Piis 1360859215001679
Piis 1360859215001679
Piis 1360859215001679
ScienceDirect
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/jbmt
PILOT STUDY
Received 23 March 2015; received in revised form 9 May 2015; accepted 18 June 2015
KEYWORDS
Hemiplegia;
Balance training;
Soft tissue;
Myofascial release
Abstract Background: We hypothesised that the balance of spastic chronic stroke patients is
related to myofascial problems. We performed myofascial release (MFR) with a tennis ball on
the affected limb, as suggested by Myers.
Purpose: This study investigated the benefits of 8 weeks of MFR using a tennis ball on the balance of spastic patients.
Methods: Eight stroke patients were enrolled voluntarily after providing informed consent. All
subjects received 8-week interventions with MFR using a tennis ball three times per week. The
patients were evaluated using the Berg Balance Scale (BBS) and Timed Up & Go (TUG) test
before and after 4 and 8 weeks of the intervention.
Results: There were significant differences in the BBS scores (p Z 0.001). The TUG time
decreased significantly at 4 and 8 weeks (p Z 0.034).
Conclusion: Myofascial release appears to improve the balance of spastic chronic stroke patients; however, further studies should evaluate the effective of MFR on walking in stroke patients and determine the mechanism of the effect of MFR.
2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Introduction
99
Intervention
A tennis ball was used to obtain myofascial release (MFR) in
the sole (plantar fasciae), triceps surae, hamstring, and
sacrotuberous ligament, all parts of the superficial back
100
Table 1
Subjects
Sex
Age (yr)
Etiology
Affected side
Height (cm)
Weight (kg)
Assistive device
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
M
M
M
M
M
F
F
F
61
50
80
68
51
56
77
64
48
61
67
63
27
55
60
54
ICH
CVA
INF
INF
ICH
ICH
ICH
ICH
R
R
L
R
R
L
R
R
169.3
163.2
156.6
160.5
163.2
156.5
150.0
147.4
65.1
52.8
68.8
42.0
72.6
62.9
46.8
51.2
Single-cane
NA
Single-cane
Single-cane
Single-cane
Single-cane
Quad-cane
Quad-cane
Measurements
The eight participants were evaluated using the Berg Balance Scale (BBS) and Timed Up & Go (TUG) test before
and after 4 and 8 weeks of intervention. The therapist who
performed the assessments had 10 years of experience and
worked with an assistant who helped the participants
perform the tests safely. There was a 5-min rest between
the tests.
Berg Balance Scale
The BBS is a functional balance measurement that consists
of 14 items (Berg et al., 1995). Each item is rated on a 5point ordinal scale ranging from 0 to 4, with 0 indicating
the inability to complete the task entirely and 4 indicating
the ability to complete the task criterion (Berg et al.,
Figure 1
Statistical analysis
The differences in the mean values for the functional balance at 0, 4, and 8 weeks were compared using the Friedman test. The data were processed using SPSS ver. 17.0 for
Windows (SPSS, Chicago, IL). The level of statistical significance was set at 0.05.
Results
The BBS scores differed significantly (p Z 0.001) after 4 and
8 weeks. After 4 weeks, the scores for each BBS item
increased, except for items 11 and 14. At 8 weeks, the
Figure 2
101
MFR with a tennis ball on post. thigh and sacroiliac ligament (affected side).
Discussion
This study found significant improvements in the balance of
spastic stroke patients treated with MFR for 8 weeks based
on the BBS and TUG test. After the 8-week intervention,
there was a significant decrease in the TUG time. A negative significant relationship has already been found between TUG and BBS (Manaf et al., 2014).
Many therapists perform a tool assisted therapy as an
MFR approach. A tennis ball was used as a tool to perform
the study as a simple approach. For the performance of the
MFR by using tennis balls to be made adaptable in the
study, pressure was applied only within the subjects pain
tolerance levels. Myers (2014, 3rd edition, pp. 78e79) also
suggested that rolling a tennis ball on the plantar fasciae as
a self exercise.
Recent studies have demonstrated that spastic stroke
patients have normal reflex stiffness of the ankle extensors,
but the muscles themselves are stiff intramuscularly, which
altered the intra- and extra-muscular supporting structures
(Sinkjaer et al., 1993; Sinkjaer and Magnussen, 1994). In
addition, Fride
and Lieber (2003) suggested that spastic
muscle cells are shorter and stiffer than normal cells.
We postulate that a myofascial release around the posterior sacrotuberous ligament and in the lower extremity on
the affected side might increase pelvic and sacral flexibility, which would significantly improve the BBS and TUG
scores related to balance and walking velocity. Furthermore, the stiffness of the lower extremity and pelvis connected to the SBL would be released, improving the
flexibility and stability of the affected side. Myers (2014,
3rd edition, pp. 78e79) also suggests that the SBL exists
bilaterally, not unilaterally. However, Stecco (2004) insisted that the plantar fascia is completely connected to the
BBS
34.75
15.73
51.30
34.28
37.50
16.96
53.30
35.48
2 0.001**
2 0.034*
lower and upper limb fascia, through the pelvic floor and to
the contralateral low back fascia in the 3-dementional
plane sequences. In addition, Myers (2001) and Stecco
(2004) asserted that myofascial connections (myofascial
trains or sequences) could be directly effective in the
organisation of movement and muscular force transmission.
