LVSR Guideline FullText

Low-volume Sealed Roads
July 2003
Guideline
SADC Guideline on Low-volume Sealed Roads July 2003
ii ii
JULY 2003
ISBN 99912-0-456-3
Any material from this Guideline may be reproduced without permission
provided the source is acknowledged.
Although the Guideline is believed to be correct at the time of printing,
SATCC does not accept responsibility for any consequences arising from
the use of the information contained in it.
Southern African Development Community (SADC)
SADC House
Private Bag 0095
Gaborone
BOTSWANA
Tel: + 267 3951 863
Fax: + 267 3972 848
E-Mail: [email protected]
T
he SADC road network of just over one million kilometres provides the dominant
TTmode of freight and passenger transport and thus plays a vital role in the economy TT
of the region. Unsurfaced low-volume roads constitute a substantial proportion of that
network and impact on the lives of the majority of the regions population who live
and work in rural areas. Many of these roads are being upgraded to a sealed standard
following strategies that focus on poverty alleviation in pursuit of the regions broader
goals of socio-economic growth and development.
The main purpose of the Guideline is to provide stakeholders with a synthesis TT
of best regional and international practice in all aspects of low-volume sealed
roads. In so doing, it will correct a shortcoming of other available guidelines
and manuals that tend to be more narrowly focused on the technical aspects of
relatively more heavily trafcked roads and, as a result, have limited applicability
to low-volume sealed roads.
Funding for this Guideline has been provided by the UK Department for Inter national FF
Development (DFID), the Norwegian Agency for Development Co-op eration
(NORAD) and the Swedish International Development Agency (SIDA). These co-
operating partners continue to provide development assistance to the region in the
transport sector aimed, in part, at improving the sustainability of low-volume
sealed roads, coupled with direct poverty alleviation.
By promoting the adoption of a more holistic approach to the provision of low- BB
volume sealed roads and the use of innovative best practice from the region, the
Guideline will undoubtedly lead to a more efcient use of available road funding.
This will result in direct benets to all SADC countries and facilitate socio-
economic growth and development, leading to a reduction in poverty.
I wish to thank our cooperating partners for co-funding this project as well as the
UK Transport Research Laboratory (TRL) and the Norwegian Public Roads
Administration (NPRA) for managing it. I also wish to thank all those who contributed
their knowledge and experience to enable this Guideline to be produced; in parti- r
cular, the Lead Authors, representatives from member states who were closely
involved in its development and the international panel of experts who reviewed
the document. I am convinced that all stakeholders will nd the Guideline to be a
valuable source of information for the more efcient and effective provision of low-
volume sealed roads in the SADC region.
Sakhe Silo
Director - SATCC Technical Unit
Maputo, Mozambique
Foreword
iii
iv iv
Dedication Dedication
This guideline is dedicated to the memory of the late Eric Msolomba, This guideline is dedicated to the memory of the late Eric Msolomba,
former director of the SATCC Technical Unit, whose vision provided the former director of the SATCC Technical Unit, whose vision provided the
motivation for this project, and whose dedication and leadership made motivation for this project, and whose dedication and leadership made
this document possible. this document possible.
vv
Acknowledgements
The Project Team gratefully acknowledges the contributions and comments received from a large number
of professionals representing a wide range of disciplines, in organisations from both the public and private
sectors, who participated in the workshops held in connection with the compilation of the Guideline.
These organisations included Government ministries (including Roads Departments and Trafc Safety
Units), National Roads Authorities, consultants, contractors and materials suppliers. Particular thanks
are due to the SATCC Technical Unit, the CSIR and the authors for their contributions and to the Peer
Reviewers for their comments on the drafts. Thanks are also due to the workshop facilitators and
presenters who also made valuable contributions to the project.
SADC Road Sector Organisations
The high level of support and guidance provided by the road sector organisations in the SADC member
states in the development of the Guideline and in the hosting of country workshops is gratefully
acknowledged. The following organisations are expected to be the main agencies involved in the
implementation of the Guideline:
Angola Angolan Road Agency (INEA), Ministry of Public Works, Luanda
Botswana Roads Department, Ministry of Works and Transport, Gaborone
DRC Ofce des Routes, Kinshasa/Gombe
Lesotho Roads Department, Ministry of Public Works and Transport, Maseru
Malawi National Roads Authority, Lilongwe
Mauritius Road Development Authority, Ministry of Public Infrastructure, Phoenix
Mozambique National Roads Administration (ANE), Maputo
Namibia National Roads Authority, Windhoek
Seychelles Land Transport Division, Ministry of Transport and Tourism, Mah
South Africa South African National Roads Agency (SANRA), Pretoria
Swaziland Roads Department, Ministry of Public Works and Transport, Mbabane
Tanzania Tanzania National Roads Agency (TANROADS), Dar es Salaam
Zambia Roads Department, Ministry of Works and Supply, Lusaka
Zimbabwe Roads Department, Ministry of Transport, Harare
Project Management Team
Project Manager Mr P A K Greening, Transport Research Laboratory, UK
Deputy Project Manager Mr C Overby, Norwegian Public Roads Administration, Norway
Team Members Mr M I Pinard, InfraAfrica Consultants, Botswana
Mr M E Gumbie, Civil Consult (Pvt) Ltd., Zimbabwe
Mr D R Rossmann, National Roads Agency, South Africa
Quality Assurance Dr J Rolt, Transport Research Laboratory, UK
Authors
M I Pinard (Lead) InfraAfrica Consultants, Botswana
S D Ellis (Main) World Bank (formerly Transport Research Laboratory, UK)
C-H Eriksson (Main) Transport Consultants AB, Sweden
R Johansen (Main) ViaNova Consultants, Norway
T Toole (Main) ARRB, Australia (formerly Transport Research Laboratory, UK)
R Beger (Contributing) RB Project Management, South Africa
M E Gumbie (Contributing) Civil Consult (Pvt) Ltd., Zimbabwe
H J S Lotter (Contributing) Council for Scientic and Industrial Research, South Africa
A R Quimby (Contributing) Transport Research Laboratory, UK
National workshop facilitators: A A Awadh (Tanzania), C S Gourley (Transport Research
Laboratory, UK), T E Mutowembwa (Zimbabwe), G Sibanda (ILO ASIST, Zimbabwe)
Peer Review Team
Mr J N Bulman, OBE Consultant, UK (formerly Head of TRL Overseas Unit)
Prof J D G F Howe Consultant, UK (formerly Professor, IHE Delft, Netherlands)
Prof H G R Kerali University of Birmingham, UK
Prof J B Metcalf Louisiana State University, USA
Dr F Netterberg Construction Materials and Geotechnical Specialist, South Africa
Prof N A Parker City University of New York, USA
Prof A T Visser University of Pretoria, South Africa
Publishing Services
Layout M I Pinard, InfraAfrica Consultants, Botswana
Cover design/DTP J Edvardsen, Interconsult, Oslo, Norway
Printing Goldelds Press (Pty) Ltd, Johannesburg, South Africa
vi vi
vii vii
Provision of Low-volume sealed roads:
Time for a re-think by decision-makers!
Low-volume roads, economic development and poverty alleviation
The majority of rural roads and a signicant proportion of the main roads in
the SADC region are currently unsurfaced and are relatively lightly trafcked.
These low-volume roads are important in that they:
impact signicantly on the livelihoods of the majority of the population of
many countries in the region, who live and work in rural areas where
poverty levels are generally very high
are central to sustained socio-economic growth and development of the
region and are a key component of development programmes targeted n by
donors and governments in which poverty reduction strategies feature
Unfortunately, the poor condition of these roads, which can be largely attributed to
the way in which they have customarily been provided and maintained, has acted
as a brake on economic development and hindered poverty alleviation efforts.
New, more appropriate, approaches to the provision of low-volume sealed roads
(LVSRs) are now required if the region is to improve road transport efciency and
attain its broader goals of socio-economic growth, development and poverty alleviation.
The inappropriateness of traditional methods
Traditional approaches to the provision of low-volume sealed roads have
stemmed from technology and research carried out in Europe and the USA over
40 years ago in very different environments.
Locally prevailing circumstances are usually very different in terms of climate, traf-
c, materials and road users. It is therefore not surprising that many of the imported d
approaches, designs and technologies are inappropriate for application in the region.
Technology, research and knowledge about LVSRs have advanced signicantly
in the region and not only question much of the accepted wisdom on LVSR provision
but also show quite clearly the need to revise conventional approaches.
Unfortunately, there has been little effective dissemination and uptake of the
results of research carried out in the region. This has triggered the need for this
SADC Guideline on Low-volume Sealed Roads. C
The criteria for dening a Low-volume
road varies sig nicantly in various parts of
the world. In the SADC region, such roads
may be primary, secondary or tertiary/access
roads. They typically carry less than 200
vehicles per day, including up to 20%
commercial vehicles, and often include
non-motorised trafc, particularly near
populated areas.
Extensive research has been undertaken in
the SADC region over the past 20 - 30 years.
This has enabled local, non-standard
materials to be successfully incorporated
in appropriate pavement design for LVSRs.
A new approach
The successful provision of a low-volume
sealed road requires ingenuity, imagination
and innovation. It entails working with
nature and using locally available, non-
standard materials and other resources in
an optimal and environmentally sustain-
able manner.
It will rely on planning, design, construc-
tion and maintenance techniques that
maximize the involvement of local com-
munities and contractors.
When properly engineered, a LVSR will
reduce transport costs and, through its
impact on rural production and on trade
between regions, facilitate socio-economic
growth and development and reduce
poverty in the SADC region.
Preview Preview
viii viii
Why sealed roads?
The substantial length of unsurfaced, particularly gravel, roads in the region is
becoming increasingly difcult to sustain in that such roads:
impose a logistical, technical and nancial burden on most road agen cies due
to constraints on physical, human, nancial and natural resources
require the continuous use of a non-renewable resource (gravel) which is being
seriously depleted in many countries and, in the proc ess, is causing serious
environmental problems
Implementation of the results of regional research (for example, that reduce con-
struction costs through the increased use of natural gravels), enable the sealing of
gravel roads to be economically justied at less than 100 vehicles per day (vpd).
This gure is in contrast to the previously recommended threshold values for Sub-
Saharan Africa, which were in excess of 200 vpd and is a gure that still persists
in the minds of many practitioners.
Failure to observe the optimal timing for sealing gravel roads can be very costly to
national economies, not only in terms of incurring excess transport costs but, also,
in the continuing excessive maintenance burden and adverse socio-environmental
effects. This provides a strong impetus for policy change and the adoption of f
alternative, cost-effective, surfacing strategies promoted in this Guideline.
The benets of sealed roads
The whole-life benets of sealed roads include:
lower transport (construction, maintenance and vehicle operating) costs
increased social benets (more reliable access to schools, clinics, etc)
reduced adverse environmental impacts and health and safety problems
Based on a conservative rate of upgrading gravel roads to a sealed standard of
100 km/year, the annual benets of adopting the recommendations of this Guideline
will be of the order of US $35 million.
The above benets hinge critically on the ability of the responsible authority to
maintain the sealed roads to the level of service for which they were designed. This
requires provision of adequate, sustainable and timely funding for the sub-sector
which, increasingly, is being provided by road users on a fee-for-service basis.
Key dimensions of sustainability
There has been a tendency to focus predominantly on the technical and economic
aspects of LVSR provision and inadequate attention has been given to other aspects
of sustainability. The result has often been a lack of responsiveness to various
other requirements and a reduced likelihood of achieving sustainable solutions,
even when substantial funding is made available.
The seven key dimensions of a sustainable system, which should always be
observed in the provision of LVSRs, are shown below. d
Unpaved roads generate dust in dry weather
causing health hazard, damage to crops, vehicles
and natural habitats and adversely affecting
the safety of pedestrians and vehicles. Is a
sealed surface an affordable option?
Yes! It certainly can be.
A substantial amount of gravel is extracted
annually from borrow pits in all countries of
the SADC region. Is this sustainable?
No! It is not.
Preview Preview
Politically
supported
Institutionally
possible
Technologically
appropriate
Economically
viable
Financially
sound
Environmentally
sustainable
Planning, economic appraisal, environment
Geometric design and road safety
Pavement design, materials and surfacing
Construction and drainage
Maintenance, and road management
EEccoonnoommiiccaallllyy
vviiaabbllee
TTee TTTT cchhnnoollooggiiccaallllyy
aapppprroopprriiaattee
IInnssttiittuuttiioonnaallllyy
ppoossssiibbllee
Socially
acceptable
Achieving sustainability in all aspects of
LVSR provision is absolutely critical, if the
SADC regions long term goals of sustained
economic growth and poverty alleviation
are to be attained. In the past, attempts to
achieve such sustainability have failed
because one or more of the seven key
dimensions has been missing or inadequate.
The result has been that LVSRs have fallen
into disrepair and, consequently, have not
only failed to serve the needs of the poor
but, also, have often adversely affected the
environment.
ix ix
Sustainability in all aspects of LVSR provision should now become the basis of
a more demanding policy of SADC governments. This will require that practitioner
adopt a more broadly based approach than hitherto that pays full attention to
all seven dimensions of sustainability.
Meeting new challenges the SADC Guideline on LVSRs
The main objective of the Guideline is to capture best regional and international
practice in all aspects of LVSR provision. It is not a prescriptive document but,
rather, provides guidance to users so as to ensure that well-considered decisions are
made. The development of the Guideline has beneted from the close involvement
of practitioners in the region.
The Guideline presents a major departure from traditional practice in all aspects
of LVSR provision by examining procedures, practices and methods used in:
planning, appraisal and environment construction and drainage
geometric design and road safety maintenance
pavement design, materials and surfacing
The Guideline promotes the use of a holistic approach to LVSRs, which
recognizes that criteria need to be satised in the different and often interacting
dimensions of road provision.
The benets of using the Guideline
There are a number of benets to be derived from adopting the approaches
advocated in the Guideline. These include providing LVSRs that:
are less expensive in economic terms to build and to maintain through the
adoption of more appropriate, locally-derived technology and design/
construction techniques that are better suited to local conditions
minimize adverse environmental impacts, particularly as regards the use of
non-renewable resources (gravel)
increase employment opportunities through the use of more appropriate
technology, including the use of labour-based methods, where feasible
improve road safety in all aspects of road provision
take better account of the needs of all stakeholders, particularly the local
communities served by these roads
foster local road building and maintenance capacity through the greater use
of small-scale, local contractors
ultimately, facilitate the longer-term goal of socio-economic growth, develop-
ment and poverty alleviation in the region
In addition to the above, the Guideline will also generate awareness and disseminate
the knowledge required if these benets are to be enjoyed more widely in the
region.
Moving from vision to practice
The full benets of the Guideline will be realised only if the approaches
recommended are implemented in practice. However, there are a number of d f
barriers which will tend to frustrate this process. These include:
an inevitable and natural tendency to resist change and the conservative nature
of public-sector organisations which tend to institutionalize this resistance
The fact that many of the recommendations contained in the Guideline may
be in conict with existing, often out-dated, country manuals and standards
Promotion of labour-based methods where
feasible, is a key factor in creating productive
employment and reducing poverty.
The new idea either nds a champion or
dies.....No ordinary involvement with a new
idea provides the energy required to cope
with the indifference and resistance that
major technological change provokes...
Champions of new ideas must display
persistence and courage of heroic quality. yy
Preview Preview
xx
Ultimately, the successful move from vision to practice will require endorse-
ment at political level, as well as the full support of all stakeholders. In addition,
it will require considerable technology transfer effort including:
support and technical assistance to facilitate the implementation of the Guideline
updating country documents to suit specic local conditions
technical staff training to address potential internal resistance to change
careful monitoring of acceptance, adoption, renement and satisfactionn
amongst users of the Guideline
Preview Preview
SADC Guiaeline on Low-volume Sealea Roaas July 2003
xi
ConIenIs
Foreword .......................................................................................III
AcknowIedgments ....................................................................... v
PrevIew .........................................................................................vII
AbbrevIatIons ........................................................................... xIII
I. 1NTHODUCT1ON
1.1 Background .......................................................................... 1 - 1
1.2 Purpose and Scope ............................................................... 1 - 2
1.3 Focus .................................................................................... 1 - 3
1.4 Development of Guideline ................................................... 1 - 4
1.5 Structure and Content .......................................................... 1 - 5
1.6 Updating .............................................................................. 1 - 6
1.7 Sources of Information ........................................................ 1 - 6
1.8 References and Bibliography ............................................... 1 - 7
z. HG1ONA1 STT1NG
2.1 Introduction ......................................................................... 2 - 1
2.2 The SADC Region ............................................................... 2 - 2
2.3 Regional Road Network ...................................................... 2 - 5
2.4 Road Network Details ......................................................... 2 - 7
2.5 Low-volume Sealed Roads .................................................. 2 - 9
2.6 Summary .............................................................................. 2 - 14
8. P1ANN1NG, APPHA1SA1 AND
NV1HONMNTA1 1SSUS
3.1 Introduction ......................................................................... 3 - 1
3.2 Planning ............................................................................... 3 - 3
3.3 Appraisal .............................................................................. 3 - 14
3.4 Environmental Issues ........................................................... 3 - 25
3.5 Summary ............................................................................. 3 - 33
4. GOMTH1C DS1GN AND
HOAD SAFTY
4.1 Introduction ......................................................................... 4 - 1
4.2 Design Philosophy, Standards and Approach ..................... 4 - 4
4.3 Design Framework and Process ......................................... 4 - 7
4.4 Design, Controls and Elements .......................................... 4 - 17
4.5 Roadside Safety, Education and Enforcement ..................... 4 - 28
4.6 Summary .............................................................................. 4 - 33
xii xii
5. PAVEMENT DESIGN, MATERIALS
&SURFACING
5.1 Introduction........................................................ n 5 1
5.2 Pavements, Materials and Surfacing Terminology ..........5 4
5.3 Materials ...........................................................5 10
5.4 Pavement Design.................................................. n 5 27
5.5 Surfacing ...........................................................5 43
5.6 Summary...........................................................5 57
5.7 References and Bibliography ...................................5 58
6. CONSTRUCTION AND DRAINAGE
6.1 Introduction........................................................ n 6 1
6.2 Construction Issues ...............................................6 3
6.3 Construction Equipment......................................... t 6 10
6.4 Utilising Soils and Natural Gravels............................6 14
6.5 Construction of Seals ............................................6 23
6.6 Quality Assurance and Control ................................6 26
6.7 Drainage............................................................6 29
6.8 Summary...........................................................6 37
7. MAINTENANCE AND ROAD
MANAGEMENT
7.1 Introduction........................................................ n 7 1
7.2 Maintenance Issues ...............................................7 3
7.3 Maintenance Management ...................................... t 7 11
7.4 Maintenance Operations .........................................7 24
7.5 Summary...........................................................7 28
7.6 References and Bibliography........................................7 29
8. VISION TO PRACTICE
8.1 Motivation ......................................................... n 8 1
8.2 Pathway to Implementation ..................................... n 8 2
8.3 Vision to Practice .................................................8 6
AAPPENDICES
Appendix A - List of Figures and Tables ..............................A 1
Appendix B - List of Useful Organisations ...........................B 1
xiii xiii
AID Agency for International Development
AASHO American Association of State Highway Ofcials
AASHTO American Association of State Highway and Transportation Ofcials
ARRB Australian Road Research Board
ASIST Advisory Support Information Services And Training (For Employment-
Intensive Infrastructure)
ASTM American Society for Testing and Materials
CAPSA Conference on Asphalt Pavements for Southern Africa
CEBTP Centre Experimental de Recherches et Detudes du Batiment et des Travaux Publics
CSIR Council for Scientic and Industrial Research
CSRA Committee of State Road Ofcials
DFID Department for International Development
DLO Direct Labour Organisations
DoR Department of Roads
ILO International Labour Organisation
IRF International Road Federation
MOW Ministry of Works
NAASRA National Association of Australian State Road Authorities
NIRR National Institute for Road Research
NITRR National Institute for Transport and Road Research
NORAD Norwegian Agency for International Development
NPRA Norwegian Public Roads Administration
NRRL Norwegian Road Research Laboratory
NSW New South Wales (Australia)
ODA Overseas Development Administration
PIARC Permanent International Association of Road Congresses (World Road Association)
RA Board Roads Agency Board
RF Board Road Fund Board
SABITA Southern Africa Bitumen and Tar Association
SADC Southern Africa Development Community
SADCC Southern African Development Coordination Conference
SAICE South African Institution of Civil Engineering
ATC Annual Transportation Conference
SANRA South African National Roads Agency
SATCC Southern Africa Transport and Communications Commission
SIDA Swedish International Development Agency
TANROADS Tanzania National Roads Agency
TRB Transportation Research Board
TRL Transport Research Laboratory
TRRL Transport and Road Research Laboratory
UK United Kingdom
UN United Nations
UNESCO United Nations Educational Scientic & Cultural Organisation
USA United States of America
WA Western Australia
Abbreviations
Organisations
xiv xiv
AADT Annual Average Daily Trafc g y
AIV Aggregate Impact Value gg g p
AC Asphalt Concrete p
ACV Aggregate Crushing Vakue gg g g
ADT Annual Daily Trafc y
BCR Benet Cost Ratio
BOQQ Bill of Quantities Q
BS British Standards
CBA Cost-benet analysis y
CaSE Cost and Safety Efcient Design y g
CBR California Bearing Ratio g
CEO Chief Executive Ofcer
DMI Durability Mill Index y
elv Equivalent Light Vehicles q g
DCP Dynamic Cone Penetrometer y
E
SS
Elastic Stiffness
EIA Environmental Impact Assessment p
EIS Environmental Impact Statement p
ESA Equivalent Standards Axle (based on 80 kN standard) q ( )
FACT Fines Aggregate Crushing Test gg g g
FMC Field Moisture Content
FWD Falling Weight Deectometer g g
GDP Gross Domestic Product
HDM-4 Highway Development and Management Model-4 g y p g
HIV/AIDS Human Immune Deciency Virus/Acquired Immune Deciency Syndrome y q y y
HVR High-volume road g
HVS Heavy Vehicle Simulator y
HVSR High-volume Sealed Roads g
IQL Q Information Quality Level Q y
IRAP Integrated Rural Accessibility Planning g y g
IRI International Roughness Index g
IRR Internal Rate of Return
KPIs Key Performance Indicators y
LAA Los Angeles Abrasion g
LBM Labour Based Methods
LVR Low-volume Road
LVSR Low-volume Sealed Road
MC Moisture Content
MDD Maximum Dry Density y y
NMT Non Motorised Trafc
NPV Net Present Value
OMC Optimum Moisture Content p
ORN Overseas Road Note (TRL series of publications) ( p )
PI Plasticity Index y
PSD Passing Site Distance g
PSV Polished Stone value
R & W Riedel and Weber
RED Road Economic Decision model
Abbreviations
Technical
xv
RM Routine Maintenance
RMI Road Maintenance Initiative
RMS Road Management Systems
RTIM Road Transport Investment Model
RTRN Regional Trunk Road Network
SAMDM South African Mechanistic Design Method
SFRDP Secondary Feeder Road Development Programme
SSATP Sub-Saharan Africa Transport Program
SSD Stopping Sight Distance
TBM Texas Ball Mill
TMH Technical Methods for Highways
TRH Technical Recommendations for Highways
TTC Travel Time Cost
VCI Visual Condition Index
VOC Vehicle Operating Costs
vpd Vehicles per day
Hr Hour
Kg Kilogram
Km, m, cm, mm Kilometre, metre, centimetre, millimetre
kPa Kilo-Pascal
kN Kilo-Newton
Km/h Kilometre per hour
m
2
, m
3
Square metre, cubic metre
Veh-km Vehicle kilometre
Yr Year
AbbrevIaIIons
UnIIs
C
h
a
p
t
e
r

1
1. Introduction
2. Regional Setting
3. Planning, Appraisal &
Environmental Issues
4. Geometric Design
and Road Safety
5. Pavement Design,
Materials & Surfacing
6. Construction and
Drainage
7. Maintenance and
Road Management
8. Vision to Practice
xviii xviii
1.1 Background .............................................................1 - 1
1.2 Purpose and Scope.....................................................1 - 2
1.3 Focus ......................................................................1 - 3
1.4 Development of Guideline............................................1 - 4
1.5 Structure and Content ................................................1 - 5
1.6 Updating .................................................................1 - 6
1.7 Sources of Information ...............................................1 - 6
1.8 References and Bibliography........................................1 - 7
Introduction
1
C
o
n
t
e
n
t
s
Introduction 1 - 1
Introduction
1
1.1 Background
M
any aspects of the documentation on low-volume road provision in the SADC
region have stemmed from technology and research carried out in Europe and
the USA some 30 - 40 years ago in vastly different environments. Although some
of this documentation has been modied to some extent in the intervening years, the f
basic philosophy of road provision has remained essentially the same. Whilst these
standard approaches may still be appropriate for the more heavily trafcked SADC
trunk road network, they are clearly inappropriate for use on low-volume roads which
make up a large proportion of national road networks. This has prompted a number
of international research organizations, as well as government departments and local
agencies, to undertake research into various aspects of low-volume sealed roads.
The body of highway engineer ing knowledge
remains empiric rather than rigorously scientic.
So, the knowledge taught in our [UK, USA]
universities is generally derived from a synthesis
of local experience. No wonder it is often irrelevant
and sometimes down right misleading in other
parts of the world.
Ray Millard, Highways Advisor, World Bank.
2
nd
Int. Conf. on Low-volume Roads, 1979
1
.
Box 1.1 - Road research in the SADC region
Research carried out in the SADC region by a number of international,
regional and local organisations, which is conservatively estimated to have
cost US $20 - 30 million, has questioned many of the accepted assumptions
about the planning, design, construction and maintenance of low-volume
sealed roads. This research has quite clearly shown:
the importance of adopting a more holistic, sustainable approach to the
provision of low-volume roads f
the need to revise conventional approaches to planning, economic
appraisal and the environment
the shortcomings of conventional specications and, to some extent,
of test methods, in assessing the adequacy of local materials for use inn
low-volume roads
the advantages of adopting more appropriate geometric and pavement t
design standards
the economic success of innovative construction methods
the importance of paying greater attention to the environmental aspects
of road provision
Research carried out in the SADC region
has catalysed the re-thinking of the whole
approach to low-volume sealed roads
2,3,4
.
Introduction 1 - 2
Unfortunately, because of a lack of funding, there has been very little effective
dissemination of the research carried out in the region. This has led to:
a lack of awareness of the results of research
a lack of understanding of the often satisfactory performance of innovative
solutions
an aversion to the use of non-standard designs, particularly by foreign
consultants and contractors who are often unfamiliar with local conditions
poor technology transfer
little implementation of innovative technology
In recognition of the need for raising awareness of recent developments
in low-volume sealed road technology in the region, the Southern African
Transport and Communications Commission (SATCC) commissioned the
preparation of this Guideline on Low-volume Sealed Roads (LVSRs) which
was funded by DFID, NORAD and SIDA.
1.2 Purpose and Scope
T
he main purpose of the Guideline is to provide a synthesis of practical,
state-of-the-art approaches to LVSR provision, based largely on regional
knowledge and experience, while taking into account international best practice.
In so doing, the primary goal is to reduce the cost of constructing and
maintaining LVSRs leading to:
increased public and commercial transport through lower road user costs
improved access to schools, clinics, jobs, urban centres and neighbouring
rural areas
improved environmental, health and social conditions
reduced depletion of nite materials resources - regravelling is an inherently
unsustainable activity
enhanced socio-economic growth, development and poverty alleviation
The means of achieving the above hinges on cost-effective provision of sealed
roads in rural and peri-urban areas by the transfer of technology developed
through research. The Guideline therefore seeks to:
act as a vehicle for the dissemination and implementation of appropriate
in novative LVSR technology in the SADC region
promote the use of a holistic approach to LVSR provision
encourage optimal utilization of local resources and non-standard, but
appropriate, designs for all aspects of LVSR provision
promote greater local public and private sector involvement and d
participation in road projects
ultimately, act as the standard consultative document for LVSRs
Adoption of the above is expected to lead to an increase in sealed roads
constructed at an affordable cost and to an appropriate standard by applying
proven, sometimes unconventional, methods and innovative technology.
Probably the most important and critical
issue (in technology transfer) is information
dissemination. Presenting all available
and relevant information to practitioners is
essential to implementing improved procedures
and new techniques. Given the amount of
research and development that is still being
undertaken, the ability to disseminate this
information quickly is the key to advancing
the low-volume road situation.
Transport Research Circular No. 446, May
1995
5
.
Introduction 1 - 3
The Guideline is aimed at a wide range of stakeholders, from politicians to
practitioners, including consultants, contractors, materials suppliers, donors,
road users and the general public who, in various ways, are all involved in
different but complementary aspects of low-volume road provision.
Because the SADC region is a diverse one, it would be impractical and
inappropriate to provide recipe solutions for specifc situations. Instead,
emphasis has been placed on guiding the practitioner towards evaluating
alternative options and considering their pros and cons as a basis for decision
making and application to country-specifc situations. This is achieved by
collating together in one document key background knowledge and experience
in the application and performance of tried and tested, new and innovative
solutions in all aspects of LVSR provision.
The Guideline provides a compendium of recent approaches to the following
aspects of low-volume sealed road provision:
Planning, appraisal and environment.
Geometric design and road safety.
Pavement design, materials and surfacing.
Construction and drainage.
Maintenance.
The Guideline does not deal in detail with slope stability, geotechnical and
hydrological issues or standard drainage details. However, it provides a source
of comprehensive references which provide additional details and more fully
documented examples of local and international experience.
Although the Guideline has been produced specifcally for the SADC
environment, there are many aspects of it which, with sound engineering
judgement, could apply in similar environments elsewhere.
I.8 Fouus
T
he focus of the Guideline is on Low-volume Sealed Roads (LVSRs) - a term
for which there is no standard defnition. Typical criteria for defning such
roads include traffc volume, road function, administrative classifcation as well
as management and fnancing arrangements. The concept of a low-volume road
(LVR) also varies from country to country, simply because this type of road serves
different functions and operates in different socio-economic environments. In the
context of this Guideline, LVSRs are characterized by the following features that
pertain to the SADC region:
Table 1.1 - LVSR Characteristics
Contrasting examples of low-volume
roads in the SADC region
Earth/gravel road (Tan:ania).
Old strip road (Zimbabwe).
Old narrow-mat road (Zimbabwe).
New low-volume sealed road (Botswana).
Ownership Mostly local governments/communities but also provincial/ central governments.
Classication
and function
Mostly secondary or tertiary/access roads but can also be main/ primary roads.
Serve predominantly rural populations oI most countries typically more than
75 oI the population.
Management
and nancing
Local government Ior tertiary/access roads, central government Ior primary/
secondary roads.
Function Economic/social/administrative/political.
Physical
features
Majority are unsealed, partly engineered, single or 2-lane, earth/sand or gravel
roads with elevated running surIaces, side drains and cross-drainage structures,
including low or high level water crossings.
Trafc Relatively 'low-volume, typically up to about 200 vpd, carrying both motorised
and non-motorised traIfc.
Introduction 1 - 4
Low-volume roads in the region cut across a wide range of environments. In
practice, there will be many overlaps in classication and function and clear
distinctions will not always be apparent on functional terms alone. Nonetheless,
the focus will be secondary/tertiary/access roads in rural and peri-urban areas.
Primary
Secondary
Tertiary/Access
ma|or international/
national centre
town/administrative
centre
village/district centre
Figure 1.1 - Road hierarchy and function
1.4 Development of Guideline
T
he Guideline draws on the accumulated knowledge and practical experience
of international research organizations, consultants and others who have long
experience of working in the region. It was produced by a team comprising
key specialists in each technical eld, together with experts from SADC
countries.
The Guideline is unique in the following important aspects:
1. It was developed with a high level of local participation. As a result, it t
has been possible to capture and incorporate a signicant amount of local
knowledge in the document. The benets of this approach include a
document that:
reects the needs of the region
has an emphasis on local ownership
facilitates wider application
improves prospects for sustainable implementation
2. It draws extensively on the output of a 4-year SADC regional programme
of research in highway engineering materials
2
.
3. It focuses on the multi-dimensional nature of LVSR provision, giving
balanced attention to aspects of LVR provision that are often neglected d
in most other guidelines, such as the political, social, institutional and d
funding aspects.
Organisational chart for management and
development of the Guideline.
LVRs are multi-faceted. At one extreme,
they serve as a mobility link in the road
transport chain from the main highway
network to the local market. At another
extreme, they serve as an access link in a
road transport chain with one end in the
agricultural elds or villages and the other
in the town market.
Mobility
Trunk
Primary
Secondary
Tertiary
Access
Access
Project
Manager
Guideline
Chapters
SADC Working Group
of Member States
Core Management
Group
Lead Authors
Introduction 1 - 5
I.5 SIruuIure and ConIenI
T
he Guideline is divided into eight chapters which collectively address
various aspects of LVSR provision as presented below.
I
1ntroductIon
Comprises the introduction to the Guideline, including an
overview of the focus of the document and the approach
advocated in contrast to previous approaches to road provision.
Against this background, the purpose, scope, development and
structure of the Guideline are highlighted.
z
HegIonaI
SettIng
Provides the geographic setting for the SADC region.
Gives an overview of the regional road network and its
various details. Highlights the challenge faced in providing
LVSRs in a sustainable manner and the developments taking
place in road sector reform. Outlines the main components
of LVSR provision.
8
PIannIng,
AppraIsaI and
EnvIronmentaI
1ssues
Provides a holistic framework for planning and appraising
LVSRs and highlights the key external factors that affect
their provision. Covers the process of life-cycle costing and
the appropriateness of the available appraisal tools for
doing so. Presents various environmental issues including the
importance of the EIA process in the planning process.
4
GeometrIc
DesIgn and
Hoad SaIety
Presents factors relevant to the selection of appropriate
standards for LVSRs and the steps involved in selecting
suitable solutions. Summarises both conventional techniques
and low-cost design-by-eye` methods, and the cost,
environmental and safety implications of each. Highlights
measures for improving road safety on LVSRs.
5
Pavement
DesIgn,
MaterIaIs and
SurIacIng
Provides a systems approach to the design of LVSR
pavements and surfacings derived from regional research
work and practice. Highlights the importance of using local
materials selected on the basis of appropriate specifcations.
Emphasises the importance of catering for both internal
and external drainage of pavements to enhance performance.
6
ConstructIon
and DraInage
Provides guidance on the choice of methods available for
the construction of LVSRs, with a focus on labour-based
methods. Includes examples aimed at optimising the use of
local labour and equipment technologies within a conducive
contracting environment aimed at maximizing the use of
small-scale local contractors.
Introduction 1 - 6
V
MaIntenance
and Hoad
Management
Highlights the importance of maintenance and the challenges
faced in carrying it out effectively and effciently. Presents
the particular characteristics of LVSRs, including their
deterioration characteristics. Outlines typical maintenance
management functions and considers the contractual
aspects of undertaking maintenance works. Outlines the
role, function and selection criteria for Road Management
Systems.
8
From VIsIon to
PractIce
Summarises the motivation for producing the Guideline
and the benefts of adopting the approaches proposed.
Outlines the pathway to implementation of the Guideline,
the barriers that need to be overcome in the course of so
doing and the need to take account of many non-techni-
cal factors that often infuence the manner in which LVSRs
are provided.
I.6 UpdaIIng
A
s highway engineering technology and improved methods of low-vol-
ume road provision are continually being researched and changed, it will
be necessary to update the Guideline periodically to refect improvements in
practice.
The Guideline has been produced in a loose-leaf format to allow notes and
pages to be inserted as and when necessary. In addition, it has been produced
in electronic CD format and has also been posted on the SATCC website
www.sadc.int. The Guideline is produced in all three offcial SADC languages
- English, French and Portuguese.
I.V Sourues oI 1nIormaIIon
I
n addition to the references cited in the text of each chapter, an extensive
bibliography has also been provided for those readers who wish to obtain
additional information about any of the topics included. A list of the main
organizations producing relevant publications is also provided, including their
contact details.
Introduction 1 - 7
I.8 HeIerenues and BIbIIograpby
HeIerences
1. Transportation Research Board (1979). Low-volume Roads: Second
International Conference. Transportation Research Record 702. National
Academy of Sciences, Washington, D.C. August, 1979.
2. Gourley C S and P A K Greening (1999). Performance of Low-volume
Sealed Roads: Results and Recommendations from Studies in Southern
Africa. Project Report PR/OSC/167/99. TRL. November, 1999.
3. Norwegian Public Roads Administration (1999). A Guide to the Use of
Otta Seals. Road Technology Department (NRRL), Publication No.
93, Oslo. August, 1999.
4. Netterberg F and P Paige-Green (1998). Pavement Materials for Low-
volume Roads in Southern Africa: A Review. Annual Transport Convention,
S.443, Vol. 2D, Pretoria. July, 1988.
5. Transport Research Board/National Research Council (1995). Assessing
Worldwide Low-volume Roads: Problems, Needs and Impacts. Transport
Research Circular No. 446. Washington. May, 1995.
C
h
a
p
t
e
r

2
1. Introduction
2. Regional Setting
4. Geometric Design
and Road Safety
5. Pavement Design,
6. Construction and
Drainage
7. Maintenance and
Road Management
SADC Guideline on Low-Volume Sealed Roads July 2003
Regional Setting
2
2.1 Introduction ........................................................... 2 - 1
2.1.1 Background ................................................... d 2 - 1
2.1.2 Purpose and Scope of Chapter ............................ 2 - 1
2.2 The SADC Region ................................................... 2 - 2
2.2.1 Geographic Setting .......................................... 2 - 2
2.2.2 Road Sector Reform......................................... m 2 - 2
2.3 Regional Road Network ........................................... 2 - 5
2.3.1 The Road Network .......................................... 2 - 5
2.3.2 Roads and Economic Development ....................... t 2 - 6
2.4 Road Network Details .............................................. 2 - 7
2.4.1 Classication and Trafc Flows ........................... 2 - 7
2.4.2 Design Standards............................................. 2 - 7
2.4.3 Road Conditions .............................................. 2 - 7
2.4.4 Road Safety ................................................... 2 - 8
2.5 Low-volume Sealed Roads ........................................ 2 - 9
2.5.1 The Challenge ................................................ 2 - 9
2.5.2 Gravel Road Issues .......................................... 2 - 9
2.5.3 Need for Sustainable Strategies ........................... 2 - 10
2.5.4 Main Components of LVSR Provision ................... n 2 - 12
2.6 Summary ............................................................. 2 - 14
2.7 References and Bibliography...................................... 2 - 15
C
o
n
t
e
n
t
s
i S i Regional Setting 2 - 1
2.1 Introduction
2.1.1 Background
R
oad transport is essential for the operation of the SADC economy and
for the development of national and regional markets. With a total eet
of over 10 million vehicles in 2002, it provides the dominant mode of freight
and passenger transport and carries about 80% of the regions total trade
in goods and services. It also accounts for about 20% of the regions
cross-border trade.
In common with many other developing countries, a large percentage of the
population in the SADC region lives in rural areas, where agriculture is the
dominant economic activity. In this context, low-volume roads full a critical
function in that they generally provide the only form of access to these
communities and provide for the mobility of people and movement of goods
from the elds to the market place. A good rural road network is therefore
essential for improving rural livelihoods and socio-economic growth and
development.
Unfortunately, despite the substantial investments made in road transport
infrastructure, the cost of road transport services is still inordinately high,
especially in rural areas where inadequate transport infrastructure and lack
of mobility still impose major constraints on development. There are many
reasons for this unsatisfactory situation, some of which are attributable to
the questionable nature of various approaches adopted in the provision of
LVSRs, many of which have proved to be unsustainable.
2.1.2 Purpose and Scope of Chapter
T
he main purpose of this chapter is to set the background to the SADC
region against which the characteristics of the regional road network
are presented. Issues relating to the sustainability of the gravel road network
and the challenges of alternative approaches for the delivery of low-volume
sealed roads are described. A new, more sustainable, multi-dimensional
approach is proposed that is set in the context of the reforms taking place in
the road sector in the SADC region. These initiatives are designed primarily
to improve the management and nancing of roads but will also facilitate
the implementation of the approaches recommended in this Guideline.
Agriculture is the predominant activity in
the rural areas of most SADC countries.
Regional Setting
2
2.2 The SADC Region
2.2.1 Geographic Setting
T
he Southern Africa Development Community (SADC) is an economic
grouping of fourteen countries located in the Southern African region
with a collective land area of about 10 million square kilometers and a
population of nearly 200 million people in 2002. Six of the fourteen coun-
tries are land-locked and two are island states as shown in Figure 2.1.
Figure 2.1 - The Southern African Development Community
The SADC region is diverse with climates varying from true deserts through
savannah to rainforests. Although the natural resource base is varied, the
economies of the various countries are mostly agrarian, with approximately
80% of the population living and working in the rural areas. In such a setting, n
rural roads play a critical role in support of socio-economic growth and
development and, ultimately, poverty alleviation - an over-arching goal of all
SADC governments.
2.2.2 Road Sector Reform
S
ince the late 1990s, the SADC region has experienced a wind of change in
its approach to road management and nancing. It has become increasingly
apparent that traditional approaches, which have relied on managing roads through t
a government department and nancing them through general budget allocations,
have generally not worked satisfactorily. This has led to the development of the
SADC Protocol on Transport, Communications and Meteorology
1
.
The SADC Protocol promotes perhaps the most far-reaching set of changes ever
contemplated in the roads sector in Sub-Saharan Africa. Its strategic vision is to
provide a safe, sustainable, efcient and effective road transport system in
support of regional socio-economic growth and development. Since its ratica-
tion by all member states, the SADC Protocol has been implemented to varying
extents and with varying degrees of success. All member states are required to
fully comply with the requirements of the protocol by 2010.
The vision of SADC is to transform the
fourteen countries of southern Africa from
operating as individual fragmented markets
into a single integrated vibrant and globally
competitive market characterised by free
movement of goods, services and labour.
Transport, particularly road transport, is
an integral component of this vision.
One of the rst institutional priorities identied
by SADC was the creation of the Southern
African Transport and Communications
Commission (SATCC) to coordinate the use
of existing systems and the planning and
nancing of additional regional transport
facilities. Transport is, therefore, the major
initial focus for regional action.
DEMOCRATIC
REPUBLIC
OF CONGO
MOZAMBI QUE
ZIMBABWE
BOTSWANA
SWAZILAND
LESOTHO
SOUTHAFRICA
NAMIBIA
ANGOLA
Z A MB I A
TANZANIA
Mauritius
Kinshasa
Luanda
Windhoek
Gaborone
Pretoria
Mbabane
Maseru
Cape Town
Maputo
Harare
Lusaka
Dar es Salaam
Port Louis
MALAWI
Seychelles
Victoria
The bulk of the SADC rural road network is still
unsurfaced and in relatively poor condition.
Box 2.1 - The main features of the SADC Protocol on Transport,
Communications and Meteorology
The SADC Protocol commits member states to the development of a
harmonised regional road sector policy with the following main features: d
Clear demarcating and g allocating of authority and responsibilities for g road rr
funding and road management.
Establishing accountable and e autonomous roads authorities with public and s d
private sector participation in key decision-making and the ability to source
expertise outside civil service restrictions.
Adopting commercial management practices to foster institutional,
economic and technical efciency, amongst others, by introducing
competition in undertaking any road-related activity and adopting a
preference for the contracting out of all types of road construction
and maintenance activities.
Adopting appropriate nancing principles and practices to secure
adequate and sustainable sources of funding through incremental
expansion of road user charging.
Dedicating revenues from roads to their provision, operation and
maintenance.
Identifying sustainable funding sources to ensure a regular ow of funds. s
SADC Institutional Framework
The agreed SADC institutional framework clearly and unambiguously dif-
ferentiates between the separate and discrete roles played by key road sector
stakeholders in terms of policy formulation, policy delivery and works
execution as illustrated in Figure 2.2.
Parliament
Minister of Transport
RA Board
CEO
RF Board
CEO
Roads Agency Road Fund
Consultants Contractors Road Users
General Public/Road User
Reporting/delivery Consultation/coordination Monitoring
Policy
Formulation
Policy
Delivery
Works
Execution
Road User
Charges
Ministers Committee
Other Roads Authorities
RA = Roads Authority
RF = Road Fund
CEO = Chief Executive Officer
Figure 2.2 - SADC institutional framework for management
and nancing of roads
2
The restructuring of road management
and nancing in the SADC region, within
a more commercialised institutional frame-
work, is meant to ensure that institutional
capacity exists to support improvements in
technical capability, such as maintenance
operations and management.
Within the new SADC institutional framework, policy, management, nancing
and operations are treated as follows:
Policy formulation: The overall legal authority for the road network is vested
in a single Ministry with responsibility for all regulatory, policy, standards
and legislative matters. The Ministry has authority over the Transport/
Trafc Agency. The authority over the National Roads Board is limited
to approving the level of road user charges recommended by the Board to
nance road maintenance and improvement works, and to monitoring the
Boards compliance with the terms set out in the legislation under which
it was established.
A Ministers Committee fulls the function of a policy co-ordination forum
in respect of national, regional and local road authorities. The committee
also plays an important role in promoting transparency and accountability
and democratizing decision-making with regard to roads.
Management: An arms-length autonomous or semi-autonomous Roads
Agency has replaced (or commercialised) the former Roads Department in
the Ministry of Transport. Its functions are basically the same as those of
the previous Roads Department in terms of strategic management and planning
of the development, maintenance and rehabilitation of the national road net-
work, except that they are carried out in a commercial manner. The Agency is
overseen by a majority private sector Board and managed on a day-to-day n
basis by a Chief Executive Ofcer (CEO).
Financing: An arms-length autonomous or semi-autonomous Road Fund
operates as a commercial agency with responsibility for road nancing. In
so doing, it:
acts as a channel for the receipt of all revenues destined for roads
disburses funds to roads agencies based on simple, transparent procedures
audits compliance with well dened nancial auditing principles
Sustainable funding for road maintenance is based on the user pays principle
and is secured through the levying of a Road User Charge. Such a charge
reects the usage of roads and typically consists of a fuel levy on petrol,
diesel, vehicle license fees including supplementary heavy vehicle license
fees, nes imposed on overloaded vehicles, and any other user charges that
may be preseribed by Parliament from time to time.
The funds available from road user charges should not necessarily be spent
directly according to trafc level. Low-volume social roads will probably
need to be subsidised to some extent from the revenues from high-volume
economic roads.
Operations: All types of road construction and maintenance works should be
contracted to the private sector through competitive bidding processes rather
than undertaken in-house by Force Account or Direct Labour operations.
The procurement of works through performance-specied term contracts and
the use of Petty Contractors is increasingly being viewed as the preferred
method of contracting out maintenance works, in contrast to the traditional
type of contract which, typically, is based on rather prescriptive input
specications and utilises large, foreign contractors.
2.3 Regional Road Network
2.3.1 The Road Network
T
he total length of the SADC classied road network (Figure 2.3) is just
over 930,000 km of which approximately 20 per cent is paved. More
than half of the regions total network (511,000 km) is in South Africa. There
is also a large network of rural roads in the SADC region, approximately
430,000 km, which consists mainly of 2-lane, all-weather gravel roads and f
seasonal earth tracks. Most of these roads were constructed in the post
independence era of the 1960s and 1970s and are one of the regions biggest
assets with current replacement costs in excess of US $50 billion.
Figure 2.3 - The SADC Regional Trunk Road Network (2001)
(excludes the Democratic Republic of the Congo)
The current main road length averages about 5.6 kilometres for every 100
square kilometers, which is low by comparison with to other developing
regions such as Latin America (12 km/100 sq. km) and Asia (18 km/sq. km).
Table 2.1 - Inventory of SADC Regional Road Network
The SADC Regional Trunk Road Network
(RTRN) comprises approximately 50,000
kms of strategic, intra-regional routes link-
ing capital cities, major regional ports and
other areas of economic importance. In
addition to the unpaved rural road network,
a signicant proportion of the RTRN
(approximately 30 per cent) also carries
relatively low levels of trafc and, hence,
these roads are also classied as low-volume
roads.
Main Roads Rural Roads Total Network
Paved
(km)
Unpaved
(km)
Total
(km)
Paved
(km)
Unpaved
(km)
Total
(km)
Paved
(km)
Unpaved
(km)
Total
(km)
105,122 395,900 501,022 21,559 409,626 431,185 126,681 805,526 932,207
21.0% 79.0% 100.0% 5.0% 95.0% 100.0% 13.6% 86.4% 100.0%
Source: Report by SAGP consultants; Updates from SADC member states (2001)
4
. (Note:
Classication is inconsistent. Main roads can include trunk, regional, main, primary and
secondary roads.)
* Excludes the Democratic Republic of the Congo
A substantial proportion of both the main
and rural road networks in the SADC region
is unpaved.
5 % paved
21 % paved
95 % unpaved
79 % unpaved
Rural Roads
Main Roads
Europe/Central Asia
Middle East/North Africa
South Asia
Latin America/Caribbean
Sub-Saharan Africa %paved roads
0 20 40 60 80 100
Nairobi
ANGOLA
(Cabinda enclave)
Lobito
CONGO
RWANDA
BURUNDI
UGANDA
KENYA
TANZANIA
ANGOLA
ZAMBIA
ZIMBABWE
NAMIBIA
BOTSWANA
MOZAMBIQUE
SWAZILAND
SOUTH
AFRICA
LESOTHO
Trunk Road
Trunk Railway
Regional Port
Capital City
100 200 300 400 500 50 100 150 200
km km
Luanda
Kinshasa
Namibe
Walvis Bay
Windhoek
Gabarone
Lusaka
Cape Town
Port Elizabeth
East London
Durban
Maseru
Pretoria
Mbahane
Richards Bay
Maputo
Beira
Harare
Nacala
Dar es Salaam
Lilongwe
MALAWI
Saldanha Bay
N
Mauritius
Kampala
Mauritius
Port Louis
Seychelles
Victoria
Sub-Saharan Africa, including the SADC
region, lags considerably behind Asia and
Latin America in terms of road coverage
and density
3
.
2.3.2 Roads and Economic Development
T
he precise role that roads play in economic development is complex but
the fact that there is a link is widely accepted and most economists agree
that investment in transport infrastructure makes a positive contribution.
However, the provision of road transport infrastructure alone is not enough
to reap all the possible benets from interventions. Indeed, recent research
5
highlights two major aspects that should be considered by policy makers: the
access to transport means, and the market organisation for goods and trans-
port services. r Thus, SADC governments should also address the need for
d l credit, low-cost vehicles, and intermediate means of transport, and also be
pprepared to intervene in markets to ensure that benets become widespread.
The benets from road investment vary greatly depending upon the type of
interventions, and the social and economic context where they take place.
For example, in those rural areas in southern Africa where infrastructure
is so basic that vehicle use is difcult or near impossible, facilitating the
change to motorised transport would result in major benets.
In terms of the relationship between km of paved roads/million persons and
GDP per capita, the SADC region occupies a relatively low position (Figure 2.4).
Thus, improving the efciency of LVSR provision by providing them at lower
and more affordable costs than hitherto, has the potential (together with other l
complementary interventions) for providing considerable benets to the
regions economy and, in so doing, for reducing poverty.
Figure 2.4 - International comparison of paved road density and GDP per capita
Road transport investment should be
viewed as part of an integrated approach
considering the economic and social con-
text where improvements take place, and
including additional policies on other
fronts (e.g. marketing, education, stimulus
to demand) that would lead to higher social
returns from investment.
8ulgaria
Lithuania
|reland
Prance
1apan
Spain
|srael
USA
Singapore
Malaysia
Uruguay
Turkey
Libya
|ndonesia
Mexico
|taly
Albania
Morocco
1ordan
Honduras
|vory Coast emen
Kenya
Cambodia
Mali
8urundi
Tunisia
l00 000
l00 000
l0 000
l0 000
l000
l000
l00
l0
3!$#
P
a
v
e
d

r
o
a
d
s

(
k
m
)

/

m
i
l
l
i
o
n

p
e
r
s
o
n
s
GDP per capita (US$) l997
Road network density in developed countries
is generally much higher than in developing
countries. However, the cost of building
roads is not proportional to the wealth of a
nation in terms, for example, of the GDP per
inhabitant. Thus, with the GDP per inhabitant
being 10 to 20 times lower in developing
countries, the cost of road provision is two to
three times higher than in developed
countries. It is therefore critically important
that paved road construction costs are mini-
mized through the selection of appropriate o
standards and implementation strategies.
2.4 Road Network Details
2.4.1 Classication and Trafc Flows
R
oads in the SADC region are typically classied according to function
as shown in Table 2.2 and illustrated in Figure 1.1.
Table 2.2 - Typical road functions and classication
Key Tr = Trunk P = Primary S = Secondary Te =Tertiary/access
With the exception of South Africa, and apart from a few heavily trafcked
international routes, most of the main roads carry modest volumes of trafc,
with little more than about 10 per cent carrying over 2000 vpd, approximately
25 per cent of which consists of heavy, often over-loaded, commercial vehicles.
On rural roads, trafc volumes are relatively very low and much of this
network carries trafc in the range of 50 - 200 vpd. Near village centres k
non-motorised trafc, including bicycles, often comprises a signicant
proportion of the total trafc.
The low-trafc characteristics of much of the rural road networks in the
SADC region have implications for geometric design, pavement and drainage
structures, road furniture and maintenance practice and, indeed, the manner
in which investment appraisals are carried out.
2.4.2 Design Standards
R
oad design standards in the SADC region vary considerably, reecting
either the practice of the developed countries with which member states
have had previous ties, or the preferences of international consultants, usually
donor funded, who have worked in the country. Thus, British, American,
Portuguese, French, German and other standards have left their mark on the
road infrastructure. In many instances, these standards have been inappropriate
for cost-effective application in the SADC region where the physiographic,
socio-economic and environmental conditions vary tremendously from
those prevailing in the countries of origin of the standards.
2.4.3 Road Conditions
A
bout 50% of the paved main road network is currently (2001) in good
condition, with the remainder classied as only fair or poor, as shown
in Table 2.3. The unpaved main road network is considerably worse than the
paved road network, with less than 40% being in good condition. The net
result is that transport costs are very high with estimates of four to ve times
of those in developed countries and, for some landlocked countries, as high
as 30 - 40 per cent of the price of goods
6
.
Road Function Design
Class
Trafc
Flow (AADT)
Typical
Surface Type
Tr P S Te
A > 2000 Paved
B 500 - 2000 Paved
C 200 - 500 Paved/Unpaved
D 50 - 200 Unpaved
E < 50 Unpaved
Pedestrians and non-motorised trafc often
constitute a signicant proportion of trafc
near villages.
100% = 5.64
100% = 2.50
100% = 3.67
7.1%
7.1%
5.0%
42.5%
0.7%
2.1%
24.8%
1.8%
8.9%
Overhead
Repairs &
Maintenance
Tyres
Fuel
Tax
Insurance
Drivers costs
Interst
Depreciation
16%
8%
24%
5%
28%
10%
10.9%
8.2%
3.8%
32.7%
1.1%
3.3%
27.2%
2.7%
10.1%
3%
2%
4%
Road quality Good Reasonable Bad
Average speed 90 70 45 km/h
Rolling resistance 7 16 25 kg/tonne
Haulage rate 2.50 3.67 5.64 Hfl/km
Source: PIARC (1987)
costs - both the operating and maintenance
costs of vehicles escalate with increasing
rapidity as the surface condition worsens
(PIARC, 1987).
Main Roads Road Condition (Weighted Average)
Good Fair Poor
Paved 49 36 15
Unpaved 38 31 31
Table 2.3 - Condition of main roads in the SADC region
Sources: Report by SAGP consultants to SATCC
4
; Updates from member states (2001).
Notes:
Good: Substantially free of defects and requiring only routine maintenance.
Unpaved roads need only routine grading and spot repairs.
Fair: Having signicant defects and requiring resurfacing or strengthening.
Unpaved roads need reshaping or re-gravelling and spot repair of drainage.
Poor: Having extensive defects and requiring immediate rehabilitation or reconstruction.
Unpaved roads need reconstruction and major drainage works.
Rural poverty in the SADC region is exacerbated by the prevailing poor road
conditions which adversely affect accessibility and, as a result, limit the
facilitating role of transport in both production and consumption activities.
Improvements in the quality and reliability of the rural road network are
therefore critical for development and poverty eradication, the over-arching
goal of all SADC governments.
For these reasons, most of the current investment in the roads sub-sector
involves upgrading these predominantly low-volume, rural secondary and
feeder roads to an improved standard at minimum life-cycle cost - which is
the main focus of this Guideline.
2.4.4 Road Safety
T
here is a serious road safety problem in all countries of the SADC region.
This is characterised by a high rate of road accidents involving pedestrians
and other vulnerable road users, particularly on rural roads where vehicle
speeds tend to be relatively high. Fatality rates, in relation to vehicle eets,
are estimated to be 30 - 40 times higher than those of industrialised countries
and cost the region between one and three per cent of its annual GDP
7
.
Fortunately, there is now a widespread recognition that much more can be
done to improve the poor road safety situation. This includes improvements
in road design and the more widespread use of road safety audits. These
issues, amongst others, are dealt with in Chapter 4 of the Guideline.
My country was never so rich that it could
afford poor roads
(William the Conqueror, Doomsday Survey,
1066).
Can any country afford roads in this
condition?
The high accident rate in the SADC region
is a source of loss and damage to trade
and one of the major causes of injury and
death.
2.5 Low-volume Sealed Roads
2.5.1 The Challenge
A
number of factors combine to pose a major challenge to road authorities
in the provision of LVSRs. In this regard:
They generally constitute a high proportion (typically 80%) of the road
network for which available resources are severely limited.
Limited funding tends to be allocated in favour of HVRs which are
perceived as fullling an important economic role even though LVRs ful- d
ll at least equally important social and development functions.
Social and developmental benets are often dealt with inadequately in
traditional investment appraisal methodology.
There has been a tendency to focus predominantly on the technical aspects
of LVSRs, with inadequate attention being paid to the other environments
within which they operate and which inuence their long-term sustainability.
Traditional highway engineering, planning and standards that are appliedd
to roads with higher volumes of trafc are often not appropriate for
LVSRs and, when used, result in unnecessarily expensive solutions.
Although trafc volumes may be relatively low, h vehicle loads are oftenn
high, with signicant overloading. This makes the relatively light pavement
structures, that would otherwise be appropriate, vulnerable to overloading.
The allocation of limited research funding tends to be prioritized in favour
of high-volume roads which are perceived to offer higher rates of return.
In addition to the challenges faced by road agencies in providing LVSRs,
transport agencies also face a major challenge of providing affordable
transport services to rural communities. However, although closely related, t
this topic is outside the scope of this Guideline.
2.5.2 Gravel Road Issues
A
substantial proportion of the rural road networks, and to a lesser extent,
of the main road networks in the SADC region, are currently unpaved.
These roads need to be continuously regravelled utilizing naturally occurring
gravels, a nite, often scarce, non-renewable resource.
In practice, many countries do not have the necessary nancial resources to
sustain their gravel road networks. As illustrated in Figure 2.5, this quickly
leads to the total loss of the investment as well as to all-weather access for
the communities that these roads serve.
In the past, geometric design standards
were not specically addressed in the SADC
region. Both road planners and designers
were faced with either using national
imported standards that were developed for
a higher classication of roads or reduc-
ing these higher classication standards to
meet economic constraints, usually without
a logical basis for doing so.
Based on a typical regravelling cycle of 3 -
4 years and a replacement gravel thickness
of 100 mm over a 6.5 m carriageway, the
annual consumption of gravel in the region
is of the order of 150 million cubic metres.
Is this process sustainable in the medium to
long term? NO!
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Year
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Year
Regravel Regravel
Road
Requires
Rebuilding
20
15
10
5
0
20
15
10
5
0
G
r
a
v
e
l
t
h
i
c
k
n
e
s
s
(
c
m
)
G
r
a
v
e
l
t
h
i
c
k
n
e
s
s
(
c
m
)
(a) Gravel thickness with preventative maintenance (timely regravelling). h
(b) Gravel thickness without preventative maintenance (no timely re-gravelling). t
Figure 2.5 - Periodic maintenance (regravelling) of unsurfaced roads
10
Sustainability considerations
There are a number of very serious concerns to national governments,
development agencies and rural communities regarding the use of gravel t
road surfaces. These are summarized in Table 2.4.
Table 2.4 - Gravel road sustainability considerations
Issue Sustainability Factor
Financial and
economic
Gravel is a sacricial layer and replacement is at a high cost:

- 30 to 150 mm can be lost per annum
- regravelling operations cost US $5,000 to 30,000 per/km/year
- periodic maintenance costs US $2,000 to $3,000/km/year
- continuous regravelling is a signicant recurrent nancial burden
Institutional and
management
Unpaved roads:
- typically constitute 70 to 90% of the main road network and most
of the undesignated network
- generate a continuous cycle of deterioration and backlog maintenance
Roads agencies:
- suffer logistical, technical and nancial constraints
- often have limited physical, human and natural resources
- have little capacity to intervene in maintenance activities as required
Standards and
technology
Wastage of nite resources (selective gravelling difcult in practice).

Expensive mechanised approaches required for regravelling result in:
- operational, support and technical problems
- local nancing burden
Potential longer term sustainability of labour-based methods

Social
Land take and rehabilitation of borrow pits.Wet weather access

problems for communities continue.
Generation of dust in dry weather with adverse impacts including:
- health hazard
- pedestrian and vehicle safety
- crop, natural habitat and vehicle damage
Environmental
Continuous demand for use of non-renewable natural resources

which are being seriously depleted.
Haul distances and costs continually increase.
Land take continues.
Roads susceptible to erosion (silting of drains and water courses).
Chemical treatment options can be hazardous.
Due to loss of nes, gravel roads often
become very rough which make driving
conditions hazardous and, in addition to
severe driver discomfort, impose very high
vehicle operating costs.
Generation of dust is a constant hazard to
over-taking motorists as well as to inhabitants
living nearby and their crops.
For the above reasons, it is now abundantly clear that the time has come
to provide more sustainable solutions to low-volume roads in many SADC
countries by sealing them, where viable, at an affordable cost. Meeting this
challenge is the main focus of this Guideline.
Regional Setting 2 - 11
2.5.3 Need Ior SustaInabIe StrategIes
T
raditional approaches to LVSR provision have tended to focus some-
what narrowly on the technical environment with inadequate consider-
ation of the other inter-related environments shown in Figure 2.6. The result
has often been a lack of responsiveness to the needs of various stakeholders
and a reduced likelihood of achieving sustainable solutions
8,9
.
Lessons learned from the region indicate that if LVSRs are to be provided in
a more sustainable manner than hitherto, new approaches are required that
focus in a more holistic way on a number of factors operating within multi-
dimensional, inter-acting environments.
Figure 2.6 - A new framework for sustainable provision of LVSRs
Achieving sustainability in the provision of LVSRs requires an important shift
of emphasis from a relatively narrow focus to a more broadly focused, multi-
dimensional approach in which a number of infuential factors need to be
considered as indicated in Table 2.5.
Table 2.5 - Factors affecting the provision of LVSRs in the SADC region
0OLITICALLY
SUPPORTED
3OCIALLY
ACCEPTABLE
)NSTITUTIONALLY
POSSIBLE
4ECHNOLOGICALLY
APPROPRIATE
%CONOMICALLY
VIABLE
&INANCIALLY
SOUND
%NVIRONMENTALLY
SUSTAINABLE
Criteria for sustainabIe
provision of LVSR
Environment Sustainability factors
Political *RYHUQPHQWSROLF\ Often no coherent policy in place.
Need to highlight the key benefts to be derived Irom LVSRs
leading to the development oI a comprehensive policy that:
promotes sustainability in all aspects oI LVSR provision

covers wider social and economic goals oI poverty alleviationan
by implication, employment creation
promotes the use oI appropriate technology as well as environmental
awareness
3ROLWLFDODQGSXEOLFSHUFHSWLRQV Tenaency to favour conventional approaches
ana stanaaras with perceivea minimum 'risk` attachea to them.
Need to maintain continuous dialogue with political and public

stakeholders in order to:
highlight pros and cons oI alternative solutions in a balanced

and transparent manner
more determinedly 'sell proven innovative approaches and appropriate,
non-traditional standards on the basis oI quantifed benefts
By their nature, L\SRs jull a variety oj
economic and social junctions and their
provision is inuenced by a number oj com-
plex, inter-acting environments in which
non-technical jactors play a crucial role.
Thus, it is oj paramount importance that
emphasis is placed on a multi-disciplinary,
participatory approach in the planning, design,
construction, maintenance, etc., oj L\SRs.
Social Social issues: Tend to be neglected or to be subordinate to technical and
economic issues.
Adopt strategies that:
support cost-effective labour-based methods of construction and

maintenance
ensure community participation in mainstream policy, planning
and decision making
eliminate gender biases and promote participation by
women in labour-based activities
promote activities and investment for sustainable enhanced livelihoods
minimise the amount of resettlement and, where unavoidable,
mitigate its effects by expeditious and compensated resettlement
Institutional Institutional capacity: Often inadequate. Growing trend towards
establishment of more autonomous central and local road authorities.
promote commercial management practices to foster institutional,

economic and technical efciency in the provision of LVSRs
reduce and eventually phase out in-house, force account operations
in favour of contracting out of works to the private sector
dene and develop an optimal environment for the development
of local contractors
Technical Technology choice: A wide range of options is available for designing,
constructing and maintaining LVSRs.
employ appropriate design standards and specications

utilise technologies that create employment
use types of contract that support the use of local contractors
promote road safety in all aspects of LVSR provision
Economic Economic analysis: Traditional approaches are often unable to capture
the full benets of LVSR provision.
integrate social, environmental and economic elements in project appraisal

use appropriate evaluation tools capable of quantifying social,
economic and environmental costs and benets
Financial Funding: Usually inadequate to meet minimum requirements.
promote commercialisation in the roads sector

establish sustainable sources of funding
Enviromental Environment: Generally regarded as the price to be paid for development
and often neglected.
minimise the physical impacts of construction and maintenance

take account of socio-cultural impacts (community cohesion)
resource management (recycling of non-renewable materials)
recognise that climate change should be taken into account in the
design process
2.5.4 Main Components of LVSR Provision
T
he four major components of LVSR provision that will typically be
undertaken within the new SADC institutional framework are as follows:
Planning
Design
Construction
Maintenance
These components have important but changing impacts on the end result - a
Low-volume Sealed Road - in terms of their level of inuence d
11
. Figure 2.7
illustrates the essential features of the level of inuence concept in terms of
how the effect on the total life-cycle costs of a LVSR project decreases as the
project evolves.
Level of
Influence
Increasing Expenditures
100 %
50 %
0 %
100 %
50 %
0 %
Planning
Design
Construction
Maintenance
Decreasing Influence
1 Time (Years) 10 - 15
Cumulative
Total cost
In essence:
Costs during the planning and design phases are relatively small com-
pared with the total expenditure and are incurred during a relatively short
period of the projects life. However, their downstream level of inuence is
very large in terms of decisions and commitments made during the early
phases of the project.
This emphasizes the importance of employing a broadly-based, holistic
approach to the planning of LVSRs with the main stakeholders being
involved in the decision-making process. In addition, the designs employed
(geometric and pavement) should be appropriate and relevant to the
environment in which t the road is being constructed.
The capital costs for construction are a fraction of the operating and
maintenance costs associated with a pavement life-cycle. However, the
decisions made during the construction phase, and the methods of
construction adopted, can have a great impact on the cost of maintaining
the road.
This emphasizes the importance of ensuring a high degree of quality
control in the use of local materials and the adoption of construction
methods that are appropriate to the multi-dimensional environment in
which the road is being provided.
Maintenance occupies a signicant number of years in the life of the
project and the type and cost of maintenance required is inuenced
signicantly by the preceding planning, design and construction phases.
This emphasizes the importance of ensuring that the maintenance phase
is prolonged as much as possible to extend the useful life of the road
and the period of time during which benets are incurred.
At the beginning of the project, the roads agency controls all factors
(100 per cent inuence) in determining future expenditures. The key issue
is how to optimize the use of scarce resources in the provision of LVSRs
in an efcient, effective, appropriate and sustainable manner.
The subsequent chapters of the Guideline deal in turn with the main components
of LVSR provision - planning, design, construction and maintenance - with
particular emphasis on the level of inuence concept described above.
z.6 Summary
T
he key points raised in this chapter are:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Roads are central to economic development and poverty alleviation as
well as to creating opportunities for employment in the SADC region.
Despite the substantial investments made in road infrastructure, road
transport costs remain very high, particularly in rural areas, and this has
had an adverse impact on the regional economy.

