Strigolactone
Strigolactone
Strigolactone
Strigolactones (SLs)
SLs are a class of sesquiterpene lactones are derived from carotenoids & contain a large four ring backbone (Matusova et al., 2005)
Biosynthesis occurs mainly in roots & isolated from roots of a variety of plant species
Natural SLs isolated from plant roots are mainly 5-deoxy-strigol, strigol, sorgolactone, alectril & orobanchol
Historyofstrigolactoneinven1on
Germination stimulant for Striga was isolated in 1966 from root exudate of cotton, which is not a host for Striga or Orobanche
Structure of strigol was elucidated in 1972, its absolute stereochemistry was established by X-ray diffraction analysis in 1985
Sorgolactone a compound with a structure similar to strigol was isolated from roots of sorghum (Mori 1998); CCDs - (Aldridge et al., 2005); Tillering in rice (Zhou et al., 2006) Collective name strigolactones was proposed for class of molecules
SLs Biosynthesis
3 enzymes identified that are involved sequentially in their synthesis 1. carotenoid- cleaving dioxygenase 7 (CCD7, MAX3/RMS5 /HTD1/D17) 2. carotenoid-cleaving dioxygenase 8(CCD8, MAX4/ RMS1/DAD1/D10) 3. cytochrome P450 monooxygenase (Cyt P450, MAX1) Enzymes solely responsible for synthesis of such complex SLs compounds Two independent pathways to synthesize sesquiterpenoids 1. SLs produced by plastidic methylerythritol phosphate (MEP) pathway 2. Independent by cytosolic mevalonic acid pathway
Open arrows - several conditions or strategies - modify the production of strigolactones (+ve effect on strigolactone production; ve effect on strigolactone production)
MovementofStrigolactone
GR24intothestemofpeaplants Moveupward(Transpira1onstream)
(Gomez-Roldan et al., 2008)
Shoot-Branching Inhibition
SLsalleviatethermoinhibi1onofseedsofArabidopsis
ShootBranchingInhibi1on
SLs inhibit shoot branching by preventing bud outgrowth of leaf axillary buds
SLs require receptor in order to exert their activity - Receptors are active at very low conc & transported in plant over some distance Under Pi deficiency, plants increase the biosynthesis of SLs to reduce shoot branching Maximizes symbiotic interaction with AM fungi to facilitate the uptake of mineral nutrients Strigol, 5-deoxystrigol & GR24 were active in bioassays for shoot-branching inhibition
SLs - central role in coordinating shoot branching, AM symbiosis & parasitic weed seed germination
SLs are produced in plant root, from which some is release to soil to induce hyphae branching & some is translocated to shoots to inhibit shoot branching Shoot branching - Inhibited by IAA from shoot & promoted by CK from root Biosynthesis of SLs is regulated by soil nutrient availability
Simplified model of shoot branching inhibition via strigolactones & MAX/RMS/D pathway
Gene1cvaria1oninSLproduc1on&1lleringinrice
Strigolactone conc in root exudates (a) root tissues (b) of rice cultivars
Inhibi1onofbudoutgrowth
Schematic representation of inhibition of bud outgrowth by SLs
Strigolactones inhibit bud outgrowth Production requires - carotenoid cleavage dioxygenase-like enzymes CCD7 & CCD8
Simplified model of bud outgrowth regulation by the SMS pathway exemplified in pea
Cont d
3,6-dihydro-GR24 was inactive as a germination stimulant but still showed distinct activity on hyphal branching (K. Akiyama, unpublished data) Strigolactones present in root exudates & inducing hyphal branching of AMF -important plant recognitions signals for AMF Branching factor(s) in root exudates - Regulating mechanism for root colonization - effect of root exudates from plants with low P-levels on hyphal branching Arabidopsis, rape, cabbage (Brassicacea) & sugar beet (Chenopodiaceae) are AM non-host plants - root exudates of these plants (Benharrat et al., 2003) not showed a hyphal branching activity on AMF - because lack of branching factor
SLsreleasedbyroots,inducehyphalbranchinginproximityto theroot
Strigolactones influence germination of parasitic seeds & branching patterns of mycorryzial fungi
Strigolactones & Environmental Cues Strigolactones (SLs) - Role in plant developmental plasticity in roots & shoots in response to environmental cues
(Light & Nutrient status)
Light status
Light quality & intensity affect multiple processes in plants, including determination of shoot architecture SLs +ve regulators of light associated processes Light quality, i.e., a low R:FR ratio suppress shoot branching (part of the shadeavoidance response) - SLs identified as shoot-branching inhibitors - one of the mediators of response (Franklin 2008; Leyser 2009; Franklin and Whitelam 2005 ) SLs may regulate shoot branching in response to light quality on one hand & light harvesting on other one SLs - suggested to be associated with inhibition of lateral root initiation & root hair elongation (Schlicht et al., 2008) Cross-talk bw SLs & light-associated pathways follow a feedback loop, because carotenoid biosynthesis is light-dependent & SLs are thought to be derived from this pathway (Matusova et al., 2005)
Nutrient status