Therefore, we postulate that the released stiffness on the
affected side would influence the SBL and improve balance
and walking velocity.
On the BBS scale, item 7 and 13 differed largely at 8
weeks (Fig. 3). Item 7 is standing unsupported with the feet
together and item 13 is standing unsupported with one foot
in front. Both items demonstrated improved balance on
reducing the base of support on the feet. The therapists used
the MFR to release the plantar fasciae and intrinsic muscles
of the affected foot via the sensory inputs of pressure and
compression through the rolling motion of the tennis ball.
Another study examined self-MFR using a tennis ball and
found significant differences in muscle length between the
control and intervention groups (Grieve et al., 2014).
This study was limited by the small sample size. Nevertheless, it used a non-parametric test to minimise errors
and obtained clinically significant results. Another limitation was that several therapists participated in the intervention. The therapists were trained in MFR using a tennis
ball and well-acquainted with matters that require attention. Despite the number of therapists, significant differences were obtained, implying that the training was
effective.
102
Even self-MFR is effective in stiff individuals (Grieve
et al., 2014). Another limitation is that there was no control group, so a future study of MFR with a tennis ball should
include a comparison between control and intervention
groups. We should also examine the relationship between
spasticity and MFR with a tennis ball in stroke patients.
Conclusion
This pilot study investigated the effects of MFR with a
tennis ball for 8 weeks on the balance of patients with
chronic spasticity. The results suggest that it improved
balance. However, further studies must examine the
effectiveness of MFR in stroke patients, such as walking
patterns. We also need to elucidate the mechanisms of MFR
in stroke patients.
References
Ada, L., Vattanasilp, W., ODwyer, N.J., Crosbie, J., 1998. Does
spasticity contribute to walking dysfunction after stroke. J.
Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 64, 628e635.
Barnes, M., 1997. The basic science of myofascial release:
morphologic change in connective tissue: morphologic change
in connective tissue. J. Bodyw. Mov. Ther. 1, 231e238.
Barnes, J., 2004. Myofascial Release: the Missing Link in Traditional
Treatment. Complimentary Therapies in Rehabilitation: Holistic
Approaches for Prevention and Wellness, second ed. SLACK Inc,
Thorofare, NJ.
Berg, K., Wood-Dauphinee, S., Williams, J.I., 1995. The balance
scale: reliability assessment for elderly residents and patients
with an acute stroke. Scand. J. Rehabil. Med. 27, 27e36.
Brown, P., 1994. Pathophysiology of spasticity. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 57, 773e777.
Bruno, B., Emiliano, Z., 2014. Skin, fascias, and scars: symptoms
and systemic connections. J. Multidiscip. Healthc. 7, 11e24.
Carey, J., Burghardt, T., 1993. Movement dysfunction following
central nervous system lesion: a problem of neurologic or
muscular impairment? Phys. Ther. 73, 538e547.
Castro-Sa
nchez, A.M., Matara
n-Pen
arrocha, G.A., ArroyoMorales, M., Saavedra-Herna
ndez, M., Ferna
ndez-Sola, C.,
Moreno-Lorenzo, C., 2011a. Effects of myofascial release
techniques on pain, physical function, and postural stability in
patients with fibromyalgia: a randomized controlled trial. Clin.
Rehabil. 25, 800e813.
Castro-Sa
nchez, A.M., Matara
n-Pen
arrocha, G.A., GraneroMolina, J., Aguilera-Manrique, G., Quesada-Rubio, J.M., Moreno-Lorenzo, C., 2011b. Benefits of massage-myofascial release
therapy on pain, anxiety, quality of sleep, depression, and
quality of life in patients with fibromyalgia. Evid. Based Complement. Alternat. Med. 1e9.
Chaitow, L., 2008. Biochemistry and bodywork. J. Bodyw. Mov.
Ther. 12, 95.
Dietz, V., 1992. Human neuronal control of automatic functional
movement: interaction between central programs and afferent
input. Physiol. Rev. 72, 33e69.
Flansbjer, U.B., Holmba
ck, A.M., Downham, D., Patten, C.,
Lexell, J., 2005. Reliability of gait performance tests in men and
women with hemiparesis after stroke. J. Rehabil. Med. 37,
75e82.
Fride
, J., Lieber, R., 2003. Spastic muscle cells are shorter and
stiffer than normal cells. Muscle Nerve 27, 157e164.
103
Whisler, S.L., Lang, D.M., Armstrong, M., Vickers, J., Qualls, C.,
Feldman, J.S., 2012. Effects of myofascial release and other
advanced myofascial therapies on children with cerebral palsy:
six case reports. Explore 8, 199e205.
Further reading
Barnes, J., 1990. Myofascial Release: the Search for Excellence,
tenth ed. Rehabilitation Services Inc, Paoli, PA.
Oschman, J.L., 1997. Connective Tissue Energetics. Introduction to
a presentation for the Stichting Opleiding Manuele Therapie.
Amersfoort, The Netherlands.