The road network of about one million kilometres is characterised by
relatively low traffc levels (< 200 vpd) outside of urban areas, variable
design standards, poor road conditions and a very serious road safety
problem.
More than 80% of the regional road network is unpaved. In the medium
to long term, continuous gravelling or regravelling of these roads is
unsustainable. Consideration must be given to sealing them, where
viable, at an affordable cost.
New, more sustainable, broadly focused, multi-dimensional approaches
are required to deal effectively and effciently with the management
of the large kilometrage of unsurfaced roads.
The region has embarked on major reforms of the road sector with the
objective of managing and fnancing roads within a more commer-
cialised environment. This will have a profound effect on the way in
which the sector operates in future and provides the potential for
substantial improvements in the provision of LVSRs.
The main components of LVSR provision - planning, design, construction
and maintenance - have important but changing impacts on the end result
in terms of their 'level of infuence.
This chapter puts into context the challenges that road agencies in the region
face in providing LVSRs in a sustainable manner - challenges that are
addressed in subsequent chapters of the Guideline.
z.V HeIerenues and BIbIIograpby
HeIerences
1. SATCC (1998). SADC Protocol on Transport, Communications and
Meteorology. Maputo.
2. SATCC (1999). Model Legislative Provisions. Road Network Management
and Financing, Maputo.
3. NEPAD (2002). Main Report: Short-term Action Plan Infrastructure.
NEPAD Secretariat, Midrand.
4. Southern Africa Consulting Group (SAGP) (1998). Transport and
Communications Integration Study for Southern Africa. Review Final
Report. Vol. 1: Summary and Main Report. Maputo, 31 March, 1998.
5. Hine J L and S Ellis (2001). Agricultural Marketing and Access to
Transport Services. Rural Transport Knowledge Database. TRL Limited.
Crowthorne.
6. African Development Bank (2000). Report on Regional Integration in
Africa. African Development Bank, Abidjan.
7. Transport Research Laboratory, Ross Silcock Partnership and Overseas
Development Administration (1991). Towards Safer Roads in Developing
Countries ~ A Guide for Planners and Engineers. TRL, Crowthorne.
8. Parker N A (1997). The Socio-Economics of Paving Low-volume Roads.
Keynote Paper, 1.
o
Simpso International de Pavimentaco de Rodovias
de Baixo Volume de Trfego, Rio de Janeiro, 5 a 10 de Outubro de 1997.
9. The World Bank (1996). Sustainable Transport: Priorities for Policy
Reform. The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development,
Washington, D.C.
10. Intech Associates (2001). Low-cost Road Surfacing (LCS) Project. Rationale
for the Compilation of International Guidelines for Low-cost Sustainable
Road Surfacing. LCS Working Paper No.1.
11. Barrie D and B Paulson (1978). Professional Construction Management.
McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York.
HIbIIography
Behrens L C (1999). Overview of Low-volume Roads: Keynote Address. 7
th
Int.
Conf. On Low-volume Roads. Transportation Research Record No. 1652. TRB,
Washington.
CAPSA (1989). Cost Effective Low-volume Roads. Workshop Session, 5
th

Conf. on Asphalt Pavements for Southern Africa, 1989.
Cavelle D C (1993). Transport and Economic Performance: A Survey of
Developing Countries. World Bank Technical Paper 232. Africa. Technical De-
partment Series, World Bank, Washington, D.C.
Department of Transport (1992). Towards Appropriate Standards for Rural
Roads. Discussion document. Project Report PR 92/466/001, Pretoria.
Department of Transport (1993). Guidelines for Upgrading Low-volume Roads.
Project Report PR 92/466/002, Pretoria.
Division of Roads and Transport Technology (1990). The Design, Construction
and Maintenance of Low-volume Rural Roads and Bridges in Developing Areas.
CSIR, Pretoria.
Edmonds G A (1979). Appropriate Technology for Low-volume Roads. 2
nd

Int. Conf. on Low-volume Roads. Transportation Research Record No. 702.
TRB, Washington.
European Communities - Commission (1996). Towards sustainable transport
infrastructure: A sectoral approach in practice. Offce for Offcial Publications
of the European Communities, Luxembourg.
Gichaga F J and N A Parker (1988). Essentials of Highway Engineering.
Macmillan Publishers Limited, London.
Heggie I G (1995). Management and Financing of Roads: An Agenda for
Reform. World Bank Technical Paper 275 Africa Technical Series. World Bank,
Washington, D.C.
Howe J D G F and P Richards (1984). Rural Roads and Poverty Alleviation.
Intermediate Technology Publications Ltd., London.
Lebo K and D Schelling (200x). Design and Appraisal of Rural Road Infra-
structure: Ensuring Basic Access for Rural Communities. World Bank Tech-
nical paper No. 496. The World Bank, Washington, D.C.
Lees R and A Tostensen (1982). Regional Cooperation in Southern Africa:
The Case of the Southern African Development Coordination Conference
(SADCC). Review of African Political Economy. No. 23, Gaborone.
Mandaza I and A Tostensen (1994) Southern Africa in Search of a Common
Future: From the Conference to a Community. Printing and Publishing
Company of Botswana, Gaborone.
Millard R S (1979). The Craft of Highway Engineering. 2
nd
Int. Conf. On Low-
volume Roads. Transportation Research Record No. 702. TRB, Washington.
Oglesky H O (1990). Dilemmas in the Administration, Planning, Design,
Construction and Maintenance of Low-volume Roads. Transportation
Research Special Report 160, TRB, Washington.
UNESCO (1967). Low-Cost Roads: Design, Construction and Maintenance.
The Butterworth Group, London.
C
h
a
p
t
e
r

3
1. Introduction
2. Regional Setting
4. Geometric Design
and Road Safety
5. Pavement Design,
6. Construction and
Drainage
7. Maintenance and
Road Management
3.1 Introduction ............................................................... 3 - 1
3.1.1 Background ....................................................... d 3 - 1
3.1.2 Purpose and Scope of Chapter ................................ 3 - 2
3.2 Planning.. ............................................................... 3 - 3
3.2.1 General Approach ............................................... h 3 - 3
3.2.2 Planning Framework ........................................... 3 - 3
3.2.3 Planning Considerations ........................................ 3 - 4
3.2.4 External Factors .................................................. 3 - 6
3.2.5 Planning Tools .................................................... 3 - 7
3.2.6 Stakeholder Consultations ...................................... 3 - 9
3.2.7 Surveys............................................................ 3 - 10
3.3 Appraisal........................................................... . 3 - 14
3.3.1 Investment in LVSRs ............................................ 3 - 14
3.3.2 Life-Cycle Costing .............................................. 3 - 14
3.3.3 Quantication of Costs and Benets ......................... 3 - 16
3.3.4 Project Costs ..................................................... 3 - 17
3.3.5 Project Benets ................................................. 3 - 18
3.3.6 Cost-Benet Analysis .......................................... 3 - 20
3.3.7 Ranking Methods ............................................... 3 - 23
3.3.8 Implications of Using Revised Approaches ................ 3 - 24
3.4 Environmental Issues ................................................... 3 - 25
3.4.1 Introduction....................................................... n 3 - 25
3.4.2 The Environment ................................................ t 3 - 25
3.4.3 Typical Causes of Environmental Problems ................ 3 - 26
3.4.4 Environmental Impact Assessments .......................... 3 - 28
3.4.5 Assessing Environmental Impacts ............................ 3 - 31
3.5 Summary .............................................................. 3 - 33
3.6 References and Bibliography ..................................... 3 - 34
Planning, Appraisal &
3
C
o
n
t
e
n
t
s
i i & i Planning, Appraisal & Environmental Issues 3 - 1
3.1 Introduction
3.1.1 Background
A
s indicated in Chapter 2, planning exerts a substantial level of inuence
on the downstream aspects of LVSR provision in terms of its impact on
the subsequent design, construction and maintenance phases. The planning
phase can therefore be rightly viewed as the foundation on which the sub-
sequent phases are based. It is an activity aimed at considering a wide range
of options with the objective of providing an optimal, sustainable solution,
i.e. one which satises the multiple needs of stakeholders at minimum
life-cycle costs.
It is noteworthy that planning technologies and techniques that are often applied
in the region generally draw little distinction between low-volume and high-
volume roads even though these roads have quite different characteristics. As
a result, many aspects of LVSR sustainability are not adequately addressed.
Failure to revise or adapt these planning approaches to cater specically
for low-volume roads can lead to the adoption and implementation of sub-
optimal solutions that are unsustainable.
Planning, Appraisal &
3
Planning
Design
Construction
Maintenance
Duration of activities
S
e
q
u
e
n
c
e
o
f
a
c
t
i
v
i
t
i
e
s
Planning, Appraisal & Environmental Issues 3 - 2
The appraisal of LVSRs also requires careful consideration. This is largely
because the traditional tools that are available for their evaluation are generally
not adequate for capturing the full range of benets - often of a predominantly
social rather than economic nature - that arise from their upgrading. This
indicates the necessity for adopting methods of appraisal that include more
socially oriented investment criteria so as to accord with the social objec-
tives of poverty alleviation. Fortunately, new, customised economic evaluation
models are being developed which are better suited than hitherto for
appraising the upgrading of unpaved roads to a bituminous standard.
Prior to the start of the 1990s, environmental impact assessments of road
projects were generally not required and, where carried out, were done
largely at the insistence of donors. However, environmental issues are now
assuming greater importance than hitherto and environmental degradation is
no longer being regarded as the price to be paid for development. More and
more environmental units are being established within parent ministries to
ensure that appropriate mitigation measures are employed on road projects.
This requires an integrated framework for dealing with environmental issues
in a comprehensive and systematic manner.
3.1.2 Purpose and Scope of the Chapter
T
he main purpose of this chapter is to outline a generalised approach to
planning which is holistic in nature, taking into account the many exter-
nal factors that affect the process. The chapter also highlights approaches
that are typically adopted in the appraisal of LVSRs and provides guidance
on their adequacy for dealing with the full range of benets arising from
upgrading earth/gravel roads to a sealed standard. Finally, the chapter
considers the environmental issues facing road authorities in the region and
the various methods available for mitigating the adverse impacts of road
construction and maintenance.
3.2 Planning
3.2.1 General Approach
C
urrent approaches to the planning of LVSRs place greater emphasis than
hitherto on the important issue of sustainability. Achieving sustainability
in the provision of roads continues to elude transport professionals in many
countries. There are still many examples of roads being constructed which,
because of lack of sustainability in one way or another, often as a result of
inadequate maintenance, have resulted in wasted investments.
As highlighted in Chapter 2, a holistic approach is required in which all
dimensions of sustainability are addressed at the planning stage. This places
more weight on multi-disciplinary planning in which teams consisting of
planners, engineers, environmentalists, etc. work together with stakeholders
in order to reach optimal solutions in the most cost-effective way. Such an
approach provides the best chance of achieving long-term sustainability of
projects and is strongly promoted in this Guideline.
Planning for labour-based construction and maintenance works has also taken
on a new emphasis as more and more SADC governments recognise the
benets of adopting this approach, where viable, as a means of providing much
needed employment.
3.2.2 Planning Framework
A
major challenge faced by planners and engineers in the SADC region
is to ensure that the planning and appraisal procedures produce outputs
that have the full support of decision makers. Such a framework should be
transparent, relatively simple to carry out, unambiguous and equitable. Table
3.1 presents a generalised framework for this purpose.
Table 3.1 - Framework for planning and appraisal
A road where one or more of the seven
dimensions of sustainability is missing.
Project
Cycle
Planning
Activity
Typical Evaluation Tools Output
Identication Selection Policy resource analysis
Master Plans
Local/regional plans
Long list of
projects
Feasibility Screening Livelihoods analysis
Integrated Rural Accessibility Planning
Shorter list of
projects
Design Evaluation Cost-benet analysis
- consumer surplus (e.g. RED)
- producer surplus
- compound ranking
- multi-criteria analysis
Short list of
projects
Commitment
and
negotiation
Prioritisation Budget considerations
- ranking by economic or socio-
economic criteria
Final list of
projects
In principle, the planning and appraisal processes are structured activities
which start from the general and work towards the particular in relation to
both data and project ideas
1
. The main features of the planning and appraisal
processes are as follows:
When needs are great and resources limited,
selection methods are necessary to make
sure that only the roads with the greatest im- t
pact are constructed. Such methods should
not be too costly to apply in proportion to the
investment involved, nor should they be so
complicated that few understand how they
work. Ideally, selection methods should ensure
that few good candidate projects will be
rejected and not too many poor ones accepted.
Box 3.1 - Planning and appraisal processes
Selection: This is a multi-sectoral and multi-disciplinary process which h

should generate sufcient projects to ensure that no potentially worthwhile
ones are excluded from consideration. The output is a long list of projects
determined on the basis of an unconstrained policy resource analysis that
satisfy national road transport policy.
Screening: Denes the constraints within which specic planning
solutions must be found, i.e. a constrained policy resource analysis.
The output is a shorter list of projects that justify further, more detailed,
analysis.
Evaluation: The shorter list of projects is subjected to a detailed cost-
benet appraisal for which various methods are available. The output is t
a nal list of projects which satisfy a range of criteria - political, social,
economic, environmental - at least cost.
Prioritisation: Ranks the best projects in order of merit up to a cut-
off point dictated by the budget available.
3.2.3 Planning Considerations
T
he procedures described in the planning and appraisal framework shown
in Table 3.2 are common to any type of road project. However, there are
aspects of it that are of particular signicance in the planning and appraisal
of LVSRs that often do not emerge from conventional approaches. These are
summarised below:
Table 3.2 - Project cycle and related activities
Stage Issues to be considered
Project identication
Project objectives
Are the strategies being adopted supportive of government

policy? (e.g. employment creation).
Are they relevant to the current and future needs of beneciaries?
Are they cognisant of the multiple objectives and views of
stakeholders?
Have effective communication channels with stakeholders
been created? Are they gender sensitive?
Feasibility
Design criteria
Cost-benet analysis
Socio-economic assessment
Road safety assessment
Environmental assessment
Livelihoods
Is there adequate participatory planning and consultation

with public and private sector stakeholders?
Do the design criteria take full account of the specicities
of LVSRs, including non-motorised trafc?
Are appropriate evaluation tools being used?
Has a base line environmental survey been undertaken?
Has a road safety audit been incorporated in the project?
Design
Design standards
Pavement/surfacing design
Are the geometric, pavement design and surfacing stan-

dards technically appropriate?
Are they environmentally sound?
Are specications and test methods appropriate to local
materials being used?
Commitment & negotiation
Contract documentation
Do designs accommodate construction by labour-based methods?

Do they include environmental protection measures?
Have tender documents been prepared and contract strategies
adopted that facilitate involvement of small contractors?
Proper selection and screening of candidate
road projects at an early stage of the planning
process are important.
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
i
d
e
n
t
i
f
i
c
a
t
io
n
F
e
a
s
i
b
i
l
i
t
y
D
e
sign
C
o
m
m
i
t
m
e
n
t
&
n
e
g
o
t
i
a
t
i
o
n
I
m
p
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
t
i
o
n
O
p
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
s
&
m
a
in
t
e
n
a
n
c
e
START
THE PROJECT
PROCEDURE
Typical Project Cycle
It is important that both the client and the con-
tractor share a common vision on the standard
of the road to be constructed.
Implementation
Construction
Inspection and monitoring
Environmental mitigation
Have labour-based rather than equipment-based methods

of construction been adopted where feasible?
Are environmental mitigation measures contained in the
contracts? Are they enforcable?
Have specic measures been included in the contract to
cater for health and safety matters such as HIV/AIDS?
Operations and maintenance
Performance evaluation
Maintenance operations
Have the various indicators of socio-economic well-being

been monitored and evaluated?
Are there adequate arrangements for community participa-
tion in road maintenance?
What are the lessons for the future?
Thus, in the planning and appraisal of LVSRs, it is necessary to consider
carefully the multi-dimensional range of issues highlighted in Table 3.2 that
can signicantly inuence the output of the process.
Labour-Based Projects
In view of the emergence of labour-based approaches as a viable alternative to
some aspects of the more traditional plant-based approaches, the planning of
such projects merits special consideration. Without appropriate technical and
nancial planning from the inception of a project, serious problems may ensue,
which may ruin the initiative and bring into disrepute the practicability and
objectives of labour-based projects.
Many items need to be investigated in terms of their suitability for labour-based
methods of construction or maintenance. Contractual aspects need to be
established and appropriate designs undertaken. Such planning must extend d
beyond engineering technology and the practicality of construction and also
consider such factors as the nancing and management of labour-based projects.
Guidance and training on such issues is provided by a number of international
organisations in the SADC region, including the International Labour
Organisation Advisory Support, Information Services and Training (ILO/ n
ASIST).
Box 3.2 - Why labour-based construction?
The primary objective of labour-based projects is to complete construction
efciently and economically within a specied time. Secondary objectives
include:
Employment creation. Creation of skills.
Creation of local entrepreneurs. Improvement of labour productivity.
Optimization of the use of local Construction of a technically sound,
resources. economically efcient product.
For many people, labour-based work may be their rst formal job and a future
doorway to other forms of work. Moreover, money which would go out of the
community is retained and the skills attained can be applied later in the
maintenance of the project throughout its life, or on other similar projects.
Labour-based construction: The economi-
cally efcient employment of as much labour
as is technically feasible to produce as high
a standard of construction as demanded by
the specication and allowed by the funding
available. This implies an optimal balance
between labour and equipment.
Labour-intensive construction: The use of
as much labour as possible by substituting
men for machines often to satisfy short-term
needs. This implies an imbalance between
labour and equipment and, invariably, an
economically inefcient end product.
We know that employment is the rst
step towards escaping from poverty.
Juan Somavia, Director General of the
International Labour Organisation (ILO),
2001.
The end result - a successfully completed
project that meets the requirements of all
stakeholders by satisfying the seven key
dimensions of sustainability.
3.2.4 External Factors
T
here are a number of external factors, many of them of a non-technical
nature, that directly or indirectly affect the planning process itself or the
outcomes from that process. It is important to be aware of them when devising
an appropriate planning procedure and, where possible, to take them into
account. These various factors are listed in Table 3.3.
Table 3.3 - External factors that affect the planning of LVSRs
Environment Factor Implications on approach to LVSR provision
Political
Government
policy
Political
perceptions
Political
involvement
Inuences practice. Covers issues such as poverty allevia-

tion, sustainable socio-economic development, technology
choice, employment creation, standards, sources of funding.
Tendency to favour conventional approaches and standards
with perceived minimum risk attached to them. There is a
need to communicate effectively, quantify and sell innova-
tive approaches and appropriate, non-traditional standards.
To be expected. Will tend to inuence decision-making.
Highlight pros and cons of alternative solutions in a bal-
anced, transparent manner and maintain continuous dia-
logue with stakeholders.
Social
Poverty
alleviation
Sustainable
livelihood
Gender con-
siderations
Implies use of labour-based rather than fully plant-based

methods, where feasible.
Enhance local participation and resource mobilisation by
involving the people who will ultimately benet from the
projects.
Understanding community strengths and weaknesses,
assets, vulnerability to shocks and constraints, govern-
ance issues and policies needed.
Eliminate gender biases by integrating the transport
needs of women in the mainstream of policy and
planning.
Promote participation by women in labour-based con-
struction and maintenance programmes and training to
assume supervisory roles.
Institutional
Organisation
Growing trend towards establishment of more

autonomous central and local roads authorities.
Greater scope for generating accountability for results
in road programmes and moving from force account
to contracting out of work to the private sector.
Technological
Technology
choice
Need for cost-effective strategies that utilise the dual

output of road infrastructure and employment creation.
Economic
Evaluation
Road benets are often not limited to use of road, but

alsofrom the way in which the road is nanced, de-
signed, constructed and maintained. There is a need to
capture monetary and non-monetary benets in the
evaluation ramework.
Financial
Funding
Sustainability
Usually very scarce. Financing proposals must look

increasingly at minimum standards, limited donor fund-
ing and local funding of recurrent maintenance costs.
Sustainability of funding has become a critical issue.
There is a need to commercialise operations where possible
and involve stakeholders in the maintenance of facilities.
Environmental
Impact
Need to capture social as well as environmental impacts

in the evaluation of LVSRs.
Address health-threatening impacts as a high priority.
Decision making should be based on rational
technical, economic or social factors which,
ultimately, should be coincident with the best
political options. However, frequently, the
political factors take precedence over tech-
nical, economic or social factors.
3.2.5 Planning Tools
Policy Analysis
T
he objective of policy analysis is to dene, in general terms, the con-
straints within which specic planning solutions must be found. Constraints
may relate to such factors as government policy on employment, provision of
accessibility, income distribution and regional development as well as tech-
nical factors such as type of terrain and transport facilities, level of existing
trafc, capacity and expertise of the local construction industry, availability
of nance, etc.
Master Plans
Master plans or regional plans are used in many SADC countries to help in
determining priorities for the future. These plans are not transport specic
but relate to all sectors and help to identify investment requirements and
priorities over a dened period. It is at this stage that new road projects will
rst be identied.
During the preparation of a master plan it is important that transport planners
liaise closely with other Ministries. In the rural context particular priorities will
include education, health and agriculture. It is also important that extensive
consultation is undertaken with local communities and opinion leaders.
Livelihoods Framework
Livelihoods Analysis is a useful approach to adopt in order to identify the
ways in which any particular investment intervention will impact, benet or
disadvantage the local community
2
. A rural livelihoods analysis provides a
framework for understanding how any proposed changes will affect personal
or community livelihoods in the longer term. It focuses directly on how the
local community uses and develops its social (S), human (H), nancial (F),
natural (N) and physical (P) asset structure (see Figure 3.1).
It is clear that transport interacts with many aspects and dimensions of a
persons or a communitys livelihood. For example, substantial benets
could be obtained if the labour requirements involved in collecting water,
rewood or taking crops to market could be reduced. The provision of all-
season road access could reduce the vulnerability of rural communities by
removing seasonal isolation, and reducing transport costs and travel times to
essential economic and social services.
Figure 3.1 - Sustainable livelihoods framework
A livelihood comprises the capabilities,
assets (including both material and social
resources) and activities required for a
means of living. A livelihood is sustainable
when it can cope with and recover from
stresses and shocks and maintain or enhance
its capabilities and assets, and provide
sustainable livelihood opportunities for
the next generation; and which contributes t
net benets to other livelihoods at the local
and global levels and in the long and short
term.
Chambers and Conway, 1992
2
.
H = human capital: the skills, knowledge,
ability to work and good health are important
to the ability to pursue different livelihood
strategies.
P = physical capital: the basic infrastructure
(transport, shelter, water, energy and com-
munications) and the production equipment
and means that enable people to pursue
livelihoods.
S = social capital: the social resources (networks,
membership of groups, relationships of trust,
access to wider institutions of society) upon
which people draw in pursuit of livelihoods.
F = nancial capital: the nancial resources
which are available to people (whether savings,
supplies of credit or regular remittances or pen-
sions) and which provide them with different
livelihood options.
N = natural capital: the natural resource
stocks from which resource ows that are
useful for livelihoods are derived (e.g. land,
water, wildlife, biodiversity, environmental
resources.)
VULNERABILITY
CONTEXT
SHOCKS
TRENDS
SEASONALITY
TRANSFORMING
STRUCTURES &
PROCESSES
STRUCTURES
Levels of
Government
Private
sector
LIVELIHOOD
OUTCOMES
More income
Increased
well-being
Reduced
vulnerability
Improved
food security
More sustainable
use of NR-base
Laws
Policies
Culture
Institutions
PROCESS
N
H
F P
S
LIVELIHOOD
STRATEGIES
influence
&access
I
N
O
R
D
E
R
T
O
A
C
H
I
E
V
E
LIVELIHOODASSETS
Integrated Planning Techniques for Transport
Master plans and the sustainable livelihoods approach are both general multi-
sectoral planning tools but the specic focus is not on transport interventions.
Transport may or may not be one of the interventions that are identied.
However, there are a number of integrated planning techniques that specically
address transport issues. Their common thread is that planners need to address
a range of issues in improving the accessibility of rural people to essential
economic and social services through a combination of improved infrastructure,
improved transport services and the improved location of the services
themselves.
Integrated Rural Accessibility Planning (IRAP) was developed by the ILO
3
and is probably the most widely used planning technique of its type. IRAP has
been used in many countries in the region, including Tanzania and Malawi.
The approach integrates rural households mobility needs, the sit ing of essential
social and economic services, and the provision of appropriate transport
infrastructure. Communities are involved at all stages of the planning procedure.
It is based on a thorough but easy to execute data collection system that seeks
to rank the difculty with which communities access various facilities.
Box 3.3 - Integrated Rural Accessibility Planning
In this approach, an Accessibility Indicator (AI) is calculated for various
fa cilities in each community. It is a function of the number of households
(N), the average travel time to a facility (T), the target travel time (Tm) and
the frequency of travel (F):
AI = N * (T - Tm) * F
Typical facilities included are health, education, water and fuel. The acces sibility
indicators are ranked in descending order and interventions are pri oritised in
this way. Results of this process are discussed at a participatory workshop and
interventions identied which most effectively reduce time and effort spent.
Network-Based Planning
Traditionally, investments in roads have been evaluated on a link by link basis
with less consideration given to the contribution that each link - competing
for investment - makes to the connectivity or accessibility of the entire net-
work. To overcome such short-comings, network-based planning approaches
are increasingly being used to analyse the road system as a whole in order
to prepare long-term strategic planning expenditure for road development
and maintenance under various budgetary and economic scenarios.
Unfortunately, the situation confronting many SADC countries is one in
which funding is available for maintenance of only part of the road network.
In such situations it has become necessary to identify a core road network
which is reviewed periodically and will expand or contract depending on local
circumstances. Such networks often include roads of different classes that
are considered to be an essential part of the total network so that links are
maintained between all the communities throughout the country. d
Models such as HDM-4 can be used for network-based planning purposes.
However, as is often the case in many rural network situations, the necessary
data required by such models are often not available, making such models
inappropriate. Thus, procedures that involve a high level of stakeholder con-
sultation are likely to be more effective for rural network planning purposes.
However, there seems to be little information in the form of manuals on
community-based network planning procedures.
3.2.6 Stakeholder Consultations
Why Have Stakeholder Involvement?
T
he objective of consultation is to ensure that the road planning process is
undertaken in an accountable and transparent manner. This is important n
for the overall benet of the affected stakeholders and for the country at
large. Consultations should be carried out throughout all stages of the project
cycle and should be undertaken in such a manner as to allow full participation
of the authorities and the public with the following typical aims:
establishing background information on the project from all possible sources
identifying viable alternatives for the project
taking on board the views of stakeholders at all stages of the project
reaching a consensus on the preferred choice of project(s)
Decisions on transport planning and prioritisation in the SADC region have
often been taken without considering the transport requirements of the people
being affected by the investment. Insufcient consultation has led to the
inappropriate use of resources both in terms of their usefulness to rural com-
munities but also in terms of their impact on social and cultural traditions.
To rectify this shortcoming it should be ensured that:
local people are involved in the selection, design, planning and imple-
mentation of programmes and projects that will affect them
local perception, attitudes, values and knowledge are taken into ac count
a continuous and comprehensive feedback process is made an integral
part of all development activities
Who are the Stakeholders?
Many people have an interest in road projects and all interested groups need
to be identied and consulted in the road selection process. The primary
stakeholders are those people whose social and economic livelihoods will be
directly affected by the project and include:
rural communities
farmers group
market traders
transport operators
Some other interest groups are important in the decision-making process,
even though their own lives may not be affected directly by the project.
These include:
district leadership
districts works agencies
national roads department
local and national politicians
Because leaders standpoints can differ signicantly from the experiences of
average village members, it is important for any consultation process to go
beyond the leadership to the grass roots.
Benets of engaging in consultations with local
communities at all stages of the project cycle
include local knowledge of risks such as ood
levels, location of resources, trafc ows, etc.
Stakeholder involvement in the decision-
making process is critical for long-term
sustainability of any road project.
Consultation Techniques
There are a number of recognised participatory techniques for working with
communities to determine their transport needs. These usually entail the use
of trained facilitators to visually represent community livelihoods to identify
constraints and needs. Typical techniques include:
Participatory Rural Appraisal (PRA).
Rapid Rural Appraisal (RRA).
Other methods include public hearings through political leaders, and direct
community consultation. Workshops are often a good way of undertaking
initial prioritisation exercises, delivering key messages and receiving feed-
back. It is important that all consultation techniques are well organised, that
all the relevant stakeholders have been invited and that the deliberations
take place in an interactive and transparent manner.
3.2.7 Surveys
F
ollowing from the rst two phases of the project cycle there will be an
initial selection of roads put forward for possible improvement and
funding. Before nal decisions can be made it is important to obtain infor-
mation that is specic to the roads concerned. This involves conducting various
road transport surveys which can help to pinpoint measures (technical,
institutional and nancial) for improving efciency. These surveys may also
provide supporting evidence for community perceptions on transport or,
exceptionally, may provide some contradictory arguments that would need
to be resolved. Participatory enquiry also supports a much greater focus on
poverty issues and the role of transport in livelihoods
4
.
Engineering Surveys
Engineering condition surveys need to be undertaken in order to identify the
present condition of the road, the nature of proposed interventions, the quanti-
ties of work and the costs of the interventions and the future condition of the
road. The interventions required for different treatments need to be identied
and costed with the engineering surveys. It is important that alternative
options are considered in the detailed appraisal.
Of particular importance to low-volume sealed roads is the provision of year
round access and the social and economic benets that arise from that. There-
fore, it is important that there is some engineering judgement on the length of
time that impassability or trafckability problems affect the road.
The term trafcability is relatively new and stems from research in Tan-
zania that showed that trafc levels tend to fall during the wet season even
on roads in good condition. Typically, motorised trafc volumes will fall
in the wet season to 80% of their dry season level. However, on poor qual-
ity roads this difference is even more marked and trafc can fall to 35%
of dry season trafc levels, as shown in Figure 3.2. For the purposes of
this Guideline it can be assumed that roads have trafckability problems
when wet season trafc levels fall below 50% of dry season levels.
Trafcability of unpaved roads is adversely
affected during the wet season.
Trafcability versus Passability:
Trafcability: A road is dened as having
trafcability problems when the percentage
of wet season trafc falls below 50% of the
dry season trafc.
Passability: A road is dened as having
passability problems when it is completely
closed to motorised trafc for either part of
or all of the year.
Figure 3.2 - The difference in wet season and dry season trafc levels
on poor quality roads in Tanzania
Trafc Surveys
Trafc counts are one of the most important items of data for both geometric
and pavement design as well as for planning purposes in terms of evaluation
of economic benets derived from construction of LVSRs. For these purposes,
it is necessary to ascertain the volume and composition of current and future
trafc in terms of motorcycles, cars, light, medium and heavy goods vehicles,
buses, and, importantly, non-motorised vehicles and pedestrians.
The three most commonly used types of trafc surveys for LVRs are:
Automatic Trafc Surveys.
Manual Trafc Surveys.
Moving Observer Methods.
Although the methods of trafc data collection may vary, the objective of the
each method remains the same - essentially to obtain an estimate of the
Annual Average Daily Trafc using the road, disaggregated by vehicle type.
Prediction of such trafc is notoriously imprecise, especially where the roads
serve a predominantly developmental or social function. Thus, the timing,
frequency and duration of trafc surveys should be given very careful
consideration in terms of striking a balance between cost and accuracy. As n
indicated in Figure 3.3, short duration trafc counts in low trafc situations
can lead to large errors in trafc estimation and, in this respect, Moving
Observer methods are likely to be particularly inaccurate.
w
e
t

s
e
a
s
o
n

a
s

p
r
o
p
o
r
t
i
o
n

o
f

d
r
y

s
e
a
s
o
n

t
r
a
f
f
i
c

(
%
)
0
20
40
60
80
l00
l20
l40
0
E
D
E
S
T
R
I
A
N
S
!
N
I
M
A
L
4
R
A
N
S
P
O
R
T
"
I
C
Y
C
L
E
S
-
O
T
O
R
C
Y
C
L
E
S
,
A
R
G
E
B
U
S
E
S
3
M
A
L
L
B
U
S
E
S
4
R
U
C
K
S
|
S
#
A
R
S
< 75 vehicles/day
76-200 vehicles/day
20l- 600 vehicles/day
60l-l000 vehicles/day
> l00l vehicles/day

l 2 3 4 5 l0 l5 20 25 30 35 40 45
weekdays
l week 2 weeks 4 weeks 6 weeks
Duration of counting (days)
L
r
r
o
r

(
p
e
r
c
e
n
t
)
Figure 3.3 - Errors in ADT estimates from counts of varying duration
5
The accuracy of trafc counts can be improved by increasing the count
duration or by counting in more than one period of the year. Improved
accuracy can also be achieved by using local knowledge to determine
whether there are days within the week or periods during the year when
the ow of trafc is particularly high or low.
Local knowledge should also be used to select appropriate locations for
conducting the trafc counts to ensure a true reection of the trafc using
the road and to avoid under - or over-counting.
Origin and Destination Surveys, using a variety of survey techniques, are
sometimes carried out to establish the nature of travel patterns in and around
the area of enquiry. These surveys, which can be quite labour-intensive,
serve a number of useful purposes including a quantitative assessment of the
amount of trafc likely to be affected by the proposal and the consequent
impacts on various elements in the road system.
Axle Load Surveys
Axle load surveys provide critical and essential information that is required
for both cost-effective pavement design as well as preservation of existing
roads. The importance of this parameter is highlighted by the well-known
fourth power law which exponentially relates increases in axle load to
pavement damage (e.g. an increase in axle load of 20% produces an increase
in damage of about 120%).
Axle load surveys can be expensive to undertake and should be carefully planned
and organised in relation to the level of resources that can be committed to the
survey (time, personnel and money) and the objective of the survey which could
be:
determination of vehicle equivalence gures (pavement design)
overload control (pavement preservation)
The type of equipment which may be used for axle load surveys also varies
widely and includes:
static or dynamic weighing equipment
manual or automatic recording of loads
portable or xed installation
The quality of the data obtained will depend on the type of equipment used, the
duration of the survey and the degree of quality control performed. In general,
the higher the quality of the data, the greater will be the resources required to
collect them.
There is an almost inevitable trade-off between available resources and the
accuracy obtainable from a sample survey. The art of good survey design is to
know when the optimal value for money from the survey is achieved. Further
constraints exist for the data analysis stage. Some analysis techniques require
expertise, computer hardware and software which may not always be available.
Thus, the choice of analysis procedures may also involve trade-offs.
Portable weighbridge system.
Trade-offs in undertaking an axle load
survey.
Survey
Resources
Quality of
Data
Quantity of
Data
Ultimately, an appropriate choice of equipment should be made in relation to
such factors as:
accessibility to back-up support (technical and maintenance)
ease of installation and use
accuracy of measurement required
acquisition and operational cost of equipment
It is also important that axle load surveys are carried out in a systematic and
standardised manner and separated from weighbridge measurements under-
taken for the purpose of enforcing axle load limits. Guidelines currently exist
in a number of SADC countries for carrying out axle load surveys.
Box 3.4 - Minimum information typically derived from axle load surveys
Axle loads of all heavy vehicles whether empty or loaded.
Vehicle category.
Loading in each direction of the road.
Each axle in a multi-axle combination shall be measured separately. The
survey point should also be equipped with sufcient capacity to weigh all
heavy vehicles that are passing in one direction at a time, both empty and
loaded.
Measurement of rear axle load using portable
weighbridge.
Axle load survey in progress. Such surveys
are typically carried out over a 24 hour
period for seven days.
3.3 Appraisal
3.3.1 Investment in LVSRs
T
he road sector consumes a considerable part of the overall infrastructure
investments made in the SADC region and, with an increased focus on
poverty reduction, there is an increasing emphasis on those for LVSRs.
However, investment in such roads should be based on a set of clearly
understood needs for them. d The process of establishing those needs requires
detailed consideration of both the economic and social roles of roads and
these, in turn, must be seen in the context of larger community needs for
accessibility and mobility. Certainly the provision of roads will be only one
of the mechanisms used to satisfy those needs.
The various short-term effects and longer-term impacts of such road investments
may be depicted roughly as shown in Figure 3.4. They are not just a progression
in time, they are also a progression in certainty with the more distant
developments being more difcult to achieve and less certain to materialise.
Figure 3.4 - Effects and impacts of road investments over time
6
From the perspective of investment in roads only, employment is regarded as
certain. Such employment, and thus the potential for assisting the poor,
is obviously enhanced by the use of labour-based methods. With the
exception of employment, all the rest of the other effects and impacts are
indirect. Whether they occur or not depends on two factors:
(1) that trafc materialises as a result of the road improvement
(2) that this trafc is operating more efciently
3.3.2 Life-Cycle Costing
H
aving identied a short list of projects, it is the purpose of an economic
appraisal to ensure that the options considered represent a cost effective
way of delivering the road. Appraisals driven by economic requirements will
be relatively easy to identify via benet-cost analyses. However, traditional
appraisal frameworks do not cater well for economic justication of LVSRs
as poverty reduction and other social benet issues are more difcult to
quantify and tend to be ignored.
Effects/impacts
Road construction / maintenance
Employment
Transport
Agriculture
Non-road related employment
Non-agricultural production
Income effects
Social effects
Institutional changes
Time
Life-cycle costing uses economic evaluation
techniques to select, from a series of options,
the most economically appropriate new
road project and the maintenance and/or
rehabilitation treatment to be applied to an
existing road.
In traditional approaches to undertaking an economic analysis, the basic objective
is to determine the optimum mix between the costs of the project (related to the
design standard) and the benets from the project in terms of transport cost
savings and other secondary benets such as social and environmental benets.
The purpose is to nd the investment option that minimises life-cycle costs.
Figure 3.5 shows the conceptual total road transport cost curve which is made
up of the construction/rehabilitation costs, maintenance costs and road user
costs. It shows that as construction/rehabilitation costs increase (because of
higher design standards) road user costs are typically reduced. The optimum
road design standard is attained when the sum of the project costs are
minimised. This optimum standard varies in relation to trafc level and
the associated relative mix of construction, maintenance and user costs.
Figure 3.5 - Economic analysis of optimum road design standards
For a given trafc level, if the road were to be constructed to a standard
higher than the optimum, then the benets derived from a reduction in road
user and maintenance costs would not sufciently offset the costs of initial
construction and the resulting investment would be sub-optimal. This high-
lights the importance of ensuring that appropriate standards are adopted in
the planning, design, construction and maintenance of LVSRs. As might be
expected, the optimum design standard for a LVR is lower than for a HVR.
Principles of Economic Appraisal
Several methods exist for the economic appraisal of road paving projects for
which the primary objectives are to determine:
the appropriate size of investment and the returns to be expected from this
investment
the appropriate geometric and structural design standards for the size of
investment in order to obtain the expected returns
the economic and socio-economic impact of investments such as the
improvement to the community of industrial, agricultural, educational and d
health services
Total
Optimum
Road User
Construction/
Rehabilitation
Maintenance
Road Design Standard
C
o
s
t
Decreasing traffic Increasing traffic
Through identifying, quantifying in monetary terms, and comparing the costs
and benets of different options, this technique is able to provide guidance
on the design, prioritisation and selection of candidate road projects by
addressing a wide variety of key decision-making issues. For instance:
is the investment economically justiable?
if there are a range of alternative investments, which option gives the
best economic returns?
is the timing of the proposed project optimal?
should components of the project be phased in over a period of time?
how does risk and uncertainty affect the choice of projects?
if funds are limited and there are many worthwhile investments, which
should be built rst?
An economic analysis considers the project from a national point of view. In an
economic cost benet analysis, the total costs and benets that arise from a pro-
ject are identied and measured, irrespective of who incurs the costs or benets
from the project. In contrast to a nancial analysis, no monetary transaction
needs to take place for an economic benet or cost to be incurred.
Main components: The main components of an economic evaluation are as
follows
7
:
The identication of at least two different cases or scenarios; this will involve
one base or without investment case and at least one project or with
investment case.
The planning time horizon i.e. the period over which the evaluation is made.
An estimate of the project investment costs specied in economic price terms.
The benets of the project or projects specied in economic price terms
estimated from the differences in the costs of the with and without cases.
A year-by-year determination of the costs and benets of the different projects
over their design lives, using discounted cash ow techniques to bring them all
to their present value in terms of economic decision criteria such as
NPV, BCR or IRR.
An investigation of how robust or reliable the results are through the use of
sensitivity analysis or risk analysis.
3.3.3 Quantication of Costs and Benets
T
here are two principal methods of quantifying project costs and benets
in economic terms, the Consumer Surplus approach and the Producer
Surplus approach:
(1) Consumer surplus approach: This is the orthodox approach to estimat-
ing the economics of road investments which assumes a reduction in trans-
port costs arising from savings in vehicle operating costs
8
. The direct benets
to road users - the consumer surplus - equals the product of the number of
trips and the cost saving per trip.
Distribution of costs and benets during the
life-cycle of a road option.
User cost
savings
Benefits
(+)
Time
(years)
Maintenance
Rehabilitation
Construction
Costs
(-)
The consumer surplus approach is normally used for those projects where
trafc levels are likely to be sufcient for road user costs savings to justify
funding of the project. The minimum trafc threshold which makes this
approach appropriate to use is difcult to dene beforehand but is likely
to be of the order of 50 - 100 vpd.
(2) Producer surplus approach: In situations where no road exists and a
substantial improvement in vehicle accessibility is planned to help develop
an area, the producer surplus approach may be the most appropriate way of
estimating agricultural benets arising from road investment
9
. The producer
surplus approach estimates the predicted benets arising from the reduced
cost of agricultural produce which will normally be the same as that predicted
by a consumer surplus approach. However, when the producer surplus method
is used, passenger benets and other non-agricultural cost savings still need to
be estimated separately.
The agricultural production and the size of the producer benets are predicted
from the rise in farm gate prices brought about by the decline in costs of
transporting produce to market, as well as the decline in transport costs of
agricultural inputs. However, several difculties have been identied with
the application of this method, including the need for substantial amounts of
data, which may be either unavailable or of questionable reliability, and the
fear of double counting. For such reasons, the use of the producer surplus
method is not recommended unless there is a great deal of knowledge about
agriculture and its likely response to changes in input and output prices.
3.3.4 Project Costs
T
here are two main areas to address in calculating project costs:
1) The project costs for a range of alternative infrastructure standards.
2) Technology choice and the options available from labour-based to equip-
ment intensive.
The main project costs include:
planning/design costs
construction/supervision costs
road agency costs (administration, operation and maintenance)
road users costs (VOC and TTC)
Construction and maintenance costs can vary signicantly according to the
standards to which the road is built. There are signicant cost advantages
from using the LVSR standards as set out in this guideline and it is important
to have a detailed knowledge of these costs in the appraisal process. Table
3.4 gives the main options and the likely impact on construction costs.
Transporting bananas and other food-stuff
by bicycles.
Table 3.4 - Options for reducing construction costs
Option Potential Benets
Replacing a conventional geometric design
process by a design by eye approach, where
appropriate, and minimising deviations from
existing alignments.
Reduced earth works and environmental
damage. Earthworks can be typically 30%
of total construction costs in rolling terrain.
Use of more appropriate pavement designs
and natural gravel rather than crushed stone.
Reduced pavement costs due to lesser haulage
distances and reduced materials processing
costs.
Considering a range of infrastructure stan-
dards.
Allows an optimum standard to be adopted
which minimises total transport costs.
Utilising an existing gravel wearing course
e.g. as base or subbase .
Reduced haulage distances and materials costs.
Compacting subgrade and pavement layers
to refusal, where feasible, rather than to
arbitrary prescribed levels.
Increased density, reduced road deterioration
and increased maintenance intervals.
Adopting appropriate surfacing technologies
such as sand seals and Otta seals.
Reduced haulage distances, reduced processing
costs.
Increasing the use of labour and local
resources where appropriate.
Lower economic/nancial costs for specic
tasks.
Using seals as a spot improvement measure. Reduced surfacing costs whilst maintaining
year round access.
The use of LVSR technology for spot improvements has, potentially, very
signicant applications on a wide range of roads that do not justify providing t
a seal over the entire length but could benet from spot sealing works.
These spots might include areas where there is signicant seasonal difculty
in maintaining access such as on steep slopes or areas that are prone to
ooding. They may also include stretches through towns and villages where,
for social and environmental reasons, a sealed road would reduce dust nuisance
and improve safety. Spot improvement strategies, particularly for the lower
volume roads, provide a good way of meeting the planning objectives of
maintaining basic access while minimising total transport costs.
3.3.5 Project Benets
C
hanges in the efciency of transport are the essential mechanism by t
which benets from road building are transferred or released
6
. These
changes are more than likely to occur with the sealing of an earth/gravel
road in the form of a reduction in vehicle operating costs (VOC). However,
other benets of a broader socio-economic nature are also likely to occur
and, by meeting specied social objectives, offer scope for achieving poverty
reduction.
The benets arising from the upgrading of a LVR typically include:
developmental benets - such as benets to generated trafc
social benets - access to facilities through improved passability
road user cost savings - such as reduction in VOC and TTC
road agency benets - such as reduction in maintenance costs
In general, the more competitive and less distorted an economy, the more
likely that the primary benets will cover the full consequences of a road
investment. However, for the purpose of this Guideline, there is a case for
including secondary benets, particularly in circumstances where:
existing trafc volumes are relatively low
new road investments are made in remote rural areas
a relatively large change in transport costs is anticipated
there are unused resources
Short sections of road in poor condition can
benet signicantly from spot improvement
works.
Figure 3.6 - Overlap of primary and secondary benets
Social Benets
Social benets are not only some of the most difcult to quantify but, also,
there is no universally agreed method for incorporating them within an
economic analysis. Furthermore, a simplistic addition of social and economic
benets is likely to lead to problems of double counting.
The following provides some of the options that could be considered for
incorporating social benets within an economic analysis.
(1) Where roads suffer from impassability or trafckability problems there
will be additional benets from improved road provision that create year
round access. The principal social benets come from improved access to
health facilities and education services, employment opportunities and social
interaction. Little research has been done on the best way to quantify these
benets but practical approaches have tended to factor up conventional
VOC savings for the period a road suffers either passability or trafckability
problems.
(2) It is possible to identify key social criteria such as targeting the poorest
areas, reducing isolation to basic services and markets. These would have
to be identied on a project by project basis following consultation with
all the relevant stakeholders. In a similar way to the approach indicated
above, VOC benets could be factored up if the improvement of a particular
road met these social criteria.
(3) Benets from education and health facilities can be estimated from im-
proved access and the resulting improvements from income earning
opportunities. For example, benets from increased school enrolment levels
can be estimated based on higher life earnings of the children who would d
have otherwise remained unskilled. Health benets can be assessed based d
on reduced sick days away from work and the associated net income.
However, such an approach may involve considerable eld data collection
and analysis.
(4) Quantifying social benets in the same units as economic benets
10
. In this
approach, it is assumed that the population within a distance of 5 kilometres
on either side of the road will receive social benets as a result of the roadd
improvement. In so doing, social factors are converted to the same units
as VOC savings.
Estimate of
primary
benefits
Estimate of
secondary
benefits
Area of overlap or
double counting
Benets to Non-Motorised Trafc
In many SADC countries non-motorised trafc constitutes a signicant
proportion of the trafc on low-volume roads and, in many cases, this trafc
represents the majority of total tonne kilometres. Benets to non-motorised
trafc represent signicant savings that are not captured in a conventional
consumer surplus analysis and therefore, alternative methods need to be
considered.
Although there has been limited research into the impacts of road improvements
on non-motorised transport there are a number of sources of information that
will help planners to make estimates of the potential benets. Table 3.5 sets out
the sources and the type of information available.
Table 3.5 - Sources of information for non-motorised transport
Source of information Type of information
Roads Economic Decision
Model (RED)
11
Calculates VOCs for pedestrians, animal carts, and
bicycles.
Appraisal of investments in
improved rural access.
Economist guide
12
Contains a number of mini-guides including one on
calculating VOCs for non-motorised transport based on
HDM 4 relationships.
A handbook of rural transport
vehicles in developing countries
13
Contains look-up tables for a wide range of motorised
and non-motorised vehicles for different infrastructure
quality and distances.
Ghana prioritisation procedure
14
Provides VOC savings for bicycles and pedestrians
following road improvements.
Where estimates of benets to non-motorised transport are available it is
appropriate to add these to the benets from motorised transport.
3.3.6 Cost-Benet Analysis
Use of Investment Appraisal Models
T
he primary function of a road investment appraisal model is to calculate
the costs and benets of road construction, road maintenance and road
user costs for a specied analysis period. This is accomplished by modelling
the interrelationships between the environment, construction standards,
maintenance standards, geometric standards and road user costs. Such models
can be used to perform a number of economic analyses, one of which is to
identify unpaved roads that may be potential candidates for paving.
Typical components of a life-cycle cost analysis are shown in Figure 3.7 for
a base or without investment case (gravel road) and a project or with
investment case (paved road).
In very general terms, paving a gravel road will be economically justied
when the net present value (NPV) of the sum of savings in VOCs and main-
tenance costs, relative to a well-maintained gravel road, is at least as great
as the NPV of upgrading costs. Where not captured in the investment appraisal
model, socio-economic benets will need to be evaluated separately after the
economic appraisal has been carried out.
Research from Tanzania suggests that, on average,
just over 30% of the total tonne kilometres is
carried by non-motorised transport on low-
volume roads. This gure ranged from just over
8%for higher volume roads (over 150 vehicles
per day) to over 60% for the lowest volume
roads (less than 10 vehicles per day).
Life-cycIe anaIysis period
Dption A - ase or without investment case (graveI road)
Dption - Project or with investment case (paved road)
RC
S7 S7
RM RM RM RM
RM RM
P
P
RV
RV
NPV
A
NPV
C
o
s
t
s
C
o
s
t
s
0 5 10 15
7ime (years)
Key: P pavement / C gravel / RC regravel / RM routine maintenance /
S7 surface treatment / RV Pesidual value / NPV Net present value
Figure 3.7 - Typical components of a life-cycle cost analysis
Characteristics of Main Project Types
Candidate projects for upgrading typically fall in the following categories, viz:
Basic accessibility projects: including upgrading tracks and earth roads to
gravel roads.
Mobility projects: (a) bitumenising existing gravel roads
(b) strengthening/expanding capacity of existing
bitumenised roads
Investment in the above types of project is generally motivated by quite different
reasons and yields quite different types of benets. For convenience, these
project types may be categorised in relation to broad trafc bands as follows: t
Category I less than 50 vpd: Investments in this category of road are usually
poverty-targeted with a focus on social rather than economic objectives. Thus,
a least-cost or cost-effectiveness approach is usually adopted and investment
models are generally not appropriate for such roads
15
.
Category II 50 to 200 vpd: (Primary focus of this Guideline): Investments in
this category of road give rise to a mix of economic, social and environmental
impacts depending on their function and level of trafc carried, which can
include a signicant proportion of non-motorised trafc.
Category III more than 200 vpd: investments in this category of road give rise
to predominantly economic impacts in the form of reduced transport costs, as
well as to environmental impacts.
Suitability of Investment Appraisal Models
The economic evaluation of donor-funded road projects in the SADC region
generally requires the use of an internationally recognised investment model.
The following models which adopt the consumer surplus approach have been
used for that purpose:
Road Transport Investment Model (RTIM) developed by the UK Transport
Research Laboratory
16
.
PIARCs Highway Development and Management Model (HDM-4)
17
.
Unlike models such as the South African CB-Roads
18
and SURF
19
models,
which were developed specically for local conditions, models such as RTIM
and HDM were developed to be applicable in a large number of countries
covering a wide range of conditions. Moreover, they are the result of the
collaboration of a number of international organisations and, as a result, the n
latest version of the HDM model, HDM-4, has become the de facto model for
use in the region, together with a more recently developed and simplied
derivative, the Roads Economic Decision Model (RED)
10
.
Whereas the HDM-4 model presents a very good framework for the economic
analysis of road investments, it is neither customized for LVRs nor does it
capture all the benets associated with such roads. In contrast, RED has been
customized for LVRs and offers a number of other advantages which are
contrasted with HDM-4 in Table 3.6.
Table 3.6 - Comparison of HDM-4 and RED appraisal investment models
Model Advantages Disadvantages
HDM 4
Globally used model.

Extensive research on VOC and
deterioration relationships.
Can be used for strategic planning
i.e. can assess networks.
Now includes NMT.
High data requirements.

Does not include social benets
1
.
Cannot deal with passability and
trafckability issues.
Road roughness is often not an appro-
priate measure of condition for LVRs.
Not well suited for low trafc levels.
RED
Has limited data requirements.

Can accommodate NMT and some
social benets.
Can be run from a spreadsheet.
Can accommodate impassability issues.
Can be used for ranking projects.
Well suited for trafc levels in range
50 200 vpd.
NMT categories are limited to four.

Would have to be calibrated for
Low-volume sealed roads.
1 to be included in a later version
Table 3.7 provides a general guide to the applicability of commonly used
investment models in the SADC region for evaluating LVSRs. The preferred
choice of model depends largely on the nature of the impact triggered by
the investment intervention.
Table 3.7 - Applicability of investment models to LVSR evaluation
Factor
Project Type
Access Mobility
Basic Advanced
Motivation Social Socio-economic Economic
Trafc band < 50 vpd 50 200 vpd > 200 vpd
Trafc type NMT NMT - MT MT
Relative
benets
Social High Medium Low
Economic Low Medium High
Appropriate model Least Cost RED HDM-4
As indicated in Table 3.6, those road improvements in which economic impacts
are dominant (trafc is typically > 200 vpd and is predominantly motorised)
are best evaluated by investment models such as HDM-4. However, at lower
trafc levels (trafc typically 50 - 200 vpd ) where NMT is signicant and social
benets are dominant, RED would be the more appropriate investment model
to apply.
3.3.7 Ranking Methods
R
anking Methods are important for two reasons. First of all it is unlikely
that funds will be sufcient for all projects that are economically or socially
justied and hence projects need to be placed in an order of priority. The use
of investment appraisal models can facilitate this. Secondly, as discussed
above, some important benets cannot be easily quantied and may not be
included in appraisal models. Therefore ranking methods that allow such benets
to be taken into account in the appraisal process are essential if the best
projects overall are to be selected for implementation.
Multi-criteria Analysis: These methods adopt a multi-objective approach
which seeks to incorporate both economic and non-economic goals into an
evaluation framework
20
. The approach assumes that the full set of attributes h
characterising a project cannot be expressed by a single parameter. Instead, the
framework should include a number of criteria for evaluating the project in
socio-economic terms such as economic benets, economic costs, distribution
of economic benets, accessibility to social services, employment, etc. Quanti-
tative measures of each of these criteria must then be dened in their own units
to facilitate transforming the spectrum of physical measures for each criterion
into utility value terms. Completion of the utility analysis depends upon the
decisionmakers articulation of his preferences amongst the various criteria.
As with other planning systems it is important that communities are fully
informed both in the selection of relevant criteria and in the subsequent results.
Problems may arise where consultation has not taken place or where the
complexity becomes too great because of too many variables.
The advantage of adopting such an approach is that a number of factors can
be included to reect wider political and socio-economic needs. However,
the disadvantages are that the addition of other factors complicates the analysis
and more data needs to be collected.
Least Cost Approaches
The goal of the Least Cost Approach is to
employ the most appropriate and cost-effective
intervention which provides a minimum level
of reliable, all-season passability for the
locally prevailing means of transport.
Compound Ranking Methods: These methods rank projects according to
factors that are considered to be relevant to the investment decision rather
than derive economic benefts that can be used in a cost-beneft analysis.
The approach enables social and political factors to be considered alongside
economic factors and is based on the following principles
21
:
factors included should refect the objectives of the investment programme
each factor is measured in its own units (for example, number of people
gaining access to services)
factors are weighted to refect their impact on the programme objectives
Compound ranking methods utilise a points scoring system which is rather
subjective. They are probably most appropriate when non-economic objec-
tives are part of the investment objectives for which a 'least cost approach
would be adopted.
3.3.8 1mpIIcatIons oI UsIng HevIsed Approaches
T
he implications of using the revised approaches recommended in this
Guideline are a signifcant reduction in both the initial construction and
longer terms maintenance costs. Coupled with the use of an investment model
which is able to quantify important socio-economic benefts, the effect is
to reduce the threshold level at which it is economically justifed to pave an
earth/gravel road (see Table 3.8).
Table 3.8 - Factors inuencing the trafhc threshold for upgrading
Parameter Impact
Use oI more appropriate pavement designs
Use oI more appropriate geometric designs
Increased use oI natural/unprocessed gravels
Quantifed impacts oI depleted gravel resources
Benefts Irom non-motorised transport
Quantifed adverse impacts oI traIfc on gravel roads
Reduced environmental damage
Quantifed assessments oI social benefts
Reduced costs
Reduced costs
Reduced costs
Reduced costs
Increased benefts
Increased benefts
Increased benefts
Increased benefts
The impact of these factors is illustrated conceptually in Figure 3.8 which
refects the outcome of recent research
22
and indicates that, in some circum-
stances, bitumen sealing of gravel roads is economically justifed at traffc
levels of less than 100 vpd. This is in contrast to the previously
accepted fgures for Sub-Saharan Africa, which indicated that it was only
economic to provide a bitumen surface at traffc levels over 200 vpd.
Pevised approaches
< l00 vpd
Traditional approaches
> 200 vpd
|nitial Average Daily Traffic (vpd)
N
P
v
o
f
U
p
g
r
a
d
i
n
g
|
n
v
e
s
t
m
e
n
t
(
$
)
Figure 3.8 - Break-even trafhc levels for paving a gravel road:
Traditional versus revised approaches
The Net Present \alue (NP\) is simply the
dijjerence between the discounted benets
and costs over the project analysis period. A
positive NP\ indicates the project is economic-
ally justied at the given discount rate.
3.4 Environmental Issues
3.4.1 Introduction
A
ny development brought about by man, such as the construction of
roads, inevitably produces an impact on the environment. In practice,
therefore, it must be accepted that modications to the natural environment are
an inevitable result of attempts to achieve social and economic progress,
alleviate poverty and improve human welfare.
LVSRs in the region are generally constructed to improve the economic and
social welfare of those using the roads or served by them. By their very
nature, such roads are agents of change which can bring both benet and
damage to the existing balance between people and the environment. In the
past, the attention of many SADC countries was focused almost exclusively n
on the potential benets from these new or improved road facilities. In con-
trast, the resulting environmental problems have received little attention,
largely because they were considered to be either unimportant or the price
to be paid for development
23
.
More recently, all SADC governments have become increasingly conscious
of the impact of unbridled development on the environment and the recognition
that, in the long term, environmental conservation and economic develop-
ment are not only compatible but interdependent and mutually reinforcing. This
has raised a number of issues which must now be faced in an attempt to create
a balance between much needed development on the one hand and environmental
care on the other.
This section considers the environmental issues facing road authorities in the
SADC region with a focus particularly on LVSRs. The importance of establishing
appropriate policy guidelines and the role of environmental impact assessments
in LVSR provision is considered together with the main environmental impacts
likely to be encountered and mitigating measures for overcoming them.
3.4.2 The Environment
I
n its broadest sense, the term environment includes both the natural or t
bio-physical environment (ora, fauna and physical features) as well as
the human environment (socio-economic and cultural factors) and the interaction
between them. As illustrated in Table 3.9, there are four key cornerstones of the
environment:
ecological
economic
social and
physical
Each of the cornerstones of the environment includes a range of factors
which should be considered at all stages of the planning cycle, as discussed
further in this chapter.
Safeguarding the future
All human activity depends on the Earth and
its natural resources, but it sometimes
threatens the delicate balance of the environ-
ment. The greatest challenge we face today
is to bring about improvements in the living
conditions of millions of people while protecting
and safeguarding the environment for future
generations.
Overseas Development Administration (ODA),
UK. Action for the Environment. May 1992.
Table 3.9 - Cornerstones of the environment
E
N
V
I
R
O
N
M
E
N
T
Ecological
- impact on fora and Iauna
- deIorestation
- disturbance oI natural eco-system
- decrease in bio-diversity
- threats to exotic and non-indigenous species
- depletion oI scarce material resources
- regressive or progressive soil erosion
Economic
- capital costs (design and construction)
- maintenance costs
- food damage costs
- loss/degradation oI agriculture/arable land
- sterilisation oI land Ior Iuture use
- land value reduced (designated borrows, severed Iarms)
Social
- severance/dislocation oI local communities
- adverse impacts on women
- destruction oI cultural antiquities
- conficts arising Irom changing land use/ownership oI land
- traIfc accidents
- health and saIety (e.g. danger to humans, especially child-
ren, and wildliIe Irom drowning in borrow pits)
- construction impacts
Physical
- aesthetic - e.g. loss oI natural beauty and scars on landscape
- natural vegetation is not, or cannot, be replaced
- noise, air, water pollution
- dust impact
- disruption oI drainage courses
3.4.3 TypIcaI Causes oI EnvIronmentaI ProbIems
T
he following are typical causes of environmental problems related to the
provision of LVSRs.
Design defects: These create problems when they are not anticipated and
the project fails to include remedial measures. For example, measures taken to
keep water off the road can cause problems elsewhere. Upstream preventative
measures can interfere with natural river fows. Drains concentrate and speed
up fow, sometimes causing fooding and soil erosion downstream.
Poor project documentation: Unless remedial measures are clearly refected
in project documents (e.g. Terms of Reference or contract documents) they
may not be fully implemented. This often results from use of standard con-
tract documents which do not allow for the special circumstances of the
project. For example, standard contract documents for roads often include
specifcations requiring the contractor to 'cut and dispose of soil within the
transverse profle, or to 'carry surplus material to spoil. When such
specifcations are inadvertently applied in steep, mountainous terrain
- particularly if hillsides are intensely cultivated - the dumping of soil over
the edge of the road formation can have devastating results.
Presence of construction activities: Temporary site works are typically
characterised by borrow pits, ruts in the road created by vehicle wheels and
drainage ditches which provide ideal breeding grounds for insects (particu-
larly mosquitoes). Construction workers may kill local fauna for the pot,
while the canteen refuse normally associated with construction camps
What price the environment?
The environment is not a jree resource in
innite supply. /t provides a wide range oj
services which underpin all productive activ-
ities and contributes to human weljare in a
number oj direct ways. Although it may not
be possible to put a conventional price on the
environment, it still has a value jor those who
work and live in it.
Un-renovated borrow area - typical oj many
countries in the SADC region.
Elephants crossing a main road that traverses
a game park.
encourages the proliferation of insects and vermin. One of the most serious
diseases spread by construction crews in many SADC countries is malaria.
Such impacts can generally be avoided by including appropriate remedial
measures in contract documents.
Weak environmental institutions: Successful remedial measures depend
on the effectiveness of local environmental institutions, including those
dealing with the regulation of land-use. For example, when new roads are
being constructed in undeveloped areas, it should be mandatory for the
project to be cleared by the local planning agency responsible for dealing o
with the planned and spontaneous development that may occur in response
to the project. However, such provisions will only be effective if the local
environmental agency has the skills, manpower and authority to ensure that
the contractor complies with the requirements. If the poor performance of
local environmental institutions is likely to affect project implementation,
this should be evaluated and attended to before the project is approved.
The Special Case of Borrow Pits
The extraction of substantial amounts of non-renewable natural resources for
road construction in SADC countries is over 150 million cubic metres per
annum and has the potential to create signicant damaging effects (negative
impacts) on the local environment and its inhabitants.
Box 3.6 - Specic impacts of borrow pits in the SADC region
Material resources:
permanent loss of natural resources
Morphological damage:
modication of the natural drainage
increased soil erosion and siltation of watercourses by disturbance
of soil
destabilisation of slopes
Ecology:
loss of wilderness and forest
displacement of species and habitats
loss of potential productivity of agricultural land
Pollution:
contamination of water and soil by fuel and oil spillage
generation of dust during the processing, loading and transporting
of materials
increased dust generated by vehicles along access tracks
littering
Social and health impacts:
creation of habitats for disease
landscape alteration and interference with natural beauty
bisection of communities or farms
loss of land legacy
loss of antiquities, cultural heritage, areas of cultural concern
(e.g. graves)
hazards to pedestrians and animals, including open or unmarked d
trial pits, demarcation beacons, etc
safety risks to local population by exposure to heavy plant and trafc
noise of drilling, blasting, trafc and plant
Gravel stockpile for road construction - causes
gradual depletion of a nite, non-renewable
resource - an unsustainable activity.
Children exposed to risk of drowning and poor
quality water. Ponding and poor drainage
also increases the level of mosquito-borne
disease.
Very often, worn out construction plant is
abandoned and becomes an eyesore. The
contract documents should cover removal
of unwanted plant to an approved area.
Other environmental impacts associated with the construction of roads in the
SADC region include:
hard rock quarries
river bed gravel pits
hill slope pits
Recent surveys carried out by the UK Transport Research Laboratory
24
in
two countries have shown that:
Historically, restoration of borrow pits has been the exception rather than
the rule. On average, only around 15% of borrow pits are restored after
extraction of materials.
The environmental damage caused by improper extraction and rehabili-
tation practices can extend over a wide area and may only become apparent
after project completion. Examples include soil erosion causing siltation of f
natural water courses. Around 50% of worked borrows had excessive land
erosion.
Environmental damage caused by pits is often most severe in areas im-
portant for subsistence farming. Only 4% of land previously used for
farming was under cultivation after extraction of material.
Contractors often leave pits open at the request of the land owner, because
these are seen as a useful mini-reservoir to provide water for animals,
washing and bathing. However, this practice poses severe risks to humans
caused by exposure to stagnating water and mosquito borne disease.
Following on from the TRL survey, improved guidelines for borrow area
management have been developed
24
. These guidelines consider:
planning and access issues
top soil and overburden removal and stockpiling
rehabilitation procedures and disposal of soil
safety (e.g. health and disease, warning signs and fencing, littering and
fuel spillages)
The guidelines also contains advice for use in contract documents.
3.4.4 Environmental Impact Assessments
R
esponsibility for applying sound environmental policies rests with the
executing agencies in the SADC region, usually the roads agencies, guided
and assisted by environmental units within the agency. However, increasingly,
dedicated environmental Departments and Ministries are being established.
In carrying out these responsibilities, staff should be guided by the over-
arching objective of ensuring that projects are designed and implemented
according to sound principles which minimise adverse impact and enhance
benets. A variety of procedures need to be followed at various stages of the
project cycle in order to achieve these objectives. These procedures normally
involve some kind of environmental impact assessment (EIA).
Borrow pit rehabilitation
(a) Original pit used for construction.
(b) Borrow pit rehabilitation in progress
after one year.
(c) Full rehabilitation of borrow pit
achieved after 3 years.
The EIA Process
EIA is not an outcome. Rather, it is a process for improving the quality of the
outcome and can be applied to any proposal
25
ll . The process is exible and
adaptable and can be tailored to suit the circumstances of any road project.
In essence, an EIA evaluates foreseeable impacts, both benecial and adverse,
and helps to reveal mitigating measures and alternatives as well as to optimise
positive impacts while reducing or limiting negative impacts.
The main components of the EIA include:
establishing the need for the project
identifying and quantifying the full range of potential impacts on the
natural and social environments
formulating remedial procedures for avoiding, mitigating and compensating
for these impacts
reecting remedial measures in the project documents
ensuring that remedial measures are complied with during the project
implementation
The EIA process is usually integrated into the project cycle as a means of
improving the quality of the outcome. Community involvement in this process
is important and necessary as it seeks to solicit information, views and concerns
that only the affected community can provide. It can take many forms and t
into the process at any or all stages depending on the type of project. It can
involve a broad range of interest groups and individuals or it may only
require limited involvement. The process is set out in outline in Table 3.10.
Table 3.10 - A framework for EIA
Phase of
project cycle
Activity Objective
Project
identication
Initial
screening
- register danger signals
- avoid unnecessary investigation where impacts are
likely to be minimal
Feasibility Environmental
appraisal
- predict main impacts
- assess importance of effects
- indicate key mitigating actions required
- present implications to decision makers
Design Environmental
impact assess-
ment
- predict in detail likely impacts, including cost
implications
- identify specic measures necessary to avoid,
mitigate or compensate for damage
- present predictions and options to decision makers
Commitment &
negotiation
Environmental
enforcement
- ensure environmental mitigation measures are
included in the contract documents
Implementation Environmental
monitoring
- ensure environmental mitigation measures are
being complied with during construction
Operations and
maintenance
Environmental
audit
- assess the extent of implementation of a project
against the requirements derived from the EIA
- ensure lessons learned are incorporated in future projects
The output of the EIA is often formalised into an environmental impact
statement (EIS) which, in some SADC countries, is mandatory for many t
road projects. Such a report would typically cover the following:
brief description of project
brief description of existing environment
likely impact of project
Road upgrading requires careful planning
to minimise adverse impacts on the natural
environ ment.
p
mitigation and protection measures
consideration of no change alternative
summary and conclusions
The EIS should provide a better understanding of the linkages between society,
the natural environment and the sustainable use of inherited resources.
An important component of the EIA is the environmental audit which t
seeks, in essence, to assess the implementation of a project against
requirements derived from the EIA. The audit can be viewed as a snap-
shot of the environmental situation at a given site and at a given time. It
does not attempt to predict the potential impacts of planned investments
but, rather, to serve as a source of baseline information which may complement
or substitute for normal EIAs, depending on the type of project.
Box 3.7 provides an example of a checklist of issues that would typically be
considered in an EIA for a LVSR.
Box 3.7 - Typical check-list of issues to be considered in an environ-
mental impact assessment for LVSRs
7
Consequential developments: Will the project stimulate land clearance for
agriculture, the development of industry or mineral extraction? What steps
can be taken to mitigate long-term adverse effects?
Social factors: Has adequate provision been made for vehicle, pedestrian
and NMT safety? Are the geometric standards adopted likely to require
additional safety countermeasures (e.g. signing, education programmes)?
Geotechnical damage: Has the project been designed to minimise the possibility
of landslides and other geotechnical problems? Have long-term maintenance
consequences been taken into account?
Materials resources: Will the project result in the unacceptable depletion
of material resources that may be needed for subsequent maintenance or
other construction projects? Will borrow pits be restored and can their effect
on the landscape be minimised?
Drainage: Will the project result in increased risks from ooding or landslides
as a result of disturbing natural drainage patterns? Will later development of
agricultural land and other settlements affect hydrological conditions so that
drainage works and bridges must be modied? Will any water impoundments
create health hazards?
Ecology: Have the effects on animals and plants been considered? Has an
ecological reconnaissance been carried out to assess effects?
Other factors: Are air pollution, noise and vibration, and visual intrusion issues
of concern in the project? If so, what can be done to mitigate the effects?
Value of the EIA
Effective use of scarce resources is becoming increasingly important in a
climate of decreasing funding and increased community demand for the
improved efciency and performance of SADCs new generation of more
autonomous roads agencies. In this regard, the EIA process offers the
following benets:
alternative projects are systematically considered
the decision-making process is more transparent
environmentally signicant issues are identied at an early stage
a bridge is provided between the roads agency and the public it serves
the community is reassured that its needs are being considered
the roads agency is forced to consider the broader issues of its work
local information provided through involvement of the community can
improve the accuracy and relevance of the information collected for the mm
project
the risk of aborting a project at an advanced stage due to public dissatisfaction n
with the project is reduced
interaction between technical, economic and environmental factors leads to
optimum design and improved technical and economic efciency
Legislative Aspects
The effectiveness and success of an Environmental Impact Assessment
(EIA) depends on the extent to which it is actively used and incorporated
into different stages of a normal project planning process. In most SADC
countries, an EIA has become a formal legal or administrative requirement.
However, there is a need in each SADC country to institutionalise the entire
process of environmental management by setting up a duly constituted
organisation with the necessary authority and legal backing to enforce n
government environmental policy. yy
3.4.5 Assessing Environmental Impacts
A
ssessing the likely effect of a road project on the environment can be
accomplished through an EIA as described above. However, quantifying
these impacts is more difcult. Unlike monetary impacts, non-monetary impacts mm
cannot be calculated, assessed or compared with each other in a standardised
manner. Nonetheless, non-monetary impacts should be considered in a trans- d
parent and accountable manner. An impact assessment procedure to evaluate
each of the non-monetary impacts has been developed so that these can be
considered together with or compared to monetary impacts
26
. The procedure
is based on the following three factors:
value
magnitude
signicance
When evaluating each of the non-monetised impacts the following steps apply:
(1) Assess the value of areas inuenced by the project and characterised with h
respect to the most important impacts.
(2) Determine the nature and magnitude of impacts through qualitative descriptors.
(3) Assess the overall signicance of the impacts for the project.
The signicance of the various impacts can be assessed by combining the
value and magnitude of the impact. The general principle is that the larger
the value and vulnerability of the project, the more signicant is the impact,
whether positive or negative.
Impact assessment is a systematic evalu-
ation of the relevant advantages (benets)
and disadvantages (costs) that a new road
plan or improvement of existing roads will
generate regardless of the unit of measure-
ment, i.e. whether measurable in monetary
units or not.
General principle of assessing non-monetary
impacts.
Value Impact
Signicance of impacts
+
A general scale for assessing the signicance of the impacts is shown below,
ranging from very negative (- - - -) to very positive (++++) and is illustrated
in Figure 3.9.
++++ Very large positive signicance
+++ Large positive signicance
++ Fairly large positive signicance
+ Small positive signicance
0 No signicance
- Small negative signicance
- - Fairly large negative signicance
- - - Large negative inuence
- - - - Very large negative signicance
The horizontal axis measures value of impact
while the vertical axis shows the magnitude of the
impact. For example, an impact whose value is
found to lie in the region large value and whose
magnitude lies in the region large positive, will
have a signicance factor described as very large
positive signicance. This implies that the road
alternative will be positive with respect to the
impact.
V
e
r
y
l
a
r
g
e
p
o
s
i
t
iv
e
s
i
g
n
i
f
i
c
a
n
c
e
(
+
+
+
+
)
L
a
r
g
e
p
o
s
i
t
i
v
e
s
ig
n
if
ic
a
n
c
e
(+
+
+
)
F
a
i
r
l
y
l
a
r
g
e
p
o
s
it
iv
e
s
ig
n
ific
a
n
c
e
(+
+
)
S
m
a
ll
p
o
sitive
significance (+)
Small/no significance (0)
S
m
a
ll
n
e
g
a
tiv
e
sig
n
ificance
(-)
F
a
i
r
l
y
l
a
r
g
e
n
e
g
a
t
iv
e
s
ig
n
ific
a
n
c
e
(--)
L
a
r
g
e
n
e
g
a
t
i
v
e
s
ig
n
if
ic
a
n
c
e
(---)
V
e
r
y
l
a
r
g
e
n
e
g
a
t
iv
e
s
i
g
n
i
f
i
c
a
n
c
e
(
-
-
-
-
)
Small value Medium value Large value
L
a
r
g
e
n
e
g
a
t
i
v
e
m
a
g
n
i
t
u
d
e
S
m
a
l
l
/
n
o
m
a
g
n
i
t
u
d
e
L
a
r
g
e
p
o
s
i
t
i
v
e
m
a
g
n
i
t
u
d
e
M
e
d
i
u
m
n
e
g
a
t
i
v
e
m
a
g
n
i
t
u
d
e
M
e
d
i
u
m
p
o
s
i
t
i
v
e
m
a
g
n
i
t
u
d
e
Figure 3.9 - A framework for assessing the signicance of impacts on
LVSR projects
26
An example of the process of assessing the value of the natural environment,
the magnitude of the impacts, as well as the signicance of the impacts is
shown in Figure 3.10.
A B
Alt.3
Alt.1
Alt.2
Lake
Lake
Nature reserve
Baobab
trees
Alt.1 Natural environment: Medium value
Alt.2 Natural environment: Large value
Alt.3 Natural environment: Small/low value
Value assessment
A B
Alt.3
Alt.1
Alt.2
Lake
Lake
Nature reserve
Baobab
trees
Alt.1 Small negative significance (-)
Alt.2 Very large negative significance (- - - -)
Alt.3 Fairly large negative significance (- -)
A B
Alt.3
Alt.1
Alt.2
Lake
Lake
Nature reserve
reduced 30% in size
Half of the
baobabs will
go
Alt.1 Small negative magntude
Alt.2 Large negative magntude
Alt.3 Medium negative magntude
Magntude assessment
Some surface run off
water into dams
+
Significance assessment
Figure 3.10 - Example of assessing value, magnitude and signicance
of impacts on LVSRs
27
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Planning and appraisal procedures should consider a wide range of external
factors, many of them of a non-technical nature, that affect the planning
process if long-term sustainability of the investment is to be achieved.
Stakeholder consultations are critical in the planning process for
which there are a number of techniques which should be undertaken as
appropriately and as transparently as possible.
The traditional methods of investment appraisal are generally not ade-
quate for capturing the full range of benefts - often of a social rather than
economic nature - arising from the provision of LVSRs. More recently
developed models, such as the World Bank`s Roads Economic Decision
(RED) model, are better suited for appraising such roads.

