CFSD - Pub - Aisi d310-14 - Design Guide For Aisi s310-13
CFSD - Pub - Aisi d310-14 - Design Guide For Aisi s310-13
CFSD - Pub - Aisi d310-14 - Design Guide For Aisi s310-13
DESIGN EXAMPLES FOR THE DESIGN OF PROFILED STEEL DIAPHRAGM PANELS BASED ON AISI S310
AISI D310-14
Approved by
AISI Committee on Specifications
Diaphragm Design Task Group
2014 EDITION
Approved by
AISI Committee on Specifications
Diaphragm Design Task Group
Disclaimer
Page ii
The material contained herein has been developed by the American Iron and Steel Institute
Committee on Specifications for the Design of Cold-Formed Steel Structural Members. The
Committee has made a diligent effort to present accurate, reliable, and useful information on
this cold-formed steel application design guide. The Committee wishes to acknowledge and
express gratitude to author of this document, John Mattingly.
With anticipated improvements in understanding of the behavior of cold-formed steel
framing and the continuing development of new technology, this material will become dated. It
is anticipated that AISI will publish updates of this material as new information becomes
available, but this cannot be guaranteed.
The materials set forth herein are for general purposes only. They are not a substitute for
competent professional advice. Application of this information to a specific project should be
reviewed by a design professional. Indeed, in many jurisdictions, such review is required by
law. Anyone making use of the information set forth herein does so at their own risk and
assumes any and all liability arising therefrom.
Preface
Page iii
Preface
This document is developed based on the 2013 edition of AISI S310, North American Standard
for the Design of Profiled Steel Diaphragm Panels. This supporting document provides five design
examples that illustrate the application of the design provisions in AISI S310. Users should not
use this document without first reviewing the design provisions included in AISI S310, and
should refer to AISI S310 for terminology and equations used in this document.
The material presented in this document has been prepared for the general information of
the reader. While the material is believed to be technically correct and in accordance with
recognized good practices at the time of publication, it should not be used without first securing
content advice with respect to its suitability for any given application. Neither the American
Iron and Steel Institute, its members, nor author John Mattingly warrant or assume liability for
the suitability of the material for any general or particular use.
Preface
Page iv
Table of Contents
Page v
Table of Contents
Design Examples for the Design of Profiled Steel Diaphragm Panels
Based on AISI Standard S310-13
Example 1a: Nominal Diaphragm Shear Strength of a Wide Rib Deck Welded to Supports in the
Absence of Uplift ................................................................................................................................. 1
Example 1b: Edge Detail Parallel to the Edge Panel Span ................................................................ 10
Example 1c: Diaphragm Stiffness for Example 1a Configuration .................................................... 13
Example 2a: Nominal and Available Diaphragm Shear Strength of a Perforated Panel
Connected to a Thin Support in the Absence of Uplift ................................................................ 17
Example 2b: Nominal and Available Diaphragm Shear Strength of a Perforated Panel
Connected to a Thin Support With Uplift ...................................................................................... 24
Example 2c: Required Edge Detail Parallel to the Edge Panel Span With Panel Connected to a
Thin Support in the Absence of Uplift ........................................................................................... 32
Example 2d: Diaphragm Stiffness Calculation .................................................................................... 37
Example 3a: Nominal and Available Diaphragm Shear Strength and Stiffness of a Panel on
Wood Supports in the Absence of Uplift ....................................................................................... 44
Example 3b: Nominal Diaphragm Shear Strength of the Example 3a Configuration Subjected to
an Uplift Load .................................................................................................................................... 53
Example 3c: Nominal Diaphragm Shear Strength per Unit Length, Sn, With Fiberglass
Insulation ............................................................................................................................................ 62
Example 3d: Edge Connections and Details Parallel to the Edge Panel Span ................................. 66
Example 4a: Multiple-Span Nominal Diaphragm Shear Strength Equivalent to That of a SingleSpan Configuration With Large Side-Lap Spacing....................................................................... 75
Example 4b: Multiple-Span Nominal Diaphragm Shear Strength Equivalent to That of a SingleSpan Configuration with Close Side-Lap Spacing........................................................................ 82
Example 5a: Available Diaphragm Shear Strength in the Absence of Uplift Where the Support
Thickness Approaches the Panel Thickness .................................................................................. 86
Example 5b: Stiffness of the Configuration in Example 5a ................................................................ 92
Page vi
Example 1a
Page 1
Example 1a: Nominal Diaphragm Shear Strength of a Wide Rib Deck Welded to Supports
in the Absence of Uplift
Objective
Calculate the nominal diaphragm shear strength per unit length, Sn, and available strength of a
Wide Rib Deck (WR) in the absence of uplift. WR is defined in AISI S310 Commentary Table
C-1.1a.
Note: Other examples of deck, cellular deck, and concrete slab diaphragm designs are
available in the Third Edition of Steel Deck Institute Diaphragm Design Manual.
Diaphragm Configuration
Typical Side-lap
18 in.
12 in.
Welded Connection
Support
Flange
5 support welds per 36 in. wide deck with one weld common - Pattern 36/5
Deck Data
See Figure D2.1-1 for definitions of deck parameters.
Yield stress, Fy
= 40 ksi
Modulus of Elasticity, E
= 29500 ksi
= 52 ksi
Panel length, L
= 18.0 ft
Tensile strength, Fu
Depth, Dd
= 1.47 in.
Cover width, w
= 36.0 in.
Thickness, t
= 0.036 in.
Pitch, d
= 6.00 in.
Top flat width, f
= 3.56 in.
Web flat width, w
= 1.53 in.
Bottom flat width, 2e
= 1.56 in.
Moment of Inertia, Ixg = 0.210 in.4/ft
This is the Ix value from manufacturer and
conservatively used for Ixg
Deck is end-lapped (strength of butt-joint will also be determined).
Note: Chapter D limits (a) through (d) are satisfied, and the deck can be designed per
Section D1. Material is based on ASTM 1008 SS Grade 40; other steels conforming to
AISI S100 Section A2 are acceptable.
Steel Support Data
Yield stress, Fy = 50 ksi
Thickness, t = 0.25 in.
Tensile strength, Fu
= 62 ksi
Spacing, Lv (shear span) = 6.00 ft.
Page 2
Example 1a
Connection Schedule
Support connection:
Pattern = 36/5 See Figure above
3/4 in. arc spot weld
d = 0.75 in.
Fxx = 70 ksi
The same support connection type and spacing will be used at interior and exterior supports.
Side-lap connection: Spacing = 18 in. o.c. (between supports)
#10 screw
d = 0.190 in.
Pnss = 1.5 k
Pnss is the breaking nominal shear strength of the side-lap screw.
Note: Ratio of support thickness to panel thickness = 6.94, so welding to the support
shouldnt be an issue.
Total thickness of four (4) layers at the end-lap = 4(0.036 in.) = 0.144 in < 0.15 in.
OK per Section D1.1.1 at the end-lap, but 0.036 in. is at the upper limit unless the
welding procedure qualifies a greater thickness.
Edge dimensions must be checked using AISI S100 Sections E2.3.1, E4.1 and E4.2 as
applicable. This example assumes that the as produced and installed deck
provides adequate edge dimensions. Consult panel manufacturer for dimensions,
and check whether arc spot welds are permitted at end-laps and screws are
permitted at side-laps.
Determine Available Strength per Eqs. D-1 and D-2
Safety and resistance factors are in Section B1
S
S
for ASD
= min nf , nb
df db
S nf = min (S ni , S nc , S ne )
Sn
Note: Chapter D defines the available strength as the minimum based on Snf and Snb. Snf is
controlled by connection strength. Section D1 defines Snf as the minimum of Sni, Snc,
and Sne. An edge detail is designed in Example 1b, so the strength controlled by an
edge panel, Sne, will not be considered in Snf Example 1a. Snb is defined in Section D2
and controlled by panel buckling. Snb is calculated in Example 1a. Stiffness, G, is
calculated in Example 1c and is required for serviceability checks.
Calculate Nominal Diaphragm Shear Strength per Unit Length Controlled by Deck Welds, Snf,
Using Section D1
P
S ni = [2A( 1) + ] nf
L
N 2 2
S nc = 2 2
L N + 2
Eq. D1-1
0.5
Pnf
Eq. D1-2
Note: Sni is based on Pnf at an interior support weld, and Snc is based on Pnf at an exterior
support weld. In this example, the same Pnf will be used at all supports.
Example 1a
Page 3
Calculate support connection strength, Pnf (Section D1.1.1 or AISI S100 Section E2.2.2.1):
Cases considered:
(1) A single-thickness support connection, which applies at the top ply of end-laps and at interior
flutes over interior supports;
(2) A two-thickness support connection at end-laps or interior support side-laps;
(3) A three-thickness support connection at end-laps along the side-lap; and
(4) A four-thickness support connection at end-laps along the side-lap
Pnf =
d 2e
0.75Fxx
4
Pnf = 2.20tda Fu
For
da
E
0.815
t
Fu
E/Fu
E da
E
<
1.397
Pnf = 0.280 1 + 5.59
td a Fu For 0.815
F
t
F
d
/t
u
u
0.815
E
29500 ksi
= 0.815
= 19.4
Fu
52 ksi
1.397
E
29500 ksi
= 1.397
= 33.3
Fu
52 ksi
Page 4
Example 1a
da
0.606 in.
=
= 4.21
t
4(0.036) in.
de = 0.7(0.75 in.) 1.5(4(0.036 in.)) 0.55(0.75 in.)
= 0.309 in. < 0.413 in.
de = 0.309 in. See Note below.
Note: de 3/8 in. is required by AISI S100 Section E2.2. Therefore, a larger weld size is
needed for three-thickness and four-thickness connections. For the connection
strength calculation in this example, the size is not changed.
Calculate support connection strength at each thickness case:
Single-thickness connections: minimum of AISI S100 Eqs. E2.2.2.1-1 and E2.2.2.1-3:
(0.413 in.) 2
k
= 7.03 k
0.75 70 2
4
in.
d
19.4 < a = 19.8 < 33.3 Therefore,
t
29500 ksi
19.8
in.2
Pnf =
0.75 70 2 = 5.43 k
4
in.
Note: Consider that 0.363 in. is close enough to 0.375 in. to use the equation.
da
= 5.94 19.4, Therefore,
t
k
Pnf =
(0.309 in.)2
k
0.75 70 2 = 3.94 k
4
in.
Note: Consider that 0.309 in. is close enough to 0.375 in. to use the equation.
Pnf =
Example 1a
Page 5
da
= 4.21 19.4, Therefore,
t
Note: Bearing of the deck against the weld at single-thickness controls connection strength.
This connection strength is used:
1. As required for other fastener connections in Section D1.1.5, and
2. To calculate Sni and Snc in Section D1 per standard industry practice.
Calculate side-lap connection strength, Pns (Section D1.2.5 or AISI S100 Section E4.3.1):
t 2 0.036 in.
=
= 1.0
t 1 0.036 in.
( )1 2 Fu2
1
k
= 4.2 ((0.036 in.) 3 (0.19 in.)) 2 52 2
in.
k
= 0.960 k
in.2
Eq. D1-5
Page 6
np =
Example 1a
L
18 ft
1=
1 = 2.0
Lv
6 ft
in.
(6 ft) 12
18 ft
ft
ns =
1
=9
in.
6 ft
18
conn.
P
0.650 k
s = ns =
= 0.225
2.89 k
Pnf
Eq. D1-6
Eq. D1-8
1
2p = 2e = 2 x 2e
w
x e1 = 0 in. x e2 = 12 in.
x e3 = 18 in.
2
1
0 + 2(12 in.)2 + 2(18 in.)2 = 0.722
2p = 2e =
( 36 in.)2
Eq. D1-5
Calculate Snf:
S ni = [2(1.0)(0.806 1) + 7.80]
2.89 k
= 1.19 klf
18 ft
(1.33 )2 (7.80)2
ft
S nc =
(18 ft)2 (1.33 1 )2 + (7.80)2
ft
Eq. D1-1
0.5
Eq. D1-2
Sne is in Example 1b
Note: Although not mandatory, Sni and Snc values often are close.
Result: Snf = 1.19 klf
Comment:
The justification of using one connection strength by
considering shear flow through weld support connections at the
end-lap:
The discussion assumes that proper quality control is
maintained during welding and that prequalification
procedures have been used to establish proper weld settings
and times.
When shear flows from one sheet to the adjacent sheet at endlap connections, one support connection strength is commonly
used to determine the strengths Sni and Snc unless different
type connections are used or a detail does not develop that
strength at all connections.
Snx
Sny
Sny
2
Snx
Vectors On
Deck Corner Welds
Example 1a
Page 7
Lets investigate the shear flow at end-laps in reference to Figure, Vectors on Deck Corner
Welds. As shown in the figure, the shear in each interior panel can be divided into two
components, horizontal (x-axis) and vertical (y-axis). The four vertical components are
counterbalanced at the connection where four panels connect to the support with one
common weld. The horizontal components are in the same direction in Panels 3 and 4 and in
the same but opposite direction in Panels 1 and 2. Thus, the horizontal components are also
counterbalanced, with one weld penetrating all four plies into the support. There is no force
at the weld kernel in the support, but there are still two components bearing against the
weld in each ply. The bearing strength in each ply decreases because of the slight decrease
in da with depth. Connections at interior flutes at end-laps are through two plies (Panels 4
and 2, or 3 and 1) and have additive vertical components into the support while the
horizontal components are counterbalanced.
If the panels are assembled with Panel 1 as the bottom ply followed by 2, 3, and 4, then the
shear transfer planes may exist in the weld kernels between Plies 4 and 3, 3 and 2, 2 and 1,
and 1 and the support. As discussed above, there is no shear at the last plane. The nominal
shear strength in the top ply (Panel 4) is 2.89 k. The shear force in the kernel between Plies 4
and 3 is 2.89 k. The nominal shear strength in the top two plies is 5.58 k, average strength for
each ply 5.58 k/2 =2.79 k and very close to 2.89 k, and the single value used in the
calculation is applicable. As shear flows across the plane between Panels 3 and 2, the force
in the kernel is twice the horizontal component in the top ply, but less than the weld kernel
strength at that plane, 7.03 k (the horizontal force must be less than twice 2.89 k). The
nominal shear strength of the top three plies is 7.93 k, the average strength for each ply
7.93k/3 = 2.64 k and close to 2.89 k. As shear flows across the plane between Panels 2 and 1,
the force in the kernel is the same as that between Panels 4 and 3, but less than the weld
kernel strength at that plane, 5.43 k (the force limit is 2.89 k). The nominal shear strength of the
top four plies is 9.98 k, the average strength for each ply 9.98k/4 = 2.50 k, or 87% of 2.89 k.
