Jollibee International Business - Case Study

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 13
At a glance
Powered by AI
The key takeaways are that Jollibee began as an ice cream parlor and expanded throughout the Philippines. It has since expanded internationally but faced various issues in different countries.

Jollibee Foods Corporation began as an ice cream parlor in 1975 and expanded throughout the Philippines. It faced competition from McDonald's in 1981 but continued growing. It began expanding internationally in the 1980s but faced issues with local managers in Singapore and Taiwan.

Issues were identified with improper utilization of financial resources, lack of promotional campaigns, and communication gaps between management and employees.

Executive Summary

This report is an attempt to analyze the case of “Jollibee Foods Corporation (A) International
Expansion. In this study we have first analyzed the case background so that we understand
the scheme of things. In this section we have laid emphasis on the inception of Jollibee
Foods Corporation, their expansion in various countries like Singapore, Honk Kong, Brunei,
Taiwan, Indonesia, California etc.

Further we have discussed the Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats to Jollibee
in the fast food industry. We have dealt with different problems like the management issues,
the market issues, business expertise, financial resources, inventory management etc. This
would help in better understanding of Jollibee’s present condition and future sustainability in
the modern and fast changing business world.

After the SWOT analysis we identified certain issues with Jollibee which concerned the
Management, business, expansion etc. There were issues like improper utilization of financial
resources, lack of promotional campaigns, communication gap between the different wings of
Jollibee and between the Management and the employees. Keeping in mind these issues we
have come up with a few recommendations. We have discussed them through Human
Resource, Marketing, Financial and Operations perspective.

Then we have discussed the Strategic decisions with regards to expansion in the future in
California, Hong Kong and Papua New Guinea. We have studied various pros and cons of
expansion in each of the above mentioned countries and reached the conclusion that
California is the most favorable location. The reasons for the location being that there is a
huge Philippine population in Dale City of California which will help in the establishment of
the store. Also they have successfully catered to the taste buds of the people in Guam which
will help them serve the Americans better and thus the expansion could be a success.

Later we have conversed about the implementation plan and how to go about it.

At the end of the document we have attached appendix for the reader’s facilitation. It contains
certain tables and graphs for better understanding of the financials of Jollibee Food
Corporation.

1
Business Landscape:
Company History;

Jollibee Food Corporation began as an Ice- cream parlour in the year 1975 and was run by the
Chinese Filipino Tan Family. But later they diversified in to sandwiches when the 1977 oil
crisis occurred and the President Tony Tan Caktiong (TTC) expected the ice cream prices to
soar. The hamburger recipe developed Tony’s Chef father became famous and a year later
they opened five store in Manila, where the family incorporated as Jollibee Food
Corporation.

TTC’s vision was to see that the employees enjoy while working and are efficient. Jollibee
expanded quickly throughout Philippine financing all growth internally until 1993. Most of
the operations of the business were run by the Tan family and for expert opinion they brought
in outsider especially in the Marketing and Finance Department.

Background:

Until 1981it was a smooth sailing for Jollibee, but then came Mc Donald’s to Philippines. But
the group was fearless and had confidence in the spicy taste of their Hamburger which
appealed to the Philippine customers.

Slowly Jollibee forayed in to the foreign markets and began with its investment in Singapore
in 1985 in 1988 with the help of some family friends. However the relations between Jollibee
and the local manager started to deteriorate. Their next venture was in Taiwan again with the
help of family acquaintance, but this also did not last long and the transaction came to an end
on the basis of distrust between the local manager and Jollibee management in 1988. Brunei
was another joint venture that they entered into in 1987 August. Then they forayed in to the
Indonesian Market in the year 1989, opening a store in Jakarta but due to conflicts with the
local manager again this store also had to be closed down.

In 1994 the International Division was created with Tony Kitchner, an Australian native as
the Vice President. Kitchner went about differentiating the International Division from the
Philippine part of Jollibee and tried to create a more formal culture for the division.
Kitchner’s strategy rested on two themes: 1) Targeting expats 2) Planting the Flag

He realized that there are a lot of Filipino expats in Middle East, Hong Kong, Guam and
other Asian Territories and this would provide a good market for Jollibee.

The other strategy was to have a first mover advantage. They started with planting the
company’s flag in those countries where there was no or little competition.

But these strategies had their own constraints. First of all there was a strain on the resources
as they were expanding rapidly and then there was no enough advertising budget.

2
Kitchner was responsible for the Franchise Service Managers (FSM) and they acted as a point
of contact between the company and its franchise. Kitchener asked the FSM to work on the
ambience of the store and customize it on the basis of the local consumers taste. to ensure a
good local crowd turn up.

