BRIEF AN ROMAIN ROLLAND
(EINE ERINNERUNGSSTORUNG AUF DER AKROPOLIS)
(2) Gensan Eprrions:
1936 Almanach 1937, 9-21.
1950 G.W., 16, 250-7.
(8) Enouisi: Transtation:
‘A Disturbance of Memory on the Acropolis’
1941 Int. J. Psycho-Anal., 22 (2), 93-101. (Tr, James Strachey.)
1950 C.P,, 5, 302-12. (Reprint of above.)
‘The present translation is a corrected version of the one
published in 1950,
Romain Rolland was born on January 29, 1866, and this
paper was dedicated to him on the occasion of his seventicth
birthday. Freud had the greatest admiration for him, as is
proved not only by the present work, but by the message to
Rolland on ‘ieth birthday (Freud, 1926a) and by the
{2 him which have been published (Freud,
0a), a y a passage at the beginning of Civilization
and is Discontents (19300), Standard Ed, 24, 64-5, Freud had first
x vith him in 1923, and had met him, for the only
time, it seems, in 1924.
-en impossible to trace any earlier publication of this
pa ferman, other than that in the A/manack noted above,
It should be borne in mind that any publications connected
ith Romain Roland, ax wity many other author including
}omas Mann and of course all Jewish writers, w
uring this period by the Nai a
238
A DISTURBANCE OF MEMORY
ON THE ACROPOLIS
AN OPEN LETTER TO ROMAIN ROLLAND ON THE
OCCASION OF HIS SEVENTIETH BIRTHDAY
‘My dear Friend,
T have been urgently pressed to make some written con-
tribution to the celebration of your seventicth birthday and I
have made long efforts to find something that might in any way
be worthy of you and might give expression to my admiration
for your love of the truth, for your courage in your beliefs and
for your affection and good will towards humanity; or, again,
something that might bear witness to my gratitude to you as a
‘writer who has afforded me so many moments of exaltation and
pleasure, But it was in vain, I am ten years older than you and
my powers of production are at an end. All that I can find to
offer you is the gift of an impoverished creature, who has ‘seen
better days’.
‘You know that the aim of my scientific work was to throw
light upon unusual, abnormal or pathological manifestations of
the mind—that is to tay, to trace them back to the psychical
forces operating behind them and to indicate the mechanisms
at work. I began by attempting this upon myself and then went
on to apply it to other people and finally, by a bold extension,
to the human race as a whole. During the last few years, a
phenomenon of this sort, which I myself had experienced a
‘generation ago, in 1904, and which I had never understood, has
kept on recurring to my mind. not at first see why; but at
last I determined to analyse the incident—and I now present
you with the results of that enquiry. In the process, I shall have,
of course, to ask you to give more attention to some events in
my private life than they would otherwise deserve.
Every year, at that time, towards the end of August or the
2 [Freud had made a short allusion to the episode some ten years
earlier, in Chapter V of The Future of an Ilusion (1927), Standard Ed,
24,25, but had not put forward the explanation]20 AN EXPERIENCE ON THE ACROPOLIS
beginning of September, I used to set out with my younger
‘brother on a holiday tri would last for some weeks and
would take us to Rome or to some other region of Italy or to
some part of the Mediterranean sea-board, My brother is ten
years younger than I am, so he is the same age as you—a coin-
cidence which has only now occurred to me. In that particular
year my brother told me that his business affairs would not
allow him to be away for long: a week would be the mot that
he could manage and we should have to shorten our trip. So
‘we decided to travel by way of Trieste to the island of Corfu and
there spend the few days of our holiday. At Trieste he called
upon a business acquaintance who lived there, and I went with
him. Our host enquired in a friendly way about our plans and,
hearing that ‘our intention to go to Corfu, advised us
strongly against it: “What makes you think of going there at this
time of year? muld be too hot for you to do anything. You
had far better go to Athens instead. The Lloyd boat sails this
afternoon; it will give you three days there to see the town and
will pick you up on its return voyage. That would be more
agereable and more worth while.”