The implications of adopting cost-reducing measures, such as the use
of more appropriate pavement and geometric design methods and wider
use of natural gravels rather than crushed stone, in combination with the
use of appraisal models, such as RED, are a lowering in the traffc
threshold level for sealing an earth/gravel road from the previous fgure
of over 200 vpd to less than 100 vpd.
Environmental issues are assuming greater importance in the region
than hitherto. Environmental impact assessments (EIA) should become
an integral aspect of all LVSR projects. The effectiveness of the EIA
will depend on the extent to which it is actively used and incorporated
into different stages of the project planning process.
The important processes of planning and appraisal have been covered in this
chapter together with environmental issues. Decisions made during the ini-
tial planning phase are particularly infuential and have a high impact on the
subsequent stages of LVSR provision, including those of geometric design and
the associated road safety issues covered in Chapter 4.
8.5 Summary
T
he key points arising in this chapter are:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
Heggie I G (1972). Economic Evaluation of Engineering Projects: A
Comprehensive Approach to Planning Transport Facilities. Proceedings
of the UK Institution of Civil Engineers. Paper 7500S, London.
Carney D (1998). Implementing the Sustainable Rural Livelihoods
Ap A proach. pp Sustainable Rural Livelihoods What Contribution Can We Make?
(ed Diana Carney). Papers presented at the Department for International
Developments Natural Resources Advisers Conference, London. July 1998.
International Labour Organisation (ILO) (1996). Integrated Rural
Accessibility Planning in Lao PDR. August 1996.
Fouracre P (2001). Rural Transport Survey Techniques. Rural Transport
Knowledge Base, Rural Travel and Transport Programme. TRL Limited,
Crowthorne.
Howe J D G F (1972). A Review of Rural Trafc-Counting Methods in
Developing Countries. RRL Report LR 427. Road Research Laboratory,
Crowthorne.
Howe J D G F (1998): Impact of Rural Roads on Poverty Alleviation in
Developing Countries. Third International Workshop on Secondary Rural
Roads, 19-21 May 1998, Jozefow. IHE Working paper T&RE-21.
Transport Research Laboratory (1988). A Guide to Road Project Appraisal.
Overseas Road Note 5, TRL, Crowthorne.
Van der Tak H G and A Ray (1971). The Economic Benets of Road
Transport Projects. World Bank Staff Occasional paper No. 13, The
World Bank, Washington, D.C d
Carnemark C, J Biderman and D Bovet (1976). The Economic Analysis
of Rural Road Projects. World Bank Staff Working Paper No. 241, The
World Bank, Washington, D.C.
Robinson R (1999): A New Approach to Quantifying Economic and
Social Benets for Low-volume Roads in Developing Countries. Impact
Assessment and Project Appraisal, Volume 17, No.2, London. June 1999.
Archondo-Callao R (1999). Roads Economic Decision Model (RED)
for Economic Evaluation of Low-volume Roads. Sub-Saharan Transport
Policy Program Technical Note No. 18. World Bank, Africa Regional
Ofce, Washington, D.C.
DFID (2001). Appraisal of Investments in Improved Rural Access:
Economists Guide. Department for International Development, London.
Crossley P C and S D Ellis (1996). A Handbook of Rural Transport
Vehicles in Developing Countries. Silsoe College, Craneld University.
.
3.6 References and Bibliography
References
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
Government of Ghana (2001). Development of a Feeder Road Prioritisation
Method. Dept. of Feeder Roads. Vol I Working Documents: Vol. II Support
Documents.
Howe J D G F (1997). Least-Cost Planning Methodologies in Rural
Transport. Working Paper T&RE 19. International Institute for Infra-
structural, Hydraulic and Environmental Engineering, Delft.
Parsley L L and R Robinson (1982). The TRRL Road Investment Model
for Developing Countries. TRL Report LR 1057, Crowthorne.
Kerali H, R Robinson and W D O Paterson (1996). The New Highway
Development And Management Tools (HDM-4). 75
th
TRB Conference,
Washington D.C.
South African Roads Board: (1993). Cost-Beneft Analysis Of Rural Road
Projects: Program CB Roads, User Manual version 4.1, South African
Department of Transport, Chief Directorate: National Roads, Pretoria.
Southern African Bitumen and Tar Association (SABITA) and Council
for Scientifc and Industrial Research (CSIR). (1989). Economic Warrants
for Surfacing Roads: Manual 7. CSIR, Pretoria.
Koch J A, F Moavenzadeh and K S Chew (1979). A Methodology for
Evaluation of Rural Roads in the Context of Development. In Proceedings
of Transportation Research Record 702: Low-volume Roads: Second
International Conference, 1979. Transportation Research Board.
Anderson M (1995). Why Are Rural Roads So Important? New World
Transport `95 (Sterling Publications, London).

Gourley C S and P A K Greening (2001). Cost-Effective Designs for
Low-volume Sealed Roads in Tropical and Sub-Tropical Countries. TRL
Unpublished Report PR/OSC/167/99, Crowthorne.
Lionjanga A V L (1999). Environmental Problems Facing Road
Authorties in Africa. PIARC XIX World Road Congress, Marrakech,
22-28 September, 1991.
Gourley C S and P A K Greening (1999). Environmental Damage From
Extraction Of Road Building Materials: Results And Recommendations
From Studies In Southern Africa. TRL Unpublished Report PR/
OSC/169/99, Crowthorne.
Tideman J (1990). Environmental Impact Assessment: A Process for
Effective Management of Resources. Highway Engineering in Australia
- December 1990, Sydney.
Norwegian Public roads Administration. (1995). Impact Assessment of
Road Projects. Norwegian Public Roads Administration, Oslo.
Roads Department, Botswana (2001). Planning and Environmental Impact
Assessment of Road Infrastructure. Guideline No.5. Roads Department,
Ministry of Works, Transport and Communications, Gaborone.
Bibliography
Austroads (1994). Environmental Strategy: Austroads Publication No. AP-
27/94. Sydney.
Austroads (1995). Strategy for Ecologically Sustainable Development.
Austroads Publication No. AP-40/95. Sydney.
Austroads (2003). Environmental Considerations for Planning and Design of
Roads. Austroads Publication No. AP-R217, Sydney.
Beenhakker H and A Lago (1983): Economic Appraisal of Rural Roads:
Simplied Operational Procedures for Screening and Appraisal. Staff
Working Paper 610. World Bank, Washington, D.C.
Creightney C D (1993). Transport and Economic Performance A Survey
of Developing Countries. World Bank Technical Paper No. 232. Africa
Technical Department Series. Washington, D.C.
Crossley P and S D Ellis (1996). A Handbook of Rural Transport Vehicles
in Developing Countries. Silsoe College, Craneld.
Devres Inc. (1980). Socio-Economic and Environmental Impacts of Low-
volume Roads: A Review of the Literature. A.I.D. Program Evaluation
Discussion Paper 7. Washington, D.C: Agency for International Development. n
Ellis S D (1999). Livelihoods of Poor People - What Contribution Can
Transport Make? Workshop Report 29. Department for International ?
Development, London.
Fujimura M and J Weiss (2000). Integration Of Poverty Impact Economic
Analysis: Issues In Theory And Practice. EDRC Methodology Series Number
2, Asian Development Bank.
Hine J L and M Cundill (1994). Economic Assessment Of Road Projects:
Do Our Current Procedures Tell Us What We Want To Know? Intern ? ational
workshop on Impact Evaluation and Analysis of Transport Projects in Developing
Countries, Bombay, December 1994.
Hine J L, P R Fouracre and M Witkiss (2001). Road Planning, Funding
and Funds Allocation. TRL Unpublished Report PR/INT/211/01.
Howe J D G F and P Richards (1984). Rural Roads and Poverty Alleviation.
Intermediate Technology Publications Ltd., London.
Howe J D G F (1997). Rural Transport Projects: Concept Development,
Justication and Appraisal. Lecture Series at the World Bank, September
20-24, 1999.
Howe J D G F (2001). Socio-Economic Impact Of Rural Transport Inter-
ventions And Poverty Alleviation. Rural Transport Knowledge Base, TRL,
Crowthorne.
Kumar A and P Kumar (1999). User-friendly Model for Planning Rural
Roads. Transportation Research Record 1652, Transportation Research
Board, Washington, D.C.
Little I M D and M F G Scott (1976). Using Shadow Prices. Heinemann
Educational Books.
Malmberg-Calvo C (1997). The Institutional and Financial Framework of
Rural Transport Infrastructure. SSATP Working Paper No. 17, Sub-Saharan
African Transport Program. The World Bank, Washington D.C.
McRobert J, Styles E, Giummarra G, McArthur M, and Sheridan G (2001).
Environmental Practices Manual for Rural Sealed and Unsealed Roads.
ARRB Transport Research Ltd., Melbourne.
Overseas Development Administration (ODA). (1996): The Manual of
Environmental Appraisal.
Riverson J D N, J Gavira and S Thriscutt. (1991). Rural Roads in Sub-Saharan
Africa - Lessons from World Bank experience. World Bank Technical
Paper No. 141, Africa Technical Department Series. Washington, D.C.
Stock,E and J de Veen (1996). Expanding labour-based Methods for Road
Works in Africa. World Bank Technical Paper No. 347. Washington, D.C.
Transport Research Laboratory (1988). A Guide to Road Project Appraisal. pp
Overseas Road Note 5, TRL.
Tsunokawa K and C Hoban (ed). (1997). Roads and the Environment: A
Handbook. World Bank Technical Paper 376. Washington, D.C.
The Institution of Civil Engineers, UK (1982). Highway Investment in Developing
Countries. Proceedings of the Conference Criteria for Planning Highway
Investment in Developing Countries, Caf Royal Conference Centre, London,
17 18 May 1982.
World Bank. (1999). Managing the Social Dimension of Transport. The Role
of Social Assessment. World Bank, Social Assessment Thematic Team,
Washington, D.C.
World Bank. (1997). Roads and the Environment: A Handbook. World
Bank Technical Paper No. 376. Washington, D.C.
1. Introduction
2. Regional Setting
4. Geometric Design
and Road Safety
5. Pavement Design,
6. Construction and
Drainage
7. Maintenance and
Road Management
C
h
a
p
t
e
r

4
Geometric Design
and Road Safety
4
4.1 Introduction .......................................................... 4 - 1
4.1.1 Background ................................................. 4 - 1
4.1.2 Basic Terminology.......................................... 4 - 3
4.1.3 Purpose and Scope of Chapter ........................... 4 - 3
4.2 Design Philosophy, Standards and Approach ................ 4 - 4
4.2.1 Philosophy ................................................... 4 - 4
4.2.2 Standards ..................................................... 4 - 4
4.2.3 Approach ..................................................... h 4 - 5
4.3 Design Framework and Process ................................ 4 - 7
4.3.1 Framework ................................................... k 4 - 7
4.3.2 Process ....................................................... 4 - 7
4.3.3 Safety Issues ................................................. 4 - 11
4.3.4 Design Guides/Manuals .................................... 4 - 15
4.4 Design Techniques, Controls and Elements................... 4 - 17
4.4.1 Techniques ................................................... 4 - 17
4.4.2 Controls ...................................................... 4 - 19
4.4.3 Elements ...................................................... 4 - 24
4.5 Roadside Safety, Education and Enforcement .............. 4 - 28
4.5.1 Roadside Safety ............................................. 4 - 28
4.5.2 Education and Enforcement ............................... t 4 - 31
4.6 Summary.............................................................. 4 - 33
4.7 References and Bibliography..................................... 4 - 34
C
o
n
t
e
n
t
s
Geometric Design and Road Safety 4 - 1
Geometric Design
and Road Safety
4
4.1 Introduction
4.1.1 Background
G
eometric design is one of the rst stages of the LVSR design process
that is normally carried out after the planning and appraisal stages. The
outcome determines the construction requirements and inuences the
maintenance requirements. In the design process, the layout of the road in
the terrain is designed to meet the specic needs of road users. This involves
the selection of suitable road widths and horizontal and vertical alignments
in accordance with appropriately prescribed standards which provide the
following:
minimum levels of safety and comfort for drivers
a framework for economic design
consistency of alignment
The design standards should take into account the road environment, road
conditions, trafc characteristics and driver behaviour. In so doing, the design
aims to provide a road with an alignment and cross-section that are not only
the best compromise between operational efciency, safety and economy
but also minimises any adverse environmental and social/cultural impacts.
This requires a thorough knowledge of the local road environment which
affects every aspect of the design process.
Planning
Design
Construction
Maintenance
S
e
q
u
e
n
c
e
o
f
a
c
t
i
v
i
t
i
e
s
Geometric Design
The geometric design of LVSRs presents a unique challenge because the
relatively low trafc levels make designs normally applied on higher volume
roads less cost effective. Unfortunately, design standards for LVSRs have
never been specically developed for the SADC region. In the absence of
such standards, there has been a tendency to use national standards that are
based on those developed in industrialised countries, such as the traditionally d
used AASHTO Policy on Geometric Design of Rural Highways
1
.
Imported standards tend to cater for relatively high levels of trafc and
embody relatively high levels of service, as a result of which they are often
inappropriate for application to LVSRs. Moreover, they give little, if any,
consideration to the use of labour-based methods of construction which can
inuence the design process (ref. Box 4.1). This results in LVSRs often being
designed in a manner that does not take account of the socio-economic and
other characteristics of the local road environment.
Road Safety
Many aspects of the geometric design process are affected by the road
environment which, in turn, can inuence the level of road safety provided
to road users. Experience has shown that simply adopting international
design standards from developed countries will not necessarily result in levels of
safety that are achieved in those countries as these are generally accompanied
by effective enforcement, driver training and publicity - inuences that are
often not operating as efciently in the SADC region.
Road trafc operations also tend to be complex and often involve a mixture
of motor vehicles, bicycles, animal drawn vehicles and pedestrians. A large
proportion of the trafc composition is dominated by relatively old, overloaded
and slow-moving vehicles and there are often low levels of driver training
and control of road users. In such an environment, trafc safety assumes
paramount importance, an aspect of geometric design which is often inadequately
addressed at the various stages of planning, designing and constructing LVSRs.
Many aspects of the geometric design process also have a potential impact
on the physical and social/cultural environments, especially where the alignment
traverses built-up areas and where there is a high potential for severe erosion.
Unfortunately, various practical measures that can be undertaken during the
geometric planning process to minimise environmental impacts are often not
adequately understood and addressed.
From the above, it is apparent that existing design standards and practice are
generally not appropriate for application in the SADC region. A need
therefore exists to adapt these standards in order to provide acceptable levels
of service, safety and uniformity consistent with the types of trafc generally
experienced on LVSRs. Such adaptation needs to be based on local knowledge,
experience, socio-economic conditions and established criteria within a
design process that needs to be exible and multi-faceted, from feasibility
to the end-of-life cycle.
It was only in 2001 that, AASHTO pro-
duced its Guidelines for Geometric
Design of Very Low-volume Local Roads
(ADT 400). This was in recognition of
the fact that very low trafc volumes
make designs normally applied on higher
volume roads less cost effective. Prior to
this, its Policy on Geometric Design of
Rural Highways - 1965 edition, which did
not cater specifcally for low-volume roads,
was the de facto standard adopted in most
SADC countries!
Accident rates in the SADC region are of
the order of 30 - 50 times higher than in
Europe or the USA.
Severe erosion of side slopes that can lead
to siltation of streams and rivers.
4.1.2 Basic Terminology
Figure 4.1 - Typical road cross section elements (after Austroads
2
)
T
he main purpose of this chapter is to raise awareness of the widely
differing recommendations made by various design guides or manuals
pertaining to LVSRs. It highlights the many shortcomings that are inherent in
those traditional approaches to geometric design that have been imported and
used without appropriate adaptation to the specic characteristics of the
LVSR environment. Particular emphasis is placed on the need to incorporate
appropriate road safety features in the design process.
The approach adopted is not prescriptive; nor is it intended to be a detailed
design manual that could supersede the need for application of sound principles
by the knowledgeable design professional. Rather, it emphasises the need to
consider the basis on which various design parameters are chosen in relation
to the specics of the SADC regions road environment.
formation width
carriageway
batter batter shoulder shoulder traffic lanes
(pavement)
crossfall
verge
verge
table drain
catch
drain
right-of-way
boundary
right-of-way
boundary
natural surface
4.2 Design Philosophy, Stand-
ards and Approach
4.2.1 Philosophy
T
he philosophy embodied in the geometric design of a road is linked to
such factors as a countrys economic prosperity, the state of development
of the road network and the unique characteristics of the road environment
within which the road functions. It would normally evolve from analytical
evaluation and experience of local conditions and often reect the physical
and economic environment of the road project itself. Thus, geometric design
philosophy would be expected to vary between industrialised and developing
countries.
The functionality and characteristics of the road network in the SADC region
are quite different from those in industrialised countries. Not only are trafc
levels relatively low, but the trafc mix is complex, consisting of a mixture
of motorised and non-motorised trafc. The proportion of commercial vehicles
and levels of pedestrianisation near peri-urban areas are also relatively high.
This clearly dictates a need to develop a design philosophy and related standards
that are suited to the socio-economic environment of the region. Such a
philosophy would be expected to be quite different from that embodied in
geometric design manuals developed in industrialised countries that often
form the basis of geometric design in the region. Such manuals generally
cater to higher trafc volumes, greater need for all-weather accessibility and
provide for operational efciency of the trafc using the network - requirements
that are clearly less appropriate for the region.
4.2.2 Standards
G
eometric design standards provide the link between the cost of building
and subsequently maintaining the road and the cost of its use by road
users. Usually, the higher the geometric standard, the higher the construction
cost and the lower the road user costs. The aim is to select design standards that
minimise total transport costs. Thus, the relatively low trafc characteristics
of LVSRs means that road improvements should be planned at the lowest
practicable standards (without unduly impairing safety requirements) if costs
are to be justied by the benets obtained.
Unfortunately, there are no existing standards in any SADC country that are
based on in-country research into economic and safety factors. Those standards
that do exist vary tremendously, reecting either the practice of the developed
countries with which SADC countries have had previous ties or the preferences
of international consultants who have worked in these countries. Many of
them are a direct translation from overseas practice, sometimes with some
modication to compensate for local operational differences and deciencies,
often without full evaluation of the consequences.
In view of the above, until standards for LVSRs are developed, the challenge is
to apply existing designs and standards in a exible manner to t the parameters
pertaining to the local environment and to achieve safe economic design.
Flat terrain with little constraint on geometric
standards.
Hilly terrain with constraints on geometric
standards.
LVSRs, more than any others, call for a
detailed examination of design options on
the basis of sufcient data to allow an ap-
propriate choice of geometric standards
and should not be designed according to
rigid guidelines and standards established
a priori, often in environments very different
from those prevailing in the SADC region.
Choice of Standards
The choice of geometric design standards is related to the function of a road. In
a developing region, such as the SADC, three stages of road network development
usually occur, as follows:
Stage 1 - provision of access
Stage 2 - improvement in existing capacity

Stage 3 - increase in operational efciency
LVSRs generally full a function within road networks at Stages 1 or 2 of the
above sequence. Thus, the road design philosophy and standards should reect
the particular requirements of such roads and their particular characteristics.
In this regard, a case may be made for a relaxation of traditional standards
as, when sensibly applied, they can result in substantial construction cost
savings, with little additional risk of increased accidents. Such relaxations, or
local reductions in standards, can be undertaken in the context of the Design
Domain, a relatively new concept in geometric design which is described
in Section 4.3.2.
4.2.3 Approach
I
nvestment in road infrastructure represents a large part of investment in
national development programmes. It is therefore even more important
to ensure that scarce funds are deployed to best advantage. There is a tendency
for the construction cost per kilometre to increase as each road design
criterion is considered. As a matter of policy, therefore, it is necessary
to ensure that an approach to geometric design is adopted which is appropriate
to the prevailing socio-economic conditions. This may mean considering
design approaches that favour labour exclusive rather than plant exclusive
construction technology.
Box 4.1 - Labour-based methods and geometric design
3
In a labour-abundant economy, it is often benecial to employ labour-based
rather than equipment-based methods of road construction. In such a situation,
the choice of technology can be a major constraint or facilitator affecting
design. Where labour-based technology is being contemplated at the geometric
planning stage, it could have the following implications:
the geometric standards that are achievable will be seriously affected,
especially in rolling, hilly or mountainous terrain
economic haul distances will be limited to those achievable using wheel
barrows
mass balancing will need to be achieved by transverse rather than longitudinal
earthwork distribution
maximum gradients will need to follow the natural terrain gradients
horizontal alignments will need to be less direct
maximum cuts and lls will need to be low
The reverse of the above is true for equipment intensive technology. Thus,
at the geometric planning stage, consideration must be given to the type of
technology to be employed in road construction and to the inuence that
this will have on the approach to geometric design.
6 Geometric Design and Road Safety 4 - 6
The following aspects of geometric design require particular consideration
from a policy perspective as they have a crucial bearing on the life-cycle
costs of LVSR provision:
Design standards
design speed
cross-sectional dimensions
safety measures
maximum gradient
horizontal curvature
In the fnal analysis, the wide variety of topographic, climatic, economic and
social conditions will dictate the road geometry appropriate to a specifc situa-
tion. The aim should be to establish a basic network of LVSRs by spreading
limited resources to cover several road projects rather than building a smaller
number of roads to a higher standard. In this way, funds saved by using cost-
effective design standards can be used for other projects which would bring the
best economic return on the investment.
Cost-effective geometric design can be achieved by identifying areas where
road standards could be made more fexible and more responsive to environ-
mental changes consonant with local knowledge, experience, socio-economic
conditions and established criteria.
4.3 Design Framework and
Process
4.3.1 Framework
L
VSRs full a variety of functions within diverse operational environ-
ments. Thus, designs need to cater for an array of different situations in
which consideration must be given to all the inter-acting elements that affect
the design process.
In order to help dene the situations which are appropriate for a specic
design application, it is useful to group them within a design framework as
shown in Table 4.1.
Table 4.1 - Design Framework
Element Range Inuence on design
Project type
New
Existing
greater exibility of choice but there are few new

greeneld projects
focus on upgrading/reconstruction projects which
places constraints on designers choice
designers choice often restricted by nature of existing
developments and roadside environment
Area type
Urban
Peri-urban
Rural
wide range of operating characteristics, constraints and

congurations which vary widely in terms of
- range of uses
- trafc volumes, speeds and mix
- pedestrian activity
need for producing appropriate matching designs
Functional
classication
Primary
Secondary
Tertiary/access
identies relative importance of mobility and access

functions for road
prescribes related minimum standards
Terrain type
Flat
Rolling
Mountainous
inuences choice of alignment, design/operating

speeds and standards
impacts on drainage and maintenance requirements and
also on environment
Design/
operating
speed
Low
Medium
High
used to correlate various features of design

ultimately determines construction, maintenance and
road user costs
Trafc
volumes,
type and mix
Low
Medium
High
provides fundamental basis of design

includes both motorised and non-motorised trafc
LVSR projects will be, predominantly, the upgrading of existing gravel roads
to a bituminous standard. The designers freedom of choice will often be
restricted by developments, including ribbon development, surrounding the
road to be upgraded. Thus, rigid adherence to standards may not be possible
and exibility must be built into the process through the adoption of exible
design techniques.
4.3.2 Process
T
he process of geometric design contains various stages within which the
nal product is gradually developed. The process is iterative. A number
of investigations and evaluations have to be undertaken, questions asked, and
decisions taken in preparatory phases that may have to be re-evaluated later,
until the process has provided satisfactory results. An outline of the design
process is presented in Figure 4.2.
Physical obstacles in the terrain can
constrain design options.
1. Conduct technicaI audit
|dentify existing conditions:
- terrain & road alignment
- traffic flow & composition
- speed
4. Define basic parameters
|dentify homogeneous sections of:
- terrain & road alignment
- traffic flow & composition
- speed

Consider reIaxations of standards
in combination with appropriate
warning signage and traffic calming
measures.

Do all the elements fall within the
Design Class StandardI
YES

YES
Does physical environment favour
(a) Design-by-eye or conventional
design. Select (a) if experienced field
staff available.

a) Design by eye d) Conventional

Pield investigation
& detailed inventory
Pield investigation &
detailed office design

YS
ND
ND

YS
7. Decide design approach
Step 1: Project preparation
8. CompIete design
Step 2: Design
6. Design triaI aIignment
NO
NO
12. conomic evaIuation
|s the pro|ect economically viableI
YS
NO
NO
13. Financing
Are construction costs within fund
allocationI

YS
14. Appropriate design achieved
Review project
Step 3:
Evaluation
2. Conduct road safetyaudit
|dentify existing conditions:
- accident potential
- design remedial measures
3. nvironmentaI audit
Get approval from the community
in principle
Are all the design elements consistent
with operational speed estimatesI
9. Safetyaudit (Part 2)
Does design meet minimum criteriaI
10. nvironmentaI Audit (Part 2)
Has the community accepted the
complete designI
11. Cost estimate
5. SeIect design cIass
Lstablish:
- development levels and functional
requirements
- design speed
- geometric design elements
Figure 4.2 - The geometric design process
The design process may be broken down into three phases as follows:
project preparation
design
evaluation
A. Step 1 Project Preparation
The project preparation phase embodies a number of concepts that are not
normally considered in conventional design manuals. These include a focus
on the planning aspects of the geometric design process in which there is:
a primary, over-riding focus on road safety
continuous public involvement in all stages of the design process
The main activities undertaken in the project preparation phase include:
(1) Technical Audit: One of the rst tasks to be carried out is a technical
audit of the project. This entails information gathering on such factors as
terrain and road alignment, trafc ows and composition, overall speed and
speed over individual sections, land use and settlements including schools
and hospitals. Trafc counts and trafc forecasts also need to be conducted.
The results of the technical audit provide an input into the next step - the
denition of basic parameters.
(2) Road Safety Audit (1): The preliminary design stage of the audit
entails investigation of all factors that could have an adverse impact on the
safety of the design, including such factors as accident black spots and the
accident potential related to the improvement/upgrading of the road assessed,
so that the information can be included in the subsequent design.
(3) Environmental Audit (1): The community should be consulted and
involved at an early stage of the design process. This is necessary to ensure d
that their views are accommodated where appropriate and their priorities
taken into account in the nal design.
(4) Dene Basic Parameters: The main task is to identify and group the
project into homogenous sections with similar conditions and characteristics
such as terrain, alignment, trafc, speed, land use and development. The
information will form the basis for selection of the design class.
(5) Select Design Class: The selection of design speed and geometric
elements is based on the developmental potential and functional requirements
of the road. The design class for each homogenous section of road, in terms
of terrain, road alignment, trafc and speed, can then be determined as a basis
for selecting the various design elements.
B. Step 2 Design
(6) Design Trial Alignment: The trial alignments will conrm if the
intended standard can be introduced, for instance, if the design elements fall
within the standard and are consistent with the expected operational speed.
Failure to comply with set conditions will require new trials with modied
inputs. Such trials may include relaxation of standards consisting of measures
such as a lower design speed in combination with appropriate signage or
trafc calming measures.
(7) Decide on design approach: The design approach will be dependent
on topography, institutional arrangements, availability of suitable skilled and
experienced eld staff, etc. The selection of the design approach is also inu-
enced by the type of project in terms of whether it involves rehabilitation of d
an existing facility or provision of a new one. The requirements for the eld
surveys and investigations will also depend on the type of project.
(8) Complete Design: The completion of the design concludes Stage 2 -
Design, and is followed by the next Stage 3 - Evaluation. This stage includes the
follow-up of a number of audits and evaluations related to safety, social
considerations, costs, along with economics and nancing which received
preliminary consideration in the project preparation phase.
Step 3 Evaluation
(9) Road Safety Audit (2): The design features are examined from a
safety point of view. Remedial measures are proposed for possible weak-
nesses in the design. If the design is such that simple remedial measures are
not adequate to rectify the shortcomings, the design will need to be reviewed
and new trial alignments be carried out. This iterative procedure will be
repeated until the design is acceptable from a road safety perspective. d
(10) Environmental Audit (2): Public participation should continue after
the detailed design is completed. If necessary, modications or adjustments
to the design, as a result of community consultations, will have to be under-
taken to ensure that the nal project accords with local requirements.
(11) Cost Estimate: Cost estimates should be conducted at various steps
of the design process as they may inuence the scope of the project and
decisions made concerning the design controls and elements. A detailed cost
estimate will be required at nal design stage to allow an economic evaluation
of the project to be carried out.
(12) Economic Evaluation: Cost-benet analyses, as described in Chapter
3, need to be undertaken to allow the viability of the project to be assessed.
If the project turns out to be not viable in terms of the criteria prescribed,
modications to the project may need to be undertaken. Such modications
may include relaxations of design standards, stage construction, or other
factors that reduce cost or increase benets.
(13) Financing: Adequate nancing for the project, in terms of both
construction and future maintenance costs, needs to be secured before
implementation begins, otherwise the sustainability of the project could be n
jeopardised. Should such funding not be available, it may be preferable to
defer implementation until it can be obtained.
(14) Appropriate Design Achieved: If the tasks outlined in the ow chart
and in the discussion above have been methodically carried out, the nal result
should be an appropriate geometric design.
4.3.3 SaIety 1ssues
1mportance oI SaIety
S
tudies carried out by international organisations reveal that the road
safety situation throughout the African continent, including the SADC
region, is one of the worst in the world
4
. Fatality rates, in relation to vehicle
feets, are 30 - 40 times higher than those of industrialised countries. Indeed,
in several countries a motor vehicle is over one hundred times more likely
to be involved in a fatal crash than in Europe or the USA.
Figure 4.3 - International comparison of fatalities in selected countries
4
Because of the substantial cost implications on the economies of these countries
- of the order of one to two per cent of gross national product (GNP) - road
safety has become of paramount importance in all aspects of road provision.
Road safety is multi-dimensional in nature and cannot be discussed in isolation
from geometric design. As illustrated in Figure 4.4, the various elements of
the road system, such as geometry and pavement condition and operational
conditions, such as operating speed, infuence road safety.
Australia
Netherlands / United Kingdom
Sweden
Spain
Germany
Prance
1apan
|taly
Canada
USA
South Africa
Malawi
Kenya
8otswana
Lgypt
Morocco
Namibia
2000
l500
l000
500
0
0 l00 200 300 400 500 600 700 800
P
a
t
a
l
i
t
i
e
s
p
e
r
l
0
0
0
0
0
v
e
h
i
c
l
e
s
vehicles per l000 population
S d
a
c
a
/
n
n
d
a
RDAD
LMN7S
GLOMLTP
POAD S|DL
PUPN|TUPL AND
O8STACLLS
POAD S|GNS,
POAD
MAPK|NGS AND
POAD STUDS
LNv|PONMLNT
PAvLMLNT
COND|T|ON
DPRA7IDNAL
CDNDI7IDNS
TPAPP|C
PLOw
SAPLT
(ACC|DLNTS)
OPLPAT|NG
SPLLD
TPAPP|C
OPPLNCLS
7H RDADSYS7M
Figure 4.4 - Elements of the road system and operational conditions
/n 1990 road trajc accidents were rated ninth
in the top ten causes oj death and disability in
the world. By 2020 it is predicted that it will
be rated third.
Harvard School of Public Health Projections.
Unconventional signs are sometimes usea
to warn of the aangers of overloaaing ana
speeaing.
A poorly-maintainea roaa sign can be the
cause of roaa acciaents.
For example, as illustrated in Figure 4.5, overloading has an important
inuence on pavement condition and deterioration and is inuenced by police
surveillance, while speeding is also inuenced by the road geometry and
police surveillance. Both overloading and speeding, in turn, have an inuence
on safety in terms of accidents.
Figure 4.5 - An example of the interrelationship between road
elements and operational conditions
Thus, although the importance of designing for safety is now widely recognised,
the actual process of identifying key design features and resolving the con-
ict of safety and other considerations is complex and requires tackling in a
holistic manner.
The Nature of Accidents
Confronting the challenge of safety requires proactive strategies that treat
the root causes of accidents and levels of severity before they occur. To this
end, valuable guidance on accident prevention is given in a number of
documents including, particularly, the TRL guide entitled Towards Safer
Roads in Developing Countries
5
.
As illustrated in Figure 4.6, accidents are multi-causal in nature, involving
human factors, the road environment and vehicle factors. They are more often n
caused by a combination of these factors, with human factors contributing to
an estimated 95 per cent of all accidents, the road environment 28 per cent
and vehicles only 8 per cent. Thus, although not the dominant cause of road
accidents, it is important that features are not introduced in the geometric
design which could result in additional negative impacts on road safety.
Police surveillance
Loading
(overloading)
Pavement condition
Road geometry
Operating speed
(speeding)
Accident rate
(road safety)
Speed limit painted on the road.
The above document provides practical
guidance on how to make roads safer by
highlighting the key, safety-related factors
which need to be incorporated when planning,
designing and operating road networks.
Drinking and driving are a common cause
of accidents in the SADC region.
Human factors (95%)
67%
24%
4%
4%
4%
Road environment
factors (28%)
Vehicle factors
(8%)
Figure 4.6 - Factors contributing to road accidents
6
The Inuence of Design
Almost all geometric design elements affect road safety by:
inuencing the ability of the driver to control his/her vehicle
inuencing the opportunities that exist for conict (and accidents) with
other road users
inuencing the outcome of an out-of-control vehicle
affecting the behaviour and attentiveness of a driver
Thus, by incorporating good design principles from the start of the design
process, it is possible to avoid many problems simply by planning and
designing new roads or upgrading existing ones in a safety conscious manner.
Moreover, it is often possible to improve road safety characteristics markedly
at little or no extra cost, provided the road safety implications of design
features are considered at the design stage. Unfortunately, road design engineers d
are often part of the problem and their failure to take adequate account
of operational use of roads often result in increased speeds and increased
deaths when such roads pass through communities straddling the road.
There are a number of tools to assist in this process, such as Road Safety
Audits, which are considered below.
Box 4.2 - Key principles for designing safer roads
Adherence to various key principles of design can considerably improve
the safety of LVSRs. These key principles are summarised below:
Designing for all road users.
includes non-motorised vehicles, pedestrians, etc.
has implications for almost all aspects of road design, including
carriageway width, shoulder design, side slopes and side drains
Providing a clear and consistent message to the driver.
roads should be easily read and understood by drivers and should
not present them with any sudden surprises
Encouraging appropriate speeds and behaviour by design.
trafc speed can be inuenced by altering the look of the road, for
example by providing clear visual clues such as changing the shoulder
treatment or installing prominent signing
Reducing conicts.
cannot be avoided entirely but can be reduced by design, e.g. by
staggering junctions or by using guard rails to channel pedestrians
to safer crossing points
Creating a forgiving road environment.
forgives a drivers mistakes or vehicle failure, to the extent that this
is possible, without signicantly increasing costs
ensures that demands are not placed upon the driver which are
beyond his or her ability to manage
Despite adherence to various key principles for designing safer roads, very
few engineering measures, on their own, are totally self-enforcing. They
normally require other measures of external control and facilitation such as
enforcement and education, to be fully effective (ref. Section 4.5).
Reviews of road projects in many develop-
ing countries reveal a depressing catalogue
of unsafe and inconsiderate road designs
which though compliant with highway
design standards, remain unsafe because
of the particular characteristics of the trafc
using the road and the operating environ-
ment in which the road will function
4
.
Designs need to cater for different types of
road users.
Hoad SaIety AudIts
Safety should be given special attention at all stages of the design process.
One effective means of achieving that goal is by the use of a road safety
audit. This may be defned as '.a jormalised examination oj an existing or
juture road or trajc project or any project which interacts with road users,
in which independent, qualied examiner reports on the project`s accident
potential and sajety perjormance
6
.
The objectives of a road safety audit are essentially to:
identify and report on the accident potential and safety problems of a
road project
ensure that road elements with an accident potential are removed or
improved
ensure that measures are implemented to reduce accident risks
As illustrated in Figure 4.7, road safety auditing is an iterative process and
should be carried out at all stages of a road project from preliminary design,
through detailed design to pre-opening. It provides an opportunity, especially
during the preliminary design stages of the project, to eliminate, as far as
possible, road safety problems in the provision of both new roads as well as
those being upgraded.
lstool|sh
solety
u|Jel|nes
Peasibility Audit
Question
choice of
route
l. Preliminary
design
5olety
exet|ence
to m|t|ote
toolems
2. Detailed
design
Checklists to
avoid mistakes
Poad user
role play
Von|tot
scheme
etlotmonce
3. Pre-opening
Peedback to
future design
Figure 4.7 - Road safety audit ow-chart
The major benefts of such audits include:
a reduction in the likelihood of accidents on the road network
a reduction in the severity of accidents on the road network
an increased awareness of safe design practices among traffc engineers
and road designers
a reduction in expenditure on remedial measures
a reduction in the life-cycle cost of a road
The resources required for carrying out a road safety audit are usually quite
small and could add about 4 per cent to the road design costs. However, the
benefts can be very marked with an estimated potential beneft-cost ratio
of 20:1
7
.
Roaa safety auaits help to proauce aesigns
that reauce risks to roaa users.
Box 4.3 - Road Safety Audits in SADC
Road safety audits have not yet become a formalized, mandatory aspect of
the road design process in many SADC countries. At present, road safety is
assumed to be addressed through adherence to geometric design standards.
However, this is neither adequate nor sufcient. It has been shown that
roads designed to standards are neither necessarily safe nor unsafe and
that the linkage between standards and safety is largely unpremeditated
8
.
As a result:
there is a need to accelerate the rate of adoption of a more formalized
road safety audit procedure appropriate to all roads in any country
road safety audit procedures should be introduced as part of a comprehen-
sive road safety programme in all countries
lessons learned from safety audits should be centrally coordinated and
shared amongst all countries in the region
4.3.4 Design Guides/Manuals
I
n recognition of the shortcomings of the use of guides from developed
countries for LVSRs, attempts have been made to develop more appropriate
guides for developing countries (e.g. TRLs ORN 6
9
). Recourse has also
been made to the use of more appropriate standards emanating from other
countries such as Australia (e.g. NAASRA
10
, Austroads
11
and ARRB
12
guide-
lines). Most recently, guidelines have been developed in the region for use
either nationally (e.g. South Africas G2 Manual
8
) or regionally (e.g.
SATCCs Geometric Design of Rural Roads
13
). However, neither of these
guidelines apply to LVSRs. Table 4.2 provides a listing of the various design
guides and the extent of their use in the region.
Table 4.2 - Design guides/manuals used in SADC region
Design Guide/Manual Degree of Use
High Med Low
USA
X
X
X
*
AASHO:
- A Policy on Geometric Design of Rural Highways (1965).
AASHTO:
- A policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets (1984).
- Guidelines for Geometric Design of Very Low-volume
Local Roads (ADT 400) (2001).
Australia
X
X
X
*
NAASRA:
- Interim Guide to the geometric design of rural roads. (1980).
Austroads:
- Rural Road Design: Guide to the design of Rural Roads (1989).
ARRB:
- Road classications, geometric designs and maintenance
standards for low-volume roads (2001).
United Kingdom
TRL:
- Overseas Road Note 6: A guide to geometric design (1988). X
By conducting road safety audits, a road
authority is showing that it has the intention
to improve the safety on its roads, and con-
sequently has a stronger defence against
tort liability claims.
Designs should cater for pedestrians as
well as vehicular trafc.
Southern Africa
X
X
X
SATCC:
- Recommendations on Road Design Standards: Geometric
Design of Rural Roads (1987).
South Africa:
- G2 - Geometric Design Manual (South Africa, 2003).
Member states: Country manuals based essentially on one or
other of the guides listed above.
* These guidelines have very recently been developed and knowledge of their exis-
tence and use is still very limited.
All the guidelines/manuals listed above are based on different philosophies
and make different assumptions or use different criteria for developing
design values for the various design elements. For example, some guides n
give emphasis to safety considerations while others may place emphasis on
service level, capacity, comfort or aesthetic values. Not surprisingly, the
resulting design values recommended, and their related cost implications, all
differ, sometimes quite signicantly. Thus, it is essential for the designer to
have a thorough understanding of the origin, background and basis of devel-
opment of the design guides or manuals and related design criteria as a basis
for adaptation, where necessary, and subsequent judicious application to
LVSR situations.
In the next section, a comparison is made of design values obtained from
the application of some of the design guides considered most appropriate for
use in the SADC region.
4.4 Design Controls and Elements
4.4.1 Techniques
T
here are a number of techniques that have been developed in recent years
which offer a considerable degree of exibility to the LVSR designer in
the design process as well as improve the quality of the design. These are
described briey below:
Context Sensitive Design
Context Sensitive Design
14
is responsive to, or consistent with, the roads
natural characteristics and human behaviour, i.e. the design can deviate when
necessary from accepted design criteria. Consideration is given to the desires
and needs of the community by inviting the appropriate stakeholders to
participate in identifying solutions so that they are acceptable to the community.
Context Sensitive Design recognises that exceptions may be required in some
cases in applying standards. For example, where provision of an engineered
alignment results in excessive earthworks, it may be preferable to lower the
design speed in order to minimise social or environmental impacts.
Design Domain Concept
The design domain concept
8
, shown in Figure 4.8, recognizes that there is
a range of values which could be adopted for a particular design parameter
within absolute upper and lower limits. Values adopted for a particular design
parameter within the design domain would achieve an acceptable, though
varying, level of service in average conditions in terms of safety, operational,
economic and environmental consequences.
Cost or
benefit
Practical lower limit
Absolute
lower limit Design domain
Guideline
Practical upper
limit
Absolute
upper
limit
Range of values
Figure 4.8 - The design domain concept
While values within the lower region of the design domain are generally less
safe and less operationally efcient, they are normally less costly than those
in the upper region. In the upper region of the domain, resulting designs are
generally safer and more efcient in operation, but may cost more to con-
struct. The design domain sets the limit within which parameters should
be selected for consideration within the value-engineering concept.
The design domain concept provides the following benets to the designer:
It is directly related to the true nature of the road design function and
process, since it places emphasis on developing appropriate and cost-
effective designs, rather than simply meeting standards.
It directly reects the continuous nature of the relationship between service,
cost and safety and changes in design dimensions. It thus reinforces the
need to consider the impacts of trade-offs throughout the domain and not
just when a standards threshold has been crossed.
It provides an implicit link to the concept of Factor of Safety - a conceptt
that is used in other civil engineering design processes where risk and
safety are important.
An example of the design domain concept for shoulder width is shown in
Figure 4.9
Figure 4.9 - Example of design domain application - shoulder width
14
Design-By-Eye
Conventional approaches to design involve precise engineering surveys over
the total length of the road as a basis for producing horizontal and vertical
alignments and cross-sections on working drawings from which quantities
are normally calculated. The cost of this approach, which is normally
justied for relatively high-volume/standard roads, can hardly be justied d
for relatively low-volume/standard roads.
Design-by-eye is a relatively simple approach to design which is intended
primarily for the upgrading of existing LVRs where the geometry is adequate.
In this approach, the route alignment is chosen by eye at the time of con-
struction by experienced site staff who are aware of the economic, operational
and safety consequences of geometric design.
Mobility
Maintenance
cost
User cost
Capital
cost
Environmental
Impact
Collision
rate
0 1,0 2,0 3,0
Width (m)
Design domain
The exibility offered by the
Design Domain concept
For many elements, a range of dimesions is
given and the designer has the responsibil-
ity of choosing the appropriate value for a
particular application. If a design involves
compromise, it may be more appropriate to
compromise several elements by a small
amount than to compromise one element
excessively. It is important that a design
should be balanced.
Box 4.4 - Advantages of the Design-by-eye approach
Enables the engineer to t the alignment to the terrain so that it causes
minimum disturbance to any existing facilities and the adjacent physical
environment.
Obviates the need for a conventional topographic survey of the existing
road and normal plan and prole drawings do not need to be prepared.
Allows the geometry of the road to be described on a simple road location
straight-line plan showing roughly the horizontal alignment with kilometre-
stationing and possible improvements indicated, such as sight distances.
Minimises earthworks, increases speed of construction and reduces
preparatory costs and, ultimately, construction costs by 10 - 20 per cent.
Can result in a nished product of at least similar quality to the conventional
approach.
The design-by-eye approach is best suited to situations where detailed
documentation in terms of drawings and quantities is not required. This includes
situations where construction is undertaken by a management team or by
in-house construction units rather than by a contractor governed by rigidly
specied contractual and payment conditions of a contract.
The degree to which the design-by-eye approach is applied in relation to
conventional approaches (full horizontal and vertical survey and control) can
also vary widely depending on local circumstances and can include the
following options:
no survey, but brief indications of corridor, areas to avoid, required
ll/cut heights for drainage, soils, or other information
survey of the horizontal alignment and/or vertical alignment with spot
surveys of alignment options at critical locations
survey of the horizontal alignment and vertical alignment up to e.g. sub-
base level only. Base course then to be placed within thickness tolerances
4.4.2 Controls
T
he need to relate the physical elements of a road with the requirements of
the driver in an environmentally acceptable manner imposes a number of
controls on the road designer. Many of these controls relate to the characteristics
of the road environment; those that may be appropriate for one environment
may well not be appropriate for another. The more important design controls
include:
driver characteristics design trafc
design speed design vehicles
sight distances environmental factors
Design parameters such as driver-eye-height and perception-reaction time vary
considerably among drivers as well as vehicle type and driving conditions.
Thus, in relation to the underlying assumptions made, guidance on various
design parameters pertaining to driver characteristics vary quite signicantly
as illustrated in Table 4.3. As a result, the values derived for related design
elements such as sight distance are affected. Such guidance should be care-
fully evaluated in relation to the assumptions made and their applicability to the
project situation.
Parameter Design Guide
SATCC TRL ORN6 ARRB
Driver eye height (m) 1.00 1.05 1.15
Brake reaction time (secs) 2.50 2.00 2.50
Object height (stopping) (m) 0.10 0.20 0.20
Object height (passing)(m) 1.00 1.05 -
Speed Kills Kill Speed
Table 4.3 - Driver characteristics recommended for rural/low-volume roads TT
Design Speed
The design speed is probably the most inuential factor affecting the geometric d
design of a LVSR and is inuenced by the following factors:
nature of the terrain
classication of the road
density and character of the adjoining land use
trafc volumes and composition expected on the road
cross-section
Design speed is normally taken as the maximum speed that 85% of the drivers
are expected to adopt over a specied section of the completed road when
conditions are so favourable that the design features of the road govern the
drivers choice of speed. The higher the design speed, the higher, usually, the
cost of construction. In undulating country, a rough rule of thumb is that an
increase of 20 km/h in the speed standard doubles the cost of earthworks.
It is noteworthy that the conventional design speed approach to specifying
alignment design standards carries implicit assumptions regarding driver behaviour
which have not been substantiated by empirical research
15
. Alternative design
procedures have been developed which ensure compatibility between align-
ment standard and observed driver-speed behaviour, and in which emphasis
is placed on consistency and driver expectancy rather than absolute minimum
standards. Such an approach is believed to result in safer operations, particularly
for low-standard alignments, than the conventional design speed approach
16
.
As a result, it would appear better suited to the SADC region where driver
behaviour is a critical determinant of operational, and hence, design speed.
Although speed has been viewed traditionally as the most inuential factor
affecting the geometric design of LVSRs, it is also suggested that life-cycle
costs could be considered as the most important factor
3
. The rationale
behind this approach is that cost will continue to be the most critical d
constraint on LVSR provision. This cost minimisation approach also applies t
to the horizontal and vertical design (4.4.3 Elements). Speed, geometrics etc.
would then emerge as the outputs from the life-cycle costs analysis.
Speed limits can be used to inuence driver behaviour, but only if they are
realistic. When the speed limit is set at a level that is signicantly different
from the 85
th
percentile of the free speed, this tends to produce an accident
h
prone situation as drivers tend not to adjust their speeds to the notional
classication of the road but, rather, to its physical characteristics. Attention n
should therefore be given to creating a road environment which tailors the
operating speed to a level commensurate with the constrained alignment
17
.
The expertise required by the low-volume
road designer may lie in his ability to make
his intentions clear to the road user and to
create a state of mind in the driver such that
he will be content to travel at safe speed.
However, while the approach is sound,
quantitative guidelines are still lacking.
Non-standard sign intended to shock drivers
into driving carefully.
Box 4.5 - Design versus operational speeds in the SADC region
There are marked differences in the physical environments of countries in the SADC
region which, as a result, have a large inuence on the application of a number
of geometric parameters. For example, the terrain in countries such as Botswana
and Namibia is mostly at. As a result, operational speeds tend to be much
higher than the design speed and, from a trafc safety perspective, there may
be need to introduce special measures to constrain the high operational speed
close to the design speed. In contrast, in countries such as Lesotho, Seychelles
and Mozambique, the terrain in parts is very mountainous. As a result, the
design features of the road govern and sometimes constrain the drivers
selection of speed.
Guidance on design speeds is given in a number of design manuals
8,9,10,11,12,13
which all purport to apply to rural/LVRs in developing countries. The design
speeds recommended vary, presumably depending on the philosophy of design
adopted and the environment for which they are meant to apply - examples
are shown in Table 4.4. In view of the critical effect that design speed has on
the values of other geometric elements and the related costs of implementing
them, careful consideration should be given to the choice of this inuential
parameter.
Table 4.4 - Recommended design speed values for selected design guides
Parameter Design Guide
SATCC TRL ORN 6 ARRB
Trafc (ADT) - 100 - 400 >100
Terrain F R M F R M F R M
Design Speed km/h 70 70 50 70 60 50 80 70 50
Note: F = at, R = rolling, M = mountainous.
Design Vehicle
The physical characteristics of vehicles and the proportions of the various
sizes of vehicles using a road are positive controls in design and dene
several geometric design elements. The dimensions used to dene design
vehicles are typically the 85
th
percentile value of any given dimension but
h
are, in fact, hypothetical vehicles selected to represent a particular vehicle class.
The dimensions of design vehicles adopted in design manuals developed
overseas are, quite naturally, based on vehicle types found in those countries.
However, the range of vehicle types found in the SADC region and their
operating characteristics, in terms of vehicle performance, condition, usage,
trafc mix and road users attitude, vary quite signicantly from those in
developed countries. Thus, careful attention should be paid to design vehicle d
characteristics in the LVSR design process.
Vehicle size regulations in the region have undergone substantial revisions
in recent years which have resulted in the emergence of relatively large,
multi-vehicle combinations up to 22 metres in length. These developments
also indicate the need to adopt design vehicles that are appropriate to the
region.
Braking distance and those factors which
depend on it, such as sight distance, are
approximately proportional to the square
of the speed and every increase in the design
speed represents a signicant increase in
the value of these factors. However, extra
construction costs are usually offset by the
benets to trafc, namely increased safety,
capacity and convenience, and lower road
user costs.
Design Trafc
The design trafc is a critical design control which has a major impact on
all geometric design elements of a road. For HVRs, this factor normally
applies only to motorised trafc in terms of Annual Average Daily Trafc
(AADT) in the design year. However, for LVSRs, due account must also be
taken of non-motorised trafc, animal-drawn vehicles and large pedestrian
ows near urban and peri-urban areas which all affect such design elements
as carriageway and shoulder widths. Unfortunately, none of the recent
regional guidelines and few international guidelines, fully cater for non-motorised
trafc. Measures that could be considered are wider shoulders, sealed shoulders,
wider side drains or physical separation from motorised trafc, all of which
will increase costs.
Sight Distance
A critical feature of safe road geometry is provision of adequate sight
distance the distance ahead that can be seen by the driver. As an irreducible
minimum, drivers must be able to see objects on the road with sufcient
time to allow them to manoeuvre around them or to stop. The basic elements
of sight distance which are important to LVRs include:
stopping sight distance - the distance needed for safe stopping from travelling m
speed
meeting sight distance - the distance needed for drivers of two vehicles
travelling in opposite directions to bring their vehicles to a safe stop
passing sight distance - the distance needed to see ahead for safe overtaking
The values of Stopping Sight Distance (SSD) and Passing Sight Distance
(PSD) recommended in various design manuals for rural/LVRs vary quite
signicantly as shown in Table 4.5. For SSD, this is due to different assump-
tions regarding brake reaction time and braking distance, which is dependent
on vehicle condition and characteristics and object size. For PSD, this is due
to different assumptions about the component distances in which a passing
manoeuvre can be divided, different assumed speeds for the manoeuvre and,
to some extent, driver behaviour.
Table 4.5 - Minimum stopping (SSD) and passing (PSD) sight distances
Design
Speed
(km/h)
SATTC TRL ORN6 ARRB
SSD PSD SSD PSD SSD PSD
40 44 110 35 - - -
50 - - 50 140 50 -
60 79 230 65 180 - -
70 - - 85 240 90 -
80 126 420 - - 110 -
100 185 700 160 430 - -
Sight distance has an impact on road safety. Poor visibility alone may
cause a collision between oncoming vehicles. No local guide is available
for LVSRs. In the nal analysis, therefore, the designer should be aware of
the differences in sight distance recommended by various guides and should
adopt values for which the underlying assumptions accord closest to project
conditions.
Designs need to accommodate expected
trafc over the life of the road.
Good sight distances on a well-designed
LVSR. Note wide shoulder and shallow
slope to drainage ditch which both reduce
potential hazards.
Deep V-type drainage ditches leave no
room for recovery if a vehicle runs off the
road.
All road projects have an impact on the environment. However, the provision
of LVSRs that result in an improvement of existing earth/gravel roads without
involving major earthworks or disturbance of existing cut and ll slopes or
drainage patterns have little or no environmental impact. Indeed, the introduction
of a sealed road as a replacement for an earth/gravel road has an important
positive effect on the environment in that there is no longer any dust from
the earth/gravel road which would have had a negative impact on the
environment, particularly when the road passed through built up areas.
When there is a new road alignment or when spot improvements include
excavations in existing slopes, the environmental impacts of the works
should be evaluated and suitable remedial measures introduced. Where slope
instability or erodible soils present a problem, various remedial measures
need to be considered, including bio-engineering methods, sometimes in
combination with engineering structures. Such measures can also be used to
improve surface drainage, particularly in rolling and hilly terrain with steep
gradients.
Because of the low levels of trafc on LVSRs, environmental pollution from
these roads is also low. However, there may be some slight increase in air
pollution from increased emissions if steeper grades and super-elevations result
from a design-by-eye approach. The disturbance due to noise is also increased
in hilly areas where the strain on the engines due to steep gradients and
heavy loads is extensive. Because of the low trafc volumes on LVSRs, the
environmental impacts from emissions and noise are rather limited, but an
environmental impact assessment should always be carried out.
In order to minimise the adverse impacts of LVSR provision, it is important
to carry out an environmental audit at the commencement of the design process.
Such an activity aims to:
design road corridors to minimise environmental and social/cultural impacts
and maximise user safety
integrate the results of the geometric planning process into the design
process
identify appropriate design options to minimise impacts of the proposal andd
be compliant with the design brief
provide an Environmental Design Report that sets out various criteria for
minimising environmental impacts
consider the objectives of all road users, and the natural and cultural values
of the community through consultation
minimise disturbance to the natural vegetation and landscapes
ensure road drainage systems use natural drainage lines and maintain catch-
ment integrity at all times t
Bio-engineering offers the engineer a new
set of tools, but does not normally replace
the use of civil engineering structures. The
materials and skills are all available in rural
areas, however remote.
4.4.3 Elements
T
he road design process includes the selection, sizing and linking of the
following elements which, to a large extent, is inuenced by the chosen
design speed:
cross-section
bridges and culverts
horizontal alignment
vertical alignment
All of the above elements affect road safety by inuencing the ability of the
driver to maintain vehicle control and identify hazards. It is therefore essential
that particular attention should be given to safety as a prime design criterion.
Cross-Section
The following elements of the road cross-section for various classes of
LVSRs need to be considered:
width of carriageway
width of shoulders
cross-fall
width of road reserve
Of particular importance to LVSRs is the issue of catering simultaneously for
the requirements of motorised as well as non-motorised trafc and pedestrians.
In such circumstances, it will be necessary to consider cost-effective ways of
segregating these various types of road users within an appropriately
designed cross-section in which carriageway and shoulder widths play a d
crucial role.
Relatively wide shoulders (typically 1.5 to 2 metres) are particularly important
in mixed trafc situations and serve the following important functions:
movement of pedestrians and non-motorised trafc with minimum
encroachment on the carriageway t
provision of additional manoeuvring space for vehicles and on which a
driver may regain control of his vehicle if it goes out of control
provision of space for the use of vehicles which are broken down
provision of additional width to the cross section thereby improving sight
distances
Examples and comments on appropriate values for the cross section elements
for various classes of LVSRs are given in Table 4.6.
Lay-bys provide a safe haven where vehicles
can pull off the road.
A segregated footpath can be a cost-effective
means of catering for high volumes of
pedestrian trafc.
Where a segregated footpath is not possible,
the use of relatively wide, sealed shoulders
provides an acceptable surface for walking
or cycling.
Table 4.6 - Examples of typical cross-sectional widths
9
Road
Function
Indicative
Trafc Flow
(vpd)
Carriageway Shoulder
Width
(m)
Comments Width
(m)
Comments
Primary ~ 400 6.0
to
7.0
Two commercial
vehicles will pass
completely within the
carriageway; some
movement towards
the edge may occur.
1.0 Represents the minmum
width recommended. Need
to provide edge markings
on shoulder. Widths may
need to be increased to
cater Ior pedestrians or
non-motorised traIfc.
For traIfc saIety reasons,
sealing oI shoulders is
recommended. This is also
advantageous Ior structural
and maintenance reasons.
Secondary 100 - 400 5.5
to
6.0
Need to maintain a
minimum width oI
5.5 m to avoid severe
edge break even at low
traIfc levels.
1.0
Tertiary/
Access
20 -100 3.0 Single lane. Two com-
mercial vehicles will
pass completely within
the total width oI 6.0 m
utilising the shoulders.
1.5
Note: In case of a high percentage of heavy vehicles, say over 40%, it is advisable to increase the
carriageway to 5.5, 6.0 or 6.5 metres.
Higher standards will put a higher demand on the construction and maintenance
budget and this needs to be considered at the design stage. For instance,
increased road width produces a greater area to be maintained, thus increasing
costs. However, increased width also spreads the traffc loading over a great-
er area, thereby to some extent reducing pavement deterioration. Thus, as
described in Chapter 3, a life-cycle cost analysis of the various options should
be undertaken to provide guidance on the optimum solution.
Camber and cross-fall: A commonly recommended value of all design manuals
for the minimum normal cross fall on a paved road is 3%, including shoulders
where they have the same surface as the carriageway. The preferable maximum
value of super-elevation is normally set at 6 - 7% and with an absolute maximum
of 10%. As indicated in Table 4.7, the use of a higher value of super-elevation
makes it possible to introduce a smaller horizontal curve based on the same
design speed.
Table 4.7 - Design radii for different super-elevations
Design speed
(km/h)
Horizontal radius (m)
(Super-elevation 6 )
Horizontal radius (m)
(Super-elevation 10)
60 100 85
HrIdges and CuIverts
The cross-section on bridges needs additional consideration, particularly where
they have been built with a restricted carriageway width. In such situations, there
may be insuffcient clearance for a truck to pass a pedestrian safely. This engenders
a need to provide a segregated footpath and, where this is not possible, to employ
traffc calming measures in combination with warning signs.
HorIzontaI AIIgnment
The following horizontal alignment elements need to be considered for
various classes of LVSRs:
minimum radius of curvature
minimum stopping sight distance
minimum passing sight distance
super-elevation
widening of curves
Severe edge break on a 5.0 m carriageway
even at relatively low trajc levels (< 100
vpd).
A segregated jootway on a narrow bridge
provides protection jor pedestrians.
In general, the horizontal alignment should conform to the landscape. On
new alignments, long straights should be avoided as they have an adverse
impact on the motorist. Measures are required to reduce headlight or sun
glare in appropriate circumstances, as well as to reduce boredom and fatigue.
On existing alignments, as far as possible, upgrading should be undertaken
without changing the existing curve geometry and cross-section. Curve
improvements should focus on low-cost measures designed to control speeds,
enhance curve tracking or mitigate roadside encroachment severity.
Minimum horizontal curvature is governed by maximum acceptable levels of
lateral and vertical acceleration, minimum sight distances required for safe
stopping and passing manoeuvres and values of side friction assumed for the
road surface type. These design parameters are, in turn, related to the vehicle
speeds assumed in the design. Curvature standards are thus explicitly or
implicitly dependent on a number of assumptions which, as illustrated in
Table 4.8, result in quite different values of minimum horizontal radii. The
choice of minimum radius of horizontal curves has a signicant impact on
earthworks and costs and therefore needs additional consideration in LVSR
design.
Table 4.8 - Comparison of minimum radii of horizontal curvature
Design
Speed
(km/h)
Minimum radius of horizontal curvatures (m)
SATTC TRL ORN6 ARRB
Side f e=10 e= 6 Side f e = 10 e = 6 Side f e=7-10
40 - - - 0.30 30 35 - -
50 - - - 0.25 60 65 0.35 45
60 - 110 140 0.23 85 100 - -
70 - - - 0.20 130 150 0.31 100
80 - 210 250 0.19 175 200 0.26 160
100 - 350 420 0.15 320 375 - -
F = side friction, e = super-elevation
Vertical Alignment
The main components of the vertical alignment include:
maximum gradient
minimum stopping or passing sight distances on crest curves
minimum radius of crest and sag curves
Vertical alignment has a direct effect on construction costs and depends on
terrain. Cost can be reduced by reducing earthworks through careful route
selection. Greater maximum grades should be considered for lower standard
roads than for those with a higher classication. The benets gained from
reducing vehicle operating costs and time costs are unlikely to offset the
additional construction costs of implementing minimal grades.
Table 4.9 shows the values for vertical crest and sag curves recommended by
different design manuals for rural/LVRs in developing countries. As indicated
in the Table, there is a considerable difference between the values recom-
mended for both vertical crest and vertical sag curves, largely because of the d
different assumptions made in their derivation. The values recommended in
the SATTC guide for trunk roads are based on headlight illumination criteria
while the values by TRL ORN6 and ARRB are based on driver comfort
criteria. In the SADC region, LVSRs serve a number of different functions
and in very different terrains. In the absence of a local guide for LVSRs, t the
designer will need to determine which of the recommended values are most
suited to the local terrain and road function (primary, secondary or tertiary).
Good combination of curves and adequate
horizontal curvature provide for a safe road
environment. However, a lack of road mark-
ings constitutes a serious safety hazard.
Poor visibility due to hidden sag curve
- a potential cause of accidents.
Plan
Profile
Plan
Profile
Figure 4.10 - Examples of good and poor combinations of horizontal
and vertical alignments
11
Example of good alignment design - a smooth-fowing appearance
results when vertical and horizontal curves coincide
Example of a poor alignment design - uncoordinated horizontal and vertical curves
Table 4.9 - Comparison of minimum values of 'K` for vertical curves
Design
speed
(km/h)
SATTC TRL ORN6 ARRB
Crest
curves
1
Sag
curves
2
Crest
curves
1
Sag
curves
3
Crest
curves
1
Sag
curves
3
40 6 8 3 1.3 - -
50 11 12 5 2.2 5 4
60 16 16 10 3.5 9 6
70 23 20 16 4.8 14 8
80 33 25 - - 23 10
85 - - 30 8.1 - -
90 46 31 - - - -
100 60 36 60 13.1 63 16
Notes: 1-Based on stopping sight distance. 2-Based on headlight illumination criteria. 3-Based
on comfort criteria.
PhasIng oI HorIzontaI and VertIcaI AIIgnments
Certain combinations of horizontal and vertical curves can result in drivers
seeing an apparent distortion in the alignment or grade or both, even though
the horizontal and vertical curves comply with design rules. Other combinations
can hide a change in horizontal alignment for the driver. Thus, proper
sequencing of horizontal and vertical curvature is important for accident
prevention. However, such sequencing is usually attained at the cost of extra
earthworks and a careful balance must be struck between the costs and benefts
of such an undertaking. Examples of good and poor alignment designs are
The K
,
valued jor a vertical curve is dejined
as the length oj vertical curve in metres jor a
1% change in grade.
4.5 Roadside Safety, Education
and Enforcement
4.5.1 Roadside Safety
T
he roadside environment and its design play an important role in road
safety. Elements of this environment include:
roadside furniture and obstacles
road signs, markings and studs
parking facilities, lay-bys and passing lanes
trafc calming measures and lighting
Roadside Furniture and Obstacles
Whilst fullling important safety roles, both roadside furniture and obstacles
can have negative safety implications as well which include:
obstructing the view of road users and line of sight of drivers and
pedestrians
causing a risk of vehicles colliding into them
The ideal situation is to provide for a clear zone, which is kept free of hazards,
including roadside furniture and obstacles. However, in cases where the
provision of clear zones is too expensive or impractical due to topographical,
environmental or other constraints, options should be considered to reduce the
seriousness of the consequences. Figure 4.11 provides guidance on dealing with
roadside hazards in order to provide a forgiving roadside.
NO
Can road section be redesigned
to allow for safe transversal?
NO
Can road section be relocated to a
position where it is less likely to be
hit by an errant vehicle?
NO
Can an appropriate breakaway device
be used to reduce accident severity?
NO
Apply traffic calming if required
Can delineation be provided to increase
the awareness of the presence of the
roadside hazard?
due to the seriousness of the hazard
NO
Can roadside hazard be removed?
Leave as is
YES
YES
YES
Implement
YES
YES
Figure 4.11 - Selection process to ensure a forgiving roadside
Roadside furniture includes:
Road signs.
Street lighting.
Guardrails, etc.
Roadside obstacles include:
Trees.
Shrubs.
Illegally positioned advertising signs
within road reserve.
Power lines or other utility poles
within road reserve.
Building structures.
Deep side drains.
An unforgiving roadside is one which is not
free of obstacles that may cause serious
injuries to occupants of light vehicles.
Non-standard cattle warning sign.
Road Signs, Markings and Studs
Road safety is greatly facilitated by the provision of road signs, markings and
reective studs, which provide drivers with information about routes, road
geometry, etc.
Road signs help to regulate trafc by assigning right of way and indicating
regulations in force, warning road users of hazards and guiding the road user
through navigational information. Road markings play a complementary role
to road signs by conveying additional information to the driver, particularly
in terms of delineating various road elements, such as the width of the lane
or edge of the carriageway. Road studs, sometimes colour-coded, may be
used to supplement road markings where these are subject to conditions of
poor or limited visibility. The SATCC Road Trafc Signs Manual
18
should be
used as far as possible to maintain consistency throughout the region.
Road signs generally need to be located within close proximity of the road-
way (i.e. within the clear zone) and therefore need to afford some protec-
tion to errant vehicles. This can be achieved through the use of a simple
breakaway device, using a notched wooden support.
Signs, particularly regulatory and warning signs, must be maintained in a
sound order (i.e. reectivity, cleanliness, visibility) as they play a crucial
role in terms of road safety in giving information on rules and hazards
further ahead (e.g. sharp curves, steep down grades, areas of high pedestrian
activity, etc).
Regular maintenance (trimming) of grass verges and shrubs is particularly
important at bends, around road signs, and where pedestrians and animals
cross regularly. Poles for services and trees in the road reserve are hazardous
for vehicles accidentally leaving the road, and they may also hinder sight
distance. Large trees may need to be removed from the immediate roadside.
The use of high standard guard-rails is safety efcient, but is very costly.
Simpler types of guard-rails or delineators made of painted wooden poles
may be used instead of the normal types of guard-rails.
In case of nancial constraints, rst priority in the placement and main-
tenance of signage should be given to regulatory and warning signs. Reec-
tivity of road signs must be adequate for the purpose, with higher reectivity
for warning signs and little (or no) reectivity for guidance signs. Ideally,
signs should be reectorised, but ordinary paint is better than no sign at all.
Road studs should only be considered on road sections where mist is prevalent.
They can usually be discontinued on shoulders and be replaced by edge lines
as they suffer signicant wear and tear.
Channelisation of Trafc
Warning signs and reduced speed limits are particularly important near
localised areas of high activity, such as stretches of road with ribbon d
development, where there is inadequate sight distance for normal overtaking
manoeuvres, and the crests of hills. Speed calming devices can also be used
as self-enforcing measures where compliance to warning signs and speed
limits are low.
Various SADC trafc signs as contained in
the SATCC Trafc Signs Manual.
Additional signage should be provided on
dangerous curves.
The easiest and cheapest way of segregating pedestrian and vehicular trafc is
through the use of road markings (i.e. demarcation of shoulders.) These can
be in white paint; although the use of another colour (e.g. yellow) helps to
identify the particular function of the marking. However, kerbs and even
guard-rails can be used to physically separate pedestrians and vehicles. They
can also be used to give added protection to pedestrians over bridge and
other structures. If there is sufcient room in areas of high pedestrian movement,
a footpath (perhaps raised with a kerb to dissuade vehicles from using it) can
be provided, either alongside the road itself; or preferably separated by a grass
or earth verge of some kind.
Even on low-volume roads there will be areas where pedestrian movements
and trafc ow are sufciently high that pedestrians should be provided with
assistance to allow them to cross the road safely. This is especially important
near schools and shops. This might involve providing clearly signed zebra
crossings with or without a central refuge. As well as offering pedestrians
protection, crossings and refuges promote trafc calming and also encourage
pedestrians to cross where it is safer to do so.
Parking Facilities, Lay-bys and Passing Lanes
If the road topography permits, provision should be made for stopping and
parking vehicles. Thus the road design should take account of the need for
bus stops, the location of (ofcial or unofcial) street vendors and market
stalls, shops and schools. Off-road parking areas should also be provided for
rickshaws and taxis and so on.
When there are steep gradients, provision can be made for faster vehicles to
pass slow moving lorries and buses safely. This can be provided by having an
additional crawler lane, or occasional lay-byes for slow moving vehicles to
pull in to let trafc queues pass. However, for LVSRs, the cost-benet aspects
of such measures need to be carefully considered.
At the end of steep descents, emergency provision should also be made for
out-of-control vehicles with brake-failures or those travelling too quickly.
For example, beds of gravel can be provided to stop vehicles that are out of
control and hazardous objects should be protected or removed.
Trafc Calming Measures
Although trafc-calming measures are generally aimed at reducing speeds
and diverting trafc (decreasing trafc volumes) in urban areas there are a
number of measures that are appropriate for LVSRs. They are normally used
on sections of road where there are a high proportion of unprotected/
vulnerable road users (pedestrians, cyclists and animal drawn carts, etc), or
where there is a localised (unexpected) change in the design speed. Speed
calming measures can basically be categorized according to the extent to which
they may have an effect, namely:
localised trafc calming measures, which include warning signs and d
markings, speed humps, rumble strips, jiggle-bars, pinch-points,
roundabouts together with road surface texture and colour
continuous trafc calming measures, such as speed humps, along a stretch
of road
Simple, innovative measures may help to
separate trafc and improve the road safety
situation for non-motorized trafc in built-
up areas.
Dedicated crossings provide increased safety
for pedestrians if correctly positioned and
marked.
By deterring drivers from using road shoulders,
the use of shoulder humps can improve the
safety of pedestrians and cyclists
Speed humps are one of the most effective localised trafc calming measures,
but require precision in design and construction to achieve a comfortable ride
when traversed at the desired speeds but uncomfortable to drivers exceeding
this speed.
Rumble strips in combination with trafc signs and/or speed humps, as
appropriate, are trafc calming devices used to gradually reduce high
speed before a dangerous spot. Community acceptance is very important
for successful implementation of trafc calming devices.
Physical roadway design to enforce speed limits, such as narrowed lane
width, can also be employed. This, however, has to be balanced by the
need for passing opportunities, which is generally determined by the trafc
mix. Visual narrowing of the roadway can have the same effect on speed as
physical narrowing and can be achieved by using edge lines or omitting centre
lines.
Animals
Many rural communities graze farm animals such as cows and goats on
road-side vegetation. Ideally such animals should be tethered or supervised.
This can be encouraged by providing community education programmes.
Domestic pets and wild animals can also pose a hazard for road users. In
some SADC countries, fencing is used and can be effective if well main-
tained but the high cost means that it is seldom used along LVSRs. Often
when fences are erected, gates are left open and gaps appear due to theft and
vandalism, which rapidly reduces their effectiveness.
Street Lighting
This can help visibility and safety but is expensive and generally unaffordable
in the context of LVSR. There might, however, be situations where street
lighting of the road can be considered, for instance, when passing built-up
areas, schools, hospitals and busy intersections.
4.5.2 Education and Enforcement
Education
R
oad safety education (RSE) is an important tool to raise awareness of
problems and behaviours related to trafc and road safety. It involves
teaching children, and often adults, to be safer road users. It does so by
developing:
knowledge and understanding of road trafc
behavioural skills necessary to survive in the presence of road trafc
an understanding of their own responsibility for keeping themselves safe
knowledge of the causes and consequences of road accidents
a responsible attitude to their own safety and to the safety of others
Well-designed speed humps are an effective
means of slowing down trafc.
Stray cattle are a trafc safety menace in
some countries.
Road safety education for school children,
an important awareness raising tool.
RSE should be provided during formal schooling by trained teachers who are
provided with suitable resource materials. However, it should also be recognised
that not all children attend school and that many adults have never received any
proper road safety education. This can be overcome by providing community
road safety education programmes in addition to formal teaching in schools.
Where literacy rates are low, special teaching methods can be used (e.g. drama,
singing and dance) while road safety education can be incorporated into other
curriculum topics (such as science and geography). RSE needs to be relevant,
practical (participatory) and regular and aimed at the childs level of education
and social development. In some situations the children themselves can be used
to educate either their parents or other children.
Road safety publicity campaigns can also raise the awareness of problems and
behaviour in addition to improving knowledge, shaping attitudes and behaviours,
as well as stimulating discussion and debate. These publicity campaigns can
include local drama performances in which tribal languages are used in order
to reach illiterate persons. Community workshops, radio, television and cinema
can also be successfully used.
Box 4.6 - Examples of innovative road safety initiatives
In Swaziland community involvement has been used to solve road safety
problems. A project was recently launched whereby children were employed
to control stray animals on rural roads during critical times of the year
(e.g. during the Easter holidays.) The community was also mobilised to
erect roadside fences. The road authorities provided the materials for
construction. Once erected, the community became involved in the
maintenance of the fences on an on-going basis which provided a valuable
source of employment for them.
Enforcement
Trafc law enforcement is meant to achieve the safe and efcient movement
of all road users including non-motorised trafc and pedestrians. In this regard,
enforcement of trafc rules (such as speed limits, stop signs and rules at
pedestrian crossing facilities) can be used to signicantly improve road user
behaviour and safety.
Unfortunately, because of a severe shortage of trained trafc police, trafc
law enforcement is inadequate. As a result, drivers tend to disregard regu-
lations and a general disregard for trafc law often gradually becomes the
norm. This situation highlights the need to promote trafc law enforcement
more vigorously, including the use of well mounted campaigns which, ideally,
should be accompanied by education and publicity. The objective should be
to improve the behaviour (and safety) of the majority of road users, rather
than to simply catch (and punish) a few. Moreover, such strategies should
not be used as a simple means of raising money - but to improve safety.
Road safety awareness campaign in progress.
Enforcement is an essential component for
improving road safety.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
The functionality and characteristics of the LVSR network in the
SADC region are quite different from those in industrialised coun-
tries. Trafc operations tend to be complex, comprising a mixture of
both motorised and non-motorised trafc and there is often a relatively
high proportion of commercial vehicles.
There are no geometric design standards for LVSRs in any SADC
country based on in-country research into economic and safety factors.
National standards are generally based on adaptations of those developed
in industrialised countries and often do not cater for the characteristics
of the road environment in the region.
No single design guide or manual can be recommended for use as they
are based on different philosophies and make different assumptions or
use different criteria for developing design values for the various
geometric design elements.
It is essential for the designer to have a thorough understanding of the
underlying criteria and assumptions that have inuenced the development
of existing design guides or manuals as a basis for adapting them,
where necessary, to suit the local road environment.
Road safety is a major problem with accident rates being some of the
highest in the world. There is an overriding need to incorporate road
safety measures in the geometric design process. Road safety audits
should be introduced as part of the road design process in all countries.
Road safety education and enforcement are key factors which can have
a major inuence on road safety and should be given high priority in
order to promote a road safety culture for all ages of road users.
This chapter has reviewed established and more recent approaches to
geometric design, particularly in the context of road safety. The need for
adopting appropriate standards has been stressed and the scope for improving
the appalling road safety situation highlighted. Design standards will have an
impact on pavement design and road surfacing - subjects that are covered in t
Chapter 5.
4.6 Summary
T
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
American Association of State Highway and Transportation Offcials
(1990). A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets.
Washington D.C.
AUSTROADS (1989). Rural Road Design: Guide to the Geometric
Design of Rural Roads. 7
th
Edition. Austroads: Sydney.
Gichaga F J and N A Parker (1988). Essentials of Highway Engineering.
Macmillan Publishers Ltd, London and Basingstoke.
Ross A (1998). Road Safety in Developing Countries. Jour. Inst. of
Highways and Transportation, April 1988.
Transport Research Laboratory, Ross Silcock Partnership and Overseas
Development Administration (1991). Towards Safer Roads in Developing
Countries - A Guide for Planners and Engineers. TRL, Crowthorne.
Austroads (1994). Road Safety Audits, NSW.
Hoque M M, M McDonald and R D Hall (1998). Relevance and
Introduction of Road Safety Audit in Developing Countries, AUSTROADS
International Road Safety Audit Forum, Melbourne.
CSIR Transportek (2001). G2 Geometric Design Manual, CSIR, Pretoria.
Transport and Research Laboratory (1988). Overseas Road Note 6, A Guide
to Geomeric Design, TRL, Crowthorne.
National Association of Australian State Road Authorities (1980).
Interim Guide to the Geometric Design of Rural Roads. Sydney.
Austroads (1989). Rural Road Design - Guide to the Geometric Design
of Rural Roads, Sydney.
Giummarra G (2001). Road Classifcations, Geometric Designs and
Maintenance Standards for Low-volume Roads. Research Report AR
354, ARRB Transport Research Ltd, Vermont South, Victoria.
Carl Bro International. (1990). Recommendations on Road Design
Standards. Volume 1: Geometric Design of Rural Roads. Southern
Africa Transport and Communications Commission (SATCC), Maputo.
Federal Highway Administration. (2001). Geometric Design Practices for
European Roads, Mobility, Safety, Community Issues, Context Sensitive
Design, US Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C.
McClean J R (1979). Review of the Design Speed Concept. Australian
Road Research Board 8 (1), 3-16. Sydney.
McCelan J R (1979). An Alternative to the Design Speed Concept for
Low Speed Alignment Design. Proc. 2
nd
Int. Conf. on low-volume roads,
Transport Research Record 702, 55-63, TRB.
4.V HeIerenues and BIbIIograpby
HeIerences
HIbIIography
Assum T (1998). Road Safety in Africa: Appraisal of Road Safety Initiatives
in Five African Countries, SSATP Working Paper No. 33, The World Bank,
Washington, D.C.
Boyce A M, M McDonald, M J Pearce and R Robinson (1988). A Review of
Geometric Design and Standards for Rural Roads in Developing Countries,
Contractor Report 94, TRL, Crowthorne.
Committee of Land Transport Offcials (1999). South African Road Safety
Manual Volume 4 : Road Safety Audits (Final Draft), Pretoria.
Manual Volume 6: Roadside Hazard Management (Final Draft), Pretoria.
Manual Volume 7: Design for Safety (Final Draft), Pretoria.
Cron F W (1978). A Review of Highway Design Practices in Developing
Countries. Reprinted in Transportation Technology Support for Developing
Countries, Compendium 1, Geometric Design Standards for Low-volume
Roads. Transportation Research Board, National Academy of Sciences,
Washington, D.C.
Dhliwayo M E (1997). A Review of the Road Safety Situation in Africa,
Proc. 3
rd
African Road Safety Conference, Pretoria.
Dixon J A, R A Carpenter, L A Fallon, P B Sherman and S Manipomoke
(1986). Economic Analysis of the Environmental Impacts of Development
Projects. Earthscan Publications Ltd., London.
Downing A J et al. (1991). Road Safety in Developing Countries: An
Overview. PTRC 19
th
Summer Annual Meeting. Proc. of Seminar C.
Hills B L, R S Mansfeld and R Robinson (1984) Appropriate Geometric Design
Standards for Roads in Developing Countries. Int. Conf. On Roads and
Development, Paris, 22-25 May 1984 (Revised 1986).
Institute of Highways and Transportation (1990). IHT Guidelines for the
Safety Audit of Highways, London.
Jacobs G and A Aeron-Thomas (2000). Africa Road Safety Review Final
Report. U.S. Department of Transportation/Federal Highway Administration,
Washington, D.C.
Kosasih D, R Robinson and J Snell (1987). A Review of Some Recent Geometric
Road Standards and Their Applications to Developing Countries. TRL
Research Report 114, Crowthorne.
17.
18.
McClean J R (1977). Geometric Road Design - Some Recent Research.
Proc. 15th ARRB Regional Symposium.
Southern Africa Transport and Communications Commission (1990).
The SATCC Road Traffc Signs Manual, SATCC, Maputo.
Lebo J and D Schelling (2001). Design and Appraisal of Rural Transport
Infrastruture-Ensuring basic Access for Rural Communities, World Bank
Technical Paper No. 496, Washington, D.C.
Ltter H J S (1999). Road Safety Diagnostic System for South Africa.
Linkping Institute of Technology, Linkping University, Linkping.
McClean J R (1978). The Role of Geometric Standards. Second Conference
of the Road Engineering Association of Asia and Australasia, Better Roads
as Instruments of Progress, Vol. 2, Manila.
McClean J R and J B Metcalf (1985). Economic Design Standards for Low
Trafc Roads. ARRB.
National Road Safety Council of Kenya. (1990). Manual on Accident
Prevention Using Low-Cost Engineering Countermeasures. Ministry of
Public Works, Nairobi.
Neuman T R (1999). Design Guidelines for Very Low-volume Local Roads
(<400 ADT), Final Report of NCHRP Project 20-7(75), CH2M Hill Chicago,
Illinois.
Ogden K W (1996). Safer Roads: A Guide to Road Safety Engineering,
Avebury Technical.
Oglesby C H and M J Altenhofen (1969). Economics of Design Standards
for Low-volume Rural Roads. NCHRP Report 63. Highway Research
Board, National Research Council, National Academy of Sciences, National
Academy of Engineering.
Robinson R (1981). The Selection of Geometric Design Standards for Rural
Roads in Developing Countries. TRL Supplementary Report 670, Crowthorne.
Ross A (1992). Road Safety Checks. Infrastructure Notes, Infrastructure
and Urban Development Department, World Bank, Washington, D.C.
South African Roads Board (1991). Implications of Alternative Standards
for South African Rural Roads, Interim Report IR 91/112/1, Pretoria.
South African Roads Board (1989). The Design, Construction and Maintenance
of Low-volume Roads and Bridges in Developing Areas, Report S89/2, Pretoria.
Thagesen B (Ed.) (1996). Highway and Trafc Engineering in Developing
Countries, Publisher: E & F Spon, London.
Transport Research Laboratory (2002). Cost and Safety Efcient (CaSE)
Design of Rural Roads in Developing Countries. TRL Unpublished Report
PR/INT/242/2002, Crowthorne.
Transport Research Laboratory/Department for International Development
(2001). CaSE Highway Design Note 2/01: Horizontal Curves, Crowthorne.
Transport Research Laboratory/ Department for International Development (2001).
CaSE Highway Design Note 3/01: Vulnerable Road Users, Crowthorne.
Transport Research Laboratory/ Department for International Development
(2001). CaSE Highway Design Note 4/01: Roadside, Village and Ribbon
Development, Crowthorne.
C
h
a
p
t
e
r

