No Insurance Utah
No Insurance Utah
No Insurance Utah
5 PROVIDES
THAT I AM NOT REQUIRED TO PROVIDE PROOF OF
INSURANCE UNTIL AFTER I HAVE BEEN IN AN ACCIDENT
CAUSING BODILY INJURY, DEATH OR DAMAGE TO
ANOTHER VEHICLE OF AT LEAST $1,000.00 AS PROVIDED
BY UTAH LAW AT 46-6-31 & 41-6-35:
Utah Law at Article 4 Section 41-6-35.5 provides that I am not required to provide
evidence of “operator’s security” or INSURANCE at the request of a peace officer unless I was
first involved in an ACCIDENT causing the minimum threshold of $1,000.00 worth of damage.
See Article 4 Section 41-6-35.5 to wit :
Utah Law further provides at Part V Section 41.12a-501(2)(a) that I am exempt from
Utah Law at Part V Section 41.12a-501 at subsection (2)(a) clearly states that I am
exempt from having to provide PROOF OF INSURANCE unless I was first involved in an
accident causing bodily injury, death, or damage to the property of another in the excess of the
$1,000.00 damage limit specified under Section 41-6-31. See also Utah Statutes 41-6-31 and 41-
6-35 to wit:
Utah law at 41-6-31 and 41-6-35 cited above both clearly provide that I have NO duty to
ACCIDENT causing bodily injury, death or damage to another vehicle in excess of $1,000.00.
“The statute does not impose its requirements as to proof of financial
responsibility until the occurrence of certain accidents, ...” Royse v. Boldt, 80
Wn.2d 44, 46, 491 P.2d 644 (Dec. 9, 1971); “Under the provisions of this
statute, the driver after an injury accident must deposit security, . . .”
Mutual of Enumclaw v. Wiscomb, 95 Wn.2d 373, 378, 622 P.2d 1234 (December
31, 1980); “. . . the act does not require mandatory insurance coverage, . . .
The financial responsibility act does not require an individual to prove that
he is financially able to compensate those he may injure through the use of
his vehicles until he is is involved in an automobile accident resulting in
bodily injury or death of any person or property damage of $300 or more.
RCW 46.29.060.” Mutual of Enumclaw v. Wiscomb, 97 Wn.2d 203 206, 643
P.2d 441 (April 8, 1982); Miller v. Aetna Life & Casualty co., 70 Wn. App. 192,
197, 851 P.2d 1253 (June 1, 1993.); “As we noted in Wiscomb, the provisions
of the financial responsibility act, RCW 46.29, do not become mandatory
until the driver is involved in an accident causing injury or damage of $300
or more.”; Progressive Casualty Ins. v. Jester, 102 Wn.2d 78, 81, 82, 83, 683
P.2d 180 (June 21, 1984); Johnson v. Dept. of Licensing, 46 Wn. App. 701, 731
P.2d 1097 (December 22, 1986). And;
The State of Utah cannot impair the obligation of my Insurance Contract between me and
my insurance company and all you cops can “C” your way out of this A & B conversation:
“[1] The existence of an insurance policy is a matter of contract law, since
insurance involves a contractual relationship between the insurer and the
insured.” LaPoint v. Richards, 66 Wn.(2d) 585, 588 (July 8, 1965); “[2]
Traditionally, insurance contracts have been considered to be private
contracts between the parties.” Mutual of Enumclaw v. Wiscomb, 25 Wn.App.
841, 846, 611 P.2d 1304 (April 14, 1980).
For help beating your Traffic Tickets, call Luis Anthony Ewing at (253) 226-3741 or E-
Mail: <[email protected]> or <[email protected]> or to hear Luis speak, go
to: <www.TruthRadio.com> or <www.RBNLive.com> or <www.VeritasRadio.com>