Olevel English Standards Booklet

Example Candidate Responses
Cambridge O Level
English Language
1123
Cambridge Secondary 2
Cambridge International Examinations retains the copyright on all its publications. Registered Centres are
permitted to copy material from this booklet for their own internal use. However, we cannot give permission
to Centres to photocopy any material that is acknowledged to a third party even for internal use within a
Centre.
Cambridge International Examinations 2015
Version 1
Contents
Introduction ........................................................................................................................... 2
Assessment at a glance ........................................................................................................ 3
Paper 1 Writing ................................................................................................................. 4
Paper 2 Reading ..............................................................................................................49
Introduction
Introduction
The main aim of this booklet is to exemplify standards for those teaching Cambridge O Level English
Language (1123), and to show how different levels of candidates performance relate to the subjects
curriculum and assessment objectives.
In this booklet a range of candidate responses has been chosen to exemplify grades A, C and E. Each
response is accompanied by a brief commentary explaining the strengths and weaknesses of the answers.
In this booklet a grade is given to each question but in the examination each question paper (whole
candidate script) is graded on the overall mark awarded, not on each question or part question. It is therefore
possible that, on some individual questions, lower grade candidate scripts are awarded the same, similar or
sometimes higher marks than higher grade candidate scripts.
For ease of reference the following format for each paper has been adopted:
Each question is followed by an extract of the mark scheme used by examiners. This, in turn, is followed by
examples of marked candidate responses, each with an examiner comment on performance. Comments are
given to indicate where and why marks were awarded, and how additional marks could have been obtained.
In this way it is possible to understand what candidates have done to gain their marks and what they still
have to do to improve their grades.
Past papers, Examiner Reports and other teacher support materials are available on Teacher Support at
http://teachers.cie.org.uk
Cambridge O Level English Language 1123
Assessment at a glance
Assessment at a glance
All candidates take two papers.
Paper 1: Writing
1 hour 30 minutes
Paper 2: Reading 1 hour 45 minutes
Marks
60 weighted to 50
50
Weighting
50%
50%
Candidate
response
On the question paper
On the question paper
Focus
Task
Language
Task
Language
Section title
Directed Writing
Creative Writing
Reading for Ideas
Reading for
Meaning
Mark allocation
30 marks
(15 marks for
task fulfilment
and 15 marks for
language)
30 marks
(combined
language and
content)
25 marks
(15 marks for
content points of
notes, 5 marks
for language of
summary; 5 marks
for main ideas
questions)
25 marks
(content only)
Weighting for
writing skills:
50%
20%
25%
5%
Weighting for
reading skills:
50%
5%
20%
25%
Assessment
objectives
W1, W2, W3, W4
W1, W2, W3, W4
R3, R4
R1, R2
Teachers are reminded that a full syllabus is available on www.cie.org.uk
Paper 1 Writing
Paper 1 Writing
Section 1: Directed Writing
Paper 1 Writing
Mark scheme
Paper 1 Writing
Paper 1 Writing
Paper 1 Writing
Paper 1 Writing
Example candidate response grade A
Task Fulfilment mark = 15 out of 15

Language mark = 14 out of 15
Total mark awarded = 29 out of 30
Paper 1 Writing
Examiner comment grade A

This is a very good response because it is admirably business-like in its approach and does not make the
mistake of lapsing into narrative.
The task fulfilment is very strong. There is a clear sense of the purpose, audience and situation given in
the address and the opening paragraph. The purpose is re-emphasised in the opening of the final paragraph
which brings a sense of unity to the text. The format is good, without being perfect Cordially is just
formal enough to confirm the seriousness of the letter, whereas Yours faithfully would have been better.
There is an effort made to provide an opinion with justification in the penultimate paragraph. The tone and
register are excellent as the letter is crisp, matter-of-fact and polite; it has a number of appropriate phrases
such as On the day in question. Most importantly, the detail in response to the bullet points in the
question, especially in the second paragraph, is convincing and helpful to the police. There is a real attempt
to suggest how the police might catch the thieves, something that many candidates left out or simply
allowed to be a hope. There is also a sensible use of elaboration in providing a contact number.
The language of the letter is very good indeed because it is not over elaborate; a letter like this needs to be
direct. The accuracy is excellent and the sentence structure is complex in places, without being fussy. The
verb forms and tenses are absolutely secure while the vocabulary is mature (perpetrators; inventory)
and the spelling is accurate. Paragraphing and punctuation (even a semi-colon) are also of a high standard,
although some lapses with commas and the repetition of I as a paragraph opening prevent this from being
full marks.
10
Paper 1 Writing
Example candidate response grade C
11
Paper 1 Writing

