2.0 Managing Uncertainty in Demand With Safety Stock
2.0 Managing Uncertainty in Demand With Safety Stock
2.0 Managing Uncertainty in Demand With Safety Stock
11-1
Outline
The role of safety inventory in a supply chain Determining the appropriate level of safety inventory Impact of supply uncertainty on safety inventory Impact of aggregation on safety inventory Impact of replenishment policies on safety inventory Managing safety inventory in a multi echelon supply multi-echelon chain Estimating and managing safety inventory in practice
11-3
11-4
11-6
11-7
Higher levels of uncertainty require higher levels of safety inventory given a particular desired level of product availability Higher levels of desired product availability require higher levels of safety inventory given a particular level of uncertainty
2007 Pearson Education
11-8
11-10
Replenishment Policies
Replenishment policy: decisions regarding when to reorder and how much to reorder d dh ht d Continuous review: inventory is continuously monitored and an order of size Q is placed when the inventory level reaches the reorder point ROP Periodic review: inventory is checked at regular (periodic) i ( i di ) intervals and an order is placed to raise the l d d i l d i h inventory to a specified threshold (the order-up-to level)
11-12
= DL = L D
1
ss = F S (CSL) L ROP = D L + ss
CSL = F ( ROP, D L , L )
Average Inventory = Q/2 + ss
11-13
11-14
=D
L
L = (500) 2 = 707
Cycle service level, CSL = F(DL + ss, DL, L) = y , ( , = NORMDIST (DL + ss, DL, L) = NORMDIST(6000,5000,707,1)
= 0.92 (This value can also be determined from a Normal probability distribution table)
2007 Pearson Education 11-15
Fill Rate
Proportion of customer demand satisfied from stock Stockout occurs when the demand during lead time exceeds the reorder point ESC is the expected shortage per cycle (average demand in excess of reorder point in each replenishment cycle) ss is the safety inventory Q is the order quantity
f fr = 1
ESC Q
ss ESC = ss{1 F S } L ss + L f S L
11-18
10
10
Evaluating Safety Inventory Given Fill Rate (try different values of ss)
F ill R ate 97.5% 98.0% 98.5% 99.0% 99.5%
2007 Pearson Education
11
11
D
2007 Pearson Education
= DL
2 2
L = L D + D
2 L
11-23
12
12
11-25
11-26
13
13
Impact of Aggregation
If number of independent stocking locations decreases by n, the expected level of safety inventory n will be reduced by square root of n (square root law) Many e-commerce retailers attempt to take advantage of aggregation (Amazon) compared to bricks and mortar retailers (Borders) Aggregation has two major disadvantages:
Increase in response time to customer order Increase in transportation cost to customer Some e-commerce firms (such as Amazon) have reduced aggregation to mitigate these disadvantages
2007 Pearson Education 11-27
Information Centralization
Virtual aggregation Information system that allows access to current y inventory records in all warehouses from each warehouse Most orders are filled from closest warehouse In case of a stockout, another warehouse can fill the order Better responsiveness, lower transportation cost, higher product availability, but reduced safety inventory Examples: McMaster-Carr, Gap, Wal-Mart
2007 Pearson Education 11-28
14
14
Specialization
Stock all items in each location or stock different items at different locations?
Different products may have different demands in different locations (e.g., snow shovels) There can be benefits from aggregation
Cleaner 1,000 , 100 0.1 $30 $15,792,000 0.0025 $394,770 $3,849,308 $0.046
11-30
15
15
Product Substitution
Substitution: use of one product to satisfy the demand for f another product th d t Manufacturer-driven one-way substitution Customer-driven two-way substitution
11-31
Component Commonality
Using common components in a variety of different products diff t d t Can be an effective approach to exploit aggregation and reduce component inventories
11-32
16
16
SS
11-33
Postponement
The ability of a supply chain to delay product differentiation or customization until closer to the diff ti ti t i ti til l t th time the product is sold Goal is to have common components in the supply chain for most of the push phase and move product differentiation as close to the pull phase as possible Examples: Dell, Benetton
11-34
17
17
11-35
11-36
18
18
11-37
19
19