employer and receive remuneration in wages, salary, commission, tips, piece rates, or pay in kind. Agriculture corresponds to division 1 (ISIC revision 2) or tabulation categories A and B (ISIC revision 3) and includes hunting, forestry, and shing. Source: World Bank (WDI) Owner: ILO Economically active children, total (% of children ages 7-14)

P1.RES.WBK.WDI.LAB.EMP
Page: table 5 (p. 50). Employees are people who work for a public or private employer and receive remuneration in wages, salary, commission, tips, piece rates, or pay in kind. Industry corresponds to divisions 2-5 (ISIC revision 2) or tabulation categories C-F (ISIC revision 3) and includes mining and quarrying (including oil production), manufacturing, construction, and public utilities (electricity, gas, and water). Source: Key Indicators of the Labour Market (KILM) 7th edition Owner: ILO Employment to population ratio, 15+, female (%)

P1.RES.WBK.WDI.LAB.CHLD
Page: table 6 (p. 53). Economically active children refer to children involved in economic activity for at least one hour in the reference week of the survey. A child is dened as any person under 18 years of age. Child labour is dened based on a childs age, hours and conditions of work, activities performed and the hazards involved. Child labour is work that interferes with compulsory schooling and damages health and personal development. Source: World Bank (WDI) Owner: ILO, UNICEF and World Bank Employment in agriculture (% of total employment)

P1.RES.WBK.WDI.LAB.EPRF
Page: table 6 (p. 53), chart 14 (p. 20). Employment to population ratio is the proportion of a countrys population that is employed. Ages 15 and older are generally considered the working-age population. Source: World Bank (WDI) Owner: ILO

P1.RES.WBK.WDI.LAB.EAT
Page: map 6 (p. 18). Employees are people who work for a public or private employer and receive remuneration in wages, salary, commission, tips, piece rates, or pay in kind. Agriculture corresponds to division 1 (ISIC revision 2) or tabulation

78

DEFINITIONS AND SOURCES

Employment to population ratio, 15+, male (%)

Labour participation rate (% of population ages 15+)

P1.RES.WBK.WDI.LAB.EPRM
Page: table 6 (p. 53), chart 14 (p. 20). Employment to population ratio is the proportion of a countrys population that is employed. Ages 15 and older are generally considered the working-age population. Source: World Bank (WDI) Owner: ILO Employment to population ratio, 15+, total (%)

P1.RES.WBK.WDI.LAB.PTRM
Page: table 6 (p. 53), chart 16 (p. 21). Labour force participation rate is the proportion of the population ages 15 and older that is economically active: all people who supply labour for the production of goods and services during a specied period. Source: World Bank (WDI) Owner: ILO Labour force, total

P1.RES.WBK.WDI.LAB.EPRT
Page: table 6 (p. 53). Employment to population ratio is the proportion of a countrys population that is employed. Ages 15 and older are generally considered the working-age population. Source: World Bank (WDI) Owner: ILO Employment in services (% of total employment)

P1.RES.WBK.WDI.LAB.TOT
Page: table 5 (p. 50). Total labour force comprises people ages 15 and older who meet the International Labour Organization denition of the economically active population: all people who supply labour for the production of goods and services during a specied period. It includes both the employed and the unemployed. While national practices vary in the treatment of such groups as the armed forces and seasonal or part-time workers, in general the labour force includes the armed forces, the unemployed, and rst-time job-seekers, but excludes homemakers and other unpaid caregivers and workers in the informal sector. Source: World Bank (WDI) Owner: ILO Unemployment, female (% of female labour force)

P1.RES.WBK.WDI.LAB.ESTx
Page: chart 15 (p. 21). Regional employment in services. Employees are people who work for a public or private employer and receive remuneration in wages, salary, commission, tips, piece rates, or pay in kind. Services correspond to divisions 6-9 (ISIC revision 2) or tabulation categories G-P (ISIC revision 3) and include wholesale and retail trade and restaurants and hotels; transport, storage, and communications; nancing, insurance, real estate, and business services; and community, social, and personal services. Source: Key Indicators of the Labour Market (KILM) 7th edition Owner: ILO Employees, agriculture, gender (% of gender employment)

P1.RES.WBK.WDI.LAB.UNF
Page: table 6 (p. 53). Unemployment refers to the share of the labour force that is without work but available for and seeking employment. Denitions of labour force and unemployment differ by country. Source: World Bank (WDI) Owner: ILO Unemployment, total (% of total labour force)

P1.RES.WBK.WDI.LAB.GENDAG
Page: chart 13 (p. 20). Share of agriculture employment in total employment by gender. Source: Key Indicators of the Labour Market (KILM) 7th edition Owner: ILO Labour participation rate, female (% of female population ages 15+)

P1.RES.WBK.WDI.LAB.UNFT
Page: table 6 (p. 53), map 7 (p. 21). Unemployment refers to the share of the labour force that is without work but available for and seeking employment. Denitions of labour force and unemployment differ by country. Source: World Bank (WDI) Owner: ILO Net ODA received (% of GNI)

P1.RES.WBK.WDI.LAB.PTRF
Page: table 6 (p. 53), chart 16 (p. 21). Labour force participation rate is the proportion of the population ages 15 and older that is economically active: all people who supply labour for the production of goods and services during a specied period. Source: World Bank (WDI) Owner: ILO

P1.RES.WBK.WDI.ODA.GNI
Page: table 9 (p. 62). Net ofcial development assistance (ODA) consists of disbursements of loans made on concessional terms (net of repayments of principal) and grants by ofcial agencies of the members of the Development Assistance Committee (DAC), by multilateral institutions, and by non-DAC countries to promote economic development

79

PART 1

and welfare in countries and territories in the DAC list of ODA recipients. It includes loans with a grant element of at least 25 percent (calculated at a rate of discount of 10 percent). Source: World Bank (WDI) Owner: OECD Net ODA received per capita (current US$)

Agricultural machinery, tractors per 100 sq. km of arable land

P1.RES.WBK.WDI.TRA.SKM
Page: table 10 (p. 65). Agricultural machinery refers to the number of wheel and crawler tractors (excluding garden tractors) in use in agriculture at the end of the calendar year specied or during the rst quarter of the following year. Arable land includes land dened by the FAO as land under temporary crops (double-cropped areas are counted once), temporary meadows for mowing or for pasture, land under market or kitchen gardens, and land temporarily fallow. Land abandoned as a result of shifting cultivation is excluded. Source: Statistics Division (FAOSTAT) Owner: FAO Agricultural machinery, tractors per 100 sq. km of arable land (regional)

P1.RES.WBK.WDI.ODA.PCP
Page: table 9 (p. 62), map 9 (p. 25). Net ofcial development assistance (ODA) per capita consists of disbursements of loans made on concessional terms (net of repayments of principal) and grants by ofcial agencies of the members of the Development Assistance Committee (DAC), by multilateral institutions, and by non-DAC countries to promote economic development and welfare in countries and territories in the DAC list of ODA recipients; and is calculated by dividing net ODA received by the midyear population estimate. It includes loans with a grant element of at least 25 percent (calculated at a rate of discount of 10 percent). Source: World Bank (WDI) Owner: OECD Research and development expenditure (% of GDP)

P1.RES.WBK.WDI.TRA.SKMr
Page: chart 24 (p. 30). Agricultural machinery refers to the number of wheel and crawler tractors (excluding garden tractors) in use in agriculture at the end of the calendar year specied or during the rst quarter of the following year. Arable land includes land dened by the FAO as land under temporary crops (double-cropped areas are counted once), temporary meadows for mowing or for pasture, land under market or kitchen gardens, and land temporarily fallow. Land abandoned as a result of shifting cultivation is excluded. Source: Statistics Division (FAOSTAT) Owner: FAO World pesticide usage

P1.RES.WBK.WDI.RD.GDP
Page: table 9 (p. 62). Expenditures for research and development are current and capital expenditures (both public and private) on creative work undertaken systematically to increase knowledge, including knowledge of humanity, culture, and society, and the use of knowledge for new applications. R&D covers basic research, applied research, and experimental development. Source: World Bank (WDI) Owner: UNESCO Researchers in R&D (per million people)

P1.RES.FAO.ESS.PES.TYPE
Page: chart 21 (p. 27). Global utilization of pesticides by category Source: United States Environmental Protection Agency Owner: Pesticides Industry Sales and Usage

P1.RES.WBK.WDI.RD.NUM
Page: table 9 (p. 62). Researchers in R&D are professionals engaged in the conception or creation of new knowledge, products, processes, methods, or systems and in the management of the projects concerned. Postgraduate PhD students (ISCED97 level 6) engaged in R&D are included. Source: World Bank (WDI) Owner: UNESCO Roads, paved (% of total roads)

P1.RES.WBK.WDI.RD.PV
Page: table 10 (p. 65), map 12 (p. 31). Paved roads are those surfaced with crushed stone (macadam) and hydrocarbon binder or bituminized agents, with concrete, or with cobblestones, as a percentage of all the countrys roads, measured in length. Source: World Bank (WDI) Owner: International Road Federation

80

PART

Hunger dimensions

Introduction
Terms such as hunger, food insecurity, undernourishment, malnutrition, food deprivation, food crisis, are often used interchangeably as if they meant the same thing. Yet, in many cases they do not the diversity in terminology is in itself a recognition of the fact that hunger is a multidimensional phenomenon. These dimensions encompass issues of food access and poverty, food availability, nutritional balance and also time how long is hunger endured. Those who are chronically food insecure rarely have enough to eat, while the seasonally food insecure do not receive adequate food in the lean season. The transitory food insecure fall below the food consumption threshold as a result of an economic or natural shock such as a drought or conict. Large shocks, however, can have long-lasting and irreversible consequences to populations without adequate coping mechanisms. In measuring hunger, the highest prevalence is to be found in sub-Saharan Africa, where one in every three people suffers from chronic hunger, but the greatest numbers are in South and East Asia. As a group, for most of them the lack of access to food is by far a greater problem than food availability. The paradox is that most of the food insecure live in rural areas where food is produced, yet they are net purchasers of food rather than sellers. In most instances, poverty constrains their access to food in the marketplace, and is accentuated by periods of high prices. Indeed, among the many root causes of hunger, poverty is one of the most important, but it too is multifaceted.

Poverty is not seen as simply a lack of income or consumption: it includes deprivation in health, education, security, empowerment and a lack of dignity. The poor often lack access, or are excluded from income generating opportunities, such as gainful employment and productive resources, including land, forests, the seas, water, seeds, technology and credit, while poor governance often entrenches poverty. Even when dietary energy intake may be sufcient, a lack of dietary diversity and poor quality food intake often leads to micronutrient deciencies, or hidden hunger, which affects around 2 billion people worldwide. Hidden hunger can cause illness, disability, and premature death as well as impairing the cognitive development of those who survive. Productivity losses arising from the effects of nutritional deciency among adults are equivalent to 2 to 4 percent of Gross Domestic Product (GDP) every year in South Asia. Insufcient nutritional attainment by the age of two condemns a child to being shorter, enrolling later in school, being less academically capable and receiving lower incomes as an adult. Education, particularly womens education, is one of most important instruments for combating child malnutrition and infant mortality. In addition, there is ample evidence to show that literacy in women is associated with sustainable fertility rates, increased birth spacing, better nutritional and child feeding practices, and lower maternal death.

Key Resources
The State of Food Insecurity in the World (SOFI) The State of Food Insecurity in the World raises awareness about global hunger issues, discusses underlying causes of hunger and malnutrition and monitors progress towards hunger reduction targets established at the 1996 World Food Summit and the Millennium Summit. The publication is targeted at a wide audience, including policy-makers, international organizations, academic institutions and the general public with a general interest in linkages between food security, and human and economic development. SOFI 2011 focuses on the costs of food price volatility, as well as the dangers and opportunities presented by high food prices. 2010: Addressing food insecurity in protracted crises 2011: How does international price volatility affect domestic economies and food security? Publication cycle: Annual Webpage: http://www.fao.org/publications/so/en/ Safeguarding Food Security in Volatile Global Markets Safeguarding Food Security in Volatile Global Markets is a four-part volume that gathers together the latest thinking on the issues and controversies surrounding price volatility in global food markets. Drawing from theory, empiricism and heuristic evidence, the book contributes to the debate on the causes, consequences, and challenges of food price volatility. Food security and vulnerability are placed at centre stage, especially in their demands on shaping innovative policy design. Webpage: http://www.fao.org/economic/ est/volatility/vgm/en/

SAFEGUARDING Food SECURITY In VoLATILE GLOBAL MARKETS

EdITEd bY

AdAm PrAkAsh

PART 2

Risks, hazards and shocks

Armed conict and natural disasters pose a signicant risk to a populations food security, especially when combined with poverty, poor governance, scarce resources, unsustainable livelihood systems and the breakdown of local institutions. Under these circumstances, a perceived transitory shock or short-lived crisis can turn into a self-perpetuating vicious cycle, from which countries cannot easily return to a path of longer-term development. Severe events can have an irreversible impact on human capital and societal systems. Armed conict and natural disasters therefore represent ongoing and fundamental threats to both lives and livelihoods, from which recovery is progressively more difcult over time. As of 2010, FAO identied 22 countries as being in a state of protracted crisis, dened as those environments in which a signicant proportion of the population is acutely vulnerable to death, disease and disruption of livelihoods over a prolonged period of time. The governance of these environments is usually very weak, with the state having a limited capacity to respond to, and mitigate, the threats to the population, or to provide adequate levels of protection. Food insecurity is the most common manifestation of protracted crises. Seventeen of the 22 countries are located in sub-Saharan Africa. All 22 have suffered some kind of human-induced emergency such as conict or political crisis. Sixteen have also experienced some kind of natural disaster at some point either as a stand-alone crisis or combined with a human-induced emergency while 15 have experienced at least one occurrence of combined natural and human-induced emergency. Some protracted crisis situations are limited to a particular geographic area of a country and may not affect the entire population. In the 22 countries, a total of around 166 million people are undernourished, representing nearly 40 percent of their combined population and nearly 20 percent of all undernourished people in the world. Around 43.7 million people were forcibly displaced worldwide in 2010: 15.4 million refugees, 27.5 million internally displaced persons (IDP) as a result of conict, and nearly 850 000 asylum-seekers. Four-fths of the worlds refugees are being hosted by developing countries, including some of the poorest countries, adding a strain both in refugee numbers and in relation to the size of their economies. Pakistan bears the largest burden in terms of economic impact, hosting 710 refugees for each US dollar of its per capita GDP (Gross Domestic Product), followed by the Democratic Republic of the Congo and Kenya with 475 and 247 refugees respectively. By comparison, Germany, the industrialized country with the largest refugee population (594 000 people), has 17 refugees for each dollar of per capita GDP.

Map 16:

Number aff No Data <1

1 10

Source: OFDA-CRED Metalink: P2.HUN.ODFA.EMDAT.RHS.PPND, p. 166

Around 350 million people were affected

by drought and other natural disasters between 2010-2011 were hardest hit

Parts of sub-Saharan Africa and Asia Many of those affected already suffer
from acute food-insecurity

84

RISKS, HAZARDS AND SHOCKS

Number affected by droughts and other natural disasters (thousands, 2010 11) 1 10 10 50 50 500 > 500

Chart 29: Floods and droughts impact by far the largest number of people
Number affected by type (2010 - 11)

150 100 50 0

Millions

ght Drou

Earth

e emp. quak me T Extre

Flood

slide Land

Storm

Source: OFDA-CRED Metalink: P2.HUN.ODFA.EMDAT.RHS.PPND, p. 166

85

PART 2

According to the Centre for Research on the Epidemiology of Disasters (CRED), the world endured some 373 natural disasters in 2010, which killed approximately 297 000 people the highest level of fatality in the past two decades and disrupted the lives of nearly 208 million others. Disaster statistics are often altered by single extreme events that cause excessive human impact. For instance, the 12 January 2010 earthquake in Haiti killed over 222 500 people, and the heat wave that hit the Russian Federation in mid-2010 resulted in around 56 000 fatalities. In the last four decades, the mortality gures of 2010 were only surpassed by the 1970 rates, when a tropical cyclone killed 300 000 people in Bangladesh, and in 1983-84, when famines affected the African continent and caused 450 000 deaths. As for major events in 2011, the 20102011 drought in the north of China was the worst drought to afict the country in 60 years. The drought enveloped 7.7 million hectares of winter wheat, and by the end of the episode in June, some 35 million people had been affected. Losses to Chinas wheat harvest were a prominent factor in the increase of worldwide wheat prices in early 2011. The March earthquake and tsunami in Japan, which had no long-lasting impact on food security, nevertheless left well over 20 000 people either dead or missing. By the end of 2011, the food crisis in the Horn of Africa, a result of the driest spell in the region since 1950-51, had affected some 13 million people in Djibouti, Ethiopia, Kenya and Uganda with parts of southern Somalia enduring famine. The situation has been exacerbated by high local cereal prices, excessive livestock mortality, conict and restricted humanitarian access. In August 2011, the UN refugee agency (UNHCR) reported a ten per day rate of malnutrition-related child mortality at a camp in eastern Ethiopia for Somali refugees who had ed drought, famine and ghting within their own borders.

Chart 30: Natural disasters have affected more than 2.5 billion people over the past ten years
Number affected (2000 - 10)

600

500

400

Millions

300

200

100

2000

2002

2004

2006

2008

2010

Source: OFDA-CRED Metalink: P2.HUN.ODFA.EMDAT.RHS.PPNDT, p. 166

Chart 31: Most countries in protracted crises are in Africa

Countries in protracted crisis Afghanistan Angola Burundi Central African Republic Chad Congo Cte dIvoire Democratic Peoples Republic of Korea Democratic Republic of the Congo Guinea Haiti Iraq Kenya Liberia Sierra Leone Somalia Sudan Tajikistan Uganda Zimbabwe

Further reading
FAO The State of Food Insecurity in the World 2010:
Addressing food insecurity in protracted crises (www.fao. org/publications/so-2010/en/)

Eritrea Ethiopia
Source: FAO, Trade and Markets Division Metalink: P2.HUN.FAO.ESA.RHS.NPC, p. 163

Centre for Research on the Epidemiology of Disasters

(http://www.cred.be/)

United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (http:

//www.unhcr.org)

Internal

Displacement Monitoring (www.internal-displacement.org/

Centre

86

RISKS, HAZARDS AND SHOCKS

Map 17: Natural disasters and armed conict result in large numbers of displaced people

Total population of concern (thousands, 2010) No Data <1 15

5 75

75 500

> 500

Source: UNHCR Metalink: P2.HUN.UNHCR.GT.RHS.TPC, p. 166

Chart 32: A slight decline in 2010 does not mask an upward trend in the global number of displaced

Total population of concern by type over time (2000 - 10)

IDPs Others Refugees

40

30

Millions

20

10

2000

2002

2004

2006

2008

2010

Source: UNHCR Metalink: P2.HUN.UNHCR.GT.RHS.TPCT, p. 167

87

PART 2

Undernourishment
Food security exists when all people, at all times, have physical, social and economic access to sufcient, safe and nutritious food that meets their dietary needs and preferences for an active and healthy life. Undernourishment or hunger exists when caloric intake is below the minimum dietary energy requirement (MDER). The MDER is the amount of energy needed to perform light activity and to maintain a minimum acceptable weight for attained height. It is derived by aggregating the estimated sex-age-specic minimum dietary energy requirements using the populations relative proportion in corresponding sex-age and weight groups. The ght against hunger is one of the central objectives for development. Indeed, the rst Millennium Development Goal (MDG1) seeks to halve the proportion of people who suffer from hunger between 1990 and 2015. Habitual food consumption, in terms of calories per person per day (kcal/person/day), is the key metric used for measuring and evaluating the evolution of chronic hunger worldwide. There has been signicant progress in raising food intake per person at the global level. In the past two decades, this rate increased from an average of 2610 kcal/person/day to less than 2800 kcal/person/day. The gains in the world average predominantly reect those of the developing countries, given that developed countries previously had fairly high levels of per capita food consumption. Changes in food consumption levels closely correlate to changes in rates of undernourishment. Based on the latest available data, the total number of undernourished people in the world is estimated to have reached 850 million in 2006-08, and according to preliminary forecasts, this gure could reach around 925 million people in 2010-2011. But because the worlds population is still increasing (albeit more slowly than in recent decades), a given number of hungry people represents a declining prevalence of people who are hungry. Not surprisingly, developing countries account for 98 percent of the worlds hungry and demonstrate, on average, a prevalence of undernourishment of 15 percent. Two-thirds of the hungry live in just seven countries (Bangladesh, China, the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Ethiopia, India, Indonesia and Pakistan) and over 40 percent live in China and India alone. Developing countries overall progress has been decisively inuenced by the signicant gains made by the two most populous among them. But for the most vulnerable, the total number of undernourished in the least developed countries rose to 264 million in 2006-08, around 25 percent higher than the level at the beginning of the decade and considerably above the 1 percent increase observed in the developing country group.

Map 18:

No Data

<5

5 15

Source: FAO, Statistics Division Metalink: P2.HUN.FAO.ESS.UNMNT.PREV, p. 164

850 million people suffered from undernourishment during the period 2006-08, representing 13 percent of the worlds population halving hunger by 2015 will likely not be achieved food prices combined to stall progress in reducing the number of hungry

Despite longer term inroads, the goal of

Recently, economic turmoil and high

88

UNDERNOURISHMENT

Share of population undernourished (%, 200608) 5 15 15 25 25 35 > 35

Chart 33: Progress in reducing the global prevalence of undernourishment has slowed in recent years
Global share of undernourished (1969-71 - 2006-08)
26 24 22 20

18 16 14

1975

1980

1985

1990

1995

2000

2005

Source: FAO, Statistics Division Metalink: P2.HUN.FAO.ESS.UNMNT.PNW, p. 163

89

PART 2

The proportion of undernourished people remains highest in sub-Saharan Africa, at 30 percent according to the most recent estimates, but there is wide variation at the country level. The Congo, Ghana, Mali and Nigeria have already achieved MDG1, while Ethiopia and others are close to achieving it. In the Democratic Republic of the Congo, however, the proportion of undernourishment had risen to 69 percent (from 26 percent in 199092). A signicant number of countries in the region failed to participate in this general thrust towards increasing average food consumption levels, and out of the current 26 developing countries where food consumption is 2200 kcal/person/day or under, 14 are situated in sub-Saharan Africa. Periods of high food prices during the past ve years have affected countries and regions in different ways. While Africa saw a further deterioration of its hunger situation, Asia remained fairly resilient to shocks. Countries in this continent managed to restrict exports, or had sufcient means to aggressively purchase food on international markets, and thus managed to keep their domestic supply and price situation relatively stable. Others had sufcient domestic reserves to buffer against reduced imports; they took shelter from international markets by drawing on these supplies. This left those without safety nets, reserves, exports to restrict or the means to procure food at high prices fully exposed to international price swings. Recent events and their implications on food security highlight the need to broaden and deepen the set of indicators used to monitor it. FAO has engaged in a series of initiatives aimed at improving the quality and timeliness of information on food security. One important area of activity includes efforts to improve the underlying methodology of the FAO indicator that gauges the prevalence of undernourishment and to add to it related indicators such as depth of hunger (i.e. how much a population falls short of minimum food needs in terms of dietary energy). Another area of improvement aims at identifying a suite of indicators that would capture the multidimensionality of food insecurity.

Chart 34: Despite falling prevalence of undernourishment, it nevertheless remains unacceptably high
Regional share of undernourished (1990-2 - 2006-08)
Developing 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 S.Asia S.E.Asia SSA World

1992

2008

Source: FAO, Statistics Division Metalink: P2.HUN.FAO.ESS.UNMNT.PREVR, p. 164

Chart 35: The global number of undernourished has increased in the past decade, reversing the considerable gains of the 1990s
Global number of undernourished (1969-71 - 2006-08)

860

Millions

840

820

800

1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005

Source: FAO, Statistics Division Metalink: P2.HUN.FAO.ESS.UNMNT.PNW, p. 163

Further reading
FAO State of Food Insecurity 2011 (http://www.fao.
org/publications/so/en/)

FAO Hunger Portal (www.fao.org/hunger)

90

UNDERNOURISHMENT

Map 19: Two thirds of the hungry live in just seven countries

Incidence of undernourishment (millions, 200608) No Data 0 0.1 1 15

5 100

> 100

Source: FAO, Statistics Division Metalink: P2.HUN.FAO.ESS.UNMNT.NUM, p. 163

Chart 36: Large food decits prevail where undernourishment is high

Depth of hunger (1995-97 - 2006-2008)

1997 2002 2007

250 200 150 100 50 0

kcal/cap/day

Developed

East Asia

L.Amer. & Carib.

South Asia

Sub-S Africa

Source: FAO, Statistics Division Metalink: P2.HUN.FAO.ESS.UNMNT.DEP, p. 163

91

PART 2

Diets
Worldwide, any progress in raising food consumption per person has invariably been accompanied by signicant structural change in dietary patterns. Food consumption is now more centred on caloric-yielding foodstuffs and less on starchy staples such as roots and tubers, at least in the countries that recorded such growth. The combination of urbanization, rising incomes and opportunities for trade has fuelled trends in dietary convergence and dietary adaptation. Dietary convergence refers to the increasing similarity in global diets, characterized by a greater reliance on a narrow base of staple grains (wheat and rice), increased consumption of meat, dairy, edible oils, salt and sugar, and lower intake of bre much in the form of highly processed foodstuffs. On the other hand, dietary adaptation or the consumption of more convenience foods reects the rapid pace and time pressure of urban lifestyles. Cereals continue to be by far the most important source of dietary energy, providing 50 percent of all global calories. However, global per capita food use of cereals has been in gradual decline since the early 1990s. This is largely a reection of changing diets in Asia, where the major countries (particularly those in the East Asia region) are moving away from predominantly rice-based diets. In contrast, for agro-ecological reasons, wheat constitutes the fastest of all growing cereals in countries that are non-producers or minor producers. Coarse grain consumption is also on a downward path but continues to be important mainly in sub-Saharan Africa, where it accounts for as much as 70 percent of all cereal consumption. Livestock products contribute around 13 percent of global calories and 28 percent of protein directly through provision of meat, milk, eggs and offal. In spite of recent growth in consumption, especially in Asia and Latin America, many people are still decient in the nutrients that can be provided by animal source foods. Even quite small amounts are important for improving the nutritional status of low-income households. Meat, milk and eggs provide proteins with a wide range of amino acids that match human needs as well as bioavailable micro-nutrients such as iron, zinc, vitamin A, vitamin B12 and calcium in which many malnourished people are decient. Energy and protein consumption are closely correlated, and insufcient calorie consumption tends to go in tandem with insufcient protein consumption. But in the absence of cultural grounds, poverty for the most part is major determinant, as the consumption of livestock products is dictated by income, which explains the low observed intake in poorer regions.

Map 20:

No Data

< 2100

210

Source: FAO, Statistics Division Metalink: P2.HUN.FAO.ESS.DIET.DES, p. 163

2790 calories per person per day repre-

sents the average available food supply at the world level to just 2120 but rises to 3430 calories per person per day in developed countries

In the poorest countries the average falls

There is enough food available to feed

the world, but large disparities in the distribution of food obstruct the ght against hunger

92

DIETS

Dietary energy supply per person (kcal/cap/day, 200608) 2100 2300 2300 2800 2800 3200 > 3200

Chart 37: Dietary energy supplies are on the rise, but not sufcient to make inroads in reducing undernourishment
Dietary energy supplies over time (1990-92 - 2006-08)
Developed 3400 3200 East Asia South Asia Sub-S Africa L. Amer. & Carib.

kcal/cap/day

3000 2800 2600 2400 2200

1995

2000

2005

Source: FAO, Statistics Division Metalink: P2.HUN.FAO.ESS.DIET.DES, p. 163

93

PART 2

% Starchy root in dietary energy supply

The rapid growth in consumption of vegetable oils, in combination with their high calorie content, has been instrumental in bringing about the increases in food consumption of those developing countries that characterize progress towards food security. One out of every four calories added to the consumption of the developing countries originated in this group of products. Sugar shares many of the characteristics of vegetable oils as a fast-rising consumption item. The scope for consumption growth is still considerable and momentum in food use is likely to be sustained. Consumption of pulses has stagnated overall and registered drastic declines in Asia and sub-Saharan Africa. These trends reect not just changing consumer preferences, but cultivation shifts towards self-sufciency in cereals. Roots, tubers and plantains are the mainstay of sustenance in many countries with low and middle levels of overall food consumption, predominantly in subSaharan Africa and in Latin America and the Caribbean. Nineteen countries in Africa, which represent 60 percent of the continents overall population, depend on these products for over 20 percent of food consumption in terms of calories. Data show that in many of the countries with high dietary dependence on roots and tubers, production of these crops is an important determinant of changes in national average food consumption. Vulnerability to unstable food prices is high when food intake is concentrated on one staple commodity, especially when that staple is traded in large volumes on international markets. By implication, when dietary concentration on one staple is high, that staple accounts for a high share of expenditure. The countries that tend to concentrate most on one staple are the rice economies in South and Southeast Asia. The dominance of preferences towards rice in that region and the reluctance to shift to other staples restricts the potential for using trade in other staples to moderate variability in rice prices. In some countries, such as Pakistan, Morocco, Yemen, and Chile, there is also a high dependence on wheat, while Mexico and in much of southern Africa rely on maize. Countries in which cassava is a major staple, such as in West and Central Africa, generally have the most diverse food consumption baskets.

Chart 38: High dependence on root crops in foodinsecure countries

Starchy root consumption and dietary energy supplies (2005-07)

50

40

30

20

10

2000

2500 3000 Dietary energy supply

3500

Source: FAO, Statistics Division Metalink: P2.HUN.FAO.FV.DIET.RTDES, p. 165

Chart 39: Diets of many vulnerable countries characterized by high consumption of one or two staples
Dietary diversity in LIFDCs (2005-07)

70

60

Concentration (%)

50

40

30

20

20

30

40 50 60 Share in consumption

70

80

Source: FAO, Statistics Division

Further reading
FAO Statistics Division - food security www.fao.org/
economic/ess/ess-fs/

Metalink: P2.HUN.FAO.FV.DIET.DIV, p. 165

FAO World Livestock 2011: livestock in food security

www.fao.org/docrep/014/i2373e/i2373e.pdf)

94

DIETS

Chart 40: Declining cereal and rising livestock consumption in most regional diets Changes in the commodity composition of food consumption (1990-92 - 2005-07, % p.a.) Cereals Developed East Asia Latin America and Caribbean South Asia Sub-Saharan Africa
Source: FAO, Statistics Division Metalink: P2.HUN.FAO.ESS.DIET.FDS, p. 163

Starchy roots 1.14 -0.43 0.36 1.94 -0.05

Meat and sh 1.04 3.63 2.16 0.37 0.25

Dairy and eggs 1.43 5.89 1.26 0.79 0.54

1.51 -0.31 0.27 -0.36 0.64

Chart 41: ... and also vegetable oil consumption Changes in the commodity composition of food consumption (1990-92 - 2005-07, % p.a.) Pulses Developed East Asia Latin America and Caribbean South Asia Sub-Saharan Africa
Source: FAO, Statistics Division Metalink: P2.HUN.FAO.ESS.DIET.FDS, p. 163

Fruit and vegetables 1.67 5.32 0.72 2.16 -0.42

Sugar 1.59 0.43 -0.28 -0.45 1.52

Vegetable oils 1.73 2.03 0.55 2.20 0.70

Others -3.32 2.03 2.15 1.19 0.51

0.28 -1.48 0.17 -0.51 1.39

95

PART 2

The spectrum of malnutrition

Adequate nutrition is essential for economic growth, good health and physical and cognitive development. It requires a diverse diet including staple foods, vegetables, fruits, animal-source foods and where needed, fortied foods. Levels of nutrition are affected not only by food availability and access but also by sanitation such as access to safe drinking water and disease. In addition, education can play a key role in improving nutritional intake and balance. Chronically food-insecure populations are characterized by high or very high levels of undernutrition and recurrent high levels of acute malnutrition (wasting, low weight-for-height). These factors limit the development of individuals and societies. Undernutrition accounts for approximately 12 percent of deaths worldwide, and in developing countries, 60 percent of deaths in the underve age group are linked with the low weight (i.e. one third of the 8.8 million annual child deaths). The malnourished are exposed to a high risk of diarrhoeal disease from contaminated water and food, and in turn diarrhoea worsens the effects of malnutrition, as it compromises the human bodys capability to utilize nutrients. Underweight children whose growth is stunted (when a childrens height is low for their age a telling indicator of chronic undernutrition) and wasting (when childrens weight is low for their height a measure of acute undernutrition) are highly unlikely to reach their full educational and productive potential, especially if these conditions are present under the age of two. This affects both the individuals and their countries long-term prospects for economic growth and development. South Asia has the highest levels of stunting and wasting in the world, with 46 percent of its children stunted and 15 percent wasted. Sub-Saharan Africa has the next highest proportion of stunted children, with a prevalence as high as 41 percent in Eastern/Southern Africa, and 28 percent of its children underweight. According to the United Nations Childrens Fund (UNICEF), more than 20 million infants are born each year weighing less than 2.5 kg. This represents 17 percent of the total number of births in developing countries. Infants with low birth weight are at high risk of mortality during their early months. Those who survive are often aficted with an impaired immune system and are prone to suffer chronic illnesses in later life. Over 96 percent of cases of low birth weight occur in developing countries, where there is a high likelihood of being born in poor socio-economic conditions, and where women often undertake physically demanding work during pregnancy and are prone to infection and poor diets. The high prevalence is also symptomatic of intergenerational transmission of poor nutritional status, the consequences of which are passed to children by mothers who are themselves in poor health or undernourished.

Map 21:

No Data

<5

5 15

Source: WHO-WHS Metalink: P2.HUN.WHO.GHO.CHLD.UW, p. 170

Children living in rural areas of develop-

ing regions are two times more likely to be underweight than are urban children age two condemns a child to being less academically capable, receiving lower incomes as an adult, and in the case of girls, being at greater risk of difcult childbirth and maternal mortality

Insufcient nutritional achievement by

96

THE SPECTRUM OF MALNUTRITION

Share of children under 5 who are underweight (%, 2009*) 5 15 15 20 20 25 > 25

Chart 42: South Asia has the highest prevalence of underweight children in the world
Share of children under 5 who are underweight (2009*)
40 30 20

%
10 0

East Asia

L.Amer. & Carib.

South Asia

Sub-S Africa

Source: WHO-WHS Metalink: P2.HUN.WHO.GHO.CHLD.UW, p. 170

97

PART 2

Early childhood nutrition plays a key role in cognitive achievement, learning capacity and ultimately household welfare. Available studies have shown that low birth weight, protein energy malnutrition in childhood, childhood iron-deciency anaemia and iodine deciency (e.g. being born to a mother with goitre) are all linked to cognitive deciencies and the effects are more or less irreversible by the time a child is ready to go to school. The UN Standing Committee on Nutrition (SCN) has estimated that the economic costs of anaemia in Bangladesh alone, for example, amount to 7.9 percent of the countrys Gross Domestic Product (GDP). More widely, when a signicant proportion of the population is undernourished, potential rates of GDP growth can be curtailed. For example in South Asia, adult productivity losses arising from the combined effect of stunting, iodine deciency and iron deciency are equivalent to a loss of 2 to 4 percent of GDP every year. In adults, a commonly used measure to detect malnutrition is the body mass index (BMI), dened as the ratio of bodyweight in kilograms to the square of height in metres. BMI can clearly vary over a persons lifetime, but physical stature is determined by the time an individual reaches adulthood. Low stature and low BMI are associated with lower labour force participation not only do people with lower stature or BMIs earn less, but they are less likely to be in a position to earn wages at all. At the other end of the malnutrition spectrum is the problem of overnourishment, which leads to overweight and obesity. Already a well-known phenomenon in developed countries, obesity is also increasing in the developing world, especially among urban dwellers. The issue of obesity has not been given much attention in developing countries because of the more compelling problems at the other end of the scale. Overnutrition is a result of diets that are characterized by energy-dense, nutrient poor foods that are high in fat, sugar and salt. It is a major contributor to heart disease, stroke, diabetes and cancer, and is compounded by low levels of physical activity and by tobacco consumption. Worldwide obesity has more than doubled since 1980. At 1.5 billion adults aged 20 and over, there are more overweight adults in the world today than there are undernourished. Of them, over 200 million men and nearly 300 million women are obese.

Chart 43: One in nine children under ve are low weightfor-height in developing countries. Stunting and wasting are caused by long-term insufcient nutrient intake
Share of children under 5 that are stunted and wasted (2009*)
Stunted Wasted

40

30

20

10

Developed

East Asia

L.Amer. & Carib.

South Asia

Sub-S Africa

Source: WHO-WHS Metalink: P2.HUN.WHO.GHO.CHLD.STNT, p. 170

Chart 44: Insufcient iron in diets is a primary cause of anaemia, and is common in vegetal-based diets
Availability of dietary iron (2005-07)
60

50

40

mg/ person / day

30

20

10

Developed

East Asia

L.Amer. & Carib.

South Asia

Sub-S Africa

Further reading
FAO Nutrition and Consumer Protection Division (www.
fao.org/food/)

Source: WHO-WHS Metalink: P2.HUN.FAO.MCN.IRON, p. 165

UNICEF Nutrition (www.unicef.org/nutrition/) WHO Nutrition and disorders (www.who.int/topics/

nutrition_disorders/)

98

THE SPECTRUM OF MALNUTRITION

Map 22: Undernourished women are more likely to raise children who are undernourished, reinforcing the intergenerational cycle of malnutrition

Share of women with a BMI of less than 18.5 (%, 2009*) No Data <5 5 10 10 15

15 25

> 25

Source: WHO-WHS Metalink: P2.HUN.WHO.GHO.ADLT.LBMIF, p. 170

Map 23: Obesity is an entrenched problem in many developed countries, but under- and over-nutrition co-exist in many countries, leading to a double burden of malnutrition

Share of adults which are overweight or obese (%, 2009*) No Data < 15 15 25 25 40

40 50

> 50

Source: WHO-WHS Metalink: P2.HUN.WHO.GHO.ADLT.OBSx, p. 170

99

PART 2

Trade, food stability and food security

Against the backdrop of deepening international markets, convertible domestic currencies, improved international transportation networks and diminishing public stock regimes, trade plays an increasingly important role in stabilizing food availability in almost all countries. When agricultural-based countries experience declining per capita production of staple foods, the role of trade becomes pivotal in their food security. Equally, trade assists food security in staple food production systems undergoing wide uctuations caused by variable climates, especially in those systems that are rain-fed. High coefcients in the variation of staple food production 10 percent and above are common in much of sub-Saharan Africa. This means that a shortfall of at least 10 percent of average staple production occurs every six years. Instability in food production can also lead to problems in global markets. While a handful of countries continues to dominate supply in the international arena, there is an increasing number of countries at the margin that participate in exports. Those that have emerged recently as regular international suppliers instil a great degree of uncertainty in the global marketplace owing to the high year-to-year variability of their production. This is particularly true for several rain-fed grain producing countries in the Black Sea region, which triggered turmoil in markets midway in 2010 when weather problems lowered export availabilities. This feature can also shift the nettrade status of large producing and consuming countries from one year to the next, bringing uncertainty to markets (as in the case of rice). Beyond production instability, trade decits in many of the most food-insecure countries have become structural over the past two decades. Expensive inputs, high shipment costs and high losses from farms to markets have lowered the competitiveness of the agriculture sector in many developing countries. At the same time, large global suppliers have beneted from subsidies in export markets and the transformation of the retail sector in importing countries, resulting in a growing prevalence of higher foreign standards. These factors contributed to the growing trade decit of many developing countries, which shifted their trade status from a position of net exporters to that of net importers. The most economically vulnerable group, including least developed countries (LDCs), has been hardest hit; their net food and agriculture import bills have soared over the past 20 years to a level of nearly USD 27 billion by 2010.

Map 24:

No Data

< 75

75

Source: FAO, Statistics Division Metalink: P2.HUN.FAO.TFS.SSCAL, p. 165

Underperforming

productive sectors and/or a lack of resource endowments are behind low rates of food self sufciency, requiring imports to ll food decits and Latin America and the Caribbean do not produce enough food to cover domestic food needs confounded with food self sufciency

Many countries in sub-Saharan Africa

However, food security should not be

100

TRADE, FOOD STABILITY AND FOOD SECURITY

Caloric selfsufficiency (%, 2009) 75 100 100 125 125 150 > 150

Chart 45: Much of Latin America more than self-sufcient in food but the converse in Africa
Caloric self-sufciency (1990-2009)
Developed 115 110 105 100 95 90 East Asia South Asia Sub-S Africa L. Amer. & Carib.

1990

1995

2000

2005

Source: FAO, Statistics Division Metalink: P2.HUN.FAO.TFS.SSCAL, p. 165

101

PART 2

With the global cost of purchasing food on the international marketplace surpassing USD 1 trillion in 2010 (as it did in 2008), food import bills for LDCs have climbed the most. At 17 percent, their increase far exceeded that of the global level. The sheer encumbrance facing some of the worlds poorest countries in importing food can be contrasted to that of developed nations, whose food import bills rose by only 8 percent in 2010. Seen in a broader perspective, expenditures on imported foodstuffs for vulnerable countries account for roughly 18 percent of all their expenditures on imports, compared to a world average of around 7 percent. Rising import bills could lead to increased stress if there is insufcient income growth or export earnings to accommodate the higher pace of food import costs. Higher food import bills can place a severe burden on the balance of payments, depriving disadvantaged countries of limited foreign exchange reserves that could be used for importing other essential goods and services, such as fuel and inputs. Sovereign credit ceilings also constrain the ability to nance imports and to meet unforeseen higher procurement costs. The on-going instability in international food markets has prompted rising mistrust in many food-importing countries about the reliability of international markets as suppliers of affordable food. Several countries have explored the possibility of becoming less reliant on food imports in the context of safeguarding their own food security. The notion of food security often becomes conated with ideas about food self-sufciency. Food security and food self-sufciency, however, are different concepts, and are often at odds with one another. Self-sufciency policies that distort market signals using protectionist strategies, such as import bans, have high social costs given their distributional effects. They place food self-sufciency at variance with the goals of food security and poverty reduction. But, by improving agricultural productivity and domestic competitiveness, imports are likely to be deterred, and consequently, higher levels of self-sufciency will be compatible with food security and poverty reduction.

Chart 46: Production variability remains high in many food-insecure regions

Index of variability of food production (1990-2009)
Developed East Asia L.Amer. & Carib. South Asia Sub-S Africa

16

14

% p.a.

12

10

1990

1995

2000

2005

Source: FAO, Statistics Division Metalink: P2.HUN.FAO.TFS.QPVAR, p. 165

Chart 47: Global cereal stocks on the decline owing to policy shifts and greater dependence on trade
World cereal stocks-to-utilization (1980-2010)
35

30

25

Further reading
FAO
World Food worldfoodsituation/en/) index.htm) Situation (www.fao.org/

20

1980

1985

1990

1995

2000

2005

2010

FAO Food Outlook (www.fao.org/giews/english/fo/ Prakash (2011b)

Source: FAO, Statistics Division Metalink: P2.HUN.FAO.TFS.STU, p. 165

102

TRADE, FOOD STABILITY AND FOOD SECURITY

Chart 48: Barring Asia, cereal stocks are sufcient to meet less than two months of consumption
Months of cereal self-provisioning capacity (2010)

Chart 50: The burden of food and energy import bills is high when measured against GDP
Food and energy import bills, share of GDP (2010)
Food Fuel

3 6

Months

%
2 0 0

Developed

E & SE Asia

L.Amer. & Carib.

Sub-S Africa

Developed

East Asia

L.Amer. & Carib.

South Asia

Sub-S Africa

Source: FAO, Statistics Division Metalink: P2.HUN.FAO.TFS.STU, p. 165

Source: FAO-IMF Metalink: P2.HUN.FAO.TFS.FIB, p. 165

Chart 49: Food import bills have risen markedly in the past few years, driven by a combination of higher international prices and greater trade
Food import bills (1995-2010)
Developed East Asia South Asia Sub-S Africa L.Amer. & Carib.

Chart 51: ... and also on a per capita basis

Food and fuel import bills per capita (2010)

Food Fuel

600 500 400

Developed

1000 800 600

Billion US$

300 140

US$

120 100 80 60 40 20

400 200 0

Other Regions 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010

Developed

East Asia

L.Amer. & South Carib. Asia

Sub-S Africa

Source: FAO, Statistics Division Metalink: P2.HUN.FAO.TFS.FIB, p. 165

Source: FAO-UNSD Metalink: P2.HUN.FAO.TFS.FIB, p. 165

103

PART 2

Food prices and food price volatility

High food prices pose a major threat to food security. By reducing real incomes, rising prices can worsen the prevalence of hunger and malnutrition because they reduce the quantity and quality of food consumed. The impact of high prices falls heaviest on the poor, especially female-headed households and the landless, which may spend as much as 80 percent of their income on food. The lack of dietary diversication aggravates the problem, as price increases in one staple cannot easily be compensated by a switch to other foods. The lack of adequate social and income safety nets, such as savings, compounds price increases. Vulnerable households often deal with soaring prices by selling assets, which are very difcult to rebuild, and by cutting down on health and education expenditures. These short-term coping mechanisms have long-term negative, sometimes irreversible, effects on livelihoods. Soaring food prices have triggered worldwide concern about threats to global food security, and have shaken the unjustied complacency caused by many years of low commodity prices. Up until 2006, the cost of the global food basket had fallen by almost a half over the previous thirty years or so when adjusted for ination. Declining real prices as a result of technological advances put farmers under considerable strain, except mainly in developed countries, where governments were able to provide support to agricultural producers through subsidies and price guarantees. Elsewhere, public and private sectors saw limited need or incentive to invest in agricultural production and infrastructure. These factors rendered production in many developing countries unprotable and entrenched the role of a handful of countries in regularly supplying the world with food. Changes in the market and policy setting were also instrumental in reducing stock levels and have led to far more planned dependence on imports as an efcient way of achieving food security. Taken together, these developments have imposed a heavy responsibility on major exporting countries to supply international markets when called upon. It is thus unsurprising that when production shortages occur in such countries, global supplies are stretched and the ensuing market tightness manifests both higher prices and higher volatility. This was precisely the case in the run-up to the high-price episodes that the world has witnessed in recent years. Other contributory factors included dependence on new exporting zones, where rainfed crop outcomes are much more prone to weather vagaries, growing demand for food from other sectors (e.g., energy), faster transmission of macroeconomic factors onto commodity markets, and lack of trade policy discipline, especially in the context of export restraints.

Map 25:

No Data

<0

05

Source: FAO, Statistics Division Metalink: P2.HUN.FAO.FPV.FCPI, p. 164

Food purchases can account for as much

as 80 percent of household expenditure in developing countries harmful in these circumstances

Rising prices of food are particularly Affected households often respond by

selling productive assets, which are difcult to rebuild, and by cutting down on health and education expenditures, leading to longer-term problems

104

FOOD PRICES AND FOOD PRICE VOLATILITY

Food price inflation (%, 2010) 05 5 10 10 15 > 15

Chart 52: The international price of the global food basket has soared in recent years
FAO Global Consumption Price Index (1990-2010)

200

2002-04=100

150

100

1990

1995

2000

2005

2010

Source: FAO, Statistics Division Metalink: P2.HUN.FAO.FPV.GCI, p. 164

105

PART 2

In 2011, international prices rose to levels not seen in decades. The export-weighted FAO food price climbed to a record 238 points in February and remained stubbornly high throughout much of the year. Escalating world prices for cereals, vegetable oils and sugar (40, 35 and 25 percent, respectively over the past year) have fuelled much of the increase. The FAO global food consumption index, which uses global average calorie shares as weights, also rose to a record level, climbing 26 percent from 2010. Movements of prices in global markets may seem less important than price movements within domestic markets, as international trade accounts for a low percentage of global transactions. The issue is how global price movements affect domestic prices and markets for agricultural products inside countries (and, potentially, vice versa) and how international prices are transmitted differentially to producers and to consumers. Measuring price transmission is often plagued with difculties, but as markets are increasingly integrated in the world economy, price changes in the international arena can potentially transpire and spread to domestic markets much more quickly than before. There is emerging consensus that the global food system is becoming more vulnerable to episodes of high prices and volatility. Price volatility is by no means a new phenomenon in developing countries, where signicant seasonal or annual price uctuations remain features of rural life. With poor infrastructure, local prices may be subject to substantial variation. While price volatility is in part a function of the interplay between global and domestic factors, it is also a structural problem. Bouts of high price volatility come at a cost, as market participants have difculty planning ahead and adjusting to uctuating market signals. As unpredictable changes, or shocks, surpass a certain critical size and persist at those levels, traditional policy prescriptions and coping mechanisms are likely to fail. For instance, high price volatility can result in large income uctuations for farmers, who have little or no recourse to savings and insurance. The delay between production decisions and actual production creates additional risks, as farmers base their investment and planning on expected prices.

Chart 53: Internationally traded food prices reached record highs in 2010
FAO International price indices - traded staples (1990-2010)
Meat Dairy Cereals Oils Sugar

350 300

2002-04=100

250 200 150 100

1990

1995

2000

2005

2010

Source: FAO, Trade and Markets Division Metalink: P2.HUN.FAO.FPV.FPI, p. 164

Chart 54: Food prices have risen faster than income

Global affordability of food (1990-2010)

Least Developed Countries World

150 140 130 120 110 100 90

2002-04=100

1990

1995

2000

2005

2010

Source: FAO, Statistics Division Metalink: P2.HUN.FAO.FPV.AFD, p. 164

106

FOOD PRICES AND FOOD PRICE VOLATILITY

Chart 55: Historical volatility of world reference food prices also reached new heights in 2010

International food price volatility (1990-2010)

16

14

12

10

1995

2000

2005

2010

Source: FAO, Statistics Division Metalink: P2.HUN.FAO.FPV.FPV, p. 164

Chart 56: Of all the prices of major food commodities, global sugar quotations have been most volatile

International food price volatility by food group (1990-2010)

Meat Dairy Cereals Oils Sugar

40

30

20

10

1995

2000

2005

2010

Source: FAO, Statistics Division Metalink: P2.HUN.FAO.FPV.FPV, p. 164

107

PART 2

According to an IFAD survey of farmers in the Middle East and North Africa conducted in the aftermath of the 200608 high price episode, it was found that more than 60 percent of farmers would have expected to increase the area under cereals if prices had remained at the high levels of early 2008. However, the sharp reduction in prices created uncertainty and complicated farmers decisionmaking. With global markets yet again experiencing turmoil over 2010-2011, developing countries must enact measures to protect the most vulnerable, not by ghting volatility, but by managing its risks and mitigating its consequences by providing the poor with access to food. In the long run, vulnerability can be lowered by raising agricultural productivity for a diverse set of both competitive and sustainable crops, as well as by promoting dietary diversication. Reducing market uncertainty may not be among the fastest remedies for lowering the number of hungry. Yet, letting international markets continue in their present state, volatile and unpredictable, will only aggravate an already grim outlook for world food security. This is the reason why world leaders have been dwelling at length on the issue of price volatility since the start of the year. Such discussions gained momentum in recent months as attention turned towards nding ways to improve the accuracy of supply and demand forecasts for major food crops as an important rst step in promoting stable and transparent food markets. In June 2011, the Group of 20 (G-20) established a global information system under the banner of Agricultural Market Information System (AMIS). This initiative, proposed by a number of international organizations, has been endorsed by all G-20 Members and, subsequently, by the Committee on World Food Security (CFS).

Map 26:

No Data

< 10

10

Source: FAO, Statistics Division Metalink: P2.HUN.FAO.FPV.FPVn, p. 164

Food price volatility, measured over the

past ve years, is highest in many of the most food-insecure countries cost, as market participants have difculty planning ahead and adjusting to uctuating market signals volatile in the future compared to previous decades

Bouts of high price volatility come at a

Further reading
FAO Global Food Price Monitor (www.fao.org/giews/
english/gfpm/)

Food markets are expected to be more

FAO

World Food worldfoodsituation/en/)

Situation

(www.fao.org/

Prakash (2011a) IFAD Rural Poverty Report. New realities, new challenges, new opportunities for tomorrows generation (www.ifad.org/rpr2011/)

108

FOOD PRICES AND FOOD PRICE VOLATILITY

Food price volatility annualized historical volatility (%, 2010) 10 20 20 30 30 50 > 50

Chart 57: Historical volatility of a typical food basket on the rise

FAO Global Consumption price volatility (1990-2010)
16 14 12

10 8 6

1990

1995

2000

2005

2010

Source: FAO, Statistics Division Metalink: P2.HUN.FAO.FPV.GCI, p. 164

109

PART 2

Poverty and inequality

Among the many determinants of hunger, poverty is one of the most important. But like hunger, poverty too is multifaceted. Not simply a lack of income or consumption, poverty includes deprivation in health, education, nutrition, security, empowerment and dignity. Vulnerability constitutes a further dimension of poverty. Without effective coping mechanisms, excessive exposure to shocks such as drought and sudden price swings creates the risk of future poverty. All of these dimensions interact with and reinforce one another. However, to facilitate international comparison, poverty indicators are usually conned to measuring the proportion of a population whose income is below a particular threshold. Whereas poverty metrics tend to be absolute, inequality, on the other hand, looks at the distribution of the metric (e.g. income) in a population. For example, a highinequality country might need twice as much economic growth as low-inequality countries to meet a poverty target. Furthermore, a major reason that people may not have access to food even when enough is produced is that there is no guarantee that a market economy will generate a distribution of income that provides enough for all to purchase the food needed. Fighting hunger also helps reduce poverty, as undernourishment reduces labour productivity, increases susceptibility to illness, worsens school performance, reduces the willingness to undertake risky but more protable investments and transmits itself from one generation to the next. Although in the past three decades, tremendous progress has been achieved in reducing income poverty in certain parts of the world notably in China and other parts of East Asia where poverty incidence dropped from 78 to 17 percent there remains an estimated 1.44 billion people who still live on less than US$1.25 a day (the present internationally accepted poverty line). Progress in poverty reduction has been very uneven. Sub-Saharan Africa, for example, has registered only a marginal decline. From a headcount perspective, the number of poor people living in the region nearly doubled and its share of the worlds poor increased from 11 to 27 percent during this thirty year period. The monetary poor are particularly vulnerable to rising prices of food, with some groups spending over 80 percent of their income to meet sustenance needs. From a broader perspective, roughly 1.75 billion people in the 104 countries covered by the United Nations Development Programmes (UNDP) MPI (Multidimensional Poverty index), representing one-third of their population, live in multidimensional poverty, which is indicated by acute deprivation in health, education and the standard of living.

Map 27:

No Data

<1

15

Source: World Bank Metalink: P2.HUN.WBK.WDI.POV.P125, p. 169

Around 1.4 billion people have less than

USD 1.25 per day

Despite being high, the proportion of the

worlds poor has fallen by half in recent decades

Progress is particularly driven by China

110

POVERTY AND INEQUALITY

Poverty gap at $1.25 a day PPP (%, 2009*) 15 5 10 10 20 > 20

Chart 58: As a share of world population, poverty is decreasing

Poverty headcount ratio at $1.25 a day - PPP (2005)
50 45 40 35 30

% of population

1985

1990

1995

2000

2005

Source: World Bank Metalink: P2.HUN.WBK.WDI.POV.AGG, p. 168

111

PART 2

According to the agency, over half the worlds multidimensionally poor live in South Asia (844 million people), and more than a quarter live in Africa (458 million), which also has the highest incidence of multidimensional poverty. In many societies there are groups, especially rural women, youth, indigenous peoples and ethnic minorities that face deeply rooted inequalities. Gender inequalities are very pronounced in sub-Saharan Africa, South Asia and the Near East and North Africa. The agricultural sector is a case in point. Women in agriculture and rural areas have one thing in common across regions: they have less access than men to productive resources and opportunities. The gender gap is found in the case of many assets, inputs and services land, livestock, labour, education, extension and nancial services, and technology and it imposes costs on the sector, the broader economy and society, as well as on the women themselves. Around the world, rising income inequality is the norm: more countries have a higher Gini coefcient now than in the 1980s. For each country where inequality has fallen in the last 20 to 30 years, it has worsened in more than two others. The majority of countries in East Asia have rising income inequality. To an extent, this can be explained by widening disparities between rural and urban populations, owing to rapid industrialization and increasing returns to higher levels of schooling. In subSaharan Africa, inequality has substantially improved, coinciding with the period of economic growth that began more than a decade ago. Latin America and the Caribbean, traditionally a region of high inequality related to unequal land distribution, regressive public spending and uneven access to education, has made rapid progress in recent decades. This is especially true of Brazil, Ecuador and Paraguay. Greater equality is associated with structural economic changes that have brought women into employment and to afrmative measures designed to equalize access to education. The challenge is to create conditions that allow the poor to escape poverty and, in doing so, ensure that opportunities are inclusive.

Chart 59: Countries in sub-Saharan Africa have the lowest human development index adjusted for inequality
Inequality-adjusted HDI score (2010)

Morocco Bolivia (Plur. State) Micronesia (Federated States of) Lao, PDR Guatemala India Cambodia Ghana Namibia Pakistan Timor-Leste Congo Bangladesh Swaziland Kenya Madagascar Cameroon Nepal Yemen Togo Uganda Tanzania, Utd. Rep. Lesotho Benin Mauritania Zambia Senegal Malawi Cte dIvoire Djibouti Nigeria Rwanda Angola Comoros Haiti Gambia Ethiopia Guinea Burkina Faso Sierra Leone Mali Liberia Central African Republic Chad Burundi Niger Guinea-Bissau Mozambique Congo, Dem. Rep. Zimbabwe

Further reading
UNDP - Human Development Report 2010. The Real
Wealth of Nations: Pathways to Human Development (hdr.undp.org/en/reports/global/hdr2010/)
Source: UNDP-HDR

0.0 Index

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

Metalink: P2.HUN.UNDP.HDR.POV.HDIi, p. 166

IFAD Rural Poverty Report. New realities, new challenges, new opportunities for tomorrows generation (www.ifad.org/rpr2011/)

World Bank Poverty Reduction and Equity Group

(wwwr.worldbank.org/poverty)

112

POVERTY AND INEQUALITY

Map 28: Income inequality prevalent throughout the world

Giniscore of income distribution, higher scores reflect higher inequality (index, 2009*) No Data < 30 30 40 40 45 45 50 > 50

Source: World Bank Metalink: P2.HUN.WBK.WDI.POV.GINI, p. 168

Map 29: ... and so is gender inequality

Gender inequality score, higher scores reflect higher inequality (Index, 2008) No Data < 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.7

> 0.7

Source: World Bank Metalink: P2.HUN.UNDP.HDR.POV.GEI, p. 166

113

PART 2

Good governance
Former UN Secretary General Ko Annan once said good governance is perhaps the single most important factor in eradicating poverty and promoting development. Efforts to promote agricultural development and food security in countries where they are most needed are often hindered by a lack of good governance. Simply put, governance means the process of decisionmaking and how decisions are implemented (or not implemented). According the World Bank, the concept of good governance consists of many dimensions including political stability, rule of law, voice and accountability, government effectiveness, regulatory quality and control of corruption. All of these dimensions matter for agriculture. Political stability, the absence of violence and the rule of law are essential preconditions for agricultural development. Violent conicts are often linked to unequal access to land and other natural resources. In political systems that lack voice and accountability, the rural poor face acute difculties when attempting to inuence the political agenda, resulting in low political attention in using agriculture for development. Although governance is difcult to measure, the evidence from cross-country analysis is unambiguous: governance is instrumental for affecting progress towards development. For instance, better governance is positively associated with higher investment and growth rates. Government effectiveness, an efcient bureaucracy and an equitable rule of law are associated with increased economic performance, adult literacy and lower infant mortality. High levels of corruption, on the other hand, are linked with poor development prospects. In developing countries, where agriculture plays an important role in the economy, there is a tendency toward poor governance. This is of particular concern when the public sector is most needed to provide guidance in realizing rural development. Moreover, many large donors concerned with aid effectiveness employ good governance indicators when they select countries that qualify for Ofcial Development Assistance (ODA). This presents a dilemma for agricultural-based countries, as they are often less eligible for assistance because of poor performance in terms of good governance. With the world increasingly turning its attention to issues of governance, there are grounds for optimism towards change. However, success cannot be taken for granted given the often complex and sizeable challenge of improving governance.

Map 30:

No Data

< 1.1

1.1

Source: World Bank Metalink: P2.HUN.WBK.POV.GOV, p. 167

Efforts to combat poverty and food security are often hindered by a lack of effective governance developing countries, and is especially acute in Central Asia and Central Africa

The lack of effective governance is rife in

Further reading
World Bank - The Worldwide Governance Indicators
(WGI) project (info.worldbank.org/governance/wgi/)

114

GOOD GOVERNANCE

Average governance ( 2.5 to 2.5. lowest to highest, 2010) 1.1 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.4 1.1 > 1.1

Chart 60: Governance, including the degree of voice and accountability, political stability and absence of violence and terrorism, government effectiveness, regulatory quality, rule of law and control of corruption, is poor in food-insecure regions
Average governance (2010) -2.5 to 2.5 (lowest to highest)
0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0 -0.2 -0.4 -0.6 -0.8

Developed

East Asia

L.Amer. & Carib.

South Asia

Sub-S Africa

Source: World Bank Metalink: P2.HUN.WBK.POV.GOV, p. 167

115

PART 2

Education, health and sanitation

The two greatest potential resources in most poor, foodinsecure countries are the people and the productivity of the land and water. To defeat chronic hunger and poverty, investments must be made in both people and productivity. Investing in people must come in the form of education, clean water and sanitation, health and social services and, in some cases, direct food and nutrition support. In rural areas, such expenditures are essential if the corresponding investments in agriculture and its productive subsectors are to pay off. Education, particularly womens education, is one of most important instruments for combating child malnutrition and infant mortality. There is ample evidence to show that literacy in women is associated with sustainable fertility rates, increased birth spacing and lower maternal death. Literate mothers are more likely to immunize their children and improve their nutritional status. Acquiring knowledge on improved child feeding practices, food preservation and better sanitation is key to breaking the cycle of malnutrition. For every year of a girls education, the likelihood of her prospective child dying before the age of ve is reduced by 10 percent. Education is sometimes referred to as the social vaccine against HIV/AIDS. Those who complete primary education are more likely to know about preventive measures. People around the world today have much higher levels of education than ever before. In the space of almost two decades, global literacy rates have risen from 73 to 84 percent, with school enrolments increasing faster for girls than for boys, and school completion rates rising by 29 points to 87 percent. Yet, wide disparities remain in both access to and equality of educational attainment of girls and boys both among and within countries, particularly in those dominated by large rural poor populations. In parts of Latin America and the Caribbean, 35 percent of rural girls and 71 percent of urban boys are enrolled in school, while in sub-Saharan Africa, the rates range from 37 percent and 84 percent. There are also strong intergenerational effects associated with illiteracy. For example, 75 percent of children not in school have mothers with no formal education.

Map 31:

No Data

< 50

50

Source: UNESCO Metalink: P2.HUN.WBK.WDI.EDU.FILT, p. 167

Education is key for development Improving womens education, in particular, is one of the most important instruments to combat child malnutrition quently below 30 percent in many developing countries

However, literacy rates of women are fre-

116

EDUCATION, HEALTH AND SANITATION

Literacy rate, female (%, 2009*) 50 80 80 90 90 95 > 95

Chart 61: Unequal opportunity afforded to girls in basic education where it matters most
Ratio of girls to boys in primary and secondary education (2009*)
100 80 60

40 20 0

Developed

East Asia

L.Amer. & Carib.

South Asia

Sub-S Africa

Source: UNESCO Metalink: P2.HUN.WBK.WDI.EDU.GEN, p. 167

117

PART 2

Investment in health is also important for human welfare and sustained economic and social development. Timely access to health services that is, to a mix of promotion, prevention, treatment and rehabilitation is critical. This cannot be achieved for the majority of the population without a well-functioning health nancing system. The most recent estimates of money needed to ensure access to essential healthcare suggests that, on average, low-income countries must spend around US$ 60 per capita, which is almost double the amount they are currently spending. Public nancing is usually a mix of government money, loans, grants and aid from international organizations and non-governmental organizations. Apart from insufcient overall funds, the per capita distribution of public expenditure on healthcare across countries is vastly uneven. It is unrealistic to expect most low-income countries to achieve universal coverage. Access is often dictated by the ability to pay, and fees are a major hindrance for poor people soliciting treatment. There are other factors beside income that determine access to health care. For instance, migrants, ethnic minorities and indigenous people use services less than other population groups, even though their needs may be higher. Also, when people do require healthcare, they often incur high, sometimes catastrophic costs in paying for access. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), about 150 million people globally suffer nancial catastrophe annually, while 100 million are pushed below the poverty line each year. Often, lost income causes strenuous nancial penalties on the ill and those who care for them. The International Labour Organization (ILO) nds that only one in ve people in the world has broad-based social security protection that also includes cover for lost wages in the event of illness, and more than half the worlds population lacks any type of formal social protection.

Map 32:

No Data

< 50

50

Source: WHO Metalink: P2.HUN.WBK.WDI.HAE.HE.PCP, p. 168

USD 860 spent annually on health per

person at the global level tween regions

This number masks huge differences be An average of just USD 32 is spent on a

per capita basis in low-income countries

118

EDUCATION, HEALTH AND SANITATION

Annual health expenditure per capita (US$, 2009) 50 150 150 300 300 1000 > 1000

Chart 62: Budgetary constraints preclude adequate public health spending in many developing regions
Annual health expenditure (2009)
10 8

% of GDP

6 4 2 0

Developed

East Asia

L.Amer. & Carib.

South Asia

Sub-S Africa

Source: WHO Metalink: P2.HUN.WBK.WDI.HAE.HE.TOT, p. 168

119

PART 2

Improving access to safe water and sanitation can greatly reduce the burden on health systems and promote wider development. According to the United Nations Childrens Fund (UNICEF), 2.5 billion people in developing countries around 50 percent of their population lack improved sanitation facilities, and over 884 million still use unsafe drinking water sources. Inadequate access to safe water and sanitation services, coupled with poor hygiene practices, kills and sickens thousands of children every day, and leads to impoverishment and diminished opportunities for thousands more. Estimates point to some 2 million people dying every year as a result of diarrhoea and diseases caused by ingesting contaminated water. Poor water and sanitation have many other serious repercussions as well. Children, especially girls, are denied their right to education because schools lack private and decent sanitation facilities. Women and girls are forced to spend large parts of their day searching for and fetching water, denying them participation in education and income-generating employment. Inadequate water and sanitation means that poor farmers and wage earners are less productive due to illness, health systems are overwhelmed and national economies underperform.

Map 33:

Imp No Data < 30 30

Source: WHO Metalink: P2.HUN.WBK.WDI.HAE.WAT.IMPRU, p. 168

78 percent of the worlds rural population now have access to clean water more than two decades ago

Progress has been slow - just 15 percent

Further reading
UNESCO
education/) education (www.unesco.org/new/en/

Yet, in many developing countries, more

than half of all households struggle with inadequate access to safe water and sanitation services

UNICEF Water, Sanitation and Hygiene (www.unicef.

org/wash/)

WHO The world health report - Health systems nancing: the path to universal coverage (www.who.int/whr/ 2010/en/index.html

UNDP, Human Development Report 2010 (hdr.undp.

org/en/reports/global/hdr2010/)

ODonovan (2008)

120

EDUCATION, HEALTH AND SANITATION

Improved water source share of rural population with access (%, 2008) 30 50 50 75 75 90 > 90

Chart 63: There are still many who do not have access to adequate sanitation
Improved sanitation facilities - share of population with access (2008)
80 60

40 20 0

Developed

East Asia

L.Amer. & Carib.

South Asia

Sub-S Africa

Source: WHO Metalink: P2.HUN.WBK.WDI.HAE.SAN.IMPS, p. 168

121

PART 2

Food aid
Emergency situations have become increasingly frequent over the past 25 years, and are often coupled with acute and chronic food insecurity in the affected countries. International responses to these crises have generally focused on addressing immediate humanitarian needs, as evidenced by the growing share of food aid that is channelled to emergencies. Several formal agreements govern food-related assistance at the international level. Among these, the Food Aid Convention (FAC) is the only legal instrument to ensure a minimum amount of food aid. The components of the FAC have remained largely unchanged since its creation in 1967, and many believe that it no longer applies to todays food-related assistance needs. Current food aid patterns do not reect longer-term requirements. In 2009, around 80 percent of total assistance was channelled to emergency relief measures, while the remainder was used for promoting agricultural and broader economic development. More troubling is the perceived high negative correlation of international food prices with the level of food aid. The strong focus on short-term relief measures, combined with limited support to local agriculture, is not only less effective for overcoming the structural reasons for food insecurity, it might even lower incentives to invest in agriculture and domestic food production. A more sustainable solution is required to tackle the underlying reasons for food insecurity, such as low agricultural productivity. Accordingly, those most in need would also benet from the provision of basic inputs, such as seeds, fertilizers and farming tools. Donors are addressing shortcomings of traditional food assistance. A growing number now rely on procurement mechanisms in the target countries themselves. Local purchases not only minimize market distortions (supplies are neither increased nor effective demand lowered), they are also generally cheaper than in-kind aid and can generate development benets to local markets and farmers. Some donors also strive for better integration of emergency interventions and longer-term development operations. The European Union, for example, envisages a rapid handover to structural food security mechanisms during emergency response. Such measures help rebuild the livelihoods of affected populations and strengthen their resilience to future crises. These examples illustrate a fundamental departure from the ad hoc and partial approaches to food security interventions followed in the past. They also point to donors general agreement on the principles that should guide food aid interventions.

Map 34:

No Data

0.00

Source: WFP Metalink: P2.HUN.WFP.FAIS.FDAID, p. 169

5.7 million tonnes of food aid were received in 2010

Despite no let-up in the number of emergencies, food aid fell to a historical low

Many donors now rely on locally purchased food in order to strengthen domestic markets in crisis-hit countries

Further reading
FAO Making the Food Aid Convention meet the realities of the 21st century (www.fao.org/docrep/013/ al935e/al935e00.pdf)

World Food Programme (www.wfp.org)

122

FOOD AID

Food aid received, grain equivalent (thousand tonnes, 2010) 0.001 1 1 50 50 100 > 100

Chart 64: Food aid ows are in long-term decline and have fallen further at a time when food prices have spiked
Food aid received (1988-2010)
16000

Thousand tonnes

14000 12000 10000 8000 6000

1990

1995

2000

2005

2010

Source: WFP Metalink: P2.HUN.WFP.FAIS.FDAID, p. 169

123

TABLE 13: Population at risk: UNHCR population of concern

UNHCR population of concern total total refugees thousands 2009 internally displaced persons thousands 2009 others and stateless persons thousands 2009 total total refugees thousands 2010 internally displaced persons thousands 2010 others and stateless persons thousands 2010

thousands 2009 WORLD DEVELOPING REGIONS AFRICA North Africa Algeria Egypt Libya Morocco Tunisia Sub-Saharan Africa Angola Benin Botswana Burkina Faso Burundi Cameroon Cape Verde Central African Republic Chad Comoros Congo Cte dIvoire Congo, Dem. Rep. Djibouti Equatorial Guinea Eritrea Ethiopia Gabon Gambia Ghana Guinea Guinea-Bissau Kenya Lesotho Liberia Madagascar Malawi Mali Mauritania Mauritius Mozambique Namibia Niger Nigeria Rwanda Senegal Seychelles Sierra Leone Somalia Sudan South Africa Swaziland Tanzania, Utd. Rep. Togo Uganda Zambia Zimbabwe

thousands 2010

29 233 28 139 10 636 143 10 9 3 3 3 10 493 159 1 0 1 231 17 0 357 250 0 24 714 2 663 1 0 224 112 0 5 16 14 1 417 0 78 0 0 4 52 0 0 1 1 25 155 17 0 19 2 249 1 619 1 0 156 20 863 0 24

10 174 9 642 2 805 138 8 7 2 2 2 2 667 141 0 0 1 94 15 0 160 55 0 21 23 456 1 0 209 63 0 2 15 11 1 10 0 72 0 0 3 39 0 0 1 1 16 129 16 0 15 678 368 0 0 1 18 8 0 22

15 628 15 207 6 469 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 469 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 197 171 0 0 519 2 053 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 399 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 550 1 034 0 0 0 0 446 0 0

3 431 3 290 1 362 5 2 2 1 1 1 1 357 18 0 0 0 37 2 0 1 25 0 3 172 154 0 0 14 49 0 3 1 3 0 8 0 6 0 0 1 13 0 0 0 0 10 25 1 0 3 21 217 0 0 155 1 409 0 1

29 986 28 931 10 587 142 8 9 3 3 3 10 445 136 1 0 2 254 17 0 359 237 0 24 585 2 719 1 0 236 118 0 3 22 15 1 311 0 73 0 0 4 40 0 0 1 1 28 136 18 0 15 2 257 2 185 1 0 164 19 436 0 25

10 350 9 845 2 947 137 7 7 2 2 2 2 810 135 0 0 1 84 15 0 165 54 0 21 42 477 1 0 222 69 0 2 20 12 1 9 0 70 0 0 4 38 0 0 1 1 16 115 16 0 11 770 387 0 0 1 18 6 0 24

14 456 14 058 6 154 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 154 0 0 0 0 157 0 0 193 131 0 0 515 1 721 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 300 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 464 1 548 0 0 0 0 126 0 0

5 180 5 027 1 486 5 2 2 1 1 1 1 481 1 0 0 1 12 2 0 2 53 0 3 29 520 0 0 14 49 0 1 2 3 0 2 0 3 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 12 21 2 0 3 23 250 0 0 162 1 304 0 1

124

TABLE 13: Population at risk: UNHCR population of concern (continued)

UNHCR population of concern total total refugees thousands 2009 internally displaced persons thousands 2009 others and stateless persons thousands 2009 total total refugees thousands 2010 internally displaced persons thousands 2010 others and stateless persons thousands 2010

thousands 2009 ASIA Central Asia Kazakhstan Kyrgyzstan Tajikistan Turkmenistan Uzbekistan East Asia Brunei Darussalam Cambodia China Indonesia Korea, DPR Korea, Republic of Lao, PDR Malaysia Mongolia Myanmar Philippines Singapore Thailand Viet Nam South Asia Afghanistan Bangladesh Bhutan India Iran (Islamic Rep.) Maldives Nepal Pakistan Sri Lanka West Asia Armenia Azerbaijan Bahrain Cyprus Georgia Iraq Jordan Kuwait Lebanon Occupied Palestinian Territory Saudi Arabia Syrian Arab Republic Turkey United Arab Emirates Yemen LATIN AMERICA & THE CARIBBEAN Argentina Bahamas Barbados Belize Bolivia (Plur. State) Brazil Chile Colombia Costa Rica

thousands 2010

13 602 17 4 3 1 1 8 1 153 0 17 199 21 1 1 9 62 4 497 2 0 1 341 7 225 3 279 12 90 24 87 0 7 3 041 684 5 206 104 606 0 0 378 3 565 3 1 18 98 1 23 156 0 253 3 898 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 3 758 0

6 372 14 4 3 1 1 7 975 0 17 181 18 1 1 8 1 1 407 1 0 1 339 3 265 2 887 10 89 20 73 0 5 35 146 2 117 18 17 0 0 15 1 785 2 1 16 95 1 18 146 0 2 463 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 390 0

5 435 0 0 0 0 0 0 67 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 67 0 0 0 0 2 627 297 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 895 435 2 741 0 586 0 0 353 1 552 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 250 3 304 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 304 0

1 796 3 1 0 0 0 2 110 0 0 18 2 0 0 0 61 2 23 1 0 0 1 1 334 95 2 1 5 14 0 2 1 111 104 349 86 3 0 0 10 228 1 0 2 3 0 6 10 0 1 132 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 64 0

14 103 301 4 284 1 1 10 1 303 0 16 192 17 1 1 8 1 4 500 221 0 1 340 7 400 4 404 17 76 22 85 0 7 2 199 590 5 100 103 612 0 0 378 3 387 3 1 17 97 1 28 155 0 318 4 238 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 4 128 0

6 425 17 4 3 1 1 9 986 0 16 185 17 1 1 8 1 2 416 1 0 0 339 3 413 3 055 10 75 18 69 0 6 40 141 2 010 18 17 0 0 11 1 684 2 1 16 93 1 18 147 0 2 471 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 396 0

4 232 60 0 60 0 0 0 202 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 62 140 0 0 0 1 578 352 0 0 0 0 0 0 952 274 2 393 0 593 0 0 236 1 344 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 221 3 672 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 672 0

3 446 224 1 222 0 0 2 115 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 2 22 81 0 0 1 2 409 998 7 1 4 16 0 1 1 207 175 698 85 2 0 0 131 360 1 0 2 3 0 10 8 0 95 95 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 60 0

125

TABLE 13: Population at risk: UNHCR population of concern (continued)

UNHCR population of concern total total refugees thousands 2009 internally displaced persons thousands 2009 others and stateless persons thousands 2009 total total refugees thousands 2010 internally displaced persons thousands 2010 others and stateless persons thousands 2010

thousands 2009 Cuba Dominica Dominican Republic Ecuador El Salvador French Guiana Grenada Guatemala Guyana Haiti Honduras Jamaica Mexico Netherlands Antilles Nicaragua Panama Paraguay Peru St. Kitts & Nevis St. Lucia St. Vincent & Grenadines Suriname Trinidad & Tobago Uruguay Venezuela (Boliv. Rep. of) OCEANIA Fiji French Polynesia New Caledonia Papua New Guinea Samoa Solomon Islands Tonga Vanuatu DEVELOPED REGIONS NORTH AMERICA Bermuda Canada United States of America ASIA & OCEANIA Australia Israel Japan New Zealand EUROPE Albania Belarus Bosnia & Herzegovina Croatia European Union Iceland Macedonia, FYR Montenegro Norway Republic of Moldova Russian Federation Serbia Switzerland Ukraine

thousands 2010

10 0 1 1 15 0 0 15 1 36 2 1 27 2 0 0 12 0 1 2 0 1 0 8 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 094 4 0 0 4 3 0 2 0 0 1 088 17 7 237 103 39 0 9 3 0 7 204 437 0 26

8 0 0 1 5 0 0 6 1 24 1 1 6 1 0 0 6 0 0 1 0 0 0 6 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 532 2 0 0 2 1 0 1 0 0 528 16 6 70 76 14 0 8 3 0 6 109 196 0 25

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 421 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 421 0 0 114 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 80 225 0 0

2 0 0 0 10 0 0 9 0 12 1 1 20 0 0 0 6 0 1 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 141 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 139 2 1 53 25 24 0 1 0 0 1 14 16 0 2

12 0 1 1 7 0 0 7 1 33 2 2 17 2 0 0 11 0 1 2 0 0 0 7 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 055 4 0 0 4 2 0 2 0 0 1 048 16 6 232 89 20 0 11 3 0 7 199 439 0 26

7 0 0 1 5 0 0 6 1 26 1 1 7 1 0 0 6 0 0 1 0 0 0 7 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 505 3 0 0 3 2 0 1 0 0 500 15 6 63 66 13 0 8 3 0 6 112 183 0 25

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 397 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 397 0 0 113 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 53 228 0 0

4 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 7 1 1 10 0 0 0 5 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 153 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 151 1 1 55 21 7 0 3 0 0 1 34 27 0 1

126

TABLE 14: Population at risk: persons affected by natural disasters

Persons affected by natural disasters total drought earthquake extreme temperature ood landslide storm volcanoes, wildres and epidemics thousands 2010

thousands 2010 WORLD DEVELOPING REGIONS AFRICA North Africa Algeria Egypt Libya Morocco Tunisia Sub-Saharan Africa Angola Benin Botswana Burkina Faso Burundi Cameroon Cape Verde Central African Republic Chad Comoros Congo Cte dIvoire Congo, Dem. Rep. Djibouti Equatorial Guinea Eritrea Ethiopia Gabon Gambia Ghana Guinea Guinea-Bissau Kenya Lesotho Liberia Madagascar Malawi Mali Mauritania Mauritius Mozambique Namibia Niger Nigeria Rwanda Senegal Seychelles Sierra Leone Somalia Sudan South Africa Swaziland Tanzania, Utd. Rep. Togo Uganda Zambia Zimbabwe

thousands 2010

thousands 2010

thousands 2010

thousands 2010

thousands 2010

thousands 2010

344 655 342 717 43 854 81 0 4 77 43 773 255 832 0 139 184 6 2 2 552 1 6 85 120

106 870 106 870 38 810 0 0 0 0 38 810 0 0 0 0 180 0 0 2 400 0 0 0 120

7 485 6 650 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

3 986 3 971 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

191 861 191 352 4 657 81 0 4 77 4 577 255 831 0 133 3 3 2 145 0 6 70 0

2 464 2 464 20 0 0 0 0 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0

30 954 30 403 317 0 0 0 0 317 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

1 034 1 007 50 0 0 0 0 50 0 1 0 6 0 3 0 7 1 0 14 0

9 482 2 39 17 48 57 7 514 5 15 1 027 79 619 309 544 338 8 134 1 509 10 103 0 2 866 4 438 26

9 400 0 0 0 0 0 7 300 0 0 720 0 600 300 460 0 7 900 0 0 0 0 2 850 4 300 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

81 0 39 17 48 57 211 5 15 0 79 19 9 81 338 233 1 500 4 103 0 16 138 20

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0

0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 307 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6

1 1 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 1 8 0 0 0 0 0 0

112 613 3 1 681

0 600 0 1 680

0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0

112 0 3 1

0 13 0 0

0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0

127

TABLE 14: Population at risk: persons affected by natural disasters (continued)

Persons affected by natural disasters total drought earthquake extreme temperature ood landslide storm volcanoes, wildres and epidemics thousands 2010

thousands 2010 ASIA Central Asia Kazakhstan Kyrgyzstan Tajikistan Turkmenistan Uzbekistan East Asia Brunei Darussalam Cambodia China Indonesia Korea, DPR Korea, Republic of Lao, PDR Malaysia Mongolia Myanmar Philippines Singapore Thailand Viet Nam South Asia Afghanistan Bangladesh Bhutan India Iran (Islamic Rep.) Maldives Nepal Pakistan Sri Lanka West Asia Armenia Azerbaijan Bahrain Cyprus Georgia Iraq Jordan Kuwait Lebanon Occupied Palestinian Territory Saudi Arabia Syrian Arab Republic Turkey United Arab Emirates Yemen LATIN AMERICA & THE CARIBBEAN Argentina Bahamas Barbados Belize Bolivia (Plur. State) Brazil Chile Colombia Costa Rica

thousands 2010

thousands 2010

thousands 2010

thousands 2010

thousands 2010

thousands 2010

285 231 64 38 8 17

67 783 0 0 0 0

252 8 0 0 8

3 900 0 0 0 0

181 630 47 38 0 9

2 388 8 0 8 0

28 948 0 0 0 0

330 1 0 0 0

256 254 0 231 535 238 96 42 0 426 6 738 15 654 1 524 27 536 49 987 4 790 5 13 20 399 1 292 1 377 70

66 483 0 60 000 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 483 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 300 0

234 0 196 17 0 0 0 21 0 0 0 7 1 0 0 5 0 1 0 4 0

3 800 0 3 800 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

154 940 0 140 254 69 56 0 0 0 3 901 9 171 1 490 26 570 48 575 4 283 0 8 20 363 1 292 74 70

2 294 0 2 148 0 0 0 0 145 1 0 0 86 0 55 0 0 0 30 0 0 0

28 180 0 25 137 0 40 42 0 260 2 666 0 35 768 0 257 507 0 0 4 0 0 0

324 0 0 152 0 0 0 0 171 1 0 5 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0

0 0 1 300 4 1 13 570 0 2 0 428 357 2 676 3 005 3

0 0 1 300 0 0 277 0 0 0 62 62 0 0 0

0 0 0 4 0 6 397 0 0 0 0 0 2 672 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 71 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 1 5 049 0 0 0 358 295 0 3 005 3

0 0 0 0 0 56 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 1 093 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 628 0 0 0 3 0 4 0 0

128

TABLE 14: Population at risk: persons affected by natural disasters (continued)

Persons affected by natural disasters total drought earthquake extreme temperature ood landslide storm volcanoes, wildres and epidemics thousands 2010

thousands 2010 Cuba Dominica Dominican Republic Ecuador El Salvador French Guiana Grenada Guatemala Guyana Haiti Honduras Jamaica Mexico Netherlands Antilles Nicaragua Panama Paraguay Peru St. Kitts & Nevis St. Lucia St. Vincent & Grenadines Suriname Trinidad & Tobago Uruguay Venezuela (Boliv. Rep. of) OCEANIA Fiji French Polynesia New Caledonia Papua New Guinea Samoa Solomon Islands Tonga Vanuatu DEVELOPED REGIONS NORTH AMERICA Bermuda Canada United States of America ASIA & OCEANIA Australia Israel Japan New Zealand EUROPE Albania Belarus Bosnia & Herzegovina Croatia European Union Iceland Macedonia, FYR Montenegro Norway Republic of Moldova Russian Federation Serbia Switzerland Ukraine

thousands 2010

thousands 2010

thousands 2010

thousands 2010

thousands 2010

thousands 2010

52 121 12 0 456 0 4 310 102 3 1 600 76 33 16 154 3

0 108 0 0 0 0 0 45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 3 700 0 0 25 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 71 0

39 11 0 0 3 0 24 5 0 1 020 76 33 0 80 2

0 0 0 0 51 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0

12 0 12 0 400 0 78 25 3 555 0 0 0 0 1

0 2 0 0 2 0 507 27 0 0 0 0 16 2 0

0 0 95 62 39 3 0 18 0 0 1 922 36 0 36 1 046 219 20 507 300 840 14 35 1 634 0 6 12 66 32 0 40

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 835 1 0 1 792 0 0 492 300 42 0 0 0 15 0 0 0 0 27 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 0 0 0 15 0 0 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 95 16 0 0 0 16 0 0 509 7 0 7 211 211 0 0 0 291 14 35 1 119 0 6 12 58 5 0 40

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 45 39 3 0 1 0 0 536 29 0 29 7 7 0 0 0 500 0 0 0 500 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 27 0 0 0 20 0 20 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0

129

TABLE 15: Undernourishment

Share of population undernourished % 1995-97 % 2006-08 % p.a. growth: 1995-97 2006-08 Incidence of undernourishment millions 1995-97 millions 2006-08 % p.a. growth: 1995-97 2006-08 kcal/cap/day 1995-97 Depth of hunger kcal/cap/day 2006-08 % p.a. growth: 1995-97 2006-08

WORLD DEVELOPING REGIONS AFRICA North Africa Algeria Egypt Libya Morocco Tunisia Sub-Saharan Africa Angola Benin Botswana Burkina Faso Burundi Cameroon Cape Verde Central African Republic Chad Comoros Congo Cte dIvoire Congo, Dem. Rep. Djibouti Equatorial Guinea Eritrea Ethiopia Gabon Gambia Ghana Guinea Guinea-Bissau Kenya Lesotho Liberia Madagascar Malawi Mali Mauritania Mauritius Mozambique Namibia Niger Nigeria Rwanda Senegal Seychelles Sierra Leone Somalia Sudan South Africa Swaziland Tanzania, Utd. Rep. Togo Uganda Zambia Zimbabwe

18 18 29 5 5

16 16 23

2.3 2.3 2.4

701.2 701.1 162.2 3.1 1.5

739.2 739.2 160.3

0.5 0.5 0.1

214 234 253 185 180 190 130

212 234 234 188 180 200 130 200 120 243 320 210 240 200 390 230 190 300 320 300 230 230 280 350 320 140 240 180 260 250 260 220 330 250 280 220 210 180 330 220 240 180 300 220 150 340 240 150 220 280 280 240 320 300

0.3 0.3 0.5 0.1 0.0 0.3 0.5 0.3 0.0 0.5 1.7 0.8 0.8 0.6 1.4 0.8 0.0 0.2 1.2 0.7 1.8 0.0 2.0 0.2 1.7 0.4 0.5 2.3 0.2 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.2 0.5 0.8 1.3 0.3 0.3 1.2 0.8 1.4 1.2 0.6 0.3 0.4 0.7 1.2 0.0 0.9 0.5 0.6 0.0 0.6 0.6

6 31 61 18 23 12 56 34 14 47 53 47 41 17 50 64 62 23 13 19 26 32 16 32 26 36 25 9 7 47 30 37 10 53 26 10 39 29 21 42 36 23 38 44 23 41 12 25 8 62 22 11 40 39 47 13 14 26 65 41 19 5 16 22 33 14 32 25 27 12 8 5 38 18 16 6 32 19 8 35 22 19 34 30 22 44 30 2.3 3.5 3.6 0.8 3.6 0.9 3.9 2.2 1.5 2.7 0.0 9.9 1.7 5.8 0.1 3.7 1.7 8.3 1.5 1.5 0.3 1.2 0.0 0.4 2.6 6.5 1.1 3.0 1.9 4.5 7.3 4.5 4.5 2.8 2.0 1.0 2.5 0.9 1.9 1.6 0.4 1.3 3.4

1.6 159.1 7.8 1.0 0.4 1.2 3.5 5.0 0.1 1.6 3.9 0.3 1.2 2.6 0.3 2.1 36.2 0.3 2.3 1.5 0.3 9.0 0.3 0.7 3.5 3.8 2.5 0.2 0.1 7.8 0.5 3.5 10.9 3.0 2.3 0.0 1.6 9.3 0.2 12.8 1.7 4.9 3.6 5.3 160.3 7.2 1.0 0.5 1.2 4.9 4.2 0.1 1.7 4.1 0.4 0.5 2.9 0.2 3.1 32.6 0.3 1.1 1.6 0.3 12.4 0.3 1.1 4.7 3.9 1.5 0.2 0.1 8.3 0.4 2.3 9.4 3.0 2.3 0.0 1.9 8.8 0.2 13.9 1.9 6.7 5.4 3.7 1.6 0.5 0.0 0.8 1.0 2.9 3.8 3.2 0.1 0.7 0.0 2.0 0.0 3.1 1.6 0.0 0.6 0.5 2.6 7.6 1.0 3.6 3.6 0.9 0.0 6.5 0.6 0.0 3.0 0.0 4.2 2.7 0.2 4.5 0.0 0.0 0.6 2.0 3.7 1.3 0.0 0.0

210 120 268 390 230 230 210 350 260 190 320 370 300 310 240 350 340 390 140 250 210 270 260 250 220 330 250 310 260 210 190 360 250 300 200 360 240 160 360 260 160 220 300 290 240 300 340

130

TABLE 15: Undernourishment (continued)

Share of population undernourished % 1995-97 % 2006-08 % p.a. growth: 1995-97 2006-08 Incidence of undernourishment millions 1995-97 millions 2006-08 % p.a. growth: 1995-97 2006-08 kcal/cap/day 1995-97 Depth of hunger kcal/cap/day 2006-08 % p.a. growth: 1995-97 2006-08

ASIA Central Asia Kazakhstan Kyrgyzstan Tajikistan Turkmenistan Uzbekistan East Asia Brunei Darussalam Cambodia China Indonesia Korea, DPR Korea, Republic of Lao, PDR Malaysia Mongolia Myanmar Philippines Singapore Thailand Viet Nam South Asia Afghanistan Bangladesh Bhutan India Iran (Islamic Rep.) Maldives Nepal Pakistan Sri Lanka West Asia Armenia Azerbaijan Bahrain Cyprus Georgia Iraq Jordan Kuwait Lebanon Occupied Palestinian Territory Saudi Arabia Syrian Arab Republic Turkey United Arab Emirates Yemen LATIN AMERICA & THE CARIBBEAN Argentina Bahamas Barbados Belize Bolivia (Plur. State) Brazil Chile Colombia Costa Rica

16 12 13 42 9 5 13 40 12 11 30 29 33 20 18 22 20 41 17 9 20 20 25 24 36 27

15 13 11 26 7 11 11 25 10 13 35 22 27 13 16 11 20 26 19 10 17 25 20 24 21

2.1 2.0 1.5 4.3 2.3 7.4 1.8 4.2 1.6 1.5 1.4 2.5 1.8 3.8 1.1 6.1 1.1 4.1 1.0 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.0 4.2 4.8

490.9 4.6 0.6 2.4 0.4 1.2 219.4 4.7 141.7 22.0 6.6 1.4 0.8 14.1 11.1 16.7 257.0 54.2 167.1 0.0 4.4 26.8 4.5 9.9 1.1 2.2

537.2 5.5 0.6 1.8 0.3 2.8 205.8 3.6 129.6 29.7 8.4 1.4 0.7 11.8 10.7 9.6 317.4 41.4 224.6 0.0 4.7 42.8 3.9 8.5 0.6

0.8 1.6 0.0 2.6 2.6 8.0 0.6 2.4 0.8 2.8 2.2 0.0 1.2 1.6 0.3 4.9 1.9 2.4 2.7

233 171 130 210 270 180 160 241 140 280 250 210 250 120 270 120 260 250 240 270 232 330 220 170 180

238 172 120 210 230 180 180 241 130 250 250 220 270 130 260 130 260 240 240 240 246 290 240 180 190 220 280 250 169 200 140 120 160 150 190 170 190 130 170 160 140 260 203 130 160 140 170 240 220 140 210 150

0.2 0.1 0.0 0.3 0.5 0.0 0.7 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.5 0.5 0.2 0.7 0.7 1.2 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.7 0.7 0.3 0.0 0.2 0.2 1.4 2.8 0.0 3.9 0.0 1.2 0.4

0.6 4.3 1.3 1.4 5.4

230 260 260 173 230 220 120

19 5 5 10

9.9

1.0 0.2

0.3

10.4

200 170

5 21

0.0 7.0

0.1 0.3

0.1 0.8

0.0 9.3

180 160 160 130 160 160 130

0.5 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.2 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.8 0.3 0.4

31 14

30 11

0.3 1.9

5.0 48.0

6.7 41.6

2.7 1.3

260 212 120

8 8 24 10 11

6 5 27 6 9

2.6 4.2 1.1 4.5 1.8

0.0 0.0 1.9 16.6 4.0

0.0 0.0 2.5 11.7 4.1 2.5 3.1 0.2

160 140 180 230 240 150 210 150

131

TABLE 15: Undernourishment (continued)

Share of population undernourished % 1995-97 % 2006-08 % p.a. growth: 1995-97 2006-08 Incidence of undernourishment millions 1995-97 millions 2006-08 % p.a. growth: 1995-97 2006-08 kcal/cap/day 1995-97 Depth of hunger kcal/cap/day 2006-08 % p.a. growth: 1995-97 2006-08

Cuba Dominica Dominican Republic Ecuador El Salvador French Guiana Grenada Guatemala Guyana Haiti Honduras Jamaica Mexico Netherlands Antilles Nicaragua Panama Paraguay Peru St. Kitts & Nevis St. Lucia St. Vincent & Grenadines Suriname Trinidad & Tobago Uruguay Venezuela (Boliv. Rep. of) OCEANIA Fiji French Polynesia New Caledonia Papua New Guinea Samoa Solomon Islands Tonga Vanuatu DEVELOPED REGIONS NORTH AMERICA Bermuda Canada United States of America ASIA & OCEANIA Australia Israel Japan New Zealand EUROPE Albania Belarus Bosnia & Herzegovina Croatia European Union Iceland Macedonia, FYR Montenegro Norway Republic of Moldova Russian Federation Serbia Switzerland Ukraine

14 26 16 12 18 20 11 60 16 6 24 15 9 21 22 8 57 12 5 0.7 0.6 2.6 1.4 0.9 2.9 0.5 2.6 1.6

1.5 2.1 1.8 0.7 0.0 2.1 0.1 4.8 0.9 0.2 2.3 2.0 0.6 0.0 2.9 0.1 5.5 0.9 0.1 3.0 0.0 1.2 0.0 6.1 0.8 1.0 1.4

190 150 240 190 200 240 220 200 430 240 170 190 150

120 150 230 190 190 250 230 190 420 230 170 190 150 260 220 210 220 220 190 170 200 220 140 170 173 160 150 210 150 190 180 116 101 200 110 100 126 120 90 130 120 121 160 130 140 150 115 120 150 170 110 190 130 170 120 130

1.8 0.0 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.8 0.6 1.2 0.3 0.5 0.7 0.0 1.1 1.8 0.3 0.3 0.8 0.6 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.6 0.7 1.1 0.3 1.1 0.6 0.7 0.1 0.2 0.7 1.0 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.7 0.5 1.2 1.8 0.2 0.5 1.1 0.5 0.7 0.9 0.0 0.5

38 20 10 21 16 7 16 13 14 14 8 5 5 9 10 13 9 5

19 15 10 16 16 8 5 15 11 7 9

6.1 2.6 0.0 2.4 0.0 1.2 10.0 1.3 2.2 6.1

1.8 0.6 0.5 5.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 3.1 0.0 0.0 0.0