12
Paper 1 Writing
Examiner comment grade C

This is a very satisfactory response (just above middle of the range) because it is mostly accurate but it is
a safe response; it relies on basic correctness rather than any great sophistication and this is often the
hallmark of a high Band 3 script or low Band 2 script.
The task fulfilment is perfectly adequate and lifts the overall achievement. A sense of the purpose,
audience and situation emerges, although the expression express my situation is a little vague. The
purpose is re-emphasised in the opening of the final paragraph, although again it could be more forceful.
The format is good; it is a formal letter with the correct valediction. There is a hint that the format is of a
report (the sub-heading and the paragraph headings) but this is acceptable in this case. Unfortunately, it
lapses into narrative on occasions as in the detail about rushing into the house to make an inventory and
this detracts from the crispness of the letter. There is an effort made to provide an opinion with justification
in the penultimate paragraph in the detail about the digital prints. The tone and register are very good as
the letter is polite, especially with the thanks at the end, and it has one or two appropriate phrases such as
some blood residue. The detail in response to the bullet points in the question is convincing but needs to
be more helpful to the police. For example, last night is too vague when it would have been easy enough
to suggest a time, although this is put right a few lines later. The greatest weakness is in the lack of helpful
detail about the stolen items; it is merely a list and a hefty value is particularly vague. The final bullet point
is addressed well.
The language of the letter is clean but straightforward. It has good accuracy and clarity in explaining the
situation and there are some good phrases such as To my dismay but there are few vocabulary ticks for
real merit. The sentence structure has some complexity. The verb forms and tenses are secure although
there is a lapse with I will in the final paragraph. Spelling is mainly correct but more difficult vocabulary
(profesional and occurred) proves to be a problem. Paragraphing is good and, crucially in this band,
punctuation is sensible, with secure sentence endings. The script is an example of an upper Band 3
(bordering on a grade B) rather than lower Band 3.
13
Paper 1 Writing
Example candidate response grade E
14
Paper 1 Writing

15
Paper 1 Writing
Examiner comment grade E

This is a weak response because the content is vague and undeveloped and, although the overall meaning is
never in doubt, it has frequent and serious errors which hamper precision.
The task fulfilment is adequate in some respects and poor in others. There is an obvious understanding
of the purpose, audience and situation given in the opening line and at the end of the letter. However,
the format is confused. The letter starts with the given opening Dear sirs, but it lacks the capital S to
suggest formality. Furthermore, there is no valediction, even though the text ends with the word letter.
Even more of a problem is the way the letter becomes largely a narrative I felt so paniccried loudlycall
my parents. This is made worse by the inclusion of direct speech which is inappropriate in such a letter.
There is, though, an effort made to provide an opinion with justification in the detail of the clothes. Also, the
tone and register improve with the courteous ending. However, the detail in response to the bullet points in
the question is weak as there is no detail about the stolen items and in fact the candidate relies on repeating
the words of the question (make my letter informative and helpful for the police). Also, the suggestion as
to how to catch the thieves (based merely on the fact that it could be a boy and a girl) is unhelpful.
The language of the letter is flawed. The accuracy is only occasional; there are no patches of clear writing.
The sentence structure is mainly simple and yet suffers sometimes from a lack of sentence endings. The
verb forms and tenses are particularly confused while the vocabulary is simple and yet still subject to error,
especially in the use of prepositions. The spelling is actually good at this level. Paragraphing, however, is
non-existent and punctuation is weak with the use of a lower case I.
16
Paper 1 Writing
Section 2: Creative Writing

In this section there are five topics to choose from, each of which comes under one of three essay types:
narrative (3 and 5), discursive (2) and descriptive (1) 4 can be interpreted in any way candidates choose.
Example candidate responses at grades A, C and E have been included for each of these essay types.
17
Paper 1 Writing
Mark scheme
18
Paper 1 Writing
19
Paper 1 Writing
20
Paper 1 Writing
Narrative essays
21
Paper 1 Writing

The essay is a response to Question 3 and concerns a young woman called Alison not turning up for a prom
party. The essay correctly interprets failed to turn up as being absent, whereas many candidates saw it
as meaning failed to do well, as in an exam or sporting event. The achievement places this essay in Band
1 because it is highly accurate in its language while the content creates great interest. However, it is in the
lower half of Band 1 because it contains lapses in the language and the content is a bit of an anti-climax in
the final sentence.
Overall the language is highly accurate. The sentence structure is complex, containing a variety of sentence
lengths and types and even employing dramatic short sentences for effect Alison wasnt there.. Verb
forms and tenses are very good indeed and the candidate can handle sophisticated forms as in Cindy
thought she had never seen. However, the tenses are not perfect, with Alison didnt come being a
fault it is an indication that scripts do not have to be perfect to get into Band 1 but must have real merit
to offset any lapses. Here, there is some excellent, precise observation and detail as in vivid robins egg
blue. Vocabulary is certainly a very strong point (opted, conspicuous, host, valedictorian, vibrant,
strategic) although there is a sense that the candidate overstretches occasionally with plethora and
heaping not being quite right. Punctuation is very good with sophistication again demonstrated in the use
of the semi-colon. Paragraphing is also good although some might debate the use of And to start one
paragraph. Spelling, especially of such a mature vocabulary, is excellent. This is a complex, sophisticated,
occasionally tense, narrative with a real feel for the occasion. Linguistically, it is far better than the
accurate descriptor of Band 2 and yet is not so accurate as to be at the top of Band 1.
22
Paper 1 Writing