As shear flows across the plane between Panel 1 and the support, the force is 0.00 k. The
most conservative evaluation of the bearing strength in Panel 1 might be based on (d- 7t),
and Pnf is then 2.05 k or 71% of 2.89 k. The center of the bottom ply is 3.5t below the top, and
AISI S100 Section E2.2.2.1 uses a 45o decrease in weld size on each side. However, the
strength at the adjacent interior flute with a weld in 2.79 k (average of two plies) and
redistribution mitigates this reduction.
In summary, Sn could be calculated with Pnf = 2.50 k at end-laps and 2.89 k at interior
supports. To exhaust the discussion, this will be done and then compared with Sn calculated
with Pnf = 2.89 k at all connections. Common practice is to use one value of Pnf to determine
Sni, Snc, and Sne to simplify the process.
It should be noted that the vertical shear component in four panels can be in the same
direction and resisted by a support, such as an edge panel over an interior lateral force
resisting system. In this case, the reaction shear plane is between the last ply and the
support. The nominal shear strength of the weld is 3.94 k (based on four layers of thickness) to
resist that reaction. However, the shear strength in each panel at either side of the lateral
force resisting system should be based on an average strength for each ply9.98 k/4=2.50 k.
Page 8
Example 1a
Calculate Nominal Diaphragm Shear Strength per Unit Length Controlled by Panel Connections,
Snf, Based on Varying Support Connection Strength at the End-Lap and Interior Supports
Adjust the theory at Eq. D1-1 to cover variation of support connection shear strength along a
panel length, L:
Note: Diaphragm theory uses full nominal strength in one ply at all connections.
Let Pnfe = Connection nominal strength at exterior supports in one ply (at end-lap)
Pnfi = Connection nominal strength at interior supports in one ply
S ni = [2A( 1) + n s
1
L
Pnfe Pnfi
]
, or
Pnfi L
P
P
Pns
+ 2n p 2p nfi + 42e ] nfe
Pnfe
Pnfe
L
= 9(0.26) + 2(2)(0.722)
(1.33 )2 (8.57)2
ft
S nc =
1
(18 ft)2 (1.33 )2 + (8.57) 2
ft
Result: S nf = min (S ni , S nc )
Eq. D1-1
0.5
Eq. D1-2
= min (1.14, 1.12) = 1.12 klf (6% reduction vs. 1.19 klf at butt-joint)
Note: The difference will be reduced for multi-spans greater than 3 span where weighted
contribution of interior supports increases. It is rational to use simplification that is
common practice, Pnf = 2.89 k and Snf = 1.19 klf. Thickness, 0.036 in., is at the upper
limit of a four-thickness end-lap.
Diaphragm strength with end-lap is controlled by exterior support single-thickness
connections, but is still relatively balanced1.14 klf vs. 1.12 klf.
Example 1a
Page 9
Calculate Nominal Diaphragm Shear Strength per Unit Length Controlled by Panel Buckling, Snb,
Using Section D2.1
0.25
3 3
7890 I xg t d
Eq. D2.1-1
S nb =
L v 2 s
Note: See Deck Data for parameters. Required units are defined in Section D2.1.
Coefficient, 7890, includes necessary adjustments See Commentary Section D2.1.
=1
Conversion factor for U.S. customary units
s = 2(e + w) + f = 2e + 2w + f
= 1.56 in. + 2(1.53 in.) + 3.56 in. = 8.18 in.
0.25
4
3
3
in.
(
0
.
210
)
(
0
.
036
in.)
(
6
.
0
in.)
7890
ft
S nb =
= 5.20 klf
2
8.18 in.
( 1)( 6 ft)
Eq. D2.1-2
Eq. D2.1-1
df db
for ASD
Eq. D-1
S nf S nb
<
df db
and
S n = min( df S nf , db S nb )
df S nf < db S nb
and
Eq. D-2
Note: For LRFD and LSD, the product of two smaller parameters is smaller. For ASD, the
smaller number divided by the larger number is smaller. In this case, Snb will not
control Sn for all load combinations.
Example 1a Result (No Uplift)
Nominal Strength:
S n = 1.19 klf
Nominal strength per unit length is controlled by the connection strength at one thickness,
and both nominal strength limits (Sni, Snc) are balanced.
Safety Factors and Resistance Factors are in Section B1 (AISI S100 Table D5) for different
loading events.
Available Strength:
Sn
for ASD
d
d S n for LRFD and LSD
Page 10
Example 1b
Note: Interior lateral force resisting systems might require a reaction > Sn.
Edge Detail Configuration
Consider two cases:
(1) Starting condition allows standard installation of full width sheet, we = 36 in.
(2) Ending condition requires a partial width sheet, we = 24 in.
Both cases allow a bottom flat on edge support.
Try to match side-lap spacing = 18 in. o.c. so ne = ns.
The same support connection type as Example 1a (3/4 in. arc spot weld) will be used along
edge panel parallel with deck to determine Sne.
Ripped Edge
Ending Condition
Starting Condition
Eq. D1-3
(From Example 1a)
x ee1 = 0 in.
x ee2 = 12 in.
x ee3 = 18 in.
Figure D1-1
1
1 = 2 =
(0 + 2(12 in.) + 2(18 in.)) = 1.67
36 in.
From Example 1a, np = 2, ne = 9 and L = 18 ft.
Try ne = ns
S ne =
Eq. D1-3
Example 1b
Page 11
Eq. D1-3
Note: End-lap weld acts as two welds along the edgeeach ply develops its bearing
strength, 2.89 k, and kernel strength 7.03 k > 2(2.89) k. This justifies the coefficient, 2,
at 1. See Comments at Example 1a for two thicknesses - 2.79 k 2.89 k .
Simplification (2.09 klf) is 83% of the more precise value (2.52 klf).
S ne = 2.09 klf > S n = 1.19 klf OK
Case 1 Result: Use 18 in. o.c. spacing at edge panel over edge support.
Case 2: Partial Width Sheet at Ending Condition
Considering that Sn cannot be reduced, try 24/5 pattern or 3/4 arc spot weld at 6 in. o. c.
over supports, and #10 screw side-lap connections at 12 in. o.c. at side-lap between partial and
last full-width sheet.
Welded Connection
Side-Lap
12 in.
Full Sheet
6 in.
Support
Flange
5 support welds per 24 in. wide deck with one weld common - Pattern 24/5
x ee1 = 0 in.
1
0 2 + 2(6 in.)2 + 2(12 in.)2 = 0.625
2p = 2e =
(24 in.)2
in.
(6 ft) 12
18 ft
ft
ns =
1
= 15
in.
6 ft
12 conn.
4 welds
welds
N =
= 2.0
2 ft
ft
np, L, A, and are from Example 1a.
Figure D1-1
Eq. D1-8
Page 12
Example 1b
Eq. D1-5
Note: N and are greater than those at full-width sheet (36 in.).
S ni = [2(1.0)(0.806 1) + 8.38]
2.89 k
= 1.28 klf
18 ft
(2 )2 (8.38) 2
ft
S nc =
(18 ft)2 (2 1 )2 + (8.38) 2
ft
S nf = min (S ni , S nc )
Eq. D1-1
0.5
Eq. D1-2
Note: Simplified Sne (2.09 klf) at full-width panel is used to verify partial width since that
value is independent of cover width.
S ne = 2.09 klf > S n = 1.19 klf OK at ending condition
Eq. D1-3
Example 1c
Page 13
Note: Sections D5.1.1 and D5.2 will be used. Appendix 1.4 will be used for Dn and then
Appendix 1.5 will be used as a check. G is based on interior panels.
Et
K
Eq. D5.1.1-1
G' =
2(1 + ) s + D + C
c n
d
Et
2L
S
C =
Eq. D5.1.1-2
f
S
w
2 + n + 2n f
p 4
s
3
S s
x e1 = 0 in.
x e2 = 12 in.
Figure D1-1
x e3 = 18 in.
xe 1
=
(0 + 2 (12 in.) + 2(18 in.)) = 1.67
w
36 in.
1.15(1)
1.15
in.
Sf =
=
= 0.0061
kip
1000 t 1000 .036 in.
3 = 4 =
Ss =
3.0(1)
3.0
in.
=
= 0.0158
kip
1000 t 1000 .036 in.
Eq. D5.1.1-3
Eq. D5.2.1.1-1
Eq. D5.2.2-2
in.
2(18 ft)(12 )
29500 2 (0.036 in.)
in.
ft
0.0061 in. = 5.70
C =
0.0061
36 in.
kip
0.0158
s = 8.18 in. From Example 1a at calculation of Snb
= 0.3
Poissons ratio for steel
d = 6 in.
From Deck Data
c = 0.9
Table 1.3-1
D
Dn =
Eq. 1.4-1
L
Note: The value, Dn, can be determined using the detailed method illustrated in Example
2d and based on Appendix 1. However, the WR results can be obtained quickly from
Commentary Table C-1.2, which is based on t = 0.0358 in. This is close enough to t =
0.036 in. and can be adjusted to refine the tabulated D.
D =
U 1D 1 + U 2 D 2 + U 3 D 3 + U 4 D 4
U1 + U2 + U 3 + U 4
Eq. 1.4-2
Page 14
Example 1c
D =
Eq. 1.4-2
0.0358
Note: To refine D to t = 0.036 in., multiply D by
0.036
D = 0.992(5460) = 5420
5420 in.
Dn =
= 25.1
in.
(18 ft) 12
ft
1.5
= 0.992
Eq. 1.4-1
(1) = 33.4 k
G' =
8.18 in.
in.
+ 0.9(25.1) + 5.70
2(1 + 0.3)
6.0
in.
Eq. D5.1.1-1
Eq. 1.4-9:
11 = 9.90 in.
12 = 4.95 in.
Eq. 1.4-11:
t1 = 2.56
1
in.3
t1
24 f
1 = t1 =
t1 4f 2 (f + w)
Eq.1.4-10:
22 = 2.87 in.3
Eq.1.4-22:
Eq. 1.4-25:
t2 = 59.7 in.2.5
b2 = 129 in.2.5
0.25
0.25
1
2.56
24(3.56 in.)
in.3
=
= 10.5 in.2.5
2
1 4(3.56 in.) (3.56 in. + 1.53 in.)
2.56 3
in.
2 = 2 t2 +
2e
b2
f
= 2(59.7 in.2.5 ) +
Eq. 1.4-32
1.56 in.
(129 in.2.5 ) = 176 in.2.5
3.56 in.
D1 =
U1 = 2
Eq. 1.4-3
D2 =
U2 = 4
Eq. 1.4-4
1f
2f
Example 1c
Page 15
(18 ft) 12
ft
D =
Eq. 1.4-2
Eq. 1.4-1
1 = 33.5 k
G' =
8.18 in.
in.
+ 0.9(25.0) + 5.70
2(1 + 0.3)
6.0
in.
Eq. D5.1.1-1
Note: The above result is the same as the one obtained based on the data from Commentary
Table C-1.2 (Round-off error due to three significant figures.)
Check using the approximation of Appendix Section 1.5-5:
Note: Input units are defined in Section 1.5-5, = 1 for U.S. Customary Units
Dn =
1 n
D ni
n i =1
D ni =
Dd f 2 1 1.5
25L t
D ni =
0.94d 2
f
Eq. 1.5-1
Dd f 2 1 1.5
25L t
For = 1
Eq. 1.5-2
For 1 < 3
Eq. 1.5-3
1.5
(1.47 in.)(3.56 in.)2
1
D n1 =
0.036 in. = 6.06
25(1)(18 ft)
1.5
(1.47 in.)(3.56 in.)2
1
= 38.4
25(1)(18 ft)
0.036 in.
Number of corrugations with:
a) = 1 is 2, and (Same as U1)
D n2 =
0.94(6 in.)(2)2
3.56 in.
b) = 2 is 4 (Same as U2)
Dn =
1
(2(6.06) + 4(38.4) ) = 27.6
6
Note: Compare the rigorous calculation with the one using approximate Dni
From calculated D1 above:
From calculated D2 above:
912
7640
D n1 =
= 4.22
D n2 =
= 35.4
12x18
12x18
6.06
38.4
Ratio =
Ratio =
= 1.44
= 1.08
4.22
35.4
Eq. 1.5-2
Eq. 1.5-3
Page 16
Example 1c
Approximation result:
in.
1 = 31.2 k
G' =
Eq. D5.1.1-1
8.18
in.
2(1 + 0.3)
in.
0.9(27.6)
5.70
+
+
6.0 in.
k
Note: G approximation is within 7% of 33.5
from rigorous calculation.
in.
Dn approximation works relatively well and is best when > 1 dominates. Variance
of G due to Dn approximation is mitigated by the other two contributing factors in
the denominator: G is 7% vs. Dn is 10% in this example.
Example 1c Result
G' = 33.5
k
in.
Example 2a
Page 17
Example 2a: Nominal and Available Diaphragm Shear Strength of a Perforated Panel
Connected to a Thin Support in the Absence of Uplift
Objective
Calculate the nominal diaphragm shear strength per unit length, Sn, and the available strength of
a perforated panel in the absence of uplift using Chapter D. Consider the impact of a
relatively thin support.
Note: Acoustic Panels with perforated elements are addressed in Sections D1.4, D2.1, and
D5.1.2.
Diaphragm Configuration
Typical
Side-Lap
Screw
Support
Screw
Perforated
Webs
14.4 in.
Support
Flange
Yield stress, Fy
Tensile strength, Fu
Depth, Dd
Thickness, t
Top flat width, f
Bottom flat width, 2e
Moment of Inertia, Ixg
= 50 ksi
= 65 ksi
= 1.50 in.