5
1. Introduction
2. Regional Setting
4. Geometric Design
and Road Safety
5. Pavement Design,
6. Construction and
Drainage
7. Maintenance and
Road Management
38 38
Pavement Design,
5
5.1 Introduction ..........................................................5 - 1
5.1.1 Pavement Design ............................................ n 5 - 1
5.1.2 Materials .....................................................5 - 2
5.1.3 Surfacing .....................................................5 - 3
5.1.4 Purpose and Scope of Chapter ...........................5 - 3
5.2 Pavements, Materials and Surfacing Terminology ..........5 - 4
5.2.1 Components..................................................5 - 4
5.2.2 Requirements of a Pavement .............................. t 5 - 5
5.2.3 Performance ..................................................5 - 6
5.2.4 Perceived causes of Deterioration of LVSRs ...........5 - 7
5.2.5 Terminology .................................................5 - 8
5.3 Materials ..............................................................5 - 10
5.3.1 Formation and Classication.............................. n 5 - 10
5.3.2 Characteristics of Pavement Materials ...................5 - 13
5.3.3 Soil Improvement ........................................... t 5 - 18
5.3.4 Specications ................................................5 - 20
5.3.5 Prospecting ...................................................5 - 22
5.3.6 Testing ........................................................5 - 23
5.3.7 Materials Inventory .........................................5 - 25
5.4 Pavement Design ....................................................5 - 27
5.4.1 Objective .....................................................5 - 27
5.4.2 Pavement Design System .................................. m 5 - 27
5.4.3 Input Variables ..............................................5 - 28
5.4.4 Design Process .............................................5 - 37
5.4.5 Design Output ............................................... t 5 - 42
5.5 Surfacing ..............................................................5 - 43
5.5.1 Introduction .................................................. n 5 - 43
5.5.2 Objective .....................................................5 - 43
5.5.3 Role and Function of Surfacings .........................5 - 43
5.5.4 Types and Performance Characteristics ................5 - 44
5.5.5 Constituents, Properties and Specications ............5 - 46
5.5.6 Selection of Surfacing Type...............................5 - 51
5.5.7 Surfacing Design............................................ n 5 - 56
5.6 Summary..............................................................5 - 57
5.7 References and Bibliography.....................................5 - 58
C
o
n
t
e
n
t
s
Pavement Design, Materials & Surfacing 5 - 1
PavemenI DesIgn,
MaIerIaIs & SurIauIng
5
5.I 1nIroduuIIon
5.1.1 Pavement DesIgn
T
he objective of pavement design is to provide an economic structure, in
terms of material types and thicknesses, that can withstand the expected
traffc loading over a specifed time, without deteriorating below a predetermined
level of service. This provides a particular challenge for designers, as existing
methods of pavement design, even those developed in the SADC region,
generally cater for relatively high volumes of traffc (> 0.5 million Equivalent
Standard Axles (ESAs)). As a result, such methods are often inappropriate
for application to LVSRs for which environmentally induced, rather than
traffc-induced, stresses tend to play a dominant role in pavement deterioration.
Thus, there is a need to be very discerning in the application of current
pavement design methodologies and to adapt them, where necessary, to suit the
prevailing conditions of climate, materials, traffc loading and other related
factors.
Planning
D
Construction
Maintenance
0utot|on ol oct|v|t|es
5
e
q
u
e
n
c
e
o
l
o
c
t
|
v
|
t
|
e
s
The outcome of the design process, in terms of the type of structure chosen,
is inuenced by the preceding phases of planning and geometric design and,
in turn, determines many aspects of construction requirements. It also inu-
ences the level and type of maintenance necessary to keep the pavement at
the design serviceability level. In order to ensure a successful outcome, n
there is a need to ensure that the design process is undertaken in a holistic
manner that takes full account of a variety of inuential factors, as discussed
in Chapter 3.
5.1.2 Materials
N
aturally occurring soils and gravels are an important source of material
for use in the construction of a LVSR. This is because these materials
are relatively cheap to exploit by comparison with processed materials such
as crushed rock. Moreover, in many SADC countries, they are often the only
source of material within a reasonable haul distance of the road. Thus, because
of the substantial inuence that naturally occurring materials exert on the
cost of a LVSR, typically about 70 per cent, it is essential that the benets of
using them are fully exploited in road construction.
Unfortunately, many of the naturally occurring road building materials in the
SADC region are disparagingly described as being non-standard, marginal, r
low-cost, or even sub-standard! This is because such materials are often
unable to meet the required specications, which are usually based on European
or North American practice that did not always make provision for local
conditions. However, there are many examples of naturally occurring materials,
such as laterite and calcrete, that have performed satisfactorily despite being
sub-standard with respect to their grading, plasticity or strength. Where
failures have occurred, investigations have generally shown that poor quality
construction or drainage problems were more likely the cause, rather than
the materials themselves.
The use of local materials requires not only a sound knowledge of their
properties and behaviour but also of the trafc loading, physical environment,
and their interactions. In addition, it will require the use of appropriate pave-
ment design methods and the application of appropriate design standards
and materials specications, coupled with construction quality that complies
with the required standards and specications.
Box 5.1 - The challenge of using natural gravels
Calcrete and laterite are typical examples
of natural gravels which, although occurring
throughout southern Africa, had generally rr
been considered to be unsuitable for use in
base courses. However, experience and full-
scale trials in a number of SADC countries
have demonstrated that these materials can
be used successfully in the upper layers of
pavements.
Naturally occurring calcrete found under a
relatively thin layer of overburden.
The term natural gravel refers to a gravelly
material occurring in nature as such, (e.g.
laterite) or which can be produced without
crushing. Some processing, to remove or
break down oversize may still be necessary.
However, a distinction is made between
these natural gravels, and material pro-
duced from crushed hard rock, and is referred
to as crushed stone base.
Because of their mode of formation, involving intensive processes of

weathering, many road-building materials in the SADC region tend
to be highly variable and moisture sensitive. This requires the use of
appropriate construction techniques and provision of adequate internal
and external drainage.
Standard methods of test that, for the most part, have evolved as a
result of experience of soils in temperate zones, do not always give a
true assessment of the performance of locally available materials when
used in road construction.
Conventional specications apply to ideal materials and often
preclude the use of many naturally occurring materials (laterites,
calcretes, etc.) despite their good performance in service.
5.1.3 Surfacing
I
n situations of rapidly dwindling sources of gravel for maintaining un-
surfaced roads, the bituminous sealing of a gravel road offers numerous d
technical, economic and environmental advantages and, in many cases, is un-
avoidable. However, because of the relatively low levels of trafc carried, there
is need to provide a durable surfacing at the lowest possible life-cycle cost.
Unfortunately, current specications for traditional bituminous surfacings are
demanding and exclude the use of local materials that could be suitable.
Providing a surfacing for a gravel road calls for the innovative use of local
materials, which may often be of a non-standard nature, in situations where
the use of conventional materials would be prohibitively expensive. Fortunately,
in addition to the traditional chip seal or surface treatment, there are a number
of alternatives which, although not yet widely used, can provide eminently cost-
effective solutions.
T
he main purpose of this chapter is to provide a generic guide to the design
of low-volume sealed road pavements using locally occurring materials
to the greatest extent possible. This is based on research work and developments
that have taken place in the SADC region with respect to the emergence of
more appropriate design methods, specications and test methods. The principal
aim of this approach is to maximize implementation of previous research,
which now exists in a disparate fashion and has not been adequately synthe-
sized and packaged in an easily retrievable format for dissemination and d
implementation.
5.2 Pavements, Materials and
Surfacing Terminology
5.2.1 Components
A
road pavement typically consists of the following three primary
components:
surfacing
pavement structure (base and subbase)
subgrade
A typical LVSR pavement structure consists of a thin bituminous surfacing
underlain by one or more layers of natural gravel. n
Surfacing
The surfacing is the uppermost layer of the pavement and forms an inter-
face with trafc and the environment. It normally consists of some kind of
non-structural, impermeable bituminous surface treatment or a structural
layer of premixed bituminous material (asphaltic concrete).
Base
The base is the main load-bearing and load-spreading layer of the pavement
and normally consists of natural gravel, gravelly soils, decomposed rock,
sands and sand-clays. The weaker materials are often stabilized with cement,
lime or bitumen. On relatively highly trafcked roads, asphalt concrete and
crushed stone may also be used.
Subbase
The subbase is the secondary load-spreading layer underlying the base and
normally consists of a material of lower quality than that used in the base.
This layer protects the subgrade and, importantly, acts as a construction
platform and also provides a stiff platform against which the base can be
adequately compacted.
Subgrade
The subgrade is the upper layer of the natural soil that supports the pavement
structure. It may be undisturbed local material or soil imported from
elsewhere and placed as ll. In either case, it is compacted during con-
struction to give added strength. The ultimate strength characteristics of the
subgrade dictate the type of pavement structure required, in terms of layer
thickness and material quality, to reduce the surface load by trafc or the
environment to a magnitude that can be supported without unacceptable
permanent deformation.
Carriageway
The carriageway is that section of the roadway which is normally reserved
for use by vehicular trafc. In many SADC countries such trafc may be
both motorised and non-motorised. d
Surfacing
Base
Subbase
Subgrade
Typical pavement structure.
The shoulders provide a number of functions including lateral support for
the pavement structure and accommodation for stopped vehicles. The shoulders
may be sealed or unsealed, the implications of which are discussed in Section
5.4.3.
Each of the components of the pavement structure forms part of a typical
road cross-section as shown in Figure 5.1.
Original ground level
|mproved
subgrade layers
Cutting
|n-situ subgrade
Pill
Poadbed
Surfacing
Shoulder Carriageway Shoulder
Pavement structure
Subgrade
Figure 5.1 - Cross-section of a typical road pavement
5.2.2 HequIrements oI a Pavement
A
pavement must be designed to meet both functional and structural
requirements. Functionally, it should serve traffc safely, comfortably
and effciently at minimum or 'reasonable cost. Structurally, it is a load-
bearing structure that is required to perform under the prevailing traffc and
environmental conditions with minimum maintenance.
The pavement structure transfers the wheel loads from the surface to the
underlying subgrade. As shown in Figure 5.2, the wheel load or pressure
at the surface is effectively reduced within the pavement structure by being
spread over a wide area of subgrade. The strength characteristics of the roadbed
soil dictate the type of pavement structure required to spread the applied load
and to reduce it to a magnitude that can be supported by the subgrade.
wheel load
Contact area
Surfacing
Pavement structure
Subgrade
Load
transfer
Figure 5.2 - Spread of wheel load through pavement structure
The design oj a L\SR may require a dijjerent
approach to each oj the pavement parameters
compared with conventional design.
5.2.3 Performance
P
avements deteriorate gradually with time for a number of reasons, the
two most important being: PP
environmental effects
trafc loading, comprising effects caused by wheel loads and tyre pressures,
and which is dependent on the stresses and the number of times they are
applied
These factors have the effect of reducing the riding quality of the pavement,
as manifested by obvious visible features such as surface roughness, rutting
and cracking in the manner illustrated in Figure 5.3.
P
a
v
e
m
e
n
t

I
n
d
i
c
a
t
o
r
s
7ime / 7raffic
Piding quality
Put depth
Cracking
Figure 5.3 - Generalised pavement behaviour characteristics and indicators
Ultimately, the challenge of good pavement design is to provide a pavement that
fulls its function at minimum life-cycle cost at an optimal level of service.
However, positive action in the form of timely and appropriate maintenance
will be necessary to ensure that the assumptions of the design phase hold true
over the design life.
Environmental Effects
Environmentally induced distress through climatic inuences, including temp-
erature and rainfall, play a particularly important role in the performance
of low-volume road pavements. For example, high temperature can accelerate
hardening of binders in road surfacings through loss of volatiles and oxidation,
resulting in their loss of exibility and consequent ravelling of the aggregate
and brittle fracture of the layer.
High rainfall can also result in a change in the moisture content of the
pavement and subgrade materials which, under poor drainage conditions
and moisture sensitive materials, can adversely affect the pavement struc-
ture and its performance under trafc (Section 5.3.2).
Carbonation of materials stabilised with lime and cement can also occur. This
is a reaction between the stabilising agents and carbon dioxide in the air or
under road pavements and leads to a weakened material (Section 5.3.3).
Damage can occur to road surfacings as result of salt crystallisation. This effect
is especially prevalent in dry climates and/or in circumstances where pave-
ments have been constructed with materials or water with a relatively high
salt content (e.g. minewaste) (Section 5.3.3).
On low-volume roads, benets accruing
from savings in vehicle operating costs will
be small. As a result, in contrast to high-
volume roads, lower levels of riding quality
(roughness) can be tolerated over the life of
the pavement.
Cracking of surfacing mainly due to
oxidation and consequent hardening of
bituminous binder.
Hydrogenesis is the upward migration of water vapour in the road pavement
which, under certain climatic conditions, condenses under the road surfacing.
The adverse effects of hydrogenesis on road pavements have not yet been fully
quantifed (Section 5.4.4.)
TraIBc LoadIng
Traffc loading is responsible for the development of ruts and cracking that
initiates within the pavement structure. Every vehicle using the road causes a
small temporary defection and a small permanent deformation in the pavement
structure. The passage of many vehicles has a cumulative effect that gradually
leads to signifcant permanent deformation and/or fatigue cracking. Overloaded
vehicles, which are prevalent in the SADC region, cause a disproportionate
amount of damage to the pavement structure, accelerating such deterioration.
On low-volume roads, the lack of traffc can also lead to ravelling and sur-
face cracking. This arises because the kneading action of traffc keeps bitumen
'alive i.e. fexible.
/t is noteworthy that most oj the available manuals on pavement design tend to
jocus on load-associated jactors whereas environmentally induced distress is
ojten the major mechanism oj distress jor L\Rs. The signicance oj these
jactors is discussed in Section 5.4.3.
Tyre Pressures
Tyre infation pressure is an important parameter that can infuence the perform-
ance of LVSRs. Prevailing tyre infation pressures have risen steadily over the
years and are now considerably higher (of the order of 900 - 1000 kPa) than
those used on key road performance experiments, such as the AASHO
1
Road
Test (550 kPa), on which many empirical pavement design methods have been
based.
The effect of repeated high tyre contact pressures is to generate high shear
strains in the upper layers of pavements. This is not normally a problem where
pavements have been well designed and constructed. However, in certain situations,
e.g. on steep grades or in poorly drained areas where moisture-sensitive, low-
strength materials are used, it can be problematic and can result in the cracking
of surface layers are rutting from plastic deformation of one or more of the
pavement layers, causing shoving (shear failure) and breakdown of weak
aggregates. In such situations, appropriate design and construction counter
measures should be observed.
5.2.4 PerceIved Causes oI DeterIoratIon oI LVSHs
B
ased on workshops carried out in a number of SADC countries, the perceived
deterioration effects of LVSRs were recorded. These are summarized in
Table 5.1.
Table 5.1 - Deterioration effects on LVSRs
Parameter Related Issues
Poor drainage water ingress to pavement structure
inadequate maintenance oI drainage structures
poor roadside drainage/food water scour
poor geometric design
Inadequate
maintenance
poor/lack oI/insuIfcient maintenance
poor maintenance techniques
integrity oI seal/delayed reseal/unsealed cracks
An example oj rutting due to permanent
dejormation oj the base layer caused by
densication oj material.
0
20
40
60
c m
0 300 600 900
Vertical stress
(kPa)
900 kPa
tyre pressure
600 kPa tyre pressure
50 kN wheel load
30 kN wheel load
D
e
p
t
h
Stress distribution versus depth in a pavement
subjected to wheel loading
2
.
Overloading unexpected heavy loads after design
very high tyre contact pressures, sometimes associated with
weakening of upper base layers due to crushing or carbonation
Quality of
construction
inadequate/poor compaction
poor workmanship/supervision/construction standards
inadequate use of appropriate plant
poor mixing of materials/permeable pavements
Materials
quality
inadequate classication of soils
non-availability of good natural gravels, presence of poor
subgrade soils
salt damage
low quality of surfacings
sodic, dispersive and other problem soils
Environmental
extremes
climatic (temperature and weather) extremes
erosion of shoulders and side slopes
Design inadequate pavement design/design specications
poor shoulder design/lack of sealed shoulders
at terrain/low embankments/inadequate camber
increased generated trafc
The above perceived causes of deterioration of LVSRs are indicative of the
range of important issues that should be addressed when considering the
pavement, materials and surfacing aspects of such roads (dealt with in this
chapter) are considered, as well as other aspects pertaining to construction and
maintenance (dealt with in Chapters 6 and 7 respectively).
5.2.5 Terminology
Materials
Naturally occurring materials: These include natural soils, gravel-soil mixtures
and gravels. Little or no processing is required other than, possibly, loosening
the in situ material by ripping and breaking down (usually with a n grid roller)
or removing oversize particles. The cost of such materials is, typically, about
25% of crushed stone. They may be used in their natural state or modied
with small amounts of lime, bitumen or cement. Crushing may occasionally
be required.
Standard/traditional materials: These are dened as materials which meet
traditional specications, such as those of the American Association of State
Highway and Transportation Ofcials (AASHTO). Such materials are tolerant
of construction mishandling and adverse environmental conditions and will
probably perform well in most cases. However, when used as specied, their
use is often excessively conservative for the level of performance required from
LVSRs.
An essential feature of most traditional specications for standard materials
is a requirement for strict compliance with limitations on particle size
distribution (grading), plasticity index and aggregate strength. This is partly n
to avoid the use of any materials in pavement layers that are susceptible to
the weakening effects of water and frost. Crushed rock and river-washed
and uvio-glacial gravels are thus the predominant materials used for building
roads in temperate climates. The export of these practices to tropical and
subtropical regions has meant that the potential of natural gravels, especially
in the drier areas of such regions, have often been neglected.
As-dug, nodular laterite gravel used in
LVSR construction.
Crushed limestone is a typical standard
material that is produced by crushing of
blasted, massive rock to a specied grading.
Non-standard/non-traditional materials: These comprise any material that
is not wholly in compliance with the specications used in a country or region
for a standard or traditional material, for example, as regards grading or PI.
Nonetheless, it has become increasingly recognized worldwide that, under
favourable circumstances, many such materials can and, indeed, have been
used successfully. However, this requires an in-depth knowledge and experience
of the properties of such materials and the conditions necessary for successful
performance - requirements which have been facilitated by the extensive
research work undertaken in the SADC region in the past 20 - 30 years. n
It should be noted that the concept of non-standard in relation to materials
is specic to a particular time and place associated with our level of under-
standing of the behaviour of the material and knowledge of how to use it.
For example, forty or fty years ago, gravel was considered as a nonstandard
material because crushed stone, the standard material, was used in the
construction of Macadam and Telford pavements.
Surfacing
A number of different terms are used to describe a road surfacing which,
as described in Section 5.2.1, normally consists either of some kind of non-
structural bituminous surface treatment or of a structural layer of pre-mixed
bituminous material. Typical terms include:
surface treatment
surface dressing
chip and spray
chip seal
sprayed seal
The above terms all essentially describe a similar product in that, in the
construction of these seals, a thin layer of bitumen is sprayed onto the existing
road surface (base or existing seal) and one or more layers of aggregate or
sand are applied.
asphaltic concrete
A layer of premixed materials (aggregate and bitumen).
Laterite is a typical example of a non-
standard material that has been success-
fully used in LVSR construction despite its
non-compliance with traditional strength,
grading and plasticity requirements.
A typical surface treatment operation -
spraying a thin layer of bitumen onto a road
surface prior to the application of aggregate.
10 Pavement Design, Materials & Surfacing 5 - 10
5.8 MaIerIaIs
5.3.1 FormatIon and CIassIBcatIon
I
n contrast to the abundant deposits of clean, durable, fuvioglacial gravels
such as those used in much of Europe and the USA, the materials available for
pavement construction from southern Africa have undergone considerable
depths of weathering or pedogenesis
3
. The materials are therefore mostly
residual weathered igneous rocks (e.g. basalt, dolerite and granite), meta-
morphic rocks (e.g. gneiss and quartzite), sedimentary rocks (e.g. shale and
mudrocks) and pedogenic materials (e.g. laterite, calcrete and ferricrete). These
pavement materials are generally weaker than those of northern Europe and
North America but road subgrades, other than those in localized problem areas,
e.g. 'black cotton soils or collapsible sands, tend to be generally stronger.
A simplifed view of the formation of soils and rocks that form the backbone
of road construction materials in the region is given in Figure 5.4. The manner
in which such materials differ from conventional road building materials is
presented in Table 5.2.
0%$/'%.)#
-!4%2)!,
42!.30/24%$
3/),
3%$)-%.4!29
2/#+
-%4!-/20()#
2/#+
2%3)$5!,3/),
)'.%/532/#+
%4$
-!'-!
0 0
7
7
7
# 2
-
-
,
02/#%33%3
# #RYSTALLISATION
7 7EATHERING
% %ROSION
4 4RANSPORTATION
$ $EPOSITION
0 0EDOGENESIS
, ,ITHIFICATION
- -ETAMORPHISM
2 2EMELTING
Table 5.2 - Differences between conventional and pedogenic materials
3
Property Conventional (crushed rock
base, river gravels, glacial
outwash)
Pedogenic (laterites, calcretes,
ferricretes, silcretes)
Climate Temperate to cold Arid, tropical, warm temperate
Composition Natural or crushed Varies Irom rock to clay
Aggregate Solid, strong rock Sometimes porous, weakly cemented
fnes
Clay minerals Mostly illite or montmorillonite Wide variety, e.g. halloysite,
attapulgite
Cement/bonding
agent
None (usually) Iron oxides, aluminium hydroxide,
calcium carbonate, etc
Chemical reactivity Inert Reactive
Grading Stable Sensitivity to drying and working
Solubility Insoluble May be soluble
Weathering Weathering or stable Forming or weathering
Consistency limits Stable Sensitive to drying and mixing
Salinity Non-saline May be saline
SelI-stabilisation Non-selI-stabilising May be selI-stabilising
Variability Homogeneous Extremely variable
Four types oj calcrete jound in some SADC
countries: (1) Boulder, (2) Nodular, (3)
Powder, (4) Calcied Sand.
Figure 5.4 - Soil-Rock cycle
4
1 2
3 4
The road-making materials commonly used in the construction of LVSRs
in southern Africa can mostly be classifed as crushed or natural, residual or
transported gravels and soils derived from the following main groups
5
:
basic crystalline (e.g. dolerite, andesite, basalt)
acid crystalline (e.g. granite, gneiss)
high silica rocks (e.g. quartzite, hornfels, chert)
arenaceous rocks (e.g. sandstone, conglomerate)
argillaceous (e.g. mudstone, shale, slate, schist)
carbonate rocks (e.g. limestone, dolomite)
diamicites (e.g. tillite)
pedocretes (e.g. calcrete, laterite, ferricrete, silcrete)
Each group has a characteristic range of properties and potential problems
that should be taken into account in test methods and specifcations. For
example, a PI of up to 15 may be allowable in an unstabilised calcrete or later-
ite gravel base, whereas a value of more than 1 or 2 may be problematic in a
base composed of a basic crystalline rock, even if stabilised
6
.
Ultimately, the challenge of selecting pavement materials for low-volume
roads in southern Africa is essentially one of quantifying the risk associated
with departing from the use of traditional, high quality materials. For such
materials, specifcations rely heavily on experience with traditional 'ideal
materials from more temperate climates which, as stated previously in this
chapter, do not necessarily apply to local materials. Fortunately, the extensive
research carried out in the region over the past two decades has gone a long
way towards quantifying the conditions under which local materials can be
used with confdence.
1nBuence oI CIImate
The southern African climate exerts a signifcant infuence on the properties
of natural road building materials, as well as on the subsequent performance
of roads in which such materials are used. In this regard, the various climat-
ic zones in the SADC region may be characterized by the Weinert N-Value
which correlates broadly with mean annual rainfall, as shown in Table 5.3
7
.
Table 5.3 - Climatic zones: Approximate mean annual rainfall and N-values
Climatic Zone Arid Semi-arid Sub-humid Humid
Weinert N-Value ~ 10 5 - 10 2 - 5 2
Mean Annual
RainIall (mm)
250 250 - 500 500 - 800 ~ 800
The climatic N-values for southern Africa are also signifcant in that they
provide some indication of the dominant mode of rock weathering and the
related engineering properties of the resulting products. The values N = 2,
N = 5 and N = 10 are of particular signifcance and their contours are
Soils and granular materials in the SADC
region are inherently variable in terms oj
their engineering properties such as plastic-
ity, grading and strength. Bhen considering
their appropriate selection jor L\SRs, it is
important to consider how the compacted
material will interact with the road environ-
ment, i.e. moisture susceptibility, swell and
collapse characteristics, particle degradation,
durability, etc. Specialist testing may be re-
quired with basic rocks, pedocretes (calcrete,
silcrete, etc) and various weathered materials.
Weinert`s N-Value
The Beinert N-value is calculated jrom
climatic data as jollows:
N = 12.E
j
Pa
Bhere E
j
= evaporation during hottest
month (1anuary)
Pa = annual precipitation
MOZAAAMMBI QUE
ZIMBABWE
BOTSWANA
SWAZILAND
LLLEESOOOTTHO
NAMIBIA
ANGOLA
Z A MB I A
TTANZANIA
MAALLAAWWWWII
10
10
10
5
5
5
2
2
2
SOUTH
AFRICA
Climatic N-value
Figure 5.5 - Climatic N-value map of southern Africa
7
(currently does not cover the entire SADC region)
The Weinert N-values and climatic zones provide an important insight into
the properties and engineering characteristics of the naturally occurring
materials of the SADC region. This fosters a clear understanding of the
likely behaviour of these materials in particular environments and allows
practitioners to design and build LVSRs in a wide range of circumstances
with greater condence.
In areas where N-values are greater than 5, mechanical disintegration - the
physical breakdown of rock - tends to predominate. In areas where N-values
are less than 5, chemical decomposition - the chemical alteration of a rock
- predominates. This can lead to the transformation of certain minerals into
some type of clay. From these divisions, very broad but important generalisations
can be made about the soil prole, as indicated in Table 5.4.
Table 5.4 - Characteristics of materials in relation to climate (N-value)
7
N-value Material Characteristics Signicance of material properties
N < 2 Rocks are extensively weathered,
often to depths of several metres, and
decomposition is pronounced. Smectite
minerals are the principal products of
the decomposition of basic crystalline
rocks.
Materials tend to have relatively high
plasticity and are moisture sensitive. Basic
igneous rocks are often not durable and
prone to degradation in service. Careful
attention should be paid to the internal
and external drainage of pavement.
N = 2-5 Conditions similar to above but the thick-
ness of residual soil cover gradually decreases
as the N = 5 contour is approached.
N = 5-10 Thickness of residual soil cover grad-
ually decreases even further than above.
Disintegration is the dominant mode of
weathering.
N > 10 All rock types weather by mechanical disin-
tegration alone and the shallow residual soils
are commonly granular and gravelly.
Materials have relatively low plasticity
and are not particularly sensitive to
moisture.
5.3.2 Characteristics of Pavement Materials
M
aterials used in pavement layers can be classied into four categories
as follows:
Unbound granular - 1. Unprocessed (naturally occurring, as dug).
- 2. Processed (screened, mechanically stabilized).
- 3. Highly processed (crushed to specied grading).
Bound granular - 4. Cement, lime, bitumen or pozollanic material.
The material types described above derive their strength from a combination
of the following intrinsic properties
8
:
inter-particle friction
cohesive effects from ne particles
soil suction forces
physico-chemical (stabilization) forces
The relative dependence of a material and the inuence of moisture on each
of the above components of shear strength will signicantly inuence the
manner in which they can be incorporated within a pavement. For example,
unbound/unprocessed materials (e.g. calcrete or ferricrete) are highly dependent
on suction and cohesion forces for development of shear resistance that will
only be generated at relatively low moisture contents. Special measures there-
fore have to be taken to ensure that moisture ingress into the pavement is
prevented. Otherwise suction forces and shear strength will be reduced as
illustrated (notionally) in Figure 5.6, possibly resulting in failures.
Box 5.2 - Soil suction and its contribution to shear strength - basic concepts
Soil suction: As the grain size of a ne-grained material decreases, the total
exposed surface area becomes very large in relation to the volume of voids
within it. Under these circumstances, molecular forces, which are only
effective for very short distances from the surface, begin to play an increasingly
important role. They are essentially attractive in nature and can provide
signicant additional strength. The forces are equivalent to, and can be
described by, a reduction in pressure in the poresor voids in the material. d
This is referred to as suction.
As the magnitude of soil suction can be very much greater than normal
atmospheric pressure, the effective pressure can become highly negative.
Its value depends not only on the amount of uid in the pores (voids) but
also on its nature, i.e. dissolved salts. As the pores ll with water, the
magnitude of the suction decreases rapidly.
Soil strength and stiffness: The shear strength of granular materials and normally
consolidated ne-grained soils is described by the well known effective stress equation:
Shear strength = (cohesion) + [(normal stress) (pore pressure)] Tan (angle of internal friction)
The strength and stiffness of a pavement layer are reduced if pore pressure
is increased (at high moisture contents) and, conversely, are increased when
pore water pressure is decreased (at low moisture contents). When the pore
pressure equals the total stress, internal friction becomes negligible and the
shear strength is equal to the cohesion.
Thus, it is pore water pressure or suction of the water in the pavement,
rather than the amount of water, that affects pavement behaviour. Two soils
of different textures may have similar strength, and stiffnesses, even though t
their moisture contents may be quite different.
Figure 5.6 - Illustrative soil strength/suction relationship
Problem Soils and Materials
By virtue of their unfavourable properties, a number of soils and materials
fall into the Problem soils and materials category and, when encountered,
would normally require special treatment before acceptance in the pavement
foundation. This category of soils and materials includes:
low-strength soils
expansive clays (black cotton soil)
collapsible sands
dispersive soils
organic soils
saline soils or presence of saline water
weathered materials
The characteristics, investigation, testing and design counter-measures to
deal with problem soils are well covered in the literature and are not dealt
with in depth in this Guideline. In dealing with such materials, a careful
balance has to be struck between the cost of the counter-measures and the
benets to be derived, bearing in mind the relatively small user benets
generated by LVSRs.
The main characteristics of typical problem soils found in the SADC region
are highlighted below:
Low-strength soils: Soils with a soaked CBR of less than 3 per cent (< 2
per cent in dry climates) are described as Low-strength soils. Typical treatment
measures for such soils include:
removal and replacement with suitable material
chemical or mechanical stabilization (see section 5.3.3)
elevation of the vertical alignment to increase soil cover and thereby n
redene the design depth within the pavement structure
Equilibrium moisture content
Optimum moisture content
Soaked
1 2 3 4
Soil suction
75
50
25
S
o
i
l
s
t
r
e
n
g
t
h
(
C
B
R
)
pF
Expansive soils: These clay soils exhibit particularly large volumetric changes
(swell and shrinkage) following variations in their moisture contents. They
shrink and crack when they dry out and swell when they get wet. The cracks
allow water to penetrate deep into the soil, hence causing considerable
expansion. This results in deformation and unevenness of the road surface,
since the expansion and the subsequent heave are never uniform. Furthermore,
if the side slopes are not gentle enough these volume changes may produce
lateral displacements ('creep) of the expansive soil. When dry, some expansive
soils present a sand-like texture and are prone to erosion to a much greater
extent than what would be normally expected from their plasticity and clay
content.
The measures chosen to minimize or eliminate the effects of expansive soils
for LVSRs need to be economically realistic and proportionate to the risk
of potential pavement damage and increased maintenance and user costs.
Typical methods include:
realignment, where possible
excavation and replacement
chemical treatment
minimising moisture changes
wide (at least 2 m), sealed
shoulders
avoidance of side drains
gentle side slopes (1:6 or fatter)
minimum earthworks cover
of 0.6 m
0
t
l
Time
Normal settlement
with soil partially
saturated
Additional settle-
ment - no change
in applied pressure
but increase in
moisture content
S
e
t
t
l
e
m
e
n
t
70
60
50
40
30
20
l0
0
0 l0 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
Clay Content (< 2 m)
P
l
a
s
t
i
c
i
t
y
|
n
d
e
x
%
(
P
|
)
v
e
r
y
H
i
g
h
8
%
L
o
w
<
2
%
Low < 2 %
M
e
d
i
u
m
2
%
H
i
g
h
4
%
Qualitative measure oj soil expansiveness
(Modied van der Merwe Chart).
N.B - P/ test to be carried out on material
passing the 0.075 mm sieve.
Typical longitudinal cracking caused by
large volumetric changes in an expansive
soil subgrade.
Collapse settlement in excess oj 150 mm
ajter impact rolling.
Expansive black cotton soil exhibiting widely
spaced shrinkage cracks.
Figure 5.7 - The basic concept of additional
settlement due to collapse of soil fabric
9
Collapsible sands: These sandy soils
occur mostly in the arid and semi-arid
regions of southern Africa, particularly in
the Kalahari Desert regions of western Bot-
swana and eastern Namibia. They exhibit
a weakly cemented soil fabric which,
under certain circumstances, may be in-
duced to rapid settlement. A characteristic
of these soils is that they are all un-
saturated, generally have a low dry
density and a low clay content. At the in-
situ moisture content they can withstand
relatively large imposed stresses well in
excess of the overburden pressure with
little or no settlement. However, without
any change in the applied stress, but an
increase in moisture content, additional
settlement will occur, as shown in Figure
5.7. The rate of settlement will depend
on the permeability of the soil. Useful
indicators for assessing the collapse
potential of a soil include density and
grading (ref. Table 5.5). More rigorous
tests to quantify collapse potential include
the single odometer test in which an undisturbed sample is loaded at its natural
moisture content up to 200 kPa and then saturated. The collapse potential of the
material is a mathematical expression, in percentage terms, of the reduction in
Box 5.3 - Conditions to be satished
before collapse settlement can occur
the soil must have a collapsible
fabric
it must be partially saturated
the applied load must exceed the
overburden pressure
there must be an increase in
moisture content after the load
has been applied
Table 5.5 - Indicators of collapse potential and severity of problem
10
Property Guide to
Collapse
Potential
a
Collapse
Potential (%)
Degree of
Severity
Dry density (kg/m
3
) < 1600 0 - 1 No problem
% passing 2.0 mm and
retained on 0.75 mm sieve
> 60% 2 - 5 Moderate trouble
% passing 0.075 mm sieve < 20% 6 - 10 Trouble
Relative density < 85% 11- 20 Severe trouble
> 20 Very severe trouble
a See Botswana Road Design Manual
Methods of dealing with collapsible soils includes the following:
Excavation of material to a specied depth below ground level and d
replacement in thin lifts (typically 200 mm).
Ripping of the road bed, inundation with water and compaction with
heavy vibrating rollers.
Use of high energy impact compaction at in situ moisture content.
The above measures are all relatively expensive to undertake and a careful
balance should be struck between the costs and benets of their application
to LVSRs
Dispersive soils: These soils, some of which are clayey gravels, are easily
eroded in the presence of water - a property that makes them problematic
when they occur in cut slopes and in drainage channels. They are generally
found in areas where the climatic N-value is between 2 and 10. They have
almost no resistance to erosion, are susceptible to pipe developments in t
earthworks, crack easily and have low shear strength. Their identication
involves the use of a combination of indicator tests, observations of erosion
patterns, soil colour, terrain features and vegetation.
The following measures are typically employed where dispersive soils are
encountered:
erosion protection in cut slopes and drainage channels
modication with 2% to 3 % lime
Saline soils or presence of saline water: The presence of soluble salts in
pavement materials or subgrades can cause damage to the bituminous surfac-
ings of LVSRs. This problem occurs mostly in the semi-arid regions of
southern Africa where the dry climate, combined with presence of saline
materials (often calcrete or minewaste) and/or saline ground or surface water,
create conditions that are conducive to the occurrence of salt damage. Such
damage occurs when the dissolved salts migrate to the road surface, mainly
due to evaporation, become supersaturated and then crystallize with associated
volume change. This creates pressures which can lift and physically degrade
the bituminous surfacing and break the adhesion with the underlying pave-
ment layer. Generally, the thinner the surfacing layer is, the more likely the
damage, primes being the most susceptible and thick, impermeable seals the
least susceptible.
Salt damage may appear in the form of
blistering, doming, heaving and
ufng of the prime or surfacing.
An example of severe distress to a runway
surfacing due to salt attack resulting in
damage within two years of its construction.
voids ratio, in relation to the thickness of the potentially collapsible material and
provides a guide to the potential severity of the problem.
It is quite feasible, and often cost-effective, to use saline materials in LVSR
construction, rather than haul non-saline material great distances. However,
this requires a sound knowledge of the project environment and the type of
salts and salinity levels in the materials as a basis for designing and specifying
appropriate preventative measures and monitoring of salt levels during and after
construction.
Guidelines for the prevention and repair of salt damage to roads and run-
ways have been developed based on research work carried out in the region
and elsewhere
11,12
. These guidelines provide guidance on methods of testing
and measurement of salts as well as on repair methods where damage has
already occurred.
Weathered materials: Weathered materials, such as basic igneous rocks
(e.g. basalt, dolerite), occur extensively in southern Africa and are common-
ly used in the construction of LVSRs, either in their natural (untreated) or
chemically stabilised states. The properties of these materials are governed
by their mineralogy and apparently sound rock containing secondary
minerals liable to decomposition by weather or traffc must be avoided.
Specialised testing may therefore be required to assess their long term durability
for which reference should be made to Draft TRH13: Cementitious stabilisers in
road construction
13
.
Waste MaterIaIs
Numerous types of 'waste materials can be recycled into aggregates and
additives for use in LVSRs. However, an imaginative approach is required to
recognise their potential use - a use that would alleviate the need to open new
gravel sources, thereby reducing the environmental impact of the provision of
new, or upgrading/rehabilitation of existing infrastructure. The use of waste
materials, where feasible, will also reduce the impacts associated with their
stockpiling (e.g. dust from a dump).
Examples of waste materials that can be considered for use in LVSRs include:
waste rock dumps at mines and quarries (base and surfacing aggregate)
slags from metal processing (base course)
crushed glass (surfacing aggregate)
clinker ash (subbase and base course)
fy-ash (mechanical stabilization agent on fnes-defcient material)
phosphogypsum (mechanical stabilization agent, subbase material)
tyres (ground for bitumen rubber, chips for light-weight fll, complete
for bank stabilization and slope-failure repairs)
Prior to use, materials should be subjected to a standard testing programme,
as well as an environmental assessment to ensure that no signifcant environ-
mental impacts occur as a result of the use of the material. As certain materials
may also have relatively high soluble salt contents, additional tests should be
carried out to ensure that their presence will not infuence the performance of
the surfacing.
Sample oj weathered, decomposed basalt,
showing altered clay minerals in rock vesicles
and cavities.
5.3.3 Soil Improvement
W
here suitable naturally occurring gravels are not available within an
economical haulage distance, it may be necessary to resort to some
form of stabilisation the process by which additives are used to enhance
the properties of subgrade and pavement materials - in order to improve the
materials properties, including strength, volume stability, durability and
permeability.
The additives in common use in the region are:
granular materials Mechanical stabilisation
portland cement
lime (quicklime and hydrated lime)
pozzolans (y-ash, pumice, scoria)
Chemical stabilisation
bitumen and tar
The following factors inuence the selection of the most suitable method of
treatment:
site constraints
materials
climate and drainage
economics of the various options
A general guide to the stabilisation of soils with cementitious stabilisers is
given in Draft TRH13 n
13
, while the suitability of the various types of stabilisation
additives is given in Figure 5.8.
Figure 5.8 - Guide to the method of stabilization
14
Mechanical Stabilisation
The simplest, and often cheapest,
form of stabilisation, as well as the
easiest to construct, can be achieved
by blending two natural materials,
usually gravel with sand, to form a
mechanically stable layer. This usually
results in the following advantages:
improved CBR
lowering of PI
lowering of OMC
improved workability
The results of a laboratory investiga-
tion of the mechanical blending of a
natural gravel (calcrete) with sand is
shown in Figure 5.9. As is evident
from the gure, the CBR of two samples
(A and B) increased signicantly by
over 40 per cent (20 per cent sand
added) and 30 per cent (30 per cent
sand added) respectively.
Figure 5.9 - Results of mechanical
blending of calcrete with sand
15
In blending granular materials with ner-grained materials, care must be taken
to ensure that the plasticity of the nes fraction is not increased to such a
degree that there is a loss in stability.
Chemical Stabilisation
The main objective of chemical stabilisation is to enhance the suitability of
locally available natural gravels for pavement construction, thereby avoiding
the need to import other materials. This can often lead to more cost-effective
use of available materials with the following benecial properties by comparison
with the untreated parent material:
increased strength or stability
improved load-spreading capability
increased resistance to erosion
reduced sensitivity to moisture changes
improved workability of clayey materials
As indicated in Figure 5.8, the choice of chemical stabiliser will depend on
the material to be stabilised and the position in the road pavement it is to
occupy. These stabilisers are generally applied at relatively low dosages,
typically between 3 and 6 per cent. However, if problems are to be avoided,
they must be subjected to careful and well-controlled processing and
construction.
Specications for chemically treated materials vary in different parts of the
world and for different road authorities. For southern African conditions,
reference should be made to Draft TRH
13
.
Improved workability of clayey materials
A: Untreated - relatively unworkable.
B: 3 % lime-treated - more workable.
When mixed in the appropriate proportion,
two non-standard materials, such as Kalahari
sand and Calcrete, often satisfy the speci-
cations of a standard/traditional material.
l00
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
0% l0% 20% 30% 40% 50%
C
8
P

(
s
o
a
k
e
d
)

a
t

9
8
%

M
o
d
.

A
A
S
H
T
O
A
Percentage sand added to calcrete

Potential problems or pitfalls with these types of materials include:
propensity to crack because of traffc loading or environmental conditions,
particularly with cement treatment
degradation of the cementing action due to carbonation, particularly in
the use of cement and lime treatments
requirement for greater levels of skill and control during construction
(compared with that required for untreated materials) to achieve a satis-
factory product
Box 5.4 - Effects of carbonation
Lime- and, to a lesser degree, cement-stabilized soils, can lose strength
through carbonation. This effect is particularly evident in lime-stabilised
fne-grained, relatively weak soils (especially calcretes). When used as base
course material, prolonged exposure of these stabilised soils to the air
before sealing can also result in a weak upper layer being produced prior
to surfacing. Subsequent crushing of the aggregate as well as poor bonding
between the surface and the base can occur, leading to pavement failure.
Measures that ameliorate the effects of carbonation during the stabilisation
process include
16
:
- immediate covering with the next layer of material
- immediate application of a bitumen prime coat
- full moist curing (with no drying of the surface)
- construction of layer with a sacrifcial thickness to be bladed off
Proprietary Chemicals: Various proprietary chemicals and road additives
are sometimes used to improve the properties of natural gravels for use as
pavement materials. However, their use is very project specifc and they
should be used with caution. There is relatively limited and well documented
experience of their successful use and well-controlled trials are required to
confrm their suitability for use with specifc materials. The more common
chemicals include:
wetting agents to improve compaction
natural polymers (e.g. ligno sulphonates)
synthetic polymer emulsions (e.g. acrylates)
modifed waxes
sulphonated oils
biological enzymes
5.3.4 SpecIBcatIons
S
pecifcations are meant to exclude most unsatisfactory materials for use in
roads by placing limits on their various properties such as grading, plasticity
and strength. The derivation of appropriate limits requires an intimate knowledge
of the performance of local material in a specifc environment (climate and
drainage measures) and for specifc traffc loadings. The challenge is basically
to relate the materials` physical properties with performance in a particular
environment.
Until relatively recently, most of the specifcations used in the SADC region
tended to refect temperate zone specifcations emanating from Europe and
North America. Typical conventional specifcations rely heavily on experience
and on 'ideal materials having the following properties:
restrictive grading requirements
low plasticity (PI < 6)
high road base strength (soaked CBR > 80 per cent at 98 per cent modifed
AASHTO compaction)
/nexperience tends to cultivate a rigid
adherence to specications.
Traditional specications jor base gravels
typically specijy a soaked CBR 98%
modied AASHTO density oj * 80%, P/ oj )
6 and adherence to a tight grading envelope.
However, research in the region has shown
that when due consideration is given to jactors
such as trajc, subgrade strength, drainage,
pavement cross section, etc, substantial
relaxations can be made on selection criteria
with signicant cost savings.
Phenolphthalein reaction in stabilised sub-
base.
The above limits originate from situations very different from those prevailing in
much of the SADC region in terms of material types, climate, traffc characteristics,
standards, etc. and, when applied, would rule out many natural gravels available
for use in LVSR construction. Standard specifcations cannot address all possible
variations in environmental conditions or cover all types of material. Judicious
interpretation of existing specifcations and application of local knowledge can
produce project-specifc and more appropriate specifcations.
Box 5.5 - Transferability of materials specihcations
Materials specifcations are not always simply transferable from one
region to another. What may be appropriate in one region, in relation to such
factors as material type, climate and traffc loading, may well be quite
inappropriate in another region where these factors may be quite different. In
the fnal analysis, every material has its uses and limitations and must simply be
matched to the traffc, climatic and other conditions infuencing its perfor-
mance. Costly failures in some cases as well as over-conservative,
uneconomic designs in others can result when conventional materials
specifcations are rigidly applied in the region.
It is also important to bear in mind that specifcations are tied directly to the test
methods used in carrying out research work. For example, most of the research
work carried out in the region on pedocretes is tied to ASTM-type methods. It
would therefore be inappropriate and risky to apply BS standards to evaluate
pedocretes unless suitable compensatory adjustments were made to the test results.
The successful use of non-standard materials is largely dependent on the
availability of a local specifcation developed for specifc operating
environments. The formulation of these 'customized material specifca-
tions has enabled the use of many materials that otherwise would be rejected if
traditional specifcations were used.
Based on a 4-year programme of research in highway engineering materials
17
,
specifcations have been developed for a variety of commonly occurring natural
gravels in which their geological origin as well as climatic and traffc loading
factors relevant to the region are taken into consideration. The research
focused on how existing sealed road pavements performed with time and traffc
in different climatic conditions and found that:
The minimum standard of 80 per cent soaked CBR for natural gravel
bases was inappropriately high for many LVSRs. New limits are recom-
mended depending on trajc, materials and climate.
The grading envelopes for natural gravel bases were narrow. Alternative
(wider) envelopes are recommended jor relatively lightly trajcked roads.
Traffc below 500,000 cumulative ESA was not a signifcant factor in
pavement deterioration. Many road sections performed well even when
subjected to a high degree of overloading and with PIs of up to 18. New
limits jor P/ have been recommended.
Drainage was a signifcant factor on performance, even in dry areas. A minimum
crown height oj 0.75 m above the invert level oj the side drain is recommended.
As a result oj the SADC regional research work, revised specications have
been derived jor the major groups oj natural gravel roadbase materials jound
in the region (quart:itic gravels, weathered rocks, lateritic gravels, calcareous
gravels and sand) jor a range oj trajc levels up to 500,000 ESA and subgrade
types not currently catered jor in existing guides. Thus, they should be incorporated
in country documents and considered jor use in the design oj L\SRs.
The art oj the roads engineer consists, to
a great extent, in utili:ing specications
that will make possible the use oj materials
he nds in the vicinity oj the road works.
Unjortunately, jorce oj habit, inadequate
specications and lack oj initiative have
suppressed the use oj local materials and
innovative construction technologies.
\olume 1 oj a ve-volume series oj reports
on the outcome oj the 4-year programme oj
research on highway engineering materials.
5.3.5 ProspectIng
L
arge quantities of natural gravel are required for constructing and maintain-
ing LVSRs. It is therefore essential that optimum use be made of all
materials available at the lowest possible cost. Very often, gravels occur as
relatively small localized deposits scattered around the landscape, and are
usually overlain by a cover of soil and vegetation which makes them very
diffcult to fnd. Consequently, modern exploration techniques must be
employed to ensure that available materials are located as effciently as
possible, instead of the 'haphazard or random methods often used.
The art of prospecting involves looking for clues as to the occurrence of useful
materials and then digging to see what may be there. Learning to identify
features that indicate the presence of gravel from interpretation of maps and
other information is a key activity in prospecting. However, the most impor-
tant parts are the desk study followed by the feld survey and pit evaluation.
Information about gravels in the landscape typically comes from fve main
sources, viz:
geological information from geological maps and reports
soils information from agricultural soils maps and reports
botanical indicators
landscape information from topographic maps, aerial photos and satellite
images
other local information
The above sources of information are all analysed together to assess the
likelihood that gravel may occur at a particular place. A typical fow diagram for
materials prospecting is shown in Figure 5.10.
Desk Study
Specifcation and quantity of materials required
Interpretation of background material
Provisional materials map
Data Capture and Feedback
Reporting
Figure 5.10 - Flow diagram stages for material prospecting
26
Plan Survey
Decide on methodology and procedure
Carry out in-house or use consultants
Consider environmental aspects
Find and Map Sources of Materials
Reconnaissance feld survey
Detailed feld survey
Source Evaluation (Laboratory)
Laboratory testing
Source Evaluation (Field)
Areal extent
Profle description
Visual classifcation
H
H
H
H
Proper planning is essential jor a successjul
materials prospecting survey.
Experience has shown that a signicant
amount oj material used is ojten located
during construction when excavation equip-
ment is more readily available than in the
pre-construction, site investigation phase.
Aerial photographs and satellite images
are valuable sources oj injormation which
can be used jor materials location.
5.3.6 Testing
Standards
M
aterials testing is normally prescribed in standards put out by various
countries, of which the BS (British), ASTM (American) and TMH
(South African) are in common use in the region. Unfortunately these methods
differ in many respects with regard to the actual test procedure and the method
of testing. For example, authorities employing a BS Liquid Limit device will
obtain a Plasticity Index (PI) that is, on average, 4 units higher than that
obtained on an ASTM Liquid Limit device
18
. It is important, therefore, not
to mix testing standards because the differences in test procedure alone are
sufcient to explain the difference in material quality apparently tolerable by
pavements in different SADC countries
6
. Ideally, materials testing standards
in the SADC region should be standardized so as to facilitate intra-regional
research efforts, technology transfer and reporting.
Tests
Materials testing is carried out to assess the various properties of road
construction materials as an indicator of their likely performance in service. n
A wide variety of laboratory tests is available for this purpose and includes:
classication stiffness
moisture content durability
density chemical
strength special
In addition, there are various eld tests which may be used to assess the properties
of the placed material such as:
in situ strength (in situ CBR test, Dynamic Cone Penetrometer or
Clegg Hammer)
stiffness (deection testing, e.g. Falling Weight Deectometer,
Benkelman Beam, Plate Bearing)
permeability (water permeability test)
The two critical properties which are known to exert a major control on the
performance of natural gravels in road construction are strength and stiffness.
Both are dependent on moisture content and density and can be affected by the d
wetting and drying history or to the compaction process to which the material
has been subjected in reaching the density involved. Ideally, therefore, for pave-
ment design purposes, the strength and stiffness properties of natural gravels
should be assessed from samples made up at the densities and critical moisture
contents likely to occur in the road and not at pre-determined values. A number
of tests are used for assessing the suitability of natural gravels for use in road
pavements. The more common ones are discussed below:
California Bearing Ratio (CBR) test: One of the most important strength
tests in common use is the CBR test, an arbitrary test that was originally
devised as a method of comparing subgrade soils with crushed rock. Because d
of its ease of use in comparison with the more complex methods of strength
measurement, it is widely used in many empirical methods of pavement design.
However, its use as a primary means of selecting natural gravels for LVSRs
has long been questioned.
Liquid Limit device used in the determination
of the plasticity index of a soil.
0.01% Strain
0.1% Strain
1% Strain
% of MOD BS Compaction
90 92 94 96 98 100 102 104 106 108 110
1.50 1.60 1.70 1.80 1.90
Dry Density Mg/m
3
6000
4000
2000
S
t
i
f
f
n
e
s
s
E
u
/
p
1
0
Stiffness-dry density relationship, lateritic
gravel (Kenya)
19
.
Strength assessment of pavement
materials
There is a tendency to attach a strength
rating to a material without realizing that
this is of little value if divorced from an
appreciation of the probable in-service
moisture content and density condition.
Irrespective of what strength criteria are
advanced, they will be abused if no attempt
is made to test for strength at moisture
content and density conditions expected in t
the eld.