23
Paper 1 Writing
24
Paper 1 Writing

The essay is a response to Question 5 which should be about the fear of flying. What the candidate has
produced is an exciting story of satisfactory length in which the narrator runs away during a chase through
a forest. It seems to be about flying in the sense of fleeing or running away. It is possible to understand
how such an interpretation could result in the heat of the moment but it is nevertheless a misinterpretation.
Therefore, instead of being seen as totally irrelevant, it is subject to some penalty which lowers it to the
bottom of its language band.
The language is best described as mostly accurate with errors which do not mar clarity. On language
grounds alone it represents a comfortable, safe Band 3 achievement before any adjustment is made for the
content worth possibly 21 marks. The sentence structure is sensible but is almost entirely made up of
very short sentences of the same mood (see particularly paragraph 3). This produces a limited, monotonous
effect. There is a particular lack of variation, such as dialogue, to change the pace. Tenses, apart from
one example (experience that I have had) are very secure and consistent, a strength of the essay which
helps to confirm it as a Band 3. There is the very occasional merit in the vocabulary (loitered, remarked
and also in the use of the similes in paragraph 2) but otherwise the vocabulary is very straightforward and
rather ordinary the description of the old, white house suggests this limitation, as does the expression
extremely terrified. The repetition of vocabulary (temple in paragraph 4 and went upstairs and then
went to sleep) emphasises this limitation. Punctuation is very accurate, apart from the odd omission of
a comma, and in particular the sentence boundaries are very secure, another sign of a safe Band 3. There
are, however, no question marks, exclamations or semi-colons to give the work sophistication or to lift it.
The spelling has very few errors and the paragraphing is logical and good as it marks out the stages of the
narrative. Ultimately, this is a secure use of the language but with limitations. It is too accurate to be in Band
4 but it does not have the range of vocabulary or sentence variation to be in Band 2. Therefore, it is a Band 3
with some reduction for content to leave it at the bottom of Band 3.
25
Paper 1 Writing
26
Paper 1 Writing
27
Paper 1 Writing

The essay is a response to Question 5 and concerns the narrator and a fear of flying which disappears after
a successful trip in a plane. The essay is a little short of the stated minimum number of words but not so
short as to incur any penalty. It is relevant and there is some interest in seeing how the trip will turn out but
otherwise it is a rather routine story without a great deal of development.
As far as language is concerned, the overall meaning is never in doubt there is sufficient accuracy to
know about the candidates fear, why the candidate has to take the trip and how the situation is resolved;
indeed there are occasional clean sentences. On the other hand, the errors are sufficiently frequent and
serious to hamper precision and to distract the reader from the content. The sentence variation is limited,
with the candidate relying mainly on simple or compound constructions. There are no real attempts to vary
the sentences for effect and only one exclamation to vary the sentence mood. Verb forms and tenses are
not secure with the candidate appearing to have difficulty distinguishing between the past and present
tenses on times (have to go and I was agreed) so that the sequence can be very confused as in
made me more realised that what would happen. The vocabulary is simple but reasonable, yet there are
some strange choices as with very importantly and go there urgent and especially in the serving of
air hostess which creates quite the wrong meaning. There is also the intrusive that in I realised that
how could I. Some repetition of vocabulary (urgent) at key times limits the achievement, as do the
several omissions of words and the weakness with prepositions (On the airport). As for punctuation,
sentence separation is good overall but there is a careless use of commas and some clear weaknesses in
the spelling of this straightforward vocabulary. Paragraphing is present but possibly it is over-paragraphed.
Ultimately, it is difficult to find the patches of clear writing that would lift the essay into band 4, nor does
it have errors in every line to lower it into Band 6, so it remains in Band 5. A concentration on ensuring the
proper sequence of tenses would have helped to raise the achievement.
28
Paper 1 Writing
Discursive Essays
29
Paper 1 Writing
30
Paper 1 Writing

This essay is a response to Question 2 and argues strongly that young people have little interest in politics.
The content is mature and sensible. There is a very good sense of balance here as the essay neatly raises
the opposite view in the penultimate paragraph and yet the reader is always aware of the candidates real
opinion. The essay ends strongly by urging the need for change; it does it without hectoring and so the
essay is quietly but powerfully persuasive. It is particularly impressive that the candidate does not run out of
ideas and resort to repetition which often happens with weaker candidates in discursive essays.
Overall the language is highly accurate with very occasional slips. The sentence structure has some
variation; sentences are nearly always complex in mood but they do vary in length. Verb forms and tenses
are absolutely right and demonstrate some sophistication as in might put forward and are actually
being encouraged. Vocabulary is certainly a very strong point without being spectacular. There are some
very good words (engrossed, phenomenon, evident and even the more colloquial whopping is
acceptable here) but, more than that, there is the impression that the candidate nearly always chooses
the right word. The candidate never tries simply to impress with extravagance but produces a range of
vocabulary which has an admirable clarity, well suited to a discursive text. Punctuation is invariably correct,
while paragraphing is also good, carefully allowing the argument to build. Spelling is excellent. There are
occasional slips in this essay (resposible, and some omissions) but overall this is a secure, fluent piece of
writing. It has a very natural feel to it. However, it is on the lowest mark in Band 1 because, although the
vocabulary is well chosen for a discursive topic, it lacks some ambition. Also, the punctuation and sentence
structure would benefit from a little more variation for effect. It is a good example of how an essay,
especially a discursive one, can gain a Band 1 without being flamboyant in any respect but by being highly
competent in every aspect.
31
Paper 1 Writing
32
Paper 1 Writing
33
Paper 1 Writing