= 0.024 in.
= 2.00 in.
= 2.00 in.
= 0.123 in.4/ft
Modulus of Elasticity, E
Panel length, L
Cover width, w
Pitch, d
Web flat width, w
= 29500 ksi
= 25.0 ft
= 36.0 in.
= 7.20 in.
= 2.19 in.
Page 18
Example 2a
Note: Chapter D limits (a) through (d) are satisfied, and the panel strength can be
calculated per Section D1. Material is based on ASTM 653 SS Grade 50.
Perforation Data
Perforations are located in webs only and have a band width, Wp = 1.313 in.
dp = 3/16 in. diameter at spacing, cp = 3/8 in. stagger.
p o = 0.9069
0.188 2
=
0.9069
= 0.228
cp2
0.375 2
dp
Tensile strength, Fu
Spacing, Lv (shear span)
= 65 ksi
= 5.00 ft
df db
S nf = min (S ni , S nc , S ne )
for ASD
Note: Snf and Sne are determined in Section D1 and Snb is in Section D2. Snb is calculated
in Example 2a. An edge detail is designed in Example 2c. Therefore, strength
controlled by edge panel, Sne, will not be considered in Example 2a. Uplift is in
Example 2b (shear and tension interaction). Stiffness, G, is calculated in Example 2d.
Use U.S. Customary Units.
Connections are not located in perforated zones, so testing is not required for Pnf or
Pns per Section D1.4.
Example 2a
Page 19
Calculate Nominal Diaphragm Shear Strength per Unit Length Controlled by Panel Screws, Snf,
Using Section D1
P
S ni = [2A( 1) + ] nf
L
Eq. D1-1
0.5
N 2 2
Pnf
S nc = 2 2
Eq. D1-2
L N + 2
Note: Eq. D1-1 for Sni should be based on the interior support screw, and Eq. D1-2 for Snc
should be based on the exterior support corner screw. However, the same Pnf value
will be used at all supports in determining Sni and Snc in this example.
Calculate Support Connection Strength, Pnf (Section D1.1.2 or AISI S100 E4.3.1)
Cases considered:
(1) A single-panel thickness support connection, which applies at top ply of end-laps and at
interior flutes over interior supports; and
(2) A two-panel thickness support connection, which applies at end-laps.
Note: Bearing of the panel against the screw at one thickness controls connection strength.
This one-connection strength will be used:
1. As required for other fasteners in Section D1.1.5, and
2. To calculate Sni and Snc in Section D1 per standard industry practice.
Page 20
Example 2a
2SnL/
Connection strength at the end-lap top ply shear plane is the same as
that over an interior supportboth with one bearing thickness. Lets
Snx
End investigate the panels at the end-lap. In this case, the support
Lap
connections are through two plies and located in only two panels.
There are four plies at the elevated side-lap over the support.
Sny
Force vectors in support connections are shown in the figure at
Sny
right. At the corner of a four-panel connection, the vertical
components of the two panels add to each other and are
transferred to the support. The adjacent two panels vertical
Snx
components are in the opposing direction and are also transferred
to the support. The horizontal components in the two panels
Vectors On
cancel and do not show up at the support. However, both
Panel Corner
Connections
components are present in each ply and cause bearing at one
thickness. As stated above, the shank breaking strength and
bearing against the support will not control the strength in this configuration. Therefore, it is
permissible to use the one-thickness connection strength to determine Sni. The value in the endlap top ply can be limited to 1/2 the support bearing or screw breaking capacity when
determining Sni. In this configuration, Snc is always controlled by the one-thickness connection
strength since both components are not present at the support.
Case 2 result: Based on the above discussion, Pnf = 0.910 k Used to calculate Sni and Snc for
butt-joint or end-lap.
Calculate side-lap connection strength, Pns (Section D1.2.5 or AISI S100 E4.3.1):
t 2 0.024 in.
t
Therefore, 2 1.0
=
= 1.0
t 1 0.024 in.
t1
( )1
1
k
= 4.2((0.024 in.)3 (0.216 in.)) 2 (65 2 ) = 0.472 k
in.
Example 2a
Pns = 2.7t1dFu1
Page 21
) = 0.910 k
in.2
Pns = 2.7t 2dFu2 (same as above) = 0.910 k
Pnss = 2.0 kips
From Connection Schedule
Pns = min (0.472, 0.910, 0.910, 2.00 ) = 0.472 k
= n s s + 2n p 2p + 4 2e
np =
ns =
L
25 ft
1=
1 = 4.0
Lv
5 ft
25 ft(12 in. ft )
+ 1.0 = 16
in.
conn.
P
0.472 k
s = ns =
= 0.519
Pnf 0.910 k
Eq. D1-5
Modified Eq. D1-9
20
1
See Figure D1-1
2p = 2e = 2 x 2e
w
x e1 = 0.0
x e2 = x e3 = 2(7.2 in.) = 14.4 in.
Eq. D1-6
Eq. D1-8
1
(0 in.)2 + 2(14.4 in.)2 = 0.32
2p = 2e =
(36 in.)2
S nc = 2 2
L N + 2
Eq. D1-5
Eq. D1-1
Eq. D1-2
Page 22
Example 2a
0.5
(1)2 (12.1) 2 2
ft
=
0.910 kips = 0.396 klf
2
ft
2
2
2
(25) (1)
+ (12.1)
ft 2
Calculate Nominal Diaphragm Shear Strength per Unit Length Controlled by Panel Buckling, Snb,
Using Section D2.1 and Appendix 1 Section 1.6
0.25
3 3
7890 I xg t d
Eq. D2.1-1
S nb =
s
L v 2
Note: See Panel and Perforation Data for parameters. Required units are defined in Section
D2.1. Coefficient, 7890, includes necessary adjustments See Commentary Section
D2.1. Since perforations are only in web, only w = wp needs to be inserted at Eq.
D2.1-2 to determine s.
=1
Conversion factor for U.S. customary units
= 2(e + wp) + f = 2e + 2wp + f
wp
= K 1/3
E w
Eq. 1.6-3
1
= 1 + w 3 1
k
Wp 1.313 in.
Aw =
=
= 0.600
w
2.19 in.
KE
Eq. 1.6-4
= 0.9 + p o2 1.875p o
Eq. D2.1-2
Eq. C-1.6-3
Eq. 1.6-5
1
= 1 + (0.600 )3
1 = 1.196
0.524
Eq. 1.6-4
wp
S nb
3
3
7890 (0.123 in. ft ) (0.024 in.) (7.2 in.)
=
8.64 in.
(1)(5 ft)2
Eq. 1.6-3
Eq. D2.1-2
0.25
= 3.82 klf
Eq. D2.1-1
Result:
Example 2a
Page 23
Available Strength
Safety and resistance factors are in Section B1 (AISI S100 Table D5):
S
S
Sn
= min nf , nb
for ASD
df db
Since df > db, Snf < Snb,
S
S nf
< nb
df db
S n = min( df S nf , db S nb )
df S nf < db S nb
Eq. D-1
Eq. D-2
Discussion:
Wind load is the probable load that allows Snb to control available strength. The available
strength based on Snf is greatest for that event.
ASD:
df = 2.35 and db = 2.0
Sn
0.396 3.82
= min
,
= 0.169 klf
2
2.35
LRFD:
df = 0.70 and db = 0.80
S n = min (0.70(0.396), 0.80(3.82)) = 0.277 klf
LSD:
df = 0.65 and db = 0.75
S n = min (0.65(0.396), 0.75(3.82)) = 0.257 klf
Result:
Snf will control both Sn and available strength for all load combinations in this
diaphragm configuration. Snb does not control in this example.
Sn
d
for ASD
Safety Factors and Resistance Factors are in Section B1 (AISI S100 Table D5) for different
loading events.
Page 24
Example 2b
Example 2b: Nominal and Available Diaphragm Shear Strength of a Perforated Panel
Connected to a Thin Support With Uplift
Objective
Use the configuration of Example 2a and calculate the nominal and available diaphragm shear
strength per unit length in the presence of an uplift load. Consider the impact of a relatively
thin support.
Note: Section D3.1.2.1 will be used to determine shear and tension interaction and the
nominal shear strength per screw, Pnft. Section D1 will be used to determine Snf based
on Pnft. Sn = min (Snf, Snb). From Example 2a, Snb will not control Sn.
Load Data
Wind uplift zone = 30 psf (0.030 ksf)
Reaction at interior support = 1.1(5 ft)(0.030 ksf)
= 0.165 klf
Reaction at exterior support = 0.4(5 ft)(0.030 ksf)
= 0.060 klf
= 2(0.060 klf)
= 0.120 klf
Note: Two plies exist at end-lap, so tributary length doubles for screw pull-out. Neglect
dead load of panel in load combination (would reduce force on the screw). Quick
design could avoid refinements and conservatively use 0.165 klf as the universal
connection load See Example 2b; discussion below. Coefficients 1.1 and 0.4 are
rational for multiple-span applications subject to uniform loads. More precise fivespan values are available, and some engineers use coefficients 1.0 and 0.5.
AISI S100 Section E4.5.2 does not require a strength reduction for eccentric loading in
pull-out. Even if required, opposing forces at an end-lap would partly offset this
eccentricity (prying).
d Pnf
0.71T 1.1
+
=
Pnov
= d = 2.35
Eq. D3.1.2.1-2
Example 2b
Page 25
Note: t = 0.024 in. is slightly outside the specified limits of this equation, but will be used in
this example for illustrative purposes.
At interior supports:
N = 1 screw/ft at all supports (See Example 2a)
0.165 k/ft
Tensile force per screw
T
=
= 0.165 k/screw
1 screw/ft
) = 1.17 k
in.2
Note: The above pull-over strength is based on one thickness with uniform pull-over.
Pnft
Pnf
Pnf
1.1 d 0.71T d
=
1.0
Pnov
1.1(2.35) 0.71(0.165 k)(2.35)
=
2.35
1.17 k
= 0.865
= 0.910 k
From Example 2a
Note: Top ply resists 0.06 k and sees end eccentricity. Snc concerns corner connection at
end-lap.
Pnov = 0.5(1.17 k) = 0.585 k
Pnft
Pnf
1.1 d 0.71T d
=
Pnov
1.0
=
2.35
0.5(1.17 k)
Pnf
Pnf
= 0.910 k
From Example 2a
Result: Pnft = 0.929(0.910 k) = 0.845 k/screw at exterior supports
Page 26
Example 2b
1
L
Rewriting so closer in form to Eq. D1-1 and to develop a modified :
P
P
P
P
S ni = [2A( 1) nfe + n s ns + 2n p 2p + 4 2e nfe ] nfi , or
Pnfi
Pnfi
Pnfi L
S ni = [2A( 1)Pnfe + n s Pns + 2n p 2p Pnfi + 4 2e Pnfe ]
S ni = [2A( 1) + n s
P
P
+ 2n p 2p nfi + 4 2e ] nfe
Pnfe
Pnfe
L
Pns
= n s s + 2n p 2p
s =
Pnfi
+ 4 2e
Pnfe
Pns 0.472 k
=
= 0.559
Pnfi 0.845 k
= 16(0.559) + 2(4)(0.32)
0.787 k
+ 4(0.32) = 12.6
0.845 k
0.5
(1)2 (12.6) 2 2
ft
S nc =
0.845 k = 0.380 klf
2
ft
2
2
2
(25) (1)
+ (12.6)
ft 2
(
)
(
S nf = min S ni , S nc = min 0.425, 0.380) = 0.380 klf
Eq. D1-2
Section D1
+
=
Eq. D3.1.2.1-6
d Pnf Pnot
Pnft
Pnf
Example 2b
1.15 d T d
=
1.0
Pnot
= 2.55
Page 27
d = 2.35
At interior supports:
0.165 k/ft
T
=
= 0.165 k/screw
1 screw/ft
Pnft
Pnf
Pnf
= 0.518
2.55
0.716 k
From Example 2a
= 0.910 kips
Eq. D3.1.2.1-6
Pnf
Pnf
= 0.666
2.55
0.716 k
From Example 2a
= 0.910 kips
Eq. D3.1.2.1-6
A, ns, 2e , 2p , and
Pnfi = 0.471 k
Pnfe = 0.606 k
Page 28
s =
Example 2b
Pns 0.472 k
=
= 1.00
Pnfi 0.471 k
Eq. D1-6
0.606 k
0.471 k
= 20.2
S ni = [2(0.0)(0.798 1)
0.606 k
0.471 k
+ 20.2]
0.471 k
25 ft
= 0.381 klf
0.5
(1)2 (15.7)2
2
0.606 k
ft
S nc =
2
ft
2
(25)2 (1)2
+
(15.7)
ft 2
= 0.322 klf
S nf = min (S ni , S nc ) = min (0.381, 0.322 ) = 0.322 klf
Eq. D1-2
Section D1
Pnf
t T
+
= 1.3
Pnts
Pnft
T
= 1.3 t 1.0
Pnf
Pnts
t = 3.0
Pnts = 2.7 k
Eq. D3.1.2.1-10
Rewriting Eq. D3.1.2.1-10
Pnf
3(0.165 k)
= 1.3
= 1.12 > 1.0 Therefore, 1.0 is used.
2.7 k
Eq. D3.1.2.1-10
Example 2b
Page 29
(no reduction)
Pnf
3(0.120 k)
= 1.3
= 1.17 > 1.0 Therefore, 1.0 is used.
2.7 k
(No reduction)
Note: Screw pull-out controls. The 30 psf uplift significantly impacts the nominal diaphragm
shear strength per unit length of this configuration. The support is relatively thin,
which resulted in a 30-50% reduction in support screw strength and an 18.7%
reduction in diaphragm strength. These unproportional reductions indicate the
strength contribution from side-lap screws. Adding support fasteners or increasing
support or panel thickness could be considered to increase Sn.
d = 2.35 for wind load
S
0.322
Available Strength: n =
= 0.137 klf
2.35
Example 2b Discussion:
The following calculation uses a simpler design approach by using only one reaction force at
the exterior support, T = 0.165 k/conn., to determine both Sni and Snc while still considering
eccentricity at the panel ends:
(a) Interaction of shear and pull-over
At interior supports,
From (a) above with no eccentricity and based on T = 0.165 k/conn.
