Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 4K views

    Republic V Peralta Digest

    Uploaded by

    anners
    The Supreme Court of the Philippines modified and remanded the order of the Court of First Instance of Manila regarding the insolvency proceedings of Quality Tobacco Corporation. The trial court held that the claims of the Unions for separation pay of their members from final NLRC awards were preferred over the claims of the Bureau of Customs and BIR. The Solicitor General argued that Article 110 of the Labor Code, which gives preference to wages in insolvency, does not apply because separation pay is not considered "wages." The Supreme Court held that separation pay is considered part of "remuneration" and falls within the scope of "wages" in Article 110, based on previous jurisprudence. However, the resolution cannot

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Republic V Peralta Digest

    Uploaded by

    anners
    4K views2 pages
    The Supreme Court of the Philippines modified and remanded the order of the Court of First Instance of Manila regarding the insolvency proceedings of Quality Tobacco Corporation. The trial court held that the claims of the Unions for separation pay of their members from final NLRC awards were preferred over the claims of the Bureau of Customs and BIR. The Solicitor General argued that Article 110 of the Labor Code, which gives preference to wages in insolvency, does not apply because separation pay is not considered "wages." The Supreme Court held that separation pay is considered part of "remuneration" and falls within the scope of "wages" in Article 110, based on previous jurisprudence. However, the resolution cannot

    Original Title

    Republic v Peralta Digest

    Copyright

    © Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)

    Available Formats

    DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    The Supreme Court of the Philippines modified and remanded the order of the Court of First Instance of Manila regarding the insolvency proceedings of Quality Tobacco Corporation. The trial court held that the claims of the Unions for separation pay of their members from final NLRC awards were preferred over the claims of the Bureau of Customs and BIR. The Solicitor General argued that Article 110 of the Labor Code, which gives preference to wages in insolvency, does not apply because separation pay is not considered "wages." The Supreme Court held that separation pay is considered part of "remuneration" and falls within the scope of "wages" in Article 110, based on previous jurisprudence. However, the resolution cannot

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as doc, pdf, or txt
    4K views2 pages

    Republic V Peralta Digest

    Uploaded by

    anners
    The Supreme Court of the Philippines modified and remanded the order of the Court of First Instance of Manila regarding the insolvency proceedings of Quality Tobacco Corporation. The trial court held that the claims of the Unions for separation pay of their members from final NLRC awards were preferred over the claims of the Bureau of Customs and BIR. The Solicitor General argued that Article 110 of the Labor Code, which gives preference to wages in insolvency, does not apply because separation pay is not considered "wages." The Supreme Court held that separation pay is considered part of "remuneration" and falls within the scope of "wages" in Article 110, based on previous jurisprudence. However, the resolution cannot

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as doc, pdf, or txt
    of 2

    REPUBLIC V PERALTA 150 SCRA 37 FELICIANO; May 20, 1987

    NATURE: Review on certiorari FACTS: - The Republic of the Philippines seeks the review on certiorari of the Order of the CFI of Manila in its Civil Case No. 108395 entitled "In the Matter of Voluntary Insolvency of Quality Tobacco Corporation, Quality Tobacco. - In its questioned Order, the trial court held that the above enumerated claims of USTC and FOITAF (hereafter collectively referred to as the "Unions") for separation pay of their respective members embodied in final awards of the NLRC were to be preferred over the claims of the Bureau of Customs and the BIR. The trial court, in so ruling, relied primarily upon Article 110 of the Labor Code. - The Solicitor General, in seeking the reversal of the questioned Orders, argues that Article 110 of the Labor Code is not applicable as it speaks of "wages," a term which he asserts does not include the separation pay claimed by the Unions. "Separation pay," the Solicitor General contends: is given to a laborer for a separation from employment computed on the basis of the number of years the laborer was employed by the
    7 SEC. 1. Requirements for Issuance of License. Every applicant for license to operate a private employment agency or manning agency shall submit a written application together with the following requirements: xxx xxx f. A verified undertaking stating that the applicant: xxx xxx xxx (3) Shall assume joint and solidary liability with the employer for all claims and liabilities which may arise in connection with the implementation of the contract; including but not limited to payment of wages, health and disability compensation and reparation.

    employer; it is a form of penalty or damage against the employer in favor of the employee for the latter's dismissal or separation from service ISSUE WON separation pay of their respective members embodied in final awards of the NLRC were to be preferred over the claims of the Bureau of Customs and the BIR (WON separation pay is included in the term wages8) HELD 1. YES Ratio For the specific purposes of Article 1109 and in the context of insolvency termination or separation pay is reasonably regarded as forming part of the remuneration or other money benefits accruing to employees or workers by reason of their having previously rendered services to their employer; as such, they fall within the scope of "remuneration or earnings for services rendered or to be rendered ." Liability for separation pay might indeed have the effect of a penalty, so far as the employer is concerned. So far as concerns the employees, however, separation pay is additional remuneration to which they become entitled because, having previously rendered services, they are separated from the employer's service. Reasoning - We note, in this connection, that in Philippine Commercial and Industrial Bank (PCIB) us. National Mines and Allied Workers Union, the Solicitor General took a different view and there urged that the term "wages" under Article 110 of the Labor Code may be regarded as embracing within its scope severance pay or termination or separation pay. In PCIB, this Court agreed with the position advanced by the Solicitor General. We see no reason for overturning this particular position. - The resolution of the issue of priority among the several claims filed in the insolvency proceedings instituted by the Insolvent cannot, however, rest on a reading of Article 110 of the labor Code alone. - Article 110 of the Labor Code, in determining the reach of its

    terms, cannot be viewed in isolation. Rather, Article 110 must be read in relation to the provisions of the Civil Code concerning the classification, concurrence and preference of credits, which provisions find particular application in insolvency proceedings where the claims of all creditors, preferred or non-preferred, may be adjudicated in a binding manner. Disposition MODIFIED and REMANDED to the trial court for further proceedings in insolvency.
    Article 97 (f) of the Labor Code defines "wages" in the following terms: Wage' paid to any employee shall mean the remuneration or earnings, however designated, capable of being expressed in terms of money, whether fixed or ascertained on a time, task, piece, or commission basis, or other method of calculating the same, which is payable by an employer to an employee under a written or unwritten contract of employment for work done or to be done, or for services rendered or to be rendered, and includes the fair and reasonable value, as determined by the Secretary of Labor, of board, lodging, or other facilities customarily furnished by the employer to the employee. 'Fair and reasonable value' shall not include any profit to the employer or to any person affiliated with the employer.(emphasis supplied)

    Article 110. Worker preference in case of bankruptcy In the event of bankruptcy or liquidation of an employer's business, his workers shall enjoy first preference as regards wages due them for services rendered during the period prior to the bankruptcy or liquidation, any provision of law to the contrary notwithstanding. Union paid wages shall be paid in full before other creditors may establish any claim to a share in the assets of the employer. (emphasis supplied).

    You might also like