Assignment Performance A ADL 32
Assignment Performance A ADL 32
Assignment Performance A ADL 32
Study Centre :
Enroll No. :
Date :
ASSIGNMENT INSTRUCTION
a) Total weightage given to these assignment is 30%
b) All assignments are to be completed in your own hand writing
c) All questions are required to be attempted
d) Three assignments i.e. A, B & C are to be answered. Assignment A will carry Five
subjective questions (10 marks). Assignment B will carry three subjective questions
with a Case Study (10 marks) and Assignment C will carry Forty objective type
questions (10 marks)
e) All the three assignments are to be completed by due dates (specified from time to
time) and mailed/ given by hand for evaluation at the ASoDL office Noida/ your Study
Centre.
f) The evaluated assignments can be collected from your study center/ ASoDL Office
after Six weeks. Thereafter these will be destroyed at the end of each semester.
Signature : _______________________
Name : _______________________
Date : _______________________
1. “360 degree appraisal method has its own short-comings”. Discuss. Also point out the merits of
this method.
2. Enlist the modern methods of performance appraisal. Which of these do you prefer the most
and why? Give reasons.
3. Discuss, in brief, the role of coaching and counseling in improving performance
of employees.
4. How can the relationship between ‘performance’ and ‘pay’ be instrumental in improving
performance in an organization?
5. Distinguish between ‘Performance Appraisal’ and “Potential Evaluation”. Also discuss, in brief,
the methods of Potential evaluation.
Assignment B
Marks 10
Answer all questions.
1. What precautions should be taken while designing performance appraisal system so that
it may serve the desired purpose? Discuss in detail.
2 .“No performance appraisal method will serve the desired purpose until and unless it is
followed by post-review discussion” Discuss.
CASE STUDY
PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL AT KALYANI ELECTRONICS CORPORATION
Kalyani Electronics Corporation Ltd., recently diversified its activities and started producing
computers. It employed personnel at the lower level and middle level. It has received several
applications for the post of Commercial Manager-Computer Division. It could not decide upon the
suitability of the candidates to the position, but did find that Mr. Prakash is more qualified for the
position than other candidates. The Corporation has created a new post below the cadre of General
Manager i.e. Joint General Manager and asked Mr. Prakash to join the Corporation as Joint General
Manager. Mr. Prakash agreed to it viewing that he will be considered for General Manager’s position
based on his performance. Mr. Anand, the Deputy General Manager of the Corporation and one of
the candidates of General Manager’s position was annoyed with the management’s practice. But, he
wanted to show his performance record to the management at the next appraisal meeting. The
management of the Corporation asked Mr. Sastry, General Manager of Televisions Division to be the
General Manager in-charge of Computer Division for some time, until a new General Manager is
appointed. Mr. Sastry wanted to switch over to Computer Division in view of the prospects, prestige
and recognition of the position among the top management of the Corporation. He viewed this
assignment as a chance to prove his performance.
The Corporation has the system of appraisal of the superior’s performance by the
subordinates. The performance of the Deputy General Manager, Joint General Manager and General
Manager has to be appraised by the same group of the subordinates. Mr. Anand and Mr. Sastry know
very well about the system and its operation, whereas Mr. Prakash is a stranger to the system as well
as its modus operandi. Mr. Sastry and Mr. Anand were competing with each other in convincing their
subordinates about their performance and used all sorts of techniques for pleasing them like
promising them a wage hike, transfers to the job of their interest, promotion, etc. However, these two
officers functioned in collaboration with a view to pull down Mr. Prakash. They openly told their
subordinates that a stranger should not occupy the ‘chair’. They created several groups among
employees like pro-Anand’s group, pro-Sastry group, Anti-Prakash and Sastry group, Anti-Anand and
Prakash group.
Mr. Prakash has been watching the proceedings calmly and keeping the top management in
touch with all these developments. However, Mr. Prakash has been quite work-conscious and top
management found his performance under such a political atmosphere to be satisfactory. Prakash’s
pleasing manners and way of maintaining human relations with different levels of employees did,
however, prevent the emergence of an anti-Prakash wave in the company. But in view of the political
atmosphere within the company, there is no strong pro-Prakash’s group either.
Management administered the performance appraisal technique and the subordinates
appraised the performance of all these managers. In the end, surprisingly, the workers assigned the
following overall scores. Prakash: 560 points; Sastry: 420 points; and Anand: 260 points.
QUESTIONS:
1. How do you evaluate the worker’s appraisal in this case?
2. Do you suggest any techniques to avert politics creeping into the process of performance
appraisal by subordinates? Or do you suggest the measure of dispensing with such appraisal
systems?
Assignment C
(Objective Questions)
Answer all questions Marks 10
Tick Marks (√) the most appropriate answer
14. Which of the following is not included in the 2x2 matrix used in Philips’ Hi-Lo Model of potential
evaluation?
(a) Developers
(b) Problem Children
(c) Stars
(d) Planned Separation
15 Which of the following four qualities is generally not included while preparing 5-point scale for
potential evaluation in Philips NV Holland Model?
16. Which of the following is not considered as one of the best practices of potential evaluation?
(a) Rewarding for good performance in the past
(b) Communicating potential appraisal to all employees regularly
(c) Incorporating the appraisal and reward of potential in the assessment system
(d) Ensuring to distinguish reward for potential from reward for past performance.
17. As per Mihir, K Basu’s Survey, the appraisal system for managerial personnel in the Tata Iron &
Steel Company (TISCO ) was introduced in :
(a) 1943
(b) 1953
(c) 1963
(d) 1973
18. Which of the following factors does not influence the measurement of work performance?
(a) Situational characteristics
(b) Individual Characteristics
(c) Image of the company
(d) Performance Management Procedures
19. Which of the following statements is false?
(a) Job analysis is the basic for performance standards
(b) Subjective measures in performance appraisal are most desirable
(c)Using multiple raters improves performance
(d) Rating scales are particularly subject to bias
37. Which of the following is not one of the steps essential for development and introduction of
performance appraised system?
(a) Deterring an overall approach to performance appraised system
(b) Setting up project team
(c) Appropriate compensating the Project Team
(d) Pilot testing
38. Which of the following is not the purpose of self-appraisal?
(a) Orienting the employee regarding the intricacies of performance appraisal system
(b) Providing a formal opportunity for the employee to recapitulate.
(c) Identifying his own development needs
(d) Initiating an organization-wide process of review and reflection and supportive climate
39. Which is not the advantage of 360 degree appraisal?
(a) Requires extensive training
(b) Is more objective being multi-rater based
(c) Increases accountability of employees to customers
(d) Increases credibility of performance appraisal
40. Which of the following is not the new performance measure that Godrej & Boyce has identified?
(a) Networking Capital Returns
(b) Return on Investment
(c) Volume of Business Growth
(d) Net contribution of the Division