Pnft = 0.787 k
At exterior supports,
Pnft
Pnf
Pnf
Pnft
2.35
0.5(1.17 k)
From Example 2a
= 0.910 k
= 0.629(0.910) = 0.572 k
Page 30
Example 2b
A, ns, 2e , 2p , and
Pns = 0.472 k (Example 2a, and not affected by uplift)
= n s s + 2n p 2p + 4 2e
Pnfe
Pnfi
s = 0.600
Eq. D1-6
Modified Eq. D1-5
0.5
(1) 2 (18.0) 2
2
ft
S nc =
0.572 k = 0.334 klf
2
ft
2
2
2
(25) (1)
+ (18.0)
ft 2
Eq. D1-2
Eq. D1-6
Eq. D1-5
Example 2b
Page 31
0.471 k
25 ft
2
2 1
(1)
(19.8)
2
ft
S nc =
2
(25)2 (1)2 ft + (19.8) 2
ft 2
= 0.373 klf
Eq. D1-1
0.5
Eq. D1-2
Note: The simpler design has significant impact on the nominal diaphragm shear strength per
unit length of this configuration. Pull-out still controls, and simplification causes a
9.3% reduction vs. 0.322 klf using the more precise calculation.
Page 32
Example 2c
Example 2c: Required Edge Detail Parallel to the Edge Panel Span With Panel
Connected to a Thin Support in the Absence of Uplift
Objective
Using Section D1, determine a required edge detail parallel to the edge panel span so Sne
exceeds Sn from Example 2a (no uplift) = 0.396 klf.
Note: The Section D1 requirements for Pnfs must be met, and Eq. D1-3 with the Eq. D4.4-1
simplification will be used. The simplification only considers the contribution of
screws over the edge support angle by:
a) Setting 1 and 2 to 1 in Eq. D1-3, and
b) Requiring a screw in line with the transverse support at this detail. The designer
could include the contributions of other transverse support screws through the
bottom flat in the edge panel and calculate 1 and 2 > 1.
The following conditions apply at the detail:
a) Starting and ending conditions allow installation of full-width sheets, we = 36 in.
b) Starting and ending conditions do not allow a bottom flat on the edge support angle.
c) The edge connection is through the edge panels top flat; therefore, set Pnfs = 0.0 k.
(Sne 0.0 klf) or require a detail that provides a direct path to the edge angle so connections
are effective. See Section D1.
d) #12 side-lap screw with 1/2 in. round sealing washer will be used at panel to Zee.
e) #12 support screw without washer will connect 1 in. deep Zee to edge support.
f) Try to match side-lap screw spacing = 20 in. so that ne = ns.
g) Try to use reinforcing zee with t = 0.06 in., Fy = 50 ksi, and Fu = 65 ksi.
h) Edge angle is same material as supports: t = 0.06 in., Fy = 50 ksi, and Fu = 65 ksi.
Note: Interior lateral force resisting systems might require a reaction (Sne) > Sn = 0.396 klf.
Starting edge panel detail will transfer
diaphragm shear to a Lateral Force Resisting
System. Anti-roll clip or other means is
provided to prevent purlin roll.
1-1/2 in. deep Zee member is used to transfer
longitudinal diaphragm shear from the top
flange screw connections to the bottom flange
screw connections. Due to screw eccentricity,
the Zee web has potential for twisting and
warping.
Example 2c
Page 33
Rewriting
L Pnfs
=
ne
Sn
Eq. D4.4-1
k
L
screw = 2.30 ft
=
k
ne
screw
0.396
ft
Note: 2.30 ft/screw > 20 in. o.c. (1.67 ft/screw)
0.910
Use:
0.060 in.
= 1.0
0.060 in.
1
k
Pnfs = 4.2 (0.060 in.) 3 (0.216 in.) 2 (65 2 )
AISI S100 Eq. 4.3.1-1
in.
= 1.86 k < Pnss = 2.0 k
k
Pnfs = 2.7 (0.060 in.)(0.216 in.)(65 2 )
AISI S100 Eq. 4.3.1-2
in.
= 2.27 k > Pnss = 2.0 k
Pnfs = min(1.86 k, 2.27 k, 2.0 k) = 1.86 k
Note: Tilting of screw in angle controls but almost at limit of screw breaking strength= 2 k
k
screw = 4.7 ft
k
screw
0.396
ft
1.86
Eq. D4.4-1
Page 34
Example 2c
k
ft = 5.63 ksi
2
4.0 ft (0.169 )
2(0.06) in.
2M
2 in.
in.
Screw in Zee bottom flat
Note: Twisting due to screw eccentricity will create secondary (x axis) reaction on bottom
flat screws. Screw strength will be re-checked below.
Calculate St. Venant shear in Zee web due to twisting (screw eccentricity):
Note: Refer to Advanced Mechanics of Materials by Seely and Smith or other textbooks for
torsional resistance of rectangular cross-sections:
ASD Available Diaphragm Strength = 0.169 klf
Bottom
Flat
Example 2c
Top
Flat
Web
M
Page 35
2M
in.k
3(0.127)
3M
ft = 8.82 ksi
SVv = 2 =
bt
in. 3
12(0.06) 2
ft
Web
Fv
30
=
= 18.8 ksi
1.6 1.6
Page 36
Example 2c
1.86 k
= 0.791 k/screw > 0.676 k/screw OK
2.35
Note: This just verifies that 4 ft. spacing is less than 4.7 ft determined above.
Secondary force is negligiblePresultant = 0.508 k vs. Py = 0.507 k
Available Strength =
Example 2c Results
Use: 1-1/2 in. Zee with t = 0.06 in. and Fy = 50 ksi
Typical length = 10 ft.
Panel to Zee:
#12 1 in. long side-lap screw with in. round sealing washer at
20 in. o.c. (5 ft = 60 in. o.c. so it works with 20 in. o.c.)
Flashing is not required for diaphragm shear strength.
Install screws in line with transverse supports.
Zee to Support: #12 1 in. long support screw without washer
Zee Length
Screws/Length
Screw Spacing
Lz = 10 ft
3
12 in., 4 ft - 0 in., 4 ft - 0 in., 12 in. = 10 ft
5 ft < Lz < 10 ft
3
6 in., 3 ft - 0 in., 3 ft - 0 in., 6 in. = 7 ft
2
6 in., 4 ft - 0 in., 6 in. = 5 ft
Lz 5 ft
Sn = 0.396 klf
Note:
1) Example 2c establishes a direct load path to the lateral force resisting system and provides
design considerations for the edge connection details. Other details are possible.
2) The ending edge condition could require an alternate detail if the edge panel bottom flat
lands on the edge support or if a partial-width panel is required. See Example 3d for such
edge panel conditions.
3) Zee-member connection selection considers normal press-brake limits, use of the same
stock material, and practical screw spacing limits.
4) Uplift is taken by transverse support connections and is not significantly resisted by this
edge detail.
5) Rake flashing may be required for cosmetics or serviceability. Follow the manufacturers
guidelines for flashings and minimum attachments.
Example 2d
Page 37
Note: Use Section D5.1.2 for perforated panels and Appendix Sections 1.4 and 1.6. Same G
applies with or without uplift.
Et
K
Eq. D5.1.1-1
G' =
2(1 + ) s + D + C
c n
d
Et
2L
S
C =
f
S
w
2 + n + 2n f
3
p
4
s
S s
xe
3 = 4 =
See Example 2a for parameters
Eq. D5.1.1-2
0 + 2(14.4) in.
= 0.8
36
in.
Eq. D5.1.1-3
in.
in.
in.
ft
0.00839
C=
= 5.31
36 in.
2(0.8) + 4(0.8) + 2(16)(0.433)
k
Page 38
Example 2d
used as a check. Example 2d only requires D1 and D2; all deflection indicators and
spring constants are not required.
Dn =
(Unit-less)
D=
Eq. 1.4-1
U 1D1 + U 2 D 2 + U 3 D 3 + U 4 D 4
U1 + U2 + U3 + U 4
D1 =
D3 =
1f
Eq. 1.4-2
d(t )1.5
3f
Eq. 1.4-4
2d(t )1.5
4f
D4 =
4d(t )1.5
Eq. 1.4-5
3d(t )1.5
2f
D2 =
Eq. 1.4-3
Eq. 1.4-6
Note: See Panel Data in Example 2a for parameters. See Snb determination in Example 2a
for calculation of equivalent wp.
w p = K 1/3
E w = 2.32 in.
Eq. 1.6-3
Insert the equivalent element lengths in Eq. 1.4-7 through Eq. 1.4-10 to calculate the
deflection indicators:
s
11 =
(1.5 in.)
D d2
2w p + 3fp =
3
3
Eq. 1.4-7
7.98 in.3
12 = 11 =
= 3.99 in.3
2
2
22 =
[(
Eq. 1.4-9
1 Dd
2
2
2
s 4e p 2e p fp + fp + d 3fp + 2w p
12 d
Eq. 1.4-8
)]
Eq. 1.4-10
1 1.5in. 2
2
2
2
= 2.12 in. 3
22 12
2
1
3.99 in.
2.12 in.
2
3
= 8.00
1
in.3
Eq. 1.4-11
t2 =
t3 =
Example 2d
Page 39
1
1
1
=
= 0.243 3
3
2e 12 +
in.
22 2 in. 3.99 in. + 2.12 in.3
f 2
2
2 in.
= 0.123
Eq. 1.4-12
2e
2 in.
3
3
in. 3
0.5 + 12 + 22
0 .5 +
3.99 in. + 2.12 in.
f
2 in.
1
1
1
t4 =
=
= 0.083
(
)
3e
3
1
in
.
3
3
in. 3
1 + 12 + 22 1 +
3.99 in. + 2.12 in.
f
2 in.
2 in.
2e
1
2 in.
f
b2 =
=
= 0.125
3
2e 11
in. 3
+ 12 2 in. 7.98 in. + 3.99 in. 3
f 2
2 in.
2
2 in.
2e
1
2 in.
f
b3 =
=
= 0.063
2e
2 in.
3
3
in. 3
0.5 + 11 + 12 0.5 +
7.98 in. + 3.99 in.
f
2 in.
2 in.
2e
1
2 in.
f
b4 =
=
= 0.042
3e
3(1 in.)
3
3
in. 3
1 + 11 + 12 1 +
7.98 in. + 3.99 in.
f
2 in.
1
1
=
tc3 =
3
2e
0.5 +
+
12
0.5 + 2 in. 7.98 in.3 + 2.12 in.3 + 3.99 in.
11 22 +
f
2
2 in.
2
1
= 0.062
in. 3
1
tc4 =
3e
e
1 +
+
11 22 + 1 + 12
f
f
1
1
=
= 0.036 3
3
(
1
in.
)
1
in.
1 +
7.98 in. 3 + 2.12 in. 3 + 1 +
3.99 in. 3
in.
2 in.
2 in.
2 in.
2e
1
2 in.
f
bc4 =
=
= 0.031 3
1 + 4e +
1 + 4 (1 in.) 7.98 in. 3 + 2 3.99 in. 3
in.
11 2 12
f
2 in.
Eq. 1.4-13
Eq. 1.4-14
Eq. 1.4-15
Eq. 1.4-16
Eq. 1.4-17
Eq. 1.4-18
Eq. 1.4-19
Eq. 1.4-20
Page 40
t1 =
Example 2d
t1
24f
2
t1 4f (f + w )
t2 =
t3 =
t4 =
24f
t2
24f
t3
24f
t4
b2 =
b3 =
0.25
0.25
1
24 (2 in.)
in.3
=
= 3.53 in.2.5
t2
2
4f (f + w )
0.25
t3
2
4f (f + w )
0.25
t4
2
4f (f + w )
0.25
b2
48e
2
b2 16e (2e + w )
0.25
24(2 in.)
1
0.243
in. 3
0.243
3
in.
0.25
24(2 in.)
1
0.123
in. 3
0.123
3
in.
0.25
24(2 in.)
1
0.083
in. 3
0.083
3
in.
0.25
b3
48e
b3 16e 2 (2e + w )
0.25
48(1 in.)
1
0.125 3
in.
Eq. 1.4-21
Eq. 1.4-24
0.25
1
0.125
in.3
= 79.8 in.2.5 Eq. 1.4-25
2
(
)
(
)
1
6
1
in.
2
in.
+
2.19
in.
0.063
3
48(1 in.)
in.
=
in. 3
0.25
0.042
3
48(1 in.)
in.
=
in. 3
0.25
Eq. 1.4-26
b4
48e
b4 =
b4 16e 2 (2e + w )
0.25
tc3 =
24f
tc3
tc3
4f 2 (f + w )
0.25
0.25
1
0.062
24(2 in.)
in. 3
=
= 135 in. 2.5
in. 3
Eq. 1.4-28
tc4 =
24f tc4
2
tc4 4f (f + w )
0.25
24(2 in.)
1
0.036
in. 3
0.036
3
in.
0.25
Example 2d
Page 41
Eq. 1.4-29
bc4
48e
bc4 =
0.25
0.031
3
48(1 in.)
in.
=
in. 3
0.25
Eq. 1.4-31
Eq. 1.4-32
Eq. 1.4-33
2e
Eq. 1.4-34
(2 b4 + bc4 )
f
2 in.
2.5
2.5
= 2 108 in.2.5 + 203 in.2.5 +
= 1210 in.2.5
2(181 in. ) + 227 in.
2 in.
Calculate warping value for screw spacing = 1 through 2 flutes o.c.:
Insert the final displacement indicators to determine the value for warping where bottom
flange screws are in every valley in Eq. 1.4-3 and where bottom flange screws are in every
second valley in Eq. 1.4-4:
4 = 2 ( t4 + tc4 ) +
D2 =
Eq. 1.4-3
Eq. 1.4-4
U 4 = 0 in this configuration
Eq. 1.4-2
Page 42
Dn =
Example 2d
D
=
L
5340 in.
= 17.8
in.