1.1 0.5 0.6 4.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 1.9 0.1

4.4 1.6 1.7 1.0

310 230 200 230 220 180 210

0.0 0.0 4.4

200 220 140 190 182 170 160

1.1

0.0 0.0

0.0

210 180

11

1.5

0.0 0.0 0.1

0.1

190 200 125 111 180 120 110 128 130 90 130 120

0.1

131 160 120 150 180

0.1

120 130 180 120 190 160 120 150

132

TABLE 16: Dietary energy supplies and changes in dietary composition

Dietary energy supply per person Contribution in diets by type carbohydrates kcal/cap/day 1990-92 WORLD DEVELOPING REGIONS AFRICA North Africa Algeria Egypt Libya Morocco Tunisia Sub-Saharan Africa Angola Benin Botswana Burkina Faso Burundi Cameroon Cape Verde Central African Republic Chad Comoros Congo Cte dIvoire Congo, Dem. Rep. Djibouti Equatorial Guinea Eritrea Ethiopia Gabon Gambia Ghana Guinea Guinea-Bissau Kenya Lesotho Liberia Madagascar Malawi Mali Mauritania Mauritius Mozambique Namibia Niger Nigeria Rwanda Senegal Seychelles Sierra Leone Somalia Sudan South Africa Swaziland Tanzania, Utd. Rep. Togo Uganda Zambia Zimbabwe kcal/cap/day 2006-08 % 2005-07 proteins % 2005-07 fats % 2005-07 % 1990-92 cereals % 2005-07 Contribution in diets by commodity starchy roots % 1990-92 % 2005-07 % 1990-92 pulses % 2005-07

2 583 2 430 2 266 3 035 2 890 3 090 3 180 3 000 3 120 2 102 1 580 2 250 2 260 2 460 1 860 2 020 2 370 1 880 1 700 1 900 1 970 2 470 1 720 1 530 1 550 2 520 2 470 2 120 2 420 2 290 1 970 2 370 2 220 2 200 1 870 2 180 2 580 2 760 1 750 2 060 1 970 2 310 1 830 2 190 2 280 1 950 1 960 2 820 2 380 2 080 1 890 2 280 2 010 1 980

2 805 2 664 2 495 3 175 3 090 3 160 3 150 3 260 3 330 2 351 1 960 2 510 2 230 2 690 1 680 2 240 2 530 1 960 2 010 1 840 2 570 2 500 2 300 1 590 1 950 2 710 2 330 2 900 2 550 2 270 2 030 2 460 2 200 2 130 2 150 2 590 2 810 2 930 2 070 2 360 2 390 2 710 2 090 2 280 2 400 2 120 2 280 3 000 2 290 2 020 2 150 2 220 1 880 2 210

65 67 72 71 70 73 63 72 64 72 70 72 67 68 82 72 63 61 64 69 69 74 80 63 73 79 69 64 77 70 71 68 77 70 78 77 70 63 62 76 68 68 69 82 65 60 67 61 65 68 75 71 74 73 66

11 11 10 11 11 12 10 11 11 10 9 9 11 12 11 10 11 9 12 9 8 8 6 10 12 11 12 9 8 9 8 11 11 7 9 10 11 12 11 7 11 13 9 10 10 14 10 13 11 11 10 9 9 10 10

24 22 18 17 19 15 27 17 24 19 21 19 22 20 7 18 26 29 24 22 23 18 14 27 15 10 19 27 15 22 21 21 12 24 13 13 19 25 26 17 21 19 22 9 25 26 24 26 24 21 15 20 17 17 24

53 58 49 62 57 66 47 62 55 47 29 41 43 75 17 39 50 20 52 41 19 35 16 52 72 67 25 55 32 50 61 47 76 45 52 69 69 55 48 34 48 74 47 18 64 46 55 57 53 52 47 48 19 65 62

48 53 49 60 56 64 47 60 50 47 36 40 43 73 19 42 45 25 57 38 26 33 23 52 74 66 33 56 29 47 59 49 78 43 59 59 67 51 46 40 46 60 45 18 60 41 50 50 54 50 46 49 23 61 56

8 9 22 2 2 2 2 24 30 34 6 29 20 4 37 13 17 41 31 57

7 8 20 3 3

5 5 5 2 2

5 5 5 2 2

3 2 2 22 26 31 6 32 17 4 31 8 15 34 33 55 2 3 5 7 2 6 4 9 5 3 4 5 5 27 2 4 2 6 3 5 6 5 19 6 3

5 15 21 39 14 8 8 2 22 22 4 1

3 13 17 37 14 9 5 3 23 19 15 3

8 6

7 4 3

6 4 3 3 14 3 12

41 14 20 30 1 5

37 14 19 36 3 10 4 2 5 3 4 6 3 15

5 24 28 25 13

5 17 25 23 14 2 2 5 2 9 7 4 8

133

TABLE 16: Dietary energy supplies and changes in dietary composition (continued)
Dietary energy supply per person Contribution in diets by type carbohydrates kcal/cap/day 1990-92 ASIA Central Asia Kazakhstan Kyrgyzstan Tajikistan Turkmenistan Uzbekistan East Asia Brunei Darussalam Cambodia China Indonesia Korea, DPR Korea, Republic of Lao, PDR Malaysia Mongolia Myanmar Philippines Singapore Thailand Viet Nam South Asia Afghanistan Bangladesh Bhutan India Iran (Islamic Rep.) Maldives Nepal Pakistan Sri Lanka West Asia Armenia Azerbaijan Bahrain Cyprus Georgia Iraq Jordan Kuwait Lebanon Occupied Palestinian Territory Saudi Arabia Syrian Arab Republic Turkey United Arab Emirates Yemen LATIN AMERICA & THE CARIBBEAN Argentina Bahamas Barbados Belize Bolivia (Plur. State) Brazil Chile Colombia Costa Rica kcal/cap/day 2006-08 % 2005-07 proteins % 2005-07 fats % 2005-07 % 1990-92 cereals % 2005-07 Contribution in diets by commodity starchy roots % 1990-92 % 2005-07 % 1990-92 pulses % 2005-07

2 434 2 715 3 280 2 400 2 020 2 550 2 650 2 508 2 730 1 870 2 580 2 390 2 340 2 970 2 010 2 720 2 080 2 230 2 250 2 090 2 279 1 960 2 290 2 970 2 400 2 190 2 210 2 170 2 963 1 920 2 160 3 120 1 850 2 840 2 350 3 010

2 667 2 793 3 510 2 660 2 190 2 740 2 560 2 872 2 980 2 180 2 990 2 550 2 110 3 040 2 240 2 890 2 240 2 580 2 540 2 780 2 374 2 270 2 360 3 050 2 550 2 340 2 280 2 370 3 067 2 260 3 020 3 190 2 730 3 000 3 030 3 090 2 080

67 64 61 68 64 65 64 64 64 75 61 73 74 63 76 63 56 67 73 71 70 71 80 71 69 60 74 63 73 64 64 73 48 67 63 58 58 66 64 59 62 63 69 62 55 57 59 67 71 59 61 66 62

11 12 12 12 10 13 12 11 12 10 12 9 11 11 11 11 13 11 9 9 10 10 9 10 11 16 10 10 9 11 12 11 12 11 10 12 11 11 11 10 11 13 11 11 13 12 12 11 11 11 12 10 11

22 25 27 20 26 23 25 24 25 14 27 18 15 25 13 26 32 22 18 20 19 19 12 19 20 23 15 27 18 25 24 16 41 22 27 30 32 23 25 30 27 24 20 27 32 30 29 23 18 30 27 24 27

63 59 57 57 63 57 59 63 48 82 63 66 60 54 78 42 42 73 53 57 76 65 84 64 60 46 74 55 56 51 59 66 28 57 50 39 34 0 48 50 51 33 66 39 32 27 30 37 43 33 43 33 32

56 54 43 48 63 61 57 53 45 72 50 63 62 44 70 47 46 59 57 49 66 60 78 60 53 35 69 47 56 49 44 60 21 50 46 42 34 51 48 45 48 43 61 37 31 27 27 39 47 32 40 34 31

6 4 4 5

5 6 6 8

7 2 7 7 3 6 3 2 4

5 4 5 6 7 4 2 4

2 3

2 1

3 3

5 3 3 4 3 8 2 3 5 4 5 2 3 5 6 3 3 3 2 3 6 4 3 3 3 4

3 3 3 3

2 2 3

2 850 2 830 3 590 3 160 1 980 2 664 3 010 2 610 3 040 2 510 2 030 2 760 2 600 2 410 2 820

3 120 3 040 3 500 3 170 2 050 2 915 3 030 2 710 3 020 2 710 2 100 3 120 2 960 2 690 2 820

4 3 3

3 4 3 5

6 3 2 3 9 5 4 8

6 3 2 3

4 7 5 4 6 3 5

4 5

134

TABLE 16: Dietary energy supplies and changes in dietary composition (continued)
Dietary energy supply per person Contribution in diets by type carbohydrates kcal/cap/day 1990-92 Cuba Dominica Dominican Republic Ecuador El Salvador French Guiana Grenada Guatemala Guyana Haiti Honduras Jamaica Mexico Netherlands Antilles Nicaragua Panama Paraguay Peru St. Kitts & Nevis St. Lucia St. Vincent & Grenadines Suriname Trinidad & Tobago Uruguay Venezuela (Boliv. Rep. of) OCEANIA Fiji French Polynesia New Caledonia Papua New Guinea Samoa Solomon Islands Tonga Vanuatu DEVELOPED REGIONS NORTH AMERICA Bermuda Canada United States of America ASIA & OCEANIA Australia Israel Japan New Zealand EUROPE Albania Belarus Bosnia & Herzegovina Croatia European Union Iceland Macedonia, FYR Montenegro Norway Republic of Moldova Russian Federation Serbia Switzerland Ukraine kcal/cap/day 2006-08 % 2005-07 proteins % 2005-07 fats % 2005-07 % 1990-92 cereals % 2005-07 Contribution in diets by commodity starchy roots % 1990-92 % 2005-07 % 1990-92 pulses % 2005-07

2 720 3 000 2 160 2 110 2 400 2 470 2 290 2 300 1 730 2 300 2 510 3 090 3 280 1 770 2 320 2 390 2 110 2 580 2 580 2 360 2 440 2 610 2 660 2 460 2 549 2 640 2 480 3 210 2 550 2 120 2 530 3 260 3 464 2 870 3 050 3 510 2 969 3 130 3 410 2 920 2 810 3 228 2 560 3 180 2 670 2 420 3 341 3 090 2 550 3 230 2 880 2 960 3 370 3 040

3 420 3 090 2 270 2 300 2 580 2 400 2 150 2 740 1 850 2 610 2 840 3 260 3 260 2 420 2 450 2 660 2 410 2 460 2 710 2 860 2 460 2 700 2 840 2 650 2 850 3 000 2 880 3 150 2 890 2 400 2 950 3 426 3 728 2 650 3 530 3 750 2 892 3 220 3 530 2 800 2 810 3 401 2 890 3 150 3 080 2 990 3 453 3 260 3 060 3 450 2 850 3 320 3 450 3 290

73 64 61 55 67 54 67 68 74 66 61 62 64 68 65 58 74 59 58 64 68 65 64 64 60 60 48 52 46 73 60 53 49 48 51 49 56 46 49 58 54 54 58 56 67 57 51 45 55 51 70 63 49 63

10 12 9 10 11 12 11 11 9 10 11 11 11 10 12 11 11 12 14 11 9 10 11 11 10 10 14 12 11 9 9 12 12 12 12 12 13 13 14 13 12 12 14 12 11 11 12 16 10 12 11 12 11 11

17 24 30 35 22 34 23 21 17 24 28 26 24 22 24 32 15 29 28 25 23 25 25 26 30 29 39 35 43 18 31 35 38 40 37 38 31 40 37 29 34 34 29 32 21 32 37 39 34 36 20 25 41 26

34 26 30 35 56 28 58 53 44 51 34 47 36 47 39 27 49 32 30 30 50 39 35 36 32 43 25 35 23 25 22 29 23 19 21 23 36 22 35 39 23 30 57 37 61 30 26 23 44 27 55 40 22 43

40 25 29 34 44 22 51 46 46 44 32 44 36 50 43 29 44 26 28 33 42 34 43 37 34 41 31 32 18 34 31 28 22 24 25 22 35 22 33 38 24 30 40 30 45 31 28 20 34 28 48 36 21 36

5 7

7 9

4 5

7 4 6 3 4 2 5 5 4 7 2 5 3 2 2 3

1 2 4 11 9 4

2 3 4 9 5

4 3 6 3 8 4 4

3 8 2

18 8 3 6 7 2 2 4 3 15 4 5 6 10 40 22 5 3 4 3 3 3 2 3 6 1 10 5 7 5 3 3 5 5 8

13 14 2 2 5 2 2 4 3 14 7 4 5 10 34 18 5 3 4 3 3 3 2 4 5 2 11 5 4 4 3 3 4 5 7

4 2 2 2 4

3 3

2 2

135

TABLE 17: Changes in dietary composition

Contribution in diets by commodity meat and sh % 1990-92 WORLD DEVELOPING REGIONS AFRICA North Africa Algeria Egypt Libya Morocco Tunisia Sub-Saharan Africa Angola Benin Botswana Burkina Faso Burundi Cameroon Cape Verde Central African Republic Chad Comoros Congo Cte dIvoire Congo, Dem. Rep. Djibouti Equatorial Guinea Eritrea Ethiopia Gabon Gambia Ghana Guinea Guinea-Bissau Kenya Lesotho Liberia Madagascar Malawi Mali Mauritania Mauritius Mozambique Namibia Niger Nigeria Rwanda Senegal Seychelles Sierra Leone Somalia Sudan South Africa Swaziland Tanzania, Utd. Rep. Togo Uganda Zambia Zimbabwe % 2005-07 dairy and eggs % 1990-92 % 2005-07 fruit and vegetables % 1990-92 % 2005-07 % 1990-92 sugar % 2005-07 vegetable oils % 1990-92 % 2005-07 % 1990-92 other % 2005-07

8 7 4 3 3 2 5 3 3 4 5 2 6 3 3 6 7

11 10 4 3 3 3 4 3 3 4 5 2 4 3

5 4 5 3 6 2 5 4 7

5 4 6 3 6 2 5 5 7

4 4 6 6 3 7 8 4 6 6

5 5 6 7 5 9 7 6 6 6

8 7 6 10 9 10 12 10 9 5 7

8 7 6 9 9 8 10 11 10 5 8 13

8 7 9 9 14 6 14 8 15 9 14 6 6 4

9 8 9 7 10 4 16 8 14 9 12 8 9 5 8 8 14 5 11 15 11 7 16 6 6 17 7 14 12 8 19 4 7 12 15 9 7 5 13 4 15 8 15 5 12 6 7 10 7 6 10

11 10 11 7 6 5 7 11 6 12 12 13 14 13 17 15 12 15 24 16 15 12 13 7 10 7 19 13 12 8 9 9 11 11 11 9 9 6 9 11 6 8 12 14 10 12 13 10 16 9 13 13 23 7 14

13 12 11 9 8 8 8 10 10 12 10 14 12 14 15 12 12 14 22 14 12 12 12 7 8 9 18 13 12 10 7 10 9 8 8 10 10 6 8 10 9 10 14 12 11 19 17 10 12 12 12 12 18 10 16

7 10 15 8 2 4 7 4 7 3

11

3 9 8 5 8

10 2 4 8

3 7 3 4 4 4 4 19 1

4 9 4 4 6 6 4 11 4 3 6 12 4 5 6 9 6 3 3 5 5 12 12 4 10 3 3 6 10 3 10 10 13 5 4 6 12

8 10 14 5 8 12 10 7 10 4 5 13 7 11 13 8 16 3 9 9 14 13 2 3 13 2 13 7 20 7 8 7 5 9 3 4 8

5 8 7

3 8 2

2 8 2 7 13 11 10 3 5 4 3 5 16 12

2 6 17 3 4 1 10 7 4 2 3 7 4 10 2 4 14 1 16 2 3 21 3 18 7 5 7 14 3 2 3 4 5 11 6 4 3 5 10 6 5 3

4 4 6 3 5 4 6 4

4 8 4 4 3 5 6 6 5 7

4 4

3 10

3 11

2 6

2 4

4 8 5

5 9 6

12 3 4

17 3 5 3 3 20 3 6 17

8 12 15 3 1 8 11

3 3

3 4

136

TABLE 17: Changes in dietary composition (continued)

Contribution in diets by commodity meat and sh % 1990-92 ASIA Central Asia Kazakhstan Kyrgyzstan Tajikistan Turkmenistan Uzbekistan East Asia Brunei Darussalam Cambodia China Indonesia Korea, DPR Korea, Republic of Lao, PDR Malaysia Mongolia Myanmar Philippines Singapore Thailand Viet Nam South Asia Afghanistan Bangladesh Bhutan India Iran (Islamic Rep.) Maldives Nepal Pakistan Sri Lanka West Asia Armenia Azerbaijan Bahrain Cyprus Georgia Iraq Jordan Kuwait Lebanon Occupied Palestinian Territory Saudi Arabia Syrian Arab Republic Turkey United Arab Emirates Yemen LATIN AMERICA & THE CARIBBEAN Argentina Bahamas Barbados Belize Bolivia (Plur. State) Brazil Chile Colombia Costa Rica % 2005-07 dairy and eggs % 1990-92 % 2005-07 fruit and vegetables % 1990-92 % 2005-07 % 1990-92 sugar % 2005-07 vegetable oils % 1990-92 % 2005-07 % 1990-92 other % 2005-07

8 7 10 11 3 7 6 9 9 5 9 5 7 4 12 30 2 10 8 6 2

12 7 9 7 4 10 6 14 8 5 15 5 11 5 11 17 6 12 9 12 4

3 9 8 12 6 8 9 1 7 1

4 10 13 12 5 9 9 2 9 2

3 2 1 2 2 3 3 5 3 2 8 7 2

4 4 3 4 3 4 5 5 6 3 7 8 5 3 2 6 4 5 3

6 5 6 6 6 6 4 4 12 1 3 6 10 1 13 8 3 12 8 3 9 3

6 6 9 9 7 4 3 4 13 4 2 6 11 2 12 6 6 9 14 4 8 4 8 9 13 12 11 10 8 6 13 14 15 11 11 12 10 13 8 12 12 14 16 15 19 15 13 13 14 17 19

7 9 5 4 11 11 12 6 7 2 6 7 5 8 14 1 10 6 5 2 7 4 7 9 7 6 10 3 10 2 1 13 2 11 11 14 0 13 12 11 9 9 10 11 3 10 3 4 13 9 9 12

8 9 8 5 11 6 11 7 8 3 7 8 6 12 12 6 9 4 6 3 9 7 9 7 7 7 11 4 12 5 4 15 7 15 12 14 10 12 12 14 6 10 11 11 6 9 4 3 13 8 11 12

9 8 9 3 11 9 7 9 12 8 8 12 13 14 9 9 9 8 9 17 9 9 8 9 5 13 10 9 17 9 6 8 14 15 8 10 10 0 7 12 9 12 7 11 15 18 15 18 12 9 11 10 13

12 9 9 7 10 7 10 13 12 12 13 14 8 14 14 10 10 12 9 18 10 11 8 12 7 12 10 12 19 10 7 11 18 11 10 10 11 9 8 16 10 11 7 11 13 18 13 16 12 9 12 10 14

4 8

3 11

3 2 6 5 4

4 3 10 2 5 6 5 12 7 5 11 5 0 7 4 11 3 7 17 18 16 8 9 8 9 7 5 5 17 3 6 8 4 13 5 5 11 7 5 7 4 10 4 10 17 17 15 8 10 12 14 7 5 6 8 7 7 7 2 6 6 7 8 3 3 3 9 3 6 7 7 10 7 5 8 4 0 5 6 6 9

4 3 7 4 12 3 6 10 6 10 10 5 5 5 5 5 7 6 5 6 9 6 7 6 2 7 5 8 10

2 8 4 1 3 9 8 5 8

2 12 9 2

9 9 17 12

2 7 13 3 7

11 9 4 6 12 7

3 7 15 100 10 4 8 12 2 5

2 7 9 8 10 3 8 9 3 5

15 12 11 0 10 12 8 11 10 16 14

9 3 8 7 4 3 7 6

9 7 8 6 4 3 7 5

16 16 15 14 17 15 19 21

137

TABLE 17: Changes in dietary composition (continued)

Contribution in diets by commodity meat and sh % 1990-92 Cuba Dominica Dominican Republic Ecuador El Salvador French Guiana Grenada Guatemala Guyana Haiti Honduras Jamaica Mexico Netherlands Antilles Nicaragua Panama Paraguay Peru St. Kitts & Nevis St. Lucia St. Vincent & Grenadines Suriname Trinidad & Tobago Uruguay Venezuela (Boliv. Rep. of) OCEANIA Fiji French Polynesia New Caledonia Papua New Guinea Samoa Solomon Islands Tonga Vanuatu DEVELOPED REGIONS NORTH AMERICA Bermuda Canada United States of America ASIA & OCEANIA Australia Israel Japan New Zealand EUROPE Albania Belarus Bosnia & Herzegovina Croatia European Union Iceland Macedonia, FYR Montenegro Norway Republic of Moldova Russian Federation Serbia Switzerland Ukraine % 2005-07 dairy and eggs % 1990-92 % 2005-07 fruit and vegetables % 1990-92 % 2005-07 % 1990-92 sugar % 2005-07 vegetable oils % 1990-92 % 2005-07 % 1990-92 other % 2005-07

6 10 6 6 2 10 2 3 3 3 7 6 15 3 6 12 3 11 16 11 7 5 20 6 11 12 18 11 19 4 10 11 12 19 11 12 12 15 8 12 13 11 4 11 4 6 12 17 9 14 5 10 16 7

5 11 9 10 4 15 4 6 4 6 8 9 13 4 8 9 4 13 20 12 8 7 10 9 10 11 19 10 17 3 8 11 12 17 10 12 12 15 12 12 15 10 8 11 4 7 11 21 7 14 4 8 14 6

6 9 5 7 5 10 3 3 5 4 5 8 4 7 4 3 8 8 5 6 10 6 6 6 7

3 9 4 7 7 9 3 6 7 6 5 6 5 7 4 4 8 8 5 7 7 4 7 6 8

4 11 13 11 4 8 2 1 8 5 5 3

6 12 9 10 4 7 3 3 6 6 7 4

21 15 15 9 15 17 17 14 10 16 20 16 10 14

15 14 16 8 15 16 15 13 12 17 16 15 18 15 12 9 9 17 13 17 18 21 13 16 8 10 7 8 9 4 6 13 17 14 14 17 10 13 7 10 17 12 7 11 6 13 11 13 12 12 12 13 17 15

9 8 15 18 5 9 6 4 5 9 10 8 7 9 11 8 5 13 3 9 7 11 6 15 8 12 9 12 2 2 6 12 16 10 14 16 11 13 14 10 7 10 8 4 2 8 12 5 5 10 5 5 11 7

6 5 16 17 6 11 9 7 7 9 12 8 6 9 8 12 5 11 5 8 12 10 8 14 8 10 11 13 7 4 5 14 18 12 16 18 14 16 19 13 7 12 6 11 6 13 14 6 14 11 6 9 13 10

11 14 11 14 8 13 6 15 11 7 11 11 20 15 16 14 14 14 15 14 12 11 12 12 22 19 24 16 32 22 30 19 16 24 21 15 18 17 13 18 22 20 7 16 13 18 22 17 14 17 11 17 22 14

11 15 13 14 12 14 11 13 11 6 14 11 18 10 16 16 11 18 17 12 12 13 12 13 21 19 20 21 31 18 27 18 15 21 19 15 17 17 12 17 21 19 9 16 16 17 19 17 17 18 12 19 21 16

5 4 4 2 8 4 7 3 2 7 4 2 2 5

4 3 6 3 7 6 6 3 3 4 4 2 3 8

14 9 12 15 14 18 15 19 11 15 7 7 11 11 9 4

6 9 11 6 8 11 8 12 7 7 9 9 12 11 6 10 9 14 5 11 8 8 12 8 9 10 6 6 10 7 10 6 7 4 9 18 7 10 11 9 16 6 9 11 8 11 9 4 4 3 11 7 3 3 3 9 3 7 5 5 1 5 4 5 3 8 3 2

5 4 3 6 6 3 4 4 9 3 8 5 10 3 8 4 5 4 7 4 2

4 13 17 11 14 17 12 15 12 11 16 11 6 10 4 17 11 18 12 13 9 12

13 13

138

TABLE 18: Health effects of malnutrition

Share of children under 5 share of low weight newborns total with low BMI % 2009* % 2009* Share of adults Dietary iron supply per person

underweight % 2009* WORLD DEVELOPING REGIONS AFRICA North Africa Algeria Egypt Libya Morocco Tunisia Sub-Saharan Africa Angola Benin Botswana Burkina Faso Burundi Cameroon Cape Verde Central African Republic Chad Comoros Congo Cte dIvoire Congo, Dem. Rep. Djibouti Equatorial Guinea Eritrea Ethiopia Gabon Gambia Ghana Guinea Guinea-Bissau Kenya Lesotho Liberia Madagascar Malawi Mali Mauritania Mauritius Mozambique Namibia Niger Nigeria Rwanda Senegal Seychelles Sierra Leone Somalia Sudan South Africa Swaziland Tanzania, Utd. Rep. Togo Uganda Zambia Zimbabwe

stunted

wasted

women with low BMI % 2009*

overweight or obese

% 2009*

% 2009*

male % 2009*

female % 2009*

mg / day 2005-07

18 20 22 7 4 7 6 10 3 25 28 20 11 26 39 17 22 37 25 12 17 28 30 11 35 35 9 16 14 23 17 16 17 20 37 16 28 23 15 21 18 40 27 18 15 6 21 33 32 6 17 22 16 15 14

28 30 39 24 16 31 21 23 9 42 51 45 29 35 63 36 45 45 7 31 40 46 33 35 44 51 26 28 29 39 48 35 45 39 53 53 39 29 10 47 30 55 41 52 20 5 37 42 38 30 44 28 39 46 36

9 10 10 7 4 8 7 11 3 11 8 8 6 11 8 7 11 16 13 8 9 14 26 3 15 12 4 7 9 11 9 7 6 8 15 4 15 13 14 5 8 12 14 5 9 2 11 13 21

13 14 11.1 10 6 13 5.3 5 12.6 15 13 16 11 11 6 13 22 25 13 17 10 14 20 6.6 20 13 16.4 8.6 13.2 8 14 16 14 19.2 9.2 13.5 13.0 14 15 16 12 6 19 14 8.6 15.9 19.2 12.2 9.8 18.2 11.2 12.3 5.7 10.0 15.3 20.3 10.5 13.2 8.2 18.5 6.7 20.8 9.2 1.6 7.3

9.1 6.4 6.5 17.2 10.7 22.5 21.5 11.1 13.9 4.4 3.8 3.5 3.0 1.7 2.8 7.0 6.3 2.0 2.4 3.5 2.8 3.9 0.7 6.7 7.9 1.3 0.9 8.4 2.3 4.4 4.3 2.6 2.5 3.1 3.1 1.8 2.6 2.4 4.3 12.9 2.6 4.3 1.5 5.1 4.9 3.2 15.1 3.6 3.4 4.1 8.6 23.2 3.2 10.4 10.9 6.1 4.0 3.0 4.3 1.2 2.8

12.9 10.7 13.5 36.1 24.3 46.3 41.3 23.1 33.4 9.2 10.2 9.5 22.8 3.0 3.7 15.1 15.3 5.3 3.8 5.3 7.5 9.7 3.0 13.8 14.8 2.3 1.6 21.5 14.4 11.7 5.1 8.1 6.8 26.6 7.7 1.5 6.2 6.8 23.3 23.0 7.8 16.8 3.7 9.0 4.0 12.5 33.7 10.1 7.1 8.9 42.8 37.1 6.8 6.1 4.9 7.0 13.8

14.5 14.4 15.2 16.3 13.6 17.7 14.0 16.3 15.7 15.0 9.8 15.4 14.7 24.2 13.5 15.8 12.1 12.3 18.0 9.2 12.0 11.1 8.4 10.2 13.2 15.4 15.5 11.3 14.0 10.7 9.1 13.4 16.4 11.7 11.3 16.2 18.7 13.3 13.2 8.8 14.0 23.5 19.6 17.4 11.3 15.3 11.4 15.7 14.3 13.8 14.7 13.1 14.5 11.3 14.3

3 4 16 6 6 7

14 11 9.9

12.1 9.6 9.2

139

TABLE 18: Health effects of malnutrition (continued)

Share of children under 5 share of low weight newborns total with low BMI % 2009* % 2009* Share of adults Dietary iron supply per person

underweight % 2009* ASIA Central Asia Kazakhstan Kyrgyzstan Tajikistan Turkmenistan Uzbekistan East Asia Brunei Darussalam Cambodia China Indonesia Korea, DPR Korea, Republic of Lao, PDR Malaysia Mongolia Myanmar Philippines Singapore Thailand Viet Nam South Asia Afghanistan Bangladesh Bhutan India Iran (Islamic Rep.) Maldives Nepal Pakistan Sri Lanka West Asia Armenia Azerbaijan Bahrain Cyprus Georgia Iraq Jordan Kuwait Lebanon Occupied Palestinian Territory Saudi Arabia Syrian Arab Republic Turkey United Arab Emirates Yemen LATIN AMERICA & THE CARIBBEAN Argentina Bahamas Barbados Belize Bolivia (Plur. State) Brazil Chile Colombia Costa Rica

stunted

wasted

women with low BMI % 2009*

overweight or obese

% 2009*

% 2009*

male % 2009*

female % 2009*

mg / day 2005-07

22 7 7 3 15 12 4 9 29 5 20 18 1 32 17 5 30 21 3 7 20 40 33 41 12 44 10 18 39 31 22 10 4 8 8 2 7 2 2 4 2 5 10 4 43 4 2 5 5 5 2 1 3 1

30 21 18 18 33 22 20 19 40 14 40 45 3 48 21 28 41 32 4 16 1 46 59 43 38 48 20 20 49 42 19 23 18 27 14 15 28 8 4 17 12 9 28 16 58 14 8 10 22 27 7 2 13 6

11 5 4 3 9 6 5 5 9 3 15 9 1 7 15 3 11 7 4 5 10 18 9 18 5 20 6 10 13 14 12 6 5 7 7

15 6 6 5 10 4 5 4 9 3 8.0 16.1 9.9 5.9 3.7 6.8 7.4 6.9

4.5 15.0 20.2 11.7 8.0 13.9 14.5 4.3 8.5 1.6 4.6 2.5 3.7 4.7 6.5 14.5 3.9 14.2 14.6 6.9 1.7 10.4 11.9 2.0 4.5 6.6 4.9 1.2 32.9 29.7 2.1 1.5 1.0 4.7 32.9 5.7 35.6 5.4 24.4 31.2 31.6 16.2 5.2 4.8 4.3 6.9 1.3 13.6 6.5 1.4 3.5 2.6 22.4 14.4 15.8 28.9 24.8 15.9 22.3 3.0 2.5 3.9 0.7 27.3 37.2 26.4

7.5 20.6 27.4 21.6 11.6 14.5 19.8 6.7 7.2 2.8 6.5 6.9 3.9 7.7 4.1 17.9 20.7 6.1 8.3 6.2 11.8 2.0 4.2 3.3 1.3 6.6 2.5 29.5 26.1 1.6 8.4 7.3 35.6 30.2 32.1 38.2 21.9 25.7 36.2 41.7 52.4 29.7

14.3 11.3 13.3 12.0 12.7 9.8 9.9 17.4 17.4 10.4 20.0 10.2 15.6 21.8 12.1 15.8 11.1 12.4 9.9 11.7 13.0 10.6 8.1 10.8 13.5 17.7 15.2 8.9 11.8 14.4 11.8 12.0 18.8 10.5 11.2 17.2 16.1 10.2

11 11 5 21 8 5 27

13.5 9.6 4.9 12.3 9.2 19.2 26.5

9 28 7 21 32 17 7 10

3 6 2 2 7 2 12 12 1 15 2 1 4 2 1 2 0 1 1

5 15 13 7

7.0 9 11 3.5

4.9 1.6 25.2

29.5 23.8 22.8 30.2 10.5 19.0 27.4 26.7 21.6 24.4 10.0 16.5 24.5 11.9 20.9

43.5 39.0 35.6 43.0 22.7 27.9 31.0 42.6 44.2 45.4 27.1 22.1 33.6 23.7 28.3

15.9 13.3 15.8 19.6 10.3 14.0 12.2 17.4 19.2 16.7 10.2 13.7 13.8 11.2 14.0

8 7 11 14 14 6 8 6 7 4.0 0.8 3.9 3.2

3.0 3.4 3.3 2.0 3.5 1.1

140

TABLE 18: Health effects of malnutrition (continued)

Share of children under 5 share of low weight newborns total with low BMI % 2009* % 2009* Share of adults Dietary iron supply per person

underweight % 2009* Cuba Dominica Dominican Republic Ecuador El Salvador French Guiana Grenada Guatemala Guyana Haiti Honduras Jamaica Mexico Netherlands Antilles Nicaragua Panama Paraguay Peru St. Kitts & Nevis St. Lucia St. Vincent & Grenadines Suriname Trinidad & Tobago Uruguay Venezuela (Boliv. Rep. of) OCEANIA Fiji French Polynesia New Caledonia Papua New Guinea Samoa Solomon Islands Tonga Vanuatu DEVELOPED REGIONS NORTH AMERICA Bermuda Canada United States of America ASIA & OCEANIA Australia Israel Japan New Zealand EUROPE Albania Belarus Bosnia & Herzegovina Croatia European Union Iceland Macedonia, FYR Montenegro Norway Republic of Moldova Russian Federation Serbia Switzerland Ukraine

stunted

wasted

women with low BMI % 2009*

overweight or obese

% 2009*

% 2009*

male % 2009*

female % 2009*

mg / day 2005-07

5 10 3 6 7 10 29 21 2 2 2 9 13 11 19 9 3 4 6 6 3 5 12 8 4 6 4 17 48 18 30 30 5 15 23 22 18 28 15 11 5 14 16 42 1 8 10 1 5 2 2 1 1 1 11 8 5 5 3 5 4 11 8 11 19 8 8 11 10 8 10 11 10

7.3

6.2

13.3 10.1 14.4

27.5 39.1 29.3 28.2 32.9 32.1 26.7 27.1 8.4 26.3 38.2 38.4 31.3 32.1 22.3 21.7 49.4 31.9 33.5 34.6 38.0 26.0 34.8 26.5 42.2

18.6 17.7 10.0 8.1 15.7 13.7 13.1 12.7 9.9 14.0 15.0 17.8 12.8 13.6 11.7 13.9 15.8 15.3 15.8 13.0 9.8 13.4 11.3 11.4 17.9 19.5 18.3

1.9 2.9

15.7 20.2 14.9

2.0 15.5 4.0 1.4 3.7 1.0 3.6 1.9

13.8 8.3 8.4 12.9 10.0 26.7 16.8 19.4 16.2 11.1 32.0 11.9 16.4 16.5 21.6 20.7 26.6 15.8

6.1

5.6

21.3

18 2 16 12 1

44 4 34 26 4

4 1 7 6 1

11 13 3 10 1.9 2.9 1.9

11.8 45.3 25.3 49.1 22.9 21.6 29.6 2.6 24.6 30.2 9.4 9.6 25.2 23.2 11.5 10.8 1.6 5.5 26.2 20.5 21.7 1.3 2.8

20.1 66.7 39.2 70.3 36.8 23.0 32.3 23.9 33.2 8.2 24.9 27.6 3.5 27.7 21.9 20.5 26.4 25.3 19.4 19.6 20.3 18.9 20.7 17.9 28.8 29.8 20.3 11.6 23.6 12.6 12.7 15.8 14.2 13.4 16.7 14.9 14.2 14.8 16.5 13.9 19.1 14.9 19.7 19.9 15.2 14.4 12.8 14.8 20.2 11.6 14.8 20.8 13.0 17.5 13.7

1 3

4 8

1 1 7 8

2.4 1.0

1 6

6 1 2 0

23 5 12 1

9 2 4 2 4 5 5 4 0.2 2.3 3.0

19.7 22.7 22.8 21.5 23.4 21.6 22.8 5.0 7.0 5.9 21.6 10.0 18.4 25.5 3.5 5.9 5.4 18.3 15.5

2 2 3 2 4

12 8 11 8 23

3 4

6 5

5 5 8

6 6 6 4

141

TABLE 19: Trade and food security - caloric self-sufciency

Caloric self-sufciency % 1970 WORLD DEVELOPING REGIONS AFRICA North Africa Algeria Egypt Libya Morocco Tunisia Sub-Saharan Africa Angola Benin Botswana Burkina Faso Burundi Cameroon Cape Verde Central African Republic Chad Comoros Congo Cte dIvoire Congo, Dem. Rep. Djibouti Equatorial Guinea Eritrea Ethiopia Gabon Gambia Ghana Guinea Guinea-Bissau Kenya Lesotho Liberia Madagascar Malawi Mali Mauritania Mauritius Mozambique Namibia Niger Nigeria Rwanda Senegal Seychelles Sierra Leone Somalia Sudan South Africa Swaziland Tanzania, Utd. Rep. Togo Uganda Zambia Zimbabwe % 1980 % 1990 % 2000 % 2009 % p.a. growth: 1970-2009

100.2 99.7 102.1 90.1 86.0 93.0 93.9 70.3 104.4 113.7 110.7 100.4 98.5 103.7 96.4 96.8 90.1 127.2 104.4 102.5 148.3

100.2 96.8 88.3 63.8 60.2 72.1 66.9 95.7 69.7 102.2 96.7 96.8 99.7 98.1 98.4 82.5 79.9 107.4 96.2 104.9

100.2 98.3 86.6 66.0 60.5 81.3 61.2 96.2 65.2 89.8 94.1 98.1 97.7 93.7 95.2 70.1 88.0 120.5 96.1 87.9

100.2 96.4 82.1 66.8 66.8

100.6 94.8 82.2 76.1 82.7 64.3 60.8

0.0 0.4 0.6 1.3 0.3 1.0 0.4 0.6 1.0 0.5 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.1 0.1 0.7 0.9 0.1 0.4 1.9

92.0 73.1 99.2 91.1 97.1 92.6 95.1 97.0 78.3 60.7 120.3 95.3 83.5 89.9

87.3 77.9 90.9 92.2 89.1 88.8 92.4 93.0 69.2 90.8 109.2 87.9 69.4 67.8 90.8 58.8 53.5 93.9 87.9 104.8 61.0 70.7 91.8 98.9 94.0 81.5 82.4 56.4 94.5 90.0 89.0 68.6 89.8 52.4 79.5 94.0 120.1 91.4 84.0 93.3 100.5 53.8

85.1 146.2 104.1 97.7 105.5 100.4 71.2 87.8 104.7 97.0 97.1 68.2

80.2 124.1 99.0 91.4 95.0 90.1 53.5 82.3 97.5 107.7 97.0

76.3 70.3 97.7 86.3 88.1 89.9 53.6 85.5 98.1 94.4 96.9

63.0 63.8 98.6 87.9 87.1 74.2 65.4 90.0 99.4 93.9 105.7

0.9 2.5 0.3 0.3 0.0 1.3 0.6 0.3 0.0 0.1

114.8 69.1 119.9 104.9 98.2 109.5 105.5 94.6 92.1 99.8 117.3 281.4 102.7 106.6 101.0 79.7 124.2

92.8 65.0 99.1 87.1 97.7 83.9 54.7 88.8 76.5 102.7 132.5 94.7 96.6 97.9 71.1 103.9

81.1 55.5 94.1 98.2 95.1 86.6 84.0 85.1 93.5 110.7 100.1 91.0 99.9 90.1 130.7

86.6 88.2 94.0 92.7 81.7 75.1 69.3 92.3 98.0 90.2 94.0 96.5 97.6 109.4

0.8 0.5 0.6 0.4 0.3 1.2 0.1 1.4 0.6 0.6 2.2 0.3 0.6 0.2 0.6 2.1

142

TABLE 19: Trade and food security - caloric self-sufciency (continued)

Caloric self-sufciency % 1970 ASIA Central Asia Kazakhstan Kyrgyzstan Tajikistan Turkmenistan Uzbekistan East Asia Brunei Darussalam Cambodia China Indonesia Korea, DPR Korea, Republic of Lao, PDR Malaysia Mongolia Myanmar Philippines Singapore Thailand Viet Nam South Asia Afghanistan Bangladesh Bhutan India Iran (Islamic Rep.) Maldives Nepal Pakistan Sri Lanka West Asia Armenia Azerbaijan Bahrain Cyprus Georgia Iraq Jordan Kuwait Lebanon Occupied Palestinian Territory Saudi Arabia Syrian Arab Republic Turkey United Arab Emirates Yemen LATIN AMERICA & THE CARIBBEAN Argentina Bahamas Barbados Belize Bolivia (Plur. State) Brazil Chile Colombia Costa Rica % 1980 % 1990 % 2000 % 2009 % p.a. growth: 1970-2009

98.0

97.0

98.7

96.9 113.8 162.8 91.8 62.5 93.9 83.3

94.3 100.2 123.5 80.8 57.4 89.5 84.1 97.0 95.1 89.5 124.7 90.3 102.7 145.5 62.7 100.3 89.3 142.1 96.1 90.6 81.2 80.0 95.2 95.7 65.0 92.0 90.9 72.1 83.2 53.9 73.4

0.3

99.5 107.5 98.2 100.2 92.0 75.5 90.4 92.5 79.1 109.4 124.5 129.6 79.7 96.9 96.8 90.1 83.4 97.9 95.8 109.2 99.1 71.7 86.8

98.2 88.3 95.3 96.4 94.3 53.3 98.2 133.6 84.5 105.4 120.4 155.2 93.2 95.5 98.4 89.4 93.6 98.3 71.4 99.1 98.2 79.2 89.0

101.7 99.0 96.3 103.6 90.6 98.7 154.0 92.9 100.9 101.2 178.4 109.4 95.7 88.1 90.6 77.6 100.0 69.0 98.2 90.0 77.8 82.4

99.7 93.9 97.0 103.9 63.5 97.6 134.0 58.6 101.9 92.2 139.0 107.4 93.4 68.0 84.8 70.7 98.6 60.6 94.3 92.6 68.2 87.6 69.3

0.1 0.3 0.2 0.6 0.0 0.3 1.2 0.6 0.2 0.8 0.2 0.5 0.2 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.1 1.0 0.4 0.2 0.0

63.1 85.8

69.2 72.4 96.6 70.9 107.8 170.8 84.1 101.8 54.3 104.0 189.5 175.4 82.7 105.8 84.3 98.2 117.0 87.0 107.1 67.7 92.5 108.6 104.9 209.5 59.7 102.4 112.3 96.4 96.5 100.7 102.6 245.4 51.4 246.0 120.1 112.4 68.0 83.9 94.9 153.9 142.1 140.6 69.7 78.3 91.0 1.4 0.7 0.5 0.6 0.6 112.5 273.6 0.6 1.2 65.7 92.1 67.9 95.5 56.0 93.3 0.7 0.1

143

TABLE 19: Trade and food security - caloric self-sufciency (continued)

Caloric self-sufciency % 1970 Cuba Dominica Dominican Republic Ecuador El Salvador French Guiana Grenada Guatemala Guyana Haiti Honduras Jamaica Mexico Netherlands Antilles Nicaragua Panama Paraguay Peru St. Kitts & Nevis St. Lucia St. Vincent & Grenadines Suriname Trinidad & Tobago Uruguay Venezuela (Boliv. Rep. of) OCEANIA Fiji French Polynesia New Caledonia Papua New Guinea Samoa Solomon Islands Tonga Vanuatu DEVELOPED REGIONS NORTH AMERICA Bermuda Canada United States of America ASIA & OCEANIA Australia Israel Japan New Zealand EUROPE Albania Belarus Bosnia & Herzegovina Croatia European Union Iceland Macedonia, FYR Montenegro Norway Republic of Moldova Russian Federation Serbia Switzerland Ukraine % 1980 % 1990 % 2000 % 2009 % p.a. growth: 1970-2009

238.2 94.1 237.5 108.0 97.4 77.6 100.0 295.7 95.8 112.4 112.4 99.7 119.5 110.3 103.5 95.2 101.2 82.7 83.4 105.8 110.6 72.4 117.7 91.5 116.2 117.2 133.1 121.6 155.5 106.4 126.0 158.5 122.6 232.1 241.6 116.9 86.0 112.7 134.0 174.5 116.0 132.9 119.0 161.2 171.7 159.9 178.7 121.0 55.5 125.9 98.2 88.0 65.3 109.9 204.6 81.8 109.6 55.9 77.1 86.7 110.5 113.2 63.6 89.2 51.7 116.3

221.3 81.5 98.9 80.4 50.1 105.4 133.7 65.2 101.0 56.5 74.4 91.3 92.2 158.0 66.8 153.7 91.9 82.6 88.6 166.3 61.6 134.2 261.0 60.0 119.2 93.1 190.3 81.0 139.2 118.1 135.3 153.8 132.8 266.7 290.7

148.6 52.7 50.8 101.5 66.4

59.4 51.7 53.8 100.8 70.1 1.5 3.7 0.2 0.8

126.7 267.4 52.8 86.8 66.9 93.7 63.7 166.3 68.4 101.9

119.9 169.5 51.0 88.0 69.6 95.1 54.4 66.1 52.4

0.5 1.4 1.6 0.6 0.9 0.6 1.8 0.9

79.3 135.0 58.4 138.8 194.3

79.2 232.4 61.9 136.9 132.2

0.1 1.9 0.4 0.4

135.4 83.6 134.0 79.3 132.3 112.2 132.1 160.7 128.6 272.0 293.1

143.1 72.9 122.2 75.9 107.8 114.0 129.0 183.2 123.8 204.0 207.5

0.5 1.2 0.2 1.2 0.9 1.8 0.1 0.4 0.0 0.2 0.4

183.3 91.3 87.5

178.7 87.3 97.3

144.3 93.5 79.2

164.6 96.7 60.1 77.5 54.8 101.6

185.9 101.2 61.5 103.6 62.5 108.6 92.5 68.1 50.1 133.3 113.1 126.2 62.7 193.3

0.0 0.3 0.9

85.1

87.7

98.2

98.7 72.7

0.2

58.8

62.1

71.4

64.3 107.4 88.4

0.4

55.1

71.6

66.2 108.1

144

TABLE 20: Trade and food security - import bills

Food import bills total million US$ 2000 WORLD DEVELOPING REGIONS AFRICA North Africa Algeria Egypt Libya Morocco Tunisia Sub-Saharan Africa Angola Benin Botswana Burkina Faso Burundi Cameroon Cape Verde Central African Republic Chad Comoros Congo Cte dIvoire Congo, Dem. Rep. Djibouti Equatorial Guinea Eritrea Ethiopia Gabon Gambia Ghana Guinea Guinea-Bissau Kenya Lesotho Liberia Madagascar Malawi Mali Mauritania Mauritius Mozambique Namibia Niger Nigeria Rwanda Senegal Seychelles Sierra Leone Somalia Sudan South Africa Swaziland Tanzania, Utd. Rep. Togo Uganda Zambia Zimbabwe million US$ 2010 % p.a. growth: 2000-2010 US$ 2000 per capita US$ 2010 % p.a. growth: 2000-2010 % 2000 % 2010 % p.a. growth: 2000-2010 Food + energy import bills, share of GDP

398 055.7 116 263.1 17 999.1 8 797.3 2 541.3 3 278.4 794.1 1 515.4 654.6 9 201.8 638.4 112.0 256.1 93.1 27.0 254.2 59.3 24.2 41.5 11.9 99.5 388.4 205.5 37.4 33.2 174.1 81.8 138.0 61.3 334.8 104.7 9.7 384.6 122.6 8.6 120.7 51.8 114.4 107.1 282.2 193.1 212.6 55.8 1 470.3 42.5 334.9 30.4 41.3 141.1 359.4 1 107.5 179.2 220.8 71.4 176.6 69.4 75.9

1 029 638.0 373 180.5 59 779.4 25 001.9 7 863.3 9 715.5 1 531.5 4 087.7 1 803.9 34 777.5 2 292.5 647.5 577.8 258.6 101.1 1 184.3 176.8 71.9 294.0 60.5 721.2 1 549.3 711.6 108.0 202.5 224.4 1 033.6 416.0 95.8 1 609.2 245.5 67.0 1 490.8 262.8 14.4 398.8 166.4 407.3 548.3 886.1 506.6 394.0 472.0 5 762.6 245.9 1 025.6 186.7 169.4 604.8 1 475.1 4 075.0 401.3 758.5 205.1 530.6 233.4 784.5

10.0 12.4 12.8 11.0 12.0 11.5 6.8 10.4 10.7 14.2 13.6 19.2 8.5 10.7 14.1 16.6 11.5 11.5 21.6 17.7 21.9 14.8 13.2 11.2 19.8 2.6 28.9 11.7 4.6 17.0 8.9 21.3 14.5 7.9 5.2 12.7 12.4 13.5 17.7 12.1 10.1 6.4 23.8 14.6 19.2 11.8 19.9 15.2 15.7 15.2 13.9 8.4 13.1 11.1 11.6 12.9 26.3

65.1 23.6 22.2 62.0 83.2 48.5 151.8 52.6 69.2 13.8 45.8 17.2 145.7 7.6 4.2 16.2 135.7 6.5 5.1 21.1 31.7 23.4 4.1 51.1 63.9 47.5 1.2 111.7 47.3 17.5 12.5 7.8 12.3 62.4 3.0 7.9 4.6 10.1 40.5 236.0 10.6 112.1 5.1 11.9 5.2 35.2 385.0 10.0 19.1 10.5 24.7 168.4 6.5 14.9 7.3 6.8 6.1

149.5 66.0 58.5 150.7 221.7 119.8 241.0 127.9 172.1 40.6 120.1 73.2 287.9 15.7 12.1 60.4 356.6 16.3 26.2 82.3 178.4 78.5 10.8 121.5 289.3 42.7 12.5 276.4 55.5 66.0 24.6 44.2 36.8 121.0 3.6 19.3 11.2 26.5 158.5 682.1 21.7 172.6 30.4 36.4 23.1 82.5 2 145.8 28.9 64.8 33.9 81.3 338.4 16.9 34.0 15.9 17.8 62.4

8.7 10.8 10.2 9.3 10.3 9.5 4.7 9.3 9.5 11.4 10.1 15.6 7.0 7.6 11.0 14.1 10.1 9.6 17.9 14.6 18.8 12.9 10.1 9.0 16.3 1.0 25.9 9.5 1.6 14.2 7.0 18.9 11.6 6.8 1.7 9.4 9.2 10.1 14.6 11.2 7.4 4.4 19.5 11.8 16.0 8.9 18.7 11.2 13.0 12.4 12.6 7.2 10.1 8.6 8.1 10.1 26.3

3.3 4.4 5.7 5.3 4.9 4.4 2.8 9.6 7.2 6.0 9.2 9.2 6.3 8.9 6.9 6.0 13.7 3.2 3.7 8.0 3.4 11.7 6.8 7.3 6.5 25.7 4.1 3.3 13.8 13.3 7.2 3.5 8.3 34.3 4.9 8.7 6.0 11.4 14.1 11.1 7.5 6.4 8.0 4.1 4.0 14.6 17.0 13.1 3.7 3.7 20.7 5.4 13.1 6.6 5.5

5.8 7.3 8.2 8.6 6.0 8.9 4.2 14.2 9.6 8.0 3.3 16.6 12.0 7.9 10.9 8.9 16.6 6.2 6.7 12.8 8.3 15.0 8.4 11.8 18.9 14.3 8.8 4.7 14.7 11.8 12.2 12.5 14.0 15.5 5.8 9.2 8.2 10.6 27.2 18.1 11.2 6.3 17.0 4.7 6.0 19.2 52.1 26.4 2.9 7.0 14.0 14.2 20.8 8.0 6.6 22.6

5.8 5.2 3.8 5.0 2.0 7.4 4.1 4.0 2.9 3.0 9.7 6.1 6.6 1.2 4.7 4.1 2.0 7.0 6.1 4.8 9.4 2.5 2.1 4.9 11.2 5.7 7.9 3.8 0.7 1.2 5.5 13.5 5.3 7.7 1.7 0.6 3.3 0.7 6.8 5.0 4.0 0.1 7.8 1.2 4.1 2.8 11.8 7.3 2.5 6.5 3.8 10.1 4.8 2.0 2.0

145

TABLE 20: Trade and food security - import bills (continued)

Food import bills total million US$ 2000 ASIA Central Asia Kazakhstan Kyrgyzstan Tajikistan Turkmenistan Uzbekistan East Asia Brunei Darussalam Cambodia China Indonesia Korea, DPR Korea, Republic of Lao, PDR Malaysia Mongolia Myanmar Philippines Singapore Thailand Viet Nam South Asia Afghanistan Bangladesh Bhutan India Iran (Islamic Rep.) Maldives Nepal Pakistan Sri Lanka West Asia Armenia Azerbaijan Bahrain Cyprus Georgia Iraq Jordan Kuwait Lebanon Occupied Palestinian Territory Saudi Arabia Syrian Arab Republic Turkey United Arab Emirates Yemen LATIN AMERICA & THE CARIBBEAN Argentina Bahamas Barbados Belize Bolivia (Plur. State) Brazil Chile Colombia Costa Rica million US$ 2010 % p.a. growth: 2000-2010 US$ 2000 per capita US$ 2010 % p.a. growth: 2000-2010 % 2000 % 2010 % p.a. growth: 2000-2010 Food + energy import bills, share of GDP

71 479.3 954.7 372.6 63.5 65.2 180.3 273.2 40 908.4 172.7 93.8 20 742.6 231.5 7 192.3 48.1 3 340.6 77.8 218.4 2 405.6 3 223.1 2 450.2 711.5 9 577.6 417.4 1 108.7 22.0 3 157.1 2 280.3 77.4 175.2 1 520.0 819.5 20 038.7 175.3 199.6 749.1 336.9 143.4 3 333.8 804.5 923.1 957.6 454.1 4 986.3 683.1 1 763.3 3 129.5 790.1 25 874.7 1 190.5 282.6 108.0 59.1 239.4 3 510.1 1 181.8 1 325.6 405.9

245 986.8 3 924.0 1 704.1 457.3 458.2 429.1 875.4 148 033.3 450.2 567.8 83 746.0 217.1 21 599.9 163.2 12 052.5 368.4 495.0 5 885.2 8 044.0 8 227.5 6 007.8 32 241.3 665.9 5 350.9 110.0 12 431.7 6 235.6 162.4 575.4 4 870.9 1 838.6 61 788.1 593.4 958.1 1 254.7 977.3 822.3 8 345.0 2 334.7 3 422.6 2 710.3 644.8 14 813.3 2 465.6 6 962.9 9 892.2 2 983.1 65 010.7 2 038.4 463.0 317.0 85.0 379.8 7 863.9 4 424.2 3 806.5 1 141.5

13.2 15.2 16.4 21.8 21.5 9.1 12.4 13.7 10.1 19.7 15.0 0.6 11.6 13.0 13.7 16.8 8.5 9.4 9.6 12.9 23.8 12.9 4.8 17.0 17.5 14.7 10.6 7.7 12.6 12.4 8.4 11.9 13.0 17.0 5.3 11.2 19.1 9.6 11.2 14.0 11.0 3.6 11.5 13.7 14.7 12.2 14.2 9.7 5.5 5.1 11.4 3.7 4.7 8.4 14.1 11.1 10.9

19.9 17.2 24.9 12.8 10.6 40.0 11.0 21.6 528.2 7.5 16.0 10.1 156.4 9.1 142.7 32.3 4.9 31.1 822.4 38.8 9.0 6.6 18.3 8.6 38.5 3.0 34.9 283.4 7.2 10.5 43.7 113.0 57.0 24.6 1 174.2 357.2 30.2 139.7 166.7 475.6 255.9 142.0 248.8 42.7 27.7 1 031.8 44.6 49.6 32.2 948.3 402.8 235.3 28.8 20.1 76.6 33.3 103.6

61.1 64.6 106.3 85.7 66.6 85.1 31.9 72.5 1 128.3 40.2 61.0 8.9 448.3 26.3 424.4 133.7 10.3 63.1 1 581.6 119.0 68.4 18.9 21.2 36.0 151.5 10.2 84.3 513.8 19.2 28.1 88.1 276.5 191.9 104.3 994.2 885.2 188.9 263.5 377.4 1 250.5 641.0 159.6 539.7 120.8 95.7 1 316.8 124.0 110.2 50.4 1 349.8 1 161.0 272.4 38.3 40.3 258.5 82.2 245.0

11.8 14.1 15.6 20.9 20.2 7.8 11.2 12.9 7.9 18.2 14.3 1.2 11.1 11.3 11.5 15.3 7.8 7.3 6.8 11.9 22.4 11.2 1.5 15.4 14.7 13.0 9.2 6.1 10.3 10.3 7.3 9.4 12.9 15.5 1.6 9.5 20.1 6.5 8.5 10.2 9.6 1.2 8.1 11.0 13.2 2.5 10.8 8.3 4.6 3.6 11.2 1.5 2.9 7.2 12.9 9.4 9.0

5.1 5.4 5.0 14.0 30.9 4.0 3.7 5.7 2.9 11.7 3.5 5.3 8.5 6.7 7.8 17.9 6.5 8.6 20.6 8.1 9.1 3.4 3.7 8.5 2.6 2.8 15.5 7.2 6.9 8.3 4.4 16.1 4.9 10.4 8.9 9.2 11.8 2.6 11.5

8.2 5.6 3.8 28.0 20.4 5.1 8.8 4.6 16.7 6.1 7.3 15.6 9.2 14.7 20.7 4.0 9.0 44.8 15.1 15.9 8.3 9.6 7.6 15.9 9.3 3.5 20.8 10.7 10.0 9.3 6.0 13.2 2.4 7.3 11.5 15.7 15.3 22.7 3.2 15.9

5.0 0.4 2.7 7.1 4.1 3.2 4.4 4.7 3.7 5.7 3.3 6.3 3.2 6.6 1.5 4.8 0.5 8.1 6.4 5.8 9.4 7.4 6.5 13.6 2.3 3.0 4.1 3.8 1.1 3.3 2.0 6.8 3.5 2.6 5.5 6.8 2.4 3.3

2.7 4.3 3.5 3.6 11.0 2.7 0.7 8.9 7.5 18.2 3.9 1.8 5.6 1.6 5.9

4.0 11.0 5.5 5.0 19.1 4.3 1.4 14.7 12.9 15.5 5.9 2.4 11.3 2.5 9.6

4.1 9.9 4.6 3.2 5.7 4.7 6.6 5.1 5.5 1.6 4.2 2.5 7.3 4.9 5.1

146

TABLE 20: Trade and food security - import bills (continued)

Food import bills total million US$ 2000 Cuba Dominica Dominican Republic Ecuador El Salvador French Guiana Grenada Guatemala Guyana Haiti Honduras Jamaica Mexico Netherlands Antilles Nicaragua Panama Paraguay Peru St. Kitts & Nevis St. Lucia St. Vincent & Grenadines Suriname Trinidad & Tobago Uruguay Venezuela (Boliv. Rep. of) OCEANIA Fiji French Polynesia New Caledonia Papua New Guinea Samoa Solomon Islands Tonga Vanuatu DEVELOPED REGIONS NORTH AMERICA Bermuda Canada United States of America ASIA & OCEANIA Australia Israel Japan New Zealand EUROPE Albania Belarus Bosnia & Herzegovina Croatia European Union Iceland Macedonia, FYR Montenegro Norway Republic of Moldova Russian Federation Serbia Switzerland Ukraine million US$ 2010 % p.a. growth: 2000-2010 US$ 2000 per capita US$ 2010 % p.a. growth: 2000-2010 % 2000 % 2010 % p.a. growth: 2000-2010 Food + energy import bills, share of GDP

750.9 27.3 765.3 299.7 687.1 39.1 561.2 107.4 330.1 538.8 467.7 8 245.7 112.4 256.2 369.0 158.5 830.4 31.4 57.1 39.8 58.2 256.1 345.5 1 754.8 909.9 102.3 188.6 124.2 178.9 25.0 10.1 13.1 12.4 281 792.6 52 368.7 31.3 10 782.7 41 489.3 2 579.9 1 763.7 43 689.2 914.4 180 476.6 197.8 901.0 670.4 584.5 163 010.3 205.4 229.9 1 969.8 51.8 8 302.8 3 485.7 699.9

1 893.5 46.0 1 871.0 1 795.7 1 353.3 57.0 1 748.7 168.0 1 463.3 1 159.5 748.5 18 610.9 146.6 710.5 977.0 419.9 2 997.5 48.7 27.4 70.8 203.3 708.8 878.5 6 073.8 2 403.5 260.4 368.2 305.0 605.7 72.2 86.2 49.0 50.7 656 457.5 104 268.6 134.9 24 104.6 79 872.5 8 291.5 4 646.2 57 564.0 2 815.1 478 872.1 637.5 2 443.2 1 459.7 1 900.2 412 722.5 380.3 663.1 443.8 5 340.2 451.6 39 149.6 866.8 8 266.5 4 845.4

9.7 5.4 9.4 19.6 7.0 3.8 12.0 4.6 16.1 8.0 4.8 8.5 2.7 10.7 10.2 10.2 13.7 4.5 7.1 5.9 13.3 10.7 9.8 13.2 10.2 9.8 6.9 9.4 13.0 11.2 24.0 14.1 15.1 8.8 7.1 15.7 8.4 6.8 4.1 12.4 10.2 2.8 11.9 10.3 12.4 10.5 8.1 12.5 9.7 6.4 11.2 10.5 24.2 16.8 9.0 21.3

67.6 389.6 89.1 24.3 115.7 383.6 49.9 146.6 38.2 86.6 181.1 82.5 624.3 50.5 124.8 29.7 32.1 682.8 363.9 368.3 124.7 198.3 104.1 72.1 112.2 125.9 792.4 585.9 33.3 141.1 24.6 134.1 67.2 236.1 167.2 496.4 351.6 146.9 316.3 134.6 293.2 347.5 237.0 248.8 64.4 89.6 181.5 129.7 338.5 731.0 114.4 438.6 12.6 56.6 486.3 14.3

168.2 675.9 188.5 124.1 218.5 548.1 121.5 222.9 146.4 152.6 273.1 164.1 729.2 122.8 277.8 65.1 103.1 937.3 157.2 649.4 387.3 528.6 260.8 209.6 241.4 302.5 1 358.5 1 215.1 88.3 394.8 160.2 471.0 211.1 528.8 302.6 2 075.1 708.6 257.3 456.5 372.4 626.3 454.9 644.5 650.0 199.0 254.6 388.2 431.6 824.5 1 188.6 321.7 703.3 1 093.6 126.4 273.9 87.9 1 078.6 106.6

9.5 5.7 7.8 17.7 6.6 3.6 9.3 4.3 14.4 5.8 4.2 7.1 1.6 9.3 8.3 8.2 12.4 3.2 8.0 5.8 12.0 10.3 9.6 11.3 8.0 9.2 5.5 7.6 10.3 10.8 20.6 13.4 12.1 8.4 6.1 15.4 7.3 5.8 3.7 10.7 7.9 2.7 10.5 10.1 11.9 11.0 7.9 12.8 9.3 5.0 10.9 9.6 25.9 17.1 8.3 22.2 3.2 1.8 2.6 2.0 4.3 2.6 4.4 4.4 8.1 33.5 16.6 8.1 4.4 5.1 14.5 1.9 18.9 4.0 2.9 21.4 4.7 3.1 4.8 3.5 3.4 5.1 6.3 6.8 10.5 29.4 15.7 9.0 7.0 7.4 15.6 17.3 2.7 18.1 3.6 9.2 4.3 20.8 4.1 0.3 3.8 0.4 1.1 4.0 5.6 6.3 5.6 2.2 7.0 3.5 4.4 2.6 1.3 0.5 1.0 4.7 3.7 0.8 11.6 17.8 8.7 12.6 7.5 3.0 1.9 14.1 22.7 27.1 28.2 16.9 5.1 3.3 2.0 2.5 12.0 8.4 8.5 5.6 5.5 14.1 8.6 7.2 3.7 14.1 18.4 16.3 9.9 16.2 3.8 2.0 33.6 9.0 27.8 5.1 11.4 5.7 13.1 49.2 27.1 10.7 13.0 10.2 2.2 34.6 25.7 7.0 5.1 4.6 4.4 0.7 10.3 5.2 0.8 2.2 10.3 1.3 0.3 11.1 15.3 9.7 3.6 9.8 14.0 6.9 18.6 10.0 12.7 11.7 2.0 22.2 10.8 8.3 12.8 16.1 11.3 25.3 24.6 18.8 20.9 4.8 3.8 1.1 8.9 2.7 1.4 5.1 3.1 9.4 4.0 6.0 9.1

147

TABLE 21: Dimensions of poverty

Poverty gap at $1.25 a day (ppp) % 2009* WORLD DEVELOPING REGIONS AFRICA North Africa Algeria Egypt Libya Morocco Tunisia Sub-Saharan Africa Angola Benin Botswana Burkina Faso Burundi Cameroon Cape Verde Central African Republic Chad Comoros Congo Cte dIvoire Congo, Dem. Rep. Djibouti Equatorial Guinea Eritrea Ethiopia Gabon Gambia Ghana Guinea Guinea-Bissau Kenya Lesotho Liberia Madagascar Malawi Mali Mauritania Mauritius Mozambique Namibia Niger Nigeria Rwanda Senegal Seychelles Sierra Leone Somalia Sudan South Africa Swaziland Tanzania, Utd. Rep. Togo Uganda Zambia Zimbabwe $2 a day (ppp) % 2009* national poverty line % 2009* rural poverty line % 2009* $1.25 a day (ppp) % 2009* Poverty headcount ratio $2 a day (ppp) % 2009* national poverty line % 2009* rural poverty line % 2009* Multidimensional poverty (MPI) 0 to 1 2009*

1.4 0.4 0.5 0.5 29.9 15.7 11.0 20.3 36.4 1.2 6.0 31.3 25.6 20.8 22.8 7.5 25.3 5.3

6.5 3.5 3.1 3.0 42.4 33.5 22.3 39.3 56.1 8.2 15.2 46.8 43.9 34.2 38.8 17.8 42.4 14.6

3.2 3.6

4.5

6.8 2.0 2.5 2.5 54.3

23.6 18.5 14.0 12.8 70.2 75.3 49.4 81.2 93.5 30.4 40.9 80.1 83.3 65.0 74.4 46.3 79.6 41.2

22.6 22.0 9.0 3.8

30.3 30.0 14.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5

12.0 11.7 15.3 23.4 12.3 8.1 33.1 21.6 16.3 18.9 15.3 32.2

14.0 18.4 17.6 24.2 17.5 14.3 35.0 23.3 17.8 20.6 20.3 34.9

47.3 31.2 56.5 81.3 9.6 21.0 62.8 61.9 46.1 54.1 23.8 59.2 18.8

39.0 30.6 46.4 66.9 39.9 26.6 62.0 55.0 44.8 50.1 42.7 71.3

46.0 44.8 52.4 68.9 55.0 44.3 69.4 58.6 48.7 57.7 54.2 75.7

0.4 0.5 0.5 0.3 0.5 0.3 0.4 0.2 0.4 0.4 0.1

69.0 9.6 0.9 12.1 10.5 15.0 16.5 6.1 20.8 40.8 26.5 32.3 18.8 5.7 25.2 24.6 11.9 29.6 40.9 10.8 0.1 20.3 28.9 5.0 24.9 22.3 31.0 34.8 15.1 33.1 59.5 46.9 51.8 36.5 15.9 42.9 36.5 30.6 46.9 57.2 24.7 0.3 37.5 27.5 34.6 8.3 10.0 25.1 9.6 17.6 25.0 16.3 37.9 24.4 26.8 8.0 16.7 17.0 21.2 13.0 19.6 22.8 24.0 16.4 24.1 22.2 16.0 21.2 26.6 26.0 21.5 8.5 16.0 30.5 13.5 22.0 27.8 17.5 26.5 26.3 28.9 8.6 39.0 4.8 34.3 30.0 43.3 48.8 19.7 43.4 83.7 67.8 73.9 51.4 21.2 60.0 49.1 43.1 64.4 76.8 33.5 0.2 53.4 77.6 19.6 56.7 53.6 69.6 77.9 39.9 62.3 94.8 89.6 90.5 77.1 44.1 81.6 62.2 75.9 83.9 89.6 60.4 1.8 76.1 66.4 78.5 0.4 0.5 3.3 29.4 28.1 11.4 8.3 32.8 12.3 45.8 47.5 27.9 21.3 48.3 7.0 32.9 9.9 22.9 6.8 28.5 16.0 37.0 11.0 29.3 7.6 38.8 17.4 62.9 67.9 38.7 28.7 64.3 35.7 81.0 87.9 69.3 55.3 81.5 23.0 69.2 33.4 61.7 24.5 59.3 72.0 75.0 37.4 74.3 27.2 76.8 44.0 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.3 0.4 0.3 0.2 38.9 32.7 58.0 28.5 53.0 64.7 45.9 56.6 63.8 68.7 52.4 47.4 46.3 54.7 38.0 59.5 54.7 58.5 50.8 39.3 44.6 67.8 39.2 63.0 69.1 49.1 60.5 67.7 73.5 55.9 57.6 61.2 56.9 49.0 63.9 63.8 64.2 61.9 0.2 0.2 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.6 0.4 0.5 0.2 0.6 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.6 0.2 0.3 0.1 0.5

148

TABLE 21: Dimensions of poverty (continued)

Poverty gap at $1.25 a day (ppp) % 2009* ASIA Central Asia Kazakhstan Kyrgyzstan Tajikistan Turkmenistan Uzbekistan East Asia Brunei Darussalam Cambodia China Indonesia Korea, DPR Korea, Republic of Lao, PDR Malaysia Mongolia Myanmar Philippines Singapore Thailand Viet Nam South Asia Afghanistan Bangladesh Bhutan India Iran (Islamic Rep.) Maldives Nepal Pakistan Sri Lanka West Asia Armenia Azerbaijan Bahrain Cyprus Georgia Iraq Jordan Kuwait Lebanon Occupied Palestinian Territory Saudi Arabia Syrian Arab Republic Turkey United Arab Emirates Yemen LATIN AMERICA & THE CARIBBEAN Argentina Bahamas Barbados Belize Bolivia (Plur. State) Brazil Chile Colombia Costa Rica $2 a day (ppp) % 2009* national poverty line % 2009* rural poverty line % 2009* $1.25 a day (ppp) % 2009* Poverty headcount ratio $2 a day (ppp) % 2009* national poverty line % 2009* rural poverty line % 2009* Multidimensional poverty (MPI) 0 to 1 2009*

0.1 0.1 5.1 7.0 15.0

0.3 5.5 16.8 18.4 33.2

3.1 10.0 12.4

4.5 12.0 12.4

0.2 1.9 21.5 24.8 46.3

1.5 29.4 50.9 49.7 76.7

15.4 43.1 47.2

21.7 50.8 49.2

0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0

6.1 4.0 3.6

20.2 12.2 15.5

7.2 2.5

8.3 3.1

28.3 15.9 18.7

56.5 36.3 50.6

30.1 2.8 14.2

34.5 2.5 17.4

0.3 0.1

8.9 0.0 6.2 5.5 1.9 2.3

24.8 0.2 17.2 16.4 8.3 10.9 0.8 10.1 2.7 3.0 3.5 7.9 4.6 8.3 9.8 8.1 1.8 13.4 15.2

33.9 0.0 22.4 22.6 10.8 13.1

66.0 2.3 49.1 45.0 26.5 38.5

27.6 3.8 35.2 26.5 8.1 14.5 36.0

31.7 8.2 46.6 50.7 10.4 18.7 37.5 43.8 30.9 28.3

0.3 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.1

13.1 7.0 10.5 0.3 0.1 19.7 4.3 1.0 0.2 0.2

33.8 18.8 29.5 1.8 2.5 37.8 18.7 7.4 2.3 1.5

9.0 6.1

49.6 26.2 41.6 1.4 1.5

81.3 49.5 75.6 8.0 12.2 77.6 60.3 29.1 12.4 7.8

40.0 23.2 27.5

0.3 0.1 0.3 0.0

7.5 3.1 4.9 2.0

8.5 3.2 12.1

55.1 22.6 7.0 1.3 1.0

30.9 22.3 15.2 26.5 15.8

34.6 27.0 15.7 25.5 18.5

0.3 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0

4.6 0.6 0.1

11.8 5.5 0.6

7.2 4.5 2.6

9.2 9.0

14.7 4.0 0.4

32.6 25.3 3.5

23.6 22.9 13.3

29.7 39.3 19.0

0.0 0.1 0.0

0.2 0.9 4.2

3.3 2.6 14.8 8.9 10.6

1.7 2.7 17.5

16.9 9.1 46.6 18.1 34.8 38.7 40.1

0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3

0.4

0.8

0.9

2.4

0.0

4.7 5.8 1.1 0.4 5.7 0.1

9.7 10.9 3.2 0.8 11.9 1.1

12.1 14.0 3.8 0.8 16.0 0.7

24.0 24.7 9.9 2.4 27.9 5.4

33.5 60.1 21.4 15.1 45.5 21.7

44.2 77.3 12.9 64.3 23.0

0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0

149

TABLE 21: Dimensions of poverty (continued)

Poverty gap at $1.25 a day (ppp) % 2009* Cuba Dominica Dominican Republic Ecuador El Salvador French Guiana Grenada Guatemala Guyana Haiti Honduras Jamaica Mexico Netherlands Antilles Nicaragua Panama Paraguay Peru St. Kitts & Nevis St. Lucia St. Vincent & Grenadines Suriname Trinidad & Tobago Uruguay Venezuela (Boliv. Rep. of) OCEANIA Fiji French Polynesia New Caledonia Papua New Guinea Samoa Solomon Islands Tonga Vanuatu DEVELOPED REGIONS NORTH AMERICA Bermuda Canada United States of America ASIA & OCEANIA Australia Israel Japan New Zealand EUROPE Albania Belarus Bosnia & Herzegovina Croatia European Union Iceland Macedonia, FYR Montenegro Norway Republic of Moldova Russian Federation Serbia Switzerland Ukraine $2 a day (ppp) % 2009* national poverty line % 2009* rural poverty line % 2009* $1.25 a day (ppp) % 2009* Poverty headcount ratio $2 a day (ppp) % 2009* national poverty line % 2009* rural poverty line % 2009* Multidimensional poverty (MPI) 0 to 1 2009*

0.9 1.6 1.1

3.9 4.4 4.5

4.3 5.1 5.1

13.6 13.4 15.2

50.5 36.0 37.8

57.1 57.5 46.5

0.0 0.0

6.5 3.9 28.2 11.9 0.0 1.7 5.2 3.1 1.5 1.4 7.2 5.9 1.1 0.0 1.1

12.9 6.9 41.8 18.2 0.9 3.2 12.3 7.1 4.3 4.7 15.5 11.7 3.9 0.0 3.2 10.1 14.8

16.9 7.7 54.9 23.3 0.2 3.4 15.8 9.5 5.1 5.9 20.9 15.5 4.2 0.0 3.5

29.8 16.8 72.2 35.4 5.8 8.1 31.9 17.9 13.2 14.7 40.6 27.2 13.5 0.2 10.1

51.0 77.0 58.8 9.9 47.4 46.2 32.7 35.1 34.8

70.5 88.0 64.4 25.1 60.8 67.9 59.8 49.8 60.3

0.1 0.1 0.3 0.2 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1

0.0 0.0 20.5 29.0 31.0 43.3 22.2 0.0

12.3

25.5

12.4

13.8

35.8

57.4

37.5

41.3

0.1

0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0

0.8 0.0 0.1 0.0

2.3 4.6 2.6

2.6 4.9

0.6 0.0 0.0 0.0

4.2 0.0 0.2 0.0

12.4 5.4 14.0 11.1

14.6 17.8

0.0 0.0 0.0

0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.1 0.0

0.7 0.0 2.6 0.0 0.2 0.1

7.2 0.9

7.7 1.4

0.3 0.0 1.9

4.3 0.0 12.5 0.1 0.7 0.5

19.0 4.9 29.0 11.1 6.6 7.9

21.3 8.9

0.0 0.0 0.0

2.7 1.3 1.5

5.5 2.0 2.3

0.0 0.1 0.1

21.2 9.8 11.3

0.0 0.0 0.0

150

TABLE 22: Dimensions of inequality

Human Development Index Gender inequality Index Gini-index Income share held by

inequality adjusted index 2010 WORLD DEVELOPING REGIONS AFRICA North Africa Algeria Egypt Libya Morocco Tunisia Sub-Saharan Africa Angola Benin Botswana Burkina Faso Burundi Cameroon Cape Verde Central African Republic Chad Comoros Congo Cte dIvoire Congo, Dem. Rep. Djibouti Equatorial Guinea Eritrea Ethiopia Gabon Gambia Ghana Guinea Guinea-Bissau Kenya Lesotho Liberia Madagascar Malawi Mali Mauritania Mauritius Mozambique Namibia Niger Nigeria Rwanda Senegal Seychelles Sierra Leone Somalia Sudan South Africa Swaziland Tanzania, Utd. Rep. Togo Uganda Zambia Zimbabwe index 2010 index 2008

income distribution index 2009*

highest 20% % 2009*

lowest 20% % 2009*

0.7 0.6 0.7 0.6 0.7 0.4 0.4 0.6 0.3 0.3 0.5 0.5 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.4 0.2 0.4 0.5 0.3 0.6 0.4 0.5 0.3 0.3 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.4 0.7 0.3 0.6 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.4 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.1 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.5 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.2 0.3 0.4

0.6 0.7 0.5 0.7 0.5

35.3 32.1 40.9 40.8 58.6 41.5 47.9 47.3 61.9 46.1 47.1 42.8 46.2 55.9 60.6 46.6 68.0 53.1 47.6 46.5 9.0 6.5 6.0 2.0 7.0 7.0 9.0 6.7 4.5 3.4 6.3 2.5 5.0 5.6 6.0

0.7 0.6 0.6 0.7 0.8

38.6 61.0 39.6 33.3 44.6 50.4 43.6 39.8 64.3

0.7 0.7 0.8

47.3 41.5 39.9

29.8 0.6 0.7 0.7 41.5 47.3 42.8 39.4 35.5 0.7 0.7 0.8 0.7 0.8 0.7 0.7 0.6 0.8 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 57.8 50.7 37.6 34.4 44.3 50.7 50.1 47.7 52.5 38.2 47.2 39.0 39.0 39.0 45.6 74.3 34.0 42.9 53.1 39.2 65.8 42.5

39.4 48.2 52.8 48.5 46.2 43.2 53.2 56.4 45.0 53.5 46.5 46.0 45.7 51.5 42.8 48.6 58.2 45.9 69.6 49.3

9.3 6.2 4.8 5.2 6.3 7.3 4.8 3.0 6.4 6.2 7.0 6.5 6.2 5.2 8.3 5.1 4.2 6.2 3.7 6.1

72.2 55.9 44.8 42.4 49.3 55.2

2.5 4.5 6.8 7.6 6.1 3.6

151

TABLE 22: Dimensions of inequality (continued)

Human Development Index Gender inequality Index Gini-index Income share held by

inequality adjusted index 2010 ASIA Central Asia Kazakhstan Kyrgyzstan Tajikistan Turkmenistan Uzbekistan East Asia Brunei Darussalam Cambodia China Indonesia Korea, DPR Korea, Republic of Lao, PDR Malaysia Mongolia Myanmar Philippines Singapore Thailand Viet Nam South Asia Afghanistan Bangladesh Bhutan India Iran (Islamic Rep.) Maldives Nepal Pakistan Sri Lanka West Asia Armenia Azerbaijan Bahrain Cyprus Georgia Iraq Jordan Kuwait Lebanon Occupied Palestinian Territory Saudi Arabia Syrian Arab Republic Turkey United Arab Emirates Yemen LATIN AMERICA & THE CARIBBEAN Argentina Bahamas Barbados Belize Bolivia (Plur. State) Brazil Chile Colombia Costa Rica index 2010 index 2008

income distribution index 2009*

highest 20% % 2009*

lowest 20% % 2009*

0.7 0.6 0.6 0.7 0.6 0.8 0.5 0.6 0.9 0.5 0.7 0.6 0.4 0.6 0.8 0.6 0.6 0.3 0.5 0.5 0.7 0.6 0.4 0.5 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.8 0.8 0.7 0.7 0.8

0.6 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5

0.5 0.5 0.5

30.9 33.4 33.6 40.8 36.7

39.9 42.8 41.7 44.2

8.7 8.8 7.8 7.1

0.4 0.5 0.5 0.7 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5

0.6 0.4 0.7 0.3 0.6 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.2 0.5 0.5 0.8

44.4 41.5 36.8 31.6 36.7 46.2 36.5 44.0 42.5 53.6 37.6 29.4 31.0 46.7 36.8 38.3 37.4 47.3 32.7 40.3 30.9 33.7

51.7 47.8 45.5

6.6 5.7 7.4

44.8 44.8 40.5 50.4 49.3 45.4 38.7 40.8 53.0 45.3 45.2 44.2 54.0 42.1 47.8 39.8 42.1

7.6 6.5 7.2 5.6 6.2 7.3 9.0 9.4 5.4 8.1 6.4 6.5 5.9 9.0 6.9 8.8 8.0

0.3 0.4 0.5 0.3 0.3 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.7 0.6 0.6

0.7 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.7 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.3 0.6 0.7 0.6 0.5

41.3 37.7

47.1 39.9 45.5

5.3 8.7 7.3

0.7 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.4 0.3 0.5 0.5

0.8 0.6 0.6 0.4 0.8 37.7 35.8 39.7 43.9 48.9 7.7 5.2

0.8 0.8 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.7 0.7

0.6 0.7

0.5 0.5

45.8

53.1

3.6

0.5 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.5 0.6

0.6 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.6 0.5

54.4 57.3 53.9 52.1 58.5 50.3 61.0 58.5 57.2 62.1 52.3 2.8 3.2 4.3 2.5 4.4

152

TABLE 22: Dimensions of inequality (continued)

Human Development Index Gender inequality Index Gini-index Income share held by

inequality adjusted index 2010 Cuba Dominica Dominican Republic Ecuador El Salvador French Guiana Grenada Guatemala Guyana Haiti Honduras Jamaica Mexico Netherlands Antilles Nicaragua Panama Paraguay Peru St. Kitts & Nevis St. Lucia St. Vincent & Grenadines Suriname Trinidad & Tobago Uruguay Venezuela (Boliv. Rep. of) OCEANIA Fiji French Polynesia New Caledonia Papua New Guinea Samoa Solomon Islands Tonga Vanuatu DEVELOPED REGIONS NORTH AMERICA Bermuda Canada United States of America ASIA & OCEANIA Australia Israel Japan New Zealand EUROPE Albania Belarus Bosnia & Herzegovina Croatia European Union Iceland Macedonia, FYR Montenegro Norway Republic of Moldova Russian Federation Serbia Switzerland Ukraine index 2010 index 2008

income distribution index 2009*

highest 20% % 2009*

lowest 20% % 2009*

0.5 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.5 0.6 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.6 48.4 49.0 46.9 53.6 58.9 51.9 4.4 3.6 4.7

0.6 0.6 0.4 0.6 0.7 0.7 0.6 0.8 0.6 0.7

0.4 0.5 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.6 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.5

0.7 0.6 0.7 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6

53.7 43.2 59.5 57.7 45.5 51.7 52.3 52.3 52.0 48.0 42.6

58.0 63.0 60.7 51.6 56.2 56.9 58.6 56.5 54.3

3.5 2.5 2.0 5.3 3.8 3.8 2.7 3.8 4.0

0.6 0.7 0.8 0.7 0.7

0.5 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.6

52.8 40.3 42.4 43.5 51.5 49.0 4.6 4.9

0.4 0.5 0.7

0.8

50.9

0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.8 0.9 0.7 0.9 0.6 0.7 0.9 0.7

0.8 0.8 0.9 0.8

0.3 0.5 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3

32.6 40.8 35.2 39.2 24.9 36.2 34.5 27.2 36.2

39.9 45.8

7.2 5.4

44.9

5.7

0.6 0.7 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.6 0.7 0.9 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.7

0.5

43.0 36.4 43.2 42.0

8.1 9.2 6.7 8.1

0.4 0.3

33.6

44.2 30.0 0.2 0.5 0.5 0.2 0.5 25.8 38.0 42.3 28.2 33.7 27.5

50.3 38.8 37.2 45.3 48.9 41.3 37.1

5.4 8.5 9.6 6.8 6.0 7.5 9.4

153

TABLE 23: Governance

Voice & accountability Political stability, absence of violence & terrorism -2.5 to 2.5 (lowest to highest) 2010 GovernRegulatory ment quality effectiveness Rule of law Control of corruption Average governance

-2.5 to 2.5 (lowest to highest) 2010 WORLD DEVELOPING REGIONS AFRICA North Africa Algeria Egypt Libya Morocco Tunisia Sub-Saharan Africa Angola Benin Botswana Burkina Faso Burundi Cameroon Cape Verde Central African Republic Chad Comoros Congo Cte dIvoire Congo, Dem. Rep. Djibouti Equatorial Guinea Eritrea Ethiopia Gabon Gambia Ghana Guinea Guinea-Bissau Kenya Lesotho Liberia Madagascar Malawi Mali Mauritania Mauritius Mozambique Namibia Niger Nigeria Rwanda Senegal Seychelles Sierra Leone Somalia Sudan South Africa Swaziland Tanzania, Utd. Rep. Togo Uganda Zambia Zimbabwe

-2.5 to 2.5 (lowest to highest) 2010

-2.5 to 2.5 (lowest to highest) 2010

-2.5 to 2.5 (lowest to highest) 2010

-2.5 to 2.5 (lowest to highest) 2010

-2.5 to 2.5 (lowest to highest) 2010

1.0 1.2 1.9 0.8 1.3 1.1 0.3 0.4 0.2 0.9 1.1 0.9 1.1 1.4 0.4 1.0 1.1 1.4 1.1 1.9 2.2 1.3 0.9 1.1 0.5 0.9 0.9 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.8 0.2 0.2 0.9 0.7 0.1 0.3 0.6 0.8 1.3 0.3 0.1 0.2 2.0 1.7 0.5 1.3 0.1 1.0 0.5 0.3 1.5

1.3 0.9 0.1 0.5 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.9 0.1 1.5 0.6 0.8 2.1 1.5 0.4 0.2 1.6 2.2 0.3 0.2 0.9 1.7 0.2 0.1 0.0 1.8 0.8 1.2 0.5 0.5 1.1 0.1 0.3 1.3 0.5 0.3 0.8 1.1 2.0 0.1 0.4 0.8 0.2 3.1 2.7 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.2 1.1 0.5 1.2

0.6 0.4 1.2 0.2 0.2 1.1 0.5 0.5 0.6 1.1 0.9 0.1 1.4 1.5 1.7 1.2 1.3 1.7 1.0 1.7 1.4 0.3 0.9 0.7 0.0 1.1 1.0 0.5 0.4 1.2 0.8 0.4 0.9 0.9 0.8 0.5 0.1 0.7 1.2 0.1 0.5 0.2 1.2 2.2 1.4 0.3 0.5 0.5 1.4 0.6 0.8 1.6

1.1 0.2 1.2 0.1 0.0 1.0 0.3 0.5 0.1 1.1 0.7 0.1 1.1 1.1 1.5 1.3 0.9 1.6 0.7 1.4 2.2 0.9 0.6 0.4 0.1 1.1 1.1 0.1 0.6 1.1 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.8 0.8 0.4 0.1 0.5 0.8 0.2 0.3 0.6 0.7 2.4 1.4 0.4 0.6 0.4 0.9 0.1 0.5 2.0

0.8 0.1 1.0 0.2 0.1 1.2 0.7 0.7 0.2 1.2 1.0 0.4 1.3 1.5 1.1 1.1 1.2 1.6 0.7 1.3 1.3 0.8 0.5 0.5 0.1 1.5 1.4 1.0 0.3 1.0 0.8 0.1 0.5 0.9 0.8 0.5 0.2 0.6 1.2 0.3 0.4 0.0 0.9 2.4 1.3 0.1 0.5 0.5 0.9 0.4 0.5 1.8

0.5 0.6 1.3 0.2 0.1 1.3 0.8 1.0 0.4 1.1 1.0 0.8 0.8 1.3 0.7 1.1 1.1 1.4 0.3 1.5 0.5 0.7 0.8 0.6 0.1 1.2 1.1 0.9 0.2 0.5 0.3 0.4 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.4 0.3 0.7 1.0 0.5 0.7 0.3 0.8 1.7 1.3 0.1 0.2 0.5 1.0 0.9 0.6 1.4

0.9 0.6 1.1 0.3 0.2 1.0 0.3 0.7 0.3 1.2 0.9 0.5 1.3 1.4 1.0 1.0 1.2 1.7 0.6 1.2 1.4 1.0 0.6 0.5 0.1 1.3 1.0 0.7 0.1 0.7 0.7 0.3 0.4 0.9 0.7 0.3 0.3 0.7 1.2 0.2 0.4 0.1 0.7 2.3 1.6 0.2 0.5 0.3 0.9 0.6 0.4 1.6

154

TABLE 23: Governance (continued)

Voice & accountability Political stability, absence of violence & terrorism -2.5 to 2.5 (lowest to highest) 2010 GovernRegulatory ment quality effectiveness Rule of law Control of corruption Average governance

-2.5 to 2.5 (lowest to highest) 2010 ASIA Central Asia Kazakhstan Kyrgyzstan Tajikistan Turkmenistan Uzbekistan East Asia Brunei Darussalam Cambodia China Indonesia Korea, DPR Korea, Republic of Lao, PDR Malaysia Mongolia Myanmar Philippines Singapore Thailand Viet Nam South Asia Afghanistan Bangladesh Bhutan India Iran (Islamic Rep.) Maldives Nepal Pakistan Sri Lanka West Asia Armenia Azerbaijan Bahrain Cyprus Georgia Iraq Jordan Kuwait Lebanon Occupied Palestinian Territory Saudi Arabia Syrian Arab Republic Turkey United Arab Emirates Yemen LATIN AMERICA & THE CARIBBEAN Argentina Bahamas Barbados Belize Bolivia (Plur. State) Brazil Chile Colombia Costa Rica

-2.5 to 2.5 (lowest to highest) 2010

-2.5 to 2.5 (lowest to highest) 2010

-2.5 to 2.5 (lowest to highest) 2010

-2.5 to 2.5 (lowest to highest) 2010

-2.5 to 2.5 (lowest to highest) 2010

1.1 1.0 1.4 2.0 2.0 0.7 0.9 1.6 0.1 2.2 0.7 1.6 0.5 0.0 2.1 0.1 0.3 0.6 1.4 1.5 0.3 0.5 0.4 1.6 0.1 0.5 0.8 0.5 0.9 1.3 0.9 1.1 0.2 1.1 0.8 0.5 0.3

0.5 1.0 0.9 0.2 0.8 1.2 0.6 0.8 0.9 0.5 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.5 1.3 1.6 1.1 1.2 0.1 2.6 1.4 0.7 1.3 1.6 0.0 1.7 2.7 0.8 0.0 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.7 2.3 0.3 0.4 1.5

0.3 0.6 0.9 1.6 0.8 0.9 0.8 0.1 0.2 1.9 1.2 0.9 1.1 0.6 1.7 0.1 2.2 0.1 0.3 1.5 0.8 0.6 0.0 0.5 0.2 0.8 0.8 0.2 0.2 0.8 0.6 1.5 0.3 1.2 0.1 0.1 0.3

0.3 0.2 1.1 2.1 1.6 1.1 0.5 0.2 0.4 2.4 0.9 1.0 0.6 0.3 2.2 0.3 1.8 0.2 0.6 1.6 0.9 1.1 0.4 1.6 0.4 0.7 0.6 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.8 1.4 0.6 1.1 0.2 0.2 0.0

0.6 1.3 1.2 1.5 1.4 0.8 1.1 0.3 0.6 1.3 1.0 0.9 0.5 0.4 1.5 0.5 1.7 0.2 0.5 1.9 0.8 0.1 0.1 0.9 0.3 1.0 0.8 0.1 0.5 0.9 0.4 1.2 0.2 1.6 0.2 0.5 0.7

1.0 1.1 1.2 1.4 1.3 0.9 1.2 0.6 0.7 1.3 0.4 1.1 0.1 0.7 1.7 0.8 2.2 0.3 0.6 1.6 1.0 0.8 0.5 0.9 0.6 0.7 1.1 0.4 0.7 1.2 0.2 1.1 0.2 1.3 0.0 0.3 0.8

0.5 0.9 1.1 1.4 1.3 0.7 0.8 0.6 0.5 1.6 0.7 1.0 0.3 0.3 1.7 0.6 1.5 0.3 0.5 1.8 0.9 0.1 0.3 1.2 0.3 0.9 1.1 0.4 0.3 0.8 0.1 1.1 0.1 1.4 0.1 0.2 0.6

1.8 1.7 0.2 0.9 1.3

0.2 0.8 1.0 0.8 2.2

0.1 0.6 0.4 0.8 1.0

0.1 0.9 0.4 0.4 0.6

0.2 0.5 0.1 0.4 1.1

0.1 1.1 0.0 1.0 1.1

0.3 0.9 0.1 0.4 1.2

0.3 1.0 1.2 0.7 0.1 0.5 1.0 0.2 1.0

0.0 1.0 1.1 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.6 1.5 0.6

0.2 1.0 1.4 0.4 0.5 0.1 1.2 0.1 0.3

0.7 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.8 0.2 1.4 0.3 0.5

0.6 0.7 1.0 0.4 1.1 0.0 1.3 0.3 0.5

0.4 1.4 1.4 0.1 0.5 0.1 1.5 0.4 0.7

0.3 0.9 1.1 0.1 0.6 0.1 1.2 0.3 0.6

155

TABLE 23: Governance (continued)

Voice & accountability Political stability, absence of violence & terrorism -2.5 to 2.5 (lowest to highest) 2010 GovernRegulatory ment quality effectiveness Rule of law Control of corruption Average governance

-2.5 to 2.5 (lowest to highest) 2010 Cuba Dominica Dominican Republic Ecuador El Salvador French Guiana Grenada Guatemala Guyana Haiti Honduras Jamaica Mexico Netherlands Antilles Nicaragua Panama Paraguay Peru St. Kitts & Nevis St. Lucia St. Vincent & Grenadines Suriname Trinidad & Tobago Uruguay Venezuela (Boliv. Rep. of) OCEANIA Fiji French Polynesia New Caledonia Papua New Guinea Samoa Solomon Islands Tonga Vanuatu DEVELOPED REGIONS NORTH AMERICA Bermuda Canada United States of America ASIA & OCEANIA Australia Israel Japan New Zealand EUROPE Albania Belarus Bosnia & Herzegovina Croatia European Union Iceland Macedonia, FYR Montenegro Norway Republic of Moldova Russian Federation Serbia Switzerland Ukraine

-2.5 to 2.5 (lowest to highest) 2010

-2.5 to 2.5 (lowest to highest) 2010

-2.5 to 2.5 (lowest to highest) 2010

-2.5 to 2.5 (lowest to highest) 2010

-2.5 to 2.5 (lowest to highest) 2010

1.6 1.0 0.1 0.3 0.0 1.1 0.8 0.4 0.0 0.7 0.5 0.4 0.1 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.1 0.0 1.1 1.2 1.2 0.4 0.5 1.1 0.9 1.0

0.3 1.0 0.0 0.6 0.1 0.2 0.6 0.8 0.5 0.9 0.5 0.4 0.8 1.1 0.6 0.0 0.9 0.9 1.1 0.8 0.9 0.1 0.0 0.9 1.4 0.1 0.2

0.2 0.7 0.6 0.7 0.0 1.2 0.2 0.7 0.1 1.6 0.7 0.2 0.2 0.7 1.0 0.1 0.9 0.2 0.7 0.8 0.7 0.1 0.3 0.7 1.0 0.7

1.6 0.4 0.2 1.1 0.4 1.2 0.4 0.2 0.5 1.1 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.9 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.7 0.5 0.4 1.6 0.7

0.6 0.7 0.8 1.2 0.9 1.2 0.1 1.0 0.5 1.4 0.9 0.5 0.6 0.9 0.8 0.1 0.9 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 0.1 0.2 0.7 1.6 0.9

0.5 0.7 0.8 0.9 0.2 1.1 0.4 0.5 0.6 1.3 0.9 0.4 0.4 0.9 0.8 0.4 0.8 0.2 1.0 1.2 1.0 0.4 0.4 1.3 1.2 0.9

0.5 0.8 0.4 0.8 0.1 1.0 0.4 0.6 0.4 1.2 0.6 0.1 0.2 0.8 0.7 0.1 0.7 0.2 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.1 0.1 0.8 1.3 0.7

