Dr.

Noella Piquette, U of L
CAAP 6607 Spring 2014

THE UNIVERSITY OF LETHBRIDGE

FACULTY OF EDUCATION
Master of Counselling
CAAP 6607: Counselling Diverse Clients
Spring Semester: January April 2014
Noella Piquette, Ph.D.
Instructor:

Dr. Noella Piquette

Office:

TH 317: Faculty of Education, University of

Lethbridge

Telephone:

403. 394. 3954

E-mail:

[email protected]

Course Description

Focuses on increasing personal awareness, identification of conceptual

frameworks, and development of in-depth knowledge of equity and
diversity issues in counselling. Students will be expected to examine
their own attitudes, behaviours, perceptions, and biases. Online
facilitated instruction

Course Materials
Arthur, N., & Collins, S. (2010). Culture-infused counselling:
Celebrating the Canadian mosaic [2nd ed]. Calgary, AB:
Counselling Concepts.
Weekly electronic readings will be found in our Moodle section.

Course Summary
This course is designed to enable students to enhance their
professional competencies in working with individuals or groups from
diverse populations. The course will facilitate development of selfawareness, acquisition of theoretical knowledge, and skill acquisition.
The focus of the course is on concepts and principles of counselling
psychology that enhance our understanding and effectiveness in
addressing particular issues related to age, ability, gender, sexual
orientation, race and ethnicity, socio-economic status, and so on.
Professional practice considerations are addressed through exposure to
course readings, experiential learning, interactions with peers, and
exposure to individuals with diverse cultural backgrounds. Students will

Dr. Noella Piquette, U of L

CAAP 6607 Spring 2014

be expected to examine their own attitudes, behaviours, perceptions,

and biases.
This course is unique in its development. The course authors invited
colleagues with expertise in counselling individuals and groups from
particular non-dominant populations to contribute a core reading and
the study materials for the units that relate to specific cultural groups:
girls and women, racial and ethnic minorities, lesbians, gay men,
immigrants and refugees, international students, First Nations
populations, and persons with disabilities. Throughout the course, you
will be exposed to a range of perspectives on multicultural and
diversity counselling.

Learning Objectives
1. Demonstrate an awareness of the existence and impact of
personal values and biases, focusing on issues of race, culture,
gender, sexual orientation, disability, and other areas of diversity.
2. Describe contextual and systemic values and biases and
illustrate their impact on individuals and groups from nondominant populations.
3. Develop a conceptual framework for adapting personal
counselling practice to reflect sensitivity to issues of equity and
diversity.

Course Structure
This course is designed to provide a dynamic and interactive learning
process in an online format. Resources include a list of readings and
links to supplementary resources from journals and other texts.
The course is structured into thirteen lessons. The first five lessons
address issues of multicultural counselling generally, providing a
framework for counsellors to develop competency in working with a
range of client populations. The next eight lessons highlight specific
multicultural/diversity groups that Canadian counsellors are likely to
have the privilege of engaging with to various degrees throughout their
careers. The final lesson provides an opportunity to review the learning
from the course and highlights issues related to continued competency.
The structure and process of the weekly online lessons require that all
students progress at a similar rate throughout this portion of the
course. During each week students will be expected to respond to the
thought-provoking questions that are posted in the weekly discussion
forum. Once the questions have been posted, you may contribute your
2

Dr. Noella Piquette, U of L

CAAP 6607 Spring 2014

ideas at any time. You are expected to log on at least twice a week,
although logging on several times a week is desirable inasmuch as it
will enhance the discussion among the participants.

Course Philosophy
The purpose of this course is to increase your competency to counsel
members of non-dominant populations. The philosophy in writing this
course is that such competency begins at the level of attitudinal
change and is complemented by knowledge and skill acquisition. All
three are important but the former forms the foundation for effective
multicultural diversity counselling practice. Some of you may start
from the premise that diversity counseling may not be particularly
relevant to your own practice. However, throughout your career you
will encounter individuals and groups whose world-view, values,
cultural practices, and so on differ from your own. It is hoped that by
the end of this course, you have developed the awareness and
sensitivity to respond effectively to their needs.
You will find that much of this course is focused on your own beliefs,
values, assumptions, affective reactions, and so on. Your assignments
will have a strong component of personal reflection and selfassessment. The expectations for the discussion forums shift away
from a predominantly conceptual dialogue, to focus on your own
personal perspectives and attitudes. It is hoped that you will enjoy the
learning process before you, although it is anticipated that it will not
always be comfortable as you are encouraged to step outside your
current experience and perspectives. I encourage you to talk with each
other, talk to me and with your instructors, and really integrate this
material into who you are and the counsellor you are becoming.

