The League of Nations Successes and Failures

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 11
At a glance
Powered by AI
The key takeaways are that the League of Nations was established after World War 1 to promote international cooperation and peace. However, it faced challenges in fulfilling its mission due to limitations in its covenant and difficulties harmonizing the interests of member nations.

The main goals of establishing the League of Nations were to end war as a means of settling disputes and promote democracy, justice and cooperation between nations.

The author notes that the League faced challenges because its covenant needed improving to prohibit war altogether and give more executive power to overcome the principle of unanimous decisions. It was also difficult to always find a harmonization of national interests with the interests of other nations.

1/11/2016

TheLeagueofNations:SuccessesandFailures

Home>TheLeagueofNations:SuccessesandFailures

Saturday,October1,1932
TheLeagueofNations:SuccessesandFailures
EduardBene
EDUARDBENE,MinisterofForeignAffairsoftheCzechoslovakRepublicsince1918(and
Premierfrom1921to1922)oneofthedraftersoftheGenevaProtocolin1924
ASANaccompanimentoftheeconomicandfinancialcrisistheworldhasbeenafflictedwith
ageneralpoliticalunrestandanincreaseofmistrustanduncertaintyininternational
relations.Inthissituationpublicopinioneverywherehasturneditscriticalattentiontothe
LeagueofNations,foundedtwelveyearsagoforthepurposeofcombatingjustsuch
tendencies,andtopromoteinternationalcoperationandsafeguardpeace.Thequestion
beingaskedis:WhathastheLeagueofNationsdone,whatisitdoing,toalleviatethecrisis
andhelptowardsasolutionoftheworld'surgentandcomplicatedproblems?Thequestionis
oftenaskedskeptically,implyingadversecriticismoftheLeague'sactivitiesanddoubt
regardingitsprospects.
Inmyopinion,criticismofwhattheLeaguehasdoneisnecessaryandusefulbuttobeas
usefulaspossiblethecriticismmustbediscriminating.Wemustrecognizefranklyandfairly
whattheLeaguehasaccomplishedandwhatareitsassetswemustmakejustasfrankan
appraisaloftherespectsinwhichithasnotfulfilleditsmissionsoastodecidefairlywhat
constituteitsliabilities.
I.THEMISSIONOFTHELEAGUE
ThegeneralobjectsforwhichtheLeagueofNationswasfoundedinJanuary1920,andthe
hopesthatattachedtoit,arewellknown.Exasperatedandhorrorstrickenatthefearful
sacrificesentailedbytheWorldWar,atthebloodspiltandatthemoralaswellasthe
materialdamage,mankinddemandedtheendingofthatperiodintheworld'sdevelopmentin
whichwarwasconsideredanormalpoliticalinstrumentforthesettlementofinternational
disputes.TheintroductorywordsoftheCovenantstresstheLeague'sforemostobjectto
promoteinternationalcoperationandtosafeguardinternationalpeaceandsecurity.
Inadditiontothesemoralreasonstherewerealsoeconomicandpoliticalreasonswhyitwas
necessarytomakeatremendousefforttoestablishasoundbasisforfuturepeaceand
security.Butthemoralreasons,whichmaturednaturallyinthespiritualatmosphere
prevailingattheendofthewar,werethemostpowerful.Oneprinciplesettledfirmlybythe
warwasthatdemocracyandracialandsocialjusticeshouldreplacetheobsoletepolitical
organismshithertotoleratedinmanypartsofEurope.Itgoeswithoutsayingthatoncesucha
principlehadbeenacceptedtherenolongerwasanyplaceforinternationalpoliciesbasedon
themilitaryoreconomicsupremacyofanyPowerorofanyonesocialclass,orforthe
periodicalequalizationofthemilitaryandmaterialforcesofrivalPowersbymeansof
violence,orformilitaryandothersecrettreaties,orforarmedpeace.Inotherwords,theidea
https://www.foreignaffairs.com/print/1112997