0.1 0.1 0.3 0.5

0.8 0.4 0.8 1.4

0.8 0.9 0.3 0.3

0.5 1.2 0.5 0.8

0.9 0.7 0.1 0.3

1.1 0.5 0.3 0.4

0.7 0.5 0.0 0.2

1.0 1.4 1.2 1.4 0.6 1.0 1.5 0.1 1.6 0.1 0.4 1.4 0.1 0.2 1.6 0.1 0.9 0.3 1.6 0.1

0.9 0.9 0.3 0.8 1.5 0.9 1.2 0.2 0.1 0.7 0.6 1.0 0.5 0.5 1.3 0.4 0.9 0.4 1.2 0.1

1.0 1.9 1.4 1.8 1.2 1.4 1.9 0.3 1.1 0.7 0.6 1.6 0.2 0.1 1.8 0.6 0.4 0.1 1.9 0.8

1.4 1.7 1.4 1.7 1.2 1.0 1.8 0.2 1.2 0.1 0.6 0.9 0.3 0.1 1.5 0.1 0.4 0.0 1.7 0.6

1.2 1.8 1.6 1.8 0.9 1.3 1.9 0.4 1.0 0.4 0.2 1.7 0.3 0.0 1.9 0.4 0.8 0.4 1.8 0.8

1.3 2.1 1.2 2.1 0.6 1.5 2.4 0.4 0.8 0.3 0.0 1.9 0.1 0.3 2.1 0.7 1.1 0.2 2.1 1.0

1.1 1.6 1.2 1.6 0.5 1.2 1.8 0.2 1.0 0.4 0.4 1.4 0.1 0.1 1.7 0.4 0.7 0.1 1.7 0.6

156

TABLE 24: Education, health and sanitation

Literacy rate, female Ratio of girls-to-boys Expenditure per student share of GDP per capita % 2009* Public exp. on education share of GDP % 2009* Health expenditure Prevalence of HIV ages 15-49 % 2009 Access to improved

out of primary school % 2009* WORLD DEVELOPING REGIONS AFRICA North Africa Algeria Egypt Libya Morocco Tunisia Sub-Saharan Africa Angola Benin Botswana Burkina Faso Burundi Cameroon Cape Verde Central African Republic Chad Comoros Congo Cte dIvoire Congo, Dem. Rep. Djibouti Equatorial Guinea Eritrea Ethiopia Gabon Gambia Ghana Guinea Guinea-Bissau Kenya Lesotho Liberia Madagascar Malawi Mali Mauritania Mauritius Mozambique Namibia Niger Nigeria Rwanda Senegal Seychelles Sierra Leone Somalia Sudan South Africa Swaziland Tanzania, Utd. Rep. Togo Uganda Zambia Zimbabwe ratio 2009*

in prim. and sec. education % 2009*

current per capita US$ 2009

share of GDP % 2009

sanitation facilities % 2008

water source

rur. % 2008

urb. % 2008

79.2

96.3

4.4

860.0

10.1

0.8

61

78

96

63.9 57.8 82.0 43.9 71.0 57.6 29.1 84.4 21.6 60.9 63.0 80.2 42.1 23.1 68.7 45.3 54.9

0.7 0.5 0.0 0.8 0.9 0.8 0.1 1.2 0.8 9.0 0.2 0.9 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.9 0.8 0.9

99.3 95.1 105.0 88.1 103.0 82.0 73.5 100.0 85.6 92.7 85.6 103.0 68.7 63.6 84.2 91.9 68.6 76.8 82.0 82.5 77.3 87.9 95.9 102.0 95.4 77.2 65.5 95.4 107.0 71.9 96.9 100.0 78.4 103.0 101.0 88.3 104.0 75.3 85.1 100.0 95.5 103.0 84.0 53.5 89.4 99.4 92.1 96.1 75.3 98.7 95.8 97.1

28.5 23.9 87.2 50.7 126.9 13.4 301.4 366.3 600.9 72.8 82.8 144.8 248.8 27.2 2.9 119.1 57.3 4.0 1 135.6 664.2 32.2 28.8 116.4 43.6 77.8 14.1 158.1 32.1 163.3 73.6 24.5 99.8 31.5 514.3 252.1 216.9 34.0 25.1

4.3 3.8 2.7 5.6 7.1 2.6 3.5 8.9 4.6 8.3 3.7 5.9 1.3 3.2 7.6 1.8 4.6 8.4 0.6 2.0 5.5 3.8 2.0 5.4 2.4 5.2 7.0 12.4 2.8 3.0 4.2 4.4 2.9 3.2 5.0 6.4 4.5 0.8 4.1 5.8 5.0 4.3 0.4 12.1

268.0 113.0 417.0 156.0 240.0 204.0 31.9 612.0 38.1 19.8 61.1 146.0 19.3 41.8 27.8 70.1 55.3 15.6 84.5 709.0 10.1 14.7 266.0 25.6 45.1 18.8 18.4 33.2 70.0 29.4 18.0 19.1 38.4 21.9 383.0 24.7 258.0 20.9 69.3 48.2 58.9 366.0 43.9 94.6 485.0 156.0 25.3 28.9 42.5 47.1

5.8 5.0 3.9 5.5 6.2 4.6 4.2 10.3 6.4 13.1 5.6 3.9 4.3 7.0 3.4 3.0 5.1 9.5 7.0 3.9 2.1 4.3 3.5 6.0 6.9 5.7 6.1 4.3 8.2 13.2 4.1 6.2 5.6 2.5 5.7 5.7 6.0 6.1 5.8 9.0 5.7 4.0 13.1 7.3 8.5 6.3 5.1 5.9 8.2 4.8

0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 2.0 1.2 24.8 1.2 3.3 5.3 4.7 3.4 0.1 3.4 3.4 2.5 5.0 0.8 5.2 2.0 1.8 1.3 2.5 6.3 23.6 1.5 0.2 11.0 1.0 0.7 1.0 11.5 13.1 0.8 3.6 2.9 0.9 1.6 0.7 1.1 17.8 25.9 5.6 3.2 6.5 13.5 14.3

95 94 97 69 85 57 12 60 11 46 47 54 34 9 36 30 23 23 56 14 12 33 67 13 19 21 31 29 17 11 56 36 26 91 17 33 9 32 54 51 13 23 34 77 55 24 12 48 49 44

79 98 60 84 38 69 90 72 71 51 82 51 44 97 34 68 52 57 26 41 86 74 61 51 52 81 51 29 77 44 47 99 29 88 39 42 62 52 26 9 52 78 61 45 41 64 46 72

85 100 98 99 60 84 99 95 83 92 85 92 67 91 95 93 80 98 74 98 95 96 90 89 83 83 97 79 71 95 81 52 100 77 99 96 75 77 92 100 86 67 64 99 92 80 87 91 87 99

89.8 56.0 18.0 84.1 35.8 60.4 28.1 38.0 83.5 95.3 54.5 61.6 67.0 18.2 50.3 85.3 41.5 88.1 15.1 49.8 66.8 38.7 92.3 30.1 60.8 87.0 86.2 66.9 44.4 58.9 61.3 89.4

1.0 0.9 0.7 1.0 1.1 1.1 0.7 0.7 1.1 1.2 0.4 5.3 1.8 0.5 1.3 1.3 0.5 1.6 0.8 0.9 1.8 1.1 1.5 0.6 0.9 0.9 1.2 1.1 1.5 0.4 1.5 1.4

32.8 49.1 40.9 13.0 133.9 1.0 214.3

5.4 7.8 6.8 4.6 3.2 1.3 5.2

157

TABLE 24: Education, health and sanitation (continued)

Literacy rate, female Ratio of girls-to-boys Expenditure per student share of GDP per capita % 2009* Public exp. on education share of GDP % 2009* Health expenditure Prevalence of HIV ages 15-49 % 2009 Access to improved

out of primary school % 2009* ASIA Central Asia Kazakhstan Kyrgyzstan Tajikistan Turkmenistan Uzbekistan East Asia Brunei Darussalam Cambodia China Indonesia Korea, DPR Korea, Republic of Lao, PDR Malaysia Mongolia Myanmar Philippines Singapore Thailand Viet Nam South Asia Afghanistan Bangladesh Bhutan India Iran (Islamic Rep.) Maldives Nepal Pakistan Sri Lanka West Asia Armenia Azerbaijan Bahrain Cyprus Georgia Iraq Jordan Kuwait Lebanon Occupied Palestinian Territory Saudi Arabia Syrian Arab Republic Turkey United Arab Emirates Yemen LATIN AMERICA & THE CARIBBEAN Argentina Bahamas Barbados Belize Bolivia (Plur. State) Brazil Chile Colombia Costa Rica ratio 2009*

in prim. and sec. education % 2009*

current per capita US$ 2009

share of GDP % 2009

sanitation facilities % 2008

water source

rur. % 2008

urb. % 2008

99.6 99.0 99.6 99.4 99.1 93.7 70.9 90.9 89.1 100.0

2.6 1.1 0.1 0.8 1.8 0.8 1.2 0.4 0.0

98.6 101.0 90.6 98.7 101.0 89.7 105.0 97.7 97.2 87.2 103.0 103.0 99.7 102.0 103.0 93.2 62.3 108.0 100.0 92.2 96.5 98.2 82.5 81.9 104.0 103.0 102.0 101.0 100.0 96.5 81.3 102.0 101.0 104.0

7.9 17.3 21.8

2.8 5.9 3.5 4.3 7.4 3.7

330.0 57.1 38.0 77.1 62.2 791.0 42.1 177.0 55.4 1 110.0 35.8 336.0 74.2 12.5 66.9 1 500.0 168.0 79.7 50.9 18.4 98.0 44.8 269.0 331.0 25.3 22.6 83.6 129.0 285.0 1 110.0 256.0 98.5 336.0 1 420.0 663.0

4.5 6.8 5.3 2.3 5.2 3.0 5.9 4.6 2.4 6.5 4.1 4.8 4.7 2.0 3.8 3.9 4.3 7.2 7.4 3.4 5.5 4.2 5.5 8.0 5.8 2.6 4.0 4.7 5.8 4.5 6.0 10.1 3.9 9.3 3.3 8.1

0.1 0.3 0.2 0.1

97 93 94 98 100

90 85 61 81

99 99 94 97 98

5.4 101.5 39.7 52.8 10.0 60.4 16.2 5.4 27.6 11.6 55.4 98.2

2.1 1.9 2.8 4.2 2.3 4.1 5.6 1.3 2.8 3.0 4.1 5.3 1.9

0.5 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.5 0.1 0.6 0.1 0.1 1.3 0.4

29 55 52 100 53 96 50 81 76 100 96 75 37

56 82 71 100 88 51 99 49 69 87 98 92 39 78 88 84 86 87 87 88 93 71 100 96 55 91 99 100

81 98 89 100 100 72 100 97 75 93 100 99 99 78 85 99 96 98 99 93 95 98 98 88 100 100 100 91 98 99 100

63.2 90.3 97.9 89.5 95.8 92.0 91.5 90.5 5.0 51.0 38.7 50.8 80.7 98.4 46.9 40.1 89.1 99.4 99.2 90.2 96.9 99.7 69.9 88.9 91.8 86.0

0.9 1.0 1.5 0.8 1.4 0.9 0.4 0.7 2.1 1.3 0.5 0.7 0.6 0.6 0.7 1.2 1.7 1.0 0.3 0.5 0.6 0.4 1.4 0.8 0.9

25.6 38.7 77.7 58.3 0.0 73.1

2.4 4.8 3.1 4.7 11.2 4.7 2.7 3.0

0.1 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.4 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1

53 65 31 98 31 45 91 90 45 100

53.3 15.6 32.6 135.2 41.0 27.7 25.7 10.2

3.0 2.8 2.9 4.1 3.2 5.1 4.9 3.8 1.8

0.1

95 73 98 100

0.1

81.1 78.0 85.3 91.5 44.7

0.8 0.1 0.7 0.6 0.6

91.3 97.3 92.9 99.8 65.7

36.7 33.8 54.7 27.0

5.6 4.8 3.1 1.2 5.2

714.0 72.0 571.0 1 520.0 64.0

5.0 2.9 6.7 2.8 5.6 0.1 96 90 97 52 84 96 100 57

97 94 100 100 72

97.7

2.2 1.4

105.0 101.0

56.5 60.3

4.9 3.3 6.7 5.8 6.3 5.1 4.0 4.8 6.3

730.0 1 560.0 1 040.0 217.0 84.8 734.0 787.0 323.0 668.0

9.5 7.2 6.8 4.9 4.8 9.1 8.2 6.4 10.5

0.5 3.1 1.4 2.3 0.2 0.4 0.5 0.3

90 100 100 90 25 80 96 74 95

80 100 100 67 84 75 73 91

98 98 100 99 96 99 99 99 100

70.3 86.8 90.2 98.7 93.4 96.3

4.4 1.2 0.7 0.9 1.0 1.2

101.0 98.8 103.0 98.5 105.0 102.0

39.5 28.2 65.0 42.8 58.0 29.0

158

TABLE 24: Education, health and sanitation (continued)

Literacy rate, female Ratio of girls-to-boys Expenditure per student share of GDP per capita % 2009* Public exp. on education share of GDP % 2009* Health expenditure Prevalence of HIV ages 15-49 % 2009 Access to improved

out of primary school % 2009* Cuba Dominica Dominican Republic Ecuador El Salvador French Guiana Grenada Guatemala Guyana Haiti Honduras Jamaica Mexico Netherlands Antilles Nicaragua Panama Paraguay Peru St. Kitts & Nevis St. Lucia St. Vincent & Grenadines Suriname Trinidad & Tobago Uruguay Venezuela (Boliv. Rep. of) OCEANIA Fiji French Polynesia New Caledonia Papua New Guinea Samoa Solomon Islands Tonga Vanuatu DEVELOPED REGIONS NORTH AMERICA Bermuda Canada United States of America ASIA & OCEANIA Australia Israel Japan New Zealand EUROPE Albania Belarus Bosnia & Herzegovina Croatia European Union Iceland Macedonia, FYR Montenegro Norway Republic of Moldova Russian Federation Serbia Switzerland Ukraine ratio 2009*

in prim. and sec. education % 2009*

current per capita US$ 2009

share of GDP % 2009

sanitation facilities % 2008

water source

rur. % 2008

urb. % 2008

99.8 88.3 81.5 81.8 96.0 69.5 44.6 83.5 91.1 92.1 96.4 77.9 93.0 93.5 84.6

0.8 1.5 1.1 2.8 1.6 2.2 0.4 0.6 1.0 2.3 0.9 1.7 1.2 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.5 1.0 0.1

98.8 102.0 96.5 103.0 98.3 97.0 93.8 99.7 94.6 107.0 100.0 102.0 102.0 102.0 101.0 99.5 99.4 104.0 99.4 97.7 107.0 101.0 104.0 102.0 103.0 109.0 83.5 105.0 94.0 99.9 99.5

155.3 40.7 14.7 9.2 17.6 22.7 16.6 44.7

13.6 4.7 2.3 1.0 3.6 4.8 3.2 6.1 1.5 3.6

707.0 361.0 271.0 255.0 229.0 447.0 186.0 133.0 39.6 117.0 231.0 515.0 105.0 591.0 159.0 201.0 634.0 443.0 301.0 429.0 1 070.0 698.0 686.0 130.0

11.8 6.4 5.9 6.1 6.3 7.4 7.1 8.1 6.1 6.0 5.1 6.5 9.6 8.3 7.1 4.6 6.0 8.1 5.7 7.6 5.7 7.5 6.0 3.4

0.1 0.9 0.4 0.8

91 83 92 87 97

89 84 88 76

96 87 97 94 97

0.8 1.2 1.9 0.8 1.7 0.3 0.2 0.9 0.3 0.4

81 81 17 71 83 85 52 69 70 68 96

90 93 55 77 89 87 68 83 66 61 99 98

98 98 71 95 98 96 98 97 99 90 99 98 97 98 100

85.0 63.7 14.4 39.0 53.0 18.0 7.9 36.8 45.5 18.9 37.4 17.3 96.7

5.8 4.8 3.1 3.8 4.0 2.7 9.7 4.5 6.6 9.0 4.2 2.9 3.7 6.2

93.8 98.3 98.6 94.9

0.9 0.5 0.8 1.1 1.0 1.5

1.0 1.5 0.5

84 92 100

81 93 100

0.1 98 100 33 100 87

96.0 56.5 98.5 69.0 99.1 80.3 0.8 1.7 1.0 0.6 0.5 6.5 12.0 144.9 35.3 5.8 2.2 3.9 4.8 36.7 205.0 71.9 161.0 106.0 3.1 7.0 5.4 6.2 4.0 96 52 100 79 100 96 0.9 45 100

97.9 2.3 1.4 1.4 88.7 1.5 1.1 3.1 94.7 99.7 96.4 98.1 0.9 1.7 1.3 1.2 1.3 95.6 1.3 1.3 98.0 99.4 1.0 1.2 0.9 5.7 99.6 1.1 98.7 100.0 97.3 101.0 100.0 103.0 99.5 101.0 102.0 102.0 101.0 102.0 98.3 99.0 101.0 98.0 101.0 97.3 98.8

15.7 44.0 68.2 50.9 61.1 64.7 67.5 44.4 15.0 73.2 76.4 77.1 23.8 89.5 128.6 14.2 110.5 95.6 25.1

2.6 4.9 5.5 4.5 5.9 3.5 6.1 2.9 4.5 4.6 4.9 7.4 3.5 6.8 9.6 3.9 4.8 5.2 5.3 4 380.0 7 410.0 3 870.0 1 970.0 3 320.0 2 630.0 265.0 295.0 495.0 1 120.0 3 370.0 3 130.0 314.0 617.0 7 660.0 181.0 475.0 419.0 7 140.0 180.0 10.9 16.2 8.5 7.6 8.3 9.7 6.9 5.8 10.9 7.8 10.3 8.2 6.9 9.3 9.7 11.9 5.4 9.9 11.3 7.0 0.1 0.4 1.0 0.1 0.4 1.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.6 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.1 98 93 95 99 98 100 89 92 100 79 87 92 100 95 100 100 100 100 100 99 94 100 100 100 100 98 99 98 97 100 100 99 96 100 85 89 98 100 97 100 100 100 100 100 100 96 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 96 98 99 100 98

159

TABLE 25: Food aid received

Food aid received thousand tonnes 1990 WORLD DEVELOPING REGIONS AFRICA North Africa Algeria Egypt Libya Morocco Tunisia Sub-Saharan Africa Angola Benin Botswana Burkina Faso Burundi Cameroon Cape Verde Central African Republic Chad Comoros Congo Cte dIvoire Congo, Dem. Rep. Djibouti Equatorial Guinea Eritrea Ethiopia Gabon Gambia Ghana Guinea Guinea-Bissau Kenya Lesotho Liberia Madagascar Malawi Mali Mauritania Mauritius Mozambique Namibia Niger Nigeria Rwanda Senegal Seychelles Sierra Leone Somalia Sudan South Africa Swaziland Tanzania, Utd. Rep. Togo Uganda Zambia Zimbabwe thousand tonnes 1995 thousand tonnes 2000 thousand tonnes 2005 thousand tonnes 2010

13 172 10 922 5 255 2 268 10 1 606 0 271 383 2 986 124 15 15 34 3 3 59 3 26 4 8 66 98 9 5 0 864 0 4 66 11 5 90 42 35 54 219 39 45 11 423 12 40 0 9 63 1 11 98 230 7 10 35 12 47 11 14

10 201 9 143 3 562 263 27 207 0 2 27 3 299 220 21 10 41 103 7 73 1 21 6 13 24 109 20 4 104 636 0 4 97 8 3 80 34 161 38 236 20 45 1 386 3 25 0 274 21 0 34 53 82 0 7 145 6 77 26 13

11 345 9 462 4 320 318 33 41 0 241 4 4 002 296 12 0 33 11 4 53 3 23 0 18 17 74 12 2 257 1 527 1 8 101 5 27 291 6 116 44 36 12 17 0 185 2 20 1 232 54 0 28 61 182 3 0 63 4 87 49 16

8 288 8 245 4 656 56 42 14 0 0 0 4 601 57 15 0 39 73 14 29 5 74 0 9 34 103 21 0 232 1 122 0 11 66 41 11 155 44 102 47 153 41 92 0 117 2 139 20 42 30 0 39 40 931 0 12 116 1 293 146 80

5 682 5 682 3 491 27 24 3 0 0 0 3 464 4 19 0 45 34 14 16 10 111 0 7 21 193 10 0 0 1 415 0 23 7 4 7 258 7 30 26 38 25 39 0 80 1 159 0 7 41 0 24 72 476 0 17 38 2 80 7 92

160

TABLE 25: Food aid received (continued)

Food aid received thousand tonnes 1990 ASIA Central Asia Kazakhstan Kyrgyzstan Tajikistan Turkmenistan Uzbekistan East Asia Brunei Darussalam Cambodia China Indonesia Korea, DPR Korea, Republic of Lao, PDR Malaysia Mongolia Myanmar Philippines Singapore Thailand Viet Nam South Asia Afghanistan Bangladesh Bhutan India Iran (Islamic Rep.) Maldives Nepal Pakistan Sri Lanka West Asia Armenia Azerbaijan Bahrain Cyprus Georgia Iraq Jordan Kuwait Lebanon Occupied Palestinian Territory Saudi Arabia Syrian Arab Republic Turkey United Arab Emirates Yemen LATIN AMERICA & THE CARIBBEAN Argentina Bahamas Barbados Belize Bolivia (Plur. State) Brazil Chile Colombia Costa Rica thousand tonnes 1995 thousand tonnes 2000 thousand tonnes 2005 thousand tonnes 2010

3 357 0 0 0 0 0 0 530 0 25 78 56 0 0 0 0 0 0 160 0 148 62 2 288 43 1 050 5 382 26 2 8 462 310 539 0 0 0 0 0 0 261 0 43 26 0 38 14 0 157 2 306 0 0 0 0 262 29 8 5 7

4 641 432 1 150 226 53 1 952 0 91 128 19 544 0 27 0 12 4 55 0 2 70 1 445 133 586 6 398 13 3 38 119 148 1 812 476 391 0 0 598 102 122 0 11 48 0 45 1 0 18 939 0 0 0 0 86 1 0 15 3

4 314 195 0 60 60 7 68 2 239 0 62 90 429 1 264 0 5 0 46 10 218 0 1 82 937 210 269 4 321 3 3 53 20 55 943 96 28 0 0 71 18 401 0 42 57 0 35 0 0 195 828 0 0 0 0 80 0 0 12 0

2 958 239 0 166 73 0 0 1 663 0 24 49 197 1 180 0 19 0 55 16 121 0 1 0 838 208 293 2 102 2 11 54 30 136 218 22 12 0 0 20 36 3 0 12 83 0 10 0 0 21 632 0 0 0 0 65 0 0 14 0

1 775 75 0 50 25 0 0 232 0 17 0 0 80 0 20 0 0 31 82 0 0 0 1 247 140 194 3 16 5 12 53 763 60 222 7 0 0 0 1 7 0 0 0 90 0 35 0 0 83 416 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 12 0

161

TABLE 25: Food aid received (continued)

Food aid received thousand tonnes 1990 Cuba Dominica Dominican Republic Ecuador El Salvador French Guiana Grenada Guatemala Guyana Haiti Honduras Jamaica Mexico Netherlands Antilles Nicaragua Panama Paraguay Peru St. Kitts & Nevis St. Lucia St. Vincent & Grenadines Suriname Trinidad & Tobago Uruguay Venezuela (Boliv. Rep. of) OCEANIA Fiji French Polynesia New Caledonia Papua New Guinea Samoa Solomon Islands Tonga Vanuatu DEVELOPED REGIONS NORTH AMERICA Bermuda Canada United States of America ASIA & OCEANIA Australia Israel Japan New Zealand EUROPE Albania Belarus Bosnia & Herzegovina Croatia European Union Iceland Macedonia, FYR Montenegro Norway Republic of Moldova Russian Federation Serbia Switzerland Ukraine thousand tonnes 1995 thousand tonnes 2000 thousand tonnes 2005 thousand tonnes 2010

3 0 40 77 203 0 0 185 46 108 146 293 280 0 232 1 4 359 0 0 0 0 0 20 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 250 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 2 249 0 0 0 0 2 249 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

6 7 6 19 25 0 0 70 33 168 53 56 46 0 63 2 1 254 0 3 0 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 058 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 058 10 98 23 14 40 0 0 0 0 244 125 0 0 120

24 0 2 42 3 0 0 137 26 164 68 46 2 0 62 0 0 149 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 883 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 883 18 0 84 0 1 0 63 0 0 14 1 403 0 0 0

7 0 0 43 67 0 0 69 0 137 98 11 0 0 43 0 0 78 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 43 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 43 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 26 0 0 0

0 0 50 3 3 0 0 70 0 266 3 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

162

DEFINITIONS AND SOURCES

Denitions and sources

Countries in protracted crises

of food in the household, e.g. during storage, in preparation and cooking, as plate-waste or quantities fed to domestic animals and pets, thrown or given away. Source: Statistics Division Owner: FAO Caloric contribution in diets by commodity

P2.HUN.FAO.ESA.RHS.NPC
Page: table 31 (p. 86). Protracted crises are those environments in which a signicant proportion of the population is acutely vulnerable to death, disease and disruption of livelihoods over a prolonged period of time. The governance of these environments is usually very weak, with the state having a limited capacity to respond to, and mitigate, the threats to the population, or provide adequate levels of protection. Source: Trade and Markets Division Owner: FAO Contribution in diets by type

P2.HUN.FAO.ESS.DIET.FDS
Page: table 40, 41 (p. 95, 95). Contribution of a food Group to total dietary energy supply. Source: Statistics Division Owner: FAO Percentage contribution in diets by commodity

P2.HUN.FAO.ESS.DIET.FDSx
Page: table 16, 17 (p. 135, 138). Percentage contribution of a food group to total dietary energy supply. Source: Statistics Division Owner: FAO Depth of hunger

P2.HUN.FAO.ESS.DIET.CPF
Page: table 16 (p. 135). Dietary contribution refers to the amount of carbohydrates/proteins/fats expressed in kilocalories (kcal) per day, available for each individual in the total population during the reference period. Caloric content is derived by applying the appropriate food composition factors to the quantities of the commodities. Per person supplies are derived from the total amount of food available for human consumption by dividing total calories by total population actually partaking of the food supplies during the reference period. However, per person gures represent only the average supply available for the population as a whole and do not necessarily indicate what is actually consumed by individuals. The actual food consumption may be lower than the quantity shown as food availability depending on the magnitude of wastage and losses of food in the household, e.g. during storage, in preparation and cooking, as plate-waste or quantities fed to domestic animals and pets, thrown or given away. Source: Statistics Division Owner: FAO Dietary Energy Supply per person

P2.HUN.FAO.ESS.UNMNT.DEP
Page: table 15 (p. 132), chart 36 (p. 91). The depth of food deprivation indicates how much fooddeprived people fall short of minimum food needs in terms of dietary energy. It is measured as the difference between the minimum dietary energy and the average dietary energy intake of the undernourished population (food-deprived). The depth of food deprivation is low when it is less than 200 kilocalories per person per day and high when it is higher than 300 kilocalories per person per day. The greater the decit, the greater the susceptibility for health risks related to undernutrition. Source: Statistics Division Owner: FAO Incidence of undernourishment

P2.HUN.FAO.ESS.UNMNT.NUM
Page: table 15 (p. 132), map 19 (p. 91). Undernourishment refers to the condition of people whose dietary energy consumption is continuously below a minimum dietary energy requirement for maintaining a healthy life and carrying out a light physical activity. The incidence of undernourishment is the number of people referring to those in this condition. Source: Statistics Division Owner: FAO Global number of undernourished

P2.HUN.FAO.ESS.DIET.DES
Page: table 16 (p. 135), chart 37 (p. 93), map 20 (p. 92). Dietary energy supply per person refers to the amount of food, expressed in kilocalories (kcal) per day, available for each individual in the total population during the reference period. Caloric content is derived by applying the appropriate food composition factors to the quantities of the commodities. Per person supplies are derived from the total amount of food available for human consumption by dividing total calories by total population actually partaking of the food supplies during the reference period. However, per person gures represent only the average supply available for the population as a whole and do not necessarily indicate what is actually consumed by individuals. The actual food consumption may be lower than the quantity shown as food availability depending on the magnitude of wastage and losses

P2.HUN.FAO.ESS.UNMNT.PNW
Page: chart 33, 35 (p. 89, 90). Undernourishment refers to the condition of people whose dietary energy consumption is continuously below a minimum dietary energy requirement for maintaining a healthy life and carrying out a light physical

163

PART 2

activity. The global incidence of undernourishment is the total number of people in the world referring to those in this condition. Source: Statistics Division Owner: FAO Percentage of population undernourished

P2.HUN.FAO.ESS.UNMNT.PREV
Page: table 15 (p. 132), map 18 (p. 88). Undernourishment refers to the condition of people whose dietary energy consumption is continuously below a minimum dietary energy requirement for maintaining a healthy life and carrying out a light physical activity. The percentage of population undernourished is the total number of people in each country referring to those in this condition divided by the population of that country. Source: Statistics Division Owner: FAO Regional percentage of undernourished

one or other forms of Laspeyres formula. The number of items and the weights used to compute the index are given according to expenditure group. The term "item" is used here to mean the smallest grouping of goods and services for which a specic weight is given. The source(s) and the reference period of the weights used for the index, e.g. a household expenditure survey, national accounts, etc. If the reference period for the weights differs from the base period of the index, the adjustments made to the weights to take account of the price changes between the two periods are described. See http://laborsta.ilo.org for more information. Source: LABORSTA Owner: ILO International food prices by food group

P2.HUN.FAO.FPV.FPI
Page: chart 53 (p. 106). The FAO Food Price Index is a measure of the monthly change in international prices of a basket of food commodities. It consists of the average of ve commodity group price indices (representing 55 quotations), weighted with the average export shares of each of the groups for 20022004. See http://www.fao.org/worldfoodsituation/wfshome/foodpricesindex/en/ for more information on subindex construction. Source: Statistics Division Owner: FAO International food price volatility by food group

P2.HUN.FAO.ESS.UNMNT.PREVR
Page: chart 34 (p. 90). Undernourishment refers to the condition of people whose dietary energy consumption is continuously below a minimum dietary energy requirement for maintaining a healthy life and carrying out a light physical activity. The regional percentage of population undernourished is the total number of people in each region referring to those in this condition divided by the population of that region. Source: Statistics Division Owner: FAO Global affordability of food

P2.HUN.FAO.FPV.FPV
Page: chart 55, 56 (p. 107, 107). Annualized historical volatility of the FAO Food Price Index. Source: Statistics Division Owner: FAO Food price volatility (annualized historical volatility)

P2.HUN.FAO.FPV.AFD
Page: chart 54 (p. 106). FAO Food Price Index relative to GDP, showing how much food prices have risen relative to income from the base period 2002-04. Higer (lower) index scores show greater (less) affordability. Source: Statistics Division Owner: FAO Food price ination

P2.HUN.FAO.FPV.FPVn
Page: map 26 (p. 108). Annualized historical volatility of the ILO food price indices. Source: Statistics Division Owner: FAO FAO Global Consumption price volatility

P2.HUN.FAO.FPV.FCPI
Page: map 25 (p. 104). Annual change in the ILO food price indices. The price data for the different items included in the computation of the index are normally weighted in order to take into account the relative importance of each item with respect to total consumption expenditure. In most countries, the indices are computed in a derived form such as weighted arithmetic averages of price relatives for a selected number of representative items between the period under consideration and the base period, using

P2.HUN.FAO.FPV.GCI
Page: chart 52, 57 (p. 105, 109). The FAO Global Food Consumption Price Index tracks changes in the cost of the global food basket as portrayed by the latest FAO world food balance sheet. Representative international prices for each of the commodities or commodity groups appearing in the balance sheet are weighted by their contribution to total caloric intake. Source: Statistics Division Owner: FAO

164

DEFINITIONS AND SOURCES

Dietary diversity in selected LIFDCs

Food + energy import bills per capita

P2.HUN.FAO.FV.DIET.DIV
Page: chart 39 (p. 94). The Herndahl index, H is calculated as H = where S is the consumption share of the starchy staple in diets and N is the number of staples consumed. For a single staple consumed, the index would equate to one and declines as the staple base becomes more diversied. Source: Statistics Division Owner: FAO Starchy root consumption and DES
N S2 =1

P2.HUN.FAO.TFS.FUEL
Page: chart 50, 51 (p. 103, 103). The annual value of food imported under SITC sections 0 + 22+ 4 plus fuels under SITC section 3, expressed as a ratio of population. Source: Statistics Division (FAOSTAT) and UNCTADSTAT Owner: FAO, UNCTAD Index of variability of food production

P2.HUN.FAO.TFS.QPVAR
Page: chart 46 (p. 102). Rolling ten-year window of the coefcient of variation of per capita production index. Source: Statistics Division Owner: FAO Food self-sufciency (calories)

P2.HUN.FAO.FV.DIET.RTDES
Page: chart 38 (p. 94). Caloric equivalent of starchy roots available for consumption as a ratio of total dietary energy supply. Source: Statistics Division Owner: FAO Availability of dietary iron

P2.HUN.FAO.TFS.SSCAL P2.HUN.FAO.MCN.IRON
Page: table 18 (p. 141), chart 44 (p. 98). The dietary availability of iron is calculated by converting the amount of food available for human consumption as estimated by the FAO Food Balance Sheets in equivalent of iron derived from animal and vegetal products. However the actual food consumption may be lower than the quantity shown as food availability depending on the magnitude of wastage and losses of food in the household, e.g. during storage, in preparation and cooking, as plate-waste or quantities fed to domestic animals and pets, thrown or given away. . Source: Statistics Division Owner: FAO Food + energy import bills (% GDP) Page: table 19 (p. 144), chart 45 (p. 101), map 24 (p. 100). The self-sufciency ratio (SSR) is dened as: SSR = production x 100/(production + imports - exports). The SSR can be calculated for individual commodities, groups of commodities of similar nutritional values and, after appropriate conversion of the commodity equations, also for the aggregate of all commodities. In the context of food security, the SSR is often taken to indicate the extent to which a country relies on its own production resources, i.e. the higher the ratio the greater the selfsufciency. While the SSR can be the appropriate tool when assessing the supply situation for individual commodities, a certain degree of caution should be observed when looking at the overall food situation. In the case, however, where a large part of a countrys production of one commodity, e.g. other cereals, is exported, the SSR may be very high but the country may still have to rely heavily on imports of food commodities to feed the population. The self-sufciency rate (as dened above) cannot be the complement to 100 of the import dependency rate, or vice-versa. Source: Statistics Division Owner: FAO Months of cereal self-provisioning capacity

P2.HUN.FAO.TFS.FDFL
Page: table 20 (p. 147). The annual value of food imported under SITC sections 0 + 22+ 4 plus fuels under SITC section 3, expressed as a ratio of GDP. Source: Statistics Division (FAOSTAT) and UNCTADSTAT Owner: FAO, UNCTAD Food import bills

P2.HUN.FAO.TFS.STU
Page: chart 47, 48 (p. 102, 103). Stocks-to-utilization ratios for cereals (wheat, rice and coarse grains), where stocks refer to the carry-over of the preceding national crop season. The ratio is then multiplied by 12 to calculate the number of months of self-provisioning capacity in a given year. Source: Trade and Markets Division Owner: FAO

P2.HUN.FAO.TFS.FIB
Page: table 20 (p. 147), chart 49, 50, 51 (p. 103, 103, 103). The annual value of food imported under SITC sections 0 + 22+ 4 expressed in current US$. Source: Statistics Division (FAOSTAT) and UNCTADSTAT Owner: FAO, UNCTAD

165

PART 2

Persons affected by natural disasters

P2.HUN.ODFA.EMDAT.RHS.PPND
Page: table 14 (p. 129), chart 29 (p. 85), map 16 (p. 84). People requiring immediate assistance during a period of emergency, i.e. requiring basic survival needs such as food, water, shelter, sanitation and immediate medical assistance. Appearance of a signicant number of cases of an infectious disease introduced in a region or a population that is usually free from that disease. See www.emdat.net (Universit catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium). Source: International Disaster Database: EM-DAT Owner: OFDA and CRED Total affected by natural disasters

womens participation in the work force. The Gender Inequality Index is designed to reveal the extent to which national human development achievements are eroded by gender inequality, and to provide empirical foundations for policy analysis and advocacy efforts. Source: Human Development Report 2010 Owner: UNDP Human Development Index

P2.HUN.UNDP.HDR.POV.HDI
Page: table 22 (p. 153). The HDI represents a national average of human development achievements in the three basic dimensions making up the HDI: health, education and income. Like all averages, it conceals disparities in human development across the population within the same country. Two countries with different distributions of achievements can have the same average HDI value. The IHDI takes into account not only the average achievements of a country on health, education and income, but also how those achievements are distributed among its citizens by "discounting" each dimensions average value according to its level of inequality. Source: Human Development Report 2010 Owner: UNDP Human Development Index (inequality adjusted)

P2.HUN.ODFA.EMDAT.RHS.PPNDT
Page: chart 30 (p. 86). Sum of (i) injured people suffering from physical injuries, trauma or an illness requiring medical treatment as a direct result of a disaster; (ii) homeless people needing immediate assistance for shelter; and (iii) affected people requiring immediate assistance during a period of emergency; it can also include displaced or evacuated people. See www.emdat.net (Universit catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium). Source: International Disaster Database: EM-DAT Owner: OFDA and CRED Multidimensional Poverty Index

P2.HUN.UNDP.HDR.POV.HDIi
Page: table 22 (p. 153), chart 59 (p. 112). The Human Development Index (HDI) is a summary measure of human development. It measures the average achievements in a country in three basic dimensions of human development: a long and healthy life, access to knowledge and a decent standard of living. The Inequality-adjusted Human Development Index (IHDI) adjusts the Human Development Index (HDI) for inequality in distribution of each dimension across the population. The IHDI accounts for inequalities in HDI dimensions by "discounting" each dimensions average value according to its level of inequality. The IHDI equals the HDI when there is no inequality across people but is less than the HDI as inequality rises. In this sense, the IHDI is the actual level of human development (accounting for this inequality), while the HDI can be viewed as an index of "potential" human development (or the maximum level of HDI) that could be achieved if there was no inequality. The "loss" in potential human development due to inequality is given by the difference between the HDI and the IHDI and can be expressed as a percentage. Source: Human Development Report 2010 Owner: UNDP Population of concern

P2.HUN.UNDP.HDR.MPI
Page: table 21 (p. 150). An international measure of poverty for 109 developing countries, the MPI complements income-based poverty measures by reecting the multiple deprivations that people face at the same time. The MPI identies deprivations across health, education and living standards, and shows the number of people who are multidimensionally poor and the deprivations that they face at the household level. Source: Alkire, S. Roche, JM. Santos, ME. and Seth, S (November 2011) ophi.qeh.ox.ac.uk Owner: OPHI Gender Inequality Index

P2.HUN.UNDP.HDR.POV.GEI
Page: table 22 (p. 153), map 29 (p. 113). The Gender Inequality Index is a composite measure reecting inequality in achievements between women and men in three dimensions: reproductive health, empowerment and the labour market. It varies between zero (when women and men fare equally) and one (when men or women fare poorly compared to the other in all dimensions). The health dimension is measured by two indicators: maternal mortality ratio and the adolescent fertility rate. The empowerment dimension is also measured by two indicators: the share of parliamentary seats held by each sex and by secondary and higher education attainment levels. The labour dimension is measured by

P2.HUN.UNHCR.GT.RHS.TPC
Page: table 13 (p. 126), map 17 (p. 87). Refugees are individuals recognized under the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees; and also people in a refugee-like situation, such as those who

166

DEFINITIONS AND SOURCES

are outside their country or territory of origin and who face protection risks similar to those of refugees, but for whom refugee status has, for practical or other reasons, not been ascertained. Internally Displaced Persons (IDPs) are people or groups of individuals who have been forced to leave their homes or places of habitual residence, in particular as a result of, or in order to avoid the effects of armed conict, situations of generalized violence, violations of human rights or natural- or humanmade disasters, and who have not crossed an international border. Others include Asylum-seekers (persons who have applied for asylum or refugee status, but who have not yet received a nal decision on their application), Returned IDPs and refugees, Stateless Persons (individuals not considered as nationals by any State under relevant national laws) and other groups of concern to whom UNHCR has extended its protection and/or assistance services, based on humanitarian or other special grounds. . Source: Statistical Online Population Database Owner: UNHCR Total population of concern

Ratio of girls-to-boys out of primary school

P2.HUN.WBK.WDI.EDU.COSR
Page: table 24 (p. 159). Children out of school are the number of primary-schoolage children not enrolled in primary or secondary school. Source: World Bank (WDI) Owner: UNESCO Public spending on education, total (% of GDP)

P2.HUN.WBK.WDI.EDU.EXPP
Page: table 24 (p. 159). Public expenditure on education consists of current and capital public expenditure on education includes government spending on educational institutions (both public and private), education administration as well as subsidies for private entities (students/households and other privates entities). Source: World Bank (WDI) Owner: UNESCO Expenditure per student

P2.HUN.UNHCR.GT.RHS.TPCT
Page: chart 32 (p. 87). Total population of concern is the sum of various groups of people including refugees, asylum-seekers, internally displaced persons (IDPs) protected/assisted by UNHCR, stateless persons and returnees (returned refugees and IDPs). Source: Statistical Online Population Database Owner: UNHCR Average governance

P2.HUN.WBK.WDI.EDU.EXPS
Page: table 24 (p. 159). Public expenditure per student is the public current spending on education divided by the total number of students by level, as a percentage of GDP per capita. Public expenditure (current and capital) includes government spending on educational institutions (both public and private), education administration as well as subsidies for private entities (students/households and other privates entities). Source: World Bank (WDI) Owner: UNESCO Literacy rate, adult female (% of females ages 15 and above)

P2.HUN.WBK.POV.GOV
Page: table 23 (p. 156), chart 60 (p. 115), map 30 (p. 114). The Worldwide Governance Indicators project constructs aggregate indicators of six broad dimensions of governance: (i) Voice and Accountability; (ii) Political Stability and Absence of Violence/Terrorism; (iii) Government Effectiveness; (iv) Regulatory Quality; (v) Rule of Law; (vi) Control of Corruption. The six aggregate indicators are based on 30 underlying data sources reporting the perceptions of governance of a large number of survey respondents and expert assessments worldwide. Details on the underlying data sources, the aggregation method, and the interpretation of the indicators, can be found in the WGI methodology paper: Daniel Kaufmann, Aart Kraay and Massimo Mastruzzi (2010). "The Worldwide Governance Indicators: A Summary of Methodology, Data and Analytical Issues". World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 5430 http://papers.ssrn.com/ sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1682130. . Source: World Bank Owner: Worldwide Governance Indicators (WGI) project

P2.HUN.WBK.WDI.EDU.FILT
Page: table 24 (p. 159), map 31 (p. 116). Adult literacy rate is the percentage of people ages 15 and above who can, with understanding, read and write a short, simple statement on their everyday life. Source: World Bank (WDI) Owner: UNESCO Ratio of girls to boys in primary and secondary education (%)

P2.HUN.WBK.WDI.EDU.GEN
Page: table 24 (p. 159), chart 61 (p. 117). Ratio of girls to boys in primary and secondary education is the ratio of the female to male gross enrolment rates in primary and secondary school. Source: World Bank (WDI) Owner: UNESCO

167

PART 2

Health expenditure per capita (current US$)

P2.HUN.WBK.WDI.HAE.HE.PCP
Page: table 24 (p. 159), map 32 (p. 118). Total health expenditure is the sum of public and private health expenditures as a ratio of total population. It covers the provision of health services (preventive and curative), family planning activities, nutrition activities, and emergency aid designated for health but does not include provision of water and sanitation. Data are in current US dollars. Source: World Bank (WDI) Owner: WHO Health expenditure, total (% of GDP)

protected well or spring, and rainwater collection. Unimproved sources include vendors, tanker trucks, and unprotected wells and springs. Reasonable access is dened as the availability of at least 20 litres a person a day from a source within one kilometre of the dwelling. Source: World Bank (WDI) Owner: WHO and UNCF Improved water source, urban (% of urban population with access)

P2.HUN.WBK.WDI.HAE.WAT.IMPWU
Page: table 24 (p. 159). Access to an improved water source refers to the percentage of the population with reasonable access to an adequate amount of water from an improved source, such as a household connection, public standpipe, borehole, protected well or spring, and rainwater collection. Unimproved sources include vendors, tanker trucks, and unprotected wells and springs. Reasonable access is dened as the availability of at least 20 litres a person a day from a source within one kilometre of the dwelling. Source: World Bank (WDI) Owner: WHO and UNCF Poverty headcount ratio at $1.25 a day (PPP) (% of regional population)

P2.HUN.WBK.WDI.HAE.HE.TOT
Page: table 24 (p. 159), chart 62 (p. 119). Total health expenditure is the sum of public and private health expenditure. It covers the provision of health services (preventive and curative), family planning activities, nutrition activities, and emergency aid designated for health but does not include provision of water and sanitation. Source: World Bank (WDI) Owner: WHO Prevalence of HIV, total (% of population ages 15-49)

P2.HUN.WBK.WDI.POV.AGG
Page: chart 58 (p. 111). Data are from PovcalNet: the on-line tool for poverty measurement developed by the Development Research Group of the World Bank. See http://iresearch. worldbank.org/PovcalNet/povDuplic.html. Source: PovcalNet Owner: World Bank Gini-index of income distribution

P2.HUN.WBK.WDI.HAE.HIV.PREV
Page: table 24 (p. 159). Prevalence of HIV refers to the percentage of people ages 15-49 who are infected with HIV. Source: World Bank (WDI) Owner: UNAIDS and WHO Improved sanitation facilities (% of population with access)

P2.HUN.WBK.WDI.HAE.SAN.IMPS
Page: table 24 (p. 159), chart 63 (p. 121). Access to improved sanitation facilities refers to the percentage of the population with at least adequate access to excreta disposal facilities that can effectively prevent human, animal, and insect contact with excreta. Improved facilities range from simple but protected pit latrines to ush toilets with a sewerage connection. To be effective, facilities must be correctly constructed and properly maintained. Source: World Bank (WDI) Owner: WHO and UNCF Improved water source, rural (% of rural population with access)

P2.HUN.WBK.WDI.POV.GINI
Page: table 22 (p. 153), map 28 (p. 113). Gini index measures the extent to which the distribution of income among individuals or households within an economy deviates from a perfectly equal distribution. A Lorenz curve plots the cumulative percentages of total income received against the cumulative number of recipients, starting with the poorest individual or household. The Gini index measures the area between the Lorenz curve and a hypothetical line of absolute equality, expressed as a percentage of the maximum area under the line. Thus a Gini index of 0 represents perfect equality, while an index of 100 implies perfect inequality. Source: World Bank (WDI) Owner: World Bank Poverty headcount ratio at $1.25 a day (PPP) (% of population)

P2.HUN.WBK.WDI.HAE.WAT.IMPRU
Page: table 24 (p. 159), map 33 (p. 120). Access to an improved water source refers to the percentage of the population with reasonable access to an adequate amount of water from an improved source, such as a household connection, public standpipe, borehole,

P2.HUN.WBK.WDI.POV.H125
Page: table 21 (p. 150). Population below US$1.25 a day is the percentage of the population living on less than US$1.25 a day at 2005

168

DEFINITIONS AND SOURCES

international prices. As a result of revisions in PPP exchange rates, poverty rates for individual countries cannot be compared with poverty rates reported in earlier editions. Source: World Bank (WDI) Owner: World Bank Income share held by highest 20%

Poverty gap at $1.25 a day (PPP) (%)

P2.HUN.WBK.WDI.POV.P125
Page: table 21 (p. 150), map 27 (p. 110). Poverty gap is the mean shortfall from the poverty line (counting the nonpoor as having zero shortfall), expressed as a percentage of the poverty line. This measure reects the depth of poverty as well as its incidence. Source: World Bank (WDI) Owner: World Bank Poverty gap at $2 a day (PPP) (%)

P2.HUN.WBK.WDI.POV.H20
Page: table 22 (p. 153). Percentage share of income or consumption is the share that accrues to subgroups of population indicated by deciles or quintiles. Percentage shares by quintile may not sum to 100 because of rounding. Source: World Bank (WDI) Owner: World Bank Poverty headcount ratio at $2 a day (PPP) (% of population)

P2.HUN.WBK.WDI.POV.P200
Page: table 21 (p. 150). Poverty gap is the mean shortfall from the poverty line (counting the nonpoor as having zero shortfall), expressed as a percentage of the poverty line. This measure reects the depth of poverty as well as its incidence. Source: World Bank (WDI) Owner: World Bank Poverty gap at national poverty line (%)

P2.HUN.WBK.WDI.POV.H200
Page: table 21 (p. 150). Population below US$2 a day is the percentage of the population living on less than US$2.00 a day at 2005 international prices. As a result of revisions in PPP exchange rates, poverty rates for individual countries cannot be compared with poverty rates reported in earlier editions. Source: World Bank (WDI) Owner: World Bank Poverty headcount ratio at national poverty line (% of population)

P2.HUN.WBK.WDI.POV.PNPL
Page: table 21 (p. 150). Poverty gap at national poverty line is the mean shortfall from the poverty line (counting the nonpoor as having zero shortfall) as a percentage of the poverty line. This measure reects the depth of poverty as well as its incidence. Source: World Bank (WDI) Owner: World Bank Poverty gap at rural poverty line (%)

P2.HUN.WBK.WDI.POV.HNPL
Page: table 21 (p. 150). National poverty rate is the percentage of the population living below the national poverty line. National estimates are based on population-weighted subgroup estimates from household surveys. Source: World Bank (WDI) Owner: World Bank Poverty headcount ratio at rural poverty line (% of rural population)

P2.HUN.WBK.WDI.POV.PRPL
Page: table 21 (p. 150). Poverty gap at rural poverty line is the mean shortfall from the poverty line (counting the nonpoor as having zero shortfall) as a percentage of the national rural poverty line. This measure reects the depth of poverty as well as its incidence. Source: World Bank (WDI) Owner: World Bank Food aid received

P2.HUN.WBK.WDI.POV.HRPL
Page: table 21 (p. 150). Rural poverty rate is the percentage of the rural population living below the national rural poverty line. Source: World Bank (WDI) Owner: World Bank Income share held by lowest 20%

P2.HUN.WFP.FAIS.FDAID
Page: table 25 (p. 162), chart 64 (p. 123), map 34 (p. 122). Quantity of food aid that reaches the recipient country during a given period. Quantities exported in Grain Equivalent. The latter is a unit of measurement used as alternative to Actual Ton for cereal-derived products. To convert a product into grain equivalent a commodity specic conversion factor is used. For example if the factor to convert wheat our into wheat is 1.37, a tonne of wheat our corresponds to 0.730 tons of wheat (1/1.37). Source: Food Aid Information System Owner: WFP

P2.HUN.WBK.WDI.POV.L20
Page: table 22 (p. 153). Percentage share of income or consumption is the share that accrues to subgroups of population indicated by deciles or quintiles. Percentage shares by quintile may not sum to 100 because of rounding. Source: World Bank (WDI) Owner: World Bank

169

PART 2

Percentage of adults with low body mass index (BMI)

Percentage of children under 5 who are wasted

P2.HUN.WHO.GHO.ADLT.LBMI
Page: table 18 (p. 141). The indicator of weight adequacy in relation to height of older children, adolescents and adults. It is calculated as weight (kilograms) divided by height (metres), squared. The acceptable range for adults is 18.5 to 24.9 , and for children it varies with age. Source: Global Health Observatory Owner: WHO Percentage of female adults with low body mass index (BMI)

P2.HUN.WHO.GHO.CHLD.WSTD
Page: table 18 (p. 141), chart 43 (p. 98). Percentage of wasting (weight-for-height less than -2 standard deviations of the WHO Child Growth Standards median) among children aged 0-5 years. Source: Global Health Observatory Owner: WHO Percentage of newborns with low birth weight

P2.HUN.WHO.GHO.NEW.LWB
Page: table 18 (p. 141). Low-birthweight babies are newborns weighing less than 2,500 grams, with the measurement taken within the rst hours of life, before signicant postnatal weight loss has occurred. Source: Global Health Observatory Owner: WHO

P2.HUN.WHO.GHO.ADLT.LBMIF
Page: table 18 (p. 141), map 22 (p. 99). The indicator of weight adequacy in relation to height of older female children, adolescents and adults. It is calculated as weight (kilograms) divided by height (metres), squared. The acceptable range for adults is 18.5 to 24.9 , and for children it varies with age. Source: Global Health Observatory Owner: WHO Percentage of adults who are obese by gender

P2.HUN.WHO.GHO.ADLT.OBS
Page: table 18 (p. 141). Percentage of male and female dened population with a body mass index (BMI) of 25 kg/m2 or higher. Source: Global Health Observatory Owner: WHO Percentage of adults who are obese

P2.HUN.WHO.GHO.ADLT.OBSx
Page: map 23 (p. 99). Percentage of adult dened population with a body mass index (BMI) of 25 kg/m2 or higher. Source: Global Health Observatory Owner: WHO Percentage of children under 5 who are stunted

P2.HUN.WHO.GHO.CHLD.STNT
Page: table 18 (p. 141), chart 43 (p. 98). Percentage of stunting (height-for-age less than -2 standard deviations of the WHO Child Growth Standards median) among children aged 0-5 years. Source: Global Health Observatory Owner: WHO Percentage of children under 5 who are underweight

P2.HUN.WHO.GHO.CHLD.UW
Page: table 18 (p. 141), chart 42 (p. 97), map 21 (p. 96). Percentage of underweight (weight-for-age less than -2 standard deviations of the WHO Child Growth Standards median) among children aged 0-5 years. Source: Global Health Observatory Owner: WHO

170

PART

Feeding the world

Introduction
The worlds population is set to grow considerably over the coming decades, despite an expected slowdown in the pace of overall growth. Some of the countries and regions where population growth is expected to be higher many in sub-Saharan Africa will likely undergo major shifts in dietary composition, involving increased consumption of livestock products, dietary fat and sugar. A similar pattern was observed over the last ten or twenty years in many emerging economies of the Middle East, North Africa, Latin America and East Asia. Per capita consumption in these regions has approached 3000 kcal per person per day. Sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia, by contrast, are still well below the 2500 kcal per person per day threshold. In South Asia, part of the reason may stem from cultural factors that lead to low meat consumption. At the other extreme, Latin America consumes high per capita amounts of meat, following the traditional wide availability of livestock commodities. The expected evolution of consumption may make malnutrition more prominent than it is today, especially in developing countries. Diets are expected to include a higher intake of fats (especially of saturated fat), sugar and salt. At the same time, urbanization and the reduction of primary activities will likely be associated with more sedentary lifestyles. Underway in several emerging economies already, these two phenomena will likely combine to increase diet-related diseases and their associated social costs.

Yet, food is not available for all. Beyond per capita consumption, little less than a billion people in 2010 were estimated to be food-insecure. The highest number of undernourished was found in Asia, while the highest prevalence is in sub-Saharan Africa, where it was estimated at 28 percent. Given the expected evolution of consumption, world food production will need to increase considerably over the coming decades. Recent FAO estimates indicate that in order to meet the projected demand of year 2050, global agricultural production must grow 60 percent above the level of 2005-07. But there are signs for optimism. Over the last ve decades (between 1961-63 and 2007-09) production has increased by a massive 170 percent. Most of the growth in world crop production over the past 50 years originated from increases in yield and higher cropping intensity. This pattern is expected to continue, given the limited opportunities for expanding agricultural land. At the global level, the rate of yield growth for most crops has been decelerating in the past few decades, while still increasing in absolute terms. To a large extent, yield gains originate from improved cropping techniques, fertilization and irrigation. Much can be achieved by narrowing the gap between average farm yields and the yields obtained in experimental elds, and by reducing wastage and post-harvest losses. Chinas major rice-producing provinces, for instance, have reached a point where the average yield is about 80 percent of that obtained in experimental elds. Evidence suggests that a wide yield gap exists in maize cultivated in sub-Saharan Africa. The intensication of production on land, however, is likely to carry signicant negative externalities. This is seen in the case of the large increase in mineral fertilization. Substantial improvements in efciency and productivity of land, water and input use in general are required. Technologies are also available to reduce the environmental pressure and carbon emissions from agriculture. Developing and transferring technology alone will not close yield gaps and reduce wastage and post harvest losses. It requires an enabling and conducive investment environment. Farmers are likely to adopt technologies only if there are sound incentives to do so. In turn, this calls for well-functioning input and output markets, better infrastructure, as well as better nance and risk management tools. The same applies to the reduction of wastage and post-harvest losses, which require better-functioning supply chains.

Key Resources
The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture (SOFIA) SOFIA. The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture (SOFIA) is the agship publication of the FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Department. This premier advocacy document is published every two years to provide policy-makers, civil society and those whose livelihoods depend on the sector a comprehensive, objective and global view of capture sheries and aquaculture, including associated policy issues. SOFIA 2010 reveals that the per-capita supply of sh as human food reached a new all-time high in 2008. It also highlights the growing need to focus on a variety of aspects of policy and governance, especially in relation to employment and poverty alleviation. Publication cycle: Biennial Webpage: http://www.fao.org/docrep/ 013/i1820e/i1820e00.htm Food Outlook Food Outlook is a biannual publication focusing on developments affecting global food and feed markets. The sub-title "Global Market Analysis" reects this focus on developments in international markets, with comprehensive assessments and forecasts on a commodity by commodity basis. Food Outlook maintains a close synergy with another major GIEWS publication, Crop Prospects and Food Situation, especially with regard to the coverage of cereals. Food outlook is available in English, French, Spanish and Chinese. Publication cycle: Twice a year (May/June and November/December) Webpage: http://www.fao.org/giews/ english/fo/index.htm
November 2011

Food Outlook
Global Market Analysis

I NTRODUCING

AMIS
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Market summaries Market assessments
Wheat Coarse grains Rice Cassava Oilseeds, oils and meals Sugar Meat and meat products Milk and milk products Fish and shery products

FOCUS

1-10 11-76
11 16 25 39 44 55 59 67 70

n spite of improved supply prospects and weakening demand, agricultural commodity market conditions remain fairly tight, which is the major factor underpinning prices. Production forecasts for nearly all key food crops in 2011 have risen steadily since the previous report in June. For cereals, while the forecast for ending stocks in 2012 has also been revised up signicantly, larger anticipated inventories reect not only improved production prospects but also expectations of a slowing demand growth because of the unfavourable macroeconomic environment. In spite of these developments, however, international prices of all commodities covered in this report continue to be high and, in most cases, above the previous year. Strong underlying demand in certain countries, where economic growth is robust, is price supportive. Aside from being high, most prices are also extremely volatile, moving in tandem with unstable nancial and equity markets. Fluctuations in exchange rates and uncertainties in energy markets are also contributing to sharp price swings in agricultural markets. Given all these uncertainties, it is difcult to predict how markets will evolve in the near-term. While there is some room for optimism that, for most commodities, prices could remain below their recent highs, the general picture still points to rm markets well into 2012. For most food commodities, next years production will have to increase in order to meet the expected demand, albeit moderately. However, if this demand were to rise faster than currently envisaged, which is a possibility even assuming a slow economic recovery, then a more signicant production expansion will be required. The question therefore is: do the current market signals convey the correct information for producers to adjust their production plans for next year? More critically, will there be enough time for an adequate production response in the event of an unexpected surge in demand? Input costs, from fertilizers to energy, remain high, interest rates have climbed in many emerging economies, all of which could dampen production next year and, hence, draw down stocks and boost prices further. This years global food import bill is expected to approach USD 1.3 trillion, with the cost of food purchases for the Least Developed Countries (LDCs) soaring by over a third from last year. Reducing market uncertainty may not be among the fastest remedies for lowering the number of hungry. Yet, letting international markets continue in their present state, volatile and unpredictable, will only aggravate an already grim outlook for world food security. This is the reason why world leaders have been dwelling at length on the issue of price volatility since the start of the year. Such discussions gained momentum in recent months as attention turned towards nding ways to improve the accuracy of supply and demand forecasts for major food crops as an important rst step in promoting stable and transparent food markets. In June 2011, the Group of 20 (G-20) established a global information system under the banner of Agricultural Market Information System (AMIS). This initiative, proposed by a number of international organizations, has been endorsed by all G-20 Members and, subsequently, by the Committee on World Food Security (CFS). This issue of Food Outlook also introduces AMIS by explaining how it came about, its structure and objectives.

Agricultural Market Information System (AMIS) 1-29

Foreword 1 Improving global governance for fo security: g gov rn g governance food The role of the International Organizations f Inte national Organ erna n Orga e ernat 2 Agricultural mar et information sy al market i forma on sys arket information system (AMIS) 11 orm or rma Futures markets signal change arkets sig rkets s s signal change hange hang 18 National policy resp olicy responses to cereal pr spikes 23 cy ponses o cerea price Review of changes in domestic cereal prices hanges ce 26

Special features

AMIS

77-89
77 79

A new food assistance convention imminent Fertilizers

Statistical appendix tables Market indicators

90-127 128-150
128 136 144 146 148

The 2011 price peaks Recent patterns of investment in selected non-agricultural commodities Ocean freight rates Food import bills The FAO price indices

FAO Food Price Indices

(October 2010 - October 2011) 2002-2004=100 425 Sugar

350

275

Oils & Fats Cereals Dairy Meat

200

125

O N D 2010

F M A M

2011

GIEWS

global information and early warning system on food and agriculture

PART 3

Aggregate agriculture
The growth of global agricultures productive potential has so far been more than sufcient to exceed population growth, resulting in a steady, albeit slow, increase in average per capita food availability. For the world as a whole, per capita food availability has risen from about 2220 kcal/person/day in the early 1960s to 2790 kcal/person/day in 2006-08, while developing countries even recorded a leap from 1850 kcal/person/day to over 2640 kcal/person/day. This growth in food availability in conjunction with improved access to food helped reduce the percentage of chronically undernourished people in developing countries from 34 percent in the mid 1970s to just 15 percent three decades later. More recently, the progress in the reduction in the prevalence, i.e. the percentage share of undernourished people has come to a halt. High and volatile food prices and a slowdown in global economic growth weighed on the ability of the poor to purchase enough food. Continuous, although slowing, population growth in developing countries and the lack of progress in reducing the prevalence even resulted in an increase in the absolute number of chronically hungry people. From the perspective of aggregate global food demand, this slowdown caused a further increase in the gap between potential and effective market demand. This gap is likely to remain a feature of global food and agriculture for the foreseeable future given the slow-down in global population growth and the growing saturation of food demand in developed and emerging countries. However, while growth in aggregate food demand is expected to slow, demand from other sources is likely to expand. In the last decade, the bio-based economy in which the growth of biofuels has been prominent has presented considerable scope for relaxing an environment constrained by the slowdown in food demand. This additional demand presents new opportunities and new challenges at the same time. It offers considerable growth potential for global agriculture and, importantly, new options to raise farm incomes; but it also lifts prices for the poor and presents an additional burden on the worlds natural resource base. Where growing conditions are difcult and the resource base is already limited, any additional demand from the non-food sector can become an outright threat to the resource base in general and local land, water and biodiversity reserves in particular.

Map 35:

No Data

< 1000

100

Source: FAO, Statistics Division Metalink: P3.FEED.FAO.ESS.FD.QP, p. 272

The world produced over 13 quadrillion

calories in 2010

... or 5359 kcal on a per capita daily basis Much of Africa lags behind other regions
in its present capacity to produce food

174

AGGREGATE AGRICULTURE

Per capita food production, calories (kcal/day, 2009) 1000 2500 2500 4000 4000 8000 > 8000

Chart 65: On a calorie basis, food productivity is fast increasing in developing countries
Index of per capita food production, calories (1990-2009)
Developed 105 Developing

2004-06 = 100

100 95 90

1990

1995

2000

2005

Source: FAO, Statistics Division Metalink: P3.FEED.FAO.ESS.FD.QP, p. 272

175

PART 3

The capacity for further growth in the productive base of agricultural is often contested. In drawing comparisons with the past, questions are often raised about whether slower growth will be sufcient to deliver the required additional output. There are indeed concerns. For instance, a large extent of the suitable land not yet in use is concentrated in several countries in Latin America and the Caribbean and sub-Saharan Africa, and not necessarily where it is most needed. Moreover, much of this land is suitable for growing only a few crops, not necessarily those for which there is highest demand. In addition, a great portion of the land not yet in use suffers from constraints (e.g. agro-ecological, climatic unsuitability and a lack of infrastructure) that cannot be overcome easily or economically. The availability of freshwater resources shows a very similar picture to that of land availability. Sufcient resources are unevenly distributed at the global level, and an increasing number of countries or parts of countries are reaching alarming levels of water scarcity, especially in the Near East, North Africa and in South Asia. A mitigating factor could be increasing water use efciency, such as providing the right incentives to use less water. Fears that yields are reaching a plateau do not seem warranted. The potential to increase crop yields (even with existing technology) is considerable. Provided the appropriate socio-economic incentives are in place, there are still bridgeable yield gaps the differences between agro-ecologically attainable and actual yields to be exploited. The required increases in yield, land and irrigation expansion will not come about spontaneously, such as through market forces, but will require considerable public intervention and investment, particularly in agricultural research and in preventing and mitigating environmental damage.

Map 36:

No Data

< 90

90

Source: FAO, Statistics Division (FAOSTAT) Metalink: P3.FEED.FAO.ESS.GPCPIN.FD.PCP, p. 272

Over the past two decades world food

production increased by 18 percent

Encouragingly, some of the highest

growth regions being food-insecure, required such growth food imports to satisfy their food needs

Yet, many countries increasingly rely on

Further reading
Bruinsma (2011) FAO Global Perspectives Unit (www.fao.org/economic/
esa/esag/)

176

AGGREGATE AGRICULTURE

Increase in per capita food production value (US$, 19902009) 90 100 100 105 105 110 > 110

Chart 66: On a value basis, food productivity still on the rise in developing countries
Index of per capita food production, value (1992-2009)
Developed 106 Developing

2004-06 = 100

104 102 100 98 96 94

1995

2000

2005

Source: FAO, Statistics Division (FAOSTAT) Metalink: P3.FEED.FAO.ESS.GPIN.FD, p. 272

177

PART 3

Sources of growth in crop production

In the past 50 years or so, global crop production has expanded threefold. Crop production growth goes hand in hand with crop yield increase and/or expansion in the physical area (arable land) allocated to crops, which together with increases in cropping intensities, such as higher multiple cropping and/or shortening of fallow periods leads to an expansion in the area harvested. Over the past ve decades, global arable land increased by 67 million hectares, which is the result of two opposite trends: an increase of 107 million hectares in developing countries and a decline of 40 million hectares in developed countries. The arable land area in the latter group peaked in the mid-1980s and has been falling ever since at an accelerating rate. Hence, growth in yields and more intensive use of land accounts for all of the growth in crop output in developed countries. In fact, much of the increase in world crop production over this period is attributable to yield improvements, followed by an expansion in arable land, while a small part is due to cropping intensity. These trends, however, are not uniform across regions. For instance, yield-led increases contributed to only one-third of the growth in sub-Saharan Africa crop production. For cereals, which occupy over half of the harvested area in the world, the slowdown in yield growth has been pronounced: it is down from 3 percent per annum in the 1960s to just over half that amount in the 1990s, before rising to 1.8 percent in last decade. For other staples, such as pulses and root crops, growth in global yields has been much smaller well under 1 percent per annum over the previous ve decades. By contrast, yield growth in oil crops has been particularly dynamic, standing at around 3 percent per annum, which is the highest of all crops during that period. By saving land, rising crop yields thus diminish pressure on the environment, especially deforestation. To take cereals as an example, if yield growth in the preceding 50 years did not materialize, an estimated one billion additional hectares would have been needed to meet current demand. The major forces shaping longer-term location and extent of crop production include land scarcity, access to technology and the combination of agro-ecological conditions with availability of irrigation that permits commercially viable production. On the one hand, for instance, the bulk of growth in wheat and rice production in developing countries in the land-scarce regions of Asia and the Near East/North Africa is being met by gains in yield. On the other hand, expansion of harvested land is behind production growth of maize in sub-Saharan Africa and in Latin America and the Caribbean.

Map 37:

No Data

<0

01

Source: FAO, Statistics Division (FAOSTAT) Metalink: P3.FEED.FAO.ESS.GPIN.CRPS, p. 272

World crop production has grown at average annual rate of 1 percent over the last 20 years provements, increased cropping intensity and an expansion of arable land diverse, but the Americas and Southeast Asia have experienced higher rates

Sources of growth include yield im-

The pace of growth in crop production is

178

SOURCES OF GROWTH IN CROP PRODUCTION

Growth in crop production (% p.a., 19922009) 01 13 35 >5

Chart 67: Yield increases have been instrumental in raising crop production
Sources of growth in crop production (1961-2009)
Arable Land Expansion 80 60 40 20 0 Cropping Intensity Yield Increases

East Asia

L.Amer. & Carib.

South Asia

Sub-S Africa

World

Source: FAO, Statistics Division Metalink: P3.FEED.FAO.ESS.CRPS.GSRCE, p. 271

179

PART 3

Generally, agricultural land expansion can be observed in countries that combine growing needs for food and employment with limited access to technology that could increase intensication of cultivation on land already in agricultural use, such as in many parts of subSaharan Africa. Land expansion also occurs in countries with both ample land resources and potential for crops facing fast demand growth, particularly for exports and/or for non-food uses, e.g. sugar cane and soybeans in South America and oil-palm in South-East Asia. Indeed, oilcrops have been responsible for a good part of the increases in total cultivated land in the developing countries and the world as a whole, albeit at the expense of forest area. The broad lesson of experience shows that if scarcities develop and prices rise, as has been the case in the past few years, farmers respond quickly by adopting technology and increasing production, as long as they live in an environment of not-too-difcult access to improved technology, transport infrastructure and supportive policies. In countries with land expansion possibilities, the quickest response comes from increasing land under cultivation, including shifting land among crops towards the most protable ones. However, even if there is sufcient scope in regional agriculture to support further increases in production, this is small consolation to foodinsecure people who depend on what they themselves produce for nutrition. Such people often live in semi-arid agricultural environments where the scope for increasing production can be very limited or non-existent. The fact that the world as a whole may have ample potential to produce more food is of little help to them.

Chart 68: Cropland in sub-Saharan Africa has undergone signicant expansion compensating for low yields
Expansion of area cultivated by crop by region (1961-2010)

Sub-S Africa

South Asia

L.Amer. & Carib.

East Asia

Developed

-10

10 20 Million ha

30

40

50

Coarse Grains Oilcrops Pulses Rice Roots & Tubers Sugar Cane Wheat

Further reading
FAO World agriculture: towards 2030/2050 Interim
report: Prospects for food, nutrition, agriculture and major commodity groups (www.fao.org/leadmin/user_ upload/esag/docs/Interim_report_AT2050web.pdf)

Source: FAO, Statistics Division Metalink: P3.FEED.FAO.ESS.WT.AH, p. 278

FAO Food Outlook www.fao.org/giews/english/fo/

index.htm)

180

SOURCES OF GROWTH IN CROP PRODUCTION

Chart 69: Steady progress in raising yields of food crops in developed countries

Arable crops - productivity in developed countries (1990-2010)

Coarse Grains 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 6 Oil Crops Pulses Rice Roots Sugar Wheat

Roots and Sugar

Tonnes per ha

Field crops

5 4 3 2 1

1990

1995

2000

2005

2010

Source: FAO, Statistics Division (FAOSTAT) Metalink: P3.FEED.FAO.ESS.WT.YLD, p. 278

Chart 70: Large yield gaps persist in developing countries

Arable crops - productivity in developing countries (1990-2010)

Coarse Grains 70 60 50 40 30 Oil Crops Pulses Rice Roots Sugar Wheat

Roots and Sugar

Tonnes per ha

20

Field crops

3 2 1

1990

1995

2000

2005

2010

Source: FAO, Statistics Division (FAOSTAT) Metalink: P3.FEED.FAO.ESS.WT.YLD, p. 278

181

PART 3

Trends in the crop sector

Cereals are overwhelmingly the major source of food supplies for direct human consumption. Of the 2.4 billion tonnes of cereals currently produced, roughly 1.1 billion tonnes are destined for food use, around 800 million tonnes (35 percent of world consumption) are used as animal feed, and the remaining 500 million tonnes are diverted to industrial usage, seed or are wasted. Thus, events in the cereal sector have critical implications for world food supplies. The growth rate of world cereal production fell to 1 percent per annum in the 1990s, down from 1.6 percent in the 1980s and almost 3 percent in the 1970s. Over 200003, growth had dwindled to a fth of a percentage point per annum, but since that time the rate of output has dramatically increased to the realm of 2.5 percent. Transient factors, sometimes taking several years to dissipate, have temporarily altered the underlying trajectory of global growth in the cereal sector. These factors can work either direction. For instance, whereas in the 1960s, growth was being propelled by the Green Revolution, in the 1990s demand fell in the transition economies, where such demand had previously been kept articially high for decades through subsidies on food consumption. Demand also grew more slowly in the second half of the 1990s, as the East Asian economies that were hit by economic crisis; while weather problems, low prices and an abundance of stocks depressed growth at the beginning of the following decade. In recent years, global demand growth is expected to have slowed owing to economic downturns in many major consuming countries. Overall, however, a set of longer term inuences, are limiting demand growth, especially in the food sector. These include slowing population growth, a lower scope for expanded dietary intake in the populations of wealthy countries and entrenched poverty. Such factors prevent hundreds of millions of people from effectively expressing their food needs.

Map 38:

No Data

0.1

Source: FAO, Statistics Division (FAOSTAT) Metalink: P3.FEED.FAO.ESS.RI.QP, p. 276

672 million tonnes of rice (paddy) were

harvested in 2010

Rice is the principle staple in Asia, where

production is rising in the South but falling in the East in many parts of sub-Saharan Africa

Rice is also a highly sought after staple

182

TRENDS IN THE CROP SECTOR

Rice producing countries (million tonnes, 2010) 0.1 5 5.1 15 15.1 60 > 60

Chart 71: Despite falling per capita consumption in China, rice is still the preferred or only available domestic staple in many countries in Asia, providing support to production
Per capita rice production (1990-2010)
Developed 120 115 110 Developing

Developing Developed

kg

26 24 22 20

1990

1995

2000

2005

2010

Source: FAO, Statistics Division (FAOSTAT) Metalink: P3.FEED.FAO.ESS.RI.QPPC, p. 276

183

PART 3

In recent times, cereal production has been signicantly altered by structural changes in the non-food sector that have given rise to fast growth. These changes include the meeting of feed requirements of rapidly rising and intensifying livestock sectors and demands for cereals as feedstocks in the bio-based economy, especially in the fuel ethanol sector. The geographical concentration of major grain supplies against the geographical dispersion of demand suggests that trade will continue to be important in fullling grain requirements, particularly for wheat and maize. With production mainly located in the temperate zones of developed countries, rising requirements in developing countries has meant rising dependence on exports by them. While rice is produced in vast areas of the world, the physical requirements for growing this crop are limited to certain zones. Economically viable cultivation typically requires high average temperatures during the growing season, abundant supplies of water applied in a timely manner combined with smooth land surfaces to facilitate uniform ooding and drainage, and a subsoil stratum that inhibits the percolation of water. The bulk of world rice production is destined for food use, although some quantities are used in domestic animal feeding. Rice is the primary staple for more than half the worlds population, with Asia representing the largest producing and consuming region. In recent years, rice has also become an important staple throughout Africa. At the global level, the growth of demand in rice has been tailing off, as evidenced in several large producing and consuming countries of South and East Asia, as consumption has shifted to other foodstuffs in line with income growth. Given the importance of these regions in world rice consumption, these declines are reected in the aggregate trends of the world.

Map 39:

No Data

0.1

Source: FAO, Statistics Division (FAOSTAT) Metalink: P3.FEED.FAO.ESS.WT.QP, p. 278

World output of wheat stands at around

651 million tonnes

Mainly grown in temperate climates,

China is currently the worlds largest wheat producing country

184

TRENDS IN THE CROP SECTOR

Wheat producing countries (million tonnes, 2010) 0.1 1 1.1 15 15.1 40 > 40

Chart 72: Agroclimatic conditions favour the cultivation of wheat in developed countries, where it constitutes the major staple
Per capita wheat production (1990-2010)
Developed 300 250 200 65 61 57 Developing

Developed Developing

kg

1990

1995

2000

2005

2010

Source: FAO, Statistics Division (FAOSTAT) Metalink: P3.FEED.FAO.ESS.WT.QPPC, p. 278

185

PART 3

More of the earths surface is covered by wheat than with any other food crop. Wheat is the third most-produced cereal after maize and rice, but in terms of dietary intake, it is currently second to rice as the main food crop, given the more extensive use of maize as an animal feed. As a hardy crop, which can grow in a wide range of environmental conditions and that permits large-scale cultivation as well as long-term storage of food, wheat has been key to the emergence of city-based societies for millennia. Currently, around 70 percent of this crop is used for food, 19 percent for animal feed and the remaining 11 percent is used in industrial applications, including biofuels. Growth in global consumption of wheat has been facilitated by imports, particularly by developing nations. These countries include both the many tropical nonproducing countries as well as those that face increasingly binding land and water constraints to increase production, especially in the Near East. With an ability to grow in diverse climates, maize the worlds primary coarse grain is cultivated in most parts of the world, although the vast quantity of production is concentrated in the Americas, especially the United States of America. In that country, transgenic (genetically modied) maize accounts for 85 percent of plantings. Overall, the pattern of the world coarse grains economy has undergone drastic change in the location of consumption. The major export markets have shifted increasingly to the developing countries. Pronounced growth in animal feed usage has been a major driving force in developing countries, especially in China. Currently, about 55 percent of world consumption of coarse grains is used for animal feed, but in many countries (mainly in sub-Saharan Africa and Latin America) they are also directly used for human consumption. At the global level, about 17 percent of aggregate consumption of coarse grains is devoted to food, but the share rises to as much as 80 percent in sub-Saharan Africa. There, maize, millet, sorghum and other coarse grains (e.g. tef in Ethiopia) account for 3 out of every 4 kg of cereals consumed as food. Rising industrial utilization of coarse grains has provided strong support to the sector, led by the growth of maize-based ethanol in the United States of America. At present, almost 40 percent of the crop 111 million tonnes is used for biofuel production, which represents an eight-fold increase in the span of just ten years. Though for every tonne of maize processed for ethanol, around a third is returned as a by-product in the form of distillers grains, which can directly displace maize.

Map 40:

No Data

0.1

Source: FAO, Statistics Division (FAOSTAT) Metalink: P3.FEED.FAO.ESS.CG.QP, p. 271

1.1 billion tonnes of coarse grains were

produced in 2010 for the global food, feed, industrial and energy sector

Maize is the most important coarse

grain, accounting for 74 percent of aggregate output

186

TRENDS IN THE CROP SECTOR

Coarse grain producing countries (million tonnes, 2010) 0.1 1 1.1 5 5.1 20 > 20

Chart 73: Non-food uses of coarse grain, especially as a feedstock in bioenergy production, has provided support to production in developed countries on a per capita basis
Per capita coarse grain production (1990-2010)
Developed 500 400 300 Developing

kg
200 100

1990

1995

2000

2005

2010

Source: FAO, Statistics Division (FAOSTAT) Metalink: P3.FEED.FAO.ESS.CG.QPPC, p. 271

187

PART 3

In recent decades, the oilcrops sector has been one of the most vibrant in world agriculture. Over the past 20 years the sector grew at 4.3 percent per annum compared with an average of 2.3 percent per annum for all agriculture. The major driving force has been the growth of food consumption in developing countries, mostly in the form of vegetable oil but also direct consumption of soybeans, groundnuts, etc., as well as in the form of derived products other than oil. Food demand in developing countries has accounted for around 40 percent of the increases in world output during the last two decades (with output measured in oil content equivalent). China, India and a few other countries represent the bulk of this increase. In addition, the strong growth in demand for protein products for animal feed has been a major supporting factor in the buoyancy of the oilcrops sector. The rapid growth of the oilcrops sector illustrates the synergy of the two fastest rising components of food demand: demand for oils favouring all oilcrops with the potential for rapid production expansion (e.g. oil-palm), and that for livestock products favouring oilcrops with high protein oilmeals for feed (e.g. soybeans). In fact, the demand for protein meals for animal feed has also contributed to changes in the geographical distribution of oilseeds production. The latter has shifted towards countries that could produce and export oilseeds of high protein content, in which oilmeals are not byproducts but rather joint products with oil, e.g. soybeans in South America. In addition, support policies of the European Union (EU) also helped shift world production of oilseeds in favour of rapeseed and sunowerseed. Overall, four oilcrops (oil-palm, soybeans, rapeseed and sunowerseed) now account for 75 percent of world production. For several countries, including some major producers, these fast expanding oilcrops were once hardly cultivated at all, or only in insignicant amounts.

Map 41:

No Data

0.1

Source: FAO, Statistics Division (FAOSTAT) Metalink: P3.FEED.FAO.ESS.OS.QP, p. 274

168 million tonnes of oilseeds and oilbearing crops were gathered in 2010

This volume represents a signicant

increase compared to the level two decades ago

Soybeans, rapeseed and sunower are

the major oilcrops in temperate zones, while palmoil fruit is the major oilbearing crop in the tropics, increasingly cultivated in Southeast Asia

188

TRENDS IN THE CROP SECTOR

Oilbearing crop producing countries (million tonnes, 2010) 0.1 0.5 0.6 1 1.1 3 >3

Chart 74: Rising food and industrial usage has resulted in the oilcrop sector being one of the most dynamic among commodity sectors
Per capita oilcrop production (1990-2010)
Developed 35 30 Developing

kg

25 20 15

1990

1995

2000

2005

2010

Source: FAO, Statistics Division (FAOSTAT) Metalink: P3.FEED.FAO.ESS.OS.QPPC, p. 274

189

PART 3

Although the oilcrops sector is increasingly dominated by a small number of crops and countries, the more traditional oilcrops continue to be a major element in the food supply and food security situation in many countries. Examples include groundnuts and sesame seed in the Sudan and Myanmar, coconuts in the Philippines and in Sri Lanka, olive oil in the Mediterranean countries, cottonseed oil in the countries of Central Asia and those in the Sahel. Another major driving force has been the non-food industrial use of vegetable oils, with China and the EU being major contributors to this growth. In terms of actual oil produced and used, the world currently uses some 40 percent of supply for non-food applications. Two decades ago the share was less than half of this. The main industrial products involved include paints, detergents, lubricants, oleochemicals in general and, increasingly, biodiesel. These are commodities for which world demand can be expected to grow much faster than the demand for food. Pulses are an important constituent in local food crops in developing countries. They are a key source of protein in the diets of the worlds poorest countries. In farming systems, pulses represent an input-saving and resource-conserving technology though biologically xing nitrogen to reduce the need for chemical fertilizer and reduce soil pathogens. A substantial part of the historical growth in Australias cereal yields, for example, is attributed to the introduction of legumes in rotation systems. The nutritional and environmental benets of pulses are being realized in sub-Saharan Africa, where per capita production has increased by almost 4 kg per annum in the last decade. However, at the global level, changes in consumer preferences, feed rations and the relegation of pulses to secondary crop status in the agricultural policies of other developing regions, notably Asia and Latin America and the Caribbean, has left the global level of production growth markedly stagnant and lagging well behind population growth.

Map 42:

No Data

0.1

Source: FAO, Statistics Division (FAOSTAT) Metalink: P3.FEED.FAO.ESS.PS.QP, p. 275

Around 68 million tonnes of pulses were

produced in 2010

Production is geographically diverse

where the crop plays varying roles in food and animal feed economies portant staple as a source of protein in vegetal-based diets

In India, the commodity forms an im-

190

TRENDS IN THE CROP SECTOR

Pulse producing countries (million tonnes, 2010) 0.1 0.5 0.6 1 1.1 5 >5

Chart 75: Pulse production in developed countries has not kept pace with population growth, reecting its diminishing role in diets and as an animal feedstuff
Per capita pulses production (1992-2010)
Developed 16 14 Developing

kg

12 10 8

1995

2000

2005

2010

Source: FAO, Statistics Division (FAOSTAT) Metalink: P3.FEED.FAO.ESS.PS.QPPC, p. 275

191

PART 3

Root crops have traditionally been the mainstay of food consumption in several countries with low overall consumption levels, mainly in sub-Saharan Africa and in Latin America and the Caribbean. What happens to the production of these crops is an important determinant of changes in national average food consumption. Few commodity groups exhibit such divergent trends in production across regions and economic status as do root crops. For instance, in Europe per capita production of potato (a major regional staple) has been in long-term decline, while production growth of the same commodity in Africa and Asia has registered robust growth in the past decade or so, albeit from a much smaller base. By contrast, sweet potato has undergone a precipitous decline: per capita production currently stands at one-third of the level of the late 1970s, a trend that reects a rapid fall in demand for the commodity in China (especially in animal feeding). The continued turbulence in global markets for traded food staples constantly reminds many vulnerable countries to look toward indigenous crops, such as cassava, as an alternative to potentially expensive and price-volatile imported cereals. As a crisis crop, cassava roots require few inputs and can be left in the ground for well over a year and harvested when food shortages arise or when prices of preferred cereals become prohibitive. In addition, ongoing long-term programmes for cassavas commercialization have made it among the fastest growing food staples in Africa. Government food-security initiatives with the support of the international community have also played an important role in cassava production growth in the continent. Support often takes the form of distribution of highyielding and disease-resistant planting material, extension activities, as well as measures to strengthen the cassava value chain, notably food processing for valueadded cassava products. In Asia, the rising use of cassava in biofuel production and industrial applications that employ starch, has resulted in cassavas rapid growth in the region as well.

Map 43:

No Data

0.1

Source: FAO, Statistics Division (FAOSTAT) Metalink: P3.FEED.FAO.ESS.RT.QP, p. 276

726 million tonnes of roots and tubers

were collected from world soils in 2010

Given agroclimatic constraints, potato is

the main root crop cultivated in temperate zones, while in the tropics, a broad array is cultivated but cassava is the major root crop and industrial crop has fuelled production growth in developing countries

Cassavas twin role as a food security

192

TRENDS IN THE CROP SECTOR

Roots and tubers producing countries (million tonnes, 2010) 0.1 5 5.1 15 15.1 45 > 45

Chart 76: Falling per capita consumption of potato is reected in declining rates of production in developed countries
Per capita roots and tubers production (1992-2010)
Developed 170 160 150 140 130 120 110 100 Developing

kg

1995

2000

2005

2010

Source: FAO, Statistics Division (FAOSTAT) Metalink: P3.FEED.FAO.ESS.RT.QPPC, p. 276

193

PART 3

Global fruit and vegetable production has experienced a remarkable increase, growing at annual rates of around 3 percent and 5 percent, respectively, in the past two decades rates of growth that exceed most other food crops. In 2010, almost 600 million tonnes of fruit and almost 1 billion tonnes of vegetables were gathered throughout the world. World production has largely been fuelled by an area expansion in Asia, especially in China. With an average annual growth rate of above 8 percent over the previous 20 years, China has emerged as the worlds largest fruit and vegetable producer, with global output shares of around 20 percent in the case of fruit, and over 50 percent with regard to vegetables. The familiar tendency of stagnant production growth in developed regions also prevails in the fruit and vegetables sector. Strong growth rates in fruit and vegetable cultivation have also been recorded in food-insecure and lowincome regions, such as in sub-Saharan Africa and in South Asia. This is testament to the fact that horticultural crop production generates high economic returns per unit of land, offering promising income prospects, especially for smallholders and when land is scarce. In addition, being labour intensive, the horticulture sector can contribute to poverty reduction by providing paid employment opportunities. The high value of fruits and vegetables is limited not only to their monetary value, as they play a highly important role in improving the diets of people around the world. The World Health Organization (WHO) estimates that low fruit and vegetable intake contributes to approximately 16.0 million disability adjusted life years (DALYs, a measure of the potential life lost due to premature mortality and the years of productive life lost due to disability) and 1.7 million of global deaths are attributable to low fruit and vegetable consumption. Moreover, inadequate intake of fruit and vegetables is thought to cause around 14 percent of gastrointestinal cancer deaths, approximately 11 percent of ischaemic heart disease deaths and around 9 percent of stroke fatalities worldwide. WHO/FAO recommends a minimum of 400g of fruit and vegetables per day (excluding starchy root crops) for the prevention of chronic diseases such as heart disease, cancer, diabetes and obesity, as well as for the prevention and alleviation of several micronutrient deciencies, especially in less developed countries. Meeting the rising global demand for fruits and vegetables creates new opportunities for poor farmers in developing countries, but to fully reap the benets of cultivating these highly perishable crops, improving supply chain efciency, reducing post-harvest losses and investments in infrastructure are necessary in many of them.

Map 44:

No Data

0.1

Source: FAO, Statistics Division (FAOSTAT) Metalink: P3.FEED.FAO.ESS.VG.QP, p. 278

Worldwide in 2010, over 600 million

tonnes of fruit and around 1 billion tonnes of vegetables were gathered ity of 5 percent, horticulture is one of the most dynamic sectors in world agriculture not just limited to their monetary value, as they play a highly important role in improving the diets of people around the world

With annual growth rates in the proxim-

The high value of fruits and vegetables is

194

TRENDS IN THE CROP SECTOR

Vegetable producing countries (million tonnes, 2010) 0.1 1 1.1 5 5.1 20 > 20

Chart 77: World vegetable production has largely been fuelled by an expansion in China, but high growth rates are being recorded in low-income and food-insecure regions
Per capita vegetable production (1990-2010)
Developed 150 140 130 120 Developing

kg

110 100 90

1995

2000

2005

2010

Source: FAO, Statistics Division (FAOSTAT) Metalink: P3.FEED.FAO.ESS.VG.QPPC, p. 278

195

PART 3

Currently, 166 million tonnes of sugar (raw equivalent) is produced in 120 countries. Over 70 percent of sugar is derived from sugar cane and the remainder from sugar beet. Sugar beet is a hardy biennial crop that is suited for cultivation in temperate climates, especially in the North. Forty countries or so are engaged in commercial sugar beet cultivation, with France standing currently as the worlds largest producer followed by the United States of America. Sugar beet production at the global level is in long-term decline, falling from a peak of 314 million tonnes at the end of the 1980s to around 228 million tonnes in 2010, by and large a reection of policy reform in the EU. Sugar cane is a genus of tropical grasses requiring strong sunlight and abundant water for normal growth. In contrast to sugar beet, sugar cane cultivation has undergone strong growth, with total acreage doubling in the past 25 years, leading to a world production level of around 1.7 billion tonnes in 2010. The global expansion of sugar cane has been in response to rising demand for sugar in food consumption and as a feedstock for ethanol production. Roughly 100 countries produce sugarcane on a commercial basis, with 18 countries devoting more than 10 percent of their cropland to sugar cane production, while in six countries sugar cane covers more than one-third of all cropland. The bulk of the increase has come from the developing countries, with Brazil fuelling much of this growth. Sugar cane production in Brazil has increased rapidly, doubling alone in the past decade. The worldwide expansion in sugar cane cultivation has resulted in a substantial loss of biodiversity, arguably more than any other single crop. Signicant areas of tropical rain forest and tropical seasonal forest have been cleared for sugar cane cultivation as well as low-lying and alluvial areas, which not only results in the direct loss of habitats and species, but creates wider impacts on ecosystem functioning, including changes to hydrology and greater soil erosion.

Map 45:

No Data

0.1

Source: FAO, Statistics Division (FAOSTAT) Metalink: P3.FTW.FAO.SU.QP, p. 277

Over 166 million tonnes of sugar (raw

equivalent) were produced throughout the world in 2010

In Brazil, the worlds leading producer,

Further reading
FAO Food Outlook (www.fao.org/giews/english/fo/
index.htm)

well over half of the crop is used in the production of ethanol the other hand, reect the importance of sugar in domestic diets

Higher production volumes in India, on

FAO World agriculture: towards 2030/2050 Interim

report: Prospects for food, nutrition, agriculture and major commodity groups (www.fao.org/economic/esa/ esag/en/)

Joint WHO/FAO Expert Consultation on Diet, Nutrition

and the Prevention of Chronic Diseases (www.fao.org/ DOCREP/005/AC911E/AC911E00.HTM)

196

TRENDS IN THE CROP SECTOR

Sugar producing countries (million tonnes, 2010) 0.1 1 1.1 20 20.1 70 > 70

Chart 78: Food, energy and international market needs are driving a considerable expansion in sugar (cane) production in developing countries
Per capita sugar production (2000-2010)
Developed Country 24 23 22 21 20 Developing Country

Developing Developed

kg

33 32 31 30 29 28

2000

2002

2004

2006

2008

2010

Source: FAO, Statistics Division (FAOSTAT) Metalink: P3.FEED.FAO.ESS.SU.QPPC, p. 277

197

PART 3

Trends in the livestock sector

The world food economy is increasingly driven by the shift in diet and food consumption patterns towards livestock products. In the last few decades, in the developing countries of Asia - where the bulk of the world population increase has taken place - consumption of meat has been growing at over 4 percent per annum, and that of milk and dairy products between 2 to 3 percent per annum. Aggregate agricultural output is being affected by these trends, not only through the increase in livestock production per se, but also through the linkage of livestock production to the crop sector that supplies feedstuffs, mainly cereals and oilseeds, as well as the sheries sector. Globally, livestock production is the largest user of agricultural land. On the negative side, there are environmental implications associated with the expansion of livestock production. For example, through the expansion of land for livestock development, sector growth has been a prime force in deforestation in Latin America and the Caribbean, and in overgrazing in other regions. Intensive, large-scale livestock operations, mostly in the industrial countries but increasingly also in the developing ones, are a major source of environmental problems through efuent production. In parallel, growth in the ruminant sector contributes to greenhouse gas concentrations in the atmosphere through methane emissions and nitrous oxide from the waste of grazing animals. The rapid growth in the meat sector has been underpinned by rising demand for poultry meat, which has consistently increased at around three times the rate of population growth over each of the past ve decades. As for other meat sectors, per capita consumption growth has been stagnant or non-existent, especially in ruminant meat (cattle, sheep and goats) and pork (when China is excluded). Moreover, in many developing countries, where the need to increase protein consumption is greatest, the productive sector has not participated in the livestock revolution. There are, for instance, still about 20 developing countries whose per capita meat consumption is below 10 kg, compared to an average of 80 kg among developed countries. Cultural or religions reasons may explain this feature in some countries, but low productive capacities are, by and large, to blame in many others. Growth of world milk production and consumption has been far less buoyant. Until recently, per capita growth was largely stagnant, unchanged for several decades. Developing countries continue to have per capita consumption well below that of the industrial countries (partly reecting consumption habits as well as low incomes and poverty), but the gap is gradually closing, especially in East and in South Asia. In East Asia, for example, per capita dairy intake has more than doubled in the past decade.

Map 46:

No Data

01

15

Source: FAO, Statistics Division (FAOSTAT) Metalink: P3.FEED.FAO.ESS.MT.QP, p. 273

The world produced 293 million tonnes

of meat in 2010

The Americas lead the way as the highest producing region

But growing industry intensication is

boosting output to meet demand in other areas, particularly in Asia

198

TRENDS IN THE LIVESTOCK SECTOR

Meat producing countries (thousand tonnes, 2010) 1 500 500 2000 2000 8000 8000 10000

Chart 79: Meat production on the rise in developing countries, while developed countries approach saturation
Per capita meat production (1992-2010)
Developed 90 88 86 84 32 29 26 23 Developing

Developed Developing

kg

1995

2000

2005

2010

Source: FAO, Statistics Division (FAOSTAT) Metalink: P3.FEED.FAO.ESS.MT.QPPC, p. 273

199

PART 3

Feed demand for cereals is often considered a dynamic element that conditions the growth of the cereals sector, especially in developed countries. However, in recent times, particularly in developing regions, this dynamism has been largely absent from the sector, to the extent that growth in livestock production has by far outstripped the growth in compound feed demand. Therefore, the world is now obtaining more meat, milk and eggs per kg of cereal-based feed, which points to productivity gains in livestock production. Some of these gains are linked to changes in the composition of livestock production, as poultry requires much smaller quantities of cereals feed per kg of meat than, for instance, beef. Other forces have also led to the reduced grain/meat ratios. Among them is the growing use of oilmeals in livestock feeding. World output of soybeans, which are mainly processed into oil and high protein oilmeal, grew at 4 percent per annum in the last decade and 5 percent in the 1990s. By implication, the production and consumption of soybean meal as feed has also risen at these levels, which would suggest a relative increase in the feed rations of oilmeals at the expense of feed grains. But in fact, a principal factor has been the expansion of livestock production systems in developing countries with lower average grain/meat ratios. The continued growth of developing countries share in world livestock output is being associated with the gradual shift of their production from grazing and backyard systems to stall-fed systems using concentrated feedstuffs. Consequently, changes in production systems tend to raise the average grain/meat ratios of these developing countries, compensating for the opposite trends that result from improvements in productivity.