Kitchner and Visco ( Marketing Director) discovered that Jollibee needed a world presence
and the present logo did not serve the purpose. So they changed the background from red to
orange so that it is distinguished from Coke and KFC and also added the tag line great
burgers, great chicken so that people have a clear identity about the brand.

They also customized the menu according to the tastes of the local consumers.

But as the international business grew, the relation between the International Division and the
Philippine operations started turning sour. There was lack of coordination and cooperation
between the two groups.

In 1996, TTC realized that he could no longer support Kitchner as the expansion strategy was
costing heavily and they were losing a lot of money. In February 1997, Kitchner left Jollibee.
After Kitchner, Manolo P (Noli) Tingzon took over.

He came with the conclusion that in order for Jollibee to be profitable it should earn an
annual sales of US$ 8,00,000/-

He wanted to analyze the existing strategies to discover the scope for improvement. There
were conflicting opinions from the staff on Plant-the-Flag. Some thought it was ill conceived
and some though it was a wonderful way of expansion. He also analyzed whether targeting
expats is narrowing down their scope or image.

Now he is considering the three options for profitable expansion. They are: Papua New
Guinea, Honk-Kong and California. Papua New Guinea has no much completion for Jollibee.
In Hong Kong there are several management issues and in California things seem to be quiet
pleasant.

3
Firm Analysis

Internal Analysis:

Strengths:

 Leadership in local Philippine market.


 Strong financial resources.
 Expertise in doing business in international markets.
 Well developed operations management capability (ability to provide quality products at
affordable prices).
 Diversity in product offering after the acquisition of Greenwich Pizza and joint venture with
Deli France.

Weaknesses:

 The expansion of business in international markets based on the flawed strategy of ‘Planting
the Jollibee flag’.
 Absence of proper methods to select franchisees.
 Too much dependence on Filipino expatriates and inability to cater to the needs of the local
residents of other countries.
 Weak promotional campaigns in international markets to promote Jollibee as a global brand.
 Based on the graph: 1(Refer Appendix), it can be seen that the operating profit margin is very
low over the period from 1992 to 1996. Operating margin is around 11% to 13% over the
years which mean Jollibee could not improve its operational efficiency.
 Based on the graph: 3 (Refer Appendix) it can be seen that the inventory cycle of Jollibee is
around 25 to 30 days from 1992 to 1996 which is very high for a fast food business. It means
that company is taking longer time to sell its products.
 Based on the graph: 2 (Refer Appendix) it can been seen that Jollibee could not utilise its
assets productively as Return on assets had decreased from 28% in 1992 to 17% in 1996. It
means that the new stores abroad did not give the desirable results.
 As per the Graph: 4 (Refer Appendix) it can be seen that the average payable period had been
increased from 74 days in 1992 to 111 days in 1996 which means that they are delaying the
payment of suppliers. This can damage the long term relationship with the suppliers.
 Lack of communication within the organization during the formation of International Division
which led to infighting amongst the two divisions.
 Bias towards friends and relatives while selecting local franchisee partners.

4
 Lack of cross cultural management.
 Increased diversity in menu items came at the cost of operating efficiency and complicated
the task of store level operating control.
 The involvement of the franchisees in the important decisions during the start up was varying
from country to country. Most of the decisions were being made by FSM and project
manager.

External Analysis:

Opportunities:

 Untapped locations with fewer or negligible competition from fast food chains.
 Widen product range to include more local food items.
 Make new acquisitions of profitable food chains in other countries.
 Create differentiation by cost advantage, customer experience etc.

Threats:

 Political Instability.
 Competition from local well established food chains.
 Dining habits of local people eg. More preference to dining than fast food.
 Shift of preferences of people to more health conscious items.
 Epidemics like Bird flu, Mad cow diseases that make procuring of raw material difficult.
 High set up cost due to high standard of living.
 Reduction in entry barriers like favourable policies, tax incentives etc lead to increase in
foreign competition.
 Downturn in economy.
 Rise in operational cost like cost of power, labour etc.

Recommendations:

The weaknesses of Jollibee (as mentioned above) section have been addressed in detail as relevant to
different functions.

Strategy:

 Jollibee’s strategy of ‘Planting the Jollibee Flag’ for entry in new markets was narrowly
focused on absence of competition. They were expanding too fast without giving a thought to
alternative strategies to be adopted in case their food items are not accepted by the locals. So,

5
before entering a new market various other factors like demographics, local dining habits, per
capita income etc should also be considered.
 Jollibee should have proper procedures to select franchisees to evaluate their suitability for
the company. Various factors like their financial background, previous business ventures etc
should be checked even if they are Filipinos, friends or relatives.

Marketing:

 As seen in the market in Middle East, all the Filipino expatriates were not attracted to their
offerings. Also, in Hong Kong, the standard menu was not attracting the local Chinese
customers. This shows the pressing need for Jollibee to customize their menu to include local
food items.
 Jollibee should identify the right communication channel to promote its brand cost effectively
with optimum results to promote itself as a global brand.