Overview
This course is designed to enable students to enhance their
professional competencies in working with individuals or groups from
non-dominant populations. The course will facilitate development of
self-awareness, theoretical knowledge, and skill acquisition. The focus
of the course is on concepts and principles of counselling psychology
that enhance our understanding of and effectiveness in addressing
particular issues related to age, ability, gender, sexual orientation, race
and ethnicity, socioeconomic status, and so on. Professional practice
considerations are addressed through exposure to course readings,
experiential learning, interactions with peers, and exposure to
individuals with diverse cultural backgrounds. Students will be
expected to examine their own attitudes, behaviours, perceptions, and
biases.
3

Dr. Noella Piquette, U of L

CAAP 6607 Spring 2014

ACADEMIC ACCOMODATIONS
Students with disabilities who require academic or nonacademic
considerations to support their learning experience are invited to
contact the Accommodated Learning Centre at the University of
Lethbridge before their program begins
[http://www.uleth.ca/ross/accommodated-learning-centre/content/accommodations ].
Documentation of the accommodation/ability/disability and
recommendations from a professional can be faxed to their office at
(403) 329-2281. The student will then be contacted to discuss
accommodations and notification of their instructors and/or professors.

Confidentiality
In order to create a safe place for students to share and process their
thoughts, feelings and reactions related to the course content, we need
to have a clear statement about the expectations we have regarding
confidentiality and the sharing of personal information. By virtue of
your participation in the University of Lethbridge M.Ed CAAP courses, it
is assumed that you will adhere to the ethical practices discussed
below. If, for some reason, you believe you cannot adhere to these
expectations, you are required to discuss the matter with your course
instructor before the course begins.
What are the expectations regarding confidentiality and the sharing of
personal information in University of Lethbridge CAAP courses?
Whatever you choose to share about yourself with others is
entirely up to you, completely at your discretion.
If you are doubtful about sharing specific aspects of your personal
experiences, it is best that you wait until a time when you are
more comfortable doing so.
The personal information that your classmates and course
instructors share with you is not to be discussed with anyone
outside the course.
There are no limitations on the length of time you are expected to
continue protecting the confidences you have received from
others. You will never have the right to share the personal
information your classmates and course instructors have
entrusted you with.
There will be specific incidences where the speaker directs that
the information being shared could be dispersed into the public
domain. An instructor may, for instance, share with the class that
having lost a client, she was grief stricken for months afterwards.
In the course of explaining the details she may tell the class to
feel free to share her story if it can be of benefit to others.
Golden Rule: If you have any doubts, about whether it is
4

Dr. Noella Piquette, U of L

CAAP 6607 Spring 2014

acceptable to share a specific piece of someone elses personal

information, dont!
Caution: While we will take all possible precautions to safeguard
the information that is exchanged in this course, whether in
discussion forums, web conferencing, E-mail, etc., we can not
provide you with a guarantee of confidentiality. Nonetheless, we
hope that you will feel comfortable enough to exchange your
ideas freely.
Exceptions to confidentiality: According to professional codes
of conduct, your course instructor may be required to break
confidentiality in matters relating to, but not limited to the
following circumstances:
a child or dependent adult is in need of protective services,
and/or
someones life is in imminent danger through suicide or the
intentional actions of others.
Please refer to the College of Alberta Psychologists for more details
surrounding limits to confidentiality: www.cap.ab.ca
What if I want to talk to someone outside the course about a personal
comment a student/instructor made?
If you feel you need to consult with someone outside the course
on a personal comment made in the course, you may do so as long as
you protect the identity of the individual you are discussing, This
means, at no times, are you to release the persons name, age, gender
or personal/professional background. Similarly, do not share any details
about when or where the comment was made. You are encouraged to
intervene by discussing the matter with that individual. If you are not
comfortable doing so, or if a resolution is not forthcoming, please
contact your instructor as soon as possible.
If you have anything further to add to this discussion regarding
confidentiality and the sharing of personal information, please feel free
to post your ideas in your course forum.

Overall Grading Taxonomy

Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives provides an overarching
framework for evaluating the quality of your work in this course. The
instructor will evaluate your performance in accordance with the
nature and level of learning required for a given course assignment.
Cognitive learning is demonstrated by knowledge recall;
comprehension of course materials; organizing information; analyzing,
applying and synthesizing knowledge; and critically evaluating ideas.
The cognitive domain will be assessed in this course through
contributions to the online discussion and through each of the major

