ASIAN Paints Distrbn
ASIAN Paints Distrbn
ASIAN Paints Distrbn
Asian Paints (AP) is the market leader in the Indian paint industry, commanding a market
share of 38 per cent in decorative paints and 33 per cent overall in the organised sector.
Its annual sales turnover exceeds Rs. 1,300 crore, way ahead of all the competitors in
the industry. In profits too, AP is far ahead. AP’s market leadership in the decorative
paints segments can be grasped correctly when we take note of the relative position of
the various players in the industry. Whereas AP has a market share of 38 per cent, its
nearest rival, Goodlass Nerolac, commands a share of just 14 per cent. All others have
only less than 10 per cent. Such an achievement by a company that is wholly Indian in
capital, management and technology and in an industry historically dominated by
multinationals is certainly a commendable feat.
This case study, in fact, depicts the distribution strategy adopted by AP in the early years
of its operations. The interesting point is that this strategy serves AP well even today,
when the context has somewhat changed. In the earlier years, in the decorative paint
segment, a wide product range in terms of colour and pack size was a crucial factor for
success. AP literally leapfrogged and overtook all its competitors, and offered the widest
range of products. It also created the distribution outfit that was necessary for reaching
the wide range of products to customers in every nook and corner of the country. In later
years, technology came to the rescue of the players in this regard. Customers could get
the colour of their choice through mixing at the retail outlet. With the help of an
automated machine kept at the retail outlet, paint is given the desired colour by mixing
different shades and stainers in the required proportion. The paint companies need to
maintain only half-a-dozen basic colourants with retailers; mixing can create the other
variants. The new arrangement helps the campanies to manage with a narrow range of
paints. They can reduce the number of SKUs handled and cut down inventory holding
costs.
The above shift has no doubt reduced somewhat the importance of the physical
distribution task in the business, compared to the position in the earlier years. At the
time AP entered the Indian paint business, the physical distribution and channel
management task was the most crucial one in paint marketing. This context is
elaborated in one of the sections in this case study. We can appreciate the lessons of
the case study better, if we keep in mind this contextual position. Even now, physical
distribution and channel management continue to be crucial functions in the business.
In the matter of product range too, companies are not able to totally dispense with the
need for variety in view of the many practical limitations of mixing at retail outlets. It is
no easy task to provide mixing and computers. Before we actually go into AP’s
distribution strategy, let us have brief profiles of the company and that of the paint
industry, so that the contextual setting of the case is clear. Let us start with the industry.
1
THE INDIAN PAINT INDUSTRY
The paint industry of India is 100 years old. Its beginning can be traced to the setting up
of a factory by Shalimar Paints in Kolkata in 1902. Till the advent of World War II, the
industry consisted of just a few foreign companies, and some small, indigenous
producers. The war led to a temporary stoppage of imports leading to many more local
entrepreneurs setting up manufacturing facilities. Nevertheless, foreign companies
continued to dominate the industry. Even now, they remain active contestants, though
their foreign shareholdings stand reduced, with two of them having become totally
Indian. Currently, the industry has a sales turnover of about Rs.3, 600 crore. In terms of
volume, it corresponds to 5 lakh tonnes. The industry is composed of two sectors, the
organised and the unroganised. The organised sector controls 70 per cent of the total
market. The remaining 30 per cent is in the hands of the unorganised sector, consisting
of 2000 odd small-scale units. The industry is not capital intensive. It is however working
capital intensive. The demand for paints is fairly price-elastic and is linked to economic
and industrial growth. Demand is somewhat seasonal in nature-low during monsoon
months, high during festival seasons.
Goodlass dominates the industrial paints segment, with 41 per cent market share. AP is
a poor second here, with a 15 per cent market share. Berger, ICI, and Shalimar are the
other substantive players in the sector, with 10 per cent, 9 per cent and 8 per cent
shares, respectively. The dominance of Goodlass in industrial papints is largely the result
of its technical associated with the Japanese paint major, Kansai Paints, which has a
29.5 per cent equity stake in the company. Goodlass has a lion’s share of 70 per cent in
the OEM passenger car segment, 40 per cent share of two-wheeler OEM market and 20
2
per cent of commercial vehicle OEM market. Goodlass also holds 20 per cent of the
white-goods segment.
The market shares of the five leading companies are shown in Exhibit 1
THE COMPANY
As already mentioned, Asian Paints is India’s largest paints company and the market
leader in decorative paints. AP manufacturers and markets a wide spectrum of coatings
and ancillaries, which include decoratives, production paints and heavy-duty coatings.
