Dollar Tree Case Study
Dollar Tree Case Study
Dollar Tree Case Study
BMGT372
Case Study #2
In 1986, Dollar Tree (then called Only $1.00) opened as an extension of a successful toy store,
K&K Toys. During that year, Macon Brock Jr., H. Ray Compton, and Douglas Perry opened five
additional stores. Dollar Tree, Inc. progressed to going public in 1995, earning a place in Fortune
500, and crossing the $4 billion threshold in 2010. Dollar Tree, Inc. now operates over 4,000
Unlike its main competitors, Dollar General and Family Dollar, Dollar Tree keeps all of its
merchandise priced at or below one dollar. The merchandise found in the stores includes
consumable products, variety items, and seasonal goods. These categories include such items as
candy, food, health and beauty products, toys, gifts, party goods, and house ware items. In order
to offer more merchandise to customers, Dollar Tree stores continue to expand. The stores began
primarily in indoor malls at a size between 1,500 and 2,500 sq. ft. However, Dollar Tree stores as
In order to maintain a profit when the merchandise is sold for only a dollar, Dollar Tree, Inc.
relies heavily on a high inventory turnover rate. Chief Logistics Officer, Steve White, states this
is possible through strategically located, large scale, efficient distribution centers. Dollar Tree’s
first distribution center opened in 1997 in Chesapeake, VA. The company grew to operate nine
distribution centers throughout the country by 2004. In order to keep costs under control, there is
Challenge
The distribution center in Briar Creek, PA stores and ships inventory to Dollar Tree stores across
the northeast. This distribution center has reached a utilization of 92% with a peak utilization of
124%. This over-utilization forced management to rent an expensive, off-site, short term space in
2004 to handle the peak flow. Therefore, Steve White and Dollar Tree’s logistics team
1. Expand the current Briar Creek, PA distribution center by 400,000 sq. ft. to increase
2. Build a new distribution center with 600,000 sq. ft. in Hartford, CT. The two facilities
would serve the territory currently assigned to the Briar Creek, PA distribution center.
Solution
Dollar Tree, Inc. should expand its current Briar Creek, PA distribution center by 400,000 sq. ft.
to increase the facility by two-thirds. As stated previously, Dollar Tree, Inc. relies heavily on a
high inventory turnover rate. Expanding the current distribution center will produce a turnover
rate of 14. Meanwhile, building a new distribution center in Hartford, CT will produce a lower
turnover rate of 13. In addition, building a new distribution center will incur start-up and labor
costs. Rather than simply expanding an already existing distribution center, a new distribution
center will need time and money invested into searching and purchasing new land and also the
construction costs involved in building a new distribution center. A new distribution center of
600,000 sq. ft. would require more employees overall than an expansion of 400,000 sq. ft. Both
recruiting and training costs are necessary for hiring new employees. Also, a completely new
management team would be needed for the new distribution center. Overall, the labor costs
associated with building a new distribution center are greater overall than expanding an already
existing distribution center. Considering Steve White focuses on a three year time frame when
planning a new capacity, the additional costs associated with building a new distribution center
are unnecessary. Therefore, the expansion of the current Briar Creek, PA distribution center