Dr. Noella Piquette, U of L

CAAP 6607 Spring 2014

course assignments. Each component targets a range of levels of

cognitive learning. Be sure to review the criteria listed under each level
of learning in as you complete the course evaluation components. This
chart provides a clear indication of the standards your instructor will
use to assess your work.
A second domain, affective learning, is also targeted in this course.
This domain takes into account emotions, attitudes, beliefs,
preferences, worldview, and values. This is a particularly important
domain of learning in this course and forms the foundation for
respectful and sensitive application of knowledge and skill acquisition.
While affective learning will likely also be reflected in other
components of the course evaluation, it is specifically targeted through
the online discussions and team assignments and is likely reflected in
your literature review.
A third domain of learning, the skills domain, is demonstrated by
simulated activities, generalization of skills learned from specific
applications to novel situations, and a process called responsive
implementation, where the skill is elicited in response to the unique
requirements of the situation. This course is specifically designed to
teach both the knowledge required to create your own work and to
critically evaluate the work of others. You are then provided with the
opportunity to apply those skills as you complete your own literature
review.

APA Format for Course Assignments

All written assignments must be completed according to the format
described in the Publication Manual of the American Psychological
Association (6th ed.) We strongly recommend that you purchase a copy
of the APA Manual and refer to it when writing papers and compiling
reference lists. Up to 25% of the total mark for assignments may be
deducted for errors in presentation, style, and grammar. The specific
number of marks allotted to APA format for each assignment is
indicated under the grading criteria for that assignment.
Evaluation Component
Writing Style and
Presentation
Spelling and Punctuation

Grading Criteria

One point deducted for each time two

errors are noted
One point deducted for each time two

Relative
Weight
2 points
2 points

Dr. Noella Piquette, U of L

CAAP 6607 Spring 2014

errors are noted

Organization and Heading
Style
Quotations and Within-Text
Citations

Reference List

One point deducted for each error

2 points

One point deducted for each time two

errors are noted

2 points

One point deducted for each time two

errors are noted

2 points

Intellectual Honesty

Plagiarism is a form of intellectual dishonesty in which another

person's work is presented as one's own. Be certain that whenever you
use a secondary source in your course work and assignments you
reference your source in a consistent and logical manner. All direct
quotes (quotations of any number of words from the original) and
indirect quotes (paraphrased ideas) must be acknowledged. Failure to
do so constitutes plagiarism, and as with any form of academic
misconduct, it will be penalized. Penalties may take the form of
rejection of the submitted work; expulsion from the course or the
program; or legal action, depending on the specific nature of the
infraction.
Please ensure that you uphold the highest intellectual honesty within
all of your submitted assignments and each discussion forum posting.
Refer to APA 6th edition for examples of how to cite sources if you are
unclear as to when and how to quote sources.
However, dutiful citation of quotes and paraphrased materials does not
mean that you can write an essay assignment by stringing together a
series of quotes. You should always try to summarize or describe
someone else's ideas in your own words. When you present your own
ideas or opinions in a paper, provide evidence or arguments to
substantiate your position.

Feedback on Written Assignments

The feedback you receive on written assignments will take into account
the following.

Dr. Noella Piquette, U of L

CAAP 6607 Spring 2014

* Relevance: How clearly have the central questions or issues been

defined? How closely does the subsequent writing relate to these
questions or issues? How succinct and concise is the writing?
* Definition: Have terms that require definition been defined in a
clear and appropriate way? (e.g., technical terms or terms with
meanings that are central to the argument being presented)
* Organization, argument, support: How coherent is the
argument that comprises the paper? Is the topic sufficiently introduced
and concluded? Are transitions between ideas clearly and smoothly
accomplished? Are the arguments sufficiently elaborated? Are the
arguments clearly supported by illustrative examples and references to
external sources where appropriate? Are sources of material
acknowledged?
* Formatting style: Must adhere to the APA Manual currently in
use.
* Accuracy and clarity: Is the writing sufficiently free of
grammatical error and awkwardness to communicate meaning clearly?
Are word choices appropriate and accurate? Is the presentation free of
error and omission?
* Originality: Does the writing display an original voice, as opposed
to one that relies primarily on the words and voices of others? Is there
evidence of original and creative thought?
The comments you receive on your work are intended to support your
learning, rather than to criticize for the sake of criticism. Writing is a
skill that develops over time, and it requires continuous effort and
refinement.

2014 Tentative Timeline for 6607 PIQUETTE

Date
January 8

Lesso
n
1

Focus

January 15

Concepts of Culture

January 22

Multicultural/Diversity Counselling
Competencies & Counselling Process

January 29

Ethics and Diversity Counselling

February 5

Counselling Girls and Women

Introduction to Multicultural/Diversity
Counselling

Dr. Noella Piquette, U of L

CAAP 6607 Spring 2014

February 12

Counselling Boys and Men

February 16

ProfessionalIssuesPaperdue@11:59pm.

