Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 28 views

    Filed: Case 09-17241 Document 8 Filed 10/20/09 2 Pages

    Uploaded by

    Equality Case Files
    This document is an order from the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit regarding an interlocutory appeal in the case of Perry v. Schwarzenegger. The order suggests the court may lack jurisdiction over the appeal because it involves a discovery order. The appellants are given 21 days to voluntarily dismiss the appeal or show cause why it should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. If appellants do not comply, the Clerk will dismiss the appeal. Briefing is suspended pending further order of the court.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Filed: Case 09-17241 Document 8 Filed 10/20/09 2 Pages

    Uploaded by

    Equality Case Files
    28 views2 pages
    This document is an order from the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit regarding an interlocutory appeal in the case of Perry v. Schwarzenegger. The order suggests the court may lack jurisdiction over the appeal because it involves a discovery order. The appellants are given 21 days to voluntarily dismiss the appeal or show cause why it should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. If appellants do not comply, the Clerk will dismiss the appeal. Briefing is suspended pending further order of the court.

    Original Description:

    Doc #8

    Original Title

    09-17241 #8

    Copyright

    © Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This document is an order from the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit regarding an interlocutory appeal in the case of Perry v. Schwarzenegger. The order suggests the court may lack jurisdiction over the appeal because it involves a discovery order. The appellants are given 21 days to voluntarily dismiss the appeal or show cause why it should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. If appellants do not comply, the Clerk will dismiss the appeal. Briefing is suspended pending further order of the court.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    28 views2 pages

    Filed: Case 09-17241 Document 8 Filed 10/20/09 2 Pages

    Uploaded by

    Equality Case Files
    This document is an order from the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit regarding an interlocutory appeal in the case of Perry v. Schwarzenegger. The order suggests the court may lack jurisdiction over the appeal because it involves a discovery order. The appellants are given 21 days to voluntarily dismiss the appeal or show cause why it should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. If appellants do not comply, the Clerk will dismiss the appeal. Briefing is suspended pending further order of the court.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    of 2

    Case 09-17241 Document 8 Filed 10/20/09 2 pages

    FILED
    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS OCT 20 2009

    MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK


    FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS

    KRISTIN M. PERRY; et al., No. 09-17241

    Plaintiffs - Appellees, D.C. No. 3:09-cv-02292-VRW


    Northern District of California,
    and San Francisco

    OUR FAMILY COALITION; et al.,


    ORDER
    Plaintiffs-intervenors - Appellees,

    v.

    ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, in his


    official capacity as Governor of California;
    et al.,

    Defendants,

    and

    PROPOSITION 8 OFFICIAL
    PROPONENTS; et al.,

    Defendants-intervenors - Appellants.

    A review of the record suggests that this court may lack jurisdiction over this

    interlocutory appeal because this court generally lacks jurisdiction to review

    discovery orders. See 28 U.S.C. § 1291; Truckstop.net, LLC v. Sprint Corp.,

    cj/MOATT
    547 F.3d 1065, 1067 (9th Cir. 2008); KL Group v. Case, Kay & Lynch, 829 F.2d

    909, 918, n. 5 (9th Cir. 1987). Within 21 days after the date of this order,

    appellants shall move for voluntary dismissal of this appeal or show cause why it

    should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. If appellants elect to show cause,

    a response may be filed within 8 days after service of the memorandum.

    If appellants do not comply with this order, the Clerk shall dismiss this

    appeal pursuant to Ninth Circuit Rule 42-1.

    Briefing is suspended pending further order of the court.

    FOR THE COURT:

    Molly Dwyer
    Clerk of Court

    By: Caroline A. Jacobs


    Motions Attorney/Deputy Clerk
    9th Cir. R. 27-7
    General Orders/Appendix A

    cj/MOATT 2 09-17241

    You might also like