Figure 5.11 - Relationship between elastic stiffness and CBR
for a stress pulse of 40 kPa
21
In view of the above, it may be concluded that, if the CBR test is used to justify
the use of a material which departs substantially from the traditional grading
and plasticity limits (as is the case with most pedogenic materials), then, on its
own, it may well not be appropriate.
Whilst it is not suggested that the CBR test be discarded, it is recommended
that other tests, such as the Texas Triaxial and K-Mould tests, could be very
useful supplementary tests for selecting natural gravels for use in LVSR pave-
ments. These tests can provide information that is often more discriminating
as regards material performance than the CBR test
22
.
Texas Triaxial Test: An alternative to the CBR test, is the Texas Triaxial test
which is used in Texas, Australia and Zimbabwe. This test is based essentially on
the relative stiffness of the material in the form of stress strain characteristics and
measures the fundamental strength parameters - cohesion and angle of internal
friction. It is less empirical than the CBR test in that more of the coarse fractions
of gravels can be subjected to test. Moreover, in the test the sample is tested as a
whole, and the results are less prone to specifc conditions under the CBR plunger.
Box 5.6 - How appropriate is the CBR test as a means of selecting
natural gravels for use in LVSR pavements?
The CBR test is an empirical test that was developed using empirical
observations of satisfactory pavements over a number of subgrades with
the objective of establishing subgrade bearing capacity, not the adequacy
oj the pavement material.
The test has poor reproducibility, with an overall coeffcient of variation
of the order of 20 per cent. This characteristic makes the interpretation
of test results, especially for inherently variable natural gravels, very imprecise.
For example, for a true mean value of 80, the CBR can range from 48 to 112,
a range that can lead to vastly differing interpretations of the suitability of
the soil for use as a pavement material.
The test does not measure any of the fundamental engineering properties of
soil that critically infuence its performance, such as elastic stiffness (E
r
) and
resistance to permanent deformation or resilient modulus (M
r
). As indicated
in Figure 5.11, materials with the same CBR could have very different
elastic stiffnesses and, as a result, in similar service conditions could perform
quite differently because of their different load-spreading ability.
l20
l00
80
60
40
20
0
0 l 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 l0
C8P (%)
L
r
(
M
P
a
)
P
|
l
9
(K
e
u
p
e
r
M
a
r
l)
P| 48 (London Clay)
P| 36 (Gault Clay)
The Resilient Modulus oj a soil is a measure
oj its resistance to displacement, i.e. its
susceptibility to rutting under a wheel load.
The Elastic Stiffness oj a soil reects its
load spreading characteristics. Thus, a high
E value implies good load-spreading ability
while a low E value implies that loads will
be concentrated on the subgrade and high
exural strains will occur.
Of particular importance is the ability of the Texas Triaxial test to assess the
potential benets gained by allowing the moisture content at compaction
(optimum moisture content) to decrease to the predicted equilibrium value in
the pavement. This makes the test particularly suitable for predicting the
sensitivity of the strength of the material to changes of moisture, thereby
allowing the material strength to be assessed at in-service moisture/density
conditions.The test is somewhat more time consuming to carry out than the
CBR test.
K-Mould Test: The K-Mould test is a laboratory soil strength test that was
developed in the USA in the late 1970s
23
because of the need for a rapid, direct
measure of soil strength under conditions that are reasonably representative
of those anticipated in the eld. The test is essentially a compression test in
which a cylindrical soil specimen is constrained in an axially rigid but
laterally exing steel mould such that, as axial compression occurs, the
lateral expansion of the soil is met by a constantly increasing lateral resistance,
much as occurs in eld loading conditions.
Research carried out at the CSIR shows that the K-Mould test is able to de-
termine the elastic moduli of untreated road building materials with relative
simplicity and a great degree of accuracy in a single loading cycle
24
. Thus,
although not yet commonly used, the K-Mould test may provide a useful
means of determining the elastic stiffness of natural gravels where required,
in contrast to the more complex, time-consuming and costly repeated load
triaxial tests that can hardly be justied for LVSRs.
Dynamic Cone Penetrometer (DCP): The DCP test is particularly worthy of
mention because LVSRs are very often constructed on existing gravel roads with
necessary improvements in vertical and horizontal alignment. The use of the
DCP can provide a rapid, effective, low-cost, non-destructive method of
estimating the strength of in situ materials. Methods have been developed in the
region for strengthening existing gravel roads to provide LVSRs designed on the
basis of the in situ DCP-CBR and design trafc level
25
. This information can
then be used with existing catalogue pavement structures to provide the most
economical pavement structure for a particular set of conditions.
5.3.7 Materials Inventory
A
s part of the materials prospecting process, considerable benets can be
realised through the development and use of materials inventories,
particularly at the planning and design stages of LVSR projects. The common
uses of such inventories are summarized in Table 5.6.
Table 5.6 - Common uses of materials inventories
Common Use Related Factors
Record keeping Central record keeping.
Source of readily available/easily retrievable information.
Reference for future development.
Reducing costs Reduced consultancy costs.
Materials
management
Rapid/easier materials location and identication.
Input into national engineering geological maps.
Link to other
management
systems
Development of pavement performance relationships for
input into pavement management systems.
Interface with existing laboratory management systems.
Input into road failure investigations.
Number of blows
0 20 40 60 80 l00 l20 l40
Surfacing: 50 mm(direct measurement)
ase:
Thickness l50 mm
DCP 2.9 mm/blow
C8P l00%
Subbase:
Thickness 230 mm
DCP 9.3 mm/blow
C8P 25%
Subgrade:
Thickness 400 mm+
DCP l6.6 mm/blow
C8P ll.5%
l00
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
P
e
n
e
t
r
a
t
i
o
n

Typical DCP test result plot.
Specications and
research
Support to on-going research.
Fine-tuning local materials and design specications.
Development of local materials/performance correlations.
Other Potential source of revenue.
Despite the potential benets of establishing materials inventories, their
sustainability needs to be given careful consideration in terms of such factors
as:
institutional capacity
regular system maintenance, updates and upgrades
staff training
A rst step in establishing a comprehensive inventory is to assemble, in a
simple database, materials information from existing materials reports
prepared by contractors and consultants.
5.4 Pavement Design
5.4.1 Objective
T
he objective of pavement design is to produce an engineering structure
in terms of thickness and composition that is in harmony with the local
environment, will distribute trafc loads efciently and provide a satisfactory
level of service, whilst minimizing the whole-life cost of the pavement, i.e.
both initial construction and subsequent maintenance costs. To achieve this
goal, sufcient knowledge of the materials, trafc, local environment
(particularly climate and drainage) and their interactions is required to be
able to predict reasonably the performance of any pavement conguration. In
addition, there should be a clear view as to the level of performance and
pavement condition that is considered satisfactory in the circumstances for
which the pavement structure is being designed.
Pavement design for low-volume roads presents a particular challenge to
designers. This is largely because, until relatively recently, such roads were not
specically catered for and the step from a gravel road to a paved road was a
large one. Moreover, pavement engineers are required to consider carefully
the environment within which LVSRs have to be provided, in a manner which t
is often much more demanding than with HVRs.
5.4.2 Pavement Design System
T
he many variables and interactions that inuence the nal choice of road
pavement make it appropriate to adopt a systems approach to pavement
design in which all inuential design factors are considered within an appropriate
pavement design system. Figure 5.12 shows such a Pavement Design System.
The various elements that comprise the system are discussed below, with
particular emphasis on their relevance to LVSRs.
Pavement
Configuration
Implementation
Construction and
Maintenance
Traffic
Environment Factors
Subgrade Soil
Pavement Materials
External Factors
(Chapter 3)
Structural Design
Cost Comparisons Selected Design
5.4.3 - INPUT VARIABLES 5.4.4 - DESIGN PROCESS 5.4.5 - DESIGN OUTPUT
Figure 5.12 - Pavement design system
The challenge of pavement
design for low-volume roads
I have always felt that in many respects
it is easier to design a pavement for a high
volume rather than a low-volume road for
several reasons. On the low-volume road,
for example, we are continually striving for
low cost, which makes our design extremely
sensitive from the standpoint of thickness,
quality of pavement and surfacing materials,
geometric design, and many other factors.
Eldon Yoder - one of the most prominent
pavement designers of our time.
5.4.3 Input Variables
Construction and Maintenance Factors
C
onstruction and maintenance policies can inuence the type of pavement
structure which is adopted. In addition, the properties of many materials
are dependent on construction inuences, including level of compaction and
extent of sub-surface drainage provided. These latter factors are particularly
important in the context of low-volume roads and are discussed later in this
section. The more general construction and maintenance issues are discussed
in chapters 6 and 7.
Trafc
The deterioration of paved roads caused by trafc results from both the
magnitude of the individual wheel loads and the number of times these loads
are applied. For pavement design purposes it is therefore necessary to consider
not only the total number of vehicles that will use the road but also the axle
loads of these over the design life of the road.
Design life (Years): The design life of a pavement depends on a number of
factors including, particularly, its function. Thus, a major trunk road fulll-
ing an obvious economic function and carrying high volumes of trafc, for
which any major disruption would be very costly, would normally be
designed for a longer design life than a tertiary/access d road serving a
primarily developmental or social function and carrying relatively low volumes
of trafc. Table 5.7 provides some guidance on the selection of design life.
Table 5.7 - Pavement design life selection guidance
Design data reliability Importance/level of service
Low High
Low 10 yrs 10 - 15 yrs
High 10 - 15 yrs 15 - 20 yrs
Notwithstanding the attraction of employing staged construction strategies from
a purely economic point of view, this approach is not recommended if there is
any risk that maintenance and upgrading will not be carried out correctly at
the appropriate time.
Trafc estimation: This is determined on the basis of appropriate trafc
surveys to establish the trafc volume by each trafc class in terms of the
[Annual] Average Daily Trafc [A](ADT). The various types of trafc surveys
available for determining baseline trafc ows have been dealt with in Chapter
3, Section 3.2.7.
Following the establishment of baseline trafc, further analysis is required to
establish the total design trafc based on a forecast of trafc growth in terms of h
normal, diverted and generated trafc. Such forecasts are very sensitive to
economic conditions in developing economies and the various factors to be
considered are dealt with in detail in various texts on pavement design such as d
Overseas Road Note 31
27
. Moreover, for relatively shorter term design strategies
(trafc <0.1 million ESA), an elaborate trafc analysis is seldom required, as
environmental rather than trafc loading factors often determine the
performance of the roads.
Design life - the period during which a
pavement would be expected to carry the
anticipated trafc at a satisfactory level of
service without requiring major rehabilita-
tion work.
The ADT is dened as the total annual trafc
summed for both directions and divided by
365. However, for pavement design purposes,
the trafc loading in one direction (in the
heavier loaded lane) is required.
Construction trafc can be a signicant proportion (sometimes 20 - 40 per cent)
of total trafc on LVSRs as shown in Figure 5.13 and should be taken into
account in the design of the pavement.
Figure 5.13 - Typical trafc growth pattern for a LVSR
Axle loading: The damage inicted on road pavements depends very strongly
on the axle loads of the vehicles and the number of times they are applied.
Axle load data for design purposes can be obtained from surveys of commercial
vehicles using the existing road or, in the case of new roads on new alignments,
from existing roads carrying similar trafc. Methods of carrying out such
surveys were described in Section 3.2.7 of Chapter 3. f
The damaging power of a particular axle-load is generally expressed in terms of
an equivalent standard axle - a concept that effectively reduces the varied
nature of the trafc loadings to a single parameter in terms of structural damage
to a pavement. The expression that is used for dening the equivalence factor of
any axle load is based on the Fourth Power Law derived from the AASHO Road
Test
1
, as follows:
N = ( W/Ws)
n
where N = load equivalence factor
n
W = axle load
Ws = standard axle
n = power law exponent
For design purposes, the power law exponent, n, is generally assumed to lie
in the range 4 - 4.5 (typically taken as 4.2). It is noteworthy, however, that the
value of n is strongly inuenced by pavement type (granular, cemented, etc) and
mode of distress (rutting, fatigue, subgrade deformation, etc), strength of
subgrade and stiffness and may vary from less than 1 to over 18!
28
.
There is some evidence in the SADC region to indicate that the value of the
exponent of 4.2 may not be appropriate for some LVSRs constructed with
natural gravel road bases in which the main deterioration mode is often rut-
ting. The signicantly different axle loadings on the two lanes of a road in the
region, where a range of sub-standard calcareous materials were used as road
base, enabled an estimate to be made of the damage law exponent. This was
found to be between 2 and 3, a value which has been conrmed by other
investigations carried out in the region
29
.
5 10 15 20
Time (Years)
DEVELOPMENT PHASE
HIGH GROWTH RATE
OPERATIONAL PHASE
NORMAL GROWTH RATE
TOTAL TRAFFIC
NON-CONSTRUCTION TRAFFIC
(normal/generated/diverted)
CONSTRUCTION TRAFFIC
C
u
m
u
l
a
t
i
v
e
T
r
a
f
f
i
c
(
E
S
A
s
)
Three groups of heavy vehicles with equal
damaging effect.
=
=
105 kN 105 kN
80 kN 80 kN
54 kN 54 kN
Cumulative equivalent standard axles: Following the trafc and axle load
surveys described above, the cumulative equivalent standard axle loading over
the design life of the road is determined by multiplying the number of axle loads
in each load group of the entire load spectrum in the heaviest trafcked lane by
the relevant equivalency factor.
Environmental Factors
Environmental factors - essentially in terms of moisture and temperature
- have a profound effect on pavement performance. This is particularly the
case with low-volume roads where environmentally induced distress rather
than load-associated distress determines pavement performance
17
. As illustrated
in Figure 5.14, it is only at relatively higher trafc levels that load-associated
distress plays the dominant role in pavement performance.
Figure 5.14 - Trafc loading versus dominant mechanism of distress
Most design methods used in the SADC region cater for relatively high volumes
of trafc, typically in excess of 0.5 million ESA over a 10 - 15 year design life,
for which attention is focused on load-associated distress. However, for the
large proportion of low-volume roads that exist in the region, carrying typically
less than 0.3 million ESA over their design life, priority attention should really
be paid to mitigating the effects of the environment, particularly rainfall and
temperature, on their performance, as discussed below.
Climate: The moisture environment in which a pavement operates is a major
inuence on its performance because the strength and stiffness of the pavement
materials and subgrade are critically dependent on moisture content. In turn,
moisture content is inuenced by the climatic zone in which the pavement is
located.
Moisture environment: Arguably the most important challenge faced by the
designer is to provide a pavement structure in which the detrimental effects of
moisture are contained to acceptable limits in relation to the trafc loading,
nature of the materials being used, construction/maintenance provisions and
degree of acceptable risk. This challenge is accentuated by the fact that most
low-volume roads will be constructed from natural, often unprocessed, materials
which tend to be moisture sensitive. This places extra emphasis on drainage
and moisture control for achieving satisfactory pavement life for which the
following factors require careful assessment at the design stage:
0 0.25 0.5 0.75 l l.25 l.5 l.75 2
7raffic (miIIion SA)
l00
80
60
40
20
0
nvironment
7raffic
P
e
r
c
e
n
t
a
g
e

c
o
n
t
r
i
b
u
t
i
o
n
Area of
interest
Investigations carried out in the region
indicated quite clearly that trafc below
about 300,000 to 500,000 ESA was not a
signicant factor in pavement deterioration.
rainfall and evaporation pattern
permeability of surfacing
depth of water table relative to the pavement structure
type of subgrade material
relative permeability of pavement layers (permeability/no-permeability
inversion)
pavement confguration
whether shoulders will be sealed or not
The various sources of moisture infltration into a pavement are illustrated in
Figure 5.15.
Figure 5.15 - Moisture movements in pavements and subgrades
(NAASRA, 1987)
30
Permeability: Moisture movements of any of the types illustrated in Figure 5.15
are controlled not only by the availability of moisture from the various sources
but also by the permeability of the pavement, subgrade and surrounding materials.
The permeability of the material will control the rate at which moisture moves
through the material. The relative permeability of adjacent materials may also
govern moisture conditions. A signifcant decrease in permeability with depth
or across boundaries between materials (i.e. permeability inversion) can lead to
saturation of the materials in the vicinity of the permeability inversion.
Box 5.7 - Signihcance of material permeability in pavement design
No permeability inversion: It is essential for good internal drainage that
permeability inversion does not occur. This is achieved by ensuring that
the permeability of the pavement and subgrade layers are at least equal or are
increasing with depth. For example, the permeability of the base must be less
than or equal to the permeability of the subbase in a three-layered system. To
achieve this, it is necessary to measure or assess the permeability of the
pavement and subgrade layers.
Permeability inversion: A permeability inversion exists when the permeability
of the pavement and subgrade layers decreases with depth. Under infltration
of rainwater, there is potential for moisture accumulation at the interface
of the layers. The creation of a perched water table could lead to shoulder
saturation and rapid lateral wetting under the seal may occur. This may
lead to base or subbase saturation in the outer wheeltrack and result in
catastrophic failure of the base layer when traffcked. A permeability inversion
often occurs at the interface between the subbase and subgrade since many
subgrades consist of cohesive fne-grained materials. Under these circum-
stances, a more conservative design approach is required that specifcally
caters for these conditions.
Lvaporation
|nfiltration
into pavement
|nfiltration
into shoulders
Pavement
Transfer
from
shoulder
Prom
lower
soil
layers
vapour
movements
Prom
water-table
Seepage from
higher ground
water-table
water-table
fluctuations
Where permeability inversion is unavoidable, the road shoulder should be
sealed to an appropriate width to ensure that the lateral wetting front does not
extend under the outer wheeltrack of the pavement. Lateral drainage can be
encouraged by constructing the pavement layers with an exaggerated crossfall
wherever a permeability inversion occurs. Although this is not an effcient way
to drain the pavement it is inexpensive and therefore worthwhile. Full under-
pavement drainage is rarely likely to be economically justifed for LVSRs.
In order to make due allowance in the design process for the effects of moisture
changes on subgrade and pavement strengths, assessment of these strengths
should be made at the highest moisture contents likely to occur in the materials
during the design period.
In terms of pavement design, the two moisture zones in the pavement which are
of critical signifcance are:
the equilibrium zone
the zone of seasonal moisture variation
From the above, it follows that, if the pavement of a typical LVSR has un-
surfaced shoulders, the outer wheeltrack will lie over the zone of seasonal
variation, and the feld material strength in this zone becomes critical in the
design of LVSRs (see Figure 5.16). However, for LVSR pavements with
sealed shoulders at least one metre in width, the traffc loads will lie over
the equilibrium zone where the feld material strength may be more confdently
predicted, and the use of unsoaked material strengths in design become possible.
Box 5.8 - Prediction of moisture content for use in pavement design
From extensive research work carried out in South Africa (in locations
representative of much of southern Africa), it was found that
31
:
In LVSR pavements over a deep water table (which covers much of the
rural road network of the SADC region), moisture contents in the
equilibrium zone normally reach an equilibrium value about two years
after construction and remain reasonably constant thereafter.
In the zone of seasonal variation, the pavement moisture does not reach
an equilibrium and fuctuates with variation in rainfall. Generally, this
zone is wetter than the equilibrium zone in the rainy season and it is
drier in the dry season.
The zone of seasonal variation of moisture extends horizontally from
600 mm to 1000 mm from the edge of surfaced pavements, and is more
prominent in the upper layers.
To reduce substantially the probability that the part of the pavement
immediately under the wheel load is infuenced by seasonal variations,
it has been found that the minimum width of sealed shoulders should
be one metre for design traffc of less than 3 million ESA and 1.2
metres for design traffc greater than 3 million ESA.
Shoulder sealing is highly benecial to the
perjormance oj L\SRs, especially where
moisture sensitive materials are used.
Figure 5.16 - Moisture zones in a typical LVSR
Temperature and humidity: Temperature and humidity play an important role
in the performance of a road pavement with a bituminous surface, especially
on low-volume roads. For example, ultraviolet radiation from sunlight causes
a continuous slow hardening, reduction in elasticity and consequent embrittle-
ment and cracking of the bitumen. Once the surface integrity has been lost,
water can then penetrate the cracks into the underlying pavement structure,
leading to a reduction in pavement strength and to an increased rate of
deterioration under repeated wheel loads.
Various combinations of temperature and humidity can also give rise to hydro-
genesis (i.e. the aerial-well effect) and the migration of water under a bituminous
surfacing. An explanation given for this phenomenon is that ambient air, after
penetrating the porous shoulders of the pavement, fows through the aggregate
pavement layer
32
. Under certain temperaure conditions, water vapour in the air
is then transferred to the surfaces of the aggregate particles where it forms a
liquid water flm. From this explanation, it is tentatively suggested that hydro-
genesis could occur under the surfacing of bituminous pavements with a mean
base course temperature above 20
O
C and especially if the diurnal base course
temperature range is greater than 10
O
C. These conditions are usually found in
the arid and semi-arid areas of the SADC region in summer. Thus, with moisture
sensitive natural gravels, some allowance may have to be made for hydrogenesis
in the design of the pavement.
Measures to overcome the adverse effects of temperature, including a judicious
choice of surfacing type and binder, are discussed in Section 5.5.5.
Subgrade SoIIs
The support provided by the subgrade, in terms of its stiffness, is the most
important factor determining pavement design thickness, composition and
performance. The stiffer the subgrade, the less the layer thicknesses and
component material strengths required to carry a given traffc loading. As
emphasized in Chapter 6, every effort should be made to exploit the maxi-
mum stiffness potential of the subgrade by compacting to refusal with the
heaviest plant available. However, care should also be taken to avoid over-
stressing of some soils, especially those with a bonded fabric which can break
down under excess compaction.
For a given material type, the subgrade strength and stiffness are dependent on
the conditions at construction and during service in terms of moisture content
and density. It is therefore essential that estimates of these two parameters be
obtained as a basis for establishing the design subgrade condition, which
provides a basic input into most low-volume road design methods.
The density to which a subgrade material
is compacted can have a signicant ejject
upon its strength. \ariability in density is
also a matter oj concern as it will result in
dijjerential dejormation due to trajc com-
paction.
Consideration should be given to the
depth to which ejjective compaction can
be achieved. /n some circumstances, the
strength oj the unimproved subgrade below
the depth oj ejjective compaction may be a
critical consideration in the design oj the
total pavement system.
From investigations carried out across a wide range of climatic regimes and soil
types in the SADC region
17,31
, the eld/optimum moisture ratios measured at
the wettest time of the year are given in Table 5.8.
Table 5.8 - Variation of subgrade eld/optimum moisture content with
climatic zone
10
Weinert N-Value > 4 (arid/semi-
arid)
2 - 4 (semi-arid/
sub-tropical)
< 2 (sub-tropical/
humid)
FMC/OMC* 0.5 - 0.7 0.75 - 1.25 1.0 - 1.5
* Measurement made in outer wheel track of pavement
The conclusions drawn from this research
17
provide critical inputs in the
design of LVSRs and may be summarized as follows:
the most important variables affecting equilibrium moisture content of the
subgrade are material type and climate, with the effect of the former
predominating
subgrade moisture content increases with ner, plastic materials and
generally varies inversely with maximum dry density, but directly with
optimum moisture content and soaked moisture content m
the equilibrium moisture content in the subgrade increases with wetter
climates; in the subbase and base it appears to be independent of climate
the ratio of equilibrium to optimum moisture content in the subgrade, and
to a lesser extent in the subbase, increases with wetter climates, but in the
base it is almost independent of climate
These values highlight the effect of climate on subgrade moisture content
and the importance of dening appropriate design subgrade conditions,
particularly for the weaker, more moisture-sensitive materials.
Pavement Materials
Material Selection: Despite the innumerable inuences that exist, there are
some dominant factors in pavement performance that can be identied in
order to design and construct LVSRs in a wide range of environments with
reasonable condence. These dominant factors are:
trafc loading (represented by the design ESAs)
environment (represented by the Weinert N-value/rainfall)
material properties (represented by the materials plastic modulus calculatedd
by multiplying the PI by the percentage passing the 0.425mm sieve)
pavement conguration (cross-section)
Material Characteristics: Table 5.9 summarises the characteristics of various
material types that critically affect the way in which they can be incorporated
into an appropriate pavement conguration in relation to their properties and the
prevailing conditions of trafc, climate, economics and risk assessment.
Table 5.9 - Pavement material categories and relative characteristics
Parameter
Pavement Type
Unbound Bound
Unprocessed Processed Highly
processed
Very highly
processed
Material types As-dug gravel Screened gravel Crushed rock Stabilised
gravel
Variability High Decreases Low
Plastic Modulus High Decreases Low
Development of
shear strength
Cohesion and
suction
Cohesion, suc-
tion and some
particle interlock
Particle inter-
lock
Particle inter-
lock and chemi-
cal bonding
Susceptibility to
moisture
High Decreases Low
Design
philosophy
Material
strength main-
tained only in a
dry state
Selection criteria reduces volume
oI moisture sensitive, soIt and
poorly graded gravels
Material
strength main-
tained even in
wetter state
Appropriate use Low traIfc load-
ing in very dry
environment
TraIfc loading increases,
environment becomes wetter
High traIfc
loading in wetter
environments
Cost Low Increases High High
Maintenance
reliability
High Decreases Low
Pavement ConBguratIon
As highlighted above, pavement confguration is infuenced by the properties of
the materials being utilized and by water on their performance. Thus, attention
to detail in drainage design and construction is essential for optimum perfor-
mance. Based on the broad material categories and their characteristics, as
summarized in Table 5.9, pavement confgurations have been developed for
the following three zones:
Zone A Confguration: The principal features of the Zone A environment are
relatively low traffc, a dry climatic environment and materials which are high-
ly dependent on soil suction and cohesive forces for development of shear re-
sistance. These forces may well be the only source of shear strength in these
relatively weak materials because a defciency of durable stone prevents reliance
on inter-particle friction. Thus, even modest levels of moisture (> 60% satu-
ration) are enough to reduce confning forces suffciently to cause distress
and failure.
Satisfactory performance with the use of Zone A materials can only be achieved
whilst the pavement remains in a relatively dry, stiff condition, (i.e< 80% of
OMC). Achievement of this state depends on the success of design features used
to inhibit excess moisture movement into the pavement layer from the shoulders
and from the embankment beneath the pavement. This can be achieved by such
measures as sealing the shoulders, as illustrated in Figure 5.17, or by using
unsealed shoulders, relatively low permeability if they do not otherwise impede
internal drainage (Section 6.7).
Depending on the climatic environment,
naturally occurring pavement materials
may need to be brought near to saturation
moisture content jor ejcient compaction,
but it is imperative that they be allowed to
dry back to at least equilibrium moisture
content bejore sealing. Specications will
be necessary to ensure that premature
sealing does not lock in construction
moisture.
Use oj sealed shoulders will maintain the
:one oj seasonal moisture variation outside
oj the outer wheel track.
Good external drainage can be achieved
with a raised embankment and provision oj
sujciently deep side drains, i.e. increasing
crown height.
Figure 5.17 - Pavement conguration for Zone A materials
(unprocessed, unbound materials)
Zone B Conguration: The principal features of Zone B are low to medium
trafc, a dry to moderate climatic environment and materials that have a
moderate dependency on all forms of shear resistance - friction, suction
forces and cohesion. Because of the moderate strength potential of such
materials, concentrations of moisture in the range 60% - 80% saturation
may be enough to reduce the strength contribution from suction or cohesion
sufciently to cause distress and failure
33
. Because of the variable nature of
these materials and their poor internal drainage, emphasis is best placed, on
keeping moisture away from the pavement system by sealing shoulders, as
well as on using pavement materials that can provide a frictional component
of shear strength.
Zone C Conguration: The principal features of Zone C are medium to high
trafc, a moderate to wet climatic environment with materials that have a
minor dependency on suction forces and cohesion and rely either on:
(a) internal friction which is maximized when the aggregate is hard, durable
and well-graded (granular, unbound materials), or
(b) physico-chemical forces which are not directly affected by water (bound,
granular materials)
Very high levels of saturation (80% - 100%) will cause distress which will
usually result from pore pressure effects under wheel loads and mobilization of
plasticity in the ne fractions
33
. To avoid this situation, various positive design
features are required including:
sealed shoulders
use of low-permeability selected lower subbase to protect the subgrade
from moisture movements
a subbase layer to be at least as permeable as the base layer, free to
discharge into deep side drains
Carriageway
l.0 m min.
sealed shoulder
l.0 m min.
sealed shoulder
Subbase/upper
selected subgrade
8ase
Pelatively low Permeability
Seal Seal
CL
5.4.4 DesIgn Process
ExternaI Factors
A
number of factors, which are often of a non-technical nature, can have
a signifcant infuence on the pavement design process. These factors
(political, social, institutional, etc.), were discussed in Chapter 3 and are not
repeated here.
StructuraI DesIgn
Over the past 25 years several methods of pavement design have been
developed in southern Africa based on both mechanistic and empirical methods.
In addition, several methods have also been imported and adapted from overseas
practice for use in the region.
Mechanistic/Analytical Methods: Mechanistic methods are derived from
laboratory studies of the mechanical behaviour of the pavement, in which
materials are exposed to measured stresses and strains. A suitable theory to
compute the stresses and strains in the actual pavement is then used, together
with a transfer function (or calibration factor), that relates the mechanical
response obtained from the laboratory studies to the actual behaviour of the
real pavement.
Mechanistic/analytical design methods require a considerable amount of
material testing and computational effort before they can be properly used.
Moreover, their application to higly variable, naturally occurring materials,
which make up the bulk of LVSR pavements, is questionable and they are very
poor at simulating environmental deterioration and therefore not well suited
to LVSRs.
The South African Mechanistic Design Method (SAMDM)
34
, which is
based on a linear elastic model, and the Elasto-Plastic Design Method (S-N
method), based on a non-linear elastic model, are examples of mechanistic
methods used in the SADC region for pavement design. These methods have
been used in South Africa in the preparation of simplifed design manuals
such as a catalogue of structures in which the materials commonly available
in the region have been tested and the results used to prepare thickness
designs
35
.
Empirical Methods: Empirical methods are derived from empirical studies
of pavement performance in which the design is based on past successful
practice. Empirically based methods are likely to be satisfactory, provided the
materials, environment and conditions of loading do not differ signifcantly
from those which applied during the original empirical studies on which
the designs were based. Thus, the extension of empirical methods to
different loadings, different materials and different environmental conditions
can be achieved only by carrying out expensive and time-consuming full-scale
pavement experiments.
Empirically based methods have been used in the preparation of a number of
simplifed design catalogues of structures in the SADC region, such as the
commonly used TRL ORN 31 (1993)
27
and the DCP Design catalogue
36
.
Appropriateness of Design Methods: Ideally, an appropriate pavement design
method should be based on experience and fundamental theory of structural
and material behaviour developed over time. It should also take account of
local conditions of climate, trafc, available local materials and other environ-
mental factors. It should thus allow the designer to produce an appropriate
pavement structure of sufcient bearing capacity to carry the anticipated trafc
over its design life at a pre-determined terminal level of service.
The following factors provide a benchmark against which the appropriateness
of current design methods may be evaluated for application to LVSRs:
subgrade design classes: These should be narrow enough to take advantage
of the range of strong subgrade materials which predominate over
extensive parts of the region
design trafc classes: These should be relatively d narrow to cater incrementally
for design trafc loadings in the range up to 500,000 ESA
materials classes: There should be a sufcient number of classes to cater
for the full range and differing properties of naturally occurring residual
weathered rocks (e.g. granite, quartzite) and pedocretes (e.g. calcrete,
ferricrete) that occur extensively in the region
materials specications: These should be based on proven eld performance d
in relation to such factors as trafc, subgrade design class, sealed surface
design and geo-climatic zone
Based on the above criteria, the various design methods generally used in the
SADC region were assessed for their applicability to low-volume roads. Those
mentioned in Table 5.10 were generally found to be suitable, with the proviso
that they be used exibly rather than prescriptively.
Table 5.10 - Pavement design methods appropriate for use in the SADC region
Mechanistic-Empirical Methods Empirical Methods
S-N Method (1993)
37
DCP Method (1984)
36
TRH4 (1996)
35
SATCC Pavement Design Guide (1997)
38
TRL ORN 31 (1993)
27
TRL/SADC Pavement Design Guide (1999)
17
In addition to the above generic methods of pavement design methods, there
are a number of other country specic guides/manuals which have been
developed within a few countries in the region. The most prominent ones are: d
Zimbabwe Pavement Design Guide (1975)
39
.
Botswana Roads Design Manual (1982)
40
.
Tanzania Pavement and Materials Design Manual (1999)
41
.
None of the above methods are directly comparable, except on a case by case
basis, because they differ with regard to a number of details such as the range
of trafc and subgrade design classes, design subgrade strength (soaked versus in
situ moisture content) etc. In this regard, some methods are more conservative
than others. Nonetheless, they are all based on research/investigation work
carried out in the region specically for application to low-volume roads.
The designer should become fully conversant with the details of each of
the recommended methods listed above before adopting any particular one
in their area of the SADC region. These methods are fully documented in
the literature.
A brief resum of the generic design methods is given below:
S-N Pavement Design Method (1993): The S-N (Elasto-Plastic) design method
is a mechanistic method based on the elastoplastic behaviour of granular
pavement materials and bituminous surfacings. It uses non-linear analysis
to model the pavement together with empirically derived transfer functions
calibrated with HVS testing to predict the plastic deformation (rutting) in the
granular layers. This approach has provided the basis for the development
of a catalogue of pavement structures catering specically for low-volume
roads.
TRH4 (1996): The TRH4 design method is based on the South African
Mechanistic Design Method which uses linear elastic analysis to model the
pavement in which the stresses and strains that are most likely to initiate failure
in a particular material type have been related to trafc load, via appropriate
transfer functions, some of which were calibrated from HVS testing.
Dynamic Cone Penetrometer (DCP) Method: The DCP design method is an
empirical method developed in South Africa, that uses the in situ measured
bearing capacities of existing pavements, correlating them with HVS tests on
similar material and pavement types.
SATCC Pavement Design Guide (1997): The SATCC Pavement Design Guide
provides a catalogue of pavement structures that were developed through a
desk study of practice deemed appropriate to the region, primarily as exemplied
by TRL Overseas Road Note 31 (1993) and the TRH4 (1996).
TRL ORN 31 (1993): This guide is based on research and experience in over
30 countries mainly tropical and sub-tropical. Previous editions have been
used for the design of LVSRs worldwide. The latest (1993) edition covers a
wider range of materials and structures with a catalogue of designs that cater
for trafc up to 30 million standard axles.
TRL/SADC Pavement Design Guide (1999): This guide is based on the moni-
toring and testing of selected sections of road on the existing networks in Bot-
swana, Malawi, Zambia and Zimbabwe to enable designs to be evaluated. The
research focused on measuring how road pavements performed with time and
trafc and in different climatic conditions. It also identied features which
need to be included in the road design to minimize risk, including environ-
mental inuences, the performance of non-standard materials and actual
modes of deterioration. The output of the research programme was the
development of a t set of new structural design charts and a materials design
procedure for low-volume roads in the region, based on a wide range of
trafc levels, design subgrade classes, materials types and geo-climatic
zones.
Pavement Design Process: The main steps to be followed in carrying out a
design for a LVSR pavement include:
estimating the amount of trafc and the cumulative number of standard
axles that will use the road over the selected design life
assessing the strength of the subgrade soil over which the road is to be built
selecting the most economical combination of pavement t materials and
layer thicknesses that will provide satisfactory service over the design life
of the pavement
Although the above process may appear relatively simple and straight forward, h
there are a number of aspects pertaining to LVSRs which require careful
consideration. These aspects are highlighted in the generic design process
presented in Table 5.11.
Table 5.11 - Typical checklist of LVSR pavement design factors
Main
Parameter
Inuencing item Inuencing item LVSR issue LVSR issue
Design
philosophy
- level of service
- design standard
- interacting environments
- appropriate to LVSRs
- use of appropriate standards
- need to cater for external factors
Design
strategy
- road function/classication
- analysis period
- design life
- staged construction?
- can be primary, secondary or tertiary
- short, medium, long?
- short, medium, long?
- implications on design
Design
trafc
- type and count
- axle loads
- equivalence factors
- power exponent
- tyre pressures
- reliability of data
- seasonality factors; growth projections
- motorised and non-motorised
- damage factors
- impact of overloading
- construction trafc
- basis of choice
- basis of choice (< 4?, > 4? )
- impact; design counter-measures
Materials - availability and type
- selection strategy
- moisture sensitivity
- problem soils (e.g. expansive)
- testing
- properties and impact on design
- specications and test methods
- impact on design and pavement x-section
- design counter-measures
- appropriate test methods
Environment - climatic region
- moisture regime
- temperature and humidity
- modifying inuences
- climate (e.g. El Nino)
- arid/semi-arid, semi-arid/sub-tropical,
sub-tropical/humid?
- soaked, unsoaked, equilibrium moisture
contents for design?
- age hardening of bitumen, hydrogenesis
- irrigation, vegetation, deforestation
- long-term consideration
Practical
considerations
- drainage and hydrology - internal and external drainage
- embankment height; crown height above
drain invert level
Structural
design
- pavement design method - use of appropriate methods of design
- sealed or unsealed shoulders
Cost analysis - economic life-cycle cost
analysis
- economic analysis methods (producer
surplus, consumer surplus?)
- evaluation tools (HDM4, RED, etc)
Cost Comparisons
In order to arrive at an optimum pavement design solution, a life-cycle cost
analysis should be made of all potential design alternatives capable of providing oo
the required level of service for the lowest cost over the analysis period.
The main economic factors which determine the cost of the pavement facility
include:
analysis period
structural design period
construction costs
maintenance costs
user costs
discount rate
The life-cycle cost associated with a particular design alternative is illustrated
in Figure 5.18.
Figure 5.18 - Components of a typical life-cycle cost analysis
As indicated in Table 5.7, a relatively shorter design life is frequently used
for low-volume roads. Moreover, user costs are not necessarily traffc related
and, especially at the low end of the traffc spectrum, may well be manifested
otherwise.
The optimum pavement design solution, which should be the design objective,
is a balance between construction, maintenance and road user costs and, as
illustrated in Figure 5.19, is very much traffc related
42
. Thus, the optimum
structural capacity pavement for a LVSR might well incur lower initial
construction costs but, within its life cycle, this would be balanced by higher
maintenance and VOC. Conversely, a higher capacity pavement would incur
higher initial construction costs but lower maintenance and VOC.
Figure 5.19 - Combined cost for various pavement structural capacities
Key:
PC|nitial Pavement Construction
PMPoutine Maintenance
STSurface Treatment
PvPesidual value
OvOverlay
Analysis Period
Structural Design Period
PC
ST
Ov
ST
Pv
PM PM PM PM
7ime (Years)
C
o
s
t
s
d
u
r
i
n
g
I
i
f
e
c
y
c
I
e
VTFSDPTUT VTFSDPTUT
5.4.5 DesIgn Output
SeIected DesIgn
T
he cost analysis should be regarded as an aid to decision-making as it
does not necessarily include all factors leading to a decision and should
therefore not override all other considerations. These other considerations
include the various exogenous factors discussed in Chapter 3, which are
particularly important in the provision of low-volume roads.
uantIBcatIon and MItIgatIon oI HIsk
One of the major aspects concerning the use of marginal materials and thin
pavement structures is the perceived increased risk of failure, particularly as
regards the adverse impact of moisture on pavement performance. Thus, once
the fnal design has been selected and pavement construction is undertaken,
it is necessary to ensure that the critical design assumptions are incorporated
into the pavement both during and after construction. These include:
drainage provision
material quality
subgrade bearing capacity
construction control
overloading
maintenance
Depending on circumstances, some of these factors will be more important
than others. Generally, the risk of failure can be expected to increase if a
number of factors are relaxed together. If one or the other of the design
assumptions cannot be met due to some unforeseen constraint, it may be
possible to adjust the overall design in a number of ways. For example, it
may be feasible to reduce material standards but there might be a concomitant
need to improve drainage and bearing capacity or, if design assumptions are
not met in the lower pavement layers, it may be possible to adjust the over-
all design by using higher-strength upper layer materials or thicker courses in
the upper parts of the pavement.
Ultimately, as with all road projects, control of construction quality,
maintenance and overloading will ensure that the maximum benefts will be
obtained from the recommended design.
PerIormance
Box 5.9 - Why do gravel road bases often perform better than predicted?
Many bituminous pavements constructed of natural gravels have performed
exceptionally well despite extensive overloading (according to the 4
th
power law)
and poor maintenance. The following factors may explain this:
- reduced traffc loading (extended 'life) due to inappropriate damage exponent
- good (strong) subgrade materials
- pavement design thickness based on unduly conservative saturated subgrade
conditions
- predominantly dry environment
- stiffer pavement layers than anticipated at the design stage (base, subbase
and subgrade)
- inappropriate materials specifcations
The above uncertainties emphasise the need for developing local standards,
specifcations and pavement performance relationships.
5.5 Surfacing
5.5.1 Introduction
A
s highlighted in this Guideline, gravel deposits in many SADC countries
are not only a nite, non-renewable resource but, in many areas, are either
non-existent or inaccessible. There is also an increasing awareness that,
even at relatively low trafc volumes, the upgrading of unpaved roads to a
sealed standard can be more cost-effective than maintaining the unpaved gravel d
road. As a result, the use of bituminous surface treatments over light pavement
structures for the upgrading of a substantial length of gravel roads in the
SADC region is expected to become more widespread.
There is a wide variety of bituminous surface treatments that can be used on
LVSRs. In addition to the traditional chip seal there are a number of relatively
little known alternative surfacings which, in appropriate circumstances,
allow non-standard local materials to be judiciously used in situations where
the use of conventional materials would be prohibitively expensive. There is
also a range of labour-based bitumen surfacing techniques which, although
still inadequately exploited, offer scope for providing benecial employment
to small contractors and local communities.
5.5.2 Objective
T
he main objective of this section is to highlight the wide variety of bituminous
surface treatment types that are available for use with LVSRs and to provide
guidance on their selection in relation to a range of prevailing circumstances.
In so doing, the section deals with the following aspects of surfacings for
LVSRs:
Role and Function of Surfacings. Selection of Surfacing Type.
Types and Performance Characteristics. Surfacing Design.
Constituents, Properties and Specications.
5.5.3 Role and Function of Surfacings
P
avement surfacings full a variety of functions which offer a number of
advantages over unsealed roads. The characteristics of these functions are:
seal and protect the base and provides strength at the road surface so
that the latter can resist the abrasive and disruptive forces of trafc
transmit to the base the vertical and horizontal forces imposed by moving
trafc. Have no signicant load-distributing properties
protect the pavement from moisture ingress, thus preventing loss of pave-
ment strength, thereby permitting the use of many materials that t would t d
otherwise not be appropriate
improve safety by providing a superior skid-resistant surface, free from m
corrugations, dust and mud, often increasing light-reecting characteristics
and allowing the application of pavement markings
prevent gravel loss, resulting in elimination of the costs of replacing gravel,
a nite, non-renewable resource
generate savings in vehicle operating costs due to improved riding quality
and lower maintenance costs to maintain an acceptable level of service
Typical gravel road.
Typical LVSR offering many advantages
over an unsealed road. In certain circum-
stances a bituminous surfacing may be
warranted at trafc levels of less than 100
vpd.
5.5.4 Types and PerIormance CharacterIstIcs
SurIacIng types
V
aiious types of bituminous suifacing aie available foi use on LVSRs in the
SADC iegion. These aie illustiated in Figuie 5.20.
Figure 5.20 - Schematic common types of bituminous surface treatments
The above suifacing types offei a iange of options and oppoitunities foi
addiessing the paiticulai challenge of pioviding appiopiiate, affoidable and
sustainable ioad suifacings. They have been developed to apply to specinc
situations ielating to tiafnc volume and type, enviionment, pavement stiuc-
tuies, mateiial availability, etc. The challenge is to match the suifacing type
to the pievailing ciicumstances in the most cost-effective and sustainable
mannei.
MechanIsm oI perIormance
The vaiious bituminous suiface tieatments (excluding asphalt conciete)
illustiated in Figuie 5.20 may be placed in two categoiies as iegaids
theii mechanism of peifoimance undei tiafnc as follows.
Category A: (sand seal, slurry seal, Otta seal)
These seal types iely to vaiying extents on a combination of mechanical paiticle
inteilock and the binding effect of bitumen foi theii stiength, similai to a
bituminous piemix. Eaily tiafncking and/oi heavy iolling is necessaiy to
develop the ielatively thick bitumen nlm aiound the paiticles. On this basis, the
likelihood of stone becoming dislodged and whipped off the ioad by vehicles is
ielatively small.
Undei tiafncking, the seal acts as a stiess-dispeising mat compiising of a
bitumen/aggiegate admixtuie - a mechanism of peifoimance which is quite
diffeient fiom that of Categoiy B suifacings.
Category B: (chip seal)
This seal type ielies on the bindei to glue the aggiegate paiticles to the
base, this being the piimaiy objective of the bindei. Wheie shouldei-to-
shouldei contact between the stones occuis, some mechanical inteilock is
mobilized. Should the bitumen/aggiegate bond be bioken by tiafnc oi pooi
adhesion, in-sufncient mateiial stiength, watei ingiess oi numeious othei
causes, whip off of the aggiegate by tiafnc is almost inevitable. Undei tiafncking,
the aggiegate is in diiect contact with the tyie and iequiies ielatively high
iesistance to ciushing and abiasion to dispeise the stiesses without distiess.
SAND SEAL
1 Prime
2 Binder
3 Sand
SINGLE CHIP
SEAL
1 Prime
2 Binder
3 Stone
CAPE SEAL
1 Prime
2 Binder
3 Stone
4 Slurry
DOUBLE CHIP
SEAL
1 Prime
2 Binder
3 Large stone
4 Binder
5 Small stone
l
3
2
l
2
3
l
2
3
4
5
l
3
2
4
SINGLE OTTA
SEAL
No Prime
1 Binder
2 Graded
aggregate
ASPHALT
CONCRETE
1 Prime
2 Asphalt
Premix
2
l
DOUBLE OTTA
SEAL
No Prime
1 Binder
2 Graded
aggregate
2. layer
l. layer
l
2
l
2
l
2
Category A
SurIacing
Category B
SurIacing
Sand seal surfacing.
Double chip seal.
Single Otta seal with sand seal cover.
The Cape seal is a hybrid type of seal fall-
ing between Category A and Category B
type surfacings.
The mechanism of performance of slurry seals is similar to that of a very thin
bituminous premix, which tends to harden relatively rapidly and become stiff
and brittle. The behaviour of sand seals is similar to that of slurry seals but
they tend to remain exible for longer. As a result of the difference in the
mechanism of performance under trafc between Category A and Category
B, they also differ markedly with respect to such factors as material requirements,
design approach, construction features. Examples of these differences are listed
in Table 5.12.
Table 5.12 - Relative differences in required properties
between surface treatment types on LVSRs
Parameter Category A Category B
Aggregate
quality
Relaxed requirements in terms of
strength, grading, particle shape,
binder adhesion, dust content, etc.
Allows extensive use to be made of
natural gravels.
Stringent requirements in terms of
strength, grading, particle shape,
binder adhesion, dust content, etc.
Allows limited use to be made of
locally occurring natural gravel.
Binder type Relatively soft (low viscosity) binders
are required.
Relatively hard (high viscosity)
binders are normally used.
Design Empirical approach. Relies on guide-
line and trial design on site. Amenable
to design changes during construction.
Rational approach. Relies on conrm-
atory trial on site. Not easily amenable
to design changes during construction.
Construction Not sensitive to standards of work-
manship. Labour-based approaches
relatively easy to undertake if desired.
Sensitive to standards of workman-
ship. Labour-based approaches
relatively easy to undertake if desired.
Durability
of seal
Enhanced durability due to use of
relatively soft binders and a dense seal
matrix.
Reduced durability due to use of
relatively hard binders and open seal
matrix.
Performance Characteristics
The performance of a bituminous surfacing in terms of its life depends on a
number of factors including:
type of surfacing
pavement structure (bearing capacity)
trafc using the road
environment
road characteristics (geometry curvature, gradient, camber, inter-sections,
etc.)
Experience in the SADC region has indicated the approximate ranges of lives for f
the different seal types given in Table 5.13. In addition to the factors listed
above, seal life will also depend on such factors as aggregate quality, bitumen
type and durability, and construction quality.
Table 5.13 - Expected service lives for some of the typical surface seals
Type of seal Typical service life (years)
Sand seal
Slurry seal
Single chip seal
Double sand seal
Double chip seal
Single Otta seal plus sand seal
Cape Seal (13mm + single slurry)
Cape Seal (19mm + double slurry)
Double Otta seal
2 - 4
2 - 6
4 - 6
6 - 9
7 - 10
8 - 10
8 - 10
12 - 16
10 -14
Example of a double Otta seal (using de-
composed granite) after 10 years in service
in a harsh, semi-arid environment with
practically no maintenance.
5.5.5 Constituents, Properties and Specications
T
he primary constituents of bituminous surface treatments are the aggre-
gate and the bituminous binder, which together full different functions,
depending on the type of surfacing.
Aggregates
The main functions of the aggregate are to provide:
adequate resistance to crushing and abrasion caused by moving wheel loads
in order to transfer the tyre-induced stresses to the underlying pavement
structure
a skid-resistant surface in order to minimize skidding of vehicles, especially
in wet weather
a structure/matrix to accommodate the viscous and impervious binder
protection to the binder from harmful ultra-violet radiation
The physical attributes which affect the performance of the aggregate in a
surface treatment are related to their natural and processed properties, as
indicated in Table 5.14. d
Table 5.14 - Requirements for surfacing aggregates
Property Requirements/implications on performance
Strength
need for adequate resistance to avoid crushing and abrasion under trafc
and consequent loss of stone, bleeding/ushing;
affected by particle shape, with cubical materials being stronger than
aky or elongated materials;
specication limits are placed in terms of:

-
-
-
-
-
-
Aggregate Crushing Value (ACV)
10% Fines Aggregate Crushing Value (10% FACT)
Aggregate Impact Value (AIV)
Los Angeles Abrasion (LAA)
Texas Wet Ball Mill (TBM)
Flakiness Index (FI)
the greater the percentage of weak/soft particles, the higher the ACV, AIV, tt
LAA or TBM values and the lower the 10% FACT
Durability
need for adequate resistance to weathering to avoid crushing, loss of

stone and bleeding/ ushing
related to weathering of material and alteration of primary minerals in
the rock to secondary minerals (e.g. iron oxides, carbonates, clay
minerals)
specication limits are placed in terms of:
-
-
-
-
-
wet/dry 10% FACT/ACV/AIV ratios
wet/dry 10% FACT/ACV/AIV ratios after 24 hour or 4 - day soaking
in ethylene glycol
Durability Mill Index (DMI) test
Magnesium/Sodium Sulphate soundness test
Methylene Blue Value (MBV)
Adhesion
need for good adherence to binder and non-susceptibility to stripping so

as to prevent loss of aggregate/ravelling
aggregates containing acidic minerals (e.g. quartzite, granite) or very
ne grained aggregates having smooth surfaces (e.g. silcretes or river
gravels) tend to exhibit poor adhesion properties
adhesion problems can be overcome through use of cationic bitumen
emulsionsand/or anti-stripping agents and/or pre-coating of aggregate
specication limits placed in terms of:
-
-
-
Riedel and Weber test.
Static Immersion test (Modied Vialit adhesion test).
Fines and dust content
The operational characteristics of the Otta
seal are such as to allow the use of as-dug
natural gravel which can be screened, if
necessary, to remove nes and oversize
material.
Screened gravel used as surfacing aggregate
in the Otta seal.
Water and
binder
absorption
need Ior minimum absorption to avoid high binder absorption and loss
oI stone iI not compensated in design
related to water ingress and resulting decrease in strength/ durability oI
aggregate and susceptibility to stripping
need to allow Ior binder absorption when using absorptive aggregates
(e.g.calcrete) by increasing binder application rates and/or pre-coating
specifcation limits are placed in terms oI water absorption
Polishing
need Ior good resistance to polishing in order to reduce scope Ior accidents
due to skidding,especially in wet weather related to micro-texture oI
aggregate, which is a Iunction oI its mineralogy. Some aggregates (e.g.
limestone) are more prone to polishing than others (e.g.dolerite)
specifcation limits are placed in terms oI the Polished Stone Value (PSV)
Mineralogical
composition
need Ior 'Iresh durable aggregates as maniIested by no/low secondary

mineral content to avoid loss/breakdown oI stone
most secondary minerals are deleterious to the durability oI aggregates
and secondary mineral content is directly related to such properties as
water absorption and indirectly to strength (e.g. 10 FACT)
specifcation limits are placed in terms oI the secondary mineral content
Organic
matter
need Ior aggregate to be Iree oI contaminants so as to avoid poor binder

adhesion and loss oI stone cover
related to material fner than 75 microns, which normally has high
binder absorption
no organic matter allowed in rocks
Grading
need Ior control on grading and dust content Ior rational design purposes
as well as to avoid problems with bitumen adhesion caused by dusty
aggregates
the use oI larger single-sized stone in certain seals (e.g. chip seals)
allows more latitude with binder application rate beIore voids are flled
and fushing/bleeding becomes a problem
specifcations limits are placed on grading
Particleshape
Ior some seals (e.g. chip seal) need Ior aggregate to be as cubical as
possible Ior better particle interlock
particle shape is strongly dependent on type oI crusher (e.g. cone crushers
tend to produce better particle shape than impact crushers)
certain materials are prone to producing faky material (e.g. silcrete,
basalt)
specifcation limits are placed on the Flakiness Index
HInders
The functions of the bituminous binder are to bind the aggregate particles
together and to the underlying surface, as well as to provide a waterproof seal.
The rheology of the binder allows it to deform and relieve stresses in the
surfacing caused by defections of the pavement. The binder should be capable
of conforming to the defections at the coldest conditions expected, otherwise
cracking will occur. Once cracks have occurred, ingress of water will usual-
ly result in rapid degradation of the surfacing, particularly where moisture-
sensitive materials are used in the construction of the pavement.
The durability of the bituminous binder is a key factor in the performance of
surface treatments. Being a thermoplastic material, bitumen stiffens with a
decrease in temperature and softens with an increase. With time, the binder
in the seal hardens until it can no longer withstand the movement caused
by diurnal temperature changes or fexure under heavy vehicles and cracking
occurs, or until the bond between the cover aggregate and the binder fails and
stone particles are displaced by traffc. The life of such a surfacing is thus
critically dependent on the rate of the hardening of the binder and depends on the
following factors:
Photomicrograph oj jresh basalt unaltered
plagioclase microphenocrysts.
Cubical chipings are essential jor good
particle interlock in Chip seals.
climatic regime (solar radiation, maximum and minimum temperature)
binder lm thickness
intrinsic resistance of the binder to thermal oxidation hardening. This can
be measured by the ARRB Durability test or by the Rolling Thin Film
Oven test (RTFOT) n
In areas where low temperatures are experienced the binder may become
sufciently hard during cold periods for the surfacing to become distressed.
On the other hand, if the same surfacing is in an area with a mild climate,
then distress will not occur until the binder has aged. Thus, the hardness level
at which seals rst show signs of distress (as indicated by viscosity measured
at 45
O
C) will vary with climate.
Figure 5.21 shows the relationship between bitumen hardening and seal life
for bitumen of a given durability in an environment (Australia) which is very
similar in many respects to that of the SADC region. This relationship shows
the signicant effect of temperature on the ageing/hardening of bitumens.
A 5
O
C difference in the yearly mean of daily maximum and minimum air
temperatures causes a halving of seal life. Since the rate of ageing/hardening
is dependent on the durability of a binder, every effort should be made to
use bitumens with the highest levels of durability.
The ARRB durability test has been used in Australia since the mid 1970s for
measuring bitumen durability. Most Australian State Road Authorities specify
a minimum durability requirement for their bitumen. This test or the RTFOT
is certainly worthy of wider use in the SADC region in order to engender a
keener appreciation of the quality of the bitumens being used and of the effect
of bitumen durability on seal life.
Cape seals and single or double Otta seals with a sand seal cover, are
generally less susceptible to ageing and surface cracking than conventional
chip seals as indicated in the empirical data in Table 5.13. The close tex-
tured surface provided by the graded aggregate in Otta seals, together with
the sand seal or the rich slurry (in Cape seals), offer a higher degree of
protection to the binder in the underlying layers than is provided by the second
seal in the more open-textured chip seals.
Figure 5.21 - Bitumen hardening graph for bitumen of a given durability
44
The ARRB Durability Test
43
The ARRB Durability test measures the
intrinsic resistance of a bitumen to thermal
oxidation hardening. In the test, a 20 micron
lm of bitumen is deposited onto the walls
of glass bottles and these are exposed in
a special oven at 100 l
O
C. Bottles are then
withdrawn periodically, the bitumen is re-
moved and its viscosity measured at 45 d
O
C.
The durability of the bitumen, is the time in
days for it to reach an apparent viscosity of
5.7 log Pa.s (distress viscosity).
The model illustrated in Figure 5.21 takes the following form:
Log d = 0.476TY
0.5
- 0.0227DY
0.5
+3.59 (Pearson multiple correlation = 0.93)
(Standard error of estimate of log d = 0.19)
Where: d = the viscosity of the bitumen recovered from the sprayed seal (Pa.s at 45
O
C)
T = average temperature of the site calculated from the equation
D = ARRB Durability Test result (days)
Y = number of years since the seal was constructed
T = (T
max
+ T
min
)/2 (T
max
= yearly mean of daily maximum air temperature (
O
C)
(T
min
= yearly mean of daily minimum air temperature (
O
C)
Commonly used binders: The following types of bituminous binders are in
common use in the region:
Health aspects of foamed tar
45
Tar is ojten perceived to be carcinogenic in
all jorms without considering the manner in
which the constituents oj the tar are produced.
The two main methods oj tar production are
pyrolysis oj coal, which jorms coke oven tar,
and the Lurgi process, which produces gas-
ier tar.
Those components oj tar which are be-
lieved to be carcinogenic are released to the
atmosphere only at temperatures >360
o
C. At
that temperature, the harmjul carcinogens
are prevalent in coke oven tar but practi-
cally insignicant in gasier tar. Thus,
cold-placed joamed tar is a saje, viable
construction material jor stabilisation oj
sub-standard pavement materials.

Penetration grade: 80/100 or 150/200 penetration grade is normally
used in most surface treatments, except in Otta seals which require softer
grades, usually in the form of cutback bitumens.
As a general guide, the viscosity of penetration grade binders is chosen
with regard to the prevailing temperatures during construction and the
stability under traffc. Harder (high viscosity) grades are more diffcult to
use but may be necessary to cater for heavy traffc in high ambient
temperatures.
Cutback bitumen: MC 3000 and MC 800 are commonly used, mostly
in colder climates, where a relatively low viscosity binder is required to
coat fne-grained aggregates (e.g. in an Otta seal), or damp aggregates,
or to improve binder/aggregate adhesion. MC30 and MC 70 are used
as a prime coat.
Cut-back bitumens are produced by diluting a penetration grade
binder with the appropriate 'cutter to achieve the desired characteristics.
After construction, the diluents evaporate with time and the binder reverts
back to its original penetration grade.
Bitumen emulsion: Both anionic and cationic emulsions with high bitumen
content (>60%) are used in most surface treatments and in a diluted form
for the rejuvenation of surface treatments or in situations where it is not
possible to use high cutter concentrations.
Tar: This is known for its good adhesive and coating properties and good
resistance to stripping by the action of water. However, certain tars (coke
oven rather than gasifer) are no longer in common use because of potential
environmental disadvantages. Low-viscosity 3/12 EVT tar is used as a
prime coat.
Modied bitumen: Binders modifed with rubber or with other constituents
generally exhibit improved durability properties and are generally used
in special circumstances, such as in very aggressive climatic (extreme
temperature) environments.
Recommendations on the use of the above binders and the related safety
aspects are covered in various SABITA manuals.