February 19

Reading Week no classes

February 26

March 1

Counselling Immigrants and Refugees

DFMidtermSelfEvaluationdue@11:59pm.

March 5

Counselling First Nations People

March 12

Counselling People from Religious, Racial and

Ethnic Minority Groups
No DF posts

March 19

10

Counselling Lesbians

March 26

11

Counselling Gay Males

March29

CulturalInterviewPaperdue@11:59pm.

April 2

12

Counselling International Students

April 9

13

Continued Competency in Multicultural or

Diversity Counselling
No DF posts

April 16

DF Self Evaluation due @ 11:59 pm.

April 19

Professional Competencies Paper due @ 11:59

pm.

Course Assignments
The assessment structure for CAAP 6607: Counselling Diverse Clients is
based on the following course activities, with the percentage weighting
of each activity as indicated. Your final grade for the course will be a
composite mark based on your performance in these course activities.
Course Activity

Weight

ParticipationinOnlineDiscussionForums
DueDate:March1&April16

20%

Dr. Noella Piquette, U of L

CAAP 6607 Spring 2014

Assignment1:ProfessionalIssuesPaper
DueDate:February16,2014

20%

Assignment2:CulturalInterview
DueDate:March29,2014

40%

Assignment3:PersonalCompetenciesPaper
DueDate:April19,2014

20%

Total

100%

Submission: All assignments must be submitted electronically to your

instructor for marking at the times specified in the Course Schedule.
Please use the Assignment Drop Box in Moodle to submit your papers.
o For each day that an assignment is late, you may lose up to 5%
of the total mark for that assignment unless an extension has
been granted in advance.
o Each assignment submission must have all components merged
together as one document, with your name, the date, instructor
name and assignment noted on title page.
o Each assignment submission must have your name and the
course on the saved document. For example, 6607 Student
Name Professional Issues Paper.
Final Letter Grade
The Faculty of Education at U of L has a standardized grading system
for its graduate program.

10

Dr. Noella Piquette, U of L

CAAP 6607 Spring 2014

Numeric Value
97
93
90

- 100
- 96
- 92

87
83
80

- 89
- 86
- 82

Letter Grade
Point
A+
A
A-

Grade

B+
B
B-

4.00
4.00
3.70
3.30
3.00
2.70

Note: A course with a grade of less than B- cannot be considered for credit in the
M.Ed/M.C. program
77
73
70
67
63
<63

is

79
76
72
69
66
aF

C+
C
CD+
D

2.30
2.00
1.70
1.30
1.00

Assignments
Participation in Online Discussion Forums
(20%)

The discussion forums can be accessed directly from the Moodle Home.
Please be careful to select the appropriate forum for each week.
Each week, unless otherwise noted in your course schedule, you will be
expected to participate in an online discussion forum containing a set
of questions for discussion or issues for reflection. Please note: Posting
to forums are to occur between Wednesday at 8 am to Sunday at 10
am. No marks will be awarded for posts submitted late [after 10 am
Sunday or Mondays & Tuesdays].
Participation marks will be awarded to students who contribute weekly
to the discussions. You are expected to make substantive contributions
to the forum dialogue. To do so, you must have read the required
materials and given considerable thought to the concepts and
theoretical issues presented. In general, scholarly work involves the
ability to critically analyze information, to synthesize information from
a variety of sources, to compare and contrast similar theoretical
structures across different theories, and to raise relevant examples to
illustrate principles.
Grading Criteria for Online Discussion Forums

11

Dr. Noella Piquette, U of L

CAAP 6607 Spring 2014

Participation in the online discussions is evaluated on the basis of both

the frequency of your posting to the forums and the quality of your
online comments. The specific grading criteria for these two
components are described below. Refer to the Overall Grading
Taxonomy to review the expectations associated with each level of
learning.
Quality of Comments (this will earn top marks)
Core constructs accurately identified and described
Material from previous units integrated to formulate ideas and
generate dialogue
Personal perceptions, attitudes, values reflected in the
contributions
Self-awareness, sensitivity to others, openness to personal
growth demonstrated
New and related perceptions of an issue raised
Ability to synthesize, personalize, and apply learning to personal
development demonstrated
Relevant readings and research cited to support points
The quality of your comments is evaluated on the basis of criteria
similar to those used in evaluating written assignments. Comments
should demonstrate that you have read the background material and
given thought to the issues raised. You should also demonstrate your
active engagement in the process of self-reflection.
Extent of Participation in Online Discussions
Posting the minimum will not be adequate for full marks. Minimum
posting, if of a quality level, will achieve at the highest, a minimum
passing grade (80%).
1. Two postings (minimum) per week to the questions or issues
raised within the weekly discussion forum: one post per question is
mandatory. Responses to questions or issues posted in the forums
must be between 150 and 200 words. Correct APA citation is
mandatory.
2. Two shorter responses (minimum) per week in response to the
postings of other students that extends the discourse. These should
be extensions to your peers posting or providing novel information
related to their posting.
3. Community building segments within your posts are highly
encouraged [i.e., I really resonated with your post because ,
Thank you for bringing up ..] but if the majority of the post is based
on a personal exchange it must be posted in the coffee lounge
section. This ensures that your peers do not have to wade through
excessive amounts of posts. Thank you for your consideration in this!