Map 47:

No Data

01

11

Source: FAO, Statistics Division (FAOSTAT) Metalink: P3.FEED.FAO.ESS.MK.QP, p. 273

Over 720 million tonnes or around 760

million litres of milk were produced globally in 2010

Pasture land availability (e.g. the AmerFurther reading

FAO Animal Production and Health Division (www.fao.
org/ag/againfo/home/en/)

icas) and cultural reasons (e.g. South Asia) determine the location of dairy industries developing countries as a response to changing consumer demands, in East Asia for example, per capita dairy intake has more than doubled in the past decade

FAO World agriculture: towards 2030/2050 Interim

report: Prospects for food, nutrition, agriculture and major commodity groups (www.fao.org/leadmin/user_ upload/esag/docs/Interim_report_AT2050web.pdf)

Production is growing rapidly in many

FAO Food Outlook (www.fao.org/giews/english/fo/

index.htm)

FAO The State of Food and Agriculture 2009: Livestock

in the balance (www.fao.org/publications/sofa-2009/ en/)

200

TRENDS IN THE LIVESTOCK SECTOR

Dairy producing countries (thousand tonnes, 2010) 1 1000 1000 4000 4000 15000 15000 20000

Chart 80: Dairy production growth slowing in developed countries, but rising in developing countries, albeit from a low base
Per capita dairy production (1992-2010)
Developed 290 286 282 278 66 60 54 48 42 Developing

Developed Developing

kg

1995

2000

2005

2010

Source: FAO, Statistics Division (FAOSTAT) Metalink: P3.FEED.FAO.ESS.MK.QPPC, p. 273

201

PART 3

Trends in the sheries sector

In 2009, capture sheries and aquaculture supplied the world with almost 145 million tonnes of sh. Of this, 122 million tonnes were used as human food, providing an estimated per capita food supply of about 18 kg (live weight equivalent). Globally, sh provides about 2.9 billion people with almost 20 percent of their average per capita intake of animal protein. Fish is also very important in diets in developing countries, where current per capita intake is more than 16 kg per person per annum. Although capture sheries dominate world output, aquaculture accounts for a growing percentage of total sh supply, rising from a share of 4 percent in 1970 to 38 percent in 2009. Aquaculture provides close to half of all sh supplies destined directly for human food consumption. Fish landed not used for direct human consumption is mainly processed in the form of shmeal and oil, used as animal feed (around 18 million tonnes), mainly for raising carnivorous aquatic species (such as shrimp, salmon, trout, eels, sea bass and sea bream), but also for pigs, chickens, pet food and cattle, etc. Worldwide, capture sheries and aquaculture provide a source of income and livelihood for 45 million people through direct employment and provides more than 180 million jobs as a whole in the global sh industry. There are millions of rural dwellers, many of whom are women, particularly in Asia and Africa, involved in seasonal or occasional shing activities with few alternative sources of income and employment. Employment in aquaculture is increasing at a faster rate than world population growth and now accounts for one-quarter of the total number of workers directly involved in the sheries sector. Employment in shing is decreasing in capital-intensive economies, in particular in most European countries, and in North America and Japan. The global shing eet is estimated to be around 4.3 million vessels with about 60 percent of all shing vessels engine-powered. According to the Big Numbers Project of FAO, the WorldFish Center and the World Bank, estimates indicate that small-scale sheries produce close to half of the world marine and inland sh catch, while providing employment for more than 90 percent of the worlds shers. About half of the total workforce in the shing and sh processing sector comprise women.

Map 48:

No Data

01

11

Source: FAO, Fisheries and Aquaculture Department (Fishery and Aquaculture statistics) Metalink: P3.FTW.FAO.FI.CAP.QP, p. 279

The global sh catch has remained at

around 90 million tonnes per annum over the past 20 years have combined to lower production in the capture sector of developed countries half of the global catch

Greater controls, scarcity and high costs

The Pacic Ocean provides more than

202

TRENDS IN THE FISHERIES SECTOR

Capture fish producing countries (thousand tonnes, 2009) 1 100 100 300 300 1000 1000 10000

Chart 81: Rising controls, scarcity and costs have combined to lower production in the capture sector of developed countries
Capture sh production, per capita (1990-2009)
Developed 30 25 Developing

kg

20 15

1990

1995

2000

2005

Source: FAO, Fisheries and Aquaculture Department (Fishery and Aquaculture statistics) Metalink: P3.FTW.FAO.FI.CAP.QP, p. 279

203

PART 3

During the last two decades, the production of capture sheries uctuated in a range between 85 and 95 million tonnes per annum. More than half of the global catch came from the Pacic Ocean. Global production is typically inuenced by variations in catches of anchoveta a species extremely susceptible to oceanographic conditions determined by the El Nio Southern Oscillation in the Southeast Pacic. Fluctuations in other species and regions tend to compensate for each other to a large extent. Regarding the state of major marine stocks, the proportion of stocks estimated to be underexploited or moderately exploited declined from 40 percent in the mid1970s to 15 percent in 2008. In contrast, the proportion of overexploited, depleted or recovering stocks increased from 10 percent in 1974 to 32 percent in 2008. The proportion of fully exploited stocks has remained relatively stable at about 50 percent since the 1970s. As a whole, this indicates that global marine capture production is less likely to increase, unless effective management plans are put in place to rebuild overshed stocks. While the degree of uncertainty about these estimates may be somewhat high the apparent increasing trend in the percentage of overexploited, depleted and recovering stocks and the decreasing trend in underexploited and moderately exploited stocks do give cause for concern. At the same time, there are encouraging signs of steady progress in some areas in restoring overshed stocks and marine ecosystems through effective management. Inland sheries are vital for livelihoods in many parts of the world and also in diets by providing high quality protein, essential nutrients and minerals that are often difcult to obtain from other food sources. In recent years, inland water shery production expanded to over 10 million tonnes, accounting for over 10 percent of global capture production. However, the state of inland shery resources and the ecosystems that support them is generally not precisely known and the reliability of data on inland water catches reported by several countries remains questionable. There is, nonetheless, a growing appreciation of the need to improve inland shery statistics.

Map 49:

No Data

01

15

Source: FAO, Fisheries and Aquaculture Department (Fishery and Aquaculture statistics) Metalink: P3.FTW.FAO.FI.ACQ.QP, p. 279

56 million tonnes of sh and shery

products were produced by aquaculture in 2009. Aquaculture represents the fastest-growing animal-based food producing sector for around half of world supplies of sh and shery products destined for human consumption in world aquaculture production, while Asia as a whole accounts for almost 90 percent

Aquaculture production now accounts

China has a share of over 60 percent

204

TRENDS IN THE FISHERIES SECTOR

Aquaculture producing countries (thousand tonnes, 2009) 1 50 50 100 100 300 300 10000

Chart 82: Exceptional growth in aquaculture production in developing countries is sustaining world sh supply
Aquaculture per capita production (1990-2009)
Developed 9 8 7 6 Developing

kg

5 4 3

1990

1995

2000

2005

Source: FAO, Fisheries and Aquaculture Department (Fishery and Aquaculture statistics) Metalink: P3.FTW.FAO.FI.ACQ.QP, p. 279

205

PART 3

Aquaculture represents the fastest-growing animalbased food producing sector with 56 million tonnes of production in 2009 and continues to outpace population growth. Great strides in breeding technology, system design and feed technology in the latter half of the twentieth century have enabled the expansion of commercially viable aquaculture across species and in volume. China alone produced over 60 percent of global aquaculture production, while Asia as a whole accounted for around 90 percent of worldwide aquaculture output. Aquaculture production has been dominated in quantity terms by species that feed low on the food chain in their natural habitats, such as carp, characins and tilapias. Carp alone accounted for around 60 percent of world production of cultured nshes in 2009. Aquaculture also provides a dominant share in the total production of several high-priced species such as salmon, shrimp, prawns, eels, oysters and scallops. The share of aquaculture products in international trade is increasing not only for high-priced products but for a broad range of species.

Chart 83: The scope for further increases in capture production is non-existent
State of the worlds shery stocks (1974 versus 2008)
Under or moderately Exploited 100% Fully Exploited Recovering, depleted or overexploited

80%

60%

40%

20%

0%

1974

2008

Source: FAO, Fisheries and Aquaculture Department Metalink: P3.FTW.FAO.FI.STK, p. 279

Chart 84: Capture production is dominated by marine sh, while aquaculture mainly produces freshwater and diadromous sh, shrimp and shellsh
Composition of sh products (2009)
100%

80% Marine sh 60% Freshwater & diadromous sh Crustaceans 40% Molluscs excluding cephalopods Cephalopods Others

%
20% 0%

Aquaculture

Capture

Further reading
FAO The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture
(www.fao.org/publications/en/)

Source: FAO, Fisheries and Aquaculture Department (Fishery and Aquaculture statistics) Metalink: P3.FTW.FAO.FI.CFP, p. 280

FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Department (www.fao.

org/shery/en)

FAO Food Outlook (www.fao.org/giews/english/fo/

index.htm)

206

TRENDS IN THE FISHERIES SECTOR

Map 50: Geo-location of harvests by capture and aquaculture

Source: FAO, Fisheries and Aquaculture Department (Fishery and Aquaculture statistics) Metalink: P3.FTW.FAO.FI.HARV, p. 280

Chart 85: Aquaculture supplies close to half of all sh consumed

Fish food supply, per capita (1990-2009)

Capture sheries Aquaculture

15

10

kg
5 0

1990

1995

2000

2005

Source: FAO, Fisheries and Aquaculture Department (Fishery and Aquaculture statistics) Metalink: P3.FTW.FAO.FI.TOT.QP, p. 280

207

PART 3

Trends in agricultural trade

Although most of the food consumed worldwide is sourced locally, global trade has been instrumental for achieving food security, at least in those countries where it can be afforded. The scale of food and agricultural trade today is unprecedented: in real terms, international ows have increased around vefold over the past fty years, but the expansion has been unevenly distributed across regions. For much of this period, it would not be unreasonable to say that the rich world outpaced the poor world in the very area where developing countries are supposed to have a comparative advantage. The evolution of the overall net agricultural trade balance of developing countries as a whole does not itself denote overall improvement or deterioration from a developmental standpoint. The aggregate of the developing countries is a composite of widely differing country and commodity situations. For some countries, a declining agricultural trade balance (or a growing decit) is an indicator of progress towards improved welfare. This is the case for countries like the Republic of Korea, in which the growing agricultural decit has gone hand in hand with high rates of overall economic development and increased food consumption. The declining balance also reects the rapid growth in markets such as Chinas increasing importation of oilseeds and vegetable oils (a positive development in general that contributes to improved food consumption and is paid for by growing industrial export earnings). Needless to say, a declining agricultural trade balance is also a negative developmental outcome in countries that still depend heavily on export earnings from agriculture and/or have to divert scarce foreign exchange resources to pay for growing food imports (eventually building up unsustainable foreign debt). It is an even more negative indicator from the standpoint of human welfare when such food imports are not associated with rising food consumption per capita and improved food security, but are necessary just to sustain minimum levels of food consumption. This is a not an uncommon occurrence. At the world level, barring changes in stocks, agricultural production equals consumption, but differing growth rates can be observed for individual countries and country groups depending on movements in their net agricultural trade positions. In general, production growth rates in most developing regions have been slightly below those of demand, as their agricultural imports have grown faster than their exports, leading to a gradual erosion of their traditional surplus in agricultural trade (excluding shery and forestry products). By the turn of the 1990s the trend was for the surplus to diminish and become a net decit.

Map 51:

No Data

< 10

10

Source: FAO, Statistics Division (FAOSTAT) Metalink: P3.FTW.FAO.ESS.IMPDc, p. 279

The global food economy increasingly

relies on trade to meet food needs

Higher import dependence can be indicative of economic development by way of diversifying out of agriculture into more value-added industries tural food insecurity

However, it can also be a sign of struc-

208

TRENDS IN AGRICULTURAL TRADE

Import dependence (%, 2009) 10 20 20 30 30 50 > 50

Chart 86: Growing reliance on trade to meet food needs

Global food trade index - calories and value (1990-2009)
Value Calories

2004-2006 = 100

150 100 50

1970

1980

1990

2000

Source: FAO, Statistics Division (FAOSTAT) Metalink: P3.FEED.FAO.ESS.FD.IXc, p. 271

209

PART 3

The overall net decit in food trade of developing countries would have deepened much more were it not for the exceptional performance of several emerging agro-exporters, notably Brazil and its exports mainly of oilseeds and livestock products. But by the same token, Chinas large-scale imports of agricultural products in the last decade (especially raw materials and primary commodities) also places bias on this trend. Even excluding Brazil and China, the deterioration of the net balance of the other developing countries as a whole is alarming a US$1 billion surplus towards the end of the 1980s became a decit of US$34 billion two decades later. In fact, sub-Saharan Africa has seen its share of world food exports drop from 11 percent to under 3 percent in the space of just 20 years. The regions half-abillion US dollar trade surplus in food in the late 1980s has mushroomed into a 9 billion dollar decit at present. Growing net imports of cereal and livestock products have been dominant in shaping the growing decit of agriculture in developing countries. Imports of products in the oilseed complex by several major developing countries other than China have also assumed importance, notwithstanding rapidly rising net exports of these products from other developing countries (e.g. Malaysia, Argentina, Indonesia). Cereals as a group, notably wheat, is by far the largest decit item in the developing country food basket. Over the period 1970 to 2008, over 70 percent of the increment in wheat consumption was met by increments in wheat imports. Moreover, several countries have depended entirely on imports for increasing consumption of wheat. On the other hand, net exports of fruit and vegetables, and tropical beverages (coffee, tea and cocoa) are virtually the only signicant items that have shown consistent improvements in the net trade positions of many developing countries, despite the fact that tropical beverage consumption is slowing in the traditional major markets of developed countries.

Chart 87: Rising dependence on international markets to meet food, feed and industrial needs for traditional "bulk commodities"
Global trade - cereals, sugar and oilseeds (1990-2009)
Cereals Oilseeds Sugar

140 120 100 80 60 40 20

US$ billion

1990

1995

2000

2005

Source: FAO, Statistics Division (FAOSTAT) Metalink: P3.FEED.FAO.ESS.CE.EXv, p. 270

Chart 88: The world market for vegetable oils on the rise, while improved freight technology and higher demand are boosting global fruit and vegetable ows
Global trade - vegetable oils and fruit + vegetables (1990-2009)
Fruit & Vegetables Vegetable Oils & Animal Fats

160 140 120

US$ billion

100 80 60 40 20

1990

1995

2000

2005

Source: FAO, Statistics Division (FAOSTAT) Metalink: P3.FEED.FAO.ESS.VL.EXv, p. 278

210

TRENDS IN AGRICULTURAL TRADE

Chart 89: Better transportation technology and rising intensication have met demand in an expanded global market for livestock and sh products
Global trade - livestock and sh (1990-2009)
Fish Meat Milk

Chart 91: Despite growing export markets for them in some crops, developing countries, excluding Brazil and China, have become net buyers of food
Net food trade balance, excl. Brazil & China (1990-2009)
5

100

US$ billion 1990 1995 2000 2005

80

-5

US$ billion

60

-10 40 -15 20

1990

1995

2000

2005

Source: FAO, Statistics Division (FAOSTAT) Metalink: P3.FTW.FAO.FI.TOT.EXv, p. 280

Source: FAO, Statistics Division (FAOSTAT) Metalink: P3.FEED.FAO.ESS.FD.NTx, p. 272

Chart 90: Trade in tropical beverages and spices, the mainstay of many developing country exports, on the rise
Global trade - coffee, tea, cocoa and spices (1990-2009)

Chart 92: The overall situation for sub-Saharan Africa is even more alarming, with food import costs increasingly outpacing export earnings
Net food trade balance of Sub-Saharan Africa (1990-2009)
0

60

-2

50

-4

US$ billion

US$ billion 1990 1995 2000 2005

-6

40

-8 30 -10 20

1990

1995

2000

2005

Source: FAO, Statistics Division (FAOSTAT) Metalink: P3.FEED.FAO.ESS.CF.EXv, p. 270

Source: FAO, Statistics Division (FAOSTAT) Metalink: P3.FEED.FAO.ESS.FD.NTv, p. 271

211

PART 3

As a whole, developing countries traditionally large trade surplus of sugar diminished quickly after the early 1990s, as several of them became major importers. The shrinkage also reects the effects of the heavy domestic support and trade protection in major sugar importing countries like the United States of America and Japan, or in formerly net importing countries like the European Union (EU), which lowered its dependence on imports as a result of these policies. Within the agricultural sector of developing countries there has been a move towards commercialization of the high-value food production sector including poultry, pork and sh. In the case of poultry and sh, trade expansion has easily outpaced domestic consumption. The aggregate value of net shery exports of developing countries now often exceeds the combined value of net exports of coffee, tea, cocoa, bananas and sugar the traditional mainstay of developing country agricultural export earnings. The potential of some developing countries to emerge as net exporters of certain products (meat, but also palmoil, soybeans and sugar) and to compete with industrial countries in a more globalized trading environment may eventually attenuate the broader trend of developing countries as a whole becoming growing net importers of food and agricultural products.

Chart 93: World trade in food is increasingly dominated by higher-value products

Composition of global trade (2000-09)

2008

2006

2004

2002

2000

200

400 US$ billion

600

800

Beverages Cereals Fish Fruit and Vegetables Meat Milk Oilseeds Other Trade Sugar

Further reading
FAO Food Outlook (www.fao.org/giews/english/fo/
index.htm)

Vegetable Oils and Animal Fats

Source: FAO, Statistics Division (FAOSTAT) Metalink: P3.FEED.FAO.ESS.FD.EXv, p. 271

FAO Why has Africa become a net food importer?

(www.fao.org/economic/est/publications)

FAO World agriculture: towards 2030/2050 Interim

report: Prospects for food, nutrition, agriculture and major commodity groups (www.fao.org/leadmin/user_ upload/esag/docs/Interim_report_AT2050web.pdf)

212

TRENDS IN AGRICULTURAL TRADE

Chart 94: High value products form a growing share of developing country imports

Composition of developing country imports (2000-09)

300

250

200

US$ billion

150

100

50

2000

2002

2004

2006

2008

Source: FAO, Statistics Division (FAOSTAT) Metalink: P3.FEED.FAO.ESS.FD.IMv, p. 271

Chart 95: Fish, beverages, fruit and vegetables, and vegetable oils are fuelling growth in exports from developing countries

Composition of developing country exports (2000-09)

300

250

US$ billion

200

150

100

50

2000

2002

2004

2006

2008

Source: FAO, Statistics Division (FAOSTAT) Metalink: P3.FEED.FAO.ESS.FD.EXv, p. 271

213

PART 3

Urban and peri-urban agriculture

The ongoing exodus of rural people to urban areas in developing countries has led to the rapid and massive increase in urban populations. Often, rural emigration results in the transfer of poverty, hunger and malnutrition from the countryside to towns and cities, a process known as the urbanization of poverty. To meet food needs and supplement incomes, many urban inhabitants especially new arrivals from the countryside practice urban and peri-urban agriculture (UPA) on vacant lots, in backyards, along rivers, roads and railways and under power lines. It has been estimated that some 200 million people are engaged in urban agriculture and related enterprises, contributing to the food supply of 800 million urban dwellers. In Africa, 40 percent of urban dwellers are said to be involved in some form of agricultural activity, and this gure rises to 50 percent in Latin America and the Caribbean. Much of the prevalence of UPA reects the vulnerability of urban dwellers to food and income insecurity. Many often have fewer informal safety nets, such as kinship and community networks. As they lack access to natural resources, principally land and water, allowing them to grow food on their own, they depend mainly on purchased food. The urban poor are highly vulnerable to economic crises because they spend a large share of their disposable income on food, and economic downturns can reduce their employment and income opportunities. UPA can increase the resilience of the urban poor to external shocks by buffering the adverse food security and income effects of crises and economic upheavals. More generally, UPA contributes to food security, nutrition and livelihoods in a combination of ways. For instance, by providing for self-consumption, UPA can contribute to healthy diets while reducing household food expenditures, provide a source of income generation through the sale of surpluses and provide local markets with an immediate supply of fresh and micronutrient-rich foodstuffs at competitive prices. UPA is already an important reality in developing countries. As urbanization will likely accelerate in the decades ahead, its contribution will be even more signicant. Consequently, governments and city administrations must recognize the opportunities offered by UPA to improve urban food security and livelihoods. By adopting policy responses that better integrate agriculture into urban development, developing countries can reap considerable benets, especially enhancements in social, economic and environmental sustainability.

Map 52:

No Data

<1

12

Source: FAO, Agriculture Department Metalink: P1.DEM.UN.WUP.POP.URB, p. 73

Towns and cities are growing rapidly in

developing countries, a process often accompanied by high levels of poverty and hunger lion urban dwellers are estimated to be engaged in agricultural activities nized as an important and increasingly central phenomenon of urbanization

To meet their food needs, some 200 mil-

Urban agriculture needs to be recog-

Further reading
FAO Food for the cities (www.fao.org/fcit/en/) FAO Growing greener cities (www.fao.org/ag/agp/
greenercities/)

214

URBAN AND PERI-URBAN AGRICULTURE

Urbanization rates (%, 2010) 12 23 34 >4

Chart 96: Large cities are prevalent and rising in many food-insecure regions, underscoring the importance of urban agriculture
Number of cities with populations exceeding 750 000 (2010)
150

100

Number

50

East Asia

L.Amer. & Carib.

South Asia

Sub-S Africa

Source: World Population Prospects - the 2010 Revision (UNESA) Metalink: P1.DEM.UN.WUP.POP.750, p. 73

215

PART 3

Food losses
Food losses represent a signicant cost to the world economy and greatly impact our ability to feed the world. Wastage at the consumer level is typical of food systems in developed countries, while losses from production to the retail level characterize those of developing countries. The issue is highly important in the efforts to combat hunger, raise income and improve food security in the worlds poorest countries. Food losses also affect food quality and safety, economic development and the environment. Loss assessments are generally unreliable, but it is estimated that roughly one-third of the edible food produced for human consumption is lost or wasted, which translates to about 1.3 billion tonnes per year. Per capita waste by consumers is between 95-115 kg a year in Europe and North America, while consumers in subSaharan Africa and South and Southeast Asia waste only 6-11 kg a year. In medium- and high-income countries food is to a great extent wasted at the consumer level, meaning that it is disposed of even if still suitable for human consumption. In low-income countries, however, much less is wasted at this level. Losses contribute to high food prices because they remove part of the supply from the market. They also impact environmental degradation and climate change, as non-renewable resources are used to produce, process, handle and transport food that no one consumes. The exact causes of food losses vary throughout the world and are very much dependent on the specic conditions and local situation in a given country. In broad terms, food losses will be inuenced by crop production choices and patterns, internal infrastructure and capacity, marketing chains and channels for distribution, and consumer purchase and food use practices. Developing countries can incur signicant losses at the time of harvest or when crops are left un-harvested for lack of effective demand. For cereal crops, drying, threshing and milling can cause huge losses, while poor handling, packaging and transport of perishable fruits and vegetables can, on occasions, result in the waste of half the crop. There can also be losses during food processing. All of these instances also waste human labour, land, water, fertilizer and other inputs, as well as fuel for transportation, processing and cold storage.

Map 53:

No Data

125.5448014

Source: FAO, Agriculture Department Metalink: P3.FTW.FAO.AGS.LOSS, p. 279

One-third of food produced for human

consumption is lost or wasted globally lost before it reaches markets

In developing countries, food is often In the developed world, on the other

hand, food is wasted by consumers

Further reading
FAO Global food losses and food waste: Extent,
causes and prevention (www.fao.org/leadmin/user_ upload/ags/publications/GFL_web.pdf)

FAO Food Loss Reduction Strategy (www.fao.org/

leadmin/user_upload/ags/publications/brochure_phl_ low.pdf)

FAO Rural Infrastructure and Agro-Industries Division

(www.fao.org/ag/ags/ags-division/en/)

216

FOOD LOSSES

Per capita food losses and waste (kg per year, 2010) 167.0479783 200 225 236.2774026 > 250

Chart 97: Food losses and wastage are a problem in both developing and developed countries, but at different stages of the value chain
Average per capita food losses and wastage (2010)
Consumption 250 200 Pre-consumption

kg per year

150 100 50 0

Sub-S Africa

N. Afr., W. & C. Asia

S. & E. Asia

L. America

Developed

Source: FAO, Agriculture Department Metalink: P3.FTW.FAO.AGS.LOSSr, p. 279

217

TABLE 26: Agriculture-in-aggregate production indicators

Gross per capita production index number (2004-2006 = 100) crops % 2008 - 2009 WORLD DEVELOPING REGIONS AFRICA North Africa Algeria Egypt Libya Morocco Tunisia Sub-Saharan Africa Angola Benin Botswana Burkina Faso Burundi Cameroon Cape Verde Central African Republic Chad Comoros Congo Cte dIvoire Congo, Dem. Rep. Djibouti Equatorial Guinea Eritrea Ethiopia Gabon Gambia Ghana Guinea Guinea-Bissau Kenya Lesotho Liberia Madagascar Malawi Mali Mauritania Mauritius Mozambique Namibia Niger Nigeria Rwanda Senegal Seychelles Sierra Leone Somalia Sudan South Africa Swaziland Tanzania, Utd. Rep. Togo Uganda Zambia Zimbabwe % p.a. growth: 2000-09 % 2008 - 2009 livestock % p.a. growth: 2000-09 % 2008 - 2009 food % p.a. growth: 2000-09 % 2008 - 2009 non food % p.a. growth: 2000-09

1.0 1.0 1.4 1.0 1.0 1.1 0.9 1.2 1.0 1.0 0.8 0.6 1.0 0.9 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.1 0.9 1.0 1.1 1.0 1.4 1.1 1.1 1.2 1.0 0.9 0.9 1.0 0.9 0.9 1.0 1.0 1.1 1.1 1.0 1.0 0.9 0.8 0.8 1.1 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.1 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.9 1.0 1.1 1.0

1.2 0.5 7.1 1.4 1.2 5.5 1.9 7.4 0.1 2.8 2.2 6.3 1.1 0.7 0.3 1.0 2.2 0.4 1.3 3.3 0.3 1.1 1.8 3.4 0.0 0.9 2.2 0.7 1.0 0.1 4.5 3.5 0.2 0.3 4.2 1.1 1.6 0.5 0.9 4.4 1.4 1.5 0.2 4.4 4.4 0.8 0.4 0.5 0.0 3.2 0.7 1.8 4.0 5.8

1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.1 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.7 1.0 1.1 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.1 1.0 1.0 0.9 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.9 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.1 1.0 1.0 1.0

0.9 0.4 0.7 1.2 0.4 2.1 0.3 2.0 0.8 1.5 0.2 3.8 1.2 3.4 0.8 0.9 1.7 3.8 0.7 2.7 0.3 1.8 0.9 2.2 1.9 0.3 0.5 3.1 0.8 2.5 0.0 1.1 1.8 3.7 2.5 0.6 3.8 3.9 1.9 1.6 0.4 3.2 0.0 8.3 0.2 1.6 0.0 1.3 1.7 0.2 1.6 0.8 1.7 1.0

1.0 1.0 1.2 1.0 1.0 1.1 0.9 1.2 1.0 1.0 0.9 0.6 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.1 0.9 1.0 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.0 0.9 0.9 1.0 1.0 0.9 1.0 0.9 1.1 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.9 0.8 1.1 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.9 1.0 1.1 1.0

1.1 0.6 4.4 1.5 0.9 4.4 1.3 5.0 0.7 1.8 1.3 5.6 1.2 1.4 0.5 1.0 2.1 1.0 0.1 3.2 0.3 0.1 1.2 3.2 0.5 0.8 2.1 1.2 0.6 1.5 1.9 1.2 0.3 0.0 4.2 0.7 0.4 1.3 1.2 3.2 1.2 1.7 0.1 6.8 4.2 1.5 0.2 0.4 0.6 2.4 0.8 1.7 0.9 2.2

1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.9 1.1 0.7 1.9 1.2 1.0 1.2 0.5 1.0 0.9 1.1 0.9 0.6 1.2 1.0 1.0 1.2 1.1 0.8 1.0 0.9 0.9 0.7 1.0 1.2 1.2 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 1.1 1.1 0.7 0.5 0.9 1.0 1.2 1.0 1.1 0.9 0.9 0.9 1.1 0.9

0.4 2.8 1.9 9.7 2.2 1.6 1.3 4.5 8.4 4.9 2.9 0.0 5.4 1.1 9.6 13.8 0.5 3.4 9.7 7.3 9.2 5.2 0.2 0.1 9.2 1.9 4.9 1.6 1.7 3.6 9.3 3.7 4.8 6.4 2.0 14.5 3.2 12.4 0.5 2.3 3.8 14.9 1.6 1.7 0.5 6.1 20.9 3.0 12.8 0.5 13.1 7.2

218

TABLE 26: Agriculture-in-aggregate production indicators (continued)

Gross per capita production index number (2004-2006 = 100) crops % 2008 - 2009 ASIA Central Asia Kazakhstan Kyrgyzstan Tajikistan Turkmenistan Uzbekistan East Asia Brunei Darussalam Cambodia China Indonesia Korea, DPR Korea, Republic of Lao, PDR Malaysia Mongolia Myanmar Philippines Singapore Thailand Viet Nam South Asia Afghanistan Bangladesh Bhutan India Iran (Islamic Rep.) Maldives Nepal Pakistan Sri Lanka West Asia Armenia Azerbaijan Bahrain Cyprus Georgia Iraq Jordan Kuwait Lebanon Occupied Palestinian Territory Saudi Arabia Syrian Arab Republic Turkey United Arab Emirates Yemen LATIN AMERICA & THE CARIBBEAN Argentina Bahamas Barbados Belize Bolivia (Plur. State) Brazil Chile Colombia Costa Rica % p.a. growth: 2000-09 % 2008 - 2009 livestock % p.a. growth: 2000-09 % 2008 - 2009 food % p.a. growth: 2000-09 % 2008 - 2009 non food % p.a. growth: 2000-09

1.1 1.2 1.0 1.1 0.9 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.4 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.2 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.1 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.1 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.9 1.1 1.0 0.9 1.0

4.0 5.3 0.8 5.1 1.8 3.9 1.4 7.0 2.9 3.8 1.2 0.4 3.0 1.8 10.1 5.5 1.3 11.8 1.7 2.5 0.8 3.6 1.9 1.8 0.7 1.5 1.7 1.0 0.3 0.6 8.5 3.6 6.0 6.0 2.8 3.3 1.1 0.6 1.5 0.4 0.4 1.0 0.5 16.6 0.9

1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.1 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.1 1.0 1.2 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.1 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.9 0.9 1.0 0.9 1.0 1.0 0.9 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.3 1.0

3.8 3.3 0.1 8.3 6.8 4.1 3.9 1.1 2.5 3.7 2.4 0.5 2.4 1.7 2.0 11.1 1.4 0.8 1.4 5.1 1.8 3.5 2.4 2.0 1.8 2.8 2.6 0.0 1.7 1.2 4.4 3.7 8.4 2.4 2.5 4.0 0.7 0.5 1.6 3.0 0.6 0.5 0.9 2.7 2.7

1.1 1.1 1.0 1.1 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.1 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.2 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.1 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.1 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.9 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.1 1.0 1.0 1.0

4.4 4.5 0.8 7.1 5.1 4.8 2.9 5.7 2.8 3.8 1.4 0.0 3.2 2.3 1.1 6.4 1.2 1.8 1.6 2.9 1.0 0.2 2.0 0.9 0.8 2.1 1.8 0.7 1.1 0.8 6.9 4.2 7.0 3.9 2.5 3.5 1.0 0.5 0.6 0.8 0.5 0.1 0.0 13.9 1.7

0.9 0.9 0.7 0.8 0.7 0.9 0.9 1.1 0.9 1.0 1.0 1.1 0.9 0.8 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.1 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.1 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.9 1.2 0.8 1.0 1.0 1.1 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.9 0.9 1.0

0.2 0.6 7.2 0.9 0.9 0.7 1.0 0.8 2.9 4.2 2.0 5.2 1.4 2.7 1.7 1.3 5.9 1.8 5.3 2.4 4.1 0.2 2.6 3.9 4.4 3.0 0.1 0.0 9.1 9.1 6.1 11.6 3.2 2.1 2.5 2.3 4.0 1.1 5.4 4.3 6.7 1.9

0.7 1.0 1.1 0.9 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.1

0.6 1.4 3.3 2.5 0.7 3.5 1.2 0.5 0.5

1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.9 1.0 1.0

1.2 1.6 1.7 2.2 2.0 3.1 1.2 2.2 0.9

0.8 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0

0.2 1.4 0.5 1.8 1.3 3.4 1.3 1.3 1.1

0.9

0.3

0.8 1.0 0.9 1.1 1.2 0.8

11.0 0.2 2.3 3.1 1.4 7.7

219

TABLE 26: Agriculture-in-aggregate production indicators (continued)

Gross per capita production index number (2004-2006 = 100) crops % 2008 - 2009 Cuba Dominica Dominican Republic Ecuador El Salvador French Guiana Grenada Guatemala Guyana Haiti Honduras Jamaica Mexico Netherlands Antilles Nicaragua Panama Paraguay Peru St. Kitts & Nevis St. Lucia St. Vincent & Grenadines Suriname Trinidad & Tobago Uruguay Venezuela (Boliv. Rep. of) OCEANIA Fiji French Polynesia New Caledonia Papua New Guinea Samoa Solomon Islands Tonga Vanuatu DEVELOPED REGIONS NORTH AMERICA Bermuda Canada United States of America ASIA & OCEANIA Australia Israel Japan New Zealand EUROPE Albania Belarus Bosnia & Herzegovina Croatia European Union Iceland Macedonia, FYR Montenegro Norway Republic of Moldova Russian Federation Serbia Switzerland Ukraine % p.a. growth: 2000-09 % 2008 - 2009 livestock % p.a. growth: 2000-09 % 2008 - 2009 food % p.a. growth: 2000-09 % 2008 - 2009 non food % p.a. growth: 2000-09

1.0 1.1 1.1 1.1 0.9 0.9 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.1 1.0 1.1 0.9 1.1 0.8 0.8 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.1 1.0 1.1 1.1 1.0 0.9 1.0 0.9 1.0 1.0 0.9 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.9 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.9 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.9 1.0 1.1 0.8 0.8 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.9

2.8 0.3 1.3 0.3 0.7 5.3 1.8 1.9 0.5 0.5 2.9 0.4 0.0 1.3 2.8 1.4 2.2 5.9 4.0 2.7 1.2 2.0 7.4 0.7 3.8 1.3 0.4 0.2 1.3 0.8 0.6 0.6 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 2.2 0.8 1.5 0.5 0.6 3.4 3.9 6.0 0.6 0.5 0.5 1.0 1.8 1.6 3.1 1.9 5.3

1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.9 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.1 1.0 1.0 0.9 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.9 1.0 1.0 0.8 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.9 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.9 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.1 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.9 1.0 1.0 1.1 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0

0.9 1.5 3.6 5.7 1.8 4.7 2.6 0.5 4.5 0.5 1.5 1.1 0.9 0.7 3.4 0.4 1.0 3.7 6.8 3.5 0.6 1.4 4.2 1.2 0.3 0.5 0.2 1.7 1.5 0.9 1.4 0.3 4.2 0.1 0.5 0.2 0.1 1.7 0.4 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.7 4.7 6.1 3.9 0.4 0.1 2.1 0.5 1.1 1.9 0.2 0.6

1.0 1.1 1.1 1.0 1.0 0.9 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.1 1.0 1.1 1.0 1.0 1.1 0.9 0.9 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.1 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.9 1.0 0.9 0.9 1.0 0.9 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.9 0.9 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0

1.9 0.1 2.6 2.6 1.8 5.2 1.2 2.0 0.2 0.7 3.0 0.3 0.5 0.7 2.5 1.2 1.7 2.9 6.0 2.6 2.4 1.2 1.2 3.2 0.4 2.5 0.9 1.3 0.4 1.2 0.6 0.5 1.5 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.2 1.4 0.1 0.6 0.2 0.4 2.1 4.3 6.1 1.6 0.5 0.2 1.3 0.7 1.8 2.5 0.4 3.5

1.2 1.4 1.0 1.0 0.9 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.3 1.1 1.2 0.9 1.2 1.0 0.6 0.9 2.0 1.3 1.0 2.9 0.9 1.0 1.3 1.0 0.2 0.9 1.3 1.3 0.9 1.0 0.9 1.1 0.9 1.2 0.8 0.9 0.9 1.0 0.8 0.7 0.9 1.1 1.0 1.1 1.4 0.9 1.0 1.1 1.0 0.9 1.0 0.8

3.3 0.6 3.4 9.2 4.6 0.2 2.6 5.4 3.4 1.2 0.6 4.8 0.0 1.2 15.5 0.6 1.4 3.5 9.4 2.7 2.8 3.6 0.5 3.7 11.5 4.8 1.3 2.3 0.4 9.8 4.5 0.5 4.8 8.7 7.7 2.7 2.0 2.0 2.7 1.6 0.2 7.2 2.6 6.3 0.1 0.7 13.1 3.3 16.4 2.8

220

TABLE 27: Top wheat producers and their productivity

Wheat area thousand ha 2010 Afghanistan Algeria Argentina Australia Azerbaijan Bangladesh Belarus Brazil Bulgaria Canada China Czech Republic Denmark Egypt Ethiopia European Union France Germany Greece Hungary India Iran (Islamic Rep.) Iraq Italy Kazakhstan Kyrgyzstan Lithuania Mexico Morocco Nepal Pakistan Paraguay Poland Republic of Moldova Romania Russian Federation Slovakia South Africa Spain Sweden Syrian Arab Republic Tajikistan Tunisia Turkey Turkmenistan Ukraine United Kingdom United States of America Uruguay Uzbekistan WORLD DEVELOPING REGIONS AFRICA ASIA LATIN AMERICA & THE CARIBBEAN DEVELOPED REGIONS NORTH AMERICA EUROPE % p.a. growth: 2000-10 tonnes per ha 2010 yield % p.a. growth: 2000-10 thousand tonnes 2009 thousand tonnes 2010 production % p.a. growth: 1990-99 % p.a. growth: 2000-10

2 504 1 900 4 373 13 507 656 376 603 2 177 1 109 8 269 24 256 834 764 1 288 1 684 25 998 5 426 3 298 510 1 011 28 520 7 035 1 383 1 865 13 138 375 526 679 2 852 731 9 132 561 2 406 328 2 153 21 640 350 558 1 907 404 1 400 343 434 8 054 850 6 284 1 937 19 278 404 1 420 216 775 119 518 9 502 101 180 8 837 97 250 27 547 55 870

2.1 8.7 3.8 1.1 2.9 7.6 2.9 7.4 1.3 2.7 0.9 1.5 2.0 2.2 4.7 0.2 0.3 1.1 5.1 0.1 0.4 3.3 1.4 2.2 2.7 1.7 3.6 0.4 0.2 1.0 0.8 13.4 0.9 1.3 1.1 0.1 1.4 5.0 2.1 0.1 1.8 0.0 4.9 1.5 2.0 2.0 0.7 1.1 12.2 0.5 0.1 0.4 1.6 0.3 0.5 0.3 1.6 0.1

1.8 1.6 3.4 1.6 1.9 2.4 2.9 2.8 3.6 2.8 4.7 5.0 6.6 5.6 1.8 5.3 7.0 7.3 3.1 3.7 2.8 2.1 2.0 3.7 0.7 2.2 3.3 5.4 1.7 2.1 2.6 2.5 3.9 2.3 2.7 1.9 3.5 2.6 2.9 5.4 2.6 2.5 1.9 2.4 3.5 2.7 7.7 3.1 3.2 4.7 3.0 2.9 2.3 2.9 3.3 3.2 3.0 3.6

9.6 5.9 3.2 1.0 1.8 0.8 3.1 5.9 2.4 1.4 2.4 1.7 1.2 1.3 4.4 0.5 0.1 0.0 1.5 0.3 0.2 3.0 20.0 1.4 2.1 0.8 0.3 0.9 13.6 1.7 0.2 6.1 2.0 1.5 1.6 1.7 1.3 0.1 0.5 0.9 3.3 7.8 4.9 0.9 3.9 3.1 0.4 1.0 2.4 6.2 1.0 1.3 2.8 1.1 2.7 0.7 1.1 0.8

5 064 2 953 8 851 21 656 2 096 849 1 979 5 056 3 977 26 848 115 115 4 358 5 940 8 523 3 076 138 262 38 332 25 192 1 830 4 419 80 680 13 484 1 700 6 341 17 052 1 057 2 100 4 116 6 371 1 344 24 033 1 067 9 790 737 5 203 61 740 1 538 1 958 4 724 2 284 3 702 938 1 654 20 600 2 958 20 886 14 076 60 366 1 844 6 638 686 957 348 579 26 083 299 904 22 591 338 363 87 213 228 283

4 532 3 100 14 914 22 138 1 272 901 1 740 6 037 3 995 23 167 115 180 4 162 5 060 7 177 3 000 136 507 38 207 24 107 1 600 3 764 80 710 15 029 2 749 6 900 9 638 813 1 708 3 677 4 876 1 557 23 311 1 402 9 488 744 5 812 41 508 1 228 1 465 5 611 2 184 3 600 858 822 19 660 3 000 16 851 14 878 60 103 1 301 6 730 651 398 343 698 22 017 292 260 29 421 307 685 83 269 201 149

4.7 7.8 3.8 5.7 8.8 2.5 7.4 1.9 1.7 1.4 4.5 0.6 1.2 2.8 0.2 9.1 4.1 0.9 4.4 0.5

11.9 15.1 0.8 0.0 1.0 6.9 6.1 13.8 3.7 1.3 1.5 0.2 0.8 0.9 9.3 0.3 0.2 1.1 3.7 0.2 0.6 6.4 21.8 0.8 0.6 2.4 3.3

2.9 5.6 2.7 2.5 3.5 0.0 4.8

0.5 13.4 2.8 1.0 20.3 1.1 0.2 2.7 1.9 0.2

0.2 0.7 3.3 3.0 2.4 1.2

4.9 2.6 0.8 1.5 7.8 0.2 0.7 5.9 5.2

0.6 1.9 0.9 0.1 2.7 1.3 2.9 1.2 2.0 1.9 3.2

1.2 0.1 14.9 6.7 1.1 1.7 4.4 1.4 2.2 0.5 0.5 0.9

221

TABLE 28: Top rice producers and their productivity

Rice area thousand ha 2010 Afghanistan Argentina Bangladesh Bolivia (Plur. State) Brazil Burkina Faso Cambodia Cameroon China Colombia Congo, Dem. Rep. Cte dIvoire Cuba Dominican Republic Ecuador Egypt European Union Ghana Guinea Guyana India Indonesia Iran (Islamic Rep.) Italy Japan Korea, DPR Korea, Republic of Lao, PDR Liberia Madagascar Malaysia Mali Mozambique Myanmar Nepal Nigeria Pakistan Peru Philippines Russian Federation Senegal Sierra Leone Sri Lanka Tanzania, Utd. Rep. Thailand Uganda United States of America Uruguay Venezuela (Boliv. Rep. of) Viet Nam WORLD DEVELOPING REGIONS AFRICA ASIA LATIN AMERICA & THE CARIBBEAN DEVELOPED REGIONS NORTH AMERICA EUROPE % p.a. growth: 2000-10 tonnes per ha 2010 yield % p.a. growth: 2000-10 thousand tonnes 2009 thousand tonnes 2010 production % p.a. growth: 1990-99 % p.a. growth: 2000-10

200 215 11 800 172 2 710 132 2 777 140 30 117 465 420 385 176 199 393 460 483 181 864 205 36 950 13 244 564 248 1 628 570 892 870 251 1 350 674 686 185 8 052 1 481 1 788 2 365 389 4 354 201 147 545 1 060 720 10 990 140 1 463 162 239 7 514 153 651 149 823 9 050 134 923 5 846 3 828 1 463 718

4.4 1.3 0.9 1.0 2.9 12.7 3.8 21.3 0.1 0.1 0.6 1.2 1.3 5.2 1.5 3.5 1.7 4.6 2.6 5.9 1.9 1.2 0.5 1.2 0.8 0.6 1.8 1.9 5.8 1.1 0.4 6.9 0.0 2.5 0.5 2.0 0.0 3.1 0.8 1.8 5.5 11.5 2.5 5.6 1.1 6.9 1.8 1.6 5.6 0.2 0.0 0.0 1.8 0.1 0.9 0.2 1.8 1.7

3.4 5.8 4.2 2.1 4.2 1.8 3.0 1.2 6.5 5.2 0.8 1.7 2.6 4.6 4.3 9.4 6.6 2.7 1.9 2.5 3.3 5.0 4.1 6.6 6.5 4.3 6.5 3.5 1.2 3.5 3.8 3.4 1.0 4.1 2.7 1.8 3.1 7.3 3.6 5.3 4.1 1.7 4.1 1.5 2.9 1.6 7.5 7.1 5.1 5.3 4.4 4.3 2.5 4.4 4.5 6.9 7.5 6.2

5.3 1.9 1.8 1.0 3.2 3.7 3.4 8.4 0.4 1.0 0.0 0.8 0.7 0.5 1.7 0.3 0.9 2.3 0.9 4.4 1.4 1.3 1.0 1.7 0.3 3.0 0.3 1.2 0.8 5.5 2.1 4.8 0.1 2.0 0.1 1.8 0.1 1.0 1.7 4.2 5.8 4.4 1.7 2.0 1.0 0.3 0.7 1.1 0.4 2.3 1.2 1.2 0.9 1.2 2.0 0.3 0.7 1.7

645 1 334 47 724 396 12 651 214 7 586 115 196 681 2 985 317 688 564 848 1 579 5 520 3 032 391 1 499 554 133 700 64 399 2 253 1 500 10 590 2 336 7 023 3 145 293 4 540 2 460 1 951 179 32 682 4 524 3 403 10 324 2 991 16 266 913 502 785 3 652 1 334 32 116 206 9 972 1 287 1 330 38 950 684 780 660 047 23 278 608 294 28 459 24 733 9 972 4 105

672 1 241 49 355 363 11 309 233 8 245 175 197 221 2 412 317 650 454 917 1 706 4 330 3 209 492 1 615 507 120 620 66 412 2 288 1 638 10 600 2 426 5 804 3 006 296 4 738 2 548 2 308 180 33 204 4 024 3 219 7 235 2 831 15 772 1 061 604 909 4 301 1 105 31 597 218 11 027 1 149 1 219 39 989 672 021 645 745 22 852 596 737 26 143 26 276 11 027 4 443

1.9 16.2 2.8 2.2 5.2 7.8 5.5 2.3 0.5 0.4 1.3 1.3 1.9 3.2 4.9 7.0 1.6 11.2 4.4 15.3 2.1 1.3 1.9 1.1 1.5 3.0 1.0 3.9 1.0 0.7 0.9 11.1 7.6 4.1 1.0 3.1 5.2 8.1 2.0 3.2 7.6 1.3 0.2 3.9 6.5 3.1 16.1 4.3 5.6 1.8 1.9 3.5 1.8 5.2

10.0 3.2 2.8 1.9 0.2 8.5 7.4 11.1 0.4 1.1 0.6 0.4 1.9 4.7 3.2 3.2 2.6 7.1 3.5 1.2 0.6 2.5 1.5 2.9 1.1 3.7 2.1 3.2 4.9 6.7 1.8 12.0 0.0 4.5 0.5 0.2 0.0 4.1 2.4 6.1 11.6 16.4 4.2 3.5 2.0 7.2 2.4 0.5 6.1 2.1 1.2 1.2 2.7 1.1 1.1 0.6

3.1 3.7

2.4 3.4

222

TABLE 29: Top coarse grain producers and their productivity

Coarse grains area thousand ha 2010 Angola Argentina Australia Belarus Brazil Burkina Faso Cameroon Canada Chad China Congo, Dem. Rep. Egypt Ethiopia European Union France Germany Ghana Guinea Hungary India Indonesia Iran (Islamic Rep.) Italy Kazakhstan Kenya Malawi Mali Mexico Morocco Mozambique Nepal Niger Nigeria Pakistan Philippines Poland Romania Russian Federation Senegal South Africa Spain Sudan Syrian Arab Republic Tanzania, Utd. Rep. Thailand Turkey Uganda Ukraine United States of America Zimbabwe WORLD DEVELOPING REGIONS AFRICA ASIA LATIN AMERICA & THE CARIBBEAN DEVELOPED REGIONS NORTH AMERICA EUROPE % p.a. growth: 2000-10 tonnes per ha 2010 yield % p.a. growth: 2000-10 thousand tonnes 2009 thousand tonnes 2010 production % p.a. growth: 1990-99 % p.a. growth: 2000-10

1 644 4 770 5 950 1 778 13 788 4 158 1 499 4 745 2 352 35 759 1 553 1 220 7 644 30 452 3 809 3 315 1 421 1 164 1 573 27 140 4 143 1 842 1 382 1 836 2 362 1 771 3 279 9 254 2 200 2 303 1 171 10 604 11 983 1 792 2 499 6 018 2 852 10 490 1 330 2 981 3 954 7 655 1 221 4 274 1 348 3 852 1 690 7 871 36 747 1 886 311 470 210 232 85 484 89 422 35 320 101 209 41 492 53 564

6.4 0.5 1.2 0.6 1.0 4.7 7.9 4.3 3.5 2.2 0.1 1.3 2.3 1.2 0.0 2.0 1.8 8.0 1.0 1.1 1.7 2.9 1.4 1.4 3.1 1.5 5.4 0.1 1.4 3.4 0.5 3.8 2.8 0.1 0.0 0.3 2.6 6.1 2.1 3.7 0.9 1.9 1.2 7.7 0.1 1.5 2.7 1.2 0.3 0.7 0.3 1.1 1.7 0.7 0.8 1.2 0.4 2.0

0.6 6.3 1.9 2.8 4.2 1.0 1.8 4.7 0.8 5.2 0.8 6.5 1.7 4.7 7.2 6.1 1.7 1.1 5.4 1.2 4.4 2.7 7.6 1.1 1.5 2.2 1.2 3.4 1.3 1.0 1.9 0.5 1.4 2.2 2.6 2.9 3.8 1.6 0.9 4.4 3.2 0.4 0.9 1.3 3.5 3.2 1.6 2.8 9.0 0.7 3.6 2.6 1.3 3.3 4.0 5.6 8.5 3.7

0.8 2.8 1.2 3.9 4.8 2.2 0.2 3.5 4.2 2.3 0.3 0.9 4.1 1.1 0.3 0.5 3.3 1.3 4.0 1.9 4.8 2.9 0.1 0.8 1.0 2.7 4.5 2.6 19.0 1.7 1.9 5.4 1.9 6.1 3.6 2.7 8.9 0.9 1.4 4.8 1.6 1.5 11.7 0.7 0.1 2.7 0.5 3.6 1.7 5.6 2.1 2.9 1.6 3.4 3.6 2.3 2.1 2.2

1 011 16 197 12 779 6 175 53 207 3 413 2 415 22 562 2 051 171 471 1 201 8 663 12 401 156 220 31 564 24 616 2 216 1 160 9 159 34 430 17 630 5 097 9 551 3 405 2 637 3 669 4 369 26 903 4 022 2 365 2 247 3 423 17 543 3 790 7 034 20 037 9 599 32 963 1 367 12 616 12 131 4 888 1 037 4 267 4 822 12 220 2 610 24 377 349 043 879 1 123 706 504 701 110 093 279 878 114 711 618 965 371 605 233 537

1 010 30 049 11 171 4 989 58 385 4 290 2 630 22 245 1 773 185 178 1 202 7 901 12 613 141 919 27 350 20 306 2 415 1 244 8 532 33 580 18 364 4 955 10 458 2 104 3 508 3 892 4 086 31 029 2 908 2 323 2 182 5 056 16 259 3 897 6 377 17 633 10 837 17 056 1 164 13 265 12 798 3 136 1 089 5 520 4 661 12 221 2 723 21 679 330 575 1 387 1 109 400 544 360 111 243 292 692 140 407 564 997 352 820 200 132

9.0 8.4 3.0 4.7 6.6 4.4 1.0 8.3 2.3 1.4 2.9 1.2 2.6 1.2 7.6 6.4 3.7 0.7 3.5 1.7 4.5 0.2 7.1 4.2 1.4 5.1 11.0 1.3 3.4 2.6 2.4 0.6 1.4 2.6 1.3 1.8 1.2 9.3 5.7 0.3 1.4 0.6 3.5 1.5 3.1 0.6 2.3 2.1 1.5 3.6 2.5 1.4 2.7

7.3 3.3 0.1 3.3 5.8 7.0 8.0 1.0 7.8 4.6 0.2 0.5 6.4 0.1 0.3 1.5 5.1 6.5 3.0 0.8 6.6 5.8 1.3 0.7 4.2 4.3 10.1 2.5 17.3 5.2 2.4 9.4 1.0 6.0 3.5 2.5 6.0 5.3 3.5 0.9 2.5 0.3 10.3 7.0 0.1 1.2 3.2 4.8 1.9 4.9 2.4 4.0 3.4 4.1 4.4 1.1 1.7 0.1

223

TABLE 30: Top oilcrop producers and their productivity

Oilcrops area thousand ha 2010 Argentina Australia Bolivia (Plur. State) Brazil Bulgaria Burkina Faso Canada Chad China Congo, Dem. Rep. Ethiopia European Union France Germany Ghana Greece Hungary India Indonesia Italy Kazakhstan Malaysia Mali Mexico Morocco Mozambique Myanmar Niger Nigeria Pakistan Paraguay Philippines Poland Romania Russian Federation Senegal South Africa Spain Sudan Syrian Arab Republic Tanzania, Utd. Rep. Thailand Tunisia Turkey Uganda Ukraine United Kingdom United States of America Uruguay Uzbekistan WORLD DEVELOPING REGIONS AFRICA ASIA LATIN AMERICA & THE CARIBBEAN DEVELOPED REGIONS NORTH AMERICA EUROPE % p.a. growth: 2000-10 tonnes per ha 2010 yield % p.a. growth: 2000-10 thousand tonnes 2009 thousand tonnes 2010 production % p.a. growth: 1990-99 % p.a. growth: 2000-10

20 455 2 050 1 363 24 845 939 1 054 8 588 742 27 985 860 877 16 138 2 338 1 506 819 1 116 830 37 446 9 531 1 474 1 690 4 252 699 674 824 1 093 3 920 982 7 647 3 307 3 045 3 551 809 1 392 7 540 1 259 815 2 887 2 898 1 007 1 874 1 079 1 663 2 127 1 080 6 603 697 37 350 899 1 383 266 430 186 675 31 621 101 776 52 581 79 745 45 938 31 569

4.8 0.6 4.9 5.1 5.3 7.6 2.4 1.8 0.4 0.1 6.5 1.5 1.1 2.2 5.0 0.9 6.1 0.8 4.2 1.2 12.3 2.3 2.9 1.3 3.2 4.7 4.7 7.7 0.8 0.8 7.2 1.1 6.0 2.7 4.0 1.1 2.4 1.3 2.5 2.7 5.9 0.3 1.7 1.1 2.2 7.8 3.9 0.1 30.2 0.8 1.8 2.0 1.6 0.9 5.0 1.4 0.5 3.2

0.5 0.5 0.3 0.5 0.9 0.2 0.6 0.2 0.6 0.4 0.3 0.9 1.1 1.5 0.4 0.4 0.7 0.3 2.8 0.6 0.2 4.5 0.3 0.5 0.4 0.1 0.3 0.2 0.4 0.3 0.5 0.6 1.0 0.7 0.4 0.3 0.4 0.7 0.2 0.3 0.2 1.6 0.1 0.5 0.3 0.6 1.3 0.5 0.4 0.2 0.6 0.7 0.3 0.8 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.7

0.6 0.9 1.5 2.1 10.7 0.9 2.0 1.7 1.3 0.6 8.9 2.6 0.7 2.2 1.2 3.0 2.0 2.1 5.7 0.3 0.3 2.0 1.5 0.2 9.5 4.5 3.7 6.4 0.6 1.3 2.0 0.8 2.0 7.5 0.5 1.1 1.3 5.0 2.8 2.8 2.4 4.7 2.7 0.1 3.9 1.5 2.7 1.6 3.9 1.2 2.5 2.7 1.2 3.6 1.2 1.9 1.7 1.8

6 893 866 369 11 512 638 186 5 794 151 16 649 342 257 14 431 2 874 2 426 347 579 756 10 086 26 198 961 283 19 736 176 320 224 121 1 240 110 3 322 1 021 852 2 151 958 687 3 115 329 475 2 128 559 272 307 1 824 170 989 279 3 566 745 18 500 221 307 162 968 115 838 9 821 82 351 22 746 47 127 24 294 21 897

10 722 971 372 13 437 867 197 5 536 145 16 484 345 293 13 903 2 557 2 191 355 459 621 10 289 26 977 923 299 19 087 181 355 367 124 1 037 161 2 765 891 1 535 2 136 800 907 2 745 408 350 2 151 447 312 282 1 706 197 1 094 280 3 680 873 18 853 348 322 168 411 121 901 9 313 82 337 29 300 46 506 24 388 21 070

6.3 24.3 17.5 4.7 4.7 5.3 9.5 10.6 3.8 1.7 4.3 3.7 8.4 3.6 9.3 3.6 1.0 7.2 5.9 6.1 4.6 0.9 2.3 3.3 3.3 21.8 5.4 3.0 4.4 1.0 0.8 9.5 4.0 6.2 2.2 16.2 2.3 0.5 4.6 3.6 0.9 3.0 4.8 3.6 14.9 4.2 4.4 3.9 4.2 5.1 6.1 4.7 2.2

5.4 0.2 3.3 7.2 16.6 8.6 4.4 0.1 0.9 0.5 16.0 4.1 1.8 4.4 3.7 3.9 8.2 2.9 10.2 1.0 12.6 4.4 4.5 1.2 12.9 0.0 8.6 14.6 1.4 0.6 9.4 1.9 8.1 10.4 4.5 2.2 1.1 3.6 0.2 0.2 8.5 5.0 4.4 1.1 6.2 9.5 6.7 1.6 35.2 0.3 4.3 4.8 2.8 4.5 6.3 3.3 2.2 5.0

224

TABLE 31: Top pulses producers and their productivity

Pulses area thousand ha 2010 Angola Argentina Australia Bangladesh Benin Brazil Burkina Faso Burundi Cameroon Canada Chad China Colombia Congo, Dem. Rep. Ethiopia European Union France Ghana Guatemala India Indonesia Iran (Islamic Rep.) Kenya Korea, DPR Malawi Mali Mexico Morocco Mozambique Myanmar Nepal Nicaragua Niger Nigeria Pakistan Peru Russian Federation Rwanda Spain Sudan Syrian Arab Republic Tanzania, Utd. Rep. Thailand Togo Turkey Uganda Ukraine United Kingdom United States of America Viet Nam WORLD DEVELOPING REGIONS AFRICA ASIA LATIN AMERICA & THE CARIBBEAN DEVELOPED REGIONS NORTH AMERICA EUROPE % p.a. growth: 2000-10 tonnes per ha 2010 yield % p.a. growth: 2000-10 thousand tonnes 2009 thousand tonnes 2010 production % p.a. growth: 1990-99 % p.a. growth: 2000-10

722 324 1 746 241 222 3 502 838 222 376 2 862 168 2 786 157 407 1 483 1 603 423 222 246 26 166 260 790 1 077 243 680 290 1 758 398 315 3 780 296 216 5 707 2 625 1 473 226 1 000 367 379 390 239 1 773 184 218 896 1 137 391 188 1 419 394 76 003 66 649 20 966 38 300 7 370 9 352 4 281 3 259

14.0 0.9 2.4 6.9 4.8 2.2 10.1 1.6 2.5 2.0 0.6 1.9 0.8 1.4 2.8 1.7 1.1 3.3 5.0 3.0 2.7 2.5 0.7 3.3 3.9 0.2 0.4 0.9 4.6 4.9 0.1 0.3 8.4 3.5 0.6 1.6 2.3 0.1 1.8 9.4 1.2 4.3 5.8 3.7 5.3 2.6 0.5 1.0 5.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2.9 1.8 0.7 0.4 2.9 0.6

0.3 1.3 1.1 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.6 1.1 1.2 1.8 0.7 1.6 1.3 0.5 1.2 2.5 3.9 0.1 0.9 0.7 1.1 0.7 0.5 0.9 0.7 0.5 0.8 0.7 0.5 1.2 0.8 0.6 0.3 0.9 0.6 1.2 1.4 1.0 0.9 0.8 1.1 0.7 0.9 0.4 1.5 0.6 1.5 3.9 1.9 1.0 0.9 0.8 0.6 0.8 0.9 1.8 1.8 2.0

1.1 1.3 1.1 1.9 2.2 2.8 1.2 2.3 3.2 0.4 2.0 1.4 1.5 0.8 3.3 0.1 1.3 1.0 0.8 0.7 2.8 2.6 2.6 0.8 2.5 1.3 0.7 9.9 0.0 5.1 0.4 1.9 11.1 3.8 0.8 1.2 0.5 4.6 1.0 6.5 5.9 1.3 0.8 2.0 5.8 1.4 1.5 0.2 0.2 3.0 0.4 0.8 1.6 0.4 1.7 0.1 0.2 0.3

247 382 1 804 205 154 3 514 386 242 434 5 189 125 4 331 217 201 1 840 3 443 1 022 22 231 14 160 316 508 584 216 483 131 1 291 276 155 4 406 230 213 847 2 412 1 103 265 1 579 360 293 238 229 1 260 147 80 1 237 648 624 839 2 345 337 63 111 47 379 12 446 28 080 6 845 15 730 7 534 6 268

250 413 1 901 225 205 3 228 513 235 449 5 192 122 4 472 211 204 1 806 4 022 1 630 23 222 17 110 293 566 578 224 472 136 1 412 282 158 4 390 236 138 1 831 2 289 816 265 1 399 365 356 318 273 1 272 168 83 1 343 659 592 727 2 634 376 67 713 51 302 13 473 31 207 6 614 16 410 7 825 6 536

8.3 4.9 9.2 3.1 5.5 2.5 7.0 3.7 14.5 21.8 4.8 2.9 1.4 0.5 2.6 3.5 0.5 1.8 1.8 10.2 3.3 3.2 1.0 0.7 19.9 1.7 8.4 0.3 15.3 2.9 7.3 8.2 5.1 0.2 7.0 3.6 0.2 8.4 6.1 6.4 1.9 10.1 5.1 1.3 0.8 1.3 3.5 0.3 1.0 2.2 0.3 0.9 4.2 10.0 8.0

12.8 2.2 1.3 5.2 7.1 0.5 11.4 0.7 5.8 1.6 2.6 0.5 2.3 0.6 6.1 1.8 2.4 4.4 5.8 2.2 0.1 0.1 1.9 2.5 6.5 1.5 1.1 10.9 4.7 10.2 0.5 2.2 20.4 0.2 1.4 2.9 1.7 4.7 0.9 2.3 4.7 5.7 5.0 5.7 0.2 1.2 1.0 0.8 5.4 4.4 2.0 2.5 4.5 2.2 1.0 0.6 2.7 0.9

225

TABLE 32: Top roots and tubers producers and their productivity
Roots and tubers area thousand ha 2010 Angola Bangladesh Belarus Benin Bolivia (Plur. State) Brazil Burundi Cambodia Cameroon Central African Republic China Colombia Congo, Dem. Rep. Cte dIvoire Cuba Egypt Ethiopia European Union France Germany Ghana Guinea Haiti India Indonesia Kazakhstan Kenya Korea, DPR Madagascar Malawi Mozambique Nepal Nigeria Pakistan Papua New Guinea Paraguay Peru Philippines Poland Romania Russian Federation Rwanda Tanzania, Utd. Rep. Thailand Togo Uganda Ukraine United States of America Viet Nam Zambia WORLD DEVELOPING REGIONS AFRICA ASIA LATIN AMERICA & THE CARIBBEAN DEVELOPED REGIONS NORTH AMERICA EUROPE % p.a. growth: 2000-10 tonnes per ha 2010 yield % p.a. growth: 2000-10 thousand tonnes 2009 thousand tonnes 2010 production % p.a. growth: 1990-99 % p.a. growth: 2000-10

1 275 466 367 438 197 1 983 166 217 503 334 9 134 388 1 974 1 241 244 158 675 2 022 166 255 1 539 185 328 2 186 1 497 179 260 164 568 391 1 089 218 7 528 165 223 183 463 366 491 247 2 109 489 1 426 1 201 237 1 137 1 408 454 684 214 52 138 45 207 23 052 17 546 4 328 6 926 594 6 110

7.7 5.1 5.7 1.2 0.8 0.2 2.6 24.2 2.5 1.8 1.7 2.0 0.5 4.0 3.7 6.2 1.2 4.7 0.2 1.7 2.2 0.2 5.5 2.7 0.8 1.2 1.1 2.5 0.8 0.9 0.9 4.2 0.1 1.9 2.1 1.5 0.4 0.1 8.9 1.3 4.2 1.4 1.2 0.4 1.7 1.1 1.5 2.5 2.8 2.4 0.2 0.5 1.1 0.4 0.7 3.7 2.2 3.9

11.5 17.7 21.4 15.1 6.0 14.5 3.2 20.1 10.6 3.7 17.8 12.9 7.9 6.7 6.2 26.2 10.5 28.1 39.8 40.0 13.6 6.8 3.9 20.9 18.3 14.3 4.6 13.0 7.8 20.8 6.2 12.2 9.7 21.6 7.4 14.6 12.2 8.0 17.9 13.3 10.0 10.6 4.6 18.7 6.9 7.8 13.3 42.1 15.0 6.7 13.9 13.0 9.4 18.0 12.7 19.8 39.6 17.6

4.1 4.3 4.9 3.5 0.4 0.5 7.4 9.5 1.6 0.2 0.2 1.5 0.1 1.7 1.5 1.0 2.9 1.0 0.0 1.2 2.5 0.9 0.2 0.9 4.4 3.0 4.3 2.4 1.7 4.4 0.4 3.1 1.2 2.5 0.0 1.1 1.4 1.6 0.8 0.8 0.5 4.6 0.1 1.1 0.7 0.1 0.9 0.3 7.2 2.6 0.6 0.9 1.5 1.0 0.3 0.8 0.3 0.7

14 633 5 573 7 125 6 434 1 185 28 556 780 3 616 5 215 1 174 156 271 4 870 15 618 7 702 1 566 4 135 7 311 62 647 7 175 11 618 19 635 1 246 1 098 45 134 25 638 2 756 2 178 1 950 4 395 7 251 6 691 2 559 72 542 3 383 1 506 2 656 5 503 2 878 9 703 4 004 31 134 4 261 8 036 30 541 1 624 8 634 19 666 20 449 10 207 1 383 736 175 581 039 214 264 310 863 53 957 155 024 25 031 123 731

14 690 8 237 7 831 6 602 1 190 28 661 522 4 370 5 336 1 233 162 418 4 981 15 643 8 284 1 515 4 138 7 097 56 932 6 582 10 202 20 950 1 258 1 265 45 732 27 410 2 555 1 186 2 135 4 423 8 127 6 739 2 658 72 850 3 570 1 653 2 668 5 634 2 934 8 766 3 284 21 140 5 208 6 554 22 442 1 645 8 815 18 705 19 100 10 285 1 428 726 397 589 510 217 185 315 425 54 777 136 802 23 522 107 563

7.1 8.0 7.4 0.1 1.3 0.5 11.7 3.1 2.3 3.2 0.7 1.5 3.8 6.2 1.5 1.4 3.8 2.0 12.7 3.6 0.3 3.8 0.4 3.9 7.1 1.0 21.0 2.8 4.5 7.7 8.0 0.7 0.4 9.2 0.3 6.5 2.4 0.0 3.3 2.4 3.8 4.1 1.9 1.8 4.4 1.8 3.2 4.4 2.8 0.7 3.7 2.2 1.9

12.1 9.5 1.1 4.7 0.4 0.7 9.8 36.0 4.2 1.7 1.5 3.5 0.5 2.2 2.1 7.2 4.2 3.8 0.2 2.9 4.7 1.1 5.3 3.6 3.6 4.2 3.2 0.1 2.5 5.3 1.4 7.3 1.1 4.5 2.1 0.4 1.8 1.5 9.7 0.5 4.6 6.0 1.0 1.5 2.4 1.2 0.6 2.2 10.1 5.0 0.4 1.4 2.6 0.7 1.0 2.9 1.9 3.2

226

TABLE 33: Top sugarcane producers and their productivity

Sugarcane area thousand ha 2010 Argentina Australia Bangladesh Belize Bolivia (Plur. State) Brazil Cameroon China Colombia Congo, Dem. Rep. Costa Rica Cuba Dominican Republic Ecuador Egypt El Salvador Fiji Guatemala Guyana Honduras India Indonesia Iran (Islamic Rep.) Jamaica Kenya Liberia Madagascar Mauritius Mexico Mozambique Myanmar Nepal Nicaragua Nigeria Pakistan Panama Paraguay Peru Philippines Runion South Africa Sudan Swaziland Thailand Uganda United States of America Venezuela (Boliv. Rep. of) Viet Nam Zambia Zimbabwe WORLD DEVELOPING REGIONS AFRICA ASIA LATIN AMERICA & THE CARIBBEAN DEVELOPED REGIONS NORTH AMERICA EUROPE % p.a. growth: 2000-10 tonnes per ha 2010 yield % p.a. growth: 2000-10 thousand tonnes 2009 thousand tonnes 2010 production % p.a. growth: 1990-99 % p.a. growth: 2000-10

355 405 121 24 164 9 081 145 1 695 172 40 56 431 85 107 135 63 41 213 48 76 4 200 420 68 31 69 26 95 59 704 215 180 61 54 73 943 35 100 77 363 24 267 67 52 978 40 355 125 266 38 39 23 832 23 049 1 577 9 347 12 076 783 355 0

2.4 0.3 3.4 0.5 6.9 6.5 0.7 3.6 8.2 1.1 1.7 8.4 3.4 3.3 0.0 0.8 4.2 1.6 0.9 4.9 0.0 1.4 10.3 2.4 1.8 0.6 3.5 2.2 1.3 23.1 3.1 0.5 0.6 11.8 0.7 0.2 5.3 1.9 0.8 0.0 2.1 0.6 3.6 0.9 7.2 1.6 0.3 1.3 9.9 1.0 2.1 2.2 2.0 0.6 3.8 0.9 1.6 24.2

81.7 77.7 43.8 37.8 45.4 79.2 10.0 65.7 118.1 45.7 66.9 26.2 56.5 78.1 116.8 81.3 42.7 86.2 57.3 103.0 66.1 63.1 83.2 63.9 83.1 10.2 31.6 74.4 71.6 13.0 54.0 42.5 89.9 19.3 52.4 54.7 51.3 125.5 93.7 79.3 60.0 112.0 96.2 70.4 60.0 69.9 76.0 59.9 105.2 79.5 70.7 70.6 57.5 65.2 76.7 73.7 69.9 80.0

2.2 1.6 0.8 2.3 0.6 1.6 0.0 1.2 3.2 0.1 1.8 2.8 4.1 1.1 0.0 0.8 2.9 0.5 0.7 2.0 0.7 0.3 1.1 2.2 1.9 0.0 0.3 0.6 0.0 1.2 2.1 1.6 2.7 4.0 1.3 0.5 3.1 0.6 4.2 0.5 1.9 3.6 1.0 1.5 2.1 2.1 1.0 1.9 0.1 2.1 0.9 1.0 1.4 0.4 1.7 1.8 2.1 2.1

29 000 30 284 5 233 918 7 438 672 157 1 450 116 251 38 500 1 827 3 635 14 900 4 716 8 473 15 482 5 736 2 089 18 392 2 766 6 895 285 029 26 500 2 823 1 968 5 611 265 3 000 4 669 49 493 2 207 9 715 2 354 5 116 1 402 50 045 1 914 4 800 9 937 32 500 1 908 18 655 7 527 5 000 66 816 2 350 27 608 9 500 15 608 3 200 3 100 1 668 562 91 663

29 000 31 457 5 304 918 7 438 719 157 1 450 111 454 20 273 1 827 3 735 11 300 4 781 8 347 15 709 5 127 1 751 18 392 2 766 7 819 277 750 26 500 5 685 1 968 5 710 265 3 000 4 366 50 422 2 800 9 715 2 592 4 894 1 414 49 373 1 914 5 131 9 661 34 000 1 930 16 016 7 527 5 000 68 808 2 400 24 821 9 500 15 947 4 050 3 100 1 686 014 90 725

0.7 5.6 0.7 0.9 0.5 2.7 0.8 2.3 1.9 0.1 3.9 9.3 4.1 0.3 3.6 6.7 0.8 6.6 2.1 2.9 3.6 1.9 3.4 0.8 0.8 2.0 1.0 3.9 1.8 4.6 12.0 8.0 4.9 3.3 5.0 3.9 1.8 0.0 0.8 0.9 1.8 2.6 1.3 4.6 9.8 2.6 2.8 14.1 4.3 4.7 2.2 2.1 1.7 3.3 1.1

4.7 1.9 2.6 1.9 7.5 8.2 0.7 4.9 5.3 0.9 0.2 11.0 0.6 4.4 0.0 0.0 6.9 1.1 0.2 7.0 0.7 1.0 9.2 0.3 3.8 0.6 3.2 1.6 1.3 21.6 5.3 2.1 3.3 7.4 0.6 0.7 8.6 2.5 3.3 0.5 3.9 4.2 2.6 2.4 5.0 3.7 0.7 0.6 9.7 3.1 3.0 3.3 0.5 1.0 5.6

27 608 6

24 821 6

2.6 3.4

3.7 25.8

227

TABLE 34: Livestock production - milk, eggs and poultry

Production milk thousand tonnes 2009 WORLD DEVELOPING REGIONS AFRICA North Africa Algeria Egypt Libya Morocco Tunisia Sub-Saharan Africa Angola Benin Botswana Burkina Faso Burundi Cameroon Cape Verde Central African Republic Chad Comoros Congo Cte dIvoire Congo, Dem. Rep. Djibouti Equatorial Guinea Eritrea Ethiopia Gabon Gambia Ghana Guinea Guinea-Bissau Kenya Lesotho Liberia Madagascar Malawi Mali Mauritania Mauritius Mozambique Namibia Niger Nigeria Rwanda Senegal Seychelles Sierra Leone Somalia Sudan South Africa Swaziland Tanzania, Utd. Rep. Togo Uganda Zambia Zimbabwe thousand tonnes 2010 % p.a. growth: 2000-10 thousand tonnes 2009 eggs thousand tonnes 2010 % p.a. growth: 2000-10 thousand tonnes 2009 poultry thousand tonnes 2010 % p.a. growth: 2000-10

701 966 360 304 38 859 11 072 2 243 5 624 228 1 889 1 082 27 786 158 38 116 253 44 236 22 72 266 5 1 31 7 15 123 1 691 2 9 38 128 23 4 258 34 1 555 40 914 405 4 75 110 958 472 177 162 0 21 2 319 7 480 3 104 42 1 710 10 1 155 87 389

720 980 376 424 42 237 11 364 2 304 5 742 223 2 002 1 093 30 873 184 40 118 265 44 242 23 75 272 5 1 32 8 16 151 2 121 2 9 39 131 23 5 333 34 1 703 51 948 392 4 76 115 1 002 496 216 165 0 21 2 939 7 728 3 233 42 1 758 10 1 190 88 493

2.2 4.3 4.3 4.0 4.3 4.3 0.9 4.8 1.7 4.4 0.6 3.0 0.4 4.4 4.8 2.5 9.2 1.7 2.2 1.3 2.4 1.9 4.8 1.3

67 980 48 968 2 602 869 185 333 62 200 88 1 734 4 13 4 51 3 15 2 2 4 1 2 30 9 0

68 897 49 618 2 676 908 189 336 62 230 91 1 768 4 14 4 52 3 15 2 2 4 1 2 32 9 0 2 35 2 1 37 23 1 81 2 5 21 20 14 5 10 14 4 8 623 3 30 1 9 2 56 453 1 39 9 23 50 30

2.2 2.8 3.4 3.3 6.5 6.6 0.4 0.2 1.0 3.4 0.5 7.4 3.5 2.8 0.0 1.7 1.2 3.0 0.8 0.4 3.2 0.3 2.6 4.7 1.2 2.1 0.8 2.0 5.4 6.8 3.1 2.9 1.3 2.2 0.6 0.4 1.6 1.4 2.2 1.6 6.8 0.6 4.5 2.8 5.3 6.9 1.2 0.4 2.2 3.6 1.0 1.1 4.0 1.3 2.4 3.0

94 203 55 354 4 422 1 856 267 775 125 545 144 2 566 8 18 6 35 7 64 1 6 5 1 6 23 11 0 2 51 4 1 48 7 2 25 2 11 71 21 41 4 44 24 15 11 256 2 43 1 12 4 29 1 394 5 50 26 46 40 62

97 942 58 026 4 638 1 957 267 789 129 618 153 2 681 8 18 7 35 7 68 1 6 5 1 6 24 11 0 2 53 4 1 49 8 2 27 2 11 71 22 41 4 46 24 16 12 256 2 49 1 12 4 29 1 478 5 50 28 49 42 62

3.6 4.6 4.5 3.7 0.9 2.5 2.7 8.1 2.8 5.1 0.5 3.9 2.6 3.0 1.9 12.4 4.3 5.9 1.1 0.5 0.8 0.8 0.6 0.7 1.4 3.5 0.0 2.3 9.6 6.8 3.2 7.4 2.4 5.4 1.0 3.5 3.4 0.9 8.2 2.6 4.6 0.5 4.8 5.4 7.8 3.9 1.2 1.2 1.0 6.1 4.6 1.5 9.0 1.0 2.0 9.3

7.9 6.7 0.3 2.0 1.4 5.1 2.8 8.3 0.8 0.4 2.8 3.9 6.9 1.9 2.6 0.8 2.6 5.5 2.5 5.9 3.3 4.9 7.6 3.4 2.9 2.4 1.2 8.1 3.0 8.8 1.7 0.3

2 31 2 1 37 23 1 81 2 5 21 20 14 6 10 14 4 8 613 3 27 1 9 2 55 450 1 39 9 23 45 30

228

TABLE 34: Livestock production - milk, eggs and poultry (continued)

Production milk thousand tonnes 2009 ASIA Central Asia Kazakhstan Kyrgyzstan Tajikistan Turkmenistan Uzbekistan East Asia Brunei Darussalam Cambodia China Indonesia Korea, DPR Korea, Republic of Lao, PDR Malaysia Mongolia Myanmar Philippines Singapore Thailand Viet Nam South Asia Afghanistan Bangladesh Bhutan India Iran (Islamic Rep.) Maldives Nepal Pakistan Sri Lanka West Asia Armenia Azerbaijan Bahrain Cyprus Georgia Iraq Jordan Kuwait Lebanon Occupied Palestinian Territory Saudi Arabia Syrian Arab Republic Turkey United Arab Emirates Yemen LATIN AMERICA & THE CARIBBEAN Argentina Bahamas Barbados Belize Bolivia (Plur. State) Brazil Chile Colombia Costa Rica thousand tonnes 2010 % p.a. growth: 2000-10 thousand tonnes 2009 eggs thousand tonnes 2010 % p.a. growth: 2000-10 thousand tonnes 2009 poultry thousand tonnes 2010 % p.a. growth: 2000-10

243 068 15 175 5 306 1 315 630 2 146 5 779 47 028 0 24 40 385 1 278 95 2 226 7 52 444 1 355 9 841 311 159 925 1 718 3 225 46 110 936 7 905 1 531 34 362 202 20 940 616 1 487 9 192 563 288 319 55 302 166 1 535 2 407 12 542 99 405 78 310 10 366 3 7 4 334 30 152 2 360 7 545 912

253 016 15 725 5 386 1 360 661 2 150 6 169 47 654 0 27 41 137 1 316 95 2 107 7 53 306 1 402 10 851 341 167 160 1 818 3 398 51 117 000 7 602 1 584 35 491 215 22 476 601 1 529 10 195 543 298 323 57 309 168 1 921 2 392 13 606 106 417 81 101 10 502 3 8 4 347 31 816 2 540 7 500 951

4.7 4.9 3.7 2.1 7.9 8.1 5.5 10.7 2.6 2.8 12.8 5.3 0.6 0.7 1.6 3.7 3.4 8.5 0.5 5.0 13.6 3.7 0.9 4.7 2.2 3.9 2.6 3.1 3.3 3.1 3.3 2.9 4.0 6.7 0.1 1.3 7.6 4.7 4.9 4.0 2.3 7.3 3.6 3.3 2.5 5.4 3.2 0.4 6.1 0.4 10.8 2.5 4.5 2.4 2.0 2.8

39 408 419 185 21 11 50 153 32 431 7 20 27 773 1 306 158 594 15 524 0 287 442 22 970 309 4 919 17 220 0 3 324 725 32 536 65 1 639 35 73 3 10 24 35 46 23 46 40 191 162 865 26 59 6 940 507 1 2 2 69 2 037 137 581 52

39 929 468 208 21 13 51 175 32 840 7 22 28 001 1 378 160 602 16 554 0 302 465 22 980 326 5 092 17 256 0 3 414 741 33 566 65 1 528 39 71 3 10 25 36 47 22 47 40 193 166 740 26 61 6 993 505 1 2 2 68 2 087 146 510 54

2.7 8.9 8.2 6.0 24.0 9.1 9.5 2.5 4.1 4.1 2.3 5.8 3.8 1.9 4.5 3.3 2.5 9.5 1.1 2.5 2.0 5.8 4.6 1.4 3.7 2.4 5.3 2.5 3.4 4.9 2.1 1.1 6.2 8.8 1.2 0.7 2.1 1.8 0.2 0.6 0.8 0.9 4.2 2.7 0.9 6.0 6.9 3.2 4.4 4.6 6.7 2.0 5.8 2.9 2.9 4.7 2.7

30 937 132 79 4 4 20 25 23 383 19 27 16 415 1 435 43 553 22 1 310 0 884 744 91 1 232 608 4 659 21 181 0 2 064 1 622 17 655 99 2 763 5 67 6 29 12 49 141 43 136 47 571 189 1 308 36 140 19 974 1 546 7 14 13 167 10 376 604 1 020 111

32 528 157 103 4 1 22 27 24 385 19 28 16 999 1 678 43 571 22 1 412 0 912 773 94 1 301 531 5 033 21 187 0 2 338 1 662 17 710 99 2 954 5 64 6 29 12 50 155 46 140 49 576 200 1 459 36 144 20 835 1 642 7 15 13 169 11 140 594 1 000 105

4.4 10.1 12.0 1.2 26.6 13.7 5.4 3.6 4.9 0.6 3.0 7.5 3.4 3.2 6.1 7.1 19.0 13.9 3.4 0.3 1.3 3.8 8.4 4.7 5.2 0.0 10.0 7.4 2.6 7.9 4.6 5.1 16.2 14.1 0.8 1.5 1.6 3.8 2.7 3.3 2.9 3.4 1.8 5.8 8.2 2.8 8.0 5.2 5.1 0.0 3.1 4.2 2.3 6.2 3.0 7.1 3.7

229

TABLE 34: Livestock production - milk, eggs and poultry (continued)

Production milk thousand tonnes 2009 Cuba Dominica Dominican Republic Ecuador El Salvador French Guiana Grenada Guatemala Guyana Haiti Honduras Jamaica Mexico Netherlands Antilles Nicaragua Panama Paraguay Peru St. Kitts & Nevis St. Lucia St. Vincent & Grenadines Suriname Trinidad & Tobago Uruguay Venezuela (Boliv. Rep. of) OCEANIA Fiji French Polynesia New Caledonia Papua New Guinea Samoa Solomon Islands Tonga Vanuatu DEVELOPED REGIONS NORTH AMERICA Bermuda Canada United States of America ASIA & OCEANIA Australia Israel Japan New Zealand EUROPE Albania Belarus Bosnia & Herzegovina Croatia European Union Iceland Macedonia, FYR Montenegro Norway Republic of Moldova Russian Federation Serbia Switzerland Ukraine thousand tonnes 2010 % p.a. growth: 2000-10 thousand tonnes 2009 eggs thousand tonnes 2010 % p.a. growth: 2000-10 thousand tonnes 2009 poultry thousand tonnes 2010 % p.a. growth: 2000-10

603 8 650 5 239 542 0 1 343 41 88 704 216 10 714 0 748 193 380 1 677 1 1 6 11 1 872 2 200 67 59 1 0 0 2 2 0 3 341 469 94 095 1 8 213 85 880 34 282 9 388 1 317 7 909 15 667 213 092 1 045 6 577 816 838 151 365 126 396 152 1 576 575 32 565 1 535 4 094 11 610

633 8 701 5 719 557 0 1 357 43 92 739 159 10 838 0 753 201 396 1 703 1 1 6 12 1 821 2 294 70 61 1 0 0 2 1 0 3 344 361 95 706 1 8 243 87 461 35 086 9 023 1 332 7 720 17 010 213 570 1 070 6 628 734 780 152 666 123 399 179 1 583 581 32 136 1 517 4 106 11 249

0.3 1.9 5.2 11.0 3.7 2.5 2.7 3.2 3.5 3.4 2.6 1.3 1.4 1.2 3.0 1.7 1.9 4.6 4.1 0.2 2.1 1.3 2.5 5.0 0.7 0.9 0.3 10.3 2.1 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.4 1.3 0.6 0.1 1.4 0.7 1.8 0.9 1.0 3.3 0.1 1.2 4.0 2.8 2.4 0.2 1.7 4.4 1.0 0.1 0.0 0.5 1.2

107 0 92 94 64 1 1 89 1 5 47 7 2 360 1 23 24 129 269 0 1 1 2 4 52 160 17 3 3 3 5 0 0 0 0 19 002 5 772 0 422 5 349 2 826 159 101 2 508 58 10 405 30 192 24 48 6 764 3 15 3 59 36 2 210 51 42 938

107 0 106 93 65 1 1 97 1 6 44 6 2 381 1 24 31 129 285 0 1 1 2 4 52 160 20 6 3 3 5 0 0 0 0 19 269 5 841 0 429 5 412 2 855 174 102 2 515 64 10 573 31 198 21 42 6 769 3 19 4 60 40 2 274 61 43 1 018

3.5 2.3 6.1 2.6 0.5 2.9 5.0 1.9 4.5 1.9 0.7 0.3 2.9 3.9 2.2 9.6 6.5 5.8 1.4 7.4 3.5 2.6 2.5 3.6 0.9 3.7 6.0 7.6 7.0 0.0 5.0 0.9 1.1 4.0 0.8 0.8 1.5 1.4 0.8 0.2 2.0 1.5 0.1 3.4 1.0 4.1 0.7 1.3 1.0 0.2 0.6 3.0 2.5 2.3 1.8 1.8 7.3

33 0 315 331 98 1 1 166 23 8 145 105 2 678 0 90 119 38 964 0 2 0 10 60 74 800 22 12 1 1 6 1 0 0 0 38 820 20 164 0 1 211 18 953 2 937 872 534 1 394 137 15 719 17 220 33 38 11 906 7 3 5 84 35 2 360 80 65 894

34 0 315 187 105 1 1 167 23 8 152 102 2 722 0 102 126 39 1 020 0 2 0 12 57 70 848 25 15 1 1 6 1 0 0 0 39 887 20 800 0 1 216 19 584 3 014 923 546 1 401 145 16 073 17 260 38 29 11 931 7 3 6 83 41 2 580 84 69 953

7.5 0.0 4.1 0.4 3.2 2.8 0.1 1.8 6.9 0.1 7.3 2.9 3.8 0.0 8.0 4.5 1.3 6.5 1.6 10.0 0.8 11.3 3.9 2.1 2.0 3.6 5.9 0.7 2.0 0.8 4.2 1.2 1.4 0.8 2.3 1.8 1.0 1.3 1.8 2.5 3.7 2.8 1.6 3.1 3.1 15.6 13.1 19.2 1.2 1.2 8.5 4.1 6.8 9.7 12.8 3.4 17.3

230

TABLE 35: Livestock production - pig meat, beef and buffalo meat, and sheep and goat meat
Production pig meat thousand tonnes 2009 WORLD DEVELOPING REGIONS AFRICA North Africa Algeria Egypt Libya Morocco Tunisia Sub-Saharan Africa Angola Benin Botswana Burkina Faso Burundi Cameroon Cape Verde Central African Republic Chad Comoros Congo Cte dIvoire Congo, Dem. Rep. Djibouti Equatorial Guinea Eritrea Ethiopia Gabon Gambia Ghana Guinea Guinea-Bissau Kenya Lesotho Liberia Madagascar Malawi Mali Mauritania Mauritius Mozambique Namibia Niger Nigeria Rwanda Senegal Seychelles Sierra Leone Somalia Sudan South Africa Swaziland Tanzania, Utd. Rep. Togo Uganda Zambia Zimbabwe thousand tonnes 2010 % p.a. growth: 2000-10 thousand tonnes 2009 beef and buffalo meat thousand tonnes 2010 % p.a. growth: 2000-10 thousand tonnes 2009 sheep and goat meat thousand tonnes 2010 % p.a. growth: 2000-10

106 405 66 251 1 189 1 0 1 1 0 1 188 28 4 0 31 12 31 8 14 1 2 7 24 0 2 3 1 18 2 13 18 4 8 55 45 3 1 94 4 1 226 7 11 0 2 0 313 2 14 9 111 15 31

109 258 68 428 1 232 2 0 0 1 0 1 231 32 5 0 28 12 38 8 16 1 2 7 26 0 2 3 1 18 2 13 15 4 9 55 45 3 1 97 4 1 226 8 11 0 2 0 338 2 14 9 113 16 31

2.0 2.7 4.8 9.3 0.0 16.7 2.1 1.6 4.9 1.1 2.1 6.5 3.3 11.2 8.9 2.5 2.9 2.7 2.9 1.4 0.0 0.5 0.7 0.3 6.9 4.9 0.6 1.9 2.9 4.2 7.4 10.1 7.7 3.1 1.1 2.3 9.6 0.3 3.7 8.7 2.1 11.9 0.9 0.4 12.5 4.2 1.1 4.5 3.9 5.0 3.6

65 042 37 600 6 682 1 119 127 742 9 190 52 5 563 104 28 36 110 15 110 1 82 91 1 6 34 12 6 0 23 390 1 4 26 52 6 483 10 1 150 30 136 26 2 19 36 220 298 35 82 0 9 66 1 442 768 15 290 9 129 60 104

65 716 37 986 6 922 1 128 132 743 9 192 52 5 794 106 29 37 134 16 124 1 85 95 1 6 35 12 6 0 22 373 1 4 26 55 6 462 10 1 150 34 144 26 2 19 36 240 304 36 84 0 9 66 1 505 884 16 292 9 130 61 100

1.1 2.2 4.8 2.5 0.0 3.2 1.1 3.2 1.4 5.3 1.2 4.8 2.5 4.7 6.2 2.9 6.7 2.4 2.5 2.1 14.3 0.5 0.8 0.0 0.4 3.0 2.4 0.1 1.8 0.7 5.6 3.5 6.1 0.3 1.0 0.2 7.0 9.8 2.3 2.9 4.6 5.4 7.4 0.8 7.8 6.2 11.8 4.2 0.7 17.7 3.5 1.0 2.4 2.6 3.0 1.4 0.2

13 607 11 036 2 683 515 192 66 42 156 59 2 168 13 8 7 50 7 30 1 19 40 0 1 12 21 5 0 10 150 1 2 31 15 2 87 6 2 12 22 89 38 0 23 16 103 433 9 33 0 3 90 484 176 2 44 8 41 9 13

13 674 11 218 2 763 528 194 68 43 162 59 2 236 13 8 7 52 7 37 1 20 40 0 1 12 21 5 0 10 153 1 2 31 15 2 88 6 2 12 22 93 44 0 24 16 109 440 9 34 0 3 90 509 175 2 45 8 41 9 13

1.8 2.8 3.3 0.7 1.0 0.9 3.7 1.0 0.6 4.1 1.5 2.3 0.3 3.0 6.5 1.4 7.3 6.0 2.7 0.8 3.0 1.5 0.6 0.0 0.4 1.2 9.5 0.4 9.0 4.7 6.9 3.9 4.3 0.2 3.5 5.2 11.4 6.1 2.5 6.0 0.4 1.0 5.5 2.7 10.3 3.7 0.2 10.8 2.9 6.9 1.3 3.6 1.2 1.7 3.2 6.1 0.4

231

TABLE 35: Livestock production - pig meat, beef and buffalo meat, and sheep and goat meat (continued)
Production pig meat thousand tonnes 2009 ASIA Central Asia Kazakhstan Kyrgyzstan Tajikistan Turkmenistan Uzbekistan East Asia Brunei Darussalam Cambodia China Indonesia Korea, DPR Korea, Republic of Lao, PDR Malaysia Mongolia Myanmar Philippines Singapore Thailand Viet Nam South Asia Afghanistan Bangladesh Bhutan India Iran (Islamic Rep.) Maldives Nepal Pakistan Sri Lanka West Asia Armenia Azerbaijan Bahrain Cyprus Georgia Iraq Jordan Kuwait Lebanon Occupied Palestinian Territory Saudi Arabia Syrian Arab Republic Turkey United Arab Emirates Yemen LATIN AMERICA & THE CARIBBEAN Argentina Bahamas Barbados Belize Bolivia (Plur. State) Brazil Chile Colombia Costa Rica thousand tonnes 2010 % p.a. growth: 2000-10 thousand tonnes 2009 beef and buffalo meat thousand tonnes 2010 % p.a. growth: 2000-10 thousand tonnes 2009 sheep and goat meat thousand tonnes 2010 % p.a. growth: 2000-10

58 615 249 209 17 3 0 20 57 977 0 105 49 874 637 110 1 062 65 206 0 450 1 596 17 809 3 036 370

60 591 245 206 16 3 0 21 59 970 0 100 51 720 637 110 1 097 73 234 0 459 1 613 19 862 3 036 352

2.6 3.6 4.4 4.2 5.0 3.8 2.7 0.7 0.5 2.4 4.4 2.4 1.8 10.2 3.9 8.4 14.1 2.9 1.1 2.2 8.0 3.1

15 378 1 281 396 97 26 140 623 8 344 1 75 6 370 443 22 283 44 27 59 183 283 0 211 342 4 928 135 194

15 815 1 348 407 99 29 148 665 8 595 1 73 6 546 461 22 308 44 29 48 184 294 0 223 363 5 025 134 195 5 2 549 411 212 1 490 28 847 49 114 1 4 27 51 14 3 47 5 30 66 323 6 108 15 228 2 630 0 0 2 247 6 977 211 930 97

2.5 4.3 2.9 0.2 6.8 7.5 5.5 2.3 13.9 0.6 2.4 1.8 0.8 0.1 2.8 5.0 8.3 7.1 1.2 3.1 1.0 7.0 2.5 0.6 1.0 0.3 1.3 3.9 2.3 5.3 1.3 1.1 4.7 7.5 0.8 0.1 5.7 0.6 8.0 4.0 2.0 9.0 3.3 3.4 1.1 9.7 7.6 1.0 0.3 0.2 12.6 3.5 4.5 0.6 0.7 2.2 1.7

7 911 452 135 49 37 138 93 4 309 0 3 897 128 16 2 1 2 169 29 55 0 2 9 2 193 137 229 0 853 496 51 424 1 957 7 67 13 5 4 62 16 31 12 16 79 198 299 44 62 442 55 0 0 0 27 110 16 15 0

8 011 468 143 46 39 139 100 4 318 0 3 943 131 16 2 1 2 126 30 55 0 2 9 2 244 137 246 0 876 498 53 433 1 981 7 74 13 5 5 62 16 31 12 16 82 207 296 44 69 443 55 0 0 0 27 111 16 15 0

2.7 4.5 4.2 0.8 11.8 7.0 2.3 3.9 7.9 3.9 5.3 3.3 5.9 10.1 8.3 0.5 10.1 5.0 2.5 7.4 6.2 1.5 2.1 6.5 0.9 2.4 1.3 2.8 0.8 3.1 0.6 1.2 7.8 7.0 7.5 5.7 7.2 2.0 1.1 3.8 3.3 1.7 0.9 2.3 1.3 4.0 0.6 0.6 1.7 4.8 6.0 2.3 0.9 0.1 0.9 0.8

1 350 0 17 2 19 9 1 58 8

1 332 0 17 2 23 9 1 57 13

2.9 3.3

5 2 518 406

1.5 0.5 7.2 0.2 2.5 0.9 10.0

207 1 436 27 824 50 103 1 4 29 49 13 3

9.0

47 5 29 63

36.3

326 6 97

6 357 289 0 3 1 117 2 930 514 179 54

6 514 281 0 3 1 118 3 078 498 180 54

2.4 2.8 0.6 3.1 3.6 4.4 1.7 6.7 5.5 5.7

15 519 3 378 0 0 2 255 6 662 210 936 93

232

TABLE 35: Livestock production - pig meat, beef and buffalo meat, and sheep and goat meat (continued)
Production pig meat thousand tonnes 2009 Cuba Dominica Dominican Republic Ecuador El Salvador French Guiana Grenada Guatemala Guyana Haiti Honduras Jamaica Mexico Netherlands Antilles Nicaragua Panama Paraguay Peru St. Kitts & Nevis St. Lucia St. Vincent & Grenadines Suriname Trinidad & Tobago Uruguay Venezuela (Boliv. Rep. of) OCEANIA Fiji French Polynesia New Caledonia Papua New Guinea Samoa Solomon Islands Tonga Vanuatu DEVELOPED REGIONS NORTH AMERICA Bermuda Canada United States of America ASIA & OCEANIA Australia Israel Japan New Zealand EUROPE Albania Belarus Bosnia & Herzegovina Croatia European Union Iceland Macedonia, FYR Montenegro Norway Republic of Moldova Russian Federation Serbia Switzerland Ukraine thousand tonnes 2010 % p.a. growth: 2000-10 thousand tonnes 2009 beef and buffalo meat thousand tonnes 2010 % p.a. growth: 2000-10 thousand tonnes 2009 sheep and goat meat thousand tonnes 2010 % p.a. growth: 2000-10