SpecIBcatIons
Specifcations for surfacing aggregates vary from country to country in the
region both in the type of specifcations and in the applied limits of similar
test methods. Table 5.15 gives the specifcation limits for various aggregate
tests for a representative selection of SADC and other countries. Some countries
place more demanding limits than others and some countries qualify their
specifcations by traffc and others do not.
Table 5.15 - Some specihcations for surfacing aggregates
Test
Property
Botswana South
Africa
Zimbabwe
(Trafc)
Australia
(Trafc)
- - (< 2x10
6
ESA) (AADT < 300)
10 FACT (kN)
- Dry
- Wet/Dry ratio
~ 210
~ 0.75
~ 210
~ 0.75
~ 120
~ 0.65
~ 135
~ 0.60
Max. LAA () - - 35
25
-
Max. FI () 30 30 30 35
TBM Value - - - 30
Unsound Stone
Content ()
- - - 8
Adhesion (R&W)* 1 - - 2
Max() Sodium
or magnesium
sulphate soundness
- - 20 12
* The scales used to describe the degree of stripping vary between countries.
Example oj a 10 year old crushed coral
stone surjacing aggregate which does not
meet traditional strength and durability
criteria but, nonetheless, has perjormed
very satisjactorily in a L\SR situation.
Aggregate htness for purpose
Box 5.10 - How appropriate are existing aggregate specihcations?
Most existing national aggregate specifcations are 'blanket type specifcations
covering materials for all categories of roads. They suffer from a number of
shortcomings including:
They are seldom traffc related and often rule out the use of non-standard
aggregates. For example, a material that is marginal in terms of strength
may fail when carrying high traffc volumes on a main road with a high
percentages of heavy vehicles, but may perform very satisfactorily in a
low-volume rural road situation.
They do not take into account the differing mechanisms of performance of
the different seal types. For example, a strong, cubically shaped aggregate
with a low fakiness index may be critical for the satisfactory performance of a
chip seal but much less so for an Otta seal.
The basis of derivation of some specifcations, e.g. the minimum 10% FACT
value of 210 kN, as employed in a number of countries, seems to be related
to the traditional use of steel-wheeled rollers to embed the chippings and
the related need for aggregate with a relatively high crushing strength.
However, the current, common use of pneumatic-tyred rollers for this
purpose does not require aggregates with such high crushing strength,
yet the limits remain the same as before.
The above examples indicate that in many instances traditional aggregate
specifcations are inappropriate for use with LVSRs and that there is consider-
able scope for relaxing them on the basis of experience and research evidence.
Ultimately, the challenge is to ft the materials available to an appropriate
seal type and design rather than vice versa.
Proposed Revision to Specications
Revisions to the specications for the commonly used chip seal are proposed
and are given in Table 5.16. These are based on a review of international
specications, notably in Australia and New Zealand, as well as on experi-
mental evidence and experience of the performance of surfacing aggregates
in the SADC region. Specications for Otta seals are included for comparison.
Table 5.16 - Recommended revisions to chip seal specications for LVSRs
Property
Design limits
Chip Seals Otta Seals
1
Current Proposed
Strength
10% FACT (kN)
210 180 (>500 vpd)
150 (100-500 vpd)
120 (<100 vpd)
110 (> 100 vpd)
90 (<100 vpd)
Grading As typically specied As typically specied Wide grading
Durability
Wet/dry 10% FACT 75% 65%
75% (> 100 vpd)
65% (< 100 vpd)
Flakiness Index (%)
19.0 13.2 mm
9.5 6.7 mm
25
30
35
35
If crushed material used,
35 (weighted on 4.75
to 13.2 mm fractions)
Adhesion R & W 3 No relaxation. Precoat
if R & W <3
Water Absorption - 5 Spray rate adjusted
Polished Stone
Value
- 50 (> 500 vpd)
45 (< 500 vpd)
1 Otta Seal specications should comply with the Botswana Roads Department Guideline No. 1.
5.5.6 Selection of Surfacing Type
Factors affecting choice
T
he choice of the appropriate surfacing type in a given situation will depend
on the relevance of a number of factors, including the following:
trafc (volume and type)
pavement (type - strength and exural properties)
materials (type and quality)
environment (climate - temperature, rainfall, etc.)
operational characteristics (geometry - gradient, curvature, etc.)
safety (skid resistance - surface texture, etc.)
construction (techniques and contractor experience)
maintenance (capacity and reliability)
economic and nancial factors (available funding, life-cycle costs, etc.)
other (external factors)
Trafc volume and type: Practically any type of seal will be appropriate for
low trafc situations, i.e. less than 750 equivalent light vehicles (elv)/lane/
day. However, at very low levels (<250 elv/lane/day), lack of trafc mould-
ing of the binder will result in relatively faster degradation of the seal, mostly
through drying and oxidation of the binder, with the development of shrinkage
cracking. In such a situation, early rejuvenation of the seal may be required
to retain the stone under trafc.
Trafc volume for surfacing selection and
design purposes is often expressed as the
number of equivalent light vehicles (elv)
per day. This is equal to the sum of the num-
ber of light vehicles and 40 times the number
of heavy vehicles.
The use of sand and slurry seals is generally not recommended for traffc
levels of more than about 2000 elv/lane/day as they tend to 'bleed quickly
and eventually break up. At traffc in excess of 5000 elv/lane/day, the use of
a combination of a single chip and sand seal is also risky.
Where high percentages of heavy vehicles (particularly those with tandem and
tridem axles) and/or harsh traffc actions (e.g. heavy braking and tight cornering) are
likely, the use of sand, slurry and single seals should be avoided. In such situations,
asphaltic concrete, or a double chip, Cape or Otta seal is preferable.
Type of pavement: An evaluation of the performance of various types of seals
types constructed on light pavement structures in southern Africa has revealed
that seal life was very dependent on the stiffness of the pavement
46
. The stiffer
the pavement structure, the longer the life of the pavement before cracking.
Defection or 'radius of curvature measurements give an indication of the
likely effects on seal life (Figure 5.22). Since surface defection is directly
related to the elastic modulus of the underlying pavement layers which, in turn,
depends on in situ density then, where feasible, every effort should be made to
compact the pavement layers of LVSRs to the highest density practicable -
i.e. 'compaction to refusal (see Section 6.4.1).
Figure 5.22 - Effect of surface deection on seal life
46
In situations on LVSRs, where weak subgrades occur (e.g. in expansive or
soft clay areas) or where seasonal moisture variations are high (leading to
relatively high defections in the wet season), then the seal types which are
more tolerant of relatively high defections should be selected for use. For
example, Otta seals or chip seals with appropriate modifed binders are more
tolerant of high defections than others (e.g. slurry seals, Cape seals).
A uniform, defect-free surface in the underlying layer is also required to avoid
local distress in the seal. For example, soft bases will result in embedment of
surfacing aggregate leading to loss of skid resistance and possible bleeding.
This problem can be mitigated to some extent by the use of a low viscosity
prime which will penetrate and strengthen the upper layer of the base and, thus
reduce embedment of the aggregate. In contrast, very hard bases could result
in breakdown of soft surfacing aggregate during rolling. To reduce the severity
of this problem rubber-tyred pneumatic rollers, rather than steelwheeled rollers,
should be used.
Heavy braking and tight cornering situa-
tions require an appropriate choice oj high
stability surjacings. Asphaltic concrete and
possibly Cape or double Otta seals are
prejerred to sand, slurry, chip or single
Otta seals.
Bleeding due to embedment oj surjacing
aggregate in base.
Materials: The type of aggregate available for use in a surface treatment has
a major impact on the selection of the seal type. Where traditional aggregates
are available within an economic haul distance, they lend themselves to use
in conventional seals (e.g. slurry seals, chip seals, Cape seals). Conversely,
where such aggregates are not available, then recourse to the use of more
marginal aggregates in terms of, for example, strength or shape, is quite feasible
with graded aggregate seals, such as the Otta seal. Table 5.17 indicates the
types of seal that are best suited to various aggregates with marginal
properties.
Table 5.17 - Seal selection based on marginal properties
Marginal
Property
Recommended seals Inappropriate seals
Grading Otta, sand Slurry, chip, Cape
Strength Otta, sand, slurry Chip, Cape
Durability Otta, sand, slurry, Cape Chip, slurry
Shape Otta, sand, slurry Chip, Cape
Dustiness Otta, sand Chip, slurry
Water absorption Otta, sand Chip, slurry
Environment: Environmental conditions in terms of the exposure of the seal
to solar (ultra-violet) radiation, particularly in high-temperature conditions,
play a critical role in the performance of all seals. The thinner and more
open-textured seals, such as sand, slurry and single chip seals are particularly
prone to early degradation resulting from oxidation and consequent embrittle-
ment of the binder and ravelling of the aggregate. In contrast, Otta seals (single
plus sand seal or double) and Cape seals, are especially suited to high
temperature conditions, owing to the close interlocking aggregate texture
and sand or slurry cover that protects the underlying binder from exposure
to solar radiation.
Operational characteristics: The geometry of the road alignment in terms of
gradient and curvature can have an adverse impact on seal performance. On
steep grades or tight curves, seals are subjected to signifcant tyre-induced
horizontal stresses for which seals with adequate shear strength are required.
In these circumstances, the use of asphaltic concrete might be appropriate and,
to a lesser extent, double chip, Cape or Otta seals would be preferable to sand,
slurry or single chip seals.
Safety: In areas such as intersections, sharp bends and steep grades, adequate
surface texture may be required for safety reasons, particularly in high
rainfall situations. In such situations, certain seals, such as chip seals and
coarsely graded Otta seals, because of their better skid resistance properties,
would be preferable to sand or slurry seals.
Construction: The construction technique employed will usually infuence
the selection of the types of seal. The plant available, use of labour-based
techniques or small contractors will result in the selection of the types of
seal suited to these conditions. Similarly, the experience of the contractor with
specifc types of seal can infuence the quality of some seals (e.g. chip seals)
to a considerably greater degree than with sand or Otta seals.
Loss oj second seal due to bitumen hardening
and embrittlement.
The slurry seal lends itselj to construction
by labour-based methods.
LBM
Maintenance: Where maintenance capacity is high, ravelling, potholes and
cracks can be rapidly and effectively repaired using sand, slurry and Otta
seals. However, where a time lapse between the development of defects
and maintenance is likely, more resistant/thicker seals such as double Otta
seals, double chip seals, Cape seals or even asphaltic concrete are recom-
mended.
Special conditions: Where specic problem conditions occur, the seal
selection must take this into account. For example, where there is a saline n
subgrade or where saline construction materials are involved, then a highly
impermeable seal is required, such as a bitumen-rich double chip seal or a
Cape Seal.
Costs: The cost of constructing bituminous seals can be a signicant
proportion of the overall cost of a pavement, particularly in remote areas n
where trafc is light and aggregate may have to be hauled over long distances.
In very broad terms, for a typical LVSR project with no unusual circum-
stances in terms of excessive hauls or very remote areas, coupled with n
competitive mm tendering, the cost of priming, aggregate, binder and construction
together make up between 10 and 20 per cent of the total road construction cost.
The relative costs of various seals compared with a double chip seal (1.0) are
given in Table 5.18.
Table 5.18. - Relative construction costs of LVSR surfacings
Type of seal Relative cost
With prime Without prime
Sand seal
Slurry seal
Single chip seal
Double sand seal
Double chip seal
Single Otta seal plus sand seal
Cape seal (13mm + single slurry)
Cape seal (19mm + double slurry)
Double Otta seal
0.56
0.85
0.56
0.90
1.00
1.00
1.20
1.60
1.00
N/A
N/A
0.58
0.70
N/A
0.75
0.60
0.90
0.90
The nal selection of the type of surfacing would depend on the outcome of
a life-cycle cost analysis which combines the discounted unit costs of the
following items during service life of the seals under consideration:
construction
maintenance
road user costs
fog spray
reseals
repainting of road markings
cleaning/repair of reectors
Suitability for use on LVSRs
The suitability of various types of surfacings for use on LVSRs, in terms of
their efciency and effectiveness in relation to the operational factors out-
lined above is summarized in Table 5.19.
Table 5.19 - Suitability of various surfacings for use on LVSRs
(Key: SS = sand seal, SlS = slurry seal, SCS = single chip seal, DCS = double chip seal,
CS = Cape seal, SOS+SS = Single Otta seal + sand seal, DOS = double Otta seal, AC =asphaltic concrete)
Parameter Degree Type of surfacing
SS SlS SCS DCS CS SOS+
SS
DOS AC
Service life
required
Short
Medium
Long
Trafc level Light
Medium
Heavy
Impact of
trafc turn-
ing action
Low
Medium
High
Gradient Mild
Moderate
Steep
Material
quality
Poor
Moderate
Good
Pavement
and base
quality
Poor
Moderate
Good
Suitability for labour-
based methods
Contractor
experience/
capability
Low
Moderate
High
Maintenance
capability
Low
Moderate
High
Key
Suitable/
preferred p
Less suitable/
not preferred p
Not suitable/
not applicable pp
Whilst not exhaustive, the factors listed in Table 5.19 provide a basic format
which can be adapted or developed to suit local conditions and subsequently
used to assist in making a choice of surfacing options. These options can then
be subjected to a life-cycle cost analysis and a nal decision made with due
regard to prevailing economic factors and the overall nancial situation.
Box 5.11 - Advantages and disadvantages of Otta seals
Although the choice of surfacing will depend on the particular conditions
prevailing on any particular project and, ultimately, a life-cycle cost analy-
sis, the Otta seal merits particular mention. This relatively new type of
seal has been found to be particularly advantageous in situations where the
following factors play an important role:
road construction in remote areas where, for example, only natural gravels
occur and where it may be prohibitively expensive to set up crushing facilities
contractor capacity may be low and workmanship may be of indifferent quality
fexibility and durability of the surfacing is required to tolerate, for example,
comparatively low-quality, low-bearing capacity bases with relatively high
defections
low maintenance capability
high solar radiation resulting in an increased rate of weathering of the binder
The disadvantages of using Otta seals include the following:
need to cater contractually for the post-construction 'after care of the seal
blending of hot bitumen and cutting agents on site
5.5.7 SurIacIng DesIgn
T
he complexity of surfacing design depends very much on the type of
seal involved. Some types of seals, such as chip seals and the Cape seal,
entail a fairly complex, rational design process which involves selection of the
appropriate aggregate size and calculation of the aggregate and bitumen spray
rates, taking into account such factors as embedment of stone into the base or
existing surface, gradient, climate, traffc speed, etc. Formulae and fgures
are available in the design manuals that allow these factors to be determined
fairly easily.
In contrast to chip and Cape seals, Otta, sand and slurry seals are designed
on the basis of broad guidelines and constructed by 'feel with the required
ability of site personnel to adjust or correct the aggregate and binder application
rates as a project proceeds or as the material quality varies.
The general aspects of seal design for the various surfacing types discussed
above, except for the Otta seal, have all evolved from extensive South African
and British practice as contained in the following documents:
Draft TRH 3 (1996)
47
.
TRL - Overseas Road Note 3
48
.
SABITA Manual 10
49
.
Until relatively recently, no formal guideline or manual existed for the design
of Otta Seals. However, this short-coming has been rectifed by the production
of the following documents:
Ministry of Works and Transport, Roads Department, Botswana:
Guideline No. 1 - The Design, Construction and Maintenance of Otta Seals.
Norwegian Public Roads Administration:
Publication No. 93 - A Guide to the Use of Otta Seals.
Ministry of Works, Tanzania:
Pavement and Materials Design Manual - 1999.
An example oj a single Otta seal with a sand
seal perjorming very satisjactorily ajter
more than 13 years in service and without
any surjacing maintenance in a harsh envi-
ronment.
The Otta Seal guideline contains detailed
injormation on the design, construction,
maintenance, specication and contractual
aspects oj Otta seals.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
The main factors affecting the performance of low-volume roads are
trafc and environment, with the latter being more signicant at low
levels of trafc. Drainage in terms of the crown height is particularly
important. Thus, measures that improve the pavement environment
will signicantly improve the performance of low-volume roads.
Examination of the origins of testing procedures and specications for
road-building materials often reveal that they emanated from very
different environments and for levels of trafc different from those t
that prevail on low-volume roads in the SADC region. It is on the basis
of these tests and specications that many local materials are classied
as sub-standard or marginal but which often perform much better
than expected.
Measures that provide an improved (drier) road environment, such
as sealing of shoulders and deepening of side drains, also enable locally
available materials, previously considered unsuitable for road construction
purposes to be used with greater condence.
The materials available for road construction in much of the region are
weaker than those generally found in Europe or the USA but subgrade
soils tend to be stronger. Thus, strong subgrades and the generally
drier prevailing environment facilitate the use of these sub-standard
local materials in the upper pavement layers.
Pavement designs that are based on research in the region and include
local environmental factors are now available. These designs are
intended to make the best use of locally available materials without d
incurring unacceptable risk of failure. Familiarisation with local
conditions and advice from local professionals will help to ensure
that more appropriate designs can be implemented with condence.
The traditional surfacing for sealing low-volume roads was a chip seal
using a single sized stone with a high strength specication. Other
options are now available that enable lower strength locally available
aggregates to be used in designs that produce durable road surfacings.
Forecasts of vehicle loading and predicted damage to road pavements
are usually based on the 4th power law. In dry environments, road
pavements can be stiffer than usual and there is evidence to suggest
that a lower exponent might be more applicable, thus reducing the
effect of heavy vehicles by comparison with that of lighter ones. t
This chapter has covered aspects of pavement design, materials and surfacing
of LVSRs, which are subject areas in which substantial advances in knowledge
have been made through research in the region. The judicious use of the
recommended designs together with the appropriate construction methods d
covered in Chapter 6, will reduce sealed road construction costs and increase
the provision of rural road infrastructure.
5.6 Summary
T
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
AASHO (1962). The AASHO Road Test: Pavement Research. HRB
Special Report 61E. American Assoc. of State Highway Ofcials,
Washington, D.C.
Johansen J M and P K Senstad (1992). Effects of Tire Pressures on
Flexible Pavement Structures A Literature Survey. Publication No.
62. Norwegian Road Research Laboratory, Oslo.
Netterberg F. (1985): Pedocretes. RR430 NITRR, Pretoria.
Brink A A B and A A R Williams (1964): Soil Engineering Mapping
for Roads in South Africa. CSIR Research Report 227, NIRR Bulletin
6, Pretoria.
Weinhert H H (1980). The Natural Road Construction Materials of
Southern Africa. Pretoria: Academica.
Netterberg F and P Paige-Green (1988): Pavement Materials for
Low-volume Roads in Southern Africa: A review. Proceedings ATC
Conference, Vol. 2B - Appropriate Materials and Methods. Pretoria.
Weinert H H (1974). A Climatic Index of Weathering and its Application
to Road Construction. Geotechnique, Vol. 24, No.4, pp475-488.
McLennan A K (1986). Towards a Strategy for the use of Marginal
and Naturally Occurring Materials in Pavements. 24
th
ARRB Regional
h
Symposium, Bundaberg, Queensland.
Schwartz K (1985). Collapsible Soils. Problems Soils in South Africa
- State of the Art. The Civil Engineer in South Africa. Johannesburg,
July 1985.
Jennings J E and K Knight (1975). A guide to the construction on or
with materials exhibiting additional settlement due to collapseof
grain structure. Proc. Of the 6th African Regional Conference on Soil
Mechanics and Foundation Engineering. Durban, Sepetmber 1975.
Netterberg F (1979). Salt Damage to Roads: An Interim Guide to its
Diagnosis and Repair. Institution of Municipal Engineers of South Africa,
NITRR, CSIR.
Obika B, R J Freer-Hewish, M Woodbridge and D Newill (1995).
Prevention of Salt Damage to Thin Bituminous Surfacings: Design
Guidelines. Proc. Sixth Int. Conf. on Low-volume Roads, Minneapolis,
Minnesota, June 25-29, 1995.
Committee of State Road Authorities (1986). Cementitious Stabilizers
in Road Construction. Draft TRH13. CSRA, Pretoria.
References
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
Austroads (1998). Guide to Stabilisation in Roadworks. Austroads
Publication No. AP-60/98, Sydney.
Overby C (1982). Material and Pavement Design for Sealed Low-
volume Roads in Botswana 1974-81. NRRL Report 1042. Norwegian
Public Roads Administration, Oslo.
Netterberg F and P Paige-Green (1984). Carbonation of Lime
and Cement Stabilised Layers in Road Construction. NITRR Report
RS/3/84, CSIR, Pretoria.
Gourley C S and P A K Greening. (1999). Performance of Low-volume
Sealed Roads: Results and Recommendations from Studies in Southern
Africa. TRL Published Report PR/OSC/167/99. Crowthorne.
Sampson L R and F Netterberg (1984). A Cone Penetrometer Method
for Measuring the Liquid Limits of South African soils. ff Proc. 8th African
Reg. Conf. on Soil mechanics and Foundation Engineering, Harare.
Grace H and D G Toll (1987). Recent Investigations into the Use
of Plastic Laterites as Bases for Bituminous-Surfaced Low-volume
Roads. Proc. Fourth Int. Conf. on Low-volume Roads, Ithaca.
Metcalf J B (1976). Pavement Materials The Use of the California
Bearing Ratio Test in Controlling Quality. ARR No. 48, ARRB, Victoria.
Brown S F, S C Loach and M P OReilly (1987). Repeated Loading of
Fine Grained Soils, University of Nottingham, Nottingham.
Reeves I N (1989). Modied Texas Triaxial Test for Non-Standard
Paving Materials. Workshop on Pavements in Dry Climates, Materials
Branch, Main Roads, Brisbane.
Handy R L and D E Fox (1987). K-Tests for Subgrade and Base
Evaluation. ATC Proceedings, 3 - 7 August 1987, Pretoria.
Semmelink C J (1991). The Use of the DRTT K-Mould for Determining
the Elastic Moduli of Untreated Road-building Materials. ATC Research
Forum, CSIR, Pretoria.
Kleyn E G and G D van Zyl (1988). Application of the DCP to Light
Pavement Design. First Int. Symposium on Penetration Testing, Orlando.
Roads Department, Ministry of Works, Transport and Communications,
Botswana. 2000: Methods and Procedures for Prospecting for Road
Construction Materials. Guideline No. 3, Gaborone.
Transport Research Laboratory (1993). Overseas Road Note 31. A
Guide to the Structural Design of Bitumen-Surfaced Roads in Tropical
and sub-Tropical Climates (1993): TRL, Crowthorne, Berkshire. (4
th
edition).
28.
29.
30.
31.
32.
33.
34.
35.
36.
37.
38.
39.
40.
Van Zyl , N J W and C R Freeme (1984). Determination of Damage
Done to Roads by Heavy Vehicles. Proc. Annual Transport Convention,
Pretoria.
Overby C (1990). Monitoring of Sealed Low-Volume Roads in Botswana
1980 - 1989. NRRL Report 1478. Norwegian Public Roads Administration,
Oslo.
National Association of Australian State Road Authorities. (1984).
Moisture Movements in Pavements and Subgrades. NAASRA, Sydney.
Emery S J (1992): The Prediction of Moisture Content in Untreated
Pavement Layers and Application to Design in southern Africa. CSIR
Research Report 644, DRTT Bulletin 20, CSIR, Pretoria.
Mitchell R L and M Ahronovitz (1972). The Laying of Test Sections
to Measure the Phenomenon of Hydrogenesis at Victoria Falls Airport. rr
Lab. Report 6/72, Ministry of Roads and Road Trafc, Salisbury.
McLennan A K (1986). Towards a Strategy for the Use of Marginal
and Naturally Occurring Materials in Pavements. ARRB Symposium,
Bundaberg. Queensland, March 1986.
Walker R N, W D O Paterson, C R Freeme and C P Marais (1977).
The South African Mechanistic Design Procedure. Proc. 4
th
Int.
h
Conf.
on the Structural Design of Asphalt Pavements, Ann Arbor, Michigan,
August 1977.
CSIR (1981). The Mechanistic Design Method Used to Evaluate the
Pavement Structures in the Catalogue of the Draft TRH 4 1980. Technical
Report RP/2/81. NITRR, CSIR, Pretoria.
Kleyn E G (1982). Aspects of Pavement Evaluation and Design as
Determined with the Aid of the Dynamic Cone Penetrometer (DCP).
M.Eng. Thesis, University of Pretoria, Pretoria.
Wolff H, S J Emery, G D van Zyl and P Paige-Green (1995). Design
Catalogue for Low-volume Roads Developed for South African Conditions.
Proc. Sixth Int. Conf. on Low-volume Roads, Minneapolis, Minnesota,
June 25-29, 1995.
Southern Africa Transport and Communications Commission (1998).
Code of Practice for the Design of Road Pavements (draft). SATCC,
Maputo.
Mitchell R L, C P van der Merwe and H K Geel (1975). Standardised
Flexible Pavement Design for Rural Roads with Light to Medium
Trafc, Ministry of Roads and Road Trafc, Rhodesia Government.
Ministry of Works, Transport and Communications, Botswana (1982).
Roads Design Manual, Roads Department, Gaborone.
41.
42.
43.
44.
45.
46.
47.
48.
49.
Ministry of Works, Tanzania (1999). Pavement and Materials Design
Manual, Dar es Salaam.
C P van der Merwe (1999). Material and Pavement Structures for Low-
volume Roads in Zimbabwe. Unpublished Report, Harare.
Standards Association of Australia (1986). Australian Standard 2341.
Methods of Testing Bitumens.
Olivier J H W O (1990). Models to Predict the Hardening Rate and
Distress Viscosity Level in Sprayed Seals. ARRB, Report No. 182.
Morton B S (2001). The Foamability of Tar and the Engineering
Properties of Foamed Tar Mixes. M. Eng. Dissertation. University of
Pretoria.
Paterson W D O (1987). Road Deterioration and Maintenance Effects, ff
Models for Planning and Management. John Hopkins University Press
for the World Bank, Baltimore, 1987.
Committee of State Road Authorities (1998). Draft TRH3: Surface
Seals for Rural and Urban Roads, CSRA, Pretoria.
Transport Research Laboratory (2000) Overseas Road Note 3. A Guide
to Surface Dressing in Tropical and Sub-Tropical Climates. Overseas
Centre, TRL, Crowthorne, Berkshire. (2nd edition).
SABITA Manual 10 (1992). Appropriate Standards for Bituminous
Surfacings for Low-volume Roads. South African Bitumen and Tar
Association, Cape Town.
Bibliography
American Society for Testing and Materials (1987). Journal of ASTM
Standards, Vol. 4.08. Philadelphia.
Austroads (1992). Pavement Design. A Guide to the Structural Design of
Road Pavements. Austroads Publication No. AP-17/92. Sydney.
Austroads (1995). Sealed Local Roads Manual. Guidelines to Good Practice
for the Construction, Maintenance and Rehabilitation of Pavements. Sydney.
Brink A B A (1979). Engineering Geology of Southern Africa (Volumes
1 - 4) (1979). Building Publications.
Roads Department, Ministry of Works, Transport and Communications
(2001). The Prevention and Repair of Salt Damage to Roads and Runways.
Guideline No. 6.
CEBTP (1980). Practical Guide to Pavement Design for Tropical Countries.
The Ministry of Cooperation.
Collis L and R A Fox (1985). Aggregates. Geological Society, London.
Committee of State Road Authorities (1987). Standard Specication for
Road and Bridge Works. CSRA, Pretoria.
Committee of State Road Authorities (1981). TMH 5: Standard methods
of testing road construction materials. CSRA, Pretoria.
Committee of State Road Authorities (1986). TMH 1: Sampling methods
for road construction materials. CSRA, Pretoria.
Committee of State Road Authorities (1997). TRH 4: Structural Design
of exible pavements for inter-urban and rural roads. CSRA, Pretoria.
Committee of State Road Authorities (1985). TRH 14: Guidelines for
road construction materials. CSRA, Pretoria.
Committee of State Road Authorities (1991). TRH 16: Trafc loading for
pavement design and rehabilitation. CSRA, Pretoria.
Construction Industry Research and Information Association (1988). Laterite
in Road Construction Pavements. Special Publication 47. CIRIA, Westminister,
London.
Croney D and P Croney (1991). The Design and Performance of Road
Pavements. McGraw-Hill Inst.
Division of Roads and Transport Technology (1996). Appropriate Use of
Locally Available Materials in Concrete, Bituminous Surfacings and
Layerworks for Roads in Rural Areas. Project Report RR 93/263. CSIR,
Pretoria.
Dyer C (1982). Road Construction Technology in South Africa, Juta &
Ltd, Cape Town and Johannesburg.
Emery S J, S van Huyssteen and G D van Zyl (1991). Appropriate
Stadards for Effective Bituminous Surfacings: Final report, CSIR Trans-
portek, Pretoria.
Ingles O G and J B Metcalf (1972). Soil Stabilisation Principles and Practice.
Butterworths, Sydney.
Lay M G (1985). Source Book of Australian Roads. ARRB. 3
rd
Ed., Sydney.
Lay M G (1991). Handbook of Road Technology, Gordon and Breach
Science Publishers, Reading.
Metcalf J B (1991). Use of Naturally Occurring but non-Standard Materials in
Low-cost Road Construction, Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, 9.
Mitchell M F, E C P Petzer and N Van der Walt N (1979). The Optimum
use of Natural Materials for Lightly Trafcked Roads in Developing Regions.
Transp. Res. Record 702. Washinton, D.C.
Netterberg F (1993). Low-cost Local Road Materials in southern Africa.
Geotechnical and Geological Engineering. CSIR, Pretoria.
Paige-Green P (1994). Recommendations for the use of Marginal Base
Course Materials in Low-volume Roads in South Africa, CSIR Transportek,
Pretoria.
SABITA Manual 2 (1992). Bituminous products for road construction.
SABITA Manual 7 (SURF+) (1993). Economic Warrants for Surfacing
Roads.
SABITA Manual 11 (1994). Labour-enhanced construction for bituminous
surfacings.
SABITA Manual 12 (1995). Methods and procedures Labour-enhanced
construction for bituminous surfacings.
Toole T and D Newill (1987). Strategy for assessing marginal quality
materials for use in bituminous roads in the tropics. Proc. Seminar H, PTRC
Transport and Planning Summer Annual Meeting, University of Bath,
London.
Visser A T, J H Maree and G P Marais (1983). Implications of Light
Bituminous Surface Treatments on Gravel Roads. 3
rd
Int. Conf. On Low-
volume Roads, Transp. Res. Board, Washington D.C., 1983.
Weston D J (1980). Expansive soil treatment for southern Africa. Proc.4
th
International Conference on Expansive Solis, Denver.
Wooltorton F L D (1954). The Scientic Basis of Road Design. Edward
Arnold Ltd.
Yoder E J and M W Witczak (1975). Principles of Pavement Design,
Wiley, New York.
C
h
a
p
t
e
r

6
1. Introduction
2. Regional Setting
4. Geometric Design
and Road Safety
5. Pavement Design,
6. Construction and
Drainage
7. Maintenance and
Road Management
Construction and
Drainage
6
6.1 Introduction ........................................................... 6 - 1
6.1.1 Construction .................................................. n 6 - 1
6.1.2 Drainage ....................................................... 6 - 2
6.1.3 Purpose and Scope of Chapter ............................ 6 - 2
6.2 Construction Issues .................................................. 6 - 3
6.2.1 Characteristics of LVSRs .................................. 6 - 3
6.2.2 Labour-Based Construction ................................ n 6 - 3
6.2.3 Environmental Considerations ............................. 6 - 4
6.2.4 Mobilisation................................................... n 6 - 5
6.2.5 Contracts ...................................................... 6 - 6
6.2.6 Earthworks Quantities and Design and
Construct Methods ......................................... 6 - 8
6.2.7 Working with Nature ........................................ 6 - 9
6.2.8 Stabilisation ................................................... n 6 - 9
6.3 Construction Equipment ........................................... 6 - 10
6.3.1 Introduction ................................................... n 6 - 10
6.3.2 Equipment Used with Labour-Based Methods ..... ... 6 - 10
6.3.3 Heavy Equipment Units .................................... 6 - 11
6.3.4 Compaction Equipment ..................................... t 6 - 12
6.4 Utilising Soils and Natural Gravels .............................. 6 - 14
6.4.1 General Considerations..................................... 6 - 14
6.4.2 Materials Management ................................... .. 6 - 15
6.4.3 Borrow Pits and the Community .......................... 6 - 16
6.4.4 Clearing, Grubbing and Removal of Topsoil ............ 6 - 17
6.4.5 Construction of Earthworks ............................... 6 - 17
6.4.6 Construction of Pavement Layers ......................... 6 - 18
6.4.7 Dealing with Variability .................................... 6 - 20
6.4.8 Shoulder Construction ...................................... n 6 - 21
6.5 Construction of Seals ............................................... 6 - 23
6.5.1 Selection of Seal Type and Materials .................... 6 - 23
6.5.2 Resources Required on Site ................................ 6 - 23
6.5.3 Aggregate Production ...................................... 6 - 24
6.5.4 Construction Procedure ......................... ........... 6 - 24
6.5.5 Labour Friendliness ......................................... 6 - 25
C
o
n
t
e
n
t
s
6.6 Quality Assurance and Control ................................... 6 - 26
6.6.1 Introduction ................................................... n 6 - 26
6.6.2 Methodology.................................................. 6 - 26
6.7 Drainage ............................................................... 6 - 29
6.7.1 Introduction ................................................... n 6 - 29
6.7.2 Internal Drainage ............................................ 6 - 29
6.7.3 External Drainage............................................ 6 - 33
6.7.4 Hydrology and Hydraulic Calculations ................... 6 - 33
6.7.5 Drainage Structures .......................................... 6 - 34
6.7.6 Erosion ........................................................ n 6 - 36
6.8 Summary............................................................... 6 - 37
6.9 References and Bibliography...................................... 6 - 38
Construction and Drainage 6 - 1
ConsIruuIIon and
DraInage
6
Planning
Design
#ONSTRUCTION
Maintenance
0utot|on ol oct|v|t|es
5
e
q
u
e
n
c
e

o
l

o
c
t
|
v
|
t
|
e
s
6.I 1nIroduuIIon
6.1.1 ConstructIon
C
onstruction is a practical manifestation of the planning and design
phases of LVSR provision in which the constructor faces the challenge
of adopting a construction strategy that is appropriate to the prevailing social,
economic, cultural and other needs of a particular country. In the SADC
region, such a strategy should be aimed at optimising the use of limited
funding by making maximum use of the relatively abundant resource of
labour, indigenous materials and construction skills.
One of the secondary objectives and consequences of adopting an appropriate
construction strategy is that it should reduce the demand for scarce foreign
exchange, principally by reducing the need for plant-intensive operations,
where feasible. This often requires modifcation of conventional construction
management techniques, contract conditions, tender evaluation procedures,
and the administration and fnancing procedures normally used for the
construction of major, high-volume roads.
Irrespective of the construction strategy adopted, the quality of the
construction process is critical as this can have a signicant impact on the t
subsequent costs of maintaining the road. For example, any initial savings
made during construction through the inadequate provision of drainage or
lax quality control are likely to paid for, many times over, during the life of
the road through additional maintenance and road user costs.
6.1.2 Drainage
D
rainage is widely recognised as the single most important factor that
controls the performance of any road, the more so a LVSR in which
naturally occurring, often moisture sensitive, materials are used. The lack
of good drainage can lead to ingress of water into the road structure, leading
to structural damage and costly repairs and surface water can form a road
safety hazard, especially on high-speed roads when it can cause aquaplaning.
For these reasons, adequate attention to drainage is not only an important
aspect of the preceding design process, but also of the construction and
maintenance phases of road provision.
A clear distinction should be made between internal and external drainage.
Internal drainage is concerned with controlling the movement of water within
the road pavement or embankment, whereas external drainage is concerned
with the control of surface water by various measures taken in the design and
construction stages. In the nal analysis, a balance has to be struck between
the cost of the drainage measures and the function of the road as perceived
by road users.
T
he main purpose of this chapter is to highlight the signicant differ-
ences in approach to the construction of LVSRs by comparison with
those of high volume, major highways. In view of the importance of utilising
the most abundant resource in the region - labour - this chapter also seeks
to raise awareness of the scope for utilising labour-based construction and of
the type of equipment that is best suited to complement this approach. The
importance of appropriate internal and external drainage is also highlighted
as being of crucial importance in the performance of LVSRs.
Disruption of trafc and pedestrian move-
ments due to ooding of rivers is a common
problem in many rural areas.
In view of the signicance of labour-based
methods in the construction of LVSRs,
wherever this issue arises, it is indicated as
follows:
LBM
6.2 Construction Issues
6.2.1 Characteristics of LVSRs
T
he construction process for LVSRs does not, in principle, differ from
that used for other types of road. However, LVSRs are much more
sensitive then other types of road to the social, economic and technical
context in which they are built. Variations can be considerable with regard
to the choice of construction method, type of resources available and type of
construction materials being used. Moreover, aspects regarding social and
environmental impacts, including the need for any resettlement action plan,
require particular attention prior to the start of construction.
One aspect of the provision of LVSRs that is receiving increased attention
is the use of labour-based construction. All the governments in the region
recognise that economic growth and redistribution of wealth rely upon increased
employment opportunities. Continuous efforts are therefore being made to
create productive employment through the use of labour-based construction
and maintenance, where these are technically and economically feasible.
6.2.2 Labour-Based Construction
T
he objective of labour-based construction is to maximise the number of
job opportunities per unit of expenditure. This approach involves using a
combination of labour and light equipment rather than heavy plant, without
compromising the quality of the end product. It optimises the use of labour
and employs equipment only for those activities that are difcult for a labour
force alone to undertake efciently and cost-effectively. Unfortunately, despite
the well-publicised and substantial potential benets offered by labour-based
construction, a number of myths and problems relating to this technology
still persist in the minds of some practitioners.
Box 6.1 - Common misconceptions about the use of labour-based methods and
small scale labour-based contractors
1
Myths:
standards should be lowered to allow for labour-based methods
labour-based construction is out of date and incompatible with the modern world
labour-based methods can be used for any construction activity
labour-based construction is only intended for welfare relief schemes
poorly educated contractors will never understand tender procedures
voluntary labour can be used to keep costs down
Problems:
lack of suitable documentation for the management of labour-based contracts
many clients are still not open to even considering a labour-based approach for
new projects
many clients are unable to process payment for labour and materials fast enoughh
to keep a labour-based contract operating smoothly
In order to overcome these problems, suitable forms of contract need to be more
widely used; clients need to gain experience in awarding and managing labour-based
contracts and small-scale contractors need to gain experience in managing such
contracts efciently. Government ministries also need to develop strategies that
facilitate the implementation of pro-employment policies.
The development of a White Paper on
Labour-based Works Policy is an example
of a pro-active strategy by a SADC govern-
ment to achieve increased utilization of t
abundant human resources in the roads
sector
2
rr .
Suitability of Construction Activities for Labour-Based Projects
Many activities are well suited to labour-based methods such as site
clearance/bush clearing and ditch excavation wheneas activities, such as
compaction of pavement layers or haulage of materials over long distances
(typically > 5 km) are not. Quite apart from economic considerations, some
construction activities (e.g. the manipulation of heavy precast sections) are
just not possible without the help of the right machinery. However, these
kinds of problem can be avoided if emphasis is given to those activities that
can be undertaken effectively by labour-based methods, and design options
selected that minimise the requirements for plant.
Labour-based projects usually employ a relatively large number of labourers.
In such a situation, the site management staff should be particularly good
man-managers with strong managerial and technical backgrounds. They
should be familiar with local traditions and social structures in order to avoid
serious disputes on site that could threaten the progress of construction and,
ultimately, the sustainability of the project.
6.2.3 Environmental Considerations
R
oad construction can adversely affect the environment in a variety
of ways. Assuming that the necessary mitigating measures have been
incorporated in the contract documents, it is important that the contractor
be made fully aware of his environmental responsibilities as part of his
contractual obligations. Moreover, compliance with the environmental
requirements of the project should be monitored throughout the construction
process in order to correct problems before they occur (Section 3.4).
Box 6.2 - Typical best practice guidelines for environmental mitigation
3
.
Construction process: Ensure the existence of an Environmental Management
Plan which sets out the specic undertakings for the necessary environmental
protection responsibilities, measures, monitoring and auditing to be undertaken
during construction in order to achieve the environmental requirements set outt
in the contract.
Construction procedures: Ensure that procedures are adopted that:
minimise disturbance to ora and fauna
minimise sedimentation and erosion by implementing effective drainage/
stormwater control measures
minimise generation of dust and noise
progressively revegetate disturbed areas during road construction
minimise visual impacts and environmental disturbance at site camps
minimise environmental impacts of stockpiles and storage of materials
minimise construction wastes and dispose at an approved environmentally
sustainable location
provide environmentally sound management for the handling, storage and
disposal, if necessary, of fuel, oil, lubricants, bitumen and chemicals used
in the road construction process
Auditing: Ensure the existence of a documented environmental due diligence
system to measure compliance with environmental management requirements
throughout the construction process with the objective of correcting problems
before adverse environmental impacts occur.
Before construction starts, all relevant
environmental assessments should be l
completed to ensure that the project does d
not achieve its own goal at the expense of
loss or inconvenience to non-beneciaries
or future generations
3
.
Example of appropriate
choice of technology
Screening of aggregate for road surfacing.
De-stumping of trees is an example of
appropriate labour-based technology.
LBM
LBM
6.2.4 Mobilisation
Preliminary and General Items
L
VSRs are often constructed in remote areas and establishment costs
normally make up a substantial part of the total project cost. The cost of
preliminary and general items, where establishment is included, is a larger t
proportion of total construction cost for LVSRs than that used on more
heavily trafcked roads.
However, where labour-based methods are utilised, one can expect mobilisation
costs to be considerably lower than these for large machine-based units. This
favours the use of labour-based methods in remote locations, in circumstances
where projects are relatively small or where larger projects can be split up
into smaller contracts.
Health and Safety on Site
Road construction ranks among the most hazardous occupations in all
countries of the world, particularly on projects where a large amount of
labour is involved. The following typical LVSR site situations require that
particular attention be paid to health and safety precautions on site:
LVSRs are often constructed in remote areas where access to emergency
medical care is limited, thereby aggravating the consequences in the case
of accidents on site. Under these circumstances, greater awareness is
needed of the risks attached to certain especially hazardous operations
and appropriate measures should be taken to minimise these risks. For
example, trained First Aid staff should be employed on site and an d adequate
stock of First Aid equipment and medicines should be kept in a secure
clean place. This may, however, be a requirement under national employmentt
law.
Handling of hot bitumen is potentially harzardous due to the risk of burns
and inhalation of fumes. The use of bitumen emulsion, which can be
manufactured on site, is preferable
4
.
Trafc safety measures in remote areas with low trafc densities are often
given less attention than they deserve. However, trafc moving through
construction sites at high speed always poses a severe n danger to construction n
staff.
HIV/AIDS
All governments in the SADC region are committed to combating HIV/
AIDS. In this regard, construction operations are relevant on account of the
following:
Construction of roads requires the services of skilled personnel, depending
on the type of operation and project. This leads to migration of labour
and sometimes to the division of families, a situation that is widely
considered to d be a contributory factor in the spread of HIV/AIDS.
LVSRs are often constructed in sparsely populated areas where the local
communities are vulnerable to the transient effects of the inux of large
numbers of workers. The establishment of a road camp may cause a rapid d
change in the local economy, which further exacerbates these effects.
Awareness and active involvement in taking measures to combat HIV/AIDS
have become necessary requirements for sustainable operations and affect all
responsible parties involved in road construction.
Handling of bitumen is a hazard and
requires suitable locations for storage,
heating or blending.
Counselling ahead of project commencement
is an important measure to combat the spread
of HIV/AIDS as a result of construction
activities.
6.2.5 Contracts
Labour-Hased works
The three main delivery mechanisms that may be adopted for expanding
labour-based methods of construction and maintenance amongst small-scale
contractors are shown in Figure 6.1 and are briefy described as follows
5
:
The Government-run Model: In this model the responsibility for all aspects
of contractor development (including small contract administration and
payment) lies with the government roads agency.
The Agency Model: Responsibility for all aspects of contractor development
lies with an independent non-proft management agency or with a for-
proft consulting frm.
The Development Team Model: The responsibility is divided be between
the employer, a construction manager and a materials manager.
PtoJuct|on
Attonement
Atooch
0el|vety
Vechon|sm
lotce
Account
lotce
Account
lotce
Account
us|n lstool|sheJ
Conttoctots
Convent|onol
5uo-
conttoct
Conttoct|n
0evelo|n 5moll-scole Conttoctots
Covt-tun Aency 0eveloment 7eom
Lmployer Lmployer Lmployer Lmployer Lmployer Lmployer
Lstablished
Contractor
Lstablished
Contractor
Laborers Laborers Laborers Laborers Laborers Laborers
Small
Contractor
Small
Contractor
Small
Contractor
Small
Contractor
A
Consulting
Pirm
Consulting
Pirm
and/or
Lstablished
Contractor
The type of model to be adopted will depend primarily on the country`s
contracting environment and on the extent to which the institutional reforms
mentioned in Chapter 2 have been embraced. For example, if the roads agency
is functioning well and reform can be facilitated, the Government run model
may be the most appropriate. Conversely, if the roads agency is unable to effect
the required reforms within a reasonable time, or would prefer to pass a portion
of the risk of contractor development to the private sector, a Development
Team Model may be the most suitable.
HIsk Aspects
Wherever roads are constructed with innovative methods or marginal quality
of materials, the aspect of risk inevitably plays a role in the process (Chapters:
Pavement Design, Section 5.4.6). Risk needs to be carefully considered and
managed in relation to the potential benefts offered. The roads agency is often
in the best position to allocate risk as it sees ft as it is generally in control of
the conditions that control the project.
The construction of LVSRs offers much scope for innovation and cost-savings
as highlighted in every chapter of this Guideline. However, given the nature
of the construction industry, the party most able to promote innovation is the
roads agency. In so doing, the agency cannot expect to reap the potential
benets oj reduced construction cost that lie in the use oj innovative methods
unless it is also willing to carry a part oj the any potential risks that may be
perceived to be involved.
Figure 6.1 - Alternative arrangements for undertaking labour-based works
A commercially operating contractor or consultant will have to price risk
into a contract, involving insurance cost and potential losses in execution of
the project if problems occur. This aspect is a common hindrance to
innovations that would result in considerable benets to society by providing
LVSRs in rural areas using more cost-effective methods. It therefore appears
reasonable that society, through the agency, also carries a large part of the
calculated risk, bearing in mind that society is also the potential beneciary
in the use of innovative methods. Thus, the roads agency should carefully
consider the merits of sharing some of the risk that normally lies with the
contractor when allowing, encouraging or prescribing the use of methods or
materials that are perceived to carry increased risk.
Planning and Design Stages
The key to ensuring optimal operations in construction with marginal materials
and in a variety of different climatic conditions, lies in the preparation and
planning/design of the contracts. Deriving maximum benet from the use
of marginal materials relies on the contractors use of appropriate methods
of winning the materials and subsequently processing them to meet the
prescribed specication. The aim is to utilise the full potential of the material
sources found in the project area once the appropriate standard has been set
for the project. As illustrated in Box 6.3, incentives can be included in the
conditions of contract to ensure that the contractor and the agency responsible
for the project are both striving for the same end result.
Use of rock materials in bulk earthworks
can speed up construction by:
Allowing thick layers to be constructed d
in a single lift.
Eliminating the need for construction
water and mixing in earthwork.
Minimising the need for laboratory
testing.
Box 6.3 - Issues to consider during contract preparation
As contractors normally depend strongly on their cash ow to meet their
nancial obligations for the project, the following aspects should be given
particular attention in the preparation of contracts for the construction of
LVSRs:
A contractor may be reluctant to stockpile materials well ahead of

construction (an approach that improves the management of marginal
materials), unless there is separate payment for borrow pit operations
that secures his cash ow.
Contractors are unlikely to select the better of two materials that both
meet minimum quality requirements if they have to carry the entire t
amount of any additional cost incurred.
The inclusion of haulage costs in the contract plays a key role in
directing and creating incentives for the contractor to locate and use
material sources of non-standard quality, the use of which is considered
desirable and, ultimately, also of benet to the roads agency.
Although the specication should be written to cater for producing an
acceptable end product with marginal, variable materials, there may be
instances where exceeding the specication minimum may be benecial to
the project. However, a contractor is unlikely to use additional resources
or time in processing in order to achieve a better than specied end
result unless an appropriate reward scheme is in place.
In the choice between use of machinery or manual labour, a contractor
is likely to select the option that gives the best utilisation of his own
resources and gives the better cash ow. This may not coincide with
the optimal resources for the project from a national socio-economic
perspective. Thus, where warranted, it may be necessary to specify
certain operational methods in the conditions of the contract.
ConstructIon Stage
The ultimate goal of all parties involed in a construction project is to make
the optimal use of the available resources to meet the prescribed standards
in the most effcient manner. However, after the project has started, it may
not always be possible to make changes in itemisation and payment schedules
without incurring a claims situation. Nonetheless, the supervisory staff can
facilitate the attainment of optimal solutions in a number of ways which
avoid claims. The following are typical examples:
If available, the use of better quality materials can be promoted by
pointing out to the contractor the potential for reducing the time needed
for processing of the layer, the often reduced need for the addition of water
and a greater likelihood of attaining the specifcations more consistently.
Consistently improving the workmanship/method can justify the increased
use of method specifcations, reduced frequency of control testing or use
of simpler test methods. This will, in turn, beneft the contractor by increasing
the speed of construction.
6.2.6 Earthworks uantItIes and 'DesIgn and
Construct' Methods
T
he cost of earthworks in LVSR construction comprises a larger
proportion of total costs than is the case with major highways where
more expensive options for pavement structures and other installations are
often used. Thus, a key factor in reducing total road costs is to maximise
the use of fll materials in the road alignment and minimise haul distance
or, preferably, to avoid it altogether, i.e. cut to fll by machine or to borrow
from within the road reserve/side drain. The reduction of fll is a key factor
in reducing the cost of earthworks.
Box 6.4 - Field staff requirements when using ~design and construct
methods
Where 'design and construct methods are used, it is vital that feld
staff understand the consequences of the selection of alignment. This is
important for:
traffc safety
internal and external drainage of the pavement
measures required to deal with poor in-situ soils
quantity measurement for payment
The horizontal alignment should always be given the highest priority when
resources are allocated for alignment selection. This is because of the
benefts that accrue from not having to change the road alignment if the
road is subsequently upgraded. However, in fxing the alignment, careful
attention should be given to a large variety of features within the road
corridor, including dwellings, felds, graves, community access, drainage and
irrigation channels, catchment areas, proximity of in situ material, avoidance
of rock and unsuitable materials, preservation of fora and fauna, etc.
The amount oj earth-works is decided by:
the designer where pre-made geometric
designs are used
the site staff where design by eye
methods are used
Design and construct methods can pro-
vide benets in the jorm oj increased speed
oj construction and, in some cases, reduced
earthworks quantities with associated cost
savings. However, this approach is only
viable where the eld stajj have the required
skills and knowledge and ij the appropri-
ate measurement-jor-payment procedure
is in place.
6.2.7 WorkIng WIth Nature
C
ost savings can be made where timing of the construction operations
can be programmed to suit favourable weather conditions. However, a
fexible approach is required for this. In contract work, such an approach may
be diffcult to achieve owing to contractual diffculties unless the contracts
are tailored especially for the purpose. Force account construction offers
more scope for fexibility to take advantage of local conditions that often
change rapidly and are not easily foreseeable. They allow changes to be made
and new procedures to be introduced on site without triggering contractual
disputes.
An example of 'working with nature in a hot and dry climate is to minimise
the use of water for compaction, thereby reducing associated cost and delays
6
.
Such techniques may include:
Removing overburden from borrow pits before the rainy season in order
to allow water to penetrate deep into the gravel seam, thereby increasing
the moisture content prior to stockpiling.
Carrying out compaction of the subgrade during or just after the rainy
season (i.e. in conditions nearer to the optimum for compaction).
Adding and mixing in water at night in order to minimise loss by
evaporation.
However, it is important to be aware that it can be more expensive to dry
out gravel above the optimum moisture content than to import water for
compaction.
6.2.8 StabIIIsatIon
N
ot all natural gravels are suitable for use as road pavement materials
in LVSRs and some form of improvement may be required to achieve
adequate strength and to limit permeability. There are numerous types of
stabilisers available for the purpose of achieving these improvements, of
which the conventional ones - cement and lime - have had considerable
success in the past within the region. Stabilisation with pozzolans can be
expected to be similarly effective if applied correctly. Bitumen has become a
viable option in recent years as a result of the development of emulsions and
foaming technologies for use with natural materials.
In addition to the conventional and well proven stabilisers, the market
now offers literally hundreds of brands of alternative chemical stabilisers.
However, experience with the use of these stabilisers has generally been
mixed and they should be used with extreme caution.
As a general rule, stabilisers of all kinds should only be used after careful
consideration has been given to all other options including, in particular,
screening of materials to improve their grading or mechanical stabilisation
through blending of materials. Unless there is some previous experience
of using the products, there is an inherent risk in adding substances to
natural materials that may not work as expected and may result in increased
construction costs. For example, there is the risk that failure of the stabilisation
method could make reworking of the material diffcult and costly because
previously - stabilised gravel could require the addition of at least 40 per cent
fresh gravel for the remedial works.
LBM
Supply oj construction water may involve
the construction oj temporary pipelines.
Stabilisation with lime or cement can be
successjully applied with basic methods
and use oj manual labour.
6.8 ConsIruuIIon quIpmenI
6.3.1 1ntroductIon
T
he choice of the most appropriate type of equipment for a particular
project is normally dependent on the following major factors:
site condition
type of operation
size of the project
soil conditions and type material used
the extent to which manual labour is used in the operation
Equipment in current use for construction of LVSRs in the region varies
from heavy equipment for major highways to the light plant used for labour-
based methods. It will often not be appropriate to use high-capacity, heavy
equipment on many LVSR sites because of the smaller quantities of materials
and dimensions of the works. Such equipment is certainly not appropriate
where labour-based methods are used to any signifcant extent. Use of
manual labour for construction operations requires fexible solutions with
many small units of equipment.
6.3.2 EquIpment Used wIth Labour-Hased Methods
F
ully labour-based methods usually require, in addition to hand tools,
the provision of simple equipment such as wheel barrows and perhaps
animal drawn carts, often supported by some mechanical transport. In
addition, hand-operated compactors may be used for compaction. These
require the use of specifc methods to be effective, such as construction with
a maximum layer thickness of 75 mm, and are unlikely to be effective in
operations where pavement materials require compaction on a large scale.
Compaction equipment heavier than the light equipment normally used on
labour-based unsealed roads may be required for compaction of the pavement
layers for sealed roads. Penetration macadam, emulsion-treated base and thin
reinforced concrete pavement can all be constructed entirely by labour-based
methods, whereas densely graded materials require the use of plant-based
methods in order to be effective.
Labour-Adapted EquIpment - Tractor UnIts
Construction units with agricultural tractors
7
will provide fexibility in the
use of the smaller items of equipment that suit operations where manual
labour is a major component in carrying out the roadworks. The uses of
agricultural tractors in key operations include:
Loading/transport: A small number of tractors can operate, intermittently,
many small buckets or trailers, thereby giving labourers suffcient time to
load these, whilst maximising the utilisation of the tractors. Buckets and
trailers should be of such height that they can easily be loaded by hand.
If this is not possible, the bench method can be used to facilitate hand
loading.
Spreading/shaping: Graders suitable for towing by agricultural tractors are
available in several sizes to undertake spreading and shaping operations.
Alternatively, these operations can also be done by hand if some reduction
in the regularity of the longitudinal profle can be tolerated.
LBM
LBM
Trajc loading on newly constructed pave-
ments by construction equipment is a concern
on long duration projects where very heavy
loading takes place ajter completion oj the
surjacing. /n such cases, construction
trajc should be included as part oj the
design trajc. Otherwise, work sequence/
planning will be needed and measures applied
to minimise the ejjects oj construction
trajc.
Bheel barrows constitute part oj the equip-
ment used in LBM.
The concept oj using labourers and small
tractor-drawn buckets is a good example oj
labour-based methods.
Watering: Tractors can be used to tow water bowsers ftted with simple spray
bars to spread the water evenly on sections prepared for compaction.
Mixing on the road: Agricultural disc harrows towed by large tractors are
very effective for mixing, including mixing materials on the road with water
and for stabilisation or blending.
Compaction: Towed vibrating, grid or tamping rollers. (For labour-based
methods, rollers are often hand controlled).
Surface preparation: Towed mechanical brooms.
Bitumen operations: Towed bitumen sprayers can be used for priming
and binder application in conjunction with suitable heating and pumping
equipment. For labour-based methods, bitumen emulsions are generally
preferred to avoid the need for heating to high temperatures.
Surfacing aggregate: Spreading aggregate by hand from towed trailers - also
used for towing backchip units.
6.3.3 Heavy EquIpment UnIts
C
onstruction units of various sizes based on conventional equipment,
as opposed to tractor based units, have been widespread in the region.
The components in typical units of this kind have the following features in
the context of constructing LVSRs in remote areas, often by an emerging
contracting industry:
Bulldozers for stockpiling: Large bulldozers (example>40 tonnes) are diffcult
to utilise economically where material sources are small, scattered and of very
variable quality within each borrow pit. Smaller models are normally better
suited for this operation. Bulldozers require regular preventive maintenance
by skilled staff.
Front-end loaders for loading: Front-End Loaders are available in a variety
of sizes. They are used mostly for loading gravel but use of this type of
equipment is also dependent on the size of trucks available. For LBM, a
Tractor Loader Backhoe is also suitable and can load a 6 cubic metre truck
in 5 minutes.
For scarication and stockpiling in borrow
pits there is little practical use jor tractors.
Bulldo:ers and excavators are normally
required. Labour can also do this work
under javourable site conditions.
A typical tractor unit used in labour-based
construction.
Typical gravel loading operations.
Box 6.5 - Advantages of using tractor units
Operationally, tractor-based units have the following advantages that are
well suited for use by emerging contractors and for operations in remote
areas:
Plant operation: Fewer mechanical items are in use and units are
simple to maintain with ordinary mechanical skills.
Plant availability: It is often easy to fnd locally available plant outside
the ploughing season, thereby offering fexibility in feet management.
Better utilisation of agricultural tractors.
It is often easier to obtain spare parts for agricultural tractors then for
heavy construction machinery.
Scrapers: These are effective where earthworks quantities are large and
where material quality is not critical. (The control of material quality is
very diffcult when using scrapers). The advantage of scrapers is that they
can be used for cutting the roadway, excavation of drains, flling, spreading
and, to some degree, compaction. However, motor scrapers incur very high
investment and operational costs and consequently require high utilisation
and mechanical skills for their maintenance. Thus, they are expensive to
operate and currently tend to be replaced by a combination of other types of
plant.
Motor-graders are versatile and are typically used to level tipped heaps,
spread gravel, break down oversize, mix in water, place gravel layers for
compaction, cut levels, shape road prism, shape cut-off berms and cut mitres.
Most operations carried out by the use of motor graders can be undertaken
by labour-based methods. However, on more heavily traffcked roads, it may
be preferable to cut the fnal levels with a motor grader for achieving good
riding quality. This can be carried out as a one-off operation whenever a
suffcient length (say 20 km) of base has been placed by hand.
Excavators: Large excavators can carry out the operations of both a bulldozer
and a front-end loader for earth-moving in the roadway and in the borrow
pits and is an economical option. Selection of material quality is very diffcult
and such operations can, therefore, be used only where material quality is
uniform or can be mixed in situations where quality assurance is not critical
(e.g. for bulk earthworks).
Articulated dump trucks: These incur high investment and operational costs
with stringent requirements for mechanical skills in their maintenance. They
can be effcient in high-capacity operations and provide both an off-road
and an on-road driving capability wherever the units can legally use public
roads.
Tipper trucks: Ordinary tipper trucks are often favoured by emerging
contractors because they can be used for other transport purposes and
are readily available on the second-hand market, generally with readily
available spare parts. The skills required for their mechanical maintenance
are moderate.
6.3.4 CompactIon EquIpment
I
n addition to conventional rollers for compaction there are other types of
equipment that give particular benefts in the construction of earthworks
and pavement layers for LVSRs. These includc:
Grid rollers: This is a static roller towed at a relatively high speed (approx.15
km/hour) for breaking down oversize and for compaction. In this manner
the material is better utilised and problems arising from oversize particles
are avoided. Good results are generally obtained with the use of this plant
for the compaction of pavements constructed with natural gravel and of fll
layers with marginal quality materials, which can sometimes be diffcult to
compact to the full layer depth.
The roller allows compaction of the layer to take place in several smaller lifts
at the same time as the graders spread the material. This is achieved without
forming laminations and shear planes within the layer, because of the pattern
of the surface of the roller.
Graders are versatile jor processing materials
on the road.
Excavators are convenient jor various
applications, including lijting.
Breaking down oj any oversi:e jraction
will benet the grading and quality oj the
available material.
Grid roller.
Close-up oj grid.
Very heavy towed pneumatic rollers: This type of roller can weigh up to
50 tonnes on one axle and has been used successfully for compaction and
proof-rolling of the roadbed, especially in thick layers of single-size sand. Its
advantage is it provides a uniform and sound foundation for the pavement,
achieved by collapsing and densifying any soft areas.
Impact compactors: These are non-circular, relatively high-energy rollers,
typically three-, four - or ve - sided. Large-wheeled tractors are used for
pulling the compactors at operational speeds of 12 - 15 km/hr producing a
series of high amplitude/high impact blows delivered to the soil at a relatively
low frequency (90 - 130 blows per minute) with the energy per blow varying
between 10 and 25 kilojoules, depending on the mass and amplitude of the
compactor.
Owing to their very high energy density per blow, their main advantage over
conventional compaction plant is their depth-effectiveness, typically of the,
order of one metre of ll or in situ layers, thereby producing deep, well-
balanced, relatively stiff pavement layers. These rollers are well suited for
densifying collapsible soils. They have been successfully used in low-cost
road systems and, when appropriately specied, offer a cost-effective option
for LVSR construction.
Selection of Compaction Plant
Figure 6.2 provides a broad guide to the selection of compaction equipment.
Each roller has been positioned in its economic zone of application. However,
it is not uncommon to nd them working out of their zones. Moreover, the
exact positioning of the zones can vary with differing material conditions.
Grid
Vibratory
Smooth steel drum
Heavy pneumatic
Towed tamping foot
High speed tamping foot
|mpact
Tamping foot Rock tamping
foot
Compactor zone of application Compactive principle
kneading
kneading
vibration
compression
kneading
kneading
kneading
impact
kneading
100 % Clay 100 % Sand Rock
Sheepsfoot
Figure 6.2 - Compaction equipment selection guide
9
Pneumatic roller.
3-sided Impact compactor.
Close-up.
6.3 Utilising Soils and Natural
Gravels
6.4.1 General Considerations
Natural Gravel Resources
I
n areas where natural gravel and soils are available for road building
purposes, these materials constitute the most valuable resource in the
construction of LVSRs, hence, every effort should be made to use them in
a creative manner - a challenge that has met with signicant success in the
SADC region. However, this has required that particular attention be paid to
construction methods.
Box 6.6 - Labour-based methods in borrow pit operations
Labour-based methods in borrow pit operations may be utilised for combined
stockpiling/loading in pits without overburden and where the ground does
not require ripping. Labour-based operations may also be viable in combined
operations where heavy plant is used for removal of overburden, while loading is
carried out with manual labour. Where bulldozers have removed overburden, it is
advantageous to let the same machines scarify the gravel and perhaps undertake
stockpiling before manual loading.
Compaction
Compaction is a vital, integral aspect of LVSR construction that results in
all-round improvements of soil properties and its performance as a pavement
supporting layer. A well compacted subgrade possesses enhanced strength,
stiffness and bearing capacity, is more resistant to moisture penetration and
less susceptible to differential settlement.
One of the critical aspects of using natural gravels is to maximise their
strength and increase their stiffness and bearing capacity through effective
compaction. This can be achieved, not necessarily by compacting to a
pre-determined relative compaction level as is traditionally done, but
by compacting to the highest uniform level of density possible without
signicant strength degradation of the particles (compaction to refusal).
In so doing, there is a signicant gain in density, strength and stiffness, the
benets of which generally outweigh the costs of the additional passes of
the roller.
Figure 6.3 - Illustration of concept of compaction to refusal
90 92 94 96 98 100 102 104 106 108 110
%of MDDBS Compaction
-6
5
3
2
-7
5
3
2
-8
10
10
10
1.50 1.60 1.70 1.80 1.90
Dry Density Mg/m
3
P
e
r
m
e
a
b
i
l
i
t
y
c
m
/
s
e
c
The degree to which soils and natural gravels
can be utilized in LVSR construction, instead
of more expensive processed materials, will
determine the success of the project in terms
of economy in both construction and main-
tenance.
Large thickness of overburden does some-
times exclude labour-based methods for
winning gravel materials. (The example
shown in the picture is from construction of
LVSRs where the thickness of the overburden
is in excess of 2 m).
Permeability-dry density relationship for a
lateritic gravel (Kenya).
LBM
Compaction to refusal ensures that the soil has been compacted to its near
elastic state as shown in Figure 6.3 with the signicant benet of reduced
permeability and, hence, susceptibility to moisture ingress.
In general, the effectiveness of the compaction process depends on three
important, inter-related factors, namely:
soil moisture content during compaction
soil type
type and level of the compactive effort
A maximum allowable moisture content during construction should be
specied and proper precautions for surface and sub-surface drainage (where
required) should be taken on all road-building projects to ensure optimal
performance of the road.
Different types of soils respond to compactive effort in different ways.
Thus, it is important to ensure that the compaction plant being used is
appropriate for the type of soil being compacted and the purpose intended.
For example, sand or sandy soils are most efciently compacted with high
frequency vibrating rollers, whereas cohesive soils are most efciently
compacted by static pressure, high-amplitude compaction plant. In addition,
if the requirement is to compact and to produce a good riding quality of base
course, this is unlikely to be achieved with a very heavy roller that compacts
to a great depth and, in the process, disturbs the surface.
6.4.2 Materials Management
10
P
roper management of the material sources is essential to ensure that
the best qualities of available material are used in the top layers of the PP
pavement structure. The efforts made to locate the best quality of locally
available and often scarce materials for road base are of no avail if this
material ends up in earthworks layers. Good management of materials
resources is, therefore, a critical operation in LVSR construction.
Box 6.7 - Procedure for materials management
Stockpiling forms an important part of materials management by promoting
appropriate selection of materials as well as providing opportunities for
blending materials and for testing materials before transportation to the
road. The biggest threat to good materials management is when borrow pit
operations are not kept sufciently ahead of the construction.
There is considerable experience to show that the following sequence of
procedures will ensure good management of the material resources:
Initial investigation of material sources by trial holes.
Stockpiles to be clearly marked.
Allocation of materials for specic layers on specic sections of the road d
after stockpiles are completed.
Laboratory testing should be conducted if possible.
Loading from stockpiles according to allocation for transportation to site.
Good management procedures that prevent
rejection of material on the road create
condence in the quality assurance system
and greatly reduce the risk of shortcuts and
poor practice.
It is important to ensure that rejection or
acceptance of materials is carried out at
the source and not after the material has
been transported to the road.
The procedure set out in Box 6.7 requires sufcient plant for opening of
borrow pits to avoid construction demands exceeding the materials supply
from the borrow pits. In cases where the opening of borrow pits cannot keep
ahead of construction, there is a considerable risk that materials selected for
basecourse, will end up in the lower layers of the pavement, causing pressure
on the supply of material when base course materials are needed at a later
time.
6.4.3 Borrow Pits and the Community
O
perations in borrow pits will always put a strain on surrounding
areas and the environment as a whole. Work in borrow pits has
environmental disadvantages, such as temporary noise and dust pollution,
and creates trafc safety problems and other hazards to livestock and humans.
Some of the effects may remain after construction is completed, such as
permanent changes to the topography and disturbance of the soil cover. The
Environmental Management Plan, which should be developed in conjunction
with the community, will indicate the agreed procedures for the opening and
re-instatement of borrow pits.
Wishes of the Community
The wishes of the community will vary according to their needs in the
particular area and may include one or more of the following:
provision of future access to borrow materials for utilisation by the
community
use of the depression for water collection, sometimes requiring fencing
or sloping of sides to at least 1:3 for the safety of people as well as to
protect livestock from drowning
levelling of the area in order to prevent collection of water that may lead d
to mosquito breeding and water-borne diseases
use of the depression for landll (rubbish) deposits, always requiring
special precautions to prevent pollution
reinstatement of the area for farming purposes, requiring fertile topsoil
replacement, which must be self-draining
reinstatement and landscaping of the area for building or recreational
purposes
It should be noted that the public perception of benets in leaving borrow pits
open is often exaggerated and, as a rule, borrow pits should be reinstated.
Before decisions on the future use of a borrow area are nalised, the
community should be made aware of the disadvantages of leaving borrow
pits open.
Reinstatement of Borrow Pits
The extent of the work required to comply with the wishes of the community
will depend entirely on the requirements in each individual case. In the
cases where no particular standard for reinstatement has been established,
one should routinely carry out reinstatement as described in Box 6.8. The
condition of all areas used for access roads should be assessed in the same
manner as for the borrow areas.
Backlling of borrow pits, i.e. replacement
of the material from the pit, is only viable
where the material for backlling is either:
spoil material, or
originates from a source where excavtions
give considerably less disadvantages than
in the borrow area. The cost of this method d
is likely to be very high.
Box 6.8 - General procedure for borrow pit re-instatement.
The following simple procedure will minimise the limitations that the construction
activity has placed on future use of the land:
Shape mounds and steep banks down to a slope (steepest 1:3) that is
naturally found in the landscape.
Spread the topsoil evenly back into the pit in order to promote growth
of vegetation.
Ensure the area is self-draining.
Before reinstating a borrow pit, one should assess the need for materials in
future road maintenance and then stockpile appropriate quantities of gravel
for this purpose.
6.4.4 Clearing, Grubbing and Removal of Topsoil
I
t is particularly important to take account of environmental aspects at the
early stages of construction so that sensitive operations such as clearing
and grubbing are conducted as carefully as possible. It is important that
damage to the vegetation cover is minimized, shifting of soil and associated
damage due to erosion is avoided and that any mitigation measures set out
in the Environmental Impact Assessment are observed, (Section 3.4). All
topsoil that is stripped should be stockpiled for use in areas that are being
reinstated for farming purposes or to promote vegetation. Any vegetation
being removed should be disposed of in a manner that is to the benet of the
community, e.g. for fuel wood.
Box 6.9 - Clearing and grubbing using manual labour
Clearing and grubbing is eminently suitable for labour-based operations where
the required speed of construction and availability of labour makes it possible.
Labourers may experience problems in achieving the required result as described
in specications due to the need for ripping, depth of grubbing, size of roots, etc.
In such cases it is advisable to review specications in the light of the requirements
of a low-volume road and to ascertain whether there is actually a realistic risk
of damage to the pavement resulting from reduced standards of grubbing by
comparison with current specications.
6.4.5 Construction of Earthworks
T
he optimal techniques and methods for undertaking earthworks operations
are largely dependent on available equipment in addition to the operational
skills and experience of the eld staff. Section 6.4 gives an indication of the
advantages and disadvantages of the various types of equipment available for
earthworks operations.
When compacting earthworks it may be difcult to adjust in situ moisture
content before compaction, especially when using clayey material types
where a good distribution of water in the material is difcult to achieve. To
mix water into such materials requires much effort and is not very effective.
The possibility of adjusting moisture contents of earthworks is particularly
difcult in wet climatic regions, whereas in dryer areas it is possible to dry
out materials that are too wet. Careful timing of earthworks, where possible,
can, to some extent, alleviate the problem.
Box 6.10 - Labour-based methods in earthworks
The use of labour-based methods in earthworks is only appropriate where the quantities
are moderate or where there is a large source of labour available for the work.
LBM
LBM
Reinstatement operations in a borrow pit.
Burrowing animals such as termites can
cause damage to pavement layers unless
nests are removed properly and poisoned
with an approved pesticide during clearing
and grubbing.
Research has been carried out to establish
whether it is possible to compact lls in dry
regions without costly addition of water.
Although possible, such practice could result
in the compacted layer having a high void
content and the risk of settlement at a later
time if water enters the ll materials.
6.4.6 Construction of Pavement Layers
Use of Natural Gravel Materials
O
ptimal use of natural materials is a constant challenge that is faced in
the construction of pavement layers for LVSRs. However, depending on
local conditions, it may sometimes be necessary to resort to processing of
these natural gravels by crushing/ screening, or stabilisation. Natural gravel
materials offer levels of performance that are directly related to successful
construction methods and workmanship. Aspects of construction that require
particular attention are:
Natural gravels with high contents of nes or clay particles gain their
strength as a result of suction following drying back, rather than from
friction between particles. This means that the in-service moisture regime
of the pavement, achieved through appropriate internal drainage measures,
is of vital importance for the performance of the layer.
Correct moisture content (material dependent, however just below optimumm
moisture content) and achievement of the specied density for the differentt
layers, is essential.
Depending on the construction plant used, a good surface nish is some-
times difcult to attain. It is essential that the base has a smooth dense
surface nish before sealing to ensure that a good bond is obtained between
the base course and the bituminous seal and for subsequent good pavementt
performance.
Natural materials often include some weak larger particles and, when
such materials are compared, these larger particles may break down, hence
changing the properties of the material as a whole. An assessment of the
consequences of this processing action is therefore required in order to
establish whether or not the material meets the specication requirements
following construction.
Moisture for Compaction of Pavement Layers
Experience with materials in the region has shown that thorough mixing of
water with soil or gravel over the full width and depth of the layer at the
optimum moisture content is essential for achieving the required density and
an even surface nish. The optimum moisture content for the appropriate
level of compaction determined in the laboratory is a good guide to the
amount of water required in the eld compaction process, although modern
compaction plant normally requires a lower moisture content than the
optimum indicated from laboratory compaction methods.
Box 6.11 - Effective mixing of water into the material
It is often far more difcult to achieve the required density to the full depth
of the layer in natural gravels with a high nes content than in well-graded
granular materials. Effective mixing with water is, therefore, of particular
importance when these materials are used.
Much as natural gravels may need to be brought near to saturation moisture
content for efcient compaction, it is also good practice to allow a
signicant amount of drying back to occur before sealing takes place. This
is particularly benecial for ne-grained materials that rely on suction and
cohesion as their predominant source of shear strength.
There is evidence to show that the perfor-
mance of well constructed base courses of
natural gravel can be equal to or better than r
base courses constructed of highly rened,
but less well constructed, crushed materials.
In the case of natural gravel with high nes
contents, the required density to the full
depth of the layer is often far more difcult
to achieve then that of well graded granular
pavement materials. This often requires
special techniques, such as the use of grid
rollers, to obtain a good result - see Section
6.3.4.
The use of mixing equipment, such as
ploughs or large disc harrows, greatly
reduces the time required for mixing water
into the material, by comparison with blade
mixing with a grader, particularly where
relatively poorly graded gravels with high
nes contents are used.
Close up.
Finishing of Base Courses
If the operation of mixing, spreading and compaction is not completed before
drying out of the surface takes place, then a loose upper layer (biscuit layer)
will result. If this happens, the bituminous surfacing will not have a hard
surface on which to bond resulting in base course failures resulting from
shearing by wheel loads. Such failures may appear to be the result of
insufcient material strength, but studies of construction records, and evidence
of good performance under similar conditions in base course layers of poorer
material qualities, indicate that nishing of the base course layers is vital and
decisive for the good performance of LVSRs.
Box 6.12 - Cutting nal levels of natural gravel base courses
A critical operation affecting the future performance of LVSR pavements is
the cutting of nal base levels. Attempts to make minor adjustments to the
surface should not be allowed. The cutting of nal levels should be conned
to the cutting off of high areas and not the lling in of low areas. Thus, it is
much better to make corrections to geometric levels at subbase level where
surface nish is not critical. Thereafter, construction of the base course
can be carried out by eye and with normal control of layer thickness. It is
strongly advisable to cut nal levels of natural base courses by eye rather
than by following geometric levels set out in the eld.
Figure 6.4 illustrates a recommended procedure for nishing off base courses
made of natural gravel. The advantage of this method is the speeding up of
the processing of the base course to prevent drying out of the surface whilst
ensuring that full attention is given to achieving a good surface nish rather
then to dealing with minor irregularities in geometric levels. Trimming of the
surface should be conned to the action only of cutting off gravel to side spoil
or be off loaded for use in subsequent sections. Spreading loose material over
the surface in a thin layer is unacceptable because this is likely to prevent a
rm nish of the layer which will inhibit the bond with the bituminous
surfacing.
Experience has shown that the rapid pre-
mature failure of the uppermost layer of the
base course can be linked to poor nishing
of this layer with subsequent loss of bond to
the surfacing.
In most cases, the removal of oversize
material is best carried out by the use of
manual labour.
LBM
Box 6.13 - Pavement construction with labour-based methods
Labour-based methods for construction of pavement layers have varying
potential depending on the type of layer being constructed. Certain types
of road pavement and surfacing are more labour-friendly than others as
far as their construction is concerned.
Penetration macadam may be constructed entirely by labour-based

methods, including production of materials at hard rock sources.
Granular materials, including natural gravel, may be spread, mixed and
levelled by labour. Compaction can be done effectively by labour-based
methods as long as the method is appropriate to meet the requirements
of a sealed road.
Improved riding quality is obtained if a motor grader is used to cut the
nal level.
LBM
Step A:
Step B:
Surface pattern of the base course after use of grid rollers for building up
the full thickness of the base course in several thin layers.
(Base course dumped, mixed and compacted 'by eye' to an even, final
layer thickness made up of many thin layers by use of grid rollers).
(Top of subbase cut to geometric levels).

(8ase course).
(Top of subbase).
8ase course to be cut to final level by trimming off the pattern left by
the grid roller by eye while still moist. No filling-in of depressions to be
allowed. |f the surface has dried out apply a light spray of water and
subsequently apply smooth vibrating rollers for some final compaction.
Pneumatic rollers may be required in the final stages for achieving a
dense surface.