12

Dr. Noella Piquette, U of L

CAAP 6607 Spring 2014

4. As there are 2 weeks of non posts within the DF, plus a

reading week built into this course, thus permission to miss one
posting [known as skip week] to the DF will not be granted.
You should look at your participation in the discussion forums as
roughly equivalent to the three hours you would traditionally spend in
an on-campus graduate seminar. Your reading, preparation, and
assignment time take place in addition to those three hours.

Assignment 1: Professional Issues Paper

(20%)
Thecoursetextprovidesageneralrationaleforinfusingcultureintocounsellingwithall
clients.Throughoutyourcareer,youmayencounterindividualswhowouldarguethat
multiculturalcounsellingisaspecialistfieldandthatnotallpractitionersneedto
developmentcompetenceinthisarea.Alternatively,someonemightarguethatitisupto
theclienttoadjusttoaEurocentricsocietyandcounsellingpractices.TheProfessional
IssuesPaperrequiresyoutofirstdevelopascenarioinwhichahypotheticpractitioner
mightmakeanargumentagainstcultureinfusedcounsellingpracticetoyou.
Trytopickaspecializationwithinthefieldofcounsellingthatyouaresomewhatfamiliar
withorhaveexperiencein,[i.e.,schoolcounsellingorcareercounseling],oraparticular
counsellingsettingwherethisargumentmightarise,suchasruralareasoragencies
dealingwithparticularclientele.
Brieflyoutlinetheargumentsofyourhypotheticcolleague(oneortwoparagraphs)and
thendeveloparationaleforincludingissuesofdiversitywithinthatparticularfieldor
settingofprofessionalpractice.Youraiminthepaperistoconvincethereadertotakea
multiculturalapproach/diversityapproachtoprofessionalpractice,providingsolid
reasonsforthatposition.
Youareexpectedtodemonstratecriticalthinkingaswellasintegrationofthecourse
materialsandadditionalsources.Youareexpectedtobecreativeandtonotsimplyrepeat
theargumentspresentedinthecoursewithoutadditionalreflectionandresources.
Therationaleyouprovideshouldincorporateareviewofcontemporaryliterature
intheareaofmulticulturalcounselling,withanemphasisonworkpublishedsince
2005.
Youshouldaimtoincludeatleast8to10articlesorbooksthatarenotincluded
intherequiredreadingsforthecourseandarepreferablyspecifictotheareaof
practiceyouhaveidentified.
Yourpapershouldbedoublespaced,useAPAformat,andnotexceed10pagesin
length(excludingreferences).

13

Dr. Noella Piquette, U of L

CAAP 6607 Spring 2014

Youmayfinditbeneficialtousetherubricpointsasheadersand2ndlevelheaders
toensurethatyouhaveincorporatedallofthenecessaryinformationinyour
paper.

Assignment 2: Cultural Interview (40%)

TheCulturalInterviewwillbebasedonaninformationinterviewheldwithanadultfrom
aculturalbackgroundthatisdifferentfromyourown.Thepurposeofthepaperisto
facilitateyourunderstandingofhowthetheoryandprocessesrelatedtomulticultural
experienceandcounsellingmightbeappliedinpractice.However,thisprojectisnota
counsellingintervieworintervention.Yourpurposeintheinterviewissimplytogather
informationabouttheindividual'sworldview,valuesystems,culturalexperienceand
beliefs,experienceofmulticulturalidentity,andsoon.
Culturalinformantsarerichsourcesofinformationandinsights,althoughspeakingwith
onlyonepersonfromaparticularculturalgroupdoesnotallowyoutogeneralizetoa
largerpopulation.Pleasebearinmindthatwearedefiningcultureverybroadlyhereto
includeissuesofgender,sexualorientation,abilities,race,ethnicity,andsoon.Youare
stronglyencouragedtoselectanindividualfromaculturalgroupthatyouarenotvery
familiarwith.
Pleasebesuretodiscussthenatureofthecourseassignmentwiththepersonyouare
interviewingandtohavethatpersoncompleteaconsentform[exampleisprovided;feel
freetouseit]priortoparticipatingintheexercise.Youarerequiredtoprovideacopyof
thecompletedconsentformtoDr.Piquette[scannedandincludedattheendofyour
paper]Youarealsorequiredtoshowthecompletedassignmenttotheparticipantbefore
youhanditin.Ensurethatnoidentifyinginformationiscontainedinyourcourse
submission,apartfromtheculturalidentityoftheparticipant.
Yourpapershouldbedoublespaced,useAPAformat,andnotexceed15pagesinlength
(excludingreferences).Youareexpectedtoincorporateliteratureonmulticultural
counsellinggenerally,aswellasliteraturepertainingtotheparticularculturalgroup.

