Law of The Contract
Law of The Contract
Law of The Contract
A contract is an agreement which is legally binding between the parties which enforceable
by law.
1. Offer
2. Acceptance of the offer
3. Intention to create legal relations
4. Consideration
5. Certainty
6. Capacity
Offer
Under sections of the Contract Act 1950 : -
Section 2(a) - when one person signifies to another his willingness to do or to abstain
from doing anything, with a view of obtaining the assent of that other to the act or
abstinence, he is said to make a proposal.
Section 2(c) - person making the proposal is called “promisor” and the person
accepting the proposal is called the “promisee”.
Section 4(1) - the communication of a proposal is complete when it comes to the
knowledge of the person to whom it is made.
Section 3 - the communication of proposals, the acceptance of proposals, and the
revocation of proposals and acceptances, respectively, are deemed to be made by
any act or omission of the party proposing, accepting, or revoking, by which he
intends to communicate the proposal, acceptance, or revocation, or which has the
effect of communicating it.
Section 9 - so far as the proposal or acceptance of any promise is made in words, the
promise is said to be express. So far as the proposal or acceptance is made otherwise
than in words, the promise is said to be implied.
Cases: -
Fact : -
The applicant, a Health Inspector under the Town Board, Tanjung Malim, applied for
the post of Assistant Passport Officer in the Federation of Malaya Government
Oversea Missions(FMGOM) advertised in the Malay Mail dated 19 February 1957.
The applicant was informed that he was accepted and undergoing for training.
He was posted to the Immigration Office Kuala Lumpur until December 1958 and he
was transferred to Immigration Office at Johor Bahru.
On 5 November 1959, the applicant received a letter(Assistant Passport Officer on
Probation) from the Secretary to the Public Service Commission informed that the
Controller Immigration concerning conduct in irregular issue of certain passports.
A disciplinary action was being taken against the applicant to a view with his
dismissal.
On 24 December 1959, the applicant was informed that he should not be dismissed
but his appointment on probation be terminated forthwith by payment a month
salary in lieu of notice.
The applicant moved to the court for an order of certiorari to quash the decision of
the respondents on the grounds of error in law, want of jurisdiction, and failure to
observe the principles of natural justice.
Held: -
o The Malay Mail advertisement was an invitation to qualified persons to apply and
the resulting application were offers.
o The information conveyed to the applicant was an unqualified acceptance to join the
overseas mission and he so understood it.
M.N. GUHA MAJUMDER vs R.E.DONOUGH (1974) 2 M.L.J. 114 (Not a valid offer)
Fact: -
Property owned by defendant was advertised for sale, written offers are to purchase
were invited.
Plaintiff viewed the property on two occasions.
Was in communication with the defendant’s agent and it was alleged that the
defendant had accepted the plaintiff’s offer to purchase the property for
RM70,000.
Discussion on the mode payment when second visit to the property and there
was no clear agreement on the sale of orchid plants which the defendant wish to
sell separately.
The defendant denied that he had decide to go on with the sale.
Whether there was a contract between the plaintiff and the defendant at the
material time.
Held: -
o The law does not impute an intention to enter into such a legal relationship as the
vendor and purchaser where the circumstances and the conduct of the parties
negative any intention of the kind.
o The evidence indicated that the parties did not intend to be immediately bound.
They had not the necessary animus contrahendi. What passed was only a
negotiation from the beginning to end.
Which the courts held that advertisements of bilateral contracts are not offers whereas
advertisements of unilateral contracts are construed to be offers.
Cases
Fact: -
Statute requires that the sale of certain pharmaceuticals must be carried out under
the supervision of a qualified pharmacist.
Boots (defendant) operated a store where the drugs were displayed on a self-service
basis and the customers paid at a cash desk for the goods they had selected.
A pharmacist was present at the cash desk but not at the shelves where the goods
were displayed with a price tag.
The Pharmaceutical Society claimed that the statute was being contravened.
Held: -
o The display of goods in a shop was not an offer but an invitation to treat.
o It was the customers made the offer and Boots could either accept or reject this
offer at the cash desk (in the presence of the qualified pharmacist).
o The act constituting the acceptance is the ringing up of the price on the till by the
cashier and at that moment a binding contract of sale is made.
CARLILL VS CARBOLIC SMOKE BALL CO. LTD.
Fact: -
Held: -
o That an offer could be made to the whole world, that the wording of the advert
amounted to such an offer, and that Mrs. Carlill had accepted it by properly using
the smoke ball.
Acceptance
Section: -
Section 2(b) - when one person to whom the proposal is made signifies his assent
thereto, the proposal is said to be accepted : a proposal, when accepted, becomes a
promise
Section 2(c) – the person accepting the proposal is called the ‘promisee’.
Section 9