179 0 82 180 8 0 0 55 1 33 14 9 1 162 0 7 31 187 115 0 1 1 2 3 17 165 91 4 1 2 68 4 2 2 4 40 096 12 385 0 1 943 10 442 1 697 321 20 1 310 47 26 013 12 388 10 131 22 161 6 8 2 124 42 2 169 252 238 526

172 0 87 185 8 0 0 56 1 35 10 8 1 175 0 8 30 200 116 0 1 1 2 3 18 169 91 4 1 2 68 5 2 2 4 40 773 12 112 0 1 926 10 186 1 693 336 19 1 291 47 26 968 12 398 13 121 22 821 6 8 2 129 57 2 308 269 249 631

6.2 0.0 3.6 5.0 2.5 9.9 2.9 6.3 10.0 2.3 0.1 1.9 1.3 1.6 2.7 3.2 2.4 2.4 13.8 3.2 0.2 5.1 5.9 3.4 3.0 1.6 0.4 0.1 4.8 1.6 3.0 1.0 0.7 2.5 0.9 1.7 3.4 1.6 1.7 0.1 0.8 2.4 0.3 0.1 0.6 4.8 2.8 7.8 6.6 0.5 2.6 1.5 2.0 1.4 3.9 1.0 0.7

65 1 102 245 31 0 0 75 2 44 56 5 1 705 0 108 75 315 165 0 0 0 2 1 491 480 20 8 0 3 3 1 1 0 3 27 439 13 143 0 1 252 11 891 3 382 2 124 104 517 637 10 914 39 308 23 37 7 963 4 7 5 85 11 1 741 100 142 454

64 1 100 238 33 0 0 75 2 45 59 5 1 745 0 121 79 385 172 0 0 0 2 1 524 466 20 8 0 3 3 1 1 0 2 27 725 13 319 0 1 272 12 047 3 365 2 108 108 513 635 11 041 41 309 23 38 8 147 4 7 6 84 10 1 711 96 143 428

1.8 0.0 3.8 3.4 0.5 2.4 0.2 2.0 0.5 1.1 0.6 9.3 2.2 2.3 8.7 1.3 5.2 2.8 2.5 2.3 0.9 0.4 0.6 1.5 0.8 0.7 0.5 1.9 1.4 1.7 1.0 1.9 0.3 4.0 0.3 0.2 1.5 0.1 0.2 0.7 0.6 5.4 0.3 1.1 0.6 1.3 3.8 3.7 3.0 0.3 0.7 1.2 0.8 5.5 1.0 1.1 5.5

12 0 1 10 0 0 0 2 1 7 0 1 97 0 0 4 40 0 0 0 0 0 33 8 1 0 0 0 0

12 0 1 10 0 0 0 2 1 6 0 1 99 0 0 4 40 0 0 0 0 0 32 9 0 0 0 0 0

4.1 0.1 0.4 0.6 0.8 19.9 2.7 0.5 0.5 1.3 1.4 5.4 3.2 0.7 1.7 2.4 0.5 16.9 0.4 0.8 2.6 1.3 4.7 0.8 8.6 12.5 0.0 2.8 1.3

0 0 2 565 97 0 16 80 1 150 660 10 0 480 1 318 22 1 2 3 1 024 9 5 0 24 2 183 24 6 18

0 0 2 452 92 0 16 76 1 063 581 10 0 472 1 296 21 1 2 2 994 9 5 1 25 2 188 23 6 21

0.6 0.7 1.6 2.5 0.7 2.3 3.2 1.5 1.7 2.6 3.7 1.2 1.7 0.8 6.0 3.2 0.6 2.6 0.6 1.1 0.5 4.1 3.0 0.1 2.1

233

TABLE 36: Fish production

Fish production capture total thousand tonnes 2008 WORLD DEVELOPING REGIONS AFRICA North Africa Algeria Egypt Libya Morocco Tunisia Sub-Saharan Africa Angola Benin Botswana Burkina Faso Burundi Cameroon Cape Verde Central African Republic Chad Comoros Congo Cte dIvoire Congo, Dem. Rep. Djibouti Equatorial Guinea Eritrea Ethiopia Gabon Gambia Ghana Guinea Guinea-Bissau Kenya Lesotho Liberia Madagascar Malawi Mali Mauritania Mauritius Mozambique Namibia Niger Nigeria Rwanda Senegal Seychelles Sierra Leone Somalia Sudan South Africa Swaziland Tanzania, Utd. Rep. Togo Uganda Zambia Zimbabwe inland thousand tonnes 2009 marine thousand tonnes 2009 total thousand tonnes 2009 total % p.a. growth: 2000-09 total thousand tonnes 2008 inland thousand tonnes 2009 aquaculture marine thousand tonnes 2009 total thousand tonnes 2009 total % p.a. growth: 2000-09

89 585 66 038 7 337 1 652 139 374 48 993 98 5 686 306 37 0 11 18 138 24 15 40 30 54 58 236 1 5 2 17 30 43 360 87 7 135 0 8 120 70 100 195 7 120 373 30 601 9 449 69 204 30 69 645 0 350 24 450 79 10

10 324 9 847 2 424 245 238 6 1 2 179 6 30 0 12 18 74 15 40

78 593 55 882 4 774 1 569 128 136 52 1 156 97 3 204 266 9

88 917 65 729 7 197 1 814 128 374 52 1 162 98 5 383 272 39 0 12 18

0.6 0.1 0.7 1.8 1.4 0.3 0.5 2.8 0.3 0.3 1.4 2.1 7.0 3.7 0.2 2.3 5.3 0.0 7.8 5.0 3.2 5.6 0.5 3.2 8.7 14.7 0.9 5.0 5.2 3.7 0.7 0.8 4.7 3.9 4.0 1.0 3.7 1.0 5.1 2.5 5.6 5.1 7.0 3.4 3.4 0.6 10.6 11.6 2.4 3.4 2.5 0.0 0.2 2.2 6.9 2.7 2.4

52 925 49 038 943 702 3 694 0 1 3 242 0 0 0 0 0

38 065 37 227 984 710 2 706 0 1 1 274 0 0 0 0 0

17 612 14 357 6 4 0 0 0 3 2

55 677 51 584 990 714 2 706 0 1 4 276 0 0 0 0 0

6.2 6.7 10.6 8.4 22.4 8.4 10.2 2.7 11.7 19.4 51.5

51.1 8.0 26.0

64 17

138 17 15 40

20 28 3 230 1 17 10 4 89 4 0 133 0 1 33 69 100 15 10 3 30 286 9 59 14 0 66 1 0 269 5 400 85 10 71 22 400 81 186 30 6 510 312 164 8 58 367 7 98 20 41 233 82 7 6 33 45 6 1 7 3

20 61 48 236 1 8 3 17 30 46 322 86 7 139 0 8 131 69 100 179 8 68 369 30 598 9 459 81 200 30 72 511 0 340 27 400 85 10

0 1 3 0 0 0 6 0 4 0 0 11 2 1 0 1 0 0 143 0 0 0 0 2 4 0 0 52 6 3

0 1 3 0 0 0 7 0 5 0 0 6 2 1 0 0 0 0 153 0 0 0 0 2 3 0 0 0 77 9 3 1 0 0 0 1 0

0 1 3 0 0 0 7 0 5 0 0 6 2 1 0 0 1 0 153 0 0 0 0 2 3 0 0 0 77 9 3

1.2 0.8 4.1

5.8 15.4 4.1

28.5 33.5 3.5 2.0 13.2 43.9 19.7 30.1 18.7 21.9 4.1 7.5 3.8 3.2 9.2 2.3 0.6 0.4 20.5 65.6 8.0 2.4

234

TABLE 36: Fish production (continued)

Fish production capture total thousand tonnes 2008 ASIA Central Asia Kazakhstan Kyrgyzstan Tajikistan Turkmenistan Uzbekistan East Asia Brunei Darussalam Cambodia China Indonesia Korea, DPR Korea, Republic of Lao, PDR Malaysia Mongolia Myanmar Philippines Singapore Thailand Viet Nam South Asia Afghanistan Bangladesh Bhutan India Iran (Islamic Rep.) Maldives Nepal Pakistan Sri Lanka West Asia Armenia Azerbaijan Bahrain Cyprus Georgia Iraq Jordan Kuwait Lebanon Occupied Palestinian Territory Saudi Arabia Syrian Arab Republic Turkey United Arab Emirates Yemen LATIN AMERICA & THE CARIBBEAN Argentina Bahamas Barbados Belize Bolivia (Plur. State) Brazil Chile Colombia Costa Rica inland thousand tonnes 2009 marine thousand tonnes 2009 total thousand tonnes 2009 total % p.a. growth: 2000-09 total thousand tonnes 2008 inland thousand tonnes 2009 aquaculture marine thousand tonnes 2009 total thousand tonnes 2009 total % p.a. growth: 2000-09

42 109 74 56 0 0 15 3 34 007 2 431 15 967 5 002 205 1 950 29 1 399 0 2 494 2 561 2 1 873 2 088 7 000 1 1 558 0 4 099 408 133 22 451 327 1 029 1 2 14 2 27 34 0 4 4 3 69 7 494 74 127 15 994 995 9 4 34 7 792 3 555 114 22

6 922 55 34 0 0 15 6 4 411 390 2 184 310 5 12 30 4 0 899 186 246 145 2 388 1 1 219 0 916 72 22 112 47 67 1 1

35 738

42 660 55 34 0 0 15 6

1.2 0.5 0.9 16.7 7.2 2.3 6.9 1.0 0.6 5.6 0.0 2.5 0.4 0.2 0.3 0.9 15.8 10.9 3.6 9.8 5.9 3.7 2.0 0.0 6.8 4.0 1.1 1.0 0.2 2.8 1.3 1.3 0.3 6.5 26.3 3.8 35.0 34.1 5.8 0.4 5.1 0.4 5.8 3.8 0.1 0.9 3.3 1.1 2.9 0.8 2.3 1.1 23.1 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.7 5.3

46 245 4 0 0 0 0 3 40 849 0 40 33 060 1 690 64 474 64 243 675 741 4 1 331 2 462 5 181 1 006 0 3 851 155 27 135 7 211 5 0 0 3 0 19 1 0 1 0 22 9 152 1 1 848 3

35 480 4 0 0 0 0 3 30 279 0 48 23 384 1 721 4 18 75 222 746 617 0 1 059 2 384 5 060 1 064 0 3 644 180 27 138 8 136 5 0

13 224

48 704 4 0 0 0 0 3

6.5 5.2 10.4 9.7 12.8 14.9 5.4 6.4 16.1 14.8 5.4 9.1 0.4 5.5 6.6 9.1 25.8 7.2 3.9 7.3 19.9 7.7 5.5 4.9 7.7 18.0 6.6 30.6 6.1 9.6 21.7 3.6 18.1 6.6 10.4 30.2 2.8 0.5 8.1

29 852 2 75 13 666 4 789 200 1 845 1 391 1 868 2 416 2 1 496 2 098 4 948 603 3 137 348 117 434 309 937

34 263 2 465 15 850 5 099 205 1 857 30 1 396 0 2 767 2 602 2 1 742 2 243 7 336 1 1 822 0 4 053 420 117 22 546 356 1 005 1 1

12 993 0 2 11 687 13 60 455 111 32 120 3 337 172 148

43 272 0 50 35 071 1 733 64 473 75 333 778 737 4 1 396 2 556 5 208 1 064 0

148

3 792 180 27

0 0 84

138 8 220 5 0

16 0 0 22 0 0 1 25 12 0 4 4 2 69 4 39 3 425 78 127 486 16 14 784 844 9 3 5 8 239 23 1 586 3 454 84 21

16 1 25 35 1 4 4 2 69 7 464 78 127 15 270 860 9 3 5 8 825 3 454 107 22

0 0 0 19 0 0 1 0 25 9 76 83 1 0 3

0 3 0 19 0 0 1 0 26 9 159

17.7 2.8 8.1

763 2 0

1 125 0

1 887 3 0

9.4 4.3 0.0 11.5 7.5 10.3 8.2 3.7 10.9

10 1 365 843 68 27

9 1 403 29 67 25

0 13 764 18 0

10 1 416 793 85 25

235

TABLE 36: Fish production (continued)

Fish production capture total thousand tonnes 2008 Cuba Dominica Dominican Republic Ecuador El Salvador French Guiana Grenada Guatemala Guyana Haiti Honduras Jamaica Mexico Netherlands Antilles Nicaragua Panama Paraguay Peru St. Kitts & Nevis St. Lucia St. Vincent & Grenadines Suriname Trinidad & Tobago Uruguay Venezuela (Boliv. Rep. of) OCEANIA Fiji French Polynesia New Caledonia Papua New Guinea Samoa Solomon Islands Tonga Vanuatu DEVELOPED REGIONS NORTH AMERICA Bermuda Canada United States of America ASIA & OCEANIA Australia Israel Japan New Zealand EUROPE Albania Belarus Bosnia & Herzegovina Croatia European Union Iceland Macedonia, FYR Montenegro Norway Republic of Moldova Russian Federation Serbia Switzerland Ukraine inland thousand tonnes 2009 marine thousand tonnes 2009 total thousand tonnes 2009 total % p.a. growth: 2000-09 total thousand tonnes 2008 inland thousand tonnes 2009 aquaculture marine thousand tonnes 2009 total thousand tonnes 2009 total % p.a. growth: 2000-09

31 1 15 470 32 4 2 23 42 8 13 13 1 581 17 30 225 2 7 392 0 2 4 24 14 109 295 597 44 12 4 222 14 26 3 171 23 482 5 526 0 943 4 350 4 961 182 3 4 324 452 12 996 6 1 2 49 5 138 1 284 0 2 2 431 1 3 384 3 2 195

3 0 0 4

26 1 14 478 28 4 3

29 1 14 478 32 4 3 20 44 8 11 13 1 611 19 36 222 2 6 914 0 2 4 26 14 81 296 603 40 12 4 230 13 28 2 145 23 127 5 361 0 939 4 222 4 461 173 3 3 847 438 13 305 6 1 2 56 5 192 1 142 0 2 2 524 2 3 826 4 2

9.1 4.5 2.9 2.3 14.1 1.7 4.9 7.2 1.3 3.3 4.9 9.9 2.3 0.6 5.3 0.2 26.7 4.7 0.5 0.4 19.4 2.2 0.3 3.6 2.0 6.5 0.3 1.2 0.5 8.5 4.9 4.3 6.7 8.3 2.1 1.0 3.3 0.7 1.2 2.9 1.1 7.1 3.0 2.6 2.2 6.7 5.6 0.0 11.4 2.8 5.9 4.2 0.7 18.7 0.4 0.2 6.5

35 1 172 4 0 19 0 0 47 6 159 16 8 2 43

35 0 39 4 0 17 1 0 29 6 26 19 6 2 28 0

1 1 179

36 1 218 4 0 17 1 0 29 6

1.1 8.2 15.2 36.7 1.4 17.3 1.9 23.8 12.4 3.2 12.6 14.9 15.3 39.8 23.6 13.9 21.0 7.0 7.7 1.1 4.3 20.3 3.1 0.9 22.1

2 1 0 0 0 112 1 2 2 46

18 43 8 11 13 1 499 19 35 220 6 869 0 2 4

131

157 19 6 2

16

44 0 0 0 0 15

0 1 25 16 2 0 14 0

25 14 81 271 587 37 12 4 216 13 28 2 145

0 0 0 19 3 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 3 887 652 152 500 921 59 20 730 112 2 313 2 4 8 12 1 236 5 1 1 848 5 115 8 1 24

0 0 0 15 1 0 0 2 0 0 2

3 0 0 2 0 0

0 839 310 9 301 65 6 18 41 463 1 4 7 5 291 2 2 0 0 5 113 7 1 24 1 3 0 962 0 8 986 3 3 255 324 146 179 910 59 1 746 105 2 021 2

0 4 094 634 154 480 976 65 19 787 105 2 484 2 4 8 13 1 277 5 2 1 962 5 117 7 1 24 1.4 2.8 7.7 18.9 5.2 7.7 1.0 4.0 0.2 1.7 0.9 2.1 0.6 0.9 8.2 0.4 0.3 2.3 2.2 24.3 5.2

477 54 31 22 43 2 0 40 1 380 2 1 2 0 114 0 0 1 1 2 246 4 2 6

22 650 5 307 0 908 4 200 4 418 171 3 3 807 437 12 925 4 0 55 5 078 1 142 2 2 524 3 580

207

213

236

TABLE 37: Volume of total cereal trade

Cereals imports thousand tonnes 1999 WORLD DEVELOPING REGIONS AFRICA North Africa Algeria Egypt Libya Morocco Tunisia Sub-Saharan Africa Angola Benin Botswana Burkina Faso Burundi Cameroon Cape Verde Central African Republic Chad Comoros Congo Cte dIvoire Congo, Dem. Rep. Djibouti Equatorial Guinea Eritrea Ethiopia Gabon Gambia Ghana Guinea Guinea-Bissau Kenya Lesotho Liberia Madagascar Malawi Mali Mauritania Mauritius Mozambique Namibia Niger Nigeria Rwanda Senegal Seychelles Sierra Leone Somalia Sudan South Africa Swaziland Tanzania, Utd. Rep. Togo Uganda Zambia Zimbabwe thousand tonnes 2007 thousand tonnes 2008 thousand tonnes 2009 thousand tonnes 1999 exports thousand tonnes 2007 thousand tonnes 2008 thousand tonnes 2009

264 486 170 409 39 740 25 028 7 846 9 070 1 718 4 379 2 015 14 711 397 127 161 300 15 402 80 36 50 47 207 727 290 169 12 80 704 139 104 288 331 67 753 205 162 167 120 157 370 288 381 255 160 2 418 31 884 13 187 245 726 1 546 94 221 125 145 73 244

314 565 202 309 59 238 29 427 7 287 10 509 2 356 6 150 3 125 29 811 641 236 145 249 89 717 86 30 146 50 130 1 200 649 202 21 211 694 113 163 836 463 47 1 136 257 257 368 123 267 362 295 811 100 294 9 013 117 1 594 20 147 352 1 476 3 379 186 876 151 500 39 558

315 693 202 644 55 159 33 229 9 443 12 324 2 276 6 127 3 059 21 930 734 226 177 205 29 858 103 32 147 47 65 1 090 902 201 30 119 1 424 135 169 825 324 32 1 100 259 262 276 259 252 438 282 610 201 320 1 364 56 1 533 19 214 452 1 664 2 302 182 548 307 439 48 652

314 850 204 006 51 605 22 667 7 910 6 043 2 317 4 415 1 981 28 938 700 271 209 375 67 907 135 42 195 46 40 1 665 479 193 25 127 2 229 133 219 835 413 25 2 711 254 192 221 215 263 556 328 804 119 172 4 035 131 1 348 17 88 516 2 329 2 153 159 950 163 514 70 1 277

265 448 53 579 1 946 507 0 328 0 65 115 1 438 0 0 1 4 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 15 0 0 0 3 0 1 24 0 0 61 2 0 1 6 5 26 0 2 1 6 0 0 0 0 0 322 633 3 40 24 25 12 218

327 144 100 452 3 155 1 464 1 1 250 1 146 65 1 692 1 18 5 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 25 5 0 0 3 0 0 12 2 0 55 0 0 4 410 6 26 21 0 17 16 3 95 0 0 0 119 145 2 324 17 104 238 1

317 720 83 484 2 622 422 23 258 1 95 45 2 201 1 5 2 11 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 38 5 0 0 2 0 0 0 15 0 30 0 0 3 31 4 18 30 3 30 5 8 37 0 0 0 170 1 279 1 136 19 73 238 1

329 234 72 603 3 444 910 6 774 1 100 30 2 534 1 4 7 18 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 127 5 0 0 0 0 1 0 15 0 19 0 0 1 15 4 42 16 3 30 5 0 104 0 0 0 9 1 824 1 71 32 105 71 0

237

TABLE 37: Volume of total cereal trade (continued)

Cereals imports thousand tonnes 1999 ASIA Central Asia Kazakhstan Kyrgyzstan Tajikistan Turkmenistan Uzbekistan East Asia Brunei Darussalam Cambodia China Indonesia Korea, DPR Korea, Republic of Lao, PDR Malaysia Mongolia Myanmar Philippines Singapore Thailand Viet Nam South Asia Afghanistan Bangladesh Bhutan India Iran (Islamic Rep.) Maldives Nepal Pakistan Sri Lanka West Asia Armenia Azerbaijan Bahrain Cyprus Georgia Iraq Jordan Kuwait Lebanon Occupied Palestinian Territory Saudi Arabia Syrian Arab Republic Turkey United Arab Emirates Yemen LATIN AMERICA & THE CARIBBEAN Argentina Bahamas Barbados Belize Bolivia (Plur. State) Brazil Chile Colombia Costa Rica thousand tonnes 2007 thousand tonnes 2008 thousand tonnes 2009 thousand tonnes 1999 exports thousand tonnes 2007 thousand tonnes 2008 thousand tonnes 2009

88 940 1 385 22 153 443 40 727 42 811 64 80 10 158 8 599 1 195 12 804 10 4 151 86 110 3 055 830 922 711 19 851 295 4 859 70 1 611 8 439 35 75 3 243 1 224 24 893 297 732 98 584 885 2 624 1 694 701 828 635 6 726 1 368 2 943 2 005 2 697 40 945 26 24 74 15 346 9 078 2 157 3 094 671

93 503 3 030 87 549 1 016 174 1 205 43 272 42 43 8 407 7 576 1 095 12 224 32 5 703 268 126 3 942 624 1 222 1 904 13 948 1 300 3 558 9 2 689 4 722 44 294 158 1 173 33 253 626 1 523 60 514 927 3 912 2 559 752 825 558 9 987 1 843 3 551 2 098 3 142 48 855 18 22 70 20 445 9 609 3 171 5 091 1 036

98 315 3 478 124 508 1 064 461 1 320 38 752 47 22 7 623 5 829 356 12 177 27 4 403 342 126 4 270 596 1 367 1 503 18 371 2 028 2 287 8 22 10 725 52 134 1 971 1 144 37 713 416 1 580 134 569 625 4 367 2 231 889 856 570 10 966 3 135 5 360 2 610 2 854 48 446 18 21 78 20 461 8 510 2 760 5 181 958

106 116 3 502 182 492 1 001 325 1 501 43 387 43 32 9 877 6 152 455 11 573 58 4 956 306 85 5 311 588 1 685 2 201 21 828 1 172 4 687 8 200 11 196 49 150 3 174 1 192 37 399 446 1 085 143 575 646 4 975 1 756 974 1 056 589 10 199 3 864 4 191 2 723 3 764 45 652 17 14 66 21 498 8 615 2 161 5 113 954

30 864 4 176 4 145 30 0 0 19 508 0 4 7 553 94 0 43 2 146 0 143 0 65 6 948 4 511 3 790 0 0 19 1 912 5 0 58 1 795 1 3 389 0 0 0 1 22 27 16 19 6 9 1 113 2 597 461 5 20 768 18 632 0 5 0 13 61 50 0 22

52 579 8 919 8 901 3 2 14 25 477 0 83 10 194 201 0 14 23 78 0 519 16 166 9 624 4 558 14 360 0 19 0 9 723 117 0 3 4 310 188 3 822 0 14 0 9 51 1 12 2 19 9 39 1 079 1 974 490 18 44 688 27 931 0 6 0 56 11 470 111 9 32

39 888 8 164 8 147 3 2 13 18 620 0 317 1 907 188 0 13 127 61 0 189 20 112 10 939 4 748 9 973 0 9 0 6 499 106 0 5 3 205 149 3 131 0 42 0 21 20 0 21 2 65 13 13 106 1 752 872 98 40 947 28 108 0 6 1 33 7 632 100 5 38

35 436 6 731 6 710 3 5 13 15 449 0 111 1 449 106 0 19 232 53 0 193 16 95 9 752 3 423 8 350 0 5 0 5 090 89 0 54 2 978 135 4 905 0 19 0 7 22 0 49 50 34 9 13 106 3 500 860 142 33 699 17 678 0 4 1 70 8 770 112 3 29

238

TABLE 37: Volume of total cereal trade (continued)

Cereals imports thousand tonnes 1999 Cuba Dominica Dominican Republic Ecuador El Salvador French Guiana Grenada Guatemala Guyana Haiti Honduras Jamaica Mexico Netherlands Antilles Nicaragua Panama Paraguay Peru St. Kitts & Nevis St. Lucia St. Vincent & Grenadines Suriname Trinidad & Tobago Uruguay Venezuela (Boliv. Rep. of) OCEANIA Fiji French Polynesia New Caledonia Papua New Guinea Samoa Solomon Islands Tonga Vanuatu DEVELOPED REGIONS NORTH AMERICA Bermuda Canada United States of America ASIA & OCEANIA Australia Israel Japan New Zealand EUROPE Albania Belarus Bosnia & Herzegovina Croatia European Union Iceland Macedonia, FYR Montenegro Norway Republic of Moldova Russian Federation Serbia Switzerland Ukraine thousand tonnes 2007 thousand tonnes 2008 thousand tonnes 2009 thousand tonnes 1999 exports thousand tonnes 2007 thousand tonnes 2008 thousand tonnes 2009

1 569 6 1 333 744 304 24 690 62 523 408 440 13 593 28 197 342 47 2 472 4 16 45 37 205 79 2 275 784 126 35 35 487 12 36 8 17 87 963 7 032 2 1 395 5 634 31 222 53 3 004 27 813 352 55 239 364 1 686 363 83 45 059 59 116 535 23 7 012 392 94

2 095 7 1 572 1 111 882 28 1 291 56 518 539 510 13 958 24 380 566 32 3 310 3 16 41 27 231 127 2 023 713 169 38 42 355 14 50 7 18 111 742 9 406 2 3 252 6 152 28 883 137 2 754 25 546 446 73 453 468 652 648 180 68 979 88 132 17 535 143 1 104 43 776 192

2 150 7 1 452 929 812 43 1 168 72 564 431 415 14 905 19 365 528 19 3 191 1 12 51 14 271 218 2 779 724 184 43 39 375 11 44 7 6 112 479 10 544 2 3 474 7 068 29 092 202 2 894 25 458 538 72 843 422 525 643 207 68 688 77 184 19 600 133 979 40 762 120

1 989 7 1 401 921 739 9 1 183 84 627 690 395 13 363 21 331 466 11 3 257 2 16 31 21 188 177 2 243 633 127 36 43 333 31 23 6 18 110 269 8 748 2 2 663 6 083 29 516 226 3 324 25 604 361 72 005 395 272 590 60 69 168 75 176 137 393 98 431 26 644 100

0 0 0 106 5 15 48 252 0 2 0 375 4 3 0 175 13 0 0 26 51 9 837 65 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 208 543 111 201 20 045 91 156 22 676 22 061 1 609 5 77 992 1 11 154 100 69 896 0 9 3 343 987 1 6 299

0 0 3 120 14 9 21 180 0 3 4 950 0 26 0 2 464 18 0 0 21 22 35 1 155 18 29 28 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 226 683 122 765 22 784 99 981 17 444 17 066 2 373 3 86 474 2 2 6 457 63 594 0 2 0 0 82 16 938 1 003 1 4 394

0 0 3 25 11 7 33 198 0 5 10 1 608 0 33 0 1 718 53 0 0 20 25 10 1 264 0 26 26 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 234 215 115 714 21 739 93 974 12 743 12 377 40 300 25 105 758 0 16 7 266 73 801 0 4 0 1 239 14 121 805 3 16 518

0 0 2 33 19 0 20 210 0 3 8 1 555 0 23 0 2 872 72 0 0 19 23 20 2 149 0 25 25 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 256 623 100 358 23 256 77 102 21 561 21 210 24 311 15 134 705 0 11 28 701 83 053 0 3 13 0 550 22 315 2 045 6 25 987

239

TABLE 38: Volume of wheat trade

Wheat and our (wheat equiv.) imports thousand tonnes 1999 WORLD DEVELOPING REGIONS AFRICA North Africa Algeria Egypt Libya Morocco Tunisia Sub-Saharan Africa Angola Benin Botswana Burkina Faso Burundi Cameroon Cape Verde Central African Republic Chad Comoros Congo Cte dIvoire Congo, Dem. Rep. Djibouti Equatorial Guinea Eritrea Ethiopia Gabon Gambia Ghana Guinea Guinea-Bissau Kenya Lesotho Liberia Madagascar Malawi Mali Mauritania Mauritius Mozambique Namibia Niger Nigeria Rwanda Senegal Seychelles Sierra Leone Somalia Sudan South Africa Swaziland Tanzania, Utd. Rep. Togo Uganda Zambia Zimbabwe thousand tonnes 2007 thousand tonnes 2008 thousand tonnes 2009 thousand tonnes 1999 exports thousand tonnes 2007 thousand tonnes 2008 thousand tonnes 2009

123 849 82 164 21 995 13 876 4 383 4 342 1 234 2 816 1 101 8 119 281 54 61 80 11 246 17 34 50 5 150 297 221 142 12 74 606 66 37 219 121 5 603 82 72 72 90 72 246 140 197 94 43 1 583 15 238 7 32 143 706 509 51 100 62 78 49 38

141 658 99 431 35 709 17 808 4 863 5 911 1 646 3 690 1 698 17 902 467 43 58 86 9 241 24 25 96 12 90 388 473 138 16 160 602 81 47 385 132 11 720 97 58 164 97 112 311 158 354 51 52 7 795 51 424 6 30 111 1 193 1 115 60 816 72 338 20 102

142 846 99 170 33 936 22 576 6 934 8 328 1 450 4 086 1 779 11 360 505 40 85 65 3 425 30 28 97 10 55 320 452 175 20 75 1 113 81 49 362 108 11 570 97 42 102 225 72 311 122 244 50 33 1 132 35 378 7 48 124 1 292 1 440 60 459 57 278 30 36

155 778 106 326 31 850 14 874 5 731 4 063 1 450 2 394 1 237 16 976 548 67 95 105 31 411 30 30 112 13 25 511 407 170 20 83 1 874 92 70 379 108 4 811 92 48 97 153 85 417 166 440 14 48 3 804 36 443 6 24 117 1 882 1 326 37 893 76 418 18 334

126 664 17 326 615 200 0 21 0 65 115 415 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 1 18 0 0 30 2 0 0 0 0 26 0 1 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 203 2 6 24 0 4 89

147 219 29 579 687 227 1 17 1 146 62 460 0 5 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 23 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 3 0 0 0 14 3 25 1 0 0 4 2 19 0 0 0 0 62 0 214 15 22 36 0

145 970 25 436 612 167 23 8 1 92 44 445 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 0 5 0 0 0 8 3 17 1 3 0 4 5 15 0 0 0 1 174 0 105 15 6 45 0

165 197 21 863 642 215 6 84 1 95 30 427 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 72 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 0 7 0 0 0 4 3 41 1 3 0 4 0 9 0 0 0 1 132 0 41 32 5 50 0

240

TABLE 38: Volume of wheat trade (continued)

Wheat and our (wheat equiv.) imports thousand tonnes 1999 ASIA Central Asia Kazakhstan Kyrgyzstan Tajikistan Turkmenistan Uzbekistan East Asia Brunei Darussalam Cambodia China Indonesia Korea, DPR Korea, Republic of Lao, PDR Malaysia Mongolia Myanmar Philippines Singapore Thailand Viet Nam South Asia Afghanistan Bangladesh Bhutan India Iran (Islamic Rep.) Maldives Nepal Pakistan Sri Lanka West Asia Armenia Azerbaijan Bahrain Cyprus Georgia Iraq Jordan Kuwait Lebanon Occupied Palestinian Territory Saudi Arabia Syrian Arab Republic Turkey United Arab Emirates Yemen LATIN AMERICA & THE CARIBBEAN Argentina Bahamas Barbados Belize Bolivia (Plur. State) Brazil Chile Colombia Costa Rica thousand tonnes 2007 thousand tonnes 2008 thousand tonnes 2009 thousand tonnes 1999 exports thousand tonnes 2007 thousand tonnes 2008 thousand tonnes 2009

41 558 1 332 18 143 443 38 690 15 091 8 26 1 808 3 225 531 4 190 4 1 332 71 101 2 057 385 788 559 14 430 189 2 518 20 1 371 6 156 19 25 3 240 891 10 706 265 696 56 91 882 1 843 407 179 407 350 67 17 1 614 1 246 2 330 18 290 3 11 27 14 337 7 170 634 1 059 212

42 722 2 880 5 508 1 007 173 1 187 18 057 8 28 1 778 5 457 236 3 279 4 2 231 232 122 1 957 286 1 105 1 328 7 864 1 170 2 719 1 2 679 153 24 2 136 981 13 921 505 1 453 5 94 893 3 167 1 082 254 411 336 76 55 2 147 690 2 394 20 601 2 9 27 14 427 7 528 1 095 1 289 223

45 061 3 283 33 458 1 045 461 1 284 14 770 10 12 1 374 5 237 68 2 766 4 1 167 313 45 1 777 298 895 798 11 250 1 898 1 336 1 1 5 197 26 0 1 833 957 15 758 333 1 459 68 111 589 3 643 984 316 428 353 347 76 3 709 877 2 150 19 815 1 7 30 19 412 6 998 801 1 376 241

55 828 3 313 89 448 983 325 1 467 19 947 10 25 2 433 5 554 204 3 906 5 1 223 278 62 3 199 293 1 267 1 480 15 011 1 135 4 054 1 166 5 460 22 1 3 103 1 067 17 558 383 978 66 119 600 4 189 538 368 550 358 1 381 65 3 396 1 431 2 826 18 315 2 4 22 20 478 6 349 691 1 354 270

6 845 3 481 3 451 30 0 0 496 0 0 259 1 43 120 0 0 0 53 21 59 0 19 2 1 0 33 4 0 2 809 0 0 0 1 22 2 0 17 2 7 0 112 2 200 346 0 9 866 9 330 0 5 0 3 5 0 0 11

16 643 8 215 8 199 2 0 14 3 724 0 0 3 416 98 14 75 0 0 15 88 17 1 519 0 0 45 114 0 0 1 178 183 3 185 0 13 0 9 27 1 7 2 15 5 2 1 077 1 748 167 7 12 222 10 878 0 6 0 4 107 0 3 26

11 244 7 467 7 452 2 0 13 695 0 0 416 79 13 59 0 0 17 96 14 650 0 0 15 103 0 2 385 145 2 432 0 42 0 10 13 0 15 2 58 3 9 106 1 729 285 79 13 555 10 155 0 6 0 0 648 0 1 28

10 986 6 370 6 352 2 4 13 568 0 0 370 41 15 51 0 0 15 62 14 457 0 0 49 85 0 50 143 130 3 592 0 19 0 7 15 0 15 46 27 7 9 106 2 854 285 120 10 210 6 454 0 4 0 0 386 1 1 22

241

TABLE 38: Volume of wheat trade (continued)

Wheat and our (wheat equiv.) imports thousand tonnes 1999 Cuba Dominica Dominican Republic Ecuador El Salvador French Guiana Grenada Guatemala Guyana Haiti Honduras Jamaica Mexico Netherlands Antilles Nicaragua Panama Paraguay Peru St. Kitts & Nevis St. Lucia St. Vincent & Grenadines Suriname Trinidad & Tobago Uruguay Venezuela (Boliv. Rep. of) OCEANIA Fiji French Polynesia New Caledonia Papua New Guinea Samoa Solomon Islands Tonga Vanuatu DEVELOPED REGIONS NORTH AMERICA Bermuda Canada United States of America ASIA & OCEANIA Australia Israel Japan New Zealand EUROPE Albania Belarus Bosnia & Herzegovina Croatia European Union Iceland Macedonia, FYR Montenegro Norway Republic of Moldova Russian Federation Serbia Switzerland Ukraine thousand tonnes 2007 thousand tonnes 2008 thousand tonnes 2009 thousand tonnes 1999 exports thousand tonnes 2007 thousand tonnes 2008 thousand tonnes 2009

1 046 6 340 458 194 20 344 61 274 231 168 2 711 14 94 99 42 1 291 3 13 24 21 140 6 1 209 321 89 22 24 146 6 12 8 6 38 103 2 485 2 77 2 406 7 765 3 1 571 5 975 217 31 343 322 1 166 222 15 24 287 22 37 361 18 4 720 251 3

795 6 390 473 226 18 521 49 201 238 172 3 338 16 130 120 17 1 531 2 14 24 13 149 49 1 468 398 136 23 31 160 11 15 7 7 42 133 2 863 2 239 2 622 6 874 7 1 228 5 278 361 32 397 366 337 446 18 29 931 43 66 16 285 104 503 3 337 27

857 6 384 496 216 28 503 57 222 116 187 3 300 12 119 115 2 1 495 1 10 33 6 128 61 1 557 358 122 26 29 141 10 9 7 5 43 566 3 096 2 299 2 795 7 785 6 1 675 5 783 322 32 685 321 236 428 61 30 533 40 116 18 309 100 200 6 407 7

786 6 404 508 235 6 470 55 271 191 200 2 854 13 140 116 1 1 514 1 13 22 6 87 32 1 183 334 93 22 29 146 10 12 6 7 49 333 3 121 2 257 2 862 7 605 19 1 830 5 478 278 38 607 309 116 395 19 36 700 44 125 115 306 85 103 6 386 5

0 0 0 0 1 15 1 0 0 0 0 347 2 1 0 2 4 0 17 8 110 4 1 1 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 3 0 9 9 5 0 0 0 4 672 0 17 0 276 7 0 16 31 139 0 28 28 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 3 0 7 7 9 2 0 0 9 1 539 0 20 0 584 25 0 14 9 487 0 25 25 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 2 0 10 0 7 2 0 0 8 1 258 0 17 0 875 12 0 15 9 1 127 0 24 24 0 0 0 0 0

106 645 46 224 16 386 29 839 17 353 16 887 0 465 1 45 759 1 8 0 38 40 041 0 4 2 171 838 0 4 587

117 631 51 305 17 863 33 442 15 336 14 980 0 355 2 50 990 2 2 5 433 33 921 0 0 0 0 42 14 830 577 0 1 187

120 524 46 512 16 047 30 465 8 832 8 563 8 260 1 65 180 0 15 6 54 44 569 0 0 0 0 54 12 350 248 2 7 892

143 327 41 871 19 526 22 346 17 961 17 676 6 272 7 83 494 0 2 16 313 51 904 0 0 12 0 333 17 366 424 5 13 124

242

TABLE 39: Volume of rice trade

Rice imports thousand tonnes 1999 WORLD DEVELOPING REGIONS AFRICA North Africa Algeria Egypt Libya Morocco Tunisia Sub-Saharan Africa Angola Benin Botswana Burkina Faso Burundi Cameroon Cape Verde Central African Republic Chad Comoros Congo Cte dIvoire Congo, Dem. Rep. Djibouti Equatorial Guinea Eritrea Ethiopia Gabon Gambia Ghana Guinea Guinea-Bissau Kenya Lesotho Liberia Madagascar Malawi Mali Mauritania Mauritius Mozambique Namibia Niger Nigeria Rwanda Senegal Seychelles Sierra Leone Somalia Sudan South Africa Swaziland Tanzania, Utd. Rep. Togo Uganda Zambia Zimbabwe thousand tonnes 2007 thousand tonnes 2008 thousand tonnes 2009 thousand tonnes 1999 exports thousand tonnes 2007 thousand tonnes 2008 thousand tonnes 2009

27 317 22 799 4 824 193 54 7 110 1 21 4 630 31 73 13 205 0 152 26 2 0 42 53 423 55 24 0 0 9 72 67 69 210 62 53 10 41 94 1 82 122 83 34 5 84 812 14 625 4 150 69 13 515 12 86 63 40 7 22

30 950 25 423 8 859 393 73 118 174 11 18 8 466 166 192 28 150 7 471 36 3 1 39 40 809 164 62 5 0 44 32 116 442 330 33 259 5 149 191 4 147 50 63 426 7 173 1 217 19 1 073 5 112 115 56 959 21 48 79 75 12 30

28 409 22 732 7 014 211 71 9 104 7 20 6 802 195 182 26 137 4 427 47 4 1 38 10 762 42 23 10 1 22 54 119 395 209 20 265 5 170 169 5 172 122 69 264 6 269 217 13 1 012 7 165 38 10 650 20 64 246 63 16 30

26 543 20 909 7 160 217 76 16 104 12 10 6 943 113 202 20 264 10 469 93 6 1 34 15 1 121 40 20 5 1 30 40 150 442 302 20 296 5 95 109 7 171 134 80 280 6 106 217 32 771 5 59 108 37 745 20 40 85 80 10 36

25 280 20 304 344 307 0 307 0 0 0 37 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0

33 688 28 795 1 385 1 223 0 1 223 0 0 0 162 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0

29 458 24 329 383 244 0 241 0 2 0 139 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 22 0 0

26 598 21 962 910 653 0 649 0 4 0 257 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 53 0 0

0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 5 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 1 16 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 5 0 1 0 0 17 0 0 74 0 0 0 8 1 20 2 25 4 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 30 0 0 20 0 0 0 24 1 6 4 25 0 0

0 0 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 8 0 2 0 0 30 0 0 94 0 0 0 24 1 1 0 38 1 0

243

TABLE 39: Volume of rice trade (continued)

Rice imports thousand tonnes 1999 ASIA Central Asia Kazakhstan Kyrgyzstan Tajikistan Turkmenistan Uzbekistan East Asia Brunei Darussalam Cambodia China Indonesia Korea, DPR Korea, Republic of Lao, PDR Malaysia Mongolia Myanmar Philippines Singapore Thailand Viet Nam South Asia Afghanistan Bangladesh Bhutan India Iran (Islamic Rep.) Maldives Nepal Pakistan Sri Lanka West Asia Armenia Azerbaijan Bahrain Cyprus Georgia Iraq Jordan Kuwait Lebanon Occupied Palestinian Territory Saudi Arabia Syrian Arab Republic Turkey United Arab Emirates Yemen LATIN AMERICA & THE CARIBBEAN Argentina Bahamas Barbados Belize Bolivia (Plur. State) Brazil Chile Colombia Costa Rica thousand tonnes 2007 thousand tonnes 2008 thousand tonnes 2009 thousand tonnes 1999 exports thousand tonnes 2007 thousand tonnes 2008 thousand tonnes 2009

14 617 39 3 4 1 2 30 7 669 33 54 525 4 748 250 156 5 612 8 7 834 404 1 5 3 506 106 2 215 39 34 852 16 36 1 206 3 403 12 18 36 4 1 781 114 126 51 122 840 134 247 557 207 2 921 16 12 5 1 2 984 108 37 52

13 117 55 14 32 7 0 1 6 525 34 12 979 1 406 785 265 24 798 28 3 1 806 327 3 2 2 058 126 617 7 0 949 20 227 3 109 4 479 29 15 52 6 12 736 158 214 43 133 969 291 194 1 039 347 3 190 9 13 6 0 13 704 112 135 123

12 477 79 21 43 6 0 8 5 471 36 8 732 288 67 309 22 1 120 20 81 2 432 289 14 1 2 297 107 839 6 0 1 138 26 93 4 84 4 630 16 27 56 8 9 697 134 182 47 111 956 108 224 1 293 317 2 960 8 14 6 0 44 431 124 30 70

10 502 98 34 37 11 0 16 4 808 33 4 785 248 114 267 41 1 087 20 23 1 775 278 77 1 1 076 29 35 6 0 802 26 103 4 70 4 520 11 22 60 5 10 758 166 186 50 108 1 310 207 205 746 417 3 014 7 10 6 0 16 646 119 102 79

18 162 43 43 0 0 0 14 239 0 3 2 827 3 0 0 0 0 54 0 5 6 839 4 508 3 713 0 0 1 895 0 24 1 791 1 167 0 0 0 0 0 25 15 2 2 1 0 1 1 115 0 1 799 659 0 0 0 0 48 0 0 11

25 517 44 42 0 2 0 15 527 0 3 1 333 1 0 1 0 0 359 1 77 9 196 4 558 9 605 19 0 6 450 1 0 3 129 6 342 0 1 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 31 0 1 303 1 1 892 451 0 0 0 6 201 0 0 5

21 912 29 26 1 2 0 15 998 0 5 981 2 0 0 1 0 43 1 14 10 216 4 735 5 308 9 0 2 484 1 0 2 809 4 577 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 2 1 1 0 8 525 5 2 033 423 0 0 0 0 512 0 1 10

18 405 9 6 1 2 0 12 914 0 13 788 2 0 4 1 0 43 0 32 8 620 3 411 4 912 5 0 2 148 1 2 2 751 5 569 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 4 0 0 1 0 19 526 9 2 646 613 0 0 0 0 592 1 0 7

244

TABLE 39: Volume of rice trade (continued)

Rice imports thousand tonnes 1999 Cuba Dominica Dominican Republic Ecuador El Salvador French Guiana Grenada Guatemala Guyana Haiti Honduras Jamaica Mexico Netherlands Antilles Nicaragua Panama Paraguay Peru St. Kitts & Nevis St. Lucia St. Vincent & Grenadines Suriname Trinidad & Tobago Uruguay Venezuela (Boliv. Rep. of) OCEANIA Fiji French Polynesia New Caledonia Papua New Guinea Samoa Solomon Islands Tonga Vanuatu DEVELOPED REGIONS NORTH AMERICA Bermuda Canada United States of America ASIA & OCEANIA Australia Israel Japan New Zealand EUROPE Albania Belarus Bosnia & Herzegovina Croatia European Union Iceland Macedonia, FYR Montenegro Norway Republic of Moldova Russian Federation Serbia Switzerland Ukraine thousand tonnes 2007 thousand tonnes 2008 thousand tonnes 2009 thousand tonnes 1999 exports thousand tonnes 2007 thousand tonnes 2008 thousand tonnes 2009

462 0 82 3 22 2 17 0 249 62 86 405 10 82 5 3 150 1 3 18 0 39 2 0 437 35 7 9 325 6 24 0 11 4 301 616 0 262 354 829 50 87 664 28 3 067 17 20 2 9 2 314 1 0 16 4 558 55 67

590 1 13 0 59 2 66 0 313 71 88 558 7 118 49 1 80 1 3 12 0 38 0 0 257 33 10 10 146 3 36 0 11 5 520 1 032 0 348 683 916 124 109 643 39 3 573 24 33 7 10 2 979 1 1 1 22 16 232 13 118 121

576 1 17 1 58 2 62 0 325 92 86 547 7 121 64 1 146 0 2 17 0 36 0 68 282 50 12 6 171 1 35 0 1 5 670 1 007 0 374 632 930 195 98 597 41 3 733 18 33 7 11 3 201 1 0 1 23 7 271 12 81 74

520 1 12 0 61 2 57 0 335 111 74 563 8 85 15 1 91 0 3 6 0 46 1 25 234 31 9 10 134 21 11 0 12 5 628 1 047 0 383 664 1 021 204 110 664 42 3 561 21 27 6 12 3 010 1 0 1 23 10 257 14 106 76 0 0 0 0 5 1 2 668 813 669 0 144 0 1 493 0 2 0 0 1 480 0 5 5 2 987 212 192 1 19 0 1 690 0 0 0 0 1 669 0 1 0 0 0 12 0 1 7 8 3 316 90 48 1 40 0 1 714 0 0 0 0 1 685 0 3 0 0 0 21 0 1 3 8 2 947 56 17 0 38 0 1 625 0 0 0 0 1 538 0 2 0 0 0 81 0 1 2 4 852 2 670 4 893 2 991 5 129 3 325 4 636 2 955 0 0 30 0 0 1 251 0 0 0 9 2 0 0 1 2 0 0 9 51 1 699 23 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 5 0 6 180 0 2 0 14 0 3 0 72 0 0 0 5 22 2 799 18 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4 0 5 196 0 3 1 11 0 5 0 68 18 0 0 6 25 0 741 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 5 0 4 208 0 2 0 7 0 4 0 122 48 0 0 4 23 1 994 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0

245

TABLE 40: Volume of coarse grain trade

Coarse grains imports thousand tonnes 1999 WORLD DEVELOPING REGIONS AFRICA North Africa Algeria Egypt Libya Morocco Tunisia Sub-Saharan Africa Angola Benin Botswana Burkina Faso Burundi Cameroon Cape Verde Central African Republic Chad Comoros Congo Cte dIvoire Congo, Dem. Rep. Djibouti Equatorial Guinea Eritrea Ethiopia Gabon Gambia Ghana Guinea Guinea-Bissau Kenya Lesotho Liberia Madagascar Malawi Mali Mauritania Mauritius Mozambique Namibia Niger Nigeria Rwanda Senegal Seychelles Sierra Leone Somalia Sudan South Africa Swaziland Tanzania, Utd. Rep. Togo Uganda Zambia Zimbabwe thousand tonnes 2007 thousand tonnes 2008 thousand tonnes 2009 thousand tonnes 1999 exports thousand tonnes 2007 thousand tonnes 2008 thousand tonnes 2009

113 064 65 378 12 908 10 952 3 407 4 716 374 1 561 894 1 956 85 0 87 14 3 3 37 0 0 0 4 7 14 3 6 89 1 0 0 0 0 97 113 50 0 29 3 1 64 150 156 34 23 2 20 2 5 33 7 518 31 36 0 27 16 183

141 629 77 274 14 603 11 223 2 351 4 480 535 2 448 1 409 3 379 7 0 58 13 72 5 26 2 45 0 0 3 12 3 51 48 0 0 8 1 3 118 156 50 13 22 5 2 74 30 36 68 1 47 97 9 4 126 227 1 296 105 11 1 88 6 426

143 997 80 484 14 151 10 439 2 438 3 987 722 2 033 1 260 3 712 34 4 66 2 22 6 26 0 46 0 0 8 407 3 43 289 0 1 65 7 2 254 158 50 5 28 8 5 91 101 142 15 15 9 122 5 1 290 361 207 102 23 3 98 2 586

132 238 76 596 12 563 7 575 2 104 1 964 763 2 008 735 4 988 40 2 93 5 27 27 12 5 78 0 0 33 32 3 43 324 0 0 10 3 1 1 591 158 50 15 55 8 5 82 82 96 19 15 63 133 6 5 291 410 78 102 18 2 16 42 907

113 285 15 897 979 0 0 0 0 0 0 979 0 0 1 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 3 0 0 6 0 0 32 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 321 423 0 17 0 24 8 129

145 916 41 916 1 068 11 0 8 0 0 3 1 057 0 13 1 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 3 0 0 12 0 0 51 0 2 391 1 0 19 0 0 11 2 1 0 0 114 74 1 88 0 56 198 1

141 907 33 471 1 616 10 0 9 0 1 1 1 605 0 3 1 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 24 0 3 21 1 1 29 0 0 1 3 2 0 0 163 1 081 0 24 0 40 191 1

137 084 28 569 1 871 41 0 41 0 1 0 1 830 0 3 5 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 1 4 1 0 15 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 3 1 669 0 17 0 62 20 0

246

TABLE 40: Volume of coarse grain trade (continued)

Coarse grains imports thousand tonnes 1999 ASIA Central Asia Kazakhstan Kyrgyzstan Tajikistan Turkmenistan Uzbekistan East Asia Brunei Darussalam Cambodia China Indonesia Korea, DPR Korea, Republic of Lao, PDR Malaysia Mongolia Myanmar Philippines Singapore Thailand Viet Nam South Asia Afghanistan Bangladesh Bhutan India Iran (Islamic Rep.) Maldives Nepal Pakistan Sri Lanka West Asia Armenia Azerbaijan Bahrain Cyprus Georgia Iraq Jordan Kuwait Lebanon Occupied Palestinian Territory Saudi Arabia Syrian Arab Republic Turkey United Arab Emirates Yemen LATIN AMERICA & THE CARIBBEAN Argentina Bahamas Barbados Belize Bolivia (Plur. State) Brazil Chile Colombia Costa Rica thousand tonnes 2007 thousand tonnes 2008 thousand tonnes 2009 thousand tonnes 1999 exports thousand tonnes 2007 thousand tonnes 2008 thousand tonnes 2009

32 721 14 1 6 0 0 7 20 017 23 0 7 822 619 413 8 447 1 2 204 0 2 163 41 130 147 1 913 0 125 10 205 1 431 0 14 2 126 10 777 20 19 6 489 1 0 1 173 395 369 163 5 818 1 218 1 077 202 160 19 723 7 1 42 0 7 918 1 414 1 998 407

37 562 96 68 8 2 0 17 18 629 0 3 5 637 705 74 8 662 4 2 669 2 0 173 11 109 574 4 013 4 223 0 10 3 620 0 60 17 79 14 823 91 54 2 414 23 9 1 318 284 370 90 8 935 1 497 1 209 361 388 25 053 7 0 37 5 5 1 374 1 962 3 666 689

40 588 116 70 7 12 0 27 18 436 0 3 5 488 293 222 9 086 2 2 112 2 0 55 10 455 704 4 809 24 112 0 18 4 389 0 34 134 99 17 226 67 95 10 451 27 27 1 112 390 381 106 9 652 2 951 1 426 408 335 25 660 9 0 42 0 6 1 079 1 835 3 775 646

39 656 91 58 7 7 0 19 18 581 0 2 6 656 341 137 7 384 12 2 642 2 0 326 17 337 720 5 710 8 597 0 31 4 934 0 34 56 51 15 273 52 85 16 450 35 28 1 052 419 454 123 7 508 3 592 587 522 503 24 313 8 0 37 0 4 1 618 1 351 3 656 605

5 828 652 652 0

10 279 661 661 0

6 498 664 664 0

5 858 351 351 0

0 4 752 0 0 4 446 91 0 0 2 26 0 89 0 8 88 2 11 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 413 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 395 0 5 9 090 8 628 0 0 10 9 49 0 0

0 6 196 0 80 5 421 102 0 0 23 2 0 160 0 1 407 0 3 127 0 0 0 3 119 2 3 3 0 295 0 0 0 0 24 0 2 0 3 4 6 2 224 19 10 30 569 16 597 0 0 46 11 161 111 6 1

0 1 891 0 312 492 107 0 0 127 1 0 146 2 1 691 12 3 823 0 0 0 3 809 2 3 10 0 120 0 0 0 12 7 0 2 0 6 9 3 0 15 61 13 25 357 17 528 0 1 33 6 472 100 2 0

0 1 945 0 98 276 63 0 0 232 1 0 150 1 0 1 111 12 2 822 0 0 0 2 734 2 2 84 0 739 0 0 0 0 6 0 31 0 6 1 3 0 627 48 11 20 840 10 610 0 1 70 7 792 110 1 0

247

TABLE 40: Volume of coarse grain trade (continued)

Coarse grains imports thousand tonnes 1999 Cuba Dominica Dominican Republic Ecuador El Salvador French Guiana Grenada Guatemala Guyana Haiti Honduras Jamaica Mexico Netherlands Antilles Nicaragua Panama Paraguay Peru St. Kitts & Nevis St. Lucia St. Vincent & Grenadines Suriname Trinidad & Tobago Uruguay Venezuela (Boliv. Rep. of) OCEANIA Fiji French Polynesia New Caledonia Papua New Guinea Samoa Solomon Islands Tonga Vanuatu DEVELOPED REGIONS NORTH AMERICA Bermuda Canada United States of America ASIA & OCEANIA Australia Israel Japan New Zealand EUROPE Albania Belarus Bosnia & Herzegovina Croatia European Union Iceland Macedonia, FYR Montenegro Norway Republic of Moldova Russian Federation Serbia Switzerland Ukraine thousand tonnes 2007 thousand tonnes 2008 thousand tonnes 2009 thousand tonnes 1999 exports thousand tonnes 2007 thousand tonnes 2008 thousand tonnes 2009

61 0 910 283 88 3 328 1 1 115 186 10 473 4 21 238 3 1 031 0 0 3 16 26 72 1 065 26 2 6 2 16 0 0 0 0 45 393 3 920 0 1 047 2 874 22 610 0 1 345 21 159 106 20 667 25 499 139 59 18 320 36 79 158 2 1 718 82 24

709 0 1 169 638 597 9 704 6 4 231 250 10 057 0 132 397 14 1 698 0 0 5 14 44 77 554 57 0 6 0 50 0 0 0 0 63 942 5 504 0 2 658 2 845 21 077 2 1 416 19 614 45 37 361 78 282 195 151 35 952 44 65 0 229 23 368 27 317 42

717 0 1 050 432 538 13 602 15 16 223 143 11 052 0 125 349 16 1 549 0 0 1 8 107 157 1 154 85 13 5 3 63 0 0 0 0 63 063 6 432 0 2 793 3 639 20 360 1 1 119 19 066 174 36 271 83 255 209 135 34 810 35 68 0 268 26 503 21 268 40

683 0 985 413 442 1 654 29 21 388 121 9 940 0 107 335 9 1 652 0 0 3 15 55 145 1 035 65 3 5 4 54 0 0 0 0 55 192 4 568 0 2 012 2 556 20 877 3 1 382 19 451 41 29 747 65 128 189 29 29 373 31 51 20 63 3 71 6 149 18 0 1 698 0 172 122 3 657 58 604 4 489 4 485 0 0 4 30 638 0 0 154 61 28 310 0 0 4 908 63 518 1 895 1 893 1 0 1 33 677 0 1 1 24 27 951 0 0 0 0 40 2 069 426 0 3 166 5 678 60 156 3 808 3 752 31 0 24 38 782 0 1 1 212 27 506 0 0 0 0 185 1 731 557 1 8 600 3 720 51 768 3 535 3 509 18 0 8 49 492 0 9 12 387 29 569 0 0 1 0 217 4 865 1 620 0 12 812 0 0 96 887 62 261 0 0 103 999 68 427 0 0 108 424 65 835 0 0 108 515 55 488 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 27 38 0 0 2 217 0 0 0 1 36 0 0 0 10 28 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 76 3 0 47 0 0 2 0 19 0 2 0 171 7 0 0 20 0 0 10 0 0 1 0 265 0 6 0 2 116 11 0 0 19 1 0 19 0 0 2 0 59 0 8 0 1 066 11 0 0 27 3 0 9 0 0 0 0 289 0 1 0 1 875 12 0

248

TABLE 41: Volume of sugar trade

Sugar (raw equiv.) imports thousand tonnes 1999 WORLD DEVELOPING REGIONS AFRICA North Africa Algeria Egypt Libya Morocco Tunisia Sub-Saharan Africa Angola Benin Botswana Burkina Faso Burundi Cameroon Cape Verde Central African Republic Chad Comoros Congo Cte dIvoire Congo, Dem. Rep. Djibouti Equatorial Guinea Eritrea Ethiopia Gabon Gambia Ghana Guinea Guinea-Bissau Kenya Lesotho Liberia Madagascar Malawi Mali Mauritania Mauritius Mozambique Namibia Niger Nigeria Rwanda Senegal Seychelles Sierra Leone Somalia Sudan South Africa Swaziland Tanzania, Utd. Rep. Togo Uganda Zambia Zimbabwe thousand tonnes 2007 thousand tonnes 2008 thousand tonnes 2009 thousand tonnes 1999 exports thousand tonnes 2007 thousand tonnes 2008 thousand tonnes 2009

39 839 22 553 6 038 3 094 903 1 206 221 467 296 2 944 136 61 51 27 2 43 16 5 16 4 1 49 64 9 3 12 2 7 93 109 79 5 62 26 8 27 0 137 156 38 102 37 57 890 17 41 4 9 251 4 1 0 182 19 51 28 1

49 597 31 996 8 215 3 035 1 216 443 256 748 372 5 180 289 30 54 46 9 73 20 8 61 9 0 1 227 161 4 103 92 3 139 345 113 37 248 30 15 107 0 144 223 42 13 15 66 1 213 23 75 4 23 321 283 104 1 193 54 150 0 0

47 478 28 954 8 964 3 694 1 131 1 262 208 752 341 5 270 337 66 66 27 14 56 13 12 53 8 3 1 123 171 4 32 161 0 98 263 141 14 234 30 21 123 0 140 207 44 55 4 74 1 570 26 56 4 24 235 297 163 4 72 72 146 3 4

47 352 30 453 8 040 3 165 1 251 424 191 976 322 4 875 228 94 82 27 10 36 19 12 43 5 0 1 149 98 5 76 85 0 97 338 112 18 197 30 18 134 0 77 174 36 55 4 74 1 220 31 88 4 21 252 347 127 2 109 157 137 0 41

42 467 29 186 2 598 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 597 0 0 1 0 2 1 0 0 0 25 25 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 5 0 7 48 0 0 534 20 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 103 1 138 395 25 0 5 90 165

54 727 42 760 3 820 282 5 272 0 0 4 3 538 0 20 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 22 0 0 3 75 25 3 60 265 0 15 23 0 6 115 0 0 442 115 2 10 0 0 1 0 0 0 29 1 059 904 65 4 75 135 62

47 991 39 865 2 454 61 0 56 1 0 3 2 394 0 21 0 0 3 6 0 0 0 34 6 7 0 0 19 1 0 255 0 0 48 0 11 78 0 0 427 138 2 22 3 0 0 0 0 0 3 704 298 10 6 91 98 103

51 010 42 347 2 807 235 15 215 1 0 4 2 572 0 19 1 0 3 3 0 0 0 15 6 7 0 45 27 1 60 110 0 0 2 0 35 119 0 0 348 109 2 22 3 0 0 0 0 0 35 929 272 6 2 91 161 139

249

TABLE 41: Volume of sugar trade (continued)

Sugar (raw equiv.) imports thousand tonnes 1999 ASIA Central Asia Kazakhstan Kyrgyzstan Tajikistan Turkmenistan Uzbekistan East Asia Brunei Darussalam Cambodia China Indonesia Korea, DPR Korea, Republic of Lao, PDR Malaysia Mongolia Myanmar Philippines Singapore Thailand Viet Nam South Asia Afghanistan Bangladesh Bhutan India Iran (Islamic Rep.) Maldives Nepal Pakistan Sri Lanka West Asia Armenia Azerbaijan Bahrain Cyprus Georgia Iraq Jordan Kuwait Lebanon Occupied Palestinian Territory Saudi Arabia Syrian Arab Republic Turkey United Arab Emirates Yemen LATIN AMERICA & THE CARIBBEAN Argentina Bahamas Barbados Belize Bolivia (Plur. State) Brazil Chile Colombia Costa Rica thousand tonnes 2007 thousand tonnes 2008 thousand tonnes 2009 thousand tonnes 1999 exports thousand tonnes 2007 thousand tonnes 2008 thousand tonnes 2009

14 863 867 305 49 38 100 375 6 901 7 166 917 2 324 92 1 376 24 1 158 16 14 397 361 0 47 3 325 71 152 6 1 242 1 250 5 66 23 510 3 770 76 68 21 31 161 447 189 71 100 75 693 649 2 739 439 1 601 1 11 12 0 7 0 246 16 0

21 020 1 449 482 88 283 87 510 9 016 12 221 1 687 3 170 95 1 518 23 1 669 37 6 29 475 0 61 4 200 230 1 146 0 1 1 548 11 10 686 569 6 354 95 322 26 23 261 406 279 99 175 90 1 340 868 5 1 624 655 2 697 2 9 13 0 0 0 480 164 0

17 688 1 506 554 77 196 99 580 6 771 11 342 1 474 1 057 115 1 648 53 1 451 30 5 28 418 4 129 3 421 253 1 278 1 386 809 13 31 41 609 5 991 112 267 31 23 182 793 334 112 164 93 1 564 899 5 655 606 2 170 31 6 14 0 0 0 595 169 0

19 975 1 413 367 89 241 105 611 7 736 14 476 1 860 1 505 76 1 651 50 1 568 30 6 22 377 1 96 5 465 101 1 420 1 2 596 660 9 39 140 499 5 360 70 307 60 25 107 820 233 94 182 64 1 166 792 5 655 646 2 360 3 5 13 0 0 0 606 142 0

6 572 14 2 12 0

13 522 43 36 6 0

11 528 20 19 1 0

7 681 3 3 0 0

4 577 0 0 435 3 0 323 219 0 3 143 43 3 380 29 1 004 0 0 12 4 1 987 0 976 0 0 0 1 0 0 14 0 0 2 2 0 527 430 0 19 724 175 0 50 120 31 12 472 0 954 149

6 072 0 0 175 1 0 393 439 0 0 244 176 4 610 35 5 486 0 0 4 880 601 0 3 1 1 921 0 317 0 0 75 0 6 0 0 3 403 3 42 1 058 3 25 200 363 0 35 84 91 19 961 0 802 146

6 182 0 0 104 2 0 310 158 0 5 215 195 5 189 6 3 792 0 0 3 494 0 0 298 0 1 534 0 180 1 0 16 0 11 0 0 3 334 0 6 973 4 25 623 412 0 28 67 156 19 981 0 444 91

6 262 0 0 89 1 0 316 195 0 5 249 113 5 288 6 76 0 0 44 0 0 31 0 1 341 0 192 0 0 1 0 15 0 0 4 275 0 6 804 27 31 674 813 0 17 79 213 24 848 0 976 73

250

TABLE 41: Volume of sugar trade (continued)

Sugar (raw equiv.) imports thousand tonnes 1999 Cuba Dominica Dominican Republic Ecuador El Salvador French Guiana Grenada Guatemala Guyana Haiti Honduras Jamaica Mexico Netherlands Antilles Nicaragua Panama Paraguay Peru St. Kitts & Nevis St. Lucia St. Vincent & Grenadines Suriname Trinidad & Tobago Uruguay Venezuela (Boliv. Rep. of) OCEANIA Fiji French Polynesia New Caledonia Papua New Guinea Samoa Solomon Islands Tonga Vanuatu DEVELOPED REGIONS NORTH AMERICA Bermuda Canada United States of America ASIA & OCEANIA Australia Israel Japan New Zealand EUROPE Albania Belarus Bosnia & Herzegovina Croatia European Union Iceland Macedonia, FYR Montenegro Norway Republic of Moldova Russian Federation Serbia Switzerland Ukraine thousand tonnes 2007 thousand tonnes 2008 thousand tonnes 2009 thousand tonnes 1999 exports thousand tonnes 2007 thousand tonnes 2008 thousand tonnes 2009

0 2 75 13 0 5 0 10 109 42 72 43 25 0 5 13 378 1 6 5 26 51 93 327 51 7 9 7 3 5 3 4 3 16 306 2 551 2 845 1 705 2 256 4 489 1 523 241 12 447 71 427 97 11 5 204 13 28 189 0 5 913 148 320

257 3 93 17 0 5 0 11 224 0 116 290 22 0 0 14 265 2 7 5 26 92 108 461 65 8 8 8 13 8 4 2 4 17 577 3 214 1 1 243 1 969 2 312 11 541 1 528 232 12 051 64 127 169 249 7 312 12 77 1 150 3 3 540 10 340 19

119 3 50 10 0 3 0 5 156 0 110 197 18 0 0 0 225 2 3 5 14 65 87 275 132 78 9 8 7 8 6 2 3 18 502 4 071 1 1 374 2 696 2 249 13 594 1 402 240 12 182 93 221 186 215 8 379 12 82 2 152 14 2 491 9 262 86

3 2 50 12 0 5 0 4 139 0 102 631 14 0 0 0 158 2 3 5 12 66 90 277 78 27 9 8 7 9 5 2 2 16 874 3 635 1 1 060 2 575 2 062 56 535 1 221 250 11 177 47 214 163 122 8 717 12 67 18 150 15 1 361 4 188 124

2 984 0 176 48 223 0 1 146 275 0 16 178 521 21 22 34 23 22 17 0 0 0 65 0 3 292 292 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 194 148 12 136 4 217 4 190 1 5 21 8 915 0 257 0 0 8 369 0 0 1 67 147 0 74

739 0 278 16 268 0 1 295 269 0 43 153 207 5 239 48 75 49 0 0 0 0 33 0 0 217 217 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 967 391 39 352 4 183 4 156 0 2 25 7 393 0 296 0 273 6 237 0 1 0 1 47 328 203 3 6

806 0 224 41 304 0 1 297 207 0 40 136 1 036 3 134 34 102 72 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 260 260 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 126 365 108 257 236 214 1 1 20 7 524 0 352 11 245 6 621 0 0 0 0 17 58 204 4 13

742 0 231 12 304 0 1 591 195 0 80 120 1 049 2 143 29 58 86 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 184 184 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 663 191 24 166 230 209 0 1 19 8 242 0 478 21 189 7 119 0 0 0 0 57 145 201 3 28

251

TABLE 42: Volume of oilseed trade

Oilseeds imports thousand tonnes 1999 WORLD DEVELOPING REGIONS AFRICA North Africa Algeria Egypt Libya Morocco Tunisia Sub-Saharan Africa Angola Benin Botswana Burkina Faso Burundi Cameroon Cape Verde Central African Republic Chad Comoros Congo Cte dIvoire Congo, Dem. Rep. Djibouti Equatorial Guinea Eritrea Ethiopia Gabon Gambia Ghana Guinea Guinea-Bissau Kenya Lesotho Liberia Madagascar Malawi Mali Mauritania Mauritius Mozambique Namibia Niger Nigeria Rwanda Senegal Seychelles Sierra Leone Somalia Sudan South Africa Swaziland Tanzania, Utd. Rep. Togo Uganda Zambia Zimbabwe thousand tonnes 2007 thousand tonnes 2008 thousand tonnes 2009 thousand tonnes 1999 exports thousand tonnes 2007 thousand tonnes 2008 thousand tonnes 2009

61 213 24 751 690 555 2 157 58 310 27 135 0 1 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

97 089 59 575 2 160 1 746 36 1 150 2 538 19 414 3 0 6 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 0 3

104 594 64 914 2 070 1 670 24 1 225 1 383 38 400 1 0 5 9 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 46 3

110 012 70 164 1 803 1 286 55 586 1 400 244 517 1 0 9 1 1 5 0 0 0 0 0 19 46 3

60 545 18 296 784 20 0 10 9 0 0 765 0 127 4 28 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0

97 771 44 202 1 038 18 0 17 0 0 0 1 020 0 17 5 37 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 42 0 1 3 171 0 18 67 0 2 14 0 1 78 43 0 0 62 0 2 118 0 5 0 0 0 107 16 1 110 1 16 71 11

105 846 44 986 986 34 0 34 0 0 0 952 0 7 1 37 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 52 0 1 1 170 0 18 52 0 2 8 0 1 21 7 0 0 50 0 1 128 0 6 0 0 0 119 151 1 67 1 23 9 14

111 151 41 014 1 365 69 0 68 0 0 0 1 296 0 4 3 62 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 0 1 1 324 0 18 52 0 2 8 0 1 43 7 0 0 62 0 1 135 0 3 0 0 0 146 228 1 96 0 19 20 44

0 1 15 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 5 1 2 2 0 1 0 14 0 0 1 0 0 0 64 4 2 2 0 2 10

0 2 10 5 0 1 27 2 0 0 2 8 0 2 3 3 5 18 2 9 2 0 0 2 232 5 14 0 14 3 3

15 1 9 15 1 1 36 2 0 3 15 9 0 2 2 3 2 35 8 5 2 0 0 8 62 5 15 0 15 36 8

16 1 9 15 1 1 63 2 0 2 13 9 0 2 2 3 2 34 14 7 2 0 0 9 166 5 16 0 21 8 11

38 0 18 50 15 6 2 0 0 7 16 0 0 17 0 3 50 0 8 0 0 0 187 89 18 13 23 5 20 17

252

TABLE 42: Volume of oilseed trade (continued)

Oilseeds imports thousand tonnes 1999 ASIA Central Asia Kazakhstan Kyrgyzstan Tajikistan Turkmenistan Uzbekistan East Asia Brunei Darussalam Cambodia China Indonesia Korea, DPR Korea, Republic of Lao, PDR Malaysia Mongolia Myanmar Philippines Singapore Thailand Viet Nam South Asia Afghanistan Bangladesh Bhutan India Iran (Islamic Rep.) Maldives Nepal Pakistan Sri Lanka West Asia Armenia Azerbaijan Bahrain Cyprus Georgia Iraq Jordan Kuwait Lebanon Occupied Palestinian Territory Saudi Arabia Syrian Arab Republic Turkey United Arab Emirates Yemen LATIN AMERICA & THE CARIBBEAN Argentina Bahamas Barbados Belize Bolivia (Plur. State) Brazil Chile Colombia Costa Rica thousand tonnes 2007 thousand tonnes 2008 thousand tonnes 2009 thousand tonnes 1999 exports thousand tonnes 2007 thousand tonnes 2008 thousand tonnes 2009

16 949 64 2 30 0 32 14 583 2 0 9 399 1 431 8 1 604 0 719 2 1 309 82 1 024 0 1 051 417 0 16 394 0 89 124 10 1 251 2 0 0 16 1 0 26 3 53 3 68 103 921 11 43 7 108 306 0 23 0 150 600 77 250 227

47 385 118 112 1 0 4 41 234 1 2 34 558 2 438 43 1 436 0 728 0 1 315 40 1 593 81 2 510 354 0 67 833 0 56 1 192 8 3 523 4 21 1 6 10 2 27 9 38 2 110 449 2 244 572 21 10 026 2 283 0 24 0 246 127 226 343 311

52 577 42 28 1 0 14 47 069 1 0 41 217 1 409 42 1 543 0 637 0 3 245 40 1 792 138 2 015 234 0 48 798 0 74 852 9 3 452 5 10 1 3 12 8 21 8 27 1 234 396 2 047 647 15 10 256 2 922 0 29 0 62 128 151 241 238

60 440 88 77 0 0 11 54 318 1 0 48 827 1 526 31 1 318 0 589 0 1 203 39 1 603 180 2 239 376 0 86 1 035 0 96 638 8 3 795 11 20 8 3 90 6 27 8 36 1 250 618 1 818 869 21 7 912 1 029 0 23 0 16 130 39 328 268

1 603 79 14 17 2 46 0 1 076 0 6 748 56 0 1 2 81 0 26 1 31 23 99 352 0 0 1 312 5 0 4 19 11 96 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 1 52 31 0 2 15 784 4 242 0 0 257 8 919 7 1 1

2 401 115 50 1 1 47 16 1 393 0 22 1 008 129 0 0 3 51 7 62 2 10 27 69 775 9 0 0 689 6 0 1 56 14 118 0 15 0 0 2 0 1 0 1 0 1 6 33 58 0 40 695 12 151 0 0 171 23 779 6 0 5

2 260 114 56 0 1 47 9 1 285 0 14 964 53 0 0 4 44 2 127 3 9 16 47 770 4 2 0 688 7 0 0 55 14 91 0 4 0 0 4 0 1 0 0 0 1 2 22 56 1 41 653 12 008 0 0 186 24 559 9 1 34

2 319 135 75 0 1 47 11 1 292 0 52 836 190 0 0 7 52 0 68 1 7 17 58 738 9 4 0 664 6 0 0 47 6 155 0 7 0 0 49 0 2 0 0 0 1 3 37 56 1 37 251 4 606 0 0 297 28 691 23 0 34

253

TABLE 42: Volume of oilseed trade (continued)

Oilseeds imports thousand tonnes 1999 Cuba Dominica Dominican Republic Ecuador El Salvador French Guiana Grenada Guatemala Guyana Haiti Honduras Jamaica Mexico Netherlands Antilles Nicaragua Panama Paraguay Peru St. Kitts & Nevis St. Lucia St. Vincent & Grenadines Suriname Trinidad & Tobago Uruguay Venezuela (Boliv. Rep. of) OCEANIA Fiji French Polynesia New Caledonia Papua New Guinea Samoa Solomon Islands Tonga Vanuatu DEVELOPED REGIONS NORTH AMERICA Bermuda Canada United States of America ASIA & OCEANIA Australia Israel Japan New Zealand EUROPE Albania Belarus Bosnia & Herzegovina Croatia European Union Iceland Macedonia, FYR Montenegro Norway Republic of Moldova Russian Federation Serbia Switzerland Ukraine thousand tonnes 2007 thousand tonnes 2008 thousand tonnes 2009 thousand tonnes 1999 exports thousand tonnes 2007 thousand tonnes 2008 thousand tonnes 2009

24 0 0 1 6 0 4 0 3 2 0 5 242 0 1 1 10 42 0 0 0 0 40 7 90 5 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 33 669 1 702 705 997 8 502 182 706 7 590 23 26 242 5 24 3 47 25 313 1 6 389 0 291 133 27

371 0 0 3 7 0 14 4 0 2 0 5 828 0 1 28 18 133 0 0 1 1 17 28 11 4 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 37 508 1 990 553 1 438 7 411 92 605 6 669 44 28 107 0 24 68 27 27 029 1 6 0 488 34 265 41 81 48

396 0 0 5 6 0 16 4 0 3 0 5 742 0 1 40 31 168 0 0 1 0 18 25 29 10 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 39 677 2 375 653 1 722 6 864 45 406 6 397 16 30 439 0 20 100 29 28 917 2 12 0 478 9 700 53 68 54

396 0 0 2 5 0 13 1 0 3 0 5 288 0 0 39 42 187 0 0 2 0 8 24 66 9 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 39 844 2 080 696 1 384 6 600 36 434 6 122 8 31 164 1 18 97 5 29 313 2 10 1 456 15 1 074 82 59 32

0 0 0 24 3 0 19 1 0 1 0 28 0 28 0 2 098 1 0 0 0 0 0 99 55 125 0 0 0 64 6 15 0 28 41 910 29 762 5 475 24 287 2 192 2 172 18 0 2 10 294 0 1 0 20 9 101 0 0 74 370 1 724

0 0 0 5 1 0 28 0 0 1 0 15 0 82 1 3 640 1 0 0 0 0 0 793 16 68 0 0 0 28 1 28 0 11 53 569 41 096 8 332 32 764 289 267 18 2 2 12 183 0 1 0 49 10 079 0 0 3 145 248 16 1 1 641

0 0 0 2 0 0 14 1 0 3 0 15 0 111 32 3 820 0 0 0 0 0 0 850 7 87 0 0 0 47 1 35 0 3 60 860 46 192 9 430 36 762 587 568 17 1 1 14 081 0 0 1 71 10 928 1 0 2 145 199 22 1 2 712

0 0 0 0 1 0 20 2 0 1 0 16 0 85 24 2 338 0 0 0 0 0 4 1 101 8 78 0 0 0 31 1 31 0 15 70 137 53 264 10 719 42 546 1 359 1 341 17 1 1 15 514 0 177 0 132 11 719 1 0 0 193 335 36 1 2 919

254

TABLE 43: Volume of vegetable oil trade

Vegetable oils and animal fats imports thousand tonnes 1999 WORLD DEVELOPING REGIONS AFRICA North Africa Algeria Egypt Libya Morocco Tunisia Sub-Saharan Africa Angola Benin Botswana Burkina Faso Burundi Cameroon Cape Verde Central African Republic Chad Comoros Congo Cte dIvoire Congo, Dem. Rep. Djibouti Equatorial Guinea Eritrea Ethiopia Gabon Gambia Ghana Guinea Guinea-Bissau Kenya Lesotho Liberia Madagascar Malawi Mali Mauritania Mauritius Mozambique Namibia Niger Nigeria Rwanda Senegal Seychelles Sierra Leone Somalia Sudan South Africa Swaziland Tanzania, Utd. Rep. Togo Uganda Zambia Zimbabwe thousand tonnes 2007 thousand tonnes 2008 thousand tonnes 2009 thousand tonnes 1999 exports thousand tonnes 2007 thousand tonnes 2008 thousand tonnes 2009

40 262 23 797 3 668 1 743 419 687 96 327 215 1 924 40 17 17 31 1 13 6 1 1 1 22 30 21 28 2 4 49 7 31 22 18 4 263 4 8 22 11 16 41 40 62 8 33 157 9 151 6 4 23 92 326 16 86 10 84 19 69

69 034 41 138 7 187 1 956 522 558 93 473 310 5 231 175 222 21 22 7 34 8 5 5 2 25 14 75 91 3 2 114 6 74 223 38 13 456 1 19 72 35 65 66 39 105 125 44 892 29 172 7 12 49 165 927 7 393 23 192 67 90

74 606 44 341 8 016 2 866 558 1 405 78 453 373 5 150 181 239 21 25 5 42 9 8 4 3 15 15 103 128 3 2 200 12 59 220 34 9 442 0 16 80 30 70 78 39 165 24 58 846 27 158 5 12 77 149 834 6 244 76 229 59 89

75 186 45 616 7 188 2 016 678 477 72 508 281 5 172 163 253 16 30 11 37 8 8 4 2 10 13 101 133 3 1 234 26 81 170 32 7 525 1 18 102 34 64 79 51 168 24 46 873 40 133 6 13 59 146 758 6 217 76 203 68 115

42 346 26 728 673 264 6 32 3 17 206 409 0 19 1 0 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 147 2 0 0 0 6 3 12 0 0 31 6 0 0 9 0 1 4 1 0 14 0 73 0 0 0 0 47 7 3 1 3 1 4

67 955 46 247 1 116 362 45 14 0 24 278 754 12 204 1 5 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 141 1 0 0 1 1 2 102 0 0 51 1 0 1 8 0 1 7 2 3 23 0 71 0 0 0 0 24 0 19 5 47 4 2

75 834 52 975 1 139 359 28 43 0 25 264 780 20 216 1 1 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 174 1 0 0 0 1 2 89 0 0 51 1 0 0 4 0 1 7 2 2 33 0 13 0 0 0 0 69 1 33 6 37 1 2

76 830 53 058 1 263 413 39 127 0 16 230 851 13 222 1 1 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 247 1 0 0 0 2 7 54 0 0 75 1 0 4 2 0 2 6 2 2 18 0 32 0 0 0 0 80 1 15 6 44 1 3

255

TABLE 43: Volume of vegetable oil trade (continued)

Vegetable oils and animal fats imports thousand tonnes 1999 ASIA Central Asia Kazakhstan Kyrgyzstan Tajikistan Turkmenistan Uzbekistan East Asia Brunei Darussalam Cambodia China Indonesia Korea, DPR Korea, Republic of Lao, PDR Malaysia Mongolia Myanmar Philippines Singapore Thailand Viet Nam South Asia Afghanistan Bangladesh Bhutan India Iran (Islamic Rep.) Maldives Nepal Pakistan Sri Lanka West Asia Armenia Azerbaijan Bahrain Cyprus Georgia Iraq Jordan Kuwait Lebanon Occupied Palestinian Territory Saudi Arabia Syrian Arab Republic Turkey United Arab Emirates Yemen LATIN AMERICA & THE CARIBBEAN Argentina Bahamas Barbados Belize Bolivia (Plur. State) Brazil Chile Colombia Costa Rica thousand tonnes 2007 thousand tonnes 2008 thousand tonnes 2009 thousand tonnes 1999 exports thousand tonnes 2007 thousand tonnes 2008 thousand tonnes 2009

16 819 151 48 7 21 18 58 6 104 7 23 3 545 34 32 618 0 584 6 282 173 539 76 183 8 241 56 675 3 4 721 1 089 5 52 1 509 130 2 323 19 22 24 27 7 221 107 51 76 26 315 175 790 219 138 3 276 36 3 5 1 1 340 175 217 13

29 593 229 86 26 67 5 46 14 987 9 19 10 617 74 41 954 0 1 335 16 412 251 576 127 550 10 937 326 1 408 1 5 437 1 228 7 183 1 974 373 3 440 38 82 18 24 35 396 122 77 99 20 571 144 1 031 444 200 4 303 39 4 8 1 3 358 55 267 26

31 749 289 149 31 59 5 46 15 112 7 17 10 335 86 48 941 0 1 586 12 438 253 638 165 583 12 134 250 1 129 0 7 115 1 213 8 152 2 086 180 4 214 35 95 14 35 38 698 192 128 89 17 512 173 1 288 567 159 4 532 40 3 9 1 5 448 74 297 27

34 174 339 134 40 64 10 91 16 563 8 18 11 452 97 40 1 075 0 1 859 11 390 216 621 142 629 13 365 181 1 311 0 8 414 1 081 7 174 2 086 112 3 907 34 103 21 32 36 632 155 105 105 22 423 212 1 158 566 152 4 223 31 4 5 1 4 465 64 304 28

18 125 22 1 1 0 0 20 16 960 0 0 423 4 644 18 10 746 0 0 516 433 146 35 576 0 0 282 261 6 23 4 567 0 6 25 8 0 0 89 6 4 3 15 18 217 156 0 7 554 5 110 0 1 0 116 1 653 14 116 91

32 801 45 21 0 0 2 22 31 229 0 3 327 12 068 21 16 936 0 0 941 393 534 8 783 1 0 408 93 55 116 111 743 3 50 0 3 1 0 18 3 9 5 77 99 170 195 8 11 834 7 452 0 3 0 261 2 530 20 363 183

40 404 28 8 0 0 2 18 38 727 0 8 406 17 428 27 18 868 0 1 884 463 628 13 725 1 0 427 94 52 113 37 924 0 56 0 3 1 0 71 1 8 5 50 31 295 221 6 10 882 6 316 0 3 0 228 2 469 20 338 147

41 776 56 27 0 0 2 27 40 145 0 10 295 20 005 21 18 184 0 1 861 393 363 13 706 1 0 496 90 6 102 11 869 0 43 1 2 0 0 36 5 8 4 52 28 315 222 5 9 418 5 765 0 2 0 319 1 763 28 260 161

256

TABLE 43: Volume of vegetable oil trade (continued)

Vegetable oils and animal fats imports thousand tonnes 1999 Cuba Dominica Dominican Republic Ecuador El Salvador French Guiana Grenada Guatemala Guyana Haiti Honduras Jamaica Mexico Netherlands Antilles Nicaragua Panama Paraguay Peru St. Kitts & Nevis St. Lucia St. Vincent & Grenadines Suriname Trinidad & Tobago Uruguay Venezuela (Boliv. Rep. of) OCEANIA Fiji French Polynesia New Caledonia Papua New Guinea Samoa Solomon Islands Tonga Vanuatu DEVELOPED REGIONS NORTH AMERICA Bermuda Canada United States of America ASIA & OCEANIA Australia Israel Japan New Zealand EUROPE Albania Belarus Bosnia & Herzegovina Croatia European Union Iceland Macedonia, FYR Montenegro Norway Republic of Moldova Russian Federation Serbia Switzerland Ukraine thousand tonnes 2007 thousand tonnes 2008 thousand tonnes 2009 thousand tonnes 1999 exports thousand tonnes 2007 thousand tonnes 2008 thousand tonnes 2009

64 12 178 51 151 1 135 3 85 40 40 1 011 2 65 42 15 152 0 0 1 5 17 23 392 35 15 3 2 13 1 0 0 0 15 209 2 035 1 317 1 717 1 083 198 112 700 73 13 319 29 88 39 31 11 741 5 32 46 1 1 139 103 76

64 5 256 113 165 1 223 6 120 66 24 1 321 1 89 32 10 372 0 1 1 9 32 39 591 54 14 3 3 13 1 1 0 1 27 872 3 602 1 551 3 050 1 572 335 149 977 111 22 699 45 142 49 61 20 294 7 44 1 194 8 1 297 35 145 401

106 6 239 133 139 1 209 5 132 65 14 1 372 1 85 41 8 372 0 1 1 9 26 42 619 43 16 3 3 9 1 1 0 1 30 231 4 111 1 520 3 590 1 676 313 126 1 122 115 24 443 43 125 43 77 21 677 7 45 2 254 9 1 495 35 156 509

83 4 182 135 135 1 159 5 120 61 8 1 393 1 91 33 9 347 0 1 1 8 27 46 464 32 13 4 3 9 1 1 0 1 29 537 4 018 1 574 3 443 1 639 316 134 1 089 100 23 879 49 130 46 77 21 656 7 47 12 214 6 1 105 37 150 375

0 1 0 77 10 0 35 0 0 26 0 116 0 4 3 118 7 0 0 0 0 5 35 14 376 8 5 0 325 2 36 1 0 14 442 4 674 1 108 3 566 632 482 1 13 137 10 303 0 6 0 12 9 999 0 1 22 4 40 28 192

0 0 0 197 13 0 160 1 0 189 0 82 0 12 3 292 2 0 0 0 0 1 69 0 497 7 6 0 458 2 21 0 3 21 705 5 322 1 688 3 634 631 474 1 16 140 15 752 1 35 22 23 12 591 0 1 0 90 71 657 106 7 2 152

0 0 0 256 12 0 213 1 0 224 0 71 0 18 3 494 2 0 0 0 0 1 65 0 550 6 5 0 504 2 22 0 10 22 856 5 760 1 689 4 071 695 523 10 25 138 16 401 0 32 19 26 13 842 0 8 0 91 49 611 109 7 1 609

0 0 0 247 10 0 193 1 0 183 0 55 0 14 4 336 2 0 0 0 0 1 73 0 600 4 5 0 559 2 24 0 5 23 769 5 806 1 895 3 911 688 487 6 56 140 17 275 0 94 25 23 13 312 0 8 0 90 66 1 000 134 8 2 516

257

TABLE 44: Volume of dairy trade

Dairy (milk equiv.) imports thousand tonnes 1999 WORLD DEVELOPING REGIONS AFRICA North Africa Algeria Egypt Libya Morocco Tunisia Sub-Saharan Africa Angola Benin Botswana Burkina Faso Burundi Cameroon Cape Verde Central African Republic Chad Comoros Congo Cte dIvoire Congo, Dem. Rep. Djibouti Equatorial Guinea Eritrea Ethiopia Gabon Gambia Ghana Guinea Guinea-Bissau Kenya Lesotho Liberia Madagascar Malawi Mali Mauritania Mauritius Mozambique Namibia Niger Nigeria Rwanda Senegal Seychelles Sierra Leone Somalia Sudan South Africa Swaziland Tanzania, Utd. Rep. Togo Uganda Zambia Zimbabwe thousand tonnes 2007 thousand tonnes 2008 thousand tonnes 2009 thousand tonnes 1999 exports thousand tonnes 2007 thousand tonnes 2008 thousand tonnes 2009

65 320 26 071 4 498 2 750 1 497 827 171 192 62 1 748 18 30 139 51 3 51 27 3 4 2 32 150 27 36 2 9 13 37 28 67 25 2 26 6 6 14 12 85 49 123 26 33 33 210 12 129 7 1 5 44 60 47 19 8 3 11 17

87 632 34 846 7 648 3 206 1 863 571 355 364 55 4 441 27 34 108 26 1 58 43 2 8 5 38 95 77 46 1 0 11 45 35 169 32 4 16 7 13 18 22 59 114 129 17 23 45 2 349 4 200 16 12 8 208 210 25 23 27 10 18 2

87 403 34 041 6 541 3 702 2 049 863 321 386 84 2 839 31 31 81 36 6 58 37 4 9 4 37 134 71 26 1 0 11 38 44 213 12 3 15 6 8 26 26 68 149 128 25 15 73 697 5 214 14 8 8 207 148 21 25 23 10 23 7

90 225 37 133 7 080 3 870 2 392 663 396 350 69 3 210 38 28 94 43 4 71 39 4 10 3 13 113 125 23 1 0 17 46 51 147 12 4 27 6 9 23 31 79 154 138 19 15 59 829 9 347 14 7 3 271 139 21 25 24 6 26 41

66 240 4 402 418 50 0 41 0 8 1 368 0 0 0 1 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 55 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 4 1 0 5 0 0 0 232 5 0 4 1 1 49

92 138 9 590 388 207 2 106 0 23 76 181 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 18 0 1 1 2 0 0 10 0 0 40 0 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 17 0 0 0 65 0 3 6 2 5 6

92 329 9 741 529 204 1 142 0 19 42 325 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 27 0 1 1 0 0 0 11 1 0 35 0 0 0 39 0 2 0 0 1 3 0 9 0 0 1 152 0 10 6 7 3 11

96 514 9 411 975 608 2 541 0 18 46 367 0 0 1 1 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 17 0 1 1 0 0 9 12 1 0 28 0 0 0 39 0 2 0 0 1 3 0 28 0 0 0 139 0 0 18 17 39 7

258

TABLE 44: Volume of dairy trade (continued)

Dairy (milk equiv.) imports thousand tonnes 1999 ASIA Central Asia Kazakhstan Kyrgyzstan Tajikistan Turkmenistan Uzbekistan East Asia Brunei Darussalam Cambodia China Indonesia Korea, DPR Korea, Republic of Lao, PDR Malaysia Mongolia Myanmar Philippines Singapore Thailand Viet Nam South Asia Afghanistan Bangladesh Bhutan India Iran (Islamic Rep.) Maldives Nepal Pakistan Sri Lanka West Asia Armenia Azerbaijan Bahrain Cyprus Georgia Iraq Jordan Kuwait Lebanon Occupied Palestinian Territory Saudi Arabia Syrian Arab Republic Turkey United Arab Emirates Yemen LATIN AMERICA & THE CARIBBEAN Argentina Bahamas Barbados Belize Bolivia (Plur. State) Brazil Chile Colombia Costa Rica thousand tonnes 2007 thousand tonnes 2008 thousand tonnes 2009 thousand tonnes 1999 exports thousand tonnes 2007 thousand tonnes 2008 thousand tonnes 2009

14 453 127 66 2 1 15 43 9 189 25 24 2 706 1 178 2 387 12 1 177 2 113 1 313 769 1 076 397 1 267 3 327 9 216 111 19 23 127 432 3 870 37 64 30 33 15 314 219 282 288 38 1 333 127 122 431 223 6 939 53 28 24 16 57 1 956 125 104 28

20 648 454 380 25 9 5 35 12 634 22 55 3 561 1 942 19 670 17 1 619 8 125 1 395 1 441 914 843 1 533 13 342 2 20 331 28 16 223 557 6 028 42 102 123 57 56 228 218 357 283 27 1 848 336 167 1 101 467 6 369 161 33 25 16 22 417 113 54 30

20 652 533 463 25 11 5 29 11 922 19 73 3 698 1 675 21 535 11 1 467 10 81 1 328 1 424 960 619 1 532 20 260 2 55 441 30 28 199 497 6 665 47 99 118 56 49 749 283 308 235 19 1 583 292 197 1 266 378 6 688 66 32 27 13 19 534 145 70 47

23 263 502 428 24 9 4 37 14 303 17 70 5 655 1 821 13 615 10 1 422 6 93 1 374 1 477 865 862 1 954 33 456 3 228 466 30 43 206 490 6 504 34 131 192 56 53 530 319 297 318 19 1 215 286 257 1 441 485 6 617 78 41 23 15 21 834 130 57 36

1 487 8 3 5 0 0 0 1 006 0 0 499 35 3 117 0 1 264 83 3 54 0 0 0 46 2 0 4 1 1 419 0 1 1 16 20 0 11 9 1 6 104 4 25 19 7 2 496 1 509 0 0 0 5 10 111 62 37

5 605 75 25 50 0 0 0 2 479 0 0 670 168 10 411 0 266 700 252 3 528 0 0 0 431 38 0 7 42 10 2 523 3 2 12 28 2 0 30 17 4 1 1 378 250 198 230 53 3 594 1 437 0 4 0 27 473 312 77 81

5 234 56 11 45 0 0 0 2 750 0 0 698 345 11 465 0 278 748 203 2 534 0 0 0 454 12 0 5 60 2 1 894 2 0 20 28 1 0 80 12 4 1 650 79 165 198 81 3 975 1 485 0 2 0 9 778 345 93 68

4 526 64 22 42 0 0 0 1 687 0 0 180 239 17 279 0 181 594 194 2 291 0 1 0 211 13 0 5 61 1 2 484 2 0 106 33 0 0 86 37 6 1 1 237 81 154 220 46 3 907 1 835 0 1 0 32 225 282 25 76

259

TABLE 44: Volume of dairy trade (continued)

Dairy (milk equiv.) imports thousand tonnes 1999 Cuba Dominica Dominican Republic Ecuador El Salvador French Guiana Grenada Guatemala Guyana Haiti Honduras Jamaica Mexico Netherlands Antilles Nicaragua Panama Paraguay Peru St. Kitts & Nevis St. Lucia St. Vincent & Grenadines Suriname Trinidad & Tobago Uruguay Venezuela (Boliv. Rep. of) OCEANIA Fiji French Polynesia New Caledonia Papua New Guinea Samoa Solomon Islands Tonga Vanuatu DEVELOPED REGIONS NORTH AMERICA Bermuda Canada United States of America ASIA & OCEANIA Australia Israel Japan New Zealand EUROPE Albania Belarus Bosnia & Herzegovina Croatia European Union Iceland Macedonia, FYR Montenegro Norway Republic of Moldova Russian Federation Serbia Switzerland Ukraine thousand tonnes 2007 thousand tonnes 2008 thousand tonnes 2009 thousand tonnes 1999 exports thousand tonnes 2007 thousand tonnes 2008 thousand tonnes 2009

338 7 127 12 181 10 182 77 75 109 62 2 118 35 55 54 9 353 5 13 7 14 109 5 550 181 52 26 32 31 6 2 8 2 35 197 1 881 7 483 1 390 1 978 326 49 1 567 36 35 356 22 24 72 119 33 090 1 27 18 2 1 720 224 30