Assignment 3: Personal Competencies Paper

(20%)
The Personal Competencies Paper is designed to provide you with an
opportunity to engage in both self-reflection and personal or
professional goal setting. Throughout the course, you will be
challenged to broaden your perspective, let go of some of your own
culturally embedded biases, and explore your own cutting edges in

14

Dr. Noella Piquette, U of L

CAAP 6607 Spring 2014

multicultural awareness and sensitivity. The purpose of the final paper

is to crystalize that learning into a concise appraisal of your current
level of multicultural counselling competency and your goals for
continued competency.
Be sure to address in the paper both the broad multicultural
competencies explored in the course and reflection on your sense of
awareness and competency in relation to the particular cultural groups
explored. Your continued competency goals represent a professional
development plan in relation to those competencies. Be sure to include
in your plan not only what specific areas you would target, but also
how you would go about increasing your competency in those areas.
Lesson 13 provides some valuable information for completing this
particular assignment. If you want to work ahead on the Personal
Competencies Paper, I suggest you read through the materials from
Lesson 13 before you begin. You may also want to wait until you have
completed that final lesson before submitting your final draft of the
paper for grading.
Your paper should be double-spaced and should not exceed 10 pages
in length. You are not required to reference this paper, nor are you
required to follow APA style.
Nonetheless, your paper should reflect integration and critical thought
about concepts presented through the required readings and study
process in the course, particularly the lesson on multicultural
counselling competencies. Feel free to be creative in the way in which
you present your learning. Past students have created webpages,
Powerpoint presentations, wiki pages, posters, etc.

Discussion Forum Postings

6607 Dr. Nolla Piquette
I have provided the discussion forum posting criteria that you have become
familiar with in your previous graduate courses through CAAP in our
assignment section. Please see the criteria that I utilize for feedback to you
when you receive the rubric it will contain highlighted [colored] sections in
which I am drawing to your attention. Please feel free to use this same rubric
when you evaluate your own postings, as it is a simple, effective means to
identify where you feel your contributions lay. Of course there is an
expectation for a narrative explanation below the rubric.

15

Dr. Noella Piquette, U of L

CAAP 6607 Spring 2014

Criteria
Participation marks will be awarded to students who contribute substantial
and regular comments to the online discussions. You will be evaluated,
therefore, on the basis of both the frequency of your posting to the forums
and the quality of your online comments. Timeliness is also important with
additional marks awarded for postings early in the week as well as spread out
over the week in other words, avoiding a clustering of posts on the weekend
will be advantageous!
The quality of your comments is evaluated on the basis of criteria similar to
those used in evaluating written assignments. To be an active and effective
participant, you must read the required materials and give considerable
thought to the concepts and issues presented.
Like other scholarly work, engaging in a learning conversation draws on your
ability to critically analyze and synthesize information and to make
connections to your own values and beliefs, theoretical models, practice
experiences, and other contextual factors.
Quality postings will include some or all of the following components:
consistent evidence of accurate analysis of concepts; integration of material
from previous units to formulate ideas and generate dialogue; contribution of
new or original thoughts, arguments, insights, or ideas; new and related
perceptions of an issue raised; openness to divergent points of view; links to
individual or collective experiences; challenge or questioning of prevailing
ideas or assumptions; synthesis, analysis, and comparison of concepts across
different perspectives; connection to the contributions of other participants in
a meaningful manner; relevant examples raised to illustrate principles; or
relevant readings and research cited to support key points.
Participation Mark
Extent of Participation: Weight 10 marks
Quality of Comments: Weight 10 marks
Criteria for
Participation
6607 PIQUETTE
Timeliness

10 - 9
Outstanding

8-7
Proficient

6-5
Basic

5 Below
Unsuccessful

All required
Postings; early in
discussion;
throughout
the discussion

All required
postings; some not in
time for others to read
and respond

Most required
postings; most at the
last minute without
allowing for response
time

Contributions to
our Learning
Community

Aware of needs of
community;
frequently
attempts to
motivate the
group
discussion;