‘As we walked away from
ably depressed spirits. We
proposed, agreed that it was racticable and saw noth-
ing but difficulties in the way of carrying it out; we assumed,
moreover, that we should not be allowed to land in Greece
without passports. We spent the hours that elapsed before the
Lloyd offices opened in wandering about the town in a discon-
tented and irresolute frame of mind, But when the time came,
we went up to the counter and booked our passages for Athens
as though it were a matter of course, without bothering in the
least about the supposed difficulties and indeed without having
discussed with one another the reasons for our decision. Such
it, we were both in remark-
it we had accepted the suggestion that we should
go to Athens instead of Corfu instantly and most readily, But,
if'so, why had we spent the interval before the offices opened in
such a gloomy state and foreseen nothing but obstacles and
uch a g thing
‘When, finally, on the afternoon after our arrival, I stood on
the Acropolis and cast my eyes around upon the landscape, a
= naa a
AN EXPERIENCE ON THE ACROPOLIS 241
prising thought suddenly entered my mind: ‘So all this
really does exist, just as we learnt at school!” To describe the
situation more accurately, the person who gave expression to
i erator
Ne suddenly caught sight of the form of the famous Monster
stranded upon the shore and found himself driven to the admis-
sion: ‘So it really dies exist—the sea-serpent we've never be-
lieved in!" The second person, on the other hand, was justifiably
astonished, because he had been unaware that the real exist-
‘ence of Athens, the Acropolis, and the landscape around ‘ithad
ever been objects of doubt. What he had been expecting was
rather some expresion of delight or admiration.
Or
When Iwas weheaboy Thad hgh vas
historical reality of the city of Athens an i
that the occurrence of this idea on the Acropolis had precisely
shown that in my unconscious I had not believed in it, and that
T was only now acquiring a conviction that ‘reached down to
the unconscious’. An explanation of this sort sounds very pro-
thens? Out of the question!—it will be far too difficult!” The
Se ‘seein corresponded to a regret that it was242 AN EXPERIENCE ON THE ACROPOLIS AN EXPERIENCE ON THE ACGROPOLIS 243,
out of the question: it would have been so lovely. And now cf the other. For, as has long been known, the Fate which we
we know where we are, Itis one of those cases of ‘too good to ‘expect to treat us so badly is a materialization of our con-
‘be true’ that we come across s0 often. It is an example of the q science, of the severe super-ego within us, itself a residue of the
incredulity that arises 1 often when we are surprised by a piéce punitive agency of our childhood.*
of good news, when we hear we have won a prize, for instance, ‘This, I think, explains our behaviour in Trieste. We could not
or drawn a winner, or when a girl learns that the man whom believe that we were to be given the joy of seeing Athens. The
she has secretly loved has asked her parents for leave to pay his fact that the piece of reality that we were trying to repudiate
addresses to her. ‘was to begin with only a possibilty determined the character of
‘When we have established the existence of a phenomenon, cur immediate reactions. But when we were standing on the
the next question is of course as to its cause. Incredulity ofthis
kind is obviously an attempt to repudiate a piece of reality;
but there is omething strange about it. We should not bein the
result of frustration, of the non-fulfilment of some vital neces- the whole episode; and it was this which had already interfered
sity or desire. But with these people the opposite is the cases ‘with our exchanging thoughts at Tri
they fall ill, or even go entirely to pieces, because an over- If I have rightly guessed the of the thought that
whelmingly powerful wish of theirs has been fulfilled. But the came to me on the Acropolis a
contrast between the two situations is not so great as it seems Joyful astonishment at finding a
at first. What happens in the paradoxical case is merely that the question now arises why this meaning should have been subjected
place of the external frustration is taken by an internal one, The in the thought itself to such a distorted and distorting disguise,
sufferer does not permit himself happiness: the internal frus- ‘The essential subject-matter of the thought, to be = was
1 [in English in, the original.) ing
olin Some Charter Type Met within PyeboAnaiyie ou [Of uP ME of The Fate fo Hsin (82), Sd By