424 10 59 8 176 8 222 35 67 100 101 2 745 19 30 77 14 218 4 13 9 6 112 6 1 002 181 55 38 36 25 5 2 6 4 52 729 2 405 10 830 1 563 2 395 469 87 1 742 98 47 929 33 48 103 121 45 051 1 53 10 42 23 2 043 36 305 114

397 15 68 10 174 6 190 43 70 108 75 2 483 18 23 103 15 226 3 13 8 6 115 7 1 529 161 56 34 28 22 5 2 3 3 53 305 1 957 6 638 1 312 2 311 591 93 1 535 91 49 037 28 69 106 153 45 911 1 39 11 43 21 2 231 57 295 124

423 15 67 6 178 9 232 40 72 114 63 2 724 19 26 76 19 214 3 9 9 6 100 8 916 174 51 35 38 25 6 2 4 4 53 036 1 671 6 349 1 316 2 286 585 62 1 499 140 49 080 30 53 115 136 46 119 1 47 57 44 30 1 914 44 300 242

0 0 0 6 1 0 2 0 0 7 4 105 1 42 15 0 4 0 0 0 8 559 4 0 0 0 0 0

4 0 0 7 6 0 4 0 1 20 1 118 0 123 8 7 108 0 1 0 5 771 0 3 3 0 0 0

4 0 0 4 8 0 4 1 1 27 2 117 0 173 10 7 130 0 2 0 6 697 1 3 3 0 0 0

4 0 1 7 6 0 6 1 1 51 3 114 0 188 8 8 104 0 2 0 4 919 1 3 3 0 0 0

0 0 57 546 3 129 766 2 363 13 197 5 454 8 2 7 733 45 496 0 278 4 32 44 161 4 2 138 26 105 484 278

0 0 82 520 6 581 446 6 135 15 490 3 826 15 25 11 624 60 450 0 1 740 42 69 56 355 7 1 0 87 14 269 57 806 1 031

0 0 82 559 7 493 375 7 119 13 021 3 622 23 12 9 365 62 046 0 1 825 51 62 57 809 12 7 0 89 15 270 59 876 998

0 0 87 070 5 863 367 5 496 18 483 4 180 51 16 14 235 62 724 0 2 299 59 72 58 190 8 3 0 92 15 244 64 1 009 704

260

TABLE 45: Volume of total meat trade

Meat imports thousand tonnes 1999 WORLD DEVELOPING REGIONS AFRICA North Africa Algeria Egypt Libya Morocco Tunisia Sub-Saharan Africa Angola Benin Botswana Burkina Faso Burundi Cameroon Cape Verde Central African Republic Chad Comoros Congo Cte dIvoire Congo, Dem. Rep. Djibouti Equatorial Guinea Eritrea Ethiopia Gabon Gambia Ghana Guinea Guinea-Bissau Kenya Lesotho Liberia Madagascar Malawi Mali Mauritania Mauritius Mozambique Namibia Niger Nigeria Rwanda Senegal Seychelles Sierra Leone Somalia Sudan South Africa Swaziland Tanzania, Utd. Rep. Togo Uganda Zambia Zimbabwe thousand tonnes 2007 thousand tonnes 2008 thousand tonnes 2009 thousand tonnes 1999 exports thousand tonnes 2007 thousand tonnes 2008 thousand tonnes 2009

22 149 7 069 671 218 26 184 1 3 3 453 46 42 4 0 0 11 1 0 0 2 14 13 13 0 4 0 0 23 2 31 1 1 0 6 8 0 1 0 1 15 3 32 0 4 0 1 1 0 0 0 158 7 1 2 0 0 1

33 324 10 943 1 567 482 83 350 29 12 8 1 085 200 71 6 0 0 5 9 0 0 7 38 22 67 16 13 0 0 58 7 114 6 1 1 8 9 0 0 0 7 15 12 22 0 1 0 15 4 6 0 1 330 6 0 6 0 0 1

35 379 12 016 1 342 266 78 125 44 12 7 1 075 252 106 7 0 0 3 10 0 0 6 38 19 48 11 14 0 0 50 4 106 6 1 1 8 11 1 0 0 5 15 12 34 0 1 0 12 3 6 0 1 257 5 2 15 1 0 1

34 987 11 857 1 377 290 82 157 30 13 8 1 087 234 115 7 0 0 2 11 0 0 7 9 16 55 9 16 0 0 63 5 110 6 1 0 8 10 0 1 0 9 16 16 34 0 3 0 10 3 6 0 2 264 5 2 11 0 0 18

23 444 4 466 114 2 0 1 0 1 1 112 0 0 21 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

34 685 10 958 102 2 0 1 0 1 0 100 0 0 41 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

37 403 11 040 93 5 0 2 0 3 1 88 0 0 25 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

37 644 11 350 118 6 0 3 0 1 2 113 0 0 33 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 34 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 19 2 0 0 0 0 21

5 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 23 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 19 0 1 0 0 0 3

8 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 0 0 0 0 0 3

7 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 38 0 0 1 0 0 1

261

TABLE 45: Volume of total meat trade (continued)

Meat imports thousand tonnes 1999 ASIA Central Asia Kazakhstan Kyrgyzstan Tajikistan Turkmenistan Uzbekistan East Asia Brunei Darussalam Cambodia China Indonesia Korea, DPR Korea, Republic of Lao, PDR Malaysia Mongolia Myanmar Philippines Singapore Thailand Viet Nam South Asia Afghanistan Bangladesh Bhutan India Iran (Islamic Rep.) Maldives Nepal Pakistan Sri Lanka West Asia Armenia Azerbaijan Bahrain Cyprus Georgia Iraq Jordan Kuwait Lebanon Occupied Palestinian Territory Saudi Arabia Syrian Arab Republic Turkey United Arab Emirates Yemen LATIN AMERICA & THE CARIBBEAN Argentina Bahamas Barbados Belize Bolivia (Plur. State) Brazil Chile Colombia Costa Rica thousand tonnes 2007 thousand tonnes 2008 thousand tonnes 2009 thousand tonnes 1999 exports thousand tonnes 2007 thousand tonnes 2008 thousand tonnes 2009

4 634 79 23 1 24 6 25 3 508 5 0 2 556 38 1 429 0 145 0 0 149 179 3 0 55 0 0 0 0 50 2 0 0 3 991 30 31 19 6 33 0 34 74 28 11 458 0 0 146 38 1 652 133 33 11 1 2 49 111 33 3

6 451 266 198 34 25 1 9 4 083 4 1 2 402 66 1 774 0 207 1 0 194 253 5 169 118 11 1 0 1 80 8 0 13 5 1 984 43 20 38 16 51 122 88 163 50 11 668 8 0 430 103 2 803 41 42 12 3 1 35 199 51 9

7 685 290 188 55 33 7 7 5 014 5 1 3 250 69 1 750 0 191 2 0 232 256 5 246 157 33 0 0 1 106 7 0 6 3 2 224 72 25 39 16 62 152 107 214 55 14 672 5 1 490 81 2 869 38 40 10 3 1 35 149 56 9

7 499 228 153 35 29 6 5 4 686 5 1 2 883 94 0 721 0 203 2 0 228 257 5 281 154 24 0 0 2 116 7 0 3 1 2 431 53 24 45 18 60 127 107 246 74 15 748 5 1 498 118 2 861 41 55 10 2 5 39 201 54 10

2 261 13 13 0 0 0 2 021 0 0 1 444 7 0 116 0 14 15 0 0 7 348 70 188 0 0 181 5 0 0 1 0 39 0 0 0 3 4 0 3 1 1 1 9 0 12 5 0 2 088 352 0 1 0 1 1 315 36 2 22

2 754 3 3 0 0 0 2 048 0 0 1 451 5 0 20 0 15 11 0 7 22 502 14 517 0 0 498 3 0 0 15 1 187 2 2 2 4 1 0 13 0 6 1 56 2 55 41 0 8 098 677 0 1 0 4 6 291 220 85 23

2 827 3 3 0 0 0 2 103 0 0 1 401 5 0 22 0 25 7 0 7 17 611 9 527 0 0 506 2 0 0 18 1 193 1 2 1 9 1 0 34 0 7 1 17 1 82 34 0 8 118 612 0 1 0 2 6 244 228 160 28

3 021 0 0 0 0 0 2 155 0 0 1 450 6 0 25 0 29 9 0 9 15 601 11 600 0 0 569 2 0 2 26 2 265 1 2 1 8 0 0 51 2 7 1 15 1 121 30 0 8 208 839 0 1 0 2 6 062 276 108 30

262

TABLE 45: Volume of total meat trade (continued)

Meat imports thousand tonnes 1999 Cuba Dominica Dominican Republic Ecuador El Salvador French Guiana Grenada Guatemala Guyana Haiti Honduras Jamaica Mexico Netherlands Antilles Nicaragua Panama Paraguay Peru St. Kitts & Nevis St. Lucia St. Vincent & Grenadines Suriname Trinidad & Tobago Uruguay Venezuela (Boliv. Rep. of) OCEANIA Fiji French Polynesia New Caledonia Papua New Guinea Samoa Solomon Islands Tonga Vanuatu DEVELOPED REGIONS NORTH AMERICA Bermuda Canada United States of America ASIA & OCEANIA Australia Israel Japan New Zealand EUROPE Albania Belarus Bosnia & Herzegovina Croatia European Union Iceland Macedonia, FYR Montenegro Norway Republic of Moldova Russian Federation Serbia Switzerland Ukraine thousand tonnes 2007 thousand tonnes 2008 thousand tonnes 2009 thousand tonnes 1999 exports thousand tonnes 2007 thousand tonnes 2008 thousand tonnes 2009

67 3 11 2 12 6 30 9 37 11 57 880 19 3 16 2 17 3 13 7 9 14 8 6 111 15 22 10 38 8 0 7 1 14 693 2 130 6 452 1 672 2 635 32 68 2 507 28 10 310 39 33 36 28 8 535 0 42 8 5 1 381 87 98

195 4 8 7 40 7 82 1 33 37 57 1 390 16 6 16 4 18 4 12 9 16 29 17 379 121 11 29 11 38 10 2 9 1 22 365 2 519 9 614 1 895 2 938 130 87 2 669 50 16 909 46 28 28 69 13 329 1 76 16 25 22 2 936 7 105 233

187 4 18 9 40 6 80 2 34 38 54 1 514 18 7 19 4 19 4 12 9 16 36 15 357 120 12 28 15 38 11 1 6 2 23 347 2 270 13 633 1 623 3 003 142 97 2 716 48 18 073 46 73 34 77 13 955 1 57 27 24 40 3 122 12 126 492

208 5 25 7 42 7 94 2 39 38 45 1 538 22 8 22 3 25 4 12 8 17 32 15 197 120 10 28 14 40 11 1 8 2 23 112 2 304 12 630 1 661 3 081 165 83 2 782 50 17 727 46 39 39 89 14 410 1 63 32 15 15 2 506 13 110 363

0 0 0 3 2 0 4 0 0 2 1 70 0 26 6 22 0 0 0 0 2 215 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 17 862 5 075 1 052 4 023 2 309 1 533 6 5 765 11 590 0 34 2 14 11 324 1 0 22 27 8 2 156

0 0 0 1 5 0 14 0 0 3 1 137 0 75 6 184 2 0 0 0 1 367 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 23 723 6 740 1 541 5 199 2 641 1 724 25 7 883 14 342 0 116 6 15 14 088 1 4 0 4 4 37 25 3 44

0 0 0 1 6 0 17 0 0 7 1 149 0 75 6 218 3 0 0 0 1 359 0 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 26 354 8 271 1 683 6 587 2 609 1 712 20 10 867 15 474 0 144 8 18 15 206 2 6 1 3 1 47 18 3 27

0 0 0 1 8 0 17 0 0 5 1 135 0 92 5 239 3 0 0 0 2 382 0 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 26 286 7 906 1 652 6 254 2 557 1 666 11 14 867 15 823 0 182 8 21 15 511 3 6 1 3 1 41 13 3 39

263

TABLE 46: Value of total sh trade

Fish imports US$ million 1999 WORLD DEVELOPING REGIONS AFRICA North Africa Algeria Egypt Libya Morocco Tunisia Sub-Saharan Africa Angola Benin Botswana Burkina Faso Burundi Cameroon Cape Verde Central African Republic Chad Comoros Congo Cte dIvoire Congo, Dem. Rep. Djibouti Equatorial Guinea Eritrea Ethiopia Gabon Gambia Ghana Guinea Guinea-Bissau Kenya Lesotho Liberia Madagascar Malawi Mali Mauritania Mauritius Mozambique Namibia Niger Nigeria Rwanda Senegal Seychelles Sierra Leone Somalia Sudan South Africa Swaziland Tanzania, Utd. Rep. Togo Uganda Zambia Zimbabwe US$ million 2007 US$ million 2008 US$ million 2009 US$ million 1999 US$ million 2007 exports US$ million 2008 US$ million 2009

57 611.1 8 840.6 972.7 202.8 13.3 153.1 12.7 10.5 13.3 769.8 14.5 7.6 5.1 2.0 0.1 29.6 0.9 0.5 0.0 0.5 18.7 172.8 40.7 2.0 2.5 0.1 0.2 9.5 0.4 103.2 13.5 0.5 5.3 1.4 11.6 0.7 2.9 0.6 32.6 4.8 5.9 0.4 178.1 0.1 3.8 3.1 3.3 0.2 0.9 55.7 9.7 0.2 12.2 0.1 1.2 9.9

98 823.3 21 014.5 2 807.2 399.1 25.5 223.9 35.3 61.7 52.7 2 408.1 70.3 24.3 10.2 5.8 0.0 126.7 2.0 1.8 0.5 0.5 11.9 279.7 71.0 7.6 17.4 0.2 0.8 13.8 0.9 170.8 9.1 1.5 8.5 2.0 2.9 57.6 1.2 6.8 0.2 227.5 26.7 35.3 0.8 892.8 3.0 2.1 81.9 3.6 2.7 2.9 192.7 5.3 2.3 7.8 0.7 10.4 3.5

107 933.4 23 971.1 3 052.7 601.4 29.6 377.8 47.7 75.3 71.0 2 451.3 114.5 32.1 12.7 6.5 0.0 178.1 3.3 2.0 0.3 1.4 30.0 398.4 88.8 9.7 16.1 0.3 1.7 17.6 0.8 128.7 3.6 2.0 6.2 2.8 6.2 26.6 1.8 7.8 0.2 303.7 38.9 39.4 1.3 618.1 1.8 2.8 63.5 3.5 3.7 1.9 238.7 4.0 3.9 11.0 0.9 8.9 4.8

99 651.3 23 434.0 3 371.3 763.8 53.9 475.5 51.9 115.8 66.6 2 607.5 97.3 28.5 9.3 9.1 0.2 243.3 3.0 3.0 0.5 2.5 5.5 363.5 51.0 16.7 25.5 0.1 1.1 19.6 0.8 121.4 8.8 1.5 6.6 2.1 2.6 18.0 2.7 9.4 0.4 235.5 39.8 39.1 1.4 836.6 5.5 1.1 87.4 4.1 5.5 4.6 260.6 2.9 4.0 10.1 0.8 8.4 6.0

53 098.7 25 599.0 2 468.2 842.4 2.7 1.4 5.3 750.8 82.1 1 625.8 10.0 0.9 0.1 0.0 0.2 1.5 2.6

93 468.3 45 605.6 4 509.5 1 583.4 12.2 4.5 11.7 1 371.1 184.1 2 926.1 15.8 0.4 0.1 0.8 0.2 1.4 11.3 0.0 0.3

101 854.2 50 943.5 4 792.2 1 942.4 13.3 10.7 23.2 1 696.5 198.6 2 849.8 9.4 0.0 0.0 1.2 0.2 1.4 2.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.1 198.5 0.4 0.5 0.1 0.9 0.4 7.4 2.8 44.1 5.5 1.5 75.7 0.1 0.6 160.2 0.3 0.1 148.7 280.5 76.8 576.8 0.4 75.1 0.1 223.0 97.2 10.1 4.5 0.3 518.9 0.2 184.7 2.1 119.4 1.3 1.5

95 947.6 48 780.0 4 508.1 1 725.4 8.5 14.1 4.8 1 547.8 150.2 2 782.6 9.1 0.2 0.3 1.0 0.2 2.2 14.9 0.0 0.0 0.7 170.3 0.6 0.5 0.1 1.6 0.3 2.1 5.2 53.9 9.3 3.1 57.1 1.0 115.2 0.2 0.1 126.4 284.5 66.4 574.9 0.3 100.7 0.3 242.2 210.2 9.8 3.1 0.2 441.8 0.2 145.5 5.0 109.2 1.2 2.2

0.0 1.7 153.1 0.4 0.1 2.3 1.0 0.0 8.9 3.2 72.2 1.7 2.0 32.4 0.1 39.3 0.2 0.5 95.6 38.6 74.8 291.0 1.6 10.7 301.5 108.4 12.3 4.1 0.2 260.1 2.2 60.2 1.5 24.2 0.8 1.5 510.8 0.1 165.6 2.1 118.1 0.4 3.0 2.4 171.8 0.4 0.5 0.1 1.5 0.6 14.8 3.5 61.0 7.7 2.9 61.5 0.6 186.8 0.3 0.9 159.5 263.0 70.1 502.6 0.3 50.1 0.0 313.5 197.8 10.6 3.1

264

TABLE 46: Value of total sh trade (continued)

Fish imports US$ million 1999 ASIA Central Asia Kazakhstan Kyrgyzstan Tajikistan Turkmenistan Uzbekistan East Asia Brunei Darussalam Cambodia China Indonesia Korea, DPR Korea, Republic of Lao, PDR Malaysia Mongolia Myanmar Philippines Singapore Thailand Viet Nam South Asia Afghanistan Bangladesh Bhutan India Iran (Islamic Rep.) Maldives Nepal Pakistan Sri Lanka West Asia Armenia Azerbaijan Bahrain Cyprus Georgia Iraq Jordan Kuwait Lebanon Occupied Palestinian Territory Saudi Arabia Syrian Arab Republic Turkey United Arab Emirates Yemen LATIN AMERICA & THE CARIBBEAN Argentina Bahamas Barbados Belize Bolivia (Plur. State) Brazil Chile Colombia Costa Rica US$ million 2007 US$ million 2008 US$ million 2009 US$ million 1999 US$ million 2007 exports US$ million 2008 US$ million 2009

6 800.7 16.8 11.9 1.9 0.1 0.1 2.7 6 215.9 11.5 2.8 3 291.0 62.6 2.6 1 150.0 1.2 258.7 0.1 1.0 121.5 460.7 840.7 11.6 161.6 1.1 18.9 80.7 0.2 0.8 59.8 406.4 2.3 0.8 3.2 31.9 1.4 1.3 21.0 22.1 48.0

15 637.3 65.5 55.9 5.6 1.0 0.9 2.1 14 294.8 15.5 3.1 7 358.7 115.0 73.2 3 090.0 3.7 633.7 0.8 2.8 122.8 796.3 1 714.7 364.0 208.3 6.1 3.1 47.1 25.4 8.4 1.1 3.5 113.5 1 068.7 4.1 5.8 8.9 79.5 34.7 27.9 56.9 62.4 73.9 7.2

17 623.5 91.9 77.1 7.2 1.4 1.9 4.3 16 060.1 11.8 2.4 8 348.4 196.2 84.4 2 928.2 4.4 582.2 1.2 4.6 146.7 899.5 2 400.3 449.2 244.8 9.6 2.3 57.6 36.7 8.5 1.9 2.1 126.1 1 226.6 8.8 11.1 17.0 100.2 46.1 44.1 79.3 75.9 86.8 10.5 222.6 41.1 198.6 301.7 10.1 3 171.8 100.1 21.8 20.3 2.1 10.1 689.8 250.7 240.4 61.0

17 043.8 78.4 65.8 8.0 1.1 1.5 2.0 15 465.7 10.7 4.6 8 351.3 229.6 93.7 2 693.6 4.1 672.4 1.2 6.1 192.3 807.0 1 978.6 419.4 256.7 17.3 2.5 58.8 34.0 8.2 2.8 2.0 131.2 1 242.9 7.9 16.1 14.3 78.0 32.3 22.6 86.0 79.8 97.5 12.6 223.3 59.9 187.0 313.0 8.9 2 902.7 97.8 20.8 18.1 1.3 10.3 721.6 113.6 228.3 54.7

16 377.3 12.6 12.3 0.0 0.3 0.0 14 390.2 0.2 34.9 5 048.1 1 527.1 71.5 1 394.4 0.1 299.4 0.3 201.3 372.3 390.2 4 109.9 940.5 1 737.8 251.9 1 188.7 42.0 38.9 0.0 142.1 74.1 236.6 0.5 3.9 6.9 4.3 0.2 1.2 4.7 0.3

29 606.6 80.2 79.2 0.2 0.0 0.7 26 024.7 3.2 23.3 11 329.4 2 100.9 34.4 1 088.4 0.1 752.3 0.1 357.9 473.4 368.4 5 708.8 3 783.8 2 825.8 630.8 1 670.5 55.0 106.0 191.7 171.7 676.0 4.7 5.9 15.6 31.6 2.5 0.1 1.0 1.6 2.7 0.5

33 157.2 84.5 83.4 0.4 0.1 0.6 29 431.2 2.4 24.7 12 128.3 2 473.4 45.6 1 286.8 0.0 795.0 0.4 560.6 644.5 386.5 6 532.4 4 550.3 2 711.6 537.4 0.0 1 623.5 57.9 124.3 193.2 175.2 929.9 5.4 5.6 19.2 42.8 6.7 0.1 4.9 2.1 4.5 0.3 65.2 0.2 435.4 89.1 206.7 12 549.3 1 310.2 82.5 0.7 23.8 0.0 274.0 3 931.0 240.0 127.1

32 471.7 88.1 85.9 0.4 0.0 1.8 28 478.0 0.4 30.4 12 239.6 2 247.5 60.3 1 348.7 0.0 654.7 0.2 483.0 569.3 307.0 6 235.9 4 300.9 3 091.8 516.0 2 015.2 76.3 74.9 0.0 228.5 180.9 813.7 3.6 6.0 16.2 13.7 5.3 0.1 7.1 2.6 6.2 0.4 71.2 0.6 342.5 71.0 190.4 11 337.9 1 147.9 65.1 0.4 26.3 0.0 196.6 3 606.3 208.7 116.3

110.0 55.0 59.2 67.3 4.3 1 016.5 88.4 10.1 11.0 3.0 2.9 289.8 54.6 71.0 25.4

249.6 42.4 175.0 259.2 9.4 2 460.9 100.3 17.8 18.8 1.5 5.4 568.3 177.9 174.1 45.0

9.7 98.2 50.5 20.5 6 535.4 783.3 99.4 1.0 33.3 0.0 138.2 1 702.0 183.7 148.3

61.7 0.3 221.3 89.4 173.8 11 099.4 1 103.7 83.4 0.9 20.9 0.0 313.8 3 677.0 188.7 107.3

265

TABLE 46: Value of total sh trade (continued)

Fish imports US$ million 1999 Cuba Dominica Dominican Republic Ecuador El Salvador French Guiana Grenada Guatemala Guyana Haiti Honduras Jamaica Mexico Netherlands Antilles Nicaragua Panama Paraguay Peru St. Kitts & Nevis St. Lucia St. Vincent & Grenadines Suriname Trinidad & Tobago Uruguay Venezuela (Boliv. Rep. of) OCEANIA Fiji French Polynesia New Caledonia Papua New Guinea Samoa Solomon Islands Tonga Vanuatu DEVELOPED REGIONS NORTH AMERICA Bermuda Canada United States of America ASIA & OCEANIA Australia Israel Japan New Zealand EUROPE Albania Belarus Bosnia & Herzegovina Croatia European Union Iceland Macedonia, FYR Montenegro Norway Republic of Moldova Russian Federation Serbia Switzerland Ukraine US$ million 2007 US$ million 2008 US$ million 2009 US$ million 1999 US$ million 2007 exports US$ million 2008 US$ million 2009

32.5 1.5 53.1 5.1 6.6 2.5 6.8 2.5 8.0 15.4 59.3 125.7 6.4 7.8 15.1 1.6 16.7 2.2 5.2 1.5 1.9 8.0 13.1 40.4 50.7 16.2 8.9 5.7 7.8 6.0 0.1 0.9 0.7 48 770.5 10 753.6 7.6 1 338.6 9 405.1 15 418.0 486.9 129.9 14 748.7 52.4 22 598.9 6.1 54.9 9.8 34.8 21 132.5 80.7 9.8 612.5 2.8 199.1 375.7 96.8

49.2 1.8 90.4 55.9 54.3 4.7 44.0 2.7 17.0 19.1 94.4 540.4 11.1 6.6 25.1 2.5 35.9 3.9 6.8 2.2 6.3 25.7 44.0 179.3 109.1 34.3 18.3 14.2 21.6 6.6 2.4 2.4 2.8 77 808.8 16 445.5 7.3 1 994.4 14 440.5 14 544.7 1 065.9 194.7 13 184.5 99.6 46 818.6 17.7 285.0 34.1 127.0 41 922.6 99.1 20.0 6.4 1 095.1 32.2 2 017.3 90.4 593.0 543.0

66.4 2.0 116.6 233.5 29.4 4.6 36.8 1.2 21.9 26.6 102.8 590.6 14.0 7.3 32.2 3.9 72.5 3.3 8.3 2.5 4.9 26.6 51.1 290.1 123.2 40.8 18.5 16.5 28.0 6.7 2.6 1.4 2.3 83 962.2 17 007.5 6.1 2 045.5 14 952.4 16 416.9 1 101.2 246.5 14 947.5 121.9 50 537.8 26.1 339.7 39.7 142.0 44 731.3 110.1 23.0 16.3 1 211.3 49.5 2 421.5 106.0 648.6 742.0

36.6 2.4 126.2 225.1 77.0 3.8 43.8 1.6 26.5 21.3 88.6 384.6 15.5 5.8 33.0 4.2 78.5 3.1 6.3 1.9 6.6 28.9 50.9 337.8 116.2 38.5 18.9 11.1 27.6 5.1 3.0 1.7 2.7 76 217.3 15 882.2 6.7 2 013.2 13 858.2 14 645.4 1 058.3 227.2 13 258.1 101.8 45 689.7 27.2 298.0 36.9 104.0 40 697.1 73.8 24.5 13.1 1 168.8 39.8 1 991.0 101.6 627.3 541.1

96.1 3.0 954.5 33.6 3.5 28.1 42.6 3.7 198.4 14.7 649.9 5.7 78.6 194.9 0.0 788.4 0.2 0.9 37.2 12.3 99.0 134.1 218.1 22.3 3.1 18.8 38.9 11.7 25.1 2.6 70.8 27 499.7 5 834.4 0.0 2 617.8 2 945.0 2 339.6 899.0 8.5 719.8 712.3 19 325.7 8.6 14.0 34.8 12 405.8 1 379.4 0.1 3 764.8 0.4 1 217.7 3.0 75.1

81.0 0.0 3.6 1 399.2 109.4 4.1 89.6 63.7 4.9 186.9 9.2 830.2 6.2 96.4 365.0 0.2 1 962.2 0.4 0.0 0.3 49.2 8.7 176.9 33.0 390.1 68.8 5.6 24.9 138.7 8.7 22.0 2.8 62.7 47 862.7 8 447.3 0.0 3 711.9 4 436.7 3 544.8 941.5 17.3 1 662.6 923.4 35 870.6 25.1 107.4 10.5 152.6 24 244.5 2 028.5 0.4 0.7 6 228.1 0.0 2 364.0 2.0 16.2 33.4

79.7 0.0 4.4 1 754.8 119.7 3.0 77.9 68.0 4.8 186.0 9.4 828.2 21.7 127.4 409.6 0.1 2 422.7 0.3 0.1 0.5 53.4 10.4 208.0 28.3 444.8 88.7 3.4 28.2 138.7 5.6 18.9 2.4 51.5 50 910.7 8 539.5 0.3 3 706.2 4 463.1 3 562.4 948.5 21.2 1 698.2 894.4 38 808.9 29.1 138.1 13.3 149.8 26 129.2 2 089.5 0.8 0.3 6 936.6 0.0 2 618.8 7.6 24.2 39.5

44.1 0.0 4.5 1 610.8 94.2 4.9 86.7 53.3 5.0 152.8 6.5 802.7 33.7 108.0 381.4 0.0 2 208.9 0.1 0.4 71.8 10.5 176.4 14.2 462.4 89.6 6.2 23.7 159.8 7.6 19.1 4.2 51.5 47 167.6 7 724.9 0.4 3 239.5 4 144.6 3 330.3 823.9 21.5 1 583.1 901.7 36 112.4 32.5 98.0 12.9 164.5 23 946.4 1 726.4 0.8 1.5 7 072.7 0.2 2 316.8 6.3 21.6 60.5

266

TABLE 47: Value of net trade (exports-imports) in selected cash crops

Coffee, tea, cocoa and spices net trade in cash crops (value) US$ million 1999 WORLD DEVELOPING REGIONS AFRICA North Africa Algeria Egypt Libya Morocco Tunisia Sub-Saharan Africa Angola Benin Botswana Burkina Faso Burundi Cameroon Cape Verde Central African Republic Chad Comoros Congo Cte dIvoire Congo, Dem. Rep. Djibouti Equatorial Guinea Eritrea Ethiopia Gabon Gambia Ghana Guinea Guinea-Bissau Kenya Lesotho Liberia Madagascar Malawi Mali Mauritania Mauritius Mozambique Namibia Niger Nigeria Rwanda Senegal Seychelles Sierra Leone Somalia Sudan South Africa Swaziland Tanzania, Utd. Rep. Togo Uganda Zambia Zimbabwe US$ million 2007 US$ million 2008 US$ million 2009 US$ million 1999 Fruit and vegetables net trade in cash crops (value) US$ million 2007 US$ million 2008 US$ million 2009

1 228.4 13 472.9 3 814.2 482.2 171.3 129.5 39.9 103.7 37.8 4 298.9 2.1 1.4 15.4 7.6 43.5 267.2 2.8 12.7 1.0 3.9 0.4 1 764.2 31.5 1.5 6.3 0.3 269.9 1.7 1.9 466.1 9.0 0.1 625.5 2.7 47.9 48.7 17.9 8.2 6.7 4.8 11.7 5.9 307.0 44.7 18.1 0.9 5.1 2.8 58.2 46.5 7.1 163.2 32.3 310.7 6.1 46.8

1 444.5 17 728.2 5 283.5 565.3 242.9 63.0 59.4 170.7 29.3 5 850.7 19.7 3.0 23.5 6.3 51.0 346.3 4.2 3.0 1.1 8.0 12.8 2 339.3 4.0 6.6 4.0 1.2 427.1 4.3 5.0 1 043.9 48.1 0.2 857.3 1.3 118.7 59.3 19.5 18.1 15.2 6.6 39.5 11.3 279.1 62.2 22.1 2.7 21.4 3.1 117.9 150.1 2.7 177.3 142.7 302.6 5.6 10.9

1 344.9 22 027.6 6 577.2 753.2 285.6 162.0 76.8 181.8 47.2 7 332.4 28.8 4.9 25.9 4.3 46.2 508.5 4.4 0.0 0.6 7.7 13.9 2 913.3 12.9 7.7 3.1 0.6 485.0 3.8 3.3 1 037.2 6.7 0.5 1 086.4 9.2 115.7 40.2 27.1 11.5 17.9 10.7 33.3 11.7 523.2 178.0 26.5 2.4 22.7 7.1 151.7 200.5 5.3 184.7 245.4 471.1 1.1 6.2

224.7 22 213.8 7 743.3 858.3 314.6 296.3 27.2 189.3 30.9 8 603.5 35.7 3.8 28.6 6.4 47.1 660.9 4.3 1.2 1.6 10.1 18.8 3 812.6 8.3 6.2 2.0 0.6 374.9 8.0 1.2 1 341.4 3.9 0.7 1 092.0 9.8 113.4 79.6 36.9 38.9 21.7 15.9 33.3 17.3 631.2 68.5 28.4 2.4 21.9 5.2 135.5 151.2 5.3 224.3 288.8 368.4 0.9 4.8

7 525.7 10 777.5 11 716.9 14 416.5 1 676.7 349.2 176.6 111.5 62.8 645.3 54.9 1 327.5 21.1 0.6 57.9 19.4 1.1 41.1 12.4 0.5 0.3 0.9 9.1 205.6 17.7 3.7 0.0 2.7 13.3 12.6 4.1 12.6 8.6 49.0 143.6 28.8 4.7 15.4 6.5 4.5 7.4 35.9 9.9 28.9 24.1 25.6 3.4 13.2 8.2 3.6 4.3 6.7 886.9 2.5 160.6 1.4 1.4 1.8 36.1 30 137.2 2 418.8 707.2 453.4 251.3 173.9 936.6 146.6 1 711.6 106.1 5.2 87.6 2.9 12.2 53.1 30.1 1.7 2.1 1.8 11.5 232.2 36.7 15.6 0.1 2.8 86.5 23.3 8.2 2.4 14.6 52.9 353.3 27.2 9.4 26.0 17.6 8.6 32.9 58.0 24.2 10.5 22.2 118.5 2.1 50.5 17.6 7.8 6.0 73.9 1 560.5 13.6 49.0 4.3 8.9 6.2 13.1 32 419.1 3 310.0 1 139.4 513.7 446.0 264.2 1 222.3 248.9 2 170.6 148.5 16.0 98.0 2.8 3.7 76.1 36.1 1.5 5.7 2.7 12.6 271.8 47.5 40.8 0.2 9.4 151.5 26.5 6.4 78.4 9.4 93.7 406.1 25.1 8.3 26.6 17.4 11.5 30.9 66.2 6.9 29.6 7.7 66.7 10.0 59.7 12.6 10.7 22.2 132.0 1 732.8 24.3 138.5 7.6 7.0 3.2 19.6

8 581.5 30 936.5 3 811.9 1 930.9 518.8 1 404.5 245.8 1 088.0 203.1 1 881.0 145.1 39.6 99.7 5.8 0.8 58.3 30.4 2.1 5.8 2.1 3.7 255.8 47.2 45.5 0.3 5.3 216.6 26.7 5.1 45.6 8.8 99.2 291.8 25.8 9.0 21.7 28.1 13.8 35.9 71.4 12.3 24.6 5.1 176.8 6.1 53.5 11.4 9.0 12.7 136.7 1 792.8 12.8 140.8 5.4 7.5 6.9 69.3

267

TABLE 47: Value of net trade (exports-imports) in selected cash crops (continued)
Coffee, tea, cocoa and spices net trade in cash crops (value) US$ million 1999 ASIA Central Asia Kazakhstan Kyrgyzstan Tajikistan Turkmenistan Uzbekistan East Asia Brunei Darussalam Cambodia China Indonesia Korea, DPR Korea, Republic of Lao, PDR Malaysia Mongolia Myanmar Philippines Singapore Thailand Viet Nam South Asia Afghanistan Bangladesh Bhutan India Iran (Islamic Rep.) Maldives Nepal Pakistan Sri Lanka West Asia Armenia Azerbaijan Bahrain Cyprus Georgia Iraq Jordan Kuwait Lebanon Occupied Palestinian Territory Saudi Arabia Syrian Arab Republic Turkey United Arab Emirates Yemen LATIN AMERICA & THE CARIBBEAN Argentina Bahamas Barbados Belize Bolivia (Plur. State) Brazil Chile Colombia Costa Rica US$ million 2007 US$ million 2008 US$ million 2009 US$ million 1999 Fruit and vegetables net trade in cash crops (value) US$ million 2007 US$ million 2008 US$ million 2009

2 853.9 96.2 46.2 7.5 1.2 33.1 8.3 2 482.2 6.9 1.0 305.2 1 212.6 200.8 21.7 151.1 3.5 14.8 53.0 243.4 41.6 774.4 1 320.4 56.1 16.7 0.9 996.8 0.2 10.1 276.0 651.9 856.3 17.0 2.7 2.2 21.7 4.5 34.7 33.1 99.5 63.9 21.3 204.2 84.2 6.6 268.5 3.3 6 609.9 22.5 3.0 5.9 0.7 5.6 2 608.9 25.1 1 414.4 317.0

3 533.2 352.4 260.0 33.9 22.6 12.1 23.8 3 983.2 15.7 13.8 626.7 1 778.0 358.1 9.9 242.9 22.1 28.4 108.6 69.4 3.9 2 290.3 1 483.5 38.4 53.2 0.0 1 337.0 53.7 4.0 251.2 558.8 1 592.9 44.1 17.2 32.7 52.0 62.0 64.7 74.6 76.9 101.0 23.1 606.2 98.0 35.6 399.9 21.1 8 715.3 7.0 11.6 7.8 3.1 1.1 4 207.4 74.4 1 884.9 244.7

4 709.3 470.4 307.2 48.4 37.9 31.0 45.8 4 971.1 16.3 3.5 744.9 2 563.8 419.2 8.8 356.2 33.1 23.3 142.9 110.9 32.9 2 557.7 2 320.6 42.5 57.5 0.0 1 631.1 269.8 7.7 243.9 1 309.6 2 126.1 69.6 26.5 35.1 68.2 80.6 106.7 112.3 132.7 112.5 11.2 497.8 207.0 58.4 610.8 17.5 10 425.0 45.9 11.8 8.6 3.3 6.6 5 109.9 104.0 2 117.0 323.7

4 388.4 450.6 275.9 60.8 30.4 38.5 45.0 4 813.9 17.0 9.8 826.5 2 553.3 372.6 5.5 27.0 30.4 22.8 150.7 96.3 17.2 1 937.4 2 014.4 2.4 102.7 0.0 1 374.9 193.7 12.8 259.5 1 198.9 2 003.1 59.1 16.6 38.9 68.1 68.2 107.3 116.9 101.9 114.9 9.6 538.5 263.0 30.5 428.1 10.5 9 747.7 0.1 12.6 8.8 5.7 0.3 4 498.0 85.2 1 732.0 218.4

4 202.2 28.9 0.5 8.2 11.1 14.8 32.8 2 786.8 27.5 6.2 1 431.6 170.0 0.9 225.3 0.4 219.9 6.2 180.0 428.6 400.4 1 303.5 166.6 728.9 39.3 162.4 6.5 464.9 473.0 11.1 46.9 13.2 694.2 7.8 6.4 32.8 39.1 13.8 12.8 31.4 265.6 104.0 65.9 630.6 326.2 1 974.8 386.7 13.8 8 595.9 787.9 42.3 28.5 65.4 34.9 1 067.4 1 434.3 449.9 965.0

10 017.8 364.4 92.0 51.3 91.8 1.0 314.3 9 097.0 31.9 25.6 7 380.6 242.0 10.5 1 292.4 8.9 511.6 29.4 789.4 849.7 637.9 2 055.0 824.9 320.5 101.6 214.7 0.1 541.9 817.6 80.1 246.5 105.6 826.1 39.2 133.4 95.1 30.8 25.7 332.7 231.8 287.8 88.7 52.7 925.5 708.4 3 104.6 1 112.7 71.3 17 808.3 2 084.8 85.1 36.5 93.6 101.3 2 588.1 3 465.6 511.7 1 467.5

10 559.0 195.7 148.6 66.5 68.8 2.4 211.3 9 518.4 35.5 26.8 8 040.7 152.8 2.5 1 431.8 5.6 516.0 32.6 474.1 861.3 759.7 2 109.3 1 000.1 437.1 143.1 440.3 0.2 452.7 726.7 63.0 187.0 106.0 1 224.3 51.3 197.5 90.7 0.2 60.9 270.3 230.6 262.8 97.0 55.6 952.4 109.1 4 507.9 1 357.6 86.6 18 667.6 2 744.4 91.9 38.8 100.3 133.4 2 024.8 3 719.1 548.6 1 604.4

8 530.4 260.2 217.3 160.6 86.4 3.0 233.5 8 588.6 35.9 26.4 7 106.7 415.3 12.0 1 089.3 7.4 653.5 26.2 658.6 737.0 760.0 2 164.7 933.0 1 918.4 189.7 865.0 0.4 1 294.2 519.9 14.9 285.5 124.6 1 556.5 39.9 154.4 140.9 17.8 39.4 293.8 197.9 231.2 86.5 52.0 793.1 42.1 4 746.4 1 399.9 104.9 18 706.1 2 144.3 90.1 37.2 96.4 112.5 1 614.8 3 890.1 674.7 1 552.5

268

TABLE 47: Value of net trade (exports-imports) in selected cash crops (continued)
Coffee, tea, cocoa and spices net trade in cash crops (value) US$ million 1999 Cuba Dominica Dominican Republic Ecuador El Salvador French Guiana Grenada Guatemala Guyana Haiti Honduras Jamaica Mexico Netherlands Antilles Nicaragua Panama Paraguay Peru St. Kitts & Nevis St. Lucia St. Vincent & Grenadines Suriname Trinidad & Tobago Uruguay Venezuela (Boliv. Rep. of) OCEANIA Fiji French Polynesia New Caledonia Papua New Guinea Samoa Solomon Islands Tonga Vanuatu DEVELOPED REGIONS NORTH AMERICA Bermuda Canada United States of America ASIA & OCEANIA Australia Israel Japan New Zealand EUROPE Albania Belarus Bosnia & Herzegovina Croatia European Union Iceland Macedonia, FYR Montenegro Norway Republic of Moldova Russian Federation Serbia Switzerland Ukraine US$ million 2007 US$ million 2008 US$ million 2009 US$ million 1999 Fruit and vegetables net trade in cash crops (value) US$ million 2007 US$ million 2008 US$ million 2009

2.3 0.3 43.8 177.3 241.5 17.8 608.5 2.9 14.3 254.9 28.2 559.9 4.0 134.7 6.2 9.0 278.4 0.3 1.6 0.2 2.6 1.1 47.9 34.0 192.5 2.5 7.8 3.7 201.4 0.4 4.8 0.2 1.3 4 846.3 533.4 4 310.0 2 221.4 290.3 110.5 1 760.4 60.1 7 597.8 4.5 20.6 25.4 59.9 6 498.5 17.5 13.8 189.1 1.9 556.2 20.0 107.4

43.1 0.7 85.9 306.4 154.2 1.7 696.1 3.4 7.9 491.1 24.7 195.0 16.4 194.1 0.7 18.3 538.7 0.8 2.6 0.8 6.4 5.2 56.3 50.6 194.3 3.8 16.4 11.8 232.9 6.8 4.1 0.6 0.8 6 776.0 900.7 5 868.3 3 154.3 576.1 164.6 2 297.2 116.4 25.2 164.9 130.2 107.0 6 936.8 31.8 53.9 12.5 343.5 28.3 1 521.3 99.7 481.8 200.8

57.1 0.6 100.8 339.2 222.7 1.8 826.6 4.3 11.9 563.1 17.1 158.4 16.5 278.7 7.6 28.3 817.5 0.6 2.7 0.9 6.8 13.0 72.6 62.8 314.2 4.6 16.7 9.1 342.9 6.2 7.6 0.5 1.6 8 200.8 1 170.7 7 024.4 3 599.1 691.3 204.3 2 540.9 162.5 33.5 217.4 151.7 137.8 8 887.8 34.4 52.7 17.1 395.6 38.0 1 838.4 141.0 709.4 261.8

40.2 0.6 163.7 485.5 196.5 1.2 857.6 3.8 10.4 504.9 28.3 434.3 16.4 251.9 10.6 26.9 730.6 0.6 2.4 0.7 7.2 8.8 70.5 53.5 332.5 4.7 17.6 14.0 361.4 4.3 11.0 0.6 2.0 8 006.5 1 232.8 6 767.7 3 662.6 705.8 186.1 2 572.4 198.2 33.3 195.4 134.7 127.1 8 547.4 30.0 53.2 53.8 367.2 33.9 1 721.9 58.4 854.3 222.1

21.9 20.4 44.7 1 059.2 65.8 3.7 237.1 7.5 14.9 53.0 22.2 2 406.1 25.3 6.6 148.5 11.5 204.0 3.4 22.4 23.7 11.3 28.2 6.7 172.4 58.2 8.5 26.5 14.3 6.3 0.6 0.3 5.2 2.2 4 525.8 1 532.2 2 978.9 5 046.3 258.9 335.1 6 117.9 477.7 39.1 24.6 16.6 116.5 37.9 16.3 466.7 54.4 970.1 1 031.2 9.4

131.7 8.0 71.2 1 533.1 110.5 5.5 563.4 14.9 30.2 187.2 35.4 4 960.6 24.3 48.4 221.5 22.7 919.3 8.0 1.1 11.1 10.6 51.9 36.2 447.9 107.7 17.8 39.7 33.0 9.0 0.1 1.4 1.1 0.5 8 859.6 2 531.0 6 320.5 5 160.6 193.7 781.8 6 671.3 922.6 96.6 208.0 105.2 307.9 102.8 29.4 9.1 1 115.3 101.6 6 087.3 198.0 1 638.8 106.4

115.1 10.2 66.3 1 839.3 121.1 2.9 575.0 9.9 32.8 191.7 50.3 4 885.7 18.2 57.5 285.9 28.2 1 075.6 5.2 6.4 6.6 21.4 57.3 14.5 612.4 117.5 23.7 44.1 31.7 12.4 0.9 1.2 0.4 0.9 7 977.3 2 374.8 5 586.8 5 612.7 185.0 527.8 6 871.9 916.4 99.2 321.0 128.2 371.0 103.5 87.4 13.0 1 334.2 47.0 7 494.9 137.0 1 924.5 547.9

139.5 8.5 103.8 2 238.0 126.4 6.5 741.7 9.0 32.0 215.2 36.3 5 143.4 14.7 61.2 71.4 31.8 1 060.0 5.5 15.0 8.2 21.1 65.6 7.4 423.7 111.9 15.6 39.5 41.6 12.0 1.0 1.2 0.8 3.9 7 272.7 2 303.0 4 953.2 5 407.5 82.4 706.4 7 142.8 946.5 96.7 226.7 97.1 310.3 79.1 65.0 43.4 1 123.2 86.9 6 984.1 200.4 1 796.9 426.0

15 047.9 19 045.4 23 223.8 22 319.2 22 550.8 40 859.8 44 036.3 39 413.1

9 128.5 11 436.9 10 663.2 12 375.8 26 863.7 30 479.3 26 767.4

9 734.7 17 368.6 18 396.0 15 936.1

269

PART 3

Denitions and sources

Bovine meat production

Cereal imports (volume)

P3.FEED.FAO.ESS.CE.IM
Page: table 37 (p. 239). Exports of cereals (volume). Cereals include Wheat, Rice Paddy, Barley, Maize, Popcorn, Rye, Oats, Millets, Sorghum, Buckwheat, Quinoa, Fonio, Triticale, Canary Seed, Mixed Grain and Cereals Nes. Source: Statistics Division (FAOSTAT) Owner: FAO

P3.FEED.FAO.ESS.BF.QP
Page: table 35 (p. 233). Production of meat from bovine animals including buffalos, fresh, chilled or frozen, with bone in. All data shown relate to total meat production from both commercial and farm slaughter. Data are given in terms of dressed carcass weight, i.e. excluding offals and slaughter fats. . Source: Statistics Division (FAOSTAT) Owner: FAO Exports of beverages (value)

Imports of cereals (value)

P3.FEED.FAO.ESS.BV.EXv
Page: chart 93, 95 (p. 212, 213). Value of exports of coffee, tea and cocoa in current US$. Source: Statistics Division (FAOSTAT) Owner: FAO imports of beverages (value)

P3.FEED.FAO.ESS.CE.IMv
Page: chart 94 (p. 213). Value of imports of cereals in current US$. Source: Statistics Division (FAOSTAT) Owner: FAO

P3.FEED.FAO.ESS.BV.IMv
Page: chart 94 (p. 213). Value of imports of coffee, tea and cocoa in current US$. Source: Statistics Division (FAOSTAT) Owner: FAO Net trade in beverages and spices

Exports of coffee (value)

P3.FEED.FAO.ESS.CF.EXv
Page: chart 90 (p. 211). Value of exports of coffee in current US$. Source: Statistics Division (FAOSTAT) Owner: FAO

P3.FEED.FAO.ESS.BVS.NT
Page: table 47 (p. 269). Net trade (exports-imports) of cash crops, including coffee, tea, cocoa and spices. Source: Statistics Division (FAOSTAT) Owner: FAO Exports of cocoa (value)

Coarse grain harvested area

P3.FEED.FAO.ESS.CG.AH
Page: table 29 (p. 223), chart 68 (p. 180). Data refer to the area from which coarse grain crops are gathered. Area harvested, therefore, excludes the area from which, although sown or planted, there was no harvest due to damage, failure, etc. If the crop under consideration is harvested more than once during the year as a consequence of successive cropping (i.e. the same crop is sown or planted more than once in the same eld during the year), the area is counted as many times as harvested. Coarse grains include Barley, Maize, Popcorn, Rye, Oats, Millet, Sorghum, Buckwheat, Quinoa, Fonio, Triticale, Canary seed, Mixed grain and Cereals, nes. Source: Statistics Division (FAOSTAT) Owner: FAO

P3.FEED.FAO.ESS.CC.EXv
Page: chart 90 (p. 211). Value of exports of cocoa in current US$. Source: Statistics Division (FAOSTAT) Owner: FAO Cereal exports (volume)

P3.FEED.FAO.ESS.CE.EX
Page: table 37 (p. 239). Imports of cereals (volume). Cereals include Wheat, Rice Paddy, Barley, Maize, Popcorn, Rye, Oats, Millets, Sorghum, Buckwheat, Quinoa, Fonio, Triticale, Canary Seed, Mixed Grain and Cereals Nes. Source: Statistics Division (FAOSTAT) Owner: FAO Exports of cereals (value)

Coarse grain exports (volume)

P3.FEED.FAO.ESS.CG.EX
Page: table 40 (p. 248). Exports of coarse grains (volume). Coarse grains include Barley, Maize, Popcorn, Rye, Oats, Millet, Sorghum, Buckwheat, Quinoa, Fonio, Triticale, Canary seed, Mixed grain and Cereals, nes. Source: Statistics Division (FAOSTAT) Owner: FAO

P3.FEED.FAO.ESS.CE.EXv
Page: chart 87, 93, 95 (p. 210, 212, 213). Value of exports of cereals in current US$. Source: Statistics Division (FAOSTAT) Owner: FAO

270

DEFINITIONS AND SOURCES

Coarse grain imports (volume)

P3.FEED.FAO.ESS.CG.IM
Page: table 40 (p. 248). Imports of coarse grains (volume). Coarse grains include Barley, Maize, Popcorn, Rye, Oats, Millet, Sorghum, Buckwheat, Quinoa, Fonio, Triticale, Canary seed, Mixed grain and Cereals, nes. Source: Statistics Division (FAOSTAT) Owner: FAO Coarse grain production

harvested area expressed as a percentage of the arable area is the cropping intensity. Source: Statistics Division (FAOSTAT) Owner: FAO Production of eggs in shell

P3.FEED.FAO.ESS.EG.QP
Page: table 34 (p. 230). Production of eggs in shell, including hens and other birds. Egg production covers all domestic birds which have contributed to egg production during the year, wherever they lay and the corresponding total production, including eggs intended to be used for hatching but excluding waste on farms. Source: Statistics Division (FAOSTAT) Owner: FAO Exports of food (value)

P3.FEED.FAO.ESS.CG.QP
Page: table 29 (p. 223), chart 69 (p. 181), map 40 (p. 186). Coarse grain production data refer to the actual harvested production from the eld, excluding harvesting losses and that part of crop not harvested for any reason. Production therefore includes the quantities of the commodity sold in the market (marketed production) and the quantities consumed or used by the producers (auto-consumption). When the production data available refers to a production period falling into two successive calendar years and it is not possible to allocate the relative production to each of them, it is usual to refer production data to that year into which the bulk of the production falls. Coarse grains include Barley, Maize, Popcorn, Rye, Oats, Millet, Sorghum, Buckwheat, Quinoa, Fonio, Triticale, Canary seed, Mixed grain and Cereals, nes. Source: Statistics Division (FAOSTAT) Owner: FAO Per capita coarse grain production

P3.FEED.FAO.ESS.FD.EXv
Page: chart 93, 95 (p. 212, 213). Value of exports of food in current US$. Source: Statistics Division (FAOSTAT) Owner: FAO Imports of food (value)

P3.FEED.FAO.ESS.FD.IMv
Page: chart 94 (p. 213). Value of imports of food in current US$. Source: Statistics Division (FAOSTAT) Owner: FAO

P3.FEED.FAO.ESS.CG.QPPC
Page: chart 73 (p. 187). Per capita production of coarse grains. Source: Statistics Division (FAOSTAT) Owner: FAO Coarse grain yield

Global food trade index (calories)

P3.FEED.FAO.ESS.FD.IXc
Page: chart 86 (p. 209). Index of the caloric value of world food exports, 20042006 = 100. Source: Statistics Division (FAOSTAT) Owner: FAO Global food trade index (value)

P3.FEED.FAO.ESS.CG.YLD
Page: table 29 (p. 223), chart 70 (p. 181). Harvested production per unit of harvested area for coarse grain crops. Coarse grains include Barley, Maize, Popcorn, Rye, Oats, Millet, Sorghum, Buckwheat, Quinoa, Fonio, Triticale, Canary seed, Mixed grain and Cereals, nes. Source: Statistics Division (FAOSTAT) Owner: FAO Sources of growth in crop production: Yield, Cropping intensity and Area expansion.

P3.FEED.FAO.ESS.FD.IXv
Page: chart 86 (p. 209). Index of the value (current US$) of world food exports, 2004-2006 = 100. Source: Statistics Division (FAOSTAT) Owner: FAO Net food trade balance of developing countries

P3.FEED.FAO.ESS.FD.NTv
Page: chart 92 (p. 211). The value of total food net trade (exports-imports). Source: Statistics Division (FAOSTAT) Owner: FAO

P3.FEED.FAO.ESS.CRPS.GSRCE
Page: chart 67 (p. 179). Where cropping intensity is the frequency with which crops are harvested from a given area. Therefore, the

271

PART 3

Net food trade balance of developing countries, excluding Brazil and China

Gross per capita production index number food

P3.FEED.FAO.ESS.FD.NTx
Page: chart 91 (p. 211). Net food trade balance of developing countries, excluding Brazil and China. Source: Statistics Division (FAOSTAT) Owner: FAO

P3.FEED.FAO.ESS.GPCPIN.FOOD
Page: table 26 (p. 220). Gross per capita FAO index of food production. See Concepts and methods. Source: Statistics Division (FAOSTAT) Owner: FAO Gross per capita livestock production index number

Index of per capita food production (calories)

P3.FEED.FAO.ESS.FD.QP
Page: chart 65 (p. 175), map 35 (p. 174). Index of per capita food production converted in calorie equivalent. See http://www.fao.org/DOCREP/006/ Y5022E/y5022e04.htm for conversion factors. Source: Statistics Division (FAOSTAT) Owner: FAO Exports of cash crops (value)

P3.FEED.FAO.ESS.GPCPIN.LSTK
Page: table 26 (p. 220). Gross per capita FAO index of livestock production. See Concepts and methods. Source: Statistics Division (FAOSTAT) Owner: FAO Gross per capita non-food production index number

P3.FEED.FAO.ESS.GPCPIN.NFOOD P3.FEED.FAO.ESS.FV.EXv
Page: chart 88, 93, 95 (p. 210, 212, 213). Value of exports of fruit and vegetables in current US$. Source: Statistics Division (FAOSTAT) Owner: FAO Growth in crop production imports of cash crops (value) Page: table 26 (p. 220). Gross per capita FAO index of non-food production. See Concepts and methods. Source: Statistics Division (FAOSTAT) Owner: FAO

P3.FEED.FAO.ESS.FV.IMv
Page: chart 94 (p. 213). Value of imports of fruit and vegetables in current US$. Source: Statistics Division (FAOSTAT) Owner: FAO Net trade in fruit and vegetables

P3.FEED.FAO.ESS.GPIN.CRPS
Page: map 37 (p. 178). The growth in the gross per capita FAO index of crop production. See Concepts and methods. Source: Statistics Division (FAOSTAT) Owner: FAO Index of per capita food production, value

P3.FEED.FAO.ESS.FV.NT
Page: table 47 (p. 269). Value of net trade (exports-imports) of fruit and vegetables in current US$. Source: Statistics Division (FAOSTAT) Owner: FAO Gross per capita crop production index number

P3.FEED.FAO.ESS.GPIN.FD
Page: chart 66 (p. 177). Gross per capita FAO index of food production. See Concepts and methods. Source: Statistics Division (FAOSTAT) Owner: FAO Dairy exports (volume)

P3.FEED.FAO.ESS.GPCPIN.CRPS
Page: table 26 (p. 220). Gross per capita FAO index of crop production. See Concepts and methods. Source: Statistics Division (FAOSTAT) Owner: FAO Growth in per capita food production (value)

P3.FEED.FAO.ESS.MK.EX
Page: table 44 (p. 260). Exports (volume) of dairy products in milk equivalent in current US$. Source: Statistics Division (FAOSTAT) Owner: FAO Exports of dairy (volume)

P3.FEED.FAO.ESS.GPCPIN.FD.PCP
Page: map 36 (p. 176). The growth in the gross per capita FAO index of food production. See Concepts and methods. Source: Statistics Division (FAOSTAT) Owner: FAO

P3.FEED.FAO.ESS.MK.EXv
Page: chart 89, 93, 95 (p. 211, 212, 213). Value of exports of dairy products in milk equivalent in current US$. Source: Statistics Division (FAOSTAT) Owner: FAO

272

DEFINITIONS AND SOURCES

Dairy imports (volume)

Imports of total meat (value)

P3.FEED.FAO.ESS.MK.IM
Page: table 44 (p. 260). Imports (volume) of dairy products in milk equivalent in current US$. Source: Statistics Division (FAOSTAT) Owner: FAO

P3.FEED.FAO.ESS.MT.IMv
Page: chart 94 (p. 213). Value of imports of meat in current US$. Source: Statistics Division (FAOSTAT) Owner: FAO Total meat production

Imports of dairy (volume)

P3.FEED.FAO.ESS.MT.QP
Page: map 46 (p. 198). Production of meat from animals, fresh, chilled or frozen, with bone in. All data shown relate to total meat production from both commercial and farm slaughter. Data are given in terms of dressed carcass weight, i.e. excluding offals and slaughter fats. . Source: Statistics Division (FAOSTAT) Owner: FAO

P3.FEED.FAO.ESS.MK.IMv
Page: chart 94 (p. 213). Value of imports of dairy products in milk equivalent in current US$. Source: Statistics Division (FAOSTAT) Owner: FAO Milk production

P3.FEED.FAO.ESS.MK.QP
Page: table 34 (p. 230), map 47 (p. 200). The sum of whole fresh milk production from Buffalos, Camels, Cows, Goats and Sheep. Source: Statistics Division (FAOSTAT) Owner: FAO Per capita milk production

Per capita total meat production

P3.FEED.FAO.ESS.MT.QPPC
Page: chart 79 (p. 199). Meat production expressed as a ratio of population, i.e. per capita production of meat . Source: Statistics Division (FAOSTAT) Owner: FAO Oil-bearing crops harvested area

P3.FEED.FAO.ESS.MK.QPPC
Page: chart 80 (p. 201). Milk production expressed as a ratio of population, i.e. per capita production of milk. Source: Statistics Division (FAOSTAT) Owner: FAO Exports of total meat (volume)

P3.FEED.FAO.ESS.OS.AH
Page: table 30 (p. 224), chart 68 (p. 180). Data refer to the area from which oil-bearing crops are gathered. Area harvested, therefore, excludes the area from which, although sown or planted, there was no harvest due to damage, failure, etc. If the crop under consideration is harvested more than once during the year as a consequence of successive cropping (i.e. the same crop is sown or planted more than once in the same eld during the year), the area is counted as many times as harvested. Oil-Bearing Crops or Oil Crops include both annual (usually called oilseeds) and perennial plants whose seeds, fruits or mesocarp and nuts are valued mainly for the edible or industrial oils that are extracted from them. They include: Castor oil seed, Coconuts, Cottonseed, Groundnuts, with shell, Hempseed, Jojoba Seeds, Karite Nuts (Sheanuts), Linseed, Melonseed, Mustard seed, Oil palm fruit, Oilseeds, Nes, Olives, Palm kernels, Palm oil, Poppy seed, Rapeseed, Safower seed, Seed cotton, Sesame seed, Soybeans, Sunower seed and Tung Nuts. Source: Statistics Division (FAOSTAT) Owner: FAO Exports of oilcrops (volume)

P3.FEED.FAO.ESS.MT.EX
Page: table 45 (p. 263). Exports (volume) of meat. Source: Statistics Division (FAOSTAT) Owner: FAO Exports of total meat (value)

P3.FEED.FAO.ESS.MT.EXv
Page: chart 89, 93, 95 (p. 211, 212, 213). Value of exports of meat in current US$. Source: Statistics Division (FAOSTAT) Owner: FAO Imports of total meat (volume)

P3.FEED.FAO.ESS.MT.IM
Page: table 45 (p. 263). Imports (volume) of meat. Source: Statistics Division (FAOSTAT) Owner: FAO

P3.FEED.FAO.ESS.OS.EX
Page: table 42 (p. 254). Exports (volume) of oilseeds. Oil-bearing crops or oil crops include both annual (usually called oilseeds) and perennial plants whose seeds, fruits or mesocarp and nuts are valued mainly for the edible or industrial oils

273

PART 3

that are extracted from them. They include: Castor oil seed, Coconuts, Cottonseed, Groundnuts, with shell, Hempseed, Jojoba Seeds, Karite Nuts (Sheanuts), Linseed, Melonseed, Mustard seed, Oil palm fruit, Oilseeds, Nes, Olives, Palm kernels, Palm oil, Poppy seed, Rapeseed, Safower seed, Seed cotton, Sesame seed, Soybeans, Sunower seed and Tung Nuts. Source: Statistics Division (FAOSTAT) Owner: FAO Exports of oilcrops (value)

P3.FEED.FAO.ESS.OS.EXv
Page: chart 87, 93, 95 (p. 210, 212, 213). Value of exports of oil-Bearing crops in current US$. Source: Statistics Division (FAOSTAT) Owner: FAO Imports of oilcrops (volume)

include both annual (usually called oilseeds) and perennial plants whose seeds, fruits or mesocarp and nuts are valued mainly for the edible or industrial oils that are extracted from them. They include: Castor oil seed, Coconuts, Cottonseed, Groundnuts, with shell, Hempseed, Jojoba Seeds, Karite Nuts (Sheanuts), Linseed, Melonseed, Mustard seed, Oil palm fruit, Oilseeds, Nes, Olives, Palm kernels, Palm oil, Poppy seed, Rapeseed, Safower seed, Seed cotton, Sesame seed, Soybeans, Sunower seed and Tung Nuts. Source: Statistics Division (FAOSTAT) Owner: FAO Per capita oilcrop production

P3.FEED.FAO.ESS.OS.QPPC
Page: chart 74 (p. 189). Oil-bearing crop production expressed as a ratio of population, i.e. per capita production of oil-bearing crops. Oil-bearing crops include both annual (usually called oilseeds) and perennial plants whose seeds, fruits or mesocarp and nuts are valued mainly for the edible or industrial oils that are extracted from them. They include: Castor oil seed, Coconuts, Cottonseed, Groundnuts, with shell, Hempseed, Jojoba Seeds, Karite Nuts (Sheanuts), Linseed, Melonseed, Mustard seed, Oil palm fruit, Oilseeds, Nes, Olives, Palm kernels, Palm oil, Poppy seed, Rapeseed, Safower seed, Seed cotton, Sesame seed, Soybeans, Sunower seed and Tung Nuts. Source: Statistics Division (FAOSTAT) Owner: FAO Oilcrop yield

P3.FEED.FAO.ESS.OS.IM
Page: table 42 (p. 254). Imports (volume) of oilseeds. Oil-bearing crops or oil crops include both annual (usually called oilseeds) and perennial plants whose seeds, fruits or mesocarp and nuts are valued mainly for the edible or industrial oils that are extracted from them. They include: Castor oil seed, Coconuts, Cottonseed, Groundnuts, with shell, Hempseed, Jojoba Seeds, Karite Nuts (Sheanuts), Linseed, Melonseed, Mustard seed, Oil palm fruit, Oilseeds, Nes, Olives, Palm kernels, Palm oil, Poppy seed, Rapeseed, Safower seed, Seed cotton, Sesame seed, Soybeans, Sunower seed and Tung Nuts. Source: Statistics Division (FAOSTAT) Owner: FAO Imports of oilcrops (value)

P3.FEED.FAO.ESS.OS.YLD
Page: table 30 (p. 224), chart 70 (p. 181). Harvested production per unit of harvested area for oil-bearing crops. Oil-Bearing Crops or Oil Crops include both annual (usually called oilseeds) and perennial plants whose seeds, fruits or mesocarp and nuts are valued mainly for the edible or industrial oils that are extracted from them. They include: Castor oil seed, Coconuts, Cottonseed, Groundnuts, with shell, Hempseed, Jojoba Seeds, Karite Nuts (Sheanuts), Linseed, Melonseed, Mustard seed, Oil palm fruit, Oilseeds, Nes, Olives, Palm kernels, Palm oil, Poppy seed, Rapeseed, Safower seed, Seed cotton, Sesame seed, Soybeans, Sunower seed and Tung Nuts. Source: Statistics Division (FAOSTAT) Owner: FAO Pigmeat production

P3.FEED.FAO.ESS.OS.IMv
Page: chart 94 (p. 213). Value of imports of oil-Bearing crops in current US$. Source: Statistics Division (FAOSTAT) Owner: FAO Oilcrop production

P3.FEED.FAO.ESS.OS.QP
Page: table 30 (p. 224), chart 69 (p. 181), map 41 (p. 188). Oil-bearing crop production data refer to the actual harvested production from the eld, excluding harvesting losses and that part of crop not harvested for any reason. Production therefore includes the quantities of the commodity sold in the market (marketed production) and the quantities consumed or used by the producers (auto-consumption). When the production data available refers to a production period falling into two successive calendar years and it is not possible to allocate the relative production to each of them, it is usual to refer production data to that year into which the bulk of the production falls. Oil-Bearing Crops or Oil Crops

P3.FEED.FAO.ESS.PK.QP
Page: table 35 (p. 233). Production of meat from domestic or wild pigs (e.g. wild boars), fresh, chilled or frozen, with bone in. All data shown relate to total meat production from both commercial and farm slaughter. Data are given in terms of dressed carcass weight, i.e. excluding offals and slaughter fats. Source: Statistics Division (FAOSTAT) Owner: FAO

274

DEFINITIONS AND SOURCES

Pulse crops harvested area

Per capita pulses production

P3.FEED.FAO.ESS.PS.AH
Page: table 31 (p. 225), chart 68 (p. 180). Data refer to the area from which pulse crops are gathered. Area harvested, therefore, excludes the area from which, although sown or planted, there was no harvest due to damage, failure, etc. If the crop under consideration is harvested more than once during the year as a consequence of successive cropping (i.e. the same crop is sown or planted more than once in the same eld during the year), the area is counted as many times as harvested. Pulses are annual leguminous crops yielding from one to 12 grains or seeds of variable size, shape and colour within a pod. They are used for both food and feed. The term "pulses" is limited to crops harvested solely for dry grain, thereby excluding crops harvested green for food (green peas, green beans, etc.) which are classied as vegetable crops. Also excluded are those crops used mainly for oil extraction (e.g. soybean and groundnuts) and leguminous crops (e.g. seeds of clover and alfalfa) that are used exclusively for sowing purposes. They include Bambara beans, Beans, dry, Broad beans, horse beans, dry, Chick peas, Cow peas, dry, Lentils, Lupins, Peas, dry, Pigeon peas, Pulses, nes, and Vetches. Source: Statistics Division (FAOSTAT) Owner: FAO Pulse crops production

P3.FEED.FAO.ESS.PS.QPPC
Page: chart 75 (p. 191). Per capita production of pulses. Source: Statistics Division (FAOSTAT) Owner: FAO Pulse crops yield

P3.FEED.FAO.ESS.PS.YLD
Page: table 31 (p. 225), chart 70 (p. 181). Harvested production per unit of harvested area for pulse crops. Pulses are annual leguminous crops yielding from one to 12 grains or seeds of variable size, shape and colour within a pod. They are used for both food and feed. The term "pulses" is limited to crops harvested solely for dry grain, thereby excluding crops harvested green for food (green peas, green beans, etc.) which are classied as vegetable crops. Also excluded are those crops used mainly for oil extraction (e.g. soybean and groundnuts) and leguminous crops (e.g. seeds of clover and alfalfa) that are used exclusively for sowing purposes. They include Bambara beans, Beans, dry, Broad beans, horse beans, dry, Chick peas, Cow peas, dry, Lentils, Lupins, Peas, dry, Pigeon peas, Pulses, nes, and Vetches. Source: Statistics Division (FAOSTAT) Owner: FAO Poultry meat production

P3.FEED.FAO.ESS.PS.QP
Page: table 31 (p. 225), chart 69 (p. 181), map 42 (p. 190). Pulse production data refer to the actual harvested production from the eld, excluding harvesting losses and that part of crop not harvested for any reason. Production therefore includes the quantities of the commodity sold in the market (marketed production) and the quantities consumed or used by the producers (autoconsumption). When the production data available refers to a production period falling into two successive calendar years and it is not possible to allocate the relative production to each of them, it is usual to refer production data to that year into which the bulk of the production falls. Pulses are annual leguminous crops yielding from one to 12 grains or seeds of variable size, shape and colour within a pod. They are used for both food and feed. The term "pulses" is limited to crops harvested solely for dry grain, thereby excluding crops harvested green for food (green peas, green beans, etc.) which are classied as vegetable crops. Also excluded are those crops used mainly for oil extraction (e.g. soybean and groundnuts) and leguminous crops (e.g. seeds of clover and alfalfa) that are used exclusively for sowing purposes. They include Bambara beans, Beans, dry, Broad beans, horse beans, dry, Chick peas, Cow peas, dry, Lentils, Lupins, Peas, dry, Pigeon peas, Pulses, nes, and Vetches. Source: Statistics Division (FAOSTAT) Owner: FAO

P3.FEED.FAO.ESS.PT.QP
Page: table 34 (p. 230). Production of meat from poultry birds, fresh, chilled or frozen, with bone in. All data shown relate to total meat production from both commercial and farm slaughter. Data are given in terms of dressed carcass weight, i.e. excluding offals and slaughter fats. Poultry meat includes Bird meat, nes, Chicken meat, Duck meat, Goose and guinea fowl meat and Turkey meat. . Source: Statistics Division (FAOSTAT) Owner: FAO Rice harvested area

P3.FEED.FAO.ESS.RI.AH
Page: table 28 (p. 222), chart 68 (p. 180). Data refer to the area from which rice crops are gathered. Area harvested, therefore, excludes the area from which, although sown or planted, there was no harvest due to damage, failure, etc. If the crop under consideration is harvested more than once during the year as a consequence of successive cropping (i.e. the same crop is sown or planted more than once in the same eld during the year), the area is counted as many times as harvested. Source: Statistics Division (FAOSTAT) Owner: FAO

275

PART 3

Rice exports (volume)

P3.FEED.FAO.ESS.RI.EX
Page: table 39 (p. 245). Exports (volume) of rice in milled equivalent. Source: Statistics Division (FAOSTAT) Owner: FAO Rice imports (volume)

the year as a consequence of successive cropping (i.e. the same crop is sown or planted more than once in the same eld during the year), the area is counted as many times as harvested. Roots and tubers are plants yielding starchy roots, tubers, rhizomes, corms and stems. They include Potatoes, Sweet Potatoes, Cassava, Yautia (Cocoyam), Taro (Cocoyam), Yams, Roots And Tubers Nes. . Source: Statistics Division (FAOSTAT) Owner: FAO Root and tuber crops production

P3.FEED.FAO.ESS.RI.IM
Page: table 39 (p. 245). Imports (volume) of rice in milled equivalent. Source: Statistics Division (FAOSTAT) Owner: FAO Rice production

P3.FEED.FAO.ESS.RT.QP
Page: table 32 (p. 226), chart 69 (p. 181), map 43 (p. 192). Root and tubers production data refer to the actual harvested production from the eld, excluding harvesting losses and that part of crop not harvested for any reason. Production therefore includes the quantities of the commodity sold in the market (marketed production) and the quantities consumed or used by the producers (auto-consumption). When the production data available refers to a production period falling into two successive calendar years and it is not possible to allocate the relative production to each of them, it is usual to refer production data to that year into which the bulk of the production falls. Roots and tubers are plants yielding starchy roots, tubers, rhizomes, corms and stems. They include Potatoes, Sweet Potatoes, Cassava, Yautia (Cocoyam), Taro (Cocoyam), Yams, Roots And Tubers Nes. . Source: Statistics Division (FAOSTAT) Owner: FAO Per capita roots and tuber crops production

P3.FEED.FAO.ESS.RI.QP
Page: table 28 (p. 222), chart 69 (p. 181), map 38 (p. 182). Rice production data refer to the actual harvested production from the eld, excluding harvesting or threshing losses and that part of crop not harvested for any reason. Production therefore includes the quantities of the commodity sold in the market (marketed production) and the quantities consumed or used by the producers (auto-consumption). When the production data available refers to a production period falling into two successive calendar years and it is not possible to allocate the relative production to each of them, it is usual to refer production data to that year into which the bulk of the production falls. Source: Statistics Division (FAOSTAT) Owner: FAO Per capita rice production

P3.FEED.FAO.ESS.RI.QPPC
Page: chart 71 (p. 183). Per capita production of rice. Source: Statistics Division (FAOSTAT) Owner: FAO Rice yield

P3.FEED.FAO.ESS.RT.QPPC
Page: chart 76 (p. 193). Roots and tubers production expressed as a ratio of population, i.e. per capita production of roots and tubers. Roots and tubers are plants yielding starchy roots, tubers, rhizomes, corms and stems. They include Potatoes, Sweet Potatoes, Cassava, Yautia (Cocoyam), Taro (Cocoyam), Yams, Roots And Tubers Nes. . Source: Statistics Division (FAOSTAT) Owner: FAO Root and tuber crops yield

P3.FEED.FAO.ESS.RI.YLD
Page: table 28 (p. 222), chart 70, 113 (p. 181, 305). Harvested production per unit of harvested area for rice crops. Source: Statistics Division (FAOSTAT) Owner: FAO Root and tuber crops harvested area

P3.FEED.FAO.ESS.RT.YLD
Page: table 32 (p. 226), chart 70 (p. 181). Harvested production per unit of harvested area for root and tuber crops. Roots and tubers are plants yielding starchy roots, tubers, rhizomes, corms and stems. They include Potatoes, Sweet Potatoes, Cassava, Yautia (Cocoyam), Taro (Cocoyam), Yams, Roots And Tubers Nes. . Source: Statistics Division (FAOSTAT) Owner: FAO

P3.FEED.FAO.ESS.RT.AH
Page: table 32 (p. 226), chart 68 (p. 180). Data refer to the area from which root and tuber crops are gathered. Area harvested, therefore, excludes the area from which, although sown or planted, there was no harvest due to damage, failure, etc. If the crop under consideration is harvested more than once during

276

DEFINITIONS AND SOURCES

Sugar cane harvested area

Sugar exports (volume)

P3.FEED.FAO.ESS.SC.AH
Page: table 33 (p. 227), chart 68 (p. 180). Data refer to the area from which sugar cane crops are gathered. Area harvested, therefore, excludes the area from which, although sown or planted, there was no harvest due to damage, failure, etc. If the crop under consideration is harvested more than once during the year as a consequence of successive cropping (i.e. the same crop is sown or planted more than once in the same eld during the year), the area is counted as many times as harvested. Source: Statistics Division (FAOSTAT) Owner: FAO Sugar cane production

P3.FEED.FAO.ESS.SU.EX
Page: table 41 (p. 251). Exports (volume) of sugar from sugar crops (cane and beet) expressed in raw equivalent. Source: Statistics Division (FAOSTAT) Owner: FAO Exports of sugar (value)

P3.FEED.FAO.ESS.SU.EXv
Page: chart 87, 93, 95 (p. 210, 212, 213). Value of exports of sugar from sugar crops (cane and beet) expressed in raw equivalent in current US$. Source: Statistics Division (FAOSTAT) Owner: FAO Sugar imports (volume)

P3.FEED.FAO.ESS.SC.QP
Page: table 33 (p. 227), chart 69 (p. 181). Sugar cane production data refer to the actual harvested production from the eld, excluding harvesting losses and that part of crop not harvested for any reason. Production therefore includes the quantities of the commodity sold in the market (marketed production) and the quantities consumed or used by the producers (auto-consumption). When the production data available refers to a production period falling into two successive calendar years and it is not possible to allocate the relative production to each of them, it is usual to refer production data to that year into which the bulk of the production falls. Source: Statistics Division (FAOSTAT) Owner: FAO Sugar cane yield

P3.FEED.FAO.ESS.SU.IM
Page: table 41 (p. 251). Imports (volume) of sugar from sugar crops (cane and beet) expressed in raw equivalent. Source: Statistics Division (FAOSTAT) Owner: FAO Imports of sugar (value)

P3.FEED.FAO.ESS.SU.IMv
Page: chart 94 (p. 213). Value of imports of sugar from sugar crops (cane and beet) expressed in raw equivalent in current US$. Source: Statistics Division (FAOSTAT) Owner: FAO Production of sugar (raw equivalent)

P3.FEED.FAO.ESS.SC.YLD
Page: table 33 (p. 227), chart 70 (p. 181). Harvested production per unit of harvested area for sugar cane crops. Source: Statistics Division (FAOSTAT) Owner: FAO Sheep and goat meat production

P3.FTW.FAO.SU.QP
Page: map 45 (p. 196). Production of sugar from sugar crops (cane and beet) expressed in raw equivalent. Source: Statistics Division (FAOSTAT) Owner: FAO Per capita production of sugar (raw equivalent)

P3.FEED.FAO.ESS.SH.QP
Page: table 35 (p. 233). Production of meat from sheep and goats, including kids and lambs, fresh, chilled or frozen, with bone in. All data shown relate to total meat production from both commercial and farm slaughter. Data are given in terms of dressed carcass weight, i.e. excluding offals and slaughter fats. Source: Statistics Division (FAOSTAT) Owner: FAO Exports of spices (value)

P3.FEED.FAO.ESS.SU.QPPC
Page: chart 78 (p. 197). Sugar production expressed as a ratio of population, i.e. per capita production of sugar. . Source: Statistics Division (FAOSTAT) Owner: FAO Exports of tea (value)

P3.FEED.FAO.ESS.SP.EXv
Page: chart 90 (p. 211). Value of exports of spices in current US$. Source: Statistics Division (FAOSTAT) Owner: FAO

P3.FEED.FAO.ESS.T.EXv
Page: chart 90 (p. 211). Value of exports of tea in current US$. Source: Statistics Division (FAOSTAT) Owner: FAO

277

PART 3

Vegetable production

Wheat exports (volume)

P3.FEED.FAO.ESS.VG.QP
Page: map 44 (p. 194). Production of vegetables. See www.fao.org/waicent/ faoinfo/economic/faodef/fdef07e.htm for a description. Source: Statistics Division (FAOSTAT) Owner: FAO Per capita vegetable production

P3.FEED.FAO.ESS.WT.EX
Page: table 38 (p. 242). Exports (volume) of wheat and wheat our, in wheat equivalent. Source: Statistics Division (FAOSTAT) Owner: FAO Wheat imports (volume)

P3.FEED.FAO.ESS.VG.QPPC
Page: chart 77 (p. 195). Per capita production of vegetables. Source: Statistics Division (FAOSTAT) Owner: FAO Exports of vegetable oils and animal fats (volume)

P3.FEED.FAO.ESS.WT.IM
Page: table 38 (p. 242). Imports (volume) of wheat and wheat our, in wheat equivalent. Source: Statistics Division (FAOSTAT) Owner: FAO Wheat production

P3.FEED.FAO.ESS.VL.EX
Page: table 43 (p. 257). Exports (volume) of vegetable oils. Source: Statistics Division (FAOSTAT) Owner: FAO Exports of vegetable oils and animal fats (value)

P3.FEED.FAO.ESS.WT.QP
Page: table 27 (p. 221), map 39 (p. 184). Wheat production data refer to the actual harvested production from the eld, excluding harvesting losses and that part of crop not harvested for any reason. Production therefore includes the quantities of the commodity sold in the market (marketed production) and the quantities consumed or used by the producers (autoconsumption). When the production data available refers to a production period falling into two successive calendar years and it is not possible to allocate the relative production to each of them, it is usual to refer production data to that year into which the bulk of the production falls. Common and durum wheat are the main types. Among common wheat, the main varieties are spring and winter, hard and soft, and red and white. Source: Statistics Division (FAOSTAT) Owner: FAO

P3.FEED.FAO.ESS.VL.EXv
Page: chart 88, 93, 95 (p. 210, 212, 213). Value of exports of vegetable oils in current US$. Source: Statistics Division (FAOSTAT) Owner: FAO Imports of vegetable oils and animal fats (volume)

P3.FEED.FAO.ESS.VL.IM
Page: table 43 (p. 257). Imports (volume) of vegetable oils. Source: Statistics Division (FAOSTAT) Owner: FAO Imports of vegetable oils and animal fats (value)

P3.FEED.FAO.ESS.VL.IMv
Page: chart 94 (p. 213). Value of imports of vegetable oils in current US$. Source: Statistics Division (FAOSTAT) Owner: FAO Wheat harvested area

Per capita wheat production

P3.FEED.FAO.ESS.WT.QPPC
Page: chart 72 (p. 185). Per capita production of wheat. Source: Statistics Division (FAOSTAT) Owner: FAO Wheat yield

P3.FEED.FAO.ESS.WT.AH
Page: table 27 (p. 221), chart 68 (p. 180). Data refer to the area from which wheat crops are gathered. Area harvested, therefore, excludes the area from which, although sown or planted, there was no harvest due to damage, failure, etc. If the crop under consideration is harvested more than once during the year as a consequence of successive cropping (i.e. the same crop is sown or planted more than once in the same eld during the year), the area is counted as many times as harvested. Source: Statistics Division (FAOSTAT) Owner: FAO

P3.FEED.FAO.ESS.WT.YLD
Page: table 27 (p. 221), chart 69, 70, 113 (p. 181, 181, 305). Harvested production per unit of harvested area for wheat crops. Common and durum wheat are the main types. Among common wheat, the main varieties are spring and winter, hard and soft, and red and white. Source: Statistics Division (FAOSTAT) Owner: FAO

278

DEFINITIONS AND SOURCES

Per capita total food losses and waste

Inland aquaculture production

P3.FTW.FAO.AGS.LOSS
Page: map 53 (p. 216). See http://www.fao.org/leadmin/user_upload/ags/ publications/GFL_web.pdf for data sources and assumptions. Source: Global Food Losses and Waste Owner: FAO Per capita food losses and waste at consumption and pre-consumptions stages.

P3.FTW.FAO.FI.ACQ.QPi
Page: table 36 (p. 236). Aquaculture production from inland areas. Source: Fisheries and Aquaculture Department (Fishery and Aquaculture statistics) Owner: FAO Marine aquaculture production

P3.FTW.FAO.FI.ACQ.QPm
Page: table 36 (p. 236). Aquaculture production from marine areas. Source: Fisheries and Aquaculture Department (Fishery and Aquaculture statistics) Owner: FAO Capture production

P3.FTW.FAO.AGS.LOSSr
Page: chart 97 (p. 217). See http://www.fao.org/leadmin/user_upload/ags/ publications/GFL_web.pdf for data sources and assumptions. Source: Global Food Losses and Waste Owner: FAO Import dependency (calories)

P3.FTW.FAO.FI.CAP.QP
Page: table 36 (p. 236), chart 81 (p. 203), map 48 (p. 202). Capture shery is dened as the hunting, collecting and gathering activities directed at removing or collecting live wild aquatic organisms. The capture production statistics here indicates the nominal catches of aquatic organisms, killed, caught, trapped or collected for all commercial, industrial, recreational and subsistence purposes in live weight equivalent. Data included here covers capture production of sh, molluscs, crustaceans and miscellaneous aquatic animals but excluding production for marine mammals, crocodiles, corals, pearls, sponges and aquatic plants. Source: Fisheries and Aquaculture Department (Fishery and Aquaculture statistics) Owner: FAO Inland capture production

P3.FTW.FAO.ESS.IMPDc
Page: map 51 (p. 208). Import dependency ratio (IDR) is dened as: IDR = imports*100/(production + imports - exports). The complement of this ratio to 100 would represent that part of the domestic food supply that has been produced in the country itself. However, there is a caveat to be kept in mind: these ratios hold only if imports are mainly used for domestic utilization and are not re-exported. Source: Statistics Division Owner: FAO Aquaculture production

P3.FTW.FAO.FI.ACQ.QP
Page: table 36 (p. 236), chart 82 (p. 205), map 49 (p. 204). Aquaculture is dened as the farming of aquatic organisms. Farming implies some form of intervention in the rearing process to enhance production, such as regular stocking, feeding, protection from predators, etc. Farming also implies individual or corporate ownership of the stock being cultivated. For statistical purposes, aquatic organisms which are harvested by an individual or corporate body which has owned them throughout their rearing period contribute to aquaculture, while aquatic organisms which are exploitable by the public as a common property resource, with or without appropriate licenses, are the harvest of sheries. In the case of capture-based aquaculture, only the incremental growth (or weight gain) in captivity, could and should be reported as the production from aquaculture. Data included here covers an aquaculture production of sh, molluscs, crustaceans and miscellaneous aquatic animals but excluding production for marine mammals, crocodiles, corals, pearls, sponges and aquatic plants. Source: Fisheries and Aquaculture Department (Fishery and Aquaculture statistics) Owner: FAO

P3.FTW.FAO.FI.CAP.QPi
Page: table 36 (p. 236). Capture shery production from inland areas. Source: Fisheries and Aquaculture Department (Fishery and Aquaculture statistics) Owner: FAO Marine capture production

P3.FTW.FAO.FI.CAP.QPm
Page: table 36 (p. 236). Capture shery production from marine areas. Source: Fisheries and Aquaculture Department (Fishery and Aquaculture statistics) Owner: FAO Status of world sh stocks

P3.FTW.FAO.FI.STK
Page: chart 83 (p. 206). A stock is considered "fully exploited" when its abundance is maintained at or close to the level that can

279

PART 3

produce maximum sustainable yield (MSY). "Recovering, depleted or overexploited" stocks have abundance below the MSY level, differentiated by the extent of abundance reduction as recovering, depleted or overshed, with reduced spawning biomass and reproductive capacity. Such stocks require rebuilding and the recovery time will depend on the current condition of the stock, the level of protection afforded to the stock, and environmental conditions. In contrast, if abundance of a stock is higher than the level corresponding to the MSY, the stock is classied as "under or moderately exploited", depending on its abundance. These stocks have the potential to produce more than their current catches. Source: State of the Worlds Fisheries (2010) Owner: FAO Composition of sh products

consumption, in live weight equivalent. This corresponds to the capture and aquaculture production excluding those destined for the preparation of sh-meal, sh oils and other non-food use. Source: Fisheries and Aquaculture Department (Fishery and Aquaculture statistics) Owner: FAO Geo-location of harvests

P3.FTW.FAO.FI.HARV
Page: map 50 (p. 207). Consolidated statistics of capture and aquaculture production. Data reported include sh, molluscs, crustaceans and miscellaneous aquatic animals but exclude marine mammals, crocodiles, corals, pearls, sponges and aquatic plants. Data contain attribute of species, producing countries and the location where production occurred as classied by FAO Major Areas dened by the Coordinating Working Party on Fishery Statistics (www.fao.org/shery/cwp/en). Source: Fisheries and Aquaculture Department (Fishery and Aquaculture statistics) Owner: FAO

P3.FTW.FAO.FI.CFP
Page: chart 84 (p. 206). Species composition of aquaculture and capture output Source: Fisheries and Aquaculture Department (Fishery and Aquaculture statistics) Owner: FAO Exports of sh (value)

P3.FTW.FAO.FI.TOT.EXv
Page: table 46 (p. 266), chart 89 (p. 211). Value of exports of sh in current US$ (data reported include sh, molluscs, crustaceans, and miscellaneous aquatic animals but excluding marine mammals, crocodiles, corals, pearls, sponges and aquatic plants, miscellaneous aquatic animal products and sh waste). Source: Fisheries and Aquaculture Department (Fishery and Aquaculture statistics) Owner: FAO imports of sh (value)

P3.FTW.FAO.FI.TOT.IMv
Page: table 46 (p. 266), chart 89 (p. 211). Value of imports of sh in current US$ (data reported include sh, molluscs, crustaceans, and miscellaneous aquatic animals but excluding production for marine mammals, crocodiles, corals, pearls, sponges and aquatic plants, miscellaneous aquatic animal products and sh waste). Source: Fisheries and Aquaculture Department (Fishery and Aquaculture statistics) Owner: FAO Total sh production

P3.FTW.FAO.FI.TOT.QP
Page: chart 85 (p. 207). Per capita production of sh and shery commodities by capture and aquaculture, used for direct human food

280

PART

Sustainability dimensions

Introduction
With 30 percent of the earths land used for growing crops and pastureland, another 30 percent covered by forests, and a full 70 percent of abstracted fresh water used by agriculture, there is no question that agriculture must be at the centre of any discussion of natural resource management and global environmental objectives. Ensuring adequate food and water for all while at the same time achieving sustainable rural development and livelihoods for current and future generations hinge upon the responsible management of natural resources. Agriculture, though, has a complex relationship with natural resources and the environment. While agriculture is a major user of land and water it must also maintain the quantity and quality of those resources in order to stay viable. Despite efforts to conserve and recycle natural resources, the agriculture sector generates waste and pollution that can negatively impact landscapes and wildlife habitats. For instance, as the largest consumer of water, agriculture is the main source of nitrate and ammonia pollution in both ground and surface water. It is a major contributor to the phosphate pollution of waterways and the release of powerful greenhouse gases (methane and nitrous oxide) into the atmosphere. Increasingly, however, agriculture and forestry are recognized as having potentially positive externalities, such as the provision of environmental services and amenities

through water storage and purication, carbon sequestration and the maintenance of rural landscapes. Moreover, research-driven intensication is saving vast areas of natural forest and grassland that would have been developed in the absence of higher crop, meat and milk yields. But conversely, intensication has in some instances contributed to air and water pollution that has led to reduced productivity growth. Both new and traditional demands for produce are putting intense pressure on scarce agricultural resources. While the sector will be forced to compete for land and water with mushrooming urban settlements and industrial zones, it will also be required to serve on another major front: to meet the increasing demands of the emerging bio-based economy, especially bioenergy and markets for renewable and sustainable industrial products.

Key Resources
The State of the Worlds Forests (SOFO) The State of the Worlds Forests reports on the status of forests, recent major policy and institutional developments and key issues concerning the forest sector. It makes current, reliable and policy-relevant information widely available to facilitate informed discussion and decision-making with regard to the worlds forests. SOFO 2011 considers the theme Changing pathways, changing lives: forests as multiple pathways to sustainable development. It takes a holistic view of the multiple ways in which forests support livelihoods. The chapters include regional trends on forest resources, the development of sustainable forest industries, climate change mitigation and adaptation, and the local value of forests. 2011: Changing pathways, changing lives: forests as multiple pathways to sustainable development 2009: Society, forests and forestry: adapting for the future Publication cycle: Biennial Webpage: http://www.fao.org/forestry/sofo/en/

The State of the Worlds Land and Water Resources for Food and Agriculture (SOLAW) The State of the Worlds Land and Water Resources for Food and Agriculture analyses a variety of options for overcoming constraints and improving resource management in these areas of heightened risk. By 2050, food production is projected to increase by about 70 percent globally and nearly 100 percent in developing countries. This incremental demand for food, together with demand from other competing uses, will place unprecedented pressure on many agricultural production systems across the world. These systems at risk are facing growing competition for land and water resources and they are often constrained by unsustainable agricultural practices. They therefore require particular attention and specic remedial action. 2011: Managing systems at risk. Webpage: http://www.fao.org/nr/solaw/en/

PART 4

Land
As populations and economies grow, productive lands in some countries are being displaced by urban and industrial development, roads and reservoirs. This is because, for sound historic and strategic reasons, many urban areas and industrial zones are situated on at coastal plains or river valleys with fertile soils. Where land cannot be viably expanded, the loss of prime-quality cropland has put additional pressure on agriculture to perform, especially through intensication. Changes in landcover have caused the most pressing environmental issue in recent decades. Deforestation and land use intensication, especially its impact on soil degradation, are at the heart of the issue. But, in much of the world, the current picture of landcover change shows a continuing slowdown of converting forests to areas for crop or livestock production and the steady growth of protected areas. The latest estimate of the worlds total forest area is at over four billion hectares, corresponding to 31 percent of total land area or an average of 0.6 hectares per capita. The ve most forest-rich countries (the Russian Federation, Brazil, Canada, the United States of America and China) presently account for more than half of the planets total forest area. Ten countries or areas have no forest at all, and an additional 54 have forest on less than 10 percent of their total land area. While the rate of deforestation and loss of forest from natural causes is still high, it is slowing down. At the global level, it has decreased from an estimated 16 million hectares per year in the 1990s to around 13 million hectares per year in the last decade. At the same time, afforestation and natural expansion of forests in some countries and areas have signicantly reduced the net loss of forest area at the global level. The net change in forest area over the period 200010 was estimated at -5.2 million hectares per year, down by 35 percent per year in the prior decade. However, most of the loss of forest continued to take place in countries and areas in the tropical regions, while most of the gain took place in the temperate and boreal zones and in some emerging economies. On the positive side, close to 75 percent of the worlds forests were covered by a national forest programme a participatory process for the development and implementation of forest-related policies and international commitments at the national level.

Map 54:

Global distribution

Source: FAO, Land and Water Division Metalink: P4.ENV.FAO.FOR.LCF.SOLAW, p. 348

Land and water are indispensable for

agricultural production

Many production systems are increasingly constrained by low availability of and access to these key resources economic pressures and climate change represent additional pressures

Unsustainable practises, growing socio-

284

LAND

Global distribution of risks associated with main agricultural production systems

Chart 98: Land surface in many regions is unable to sustain crop cultivation, leading to environmental pressure from the intensication of existing cropland
Land with rainfed crop potential (2007)
Suitable 1200 1000 800 600 400 200 0 Not Suitable

Million ha

East Asia

L.Amer. & N.East & N.Africa Carib.

South Asia

Sub-S Africa

Source: FAO, Statistics Division Metalink: P4.ENV.LND.SUIT, p. 350

285

PART 4

Historically, production of wood and wood products has been the main objective of forest management and other functions were not explicitly accounted for. However, there has been a shift towards assigning a higher priority to the environmental and social functions of forests. Currently, more than 1.6 billion people depend on forests for their livelihoods, with some 300 million living in them. Forests provide habitats to about two-thirds of all species on earth. In addition, forests serve as carbon reservoirs by storing large amounts of carbon in trees and soil. When forests are cleared or degraded, their sink potential is reduced and they can become a substantial source of CO2 . Overall, forests contain just over half of the carbon in terrestrial vegetation and soil, amounting to 1200 Gt of carbon. Boreal (coniferous) forests account for more carbon than any other terrestrial ecosystem (26 percent), while tropical and temperate forests account for 20 and 7 percent respectively. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) has estimated that, globally, carbon sequestration from reduced deforestation, forest regeneration and plantation development could equal approximately 15 percent of the total carbon dioxide emissions generated by fossil fuels. Crop intensication has the potential to structurally lower crop productivity through land degradation. This term refers to the reduction of the lands capacity to provide an ecosystem functioning over a period of time for the beneciaries of these functions, namely farming. According to the Land Degradation Assessment in Drylands (LADA) initiative, land degradation costs an estimated US$40 billion annually worldwide, without taking into account the hidden costs incurred by increased fertilizer use and loss of biodiversity and unique landscapes. The consequences of land degradation include reduced land productivity and socio-economic problems such as uncertainty in food security, migration, limited economic development and damage to ecosystems. Reclamation of degraded land is costly and, if severely degraded, impractical.

Map 55:

No Data

<1

1 1.

Source: FAO, Statistics Division Metalink: P4.ENV.FAO.FOR.LCF.SQ, p. 348

Carbon content in topsoil is a good measure of soil fertility, but when removed, soil depletion results, leading to poor crop yields intense cultivation and inadequate soil management fer from inherently low soil fertility

Depletion arises owing to excessively

Sub-Saharan Africa and parts of Asia suf-

286

LAND

Carbon content in topsoil (% weight, 2009*) 1 1.5 1.5 2 23 >3

Chart 99: Rates of annual net loss of forests are still very high in some regions
Average net annual change in forest area (1990-2010)
0.2 0.1 0.0 -0.1 -0.2 -0.3 -0.4 -0.5

% p.a.

East Asia

L.Amer. & Carib.