25 ft 12
ft
(Unit-less)
Eq. 1.4-1
c = 0.71
Table 1.3-1
Note: See Panel Data for Wp, 2e, w, f. Ep and Fp =0 (no perforations).
k = 0.524 - See Eq. 1.6-5; calculation for k is at Snb in Example 2a.
1
s = 2 in. + 2(2.19 in.) + 2 in. + (0 + 2 1.313 in. + 0 )
1 = 10.77 in.
0.524
Example 2d Result
Et
K
G' =
2(1 + ) s + D + C
c n
d
Eq. D5.1.1-1
in.
0.433 = 14.0 k
G' =
2(1 + 0.3) 10.77 in. + 0.71(17.8) + 5.31
in.
7.2
in.
Impact of perforations:
If the panel webs are not perforated, (po = 0, k = 1, s = 8.38 in.), then by similar process:
Dn = 17.4 or 2% less warping
k
in.
0.433 = 14.8 k
G' =
8.38
in.
2(1 + 0.3)
in.
+ 0.71(17.4) + 5.31
7.2 in.
Result:
No perforation case provides 6% greater diaphragm stiffness. The impact of web
Example 2d
Page 43
perforations is present but not too significant. Shear strain across the perforated zone (29%
increase 10.77/8.38) contributes to the increased diaphragm deflection. Warping increase
is negligible in 25 ft long panels.
in.
0.433 = 8.53 k
G' =
10.77
2(1 + 0.3)
in.
+ 0.9(29.7) + 5.31
7.2
(less stiffness)
39% decrease
vs.
14.0 k/in.
Result:
In this case, the three span table is very conservative when applied to a 25 ft panel since
warping is dominant at 18 ft, and the 25 ft panel exhibits proportionately less warping.
Page 44
Example 3a
Example 3a: Nominal and Available Diaphragm Shear Strength and Stiffness of a Panel
on Wood Supports in the Absence of Uplift
Objective
Calculate the nominal diaphragm shear strength per unit length, Sn, available strength, and
stiffness, G, of a panel on wood supports in the absence of uplift. Compare with the impact
of uplift in Example 3b.
Note:
Panel flexural strength and deflection check is left to the designer and should be completed for
all load combinations prior to the diaphragm design.
Diaphragm Configuration
Typical Side-Lap
15.75 in.
3.75 in.
Wood
Support
15.75 in.
8.25 in.
4 support screws per 36 in. wide panel with zero common Screw pattern 36/4
Example 3a
Page 45
Note: Chapter D limits (a) through (d) are satisfied, so calculate using Chapter D. Material
is based on ASTM 653 SS Grade 80 G90 Painted. AISI S100 Section A2.3.3 design
requirements apply. Use: Fy = 60 ksi Fu = 62 ksi.
Wood Support Data
Species = Douglas Fir South
Spacing, Lv (shear span) = 5.00 ft
G = 0.45
Seasoned Wood and Application Dry
Note: See Table D1.1.4.2-2 for wood-specific gravity, G. Assume wood edge dimensions
satisfy AWC NDS requirements, and depth will be enough for the screw thread
length. Designer should verify the wood dimensions. Proof is not part of this
example.
Connection Schedule
Support connection: Pattern = 36/4 See Figure above
#14 screw 2 in. long with 5/8 in. round sealing washer
d = 0.248 in.
Pnss = 2.7 k
Pnts = 3.2 k
Pnss = 2.0 k
Pnts = 2.6 k
Note: Side-lap connections will be located over supports but are not into supports.
Pnss = Breaking nominal shear strength of screw
Pnts = Breaking nominal tensile strength of screw
A large side-lap spacing is to illustrate the impact of support connection strength. For
service reasons, side-lap spacing often varies between 12 in. and 24 in. o.c. at roofs,
and spacing of 36 in. o.c. (and sometimes greater) is used at walls. Consult the
manufacturers installation guidelines.
Corrosion resistance should be considered when selecting wood support screws and
panels over wood. Consult the wood truss provider, screw manufacturer, and the
panel manufacturer.
S
S
Sn
= min nf , nb
df db
S nf = min(S ni , S nc , S ne )
for ASD
S n = min(df S nf , db S nb )
Note: Snf is in Section D1; Snb is in Section D2. Since an edge detail is designed in Example
3d, strength controlled by edge panel, Sne, will not be considered in this example.
Stiffness, G, is calculated in this example and is required for serviceability checks.
Uplift is in Example 3b (shear and tension interaction). Impact of insulation between
panel and support is in Example 3c.
Page 46
Example 3a
Calculate Nominal Diaphragm Shear Strength per Unit Length, Snf, Controlled by Panel Screws
Using Section D1
P
S ni = [2A( 1) + ] nf
L
N 2 2
S nc = 2 2 2
L N +
Eq. D1-1
0.5
Pnf
Eq. D1-2
Note: hs = threaded length of screw including tapered tip that penetrates the wood. 0.125
in. is an allowance for washer and panel thickness.
4d = 4(0.248 in.) = 0.992 in.
7d = 7(0.248 in.) = 1.74 in.
For 4d h s < 7d
h
For hs 7d
Eq. D1.1.4.2-1
Eq. D1.1.4.2-2
Note: The above equation indicates that additional length will not increase Pnf.
Table D1.1.4.2-1
Pnfws = 2.7t dF
1 u1
Table D1.1.4.2-1
) = 0.996 k
in 2
See Connection Schedule
Eq. D1.1.4.2-2
Calculate side-lap connection strength, Pns (Section D1.2.5 or AISI S100 E4.3.1):
t 2 0.024 in.
t
Therefore 2 1.0
Fu2 = Fu1
=
= 1.0
t 1 0.024 in.
t1
( )1
1
k
= 4.2[(0.024 in.) 3 (0.216 in.)] 2 (62 2 ) = 0.450 k
in.
Example 3a
Page 47
) = 0.868 k
in.2
Pnss = 2.0 k
See Connection Schedule
Result:
Pns = min(0.450k, 0.868 k, 2.00 k) = 0.450 k
Tilting of screw in panel controls the nominal strength.
Calculate configuration parameters required for Snf:
Number support screws at side-lap at panel ends
A = 0.0
Dd L v
0.7
Input units are defined in Section D1
Eq. D1-4a
240 t
1.25 in.(5.0 ft)
= 1
= 0.832 > 0.7 OK Unit-less
240 0.024 in.
4 screws
screws
Number of screws into support per ft along panel ends
N=
= 1.33
3 ft
ft
Factor defining screw interaction
Eq. D1-5
= n s s + 2n p 2p + 4 2e
= 1
np =
L
30 ft
1=
1=5
Lv
5 ft
30 ft(12 in. ft )
+ 1.0 = 19
in
20
conn.
P
0.450 k
s = ns =
= 0.507
Pnf 0.887 k
ns =
1
2p = 2e = 2 x 2e
w
xe1 = 3.75 in.
Eq. D1-9
Eq. D1-6
Eq. D1-8
x e3 = 8.25 in.
1
(3.75 in.) 2 + 2(15.75 in.)2 + (8.25 in.) 2 = 0.446
=
(36 in.) 2
Eq. D1-5
N 2 2
S nc = 2 2
L N + 2
0 .5
(1.33)2 (15.9) 2 2
ft
Pnf =
2
ft
2
2
+ (15.9)2
(30) (1.33)
ft 2
Eq. D1-1
0.5
Eq. D1-2
Page 48
Example 3a
SnL/
SnL/
2SnL/
Bottom Ply
at End-Lap
EndLap
Slotting
in Panel
Wood Bearing
Resistance
Slotting in
Wood
Sny
Snx
Sny
Snx
Force Vectors on Panel
Corner Connections
Note: See theory adjustment in Example 1a for variation of support connection shear strength
along a panel length, L Modified Eqs. D1-1 and D1-2.
Let: Pnfe = 0.5 Pnf at exterior supports in one ply
Pnfi = Pnf at interior supports in one ply
Pnfe Pnfi
]
Pnfi L
P
= n s s + 2n p 2p + 4 2e nfe
Pnfi
Pnfe
= 0.5
Pnfi
Example 3a
Page 49
Note: Snc considers both orthogonal force components at a corner connection in each panel.
At the two-ply end-lap, the opposing components in each panel that are parallel with
the wood support will cancel in the screw shank so Snc will not be limited by wood
bearing. Instead, steel bearing in one ply will control since both components are
present. The additive longitudinal limitation is in Sni. For the end-lap case, Snc will
be based on Pnfe = 0.996 k at the end-lap per ply and 0.887 k at interior supports.
Many engineers would neglect this refinement. In the case of five spans, the benefit
is a little academic, but it is there.
Calculate Snc based on Pnfe = 0.996 k:
P
= n s s + 2n p 2p nfi + 4 2e
Pnfe
0.450 kips
P
s = ns =
= 0.452
Pnf 0.996 kips
0.887
= 19(0.452) + 2(5)(0.446 )
+ (4)(0.446) = 14.3
0.996
Eq. D1-6
0.5
0.5
(1.33)2 (14.3)2 2
2
2
N
ft
S nc = 2 2
=
0.996 k = 0.447 klf
2
L N + 2
ft
2
2
2
(30) (1.33)
+ (14.3)
ft 2
3 3
7890 I xg t d
Eq. D2.1-1
S nb =
L v 2 s
Note: See Panel Data for parameters. Required units are defined in Section D2.1.
Coefficient, 7890, includes necessary adjustments See Commentary Section D2.1.
Eq. D2.1-2
Page 50
Example 3a
2
13.2 in.
(1)(5 ft)
Result:
Snb = 2.02 klf
0.25
= 2.02 klf
LRFD
S
S
Sn
= min nf , nb
df db
Sn
0.444 2.02
= min
,
= 0.148 klf
2
3
S n = min( df S nf , db S nb )
Et
K
G' =
Eq. D5.1.1-1
2(1 + ) s + D + C
c n
d
K = 0.5
For panel on wood supports
E = 29500 ksi
s = 13.2 in. From determination of Snb
= 0.3 (Poissons ratio for steel)
d = 12 in.
From the Panel Data
t = 0.024 in.
Calculate warping factor, Dn, using Section 1.4 (Appendix 1):
Dn =
L
U D + U2D2 + U 3D3 + U 4D 4
D = 1 1
U1 + U2 + U3 + U4
Eq. 1.4-1
Eq. 1.4-2
This example only requires D1 See Diaphragm Configuration and Panel Data
U3 = 0
U1 = 3
U2 = 0
U4 = 0
Note: D1 is calculated using the detailed method in Example 2d. The designer should
verify t1 and expect some round-off variation:
D1 =
Example 3a
1f
Eq. 1.4-3
d(t )1.5
t1 = 1.15
Eq. 1.4-11
in. 3
24 f
1 = t1 =
2 t1
t1 4f (f + w)
0.25
1.15 3
24(1.0 in.)
in.
=
2
1
1.15 3 4(1 in.) (1 in. + 1.6 in.)
in.
D1 =
D =
Page 51
= 269 in.
Eq. 1.4-3
3(269 in.) + 0 + 0 + 0
= 269 in.
3+0+0+0
Eq. 1.4-2
Result:
269 in.
= 0.747
12 in.
(30 ft)
ft
= 0.64
Dn =
c
Eq. 1.4-1
Table 1.3-1
2L
Et
S
C=
f
w 2 + n + 2n S f
3
p 4
s
Ss
xe
3 = 4 =
See Figure D1-1 for xe and Example 3a Configuration
w
x e1 = 3.75 in.
x e3 = 8.25 in.
x e2 = x e4 = 15.75 in.
3 = 4 =
Eq. D5.1.1-2
Eq. D5.1.1-3
Note: xe and w are used for both interior panels and edge panels, and G should be evaluated
with the dominant interior panels.
Calculate screw flexibilities:
1.5(1)
1.5
in.
=
= 0.00968
kip
1000 t 1000 0.024 in.
3.0(1)
3.0
in.
Ss =
=
= 0.0194
kip
1000 t 1000 .024 in.
Sf =
Eq. D5.2.3-1
Eq. D5.2.2-2
Page 52
Example 3a
in.
ft
C=
in.
36 in.
0.00968
0.0194
k
in.
0.5 = 42.5 k
G' =
2(1 + 0.3) 13.2 in. + 0.64(0.747) + 5.00
in.
12
in.
Eq. D5.1.1-1
Example 3b
Page 53
+
=
d Pnf Pnov
= 2.35
d = 3.00 (Wood)
Eq. D3.1.2.1-2
(Section D1.1.4.1)
Note: The given limits in AISI S100 Section E4.5.1.1 are slightly exceeded. This example,
however, will apply the design provisions for illustrative purposes. Since the pullover and shear interaction considers failure in steel, d = 2.35 could be used to
determine available strength at this limit. The conservative wood system d = 3.00
will be used in the example.
Page 54
Example 3b
At interior supports:
screws
N = 1.33
ft
0.275 k ft
T =
= 0.207 k screw
1.33 screws ft
See Example 3a
See Load Data
Note: See AISI Cold-Formed Steel Design Manual, 2013 Edition, Table IV-11a for screw head
diameter, dh.
dh = 0.409 in. (screw head diameter for #14 support screw)
tw = 0.040 in. (washer thickness estimate)
'
AISI S100 Eq. E4.4.2-2
d = d + 2t + t d
w
= 0.409 in. + 2(0.04 in.) + 0.024 in. = 0.513 in. < 0.625 in. OK
For domed washer, dw < 3/4 in. per AISI S100 Section E4.4.2.
For one-panel thickness and uniform pull-over,
k
Pnf
1 .0
2.35
1.15 k
Note: See Section D3.1.2.2. Pull-over interaction relates to steel, so wood bearing is
excluded as a limit on Pnf. However, wood bearing is included at pull-out
interaction - See (b) below.
Result of Pnft at interior support controlled by pull-over:
Pnft = 1.0(0.996 k) = 0.996 k
no reduction
At exterior supports:
0.100 k ft
T =
= 0.075 k screw
1.33 screws ft
Pnft
Pnf
Example 3b
Page 55
no reduction
Note: The Case (a) results indicate that for a relatively short span and multiple support
connections as shown in this example, the pull-over strength over wood support
does not reduce the diaphragm strength at 50 psf uplift.