Frequently
attempts to direct the
discussion
and to present
relevant
viewpoints for
consideration by

Occasionally
makes
meaningful
reflection on
groups efforts;
marginal effort to
become involved

Some or all
required
postings are
missing; lack of
response time for
others
Does not make
effort to
participate in
learning
community as it
develops; provides
minimal comments

16

Dr. Noella Piquette, U of L

CAAP 6607 Spring 2014

Connections to
weekly forum
questions
Research
Citations

presents creative
approaches to
topic

group; interact freely

with variety of peers

with group; may interact

with a few peers in
posts

and information to
peers

Clear connections
to previous or
current topic;
to real-life
situations or
research
Interprets readings
in accurate and
insightful ways; a
clear syntheses of
information and
relevant citations;
novel information;
stimulates
discussion

Connections are made

with new ideas; may
lack depth and/or
detail at times

Limited, if any
connections; vague
generalities

Little or no
connections
are made; often off
topic

Interprets readings
accurately; provides
relevant citations;
provides interesting
information;
contributes to
discussion
surrounding research

Struggles at times with

accurate interpretation
of research; may not
reference citations at
times; engages
minimally in the
discussions

Does not meet

criteria for amount of
research citations
posted; little
interpretation of
readings

17

Dr. Noella Piquette, U of L

CAAP 6607 Spring 2014

Criteria for Quality

of Comments
6607 PIQUETTE
Focus on Topic

Critical Thinking

Uniqueness

Stylistics

10 - 9
Outstanding

8-7
Proficient

6-5
Basic

5 and below
Unsuccessful

Clear indication
that the response
is motivated by
particular reading
and that the writer
has taken a
position on topic
and developed it
Rich in content;
full of thought,
insight, and
analysis

Responses make
connections to
information,
and other texts the
writer has read or
seen; opinion on
reading is established

Use of other
resources/citations
noted; limited
connections to other
topics or readings;
opinion or position not
stated

Frequently does not

cite; topic is not
linked to readings;
no opinion stated

Substantial
information; thought,
insight, and
analysis has
taken place

Generally
competent; repeats of
ideas of others; info is
not original nor detailed

Rudimentary
and superficial;
no analysis or
insight is
displayed

New ideas; new

links or
connections
made with
depth and
detail
Few or no
grammatical
or stylistic
errors; complete
sentences, well
organized

New ideas or
connections; may lack
depth
and/or detail

Few, if any new

ideas or
connections; rehash or
summarize other
postings

No new ideas;
I agree
with
statement

Several
grammatical or
stylistic errors; well
organized; could be
improved for clarity

Obvious
grammatical or
stylistic errors;
errors interfere
with content meaning

Obvious
grammatical or
stylistic errors;
makes
understanding
difficult

Comments:

18

Dr. Noella Piquette, U of L

CAAP 6607 Spring 2014

Assignment 1: Professional Issues Paper

Grading Criteria
6607 PIQUETTE

APA Style
Note: Include the bolded rubric points as 1st or 2nd level
headers in this paper
Respond to each question within the rubric; the question
stem can become a 3rd level header should you desire

Weight
(20 marks)

2 marks

Challenge to multiculturalism
Clearly articulated argument against infusing culture into
counselling as a starting point for the paper [1 3
paragraphs].
1 mark

Outline of how you will justify your area of MCC/diversity

counseling within the remainder of your paper
Consider this to be your introduction.
Synthesis of the literature on central issues in
multicultural counselling
What does the current literature say about the importance of
multicultural counseling/diversity counseling for your domain
area?
What are the key issues that writers argue are important for
competent practice with culturally diverse clientele? An
example of a critical issue may be the ethnocentrism of
current practice.

5 marks

Provide a brief introduction and summary to this section prior

to transitioning to the next section.
Critical analysis of the relevance and importance of
their integration into the particular area of
professional practice (rationale)
Provide 8 to 10 clear and well-documented arguments for
why these issues must be attended to in the area of practice
you have identified.

9 marks

How do the issues identified relate to the area of practice you

are writing about?

19

Dr. Noella Piquette, U of L

CAAP 6607 Spring 2014

What specific issues are most relevant and why? For

example, how does ethnocentrism play out in work with
children in the school setting?
What evidence from the literature supports the importance of
this issue in this context?
Provide a brief introduction and summary to this section prior
to transitioning to the next section.
Summary
Full circle for the argument against MCC:
Write a 2 - 4-paragraph summary statement that could be
submitted to the hypothetical colleague noted in the
beginning of your paper, drawing on the most compelling
arguments you have discovered.
Literature synthesis/analysis: Ensure that you have provided
a summary of the synthesis and critical analysis related to
the importance of multicultural/diversity counselling.