1/11

1/11/2016

TheLeagueofNations:SuccessesandFailures

ofaninternationalorganizationforthepurposeofpeaceandorderwasonlyalogical
consequenceofthesovereignideaswhichbroughtaboutthepoliticalreorganizationoflarge
partsofEuropeandoftheworldduringtheyears1917,1918and1919.
ThetwentysixArticlesoftheCovenantareevidencethatthenationswhichdecidedinfavor
ofthenewpolicyforesawcorrectlywhatwasnecessarytorealizeit.Theysawthatitwas
necessary:
1.Firstandforemost,toacceptandtomaintaintheobligationneverwilfullytoresorttowar,
therebyrenouncingoneofthemostimportantandfarreachingrightsofsovereignty,andto
recognizethenecessityofreducingnationalarmamentstothelowestpointconsistentwith
nationalsafety.
2.Asalogicalconsequenceofthefirstobligation,toacceptandmaintaintheobligationto
submitallinternationaldisputeslikelytoendinarupturetoarbitration,ortothePermanent
CourtofInternationalJustice,ortotheCounciloftheLeagueforinquiryandaward,aswell
astorespecttheverdictsandrecommendationsofthoseorgans.
3.Andfinallytoacceptthefarreachingobligationtomaintaininternationalpeacesolidarity,
i.e.,torespecttheterritorialintegrityandpoliticalindependenceofallstatesmembersofthe
League,andeventopreserveandprotectthisintegrityandindependenceagainstexternal
aggression,andtoviewanyresorttowarindisregardofobligationsundertheCovenantas
anactofwaragainstallothermembersoftheLeague,andtoparticipateinsubjectingthe
offendingstatetoallthe"sanctions"providedforintheCovenant.
Withthesethreefundamentalobligationsmustbementionedonefundamentalguaranteeto
allthemembersoftheLeague.NostatewhichisamemberoftheLeagueisconsideredto
haverenounceditssovereigntyfully.Inotherwords,theLeagueinitspresentformdoesnot
pretendtobeasuperstate,andinnegotiationsandinreachingdecisionsunanimityis
required.Atthesametimethetheoreticalequalityofallnations,greatorsmall,isduly
respected,althoughquitejustlytheGreatPowersareassuredpredominanceinpractice,
correspondingtothefargreatermeasureoftheirdutiesandresponsibilitiesinthe
managementofworldpolicy.
Inshort,inestablishingtheLeagueofNationstheworldmadeaboldefforttosafeguard
peaceandcreateabasisfordevelopinginternationalcoperation.Bymeansofasortof
voluntarysocialcontractbetweencivilizednationsitattemptedtotransplantintothesphere
ofinternationalrelationsthoseprinciplesofademocraticlegalsystemknowninthesphereof
internalnationalorder.
II.THELEAGUEATWORK
Whattestimonydotheyearswhichhaveelapsedfurnishconcerningthesuccessorthe
failureofthisattempt?Intryingtoanswerthatquestion,wemustbearinmindthatduringthis
periodmankindhasconfrontedthemostdifficulttasksinitshistory,andthattheprincipalaim
theestablishmentofpeaceinvolvedarevolutionarychangeinthemethodsofforeign
policyandacompleteoverturnoftheworld'sexistingpoliticalthoughtandaction.
Beforethewartheforeignpolicyofallcountrieswasasaruleegoisticandselfcentered.It
wasdeterminedbynationalinterestsorbytheinterestsofsomeparticularclass.Evenifon
specialoccasionssomestatesmanshowedthathewasconsciousofthesolidarityofall
https://www.foreignaffairs.com/print/1112997