South Asia

Sub-S Africa

World

Source: FAO, 2010. Global Forest Resources Assessment 2010 Metalink: P4.ENV.FAO.FOR.LCF.DEF, p. 347

287

PART 4

Land degradation affects large zones and many people around the world, particularly in dryland areas. The transfer of critical production elements to other uses (e.g. dry-season grazing lands), the introduction of cash crops, and the use of water for industrial and urban purposes at the expense of rural agricultural producers sever the links in traditional dryland production chains. Left uncompensated, such changes lead to the breakdown of entire production systems. Removing the protective cover to reduce competition for water and nutrients, ploughing, heavy grazing and deforestation leave the soil highly vulnerable to wind erosion, particularly during severe droughts. Heavy grazing around water points or during long droughts prevents or delays the re-growth of vegetation or favours only invasive shrubs. This problem is particularly acute in numerous parts of sub-Saharan Africa, where inherently low soil fertility, severe nutrient depletion and poor soil structure are prevalent. Large fertilizer applications are unaffordable and too risky in these low-potential rainfed cropping systems. However, sustainable land and water management techniques can greatly restore productivity. These techniques include soil fertility management, applying a combination of organic and inorganic nutrients, agronomic techniques (such as plant diversity, agroforestry, crop rotation) and the maintenance of protective soil cover.

Chart 100: Cropland has expanded at the expense of forest cover

Land use change (1990-2009)
Cropland Forests Pasture Systems

% p.a.

-1

Developed

East Asia

L.Amer. & Carib.

South Asia

Sub-S Africa

Source: FAO, Statistics Division (FAOSTAT) Metalink: P4.ENV.FAO.ESS.LAND.CROP, p. 346

Chart 101: Primary forests now make up a small proportion of forest area
Forest characteristics (2010)
Primary Forest Other Naturally Reg. Forest Planted Forest

80

60

Further reading
20

FAO The State of the Worlds Land and Water Resources

for Food and Agriculture (SOLAW): managing systems at risk 2011 (www.fao.org/nr/solaw/solaw-home/en/)
0

40

FAO State of the Worlds Forests 2011 (www.fao.org/

docrep/013/i2000e/i2000e00.htm)

East Asia

L.Amer. & Carib.

South Asia

Sub-S Africa

World

FAO Global Forest Resources Assessment 2010 (www.

fao.org/forestry/fra/fra2010/en/)

Source: FAO, 2010. Global Forest Resources Assessment 2010 Metalink: P4.ENV.FAO.FOR.LCF.FOCx, p. 347

UN International Year of Forests 2011 (www.fao.org/

forestry/iyf2011/en/)

FAO Land degradation assessment (www.fao.org/nr/

land/degradation/en/)

FAO Land Degradation Assessment in Drylands, LADA

(www.fao.org/nr/lada/)

288

LAND

Map 56: At 4 billion hectares, the worlds forests cover 31 percent of total land area

Forest area as share of total land area (%, 2010) No Data < 15 15 30

30 50

50 70

> 70

Source: FAO, 2010. Global Forest Resources Assessment 2010 Metalink: P4.ENV.FAO.FOR.LCF.FOA, p. 347

Chart 102: Other than wood production, forests perform a diverse set of functions across regions
Primary designated functions of forest (2010)
Multiple Use 40 Other or Unknown Prod. Protect.& Conserv. Social Sevices

Chart 103: 289 gigatonnes of carbon are stored in global forest biomass, but levels have fallen owing to a reduction in prime carbon-storing forests
Carbon stock in living forest biomass (1990-2009)
300000

290000

20

Giga tonnes East Asia L.Amer. & Carib. South Asia Sub-S Africa World

30

280000

270000

10

260000

0 250000

1990

1995

2000

2005

2010

Source: FAO, 2010. Global Forest Resources Assessment 2010 Metalink: P4.ENV.FAO.FOR.LCF.PFF, p. 347

Source: FAO, 2010. Global Forest Resources Assessment 2010 Metalink: P4.ENV.FAO.FOR.LCF.CSFO, p. 347

289

PART 4

Water
A very small proportion of the planets water is available for human use. Around 2.5 percent of the worlds water is freshwater. Of this 2.5 percent, more than two-thirds is locked away in glaciers, ice caps and permafrost. About 30 percent is groundwater, with the remaining 1.3 percent of the worlds total freshwater being surface water in rivers and other forms such as ice and snow, and lakes and swamps. Global demand for water has risen sharply within the last century. At the beginning of the twentieth-century, each person withdrew 360 m3 of water on average per year. By the year 2005 this had risen to 607 m3 , while total annual water withdrawal by agriculture, industry and municipalities together rose from 580 km3 to 3941 km3 over the same period. Precipitation provides some of the water needed by crops to satisfy their transpiration requirements. The soil, acting as a buffer, stores part of the precipitation water as soil moisture and returns it to the crops in times of decit. In humid climates, this mechanism is usually sufcient to ensure satisfactory growth in rain-fed agriculture. In arid climates or during the dry season, irrigation is required to compensate for the decit resulting from insufcient or erratic precipitation. Today, agriculture accounts for about 70 percent of the freshwater withdrawals in the world, mostly through irrigation. This has been crucial for gains in food production. Irrigation reduces drought risk and encourages crop diversication, thus enhancing rural incomes. Consumptive use of irrigation water can be computed as the volume of water needed to compensate for the decit between potential evapotranspiration of plants and effective precipitation over the crops growing period. The pressure of irrigation on water resources can be dened as the share of water withdrawal in total renewable water resources. While the pressure on water resources from irrigation was estimated at 6.5 percent for the world as a whole in 2005, there was wide variation across countries and regions. In the Near East/North Africa region and Central Asia, for instance, pressure on water resources from irrigation is estimated at 58 percent, while it holds at 52 percent in South Asia. On the other hand, in sub-Saharan Africa it is less than 3 percent. Variations are even wider at the country level. This indicates that some countries are already beyond the critical level, and their condition may even worsen with time. Increasing water productivity is therefore critical in these countries. And, more generally, it is necessary to reduce over-extraction of groundwater, increase the inltration of rainwater into soils and reduce the deterioration of water quality owing to waterlogging and salinization. Some of these phenomena are fuelled by agricultural intensication, which affects water availability through increased contamination of groundwater and surface water from fertilizers, pesticides and animal wastes.

Map 57:

No Data

< 300

300

Source: FAO, Land and Water Division (AQUASTAT) Metalink: P4.ENV.FAO.NRL.WAT.TWWpc, p. 348

In 2005, 3941 km3 of water was withdrawn for agricultural, industrial and municipal purposes, representing on average 607 m3 per person

70 percent of global water withdrawals

accounted for by agriculture

Increasing water scarcity increases the

competition for water by different sectors

290

WATER

Total water withdrawal per capita (m3 inhab yr, 2005) 300 800 800 1500 1500 2400 > 2400

Chart 104: Share of freshwater resources withdrawn highest in Asia, owing to large annual withdrawals by countries in the west of the region
Share of freshwater resources withdrawn (2005*)
20 15 10 5 0

Africa

Americas

Asia

Europe

Oceania

World

Source: FAO, Land and Water Division (AQUASTAT) Metalink: P4.ENV.FAO.NRL.WAT.WWfr, p. 348

291

PART 4

Widespread and largely unregulated groundwater withdrawals by agriculture have resulted in depletion and degradation of some of the worlds most accessible and high-quality aquifers. Examples exist in the Central Valley in California, the Ogallala aquifer in the US Great Plaines, the Punjab in Pakistan, the North China Plain, the Souss basin in Morocco and parts of India. In some coastal areas, over-extraction causes saltwater to permeate into freshwater aquifers, making them unt for irrigation or drinking water without costly treatment. Irrigation mismanagement can also contribute to waterlogging and salinization. Waterlogged soil results from over-irrigation and inadequate drainage. It restricts plant growth and in many cases precedes salinization. Generally, salinization results from the build-up of dissolved solids in soils, and can also occur in rain-fed areas with inherently susceptible soils. The United Nations Environmental Programme (UNEP) considers salinization to be the second largest cause of land loss. In some semi-arid countries, 10 to 50 percent of the irrigated area is affected to a greater or lesser degree with average yield decreases of 10 to 25 percent for many crops. Worldwide, FAO estimates that 34 million hectares (11 percent of the irrigated area) are affected by some level of salinization; Pakistan, China, United States of America and India represent more than 60 percent of the total (21 million ha). An additional 60-80 million hectares are affected to some extent by waterlogging and related salinity. Appropriate measures need be implemented to limit over-extraction, waterlogging and salinization that can lead to considerable losses of irrigated land and result in unsustainably high operating costs. Climate change prospects make such measures even more urgent. Given the likely increase of associated risks, such as aridity and further increases in soil moisture decits, improving water management becomes even more crucial. Sustainable land and water management can not only increase resilience of farming in the face of climate change, but it can also have a positive impact on the drivers of climate change, offering costeffective mitigation options. Many management techniques that strengthen productions systems also tend to sequester carbon either above or below the ground, as well as reducing direct greenhouse gas emissions.

Map 58:

No Data

<1

1 20

Source: FAO, Land and Water Division (AQUASTAT) Metalink: P4.ENV.FAO.NRL.WAT.WWfrag, p. 348

Measured against the sum of all re-

newable water resources, withdrawal by agriculture accounts for a signicant share in some regions East and North Africa, agricultural withdrawal can exceed 100 percent of freshwater resources from non-renewable aquifers (fossil water), desalination plants or from recycling

In water scarce regions, such as the Near

In these instances, water is extracted

Further reading
FAO The State of the Worlds Land and Water Resources
for Food and Agriculture (SOLAW): managing systems at risk 2011 (www.fao.org/nr/solaw/solaw-home/en/)

FAO Water (www.fao.org/nr/water/) FAO AQUASTAT (www.fao.org/nr/aquastat/)

292

WATER

Share of freshwater resources withdrawn by agriculture (%, 2005*) 1 20 20 50 50 100 > 100

Chart 105: Around 168 million hectares of developing country land affected by salinity
Saline soils (2005*)
40 30

Million ha

20 10 0

Africa

Developed

L.Amer. & Carib.

North & C. Asia

South & East Asia

Source: FAO, Statistics Division Metalink: P4.ENV.FAO.POL.SAL, p. 349

293

PART 4

Pollution from agriculture

Public attention tends to focus on the more perceptible signs of agricultures impact on the environment, but the non-visible or less obvious effects of pollution have the greatest economic costs. Agriculture affects air quality and the atmosphere in four main ways: 1) particulate matter and Greenhouse Gases (GHGs) from land clearance by re (mainly rangeland and forest) and the burning of rice residues; 2) methane from rice and livestock production; 3) nitrous oxide from fertilizers and manure; and 4) ammonia from manure and urine. Pollution from agriculture is not conned to atmospheric contaminants; the same pollutant sources especially runoff from fertilizers, pesticides and animal wastes can affect both groundwater and as well as surface water. Pollution problems caused by agriculture are by no means insurmountable. Industry has shown that the environmental impact of agricultural pollution can be moderated through better management and regulation. Soot, dust and trace gases are released by biomass burning during forest, bush or rangeland clearance for agriculture. Burning is traditionally practised in slash and burn tropical farming, in ring of savannah regions by pastoralists to stimulate forage growth and in clearing of fallow land and disposing of crop residues, particularly rice. Burning has had major global impacts, causing air pollution in tropical regions far from the source of the res. Agriculture now contributes about 30 percent of total global anthropogenic (human induced) emissions of GHGs. There is increasing concern not just with carbon dioxide but also with the growth of agricultural emissions of other greenhouse producing gases such as methane, nitrous oxide and ammonia arising from crop and livestock production. In some countries these can account for more than 80 percent of GHG emissions from agriculture. The conversion of tropical forests to agricultural land, the expansion of rice and livestock production and the increased use of nitrogen fertilizers have all been signicant contributors to GHG emissions.

Map 59:

No Data

< 10000

10

Source: World Bank Metalink: P4.ENV.WBK.WDI.POL.MTHEA, p. 351

Methane is a principal greenhouse gas

driving climate change

It has a warming potential 20 times more

powerful than carbon dioxide

Global methane emissions currently

amount to about 540 million tonnes per annum with agriculture contributing around 40 percent

294

POLLUTION FROM AGRICULTURE

Agricultural methane emissions (kt of CO2 equivalent, 2005) 10000 30000 30000 50000 50000 180000 > 180000

Chart 106: Despite a reduction in recent years, agriculture still accounts for more than 40 percent of total methane emissions
Agricultural and total methane emissions (1990-2005)
Agricultural methane emissions 7000 6000 5000 4000 3000 2000 1000 0 Total methane emissions

Thousand kt of CO2 equivalent

1990

1995

2000

2005

Source: World Bank Metalink: P4.ENV.WBK.WDI.POL.MTHEA, p. 351

295

PART 4

Methane is a principal GHG driving climate change. Its warming potential is about 20 times more powerful than carbon dioxide. Global methane emissions amount at present to about 540 million tonnes per annum, increasing at an annual rate of 20-30 million tonnes. Rice production currently contributes about 11 percent of global methane emissions (up to 90 percent of the methane from rice elds is emitted through the rice plant). Depending on the extent and level of intensication, around 15 percent comes from livestock (from enteric fermentation by cattle, sheep and goats and from animal excreta). The storage of manure in a liquid or waterlogged state is another principal source of methane emissions from agriculture these are conditions typical of the lagoons, pits and storage tanks used by intensive stall-feeding systems. But there are solutions. For instance, as ruminant production structures in developing countries evolve towards those found in industrial ones, the lessons of improved feed intake and digestibility can signicantly lower emissions per animal. Regarding the storage of manure, when appropriate technologies are introduced to harness methane in local power production, as has been done in some South and East Asian countries, environmental impacts can even become benecial. Finally, as a greater proportion of rice is being grown under controlled irrigation and better nutrient management, methane emissions are potentially manageable. Nitrous oxide (N2 O) is the other powerful GHG for which agriculture is the dominant human-induced or anthropogenic source. Mineral fertilizer use and cattle production are the main culprits. N2 O is generated by natural biogenic processes, but is enhanced by agriculture through nitrogen fertilizers, the creation of crop residues, animal urine and faeces, and nitrogen leaching and runoff. N2 O formation is sensitive to climate, soil type, tillage practices and type and placement of fertilizer. It is also linked to the release of nitric oxide and ammonia, which contribute to acid rain and the acidication of soils and drainage systems. Nitrogen fertilizer, a major source of nitrous oxide emissions, is used very inefciently in many developing countries. In China, for example, the worlds largest nitrogen fertilizer consumer, it is not uncommon for half to be lost by volatilization and 5 to 10 percent by leaching. The livestock sector is the other major source of N2 O emissions resulting from the breakdown (nitricationdenitrication) of manure applied as fertilizer primarily to crops but also to pastures. In developed countries, only about 15 percent of the nitrogen applied to crops is thought to be derived from livestock manure. In developing countries, the relative contribution of livestock manure can be high but is not well documented. However, where growth in industrial-scale livestock production is separate from crop production, where labour availability is low and where subsidies are available, the trend is to rely more on mineral fertilizers to maintain or raise crop yields.

Map 60:

No Data

< 10000

10

Source: World Bank Metalink: P4.ENV.WBK.WDI.POL.NOEA, p. 351

Nitrous oxide is the other powerful

green house gas for which agriculture is the dominant human-induced source emissions are attributed to agriculture production and livestock rearing

Around two-thirds of total nitrous oxide Major sources of emissions are fertilizer

296

POLLUTION FROM AGRICULTURE

Agricultural nitrous oxide emissions (kt of CO2 equivalent, 2005) 10000 30000 30000 50000 50000 180000 346981

Chart 107: Agriculture accounts for more than 66 percent of total nitrous oxide emissions, and rising
Agricultural and total nitrous oxide emissions (1990-2005)
Agricultural nitrous oxide emissions 2500 2000 1500 1000 500 0 Total nitrous oxide emissions

Thousand kt of CO2 equivalent

1990

1995

2000

2005

Source: World Bank Metalink: P4.ENV.WBK.WDI.POL.NOEA, p. 351

297

PART 4

Agriculture is the dominant source of ammonia emissions, which are nearly fourfold greater than natural emissions. Livestock production, particularly of cattle, accounts for about 44 percent of ammonia emissions, mineral fertilizers for 17 percent and biomass burning and crop residues for about 11 percent, of the global total. Volatilization rates from mineral fertilizers in developing countries are about four times greater than in developed countries because of higher temperatures and lower quality fertilizers. Ammonia emissions are potentially even more acidifying than emissions of sulphur dioxide and nitrogen oxides. Concerning water pollution by agriculture, extensive leaching of nitrates from soils into surface water and groundwater, which was traditionally an issue in almost all industrial countries, is now becoming a problem in many developing countries. It poses a risk to human health and contributes to eutrophication of rivers, lakes and coastal waters. The bulk comes from diffuse sources arising from mineral fertilizer and manure use on both crops and grasslands. The problem occurs primarily when nitrogen application rates exceed crop nutrient uptake. The risk depends on crop type and yield, soil type and underlying rocks. However, extensive areas in both developed and developing countries already receive large nitrogen fertilizer applications in commensurate with the availability of adequate soil moisture, other nutrients and management practices employed to attain higher yields. Pesticide use, the cause of serious water pollution in many industrialized countries, is now appearing in developing countries as well, and is exacerbated by the availability of cheap, out-of-patent, locally produced chemicals. Shortages of farm labour, reduced use of ood irrigation for rice and the spread of minimal tillage systems are leading to major increases in the use of herbicides. Water pollution also arises from intensive dairying and landless rearing of pigs and poultry, particularly in East Asia. The problem arises from discharges or runoff of nitrogen and other nutrients into surface waters because of bad waste management.

Map 61:

No Data

< 10

10

Source: World Bank Metalink: P4.ENV.WBK.WDI.POL.WATF, p. 351

Water pollution is becoming a serious

concern in many developing countries

In lower income countries, the contribu-

tion of the food sector to the production of organic water pollutants amounts to 54 percent, compared to 40 percent in high-income countries ment and fertilizer applications result in the substantial leaching of nitrates from soils into surface water and groundwater

Unregulated livestock waste manage-

Further reading
FAO Natural Resources Department (www.fao.org/nr/
nr-home/en/)

Bruinsma (2003)

298

POLLUTION FROM AGRICULTURE

Water pollution, food industry (% of total BOD emissions, 2007*) 10 15 15 20 20 40 > 40

Chart 108: The food sector is a signicant source of water pollution but industry dominates
Pollution by sector in total BOD emissions (2007*)
Food Industry Pulp and paper Textile Wood

% of total BOD emissions

40 30 20 10 0

Food

Industry

Pulp and paper

Textile

Wood

Source: World Bank Metalink: P4.ENV.WBK.WDI.POL.WAT, p. 351

299

PART 4

Climate change
Historically, farmers, pastoralists, forest dwellers and shers have learned to cope with climate variability and have often adapted crops and farming practices to suit new conditions. But the severity and pace of climate change is presenting new, unprecedented challenges. The poorest and most food-insecure regions around the globe are the most vulnerable to effects of climate change. In Africa, low levels of food security and economic development conspire with high levels of climate risk, while large populations and heavily exploited natural resources and climate risk threaten South Asias poor. Climate change will signicantly impact agriculture by increasing water demand, limiting crop productivity and reducing water availability in areas where irrigation is most needed or has comparative advantage. Global atmospheric temperature is predicted to rise by approximately 4 o C by 2080, consistent with a doubling of atmospheric CO2 concentration. Mean temperatures are expected to rise at a faster rate in the upper latitudes, with slower rates in equatorial regions. Mean temperature rise at altitude is expected to be higher than at sea level, resulting in intensication of convective precipitation and acceleration of snowmelt and glacier retreat. In response to global warming, the hydrological cycle is expected to accelerate as rising temperatures increase the rate of evaporation from land and sea. Thus rainfall is predicted to rise in the tropics and in higher latitudes, but decrease in the already dry semi-arid to arid midlatitudes and in the interior of large continents. Waterscarce areas of the world will generally become drier and hotter. Both rainfall and temperatures are predicted to become more variable, with a consequent higher incidence of droughts and oods, sometimes in the same place. The future availability of water to match crop water requirements is compounded in areas with lower rainfall, i.e. in those that are presently arid or semi-arid, in addition to the southern, drier parts of Europe and North America. Runoff (the water ow from soil when inltrated to full capacity) and groundwater recharge are both likely to decline dramatically in these areas.

Map 62:

Glo
Source: IPCC Metalink: P4.ENV.IPCC.CC.GSTG, p. 349

Global warming will have signicant impacts on agriculture

Most notably, these include rising sur-

face temperatures, increasing carbon dioxide concentration and changing rainfall patterns mine the carrying capacity of bio systems to produce enough food

The extent of these changes will deter-

300

CLIMATE CHANGE

2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0

Global surface temperature (C, Temperature difference of 200008 versus 194080)

Chart 109: Rising surface temperature is symptomatic of climatic change

Global surface temperature (1850-2010)
0.4 0.2 0.0

C
-0.2 -0.4

1850

1900

1950

2000

Source: IPCC Metalink: P4.ENV.IPCC.CC.GST, p. 349

301

PART 4

Runoff is also expected to decline dramatically in areas where annual potential evapotranspiration exceeds rainfall, such as in south eastern Australia where a 40 percent decrease is anticipated. Relatively small reductions in rainfall will translate into much larger reductions in runoff, for example, a 5 percent precipitation decrease in Morocco will result in a 25 percent reduction in runoff. Although mean annual runoff may be less affected in glacier-fed river systems, the timing of ows will change, which could have critical consequences for agriculture. Where rainfall volume increases and becomes more intense (Indian monsoon, humid tropics), a greater proportion of runoff will occur as ood ow that should be captured in dams or groundwater to be useable. About 40 percent of the worlds irrigation is supported by ows originating in the Himalayas and other large mountain systems (e.g. Rocky Mountains in the western United States of America and Tien Shan in Central Asia). The loss of glaciers worldwide has been one of the strongest indicators of global warming. The impacts on some river systems (such as the Indus) are likely to be signicant and will change the availability of surface water for storage and diversion as well as the amount of groundwater recharge. As temperatures rise, the efciency of photosynthesis increases to a maximum and then falls, while the rate of respiration continues to increase more or less up to the point that a plant dies. All else being equal, the productivity of vegetation thus declines once temperature exceeds an optimum. In general, plants are more sensitive to heat stress at specic earlier growth stages (sometimes over relatively short periods), than to seasonal average temperatures. Increased atmospheric temperature will extend the length of the growing season in the northern temperate zones, but will reduce it almost everywhere else. Coupled with increased rates of evapotranspiration, water productivity and potential crop yields will fall. However, low yields and water productivity in many parts of the developing world do not necessarily mean that they will decline in the long term. Rather, farmers will have to make agronomic improvements to increase productivity from current levels.

Map 63:

No Data

< 400

400

Source: FAO, Land and Water Division (AQUASTAT) Metalink: P4.ENV.FAO.ACQ.CLIM.APD, p. 344

Average precipitation is the long-term

average in depth (over space and time) of annual rainfall in a country dependent on sufcient rainfall

Harvest outcomes in many countries are Over 90 percent of agriculture in sub-

Saharan Africa, for example, is managed under rainfed systems

302

CLIMATE CHANGE

Average precipitation in depth (mm per year, 2008) 400 1000 1000 1500 1500 2000 > 2000

Chart 110: Despite a large increase in average rainfall in 2010, Sahel precipitation rates have been persistently below the long-term mean in recent decades
Sahel rainfall anomalies (1900-2010)
3 2

mm per year

1 0 -1 -2 -3

1900

1920

1940

1960

1980

2000

Source: JISAO Metalink: P4.ENV.JISAO.CLIM.SAHEL, p. 350

303

PART 4

Increased atmospheric concentrations of CO2 enhance photosynthetic efciency and reduce rates of respiration, offsetting the loss of production potential due to temperature rise. However, scientic evidence demonstrates that all factors of production need to be optimal to realize the benets of CO2 fertilisation. Early hopes for substantial CO2 mitigation of production losses from global warming have not materialized. Also, by the time CO2 levels have doubled, temperatures will also have risen by 4 o C, negating any benet. Agriculture will also be impacted by more active storm systems, especially in the tropics, where cyclone activity is likely to intensify in conjunction with increasing ocean temperatures. The evidence of this is starting to emerge. Sea level rise will affect drainage and water levels in coastal areas, particularly in low-lying deltas, and will result in saline intrusion into coastal aquifers and river estuaries. In order to stabilize output and income, production systems must become more resilient, i.e. more capable of performing well in the face of disruptive events. More productive and resilient agriculture requires transformations in the management of natural resources (e.g. land, water, soil nutrients, and genetic resources) and higher efciency in the use of these resources and inputs for production. Transitioning to such systems could also generate signicant mitigation benets by increasing carbon sinks, as well as reducing emissions per unit of agricultural product.

Chart 111: In the past two decades CO2 concentration has risen by 10 percent. Land use and biomass burning account for over 9 percent of global CO2 emissions
CO2 concentration (1959-2010)

300

ppm

200

100

1960

1970

1980

1990

2000

2010

Source: IPCC Metalink: P4.ENV.IPCC.CC.C02, p. 349

Chart 112: Agriculture in the United States emits far more GHGs than any other country, and almost three times more than the next largest emitting country
Total Greenhouse Gas (GHG) emissions from agriculture (2008)
Italy Poland Spain United Kingdom Canada Germany Australia France Russian Federation United States of America

Further reading
FAO Climate Change (www.fao.org/climatechange/) FAO Climate change, water and food security - FAO
(www.fao.org/docrep/014/i2096e/i2096e00.htm)

0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 Million gigagrams CO2 equivalent

Source: World Bank Metalink: P4.ENV.FAO.BIO.GHG.AG, p. 344

0.4

FAO Energy-smart food for people and climate (www.

fao.org/docrep/014/i2454e/i2454e00.pdf)

Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)

(www.ipcc.ch/)

304

CLIMATE CHANGE

Chart 113: Global average yields for major food crops have risen

Long-term yields, global crops (1961-2009)

Maize 5 Rice Wheat

tonnes per ha

1970

1980

1990

2000

2010

Source: FAO, Statistics Division Metalink: P3.FEED.FAO.ESS.WT.YLD, p. 278

Chart 114: ... but yield variability in all regions has increased in the past ve decades

Long-term cereal yield variability (1961-2010)

Developed East Asia South Asia Sub-S Africa L. Amer. & Carib.

% p.a.

1970

1980

1990

2000

2010

Source: FAO, Statistics Division Metalink: P4.ENV.FAO.CC.CE.YLD, p. 346

305

PART 4

Biodiversity and conservation

Biodiversity concerns the degree of variation of life forms within a given ecosystem and is ultimately a measure of the health of ecosystems. Biodiversity for food and agriculture includes the components of biological diversity that are essential for feeding human populations and improving the quality of life. It includes the variety and variability of ecosystems, animals, plants and microorganisms, at the genetic, species and ecosystem levels, which are necessary to sustain human life as well as the key functions of ecosystems. Such diversity is the result of thousands of years of farmers and breeders activities, land and forest utilization, and sheries and aquaculture activities combined with millions of years of natural selection. Much of the human population lives in areas where food production and nature co-exist together. Agricultures main impacts on biodiversity are diverse. For instance, the expansion of agriculture can lead to losses of natural wildlife habitat and reduction in the area of natural forests, wetlands and so on, with an attendant loss of species. It also causes a general decline in species richness in forests, pastures and eld margins, and the reduction of wild genetic resources related to domesticated crops and livestock. Moreover, the observed reduction of micro-organisms that help sustain food and agricultural production is another way that agricultures life support system has been damaged. The intensication of agricultural production is equally putting biodiversity at risk. The conservation and sustainable use of biodiversity for food and agriculture plays a critical role in the ght against hunger, by ensuring environmental sustainability while increasing food and agriculture production. It is imperative to do so in a sustainable way: harvesting resources without compromising the natural capital, including biodiversity and ecosystem services, and capitalizing on biological processes. To achieve sustainable increases in productivity and provide a sounder ecological basis for agriculture, a large reservoir of genetic and species diversity will need to be maintained and sustainably used. The use of multispecies and multi-breed herds and ocks is one strategy that many traditional livestock farmers use to maintain high diversity. Species combinations also enhance productivity in aquatic systems. Crop rotations, intercropping, alley farming and growing different varieties of a single crop have all been shown to have benecial effects on crop performance, nutrient availability, pest and disease control and water management. Ensuring diversity will help maintain and rehabilitate productive ecosystems to supply future generations with abundant food and agriculture.

Map 64:

No Data

<5

5 10

Source: World Bank Metalink: P4.ENV.WBK.WDI.CON.PROT, p. 350

12.5 million hectares of the worlds land

terrain is currently protected by law - but this represents a fraction of the worlds land area ticularly scare in countries that apply the most intensive production systems in agriculture

What is more, protected areas are par-

Further reading
FAO Biodiversity (www.fao.org/biodiversity) UN
International Year of Biodiversity 2010 (www.fao.org/biodiversity/ 2010-international-year-of-biodiversity)

306

BIODIVERSITY AND CONSERVATION

Nationally protected areas, share of total area (%, 2009*) 5 10 10 20 20 30 > 30

Chart 115: A large number of animal and plant species threatened from human activity including the intensication of agriculture
Species threatened (2010)
8000

6000

Number

4000

2000

Fish species

Mammal species

Plant species

Source: World Bank Metalink: P4.ENV.WBK.WDI.BIOD.PST, p. 350

307

PART 4

Organic farming
Organic agriculture is a production management system that aims to promote and enhance ecosystem health, including biological cycles and soil biological activity. It is based on minimizing the use of external inputs, and represents a deliberate attempt to make the best use of local natural resources. Methods are used to minimize pollution of air, soil and water. Organic agriculture comprises a range of land, crop and animal management procedures, circumscribed by a set of rules and limits usually enforced by inspection and certication mechanisms. Synthetic pesticides, mineral fertilizers, synthetic preservatives, pharmaceuticals, Genetically Modied Organisms (GMOs), sewage sludge and irradiation are prohibited in all organic standards. Growth rates of land under organic management in Western Europe, Latin America and the Caribbean, and the United States of America have been impressive despite low-base beginnings and the reclassication of land. Between 1995 and 2010, the combined area of organic cultivation tripled to 38 million hectares. A number of industrial countries have action plans for developing organic agriculture. Targets are set for the sectors growth and resources are allocated to compensate farmers during, and sometimes after, the conversion period, and also to support research and extension in organic agriculture. Organic practices that encourage soil biological activity and nutrient cycling include: manipulating crop rotations and strip cropping; green manuring and organic fertilization (animal manure, compost, crop residues), minimum tillage or zero tillage and avoidance of pesticide and herbicide use. Research indicates that organic agriculture signicantly increases the density of benecial invertebrates, earthworms, root symbionts and other micro-organisms (fungi, bacteria). Properly managed organic agriculture reduces or eliminates water pollution and helps conserve water and soil on the farm. At the international level, the general principles and requirements for organic agriculture are dened in the Codex Alimentarius guidelines adopted in 1999 and regularly updated between 2001 and 2010. The growing interest in organic crop, livestock and sh products is mainly driven by health and food quality concerns. However, organic agriculture does not make a product claim that its food is healthier or safer, but rather a process claim intending to make food production and processing methods respectful of the environment.

Map 65:

No Data

<1

12

Source: FAO-FiBL-IFOAM Metalink: P4.ENV.FAO.BIO.ORGAN.HA, p. 345

38 million hectares of land were organically farmed in 2009

Oceania has more area under organic

farming than any other region

308

ORGANIC FARMING

Organic agriculture area (thousand ha, 2009) 12 2 10 10 100 > 100

Chart 116: Organic area rose by almost 30 percent in the second half of the last decade
World organic agriculture area (2004-09)

34

Million ha

32 30 28

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

Source: FAO-FiBL-IFOAM Metalink: P4.ENV.FAO.BIO.ORGAN.HA, p. 345

309

PART 4

Organic agriculture is not limited to certied organic farms and products. Non-certied products can be included as long as they fully meet the requirements of organic agriculture. This is the case for many non-certied organic agricultural systems in both developing and industrial countries where produce is consumed locally or sold directly on the farm or without labels. Organic production systems can make important contributions to food supply stability and farmer livelihoods by establishing soil fertility and providing diversity and thus resilience to food production systems in light of the many uncertainties of climate change. In particular, they contribute positively to food stability in terms of fertile and well-structured soils, improved water retention, protection of biodiversity with benecial side effects on phytomedical (plant health) stability and nutrients and efcient water use. Thus far, organic agriculture has proven to be a relatively cheap and practical option to address climate instability. This option is based on scientic evidence for certain regions and extensive, though not scientically documented, effective eld application. Reports consistently show that organic systems have enhanced ability to withstand droughts and oods and maintain high resilience in the face of unpredictable impacts of climate change. The decits of organic agriculture are mainly related to lower productivity. However, the decits should not be exaggerated. Signicantly lower yields, those in the range of more than 20 to 30 percent compared to conventional agriculture, occur mostly in cash-crop-focused production systems and under most favourable climate and soil conditions.

Map 66:

No Data

< 0.5

0.5

Source: FAO-FiBL-IFOAM Metalink: P4.ENV.FAO.BIO.ORGAN.SHA, p. 345

Despite signicant growth in organic

farming, as a percentage of overall area cultivated, the sector remains miniscule in comparison area allocated to organic farming rises to single digit levels, but elsewhere a fraction of a percentage point is common

In Europe the percentage of agricultural

Further reading
FAO Organic Agriculture (www.fao.org/organicag/en/) FAO Organic Agriculture and Environmental Stability
of the Food Supply - FAO (ftp://ftp.fao.org/docrep/fao/ meeting/012/ah950e.pdf)

310

ORGANIC FARMING

Organic agriculture, share of total area (%, 2009) 0.5 1 15 5 10 > 10

Chart 117: Europe added an extra one million hectares of organically farmed area in 2009
Regional organic agriculture area (2008-09)
Africa 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 Asia Europe Latin America Northern America Oceania

Million ha

2008

2009

Source: FAO-FiBL-IFOAM Metalink: P4.ENV.FAO.BIO.ORGAN.HA, p. 345

311

PART 4

Genetically modied crops

Biotechnology encompasses a wide range of technologies and they can be applied for a range of different purposes, such as the genetic improvement of plant varieties and animal populations to increase their yields or efciency; genetic characterization and conservation of genetic resources; plant or animal disease diagnosis; vaccine development; and improvement of feeds. Some of the technologies may be applied to all the food and agriculture sectors, such as the use of molecular DNA markers or genetic modication, while others are more sector-specic, such as tissue culture (in crops and forest trees), embryo transfer (livestock) or triploidization and sex-reversal (sh). Higher productivity holds the key in the ght against rural poverty. Biotechnology promises to boost productivity and thus raise rural incomes, much in the same way that the green revolution did in large parts of Asia during the 1960s to 1980s. Productivity gains encompass essentially all factors of agricultural production. This may mean higher crop and livestock yields, lower pesticide and fertilizer applications, less demanding production techniques, higher product quality, better storage and easier processing, or enhanced methods to monitor the health of plants and animals. One type of technology, however, has given rise to a host of concerns and questions, namely Genetically Modied Organisms (GMOs). GMOs are those organisms that have been modied by the application of recombinant DNA technology or genetic engineering, a technique used for altering a living organisms genetic material. With the rapid advances in biotechnology, a number of genetically modied (GM) crops or transgenic crops carrying novel traits have been developed and released for commercial agriculture production. These include, inter alia, pest resistant cotton, maize, canola (mainly Bt or Bacillus thuringiensis), herbicide glyphosate resistant soybean, cotton and viral disease resistant potatoes, papaya and squash. In addition, various transgenic crops are under development and not yet commercially released with traits for biofortication, phytoremediation and production of pharmaceuticals, such as rice with high level of carotenoid for production of Vitamin A (e.g. golden rice) and bananas with vaccines. Commercial cultivation of transgenic crops started in the early 1990s. Herbicide tolerance and insect resistance are the main GM traits that are currently under commercial cultivation, and the main crops are: soybean, maize, canola and cotton. GM crops are now commercially planted on about 100 million hectares in some 22 developed and developing countries. Argentina, Brazil, China and India are the largest developing-country producers of transgenic crops. The choice of GM crops varies among the developing countries, with insect resistant cotton being the most important commercially produced transgenic crop in Asian and African countries, while herbicide-resistant soybean followed by insect-resistant corn is predominant in the Latin American continent.

Map 67:

No Data

0.01

Source: Clive James, ISAAA Metalink: P4.ENV.ISAAA.BIO.GM.HA, p. 349

Almost 150 million hectares of world

crop acreage planted with GM crops

The Americas constitute the largest

growing region, but GM cotton area is substantial in Asia

312

GENETICALLY MODIFIED CROPS

Area under GM crops (million ha, 2010) 0.01 1 13 39 >9

Chart 118: Genetically modied crops also becoming important in developing countries
Area under GM crops (1996-2010)
Industrial 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 Developing

Million ha

1996

1998

2000

2002

2004

2006

2008

2010

Source: Clive James, ISAAA Metalink: P4.ENV.ISAAA.BIO.GM.RHA, p. 350

313

PART 4

In most cases these GM technologies are proprietary, developed by the private sector and released for commercial production through licensing agreements. Cultivation and commercial production of GM crops are capital intensive owing to high costs of seed and technology. Nevertheless, their cultivation has generally increased, mainly because of the benets accrued from lower labour and production costs, reduction in use of chemical inputs and improved economic gain. The United States of America, Argentina and Canada are the major producers and exporters of GM crops and products. The four main global GM crops are among the major commodities traded on world markets. The increasing cultivation of GM crops has raised a wide range of concerns with respect to food safety, environmental effects and socio-economic issues. From the food and health perspective, the main concerns are related to possible toxicity and allergenicity of GM foods and products. Concerns about environmental risks include the impact of introgression of the transgenes into the natural landscape, impact of gene ow, effect on nontarget organisms, evolution of pest resistance and loss of biodiversity. Adoption of GM technologies has also evoked a range of social and ethical concerns about restricting access to genetic resources and new technologies, loss of traditions (such as saving seeds), private sector monopoly and loss of income of resource-poor farmers. The scientic evidence concerning the environmental and health impacts of GMOs is still emerging, but so far there is no conclusive information on the denitive negative impacts of GMOs on health or the environment. Nevertheless, public perceptions about GMOs in food and agriculture are divided with a tendency toward avoiding GM food and products in many developed and developing countries. Regarding international agreements, the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety came into force in 2003, and by October 2011 has been ratied by 161 countries. The objective of the Protocol, as stated is to contribute to ensuring an adequate level of protection in the eld of the safe transfer, handling and use of living modied organisms resulting from modern biotechnology that may have adverse effects on the conservation and sustainable use of biological diversity, taking also into account risks to human health, and specically focusing on transboundary movements". In a host of countries, it is also mandatory to label products that use GM ingredients. As a consequence, GM and non-GM crops must be kept separate, but as the area cultivated with GM varieties increases, this task is becoming more difcult and costly.

Map 68:

Countries t

Source: Convention on Biological Diversity Metalink: P4.ENV.CBD.GMO.CBP, p. 344

163 countries are now party to the

"Biosafety Protocol"

Notable exceptions include several of

the major grain exporters, such as the United States

Further reading
FAO Biotechnology (www.fao.org/biotech/en/) FAO Biotechnologies for agricultural development
(www.fao.org/docrep/014/i2300e/i2300e00.htm)

Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety (bch.cbd.int/protocol)

314

GENETICALLY MODIFIED CROPS

Countries that have ratified the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety (number, 2011) No Data No Yes

Chart 119: Many crops, among them food, have been subject to genetic modication Species Alfalfa Argentine Canola Carnation Chicory Cotton Creeping Bentgrass Flax, Linseed Maize
Source: ISAAA Metalink: P4.ENV.ISAAA.BIO.GM.CROPS, p. 349

Melon Papaya Petunia Plum Polish canola Poplar Potato Rice

Rose Soybean Squash Sugar Beet Sweet pepper Tobacco Tomato Wheat

315

PART 4

Agriculture and the bio-based economy

Agriculture is playing an increasingly important role in the bio-based economy, providing feedstocks for the production of liquid fuels, chemicals and advanced materials such as natural bre composites for industry. The emergence of green industries provides expanded opportunities for the rural sector beyond traditional forestry and the supply of wood. Biological science has the ability to make both incremental efciency improvements and to bring about radical change in a wide range of sectors. This includes enzymes, fermentation and organisms for processes and products in the energy, chemical, pharmaceutical, food, textile, and pulp and paper industries. Above all, biological and material science working with agriculture has the greatest potential in the energy, natural bre composite and starch sectors. Much of this potential is already being realized, especially when considering the rapid growth of the biofuel sector. Currently, ethanol is being produced from easily fermentable agricultural feedstocks such as sugar cane, sugar beet, cereal grains and cassava. Biodiesel is produced from vegetable oil (typically rapeseed, soybean and palm oil) using a process of chemical modication. The expansion of liquid biofuels has been rapid doubling 68.3 million tonnes in 2006 to 130 million tonnes in 2011, currently drawing upon feedstocks from over 45 million ha of land. The emerging bio-based economy is based on energy efciency, renewable feed stocks in polymer products, industrial processes that reduce carbon emissions and recyclable materials. Natural bres exemplify these attributes. For example, growing one tonne of jute bre requires less than 10 percent of the energy used for the production of competing polypropylene. Sisal processing produces residues that can be used in biocomposites for building houses or to generate electricity. At the end of their life cycle, natural bres are 100 percent biodegradable. Natural bres have intrinsic properties mechanical strength, low weight and low cost that have made them particularly attractive to the automobile industry. Car manufacturers are using abaca, ax and hemp in press-moulded thermoplastic panels for interior components. The low density of plant bres also reduces vehicle weight, which cuts fuel consumption. Worldwide, the construction industry is moving to natural bres for a range of products, including light structural walls, insulation materials, oor and wall coverings, and roong. Among recent innovations are cement blocks reinforced with sisal bre now being manufactured in Tanzania and Brazil.

Map 69:

No Data

0.1

Source: IEA Metalink: P4.ENV.IEA.BIO.BF.QP, p. 349

Global expansion of biofuel production

from crops has been rapid - doubling from 68.3 million tonnes in 2006 to 130 million tonnes in 2011 upon feedstocks from over 45 million hectares of land largest producers of biofuels

The bioenergy sector currently draws

The United States and Brazil are the

316

AGRICULTURE AND THE BIO-BASED ECONOMY

Biofuel production (kt of oil equivalent, 2009) 0.1 10000 10000 30000 30000 90000 > 90000

Chart 120: In the space of ve years, the global crop area used to produce biofuels rose almost threefold
Area under bioenergy crops (2005-10)
Cassava 40 Maize Oil crops Sugar Wheat

Million ha

30 20 10 0

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

Source: FAO, Statistics Division Metalink: P4.ENV.FAO.BIO.BF.HA, p. 344

317

PART 4

1000 kt of oil equivalent

In India, a growing shortage of timber for the construction industry has spurred development of composite board made from jute veneer and coir ply, whose high lignin content has been shown to make it both stronger and more resistant to rotting than teak. In Europe, hemp bres are being used in cement and to make particle boards half the weight of wood-based boards. Geotextiles are another promising outlet for natural bre producers. Made from hard natural bres, they strengthen earthworks and encourage the growth of plants and trees, which provide further reinforcement. The starch industry extracts starch from cereals and roots and tubers and processes it into products that are used as ingredients and functional supplements in food, feed and non-food applications. There are more than 600 different starches and starch derivatives, ranging from native starches to physically or chemically modied starches, liquid and solid sugars. The starch industry uses enzymatic technologies for hydrolysis that are playing a pivotal role in the development of green chemistry as an alternative to fossil-fuel-based products. For instance, in the chemical sector, starch is used for the production of surfactants, polyurethane, resins, biodegradable plastics and pharmaceuticals. When fermented, starches are used in the production of citric acid, lactic acid, amino acids, organic acids, enzymes, yeast and ethanol. Other bio-based applications involving starch products include binders, solvents, biopesticides and lubricants. The sustainability of a rapidly growing agricultural biobased economy, especially one reliant on liquid fuels, has generated the food versus fuel debate. The links between bio-industries and food security are complex and multi-faceted. Ensuring the sustainable development of bio sectors becomes challenging when one tries to capture its potential benets for rural development, climate and non-food security. For instance, the rapid growth and sheer scale of the biofuel sector has potentially negative implications for all four dimensions of food security (availability, access, stability and utilization) as it may result in increased competition for land and water resources, leading to higher and less stable food prices. At the same time, however, it may create new employment, income-generating opportunities and investment in production technologies, especially in countries with abundant marginal land and climates conducive to feedstock production, where such land would be too costly to bring into food cultivation. Such opportunities exist, for example, in countries of Latin America, South-East Asia and sub-Saharan Africa.

Chart 121: Driven by mandates, growth in world bioenergy production is around 2 percent per annum
Biofuel production (1990-2009)
1000

800

600

400

200

1990

1995

2000

2005

Source: IEA Metalink: P4.ENV.IEA.BIO.BF.QP, p. 349

Chart 122: Developing countries are by the far the largest producers of natural bres
Natural bre production (1990-2010)
Developed 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 Developing

Million tonnes

1990

1995

2000

2005

2010

Further reading
FAO Bioenergy (www.fao.org/bioenergy) UN International Year of Natural Fibres (www.
naturalbres2009.org/en/index.html)

Source: FAO, Statistics Division Metalink: P4.ENV.FAO.BIO.NF.QP, p. 344

Europabio Industrial Biotechnology (www.europabio.

org/Industrial_biotech/)

318

AGRICULTURE AND THE BIO-BASED ECONOMY

Chart 123: A substantial share of traditional food crops enter industry as a renewable material or as an energy feedstock

Share of food crop usage in world bio-based economy (2009)

Energy 100 Food and Feed Material

80

60

40

20

v Cassa

nut Coco

e Maiz

o Palm

it il Fru

ea Soyb

d n See

rc Suga

ane

t Whea

Source: FAO, Statistics Division Metalink: P4.ENV.FAO.BIO.FD.FDSTK, p. 344

Map 70: Sisal, jute, abaca and coir can become the backbone of the bio-based economy offering opportunities for developing countries

Global jute and hard fibre production (thousand tonnes, 2010) No Data 0 0.001 10 10 50

50 100

> 100

Source: FAO, Statistics Division Metalink: P4.ENV.FAO.BIO.CT.QP, p. 344

319

TABLE 48: Land indicators

Average net annual change in forest area Forest area Other wooded area Carbon content in topsoil Carbon stock in living forest biomass cropland % p.a. 1990-2010 WORLD DEVELOPING REGIONS AFRICA North Africa Algeria Egypt Libya Morocco Tunisia Sub-Saharan Africa Angola Benin Botswana Burkina Faso Burundi Cameroon Cape Verde Central African Republic Chad Comoros Congo Cte dIvoire Congo, Dem. Rep. Djibouti Equatorial Guinea Eritrea Ethiopia Gabon Gambia Ghana Guinea Guinea-Bissau Kenya Lesotho Liberia Madagascar Malawi Mali Mauritania Mauritius Mozambique Namibia Niger Nigeria Rwanda Senegal Seychelles Sierra Leone Somalia Sudan South Africa Swaziland Tanzania, Utd. Rep. Togo Uganda Zambia Zimbabwe thousand ha 2010 thousand ha 2010 % weight 2009* giga tonnes 2009* % p.a. 1990-2009 Land use change

pasture % p.a. 1990-2009

forest % p.a. 1990-2009

0.2 0.3 0.5 0.2 0.6 2.3 0.0 0.1 2.3 0.5 0.2 1.2 0.9 1.0 2.6 1.0 1.9 0.1 0.6 6.7 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.7 0.3 1.0 0.0 0.4 2.0 0.5 0.5 0.3 0.5 0.6 0.4 0.9 0.6 2.7 0.5 0.5 0.9 2.4 3.2 1.6 0.5 0.0 0.7 1.0 0.4 0.0 0.9 1.1 4.3 2.3 0.3 1.7

4 033 060 2 231 023 674 419 8 623 1 492 70 217 5 131 1 006 665 797 58 480 4 561 11 351 5 649 172 19 916 85 22 605 11 525 3 22 411 10 403 154 135 6 1 626 1 532 12 296 22 000 480 4 940 6 544 2 022 3 467 44 4 329 12 553 3 237 12 490 242 35 39 022 7 290 1 204 9 041 435 8 473 41 2 726 6 747 69 949 9 241 563 33 428 287 2 988 49 468 15 624

1 223 797 381 103 2 685 56 330 2 231 2 504 0 3 178 34 791 10 911 722 12 715 0 10 122 8 847 0 10 513 3 026 11 513 220 8 7 153 44 650 0 103 0 5 850 230 39 035 97 0 15 688 0 8 227 3 060 12 14 566 8 290 11 440 4 333 61 6 085 0 198 0 50 224 24 588 427 11 619 1 246 3 383 6 075 0

1.5 1.3 0.9 0.6 0.8 0.4 0.5 0.8 0.7 1.0 0.6 0.8 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.1 1.2 0.9 0.9 1.6 1.5 0.9 1.1 0.5 1.0 0.6 0.9 1.0 0.9 0.9 1.3 1.1 0.9 1.3 1.1 1.1 1.3 0.7 0.9 1.9 0.8 0.3 0.6 0.8 8.3 0.8 1.2 0.5 0.7 0.6 1.7 1.6 0.9 1.1 1.6 0.5

270 265 190 740 55 736 348 70 7 6 223 9 55 388 4 385 263 646 292 17 2 696 5 2 861 635 3 438 1 842 19 639 203 219 2 710 32 381 619 96 476 2 585 1 626 144 282 7 2 1 692 210 37 1 085 39 340 4 216 394 1 393 807 22 2 019 109 2 416 492

0.0 0.7 1.1 0.3 0.5 1.8 0.3 0.2 0.1 1.6 1.2 2.5 2.7 2.7 0.2 0.1 2.0 0.1 1.4 1.1 0.4 1.0 0.3 3.7 0.7

0.0 0.8 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.1 0.0 1.3 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 1.4 0.0

0.2 0.3 0.5 0.1 0.6 2.4 0.0 0.1 2.0 0.4 0.2 1.2 0.9 1.0 2.6 1.0 2.0 0.1 0.6 6.4 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.7

0.2 4.2 2.9 0.3 2.2 0.5 0.3 1.1 0.3 2.4 6.0 0.1 0.8 1.9 1.1 1.6 0.8 1.5 1.2 1.5 3.6 0.1 2.4 0.4 0.1 0.7 0.4 1.4 0.8 1.9

0.0 2.8 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.0 0.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.4 0.3 2.6 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.6 1.0

0.0 0.4 2.0 0.5 0.5 0.3 0.5 0.6 0.4 0.9 0.6 2.7 0.5 0.5 0.9 2.4 3.1 1.5 0.5 0.0 0.7 1.0 0.5 0.0 0.9 1.1 4.1 2.3 0.3 1.7

320

TABLE 48: Land indicators (continued)

Average net annual change in forest area Forest area Other wooded area Carbon content in topsoil Carbon stock in living forest biomass cropland % p.a. 1990-2010 ASIA Central Asia Kazakhstan Kyrgyzstan Tajikistan Turkmenistan Uzbekistan East Asia Brunei Darussalam Cambodia China Indonesia Korea, DPR Korea, Republic of Lao, PDR Malaysia Mongolia Myanmar Philippines Singapore Thailand Viet Nam South Asia Afghanistan Bangladesh Bhutan India Iran (Islamic Rep.) Maldives Nepal Pakistan Sri Lanka West Asia Armenia Azerbaijan Bahrain Cyprus Georgia Iraq Jordan Kuwait Lebanon Occupied Palestinian Territory Saudi Arabia Syrian Arab Republic Turkey United Arab Emirates Yemen LATIN AMERICA & THE CARIBBEAN Argentina Bahamas Barbados Belize Bolivia (Plur. State) Brazil Chile Colombia Costa Rica thousand ha 2010 thousand ha 2010 % weight 2009* giga tonnes 2009* % p.a. 1990-2009 Land use change

pasture % p.a. 1990-2009

forest % p.a. 1990-2009

0.1 0.1 0.2 0.7 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.1 0.4 1.2 1.4 1.1 1.8 0.1 0.5 0.4 0.7 1.0 0.8 0.0 0.1 2.0 0.2 0.0 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.0 0.0 1.4 2.0 1.2 0.5 1.4 0.0 0.4 0.1 0.1 0.0 3.5 0.2 0.0 0.0 1.4 0.8 1.3 0.0 0.5 0.8 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.3 0.2 0.1

567 207 12 076 3 309 954 410 4 127 3 276 443 711 380 10 094 206 861 94 432 5 666 6 222 15 751 20 456 10 898 31 773 7 665 2 18 972 13 797 92 734 1 350 1 442 3 249 68 434 11 075 1 3 636 1 687 1 860 18 686 262 936 1 173 2 742 825 98 6 137 9 977 491 11 334 317 549 955 584 29 400 515 8 1 393 57 196 519 522 16 231 60 499 2 605 61 471 36 1 113 2 473 43 772 14 658 22 727 12 45 54 0 240 51 329 273 0 220 0 1 822 266 12 921 192 1 906 29 471 2 498 613 4 795 5 423 0 1 897 1 455 0 50 133 102 012 21 003 0 0 4 834 0 1 947 20 113 10 128 0 0 1 124 16 482 390 244 0 1 218

1.3 0.7 1.0 1.2 0.9 0.3 0.5 1.7 10.2 1.0 1.1 5.2 1.6 1.3 1.0 3.5 1.1 1.3 1.3 0.6 1.0 1.3 1.0 0.9 1.9 1.1 0.9 1.0 1.3 0.9 0.9 0.8 1.6 1.2 0.3 1.0 1.1 0.6 1.0 0.4 1.2

34 883 227 137 56 3 12 19 29 253 72 464 6 203 13 017 171 268 1 074 3 212 583 1 654 663 880 992 4 271 38 80 336 2 800 258 485 213 61 1 132 13 54

0.4

1.6

0.3

0.2 1.5 0.3 0.3 1.5 0.8 0.8 2.9 0.5 1.8 1.0 0.3 5.4 0.4 2.2 0.0 0.1 0.7 2.2 0.0 0.7 0.7 0.4 0.1 0.7 0.2

0.1 2.0 4.5 0.0 0.9 0.0 1.0 0.5 0.2 0.4 0.8 0.9 0.1 3.4 1.0 0.0 0.0 1.6 0.6 2.2 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 1.6

0.1 0.4 1.2 1.4 1.2 1.8 0.1 0.5 0.4 0.7 1.1 0.8 0.0 0.2 2.0 0.1 0.0 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.0 0.0 1.5 2.0 1.2 1.9

0.3 3 212 1.3 2 2 0.7 6.0 0.3 0.2 1.4

0.0 0.8 0.0 0.3 0.0 1.5 0.0 1.9 0.2 1.0 1.5 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.3 0.5 0.1 1.7

5.1 0.4 0.1 0.0 2.9 0.2 0.1 0.0 1.4 0.8 1.4 0.0 0.5 0.8 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.3 0.2 0.0

0.6 0.8 1.0 0.5 0.6 1.9 1.5 0.4 1.6 1.6 1.0 1.2 2.2 3.8 3.3

6 822 16 5 97 511 3 062

0.1 0.0 0.7 8.6 0.6 0.6 0.8 1.0 0.0

171 4 442 62 607 1 349 6 805 238

1.5 3.0 0.9 2.9 2.1 0.1

321

TABLE 48: Land indicators (continued)

Average net annual change in forest area Forest area Other wooded area Carbon content in topsoil Carbon stock in living forest biomass cropland % p.a. 1990-2010 Cuba Dominica Dominican Republic Ecuador El Salvador French Guiana Grenada Guatemala Guyana Haiti Honduras Jamaica Mexico Netherlands Antilles Nicaragua Panama Paraguay Peru St. Kitts & Nevis St. Lucia St. Vincent & Grenadines Suriname Trinidad & Tobago Uruguay Venezuela (Boliv. Rep. of) OCEANIA Fiji French Polynesia New Caledonia Papua New Guinea Samoa Solomon Islands Tonga Vanuatu DEVELOPED REGIONS NORTH AMERICA Bermuda Canada United States of America ASIA & OCEANIA Australia Israel Japan New Zealand EUROPE Albania Belarus Bosnia & Herzegovina Croatia European Union Iceland Macedonia, FYR Montenegro Norway Republic of Moldova Russian Federation Serbia Switzerland Ukraine thousand ha 2010 thousand ha 2010 % weight 2009* giga tonnes 2009* % p.a. 1990-2009 Land use change

pasture % p.a. 1990-2009

forest % p.a. 1990-2009

1.7 0.5 0.0 1.7 1.4 0.1 0.0 1.3 0.0 0.7 2.2 0.1 0.4 0.0 1.8 0.8 0.9 0.2 0.0 0.3 0.4 0.0 0.3 3.2 0.6 0.4 0.3 5.3 0.0 0.5 1.4 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.8 0.0 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.5 0.1 0.2 0.4 6.2 0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 0.0 0.8 0.4 0.2

2 870 45 1 972 9 865 287 8 082 17 3 657 15 205 101 5 192 337 64 802 1 3 114 3 251 17 582 67 992 11 47 27 14 758 226 1 744 46 275 33 812 1 014 155 839 28 726 171 2 213 9 440 1 801 865 614 160 1 310 134 304 022 182 702 149 300 154 24 979 8 269 1 005 001 776 8 630 2 185 1 920 156 865 30 998 543 10 065 386 809 090 2 713 1 240 9 705

299 0 850 1 519 384 0 1 1 811 3 580 0 1 475 271 20 181 33 2 219 1 581 0 22 832 2 0 3 0 121 17 7 317 144 50 371 4 474 85 129 57 476

1.2 5.1 1.0 2.1 1.8 1.3 1.6 2.1 3.5 0.9 1.4 1.7 3.0 2.3 1.8 1.8 1.0 1.6 5.1 1.6 1.6 3.4 1.8 2.7 1.5 2.0 1.4

226 114

0.2 1.8 0.3 0.7 0.6

0.5 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.3 1.0 0.0 1.3 0.0 0.1 0.8 0.6 0.2 0.9 0.2 0.7 0.3 2.2 3.6 0.0 0.7 0.8 0.2 0.1 0.8 0.2 0.0 0.5 1.8 2.2 2.5 0.0 1.0 0.3 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.8 0.7 0.3 1.1 4.3 1.0

1.7 0.6 0.0 1.7 1.3 0.1 0.0 1.3 0.0 0.7 2.2 0.1 0.4 0.0 1.8 0.8 0.9 0.2 0.0 0.4 0.3 0.0 0.3 3.3 0.6 0.4 0.3 5.4 0.0 0.5 1.5 0.2 0.0 0.0 3.5 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.8 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.1

1 651 1 281 1 629 5 330 48 2 043 349 367 8 560

1.4 0.2 1.7 0.6 1.1 1.3 0.0 0.3 0.0 1.9 0.3 3.1 0.7 4.5 3.0 1.2

3 165 19

0.3 2.1 2.0 0.3

2 610 21

1.0 0.1 0.3 1.2 1.4 0.1 1.0 0.2 1.1 1.5 0.5 1.6 0.0 0.7 0.3 0.1 0.6 0.7 8.1 1.2 0.0

1.4 2.2 2.3 1.4 3.5 2.0 2.6 1.8

60 2 306 182 1 79 522 33 216 13 908 19 308 1 297 5 1 292 45 009 49 611 118 253 9 819 60 33 395 29 32 500 240 143 761

0 91 951 41 926 135 367 34 0 2 557 109 705 255 520 549 759 96 143 175 2 703 70 78 870 485 71 948 2.1 2.3 1.7 2.1 3.9 4.3 1.5 2.0 0.6 1.0 2.3 1.9 3.0 1.2 5.1 1.3 1.3 2.9 2.4 1.1

0.1 0.0

0.3 0.0

0.9 6.5

0.2

2.4

0.5

0.0

0.2

0.4

322

TABLE 49: Forestry indicators

Forest characteristics primary forest other naturally regenerated forest million ha 2010 planted forest production Primary designated functions of forest protection and conservation social services multiple use other or unknown

million ha 2010 WORLD DEVELOPING REGIONS AFRICA North Africa Algeria Egypt Libya Morocco Tunisia Sub-Saharan Africa Angola Benin Botswana Burkina Faso Burundi Cameroon Cape Verde Central African Republic Chad Comoros Congo Cte dIvoire Congo, Dem. Rep. Djibouti Equatorial Guinea Eritrea Ethiopia Gabon Gambia Ghana Guinea Guinea-Bissau Kenya Lesotho Liberia Madagascar Malawi Mali Mauritania Mauritius Mozambique Namibia Niger Nigeria Rwanda Senegal Seychelles Sierra Leone Somalia Sudan South Africa Swaziland Tanzania, Utd. Rep. Togo Uganda Zambia Zimbabwe

million ha 2010

% 2010

% 2010

% 2010

% 2010

% 2010

30 32 30 14 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.4 0.2 0.0 7.4 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 14.3 0.0 0.4 0.1 0.0 0.7 0.0 0.2 3.0 0.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 1.6 0.0 0.1 0.0 14.0 0.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.8 1.1 0.0 0.0 4.5 0.3 58.4 4.5 11.4 5.5 0.1 0.0 20.2 11.3 0.0 14.9 9.4 0.0 1.6 1.5 11.8 7.6 0.5 4.3 6.4 2.0 2.6 0.0 4.1 9.1 1.9 12.0 0.2 0.0 39.0 7.3 0.8 8.7 0.1 6.5 0.0 2.6 6.7 49.9 6.5 0.4 33.2 0.2 2.9 49.4 14.7 0.1 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 6.1 1.8 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 50 19 25 71 68 12 24 10 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.1 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.1 23 2 29 6 24 25 26 37 47 0 30 67 0 1 29 74 60 1 9 0.4 0.1 0.2 0.6 0.7 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.3 0.1 0.0 35 2 0 21 24 28 4 31 0 11 9 73 80 21 90 33 88 89 5 0 5 2 4 45

20 33 17 48 65 52 100 12 45 16 3 28 0 6 0 20 20 1 67 4 11 17 0 36 6 0 18 21 8 55 67 94 0 4 39 23 38 27 61 33 9 28 12 21 7 0 20 10 0 6 32 36 22 8

4 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 0 0

24 26 17 38 0 46 0 67 32 20 0 40 100 84 0 6 0 78 0 0 7 0 0 100 53 1 96 36 5 0 7 0 0 76 0 34 0 15 73 2 0 22 81 0 14 22 14 0 100 0 71 0 24 0 0 17 82

23 8 35 0 0 0 0 0 0 36 93 0 0 0 91 0 0 0 0 0 0 78 0 3 91 0 0 73 68 36 0 0 0 71 0 40 0 0 0 0 69 0 43 0 0 64 84 0 30 0 75 0 0 37 37 0

323

TABLE 49: Forestry indicators (continued)

Forest characteristics primary forest other naturally regenerated forest million ha 2010 planted forest production Primary designated functions of forest protection and conservation social services multiple use other or unknown

million ha 2010 ASIA Central Asia Kazakhstan Kyrgyzstan Tajikistan Turkmenistan Uzbekistan East Asia Brunei Darussalam Cambodia China Indonesia Korea, DPR Korea, Republic of Lao, PDR Malaysia Mongolia Myanmar Philippines Singapore Thailand Viet Nam South Asia Afghanistan Bangladesh Bhutan India Iran (Islamic Rep.) Maldives Nepal Pakistan Sri Lanka West Asia Armenia Azerbaijan Bahrain Cyprus Georgia Iraq Jordan Kuwait Lebanon Occupied Palestinian Territory Saudi Arabia Syrian Arab Republic Turkey United Arab Emirates Yemen LATIN AMERICA & THE CARIBBEAN Argentina Bahamas Barbados Belize Bolivia (Plur. State) Brazil Chile Colombia Costa Rica

million ha 2010

% 2010

% 2010

% 2010

% 2010

% 2010

36 1 0.0 0.3 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.3 11.6 47.2 0.8 3.0 1.5 3.8 5.2 3.2 0.9 0.0 6.7 0.1 2.4 0.6 0.0 4.0 2.6 0.1 9.7 118.1 43.6 4.1 1.4 14.0 14.8 5.6 27.6 6.5 0.0 8.3 10.2 0.9 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.6 42 0.0 0.1 77.2 3.5 0.8 1.8 0.2 1.8 0.1 1.0 0.4 0.0 4.0 3.5 58 33 41 53 86 77 23 62 7 62 76 0 14 47 26 0 0.4 0.4 15.7 0.2 0.5 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.8 2.8 42.5 10.0 3.1 1.3 1.5 0.2 0.5 0.0 0.1 2.1 0.8 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.0 10.2 0.8 0.0 0.3 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 49 16 25 14 10 32 9 25 24 0 0 24 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 5 0

36 75 16 84 95 100 99 40 26 44 33 40 14 6 77 23 92 11 24 100 54 53 36 0 25 73 45 1 26 13 31 35 46 100 100 2 87 100 99 100 28

1 4 13 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 2 0 0 9 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 13 0 1 0 0

26 20 71 15 0 0 0 12 0 4 24 0 0 7 0 15 0 27 0 0 0 0 27 100 25 0 30 85 23 55 60 40 30 0 0 28 0 0 0 0 66

1 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 15 17 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 32 0 10 0 0 11 0 0 40 0 0 0 0 0 0 38 0 0 0 0 0

0.4 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0

0.6 0.2 6.9 0.0 0.5

0.0 0.3 3.4 0.3 0.0

0 0 70 0 0 14

0 0 25 0 0 21 4 4 43 19 17 43 15 35

0 0 0 0 14 0 0 0 0 23 0 0 4

100 100 6 100 100 20 9 0 0 81 4 11 0 15

0 0 0 0 0 31 83 96 57 49 0 72 32

1.7 0.0 0.0 0.6 37.2 476.6 4.4 8.5 0.6

26.3 0.5 0.0 0.8 20.0 35.5 9.4 51.6 1.7

1.4 0.0

5 0

0.0 0.0 7.4 2.4 0.4 0.2

0 0 7 46 13 14

324

TABLE 49: Forestry indicators (continued)

Forest characteristics primary forest other naturally regenerated forest million ha 2010 planted forest production Primary designated functions of forest protection and conservation social services multiple use other or unknown

million ha 2010 Cuba Dominica Dominican Republic Ecuador El Salvador French Guiana Grenada Guatemala Guyana Haiti Honduras Jamaica Mexico Netherlands Antilles Nicaragua Panama Paraguay Peru St. Kitts & Nevis St. Lucia St. Vincent & Grenadines Suriname Trinidad & Tobago Uruguay Venezuela (Boliv. Rep. of) OCEANIA Fiji French Polynesia New Caledonia Papua New Guinea Samoa Solomon Islands Tonga Vanuatu DEVELOPED REGIONS NORTH AMERICA Bermuda Canada United States of America ASIA & OCEANIA Australia Israel Japan New Zealand EUROPE Albania Belarus Bosnia & Herzegovina Croatia European Union Iceland Macedonia, FYR Montenegro Norway Republic of Moldova Russian Federation Serbia Switzerland Ukraine

million ha 2010

% 2010

% 2010

% 2010

% 2010

% 2010

0.0 0.0 4.8 0.0 7.7 0.0 1.6 6.8 0.0 0.5 0.1 34.3 1.2 0.0 1.9 60.2 0.0 0.0 14.0 0.1 0.3

2.4 0.0 4.9 0.3 0.4 0.0 1.9 8.4 0.1 4.7 0.2 27.3 1.9 3.2 15.7 6.8 0.0 0.0 0.7 0.1 0.5

0.5

31

68

0.2 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0

2 24 0 1 28 97 54 21 2 5 20 14 37 0 0 27 34 64 49 21

73 16 30 17 63 1 4 66 25 13 71 43

0 0 0 0 0 2 0 13 0 0 0 0

21 60 52 0 0 0 0 0 6 82 2 43 0 26

4 0 18 82 9 0 42 0 66 0 8 0 89 10 0 76 55 0 0 0 54 0 90 67 66 7 33 0 6 1 7 0 6 45 0 0 0 23 0 0 43 0 3 4 19 21 0 0 26 0 47 0

0 5 15 32 36 51 11 18 7 24 5 37 50 89 28 23 5 25 61 15 33 70 77 13 21 33 1 7 26 0 15 29 27 11 12 8 35

0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 4 0 4 0 0 0 10 0 3 13 0 2 0 18 0 2 3 19 0 0 0 26 2 5 19

100 19 4 32 0 0 15 65 0 0 5 5 0 0 29 50 87 46 8 39 64 0 0 11 0 0 0 9 32 44 0 0 11 47 10 0 0

0.4 0.0 0.4 26.2 1.1 0.0

0.4 0.1 0.4 2.4 0.1 1.1 0.0

0.2 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0

17 4 2 25 47 17 11 35 27

165.4 75.3 5.0 0.0 4.7 2.1 0.1 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 256.5 0.0 0.0 0.1

135.7 203.4 142.4 0.1 9.9 4.3 0.6 6.4 1.2 1.8 0.0 0.9 8.4 0.4 535.6 2.5 1.0 4.8

9.0 25.4 1.9 0.1 10.3 1.8 0.1 1.9 1.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 1.5 0.0 17.0 0.2 0.2 4.8

1 30 14 1 0 17 24 52 79 50 56 82 39 20 81 64 60 0 51 89 40 46

325

TABLE 50: Water withdrawal

Water withdrawal by sector agricultural million m3 /yr 2005* WORLD DEVELOPING REGIONS AFRICA North Africa Algeria Egypt Libya Morocco Tunisia Sub-Saharan Africa Angola Benin Botswana Burkina Faso Burundi Cameroon Cape Verde Central African Republic Chad Comoros Congo Cte dIvoire Congo, Dem. Rep. Djibouti Equatorial Guinea Eritrea Ethiopia Gabon Gambia Ghana Guinea Guinea-Bissau Kenya Lesotho Liberia Madagascar Malawi Mali Mauritania Mauritius Mozambique Namibia Niger Nigeria Rwanda Senegal Seychelles Sierra Leone Somalia Sudan South Africa Swaziland Tanzania, Utd. Rep. Togo Uganda Zambia Zimbabwe % of total 2005* industrial million m3 /yr 2005* % of total 2005* municipal million m3 /yr 2005* % of total 2005* Water withdrawal total million m3 /yr 2005* per capita m3 /yr 2005* % of freshwater resources withdrawn total % 2005* by agriculture % 2005*

2 745 009

70

729 178

19

466 869

12

3 941 055

607

9.3

6.5

3 940 59 000 3 584 11 010 2 165 210 59 80 690 222 730 20 1 190 5 4 600 110 3 1 550 5 204 50 20 652 1 360 144 2 165 10 60 14 310 810 5 900 1 500 491 550 213 2 080 5 510 102 2 065 1 350 3 281 36 070 7 836 1 006 4 632 76 120 1 320 3 318

61 86 83 84 82 27 45 39 63 79 68 91 1 48 47 4 39 15 16 5 95 86 34 24 66 83 76 79 20 31 97 81 90 92 68 65 71 86 48 55 93 7 68 99 96 57 94 89 34 43 76 79

951 4 000 132 477 110 240 30 39 22 15 105 0 12 104 1 24 318 147 0 3 1 51 14 21 95 56 12 100 20 53 162 48 56 32 20 36 14 33 1 965 21 58 4 56 2 300 948 21 25 6 44 130 298

15 6 3 4 4 31 23 19 2 5 10 2 16 26 5 26 20 20 0 15 0 1 9 26 10 3 6 4 40 28 1 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 17 11 3 28 11 0 1 7 2 0 3 16 7 7

1 581 5 300 610 1 628 365 320 41 88 376 43 247 2 60 104 5 64 636 465 16 16 31 810 85 41 235 225 34 470 20 80 296 143 590 95 214 254 73 294 4 099 61 98 9 111 15 1 143 4 893 41 527 141 115 290 589

24 8 14 12 14 42 32 42 35 15 23 7 82 26 48 69 41 64 84 80 5 13 57 50 24 14 18 17 40 41 2 14 9 6 30 30 24 12 35 33 4 66 21 0 3 36 4 10 63 41 17 14

6 472 68 300 4 326 13 115 2 640 769 130 207 1 087 280 1 081 22 73 397 10 92 1 554 722 19 20 582 6 065 149 82 982 1 641 190 2 735 50 194 14 768 1 001 6 546 1 627 725 840 300 2 407 11 574 184 2 221 14 517 3 298 37 513 13 677 1 068 5 184 223 279 1 740 4 205

197 920 750 432 266 47 17 110 77 39 62 47 18 41 16 26 86 13 24 33 130 82 109 55 45 182 139 77 24 61 826 78 497 534 577 40 144 185 83 20 204 163 100 394 977 286 967 134 41 10 152 335

55.5 119.2 721.0 45.2 57.5 0.5 0.5 1.7 8.7 2.2 0.4 7.3 0.1 0.9 0.8 0.0 1.9 0.1 6.3 0.1 9.2 5.0 0.1 1.0 1.8 0.7 0.6 8.9 1.7 0.1 4.4 5.8 6.5 14.3 26.4 0.4 1.7 7.2 4.0 1.9 5.7 0.3 22.4 58.2 27.4 23.7 5.4 1.5 0.4 1.7 21.0

33.8 103.0 597.3 38.0 47.1 0.1 0.2 0.7 5.5 1.8 0.3 6.7 0.0 0.4 0.4 0.0 0.7 0.0 1.0 0.0 8.7 4.3 0.0 0.3 1.2 0.6 0.5 7.1 0.3 0.0 4.2 4.7 5.9 13.2 17.8 0.3 1.2 6.2 1.9 1.1 5.3 0.2 22.3 55.9 15.7 22.3 4.8 0.5 0.2 1.3 16.6

326

TABLE 50: Water withdrawal (continued)

Water withdrawal by sector agricultural million m3 /yr 2005* ASIA Central Asia Kazakhstan Kyrgyzstan Tajikistan Turkmenistan Uzbekistan East Asia Brunei Darussalam Cambodia China Indonesia Korea, DPR Korea, Republic of Lao, PDR Malaysia Mongolia Myanmar Philippines Singapore Thailand Viet Nam South Asia Afghanistan Bangladesh Bhutan India Iran (Islamic Rep.) Maldives Nepal Pakistan Sri Lanka West Asia Armenia Azerbaijan Bahrain Cyprus Georgia Iraq Jordan Kuwait Lebanon Occupied Palestinian Territory Saudi Arabia Syrian Arab Republic Turkey United Arab Emirates Yemen LATIN AMERICA & THE CARIBBEAN Argentina Bahamas Barbados Belize Bolivia (Plur. State) Brazil Chile Colombia Costa Rica % of total 2005* industrial million m3 /yr 2005* % of total 2005* municipal million m3 /yr 2005* % of total 2005* Water withdrawal total million m3 /yr 2005* per capita m3 /yr 2005* % of freshwater resources withdrawn total % 2005* by agriculture % 2005*

28 630 9 450 10 960 24 040 54 370

84 94 92 97 91

5 051 310 560 270 1 644

15 3 5 1 3

516 320 440 597 3 794

2 3 4 2 6

34 197 10 080 11 960 24 907 59 808

2 254 1 999 1 853 5 246 2 305

31.2 43.7 74.8 100.8 118.6

26.1 40.9 68.6 97.2 107.9

2 053 358 000 92 760 6 610 15 800 3 960 4 520 227 29 570 67 070 8 51 790 77 750 22 840 31 500 318 688 000 86 000 0 9 610 172 400 11 310 1 859 9 330 159 159 1 055 52 000 611 492 780 189 20 830 14 670 29 600 3 312 3 235

94 65 71 76 62 93 34 44 89 82 0 90 95 98 88 94 90 92 0 98 94 87 66 76 45 86 65 79 65 51 60 45 88 88 74 83 91

33 128 600 24 650 1 145 3 050 170 4 788 162 498 8 254 1 221 2 777 3 074 170 770 3 17 000 1 100 0 30 1 400 831 125 2 360 20 6 208 9 700 38 23 150 29 710 615 4 300 69 65

2 23 19 13 12 4 36 32 1 10 53 5 4 1 2 1 2 1 5 0 1 6 4 19 6 3 13 15 4 2 11 7 3 4 11 2 2

98 67 530 13 990 903 6 620 130 3 902 122 3 323 6 235 1 078 2 739 1 206 203 3 600 17 56 000 6 200 6 148 9 650 805 843 521 178 19 358 4 300 291 448 380 200 2 130 1 475 6 200 617 265

4 12 11 10 26 3 30 24 10 8 47 5 1 1 10 5 7 7 95 2 5 6 30 4 50 10 22 7 31 47 29 48 9 9 15 15 7

2 184 554 130 131 400 8 658 25 470 4 260 13 210 511 33 391 81 559 2 307 57 306 82 030 23 213 35 870 338 761 000 93 300 6 9 787 183 450 12 946 2 827 12 211 357 184 1 621 66 000 941 964 1 310 418 23 670 16 760 40 100 3 998 3 565

163 414 578 365 541 740 506 201 721 953 541 859 986 841 255 513 668 1 338 20 359 1 156 652 922 1 422 493 178 362 2 412 176 426 323 118 985 907 588 983 173

0.5 19.5 6.5 11.2 36.5 1.3 2.3 1.5 2.9 17.0 384.4 13.1 9.3 35.7 2.9 0.4 39.8 67.9 19.7 4.7 74.3 24.5 36.4 35.2 308.1 23.6 2.6 87.3 100.4 4 817.5 29.1 49.9 986.3 99.8 18.8 2 665.3 169.8

0.4 12.6 4.6 8.6 22.7 1.2 0.8 0.7 2.5 14.0 1.3 11.8 8.8 35.1 2.6 0.4 36.0 62.5 0.0 4.6 69.9 21.4 23.9 26.9 137.2 20.4 1.7 68.8 65.2 2 459.5 17.3 22.6 867.9 87.3 13.9 2 208.0 154.0

21 520 20 30 1 160 31 700 7 970 4 920 1 430

64 30 20 51 55 68 37 53

4 396 26 110 401 10 140 2 610 582 460

13 40 73 18 17 22 4 17

7 820 20 10 729 16 230 1 172 7 845 790

23 30 7 32 28 10 59 29

33 736 66 150 2 290 58 070 11 752 13 347 2 680

872 244 534 250 312 721 310 622

4.1 82.8 0.8 0.4 0.7 1.3 0.6 2.4

2.6 25.0 0.2 0.2 0.4 0.9 0.2 1.3

327

TABLE 50: Water withdrawal (continued)

Water withdrawal by sector agricultural million m3 /yr 2005* Cuba Dominica Dominican Republic Ecuador El Salvador French Guiana Grenada Guatemala Guyana Haiti Honduras Jamaica Mexico Netherlands Antilles Nicaragua Panama Paraguay Peru St. Kitts & Nevis St. Lucia St. Vincent & Grenadines Suriname Trinidad & Tobago Uruguay Venezuela (Boliv. Rep. of) OCEANIA Fiji French Polynesia New Caledonia Papua New Guinea Samoa Solomon Islands Tonga Vanuatu DEVELOPED REGIONS NORTH AMERICA Bermuda Canada United States of America ASIA & OCEANIA Australia Israel Japan New Zealand EUROPE Albania Belarus Bosnia & Herzegovina Croatia European Union Iceland Macedonia, FYR Montenegro Norway Republic of Moldova Russian Federation Serbia Switzerland Ukraine % of total 2005* industrial million m3 /yr 2005* % of total 2005* municipal million m3 /yr 2005* % of total 2005* Water withdrawal total million m3 /yr 2005* per capita m3 /yr 2005* % of freshwater resources withdrawn total % 2005* by agriculture % 2005*

5 640 2 240 13 960 760

74 60 88 53

761 80 549 256

10 2 3 18

1 187 1 444 1 293 410

16 38 8 29

7 588 3 764 15 802 1 426

674 406 1 177 236

19.9 17.9 3.7 5.7

14.8 10.7 3.3 3.0

1 610 1 600 930 690 200 61 200 1 080 230 350 16 420

51 95 75 45 33 77 67 45 71 82

1 063 20 52 492 138 7 400 74 19 40 1 983

33 1 4 32 22 9 5 4 8 10

512 61 258 344 275 11 200 466 263 100 1 642

16 4 21 23 45 14 29 51 20 8

3 185 1 682 1 240 1 526 612 79 800 1 620 512 490 20 045

250 2 254 133 222 228 749 299 158 83 727

2.9 0.7 8.8 1.6 6.5 17.5 0.8 0.3 0.1 1.0

1.4 0.7 6.6 0.7 2.1 13.4 0.5 0.2 0.1 0.9

620 20 3 170 3 970 50

93 8 87 40 59

20 66 80 793 10

3 25 2 8 11

30 174 410 5 123 25

4 67 11 52 30

670 260 3 660 9 886 85

1 343 197 1 101 371 103

0.5 6.8 2.6 0.8 0.3

0.5 0.5 2.3 0.3 0.2

168

43

224

57

392

64

0.0

0.0

5 410 192 400 16 660 1 129 56 840 3 533 1 060 840 11 70 126 845 760 13 200 77 50 19 690

12 40 74 58 63 74 57 20 2 42 12 29 42 20 2 2 52

31 570 220 600 2 400 113 15 800 200 232 2 268 86 14 685 1 261 883 39 600 3 361 1 503 13 440

69 46 11 6 18 4 13 53 14 8 67 43 49 60 82 59 36

8 990 65 440 3 520 712 17 400 1 020 561 1 134 534 81 217 833 146 13 400 683 1 004 4 614

20 14 16 36 19 21 30 27 85 49 21 28 8 20 17 39 12

45 970 478 440 22 580 1 954 90 040 4 753 1 853 4 242 631 165 1 028 2 939 1 789 66 200 4 121 2 557 37 744

1 424 1 612 1 107 296 712 1 150 590 432 142 556 504 636 475 460 345 804

1.6 15.6 4.6 109.8 20.9 1.5 4.4 7.3 0.6 0.1 16.1 0.8 15.4 1.5 4.8 27.0

0.2 6.3 3.4 63.4 13.2 1.1 2.5 1.4 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.2 6.5 0.3 0.1 14.1

328

TABLE 51: Agricultural emissions and pollution

Greenhouse gas emissions by agriculture gigagrams CO2 equivalent 2008 WORLD DEVELOPING REGIONS AFRICA North Africa Algeria Egypt Libya Morocco Tunisia Sub-Saharan Africa Angola Benin Botswana Burkina Faso Burundi Cameroon Cape Verde Central African Republic Chad Comoros Congo Cte dIvoire Congo, Dem. Rep. Djibouti Equatorial Guinea Eritrea Ethiopia Gabon Gambia Ghana Guinea Guinea-Bissau Kenya Lesotho Liberia Madagascar Malawi Mali Mauritania Mauritius Mozambique Namibia Niger Nigeria Rwanda Senegal Seychelles Sierra Leone Somalia Sudan South Africa Swaziland Tanzania, Utd. Rep. Togo Uganda Zambia Zimbabwe share of agriculture in total % Methane emissions total by agriculture % Nitrous oxide emissions total by agriculture %

kt of CO2 equivalent 2005*

kt of CO2 equivalent 2005*

2008*

2005*

2005*

7 140 000

42.6 50.1 42.8

2 850 000.0

66.2 73.1 75.5

134 660 5.9 16.5 35.0 23.9 54 200 47 000 14 700 10 600 8 160 45 400 96.5 54.5 78.9 97.9 61.7 13.4 43.0 91.0 85.6 15.7 71.8 75.2 40.4 33.1 80.6 21.0 40.3 50.0 86.8 56.4 51.6 90.5 45.3 87.4 81.6 6.8 56.2 64.4 78.0 20.8 40.2 37.1 10.7 7 130 130 000 12 800 5 060 22 100 8 990 2 470 52 200 8 220 5 580 11 000 18 500 4 080 4 500

29.2 8.2 31.7 5.7 51.7 25.5 27.9 47.8 84.1

33 370.0 4 900.0 19 000.0 1 290.0 5 810.0 2 370.0 38 900.0 2 900.0 3 080.0

74.0 58.6 80.0 51.9 82.6 66.4 38.4 61.5 92.0

42.4

9 130.0

75.9

31.9 17.4

3 570.0 7 360.0

51.8 29.3

73.2 72.5 1.1 39.5

1 190.0 30 500.0 482.0 4 900.0

90.9 88.8 23.3 70.5

65.5

10 500.0

88.8

44.2 94.9 19.8 68.3

9 500.0 3 800.0 21 600.0 4 080.0

71.4 94.3 77.3 88.5

83.5 9.3 16.4 75.8 71.2 90.3 41.6 20.7

67 400 63 800 32 000 2 890 19 300 9 540

85.2 31.4 63.2 39.8 59.3 73.3

49 500.0 24 000.0 21 600.0 1 740.0 25 100.0 6 110.0

92.6 59.8 78.8 67.5 71.7 85.2

329

TABLE 51: Agricultural emissions and pollution (continued)

Greenhouse gas emissions by agriculture gigagrams CO2 equivalent 2008 ASIA Central Asia Kazakhstan Kyrgyzstan Tajikistan Turkmenistan Uzbekistan East Asia Brunei Darussalam Cambodia China Indonesia Korea, DPR Korea, Republic of Lao, PDR Malaysia Mongolia Myanmar Philippines Singapore Thailand Viet Nam South Asia Afghanistan Bangladesh Bhutan India Iran (Islamic Rep.) Maldives Nepal Pakistan Sri Lanka West Asia Armenia Azerbaijan Bahrain Cyprus Georgia Iraq Jordan Kuwait Lebanon Occupied Palestinian Territory Saudi Arabia Syrian Arab Republic Turkey United Arab Emirates Yemen LATIN AMERICA & THE CARIBBEAN Argentina Bahamas Barbados Belize Bolivia (Plur. State) Brazil Chile Colombia Costa Rica share of agriculture in total % Methane emissions total by agriculture % Nitrous oxide emissions total by agriculture %

kt of CO2 equivalent 2005*

kt of CO2 equivalent 2005*

2008*

2005*

2005*

3 319 510 122 190 12 101.5 4.9 16.1 55.0 9.0 8.2 47 100 3 590 3 900 28 000 39 600 5 770 82.7 14.9 25.3 5.8 3.0 83.0 5.1 36.5 32.8 34.6 47.9 46 500 6 070 77 200 51 900 2 240 83 300 83 000 20 200 1 332 820 209 000 18 200 32 100

50.5 37.8 25.3 72.3 68.6 21.6 33.7 43.1 0.2 76.1 38.6 46.4 23.5 38.6 12.4 92.1 69.0 63.7 1.2 66.0 63.9 63.1

1 112 482.9 34 770.0 17 600.0 1 510.0 1 380.0 4 280.0 10 000.0 609.0 5 790.0 467 422.0 123 000.0 3 420.0 13 500.0 15 100.0 3 490.0 30 900.0 13 000.0 1 070.0 22 300.0 23 000.0

72.4 77.3 62.5 72.6 86.9 78.1 84.2 71.6 14.6 66.1 73.9 71.5 62.3 35.9 64.9 93.2 42.9 73.1 2.8 65.5 83.0 74.4

61.2 82.2 28.4 7.9 87.2 38.6 39.4 17.9 8.5 0.2 27.1 0.9 7.0

92 400 584 000 115 000 22 100 137 000 10 200 268 320 2 960 36 600 2 770 616 4 410 15 900 1 800 14 400 1 000

70.5 64.4 18.2 82.9 63.5 65.2 26.4 36.7 13.6 0.6 44.0 50.8 18.6 21.8 1.1 25.5

21 400.0 213 000.0 26 600.0 4 520.0 26 800.0 2 060.0 60 731.9 580.0 2 630.0 81.9 292.0 2 020.0 3 440.0 667.0 650.0 672.0

83.1 73.4 75.3 76.8 74.2 65.1 63.3 81.6 77.5 16.0 65.5 56.9 63.3 55.4 16.9 58.8

6.9 25 043.0 6.8 3.4 35.2

48 200 12 500 64 300 23 300 6 680

4.0 28.1 33.6 2.6 54.9 56.8

6 500.0 5 510.0 32 800.0 1 170.0 3 250.0

46.1 78.1 66.4 43.6 72.5 74.5

44.3 1.0 1.6 4.3 26.7 48.2 24.4 44.6 38.0

102 000

70.6

49 800.0

89.2

30 300 492 000 18 100 58 100 2 580

34.1 61.1 39.4 68.0 67.2

15 100.0 236 000.0 8 140.0 21 300.0 1 330.0

36.5 67.0 73.4 86.1 85.4

330

TABLE 51: Agricultural emissions and pollution (continued)

Greenhouse gas emissions by agriculture gigagrams CO2 equivalent 2008 Cuba Dominica Dominican Republic Ecuador El Salvador French Guiana Grenada Guatemala Guyana Haiti Honduras Jamaica Mexico Netherlands Antilles Nicaragua Panama Paraguay Peru St. Kitts & Nevis St. Lucia St. Vincent & Grenadines Suriname Trinidad & Tobago Uruguay Venezuela (Boliv. Rep. of) OCEANIA Fiji French Polynesia New Caledonia Papua New Guinea Samoa Solomon Islands Tonga Vanuatu DEVELOPED REGIONS NORTH AMERICA Bermuda Canada United States of America ASIA & OCEANIA Australia Israel Japan New Zealand EUROPE Albania Belarus Bosnia & Herzegovina Croatia European Union Iceland Macedonia, FYR Montenegro Norway Republic of Moldova Russian Federation Serbia Switzerland Ukraine share of agriculture in total % Methane emissions total by agriculture % Nitrous oxide emissions total by agriculture %

kt of CO2 equivalent 2005*

kt of CO2 equivalent 2005*

2008*

2005*

2005*

25.6 9.7 21.6 27.3 49.4 0.0 59.9 41.6 80.1 31.2 92.3 7.1 55.8 44.2 97.0 35.7 25.8 2.9 64.4 25.2 2.1 80.8 17.1 35.5

9 450 6 080 17 100 3 130

62.4 63.7 57.7 53.1

6 360.0 2 260.0 4 570.0 1 380.0

78.7 76.8 84.9 76.2

8 310 4 010 5 190 1 300 128 000 123 6 020 3 220 15 400 17 200

48.8 56.2 78.4 50.3 42.3 3.2 74.8 79.2 84.1 61.3

5 380.0 1 440.0 2 870.0 599.0 42 500.0 55.1 3 340.0 1 200.0 9 070.0 7 560.0

56.8 84.2 85.9 59.0 75.2 5.8 91.7 83.7 82.6 81.9

10 100 19 600 61 200

0.7 94.3 40.0

230.0 7 020.0 14 900.0

60.3 96.9 75.2

77.2 76.8 26.9 78.5 2 036 767 38.8 34.3 62 457.8 427 528.5 87 394.7 25 844.9 34 826.3 8.5 6.2 15.9 4.5 2.0 46.4 34.0 22 746.9 3 359.4 566.4 25.0 13.5 10.8 11.6 8.8 12.3 4 356.1 144 092.1 5 689.2 34 636.4 8.0 17.9 6.4 14.3 10.7 8.1 16 900 3 370 563 000 7 780 4 750 70 400 12.6 29.4 9.1 43.7 67.6 23.3 4 740.0 849.0 76 100.0 4 580.0 2 410.0 26 100.0 39.0 73.5 44.3 63.6 59.3 45.6 89 300 548 000 126 000 3 520 42 800 27 600 1 199 547 2 410 11 500 2 740 3 860 536 000 402 1 400 29.3 34.8 67.7 55.1 31.2 71.2 90.2 34.6 70.8 70.9 42.4 33.3 40.6 53.5 46.6 63 000.0 1 790.0 29 800.0 12 900.0 448 265.6 1 040.0 11 700.0 1 200.0 2 850.0 327 000.0 418.0 599.0 40 200.0 317 000.0 912 955.6 52.1 56.6 58.9 56.4 37.7 78.2 53.0 27.9 94.2 53.1 78.4 72.9 57.8 52.4 56.3 79.7 63.9

331

TABLE 52: Agricultural pollution

Energy use by agriculture kt of oil equivalent 2009* WORLD DEVELOPING REGIONS AFRICA North Africa Algeria Egypt Libya Morocco Tunisia Sub-Saharan Africa Angola Benin Botswana Burkina Faso Burundi Cameroon Cape Verde Central African Republic Chad Comoros Congo Cte dIvoire Congo, Dem. Rep. Djibouti Equatorial Guinea Eritrea Ethiopia Gabon Gambia Ghana Guinea Guinea-Bissau Kenya Lesotho Liberia Madagascar Malawi Mali Mauritania Mauritius Mozambique Namibia Niger Nigeria Rwanda Senegal Seychelles Sierra Leone Somalia Sudan South Africa Swaziland Tanzania, Utd. Rep. Togo Uganda Zambia Zimbabwe share of agriculture in total % Air pollution urban food industry % of total BOD emissions 2007* Water pollution paper and pulp industry % of total BOD emissions 2007* textile industry % of total BOD emissions 2007* wood industry % of total BOD emissions 2007*

annual PM10 [mg/m3 ] 2004

2009*

2.0

72 81 79 93 65

2 618.6 224.9 1 721.6 423.7 4.1 20.3

5.3 2.1 14.8 6.5 0.0 1.1

136 121 27 46 76 113 51 25 97 99

20.0 16.3

4.0 2.9

31.1 43.5

0.6 2.0

43.8

2.4

3.9

4.4

0.1

86 33 24 73 125 74

64.9 0.1

1.1 0.0 57 68 12 109 27.3 34.7 48.6 18.6 4.4 6.0 1.3 3.8 29.0 27.9 13.3 10.2 0.1 1.5 18.7 33.3

26.0 8.3 91.5

0.2 0.5 1.2

88 13 138 42 63 84

110.4

0.9

38 94 39 51 88 102 42 47 14.7 3.6 63.9 0.7 7.6 82.1 1.6 1.4 58.9 7.5 6.3 1.1 2.6 0.5 93.5

7.2 223.4

0.1 13.9

44 50 86 95 100 77.1 44.6 6.3 1.9 10.5 2.9 0.8

6.1

0.3

93 69 35

54.1 1 535.0 717.7

0.5 2.2 4.2

219 24 71 38 45 33

57.5 15.7 61.2 34.8 21.5

1.9 6.6 4.8 7.8 4.7

8.0 10.4 12.7 17.2 25.2

1.7 4.2 2.9 2.3 1.7

39.7 641.4

0.7 7.7

71 43

332

TABLE 52: Agricultural pollution (continued)

Energy use by agriculture kt of oil equivalent 2009* ASIA Central Asia Kazakhstan Kyrgyzstan Tajikistan Turkmenistan Uzbekistan East Asia Brunei Darussalam Cambodia China Indonesia Korea, DPR Korea, Republic of Lao, PDR Malaysia Mongolia Myanmar Philippines Singapore Thailand Viet Nam South Asia Afghanistan Bangladesh Bhutan India Iran (Islamic Rep.) Maldives Nepal Pakistan Sri Lanka West Asia Armenia Azerbaijan Bahrain Cyprus Georgia Iraq Jordan Kuwait Lebanon Occupied Palestinian Territory Saudi Arabia Syrian Arab Republic Turkey United Arab Emirates Yemen LATIN AMERICA & THE CARIBBEAN Argentina Bahamas Barbados Belize Bolivia (Plur. State) Brazil Chile Colombia Costa Rica share of agriculture in total % Air pollution urban food industry % of total BOD emissions 2007* Water pollution paper and pulp industry % of total BOD emissions 2007* textile industry % of total BOD emissions 2007* wood industry % of total BOD emissions 2007*

annual PM10 [mg/m3 ] 2004

2009*

87 59 942.0 141.9 355.4 254.0 1 955.9 1.0 117.4 2 687.9 1 774.2 209.6 49.8 1.0 129.5 5.0 3 424.8 598.7 2.5 5.1 17.9 2.2 5.5 0.2 2.5 1.8 1.2 0.5 2.1 0.0 0.6 0.0 4.5 1.1 25 36 57 73 81 79 48 51 80 114 88 43 25 28 16 75 34 48 77 66 98 27 1 174.9 17 387.3 6 145.7 113.4 894.3 9.2 10.7 361.2 3.8 37.0 77.9 152.5 5.1 3.9 3.8 1.1 1.3 0.1 0.6 5.5 0.1 2.1 3.1 3.2 157 13 84 68 54 161 165 93 86 84 64 65 60 46 167 69 129 43 25.5 7.5 16.7 4.5 16.9 20.8 25.6 6.2 9.2 18.6 2.3 36.3 8.9 5.1 8.0 19.6 3.0 11.7 1.5 19.2 15.1 22.4 3.9 1.9 4.3 29.4 55.6 43.6 2.0 0.4 2.5 16.1 2.8 11.2 0.7 14.1 7.6 19.7 2.3 23.3 79.3 0.5 14.4 5.3 16.4 12.7 4.2 5.5 4.2 3.5 21.6 2.3 20.5 40.2 2.1 0.5 2.8 3.3 6.3 9.2 9.1 27.2 5.4 2.2 4.9 5.1 9.3 49.2 6.6 41.6 0.9 21.4 7.8 5.4 18.1 7.4 23.1 0.9 3.9 4.0 33.6 20.6 29.2 8.2 1.7 6.3 18.7 24.2 18.0 2.4 6.3 2.7 4.0 9.8 38.4 0.6 1.6 0.3

