SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE
KAMBULOW VS TACF ET ALL
MOTION BEFORE THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CLARKE ON THE 15TH OF JANUARY, 2008 AT MILTON ONTARIO
Copyright:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
Download as pdf
You are on page 1of 39
ag
aq
3.007 (1284)
SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE
BETWEEN
WALTER KAMBULOW
Plaintiff
= and -
TORONTO AIRPORT CHRISTIAN FELLOWSHIP
JOHN ARNOTT and STEPHEN LONG
Defendants
MOTION
before the Honourable Mr. Justice Clarke
on the 15% of January, 2008 at Milton, Ontario
APPEARANCES
W. KAMBULOW Self represented
P. MIEHLS Counsel for the defendants1d
1
|
as
1
Kambulow v Toronto Airport Christian Fellowship et al
JANUARY 15, 2008
THE COURT: Counsel, are you here on a case?
MS. MIEHLS: Yes, I am.
THE COURT: What are case are you acting for?
MS. MIERLS: I’m acting for Toronto Airport on
the first matter, Toronto Airport...
THE COURT: Sir, what's your name?
MR. KAMBULOW: Walter Kambulow.
THE COURT: Oh, yes, sir. All right. I’ve gone
through the file. Take a seat, sir. You're
Patricia...
MS. MIEHLS: Pamela Miehls, Your Honour.
THE COURT: I’m sorry.
MS. MIEHLS: That’s okay.
THE COURT: You're Pamela...
MS. MIEHLS: Miehls.
THE COURT: ...Miehls - M-E..
MS. MIEHLS: M-I-E-H-L-s.
THE COURT: Miehls.
MS. MIEHLS: Yes.
THE COURT: Ms. Miehls, I’ve gone through the
file and I’ve looked at the nature of the -
actually, there are two files, there are two
actions, actually, one is a Statement of Claim in
Toronto....
MS. MIEHLS: Correct.
THE COURT: -.and there's Statement of Claim in
Milton. And I’ve read the allegations made by
the Plaintiff, Mr. Kambulow, and I’ve read the15)
2
2
EN
oer 1298
Kambulow v Toronto Airport Christian Fellowship et al
allegations made - your position on all of this.
MS. MIEHLS: Correct.
THE COURT: And I note that the action in Toronto
was started on October the 18" and then on the
29 of October the second action was started
here in Milton, and I note too that you've got a
motion for injunction and contempt combined now
for the 13” of I think, February, isn’t it.
MS. MIEHLS: That’s correct.
THE COURT: ...in Toronto?
MS. MIEHLS: Right.
THE COURT: And to cut to the chase I’m going to
hear you out if you have anything to say about
this. I know you're seeking to strike out the
Plaintiff’s Statement of Claim today...
MS. MIEHLS: Correct.
THE COURT: ...but I’m very loathe to do that.
But I am very, very open to the idea of
consolidating this matter and moving them to
Toronto...
MS. MIEHLS: Okay.
THE COURT: ...because I do think that they
interweave, and subject to what you say I think
it’s in the interest of justice that they be
consolidated. Now, do you disagree with that?
MS. MIEHLS: No, I completely agree with the fact
that the matter should be transferred to Toronto
if it still stands.
THE COURT: You want me to strike out his claim
today.
MS. MIEHLS: I want you to strike out the claim