2/11

1/11/2016

TheLeagueofNations:SuccessesandFailures

mankind,hisactionneverprogressedtothepointofacquiringtheformofgeneralpolitical
organization.Decisionsofwarandpeace,andthefreeuseofnationalforces,were
consideredthemostimportantprerogativesofnationalsovereignty,andwereuntouchable.
Thenewpolicy,asformulatedinthetextoftheCovenant,demandedfromsignatorystates
thattheyshouldrealizethatnoneofthemisaloneintheworld,andthateachformsa
componentpartoftheinternationalcommonwealththattheparticularinterestsofeachmust
bebroughtintoharmonywiththeinterestsofothersandfinallythattherearecertainmoral
andmaterialinterestscommontoallnations,andthattosecuretheseeachmustresign
certainofitssovereignrights.AndIwishtoemphasizethispoint:itwasnotonlyaquestionof
understandingtheseprinciples,butofactivelycoperatingandparticipatingasmembersof
theLeagueinestablishingandpreservingthem.
ThefulfilmentofthisconceptionwasnotmadepossiblebythemeresigningoftheCovenant.
Successwasconditionaluponacompletetransformationofexistingtraditionsinthesphere
offoreignpolicy,uponthepoliticaleducationofthewidemassesofelectorsinallcountries,
anduponthedevelopmentofanewmentalityinpoliticalpartiesandparliaments.Thisisa
processrequiringtheconsciouseffortofthebestspiritualleadersofeachnation,and
requiringmuchtimeandvastpatience.
Forthisreasonitisnotpossibleevennow,afterseveralyears,topassadefiniteverdicton
theLeague.Allthatispossibleistopointoutwhathasbeenachieved,thestagesthrough
whichthestrugglebetweenoldandnewpoliticalmethodsispassing,andhowthisstruggleis
reflectedintheLeague'ssuccessesandfailures.AnyestimateoftheLeaguecanstillhave
onlyaprovisionalandrelativecharacter.
III.THEROLEOFTHELEAGUEINORGANIZINGPEACE,ORDERANDSECURITY
Tocarryouttheaimofsafeguardinginternationalpeace,orderandsecuritytheCovenant
imposesuponLeaguememberstheobligationtoabstainfromwagingwarstosettledisputes
withoneanother,andinsteadtosettlethembypeacefulmeansanditentruststheorgansof
theLeaguewiththetaskofadoptingsuitablemeasures,incaseofaggressionorathreatof
aggression,toupholdthesaidobligation.ThustheCovenantprovidesnotonlythatthe
Leagueshallactasconciliator,butincertaineventsalsoasjudge,andsometimesevenas
policeman.ItfurtherexplicitlyimposesontheLeaguethedutyofpreparingaplanfor
disarmamentcompatiblewithnationalsafety,andofinsistingonandsupervisingthe
systematicandgradualreductionofnationalarmaments.
TheCovenant,havingimposedonmembersoftheLeaguetheobligationnottoconcludeany
treatiesorenterintoanyengagementsinconsistentwithitsterms,gavetheLeaguetheright
anddutyofinspectingallinternationaltreaties.ThusArticle18stipulatesthateverytreatyor
internationalengagemententeredintobyamemberoftheLeagueshallberegisteredwith
theSecretariatandshallbepublishedbyitassoonaspossible.NotreatymadebyaLeague
memberisbindinguntilsoregistered.
IfwetrytoanswerthequestionhowtheLeagueofNationshascarriedoutthesevarious
functionswemustturnfirsttoitseffortstoprovideandstrengthenappropriatepacific
instruments.HerethePermanentCourtofInternationalJusticeplaysanimportantpart.Its
workiscomplementedbytheLeague'ssystematiceffortstoinsurethattheideaofarbitral
tribunalsandofcommissionsofarbitrationshallbedefinitelyrecognizedandadopted,and
thatmodeltypesofarbitrationandconciliationtreatiesshallbepreparedforanymember
wishingtomakeatreatyofthatsort.InthisfieldtheLeaguehasaccomplishedwonders.The
https://www.foreignaffairs.com/print/1112997