Figure 6.4 - Illustration of procedure to nish off base courses made of
natural gravel
6.4.7 Dealing with Variability
Utilisation of Local Material Sources
T
he mixing of two different materials to achieve a quality that exceeds that
of either of the two individual materials is the most common and probably
one of the best methods of improving the engineering properties of natural
gravels. Mixing ne-graded materials with those that lack nes, such as some
volcanic tuffs, can create a material with less potential for breaking down
under compaction, with a higher density through improved grading and
improved stability and workability.
Mixing of sand in proportions up to a third of the total material quantity has
shown benets without adverse effects. However, the optimal proportion
varies depending on material properties. Simple laboratory investigations and
eld trials (test sections) are required in each individual case.
Box 6.14 - Optimal use of natural gravel
Optimal use of local materials requires innovative engineering solutions to
obtain the best performance from available resources. Mechanical blending
is often the best option for increasing the quantity of an acceptable material
quality or improving the quality of the nal material.
When trimming off the pattern from grid roll-
ers in the surface of the base, it is important
to ensure that any dragging marks from
stones is lled in immediately and before
smooth rollers are applied.
Admixture of Kalahari sand to calcrete can
potentially improve the material properties
by reducing plasticity and improving stability,
reducing the damaging effect of soluble salt
contents in the calcrete and improving
workability to achieve the required density.
Some mixing during stockpiling is a good option when this process can be
carried out by digging through two gravel seams of the materials to be mixed.
Bulldozers are not well suited for this purpose nor will heaping the borrow
materials in high cones give satisfactory results. Building up stockpiles in
layers and subsequently loading from them in a special manner or sequence
is feasible but requires very close control of borrow pit operations. Best
results are obtained by mixing on the road.
MIxIng TechnIque on the Hoad
When mixing two types of gravel on the road, motor graders should be used
in combination with disc harrows, if available, to achieve a homogeneous
mix. The method should be to dump gravel A on the road in the required
quantity, then to fatten the heaps and to spread the gravel over half the width
of the base course. Then gravel B should be dumped on top of the spread
material A and spread over the same half width. Mixing should proceed as
normal with the blading of both materials A and B. (See fgure 6.5.).
Figure 6.5 - Illustration of two alternative mixing techniques on the road
6.4.8 ShouIder ConstructIon
GeneraI
B
esides the maintenance and traffc safety benefts gained by sealing of
shoulders, there are benefts related to the load bearing strength of the
pavement. Sealed shoulders reduce the risk of water penetrating into the
pavement layers, resulting in a drier road environment, especially near and
under the outer edge of the running surface.
Box 6.15 - Simplihed construction with sealed shoulders
The construction of sealed shoulders with the same material as that in the
base course is the preferred option. Generally there has to be a considerable
difference in material cost for carriageway and shoulders to justify the use of
different materials in these two components. It may be justifed where highly
refned base course materials are used but this is unlikely in LVSRs.
Step A: Separate stockpiling
Step B: Controlled dumping on the road
Step B (Alt.) Controlled dumping on the road
Bhen materials are mixed in a borrow pit the
proportions will normally be less accurate
than when mixed on the road. This method oj
blending is not recommended.
Separate stockpiling in advance is necessary
to control the properties oj the individual
materials being mixed and the quality oj the
nal material mixture.
Mixing oj dijjerent material types requires
particular attention to be paid to blending
the jull thickness oj the dumped layer oj
material on to the road, mixing it properly
and adding water at the same time.
Mixing by labour-based methods normally
gives ejjective mixing. Bhere quantities are
moderate this method may be a viable
alternative to plant mixing.
Unsealed shoulders place particular demands
on the type oj gravel materials being used as
they need to be durable when exposed. This
design may therejore complicate operations
by requiring separate construction oj shoul-
ders and carriageway.
An increasing number of countries in the SADC region are embarking on the
sealing of shoulders on roads that were originally constructed with gravel
shoulders. This is operationally difcult and there are critical aspects with
regard to construction technique that are likely to determine the success of
such programmes. The following should be given particular attention:
Materials in the paved shoulder should be at least as permeable as the
materials in the adjacent base. If this cannot achieved, then suitable lters
should be incorporated in the shoulder in order to prevent the collection n
of water in the base.
A well-compacted joint can only be achieved if the joint between the
surfacing and the new shoulder is initially cut straight and clean before
shoulder materials are placed.
The shoulders have to be at least 2.5 m wide to enable a motor grader
to mix and place the shoulder gravel as well as to accommodate the
width of water trucks and compaction equipment. Excess width can,
if required, be cut off on completion of shoulder layer works.
Shoulders should be nished off and compacted at least 10mm higher
than the adjacent base, and subsequently cut to level, as shown in Figure
6.6. Proper compaction and a rm surface for shoulder surfacing is other-
wise impossible to achieve.
Where widening of the road prism is necessary, earthwork lls should be
benched and compacted in order to prevent pavement damage resulting
from differential settlement.
Figure 6.6 - Construction of sealed shoulders to existing bitumenised
roads initially having unsealed shoulders
Shoulder Seals
Seals on shoulders should have a higher bitumen content than those on the
carriageway, unless the shoulders are expected to be regularly trafcked, e.g.
in built-up areas. This can be achieved without higher binder spray rates by
using a smaller size aggregate than in the carriageway.
Blinding off shoulder seals with a bituminous
sand seal is often an appropriate method to: l
arrest loss of aggregate
provi de a good surface for pedestrians
and bicycles
give a desired visual contrast to the
carriageway
Edge marking of the running surface with a
paint line is also desirable if the resources
to do this are available.
6.5 ConsIruuIIon oI SeaIs
6.5.1 SeIectIon oI SeaI Type and MaterIaIs
D
ecisions on utilisation of aggregate sources for bituminous surfacing
often require revision at the construction stage as a result of increased
knowledge about available material sources as construction proceeds
10
. This is
of particular relevance to LVSRs because:
A wide range of aggregate types and qualities can be used for the bituminous
surfacing.
Site investigations at the design stage tend to be focussed on identifying
bulk materials for the pavement layers. As construction proceeds and
materials are excavated for the pavement layers, sources of better quality
surfacing materials are sometimes revealed that were not discovered at the
design stage.
Box 6.16 - Utilisation of local material sources for bituminous seals
Site staff should become familiar with the wide range of seal types and suitable
aggregates for LVSRs and with the scope for applying labour-based methods in the
production of aggregate and construction of the seal. The inability to fully utilize
locally available resources in the construction of low-cost but durable seals results in
lost opportunities for achieving construction cost savings.
6.5.2 Hesources HequIred on SIte
A
s indicated in Table 6.1, each of the various types of surfacing has
different requirements as regards the necessary resources on site to
achieve a satisfactory end result. It is important to observe these requirements
when deciding on an appropriate choice of seal for a LVSR.
Table 6.1 - Required input for achievement of a good bituminous seal
Required input for achievement of a good result
(Low - Moaerate - High)
Surface
dressing
Otta seal Sand seal Slurry AC 4)
Skills Moderate Moderate Low Moderate 3)

Un-suitable
Equipment,
Spreading
Moderate Moderate Low Low Un-suitable
Equipment, Bitumen
Application 1)
Moderate Moderate Low Low Un-suitable
Materials quality High Moderate Low 2)
Moderate/
High
Un-suitable
1) A bitumen distributor is required Ior most sprayed seals. Hand sprayers are an
alternative, especially when using emulsions, but spray rates need to be controlled.
Mixing slurry in concrete mixers is preIerred, even when laying by hand. SelI-
propelled slurry machines increase eIfciency but at much higher cost.
2) Coarse sand, sometimes available by screening, can increase the material quality
to 'moderate where sand seals are used alone as permanent seals. Where sand
seals are used as cover seals, the material quality requirements can be reduced to
'low.
3) The selection and handling oI bitumen emulsions, including proportioning and
adjustment oI consistency, increases the need Ior handling skills. Training is
usually required.
4) Although included Ior comparison with other seal types, surIacing with AC is
usually confned to areas with wet climates and/or steep terrain.
Design oj seals and selection oj appro-
priate type oj seal is jully covered under
Chapter 5 - Pavement Design, Materials and
Surjacing.
Sand seals require lower levels oj skill,
material quality and equipment than chip
seals or Cape seals. /j applied over an
Otta seal, locally available sand along the
roadside may be oj adequate quality jor the
sand seal.
LBM
6.5.3 Aggregate Production
T
able 6.2 outlines the operations required to win and produce aggregate
for each type of surfacing that may be used with a LVSR.
Table 6.2 - Production of aggregate for bituminous surfacing
Type of seal Type of aggregate
Winning and processing
of materials
Surface dressing Crushed stone or rock. Crushing and screening.
Otta seal Gravel, natural or crushed.
Stockpiling. Normally
screening is also required.
Sand seal (used
alone)
River sand (crusher dust may be
used, but can be expensive).
Stockpiling (while river is
dry). Screening out pebbles.
Sand cover seal
(over Otta seals)
Any non-plastic sand.
Stockpiling if sand is not
available along the roadside.
Slurry Crusher dust. Crushing and screening.
6.5.4 Construction Procedure
A
ll types of sprayed surfacing, such as surface dressings, Otta seals and
sand seals, follow a similar construction procedure:
1. Priming of the base (may sometimes be omitted).
2. Base repair (chip and spray by hand using emulsion) to even out the
occasional rut caused by a stone under the motor grader blade.
3. Spraying of bituminous binder.
4. Spreading of aggregate.
5. Chip spreading requires uniform aggregate cover. A drag broom can
assist this process on large areas.
6. Rolling is preferably carried out with pneumatic rollers but can also
be done by trafcking.
7. Repeat steps 2 to 6, if a double layer is applied.
8. An emulsion fog spray is sometimes applied to chip seals after they
have been laid to enhance adhesion of the chippings.
In slurry seals, crusher dust, bitumen emulsion, water and cement ller are
premixed with either a specialised mix and spread machine or in a concrete
mixer for spreading by hand with squeegees. Mixing by hand is possible but
is not recommended.
6.5.5 Labour Friendliness
T
he various types of bituminous surfacing appropriate for LVSRs offer
different degrees of suitability for labour-based application. Table 6.3
provides an assessment of the suitability of each surfacing type for the use of
manual labour in the production of aggregate and construction respectively.
A small, simple crushing/ screening plant
can be combined with labour-adapted
tractor operations.
Applying aggregate for surface dressing
using mechanical chip spreaders.
High contents of dust and nes in the
aggregate are more critical for the good
performance of a surface dressing than for
that of an Otta seal.
Drag brooming is sometimes applied in order
to improve distribution of aggregate.
Rolling of sand seal.
LBM
Activity
Friendliness for labour-based methods
(Good Moderate Poor)
Surface
dressing 1)
Otta
seal 2)
Sand
seal
Slurry 3) AC 4)
Production of
aggregate
Quality Poor Good Good Good Poor
Output Poor Good Good Poor Poor
Construction of
surfacing
Quality Moderate Good Good Good Poor
Output Good Good Good Moderate Poor
1) Hand-crushing of aggregate for surface dressing tends to produce aky chippings
with some rock types.
2) Oversize and nes can be removed by hand screening of natural gravel aggregate
for use with Otta seals.
3) Output of aggregate production for slurry (crusher dust) depends entirely on availa-
bility on the commercial market.
4) Although included for comparison with other seal types, AC would not normally
be used on a LVSR.
Table 6.3 - Labour friendliness of various surfacing types
LBM
Spreading gravel using labour-based methods.
(Otta seal), from heaps placed along the
road.
Screening aggregate by labour-based methods
(Otta seal is shown, sand seals would be
similar).
Box 6.17 - Labour-based methods in surfacing operations
The ease of application of labour-based methods for construction of seals

varies with seal type. However, in general, all seal types offer good scope
for labour-based operations, both as regards production of aggregate
as well as construction on site. However, the uniform binder spray rates
required for d chip seals are more difcult to achieve with labour-based
methods.
Where labour-based methods are desirable, seal types that are most
suited for this type of construction should be given the preferential
consideration. It may be necessary to provide training to ensure that
the nal product will be of the desired standard.
All seals, except the slurry seal, need rolling and therefore require
some form of machine-based equipment for this purpose. Where trafc
volumes are sufciently high, it may be possible to rely on trafc for
rolling, but at the risk of an inferior result and speed will need to be
strictly controlled.
LBM
LBM
LBM
6.6 Quality Assurance and Control
6.6.1 Introduction
Q
uality assurance in road construction includes the total system within the
construction site that ensures correct quality of the nal road and
associated structures. Besides conventional site control, quality assurance
Q
also includes the measures that contractors themselves apply for this purpose
during operations.
Quality control includes laboratory and eld testing of materials and
construction and forms part of the overall quality assurance system. It is
applied in various ways, depending on the type of contract. Conventional
contract relations with a supervising body - often a consultant - carrying out
control of the works is a common system used in the region. Under these
circumstances, end-product quality control is routinely included in elaborate
systems and is applied with great effect on projects where roads are
constructed. It is commonly considered necessary to establish full laboratory
services on site for control of workmanship and material quality. The resources
one can afford for such control during the construction of LVSRs are often
less, for the following reasons:
The cost of quality control measures that are applied to more highly
trafcked ff roads d would represent a much larger proportion of the
construction costs of LVSRs.
Contractors and consultants involved in the construction of LVSRs are
often smaller and have less resources available than those n routinely con-
structing larger projects.
LVSRs are often executed as small projects where the establishment of
full site-testing facilities is often not viable. Distances to central laboratory
services may also render this option impractical.
This section sets out a conceptual approach to ensure the best possible quality
assurance with a reasonable level of control in constructing LVSRs. The
inherent compromise in this approach will often require innovative solutions
and focus on the overall quality assurance system to achieve optimal results.
6.6.2 Methodology
General
A
s the resources available for quality control in construction of LVSRs are
often limited, it is important to utilise whatever means are available as
efciently as possible and to combine conventional control methods with
other quality assurance methods.
Quality Assurance with Reduced Resources
Quality assurance procedures where control systems are applied at reduced
levels include the following:
stockpiling as a means of selecting qualities and ensuring known quality
of the materials being used
good management procedures to ensure that materials are used to their full
potential and to prevent rejection of material after transportation to the
road
Quality control does not in itself create
higher quality, but is one of several tools
that are used to ensure that a product of the
desired quality is produced.
Effective quality control for LVSRs does not
necessarily require a full-scale programme
of laboratory testing.
Density control is important in calibra-
tion of method specications, but full-scale
test programmes are not always viable on
LVSRs owing to lack of resources.
systematic use of method specihcations
control by observation of construction procedures by an experienced
practitioner
proof rolling (e.g. with loaded trucks) to test the stability of layers before
proceeding with construction
use of methods for direct strength measurements by correlation with
known parameters (e.g. probing methods such as DCP and others)
11
laboratory testing for 'calibration` of method specifcations
laboratory testing of typical material sources for 'calibration` of visual
observations
PrIorIty In uaIIty ControI
Box 6.18 - Optimum priority for quality control
The resources put into quality assurance should be applied where there is a
maximum beneft from the efforts, i.e. where the benefts, in terms of structural
life or surface life, are greatest in relation to efforts made in the control.
LVSRs typically utilise natural gravel in the base course, followed by a thin
bituminous seal. This pavement structure is sensitive to any irregularities in the
seal, in the interface between seal and base course and in the base course
itself. Conceptually, the priority when allocating resources to quality
assurance should therefore be as shown in Table 6.4. The table sets out the
priority on the basis of what is possible from a technical point of view in
relation to the input of resources for control. It does not take account of
contractual and institutional issues. These aspects will vary considerably and
require varying measures for optimal quality assurance.
Having spray cans with bitumen emulsion
available at all times during surjacing
operations jor repairing minor jaults is
part oj good quality assurance.
Direct strength measurement can assist but
cannot replace materials management
and observation oj the work procedures
as the most powerjul means oj quality
assurance.
Priority Layer Comments
1
Bituminous
surfacing
Choice of equipment, choice of material type,

visual assessment and measurement of application
rates is of greatest importance.
Only basic laboratory equipment is essential for
effective control during operation.
2
Surface nish
of the base
course
Biscuit layers are the most common reason for an

unacceptable product. A geological hammer/pick
can be used to identify such aws.
Visual assessment, plus choice of equipment and
working method is of greatest importance.
Laboratory equipment is not essential for effective
control during operation.
3
Material quality
of the base
course
Laboratory tests in advance and after construction,

combined with indicative tests or observations
during construction, are essential.
4
Compaction
control of the
base course
Method specications, appropriate choice of

method and equipment, visual assessment and
proof rolling, in combination with regular testing
for calibration. r
The extent of testing required for calibration
purposes should be adapted to site conditions and
available resources.
5
Subbase and
earthworks
Visual assessment and laboratory tests ahead of

construction give improved condence in material
quality.
Method specications, visual control, proof rolling
and appropriate choice of method and equipment
are sufcient for site control of workmanship.
Visual control of the bitumen distributor
and continuous inspection of the work on
site are important parts of the quality control
procedures and can reduce aws in thin
seal that could lead to premature failure of
the surfacing.
Continuous visual control by skilled staff
through the entire operation when process-
ing the base course for LVSRs is essential.
Inadequate compaction of natural gravel is
often caused by poor mixing, insufcient
moisture content or poor nal spreading
and compaction of the layer.
Table 6.4 - Priority in quality control
6.7 Drainage
6.7.1 Introduction
D
rainage is probably the most dominant factor affecting the performance of a
LVSR. When such roads fail it is often because of inadequacies in drainage
resulting in the ingress of water into the road structure, structural damage and
costly repairs. In addition, surface water can form a road safety hazard by
causing aquaplaning of vehicles.
Unfortunately, many LVSRs have evolved with inadequate initial engineering and
drainage design. Even with properly engineered LVSRs, on-site inspection is
often necessary to correct any unforeseen conditions during construction. Such
an approach is more cost-effective than maintaining or correcting deciencies
after the road has been in service for several years.
Two inter-related aspects of drainage require careful consideration during
construction, namely:
Internal drainage of the pavement which seeks to avoid the entrapment of
water by allowing it to permeate through and drain out of the pavement
structure.
External drainage which seeks to divert water away from, and prevent its
ingress into, the pavement structure through measures such as the con-
struction of sealed shoulders, side drains, etc.
6.7.2 Internal Drainage
General
I
nternal drainage involves measures to minimise moisture contents in the
embankment and pavement layers and importantly to prevent unwanted
movement of water within the structure. Internal drainage is vital for the
satisfactory performance of earthworks and pavement layers made of natural soils
and gravel, especially those that utilise ne grained and plastic materials such as
those commonly used for LVSRs
12
. (Refer to Chapter 5 for more details).
Permeability of pavement layers
Wherever possible, each layer in pavement and earthworks should be more
permeable than the overlying layer in order to prevent any water entering the
structure from being trapped. It is often not possible to meet this requirement
consistently and the provision of cross-fall in all earthworks and layer works for
water to escape from the pavement structure can alleviate the problem (see also
Section 5.4.3 and Box 5.7). Under severe conditions, especially where there is
risk of water seepging into the pavement structure, consideration should be given
to installing subsurface drainage systems or, better still, to increase the height of
the road in such areas.
It is important to create an awareness
amongst the public so that actions that lead
to impaired drainage of the pavement can
be prevented.
Crown Height
Crown height is the vertical distance from the bottom of the side drain to the
nished road level at centre line and needs to be sufciently great to allow
proper internal drainage of the pavement layers. Economical ways to achieve
sufcient crown height include the use of material from the side drain and road
reserve a common procedure where scrapers/motor graders are used for
construction. Maintaining sufcient crown height through cuttings is of particular
importance, owing to the unfavourable drainage conditions in such areas.
However, this may result in a considerable increase in the quantity of earthworks
cut. Alternatives, such as subsurface lter drains, should be considered as a last
resort because of cost and maintenance implications. The trafc safety aspects
of large crown heights should be taken into account by moving the side drain
further away from the shoulder break point.
In areas where in situ soils are considered to be self-draining, such as in sandy
areas and desert-type areas, priority should be given to providing good side
support within a low embankment prole and shallow side slopes (typically 1:6
or 1:8) rather than a large crown height and relatively steep side slopes.
Seepage and subsurface drains
Unfortunately, inadequate surface and
subsurface drainage are typical deciencies
associated with cut-and-ll pavement
sections for LVSRs, as shown in Figure
6.7. Such deciencies can affect the
pavement by erosion, decreasing soil
support or initiating creep or failure of
the downhill ll or slope. They should be
addressed during construction rather
than waiting until failures occur because n
it is much more expensive to undertake
remedial works.
Water seepage
from rock and soil
Ditch almost non-existent
Inadeqate surface drainage Inadeqate surfa ff ce drainage
Ditch provides surface drainage
subsurface seepage zone
not intercepted
Paved shoulder
Potential for high capillary rise
Potential slope failure
due to seepage
Seepage zone
Potential fo ff r high capillary rise
Potential slope fa ff ilure
due to seepage
Seepage zone
Figure 6.7 - Typical drainage deciencies associated with cut-and-ll
pavement sections
13
Research in the region has shown that a
minimum crown height is a critical parameter
that correlates well with the actual service
life of pavements made of ne grained and/
or slightly plastic materials. A minimum
crown height of 0.75 m is recommended.
See Chapter 5 - Pavement Design, Materials
and Surfacing, Section 5.3.4.
Blocked side drains may lead to surfacing
failures.
In the design of the vertical alignment of LVSRs, it is advisable to try to
avoid cutting into the ground to reduce the risk of encountering subsurface
water. Thus, the depressed pavement construction shown in Figure 6.8
should be avoided except where soil moisture conditions are suitable or the
drainage systems effectively eliminate water-related problems.
Figure 6.8 - Potential drainage problems associated with depressed
pavement construction
Localised seepage can be corrected in
various ways but seepage along pervious
layers combined with changes in road
elevation (grades) may require sub-
surface drains as well as ditches, as
Subsurface drains can be made of geo-
textiles wrapped around aggregate, with
or without pipes installed, but various
specialised systems are also marketed.
Such drains have commonly been made
out of aggregate surrounded by lter
sand instead of geotextiles, depending
on the grading of the in-situ soils.
As subsurface drainage systems usually incur relatively high installation costs
and there is the risk of blocking of buried systems, alternative options are
preferred.
Shoulders
Construction of shoulders needs to be undertaken carefully if typical drainage
problems are to be avoided. Preferably, the granular base should extend to
the embankment slope with sufcient height above the ditch to prevent water
intrusion. Trench, canal or bathtub construction, in which the pavement
layers are conned between continuous impervious shoulders, should be
avoided as this has the undesirable feature of trapping water at the pavement/
shoulder interface and inhibiting ow into the drainage ditch.
Shoulder materials should be selected which have a permeability similar to
that of the base course, so that water does not get trapped within the pavement.
However, the material properties for unsealed shoulders may well be different
from those required for the base for reasons of durability. Unsealed shoulders
are similar to a gravel wearing course and require material with some
plasticity, which is a property that might be considered less desirable for
road base material.
Natural surface
Shallow
cut
Water ponding
Moisture migration
Shallow ditches
poor surface drainage
Shallow
cut
Moisture migrattion
From
rock
Seepage
zone
Paved
shoulder
(a) Ditch & gutter
(b) Perforated drain
alternate
Perforated
subsurface
drain
From
rock
Seepage
zone
(a) Ditch & gutter
Figure 6.9 - Benecial interception
of surface runoff and sub-surface
seepage
13
.
Construction of lter drains is well suited
for labour-based methods. Geotextiles used
for lter drains should be of a type that does
not get blocked by nes from surrounding
soils.
LBM
A common problem is water inltration into the base and subbase, which
occurs for a number of reasons as, illustrated in Figure 6.10. These include:
rutting adacent to the sealed surface
build up of deposits of grass and debris
poor joint between base and shoulder (more common when a pavedd
shoulder has been added after initial construction)
Figure 6.10 - Typical drainage deciencies associated with
pavement shoulder construction
13
Ideally, as illustrated in Figure 6.11, the base and subbase layers should be
extended outwards to form the shoulders, which should preferably be sealed.
Water in rut
Water infiltration
Water infiltration
Water infiltration
Grass and debris buildup
(a)
(b)
(c)
Ponding of water
Paved shoulder
added later
Running surface Shoulder Side drain
Camber or crossfall
at least 1 in 40 (2.5%)
Crossfall 1 in 20 (5%)
Typically +/- 750 mm
Figure 6.11 - Ideal shoulder construction/drainage arrangements
Use of different materials in the shoulder
and the carriageway is often uneconomical
because of disruption in the construction
procedures. Use of the same material in the
carriageway and the shoulder eliminates
the risk of trapping water.
Water inltration in shoulder and rut leading
to edge failures.
6.7.3 External Drainage
Introduction
E
xternal drainage involves methods of crossing of watercourses, measures
to divert water away from the road and prevention of damage caused by
erosion. In the construction of LVSRs there is often wide scope for the use
of various measures to improve external drainage, such as low-level structures,
drifts etc. where 100% passability to trafc throughout the year may not be
required.
It is not within the scope of this Section to provide a detailed description of d
all the various measures that make up a good drainage system. Conditions on
site will vary tremendously in respect of in-situ soils, topography, vegetation,
climate, human settlement patterns, environmental concerns, etc. The skills
of site personnel and knowledge about local conditions are critical for
successful installation of mitre drains, catch-water drains, side drains, berms,
channels, cut-off drains and crossings along the road
14
.
6.7.4 Hydrology and Hydraulic Calculations
Introduction
T
he use of sophisticated methods to estimate run-off and for the calculation
of the size of waterway structures is not always appropriate for LVSR
because either the data and/or the resources required are not available. Thus,
alternative methods, which also rely on visual observations and historical
evidence from consultations with the local populations are often more
appropriate. Furthermore, nancial constraints also mean that a compromise
is often required between structures that provide all-weather access and those
that can be constructed with the available resources.
Method
The capacity of drainage structures should ideally be calculated on the basis
of local experience gathered over a long period of time and should be updated
to cater for any recent changes in rainfall pattern and climate. However, such
information is often not readily available in many countries, prompting a
need to develop standards for drainage design and calculations. In all cases
it is advisable to combine calculations with observations on site, in addition
to information from reliable local sources.
With the ever-increasing cost of maintenance, it is desirable to increase the
size of drainage structures to a minimum of a 600 mm opening so that they
can be easily maintained.
Return Period
The return period for a given ow of water is related to the estimated
statistical risk of overtopping of drainage structures. It is part of the hydraulic
calculations required for each type of structure for each project on the basis
of policy and anticipated consequences to the road or the public. The return
period is therefore a critical parameter in the design of LVSRs because it
controls the level of risk in relation to cost of construction and the type of
structure that is appropriate. As a broad guide, the following return periods
can be considered for LVSRs:
Bridges: 10 - 50 years.
Culverts: 5 - 10 years.
Drifts or well-protected culverts: 0 - 5 years.
Caution is required in undertaking drainage
work as interference with the natural drain-
age pattern can lead to major environmental
damage in sensitive areas.
Overtopping on LVSRs, although undesirable,
has less impact on the economy than if it
occurs on HVRs.
6.7.5 Drainage Structures
Introduction
T
his chapter gives some examples of the range of solutions available to
designers and constructors of LVSRs. The techniques shown are the
results of innovative methods tried out and applied in many countries in the
region over a number of years. A basic requirement in the construction of
structures for crossing water courses is to assess the need for protection of
the structure against erosion during the construction period as well as
assessing the risk that structures that are not designed to withstand ooding
will actually experience overtopping, so that additional protection measures
can be taken. Construction of low, sacricial points for overtopping should
be considered where available resources do not allow for the provision of
structures with adequate capacity
15
.
Low-level structures
A low-level structure is designed to accept overtopping without damage, and
is ideally suited for LVSRs in locations where less than full all-weather
passability is acceptable to the community. The two basic types listed below
have been used with success in the region. Various alternative names are
sometimes used to describe these structures.
Drifts are designed to provide a rm driving surface in the riverbed, where
trafc can pass when water levels are moderate.
Vented drift sometimes named fords, causeways or Irish bridges, larger
structures are called low level bridges) allow water to pass through openings,
but can withstand overtopping without damage. Openings in vented drifts
should, like culverts, be made large enough, preferably not less than
0.9 m so that cleaning during future maintenance is made easier and the
risk of blockage is minimised. f
A common feature of all low level structures is that they require proper
foundations and anchoring, as well as scour protection to the road prism.
Culverts
Types: Culverts are constructed on LVSRs using a variety of methods and
materials. Examples include corrugated plastic pipes, steel pipes or arches,
pre-cast or fresh concrete pipes, boxes, arches or half arches (shelverts),
reinforced concrete slabs resting on blockwork in a box culvert prole and
wooden culverts in a box or circular prole.
As indicated in Box 6.19, there are many innovative ways of producing
inexpensive culverts.
Inadequate culvert capacity, particularly in
combination with high embankments can
result in severe damage and expensive
remedial works.
Low-level drift.
Vented drift.
Banks of pipe proles culverts are prone
to blockage by trees even when large sizes
are used.
LBM
Location: Wherever possible, culverts should be located in the original
stream bed with the invert following the grade of the natural channel. Stream
bed realignment may be undertaken in exceptional cases.
Skew culverts: Water courses intercepting the road at an angle of skew of less
than 20 degrees can generally be accommodated by a culvert placed at right
angles to the road centre line. In such cases, the culvert inlet should be
positioned at the point where the channel meets the road, and any modifcation
to the channel made downstream of the outlet. Water crossings with a skew
angle greater than 20 degrees should be provided with a skew culvert.
Inlets: To avoid silting, culvert inverts should be placed at a grade of not less
than 1.25 per cent for pipes, and 0.5 per cent for box culverts. Invert gradients
should be increased by one per cent in the case of culverts provided with drop
inlets.
Outlets: The invert level at the outlet of a culvert should coincide with ground
level. Where culverts are unavoidably constructed on a steep slope, the energy
generated must be dissipated to avoid serious erosion at the discharge end of
the culvert. A stilling box and widening at the outlet are effective methods of
reducing the velocity of the water.
Foundation: Ideally, culverts should be located on sound foundations such as
rock. Soft, saturated and expansive clayey soils may cause settlements or
seasonal movements of the culvert. Removal of poor soils or stabilisation of
the foundation should be considered.
Use oI Labour-Hased Methods
Labour-based methods are very well suited for the construction of drainage
structures, excavation of drainage channels, construction of soil berms, stone
pitching, scour protection, etc. Pre-cast concrete culverts are not well suited
for LBM if the weight of each element is too great for manual handling.
LBM
/natable rubber balloons have been used
successjully as jormwork jor construction
oj concrete pipe culverts on site. Concrete
is poured directly against the side oj the
trench, which is protected with plastic
sheets.
Upstream protection against blockage by
trees can be successjully constructed jrom
old railway steel sleepers well-anchored
into the riverbed.
Concrete culverts are only practical jor use
in labour-based methods ij each section is
not too heavy jor handling by labour or by
mechanical equipment available on site.
LBM
Box 6.19 - Innovative construction of culverts
Innovative methods are in use in the region for simple and effcient
construction of culverts that are particularly well suited for application
in LVSRs, especially where labour-based methods are used. Examples of
such techniques include:
use of locally produced treated planks (pine) for yard production of pipe
culverts, strapped with steel bands (Tanzania)
use of infatable rubber balloons as formwork for site casting of concrete
pipe culverts in a large variety of dimensions (Tanzania) up to several
metres in diameter
use of drums as formwork for standardised yard production of concrete
modules for pipe culverts (Zimbabwe)
use of drums as formwork (left behind) for site casting of concrete pipe
culverts (Tanzania)
use of timber for site construction of square profle culverts
use of blockwork for site construction of square profle culverts
(Botswana)
shelverts are pre-casts concrete half-arches that require less skill for
construction than culverts
masonry vertical brick walls with concrete slabs cast on site
LBM
6.7.6 Erosion
Introduction
Any disruption to the natural ow of water carries a risk of erosion that may
lead to environmental degradation, silting, damage to roads, damage to
buildings and services, destruction of farming land and loss of fertile soil.
Thus, there is a responsibility to ensure that the construction of the drainage
system for a LVSR receives the same attention to good practice as the
construction of other roads. Indeed, avoidance of erosion can be more critical
in the case of LVSRs because of the greater challenges faced in maintaining
the drainage system in remote areas where these roads are often located.
Scour Checks
There are many examples in the region of inexpensive and effective methods
that are used to protect drainage channels and side drains by the use of scour
checks that are easily constructed by labour-based methods. The scour checks
can be made of wooden sticks, rocks, concrete or other materials depending
on the most economical source of materials. The frequency of scour checks
needs to be properly adjusted according to slope gradient in order to prevent
erosion between the checks causing damage to the system. The following can
be used as a guide:
Gradient of the ditch Scour check spacing (m)
4% or less (not required)
5% 20 m
8% 10 m
10% 5 m
Erosion of Culverts
Short culverts requiring high headwalls and wingwalls are prone to erosion
around both inlets and outlets, especially along the wingwalls. Constructing
culverts that are sufciently long to reach the toe of the embankment will
minimise necessary protection measures, future maintenance and the risk of
damage to the embankment around the openings. It is necessary to carefully
assess the additional cost of lengthening culverts against these benets,
especially in the case of LVSRs that are often located in remote areas where
regular maintenance is a challenge.
Slope Protection
If required, placing of topsoil and planting of vegetation on the slopes of
embankments should take place in order to minimise erosion before indigenous
vegetations can establish roots.
Box 6.20 - Planting of vegetation for protection of slopes against erosion
Where grass or other vegetation is planted for protection of slopes, it is
absolutely vital that professional advice to be obtained from a botanist.
Failure to do this could lead to intrusion of non-indigenous species that
could threaten the environment or cause damage to local farming.
Blockwork has been used successfully for
simplied construction of headwalls on
small culverts and for the support of concrete
slabs to make a box culvert.
Erosion in outlet channels can cause con-
siderable environmental damage in sensitive
areas.
When there is a risk of erosion at outlets,
suitable aprons and other protective measures
are required.
Concrete scour checks in side drain.
LBM
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
The characteristics of LVSRs are such that the methods employed for
their construction may be different from those for more highly trafcked
roads. In some circumstances labour-based methods can be effectively
employed for many, if not all, of the construction activities.
Construction of LVSRs are often carried out in remote rural areas.
These circumstances can give rise to special problems relating to
health, safety and the environment and appropriate measures need to
be taken to ameliorate any detrimental effects of the road construction
processes on local populations and the environment.
A higher degree of awareness of the properties and use of materials is
required in the construction of LVSRs so the use of the (often) scarce
resources of good quality road-building material can be well managed.
The nature of LVSRs construction provides a range of both technology
choice and equipment use. The selection of equipment must be matched
to the chosen technology in order that the the highest quality of
construction is attained with the resources available.
Compaction of natural gravels is an essential component for the good
performance of LVSRs. Where the materials are suitable, compaction
to refusal during construction adds relatively little to construction costs
but is likely to produce signicant benets from improved road
performance. Conversely, poor compaction is likely to lead to lower
density, moisture ingress, deformation and increased maintenance.
Good quality control during construction is important in the construction
of all roads but is particularly important on LVSRs, where greater use
is made of locally available resources. It is important that these roads
provide a good quality riding surface and pavement performance so
that unexpected maintenance inputs do not occur.
Many of the natural gravels used in the construction of LVSRs provide
high strengths when dry but are also moisture sensitive. Keeping the
pavement dry through good drainage is, therefore, a critical factor in
the performance of LVSRs and it is important that measures that reduce
moisture ingress are applied at the construction stage rather than
later, when they are generally much more expensive to carry out.
Perceived risks associated with the use of unconventional approaches,
technology and materials can be sensibly managed through relatively
low-cost measures that ensure good performance.
6.8 Summary
T
1.
2
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
Still D A (1992). The Case for the Selective Use of Labour-based
Constructionin Civil Engineering. Proc. Conf. On Appropriate
Technology for the Third World, 8 to10 June, 1992. Windhoek.
Ministry of Works, Transport and Communication. (1999). White
Paper on Labour Based Works Policy. Windhoek.
Stevenson S R (1994). Environmental Impact Assessment of
Transportation Projects in Africa. All- Africa Engineers Conference
on the Role of the Engineer in Sustainable Development, Nairobi.
Austroads (1996). Bitumen Sealing Safety Guide (1996), Sydney.
Stock S A and J de Veen (1996). Expanding Labour-based Methods
for Road Works in Africa. SSATP Working Paper No. 22. The World
Bank, Washington D.C.
Pinard M I and S Ookeditse (1988). Evaluation of High Energy
Impact Compaction Techniques for Minimising Construction Water
Requirements in Semi-Arid Regions. Fourteenth ARRB Conference,
Canberra. 26 August - 2 September,1988.
Petts R C (1997). Agricultural Tractors in Roadworks. Annual Roads
Convention, Dar es Salaam.
Pinard M I (1998). Innovative Compaction Techniques for Improving
the Bearing Capacity of Roads and Airelds. Proc. 5
th
Int. Conf. on
h
the Bearing Capacity of Roads and Airelds. Trondheim.
Schroeder W L and S E Dickinson (1996). Soil in Construction.
Prentice Hall.
Roughton International in association with University of Birminghamand
University of Nottingham (2000). Guidelines on Materials and Borrow
Pit Management for Low-Cost Roads. DFID.
Motswagole K J (2000). Evaluation of the CSIR Quality Control Test
Kit, Final Research Report. Department of Roads, Ministry of
Transport, Harare, ILO/ASIST, Africa.
Gourley C S, and P A K Greening (1999). Collaborative Research
Programme on Highway Engineering in the SADC Region. Transport
Research Laboratory, DFID.
Birgisson B and B E Ruth (2003). Improving Performance Through
Consideration of Terrain Conditions. Proc. 8
th
Int. Conf. on Low-
h
volume Roads, Reno, Nevada, June 22 25, 2003.
Abbey P (1999). Storm Water Drainage Design Guidelines. Land and
Transport Division, Ministry of Environment and Transport, Mah.
A Pocket Guide to Road Design for Low-volume Roads, (1998).
Ministry of Transport and Energy, Department of Roads, Harare.
References
Bibliography
Bental P, A Beusch and J de Veen (1999). Guide: Employment
Intensive Infrastructure Programmes: Capacity Building for Contracting in
the Construction Sector. Development Policies Department, International
Labour Ofce, Geneva.
Bental P, A Twumasi-Bokaye and R B Watermeyer (1995). Labour-Based
Contracting: A Study to Develop Guidelines for Project Formulation and
Implementation. International Labour Ofce, Geneva.
Committee of State Road Authorities (1984). TRH 15: Subsurface drainage
for roads. CSRA, Pretoria.
Committee of State Road Authorities (1991). Code of Practice for the design
of highway bridges and culverts in South Africa: Part 3. CSRA, Pretoria.
Demsey B, M I darter and S H Carpenter (1982). Improving sub-drainage
and shoulders of existing pavements - State of the art. Federal Highway
Administration Report FHWA/RD-81/077. Department of Transportation,
Washington, D.C.
Development Bank of Southern Africa (1993). Interim Guidelines for Labour-
based Construction Projects. Johannesburg.
Edmonds G A and J J de Veen (1993).Technology Choice for the Construction
and Maintenance of Roads in Developing Countries. ILO, Geneva.
Gerke R J (1987). Subsurface drainage of road structures. Special Report
No. 35. Australian Road Research Board, Sydney.
ILO ASIST (1998). The Labour-Based Technology Source Book. A
Catalogue of Key Publications. International Labour Organisation, Advisory
Support, Information Services and Training, Nairobi.
Larcher P (Ed) (1998). Labour-based Road Construction. Intermediate
Technology Publications, London.
Larcher P and D Miles (2000). Roads & Realities: How to promote road
contracting in developing countries. IDE, Loughborough University,
Leicestershire.
Mayer A and G K Kayira (1997). Addressing Unemployment Problems
Through Expanding Labour-Based Public Works Programmes. Botswana
Development Issues No. 1, Friedrich Ebert Stiftung, October 1997.
Miles D (Ed.) (1996). Towards Guidelines for Labour-Based Contracting. A
framework document. MART Working Paper No. 1. Institute of Development
Engineering, Loughborough University, Leicestershire.
Millard R S (1993). Road Building in the Tropics. TRL State of the Art
Review 9. Transport Research Laboratory, Dept. of Transport.
National Transport Commission (1986). Road Drainage Manual. Chief
Directorate: National Roads, Pretoria.
Nilsson C (1993). Labour-based Contracting. ILO ASIST Bulletin, Harare.
Rolt JR, C S Gourley and J P Hayes (2002). Rational drainage of road
pavements. PR/INT/244/2002. Transport Research Laboratory, DFID.
Transport and Road Research Laboratory (1992). Overseas Road Note 9: A
Design Manual for Small Bridges. TRRL, Crowthorne.
C
h
a
p
t
e
r

7
1. Introduction
2. Regional Setting
4. Geometric Design
and Road Safety
5. Pavement Design,
6. Construction and
Drainage
7. Maintenance and
Road Management
Maintenance and
Road Management
7
7.1 Introduction ............................................................7 - 1
7.1.1 Maintenance ...................................................7 - 1
7.1.2 Road Management ............................................ t 7 - 2
7.1.3 Purpose and Scope of Chapter .............................7 - 2
7.2 Maintenance Issues...................................................7 - 3
7.2.1 Maintenance Setting..........................................7 - 3
7.2.2 Deterioration Characteristics ...............................7 - 5
7.2.3 Characteristics of LVSRs ....................................7 - 6
7.2.4 The Maintenance Challenge ................................7 - 6
7.2.5 Lessons Learned .............................................. d 7 - 9
7.3 Maintenance Management ..........................................7 - 11
7.3.1 Main Purpose ..................................................7 - 11
7.3.2 Inventory .......................................................7 - 11
7.3.3 Components....................................................7 - 12
7.3.4 Management Cycle ...........................................7 - 13
7.3.5 Maintenance Policy and Organisation..................... n 7 - 14
7.3.6 Maintenance Standards ......................................7 - 15
7.3.7 Assessing Needs ..............................................7 - 17
7.3.8 Determining Priorities .......................................7 - 19
7.3.9 Management Systems and Tools ...........................7 - 20
7.4 Maintenance Operations ............................................7 - 24
7.4.1 Organisational Roles and Models ..........................7 - 24
7.4.2 Performance and Contractual Agreements ...............7 - 25
7.4.3 Acceptance of Risk ........................................... k 7 - 26
7.4.4 Increasing the Use of Small-scale Contractors ..........7 - 27
7.5 Summary ...............................................................7 - 28
7.6 References and Bibliography.......................................7 - 29
C
o
n
t
e
n
t
s
Maintenance and Road Management 7 - 1
Maintenance and
Road Management
7
Planning
Design
Construction
Maintenance
S
e
q
u
e
n
c
e
o
f
a
c
t
i
v
i
t
i
e
s
Maintenance
7.1 Introduction
7.1.1 Maintenance
R
oad maintenance is an integral component of the LVSR provision process,
the type and cost of which are inuenced signicantly by decisions made
during the preceding planning, design and construction phases. Proper
maintenance contributes to the preservation of the road asset and to prolonging
the roads life to its intended service duration. Without adequate maintenance,
roads deteriorate rapidly, become dangerous and costly to use and, ultimately,
the costs to the economy are substantial.
Whereas design and construction of LVSRs are dominated by engineering
issues, maintenance is essentially a multi-dimensional issue in which the
management and technical aspects are inuenced by political, social and
institutional issues. For example, the use of maintenance works as a
poverty alleviation tool through appropriate community involvement is
assuming increasing importance.
Denition of road maintenance
To conserve as nearly as possible, the
original designed condition of paved and
unpaved roadways, and of trafc signs,
signals and markings, in a manner most
likely to minimize the total cost to society of
vehicle operation and accident cost, plus
the cost of providing the maintenance itself,
under the constraints of severe resource
limitations, in respect of skilled manpower,
equipment and money, both local and
foreign. (PIARC).
Maintenance currently constitutes one of the major preoccupations of roads
agencies in the SADC region. In the early stages of road development, most
of the road expenditure was spent on construction. However, as these
networks have become more developed, the expenditure required for
adequate maintenance and rehabilitation has increased relative to that
required for new construction.
Figure 7.1 - Pattern of road expenditure in the SADC region
Unfortunately, for a variety of reasons, including lack of adequate funding,
provision of satisfactory road maintenance still remains an elusive goal for a
number of SADC countries. As a result, these countries, and the region as
a whole, have paid a high price in terms of deteriorating road networks, very
high transport costs and the reluctance of donors to assist with the funding
of new or rehabilitation projects. Fortunately, however, roads agencies are
beginning to tackle the maintenance challenges in a more holistic manner to
improve efciency and effectiveness and to achieve sustainability.
7.1.2 Road Management
T
he SADC road system represents a major investment and is one of the
regions largest public sector assets, with a replacement cost of more than
$50 billion (2000). Indeed, the asset value of the road system often exceeds the
combined value of all the other surface transport systems. Therefore, it is
extremely important that this asset be preserved through effective and efcient
management. In the absence of this, the investment can be eroded quite quickly
because roads that are not maintained deteriorate very rapidly.
Even for relatively low-trafcked road networks, reliable information has
become essential for effective management. This has led to the development
of management tools, including various types of road management systems,
that assist roads agencies in allocating resources in a manner that achieves
the best value for money. However, to be sustainable, such systems should
be carefully chosen to match the available resources - both technical and
nancial - of the roads agency. Unfortunately, there are a number of examples
of systems which have failed to work satisfactorily.
T
he main purpose of this chapter is to provide guidance on how to improve
the maintenance and management of LVSRs through the adoption of
appropriate institutional arrangements, management strategies and technical
standards. Guidance is also given on criteria for establishing road management
systems to assist roads agencies in the overall management of their road
networks. Aspects of maintenance operations are not covered in detail because
sufcient reference texts on this topic already exist.
Example of a badly deteriorated road that
has received little, if any, maintenance since
it was rst constructed? Result? Very high
vehicle operating costs and loss of most of
the original investment.
7.2 Maintenance Issues
7.2.1 Maintenance Setting
Why Maintenance?
T
he case for maintenance is compelling. Having spent time, effort and
money in planning, designing and constructing a road, it is vital to
ensure that the asset is preserved by timely and effective maintenance. Such
maintenance has three principal purposes:
it prolongs the life of the road and postpones the day when renewal will
be required
it reduces the cost of operating vehicles on the roads
it helps to keep roads open and ensures greater regularity, punctuality
and safety of road transport services
The rst purpose corresponds most directly to the interest of the roads
agency, the second to that of operators of vehicles, and the third, more
generally, to that of the inhabitants of the area traversed by the road.
Typical Maintenance Activities
Maintenance activities are either cyclic or reactive and can be of a routine or
periodic nature. Cyclic activities are those that are carried out at regular
intervals. Reactive activities are those that are carried out in response to an
occurrence e.g. erosion, drainage repairs or a condition defect exceeding
values dictated by maintenance standards, e.g. rutting greater than a given
value.
Table 7.1 - Maintenance activities
Works
Category
Maintenance Activity Type
Cyclic Reactive
Routine
Maintenance
General:
Grass cutting
Removal of obstacles
Culvert clearing/repair
Bridge clearing/repair
Drain clearing
Erosion control/repair
Carriageway markings
Repairing road signs
Pavement:
Pothole repairs
Surface patching (local sealing)
Crack sealing
Edge repairs
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
Periodic
Maintenance
Rejuvenation seal
Resealing
Shoulder regravelling/reshaping
x
x
x
Many of the activities in Table 7.1 can be carried out cost-effectively
using labour-based methods. If some of the routine maintenance work is
contracted on a lengthman contract basis, for example, there would be
little or no requirement for maintenance labour camps for transport to and
Routine maintenance: Fixed cost activities
that are carried out irrespective of the
engineering characteristics of the road or
the density of trafc (e.g. grass cutting)
and cleaning of drains.
Recurrent maintenance: Activities required
throughout the year but whose frequencies
vary with trafc, topography and climate
(e.g. road marking).
Periodic maintenance: Those recurrent
activities that are required at intervals of
several years (e.g. resealing).
Lengthman: A man engaged on a contract
basis responsible for routine maintenance
on a xed length of road adjacent to his
own home. He is paid a xed sum per day
or month to keep drainage ditches clear, ll
in potholes, cut grass, repair minor erosion
to shoulders, etc.
Grass cutting - a typical, labour-based,
routine maintenance activity.
Road Safety
Issue/Problem Effect Solution
Vegetation growth Impairs driver visibility Ensure safety standards
are established and main-
tained.
Carry out routine inspec-
tions to identify deterior-
ation likely to lead to a
reduction in road safety.
Record and analyse accident
data to provide clues to
maintenance deciencies .
Potholes Danger to motorists
Flooding (blocked culverts) Reduces pavement strength
Dirty, damaged or missing
trafc signs Increases likelihood of
trafc accidents
Faint road markings
Damaged bridges and guard-
rails
Scoured highway shoulders Impairs integrity of road
pavement

Increases safety hazards to
road users
Causes more road trafc
accidents
Need for effective and
timely road maintenance
Road User Costs
Clear link established
between pavement condition
and vehicle operating costs
and embodied in transport
investment models (e.g.
HDM-4).
An increase in surface
roughness causes vehicle
operating costs to increase
Signicant additional costs
incurred by road users
when maintenance require-
ments are overlooked.
Identify, programme and
control maintenance opera-
tions.

Rate of pavement
deterioration is often not
contained, causing surface
roughness to increase at
an accelerating rate
Additional costs to highway
users
Use of an appropriate
maintenance management
system
Life-Cycle Costs
Feasibility and design strategies
assume: that: (a) regular pave-
ment strengthening will be carried
out to arrest deterioration, (b)
care will be taken to deal with
localised imperfections as they
arise (e.g. crack sealing).
Failure to control deterioration
results either in an earlier
requirement for strengthening
or substantially increased costs
of reconstruction.
Optimise investment by
judiciously applying
maintenance interventions
to arrest rate of deterioration
and to preserve structural
integrity of each road link in
the network.

Assumptions often not realised
in practice.
Economic penalties incurred
which result in a need for
premature reconstruction.
Use of an appropriate
pavement management
system.
from the work site, thereby saving money. Some periodic maintenance work
may still require specialised equipment, e.g. bitumen sealing operations, but
labour-based methods can be used for many activities.
Lack of attention to simple maintenance tasks can impose a multitude of
problems for road users, society and the national economy, as illustrated in
Table 7.2.
Table 7.2 - Maintenance problems, effects and solutions
7.2.2 Deterioration Characteristics
E
ven with strict adherence to proper standards of construction, roads
deteriorate with the passage of time. The rate of deterioration may vary
greatly depending on the climate, the strength of the pavement and underlying
subgrade, the trafc volume and axle loads. The wear and tear of road
surfaces by trafc is aggravated by rainwater and by changes in temperature.
Cracking occurs in the bituminous surfacing which, together with the ingress
of rainwater, often leads to pavement failures.
Figure 7.2 illustrates how road condition deteriorates with time and how road
life may be extended by controlled maintenance.
Uncontrolled deterioration
of Road Asset (little or no
maintenance)
Controlled deterioration
of Road Asset (by wise
investment of funds)
Date of
Construction
Level of maintenance
required to control
deterioration and extend life
Standard of
Maintenance for
Resurfacing
Major
maintenance
e.g. resurfacing
Minimum
tolerable
condition Condition at
which pavements
are actually
replaced
Remaining
Service Life
Remaining Actual Life
C
O
N
D
I
T
I
O
N
AGE Year X
Figure 7.2 - Typical road condition deterioration with time
Of particular signicance in responding to the maintenance requirements of
LVSRs is the fact that, in contrast to more heavily trafcked roads, the
proportion of total distress resulting from environmentally-related inuences
is very high, as illustrated in Figure 7.3
1
.
Environmental component
Rutting component
Cracking component
Structural component
0 5 10 15 20
Pavement Age (years)
R
o
u
g
h
n
e
s
s
(
I
R
I
,
m
/
k
m
)
6
5
4
3
2
SNPd = 3
HS = 50 mm
YE4 = 0.1
m = 0.023
Figure 7.3 - Contribution to total predicted road roughness of different
components for a low-medium volume paved road
1
All roads deteriorate with time. However,
LVSRs are particularly sensitive to the
vagaries of the physical environment so
that timely and effective control of their
deterioration becomes the key challenge to
the management of road maintenance.
In Zimbabwe, the environmental component
of roughness progression varied by a factor
of almost 4, with low-volume roads built
to lower cross sectional standards having
the highest rate of progression and higher
volume roads with standard designs having
the lowest rate of progression. Corresponding
crack initiation times and rates of crack
progression were almost half and double
those of standard designs respectively
1
.
Whether the increased risk of deterioration is important in any locality
will ultimately depend on the local climatic, traffc, pavement design,
construction, workmanship and maintenance factors. Consequently, knowledge
of local rates of deterioration will be vital. On the other hand, higher levels of
deterioration and consequent reduced service standards can be tolerated from
both an economic and user perspective. The lesson, therefore, is to appreciate
the risks and manage these within the decision-making framework for justifying
investment levels (see Section 5.4.6.)
7.2.3 CharacterIstIcs oI LVSHs
A
s a general rule, LVSRs are built to lower geometric and pavement
design standards than roads which carry higher traffc volumes. Thus
they may be expected to have the following characteristics which have
signifcant implications on maintenance operations:
A low cross-section prole - thus making them more susceptible to moisture
ingress and general deterioration, i.e. deterioration of the cross section
which has serious impacts on overall performance.
Measures to protect the drainage system are usually minimal - which
often leads to increased erosion.
Thin bituminous surjacings are commonplace - consequently, progressive
embrittlement, poor construction or other causes of damage to the surface
can easily lead to moisture ingress and consequent accelerated deterioration
of the pavement.
The upper pavement materials are usually plastic in nature - this can lead
to a considerable loss in strength on wetting up, and accelerated deterioration
under traffc load.
7.2.4 The MaIntenance ChaIIenge
T
he provision of adequate maintenance for LVSRs becomes even more
diffcult in an environment of limited funds, where resources become
stretched to the limit to contain road deterioration.
LVSRs present a more demanding challenge than the more heavily traffcked
HVSRs for their proper maintenance. Their characteristics, particularly their
greater sensitivity to the vagaries of the natural environment, often mean
that, in order to avoid rapid deterioration, maintenance must be scheduled
and carried out more frequently and expeditiously than for HVSRs.
AttItudes to MaIntenance
Historically, maintenance has been viewed as being un-attractive and
mundane. As a result, it has not received the priority it deserves. This
attitude has been strengthened by the preference of some aid agencies to
fnance capital rather than recurrent costs which has sometimes introduced a
bias against maintenance (as recipient governments sought to use their limited
funds in new construction, which would attract maximum foreign
fnancial participation).
With maintenance often being seen as a public responsibility, funds allocated
for maintenance have, on occasions, been diverted to other sectors that may
be considered more deserving causes in the eyes of those involved in high
level decisions. Through the 1980s and early 1990s, problems of this kind
led to the deterioration of extensive parts of the main road network in many
countries in the SADC region. This has contributed to the high transport
costs - some four to ve times higher than those in developed countries -
thereby making the region globally uncompetitive. The cycle of the effects of
inadequate maintenance is shown in Figure 7.4.
OPERATING
INEFFICIENCY
DETERIORATING
FACILITIES
INADEQUATE
MAINTENANCE
POOR
SERVICE
DELIVERY
LOWCOST
RECOVERY
Figure 7.4 - The vicious cycle of inadequate maintenance
Funding of Maintenance
Although the concept of protecting the capital investment of road provision
through timely nancing of road maintenance is generally well understood,
the application of this concept has presented formidable problems, primarily
because of a lack of a sustainable source of funding.
In most SADC countries road maintenance expenditures are generally well
below the levels needed to keep the road network in a stable long-term
condition. Worse, budget allocations are often cut at short notice in response
to difcult scal conditions, funds are rarely released on time and actual
expenditures are often well below agreed budget allocations. This has led to
a maintenance crisis in many countries where there is now a build-up of
roads in poor condition. The net result is that the road transport sector is
operating well below its optimum level, which has had an adverse impact on
many other sectors of the national economy.
Box 7.1 - Maintenance backlog on the SADC main road network
2
Recent studies indicate that about US$ 1.7 billion per annum (about 1 per cent of
regional GDP) needs to be spent on regular maintenance of the regions roads,
including a cycle of reseals and rehabilitation of paved roads. However, little more
than one half of this amount is allocated.
GDP (1999) Actual
Annual
Expenditure
Estimated
Annual
Requirement
Annual
Shortfall
Back-log
Maintenance
165,000 960 1,760 800 6,400
Note: All gures in millions of US $
It is also necessary to bring a signicant kilometrage of main roads back to
maintainable condition which is estimated to cost about US $6.4 billion.
Inadequate Road Maintenance
New paved roads, if inadequately maintained, deteriorate slowly and almost
imperceptibly during the rst half to two-thirds of their service life, after which
they deteriorate much more rapidly. Without timely maintenance, they simply
break up and, as a result, the costs of operating vehicles - and of transporting
goods - increase rapidly. Worse, vehicle operators who pay these costs, then
pass them on to the general public and the cost of living increases.
In rural areas, where roads often become impassable during the rainy season,
poor road maintenance has a profound effect on agricultural output. Poor
roads and poor transport services also have adverse effects on the provision
of health, education and other social services; these effects are not easy to
quantify, but are of vital importance to the people living in rural areas and
in helping to eliminate poverty in its widest sense.
Box 7.2 - The costs of poor road maintenance
A LVSR in good condition, carrying about 200 vpd, requires resealing,
costing about $10,000 per km, every seven years to keep it in good condition.
This has a net present value (NPV) discounted at 12 per cent over twenty
years, of $7,000 per km. Without maintenance, the road will deteriorate from
good to poor condition. This will increase vehicle operating costs by about
$2000 per km which has an NPV, when discounted over twenty years, of
$18,000 per km. The benet cost ratio of a fully funded road maintenance
programme is almost 3!
Poor road maintenance also increases the long-term costs of maintaining the
road network. Maintaining a LVSR for fteen years costs about $60,000 per
km. If the road is not maintained and allowed to deteriorate over the fteen
year period, it will then cost about $200,000 per km to rehabilitate it. Thus,
rehabilitating paved roads every ten to twenty years is more than three times
as expensive, in cash terms, as maintaining them on a regular basis, and 35
per cent more expensive in terms of NPV, discounted at 12 per cent per year.
In quantitative terms, when a road is not maintained, and is allowed to
deteriorate from good to poor condition, each dollar saved from not carrying
out maintenance increases VOCs by $2 to $3. Thus, as illustrated in Figure 7.5,
far from saving money, cutting back on road maintenance increases the costs
of road transport and raises the net cost to the economy as a whole. This fact
is a powerful one and one which roads agencies can use to convince
government of the high cost that countries pay for inadequate funding of road
maintenance.
Excess
Transport
Costs
Budget
Shortfall
Minimum
Transport
Cost
Actual Budget Optimum Budget
Sum of costs
Agencys
Maintenance Cost
Road User Cost
Maintenance Standard
Cost
Figure 7.5 - Relationship between maintenance standard and transport cost
Drains get blocked (leading to ooding),

verges become overgrown and obscure
the drivers view, thereby increasing the
incidence of road accidents.
The surface deteriorates, gets rough,
develops potholes and becomes difcult
to drive on and vehicle operating costs
increase.
Soon, stretches of the road become
impassable for long periods of the year.
Eventually, and usually more quickly
than most people realise, the road needs
reconstructing, often at three to four
times the cost of effective and timely
maintenance.
Where maintenance funds are not available,
the road becomes abandoned, commerce
and business stagnates, rural areas be-
come isolated and condemned to remain
poor without adequate communications.
The impact of inadequate
maintenance
Overload Control
To protect the huge investment in road infrastructure, all SADC countries
have promulgated Road Trafc Acts that stipulate permissible axle load and
gross vehicle mass limits. These limits are meant to ensure that roads last for
their full design life with normal maintenance expenditures. Unfortunately,
overloading is rife in most countries, with rates of up to 50%. Such overloading
causes not only a disproportionately high degree of road damage, because of
the exponential relationship between axle load and road damage, but also
contributes to the poor road safety record in many countries. Thus, overload
control is particularly important on LVSRs.
Unfortunately, the current, traditional government-driven approaches to
overload control have been ineffective in many countries for the following
reasons:
current systems provide a criminal response with low conviction rates
in-house operation with low-paid staff is susceptible to corrupt practices
there is no link between level of nes and damage to the road
constraints in the criminal justice system result in low priority being
given to overloading offences
road authorities often have a limited role in regulating overloading
current systems do not have the primary goal of preserving road infra-
structure
There is, therefore, a need for a new approach and a vehicle loading reform
strategy has been developed for the region which will form annexes to the
SADC Protocol on Transport, Communications and Meteorology.
The main elements of this initiative are:
introduction of a Regional Overloading Control Association
introduction of a regional strategy for overload control
operation of a self-regulatory system by transport operators
decriminalisation of offenders by administering an overloading fee
linking the level of the imposed fees to the actual cost of road damage
outsourcing weighbridge operations to the private sector
7.2.5 Lessons Learned
T
he ineffectiveness of maintenance operations, management and nancing
of LVSRs (and, indeed, of all roads) in the SADC region has been the
subject of much study and investigation by international and local
organisations. The worst cases of maintenance ineffectiveness have been
found to occur in countries where some or all of the following conditions
occur, not necessarily in order of importance:
a weak institutional framework which suffers from high vacancy rates
and reliance on contract personnel
a large amount of maintenance work carried out through force account
operations with reliance on plant and equipment provided from government t
plant pools free of cost
lack of basic management systems and procedures which has compromisedd
the ability of roads agencies to manage their road networks in a satisfactory
manner
Vehicle overloading also has an adverse
effect on road safety.
poor regulation of various aspects of road management, including control
of overloading
inadequate involvement of the community in maintenance
It is apparent that the key issues raised above are predominantly social and
organisational rather than technical. They support the widely emerging view
in the SADC region that many of the endemic problems associated with
inefcient and ineffective management of road networks are symptoms of a
deeper problem. The real causes are weak or unsuitable institutional
arrangements for managing and nancing roads.
New approaches
As indicated in Chapter 2, through the SADC Protocol on Transport,
Communications and Meteorology
3
, the SADC region has embarked on a
programme of road sector reform that has fundamentally changed the way in
which road maintenance is undertaken and nanced.
Box 7.3 - New approaches to road maintenance operations,
management and nancing in the SADC Region
A new approach to road maintenance in its various aspects is emerging in
the SADC region. It is no longer being viewed as a mundane topic for
second-rate engineers. Today, it operates in a changed environment and
with a changed approach. It now holds a key position in roads agencies as
a concept that espouses the need to preserve the value of the road asset, to
provide improved service to road users and to contribute to environmental
quality. Sustainable sources of road maintenance nancing are increasingly
being provided by road users.
Hierarchy of management issues
(Adapted from Brooks et al., 1989)
Until the external and institutional frame-
works are improved, it is extremely difcult
to overcome the numerous technical and
human resource problems which hamper
attainment of efcient and effective
management of road networks in the t
SADC region.
Technical
Factors
Institutional
Factors
External
Factors
7.3 Maintenance Management
7.3.1 Main Purpose
M
aintenance management is essentially a systematic means of efciently
planning, programming, budgeting, scheduling, controlling, collecting
data, monitoring, etc. In conjunction with the road planning, appraisal and
design processes, it attempts to optimise the overall performance of the road
network over time. At a practical level it aims to ensure that the correct
activities are performed on the network at the right time, and to the desired
quality. The challenge is to set policies which can contribute the greatest
benet to communities whilst supporting broad national goals.
The undertaking of the various inter-related activities associated with the
management of maintenance can be facilitated by the use of an appropriate
maintenance management system. Such a system must be well conceived and
careful consideration should be given to pursuing a strategy for its development
which should be based on methodologies, techniques and resources that are
matched to local circumstances.
7.3.2 Inventory
A
road inventory is necessary for any maintenance function. It is used as
a basic reference for planning and carrying out inspections in relation to
a location reference system. The essential elements include road nodes, route
name and length, functional classication, type of pavement and surfacing.
The inventory is a set of information about the basic engineering
characteristics of the road network and is vital for any management function.
It denes the key features of each section of road and is an essential reference
source for inspection and analysis. The content of the inventory should be
directly relevant to maintenance management. When it is rst drawn up it
should be as simple as possible and need only contain information on the
following items.
route name
functional classication
section length
type of surface and construction
cross-section width
As the inventory is built up, further information can be added on all factors
inuencing the management activities. In addition, data about the distribution
and engineering properties of soils will be useful in identifying possible
sources of maintenance materials. Inventory data are expensive to collect and
keep up-to-date. Generally, the inventory should be as simple as possible and
not be overloaded with unnecessary information.
7.3.3 Components
T
here are four distinct and inter-related components of road maintenance
which, together, comprise a management framework for successfully
addressing the maintenance challenge
4
. As illustrated in Figure 7.6, these
are: Planning, Programming, Preparation and Operations.
Figure 7.6 - Road maintenance management functions in relation to
the road network and users
5
An implication of Figure 7.6 is that, if road maintenance at the point of
delivery is to be optimised, then there is also a need to optimise the higher-
level functions of planning, programming and preparation. However, the
higher level functions will need to reect the needs of road users on the
network - an issue that has taken on added signicance with the more
commercialised approaches to road management currently being pursued in
the SADC region in which road users have become customers of roads
agencies which are now service providers. The challenge is to set policies
which can contribute the greatest benets to stakeholders whilst supporting
broad national goals.
An important conclusion from the above is that any successful change to
improve maintenance operations on SADC road networks should be driven
from the needs and requirements of users and the network (bottom-up)
whilst supporting broader national goals of economic development and
poverty alleviation. The remainder of this chapter focuses on such issues
in the context of the LVSRs maintenance management cycle.
Road maintenance management
At a practical level, road maintenance manage-
ment aims to ensure that the correct activities
are performed on the network at the right time
and to the desired quality. The challenge is to
set policies which can contribute the greatest
benet to communities whilst supporting broad
national goals.
7.3.4 Management Cycle
M
aintenance management strives to achieve maintenance policy objectives
through a series of well dened, organised and executed functions.
They relate to both long- and short-term decisions, and concern the whole
network, sub-networks and individual lengths of road. The sequence of
activities moves in a cycle that begins with planning and moves through
programming, preparation and then operations in the manner shown in Figure
7.7
4,6
.
Figure 7.7 - The cycle and scope of maintenance management functions
The following issues are important, though not exclusive, to LVSRs:
Effective management depends on the availability of sufciently compre-
hensive data on all assets, trafc and costs.
Participation, or effective representation, at the highest level, i.e. network
planning, is usually essential to ensure that adequate resources are made
available for maintenance.
Whilst general programming and prioritisation might be done at a central
level, more detailed programming will benet from greater local knowledge
and participation.
At each stage, procedures are required to guide staff in their duties, and
should form the basis of more formal management systems which, for
low-volume sealed roads, may comprise simple manual or spreadsheet-based
systems.
Having dened in general terms the nature of maintenance, the following
sections consider the operational environment within which maintenance
resides with a view to offering solutions to its more effective delivery.
PLANNINC
- setting ob|ectives
- defining standards
- determining resources
allocating funds
DPRA7IDNS
- implementing works
- supervising works
- quality checks
Predominantly
PRD1C7 LVL DR
DCN7RALISD
and short term
Predominantly
N7WDRk LVL DR
DCN7RALISD
and medium-long term
PRDCRAMMINC
- determining programmes
- setting priorities
- allocating resources
DA7A
- collecting,
storing and
processing
PRPARA7IDN
- designing works
- preparing and issuing
contracts
7.3.5 Maintenance Policy and Organisation
A
policy framework is required to provide the context within which road
maintenance is carried out in the SADC region. Maintenance policy
would be expected to support Government policy in the roads sector.
Increasingly, maintenance policy is now focusing on broader national issues
pertaining to the attainment of socio-economic goals, greater involvement of
the private sector and more attention to fullling users expectations.
Box 7.4 - Typical Maintenance Policy Objectives for LVSRs
The following are examples of typical policy objectives which are essential
for ensuring that maintenance is carried out in a sustainable way:
Poverty reduction through employment creation and the related use of

labour-based methods wherever feasible.
Local community involvement in the planning and execution of
maintenance of rural road facilities.
Private sector involvement (local contractors) in road maintenance
(rather than undertaking such maintenance by force account
operations).
The use of the most cost-effective rather than most technologically
advanced approaches in carrying out road maintenance.
Minimising the environmental impact of material resource developments
by adopting Environmental Impact Assessments.
The use of maintenance standards that balance life-cycle costs
(construction, maintenance and vehicle operating costs).
The use of simple contract documents appropriate for use by small
contractors.
The SADC protocol on Transport, Communications and Meteorology
envisages an institutional framework which clearly differentiates between the
roles played by road sector stakeholders in policy formulation, policy
delivery and works execution. The arrangements were illustrated earlier in
the General Introduction to this Guideline (Chapter 2, Figure 2.5 - SADC
institutional framework). This is a signicant change from the previous
arrangements which led, in one way or another, to the road maintenance
crisis of the 80s and 90s.
Another signicant change relates to the private sector, which is now
involved as network maintenance contractors and network management
consultants. The nature of the contracts may also be long-term and outcome-
based, as opposed to the more traditional schedule of rates approaches.
Regional agencies, with a greater degree of autonomy than previously, can
be expected to be involved in priority setting and communities might also
deliver services at the operations level.
Function Typical aims Spatial
coverage
Organisations
concerned
Policy Policy formulation.
Formulation of strategic
objectives.
Dening standards.
Network-wide. Ministry.
Strategic
Planning
Determining resources to
support dened standards
and objectives.
Network-wide. Roads Agency (HQ)
with approval by Min-
istry policy advisors.
Programming
Determining the work pro-
gramme that can be executed
within the budget period
and resource constraints,
including local priorities.
Network-wide to
Region or sub-
network wide.
Regional Agencies
or Consultant and
Contractors and
Communities.
Preparation
Design of works.
Preparation and issue
of contracts and works
instructions.
Sub-network,
Road-link,
Section or project.
Regional Agencies
or Consultants and
Contractors.
Operations Undertaking tasks as part
of works activities.
Sub-network,
Road-link,
Section or project.
Contractors and
Consultants and
Communities.
Monitoring
and
Evaluation
Measuring achievements
against performance, end
product and nancial targets.
Network-wide to
project level.
Representatives of all
functions, including
Road Fund Board.
Table 7.3 - Functions of various road sector stakeholders
7.3.6 Maintenance Standards
I
n the constrained budgetary situations that prevail in most SADC countries,
maintenance standards and associated levels of user service should be set,
wherever possible, on the basis of minimising total transport costs over the
life-cycle of the road link. If maintenance is carried out too frequently, or to
a too high standard, the maintenance provided will be unnecessarily costly
and resources will be wasted just as they will be if too little maintenance is
carried out.
Badly potholed road.
Is this acceptable?
No
Road with occasional potholes which
can be maintained through patching,
but with a waterproof surface.
Is this appropriate?
Yes
Road in excellent condition.
Is this always affordable?
No
Figure 7.8 - Choosing appropriate maintenance standards
For LVSRs, the range of choices is typically as illustrated in Figure 7.8. In
many cases the middle example will often provide the most appropriate
solution, but this will depend on local circumstances and the extent to which
it ts with the current views of policy makers and users, and those of engineers
and planners.
The Engineer and the Planner will need to specify an appropriate standard
for all types of maintenance and, importantly, to be able to justify this to
policy makers and the paying public. They will also need to be fexible and
to take into account local circumstances. Their responses may vary from a
comprehensive, Full` maintenance strategy where the objective is to
minimise life-cycle transport costs, to a minimum strategy which will help
fulfl Basic` access standards. A strategy to minimize road user costs, which
is the expensive option, is unlikely to be promoted by stakeholders.
Typical examples of routine maintenance standards, intervention levels and
work procedures, in relation to road function, are given in Table 7.4. Similar
standards and maintenance strategies can also be developed for periodic
maintenance. Many models exists for such analyses (e.g. HDM 4, RED) but
their applicability becomes more and more questionable when road user
savings are small relative to the cost of the road. In such situations, cost-
minimisation strategies become a prudent alternative, without compromising
road sajety.
Table 7.4 - Typical routine maintenance standards
Activity
Standard
A B C
Strategic/Primary roads
AADT >150
Secondary/Tertiary roads
AADT < 150 and > 50
Secondary/Tertiary roads
AADT < 50
Grass
cutting
Grass height _ 30 cm Grass height _ 30 cm
where sight distance must
be maintained
As the need arises
Removal
oI
obstacles
Clear carriageway immedi-
ately; Clear rest oI road area
and repairs within 5 days
ately; Clear rest oI road area
and repairs within 10 days
ately; Clear rest oI road
area and repairs within 60
days
Culvert
clearing/
repairs
Clearing and repairs beIore
wet season; Clear once a
week during wet season;
Repairs within 20 days
Clearing and repairs beIore
wet season; Clear once every
2 weeks during wet season;
Repairs within 30 days
Clearing and repairs
beIore wet season and,
when required, during
wet season
Bridge
clearing/
repairs
As above As above As above
Erosion
control/
repairs
As above As above As above
Drain
clearing
Clean out within 5 days
when drain depth is
reduced by ~ 20
Clean out within 10 day
when drain depth is reduced
by ~ 30
Clean out within 20 days
when drain depth is re-
duced by ~ 50
Pothole
repairs
Repair potholes within 2
days
days iI ~ 5 potholes/km or
during wet season, other-
wise repair within 10 days
days iI ~ 10 potholes/ km
or during wet season, other-
wise repair within 20 days
SurIace
patching
Repair within 2 days Repair within 5 days Repair within 10 days
Crack
sealing
Seal all cracks beIore
wet season starts; Seal
immediately during wet
season; At other times seal
within 5 days iI aIIected
road section is ~ 10 m or iI
crack width is ~ 3 mm
Seal all cracks beIore
wet season starts; Seal
immediately during wet
season; At other times seal
within 10 days iI aIIected
road section is ~ 50 m or iI
Seal all cracks beIore wet
season starts; Seal imme-
diately during wet season;
At other times seal within
20 days iI aIIected road
section is ~ 50 m or iI
Edge
repairs
Edge drop should not be
~ 15 mm; Correct within
10 days
20 days
30 days
Note: Adapted Irom TRL (2003)
7
Resealing is a typical periodic maintenance
activity.
7.3.7 Assessing Needs
R
oad condition surveys are an important aspect of the maintenance
process and are carried out to establish maintenance requirements and,
subsequently, priorities. Such surveys are normally carried out in two
stages:
Network screening survey - in the rst stage, an engineer or senior
technician undertakes a drive-over survey of the network to identify
those sections likely to need treatment.
Detailed pavement testing - the second stage involves a small team, led
by a technician, whose task is to determine the requirements for reactive
and periodic works, and to identify those sections where detailed investi-
gations are needed prior to carrying out renewal works.
Figure 7.9 gives a ow diagram of road condition surveys. Visual condition
surveys, including a drive-over of the network, are normally adequate for
LVSRs, with a detailed walk-over survey done selectively for sections
appearing to need major works. Detailed pavement testing e.g. using a FWD,
Benkelman Beam or DCP, is required for pavement rehabilitation design but
this is not the main concern in this Guideline. The concept of Information
Quality Levels (IQL)
8
have been developed with a level of detail that is
appropriate for LVSRs.
Condition Surveys
Visual Surveys
Instrument Surveys
Visual
Assessment
- Surfacing
- Structural
- Functional
Functional
- Riding
quality/roughness
- Skid resistance
Structural
- Surface
deection or
strength
- Rut depth
Figure 7.9 - Flow diagram of road condition survey tasks
Visual condition survey.
Measuring bearing capacity using Benkelman
Beams.
Roughness can be measured by using rapid
or slow measuring devices such as a Bump
Integrator or Merlin device.
Common types of road condition data collected during surveys are given in
Table 7.5.
Table 7.5 - Condition data elements
Data Category Data Elements
Visual (to be followed,
if necessary, by more
detailed inspection and
measurement)
Texture
Surfacing failure
Surfacing cracks
Block cracks
Crocodile cracks
Longitudinal cracks
Transverse cracks
Pumping
Aggregate loss
Binder condition
Bleeding/Flushing
Rutting
Settlement
Patching
Potholes
Visual and/or instrument
Deection (FWD or
Benkelman Beam)
DCP
Rut depth
Riding quality/rough-
ness
Skid resistance
Surface drainage
Cross - section
Laboratory tests
Side drainage
Shoulder condition
Edge break
Passability
It is preferable that direct measures for each type of distress are reported for
maintenance management purposes rather than combining several distress
parameters into a single index. This is because different types of distress
often require different treatments. A combined index obscures the severity
levels of the various distress types and therefore makes it difcult to identify
optimum treatment. Nevertheless, a combined index, such as the Present
Serviceability Index (PSI), can be useful for reporting the condition of roads
to non-specialists, who are unlikely to understand the engineering importance
of the different type of distress that may occur.
Irrespective of the road class, measurement of distress should be undertaken
tri-annually, with the statistics presented in a cumulative frequency distribution
for each road class, as illustrated in Figure 7.10. This can be used to
illustrate the current condition of the asset in relation to target values and
previous and current conditions.
Figure 7.10 - Example of roughness distribution for different road classes
7.3.8 DetermInIng PrIorItIes
E
ven when standards have been developed on an economic basis or in
support of policy objectives, the fact that budget allocations are invariably
less than the desired amount means that choices must be made. The types of
choices include whether to:
(a) delay investment until more funds are available
(b) lower standards
(c) perform certain activities in preference to others
Different approaches are available for prioritising works. Some depend on
the type of road, works type and traffc levels, whilst others take account of
issues such as the population served, economic indices, social indices and
strategic importance. They are often applied differently to paved or unpaved
roads and to high or low-volume roads.
Three approaches are introduced below that span the range of available
techniques and may be used to complement each other. They address the
range of issues and potential conficts important for low-volume sealed roads.
These are:
Treatment choice method (TRL, 1987)
7
.
Cost effectiveness methods.
Economic NPV and NPV/Cost methods.
Treatment Choice Method: In this method, funds are earmarked for
essential` maintenance activities such as addressing emergency works,
access restoration (over short stretches), drainage maintenance and asset
preservation. Remaining funds are distributed to more heavily traffcked
roads justifying more expensive treatments, with unfunded works being
postponed or other budget sources sought. It is both simple and fexible, since
the user can specify the order of importance based on local priorities. An
economic underpinning does exist in that it is widely recognised that routine
maintenance provides a higher economic return than an intervention occurring
only after signifcant distress has already occurred.
Table 7.6 - Example of ~Treatment Choice Method
Hierarchy of
maintenance
activity
Priority
Trafc hierarchy
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
TraIfc range (vpd) Strategic ~
1000
500-
1000
200-
500
~
200