The essay is a response to Question 4 and adopts a discursive approach to dreams, in particular the
negative and positive effects of dreams as well as the candidates own dreams for the future. The essay is
not overlong, and does not have much elaboration, but it is certainly a realistic and adequate treatment of
the topic.
In its language the essay is clean, mostly accurate, but it is not particularly ambitious and is therefore
somewhere in the middle of the overall achievement range as a basic Band 3. Each aspect of the
language descriptors is adequate or satisfactory but there tends to be a blemish in each. There is some
minor complexity in the sentence structures and variation with complex constructions being used at the
beginning of paragraph 3 and in the penultimate paragraph. Otherwise, there tends to be a repetition of
short sentences as can be seen in paragraph 2. Verb forms and tenses are secure and sustained and yet
in paragraph 3 there is a serious error with love instead of have loved and, later on, destroy instead
of destroyed and had instead of has had. As for vocabulary, words like immortal and persistent
stand out because the majority of the vocabulary is safe, sometimes even repeated (car/ cars in
paragraph 3). There is also some uncertainty in paragraph 1 about whether to treat dreams as singular or
plural. Punctuation is satisfactory, if routine, and spelling is safe at this level, while paragraphing has merit as
it clearly moves the topic forward in stages. There is enough relevance to maintain interest as a reader but
not enough to raise the linguistic achievement above a lower Band 3.
34
Paper 1 Writing
35
Paper 1 Writing
36
Paper 1 Writing

The essay is a response to Question 2 and argues the case that young people today have little or no interest
in politics. The candidate takes the view that politics can be divisive, even dangerous, and young people
have more interest in their education and subsequent jobs than in politics. Some young people may go
into politics but the majority are not interested. The essay is of adequate length, is relevant and can be
considered a satisfactory but rather superficial treatment of the topic.
As far as language is concerned, the overall meaning is never in doubt there is sufficient accuracy to be
clear about the candidates opinion; in fact, in paragraph 3 there is an improving sense of clarity and there is
the occasional clear sentence. However, overall, the errors are sufficiently frequent and serious to hamper
precision and to distract the reader from the content. Ultimately, it is difficult to find more than one patch
of relatively clear writing that could lift the essay into Band 4, nor does it have errors in every line to lower
it into Band 6, so it remains in Band 5, towards the lower end. The sentence variation is limited, with the
candidate relying mainly on simple sentences. There are occasional compound sentences to add variation
but the effect is limited by several sentences starting with a conjunction. The candidate relies entirely on
statement sentences with no attempt to vary the mood. As with the vast majority of essays in this Band,
verb forms and tenses are not secure and the candidate has difficulty maintaining a consistent sequence of
tenses young people does not interest in politics, they have easily get a good job, some has become
doctor and many more examples. This weakness is made more obvious by poor control of agreement
as in People has get, several job, our parent has not get. The vocabulary is very simple but mainly
acceptable, yet even here there are some basic errors as with our youngster are too good in education
when the candidate means better in education. Sentence separation is good overall but the punctuation
suffers from the lack of several full stops. The spelling of this simple vocabulary is mainly accurate but
as soon as the candidate becomes ambitious (developted, facilties) the errors occur. Paragraphing is
satisfactory. The overall simplicity of the language combined with the frequency of the serious error limits
the achievement of this essay to Band 5.
37
Paper 1 Writing
Descriptive essays
38
Paper 1 Writing
39
Paper 1 Writing
40
Paper 1 Writing

The essay is a response to Question 1 and describes two celebrities, the rap artist Eminem and the actress
Kristen Stewart. The essay is a very satisfactory length, giving a little more consideration to Eminem than
to Kristen Stewart, and the treatment effectively contrasts the two in the way the question requires. The
candidate is admirably clear in emphasising the different qualities of the two celebrities and the essay
creates real interest by giving an insight into the values of modern, popular culture. In fact, the quality of
this content is vital in supporting the linguistic quality of the writing. There is a high level of accuracy in this
essay but there are also some straightforward errors and so it is in the lower half of Band 1.
As has been said, overall the language is very accurate. What is crucial here in putting this in Band 1
rather than Band 2 is that the errors are not serious ones. The sentence structure is very good as it has
complexity and also it attempts different constructions for effect see particularly the effective conclusion
to paragraph 2 and the sustained sentence lengths and complexity in paragraph 5. Unfortunately, the one
real flaw of the essay is the use of conjunctions as sentence openings, although there is some excuse for it
here as the overall style is more colloquial than in most descriptive essays. Verb forms and tenses are very
good indeed and the candidate moves easily between past and present tenses. The sentence structures
and the correct tenses give the essay a natural fluency which is very convincing. Vocabulary is certainly a
strong point (scrawny, minority, lyrical, manipulate, relapsed as well as the very sophisticated
phrase deemed as vulgar). The repetition of Passion for emphasis is very good. This is a mature range
of vocabulary. There is a sense that the candidate is very comfortable using such words but the vocabulary
is not flawless the phrase to whom in the first line is excellent and yet it is let down by the repetition of
the preposition at the end of the sentence; furthermore, too overated at the end is overdone. Punctuation
is very good with sophistication again demonstrated in the use of the dashes for emphasis and in the use
of commas (Kristen Stewart, though a beautiful woman,). Paragraphing is also very good in the way that
it divides the material after a good introduction and finishes with a definite and sensible final paragraph.
Spelling, especially of such a mature vocabulary, is excellent with only one or two slips. Linguistically, this
essay is better than the merely accurate descriptor of Band 2 and yet is not so accurate as to be at the top
of Band 1.
41
Paper 1 Writing
42
Paper 1 Writing
43
Paper 1 Writing

