Info On House Joint Resolution 192

House Joint Resolution-192
On June 5, 1933, Congress enacted HJR-192 to suspend the gold standard

and to abrogate the gold clause. This resolution declared that "Whereas the
holding or dealing in gold affect the public interest, and are therefore subject to
proper regulation and restriction; and whereas the existing emergency has
disclosed that provisions of obligations which purport to give the obligee a right
to require payment in gold or a particular kind of coin or currency. . . are
inconsistent with the declared policy of congress. . . in the payment of debts.
This resolution declared that any obligation requiring "payment in gold or a
particular kind of coin or currency, or in an amount in money policy; and . . .
Every obligation heretofore or hereafter incurred, shall be discharged upon
payment, dollar for dollar, in any coin or currency which at the time of payment
is legal tender for public and private debts."
A farm control bill around the same time period had attached to it a clause
making Federal Reserve notes legal tender. In 1937, the Supreme Court struck
down the Farm Control Act, thus carrying with it the legal tender status of
Federal Reserve notes. Prior to 1933, Federal Reserve notes were used for
inter-bank transfers. Around 1945, Congress passed a bill which called for the
withdrawal of Federal Reserve notes from public circulation; but, they are still
with us. . . *NOTE that the words do not talk about "payment" of debt, but
clearly states that "Every Obligation . . . Shall be discharged."
In the case of Stanek v. White, 172 Minn. 390, 215 H.W. 784, the court
explained the legal distinction between the words "payment" and "discharge":
"There is a distinction between a `debt discharged' and a `debt paid.' When
discharged the debt still exists though divested of its character as a legal
obligation during the operation of the discharge. Something of the original
vitality of the debt continues to exist, which may be transferred, even though
the transferee takes it subject to its disability incident to the discharge. The fact
that it carries something which may be a consideration for a new promise to
pay, so as to make an otherwise worthless promise a legal obligation, makes it
the subject of transfer by assignment."
Thus, it is clear that, as a result of HJR 192 and from that day forward (June 5,
1933), no one has been able to pay a debt. The only thing they can do is tender
in transfer of debts, and the debt is perpetual. The suspension of the gold
1
standard, and prohibition against paying debts, removed the substance for our
Common Law to operate on, and created a void, as far as the law is concerned.
This substance was replaced with a "Public National Credit" system where debt
is money (The Federal Reserve calls it "monetized debt") over which the only
jurisdiction at is Admiralty and Maritime.
HJR-192 was implemented immediately. The day after President Roosevelt
signed the resolution the treasury offered the public new government securities,
minus the traditional "payable in gold" clause. Article I, Section 10, Clause 1,
proscribes the States making any thing but gold and silver coin a tender in
payment of debt -- but, this Article does not contain an absolute prohibition
against the States making something else a tender in transfer of debt.
HJR-192 prohibits payment of debt and substitutes, in its place, a discharge of
an obligation -- thereby not only subverting, but totally bypassing the "absolute
prohibition" so carefully engineered into the Constitution. There is, now, nothing
for this Article to operate on, just as there is nothing for Common Law to
operate on. Perpetual debt, bills, notes, cheques and credits fall within a totally
different jurisdiction than contemplated by Article I, Section 10, Clause 1 -- and
that jurisdiction belongs exclusively to the Law of Admiralty and Maritime. Now,
it is easy to see how "bills" as plenty as oak leaves, "polluted the laws after the
War For Independence, as described by Peletiah Webster". This is how we lost
access to substantive Common Law -- the very law the Minute Men fought to
regain.
HJR-192 places every person who deals in the public national credit in the legal
position of a merchant, and the only jurisdiction over any controversy involving
this subject matter is Admiralty and Maritime. Obviously, if we cannot pay our
debts at law, we are also benefiting from limited liability under the Limited
Liability Act when we use this credit-- and, that is marine insurance!
The definitions of "liability" and "insure" will help convince us of this fact -- in
analyzing these definitions, keep in mind the distinction between "payment" and
"discharge". Liability: The word is a broad term. It has been defined to mean: all
character of debts and obligations. . . any kind of debt or liability, either absolute
or contingent, express or implied . . . condition which creates a duty to perform
an act immediately or in the future . . . duty to pay money or to perform some
other service . . . the state of being bound or obligated in law or justice to do,
pay, or make good something. "Insure: "To engage to indemnify a person
2
against pecuniary loss from specified perils or possible liability".

QUESTION #1: Who do you suppose took possession of the treasury of the
State of Pa. on June 5, 1933, -- the moment HJR-192 made it impossible for
the State of Pennsylvania to pay its debts?
QUESTION #2: Land titles being allodial in Pennsylvania, what was the State
Assembly's authority and jurisdiction to pledge these allodiums to the Federal
Reserve as security for loan contracts from the Federal Government?
QUESTION #3: If the individual citizens of Pennsylvania were indeed
"sovereign" under the Common Law -- What was the authority and jurisdiction
of the State Assembly to pledge their labor to the Federal Reserve pool?
Clearly, the alleged authority and jurisdiction is the so-called public policy
declared by Congress. We will return to this subject later on.
If all the assets of the United States have been hypothecated to the Federal
Reserve "pool" as security for the maritime loan and insurance underwriting
policy, then that raises a couple of questions: QUESTION #1: If the United
States "dies" (or is merged) under a One World government, who gets the
pool? QUESTION #2: If the Federal Reserve "dies" by way of getting its charter
rescinded, who gets the pool?
The answers can be found in the Federal Reserve Act itself: "Should a Federal
Reserve bank be dissolved or go into liquidation, any surplus remaining, after
the payment of all debts, dividend requirements as herein before provided, and
the par value of the stock, shall be paid to and become the property of the
United States and shall be similarly applied".
31 USC 315B provided that: "No gold shall after January 30, 1934, be coined,
and no gold coin shall after January 30, 1934, be paid out or delivered by the
United States; provided however, that coinage may continue to be executed by
the mints of the United States for foreign countries". This exception was
necessary because foreign countries, being recognized or sovereign, could not
be held to the internal public policy of the United States. HJR-192 was binding
only upon those individuals who were beneficiaries of public policy; that being
the privilege of limited liability for payment of debt arising out of participation in
the Federal Reserve Public Credit System.
3
HJR-192 automatically extended the privilege to renege on debts to every

person using the Federal Reserve banking system; however, never forget that
when you operate on a privilege, you have to respect the ruler of the giver of
that privilege. Furthermore, in the case of Great Falls Mfg. Co. v. Attorney
General, 124 U.S. 581, the court said: "The court will not pass upon the
constitutionality of a statute at the instance of one who has availed himself of its
benefits."
Thus, if you avail yourself of any benefits of the public credit system you waive
the right to challenge the validity of any statute pertaining to, and conferring
"benefits" of this system on the basis of constitutionality.
See Also: The History of "How We Were Put in This Commerce Game"
It is a MUST to Listen to This Recording for Basic Understanding of the
Dual Trusts
Lecture on Beneficiary & Trustee Status in Court Cases (.mp3 Audio File)
See Also:
Title 31 USC 5118
Beneficiary & Trustee Status in Court Cases (transcribed .pdf)
The Power of Acceptance
STRAWMAN
Redeem Your Certificate of Birth
Web Source: http://www.educationcenter2000.com/legal/HJR_192.html

Info On House Joint Resolution 192

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Info On House Joint Resolution 192

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Info On House Joint Resolution 192

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

House Joint Resolution-192

On June 5, 1933, Congress enacted HJR-192 to suspend the gold standard

against pecuniary loss from specified perils or possible liability".

HJR-192 automatically extended the privilege to renege on debts to every

You might also like