Complaint Unlawful Detainer
Complaint Unlawful Detainer
Complaint Unlawful Detainer
COMES NOW the Plaintiff, by undersigned counsel, and unto this Honorable Court,
most respectfully alleges that:
1. Plaintiff is of legal age, Filipino, (single / married / widow), and a resident of Bgry.
Tabucan, Mandurriao, Iloilo Ciy, Philippines. For purposes of this action, Plaintiff
may be served with copies of our notices and orders of the Honorable Court at the
office address of the undersigned counsel indicated below;
2. Defendant is also of legal age, Filipino, and for purposes of this action, he may be
served with summons and other processes of this Honorable Court at his residence
and post-office address at Bgy. Tagbak, Jaro, Iloilo City, Philippines;
3. Plaintiff is the true and registered owner of a certain parcel of land situated in Pison
Drive, Bgy. San Rafael, Iloilo City, Philippines, consisting of approximately Five
Hundred (500) square meters, and identified as Lot 7713 and covered by Transfer
Certificate of Title No. 112377 of the Registry of Deeds of Iloilo; Machine copy of
said Transfer Certificate of Title No. 112377 is attached hereto as ANNEX "B";
4. That sometime in August 7, 2015, Defendant and his family began to be in possession
of the said property, not by virtue of any title or contract, but merely upon the
Plaintiff's tolerance, as he had no immediate need of the said property at that time;
5. That on December 25, 2016 Plaintiff demanded that Defendant vacate and return the
possession of the said parcel of land to the herein Plaintiff, but despite numerous
demands for him and his family to vacate, Defendant has remained in illegal
possession of the said land and, up to the present, still retain such possession.
Machine copy of the said demand letter is attached hereto as ANNEX "C";
6. While possession by tolerance is lawful, such possession becomes illegal upon
demand to vacate is made by the owner and the possessor by tolerance refuses to
comply with such demand (Prieto vs. Reyes, 14 SCRA 432; Yu vs. De Lara, 6 SCRA
786, 788; Isidro vs. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 105586, December 15, 1993);
7. A person who occupies the land of another at the latter's tolerance or permission,
without any contract between them, is necessarily bound by an implied promise that
he will vacate upon demand (Yu vs. De Lara, supra, cited in Sumulong vs. Court of
Appeals, G.R. No. 108817, May 10, 1994);
8. That the reasonable rental value of the said land is Twenty Five Thousand Pesos
(P25,000) per month;
9. That this action is being filed within a period of one (1) year from the demand on
Defendant to vacate the said property.