435.3 265.8 4 726.9 33.9 995.9

0.4 2.0 6.5 0.1 18.7

91 89 56 109 82 46

20.0 19.9 12.4 35.9

6.9 1.9 3.8 2.1

14.4 32.0 32.2 15.5

3.3 5.2 1.7 5.1

3 324.1

6.3

78 18 95 12

30.5 42.0

8.3 19.7

14.3 6.4

2.1 0.4

2.3 9 453.2 1 646.5 64.4

0.1 5.0 7.1 1.9

72 35 62 42 40

35.4 35.1 21.3

9.8 6.3 8.9

18.4 9.1 24.1

5.3 6.9 0.9

333

TABLE 52: Agricultural pollution (continued)

Energy use by agriculture kt of oil equivalent 2009* Cuba Dominica Dominican Republic Ecuador El Salvador French Guiana Grenada Guatemala Guyana Haiti Honduras Jamaica Mexico Netherlands Antilles Nicaragua Panama Paraguay Peru St. Kitts & Nevis St. Lucia St. Vincent & Grenadines Suriname Trinidad & Tobago Uruguay Venezuela (Boliv. Rep. of) OCEANIA Fiji French Polynesia New Caledonia Papua New Guinea Samoa Solomon Islands Tonga Vanuatu DEVELOPED REGIONS NORTH AMERICA Bermuda Canada United States of America ASIA & OCEANIA Australia Israel Japan New Zealand EUROPE Albania Belarus Bosnia & Herzegovina Croatia European Union Iceland Macedonia, FYR Montenegro Norway Republic of Moldova Russian Federation Serbia Switzerland Ukraine share of agriculture in total % Air pollution urban food industry % of total BOD emissions 2007* Water pollution paper and pulp industry % of total BOD emissions 2007* textile industry % of total BOD emissions 2007* wood industry % of total BOD emissions 2007*

annual PM10 [mg/m3 ] 2004

2009*

181.3 143.9 106.9 6.6

2.5 2.6 1.1 0.2

38 34 36 34 48 49 18.6 46.4 1.3 7.8 73.1 12.3 0.1 2.2

6.0

0.1

60 13 47 28.9 1.6 28.7 0.5

3.0 551.4 3 596.5 14.3 14.0 377.6

0.1 22.2 3.3 0.7 0.5 2.7

69 43 49 32 58 103 62 33 74 56 13 55.2 42.6 11.6 9.3 4.7 11.0 1.6 4.5 18.9 7.1 17.0 4.8

8.3 36.2 39.3

0.2 1.1 0.1

22 154 16 12 17

39.3

18.2

7.7

8.5

32.7

5.3

40.8

4.0

11 16 67.3 10 30 24 3 372.1 14 313.0 2 164.6 145.3 1 874.0 522.5 75.7 1 098.2 5.8 249.0 41.8 18.2 327.8 51.4 8 344.1 123.2 267.9 1 615.4 1.7 1.0 2.8 1.0 0.6 4.2 5.0 5.7 0.2 3.6 1.5 1.1 1.7 3.1 2.0 1.5 1.3 2.5 27 29 19.7 4.3 5.6 2.1 21 24 31 18 53 33 16 33 58 9 22 35 33 21 29 22 41 25 15.1 19.1 95.2 17.9 4.7 12.1 3.8 4.9 6.3 4.2 44.7 2.0 2.9 6.0 17.6 7.2 14.5 4.9 39.8 60.2 16.4 15.0 31.1 8.9 7.0 12.2 7.9 5.3 5.8 1.2 2.0 8.0 14.0 12.0 8.9 8.1 7.3 4.3 6.5 4.1 5.0 4.4 7.3

334

TABLE 53: Conservation and renewable feedstocks

Nationally protected area % of total area % 2009* WORLD DEVELOPING REGIONS AFRICA North Africa Algeria Egypt Libya Morocco Tunisia Sub-Saharan Africa Angola Benin Botswana Burkina Faso Burundi Cameroon Cape Verde Central African Republic Chad Comoros Congo Cte dIvoire Congo, Dem. Rep. Djibouti Equatorial Guinea Eritrea Ethiopia Gabon Gambia Ghana Guinea Guinea-Bissau Kenya Lesotho Liberia Madagascar Malawi Mali Mauritania Mauritius Mozambique Namibia Niger Nigeria Rwanda Senegal Seychelles Sierra Leone Somalia Sudan South Africa Swaziland Tanzania, Utd. Rep. Togo Uganda Zambia Zimbabwe Organic agriculture % of total area % 2009 kt of oil equivalent 2000 biofuel kt of oil equivalent 2009 % p.a. growth: 2000-2009 Production

natural bre thousand tonnes 2010 % p.a. growth: 1961-2010

recovered paper thousand tonnes 2010 % p.a. growth: 1961-2010

12.5

954 280.6 806 946.9 202 193.4 2 910.8

1 132 462.3 933 515.9 258 488.2 3 566.6 57.2 1 567.3 168.0 480.1 1 294.0 254 921.6 7 150.4 1 995.6 483.2

1.9 1.6 2.8 2.3 3.2 1.9 2.1 1.1 3.7 2.8 2.9 3.7 1.3

28 443 23 311 1 380 150 0 148 2 1 1 230 2 76 0 190 1

1.3 1.9 0.3 1.7 7.4 1.7 0.3 2.5 0.8 6.6 10.5 3.0 11.8 3.0 4.1 2.1 0.9 100.0 8.2 1.7 1.4

207 821 75 718 1 649 487 32 380 35 40 1 162

6.3 5.9 0.1 1.5 1.3 12.4 23.8 30.9 13.9 4.8 9.2 2.5 14.7 9.4 0.0 9.4 22.6 10.0 0.0 19.2 5.0 18.4 14.9 1.5 14.0 6.8 16.1 11.6 0.5 18.1 2.9 15.0 2.4 0.5 4.5 15.8 14.5 6.8 12.8 10.0 24.1 42.0 5.0 0.6 4.9 6.9 3.0 27.7 11.3 9.7 36.0 28.0

0.0 1.5 0.0 1.7 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0

76.5 1 325.1 139.6 436.0 933.6 199 282.7 5 538.2 1 445.0 542.6

4 984.7

4 436.5

1.3

62 4 26

0.8 587.6 0.1 0.0 4 223.6 15 758.4 716.9 7 780.4 21 473.1 2.2 7.0 3.5

0 81 14 0 507.7 561.3 30 052.0 1 108.7 6 456.0 1.1 6.2 2.0 0 2.2 9 13 2 57

0.4

17 423.9 924.6

0.2

5 315.2

10.5 2.0 38

0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.3 2.1 0.3 0.1 0.0 0.2 0.1 1.6 0.0 0.0

11 245.0

14 233.7

2.7

25

29 6 79 0 6 417.6 172.9 74 154.7 1 163.6 7 987.8 205.7 91 907.2 1 208.5 2.5 1.9 2.4 0.4 62 1 3 161 0 6 5 2 11 055.9 12 872.4 12 457.8 1 756.1 5 144.1 5 591.0 10 754.4 14 428.8 17 204.6 2 183.1 6 357.0 6 236.6 0.3 1.3 3.7 2.4 2.4 1.2 62 12 1 130 11 26 29 42

0.3 1.0 7.6 4.8 0.2 2.5 2.4 100.0 8.0 0.5 1.7 1.3 0.5 2.8 1.3 2.7 2.0 7.1

3 5

8 0 0

6 1 015 6

70

335

TABLE 53: Conservation and renewable feedstocks (continued)

Nationally protected area % of total area % 2009* ASIA Central Asia Kazakhstan Kyrgyzstan Tajikistan Turkmenistan Uzbekistan East Asia Brunei Darussalam Cambodia China Indonesia Korea, DPR Korea, Republic of Lao, PDR Malaysia Mongolia Myanmar Philippines Singapore Thailand Viet Nam South Asia Afghanistan Bangladesh Bhutan India Iran (Islamic Rep.) Maldives Nepal Pakistan Sri Lanka West Asia Armenia Azerbaijan Bahrain Cyprus Georgia Iraq Jordan Kuwait Lebanon Occupied Palestinian Territory Saudi Arabia Syrian Arab Republic Turkey United Arab Emirates Yemen LATIN AMERICA & THE CARIBBEAN Argentina Bahamas Barbados Belize Bolivia (Plur. State) Brazil Chile Colombia Costa Rica Organic agriculture % of total area % 2009 kt of oil equivalent 2000 biofuel kt of oil equivalent 2009 % p.a. growth: 2000-2009 Production

natural bre thousand tonnes 2010 % p.a. growth: 1961-2010

recovered paper thousand tonnes 2010 % p.a. growth: 1961-2010

514 021.4 77.1 2.5 6.9 4.1 3.0 2.3 42.9 24.0 16.6 14.1 4.0 2.4 16.3 17.9 13.4 6.3 10.9 5.4 19.6 6.2 0.4 1.6 28.3 5.3 7.1 17.0 10.3 20.8 8.0 7.1 1.3 11.0 3.7 0.1 9.4 1.6 0.5 0.5 0.3 31.3 0.6 1.9 5.6 0.5 0.0 0.3 1.3 0.1 0.0 5.0 6 497.4 0.0 77.4 90 732.1 5.4 13.7 0.1 27.9 18.2 28.0 16.5 20.4 20.9 0.8 0.1 0.7 0.5 0.1 0.4 723.1 46 484.2 4 255.8 4 393.8 248.0 3.1 2 955.4 0.1 3.0 0.0 0.7 0.0 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.4 148 879.2 351.6 6 987.9 24 027.6 4 471.8 7 384.7 1.0 1.6 0.0 8.8 645.1 26.3 2.3 0.0 128.6 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 7 603.4 0.0 0.4 0.7 0.2 0.0 2 546.8 99.6 9 175.0 8 102.5 0.0 14 592.9 22 374.8 192 321.5 0.2 0.4 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 73.3 3.6 0.0 0.0 0.2 314 238.1 0.0 3 202.5 203 682.3 49 224.0 1 004.8 232.7

551 414.6 160.4 156.6 3.6 0.0 0.0 0.2 328 508.1 0.0 3 663.9 203 672.2 52 980.6 1 046.1 691.4 3 205.2 103.3 10 530.7 6 922.4 0.0 20 537.7 25 154.6 217 463.7 8 812.9 165 421.9 403.4 8 544.7 29 531.3 4 749.5 5 282.4 1.0 0.0 0.0 16.1 382.0 26.3 4.9 0.0 120.0

0.8 8.5 8.8 0.0

20 069 1 737 92 24 102 360

2.4

64 308 15 15

0.0 0.5 1.5 0.0 0.8 0.4 12.9 2.6 0.4 1.5 1.7 3.9 1.3 1.4 1.7 1.2 1.5 2.3 2.3 0.7 3.7 0.0 100.0 7.0 5.7 0.0 8.5 0.8

1 158 6 749 2 6 330 93 28 0 4 0 71 73 49 99 10 829 18 1 224 0 7 544 72 21 1 949 0 754 13 0 16 100.0 1.4 2.3 1.0 0.9 3.7 100.0 1.5 850 80 4 163 13 2 495 0 0 40 45 10 6 3 170 3.0 4.7 3.7 1.2 3.5 14.0 2.0 100.0 3.0 0.6 3.6 2.0 1.9 0.1 0.2 1 200 38 326 275 1 856 77 1 110 8 857 60 688 20 44 105 3 934

0.0 6.4 4 641.4 0.0 100.3 123 613.2 3 269.4 2.9 3.5 1.1 8 1 862 233 1.0 0.0 1.3 2.8 3.7 246 471 1.5 1.5

1 000 1 016 170 9 761 900

1 102.2 76 701.2 5 051.5 4 455.4 772.1

4.8 5.7 1.9 0.2 13.4

29 1 290 16 26 1

7.1 1.3 2.4 2.6 0.9 4 019 489 633 29

336

TABLE 53: Conservation and renewable feedstocks (continued)

Nationally protected area % of total area % 2009* Cuba Dominica Dominican Republic Ecuador El Salvador French Guiana Grenada Guatemala Guyana Haiti Honduras Jamaica Mexico Netherlands Antilles Nicaragua Panama Paraguay Peru St. Kitts & Nevis St. Lucia St. Vincent & Grenadines Suriname Trinidad & Tobago Uruguay Venezuela (Boliv. Rep. of) OCEANIA Fiji French Polynesia New Caledonia Papua New Guinea Samoa Solomon Islands Tonga Vanuatu DEVELOPED REGIONS NORTH AMERICA Bermuda Canada United States of America ASIA & OCEANIA Australia Israel Japan New Zealand EUROPE Albania Belarus Bosnia & Herzegovina Croatia European Union Iceland Macedonia, FYR Montenegro Norway Republic of Moldova Russian Federation Serbia Switzerland Ukraine Organic agriculture % of total area % 2009 kt of oil equivalent 2000 biofuel kt of oil equivalent 2009 % p.a. growth: 2000-2009 Production

natural bre thousand tonnes 2010 % p.a. growth: 1961-2010

recovered paper thousand tonnes 2010 % p.a. growth: 1961-2010

6.2 21.7 22.1 25.1 0.8 1.7 30.6 4.9 0.3 18.2 18.9 11.1 36.7 18.7 5.4 13.6 3.6 14.3 10.9 11.4 31.2 0.3 53.7 1.3 0.4 5.5 3.1 3.4 0.1 14.5 4.3

0.2 6.5 0.9 0.4 11.5 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.0 0.4 0.1 0.3 0.7 0.2 0.2 0.9

4 665.6 1 355.4 697.4 1 342.7

1 817.2 1 765.7 615.6 1 724.9

9.9 3.0 1.4 2.8

10 1 31 4 0

1.1 4.0 4.4 5.0 3.7 5.9 2.5 1.1 0.8 2.5 3.6

28 15 150 5

3 898.7 1 517.4 1 327.8 579.0 8 939.3 0.0 1 419.3 461.5 2 237.6 2 234.1

5 123.9 1 848.9 1 954.3 516.9 8 382.8 0.0 1 416.3 330.9 2 708.5 2 439.5

3.1 2.2 4.4 1.3 0.7 0.0 3.6 2.1 1.0

1 8 1 0 170 6 5 21 0 0

18

51 0 3 039

13 1.1 3.7 100.0 1 100.0 7 0 9 0 100.0 1.3 0.5 21 237 30 72

0.0 33.7 6.3 0.0 0.0 421.4 540.8 11.6 1 063.8 540.8 11.1 10.8 0.0

0.3 14.5 4.3 4.8 147 333.7 72 397.4 198 946.4 85 615.6 11 310.1 74 305.4 11 714.6 5 690.8 20.7 4 908.3 1 094.9 101 616.2 213.0 1 334.9 183.1 438.3 93 088.5 0.4 195.2 1 067.1 71.6 2 936.1 276.3 932.5 895.3 0.6 1.5 2.2 3.4 12.0 2.8 14.7 1 80 0 3.4 1.9 0.2 2.2 1.1 1.8 18.9 0.5 0.6 5.2 2.2 5.6 0.2 1.8 5.9 0 638 0.5 5 132 3 970 28 3 942 397 387 7 0 3 766 0 46 0.7 0.5 12.2 0.5 5.6 10.0 1.4 100.0 5.5 2.5 6.2 132 103 50 317 3 444 46 873 25 547 3 187 305 21 800 255 56 239 0 0 35 0 51 989 20 2 0 1 219.9 58.8 4 005.7 869.2 726.2 261.5 474 3 2 100 25 1 298 339 4.2 4.7 4.9 5.0 5.2 3.6 3.7 0 0.5

5.6 8.0 14.8 10.5 18.7 16.3 25.8 9.8 7.3 0.6 7.3 14.9 9.7 4.8 13.3 14.4 1.4 9.0 6.0 22.8 3.5 0.3 0.1 0.9 5.6 1.3 0.0 0.2 7.4 0.7 0.0 1.4 1.0 0.5 2.9 1.1 0.2 1.1 0.0 11 527.7 60 869.6 10 590.8 4 856.0 4.4 4 691.8 1 038.5 64 345.6 260.0 814.6 179.6 373.4 55 379.0 0.0 206.2

337

TABLE 54: Forestry production

Production of selected forest products industrial roundwood million m3 2010 WORLD DEVELOPING REGIONS AFRICA North Africa Algeria Egypt Libya Morocco Tunisia Sub-Saharan Africa Angola Benin Botswana Burkina Faso Burundi Cameroon Cape Verde Central African Republic Chad Comoros Congo Cte dIvoire Congo, Dem. Rep. Djibouti Equatorial Guinea Eritrea Ethiopia Gabon Gambia Ghana Guinea Guinea-Bissau Kenya Lesotho Liberia Madagascar Malawi Mali Mauritania Mauritius Mozambique Namibia Niger Nigeria Rwanda Senegal Seychelles Sierra Leone Somalia Sudan South Africa Swaziland Tanzania, Utd. Rep. Togo Uganda Zambia Zimbabwe % p.a. growth: 1961-2010 2010 woodfuel million m3 % p.a. growth: 1961-2010 total roundwood million m3 2010 % p.a. growth: 1961-2010

1 537.2 538.9 74.2 1.1 0.1 0.3 0.1 0.4 0.2 73.1 1.1 0.4 0.1 1.2 0.9 2.6 0.8 0.8 0.0 2.4 1.5 4.6 0.0 0.5 0.0 2.9 3.4 0.1 1.2 0.7 0.1 1.2 0.5 0.3 1.4 0.4 0.0 0.0 1.4 0.7 9.4 1.2 0.8 0.0 0.1 0.1 2.2 18.9 0.3 2.3 0.2 4.1 1.3 0.7

1.5 2.8 2.3 1.5 0.4 3.2 3.5 0.7 3.0 2.4 1.1 2.5 2.5 3.7 7.5 2.6 2.7 1.8 3.2 0.1 2.1 100.0 1.1

1 868.0 1 670.4 616.7 29.2 8.2 17.5 1.0 0.4 2.2 587.4 4.0 6.3 0.7 12.8 9.8 9.9 0.2 2.0 7.1 0.3 1.3 8.9 76.6 0.4 0.4 1.3 101.3

0.7 0.7 1.8 0.8 2.2 1.1 2.5 5.1 1.1 2.3 2.6 0.5 0.4 1.5 2.1 0.8 1.8 0.5 2.0 3.8 1.0 0.7 3.0 0.8

3 405.2 2 209.3 690.8 30.3 8.3 17.8 1.1 0.8 2.4 660.5 5.1 6.7 0.8 14.0 10.7 12.5 0.2 2.8 7.8 0.3 3.8 10.4 81.2 0.4 1.0 1.3 104.2

1.0 1.0 1.9 0.8 2.1 1.2 2.5 3.9 1.2 2.3 2.2 0.6 0.5 1.7 2.3 1.0 1.8 1.0 2.0 4.0 2.1 0.6 2.9 10.2 1.0

1.4 6.2 0.9 1.9 0.7 2.1 2.4 0.8 4.7 1.7 0.0 2.9 1.1 3.6 2.9 6.6 2.2 0.5 2.0 1.8 2.9 1.8 2.2 1.5 3.4 3.1 2.9

1.1 0.7 37.8 12.0 2.6 26.4 2.1 7.0 13.1 5.4 5.3 1.8 0.0 16.7 0.8 2.9 63.2 5.0 5.4 0.0 5.6 12.5 18.8 12.0 1.1 22.8 4.4 39.6 9.1 8.7

2.3 2.5 3.7 0.6 3.9 2.4 0.7 3.1 3.7 1.1 1.5 2.1 3.1 1.9 1.8 0.6 1.1 1.2 1.3 0.0 3.2 1.4 5.8 1.3 0.5 2.1 2.1 1.6

4.5 0.8 39.0 12.6 2.7 27.6 2.1 7.5 13.4 6.8 5.7 1.8 0.0 18.1 0.8 3.6 72.6 6.2 6.2 0.0 5.7 12.6 20.9 30.9 1.4 25.1 4.6 43.7 10.4 9.5

1.6 2.7 3.2 0.7 3.6 2.4 0.7 3.1 3.4 1.5 1.5 2.1 3.1 1.8 1.8 0.9 1.3 1.6 1.4 0.0 3.2 1.4 3.6 4.8 1.4 0.5 2.2 2.2 1.7

338

TABLE 54: Forestry production (continued)

Production of selected forest products industrial roundwood million m3 2010 ASIA Central Asia Kazakhstan Kyrgyzstan Tajikistan Turkmenistan Uzbekistan East Asia Brunei Darussalam Cambodia China Indonesia Korea, DPR Korea, Republic of Lao, PDR Malaysia Mongolia Myanmar Philippines Singapore Thailand Viet Nam South Asia Afghanistan Bangladesh Bhutan India Iran (Islamic Rep.) Maldives Nepal Pakistan Sri Lanka West Asia Armenia Azerbaijan Bahrain Cyprus Georgia Iraq Jordan Kuwait Lebanon Occupied Palestinian Territory Saudi Arabia Syrian Arab Republic Turkey United Arab Emirates Yemen LATIN AMERICA & THE CARIBBEAN Argentina Bahamas Barbados Belize Bolivia (Plur. State) Brazil Chile Colombia Costa Rica % p.a. growth: 1961-2010 2010 woodfuel million m3 % p.a. growth: 1961-2010 total roundwood million m3 2010 % p.a. growth: 1961-2010

250.8 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 203.8 0.1 0.1 102.4 54.1 1.5 3.2 0.2 19.7 0.0 4.3 3.6 8.7 5.8 31.0 1.8 0.3 0.2 23.2 0.7 1.3 3.0 0.6 15.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0

2.3

764.9 0.4 0.3 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0

0.1

1 015.7 0.5 0.3 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0

0.2

2.3 2.2 3.8 2.2 4.8 1.9 2.0 2.4 2.2 4.2 1.3 1.6 2.3 2.4 1.5 1.7 1.6 2.6 4.0 1.4 3.3 0.1 4.5

367.1 0.0 8.4 188.8 59.7 6.0 2.5 5.9 2.8 0.8 38.3 12.4 19.3 22.0 390.5 1.6 27.3 4.8 309.3 0.1 0.0 12.5 29.7 5.2 6.9 0.0 0.0 0.0

1.0 2.7 1.1 0.8 2.8 2.0 0.3 0.4 1.6 0.5 2.9 0.8 0.1 0.6 1.4 2.2 1.0 1.2 1.4 6.1 1.3 0.7 1.8 0.1 0.1

570.9 0.1 8.5 291.3 113.8 7.5 5.7 6.2 22.5 0.8 42.5 16.0 28.0 27.9 421.5 3.4 27.6 5.1 332.5 0.8 0.0 13.8 32.6 5.8 22.8 0.0 0.0

0.4 0.8 1.1 0.2 1.5 2.0 0.7 0.4 1.1 0.4 2.7 1.0 0.3 0.9 1.4 1.9 1.0 1.3 1.5 4.3 1.3 0.8 1.9 0.1 1.9

1.9 2.7 3.2 3.2 5.3 1.4

0.0 0.0 0.8 0.2 0.3 0.0 0.0

1.9 3.4 2.7 3.2 5.3 1.1

3.7 1.9 1.4 0.2

0.0 0.7 0.1 0.3 0.0 0.0

0.2 0.0 15.7 0.6 4.6 0.0 4.9 0.0 0.4 207.5 9.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.9 128.4 34.6 2.4 1.3 1.4 5.0 4.2 5.1 0.5 2.2 3.8 3.3 5.4 282.9 4.6 0.0 0.0 0.1 2.3 143.1 12.7 8.8 3.4

5.8 1.2 0.8 9.2 3.1 1.1 1.4 0.6 0.2 2.4 1.1 1.0 3.5 1.0 0.1

0.2 0.1 20.6 0.0 0.4 490.4 14.4 0.0 0.0 0.2 3.3 271.5 47.2 11.2 4.7

5.8 0.3 1.8 9.2 3.1 1.8 0.5 3.4 1.8 0.7 1.7 2.0 4.6 0.6 0.5

339

TABLE 54: Forestry production (continued)

Production of selected forest products industrial roundwood million m3 2010 Cuba Dominica Dominican Republic Ecuador El Salvador French Guiana Grenada Guatemala Guyana Haiti Honduras Jamaica Mexico Netherlands Antilles Nicaragua Panama Paraguay Peru St. Kitts & Nevis St. Lucia St. Vincent & Grenadines Suriname Trinidad & Tobago Uruguay Venezuela (Boliv. Rep. of) OCEANIA Fiji French Polynesia New Caledonia Papua New Guinea Samoa Solomon Islands Tonga Vanuatu DEVELOPED REGIONS NORTH AMERICA Bermuda Canada United States of America ASIA & OCEANIA Australia Israel Japan New Zealand EUROPE Albania Belarus Bosnia & Herzegovina Croatia European Union Iceland Macedonia, FYR Montenegro Norway Republic of Moldova Russian Federation Serbia Switzerland Ukraine % p.a. growth: 1961-2010 2010 woodfuel million m3 % p.a. growth: 1961-2010 total roundwood million m3 2010 % p.a. growth: 1961-2010

0.7 0.0 2.1 0.7 0.1 0.5 0.5 0.2 0.5 0.2 6.9 0.1 0.2 4.0 1.4

1.5 6.6 2.2 3.8 2.7 1.1 1.8 0.0 0.9 10.8 2.0 4.1 0.8 4.9 2.1

1.1 0.0 0.9 4.9 4.2 0.1 18.1 0.8 2.0 8.6 0.5 38.8 0.0 6.1 1.0 6.6 7.3 0.0 0.0

0.6 0.8 1.7 2.1 1.1 4.3 2.5 0.1 1.0 0.2 13.7 1.0 0.4 0.8 0.6 2.8 1.2 0.8 1.0 1.2 0.6 0.8 2.2 1.0 1.0 0.8 1.1 1.0 0.5 1.7 0.4 0.7 0.2 1.7 0.0 2.9 0.6 3.0 10.0 100.0 0.4 2.2

1.9 0.0 0.9 7.0 4.9 0.2 18.5 1.4 2.3 9.1 0.7 45.7 0.0 6.2 1.2 10.6 8.7 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.1 11.9 6.4 12.3 0.5 0.0 0.0 10.0 0.1 1.6 0.0 0.1 1 195.9 473.1 132.5 340.7 69.1 29.8 0.0 17.3 22.0 653.7 0.4 10.4 3.6 4.5

0.0 0.8 0.6 2.1 1.3 3.5 2.4 0.6 0.9 0.2 12.7 1.1 0.4 0.6 0.4 3.4 1.3 0.8 1.0 0.2 1.0 3.8 2.8 2.4 3.8 1.3 1.0 2.1 0.6 6.7 1.7 15.5 1.0 0.4 0.7 0.3 0.4 1.5 0.5 2.7 2.9 0.0 2.6

0.2 0.0 9.4 2.3 6.4 0.4 0.0 0.0 4.5 0.0 1.5 0.0 0.0 998.3 429.8 129.6 300.2 64.3 25.1 0.0 17.2 22.0 504.2 0.1 8.1 2.4 3.4 336.4 0.0 0.1 0.2 8.3 0.0 132.8 1.4 3.4 7.5

0.1 1.6 8.1 4.1 7.1 4.3 1.0 7.1 3.6 10.7 12.2 1.0 0.5 0.8 0.4 0.0 1.8 0.0 2.1 3.1 0.1 3.6

0.0 0.0 2.4 4.1 5.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.5 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.1 197.6 43.3 2.9 40.4 4.7 4.7 0.0 0.1 0.0 149.5 0.3 2.3 1.3 1.1

1.1

84.9 0.0 0.5 0.2

0.4

421.3 0.0 0.6 0.4

1.0

0.1

2.1 0.3 40.2 6.2

0.5

10.4 0.4 173.0 7.6

0.1

0.7

1.5 8.6

0.3

4.9 16.1

0.6

340

TABLE 55: Forestry production: nished products

Production of selected forest products sawnwood million m3 2010 WORLD DEVELOPING REGIONS AFRICA North Africa Algeria Egypt Libya Morocco Tunisia Sub-Saharan Africa Angola Benin Botswana Burkina Faso Burundi Cameroon Cape Verde Central African Republic Chad Comoros Congo Cte dIvoire Congo, Dem. Rep. Djibouti Equatorial Guinea Eritrea Ethiopia Gabon Gambia Ghana Guinea Guinea-Bissau Kenya Lesotho Liberia Madagascar Malawi Mali Mauritania Mauritius Mozambique Namibia Niger Nigeria Rwanda Senegal Seychelles Sierra Leone Somalia Sudan South Africa Swaziland Tanzania, Utd. Rep. Togo Uganda Zambia Zimbabwe % p.a. growth: 1961-2010 wood-based panels million m3 2010 % p.a. growth: 1961-2010 paper and paperboard million tonnes 2010 % p.a. growth: 1961-2010 million tonnes 2010 wood pulp % p.a. growth: 1961-2010

390.7 136.5 8.4 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 8.3 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.8 0.1 0.0 0.2 0.5 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 2.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 1.9 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.6

1.3 2.7 2.2 1.3 3.0 3.8 2.8 4.4 2.2 5.2 4.9

283.1 156.9 2.8 0.2 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 2.6 0.0

5.2 9.9 4.8 6.6 5.1 3.7

399.8 171.4 3.8 1.0 0.0 0.7 0.0 0.1 0.2 2.8 0.0

3.6 7.3 5.0 4.2 0.3 5.4 2.0 2.5 7.3

168.3 41.9 2.7 0.3 0.0 0.2 2.5 5.0 4.6

100.0

0.0

4.5 1.9

0.1 0.0

4.5

0.0

0.0

3.6 2.9 1.8 2.6

0.1 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.1

3.9 10.2 4.5

0.0 0.0 3.3

0.1 2.6 8.3

4.3 0.4 1.2 1.4 2.2 1.2 1.7 2.9 0.7

0.3 0.4 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

0.0

100.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0 0.0 0.8 0.0 0.0

0.3 1.0

0.0 0.0

3.5 0.3

0.1 0.0

3.3

0.0 0.0

0.0

0.0 1.3 2.1 1.9 1.8 2.5 2.9 6.5 2.2 3.4 4.9 0.0 0.0 0.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 4.0 5.1 4.1

0.0

0.0

0.0 2.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 5.2 0.0 5.2 5.3 2.3 0.0 0.1 4.5 0.9

341

TABLE 55: Forestry production: nished products (continued)

Production of selected forest products sawnwood million m3 2010 ASIA Central Asia Kazakhstan Kyrgyzstan Tajikistan Turkmenistan Uzbekistan East Asia Brunei Darussalam Cambodia China Indonesia Korea, DPR Korea, Republic of Lao, PDR Malaysia Mongolia Myanmar Philippines Singapore Thailand Viet Nam South Asia Afghanistan Bangladesh Bhutan India Iran (Islamic Rep.) Maldives Nepal Pakistan Sri Lanka West Asia Armenia Azerbaijan Bahrain Cyprus Georgia Iraq Jordan Kuwait Lebanon Occupied Palestinian Territory Saudi Arabia Syrian Arab Republic Turkey United Arab Emirates Yemen LATIN AMERICA & THE CARIBBEAN Argentina Bahamas Barbados Belize Bolivia (Plur. State) Brazil Chile Colombia Costa Rica % p.a. growth: 1961-2010 wood-based panels million m3 2010 % p.a. growth: 1961-2010 paper and paperboard million tonnes 2010 % p.a. growth: 1961-2010 million tonnes 2010 wood pulp % p.a. growth: 1961-2010

84.9 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 60.6 0.1 0.0 37.7 4.2 0.3 3.8 0.1 4.3 0.3 1.6 0.4 0.0 2.9 5.0 17.7 0.4 0.4 0.0 14.8 0.0 0.6 1.4 0.1 6.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0

2.8

137.3 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0

11.4

146.9 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0

8.0

18.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

2.5 3.0 3.8 2.5 1.8 0.0 4.7 6.1 2.0 1.4 2.5 2.1 5.9 2.4 5.0 3.8 1.9 0.6 4.4 2.6 2.0 5.4 1.3

125.8 0.0 103.7 4.6 3.5 0.0 6.9 0.0 0.1 0.5 0.4 5.4 0.6 4.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.9 0.1 0.5 0.2 6.7 0.0 0.0

11.9 4.3 13.1 16.4 9.3 13.9 11.2 2.0 11.8 8.3

127.6 0.0 96.5 11.5 0.1 11.1 1.6 0.0 1.1 0.1 4.3 1.3 11.9 0.1 0.0

8.1 100.0 7.7 15.5 0.6 11.0

15.4

7.5 5.7 0.1 0.5 0.1 0.0

4.9

6.4

5.3 14.5 11.6 6.5 0.2 6.6 9.5

0.2 1.0 0.3 2.7 0.0 2.3 0.2

6.6

8.6 1.2 10.4

7.6

10.3 0.4 0.0

11.7 5.9

1.1 0.0 7.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1

8.6 3.6

0.1 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

6.6

3.7 2.5

0.0 0.0 0.0

0.0

0.9

0.0

0.8

0.1

8.5

1.1 0.0 6.2 1.1 4.4 0.0 6.6 1.8 10.9 0.1 5.3 0.3 0.0 43.0 2.2 0.0 0.0 0.5 25.1 6.4 0.5 0.5 2.6 2.1 3.1 0.0 0.7 5.8 2.8 4.1 1.4 1.4 0.0 9.6 2.7 0.3 0.1 11.7 7.5 10.5 4.2 5.0 0.0 9.8 1.2 1.1 0.0 100.0 6.1 4.8 6.0 4.2 14.5 4.1 0.2 0.0 8.2 7.1 16.6 1.2 7.1 5.8 20.7 1.5 5.2 2.8 21.1 0.7 5.5 9.5 0.1 1.0

342

TABLE 55: Forestry production: nished products (continued)

Production of selected forest products sawnwood million m3 2010 Cuba Dominica Dominican Republic Ecuador El Salvador French Guiana Grenada Guatemala Guyana Haiti Honduras Jamaica Mexico Netherlands Antilles Nicaragua Panama Paraguay Peru St. Kitts & Nevis St. Lucia St. Vincent & Grenadines Suriname Trinidad & Tobago Uruguay Venezuela (Boliv. Rep. of) OCEANIA Fiji French Polynesia New Caledonia Papua New Guinea Samoa Solomon Islands Tonga Vanuatu DEVELOPED REGIONS NORTH AMERICA Bermuda Canada United States of America ASIA & OCEANIA Australia Israel Japan New Zealand EUROPE Albania Belarus Bosnia & Herzegovina Croatia European Union Iceland Macedonia, FYR Montenegro Norway Republic of Moldova Russian Federation Serbia Switzerland Ukraine % p.a. growth: 1961-2010 wood-based panels million m3 2010 % p.a. growth: 1961-2010 paper and paperboard million tonnes 2010 % p.a. growth: 1961-2010 million tonnes 2010 wood pulp % p.a. growth: 1961-2010

0.2 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.1 0.0 0.3 0.1 3.6 0.1 0.0 0.6 0.6

1.1 4.0 1.0 0.6 2.8 2.6 0.2 1.0 1.2 2.7 1.9 1.4 5.1 3.4

0.1

0.0 0.1

3.0 10.7 12.6 9.7 0.0

0.6 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.8 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.1 5.1 0.8 1.9 9.1 5.9 5.0 2.3

0.2 0.1

0.0

5.1

0.1 0.0 5.4 5.5

0.0 0.3 1.3

0.0 0.0 0.2

100.0 7.4 2.5 0.0

0.1 0.0 0.3 0.9 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 254.2 97.3 38.7 58.6 18.2 5.1 0.0 9.4 3.7 138.7 0.0 2.6 0.8 0.7 100.4 0.0 0.0 0.1 2.1 0.0 28.3 0.6 1.5 1.7

0.7 1.6 3.3 3.8 2.2 2.6 0.8 1.3 4.8 5.0

0.0 0.0 0.2 0.7 0.1 0.0

5.6 6.9 8.7 0.1 0.8 2.2 4.3 1.1 0.1 15.4

0.1 0.0 0.0

4.5

0.8 0.6 2.0 0.0 1.2 0.8 2.2 1.7 0.5 6.0

126.3 43.2 9.9 33.3 7.9 1.8 0.2 4.4 1.5 75.1 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.2

3.6 2.6 3.9 2.3 2.7 4.0 2.2 1.9 6.9 4.1 0.0

228.4 88.5 12.7 75.8 31.8 3.2 0.4 27.4 0.9 108.0 0.0 0.6 0.1 0.6

2.6 1.7 1.0 1.9 3.4 3.7 4.9 3.4 3.2 3.1

126.4 68.9 18.9 50.0 12.3 1.3 0.0 9.5 1.6 45.2 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1

1.7 1.5 1.2 1.6 2.0 2.6 1.7 3.6 1.5

1.0

60.7 0.0 0.0 0.0

4.4

94.6 0.0 0.0 0.2

3.4

36.9 0.0 0.0 0.0

1.8

0.6

0.6 0.0 10.2 0.2

2.2

1.7 0.1 7.3 0.4

1.5

2.0 0.0 5.9 0.0

0.6

0.4

1.0 1.8

3.7

1.6 0.9

2.3

0.1 0.0

1.4

343

PART 4

Denitions and sources

Parties to the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety

Share of feedstocks used in bioenergy production

P4.ENV.FAO.BIO.FD.FDSTK
Page: chart 123 (p. 319). Estimated shares of commodity globally used in nonfood sectors, including industrial renewable materials and bioenergy. Source: Statistics Division (FAOSTAT) Owner: FAO Greenhouse gas emissions by agriculture

P4.ENV.CBD.GMO.CBP
Page: map 68 (p. 314). Countries which have deposited instruments of ratication, acceptance, approval or accession with the Depositary of the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety, assumed by the Secretary General of the United Nations. Source: www.cbd.int Owner: Convention on Biological Diversity Average precipitation in depth

P4.ENV.FAO.BIO.GHG.AG
Page: table 51 (p. 331), chart 112 (p. 304). Greenhouse gas emissions by agriculture: carbon dioxide (CO2 ), methane (CH4 ) and nitrous oxide (N2 O). Emissions from agricultural transport and energy use are excluded, as these sectors are not dened as part of the agriculture sector by the current IPCC guidance. Source: Statistics Division (FAOSTAT) Owner: UNFCCC Contribution of the agricultural sector to total greenhouse gases

P4.ENV.FAO.ACQ.CLIM.APD
Page: map 63 (p. 302). Long-term average (over space and time) of annual endogenous precipitation (produced in the country) in depth. Source: Land and Water Division (AQUASTAT) Owner: FAO Area under bioenergy crops

P4.ENV.FAO.BIO.BF.HA
Page: chart 120 (p. 317). The assumed land area required to produce a given annual quantity of biofuel production. Source: Based on IEA biofuel production data Owner: FAO Cotton production

P4.ENV.FAO.BIO.GHG.AGS
Page: table 51 (p. 331). Contribution of the agricultural sector to total greenhouse gases: carbon dioxide (CO2 ), methane (CH4 ) and nitrous oxide (N2 O). Emissions from agricultural transport and energy use are excluded, as these sectors are not dened as part of the agriculture sector by the current IPCC guidance. Source: Statistics Division (FAOSTAT) Owner: UNFCCC Production of industrial roundwood

P4.ENV.FAO.BIO.CT.QP
Page: map 70 (p. 319). The production of bres from vegetal origin, excluding cotton. This denition covers all bres extracted from the stems of dicotyledonous plants, including ramie, ax, hemp, sisal, other agaves, abaca, coir, jute and kenaf. Source: Statistics Division (FAOSTAT) Owner: FAO Energy use by agriculture

P4.ENV.FAO.BIO.IR.QP
Page: table 54 (p. 340). The wood removed (volume of roundwood under bark) for production of goods and services other than energy production (woodfuel). It represents the sum of: sawlogs and veneer logs; pulpwood, round and split; and other industrial roundwood. See http://www.fao.org/forestry/ 62283/en/ for further information. Source: Forestry Department (foresSTAT) Owner: FAO Natural bre production

P4.ENV.FAO.BIO.ENGY.AG
Page: table 52 (p. 334). Energy use is indicated by the annual use of energy at farm level by fuel type (GJ/ha), and the energy used to produce mineral fertilisers for agricultural use (GJ/ha). Source: Statistics Division (FAOSTAT) Owner: IEA Energy use by agriculture as a share of total energy use

P4.ENV.FAO.BIO.NF.QP
Page: table 53 (p. 337), chart 122 (p. 318). Figures relate to the total domestic production whether inside or outside the agricultural sector, i.e. it includes non-commercial production and production from kitchen gardens. Unless otherwise indicated, production is reported at the farm level for crop and livestock products (i.e. in the case of crops, excluding harvesting losses) and in terms of live weight for sh items (i.e. the actual ex-water weight at the time of the catch). Natural bre crops include Agave Fibres Nes, Cotton lint, Fibre

P4.ENV.FAO.BIO.ENGY.AGS
Page: table 52 (p. 334). Energy use is indicated by the annual use of energy at farm level by fuel type (GJ/ha), and the energy used to produce mineral fertilisers for agricultural use (GJ/ha), expressed as a ratio of total energy use. Source: Statistics Division (FAOSTAT) Owner: IEA

344

DEFINITIONS AND SOURCES

Crops Nes, Flax bre and tow, Hemp Tow Waste, Jute, Manila Fibre (Abaca), Other Bastbres, Ramie, Seed cotton and Sisal. . Source: Statistics Division (FAOSTAT) Owner: FAO Organic agriculture area

Production of recovered paper

P4.ENV.FAO.BIO.RP.QP
Page: table 53 (p. 337). Waste and scraps of paper or paperboard that have been collected for re-use as a raw material for the manufacture of paper and paperboard. It includes: paper and paperboard that has been used for its original purpose and residues from paper and paperboard production. See http://www.fao.org/forestry/62283/en/ for further information. Source: Forestry Department (foresSTAT) Owner: FAO Production of roundwood

P4.ENV.FAO.BIO.ORGAN.HA
Page: chart 116, 117 (p. 309, 311), map 65 (p. 308). Part of the area of the "Permanent crops" exclusively dedicated to organic agriculture (or which is going through the organic conversion process) and managed by applying organic agriculture methods. It is the portion of land area managed (cultivated) or wild harvested in accordance with specic organic standards or technical regulations and that has been inspected and approved by a certication body. Data are from FiBL (Research Institute of Organic Agriculture) and International Federation of Organic Agriculture Movements (IFOAM) (2011). Data Tables from the FiBL-IFOAM Survey on Organic Agriculture Worldwide. The Organic World Website (www.organic-world.net) published by the Research Institute of Organic Agriculture (FiBL), Frick, Switzerland. Available at http://www.organicworld.net/statistics-data-tables.html. Source: Statistics Division (FAOSTAT) Owner: FAO-FiBL-IFOAM Organic agriculture (share of total area)

P4.ENV.FAO.BIO.RW.QP
Page: table 54 (p. 340). All roundwood felled or otherwise harvested and removed. It comprises all wood obtained from removals, i.e. the quantities removed from forests and from trees outside the forest, including wood recovered from natural, felling and logging losses during the period, calendar year or forest year. It includes: all wood removed with or without bark, including wood removed in its round form, or split, roughly squared or in other form (e.g. branches, roots, stumps and burls (where these are harvested) and wood that is roughly shaped or pointed. In the production statistics, it represents the sum of: wood fuel, including wood for charcoal; sawlogs and veneer logs; pulpwood, round and split; and other industrial roundwood. See http://www.fao.org/forestry/62283/en/ for further information. Source: Forestry Department (foresSTAT) Owner: FAO Production of sawnwood

P4.ENV.FAO.BIO.ORGAN.SHA
Page: table 53 (p. 337), map 66 (p. 310). Organic agriculture area expressed as share of total area. Data are from FiBL (Research Institute of Organic Agriculture) and International Federation of Organic Agriculture Movements (IFOAM) (2011). Data Tables from the FiBL-IFOAM Survey on Organic Agriculture Worldwide. The Organic World Website (www.organicworld.net) published by the Research Institute of Organic Agriculture (FiBL), Frick, Switzerland. Available at http: //www.organic-world.net/statistics-data-tables.html. Source: Statistics Division (FAOSTAT) Owner: FAO-FiBL-IFOAM Production of paper and paperboard

P4.ENV.FAO.BIO.SW.QP
Page: table 55 (p. 343). Wood that has been produced from both domestic and imported roundwood, either by sawing lengthways or by a prole-chipping process and that, with a few exceptions, exceeds 5 mm in thickness. It includes: planks, beams, joists, boards, rafters, scantlings, laths, boxboards, sleepers and "lumber", etc., in the following forms: unplaned, planed, grooved, tongued, ngerjointed, chamfered, rabbeted, V-jointed, beaded, etc. It excludes: wooden ooring. See http://www.fao.org/ forestry/62283/en/ for further information. Source: Forestry Department (foresSTAT) Owner: FAO Production of wood-based panels

P4.ENV.FAO.BIO.PP.QP
Page: table 55 (p. 343). The sum of Paper and Paperboard, Newsprint, Paper and Paperboard other than Newsprint, Printing and Writing Paper, Other Paper and Paperboard, Household and Sanitary Paper, Wrapping and Packaging Paper and Paperboard and Other Paper and Paperboard Not Elsewhere Specied. See http://www.fao.org/forestry/62283/en/ for further information. Source: Forestry Department (foresSTAT) Owner: FAO

P4.ENV.FAO.BIO.WBP.QP
Page: table 55 (p. 343). The wood-based panels category is an aggregate category. In the production and trade statistics, it represents the sum of: veneer sheets, plywood, particle board, and

345

PART 4

breboard. See http://www.fao.org/forestry/62283/en/ for further information. Source: Forestry Department (foresSTAT) Owner: FAO Production of woodfuel

P4.ENV.FAO.BIO.WF.QP
Page: table 54 (p. 340). Roundwood that will be used as fuel for purposes such as cooking, heating or power production. It includes: wood harvested from main stems, branches and other parts of trees (where these are harvested for fuel) and wood that will be used for charcoal production (e.g. in pit kilns and portable ovens). The volume of roundwood used in charcoal production, is estimated by using a factor of 6.0 to convert from the weight (MT) of charcoal produced to the solid volume (CUM) of roundwood used in production. It is reported in cubic metres underbark (i.e. excluding bark). See http://www.fao.org/forestry/62283/en/ for further information. Source: Forestry Department (foresSTAT) Owner: FAO Production of wood pulp

losses and that part of crop not harvested for any reason. Production therefore includes the quantities of the commodity sold in the market (marketed production) and the quantities consumed or used by the producers (auto-consumption). When the production data available refers to a production period falling into two successive calendar years and it is not possible to allocate the relative production to each of them, it is usual to refer production data to that year into which the bulk of the production falls. Cereals include Wheat, Rice Paddy, Barley, Maize, Popcorn, Rye, Oats, Millets, Sorghum, Buckwheat, Quinoa, Fonio, Triticale, Canary Seed, Mixed Grain and Cereals Nes. Source: Statistics Division (FAOSTAT) Owner: FAO Long-term cereal yield variability

P4.ENV.FAO.CC.CE.YLD
Page: chart 114 (p. 305). Harvested production per unit of harvested area for cereals. Cereals include Wheat, Paddy Rice, Barley, Maize, Popcorn, Rye, Oats, Millet, Sorghum, Buckwheat, Quinoa, Fonio, Triticale, Canary seed, Mixed grain and Cereals, nes. Source: Statistics Division (FAOSTAT) Owner: FAO Long-term maize yield variability

P4.ENV.FAO.BIO.WP.QP
Page: table 55 (p. 343). Wood pulp is a brous material prepared from pulpwood, wood chips, particles, residues or recovered paper by mechanical and/or chemical process for further manufacture into paper, paperboard, breboard or other cellulose products. In the production and trade statistics, it represents the sum of: mechanical wood pulp; semichemical wood pulp; chemical wood pulp; and dissolving wood pulp. See http://www.fao.org/forestry/62283/ en/ for further information. Source: Forestry Department (foresSTAT) Owner: FAO Cereal harvested area

P4.ENV.FAO.CC.MZ.YLD
Page: chart 113 (p. 305). Harvested production per unit of harvested area for maize crops. A grain with a high germ content. Includes white and yellow maize. . Source: Statistics Division (FAOSTAT) Owner: FAO Land use change: cropland

P4.ENV.FAO.ESS.LAND.CROP
Page: table 48 (p. 322), chart 100 (p. 288). Change in arable land and permanent crops, where this land category is the sum of areas under "Arable land" and "Permanent crops". Source: Statistics Division (FAOSTAT) Owner: FAO Land use change: pasture

P4.ENV.FAO.CC.CE.AH
Page: chart 114 (p. 305). Data refer to the area from which cereal crops are gathered. Area harvested, therefore, excludes the area from which, although sown or planted, there was no harvest due to damage, failure, etc. If the crop under consideration is harvested more than once during the year as a consequence of successive cropping (i.e. the same crop is sown or planted more than once in the same eld during the year), the area is counted as many times as harvested. Source: Statistics Division (FAOSTAT) Owner: FAO Cereal crop production

P4.ENV.FAO.ESS.LAND.FOST
Page: table 48 (p. 322), chart 100 (p. 288). Change in forest land, where such land spans more than 0.5 hectares with trees higher than 5 meters and a canopy cover of more than 10 percent, or trees able to reach these thresholds in situ. It does not include land that is predominantly under agricultural or urban land use. Source: Statistics Division (FAOSTAT) Owner: FAO

P4.ENV.FAO.CC.CE.QP
Page: chart 114 (p. 305). Cereal crop production data refer to the actual harvested production from the eld, excluding harvesting

346

DEFINITIONS AND SOURCES

Land use change: forestry

P4.ENV.FAO.ESS.LAND.PAST
Page: table 48 (p. 322), chart 100 (p. 288). Change in permanent meadows and pastures, where such land is used permanently (ve years or more) to grow herbaceous forage crops, either cultivated or growing wild (wild prairie or grazing land). Source: Statistics Division (FAOSTAT) Owner: FAO Carbon stock in living forest biomass

native species, where there are no clearly visible indications of human activities and the ecological processes are not signicantly disturbed. Other naturally regenerated forest is forest where there are clearly visible indications of human activities. Planted forest is forest predominantly composed of trees established through planting and/or deliberate seeding. Source: Global Forest Resources Assessment 2010 Owner: FAO

P4.ENV.FAO.FOR.LCF.CSFO
Page: table 48 (p. 322), chart 103 (p. 289). Carbon in all living biomass above the soil, including stem, stump, branches, bark, seeds, and foliage; and carbon biomass of live roots. Fine roots of less than 2 mm diameter are excluded, because these often cannot be distinguished empirically from soil organic matter or litter. Source: Global Forest Resources Assessment 2010 Owner: FAO Average annual rate of deforestation

Forest characteristics by region

P4.ENV.FAO.FOR.LCF.FOCx
Page: chart 101 (p. 288). Naturally regenerated forest is forest predominantly composed of trees established through natural regeneration. Primary forest is naturally regenerated forest of native species, where there are no clearly visible indications of human activities and the ecological processes are not signicantly disturbed. Other naturally regenerated forest is forest where there are clearly visible indications of human activities. Planted forest is forest predominantly composed of trees established through planting and/or deliberate seeding. Source: Global Forest Resources Assessment 2010 Owner: FAO

P4.ENV.FAO.FOR.LCF.DEF
Page: table 48 (p. 322), chart 99 (p. 287). Rate of net loss of forest area. Source: Global Forest Resources Assessment 2010 Owner: FAO Forest area

Primary designated functions of forest

P4.ENV.FAO.FOR.LCF.FHA
Page: table 48 (p. 322). Land spanning more than 0.5 hectares with trees higher than 5 meters and a canopy cover of more than 10 percent, or trees able to reach these thresholds in situ. It does not include land that is predominantly under agricultural or urban land use. Source: Global Forest Resources Assessment 2010 Owner: FAO Forest area as % of total land area

P4.ENV.FAO.FOR.LCF.PFF
Page: table 49 (p. 325), chart 102 (p. 289). The primary function or management objective assigned to a management unit either by legal prescription, documented decision of the landowner/manager, or evidence provided by documented studies of forest management practices and customary use. Protected areas - areas especially dedicated to the protection and maintenance of biological diversity, and of natural and associated cultural resources, and managed through legal or other effective means; Production - Forest area designated primarily for production of wood, bre, bioenergy and/or non-wood forest products; Protection of soil and water - Forest area designated primarily for protection of soil and water; Conservation of biodiversity - Forest area designated primarily for conservation of biological diversity. Includes but is not limited to areas designated for biodiversity conservation within the protected areas; Social services - Forest area designated primarily for social services; Multiple use - Forest area designated primarily for more than one purpose and where none of these alone is considered as the predominant designated function; and Other - Forest areas designated primarily for a function other than production, protection, conservation, social services or multiple use. Source: Global Forest Resources Assessment 2010 Owner: FAO

P4.ENV.FAO.FOR.LCF.FOA
Page: map 56 (p. 289). Forest area expressed as a percentage of total land area. Land area is the total area of the country excluding area under inland water bodies. Possible variations in the data may be due to updating and revisions of the country data and not necessarily to any change of area. Source: Global Forest Resources Assessment 2010 Owner: FAO Forest characteristics

P4.ENV.FAO.FOR.LCF.FOC
Page: table 49 (p. 325), chart 101 (p. 288). Naturally regenerated forest is forest predominantly composed of trees established through natural regeneration. Primary forest is naturally regenerated forest of

347

PART 4

Global distribution of risks associated with main agricultural production systems

Water withdrawal % by agriculture

P4.ENV.FAO.FOR.LCF.SOLAW
Page: map 54 (p. 284). See FAO (2011d) State of the Worlds Land and Water Resources for Food and Agriculture (SOLAW). Source: Natural Resources and Environment Department Owner: FAO Average soil quality

P4.ENV.FAO.NRL.WAT.WWAperc
Page: table 50 (p. 328). Agricultural water withdrawal as percentage of total water withdrawal. Source: Land and Water Division (AQUASTAT) Owner: FAO Share of freshwater resources withdrawn

P4.ENV.FAO.FOR.LCF.SQ
Page: table 48 (p. 322), map 55 (p. 286). Carbon content in the topsoil, average - Percentage in weight (%). Soils with organic carbon content less than 1% in weight are generally affected by soil degradation processes and erosion. On the other hand, soils with 1-10% organic carbon content have high agricultural value. . Source: Statistics Division (FAOSTAT) Owner: FAO, IIASA, ISRIC, ISSCAS, and JRC: Harmonized World Soil Database Total water withdrawal

P4.ENV.FAO.NRL.WAT.WWfr
Page: table 50 (p. 328), chart 104 (p. 291). Total freshwater withdrawn in a given year, expressed in percentage of the actual total renewable water resources (TRWR_actual). This parameter is an indication of the pressure on the renewable water resources. Source: Land and Water Division (AQUASTAT) Owner: FAO Share of freshwater resources withdrawn by agriculture

P4.ENV.FAO.NRL.WAT.WWfrag
Page: table 50 (p. 328), map 58 (p. 292). Water withdrawn for irrigation in a given year, expressed in percent of the total actual renewable water resources (TRWR_actual). This parameter is an indication of the pressure on the renewable water resources caused by irrigation. Source: Land and Water Division (AQUASTAT) Owner: FAO Industrial water withdrawal

P4.ENV.FAO.NRL.WAT.TWW
Page: table 50 (p. 328). Annual quantity of water withdrawn for agricultural, industrial and municipal purposes. It includes renewable freshwater resources as well as potential overabstraction of renewable groundwater or withdrawal of fossil groundwater and potential use of desalinated water or treated wastewater. It does not include in stream uses, which are characterized by a very low net consumption rate, such as recreation, navigation, hydropower, inland capture sheries, etc. Source: Land and Water Division (AQUASTAT) Owner: FAO Total water withdrawal per capita (m3 /inhab/yr)

P4.ENV.FAO.NRL.WAT.WWI
Page: table 50 (p. 328). Annual quantity of water withdrawn for industrial uses. It includes renewable water resources as well as potential over-abstraction of renewable groundwater or withdrawal of fossil groundwater and potential use of desalinated water or treated wastewater. This sector refers to self-supplied industries not connected to the public distribution network. The ratio between net consumption and withdrawal is estimated at less than 5%. It includes water for the cooling of thermoelectric plants, but it does not include hydropower. . Source: Land and Water Division (AQUASTAT) Owner: FAO Water withdrawal % by industry

P4.ENV.FAO.NRL.WAT.TWWpc
Page: table 50 (p. 328), map 57 (p. 290). Total annual amount of water withdrawn per capita. Source: Land and Water Division (AQUASTAT) Owner: FAO Agricultural water withdrawal

P4.ENV.FAO.NRL.WAT.WWA
Page: table 50 (p. 328). Annual quantity of water withdrawn for irrigation, livestock and aquaculture purposes. It includes renewable freshwater resources as well as over-abstraction of renewable groundwater or withdrawal of fossil groundwater, use of agricultural drainage water, (treated) wastewater and desalinated water. . Source: Land and Water Division (AQUASTAT) Owner: FAO

P4.ENV.FAO.NRL.WAT.WWIperc
Page: table 50 (p. 328). Industrial water withdrawal as percentage of total water withdrawal. Source: Land and Water Division (AQUASTAT) Owner: FAO

348

DEFINITIONS AND SOURCES

Municipal water withdrawal

CO2 concentration

P4.ENV.FAO.NRL.WAT.WWM
Page: table 50 (p. 328). Annual quantity of water withdrawn primarily for the direct use by the population. It includes renewable freshwater resources as well as potential over-abstraction of renewable groundwater or withdrawal of fossil groundwater and the potential use of desalinated water or treated wastewater. It is usually computed as the total water withdrawn by the public distribution network. It can include that part of the industries, which is connected to the municipal network. The ratio between the net consumption and the water withdrawn can vary from 5 to 15% in urban areas and from 10 to 50% in rural areas. Source: Land and Water Division (AQUASTAT) Owner: FAO Water withdrawal % by the municipal sector

P4.ENV.IPCC.CC.C02
Page: chart 111 (p. 304). Data are reported as a dry air mole fraction dened as the number of molecules of carbon dioxide divided by the number of all molecules in air, including CO2 itself, after water vapour has been removed. The mole fraction is expressed as parts per million (ppm). Source: Global Climate Change: key indicators Owner: NASA Global surface temperature (time series)

P4.ENV.IPCC.CC.GST
Page: chart 109 (p. 301). The global surface temperature is an estimate of the global mean surface air temperature. However, for changes over time, only anomalies, as departures from a climatology, are used, most commonly based on the area weighted global average of the sea surface temperature anomaly and land surface air temperature anomaly. Source: IPCC Data Distribution Centre Owner: IPCC Global surface temperature (current)

P4.ENV.FAO.NRL.WAT.WWMperc
Page: table 50 (p. 328). Municipal water withdrawal as percentage of total water withdrawal. Source: Land and Water Division (AQUASTAT) Owner: FAO Saline soils

P4.ENV.IPCC.CC.GSTG
Page: map 62 (p. 300). The global surface temperature is an estimate of the global mean surface air temperature. However, for changes over time, only anomalies, as departures from a climatology, are used, most commonly based on the area weighted global average of the sea surface temperature anomaly and land surface air temperature anomaly. Source: IPCC Data Distribution Centre Owner: IPCC Genetically modied plants

P4.ENV.FAO.POL.SAL
Page: chart 105 (p. 293). Saline soils are those which have an electrical conductivity of the saturation soil extract of more than 4 dS/m at 25o C. This value is generally used the world over although the terminology committee of the Soil Science Society of America has lowered the boundary between saline and non-saline soils to 2 dS/m in the saturation extract. Soluble salts most commonly present are the chlorides and sulphates of sodium, calcium and magnesium. Nitrates may be present in appreciable quantities only rarely. Sodium and chloride are by far the most dominant ions, particularly in highly saline soils, although calcium and magnesium are usually present in sufcient quantities to meet the nutritional needs of crops. Many saline soils contain appreciable quantities of gypsum (CaSO4, 2H2O) in the prole. Soluble carbonates are always absent. The pH value of the saturated soil paste is always less than 8.2 and more often near neutrality. Source: Natural Resources and Environment Department Owner: FAO Biofuel production

P4.ENV.ISAAA.BIO.GM.CROPS
Page: table 119 (p. 315). Genetically modied (GM) crops that have been approved as shown in the ISAAA Approval Database. According to the ISAAA, they include species for commercialization and planting and/or for import for food and feed use. Entries in the database are sourced principally from Biotechnology Clearing House of approving countries and from country regulatory websites. See http://www.isaaa.org/ for further information. In the absence of verication, FAO does not necessarily endorse these data. Source: Clive James, Global Status of Commercialized Biotech and GM Crops: 2010 Owner: International Service for the Acquisition of Agribiotech Applications (ISAAA) Area under GM crops (time series of economic regions)

P4.ENV.IEA.BIO.BF.QP
Page: table 53 (p. 337), chart 121 (p. 318), map 69 (p. 316). Sum of ethanol and biodiesel production, reported in kilotonne of oil equivalent. Source: Energy Balances of OECD Countries and Energy Balances of Non-OECD Countries, 2011 editions Owner: IEA

P4.ENV.ISAAA.BIO.GM.HA
Page: map 67 (p. 312). Data refer to the area from which genetically modied (GM) crops are gathered. See http://www.isaaa.org/ for

349

PART 4

further information. In the absence of verication, FAO does not necessarily endorse these data. Source: Clive James, Global Status of Commercialized Biotech and GM Crops: 2010 Owner: International Service for the Acquisition of Agribiotech Applications (ISAAA) Area under GM crops (current)

Mammal species, threatened

P4.ENV.WBK.WDI.BIOD.MST
Page: chart 115 (p. 307). Mammal species are mammals excluding whales and porpoises. Threatened species are the number of species classied by the IUCN as endangered, vulnerable, rare, indeterminate, out of danger, or insufciently known. Source: World Bank (WDI) Owner: UNEP, World Conservation Monitoring Centre and International Union for Conservation of Nature Plant species (higher), threatened

P4.ENV.ISAAA.BIO.GM.RHA
Page: chart 118 (p. 313). Data refer to the regions from which genetically modied (GM) crops are gathered. See http://www.isaaa.org/ for further information. In the absence of verication, FAO does not necessarily endorse these data. Source: Clive James, Global Status of Commercialized Biotech and GM Crops: 2010 Owner: International Service for the Acquisition of Agribiotech Applications (ISAAA) Sahel rainfall anomalies

P4.ENV.WBK.WDI.BIOD.PST
Page: chart 115 (p. 307). Higher plants are native vascular plant species. Threatened species are the number of species classied by the IUCN as endangered, vulnerable, rare, indeterminate, out of danger, or insufciently known. Source: World Bank (WDI) Owner: UNEP, World Conservation Monitoring Centre and International Union for Conservation of Nature Nationally protected areas (% of total area)

P4.ENV.JISAO.CLIM.SAHEL
Page: chart 110 (p. 303). The Sahel is the ecoclimatic and biogeographic zone of transition between the Sahara desert in the North and the Sudanian Savannas in the south, covering from (west to east) Senegal, southern Mauritania, Mali, Burkina Faso, southern Algeria, Niger, northern Nigeria, Chad, Sudan (including Darfur and the southern part of Sudan), northern Ethiopia and Eritrea. The Sahel rainy season is cantered on June through October, and the means are taken for those months. Documentation of the Sahel precipitation climatology, and additional analyses of the variability are provided on http://jisao.washington.edu/ data/sahel/. Source: JISAO (http://jisao.washington.edu/data/sahel/) data

P4.ENV.WBK.WDI.CON.PROT
Page: table 53 (p. 337), map 64 (p. 306). Nationally protected areas are totally or partially protected areas of at least 1000 hectares that are designated as scientic reserves with limited public access, national parks, natural monuments, nature reserves or wildlife sanctuaries, protected landscapes, and areas managed mainly for sustainable use. Marine areas, unclassied areas, and littoral (intertidal) areas are not included. The data also do not include sites protected under local or provincial law. Source: World Bank (WDI) Owner: UNEP, World Conservation Monitoring Centre and International Union for Conservation of Nature Agricultural methane emissions (% of total)

Owner: Joint Institute for the Study of the Atmosphere and Ocean (JISAO) Land with rainfed crop potential

P4.ENV.WBK.WDI.POL.AMTHE
Page: table 51 (p. 331). Agricultural methane emissions are emissions from animals, animal waste, rice production, agricultural waste burning (nonenergy, on-site), and savannah burning. Source: World Bank (WDI) Owner: IEA Agricultural nitrous oxide emissions (% of total)

P4.ENV.LND.SUIT
Page: chart 98 (p. 285). Calculations based on Bruinsma (2011). Source: Agricultural Development Economics Division Owner: FAO Fish species, threatened

P4.ENV.WBK.WDI.BIOD.FST
Page: chart 115 (p. 307). Fish species are based on Froese, R. and Pauly, D. (eds). 2008. Threatened species are the number of species classied by the IUCN as endangered, vulnerable, rare, indeterminate, out of danger, or insufciently known. Source: World Bank (WDI) Owner: FishBase database, www.shbase.org

P4.ENV.WBK.WDI.POL.ANOE
Page: table 51 (p. 331). Agricultural nitrous oxide emissions are emissions produced through fertilizer use (synthetic and animal manure), animal waste management, agricultural waste burning (nonenergy, on-site), and savannah burning. Source: World Bank (WDI) Owner: IEA

350

DEFINITIONS AND SOURCES

Methane emissions (kt of CO2 equivalent)

P4.ENV.WBK.WDI.POL.MTHE
Page: table 51 (p. 331), chart 106 (p. 295). Methane emissions are those stemming from human activities such as agriculture and from industrial methane production. Source: World Bank (WDI) Owner: IEA Agricultural methane emissions, total

Water pollution, food industry (% of total BOD emissions)

P4.ENV.WBK.WDI.POL.WATF
Page: table 52 (p. 334), map 61 (p. 298). Industry shares of emissions of organic water pollutants refer to emissions from manufacturing activities as dened by two-digit divisions of the International Standard Industrial Classication (ISIC), revision 2: food and beverages (31). Emissions of organic water pollutants are measured by biochemical oxygen demand, which refers to the amount of oxygen that bacteria in water will consume in breaking down waste. This is a standard watertreatment test for the presence of organic pollutants. Source: World Bank (WDI) Owner: World Bank Water pollution, paper and pulp industry (% of total BOD emissions)

P4.ENV.WBK.WDI.POL.MTHEA
Page: chart 106 (p. 295), map 59 (p. 294). Agricultural methane emissions are emissions from animals, animal waste, rice production, agricultural waste burning (nonenergy, on-site), and savannah burning. Source: World Bank (WDI) Owner: IEA Nitrous oxide emissions (thousand metric tons of CO2 equivalent)

P4.ENV.WBK.WDI.POL.WATO
Page: table 52 (p. 334). Industry shares of emissions of organic water pollutants refer to emissions from manufacturing activities as dened by two-digit divisions of the International Standard Industrial Classication (ISIC), revision 2: paper and pulp (34). Emissions of organic water pollutants are measured by biochemical oxygen demand, which refers to the amount of oxygen that bacteria in water will consume in breaking down waste. This is a standard watertreatment test for the presence of organic pollutants. Source: World Bank (WDI) Owner: World Bank

P4.ENV.WBK.WDI.POL.NOE
Page: table 51 (p. 331), chart 107 (p. 297). Nitrous oxide emissions are emissions from agricultural biomass burning, industrial activities, and livestock management. Source: World Bank (WDI) Owner: IEA Agricultural nitrous oxide emissions, total

P4.ENV.WBK.WDI.POL.NOEA
Page: chart 107 (p. 297), map 60 (p. 296). Agricultural nitrous oxide emissions are emissions produced through fertilizer use (synthetic and animal manure), animal waste management, agricultural waste burning (nonenergy, on-site), and savannah burning. Source: World Bank (WDI) Owner: IEA Pollution by industry in total BOD emissions

Water pollution, textile industry (% of total BOD emissions)

P4.ENV.WBK.WDI.POL.WATT
Page: table 52 (p. 334). Industry shares of emissions of organic water pollutants refer to emissions from manufacturing activities as dened by two-digit divisions of the International Standard Industrial Classication (ISIC), revision 2: textiles (32). Emissions of organic water pollutants are measured by biochemical oxygen demand, which refers to the amount of oxygen that bacteria in water will consume in breaking down waste. This is a standard water-treatment test for the presence of organic pollutants. Source: World Bank (WDI) Owner: World Bank Water pollution, wood industry (% of total BOD emissions)

P4.ENV.WBK.WDI.POL.WAT
Page: chart 108 (p. 299). Industry shares of emissions of organic water pollutants refer to emissions from manufacturing activities as dened by two-digit divisions of the International Standard Industrial Classication (ISIC), revision 2: food and beverages (31). textiles (32). wood (33). paper and pulp (34). Emissions of organic water pollutants are measured by biochemical oxygen demand, which refers to the amount of oxygen that bacteria in water will consume in breaking down waste. This is a standard water-treatment test for the presence of organic pollutants. Source: World Bank (WDI) Owner: World Bank

P4.ENV.WBK.WDI.POL.WATW
Page: table 52 (p. 334). Industry shares of emissions of organic water pollutants refer to emissions from manufacturing activities as dened by two-digit divisions of the International Standard Industrial Classication (ISIC), revision 2: wood (33). Emissions of organic water pollutants are measured by biochemical oxygen demand, which refers to the amount

351

PART 4

of oxygen that bacteria in water will consume in breaking down waste. This is a standard water-treatment test for the presence of organic pollutants. Source: World Bank (WDI) Owner: World Bank Urban air pollution

P4.ENV.WHO.GHO.POL.UAP
Page: table 52 (p. 334). The mean annual concentration of ne suspended particles of less than 10 microns in diameters is a common measure of air pollution. The mean is a populationweighted average for urban population in cities above 100 000 inhabitants of a country. Source: Global Health Observatory Owner: WHO

352

PART

5
2011 ha kg US$ kt kcal

Metadata

TIME PERIODS
calendar year closest to year 2011 average for the three years centred on 2010

2011* 2009/11

1991-2011 annual period from 1991 to 2011

SYMBOLS AND UNITS

hectare kilogram United States dollar metric tonne (1000 kg) kilotonne (1000 tonnes) thousand million thousand billion

tonne

billion trillion

quadrillion thousand trillion kilocalories

mm mg km3 m3 km2 m2 mt Gt LCU PM10 ppm

millimetre milligram cubic kilometre cubic metre square kilometre square metre metric tonne gigatonne (109 metric tonnes) local currency unit particles less than 10 m in diameter parts per million

TABLE 56: List of countries

Developed regions North America Bermuda Canada United States of America Greenland Saint Pierre and Miquelon Asia and Oceania Australia Israel Japan New Zealand Albania Andorra Austria Belarus Belgium Bosnia and Herzegovina Bulgaria Croatia Czech Republic Denmark Estonia Faroe Islands Finland France Germany Gibraltar Greece Holy See Hungary Iceland Ireland Italy Latvia Liechtenstein Lithuania Luxembourg Malta Monaco Montenegro Netherlands Norway Poland Portugal Republic of Moldova Romania Russian Federation San Marino Serbia3 Slovakia Slovenia Spain Sweden Switzerland The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia Ukraine United Kingdom Europe European Union1 Austria Belgium Bulgaria Cyprus2 Czech Republic Denmark Estonia Finland France Germany Greece Hungary Ireland Italy Latvia Lithuania Luxembourg Malta Netherlands Poland Portugal Romania Slovakia Slovenia Spain Sweden United Kingdom

1 2

The European Union is treated as a group (EU27) and forms the geograpghical aggregate for Europe excluding Cyprus. Situated in West Asia, excluded from the Europe aggregate 3 Kosovo is not considered to be a part of Serbia in World Bank sourced data.

355

Developing regions Africa North Africa Algeria Egypt Libyan Arab Jamahiriya Morocco Tunisia Western Sahara Sub-Saharan Africa Angola Benin Botswana Burkina Faso Burundi Cameroon Cape Verde Central African Republic Chad Comoros Congo Cte dIvoire Democratic Republic of the Congo Djibouti Equatorial Guinea Eritrea Ethiopia Gabon Gambia Ghana Guinea Guinea-Bissau Kenya Lesotho Liberia Madagascar Malawi Mali Mauritania Mauritius Mayotte Mozambique Namibia Niger Nigeria Runion Rwanda Saint Helena Sao Tome Principe Senegal Seychelles Sierra Leone Somalia Sudan6 South Africa Swaziland United Republic of Tanzania Togo Uganda Zambia Zimbabwe and Central Asia Kazakhstan Kyrgyzstan Tajikistan Turkmenistan Uzbekistan East Asia Brunei Darussalam Cambodia China4 Indonesia Democratic Peoples Republic of Korea Republic of Korea Lao Peoples Democratic Republic Malaysia Mongolia Myanmar Philippines Singapore Thailand Timor-Leste Viet Nam Asia South Asia Afghanistan Bangladesh Bhutan India Iran (Islamic Republic of) Maldives Nepal Pakistan Sri Lanka West Asia Armenia Azerbaijan Bahrain Cyprus Gaza Strip (Palestine) Georgia Iraq Jordan Kuwait Lebanon Occupied Palestinian Territory5 Saudi Arabia Syrian Arab Republic Turkey United Arab Emirates West Bank Yemen Oman Qatar Latin America and Caribbean Antigua and Barbuda Argentina Bahamas Barbados Belize Bolivia (Plurinational State of) Brazil Chile Colombia Costa Rica Cuba Dominica Dominican Republic Ecuador El Salvador French Guiana Grenada Guatemala Guyana Haiti Honduras Jamaica Mexico Netherlands Antilles Nicaragua Panama Paraguay Peru Saint Kitts and Nevis Saint Lucia Saint Vincent Grenadines Suriname Trinidad and Tobago Uruguay Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of) Anguilla Aruba British Virgin Islands Cayman Islands Falkland Islands (Malvinas) Guadeloupe Martinique Montserrat Puerto Rico Turks and Caicos Islands United States Virgin Islands and the Fiji French Polynesia Kiribati New Caledonia Papua New Guinea Samoa Solomon Islands Tonga Vanuatu American Samoa Cook Islands Guam Marshall Islands Micronesia (Federated States of) Nauru Niue Northern Islands Palau Tokelau Tuvalu Wallis and Futuna Islands Mariana Oceania

includes China, mainland; China, Hong Kong SAR; China, Macao SAR; and China, Taiwan Province of. The composition of China in World Bank sourced data is: China, mainland; and China, Taiwan Province of. 5 Excludes West Bank and Gaza Strip. 6 Includes South Sudan owning to a lack of data availability.

356

CONCEPTS AND METHODS

Concepts and methods

Agricultural production indices The FAO indices of agricultural production show the relative level of the aggregate volume of agricultural production for each year in comparison with the base period 1999-2001. They are based on the sum of priceweighted quantities of different agricultural commodities produced after deductions of quantities used as seed and feed weighted in a similar manner. The resulting aggregate represents, therefore, disposable production for any use except as seed and feed. All the indices at the country, regional and world levels are calculated by the Laspeyres formula. Production quantities of each commodity are weighted by 1999-2001 average international commodity prices and summed for each year. To obtain the index, the aggregate for a given year is divided by the average aggregate for the base period 19992001. Since the FAO indices are based on the concept of agriculture as a single enterprise, amounts of seed and feed are subtracted from the production data to avoid double counting , once in the production data and once with the crops or livestock produced from them. Deductions for seed (in the case of eggs, for hatching) and for livestock and poultry feed apply to both domestically produced and imported commodities. They cover only primary agricultural products destined to animal feed (e.g. maize, potatoes, milk, etc.). Processed and semiprocessed feed items such as bran, oilcakes, meals and molasses have been completely excluded from the calculations at all stages. It should be noted that when calculating indices of agricultural, food and non-food production, all intermediate primary inputs of agricultural origin are deducted. However, for indices of any other commodity group, only inputs originating from within the same group are deducted; thus, only seed is removed from the group "crops" and from all crop subgroups, such as cereals, oil crops, etc.; and both feed and seed originating from within the livestock sector (e.g. milk feed, hatching eggs) are removed from the group "livestock products". For the main two livestock subgroups, namely, meat and milk, only feed originating from the respective subgroup is removed. Indices which take into account deductions for feed and seed are referred to as net. Indices calculated without any deductions for feed and seed are referred to as gross. The "international commodity prices" are used in order to avoid the use of exchange rates for obtaining continental and world aggregates, and also to improve and facilitate international comparative analysis of productivity at the national level. These" international prices", expressed in so-called "international dollars", are derived using a Geary-Khamis formula for the agricultural sector. This method assigns a single "price" to each commodity. For example, one metric ton of wheat has the same price regardless of the country where it was produced. The currency unit in which the prices are expressed has no inuence on the indices published. The commodities covered in the computation of indices of agricultural

production are all crops and livestock products originating in each country. Practically all products are covered, with the main exception of fodder crops. The category of food production includes commodities that are considered edible and that contain nutrients. Accordingly, coffee and tea are excluded along with inedible commodities because, although edible, they have practically no nutritive value. Prices applied to meat in reality represent the prices of animals for slaughtering in terms of live weight. For example, if the price of one metric ton (1000 kg) of pigs alive is 825 dollars and the ratio meat to live weight is 75 to 100, the price applicable to 750 kg of pig meat will be 825 dollars, corresponding to 1100 dollars per metric tons. The indices are calculated from production data presented on a calendar year basis. The FAO indices may differ from those produced by the countries themselves because of differences in concepts of production, coverage, weights, time reference of data and methods of calculation. Area harvested Data refer to the area from which a crop is gathered. Area harvested, therefore, excludes the area from which, although sown or planted, there was no harvest due to damage, failure, etc. It is usually net for temporary crops and some times gross for permanent crops. Net area differs from gross area insofar as the latter includes uncultivated patches, footpaths, ditches, headlands, shoulders, shelterbelts, etc. If the crop under consideration is harvested more than once during the year as a consequence of successive cropping (i.e. the same crop is sown or planted more than once in the same eld during the year), the area is counted as many times as harvested. On the contrary, area harvested will be recorded only once in the case of successive gathering of the crop during the year from the same standing crops. With regard to mixed and associated crops, the area sown relating to each crop should be reported separately. When the mixture refers to particular crops, generally grains, it is recommended to treat the mixture as if it were a single crop; therefore, area sown is recorded only for the crop reported. Capital stock in agriculture and investment in agriculture The estimate of capital stock in agriculture refers to a value that is attached to the total physical capital capacity available for repeated use in the production of other goods, in existence at specic point in time in the economy of agriculture sector. The estimates of investment in agriculture have indirectly been derived by the FAO Statistics Division using physical data on livestock, tractors, irrigated land and land under permanent crops etc., and the average prices for the year 1995. These data enabled the derivation of the capital stock in agriculture which is the gross, and the annual change in the latter is taken to reect investment in agriculture. CIF Cost-Insurance-Freight. CIF-trade values include the transaction value of the goods, the value of services performed to deliver goods to the border of the exporting

357

PART 5

country and the value of the services performed to deliver the goods from the border of the exporting country to the border of the importing country. Import values are mostly reported as CIF. Crop area Crop area is a surface of land on which a crop is grown. In general, the area measured for cadastral purposes includes, in addition to the area cultivated, headlands, ditches and other non-cultivated areas. Such an area can be called gross area as against the net area which includes only the portion of the gross area actually cultivated. For various reasons, e.g. natural calamities or economic considerations, certain areas planted or sown with a given crop are not harvested or are harvested before the crop reaches maturity. Hence the need for the concept of area to be sub-divided into sown or planted area and harvested area. Sown area data are necessary to estimate quantities used for seeding purposes; harvested area, to provide reliable and accurate yield and production data. A peculiarity of permanent crops is that number of trees or plants is reported in addition to or, instead of, the area planted. This is particularly so as regards plants growing outside of compact plantations, which are either interplanted with other crops or are scattered. Both area and number of trees are also divided into productive or bearing and non-productive or non-bearing areas or trees. In most cases, non-bearing refers to young plants that are not yet bearing. Crop production Crop production data refer to the actual harvested production from the eld or orchard and gardens, excluding harvesting and threshing losses and that part of crop not harvested for any reason. Production therefore includes the quantities of the commodity sold in the market (marketed production) and the quantities consumed or used by the producers (auto-consumption). When the production data available refers to a production period falling into two successive calendar years and it is not possible to allocate the relative production to each of them, it is usual to refer production data to that year into which the bulk of the production falls. Crop production data are recorded in tonnes (t). In many countries, crop production data are obtained as a function of the estimated yield and the total area. If such a compilation method of production statistics is enforced by the country, it must be ensured that the total area does not refer to sown or planted area, which would give then the "biological production", but to the actually harvested area during the year. Crop yield Harvested production per unit of harvested area for crop products. In most of the cases yield data are not recorded but obtained by dividing the production data by the data on area harvested. Data on yields of permanent crops are not as reliable as those for temporary crops either because most of the area information may correspond to

planted area, as for grapes, or because of the scarcity and unreliability of the area gures reported by the countries, as for example for cocoa and coffee. Domestic supply Production + imports - exports + changes in stocks (decrease or increase) = supply for domestic utilization. There are various ways of dening supply and, in fact, various concepts are in use. The elements involved are production, imports, exports and changes in stocks (increase or decrease). There is no doubt that production, imports and stock changes (either decrease or increase in stocks) are genuine supply elements. Feed Data refer to the quantity of the commodity in question available for feeding to the livestock and poultry during the reference period, whether domestically produced or imported. FOB Free-On-Board. FOB-trade values include the transaction value of the goods and the value of services performed to deliver goods to the border of the exporting country. Export values are mostly reported as FOB. Food Data refer to the total amount of the commodity available as human food during the reference period. Data include the commodity in question, as well as any commodity derived there from as a result of further processing. Food from maize, for example, comprises the amount of maize, maize meal and any other products derived there from available for human consumption. Food from milk relates to the amounts of milk as such, as well as the fresh milk equivalent of dairy products. Food Balance Sheets Food Balance Sheets (FBS) are compiled every year by FAO, mainly with country-level data on the production and trade of food commodities. Using these data and the available information on seed rates, waste coefcients, stock changes and types of utilization (feed, food, processing and other utilization), a supply/utilization account is prepared for each commodity in weight terms. The food component of the commodity account, which is usually derived as a balancing item, refers to the total amount of the commodity available for human consumption during the year. Besides commodity-by-commodity information, the FAO FBS also provide total food availability estimates by aggregating the food component of all commodities including shery products. From these values and the available population estimates, the per person dietary energy and protein and fat supplies are derived and expressed on a daily basis. In the FBS production data refer only to primary products while data for

358

CONCEPTS AND METHODS

all other elements also include processed products derived there from, expressed in primary commodity equivalent. Food insecurity A situation that exists when people lack secure access to sufcient amounts of safe and nutritious food for normal growth and development and an active and healthy life. It may be caused by the unavailability of food, insufcient purchasing power, inappropriate distribution, or inadequate use of food at the household level. Food insecurity, poor conditions of health and sanitation, and inappropriate care and feeding practices are the major causes of poor nutritional status. Food insecurity may be chronic, seasonal or transitory. Food production For primary commodities, production relates to the total domestic production whether inside or outside the agricultural sector, i.e. including non-commercial production and production in kitchen gardens. Unless otherwise indicated, production is reported at the farm level for primary crops (i.e. excluding harvesting losses for crops) and livestock items and in terms of live weight (i.e. the actual ex-water weight of the catch at the time of capture) for primary sh items. Production of processed commodities relates to the total output of the commodity at the manufacture level (i.e. it comprises output from domestic and imported raw materials of originating products). Reporting units are chosen accordingly, e.g. cereals are reported in terms of grains and paddy rice. As a general rule, all data on meat are expressed in terms of carcass weight. Usually the data on production relate to that which takes place during the reference period. However, production of certain crops may relate to the harvest of the year preceding the utilization period if harvesting takes place late in the year. In such instances, the production of a given year largely moves into consumption in the subsequent year. In the Food Balance Sheets a distinction is made between "output" and "input". The production of primary as well as of derived products is reported under "output". For derived commodities, the amounts of the originating commodity that are required for obtaining the output of the derived product are indicated under "input", and are expressed in terms of the originating commodity. The various factors used, i.e. milling rates, extraction rates, conversion or processing factors, carcass weights, milk yield, egg weights etc., should indicate the average national rate at which these commodities are generally converted. Food security A situation that exists when all people, at all times, have physical, social and economic access to sufcient, safe and nutritious food that meets their dietary needs and food preferences for an active and healthy life.

Growth rates Growth rates are calculated by the geometric formula:

100 ((

t/

0)

(1/ (t0))

1)

Harvested production Excludes harvesting losses and production not harvested for various reasons. Harvested production is one of the three main concepts of production (and yield) used by countries when reporting to FAO. Import dependency ratio Import dependency ratio (IDR) is dened as: IDR = imports x 100/(production + imports - exports). The complement of this ratio to 100 would represent that part of the domestic food supply that has been produced in the country itself. However, there is a caveat to be kept in mind: these ratios hold only if imports are mainly used for domestic utilization and are not re-exported. Kilocalorie (kcal) Unit of measurement of dietary energy. It should be noted that in accordance to International System of Units, energy is measured in joules, J, but the customary usage of thermochemical energy units of kilocalories (kcal) is mostly used. 1 kcal = 4.184 kJ. Land use In agricultural statistics refers to land classication according to the agricultural holders concepts of use, i.e. arable land, pastures etc. Livestock Animals such as cattle and sheep which are kept on the holding or otherwise for agricultural production. Minimum dietary energy requirement In a specied age and sex group, the amount of dietary energy per person is that considered adequate to meet the energy needs for minimum acceptable weight for attained-height maintaining a healthy life and carrying out a light physical activity. In the entire population, the minimum energy requirement is the weighted average of the minimum energy requirements of the different age and sex groups in the population. Poverty According to the United Nations, poverty is dened as a lack of income and productive resources to ensure sustainable livelihoods; hunger and malnutrition; ill health; limited or lack of access to education and other basic services; increased morbidity and mortality from illness; homelessness and inadequate housing; unsafe environments and social discrimination and exclusion. It is also characterised by lack of participation in decision-making

359

PART 5

and in civil, social and cultural life. It occurs in all countries: as mass poverty in many developing countries, pockets of poverty amid wealth in developed countries, loss of livelihoods as a result of economic recession, sudden poverty as a result of disaster or conict, the poverty of low-wage workers, and the utter destitution of people who fall outside family support systems, social institutions and safety nets. According to the World Bank, poverty is a pronounced deprivation in well-being, and comprises many dimensions. It includes low incomes and the inability to acquire the basic goods and services necessary for survival with dignity. Poverty also encompasses low levels of health and education, poor access to clean water and sanitation, inadequate physical security, lack of voice, and insufcient capacity and opportunity to better ones life. Prevalence of overnourished in total population Proportion of the population in a condition of overnourishment. Prevalence of undernourishment Proportion of the population in a condition of undernourishment. Undernourishment refers to the condition of people whose dietary energy consumption is continuously below a minimum dietary energy requirement for maintaining a healthy life and carrying out a light physical activity. Primary crops Primary crops are those which come directly from the land and without having undergone any real processing, apart from cleaning. They maintain all the biological qualities they had when they were still on the plants. Certain primary crops can be aggregated, with their actual weight, into totals offering meaningful gures on area, yield, production and utilization; for example, cereals, roots and tubers, nuts, vegetables and fruits. Other primary crops can be aggregated only in terms of one or the other component common to all of them. For example, primary crops of the oil-bearing group can be aggregated in terms of oil or oil cake equivalent. Primary crops are divided into temporary and permanent crops. Temporary crops are those which are both sown and harvested during the same agricultural year, sometimes more than once; permanent crops are sown or planted once and not replanted after each annual harvest. Production Figures relate to the total domestic production whether inside or outside the agricultural sector, i.e. it includes non-commercial production and production from kitchen gardens. Unless otherwise indicated, production is reported at the farm level for crop and livestock products (i.e. in the case of crops, excluding harvesting losses) and in terms of live weight for sh items (i.e. the actual ex-water weight at the time of the catch). All data

shown relate to total meat production from both commercial and farm slaughter. Data are expressed in terms of dressed carcass weight, excluding offal and slaughter fats. Production of beef and buffalo meat includes veal; mutton and goat meat includes meat from lambs and kids; pig meat includes bacon and ham in fresh equivalent. Poultry meat includes meat from all domestic birds and refers, wherever possible, to ready-to-cook weight. Production - Livestock primary Livestock primary products include products from live and slaughtered animals. Products from slaughtered animals include meat, offals, raw fats, fresh hides and skins. Products from live animals include milk, eggs, honey, beeswax and bres of animal origin. All data shown relate to total meat production from both commercial and farm slaughter. Data are given in terms of dressed carcass weight, i.e. excluding offals and slaughter fats. Production of beef and buffalo meat includes veal; mutton and goat meat includes meat from lambs and kids, respectively; pig meat includes bacon and ham in fresh equivalent. Poultry meat includes meat from all domestic birds and refers, wherever possible, to ready-to-cook weight. Cow milk production relates to total production of whole fresh milk, excluding the milk sucked by young animals but including amounts fed to livestock. The concept of production of buffalo, sheep and goat milk is the same as for cow milk; however, the coverage is probably less adequate. Egg production covers all domestic birds which have contributed to egg production during the year, wherever they lay and the corresponding total production, including eggs intended to be used for hatching but excluding waste on farms. Seed Data include the amounts of the commodity in question set aside for sowing or planting (or generally for reproduction purposes, e.g. sugar cane planted, potatoes for seed, eggs for hatching and sh for bait, whether domestically produced or imported) during the reference period. Account is taken of double or successive sowing or planting whenever it occurs. The data of seed include also, when it is the case, the quantities necessary for sowing or planting the area relating to crops harvested green for fodder or for food.(e.g. green peas, green beans, maize for forage) Data for seed element are stored in tonnes (t). Whenever ofcial data were not available, seed gures have been estimated either as a percentage of supply (e.g. eggs for hatching) or by multiplying a seed rate with the area under the crop of the subsequent year. Self-sufciency ratio The self-sufciency ratio (SSR) is dened as: SSR = production x 100/(production + imports - exports). The SSR can be calculated for individual commodities, groups of commodities of similar nutritional values and, after appropriate conversion of the commodity equations, also for the aggregate of all commodities. In the context of

360

CONCEPTS AND METHODS

food security, the SSR is often taken to indicate the extent to which a country relies on its own production resources, i.e. the higher the ratio the greater the selfsufciency. While the SSR can be the appropriate tool when assessing the supply situation for individual commodities, a certain degree of caution should be observed when looking at the overall food situation. In the case, however, where a large part of a countrys production of one commodity, e.g. other cereals, is exported, the SSR may be very high but the country may still have to rely heavily on imports of food commodities to feed the population. The self-sufciency rate (as dened above) cannot be the complement to 100 of the import dependency rate, or vice-versa. Shock An unexpected or unpredictable event that affects livelihoods Undernourishment Undernourishment refers to the condition of people whose dietary energy consumption is continuously below a minimum dietary energy requirement for maintaining a healthy life and carrying out a light physical activity. The number of undernourished people refers to those in this condition. Variability The extent to which data in a series or a statistical distribution diverge from the average value Volatility Volatility represents the directionless variability of an economic variable, i.e. the dispersion of that variable within a given time horizon. For example, high (low) price volatility is described by situations when prices uctuate signicantly (little) over a short time period in either direction. The following formula is used to measure volatility
n

hot humid climate, difcult transportation and inadequate storage or processing facilities. This applies to the more perishable foodstuffs, and especially to those which have to be transported or stored for a long time in a tropical climate. Waste is often estimated as a xed percentage of availability, the latter being dened as production plus imports plus stock withdrawals.

=
=1

[rt ]2 / n 1

where is the standard deviation, rt are the logarithmic changes Waste Amount of the commodity in question lost through wastage (waste) during the year at all stages between the level at which production is recorded and the household, i.e. storage and transportation. Losses occurring before and during harvest are excluded. Waste from both edible and inedible parts of the commodity occurring in the household is also excluded. Quantities lost during the transformation of primary commodities into processed products are taken into account in the assessment of respective extraction/conversion rates. Distribution wastes tend to be considerable in countries with

361

Bibliography
Bruinsma, J. (ed.) 2003. World agriculture towards 2015/30. An FAO Perspective. FAO and Earthscan, London. 2011. The resources outlook: by how much do land, water and crop yields need to increase by 2050?, in Looking Ahead in World Food and Agriculture: perspectives to 2050, ed. by Conforti, P. FAO. FAO 2009. State of worlds forests 2009: Society, forests and forestry: adapting for the future, FAO, Rome. 2010a. The state of food and agriculture 2009: Livestock in the balance, FAO, Rome. 2010b. The state of food insecurity in the world 2010: Addressing food insecurity in protracted crises, FAO, Rome. 2010c. The state of world sheries and agriculture 2010, FAO, Rome. 2011a. Climate change, water and food security, FAO, Rome. 2011b. The state of food and agriculture 2010-2011: Women in agriculture, closing the gender gap for development, FAO, Rome. 2011c. The state of food insecurity in the world 2011: How does international price volatility affect domestic economies and food security?, FAO, Rome. 2011d. The state of the worlds land and water resources for food and agriculture: Managing systems at risk, FAO, Rome. 2011e. State of worlds forests 2011: Changing pathways, changing lives, forests as multiple pathways to sustainable development, FAO, Rome. IFAD 2011. Rural poverty report 2011. New realities, new challenges: new opportunities for tomorrows generation, International Fund for Agricultural Development, Rome. ILO 2011. Global employment trends 2011: the challenge of a jobs recovery, International Labour Organisation, Geneva. IMF 2011. World economic outlook. Tensions from the two-speed recovery: Unemployment, commodities, and capital ows, International Monetary Fund, Washington. ODonovan, D. 2008. The Atlas of Health: Mapping the Challenges and Causes of Disease. Earthscan. Prakash, A. (ed.) 2011a. Safeguarding food security in volatile global markets. FAO, Rome. 2011b. Why volatility matters, in Safeguarding food security in volatile global markets, ed. by Prakash, A. FAO, Rome. Schmidhuber, J. & Bruinsma, J. 2011. Investing towards a world free of hunger, lowering vulnerability and enhancing resilience, in Safeguarding food security in volatile global markets, ed. by Prakash, A. FAO, Rome. Schmidhuber, J., Bruinsma, J. & Boedeker, G. 2011. Capital requirements for agriculture in developing countries to 2050, in Looking Ahead in World Food and Agriculture: perspectives to 2050, ed. by Conforti, P. FAO. UNDP 2010. Human development report 2010. The real wealth of nations: Pathways to human development, United Nations Development Programme, New York. von Cramon-Taubadel, S., Gustavo, A., de Haen, H. & Nivyevskyi, O. 2011. Investment in developing countriess food and agriculture: assessing agricultural capital stocks and their impact on productivity, in Looking Ahead in World Food and Agriculture: perspectives to 2050, ed. by Conforti, P. FAO. World Bank 2011. Global economic prospects: navigating strong currents, The World Bank, Washington.

362

0 90 12 12 45 45 67 67 89 90 01 12 23 34 45 78890890123123345345567678789890891012123234 67567890890012012234345456567567789890901012 34567567789789901012123234234456567678789890 34234456456678789789901901123234345456567678 01123123345456456678678890901012123234345345 90890912123123345345567678789890891012012234 67678890890012012234345456567567789789901012 45567567789789901012123234234456456678789890 34234456456678789789901901123123345456567678 01123123345456456678678890890012123234345345 90890912123123345345567567789890891012012456 8 7 8 0 0 2 2 4 4 6 7 7 9 9 3 3 56567789789901901123123345456456678678012012 34456456678678890890912123123345345789789012 23123345345567567678890890012012456456789345 90012012234234345567567789789123123456012123 89789891901012234234456456890890123789890891 56567678789901901123123567567890456567567789 34345456678678890890234234567123234234456456 12123345345567567901901234789901901123123456 90012012234234678678901456678678890890123123 89789891901345345678123345345567567890890012 56567678912012345890012012234234567567789789 34345678789012567789789901901234234456456678 12345456789234456456678678901901123123345456 12123456901123123345345678678890890912123123 90123678890890912012345345567567678890890012 89345567567678789012012234234345567567789789 2 4 4 5 6 9 9 1 1 2 4
The 2012 edition of the FAO Statistical Yearbook presents a visual synthesis of the major trends and factors shaping the global food and agricultural tal, social and economic dimensions. The publication landscape and their interplay with broader environmenserves as a unique reference point on the state of world food and agriculture for policy-makers, donor agencies, researchers and analysts as well as the general public. The book is subdivided into four thematic parts, where subject matter is presented: an exhaustive spectrum of the issues relevant to the Part 1 The setting measures the state of the agricultural resource base, by assessing the supply of land, labour, capital, inputs and the adequacy of infrastructure, and also examines the pressure on the world food system change stemming from demographic and macroeconomic Part 2 Hunger dimensions gauges the state of food dimensions that give rise to hunger and those that shape undernourishment insecurity and malnutrition, measuring the multitude of Part 3 Feeding the world evaluates the past and present productive capacity of world agriculture together with the role of trade in meeting changing food, feed and other demands Part 4 Sustainability dimensions examines the sustainability of agriculture in the context of the pressure it exerts on the environment, including the interaction of agriculture with climate change, and how it can provide ecosystem services in relation to the bio-based economy
ISBN 978-92-5-107084-0 ISSN 2225-7373 9 7 8 9 2 5 1 0 7 0 8 4 0 I2490E/1/02.12