The manufacturing facilities of the company for paint products are currently spread over
four locations- Bhandup, Mumbai, which was established in 1955; Taloja, Maharashtra,
where AP established its second unit in 1980; Ankleshwar, Gujarat, where operations
started in 1981; and Patancheru, Andhra Pradesh, where manufacturing started in 1985.
Asian Paints offers the widest range of paints in terms of products and shades, as well
as pack sizes. Availability of wide range of shades is in fact, one major critical success
factor in the decorative paints business. And AP scores high in this factor. AP
manufactures and markets more than 2,800 items of paints (SKU).
PERFORMANCE
AP has been consistently turning out a good performance over the years. For more than
two decades now, it has been the market leader. Besides, the company has also
consistently proved its excellence in operating performance. Exhibit 2 gives details of
AP’s sales performance during the last four years. Exhibit 3 gives some other important
details of AP’s performance. AP has set a target of gross sales of Rs 2,100 crore by
2003. It aims to be amongst the top ten decorative paints manufacturers in the world by
2003 and among the top five by 2005.
• AP’s operating profits stood at Rs 191 • The net profit stood at Rs 97 crore as
crore in FY 2000, an increase of 37.7 compared to Rs 77 crore the previous
percent over the previous year. year, higher by 26.6 per cent. Net
3
Operating profits have grown at a profit has grown at a CAGR of 12.7 per
CAGR of 13 per cent in last five years, cent in last five years.
much higher than the sales growth of
8.6 per cent
• The profit before tax (PBT) stood at Rs • Return on net worth (RONW) improved
143 crore, an increase of Rs 49 crore from 25.2 per cent in FY 1999 to 27.1
over the previous year. PBT has grown per cent in FY 2000. RONW has
at a CAGR of 12.35 per cent in last five remained close to 25-26 per cent in
years. last five years.
• Return on Capital Employed
(ROCE) improved from 26.6 per
cent in FY 1999 to 35.9 per cent in
FY 2000.
AP’s sound marketing has earned it strong brand equity. To quote AP’s managing
director: ‘We have been able to build strong brand equity for our products by focusing on
features that are appreciated by customers, ensuring that our products are of high and
consistent quality, offering a wide range of shades and packs, and ensuring that our
products are available wherever and whenever required, by building a strong distribution
system.’
Its brand Tractor, Apcolite, Uttav, Apex and Ace are well entrenched in the market. And
AP’s logo, ‘Gattu’, the impish boy, with the paint tin and brush, symbolises one of the
most recognised and most prosperous mascots in Indian business! All this has earned
the company a place among the world’s leading paint manufacturers. AP is the winner
of the 1995 corporate performance award by the Economic Times and Harvard Business
School Association of India. It actually received the award twice within a decade.
These distributors had neither the compulsion nor the motivation to invest in distribution
infrastructure. They were not required to move out to semi-urban and rural areas. They
concentrated on big cities where they could make the sales without much investment in
distribution infrastructure and market development. Also, they were shutting the doors
on any new paint company seeking an entry into the business. In other words, these
distributors controlled the paint business and were making it impossible for a new paint
company to enter and establish itself n the business. AP sized up the scenario correctly
and formulated a unique distribution strategy. In the normal course, a firm entering the
industry in this scenario would have opted for the low risk strategy of gaining a limited
access to the wholesale traders and be satisfied with a small share of the existing
4
business. But AP went in for a strategy that differed totally from the existing pattern.
AP’s strategy in fact, meant the polar opposite of the established/existing pattern.
AP GOES RETAIL
Going directly to retail dealers was the next major strategic decision of AP in the realm of
marketing and distribution. Here too, AP totally broke with the prevailing distribution
practice. As mentioned earlier, the foreign companies, who were the main players, were
practising a wholesale distributor-dependant marketing system. AP did not see any
great merit in the system. It totally bypassed the well-entrenched wholesale distributors
and went directly to the retailers. While AP’s competitors remained content with their
linkage with a handful of wholesale distributors, AP preferred direct contact with
hundreds of retail dealers.
5
AP GOES IN FOR AN OPEN-DOOR DEALER POLICY
AP followed an open-door policy in the matter of adding retail dealers to its network. The
prevailing trend in those days was to limit the number of dealers to the barest minimum.
AP broke this trend and chose to use practically everyone in the trade, who was willing
to function as its dealer. It was as a combined result of the policy of going directly to
retailers and the policy of open door to dealership that AP’s dealer network swelled
rapidly. Even after achieving stability and maturity in distribution, AP continued to follow
a policy of continuous expansion of dealer network. By 1990, AP was having a 7,000
strong dealer network. By the year 2000, the number had swelled to 12,000. And even
now, on an average, AP is adding 200 to 250 new dealers every year.