Finance:

 Synergy creation is of utmost importance for success of any joint venture. Differences in
management style and culture between the firms may pose serious problems that make it
difficult to create synergies, which ultimately lead to poor financial performance.
 There has been a year on year increase in cost of sales from 13% in 1992/93 to 46% in
1995/96, however sales during 1995/96 has only increased by 24%. Suitable ways must be
found in order to decrease cost of sales.
Year on Year Sales Cost Increase.

Year 1992/93 1993/94 1994/95 1995/96


Percentage Increase 46% 34% 28% 13%

 Cash on hand is continuously increasing which is very positive sign however EPS has
decreased 19% from 1994-96 largely on account of a bank loan. Therefore the cash at hand
should be put to better use and help ensure early repayment of loan.
 Based on the financials, Jollibee has a good cash position so it should use the cash to pay its
suppliers regularly which will build a long term relationship with the suppliers.
 Twenty four stores in foreign countries account for roughly US $9 million in sales. Present
cash flows indicate that paying off debts will not be difficult however they must slow down
their expansion plans.
 Opening new stores requires a lot of financing. Therefore once a store is opened one must
give it time to grow and generate sustainable profits before it is used to finance the opening of

6
a new store. Moreover opening multiple stores at the same time will hurt the bottom line and
will increase debt and failure of such stores may take several years to recover the investment.
This will help Jollibee to improve its asset utilisation.
 Jollibee has been expanding rapidly in the international market which is a good sign but the
company’s operations are not well managed as the inventory period is very high which means
inventory is kept idle so as to avoid it, company should improve its operating efficiency.

HR:

 The international division was distinct from the Philippine division:


The look of the international department was distinct from the Philippine counterpart. They
tried to distinguish it so that the international department is not conceived as simple and basic
and in order to give it a more international look.This approach of being different created
hostility. Here there was a communication gap. The need for the international department
should have been communicated properly and portrayed as a part of the Jollibee family. The
HR department should have convinced the domestic division to be more accepting about the
international department.
 Mixing of friends and family with business:
It is to be noted that the Singapore and Taiwan partners were family friends and yet they
could not sustain the relationship. The pros and cons of the relationship were not well
evaluated before the venture began. The terms and conditions of any business relationship
should be explicitly stated to prevent any mistrust and conflict in the future.
 Lack of Cross Culture Management:
There was a lack of training in cross cultural team management which resulted in clashes
between the workers of different cultures. A proper training programme on cross culture
behaviour and management should be developed for the employees of the international
division.

Operations:

 R&D to focus more on finding methods to customize local food to fast food production
techniques.
 Involve franchisee in all the decisions during the start up to increase trust between the
company and the franchisee and also to gain from his knowledge about the local area.

7
Strategic decisions: PNG, Hong Kong or California

a) Papua New Guinea

Pros

 First mover advantage

 Jollibee would risk no equity

 Stores at service stations

Cons

 The failure of the previous fast food chain in the country might linger in the minds of the
customers. To overcome this, Jollibee might have to do enough branding to convince the
customers.

 The target market is also smaller compared to Philippines. Hence the profit potential is very
low.

 Opening up of many stores, to cover franchises’ costs, requires huge investments and
therefore the loss would be high, if the business fails.

 Local player has not been developed and it does not have brand equity in PNG.

 Since no previous experience in this market, uncertainty of the acceptance of Jollibee food
items by locals.

b) Hong Kong

Pros

 Earlier presence in the country will help Jollibee in speedier setting up of business in HK. It
already had 3 stores in Hong Kong.

 It also provides JB an opportunity to learn from the mistakes of other franchisee units.

 Location advantage (one of the busiest in Hong Kong).

Cons

 The other franchisee units had a lot of management issues.

8
 It did not have a global image there, as it employed local Chinese employees with no English
speaking skills.

 Jollibee failing to change the menu items to cater to the local needs of the customers.

 Managerial problems (conflicts between Chinese and Filipino staff) led to uneven product
quality.

 Kowloon district had fewer Filipinos so new store would have to depend on locals but
already some issues were going on so Chinese did not use to prefer coming to Jollibee stores
and Jollibee strategy was to cater to the expats of the Philippines.

 Dominant presence of McDonalds.

c) California

Pros

 Availability of different equipments to compensate for comparatively high labour costs.

 Presence of Filipino population. (California having more than 1 million Filipino populations
provides a huge opportunity for JB.)

 The diversity of the area allows Jollibee to broaden its niche to include the Asian-Hispanic
segment and to do so without having to make major adjustments to its menu.