(1) SLs inhibit shoot branching (2) SLs modulate auxin transport (auxin transport is involved in shoot s response to B deficiency (Wang et al., 2006) (3) SLs biosynthesis is responsive to nutrient (P [Pi] & N) levels (Yoneyama et al., 2007; Lpez-Rez and Bouwmeester 2008) SLs provide a way to coordinate shoot development with nutritional conditions Root hairs development affected by SLs (Kapulnik et al., 2010; Schlicht et al., 2008; Koltai et al., 2010) Low Pi & low N conditions induce SLs production (Lpez-Rez et al., 2008) SLs are mediators of the root response to low nutrient condition
Study results
SLs are suggested to increase the plant s light-harvesting ability Inhibit shoot branching; SLs induced increase in light-harvesting capability compensates for reduction in total LA resulting from reduced shoot branching Low levels of nutrients (Pi & N) increase root SLs production Levels of SLs & putative precursor lead to alterations in root-hair length Root hair length directly associated with enhancement of the plant s ability to absorb nutrients (Gilroy2000) SLs affect root-hair elongation, resulting in modulation of nutrient uptake by the plant
Signal Transduction
MAX2 and RMS4 are a putative signaling component of branching signal MAX2/RMS4/D3 encode F-box proteins which are typically involved in ubiquitin mediated protein degradation Level of epi-5-deoxystrigol (epi-5DS), a native strigolactone of rice, was elevated in d14 mutants & d14/htd2 mutants show feedback upregulation of SL biosynthesis pathway genes D14 func1ons downstream of SL synthesis determina1on of D14 func1on & iden1ca1on of poten1al nega1ve regulators that are degraded by the MAX2/ RMS4/D3 pathway are urgently required to reveal the percep1on & signaling mechanismsofthebranchinghormone
Data represent mean number of nodules per plant (n = 20) Error bars represent standard errors at 95% confidence interval
Nodulation in Medicago sativa inoculated with Sinorhizobium meliloti after application of different GR24 solutions & corresponding control solutions Application of GR24 alter phytohormones levels (auxin & cytokinin) with crucial roles in nodule organogenesis (Arite et al., 2007; Hayward et al., 2009)
(Soto et al., 2010)
(Siameetal.,2003) (Haucketal.,1992) (Siameetal.,2003; Awadetal.,2006) (Rubialesetal.,2006) (Yokotaetal.,1998) (Mlleretal.,1992) (Siameetal.,2003; Gonzalezetal.,2005) (Yoneyamaetal.,2004)
Cont d
GR24 - Potential use for regulation of branching in chrysanthemum horticultural production
Large-scale exogenous treatment techniques need to be developed & cost of GR24 or analogues needs to be reduced practical application Chrysanthemum CCD8 genes providing opportunity to use genetic modification to improve the chrysanthemum growth habit Effects of GR24 on bud activity & DgCCD8 expression support the idea that SLs inhibit bud activation by modulating auxin transport canalization Auxin is a major mediator of feedback by SL on SL synthesis
Phosphate starvation - expression of LeNCED1 in tomato nor expression of D10 in rice were upregulated (S. Yamaguchi & K. Yoneyama, unpublished data)
Nodulating leguminous plants - SL production is promoted only under P deficiency, whereas in other mycotrophic plants it also occurs under N deficiency (K. Yoneyama, unpublished data) Nonmycotrophic plants (white lupin (L. albus) & spinach (Spinacea oleracea)) exude SLs at low levels as compared with mycotrophic plants, nutrient deficiencies hardly affect SL exudation (K. Yoneyama, unpublished data)
Inhibitors of SLs
Fluridone & Norflurazon herbicides inhibiting carotenoid biosynthesis (inhibitors of phytoene desaturase), could reduce SL production, inhibit later steps of SL biosynthetic pathway Hydroxamic acid - type CCD inhibitors affecting SL production This inhibitors induce a branching phenotype in Arabidopsis that is similar to that of ccd7/8 mutants carba-GR 24, carba-GR 7 & carba- GR 5
Cont d
SLs identified as stimulators of the germination of root-parasitic weeds that pose a serious threat to resource-limited agriculture SLs exuded from roots & function as signalling compounds in the initiation of AM, which are plant-fungus symbionts with a global effect on C & P cycling SLs established to be phytohormones that regulate plant shoot architecture by inhibiting the outgrowth of axillary buds Manage germination of parasitic weeds responsible for massive crop losses & control of lateral branching in forestry to produce higher quality woods Understanding SLs pathway has potential to significant impact in agriculture
carba-GR, carba-GR 7 & carba- GR 5 - compounds accepted by protein receptor, block active site & germination of the seeds would be inhibited used in soil seed banks
Conclusion
SLs have three distinct biological activities: Induction of seed germination of root parasitic seeds, induction of hyphal branching of AM fungi & inhibition of shoot branching in plants SLs derived from carotenoids through sequential oxidative cleavage & subsequent oxidations Plants regulate production & exudation of SLs in response to changes in their environments Plants under nutrient starvation produce more SLs to minimize excessive shoot branching & to promote root colonization by AM fungi