6
to the consumers, it automatically meant that the company had to be prepared for high
inventory holding in its various depots/retail outlets. Accounting and sales arrangements
had also to be provided for on a matching level. Naturally, distribution was becoming
more complex and expensive for AP.
7
it encountered in this task, how it tackled them and how through distribution success, it
achieved marketing and corporate success.
These are supported by six regional distribution centres, which cater to 55 depots. Each
depot has a branch manager for supervision of several salespersons who cater to more
than 14,500 dealers in the more than 3,500 big and small cities all over the country. AP
faced many challenges. Of these, the cost-service dilemma was no doubt, the most
important one. And, that is the aspect in which we are mainly interested in this case
study.
General Manager
(Marketing)
8
Sales Manager Manager Sales Manager
(Trade) (Export) (Industrial)
We have seen that AP has over 15,000 dealers in 3,500 towns in India. AP caters to all
of them directly. As a result, for AP, the distribution task gets tremendously extended and
distribution cost becomes a significant business parameter.
Naturally, distribution cost emerged as a major hurdle that AP had to cross. The strategy
adopted by AP necessitated expensive distribution. In addition, AP took another basis
decision. It went in for a very high service level in distribution. Service level is measured
in terms of the number of stock keeping units (SKUs) available in stock as a percentage
of the number of SKUs that should have been in stock. AP’s service level is more than
85 per cent whereas that of other large paint companies falls between 50 and 60 per
cent. This meant a further rise in AP’s physical distribution costs. AP had to resolve this
cost-service conflict.
In the chapter on Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, we had seen that a
cost-service dilemma is inherent in any physical distribution situation. A high service
level in physical distribution-in transportation, warehousing, order processing and
9
inventories necessarily means a high level of costs. Every firm has to face this cost-
service dilemma and work out a compromise. AP voted for a high service level and
without compromising this service level, it tried to contain the distribution costs.
Interestingly, AP succeeded in this endeavour.
When we go in to the details as to how AP actually resolved the cost-service dilemma,
four factors stand out:
(a) A special discount of 3.5 per cent. This was referred to as the discount for perfection
in payments. It was passed on at the end of the year, provided each and every
payment throughout the year was made within the stipulated time norms.
10
(b) A cash discount of 5 per cent. This was paid for all outright cash purchases. It was
given whenever payments were received within 24 hours of the supply/invoice. In
respect of outstation accounts, the payment have been made in advance by draft in
order to be eligible for the cash discount.
The scheme was a grand success. AP’s credit outstandings always stood below 25
days, while the outstandings of the other major companies were in the range of 40 days
and above. Systematic computerisation also helped AP maintain the credit outstanding
within limits.
Computerisation also enabled AP to process recent sales data for the 100 fastest
moving SKUs. This analysis was used to project sales of specific products, which
helped plan production and raw material purchases. With computerisation, AP was able
to analyse past trends to arrive at a 90 per cent accurate sales forecast. Corrections
were made every month between the sales projections and actual sales. Production
was thus evened out month-to-month. Sales statistics were maintained, classified by
product, month, salesman, branch, region and dealer. Such computerised planning and
control of production, sales and inventories helped AP cut distribution costs without
compromising on the high level of service sought by it in physical distribution.
AP later hired from the Department of Telecommunications, satellite time and got all its
offices in the country networked. They transmit data daily to the corporate head office in
Mumbai, which uses it for sales and production planning. AP has consistently improved
its IT systems over the years. It has linked al its factories and 55 depots through C-SAT
terminals, and derived big benefits in terms of streamlined distribution. More recently,
AP has implemented supply chain management software from 12 technologies. AP
plans to upgrade its communication infrastructure through VSAT leased lines and ISDN
lines all over India. It is also implementing an ERP solution from SAP to be completed in
2001.
11
cost position in the industry. Normally, when a firm consciously opts for the
differentiation route with a wide product line, it automatically points towards higher
inventory levels and consequently higher inventory and other costs. But AP, through its
effective distribution management, inventory management and control of credit
outstandings, in particular, managed to retain its inventory size and inventory costs at
the lowest possible level.
AP actually saved so much on inventory carrying costs that it almost earned its
promotion budget through these savings. This is again praiseworthy because AP
spends as much as 10 per cent of its sales on promotion, the highest in the industry. It
has to spend so much in order to maintain its differentiation advantage. But strikingly, it
has kept its total marketing costs the lowest in the industry. The two factors together-the
lowest cost position as well as the highest differentiation position-has conferred a
significant competitive advantage on AP.
12