 Already success in Guam (only 1 store and revenue is 1771202).Its menu also appealed to
Americans as well so they don’t have to do many variations.

Cons

 Country of origin of McDonalds. Though JB’s items appealed a few American customers,
competing with McDonalds for market share poses a big risk.

 As a late-mover, it will be difficult for Jollibee to obtain access to the distribution channels,
suppliers, and store location.

 Logistical problems (12 hrs by plane & 8 time zones away) would put constraints in rendering
support from the headquarters in Philippines.

9
Recommended plan of action:

Based on the above analysis, Jollibee should go ahead with opening their new store in Daly City,
California. Daly City’s large Filipino expatriate population will be helpful in supporting the business
initially. Also, Jollibee’s successful venture in Guam will come in handy to cater to the local U.S.
people. The option of adopting cost effective process instead of labour intensive methods as used
elsewhere will help in making a cost differentiation against their competitors.

In Hong Kong, the company should concentrate on the existing 3 stores first before opening a new
fourth store. Jollibee will have to customize its menu in Japan in order to attract the Chinese
population. Also, the conflict between local Chinese managers and Filipino managers has to be
resolved. Jollibee can give the entire Chinese operation to the local franchisee and FSM being the
contact point between the franchisee and the company. In the presence of a dominant player like
McDonald’s in the market, Jollibee can learn its techniques of catering to the local tastes and try to
make the existing stores less dependent on Filipino expatriates.

In Papua New Guinea, in spite of negligible competition the market, the small population of 5 million
is not attractive enough to put in a substantial investment to set up at least 5 stores which will be
needed to recover the set up costs. Jollibee also does not have enough understanding of the tastes of
the locales. Though the franchisee is ready to undertake the equity costs, sole dependence on him can
be risky as already seen by their ventures in Singapore and Taiwan. Here, the company has to conduct
a detailed market study to understand the local food habits, reasons for the failure of the Australian
franchisee, the perception of people towards fast food etc. Only after this factors can it take an
informed decision.

10
Implementation of Strategic Decision

With respect to the other available options, Daly City, California, is comparatively the best
option. The criteria for choosing the franchisee should also be such that each franchisee
should be evaluated based on various criteria, even in case of a potential Filipino franchisee,
so that in the end the franchisee who shares the most number of common values with Jollibee
is selected. The key to Jollibee’s success in Daly City will be its ability to find a local partner
who should not only be able to work with the International Division but also design a
business model that would address issues like personnel management, recruiting of managers,
language barriers, customization of menu items and branding which were the key factors that
resulted in the success or failure of Jollibee in other countries. In a market which dominated
by Mcdonald’s, marketing should be given more priority and franchisees should not associate
achieving target sales with promotional activities. The strategy of Filipino-Asian-Hispanic-
Mainstream will be difficult to implement, mainly if Jollibee continues with its policy of
‘standardization of menus’. The variety in menu should not be at the cost of ‘poor
operational efficiency’. If Jollibee has long term plans with USA it can also set up a R&D
department in USA for customizing the menus. The pricing strategy should also be such that
it is priced competitively with respect to McDonald’s.

Overall, the strategic decision that is to be made is not only about choosing from the 3
available options but also learning from their earlier mistakes in other countries, changing
their business policies and adapting to the dynamic environment of the business.

11
Appendix

1992 1993 1994 1995 1996


Profit Margin
Operating profit 280 364 458 590 780
Net profit 201 292 403 538 602
Revenue 2296 2702 3606 4851 6904
Profit Margin 8.75% 10.81% 11.18% 11.09% 8.72%
Operating profit margin 12% 13% 13% 12% 11%

Asset Utilization

Operating profit 280 364 458 590 780


Total Assets 1013 1375 1926 2645 4537
Asset Utilization 28% 26% 24% 22% 17%

Inventory Turnover

Cost of sales 1469 1663 2133 2858 4180


Inventory 116 135 183 201 323
Inventory Turnover 12.66379 12.31852 11.65574 14.21891 12.94118
Days in Inventory 28.4275 29.22429 30.88608 25.3184 27.81818

Account payable Period

Cost of Sales 1469 1663 2133 2858 4180


Accounts payable 297 323 497 715 1274
Payable turnover 4.946128 5.148607 4.291751 3.997203 3.281005
Payment period 73.7951 70.89296 85.04688 91.31386 111.2464

Table: 1

16%
14%
12%
10%
Operating profit
8% margin
6% Graph: 1
4% Profit Margin
2%
0%
Graph: 2
1992 1993 1994 1995 1996

12
Days in Inventory
35
30
25
Days in Inventory
20
15
10
5
0
1992 1993 1994 1995 1996

Graph: 3

Payment period
120
80 Payment period

40
0
1992 1993 1994 1995 1996

Graph: 4

13

You might also like