The essay is a response to Question 1, a descriptive title that asks for a contrast between two people
rather than the creation of atmosphere. This candidate describes two entertainment celebrities, Matthew
Macfadyen (Mafyden sic) and Justin Bieber, the former being admired and the latter not admired. It is a
question which requires a description of personalities rather than places or events. The content here is very
attractive because it is deliberately amusing and interesting but, while this will gain credit, it cannot disguise
the fact that the language has flaws.
The language is best described as mostly accurate, placing it in Band 3. Sometimes the sentence structure
is useful and enhances the humour (If he is happy, I am happy.) but there is no doubt that short sentences
predominate, perhaps to the extent of being repetitive. This is certainly so at the end of the first paragraph.
To offset this, the use of speech and question sentences brings some variety. Tenses are the weakness
in this script. In the second paragraph, despised and was are both the wrong tense and at the end of
paragraph 4 there are three serious tense errors where the past tense is used after Everytime. Also, in
paragraph 5, They said driving at 80km/hr were for old people is clearly wrong. There are some ticks for
vocabulary (tremendously, overrated) but otherwise the vocabulary is very straightforward and, indeed,
there are a number of simple errors in this vocabulary married with another actress, his nose is not too
sharp like other actors, He is too overrated. Punctuation can be used very well to show the humour as
with the many exclamation marks in paragraph 4 but seems a little overdone at the end of the first sentence.
The spelling is adequate and the paragraphing is good as it emphasises the contrasts. Ultimately, the errors
in tenses are serious and frequent enough to prevent this mature, amusing essay from being more than a
Band 3.
44
Paper 1 Writing
45
Paper 1 Writing
46
Paper 1 Writing
47
Paper 1 Writing

The essay is a response to Question 1 and it describes the candidates mother and a friend. This is a
very loose interpretation of the word celebrity in the question and the use of a friend shows limited
understanding of the expression least admire. However, the error was thought more likely to be the result
of haste or a lack of familiarity with the word celebrity rather than a deliberate attempt to distort the topic;
therefore, while it obviously imposes some limit on the content, the consideration of the language is still the
major one.
As far as language is concerned, the overall meaning is never in doubt there is sufficient accuracy to know
something about the two people and what the candidate feels about the two celebrities; indeed there are
occasional, relatively clean sentences, especially at the end of the penultimate paragraph and in the final
paragraph. On the other hand, the errors are sufficiently frequent and serious to hamper precision and to
distract the reader from the content. The sentence variation is very limited, especially in length, and the
sentence structure comes across as very simple. There are no real attempts to vary the sentence moods
for effect. Verb forms and tenses are insecure with the candidate appearing to have difficulty distinguishing
between the past and present tenses on times (she like eating fish followed by she lived at). However,
the sense never quite breaks down in spite of this. The vocabulary is extremely simple but only occasionally
is it misused as in the use of talls for long in the first paragraph. At times, the idiom is awkward or
misunderstood as in The most celebrity I most admire. Some repetition of vocabulary (most and she
in the first two lines) further limits the achievement. Punctuation is flawed, with sentence separation errors,
as in the first paragraph, although this does improve. There are clear weaknesses in the spelling of this
very simple vocabulary, even with the simplest words (alway) and it is certainly true of more ambitious
vocabulary (sypathy, advise and courageable). Clear paragraphing is a merit.
Ultimately, it is difficult to find the patches of clear writing needed to lift the essay into Band 4, and the
emerging sense and paragraphing keep it out of Band 6; it remains in Band 5 and towards the lower end of
the band because of the simplicity, the errors and the content.
48
Paper 2 Reading
Paper 2 Reading
Section 1: Reading for ideas
49
Paper 2 Reading
50
Paper 2 Reading
51
Paper 2 Reading
Insert
52
Paper 2 Reading
Mark scheme
53
Paper 2 Reading
54
Paper 2 Reading
55
Paper 2 Reading
56
Paper 2 Reading
57
Paper 2 Reading
58
Paper 2 Reading
59
Paper 2 Reading
60
Paper 2 Reading
61
Paper 2 Reading

