Optimizing The Properties of Thin Wall Austempered Ductile Iron
Optimizing The Properties of Thin Wall Austempered Ductile Iron
Optimizing The Properties of Thin Wall Austempered Ductile Iron
Proceedings of 68th World Foundry Congress 162 7th-10th February 2008, Chennai, India
Fig. 2 : Microstructure of the investigated different ADI wall thickness castings A: 2 mm, 400°C - B: 4 mm, 400°C
C: 6 mm, 400°C - D: 8 mm, 400°C, E: 2 mm, 350°C - F: 4 mm, 350°C - G: 6 mm, 350°C - H: 8 mm, 350°C
7th-10th February 2008, Chennai, India 163 Proceedings of 68th World Foundry Congress
Fig. 4 : Effect of wall thickness and austempering temperature
Fig. 6 : Effect of wall thickness and austempering temperature
on retained austenite volume fraction
on tensile properties.
TENSILE PROPERTIES
The correlation between tensile strength and wall thickness
is shown in Fig. 6. The samples austempered at 350 ºC
showed higher tensile properties than those austempered at
400 ºC mainly due to the structural refinement effect and the Fig. 7 : Effect of wall thickness and austempering temperature
existence of less amounts of retained austenite associated on impact elongation percentage
Proceedings of 68th World Foundry Congress 164 7th-10th February 2008, Chennai, India
austempering temperature, whereas retained austenite and In accordance with the ASTM standard A897-06, there are 6
consequently elongation increases with increasing the wall different grades of ADI depending on their ultimate tensile
thickness of the plates. It is well established that the strength 12. In this study, the samples austempered at 350°C
austempering reaction starts by nucleation of ferritic platelets can be considered as grade 2 because they have tensile
at the graphite/matrix interface. With the rather high nodule strength more than 900 MPa and impact energy of more than
count encountered in the structures of 2-mm plates, it is 100 J; while the other samples austempered at 400 °C can be
expected that the transformation will proceed at rather high characterized as grade 1 with lower strength. Minimum
speed, independent on the austempering temperature. In required strength for this grade is 750 MPa and 110 J impact
other words, it may be assumed that the enhanced toughness.
transformation rate due to the high nodule count will mask
the influence of austempering temperature on diffusion and CONCLUSIONS
the structure and the elongation of the 2-mm thick plate will 2 mm ADI plate exhibits a homogenous ausferritic
be almost the same. structure with nodule count of 300/mm2.
IMPACT ENERGY Retained austenite volume fraction increased gradually
The effect of wall thickness on impact energy of the (in both austempering temperatures of 350 & 400 °C)
specimens austempered at 350 °C & 400 °C is illustrated in with increasing wall thickness due to the difference in
Fig. 8. The results show that the impact energy is increased bainitic transformation rate.
gradually with increasing the wall thickness due to the Hardness increases with decreasing casting wall
formation of more percentage of retained austenite in the thickness due to structure refinement effect.
final structure. In addition, the austempering temperature of
400 °C showed higher impact energy in all ranges of wall The austempering temperature of 350 °C showed tensile
thicknesses than at 350 °C due to the presence of higher strength in the range of 1000 to 950 MPa with increasing
amount of retained austenite at 400 °C than at 350 °C 10. On casting wall thickness from 2 to 8 mm, while these tensile
the other hand, the nodule count plays an important role, values become lower (825 – 775 MPa) at austempering
with increasing the graphite nodule count the probability of temperature of 400 °C.
failure (decreasing the impact energy) will be increased 11. Impact strength increased gradually with increasing wall
Moreover, by increasing the nodule count the distance thickness. The austempering temperature of 400 °C
between graphite nodules will decrease and then the resulted in higher impact strength than of 350 ºC because
resistance to impact energy will be decreased. Therefore, the of the higher retained austenite associated with 400 °C.
impact energy of the studied samples depended on:
REFERENCES
Austempering temperature: higher austempering
1 Druschitz A.P. and Fitzgerald D.C., “Lightweight iron and steel
temperature of 400 °C obtained higher impact energy
castings for automotive applications”, SAE World Congress,
than at 350 °C. Detroit, Michigan, March 3-6, 2000.
Amount of retained austenite: higher amount of retained 2 Stefanescu D.M.and Ruxanda R., “Lightweight iron castings-can
austenite in matrix lead to higher values of impact they replace aluminum castings?”, Proceedings of the 65th World
energy. Foundry Congress, Gyeongju, Korea, 2002.
3 Fras E.and Gorny M., “Structure of thin wall austempered
Nodule counts: higher counts of graphite nodules ductile iron (TWADI)”, Proceedings of the 8th International
showed lower impact energy. Symposium on Science and Processing of Cast Iron, Beijing-
China, Oct. 16-19 (2006), p. 157.
4 Labrecque C., Gange M.and Javaid A., “Optimizing the
mechanical properties of thin-wall ductile iron castings”, AFS
Transactions, Vol. 116, (2005).
5 Stefanescu D.M., Dix L.P., Ruxanda R.E., Coburn C.C.and
Piwonks T.S., “Tensile properties of thin wall ductile iron, AFS
Transactions, vol. 178, (2002), p.1149.
6 Harding R.A., “The production, properties and automotive
applications for austempered ductile iron”, Asia-Europe
Environment Forum Conference: 23-25 Nov. (2005), Jakarta-
Indonesia.
7 Martinez R.A., Boeri R.E.and Sikora J.A., “Application of ADI
in high strength thin wall automotive parts”, 2002 World
Conference on ADI, Ductile Iron Society and the American
Foundry Society, Louisville, KY (USA), Sept. 26-27, (2002).
8 Gagne M., Labrecque C., Popescu M.and Sahoo M., “Effect of
silicon content and wall thickness on the properties of
austempered ductile irons”, AFS Transactions, vol. 103, (2005),
Fig. 8 : Effect of wall thickness and austempering temperature p. 1.
on strength 9 Bakkerus H., van der Holst B. , “Dutch develop vortex for
ductile iron treatment”, Modern Casting, vol. 71, (1981), p. 41.
7th-10th February 2008, Chennai, India 165 Proceedings of 68th World Foundry Congress
10 Eric O., Dragan D., Zec S., Sidjanin L.and Jovanovic M.T., 12 Keough J.R.and Hayrnen K.L., “Developments in the technology
“Microstructure and fracture of alloyed austempered ductile and engineering application of austempered ductile iron (ADI)”,
iron”, Materials Charaterization, vol. 57, (2006), p. 211. Proceedings of the 8th International Symposium on Science and
11 Rebasa N., Dommarco R.and Sikora J., “Wear resistance of Processing of Cast Iron, Beijing-China, Oct. 16-19 (2006), p.
high nodule count ductile iron”, Wear, vol. 253, (2002), p. 474.
855.
Proceedings of 68th World Foundry Congress 166 7th-10th February 2008, Chennai, India