(b) Interaction of shear and pull-out (Section D3.1.2.2)
Calculate Pnft:
Pnft
'
Pnfw
cos
P'
Eq. D3.1.2.2-1a
'
Pnfw
= Pnfw
For h s 7d
Eq. D3.1.2.2-6
From Example 3a
Pnfw = 0.887 k
h s = 1.87 in. 7d = 1.74 in. From Example 3a (for 2 in. long screw)
'
Pnfw
= 0.887 k
Eq. D3.1.2.2-6
PnT = 6.16G 2 dh s
Eq. D3.1.2.2-7
S100 Section E4.5.2.1 does not require eccentricity reduction for pull-out.
At interior supports:
0.275 k ft
T =
= 0.207 k screw
1.33 screws ft
Page 56
Example 3b
Eq. D3.1.2.2-7
3
To determine Pnft from Eq. D3.1.2.2-1a, iteration is needed. Assume Pnft = 0.475 k:
P
0.475 k
k
Required shear strength in presence of T = 0.207 k
Let V = nft =
= 0.158
3
screw
Pnft
0.475 k
=
= 0.536
Based on assumption
'
Pnfw 0.887k
0.207 k
= tan 1
= 52.6 degree
0.158 k
Pnft
0.607
=
= 0.537
'
Pnfw (0.607 )2 + 0.887 k (0.794 )2
0.733 k
Eq. D3.1.2.2-2a
Eq. D3.1.2.2-1a
= 0.475 k/ screw
The strength is controlled by wood bearing (against screw shank), and is reduced
due to shear and tension interaction.
3
Try 2- in. long screws for consistency with interior supports.
PnT = 0.733 k from above
Pull-out available strength (no shear):
PnT 0.733 k
=
= 0.244 k > 0.150 k
OK in tension only
Eq. D3.1.2.2-6
Example 3b
Page 57
P
0.700 k
k
Let V = nft =
Required shear strength in presence of T = 0.150 k
= 0.233
3
screw
Pnft
0.700 k
=
= 0.789
Based on assumption
'
0.887k
Pnfw
0.150 k
= tan 1
= 32.8 degree
0.233 k
Pnft
0.841
=
= 0.791
'
Pnfw (0.841)2 + 0.887 k (0.542 )2
0.733 k
Pnft = 0.791(0.887 k) = 0.702 k
Close enough to assumed 0.700 k
Eq. D3.1.2.2-2a
Eq. D3.1.2.2-1a
= 0.700 k/ screw
The strength is controlled by wood bearing (against screw shank) and is reduced
due to shear and tension interaction.
At the end-lap
At interior supports
The opposing forces at the end-lap eliminate the force component in the screw shank that
is parallel to the wood support and that is considered in Snc. Both components are in the
top panel ply in steel bearing at Snc. The additive force in the shank parallel to panel span
is considered in Sni.
Calculate Sni controlled by pull-out based on Pnfi = 0.475 k, Pnfe = 0.350 k:
Note: See theory adjustment in Example 1a for variation of support connection shear strength
along a panel length, L Modified Eqs. D1-1 and D1-2.
P
P P
P
S ni = 2A( 1) nfe + n s ns + 2 n p 2p + 4 2e nfe nfi
Pnfi
Pnfi
Pnfi L
P
= n s s + 2n p 2p + 4 2e nfe
Pnfi
Page 58
Example 3b
0.450 kips
P
s = ns =
= 0.947
Pnf 0.475 kips
Eq. D1-6
0.350
= 23.8
0.475
0.350 k
0.475 k
S ni = (2)(0.0)(0 .832 1)
+ 23.8
0.475
k
30 ft
= 0.377 klf
P
S ni = 2A( 1) + n s ns + 2n p 2p
Pnfe
P
= n s s + 2n p 2p nfi + 4 2e
Pnfe
P
Pnfi
+ 4 2e nfe
Pnfe
L
0.450 kips
P
s = ns =
= 0.452
Pnf 0.996 kips
= 19(0.452) + 2(5)(0.446 )
Eq. D1-6
0.475 k
+ 4(0.446) = 12.5
0.996 k
1.33 1 (12.5)2
0
.
5
N 2 2
ft
Pnfe =
S nc = 2 2
2
L N + 2
ft
= 0.396 klf
0.5
0.996 k
Eq.D1-2
Note: Uplift pressure (50 psf) reduces the diaphragm strength by 15% (0.444 klf to 0.377 klf)
even when the support screw length is increased to 2-1/2 in. The interior support
connection shear strength was reduced by 46% (0.887 k to 0.475 k), so the benefit of the
side-lap screws shows up.
(c) Interaction of shear and tension in screw (Section D3.1.2.1 or AISI S100 Section E4.5.3.1)
Pnft t T
+
= 1.3
Pnf Pnts
t = 3.0
Pnts = 3.2 k
Eq. D3.1.2.1-10
Note: Pnf should be Pnss (= 2.7 k) in equation; conservatively use Pnf = 0.887 k (from
Example 3a).
At interior supports:
0.275 k ft
T =
= 0.207 k screw
1.33 screws ft
Pnft
Pnf
Example 3b
3(0.207 k)
= 1.3
= 1.11
3.2 k
At exterior support:
0.200 k ft
T =
= 0.150 k screw
1.33 screws ft
Pnft
Pnf
3(0.150 k)
= 1.3
= 1.16
3.2 k
Page 59
No reduction
Eq. D3.1.2.1-10
Eq. D3.1.2.1-10
Result of Case (c): Since the screw failure does not reduce or control the diaphragm
strength, the nominal diaphragm strength is the same as that in Example 3a.
Same as end-lap
No reduction
Same as end-lap
No reduction
Same as end-lap
At exterior supports:
T = 0.075 k/screw
Using same iterative process as at end-lap:
Assume: Pnft = 0.845 k
'
= 0.887 k
Pnfw
0.845 k
k
= 0.282
3
screw
Eq. D3.1.2.2-6
Page 60
Example 3b
Pnft
'
Pnfw
0.845 k
= 0.953
0.887k
Based on assumption
0.075 k
= tan 1
= 14.9 degree
0.282 k
Pnft
0.966
=
= 0.954
'
Pnfw (0.966 )2 + 0.887 k (0.257 )2
0.733 k
Pnft = 0.954(0.887 k) = 0.846 k
Close enough to assumed 0.845 k
Eq. D3.1.2.2-2a
Eq. D3.1.2.2-1a
Eq. D1-6
0.845
0.475
= 25.6
0.845 k
0.475 k
S ni = (2)(0.0)(.832 1)
+ 25.6
0.475 k
30 ft
= 0.405 klf
Note: See Example 3a discussion about end-lap. Snc is based on Pnfe, and there is one ply
at end for butt-joint so both components apply to screw shank.
s =
0.450 kips
= 0.533
0.845 kips
= 19(0.533) + 2(5)(0.446 )
0.475
+ 4(0.446) = 14.4
0.845
1.33 1 (14.4)2
0
.
5
2
2
N
ft
Pnfe =
S nc = 2 2
2
2
L N +
ft
0.5
Example 3b
Page 61
Note:: The answer is about the same as the design at the end-lap (1% increase from 0.377 klf
to 0.382 klf). The controlling limit state changed from Sni to Snc. The case of one end
with end-lap and one without end-lap is between the two.
(c) Interaction of shear and tension in screw
At interior supports:
T = 0.207 k/screw
At exterior supports:
T = 0.075 k/screw
Pnft
Pnf
3(0.075 k)
= 1.3
= 1.23
3.2 k
No reduction
S nf = 0.437 klf
Page 62
Example 3c
Example 3c: Nominal Diaphragm Shear Strength per Unit Length, Sn, With Fiberglass
Insulation
Objective
Use the diaphragm configuration of Example 3a and calculate the nominal diaphragm shear
strength per unit length, Sn, and the available strength with R-19 fiberglass insulation over
supports and beneath the panel. Compare the impact with no insulation.
Note: The Section D1.3 limits (a) to (f) are met. Sections D1.3 and D1.3.1.1 are used for the
design.
All support screws are at interior flutes in this configuration; side-lap is not fastened to
the support. The support screws diaphragm shear contribution at interior flutes is
neglected but the connection provides uplift resistance.
The shear and tension interaction is not considered since shear resistance is not
provided by support connections.
The R-19 insulation will be compressed to less than 3/8 in. thickness beneath the
panel.
Determine Available Strength per Eqs. D-1 and D-2
Safety and resistance factors are in Section B and Section D1.1.4.1:
S
S
Sn
= min nf , nb for ASD
df db
S nf = min (S ni , S nc , S ne )
Note: Snf is in Section D1.3, and Snb is in Section D2. Strength will be determined with and
without uplift. Sne is calculated in Example 3d.
Calculate Nominal Diaphragm Shear Strength per Unit Length Controlled by Panel Screws, Snf
Calculate support connection strength, Pnf (Section D1.3):
Pnf = 0 k Interior flute with insulation beneath the panel
n s Pns 19(0.450 k)
=
= 0.285 klf
L
30 ft
Eq. D1.3.1.1-1
Example 3c
Page 63
Eq. D1.1.4.2-2
Result:
S nf = 0.285 klf
No Uplift
Calculate Nominal Diaphragm Shear Strength per Unit Length, Snf, Controlled by Panel Screws in
the Presence of Uplift
Load Data
Wind uplift zone = 50 psf (0.05 ksf)
Uplift reactions are the same as Example 3b.
Note: There is no shear and tension interaction since the diaphragm does not resist shear in
the support connections.
Result: S nf = 0.285 klf
With Uplift
At interior supports
Page 64
Example 3c
Pnov 0.575 k
=
= 0.230 k > 0.207 k OK for pull-over
2.50
At exterior supports:
T = 0.075 k/screw
2.50
OK for pull-over
Note: Since pull-over failure is steel-related, use = 2.5 (rational engineering analysis per
AISI S100 Section A1.2(c)) in lieu of more severe = 3, which is consistent with
d = 3.0 at wood supports (Section D1.1.4.1).
Determine the pull-out nominal strength of the #14 2- in. long screw:
Note: Pull-out strength is not impacted by insulation. Pnot is the same as Example 3b.
PnT = 6.16( 1)(0.45)2 ( 0.248)( 2.37 ) = 0.733 k
Eq. D3.1.2.2-7
At interior supports:
T = 0.207 k/screw
3.00
At exterior supports:
T = 0.150 k/screw
OK for pull-out
3.00
OK for pull-out
3.00
Result:
Connection configuration of Example 3b is acceptable to resist the required uplift load of
50 psf with insulation between panel and support based on rational engineering analysis.
Example 3c Results (With R-19 Insulation Between Panel and Support)
Example 3c
Page 65
Section D1.1.4.1
Page 66
Example 3d
Example 3d: Edge Connections and Details Parallel to the Edge Panel Span
Objective
Determine the required edge connections and details parallel to the edge panel span so that Sne
exceeds Sn:
Part 1 - With insulation from Example 3c, 0.285 klf (with or without uplift), and
Part 2 - Without insulation from Example 3a, 0.437 klf (without uplift).
Edge Support
Transverse Support
Starting Condition
Ending Condition
Example 3d
Page 67
t = 0.036 in.
Fy = 50 ksi
Fu = 65 ksi
Note: Use Section D1.1.2 (AISI S100 E4.3). Try same screw and spacing as at panel side-lap
(#12 1 in. long)
t
t 2 0.036 in.
1 < 2 < 2.5
=
= 1.5
t1
t 1 0.024 in.
( )1
1
k
= 4.2 ((0.036 in.) 3 (0.216 in.)) 2 (65 2 ) = 0.867 k
in.
Pns = 2.7t1dFu1
k
in.2
) = 0.868 k
Pns = 2.7t2dFu2
) = 1.36 k
in.2
See Connection Schedule
1.5 1.0
(0.868 k 0.867 k ) = 0.867 k
2.5 1
Note: Use Section D1.1.4.2 (AISI S100 E4.3.1). Use same screw as at wood transverse
supports in Example 3c (#14 screw 2-1/2 in. long with 5/8 in. round sealing
washer required for uplift).
Pnfw = 1.97G = 1.97(0.45) = 0.887 k
k
Table D1.1.4.2-1
Table D1.1.4.2-1
Result:
Pnfs = min(0.887 k, 1.57 k, 2.70 k) = 0.887 k Screw bearing against wood controls shear
strength at edge support.
Page 68
Example 3d
Calculate required screw spacing along Zee bottom flat at starting condition:
Typical and maximum Zee length is 10 ft due to press-brake limits.
k
Pnfs 0.887 conn.
SnL
L
ft
ne =
or
=
=
= 3.11
k
Pnfs
ne
Sn
conn.
0.285
ft
Calculate required screw spacing between panel and Zee top flat:
k
L Pnfs 0.867 conn.
ft
=
=
= 3.04
> 20 in. o.c.
k
conn.
ne
Sn
0.285
ft
Eq. D4.4-1
= 8 ft
= 5 ft
Note: Could use 2 in. long screws without sealing washers along the wood edge supports.
The 50 psf uplift of Example 3b is resisted by the transverse support connections at
the starting edge panel. 2-1/2 in. long screw should be used with sealing washer if
only one screw type is used on the project.
It is also acknowledged that the secondary (x-axis) force on bottom flat screws is
negligible from study in Example 2c.
Calculate shear stress in reinforcing Zee:
Note: Use 2 in. tributary length at the Zee bottom flat assume 1- in. flange. Because
panel has a 1 in. top flat, use a 1-1/2 in tributary length at the top flat.
ASD Available Diaphragm Strength = 0.095 klf
From Example 3c
M1 = 0.5 in.(0.095 klf) = 0.048 in. k/ ft
M2 = 0.75 in.(0.095 klf) = 0.071 in. k/ ft
Example 3d
Page 69
Bottom
Flat
Bottom
Flat
Top
Flat
Web
M1
2 in.
M1
1- in.
M1 + M2
P
in.
P
in.
Calculate St. Venant shear stress in Zee web (see Example 2c):
in.k
3(0.048)
3M 1
ft = 9.26 ksi
SVv = 2 =
bt
in.3
12(0.036) 2
ft
Calculate total shear stress in Zee web:
fv v + SV = 3.96 + 9.26 = 13.2 ksi At outer edges of web
v
Determine nominal shear strength, Fv, of web (AISI S100 Section C3.2.1):
h
1.25 in.