1
(a) Candidates were asked to select advantages of extended shopping hours from Paragraphs 2 and 3.
The candidate selected two points from Paragraph 2: that more people are needed to work, and that
more income is provided for the shop owner. The point that students benefit was incompletely made
as no reference was made to the part-time nature of the work made available to students by extended
shopping hours. The candidate selected three points from Paragraph 3: extended shopping hours
spreads the load for the shops, shoppers have more time to browse and are given an opportunity for
relaxation. These last two points were offered under one bullet point by the candidate, but points are
rewarded where made, so that it is possible to score more than one point under a single bullet. The
candidate attempted the point that mothers can work part-time but omitted to mention the link with
her husband not being at work, and so the point was incomplete.
The candidate had then to select the disadvantages of extended shopping hours as outlined in
Paragraphs 4 and 5. The candidate selected two points from Paragraph 4: that children miss out on
excursions with their families and that family bonds are removed. The point that childhood obesity is
caused by lack of exercise was made, but could not be rewarded because the dependent point that
children are not taken to parks (because they are shopping instead) was not made. The candidate
selected only one point from Paragraph 5, namely that people waste time shopping that could have
been spent doing more useful things. Three points were incompletely made: family life is interrupted
had to be specified as employees family life; appointing a deputy is a problem which had to be linked
to his absence from the shop (because it was open for more hours); employers choosing to close the
shop had to be linked to the consequence, namely that he would lose business to the shops which
stayed open. 8/15
(b) The candidate had to use selected content points to write a summary, in his own words and in the
continuous tense, of the advantages and disadvantages of extended shopping hours. The candidates
use of own words was recognisable and this, combined with the fact that the language used was
accurately expressed using some original complex sentence structures, (created by, for example, the
present participle resulting, the relative pronoun which and the conjunction as) assured almost
full marks for the question. 4/5
The candidate had to indicate the correct statement from a choice of three statements, and correctly
chose the second one: students can juggle part-time work with their studies. 1/1
The candidate had to select two opinions from Paragraph 4 and selected one of these: that the shop
till you drop mentality decreases opportunities for family activities. Linking childhood obesity to lack of
exercise is not an opinion because of the presence of the word perhaps in the text. 1/2
The candidate had to link reading of the passage with own knowledge or experience by giving
examples of valuable recreational excursions. Each answer offered was valid: (i) trips to the zoo and
(ii) camping. 2/2
62
Paper 2 Reading
63
Paper 2 Reading
64
Paper 2 Reading
65
Paper 2 Reading

1
(a) Candidates were asked to select advantages of extended shopping hours from Paragraphs 2 and 3.
The candidate selected only one point from Paragraph 2: that more income is provided for the
employer, a point that was later repeated in the candidate response and could not be rewarded
twice. Two other points were incompletely made: the point that benefit for students had to be linked
to working part-time and not compromising their studies, and the point that childcare arrangements
could be avoided had to be linked to the fact that one of the parents could be at home while the
other was working. The candidate selected three points from Paragraph 3: extending shopping hours
spreads the load for the shopping centres, and gives an opportunity for relaxation, as well as an
opportunity for a family day out. The candidate attempted the point that shopping malls offer a wide
range of goods under one roof but, as reference to shopping malls was not made, the response was
incomplete.
Paragraphs 4 and 5. The candidate selected two points from Paragraph 4: that children miss out on
excursions with their families and that opportunities for family bonding are removed. A link between
obesity and lack of exercise was established, but no reference was made to children and, in any
case, the dependent point that children are not taken to parks (because they are shopping instead)
was not made. The candidate attempted several points from Paragraph 5 but made none completely.
Reference was made to a detrimental effect on employees but this effect was not specified; the fact
that people waste their time was mentioned, without the link that they were shopping instead of
doing something more valuable; the bald statement that employers do not benefit was made, with
no explanation as to what problems employers faced instead of benefits. 6/15
(b) The candidate had to use selected content points to write a summary in their own words and in
formal continuous of the advantages and disadvantages of extended shopping hours. The candidates
use of own words was recognisable although awkward and oblique in places. Around ten serious
errors were made, including wrong agreement, wrong preposition, missing preposition, wrong
article, wrong verb form, wrong plural form, wrong use of the infinitive of the verb. The candidate
was therefore given an average mark for language. 3/5
The candidate had to select two opinions from Paragraph 4 and selected neither of these, writing instead
two statements which were in fact content points for the summary: that children miss out on family
excursions and that family bonds are destroyed. 0/2
The candidate had to link reading of the passage with own knowledge or experience by giving examples
of valuable recreational excursions. Each answer offered was valid: (i) trips to museums and (ii) trips to a
planetarium. 2/2
66
Paper 2 Reading
67
Paper 2 Reading
68
Paper 2 Reading
69
Paper 2 Reading