200
50-
200

50
SurIace type P P P P UP P UP UP
Emergency 1 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
Cyclic drainage 2 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
Reactive pavement work 3 21 24 27 30 33 36 39
Periodic preventative 4 22 25 28 31 34 37 40
Other cyclic/reactive 5 23 26 29 32 35 38 41
Overlay/reconstruction 6 42 43 44 45 46 47 48
Note: P = paved, UP = unpaved
Cost-effectiveness methods: These methods introduce other considerations
into the prioritisation process that are not addressed by conventional transport
economic approaches. These considerations include:
magnitude of population served
weighting for degree of poverty in the communities
potential for agricultural or other development
number of social and other services
This approach might best be applied to rural feeder or collector roads, where
the geographical area which benets from an improvement can be precisely
dened. It also lends itself to application at a local level through the direct
participation of representatives of various stakeholder groups. Reference
should also be made to Chapter 3 in this regard.
Economic NPV and NPV/Cost methods: These methods are appropriate for
relatively heavily trafcked roads relying on user benets for
economically justifying maintenance interventions. They are employed in
models such as HDM-4 or RED which have been described in Chapter 3.
7.3.9 Management Systems and Tools
I
n the SADC region, where allocations to the roads sector have generally
not kept pace with requirements, it is vitally important that scarce funds
are allocated to competing components of the road system in an optimal
manner. However, even with the best of intentions, the determination of such
a balance cannot be competently assessed by traditional methods which
generally relied on xed standards, subjective judgement and intuition. Nor
can appropriate funding and pricing strategies for promoting more efcient
use of resources in the roads sector be developed. To this end, the use of an
appropriately structured Road Management System can greatly assist roads
agencies in managing and nancing their road networks efciently and
effectively.
The main objectives of a Road Management System are to:
Provide a systematic and structured means of developing annual work
programmes, resource requirements and budgets based on optimum m
economic standards.
Ensure an equitable distribution of funds over the country and enable
priorities for allocations to be determined in a rational way when available
funds are inadequate.
Authorise and schedule work.
Provide a system for monitoring the efciency and effectiveness of
maintenance works.
The potential benets of efcient road management systems are well
documented. However, few systems have been sustainable within developing
environments. Current difculties are partly a consequence of the substantial
resources required to operate them effectively, particularly the basic data
collection itself and the over ambitious expectations of users. Key elements,
such as the importance of cost-effective standards, proven treatment selection
and prioritisation methods and the quality of service delivery are often given
insufcient attention.
Experience from the SADC region and elsewhere indicates that the
institutional dimension has often been sadly neglected and that, if the
foundations and commitment required for sustainability do not exist, the
systems will fall into disuse and become ineffective. This has been put into
sharp focus throughout the region as a result of the road reform process and
the resulting changes in responsibilities, which have clearer outcome-based
objectives and require more transparency and accountability.
For a road management system to be sustainable, commitment from senior
people is vital. However, complexity and excessive resource requirements,
especially at the early stages, are serious risks. Sustainability is likely if a
step-wise approach is adopted for its introduction, starting with a simple
system requiring modest data collection in keeping with the current institutional
capacity of the roads agency. An integrated modular design should be
employed to facilitate future expansion and improvements and these should
be introduced gradually as the operation of the system becomes
institutionalised.
Specication of Road Management Systems (RMS)
The approach for developing a specication for a system for application to
low-volume sealed roads, and most other categories of road infrastructure,
should
6
:
be simple, since this will ultimately retain a greater feel of transparency
and comprehension by users
specify the scope of the system and its component modules or sub-systems
identify the prospective users of the system and their role in managing its
various parts and the access they will require across the whole system
conrm the outputs that its users will require
select the categories of data and models required to produce the outputs,
and how the data will be collected and processed
An example of a simple, basic RMS is shown in Figure 7.11.
Poad
|nventory
Pavement
Traffic
Standards
and
intervention
|nputs Policy framework
Processing
Data
base
Outputs
Network
Programming
Preparation
7YPICAL DU7PU7S FRDM
MANACMN7 SYS7MS
Network statistics
Programme of work, including
list of user-selected sections, to
be funded in order of priority
and within available budget
Pro|ect formulation works
order, including 8OQ
PMS components
for basic system
Figure 7.11 - Example of a simple, basic RMS
The scope and components (or sub-systems) typically include:
A Network Information System at the core that is used to assemble,
organise and store data about the network, including road inventory,
pavement details, structures, traffc, fnance (including budgets), on-
going and planned activities, and resources.
A number of Decision Support Systems (DSS) to assist in the tasks that
form the management cycle.
Decision Support Systems produce outputs which inform management of
decisions, whereas information systems simply list or present input data in
tabular, graphical or map format.
The above approach tends to emphasise the overall purpose of the system,
and de-emphasise the software and hardware considerations which, though
important, are peripheral to the development of a system, at least in its early
stages. This approach also emphasises user control, and places systems in
their appropriate place.
Whether data are collected and presented in simple tables or spreadsheet
formats, or manipulated in databases and processed through an analytical
tool, the rules and processes employed should refect the technical procedures
described in the foregoing sections. More detailed guidance on system
specifcation and example outputs are given in various source documents
5,6,7

and proprietary systems manuals.
Data HequIrements
Probably the largest component of running costs for a Road Management
System is that incurred in data collection. Thus, the type and quality of data
to be collected will depend on what is actually needed and what can be
realistically achieved. Only data which can be regularly updated and
maintained should be collected and verifed for consistency and completeness.
To this end, the following criteria should be considered when selecting data
items:
(1) relevance: having a direct infuence on the required output
(2) appropriateness: both to the stage of planning and management
process, and to the authority`s capability to undertake the required
data collection
(3) reliability: in terms of accuracy, coverage, completeness and
correctness
(4) ajjordability: in both fnancial, and staff requirement terms
It is also important to select data acquisition technology that matches the
requirements of the road agency. Choices to be made in the selection of data
collection methods include:
Mode of operation
manual, semi-automated or automated
pedestrian, slow or high-speed
independent or composite instrumentation
Frequency, spatial coverage and spatial sampling of surveys
Mode of administration
centralisation
audit process
The range of data quality and detail required, in terms of Information Quality
Levels (IQL), depends on the management function and should also be
matched with resources available. Guidance on various aspects of data
management for road management systems is provided in literature on this
subject
7
.
7.4 Maintenance Operations
7.4.1 Organisational Roles and Models
C
urrent and previous practice in many countries in the SADC region and,
indeed, in most other countries in the world, has been to carry out
maintenance (particularly routine maintenance) by direct labour i.e. labour
permanently employed by roads agencies. However, this has proved to be
inefcient in many countries and, in accordance with the SADC Protocol,
there has been a gradual change in the execution of maintenance works
towards the increased use of the private sector.
Roles
The terms used to describe the organisational roles which prevail in the
SADC region are as follows
4
:
Owner: The organisation responsible for funding, establishing road policy
and the legal and regulatory framework for management of the road network.
Typically, this will be a ministry of transport or works acting as the de facto
owner on behalf of the state.
Administrator: The organisation responsible for implementing policy and
ensuring that the performance of the road network meets the overall political
and economic aims of the owner. In many countries, this is referred to as the
road authority or agency.
Manager: The organisation, responsible for specifying activities to be carried
out, supervising, controlling and monitoring activities. In most situations,
the manager role is combined with that of the administrator, but increasingly
worldwide there is a move to appoint managers under contract (typically,
engineering consultants).
Contractor: The organisation, responsible for delivery of operations by
executing or undertaking works for the road administrator.
Models
Model 1 - In-house works unit (Direct Labour Organisation - DLO):
This is the traditional model for undertaking routine and, occasionally,
periodic maintenance works. In this case the administrator, manager and
contractor are all part of the same organisation. In many cases, this will be
the owners organisation, such as a ministry of public works.
This traditional approach is gradually being phased out in the SADC region
as more and more agencies are becoming autonomous or semi-autonomous
organisations with a greater separation of client and supplier roles
within organisations.
Model 2 - Conventional contractor: In this model, the road administrator,
who lets conventional civil engineering contracts to an external contractor
for carrying out the works, takes the manager role. The model is widely used
for carrying out development and periodic maintenance works but is less
widely used for carrying out routine and special maintenance works.
Manager
Contractor (DLO)
Owner/Administrator
Model 1
Manager
Owner/Administrator
Several contracts
External
Contractor
Model 2
Model 3 - Conventional contractor-consultant: In this model, the road
administrator lets contracts for both the manager and contractor roles.
Consultants typically undertake the managers role and have the task of
supervising the work undertaken by contractors.
Many of the new Roads Agencies continue to employ this model, but with
the Agency itself being bound by a Performance Agreement with the
Owner Ministry. Their performance is monitored by a Road Board, or other
independent body, which essentially fulls an audit role.
Model 4 - Total service provision: In this model, a single contract is let by
the road administrator to the manager who is responsible for providing
services to the administrator. The manager organisation may choose whether
to undertake the contractor roles itself, or engage contractors. There are
few existing examples of this, although this type of arrangement is gaining
favour.
7.4.2 Performance and Contractual Agreements
The change in circumstances requires a new set of agreements to be identied
which are both legislative in nature, in that they transfer established
responsibilities to a new organisation or responsible body, and contractual in
nature. The changes also transfer a substantial amount of nancial and
technical risk to service providers, including road managers and contractors,
and require new approaches for monitoring and evaluation. The appropriateness
of the arrangements needs to be considered from the perspective of the
suppliers ability to accept risk and to provide the necessary quality
management. This will ultimately decide the scope of works which various
providers can deliver.
The characteristics of the various types of contract, in which their relevance
in rural situations, is emphasised, are indicated below:
Day labour: This type is purely a supply-only contract, and could be
extended to include plant and materials. It continues to be appropriate where
contractor development and the scale of operations is small or uncertain. An
appropriate example would be the supply of labour by lengthmen
contractors, perhaps organised through a community association, but with
overall management vested in a local works department or managing
agents.
Schedule of rates: This is the most common form of contract, (Model 2
above,) where the contractor is not subject to signicant performance-based
requirements, and undertakes a prescribed set of activities at specied
intervals, or when conditions exceed intervention standards. Rates are
negotiated, or in some cases stipulated by the purchaser; the reason for
the latter is related to the stage of commercialisation in the sector. The
quality of workmanship will be specied, and work planning and method
guidelines may be provided to ensure consistency in approach to each
operation. Many road authorities in the region have adopted such
guidelines.
Performance-based, short-term: Performance-based contracts require the
contractor to accept the greater part of the risk and to plan and specify the
long-term maintenance needs to satisfy the outcome-based performance
specication of the Client, and are usually lump sum contracts. The scope of
work includes routine and emergency works and can extend to include
Contract Contract
Owner/
Administrator
External
Contractor
External
manager
Supervision
Model 3
- O D E L
Owner/Administrator
Lxternal
service provider
(multi-functional)
Single contract
Model 3 - Conventional contractor-consultant: In this model, the road
administrator lets contracts for both the manager and contractor roles.
Consultants typically undertake the managers role and have the task of
supervising the work undertaken by contractors.
Many of the new Roads Agencies continue to employ this model, but with
the Agency itself being bound by a Performance Agreement with the
Owner Ministry. Their performance is monitored by a Road Board, or other
independent body, which essentially fulls an audit role.
Model 4 - Total service provision: In this model, a single contract is let by
the road administrator to the manager who is responsible for providing
services to the administrator. The manager organisation may choose whether
to undertake the contractor roles itself, or engage contractors. There are
few existing examples of this, although this type of arrangement is gaining
favour.
7.4.2 Performance and Contractual Agreements
The change in circumstances requires a new set of agreements to be identied
which are both legislative in nature, in that they transfer established
responsibilities to a new organisation or responsible body, and contractual in
nature. The changes also transfer a substantial amount of nancial and
technical risk to service providers, including road managers and contractors,
and require new approaches for monitoring and evaluation. The appropriateness
of the arrangements needs to be considered from the perspective of the
suppliers ability to accept risk and to provide the necessary quality
management. This will ultimately decide the scope of works which various
providers can deliver.
The characteristics of the various types of contract, in which their relevance
in rural situations, is emphasised, are indicated below:
Day labour: This type is purely a supply-only contract, and could be
extended to include plant and materials. It continues to be appropriate where
contractor development and the scale of operations is small or uncertain. An
appropriate example would be the supply of labour by lengthmen
contractors, perhaps organised through a community association, but with
overall management vested in a local works department or managing
agents.
Schedule of rates: This is the most common form of contract, (Model 2
above,) where the contractor is not subject to signicant performance-based
requirements, and undertakes a prescribed set of activities at specied
intervals, or when conditions exceed intervention standards. Rates are
negotiated, or in some cases stipulated by the purchaser; the reason for
the latter is related to the stage of commercialisation in the sector. The
quality of workmanship will be specied, and work planning and method
guidelines may be provided to ensure consistency in approach to each
operation. Many road authorities in the region have adopted such
guidelines.
Performance-based, short-term: Performance-based contracts require the
contractor to accept the greater part of the risk and to plan and specify the
long-term maintenance needs to satisfy the outcome-based performance
specication of the Client, and are usually lump sum contracts. The scope of
work includes routine and emergency works and can extend to include
Contract Contract
Owner/
Administrator
External
Contractor
External
manager
Supervision
Model 3
- O D E L
Owner/Administrator
Lxternal
service provider
(multi-functional)
Single contract
periodic works, the need for which requires approval processes to be actioned
by the Client. In many cases, the contract incorporates provision for periodic
works, thus reducing the need for new procurement processes within the
contract term thereby providing a greater guarantee of workload for the
contractor. Such contracts are generally termed Network Maintenance
Contracts (in Australia) or Term Maintenance Contracts (in the United
Kingdom) and are usually managed according to Model 3 above.
Performance based, long-term: These extend the responsibilities to the service
provider, who provides a total service` as illustrated in Model 4 above. The
long-term nature of these contracts means that substantial planning and
management capability must reside within the service provider. The works
include all maintenance activities and rehabilitation. Key Performance
Indicators need to be set by the Client for long-term and short-term attributes.
It is then the contractors who specify how the targets will be achieved and this
will be incorporated into their tendered proposals.
Contracts of this kind are becoming common-place in Australia and New
Zealand
5
, with entire rural road networks managed under such arrangements in
Western Australia and parts of New Zealand (10% increasing to 30% in future).
Independent auditing of achievement becomes a Client responsibility. These
contracts allow considerable innovation on the part of the Contractors.
7.4.3 Acceptance oI HIsk
T
he form of contract defnes each party`s responsibilities and allocates the
various risks between them. Risks can be grouped according to those that
affect:
Quality - the possibility of the work not meeting the requirements of the
client.
Cost - the possibility of the cost of work being different from that
predicted.
Time - timely delivery is less of an issue for maintenance than for
construction projects, and is closely related to cost.
The political trend in recent years has been to transfer as much risk as possible
to the private sector, but experience has now shown it is best allocated to the
party most suited to cope with that risk
9,10
. In countries where maintenance has
traditionally been carried out by in-house units, the private sector will often
not be in a position to take on signifcant new risk, nor will the road administration
be in a position to manage the private sector properly. Table 7.7 illustrates
issues of risk allocation for road maintenance.
Table 7.7 - Contracting strategies and allocation of risk
Issue Client to
manage risk
Contractor to
manage risk
Type oI
contract
Hourly rates Single
activity
Grouped
activity
PerIormance
based (short)
PerIormance-
based (long)
Payment
method
Cost reim-
bursable
Target cost Schedule oI
rates
Lump sum
Term oI
contract
Short term Long term
Packaging Many small
contracts
Few large
contracts
7.4.4 Increasing the Use of Small-scale Contractors
A
range of clients and contractors of differing capacity are usually present
in all countries. Different sized contractors will respond to different
types of client: for example, medium- and large-scale contractors will often
have little interest in low-cost, dispersed rural routine maintenance contracts.
In addition, many smaller local contractors might only be working currently
in the building sector. A contractor development programme would enable
them to compete for work in road maintenance and might achieve the
objectives of increased use of labour-based methods and increased local
employment in such areas. This has been done in some countries. The use of
local contractors and scope for labour-based maintenance, community
involvement and responsibility has been dealt with in some detail in road
maintenance policy seminars as part of the Road Maintenance Initiative (see
Bibliography.)
Community Contracting
Many maintenance works offer possibilities for community participation and
contracting, that are often not fully exploited. However, this is only likely to
happen if:
the infrastructure concerned is of direct benet to them
a sustainable institutional framework exists
initial external inputs are made available for system development, funding,
demonstration and training
Participation in community contracting initiatives implies stakeholder
involvement in the planning, organising and implementation of the works. To
this end, community bodies decide on local priorities and become responsible
for managing the execution of the maintenance works by agreed means (e.g.
through local contracts, paid labour/unpaid labour freely provided by the
community with material support etc.).
Ultimately the successful involvement of small contractors or communities in
carrying out maintenance works, by using labour-based methods where
feasible, is important as a means of creating employment and helping to
alleviate poverty. Fortunately, there are a number of manuals and guidelines
available which deal with the development of small contractors employing
labour-based techniques, including an introduction to business principles
11
.
Boiling of bitumen on road side and later
mixing with aggregate, is an appropriate
method for patching potholes in a sealed
road.
Road marking using labours have been
successfully used in many SADC countries.
LBM
LBM
1.
2
3.
4.
5.
Largely as a result of inadequate funding, the provision of satisfactory
road maintenance still remains an elusive goal in many countries. The
net effect is poor road conditions, high operating costs and an adverse
impact on national economies.
The key maintenance challenges are predominantly political, social
and institutional rather than technical.
The road sector reform process currently being pursued in the region,
including the establishment of dedicated road funds, is critically
important for the sustainability of maintenance funding. In this regard,
the recommendations of the SADC Protocol on Transport,
Communications and Meteorology should be implemented.
The pursuit of sustainable maintenance policies through the use of
labour-based methods, where cost-effective, and the involvement of
local communities and small contractors, is crucially important as a
means of employment creation and are directly linked to poverty
alleviation.
The lack of a systematic and structured approach to road maintenance
results in inefcient and ineffective utilisation of scarce funds. However,
the use of elaborate and complex management systems should be
avoided and, instead, simple systems which are appropriate to local
conditions should be introduced and implemented gradually.
The subject of road maintenance and its management aspects that are essential
for the preservation of the LVSR network as well as other inuencing factors,
such as vehicle overloading, have been covered in this chapter. The potential
benets to be derived from the recommendations contained in this chapter and
earlier chapters of this Guideline will only be realised through implementation,
which is discussed in Chapter 8.
7.5 Summary
T
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
Morosiuk G, M Riley and J B Odoki (2001). Modelling Road
Deterioration And Works Effects. Draft Volume 6 of the HDM-4 series
of publications. PIARC ISOHDM.
Southern Africa Consulting Group (SAGP) (1998). Transport and
Communications Integration Study for Southern Africa. Review Final
Report. Vol. 1: Summary and Main Report, Maputo, 31 March 1998.
SATCC (1998). SADC Protocol on Transport, Communications and
Meteorology. Maputo.
Robinson R, U Danielson and M Snaith (1998). Road Maintenance
Management, Concepts and Systems. MacMillan Press Ltd,
Basingstoke.
Parkman C C, K B Madelin, R Robinson and T Toole (2001).
Developing Appropriate Management and Procurement Approaches
for Road Maintenance. Proc. Conf. on Technology Transfer in Road
Transportation in Africa, Arusha, May 23 - 25, 2001.
Transport Research Laboratory (1998). Guidelines on the Design and
Operation of Road Management Systems. Overseas Road Note 15.
TRL, Crowthorne.
Transport Research Laboratory (2003). Road Maintenance Management
for District Engineers. Overseas Road Note 1. TRL, Crowthorne.
Paterson W D O and T Scullion (1990). Information Systems for Road
Management: Draft Guidelines on System Design and Data
Issues. Infrastructure and Urban Development Department. Report
No INU 77. The World Bank. Washington, D.C.
Grubb S R T (1998). The Private Finance Initiative - Public Private
Partnerships. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers (Civil
Engineering), 126, August, pp133-140. London.
Malmberg-Calvo C (1998). Options For Managing And Financing
Rural Transport Infrastructure. World Bank Technical paper No. 411,
The World Bank, Washington, D.C.
United Republic of Tanzania: National Construction Council. Labour-
Based Contractor Training for Rural Maintenance and Rehabilitation
Project Document: URT/90/004., ILO, Geneva, 1990.
V.6 HeIerenues and BIbIIograpby
HeIerences
Bibliography
ARRB (1995). Sealed Local Roads Manual - Guidelines to Good Practice
for the Construction, Maintenance and Rehabilitation of Pavements.
ARRB Transport Research Ltd., South Vermont, Victoria.
DORM (1997). Mongolian Road Maintenance Manual. Department of
Roads, Ulaan Baatar.
Gourley C S, T Toole T, and R C Petts, (2001). Improving Local Resource
Utilisation in Roadworks in Developing and Emerging Countries. 14
th
IRF
h
World Congress, International Road Federation, Paris, June 2001.
Gyam P and G Ruan, (1996). Road Maintenance by Contract: Dissemination
of good practice in Latin America and the Caribbean region. Regional
Studies Program, Report No.44, The World Bank, Washington, D.C.
Heggie I and P Vickers (1998). Commercial Management and Financing of
Roads. World Bank Technical Paper No. 409, The World Bank, Washington,
D.C.
Hewitt N C, T Mutowembwa, and T Toole (1998). The Zimbabwe Road
Deterioration Study. Secondary and Feeder Roads Development Programme
(SFRDP) Workshop, Harare, Zimbabwe, June 1998. PA 3396/98, Transport
Research Laboratory, Crowthorne.
Katala J and T Toole (2000). Road Management Systems: The Development
of the Road Mentor System in Tanzania. Fourth Annual Transportation
Conference. 23
rd
25
d th
November, 2000, Dar es Salaam.
h
Lantran J M and C Morse (1995). Development of the Private Sector
(Module 6). Framework and Competition and Procurement and Contract
Management. Proceedings of The Highway Policy Seminar for the Countries
of the Former Soviet Union, Moscow, 15 - 19 May 1995. The World Bank,
Washington, D.C.
Larcher P and D Miles (2000). Roads and Realities: How to Promote Road
Contracting in Developing Countries. Institute of Development Engineering,
Loughborough University.
Lebo, J and D Schelling (2000). The Design and Appraisal of Rural
Transport Infrastructure. Draft Technical Paper. The World Bank,
Washington, D.C.
Martin T C (2001). Is Local Road Maintenance Meeting the Communitys
Needs. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers. Municipal Engineer
145, Issue 2., Institution of Civil Engineers, London.
Miles D W J (1996). Promoting Small Contractors in Lesotho: Privatization
in Practice. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers (Civil
Engineering), 114, August, pp124-129, London.
MOTE (1999). Secondary and Feeder Road Development Programme
(SFRDP): Phase 2. Final Report. Ministry of Transport and Energy
Department of State Roads.
PIARC (2000). HDM-4. Highway Development and Management Series.
The World Road Association (PIARC), Paris.
Pinard M I and Kaombwe, S M A (2001). Pilot Survey of Country
Stakeholders Views of the RMI Vision, Strategy and Indicators of Progress
In Implementation and Impact. Report to World Bank, Transport 1, RMI
Africa Region. The World Bank, Washington, D.C.
Robinson P (1998). Maintenance by Contract: Is it Delivering Value for
Money? Proceedings of the National Workshop, Melbourne, Australia, ?
November 2000. ARRB Transport Research.
Robinson R (1988). A View of Road Maintenance, Management and
Economics. TRL Research Report RR 145. Transport Research Laboratory,
Crowthorne.
Robinson R (1999). A New Approach for Quantifying Economic and Social
Benets for Low-volume Roads in Developing Countries. In: Impact
Assessment and Project Appraisal, Volume 17, Number 2, June 1999, pages
147 - 155. Beach Tree Publishing, Guildford.
Talvitie A (1996). International experiences in restructuring the road sector.
Paper to annual meeting of the Transportation Research Board, January
1996. Washington, D.C.
TANROADS (2000). Road Performance Agreement with MOW and Roads
Fund Board. Tanzanian National Roads Agency. Dar es Salaam.
TANROADS (2001). Description and Classication of Road Maintenance
Activities. Tanzania National Roads Agency. Dar es Salaam.
Transport Research Laboratory (1985). Maintenance Techniques for District
Engineers. Overseas Road Note 2. TRL. Crowthorne.
Transport Research Laboratory (2001). Management of Rural Road Networks.
Overseas Road Note 20. TRL, Crowthorne.
United Nations Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean
(1993). Roads: A New Approach for Road Network Management and
Conservation. UN-ECLAC, Santiago.
C
h
a
p
t
e
r

8
1. Introduction
2. Regional Setting
4. Geometric Design
and Road Safety
5. Pavement Design,
6. Construction and
Drainage
7. Maintenance and
Road Management
8.1 Motivation ............................................................... 8 - 1
8.2 Pathway to Implementation ......................................... 8 - 2
8.2.1 Political .......................................................... 8 - 2
8.2.2 Social ............................................................ 8 - 4
8.2.3 Institutional ..................................................... 8 - 4
8.2.4 Technical ........................................................ 8 - 4
8.2.5 Economic........................................................ 8 - 5
8.2.6 Financial ......................................................... 8 - 5
8.2.7 Environmental .................................................. 8 - 5
8.3 Vision to Practice ...................................................... 8 - 6
8.4 References and Bibliography ........................................ 8 - 7
Vision to Practice
8
C
o
n
t
e
n
t
s
Vision to Practice 8 - 1
Vision to Practice
8
T
here has been a very strong motivation for preparing this Guideline on
Low-volume Sealed Roads in the SADC region. In essence:
Many aspects of LVSR provision have stemmed from technology and

research in Europe and the USA in environments very different from that
prevailing in the SADC region.
Whilst changes have inevitably occurred in the region, much of the basic
philosophy concerning LVSR provision remains unchanged, as have
many of the norms and standards to be found in guidance documents,
which have not been revised for many years.
A signicant amount of research work spanning some 20 - 30 years has
been carried out in the region by a number of specialist organisations,
collaborating country agencies and, in some cases, by country agencies
themselves.
Much of the research has been aimed at low-volume secondary and
feeder roads including planning, appraisal, design, use of local materials,
surfacing techniques, construction methods and nance for maintenance.
Where implemented, the results of this research have invariably been
highly benecial and cost-effective.
Unfortunately, there is still a general tendency to use a conventional
approach to provision of LVSRs that is often perceived to be safe. As
a result, few of the results of relevant research have been put into practice
and the potential benets of so doing have not been gained.
8.1 Motivation
8.2 Pathway to Implementation
T
he benets of the Guideline will only be achieved if the approaches
recommended are implemented. However, the path from research to
implementation is a tortuous and time-consuming one. It has been estimated
that, in engineering, in each of the steps in the pathway that begins in
obtaining funding for research through to implementation, the magnitude of
difculty increases by a factor of between 2 and 8. These activities include
carrying out the research, processing the results, developing standards,
disseminating the information, right through to actual implementation. Thus,
it can be quite difcult to get the results of engineering research put into
practice, despite the evidence that very large savings can accrue where this
has been done.
The implementation stage can be accelerated by understanding the process
that is involved in technology transfer, identifying the likely obstacles and
adopting a strategy that seeks to mitigate them. In broad terms there are ve
stages to the process of innovation
1
:
Stage 1: Idea generator - the initial perceived need for developing the
Guideline.
Stage 2: Technology generation, adaptation and transfer - which has been
achieved by raising awareness of the results of research carried out in the
region, the adaptation of appropriate standards and the knowledge shared in
the development of the Guideline.
Stage 3: State and local roads agencies - the importance of buy-in, which
has been achieved through the process of stakeholder involvement in the
compilation of the Guideline.
Stage 4: Specications and contracts - the modication of conventional
specications and contract types to suit local conditions; the important role
of contractors in embracing the new approaches as embodied in project
applications.
Stage 5: Benets - the substantial potential benets to be gained by
implementing the recommendations in the Guideline.
The production of this Guideline forms a major part of Step 3 as well as
contributing to parts of Steps 2 and 4. This chapter is concerned with the
pathway from here to full acceptance and implementation. The various
obstacles and associated problems that remain and suggestions for overcoming
them are discussed below.
8.2.1 Political
G
overnment Policy: The road transport sector cannot be properly planned
without reference to overall government transport policy. For effective
planning, SADC governments need to take a comprehensive view of the
whole transport sector, with road sector policy being designed to meet the
wider social and economic goals of each country.
Moving technology from the research environ-
ment to an operating environment will involve
considerable technology transfer effort and
resources to overcome various obstacles to
implementation.
There is nothing more difcult to take in
hand, more perilous to conduct or more un-
certain in its success, than to take the intro-
duction of a new order of things, because the
innovator makes enemies of all those who
prospered under the old order, and only
lukewarm support from those who would
prosper under the new.
Machiavelli, The Prince (1513).
Resist
Change
Avoid Change
But Go Along
Prevent
Change
Make
Change
Inhibitors Innovators Conservatives
The Curve of
Resistance to Change
Research
Development
(Specications)
(Standards)
(Guidelines)
Dissemination
Implementation
It is important that the key messages from this Guideline on the benets
to be derived from LVSRs are included in the debate leading to the
development of a policy document. The policy should cover such issues as
poverty alleviation, employment creation, technology choice, etc. The
outcome of this process will dictate the type of planning system that is
most appropriate.
Political and Public Perceptions: The intense competition for scarce public
funds makes it imperative that appropriate, cost-effective standards are
adopted at all times in the provision of LVSRs. This may well imply the use
of lower, but nonetheless appropriate, standards on these roads. However,
such standards can still provide a satisfactory level of service with no
compromise on road safety.
It is important that the public and political authorities accept the standards
adopted for LVSRs. However, their perceptions as to what is an appropriate
standard of pavement or surfacing can adversely affect technical decisions.
Very often, such perceptions are conditioned by standards adopted for high
volume trunk roads; a lower, albeit more appropriate, standard on a LVSR is
often perceived to be sub-standard and, hence, unacceptable.
More effort needs to be expended on educating politicians and the general
public as to the basis on which technical standards are determined so that
they are more readily accepted. Ranking policy changes according to their
political costs and benets can help policy makers obtain support from
politicians and the general public.
Axle Load Control: Inadequate axle load control remains arguably one of the
most serious challenges faced by road authorities in the SADC region. As
indicated in Chapter 5 of the Guideline, pavement performance is critically
inuenced by trafc loading which, in turn, controls the life of the pavement.
LVSRs are normally constructed of lighter (thinner) pavements using naturally
occurring materials that are often very sensitive to the impact of overloading.
This makes them particularly susceptible to overloading which has an adverse
and disproportionate effect on pavement life. Thus, overloading is not only
an increased risk to the road, including bridges, it is also not justied on
economic grounds. A more determined effort should be made to control
overloading.
Effective control of overloading requires a strong political will which is
sometimes not evident. The move towards new methods of overload control,
as contained in the SADC Memorandum on Vehicle Loading, provides a
strategy Control of Overloading, which should be implemented by all
countries as soon as possible.
Risk: The need to adopt more appropriate standards and specications in the
construction of low-volume road pavements has been clearly recognized in
the SADC region for some time. However, whilst there are many examples
of the successful adoption of such a strategy, few are well documented and,
until relatively recently, the conditions necessary for successful performance
were not adequately dened. Thus, there has been an understandable
reluctance, particularly by consultants and donors from outside the region,
to utilize non-standard materials because of an undoubtedly greater perceived
risk of problems or even failure.
In one SADC country, the use of a slurry
seal on a low-volume access road was
politically over-ruled because in an adja-
cent constituency the more traditional chip t
seal had been used on a similar access road
and was perceived as being of a better
standard.
Acceptance of new techniques requires
open mindedness and a willingness to learn
from planners and engineers who must apply
it. It also requires the political will to resist
pressure from vested interests and make the
best use of the resources that they have at
their disposal.
Vehicle overloading is still rife in the
SADC region with estimates ranging from
10 - 50%. The costs of such overloading
has been estimated to run into millions of
dollars.
A 22% overload from 82 to 100 kN will, in
broad terms, increase the damaging effect
on a pavement by a factor of 2.5 and reduce
the pavement life by a factor of 0.6.
Fortunately, the results of research undertaken in the region over the past 20
years make it possible to utilize local resources with greater condence.
Moreover, risks can be mitigated by ensuring that standards/specications
apply to local environments.
The perceived risks associated with the use of non-standard materials and
non-traditional designs can now be sensibly managed and a larger
proportion of unsurfaced roads can be economically surfaced without
additional risk.
8.2.2 Social
E
mployment creation: More and more governments in the SADC region
are promoting the use of labour-based methods as an alternative to the
more traditional plant-based operations as a means of combating high
unemployment levels. In this regard, road programmes that maximize the
use of surplus manpower that might exist in a rural community are more
likely to engender a positive attitude to the future maintenance of the road
than programmes that are plant-based and require the import of a limited
amount of skilled manpower.
Despite the above, negative perceptions still persist in some SADC countries
that such approaches are uneconomic, time consuming and sub-standard.
Where labour-based operations are indicated, government will need to
make a clear policy commitment for change. This will call for special
institutional arrangements, comprehensive planning as well as effective
managerial and administrative systems and procedures.
8.2.3 Institutional
T
he institutional framework of roads sector organisations in the SADC
region critically affects all aspects of LVSR provision. Historically,
traditional approaches to the management and nancing of road infrastructure
have proved to be unsuccessful. Fortunately, the agreed SADC institutional
framework for management and nancing of roads offers a promising
alternative to traditional approaches and, where implemented, has begun to
show positive results.
Where the recommendations of the SADC Protocol on Transport,
Communications and Meteorology that deal specically with road
management and nancing have not yet been implemented, Governments
in the SADC region should accelerate the reform process.
8.2.4 Technical
T
echnical Standards: The consistent application of appropriate technical
standards and design methods is critical if cost-effective, sustainable
solutions are to be obtained. In the past, there was an understandable
tendency in the SADC region to rigidly apply imported standards,
specications and geometric and pavement design methods as best practice
simply because there was little alternative other than taking an unquantied
risk in using untried materials and design methods.
Appropriate labour-based strategies utilise
the dual output of infrastructure provision
whilst creating employment. Labour-based
methods do not imply the elimination of plant
but rather selective replacement. Nonethe-
less, such methods have a relatively higher
potential for employment creation (typically
up to four times more than equipment-based
methods). Road infrastructure provision offers
one of the highest employment potentials
compared to other sectors. In the process,
there is NO compromise on infrastructure
specications such as tness for use and
purpose.
ASIST Bulletin No. 11 2000.
Use of inconsistent, inappropriate standards
should be avoided and, instead, regional
standards should be promoted by governments
and donors.
With the wealth of research and development work undertaken in the region
during the past three decades, new, indigenous standards, specications
and pavement design methods have now emerged in a number of innovative
ways on the basis of quantied evidence. Nonetheless, due sometimes to
donor insistence or to lack of awareness of the existence of regional standards,
there is still a tendency in some countries to use imported standards.
The time has come for government policy to stipulate that where regional
standards, including specications and design methods exist, they should
be used in preference to imported standards.
8.2.5 Economic
T
he results of research have shown, quite unequivocally, that adoption of
the methods described in this Guideline result in low-volume roads that
are less expensive to build, are no more expensive to maintain and reduce
the costs of operating both motorised and non-motorised transport during
their service lives. Thus, both agency costs and total (life-cycle) costs are
reduced. Furthermore, although economic assessments cannot readily take
into account social benets, if these are included, the benets of following
the principles advocated in the Guideline should be obvious. Nevertheless it
is necessary to demonstrate this repeatedly and as clearly as possible for the
benet of administrators, economists and others in authority who should not
be expected to be conversant with the engineering principles involved in road
building and maintenance.
Research should be undertaken to develop improved appraisal method-
ologies for LVSRs so as to take better account of the socio-economic
benets that are often a large component of the total benets.
8.2.6 Financial
T
he nancing of road building and maintenance has been mentioned
frequently in the Guideline. The main challenge is to secure sufcient
funding both to maintain the existing network and to accommodate the
extensions to the network that are deemed to be necessary for rural
development and for the attainment of poverty reduction goals.
The SADC Protocol on Transport Communications and Meteorology has
addressed comprehensively the issue of road nancing and the associated
institutional arrangements necessary to secure sustainable funding to maintain
road networks in the region. The measures recommended in the Guideline
support the goals set out in the protocol.
In those countries where Road Funds have not yet been established, the
Governments concerned should expedite their creation.
8.2.7 Environmental
T
he continued use of large amounts of gravel is not only causing serious
environmental problems in the SADC region but is also unsustainable in
the medium to long term. This provides a strong impetus for adopting the
strategies that are promoted in the Guideline which seek to improve the
environmental performance of the road transport sector. This can be
achieved, for example, through more extensive use of local materials, use of
low-cost road surfaces, preservation of resources of high quality stone, cost
and safety conscious design, consideration of non-motorised trafc,
community participation in planning and many more.
T
he technology transfer effort, which is so essential for the successful
implementation of the Guideline, has encompassed the following activities
leading to the production of the Guideline:
Early involvement of stakeholders in the research planning phase to ensure

that the Guideline responds to user needs.
Continuous involvement of stakeholders in the compilation of the Guideline
through their participation in a number of regional workshops.
Other aspects of the technology transfer process that will require consideration
and possible external support to ensure successful implementation include:
Technical assistance to support the implementation of the Guideline.

Technical staff training, where in-house staff do not have the required
expertise, and training to address internal resistance to change.
Changes to country standards, design manuals and specifcations needed
to accelerate the implementation of the Guideline.
Monitoring of acceptance, adoption, refnement and satisfaction amongst
users of the Guideline.
By its very nature, the Guideline is aimed at all stakeholders in the rural
transport system but the primary target audience are those who are in a position
to foster change and to implement the ideas presented in the document.
For more information on the topics herein, the reader is encouraged to refer to
the bibliographies in each chapter. Additional references can also be obtained
by contacting the organisations listed in Appendix B.
8.8 VIsIon Io PrauIIue
The establishment of a government body to address environmental issues,
including those associated with road provision, should also be promoted
in the region.
8.4 HeIerenues and BIbIIograpby
HeIerences
1. Kline S J and N Rosenburg (1986). An overview of Innovation. In The
Positive Sum Strategy. NAE, National Research Council, Washington,
D.C.
HIbIIography
Adair J (1996). Effective Innovation. How to stay ahead of the competition.
Pan Books. London.
Kumar V and S Magun (1995.) The Role of R&D Consortia in Technology
Development. Industry Canada Occasional Paper No.3.
NCHRP (1998). Putting Research into Practice: A Synopsis of Successful
Strategies and Case Histories. Washington, D.C.
TRB (1998). Transportation Technology Transfer - A Primer on the State
of Practice. National Research Council, Washington, D.C.
Appendices
Appendix A A - 1
1IsI oI FIgures

I. 1NTHODUCT1ON
1.1 Road hierarchy and function ........................................................... 1 - 4
z. HG1ONA1 STT1NG
2.1 The Southern African Development Community ............................ 2 - 2
2.2 SADC institutional framework for management and
fnancing of roads ............................................................................ 2 - 3
2.3 The SADC regional trunk road network (2001) .............................. 2 - 5
2.4 International comparison of paved road density and
GDP per capita ................................................................................. 2 - 6
2.5 Periodic maintenance (regravelling) of unsurfaced roads ............... 2 - 10
2.6 A new framework for sustainable provision of LVSRs ................... 2 - 11
2.7 Infuence level of LVSR components on total costs ....................... 2 - 13
NV1HONMNTA1 1SSUS
3.1 Sustainable Livelihoods Framework ............................................... 3 - 7
3.2 The difference in wet season and dry season traffc levels
on poor quality roads in Tanzania .................................................... 3 - 11
3.3 Errors in ADT estimates from counts of varying duration .............. 3 - 11
3.4 Effects and impacts of road investments over time ......................... 3 - 14
3.5 Economic analysis of optimum road design standards .................... 3 - 15
3.6 Overlap of primary and secondary benefts ..................................... 3 - 19
3.7 Typical components of a life-cycle cost analysis ............................ 3 - 21
3.8 Break-even traffc levels for paving a gravel road:
Traditional versus revised approaches ............................................. 3 - 24
3.9 A framework for assessing the signifcance of impacts
on LVSR projects ............................................................................. 3 - 32
3.10 Example of assessing value, magnitude and signifcance
of impacts on LVSRs ....................................................................... 3 - 32
HOAD SAFTY
4.1 Typical road cross section elements (after Austroads) .................... 4 - 3
4.2 The geometric design process ........................................................ 4 - 8
4.3 International comparison of fatalities in selected countries ............ 4 - 11
4.4 Elements of the road system and operational conditions ................ 4 - 11
4.5 An example of the interrelationship between road
elements and operational conditions ............................................... 4 - 12
4.6 Factors contributing to road accidents ............................................. 4 - 12
4.7 Road safety audit fow-chart ............................................................ 4 - 14
4.8 The design domain concept ............................................................ 4 - 17
4.9 Example of design domain application - shoulder width ................ 4 - 18
4.10 Examples of good and poor combinations of horizontal
and vertical alignments .................................................................... 4 - 27
4.11 Selection process to ensure a forgiving roadside ............................. 4 - 28
Appendix A A- 2
5. PAVMNT DS1GN, MATH1A1S
AND SUHFAC1NG .
5.1 Cross-section of a typical road pavement .......................................5 - 5
5.2 Spread of wheel load through pavement structure .........................5 - 5
5.3 Generalised pavement behaviour characteristics and indicators ....5 - 6
5.4 Soil-Rock cycle ..............................................................................5 - 10
5.5 Climatic N-value map of Southern Africa ......................................5 - 12
5.6 Illustrative soil strength/suction relationship ..................................5 - 14
5.7 The basic concept of additional settlement due to
collapse of soil fabric ......................................................................5 - 15
5.8 Guide to the method of stabilization ..............................................5 - 18
5.9 Results of mechanical blending of calcrete with sand ...................5 - 19
5.10 Flow diagram stages for material prospecting ................................5 - 22
5.11 Relationship between elastic stiffness and CBR for a
stress pulse of 40 kPa .....................................................................5 - 24
5.12 Pavement design system .................................................................5 - 27
5.13 Typical traffc growth pattern for a LVSR ......................................5 - 29
5.14 Traffc loading versus dominant mechanism of distress ...............5 - 30
5.15 Moisture movements in pavements and subgrades
(NAASRA, 1987) ...........................................................................5 - 31
5.16 Moisture zones in a typical LVSR ..................................................5 - 33
5.17 Pavement confguration for zone A materials
(unprocessed, unbound materials) ..................................................5 - 36
5.18 Components of a typical life-cycle cost analysis ...........................5 - 41
5.19 Combined cost for various pavement structural capacities ...........5 - 41
5.20 Schematic common types of bituminous surface treatments .........5 - 44
5.21 Bitumen hardening graph for bitumen of a given durability ..........5 - 48
5.22 Effect of surface defection on seal life ..........................................5 - 52
6. CONSTHUCT1ON AND DHA1NAG
6.1 Alternative arrangements for undertaking labour-based works .....6 - 6
6.2 Compaction equipment selection guide ..........................................6 - 13
6.3 Illustration of concept of 'compaction to refusal .........................6 - 14
6.4 Illustration of procedure to fnish off base courses
made of natural gravel ....................................................................6 - 20
6.5 Illustration of two alternative mixing techniques on the road ........6 - 21
6.6 Construction of sealed shoulders to existing bitumenised
roads initially having unsealed shoulders .......................................6 - 22
6.7 Typical drainage defciencies associated with cut-and-fll
pavement sections ...........................................................................6 - 30
6.8 Potential drainage problems associated with depressed
pavement construction ....................................................................6 - 31
6.9 Benefcial interception of surface runoff and sub-surface seepage ...6 - 31
6.10 Typical drainage defciencies associated with pavement
shoulder construction ......................................................................6 - 32
6.11 Ideal shoulder construction/drainage arrangements .......................6 - 32
V. MA1NTNANC AND HOAD
MANAGMNT
7.1 Pattern of road expenditure in the SADC region ............................7 - 2
7.2 Typical road condition deterioration with time ..............................7 - 5
7.3 Contribution to total predicted road roughness of different
components for a low-medium volume paved road .......................7 - 5
7.4 The vicious cycle of inadequate maintenance ................................7 - 7
7.5 Relationship between maintenance standard and transport cost ....7 - 8
7.6 Road maintenance management functions in relation to
the road network and users .............................................................7 - 12
7.7 The cycle and scope of maintenance management functions ........7 - 13
7.8 Choosing appropriate maintenance standards ................................7 - 15
7.9 Flow diagram of road condition survey tasks .................................7 - 17
7.10 Example of roughness distribution for different road classes .......7 - 18
7.11 Example of a simple, basic RMS ...................................................7 - 21
V1S1ON TO

Appendix A A - 3
1IsI oI TabIes

I. 1NTHODUCT1ON
1.1 LVSR characteristics ........................................................................1 - 3
z. HG1ONA1 STT1NG
2.1 Inventory of SADC Regional Road Network ...................................2 - 5
2.2 Typical road functions and classifcation .........................................2 - 7
2.3 Condition of main roads in the SADC region ..................................2 - 8
2.4 Gravel road sustainability considerations .........................................2 - 10
2.5 Factors affecting the provision of LVSRs in the SADC region ........2 - 11
NV1HONMNTA1 1SSUS
3.1 Framework for planning and appraisal .............................................3 - 3
3.2 Project cycle and related activities ...................................................3 - 4
3.3 External factors that affect the planning of LVSRs ..........................3 - 6
3.4 Options for reducing construction costs ...........................................3 - 18
3.5 Sources of information for non-motorised transport ........................3 - 20
3.6 Comparison of HDM-4 and RED appraisal investment models ......3 - 22
3.7 Applicability of investment models to LVSR evaluation .................3 - 23
3.8 Factors infuencing the traffc threshold for upgrading ....................3 - 24
3.9 Cornerstones of the environment ......................................................3 - 26
3.10 A framework for EIA ........................................................................3 - 29
HOAD SAFTY
4.1 Design framework ............................................................................4 - 7
4.2 Design guides/manuals used in SADC region .................................4 - 15
4.3 Driver characteristics recommended for rural/low-volume
roads .................................................................................................4 - 20
4.4 Recommended design speed values for selected design
guides ................................................................................................4 - 21
4.5 Minimum stopping (SSD) and passing (PSD) sight distances ........4 - 22
4.6 Examples of typical cross sectional widths ......................................4 - 25
4.7 Design radii for different super-elevations .......................................4 - 25
4.8 Comparison of minimum radii of horizontal curvature ....................4 - 26
4.9 Comparison of minimum radii of vertical curvature (m) .................4 - 27
Appendix A A- 4
5. PAVMNT DS1GN, MATH1A1S
AND SUHFAC1NG .
5.1 Deterioration effects on LVSRs ......................................................5 - 7
5.2 Differences between conventional and pedogenic materials ..........5 - 10
5.3 Climatic zones: Approximate mean annual rainfall and N-values ....5 - 11
5.4 Characteristics of materials in relation to climate (N-value) ...........5 - 12
5.5 Indicators of collapse potential and severity of problem .................5 - 16
5.6 Common uses of materials inventories ............................................5 - 25
5.7 Pavement design life selection guidance .........................................5 - 28
5.8 Variation of subgrade feld/optimum moisture content with
climatic zone ....................................................................................5 - 34
5.9 Pavement material categories and relative characteristics .............5 - 35
5.10 Pavement design methods appropriate for use in the
SADC Region. .................................................................................5 - 38
5.11 Typical checklist of LVSR pavement design factors. ......................5 - 40
5.12 Relative differences in required properties between surface
treatment types on LVSRs ...............................................................5 - 45
5.13 Expected service lives for some of the typical surface seals ...........5 - 45
5.14 Requirements for surfacing aggregates ...........................................5 - 46
5.15 Some specifcations for surfacing aggregates ..................................5 - 50
5.16 Recommended revisions to chip seal specifcations for LVSRs .. ...5 - 51
5.17 Seal selection based on marginal properties ....................................5 - 53
5.18 Relative construction costs of LVSR surfacings .............................5 - 54
5.19 Suitability of various surfacings for use on LVSRs ........................5 - 55
6. CONSTHUCT1ON AND DHA1NAG
6.1 Required input for achievement of a good bituminous seal ............6 - 23
6.2 Production of aggregate for bituminous surfacing ..........................6 - 24
6.3 Labour friendliness of various surfacing types ...............................6 - 25
6.4 Priority in quality control ...............................................................6 - 28
V. MA1NTNANC AND HOAD
MANAGMNT
7.1 Maintenance activities ....................................................................7 - 3
7.2 Maintenance problems, effects and solutions ..................................7 - 4
7.3 Functions of various road sector stakeholders .................................7 - 15
7.4 Typical Routine maintenance standards ..........................................7 - 16
7.5 Condition data elements ..................................................................7 - 18
7.6 Example of 'Treatment Choice Method .......................................7 - 19
7.7 Contracting strategies and allocation of risk ...................................7 - 26
V1S1ON TO

Appendix B B - 1
List of Useful
Organisations
American Association of State Highway & Transportation Ofcials (AASHTO)
AASHTO is a not-for-prot, nonpartisan association representing highway and
transportation departments in the USA and Puerto Rico. It represents the ve
transportation modes of air, highways, public transportation, rail and water. Its goal
is to foster the development, operation and maintenance of an integrated national
transportation system by advocating transportation policies, providing technical
services, demonstrating the contributions of transportation and facilitating
institutional change.
444 North Capitol Street N.W., Suite 249 T: +1 (202) 624 5800
Washington DC 20001 F: +1 (202) 624 5806
USA E: [email protected]
www.transportation.org/
aashto/home.nsf/FrontPage
ASTM International
ASTM International is a not-for-prot organisation that provides a forum for the
development and publication of voluntary consensus standards for materials,
products, systems, and services. These standards are an important part of the
information infrastructure that guides design, manufacturing, and trade in the global
economy. ASTM International has more than 20,000 members from over 100
countries representing producers, users, consumers, government and academia.
PO Box C700 T: +1 (610) 832 9585
100 Barr Harbor Drive F: +1 (610) 832 9555
West Conshohocken E:[email protected]
PA 19428-2959 (Customer service)
USA www.astm.org
Australian Road Research Board (ARRB) Transport Research
ARRB is the leading Australian provider of transport-related research and technical
services. It has a pool of experienced researchers, engineers, laboratory technicians
and support staff and has particular expertise in infrastructure asset surveying and
management, road safety and trafc engineering and transport policy and
management. ARRB works in many countries throughout Asia, Europe and the
Americas with a variety of customers, including international aid agencies, national
and local governments, state road authorities and construction, transport and mining
companies.
Head Ofce T: +61 3 9881 1555
500 Burwood Highway F: +61 3 9887 8104
Vermont South E: [email protected]
Victoria 3133 www.arrb.com.au
AUSTRALIA
Appendix B B - 2
Austroads
Austroads is the association of Australian and New Zealand road transport and trafc
authorities. Its purpose is to contribute to improved Australian and New Zealand
transport by developing and promoting best practice for the safe and effective
management of the road system, providing professional support and advice to
members, assessing and developing Australian and New Zealand standards and
managing the National Strategic Research Programme.
PO Box K659 T: +61 2 9264 7088
Haymarket F: +61 2 9264 1657
NSW 2000 E: [email protected]
Australia www.austroads.com.au
Council for Scientic and Industrial Research (CSIR)
CSIR is a scientic and technological research, development and implementation
organization and plays a part in the development of South Africa as a nation and in the
Southern African Development Community. One of eight operational divisions,
Transportek offers specialist expertise in the elds of transportation research, trafc
management, transport infrastructure and technology and information management,
contractor development and rural and accessibility planning.
PO Box 395 T: + 27 12 841 2911
Pretoria 0001 F: +27 12 349 1153
South Africa E: [email protected]
www.csir.co.za
Department for International Development (DFID)
DFID has a large programme of development assistance and also commissions
research and dissemination projects with a transport theme. DFID also has a website
whose purpose is to raise awareness of the importance of transport for development,
within the context of developing countries. Many documents can be downloaded from
this website. The address is www.transport-links.org
1 Palace Street T:P (within the UK):
London SW1E 5HE 0845 300 4100
United Kingdom T (outside the UK):
Public Enquiry Point +44 (0)1355 84 3132
F: +44 (0)1355 843 632
E: [email protected]
www.dd.gov.uk
ILO Advisory Support, Information Services and Training (ILO/ASIST)
The International Labour Organisation (ILO) is the UN agency which seeks the
promotion of social justice and internationally recognised human and labour rights.
The ILO has a unique tripartite structure with workers and employers participating
as equal partners with governments. ILO/ASIST, part of the ILOs Employment-
Intensive Investment Programme, seeks to contribute towards the alleviation of
poverty through the use of local-level planning methodologies and employment-
intensive strategies in the provision of rural and urban infrastructure. ILO/ASIST
has two Regional Programmes, run by the following ofces, and publishes a regular
Bulletin.
ASIST Asia Pacic ASIST Africa
UN Building 7th Floor B-side PO Box 210
PO Box 2-349 Harare
Rajdamnern Nok Avenue Zimbabwe
Bangkok 10200 T: +263 4 369 824-8
Thailand F: +263 4 369 829
T: +66 2 2882235 E: [email protected]
F: +66 2 2881062 www.ilo.org/asist
E: [email protected]
www.ilo.org/asist & www.iloasist.org
Appendix B B - 3
Institution of Civil Engineers (ICE)
ICE is an independent engineering institution representing almost 80,000
professionally qualied civil engineers in the UK and worldwide. The objectives of
ICE are to promote learning and training, provide professional status, act as a voice
of the profession and facilitate best practice. ICE also publishes standard forms of
contact, including the NEC series of contracts, suitable for international use.
Great George Street T: +44 (0)207 222 7722
Westminster F: +44 (0)207 222 7500
London SW1P 3AA www.ice.org.uk
United Kingdom
International Forum for Rural Transport and Development (IFRTD)
IFRTD is a global network of individuals and organisations encompassing community
organisations, national and international NGOs, academia, governments, donor
agencies, consultants and technical institutions. Its mission is to promote policies
and practices that address access and mobility as a means to eradicating rural
poverty. IRFTD has a decentralised Secretariat based in the UK, Kenya, Peru and
Senegal. IFRTD publishes Forum News quarterly. The UK address is given above.
113 Spitre Studios T: +44 (0)207 713 6699
63-71 Collier Street F: +44 (0)207 713 8290
London N1 9BE E: [email protected]
United Kingdom www.ifrtd.org
International Federation of Consulting Engineers (FIDIC)
FIDIC is an international federation of national associations of consulting engineers.
FIDIC acts as a forum for the exchange of views and information and actively
encourages the discussion of matters of mutual concern among member associations.
More information, including order forms for contracts and other publications, is
available on the website.
PO Box 311 T: +41 22 799 49 00
CH-1215 F: +41 22 799 49 01
Geneva 15 E: [email protected]
Switzerland www.dic.org
International Road Federation (IRF)
The IRF is a non-governmental, not-for-prot international organization with public
sector, private sector and institutional members in approximately 70 countries.
Established in 1948 by business and industry leaders, its mission is to encourage and
promote the development and maintenance of better and safer roads and road
networks. Today the IRF continues to provide the lead in international road
infrastructure and management development through its two programme centres
listed below.
Geneva Programme Centre Washington Program Centre
Chemin de Blandonnet 2 1010 Massachusetts Avenue NW
CH-1214 Vernier (Geneva) Suite 410
Switzerland Washington DC 20001
T: +41 22 306 0260 USA
F: +41 22 306 0270 T: +1 (202) 371 5544
F: +1 (202) 371 5565
[email protected]
www.irfnet.org
Appendix B B - 4
Norwegian Public Roads Administration (NPRA)
NPRA is the national road authority in Norway. It is responsible for national and
county roads, totalling approximately 54,000 km and its duties comprise strategic
planning of the network and other modes of transport, contracting of construction and
maintenance, traffc management, technical standards, registering and inspecting
vehicles and licensing drivers. The Offce for International Affairs coordinates
Institutional Cooperation with a number of European and African countries.
Statens vegvesen
Vegdirektoratet T: +47 22 07 35 00
Postboks 8142 Dep F: +47 22 07 37 68
0033 OSLO E: frmapostvegvesen.no
Norway www.vegvesen.no
Southern African Bitumen Association (Sabita)
Sabita leads the bituminous products industry`s contribution to development in
southern Africa. Funded by its members, Sabita`s threefold mission is to promote
social and economic development through its road provision programmes, educate and
train employees within the industry through formally sanctioned schemes and advance
best practice to give competitive delivery of bituminous products and costeffective
construction and maintenance of roads.
Postnet Suite 56 T: +27 21 531 2718
Private Bag X21 F: +27 21 531 2606
7450 Howard Place E: infosabita.co.za
South Africa www.sabita.co.za
Southern Africa Transport and Communications Commission (SATCC)
The main function of the SATCC Technical Unit (SATCC-TU) is to provide
administrative and technical support to the implementation agencies and monitor
compliance by member states of their obligations in terms of the implementation of the
SADC Protocol on Transport, Communications and Meteorology.
From January 2004: T: +267 3951 863
SADC, Private Bag F: +267 3972 848
0095 E: registrysadc.int
SADC House
Gaborone
Botswana
Transportation Research Board (TRB)
TRB is a unit of the National Research Council, a private, nonproft institution that is
the principal operating agency of the National Academy of Sciences and the National
Academy of Engineering. TRB`s mission is to promote innovation and progress in
transportation by stimulating and conducting research, facilitating the dissemination
of information, and encouraging the implementation of research results. TRB hosts an
annual meeting which attracts a large number of transport professionals from around
the world.
Keck Center of the National Academies T: +1 (202) 334 2934
Transportation Research Board F: +1 (202) 334 2003
500 Fifth Street, NW E: TRBSalesnas.edu
Washington DC 20001 (Publications and Sales)
USA www.trb.org
Appendix B B - 5
TRL Limited
TRL Limited is one of the largest and most comprehensive international independent
research centres working in land transport. The international staff work on projects
for a range of clients, including DFID, the World Bank and the African and Asian
Development Banks.
Centre for International Development T: +44 (0)1344 773131
Old Wokingham Road F: +44 (0)1344 770356
Crowthorne E: [email protected]
Berkshire RG45 6AU www.trl.co.uk
United Kingdom
World Bank
The World Bank nances many rural transport projects in developing countries and
coordinates the Rural Travel and Transport Programme and the Road Maintenance
Initiative of the Sub-Saharan African Transport Program (SSATP). Its Rural
Transport Thematic Group has produced important knowledge products on rural
transport. A large amount of material is available at www.worldbank.org/transport/
rt_over.htm
1818 H Street N.W. T: +1 (202) 473-1000
Washington D.C. F: +1 (202) 477-6391
20433 www.worldbank.org
USA
World Road Association (PIARC)
PIARC is a non-political and non-commercial association with a main objective of
becoming the world leader in providing information on roads and road transport
policy and practices within an integrated sustainable transport context. It co-ordinates
international technical committees, organises international seminars and publishes
documents.
La Grande Arche T: +33 (1) 47 96 81 21
Paroi nord, niveau 8 F: +33 (1) 49 00 02 02
92055 La Defense E: [email protected]
Paris www.piarc.org
France

LVSR Guideline FullText

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

LVSR Guideline FullText

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

LVSR Guideline FullText

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Low-volume Sealed Roads

Gravel is a sacricial layer and replacement is at a high cost:

Wastage of nite resources (selective gravelling difcult in practice).

Land take and rehabilitation of borrow pits.Wet weather access

Continuous demand for use of non-renewable natural resources

promotes sustainability in all aspects oI LVSR provision

Need to maintain continuous dialogue with political and public

highlight pros and cons oI alternative solutions in a balanced

Adopt strategies that:

support cost-effective labour-based methods of construction and

Adopt strategies that:

promote commercial management practices to foster institutional,

Adopt strategies that:

employ appropriate design standards and specications

Adopt strategies that:

integrate social, environmental and economic elements in project appraisal

Adopt strategies that:

promote commercialisation in the roads sector

Adopt strategies that:

minimise the physical impacts of construction and maintenance

Selection: This is a multi-sectoral and multi-disciplinary process which h

Are the strategies being adopted supportive of government

Is there adequate participatory planning and consultation

Are the geometric, pavement design and surfacing stan-

Do designs accommodate construction by labour-based methods?

Have labour-based rather than equipment-based methods

Have the various indicators of socio-economic well-being

Inuences practice. Covers issues such as poverty allevia-

Implies use of labour-based rather than fully plant-based

Growing trend towards establishment of more

Need for cost-effective strategies that utilise the dual

Road benets are often not limited to use of road, but

Usually very scarce. Financing proposals must look

Need to capture social as well as environmental impacts

Globally used model.

High data requirements.

Has limited data requirements.

NMT categories are limited to four.

Stage 1 - provision of access

Stage 2 - improvement in existing capacity

greater exibility of choice but there are few new

wide range of operating characteristics, constraints and

identies relative importance of mobility and access

inuences choice of alignment, design/operating

used to correlate various features of design

provides fundamental basis of design

Because of their mode of formation, involving intensive processes of

Percentage sand added to calcrete

specication limits are placed in terms of:

need for adequate resistance to weathering to avoid crushing, loss of

need for good adherence to binder and non-susceptibility to stripping so

need Ior 'Iresh durable aggregates as maniIested by no/low secondary

need Ior aggregate to be Iree oI contaminants so as to avoid poor binder

A contractor may be reluctant to stockpile materials well ahead of

Penetration macadam may be constructed entirely by labour-based

The ease of application of labour-based methods for construction of seals

Choice of equipment, choice of material type,

Biscuit layers are the most common reason for an

Laboratory tests in advance and after construction,

Method specications, appropriate choice of