=
= 34.7
t 0.036 in.
For
h
Ek v
t
Fy
Ek v
Fy
Fv = 0.6(50 ksi) = 30 ksi
18.8 ksi > 13.2 ksi OK
Fv = 0.6Fy
Fv
30
=
= 18.8 ksi
1.6 1.6
Using rational screw locations and a conservative
(tributary length) approximation
Page 70
Example 3d
Note: The gap between the panel and the supports is less than 3/8 in., but an edge support
fastener is not located in the panels bottom flat at the starting condition. A detail is
required per Section D1.3 to develop Sne.
The starting detail requires a 1- in. deep Reinforcing Zee. Pnfs can be calculated
using Section D1.1.
Part 2 - Starting Condition Without Insulation
Design reinforcing Zee to transfer Sn = 0.437 klf:
Try:
t = 0.048 in.
Fy = 50 ksi
Fu = 65 ksi
Example 3d
Page 71
Pns = 0.868 k +
2.0 1.0
(0.868 k 0.868 k ) = 0.868 k
2.5 1
Note: Use Section D1.1.4.2 and same screw as at wood transverse supports.
Pnss = 2.7 k
Table D1.1.4.2-1
k
) = 2.09 k
in.2
From Connection Schedule in Example 3a
Table D1.1.4.2-1
Calculate required screw spacing along Zee bottom flat at starting condition:
k
L Pnfs 0.887 conn.
ft
=
=
= 2.03
k
ne
Sn
conn.
0.437
ft
Page 72
Example 3d
Calculate St. Venant shear stress in Zee web (See Example 2c):
in.k
3(0.073)
3M 1
ft = 7.92 ksi
SVv =
=
2
bt
in.3
12(0.048)2
ft
Calculate total shear stress in Zee web:
fv v + SV = 3.39 + 7.92 = 11.3 ksi At outer edges of web
v
Example 3d
Page 73
Determine nominal shear strength, Fv, of web (AISI S100 Section C3.2.1):
h
1.25 in.
=
= 26.0
t 0.048 in.
Fv 30
=
= 18.8 ksi
1.6 1.6
Using rational screw locations and a conservative
(tributary length) approximation
Calculate required screw spacing between ripped edge panel and edge support:
k
0.887
L Pnfs
conn. = 2.03 ft
=
=
k
conn.
ne
Sn
0.437
ft
Result of Part 2 at ending condition without insulation:
Panel to the edge support:
Use: #14 2 in. long screw with 5/8 in. round sealing washer
Spacing:
Install in line with transverse supports
5 ft
Install at 1/3 points between transverse supports = 1.67 ft < 2.03 ft
3
Calculate diaphragm strength of partial-width panel:
Try side-lap screws at 15 in. o.c. at last side-lap between last full- and partial-width panel
(screws at quarter points rather than third points per span.)
1
(0.75 in.)2 + (12.75 in.)2 + (11.25 in.) 2 = 0.397
2e = 2p =
(27 in.)2
3 screws
screws
N =
= 1.33
2.25 ft
ft
30 ft(12 in. ft )
ns =
+ 1.0 = 25
in
15
conn.
Page 74
Example 3d
Typical Side-Lap
11.25 in.
2.25 in.
12.75 in.
0.75 in.
27 in.
Wood
Support
(1.33)2 (18.2)2 2
ft
S nc =
2
ft
2
(30)2 (1.33)2
+
(18.2)
ft 2
Result:
Eq. D1-5
0.5
Note: If additional side-lap screws are not added (keep spacing = 20 in. o.c.), = 15.2 and
Snf = 0.420 klf or 4% reduction vs. 0.437 klf. Some designers might let this go.
Result of Part 2 - Example 3d at Ending Condition Without Insulation:
Use: #12 1 in. long screw with 1/2 in. round sealing washer at the side-lap between the last
full-width panel and the partial-width edge panel. Spacing = 15 in. o.c.
Use: #14 2 in. long screw with 5/8 in. round sealing washer. Spacing along edge support:
Install in line with transverse supports; and
Install at 1/3 points between transverse supports.
Note: If diaphragm will experience an uplift event (say 50 psf), 2-1/2 in. long screws might
be required. Part 2 considered no uplift.
Example 4a
Page 75
Example 4a
Example 4b
Note: The calculation process described in this example may be used to determine the
strength of a multiple-span diaphragm that matches the test results of a single-span
diaphragm with the same configuration. The objective is to have the multiple-span
diaphragm strength equivalent to that of the single-span diaphragm by increasing the
number of interior support connections. Chapter D is used for the strength
comparison, and uplift is not considered in this example. If uplift is present, the
impact must be investigated in design.
Diaphragm Configuration
Note: The following configuration may be tested as a single span.
12 in.
Side-Lap
Screw
4 in.
PAF
4 support PAFs per 24 in. wide DR deck with one common Pattern = 24/4
Deck Data
See Deep Rib Deck (DR) in Commentary Table C-1.1a.
See Figure D2.1-1 for definitions of deck parameters.
SDI Generic load table shows: DL +LL ASD available flexural strength
= 43 psf
Page 76
Example 4a
Note: Chapter D limits (a) through (d) are satisfied. Therefore, the provisions of Section D1
will be used. Material is based on ASTM 1008 SS Grade 40. Deck profile will provide
the required edge dimensionsDesigner to verify.
Steel Support Data
Yield stress, Fy = 50 ksi
Tensile strength, Fu
Thickness, t
= 0.25 in.
= 62 ksi
Connection Schedule
Support connection:
Pattern = 24/4 See configuration above.
Power-Actuated Fastener (PAF): Test-based strength and flexibility equations are obtained
from the PAF manufacturer
Pnpa = 3.0 k
PAF nominal shear breaking strength
Pntp = 5.0 k
Side-lap connection:
#10 screw
Pnss
= 1.5 k
Spacing = 3 ft 0 in. o.c.
Note:
d = 0.190 in.
Screw nominal shear breaking strength
(Between supports)
Example 4a
Page 77
df db
S nf = min(S ni , S nc , S ne )
S n = min( df S nf , db S nb )
for ASD
Note: Snf is in Section D1, Snb is in Section D2, and Sne is in Section D1.
Calculate Nominal Diaphragm Shear Strength per Unit Length Controlled by Connections, Snf,
Using Section D1
P
S ni = [2A( 1) + ] nf
L
Eq. D1-1
0.5
N 2 2
Pnf
S nc = 2 2
Eq. D1-2
2
L
N
+
Note: Snf, is minimum of Sni and Snc. This example requires that sufficient edge connections
will be provided at the edge panels parallel with the deck span so that Sne will not
control Snf. The same Pnf value will be used at all supports.
Calculate support connection strength, Pnf (Section D1.1.3):
Use the equation provided by the manufacturer, which is applicable within the following
limits:
Support thickness: t 0.250 in.
Panel thickness: 0.028 in. t 0.060 in.
Manufacturer-provided equation
Pnf = 60t(1 2t), k for t in in.
Note: The above manufacturer-provided equation is only applicable for a specific PAF. It
cannot be used for other PAFs. Each equation is test-based.
Calculate side-lap connection strength, Pns (Section D1.2.5 or AISI S100 E4.3.1):
t 2 0.036 in.
t
Fu2 = Fu1
=
= 1.0 Therefore, 2 1.0
t 1 0.036 in.
t1
( )1
1
k
= 4.2 ((0.036 in.) 3 (0.19 in.)) 2 (52 2 )
in.
= 0.960 k
Page 78
Example 4a
3 PAF
PAF
= 1.50
2 ft
ft
np =
L
12 ft
1=
1 = 0.0
Lv
12 ft
Eq. D1-5
Eq. D1-9
in.
(12 ft) 12
12 ft
ft
ns =
1
=3
in.
12 ft
36 conn.
P
0.650 k
s = ns =
= 0.325
Pnf
2.0 k
Eq. D1-6
Eq. D1-8
1
2e = 2p = 2 x 2e
w
xe1 = xe3 = 4.00 in.
1
2 (4 in.)2 + 2(12 in.)2 = 0.556
=
(24 in.)2
Eq. D1-5
0. 5
(1.50 )2 (3.20) 2
ft
Pnf =
(12 ft) 2 (1.50 1 )2 + (3.20) 2
ft
Eq. D1-1
0.5
Eq. D1-2
Example 4a
Page 79
Calculate nominal diaphragm shear strength per unit length controlled by panel buckling,
Snb, using Section D2.1:
3 3
7890 I xg t d
S nb =
L v 2 s
0.25
Eq. D2.1-1
Note: See Panel Data for parameters. Required units are defined in Section D2.1.
Coefficient, 7890, includes necessary adjustments See Commentary Section D2.1.
= 1 Conversion factor for U.S. customary units
s = 2e + 2w + f = 1.49 in. + 2(3.07 in.) + 5.24 in. = 12.87 in.
4
3
3
(0.781 in. ft ) (0.036 in.) (8.0 in.)
S nb =
12.87 in.
(1)(12 ft)2
Eq. D2.1-2
0.25
7890
= 3.34 klf
L = 24 ft
= 0.7
s = 0.325
2p = 2e = 0.556
Pns = 0.650 k
Pnf = 2 k
N = 1.50
np =
L
24 ft
1=
1 = 1.00
Lv
12 ft
in.
(12 ft) 12
Lv
L
24 ft
ft
n s =
=6
1
=
1
12 ft
Spacing
L v 36 in.
conn.
2.00 k
= 0.391 klf
24 ft
PAF
ft
Eq. D1-9
Eq. D1-5
Eq. D1-1
Page 80
Example 4a
(1.50 ) 2 (5.29) 2
ft
S nc =
(24 ft)2 (1.50 1 )2 + (5.29) 2
ft
0.5
Eq. D1-2
Eq. D2.1-1
Result of two-spans:
S n = 0.391 klf
Note: This is 10% less than the single-span case (0.433 klf), and indicates that additional
interior support connections are required to obtain the strength equivalent to that of
the single-span.
Try new interior support connection configuration (no change at exterior support):
12 in.
2 support PAFs
per Flute
at Side-Lap
4 in.
6 support PAFs per 24 in. wide DR deck with two common Pattern = 24/6
1
2(4 in.)2 + 2(2)(12 in.)2 = 1.06
2p =
(24 in.)2
(1.50 )2 (6.29)2
ft
S nc =
(24 ft)2 (1.50 1 )2 + (6.29)2
ft
Eq. D1-8
Eq. D1-5
Eq. D1-1
0.5
Eq. D1-2
Example 4a
Page 81
Eq. D2.1-1
OK as compared to the single-span
Sn = 0.433 klf
Note: The number of interior support connections increases 33% (4 per cover width vs. 3 per
cover width) and the nominal shear diaphragm strength is 9.5% greater than that of a
single-span with the same configuration.
Calculate equivalence based on additional interior support connections at three spans:
See equivalent two-span calculation for: , , , s , 2e , 2p , Pns , Pnf
L = 36 ft
in.
(12 ft) 12
36 ft
ft
ns =
1
=9
36 in.
12 ft
conn.
np =
L
36 ft
1=
1 = 2.0
Lv
12 ft
(1.50 )2 (9.39)2
ft
S nc =
(36 ft)2 (1.50 1 )2 + (9.39)2
ft
Eq. D1-5
Eq. D1-1
0.5
Eq. D1-2
Note: The number of interior support connections increases 33% (4 per cover width vs. 3 per
cover width), and the nominal diaphragm shear strength is 13% greater than that of a
single span with the same configuration.
Result Example 4a
The proposed 24/6 pattern configuration at the interior supports provides an equivalent
nominal diaphragm shear strength per unit length relative to the single-span configuration while
all other parameters are held constant.
Note: Although the trial configuration provides more strength than needed, physically
cannot add less than one PAF per interior support per DR cover width.
Comparing the two- and three-span cases, the two-span case is slightly more severe:
0.474 klf vs. 0.488 klf in this example, where Sni controls the resistance.
The extra connection at the interior support increased nominal strength from 0.391klf to
0.474 klf or 21% at the two-span case.
Page 82
Example 4b
Note: Interior support connection numbers are the parameter for equivalence. Diaphragm
configuration that might be tested as a single span is the same as Example 4a with one
modification.
Connection Schedule
Side-lap connection:
#10 screw
Pnss
= 1.5 kips
d = 0.190 in.
Screw nominal shear breaking strength
(Between supports)
Note: A 6 in. o.c. side-lap spacing is a very close spacing. Some designers might consider
this the limit (or impractical) and will require either more support connections, a
different side-lap connection, or greater deck thickness to increase diaphragm strength
rather than placing side-lap screws more closely together.
Calculate Nominal Diaphragm Shear Strength per Unit Length Controlled by Connections, Snf, for
the Single-Span Case Using Section D1
See single-span calculation in Example 4a for: , , n p , , s , 2e , Pns , Pnf
L = 12 ft
Eq. D1-5
in.
(12 ft) 12
12 ft
ft
12
ft
6
conn.
Eq. D1-5
S ni = [2(1.0)(0.700 1) + 9.70]
2.00 k
12 ft
(1.50 )2 (9.7) 2
ft
S nc =
(12 ft) 2 (1.50 1 )2 + (9.7)2
ft
= 1.52 klf
Eq. D1-1
0.5
Eq. D1-2
Eq. D2.1-1
Example 4b
Page 83
S n = 1.42 klf
Note: Diaphragm strength is controlled by the corner connections at the deck ends. The sidelap screw increase (23 vs. 3) increases Sn from 0.433 klf to 1.42 klf with a ratio of
1.42/0.433 = 3.28.
Calculate an Equivalent Multiple-Span Configuration
Calculate nominal diaphragm shear strength per unit length in a two-span application with
the same support connections at interior and exterior supports as the single-span case:
See single-span calculation for parameters: , , , s , 2p , 2e , Pns , Pnf
L = 24 ft Two-span case with Lv = 12 ft
Eq. D1-5
in.
(12 ft) 12
24 ft
ft
ns =
1
= 46
in.