1
(a) Candidates were asked to select advantages of extended shopping hours from Paragraphs 2 and
3. The candidate selected two points from Paragraph 2: that more jobs are created and that more
income is provided for the shop owner. The candidate selected two points from Paragraph 3: people
have more time to browse, and shopping is a form of relaxation.
Paragraphs 4 and 5. The candidate selected only one point from Paragraph 4: children miss out on
excursions with their families. A reference was made to childhood obesity but no link was made to
lack of exercise and, in any case, the dependent point that children are not taken to parks (because
they are shopping instead) was not made. The candidate referred to the fact that employers cannot
always be in the store but made no link to the consequence, which is that he would have to appoint
a deputy in his absence. An irrelevant point about people saving money was made. 5/15
(b) The candidate had to use selected content points to write a summary in own words and in formal
continuous of the advantages and disadvantages of extended shopping hours. The candidates
attempt was fairly close to text wording and awkward in many places. Around fourteen serious errors
were made, including missing article, wrong word used for context, several sentence separation
errors, noun used instead of adjective, missing subject, missing preposition, wrong plural form,
wrong verb form and wrong preposition. The candidate was therefore given a mark for language
which was below average. 2/5
The candidate had to select two opinions from Paragraph 4 and selected neither of these, writing instead
one of the statements which was in fact a content point for the summary: that family bonds are destroyed.
The other response given made little sense and suggested lack of comprehension on the part of the
candidate. 0/2
The candidate had to link reading of the passage with own knowledge or experience by giving examples
of valuable recreational excursions. One answer offered was valid, being a trip to the zoo, but the second
was incorrect as it referred to taking part in school, and not family, activities. 1/2
70
Paper 2 Reading
Section 2: Reading for meaning
71
Paper 2 Reading
72
Paper 2 Reading
73
Paper 2 Reading
Insert
74
Paper 2 Reading
Mark scheme
75
Paper 2 Reading
76
Paper 2 Reading
77
Paper 2 Reading
78
Paper 2 Reading
79
Paper 2 Reading
80
Paper 2 Reading
81
Paper 2 Reading
82
Paper 2 Reading
83
Paper 2 Reading

5
(a) The candidate answered correctly that the baby was going to have an operation in the morning. 1/1
(b) The candidate wrote, correctly, that the baby was small, but did not make either of the other two
possible points: that she needed very little (focus on the other aspect of small) or that she felt sorry
for the baby (focus on pitifully). 1/2
(c) The candidate answered correctly that she did not speak and also that she did not ask again to see
the baby. 2/2
(a) The candidate answered correctly that the writer was worried whether or not there would be a nurse
with the baby and whether or not she would be fed properly. 2/2
(b) The candidate failed to get behind the ideas of this question, referring only to a lift in the passage
about these things only being able to be considered when the outcome of the operation was known.
This did not answer the question. 0/1
(c) The candidate offered a correct synonym for threat i.e. danger, but made no attempt at re-casting
what type of threat the baby was free of, i.e. fatality or death. 1/2
(a) The candidate gave the correct quotation, i.e. lethargy. 1/1
(b) The candidate wrote correctly that the writer and the baby had endured the longest separation of
their lives, and also correctly that she worried whether the operation had been a success or not. 2/2
The candidate wrote correctly that the nurse showed the writer the surgeons report but did not write that
she might have understood it, although she didnt, writing instead the opposite idea, i.e. that she did in
fact understand it. This was a distortion of the correct answer. 1/2
(a) The candidate made an acceptable inference here, i.e. that the nurses were only junior nurses,
which would account for their nervousness. 1/1
(b) The candidate offered a correct synonym for the idea of intention, i.e. aim, but offered everyone
as a synonym for whole building behind them which was too vague for the idea of the staff, or the
doctors and nurses, or the authority of the hospital. 1/2
(c) The candidate merely quoted the words of the senior nurse: Youre back again, rather than focusing
on the action of the senior nurse, namely that she pushed the writer towards the door. 0/1
10
The candidate wrote, incorrectly, that the writer had created anarchy, whereas the focus should have
been on the surgeons anger at the nurses refusal to allow the writer to see her baby. 0/1
11
The candidate wrote correctly designated as a synonym for appointed and becoming strict as a
synonym for hardened. However, showing for summoning, childish for tedious and having thought
for preoccupied were incorrect. 2/5
84
Paper 2 Reading
85
Paper 2 Reading
86
Paper 2 Reading
87
Paper 2 Reading

5
(b) The candidate wrote, correctly, that the baby was small, but went on to write that her clothes were
cheap, instead of the correct answer that she needed very little (focus on the other aspect of small)
or that she felt sorry for the baby (focus on pitifully). 1/2
(c) Instead of writing correctly that the writer neither spoke nor asked to see her baby again, the
candidate lifted irrelevant sections of the text: she thought the nurse had the wrong name and she
went home and wept copiously. 0/2
(a) The candidate wrote, correctly if awkwardly, that the writer thought whether there would be a nurse
with the baby. However, the second part of the question was answered by another question, which
was insufficient to be considered correct. 1/2
(b) The candidate wrote incorrectly that the writer would take care of the baby, showing little
understanding of the question which had been asked. 0/1
(c) The candidate offered a correct synonym for fatality i.e. life idea, and a correct synonym for threat,
i.e. risk. 2/2
(a) The candidate wrote settle instead of the correct answer lethargy. 0/1
(b) For part of the answer the candidate copied an irrelevant section of the text. i.e. the nurse said that
for such small babies visiting was not allowed. For the other part of the answer the point was made
that the baby would be happier if she didnt see her mother, which did not get behind the idea of
imperative for the writer in the question. 0/2
she might have understood it, although she didnt, writing instead the opposite idea, i.e. that she did in
fact have medical knowledge. This was a distortion of the correct answer. 1/2
(a) The candidate inferred correctly that the nurses were worried that the writer might force her way in
to see the baby. 1/1
(b) The candidate offered a correct synonym for intention, i.e. she had made up her mind but offered,
incorrectly, everyone as a synonym for the building meaning the staff, or the authorities, or the
doctors and other nurses. 1/2
(c) The candidate wrote, correctly, that the senior nurse began to push the writer towards the door. 1/1
10
The candidate wrote, incorrectly, that the writer was making a fuss, whereas the focus should have been
on the surgeons anger at the nurses refusal to allow the writer to see her baby. 0/1
11
The candidate wrote correctly suggested for appointed. Louder for hardened, continuously for
copiously, annoying for tedious and get busy with for preoccupied were all incorrect. 1/5
88
Paper 2 Reading
89
Paper 2 Reading
90
Paper 2 Reading
91
Paper 2 Reading