3 marks

Personal reflection:
Provide a paragraph outlining your personal reflection related
to this assignment.
What did you take away from it?
Barriers and strengths you feel that you were able to bring to
this assignment?
Knowledge gain or consolidation?

20

Dr. Noella Piquette, U of L

CAAP 6607 Spring 2014

Assignment 2: Cultural Interview

Grading Criteria
6607 PIQUETTE

APA Style
Note: Include the bolded rubric points as 1st or 2nd level
headers in this paper
Respond to each question within the rubric; the question
stem can become a 3rd level header should you desire
Multicultural Constructs [Theoretical Background]:
1. Articulation of the central multicultural theoretical
constructs or processes that you see as relevant to the
interviewee's experience

Weight
(40 marks)

2 marks

8 marks

2. Provide background on interviewee and the interview

process
Application of Constructs The Interview
1. Identification of how these theoretical perspectives lend an
understanding to the experience of the person being
interviewed
2. Direct quotes included within this section [interwoven
throughout] in order to hear the interviewees experiences
while describing the theoretical perspectives

12 marks

3. Interview transcript in appendix along with informed

consent
Counselling Considerations
1. Elaboration on the professional practice considerations in
working with a client from this particular background or
culture, with particular attention to the application of the
multicultural competencies/diversity

12 marks

2. Note 8 to 12 specific counselling techniques that would

support a client from client from this particular background or
culture based on what you learned from the literature review
and cultural interview
3. Provide specific directions on what nuances would need to
be taken into account if supporting a client from this
background via counseling; this can be from the counsellors

21

Dr. Noella Piquette, U of L

CAAP 6607 Spring 2014

perspective, agency or systemic overview

Self Reflection
1. Reflection on your own personal learning through the
experience of completing this cultural interview
2. What were the barriers, successes, surprises or
consolidations of what you knew that emerged within this
interview and assignment completion?

6 marks

3. What knowledge/attitude/beliefs will you take into your

counselling practice that is based on your experience with
this assignment?

22

Dr. Noella Piquette, U of L

CAAP 6607 Spring 2014

Consent Form for Participation in A Cultural Interview

As a learning assignment in the University of Lethbridge, Masters of
Counselling course, CAAP 6607: Counselling Diverse Clients, students
are required to interview an adult regarding their experience of cultural
diversity. Information from the interviews will be used as the basis of a
written case summary and for class discussion purposes only. If there
are any additional questions please contact the course instructor, Dr.
Noella Piquette at 403.394.3954 or [email protected].
To participate in the study, please read and note your agreement to the
following terms:
I understand that the time requirement for the interview is
approximately 15 to 30 minutes.
I give my permission for written notes to be made during the
interview.
I give my permission for the use of an audio recording device
during the interview.
I understand that I am free to terminate the interview at any
time.
I understand that all information will be treated in an anonymous
fashion. My name or any other identifying information will not be
used in either the written summary or in class discussion.
I understand that the results of the interview may be used for
discussion purposes in a class with other students [anonymous
names/agency].
I understand that only the instructor will see the written
summary of the interview [anonymous name/agency].
I understand that the content of this interview may be used in
the interviewers Masters exit project with an anonymous
name/agency.
I understand that all interview notes and/or tapes will be
destroyed within one month of the course end date.
I understand that I can terminate my participation at any time
with no repercussions and all of my data will be destroyed and
not be used.
By signing this form, I am providing written consent to participate in
the cultural interview and consent to the terms listed above.
________________________________ ___________________________________
Participant's Signature
Date

23

Dr. Noella Piquette, U of L

CAAP 6607 Spring 2014

________________________________ ___________________________________
Student's Signature
Date

Assignment 3: Personal Competencies Paper

Grading Criteria
6607 PIQUETTE

Weight
(20 marks)

Personal Competencies
Reflection on your current level of multicultural awareness
and competency, including the ways in which that has been
facilitated through the course readings and activities
How have you highlighted the need for you and other
counsellors to be better prepared for multicultural/diversity
counselling?

10 marks

How have you explored culture-centered counselling

competencies?
How are you defining MCC and diversity counselling?
Describe your growth process in your understanding of the
worldview of ethnically/culturally different clients.
Continued Growth with Competencies
Clear identification of targets for continued professional
development and the means for increasing competency in;
a. Self awareness
b. Understanding the worldview of culturally different
clients
c. Intervention skills and techniques
10 marks

How are you going to demonstrate respectfulness and an

understanding of multiple belief systems?
What counselling competencies are you going to incorporate
into your counselling practice/personal life? What steps will
you take? How will you know if you are moving forward with
this goal?

24

Dr. Noella Piquette, U of L

CAAP 6607 Spring 2014

25