12 ft
6
conn.
0.5
1
(1.50 )2 (18.3) 2
ft
2.00 k = 1.36 klf
S nc =
(24 ft)2 (1.50 1 )2 + (18.3) 2
ft
S n = 1.36 klf
Eq. D1-5
Eq. D1-1
Eq. D1-2
Eq. D2.1-1
Note: Diaphragm strength is controlled by the corner connections at the deck ends. Reduction
is 4% and some designers would let go: 1.36 klf 1.42 klf . This implies that many sidelap connections could require no increase in support connections to apply single-span
test results to multiple-span applications.
Calculate equivalence based on additional interior support connections:
Try the same increased interior support connection configuration (Pattern = 24/6) as in
Example 4a in the two-span case (no change at exterior support):
See two-span calculation in Example 4b for: , L, , n s , n p , , s , 2e , Pns , Pnf
See two-span equivalent calculations in Example 4a for extra support connections.
2p = 1.06
= n s s + 2n p 2p + 4 2e
Eq. D1-5
Page 84
Example 4b
Eq. D1-1
0.5
1
(1.50 )2 (19.3) 2
ft
2.00 k = 1.42 klf
S nc =
(24 ft)2 (1.50 1 )2 + (19.3) 2
ft
Eq. D1-2
Eq. D2.1-1
OK as compared to
S n = 1.42 klf at single span
Try the same interior support connection configuration (Pattern = 24/6) as in Example 4a in a
three-span case (no change at exterior support):
See two-span equivalent calculations in Example 4b for: , , , s , 2e , 2p , Pns , Pnf
L = 36 ft Three-span case with Lv = 12 ft
np =
L
36 ft
1=
1 = 2.0
Lv
12 ft
in.
(12 ft) 12
36ft
ft
ns =
1
= 69
in.
12 ft
6
conn.
(1.50 )2 (28.9) 2
ft
S nc =
(36 ft)2 (1.50 1 )2 + (28.9)2
ft
Eq. D1-5
Eq. D1-1
0.5
Eq. D1-2
Eq. D2.1-1
OK as compared to
Result Example 4b
The proposed 24/6 pattern configuration at the interior supports provides an equivalent
nominal diaphragm shear strength per unit length relative to the single-span configuration
while all other parameters are held constant.
Example 4b
Page 85
Note: When side-lap connections are very close in a configuration, it may not be efficient to
add additional interior support connections to increase the diaphragm strength. These
additional interior support connections can only increase the strength slightly. It might
be more efficient to add exterior support connections and hold interior support
connections constant. The following calculation illustrates the effectiveness of
increasing the exterior support connections:
Calculate equivalence based on additional exterior support connections:
Try 24/6 pattern at exterior supports and 24/4 pattern at interior supports at three-span case:
Collect configuration parameters required for Snf:
A = 2.0
s = 0.325
2p
N =
= 0.7
np = 2
Pnf = 2 kips
= 0.556
2e
ns
4 PAF
PAF
= 2.00
2 ft
ft
= 1.06
= 69
Calculate Snf:
S ni = [2(1.0)(0.700 1) + 28.9]
2.00 k
36 ft
(2.0 )2 (28.9)2
ft
S nc =
(36 ft)2 (2.0 1 )2 + (28.9)2
ft
Result:
= 1.57 klf
0.5
Note: In this configuration, the addition of end connections is more efficient where Snc
controls Sn. At the three-span case for a butt-jointed panel, this configuration requires
the same number of additional support connections (two at panel ends vs. two at
interior supports) but provides greater strength (1.49 klf vs. 1.42 klf).
Page 86
Example 5a
Example 5a: Available Diaphragm Shear Strength in the Absence of Uplift Where the
Support Thickness Approaches the Panel Thickness
Objective
Calculate the nominal and available diaphragm shear strength per unit length in the absence of
uplift using Chapter D where the support thickness approaches the panel thickness.
Diaphragm Configuration
Deck
Support
Typical Side-lap
18 in.
Screw connection
6 in.
Support
Flange
4 support screws per 36 in. wide deck with one screw common - Pattern 36/4
Deck Data
See Wide Rib Deck (WR) in Commentary Table C-1.1a.
See Figure D2.1-1 for definitions of deck parameters.
Yield stress, Fy
Tensile strength, Fu
Depth, Dd
Thickness, t
Top flat width, f
Bottom flat width, 2e
Moment of Inertia, Ixg
= 80 ksi
= 82 ksi
= 1.47 in.
= 0.036 in.
= 3.56 in.
= 1.56 in.
= 0.190 in.4/ft
Modulus of Elasticity, E
Panel Length, L
Cover width, w
Pitch, d
Web flat width, w
= 29500 ksi
= 20.0 ft
= 36.0 in.
= 6.00 in.
= 1.53 in.
Note: Chapter D limits (a) through (d) are satisfied. Therefore, Section D1 is used to
determine the diaphragm strength.
Example 5a
Page 87
Specified material is ASTM A653 SS Grade 80. AISI S100 Section A2.3.3 design
requirements apply. Use: Fy = 60 ksi Fu = 62 ksi
Edge dimensions must be checked using AISI S100 Sections E4.1 and E4.2 as
applicable. This example assumes that the as produced deck provides adequate
edge dimensions. Consult panel manufacturer for dimensions and determine
whether screws are permitted at side-laps, and review panel end dimensions at endlaps.
= 40 ksi
Tensile strength, Fu
= 55 ksi
Thickness, t
= 0.048 in.
= 4.00 ft
Connection Schedule
Support connection:
#12 screw
Pnss = 2.0 kips
Same support connection type and spacing will be used at interior and exterior supports.
d = 0.190 in.
Screw nominal shear breaking strength
(Between supports)
df db
S nf = min(S ni , S nc , S ne )
for ASD
S n = min( df S nf , db S nb )
Note: Snf is in Section D1, Snb is in Section D2, and Sne is in Section D1.
Calculate nominal diaphragm shear strength per unit length controlled by screws, Snf, using
Section D1:
P
Eq. D1-1
S ni = [2A( 1) + ] nf
L
N 2 2
S nc = 2 2
2
L
N
+
0.5
Pnf
Eq. D1-2
Page 88
Example 5a
Note: Snf is minimum of Sni and Snc. This example requires that sufficient edge connections
will be provided at the edge panels so Sne will not control Snf. Same Pnf will be used at
all supports.
Calculate support connection strength, Pnf (Section D1.1.2):
t 2 0.048 in.
=
= 1.5
t 1 0.036 in.
t
Therefore, 1.0 < 2 2.5
t1
( )1
1
k
= 4.2 ((0.048 in.) 3 (0.216 in.)) 2 (55 2 ) = 1.13 k
in.
k
in.2
) = 1.30 k
Result:
) = 1.54 k
in.2
See Connection Schedule
Pnf = 1.19 k
= 1.30 k
1.5 1.0
(1.30 1.13) = 1.19 k
2.5 1
Calculate side-lap connection strength, Pns (Section D1.2.5 or AISI S100 Section E4.3.1):
t 2 0.036 in.
=
= 1.0
t 1 0.036 in.
Therefore,
t2
1 .0
t1
( )1
1
k
= 4.2 ((0.036 in.) 3 (0.216 in.)) 2 (62 2 ) = 0.827 k
in.
Result:
Fu2 = Fu1
AISI S100 Eq. E4.3.1-1
) = 1.30 k
in.2
See Connection Schedule
Pns = min(0.827, 1.30, 2.00 ) = 0.827 kips Tilting of screw in panel controls.
Example 5a
Page 89
Eq. D1-4
= n s s + 2n p 2p + 4 2e
np =
L
20 ft
1=
1 = 4.0
Lv
4 ft
in.
(4 ft) 12
20 ft
ft
ns =
1
=5
in.
4 ft
24
conn.
Pns 0.827 k
s =
=
= 0.695
Pnf
1.19 k
Eq. D1-5
Eq. D1-9
1
2p = 2e = 2 x 2e
w
x e1 = x e3 = 6 in.
Eq. D1-6
Eq. D1-8
x e2 = x e4 = 18 in.
1
2(6 in.)2 + 2(18 in.)2 = 0.556
2p = 2e =
(36 in.)2
Eq. D1-5
(1.0 )2 (10.1)2
ft
S nc =
2
(20ft) (1.0 1 )2 + (10.1)2
ft
0.5
Eq. D1-2
Page 90
Result:
Example 5a
Calculate nominal diaphragm shear strength per unit length controlled by panel buckling,
Snb, using Section D2.1:
S nb
3 3
7890 I xg t d
=
L v 2 s
0.25
Eq. D2.1-1
Note: See Panel Data for parameters. Required units are defined in Section D2.1.
Coefficient, 7890, includes necessary adjustments See Commentary Section D2.1.
= 1 Conversion factor for U.S. customary units
s = 2e + 2w + f = 1.56 in. + 2(1.53 in.) + 3.56 in. = 8.18 in.
4
3
3
(0.190 in. ft ) (0.036 in.) (6.0 in.)
S nb =
8.18 in.
(1)(4 ft) 2
7890
Eq. D2.1-2
0.25
= 10.9 klf
Note: Designer must develop an edge detail so that Sne is greater than 0.536 klf using the
method of Example 1b or 2c, as applicable.
A detailed discussion of shear flow through end-laps is presented in Examples 1a
and 2a, which include a comparison with diaphragm strength determined at buttjoints based on one support connection strength, Pnf. Consider shear flow through
end-laps in this example and use:
Pnf = 0.60 kips (1.19 k/2) at exterior supports in the determination of Sni
and 1.3 k at exterior supports in the determination of Snc, while
Pnf = 1.19 k at interior supports.
The shear in the screw shank at the first interior flute at the end-lap is twice the shear
that is in each deck ply while the four corner end-lap shear at the shear plane above
the point of support tilting theoretically is zero in the shank. The selection of Pnf =
0.60 k per ply is the most severe case.
Consider shear flow through end-lap and determine Snf:
Note: See theory adjustment at Example 1a for variation of support connection shear strength
along a panel length, L, using Modified Eqs. D1-1 and D1-2.
1
Modified Eq. D1-1
S ni = [2A( 1)Pnfe + n s Pns + 2n p 2p Pnfi + 4 2e Pnfe ]
L
Example 5a
P
S ni = [2A( 1) nfe + n s
Pnfi
Pns
+ 2n p 2p + 42e
Pnfi
Page 91
Pnfe Pnfi
]
Pnfi L
0.827 k
= 0.695
1.19 k
Eq. D1-6
0.60 k
1.19 k
= 9.04
S ni = [2(1.0)(0.827 1)
= 0.528 klf
0.60 k
1.19 k
+ 9.04]
1.19 k
20 ft
(1)2 (9.48)2 2
ft
S nc =
2
ft
2
(20)2 (1)2
+
(9.48)
ft 2
= 0.557 klf
0.5
1.30 k
Page 92
Example 5b
Note: Use Sections D5.1.1 and D5.2. Use Appendix Section 1.4 for Dn. Stiffness considers
the dominant panels in the diaphragm field.
Et
K
Eq. D5.1.1-1
G' =
2(1 + ) s + D + C
c n
d
Et
2L
S
Eq. D5.1.1-2
C =
f
w 2 + n + 2n S f
p 4
s
3
S s
xe 1
=
(2(6 in.) + 2(18 in.) ) = 1.33
w
36 in.
Eq. D5.1.1-3
( )1
Rationale: Beyond thickness, t3, tilting at support will not control, and flexibility is relatively
independent of support thickness.
in.)(0.216 in.)
(t 33 )1 2 = 2.7(0.048
= 0.014 in.1.5
0.5
4.2(0.216 in.)
t3
= 0.058 in.
t t 1
S f = 3 1.7 2
0.5
t 3 t 1 1000t 1
0.048 0.036
= 3 1.7
0.058 0.036 1000(0.036 )0.5
=1
Figure C-D5.2.2-1
Example 5b
2.07(1)
2.07
in.
=
= 0.0109
k
1000 t 1000 0.036 in.
Calculate side-lap screw flexibility, Ss:
Sf =
Ss =
Page 93
3.0(1)
3.0
in.
=
= 0.0158
k
1000 t 1000 0.036 in.
Eq. D5.2.2-2
Et
2L
C =
w 2 + n + 2 n
p 4
s
3
3 =
Sf
Ss
S
f
36
36 in.
Eq. D5.1.1-2
4 =
xp =
w
= 1.33
in.
k
0.0109
Eq. D5.1.1-2
Dn =
D2 = 7640 in.
Eq. 1.4-4
As check, Commentary Table C-1.2 lists D2 =7726 at t = 0.0358 in. for WR deck and this
value could be used in design.
U2 = 6
U 1 = U3 = U4 = 0
0 + 6(7640) + 0 + 0
= 7640 in.
0+6+0+0
7640 in.
Dn =
= 31.8 (Unit-less)
in.
20 ftx12
ft
c = 0.71
D =
Calculate G:
From Deck Data
s = f + 2e + 2w = 3.56 in. + 1.56 in.+2(1.53 in.) = 8.18 in.
d = 6 in.
Eq. 1.4-2
Eq. 1.4-1
Table 1.3-1
Eq. 2.1-2
Page 94
Example 5b
in.
1 = 29.1 k
G' =
8.18
in.
2(1 + 0.3)
in.
+ 0.71(31.8) + 10.4
6
in.
Eq. D5.1.1-1
1.3(1)
1.3
in.
=
= 0.00685
k
1000 t 1000 0.036 in.
C = 7.88
24% less slippage and distortion at connections
Sf =
G = 31.2 k/in.
Eq. D5.2.2-1
k
in.
Result of Example 5:
Nominal diaphragm shear strength per unit length:
Sn = 0.536 klf Controlled by Snf
Available diaphragm shear strength per unit length, Sa:
Depending on different load types, select safety and resistance factors from Section B1.
Use d and d for connection-related diaphragm strength in AISI S100 Table D5.
S n S nf
for ASD
=
df
Diaphragm stiffness
k
G'= 29.1
in.
D es i g n G u id e D 3 1 0 -1 4
25 Massachusetts Avenue NW
Suite 800
Washington, DC 20001
www.steel.org