5
(b) The candidate introduced the question but did not answer it. 0/2
(c) The candidate answered correctly that she did not ask again to see the baby but wrote wrongly that
when she did get around to speaking she asked to see her baby, rather than that she didnt speak
at all. 1/2
(a) The candidate answered both questions with other questions. Questions do not answer questions.
Some re-shaping of the text into statement form was required. 0/2
(b) The candidate answered correctly that earlier there had been a threat to the babys life. 1/1
(c) The candidate offered a correct synonym for fatality i.e. life idea, but repeated threat which was
the word to be re-cast. 1/2
(a) The candidate wrote settle instead of the correct answer lethargy. 0/1
(b) The candidate wrote correctly that the writer and the baby had endured the longest separation of
their lives, but incorrectly lifted a section which did not answer the question, i.e. the baby had never
been settled in her short life and the writer could picture her lying in a state of lethargy, instead of
the correct idea that she thought the operation had not been a success. 1/2
she might have understood it, writing instead the stem of the question, i.e. that she thought the nurse
would not have taken such a silly risk rather than defining why it was a silly risk. 1/2
(a) The candidate repeated the stem of the question, i.e. the nurses said the writer could not see the
baby, instead of making an inference such as they were worried the writer would make a fuss or get
upset, or that they were only junior nurses. 0/1
(b) The candidate repeated the words to be re-cast in this own words question, i.e. had the building
behind them and intention. 0/2
(c) The candidate wrote, correctly, that the senior nurse began to push the writer towards the door. 1/1
10
The candidate wrote, incorrectly, that the writer was making a fuss, whereas the focus should have been
on the surgeons anger at the nurses refusal to allow the writer to see her baby. 0/1
11
The candidate wrote correctly given for appointed, but incorrect responses for tedious (silly) and
hardened (stopped). The other two possible answers were not attempted. 1/5
92
Paper 2 Reading
93
Cambridge International Examinations

1 Hills Road, Cambridge, CB1 2EU, United Kingdom
Tel: +44 (0)1223 553554 Fax: +44 (0)1223 553558
Email: [email protected] www.cie.org.uk

Olevel English Standards Booklet

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Olevel English Standards Booklet

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Olevel English Standards Booklet

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

What is the purpose of this document?

What is the purpose of this document?

What are the two papers in the O Level English Language exam?

What are the two papers in the O Level English Language exam?

Example Candidate Responses

Cambridge O Level English Language 1123

Paper 2: Reading 1 hour 45 minutes

On the question paper

On the question paper

Reading for Ideas

W1, W2, W3, W4

W1, W2, W3, W4

Teachers are reminded that a full syllabus is available on www.cie.org.uk

Cambridge O Level English Language 1123

Cambridge O Level English Language 1123

Cambridge O Level English Language 1123

Cambridge O Level English Language 1123

Cambridge O Level English Language 1123

Cambridge O Level English Language 1123

Example candidate response grade A

Task Fulfilment mark = 15 out of 15

Cambridge O Level English Language 1123

Examiner comment grade A

Cambridge O Level English Language 1123

Example candidate response grade C

Cambridge O Level English Language 1123

Task Fulfilment mark = 12 out of 15

Cambridge O Level English Language 1123

Examiner comment grade C

Cambridge O Level English Language 1123

Example candidate response grade E

Cambridge O Level English Language 1123

Task Fulfilment mark = 7 out of 15

Cambridge O Level English Language 1123

Examiner comment grade E

Cambridge O Level English Language 1123

Section 2: Creative Writing

Cambridge O Level English Language 1123

Cambridge O Level English Language 1123

Cambridge O Level English Language 1123

Cambridge O Level English Language 1123

Cambridge O Level English Language 1123

Total mark awarded = 27 out of 30

Examiner comment grade A

Cambridge O Level English Language 1123

Example candidate response grade C

Cambridge O Level English Language 1123

Cambridge O Level English Language 1123

Examiner comment grade C

Cambridge O Level English Language 1123

Example candidate response grade E

Cambridge O Level English Language 1123

Total mark awarded = 14 out of 30

Cambridge O Level English Language 1123

Examiner comment grade E

Cambridge O Level English Language 1123

Cambridge O Level English Language 1123

Total mark awarded = 27 out of 30

Cambridge O Level English Language 1123

Examiner comment grade A