3/11

1/11/2016

TheLeagueofNations:SuccessesandFailures

gistofthisworkisembodiedinthesocalledGeneralAct(preparedin1928bytheSecurity
CommissionoftheLeague),whichalsocontainsacollectionofspecimentreaties.Normust
weomittomentiontheefforttocompleteanexaminationofthetheoryofallformsofpeaceful
arbitrationprocedure(goodoffices,mediation,etc.)possibleonthebasisofthevarious
ArticlesoftheCovenant,andtoinvestigatehowtheseproceduresmightbeextendedand
improved.Thesediscussions,evenwhentheyresultonlyinunfinishedprojects,suchasthe
projectforbringingtheKelloggPactintoharmonywiththeCovenant,arenotdevoidof
interestandimportance.
Inasurveysuchasthisweofcourseshouldconcernourselvesmorewithpractical
accomplishmentsthanwithdevelopmentsoftheory.ButtheworkwhichIhavebeen
describingdidhavemanypracticalresults.
Inthefirstplace,theimportanceoftheconcreteworkforpeaceaccomplishedbythe
PermanentCourtisbeyondalldispute.Theverdictswhichithasgivenonactualdisputes
broughtbeforeit,eitherinvirtueofinternationaltreatiesorattheinstigationoftheCouncil,as
wellastherecommendationswhichithasmadeinindividualcasesattherequestofthe
Council,arehighlyimportantactsinthecauseofpeace.TheauthorityoftheCourthas
becomealivingfactorforpeace,recognizedassuchbymanynations,whobyacceptingthe
facultativeclausehaveobligatedthemselvestoapplytotheCourtforasolutionofmost
internationaldisputesofalegalnature.
AlsoofgreatpracticalpoliticalimportancearetheLeague'seffortsinthefieldofarbitration
andconciliation.Thelatestvolumeoftreatiesofarbitration,conciliationandguarantee,
publishedperiodicallybytheSecretariatoftheLeague,enumeratesabouttwohundred
treaties,testifyingtotheextentandpopularityofthenewinternationalpoliticalmethods.The
effectivenessofthetreatiesremainstobeseen,becausefewofthemhavesofarreceived
practicalapplication.Thatveryfact,however,isproofthattheexistenceofthesetreaties,
bindingthesignatorynationstopursueapacificpolicyandtoapplypeacefulmethodstothe
settlementofdisputes,actsasapowerfulbrakeoninternationalconflictsandasanimportant
factorforpeace.
PublicopiniondoesnotdenytheLeague'susefulrleinextendingtheideaofarbitration,
thoughoftenitfailstoappreciateitfully.Rather,realcriticismusuallyisdirectedatthe
League'seffortstosolvespecificconflicts.Actually,theLeague'srecordisacreditableonein
thisrespect.True,manyoftheconflictswhichittookinhandgrewoutoftheworkof
reconstructioninCentral,EasternandSouthEasternEuropeinotherwords,thequestions
involvedwerepartoftheepilogueoftheGreatWarandalmostallconcernedsmallor
mediumsizednations.ButifthiscircumstancegavetheLeagueacertainadvantage,a
furtherfactmustnotbeforgottenthatthesequestionscameupforsettlementatatime
whentheLeaguehadonlyjustbeguntoformulateitsprocedure,totryoutitsmethods,and
ingeneraltobuildupitsauthority.
TherecordofdisputessettledbytheLeagueincludesseveralwhichcamebeforeitearlyin
itsexistence.Ishallmentiononlythechiefones.Firstletmerecallthedisputebetween
FinlandandSwedenoverthelandIslands.Thisdispute,whichwasarealmenaceto
peace,wassettledbytheCouncilinJune1921,withtheaidofaspecialcommissionoflegal
expertsandofacommissionofinquiry.ThesovereigntyofFinlandovertheislandswas
recognized,butSwedenwasgivenaguaranteethattheywouldneverbeusedasafortress,
thattheywouldbeneutralized,andthatsheshouldreceivecertainrightsinthemthrougha
specialautonomousstatute.Thissolutionwasacceptedbybothparties.InthePolish
https://www.foreignaffairs.com/print/1112997

4/11

1/11/2016

TheLeagueofNations:SuccessesandFailures

LithuaniandisputeoverthetownofVilna,whichbrokeoutintheautumnof1920,itbecame
thetaskoftheCounciltoavertwarbetweenthetwocountries.Althoughhostilitieshadreally
alreadybegun,theCouncil,aidedbyaMilitaryCommissionofControl,establishedneutral
zoneswithinthedisputedterritoryandthusdidinfactpreventawar.Thatachievement
remains,eventhoughtheCouncilfailedtobringaboutasettlementacceptabletoboth
partiesofthequestionofVilnaitself.Anotherservicetopeacewasthesolutionofthe
questionofthepartitionofUpperSilesia.Inthespringof1921thedisputehadgrowntosuch
proportionsthatitmighteasilyhaveledtoopenhostilitiesbetweenPolandandGermany,as
wellastoseriousdissensionsbetweentheAllies.TheCouncilcarriedoutthepartitionofthe
disputedterritorywiththegreatestpossibleregardfortheresultsoftheplebiscite,andmade
permanentpeaceinthatpartofEuropemorelikelybyimposingoneachparty,througha
specialConvention,theobligationtorespecttheminoritiesremainingunderitscontrol.Also
ofimportancewastheworkoftheCouncilduringthepostwarconsolidationofAlbania
duringthesolutionoftheMemelquestionandintheadjustmentoffrontiersbetweenPoland
andCzechoslovakia(thequestionofJavorina),betweenCzechoslovakiaandHungary(the
questionofalgoTarjan),andbetweenJugoslaviaandHungary.
TheLeagueofNationsalsowasactiveincaseswhichdidnotarisefromterritorialchanges
duetotheWorldWar.
TheconflictwhicharosebetweenGreeceandItalyinAugust1923followingthe
assassinationoftheItalianmembersofanInterAlliedBoundaryCommissiononGreek
territorywasoneofthemostinterestingandimportantcasesinthiscategory.Italysenta
strongnotetotheGreekGovernmentdemandinginstantsatisfaction,andastheGreek
Governmentrefusedallresponsibilityfortheincidentandconsequentlyrejectedsomeofthe
Italiandemands,ItalyresortedtomilitaryoperationsandoccupiedtheislandofCorfu.The
case,broughtbeforetheCouncilattherequestofGreece,wasextremelydifficult.Notonly
wasoneofthepartiestothedisputeaGreatPowerwhichfromthebeginninghadhada
representativeontheCouncil,butalsoitwasjustthispartywhichrefusedtorecognizethe
competenceoftheLeagueinthematterbypointingoutthattheConferenceofAmbassadors
hadjurisdictionandbyassertingthattheoccupationofCorfuwasonlyprovisional,thatitwas
meantonlytoguaranteethepaymentofreparationsbyGreece,andthatitdidnotandcould
notendangerpeace.TheConferenceofAmbassadorsitselftooktheloadofftheshouldersof
theLeaguebydeclaringitswillingnesstosolvetheconflictandintheendtheconflictwas
actuallysettledbytheConference.Nevertheless,thethanksofthosewhowereanxiously
watchingtoseehowtheLeaguewouldfacethistestwentouttotheCouncilfornothaving
flinchedandforthestrongdeterminationwhichitevidencednottoallowtheconflicttobe
settledbyotherthanpeacefulmeans.InprincipletheCounciluphelditsrighttodealwith
everysortofdisputewhichcouldleadtowar.
AnexampleofdirectinitiativebytheCouncilonbehalfofpeacewasgivenduringtheconflict
whichbrokeoutbetweenGreeceandBulgariainOctober1925,followingtheshootingofa
GreekfrontiersentrybyaBulgariansentry.Thedangerousnatureofthisincidentwas
illustratedbythefactthattheGreekGovernmentatonceissuedordersthatitsthirdArmy
CorpsshouldinvadeBulgarianterritory.TheCouncil,summonedattherequestofthe
BulgarianGovernment,tookimmediatestepsnotonlytopreventhostilities,butalsotosettle
thecasebyinstitutinganinquiryandbystipulatingthemeasureofsatisfactionwhichGreece
hadarighttodemandfromtheBulgarianGovernment.[i]

https://www.foreignaffairs.com/print/1112997

5/11

1/11/2016

TheLeagueofNations:SuccessesandFailures

TheconflictbetweenChinaandJapan,broughttoGenevaonSeptember18,1931,andstill
underconsideration,iswithoutdoubtthemostseriousmatterwithwhichtheLeagueof
Nationshasyetbeenconfronted.Thereisnouseindenyingthatitrepresentsacertaincrisis
fortheLeague.Pleadingthenecessityofinterveningtomaintainitsinterestsamidthe
chaoticanduncertainconditionsprevailinginChina,aGreatPowerresortedtomilitary
operations.ThoughthisGreatPowerhadbeenamemberoftheCounciloftheLeaguefrom
thebeginning,theprocedurewhichitadoptedrepresentedarevivalofmethodswhicharenot
themethodsoftheLeague.Complicatingthequestion,too,isthefactthatthepartiestothe
conflictarethelargestAsiannationandtheAsiannationwhichispoliticallythemost
powerfulalsothefurtherfactthattheconflictistakingplaceinanareainwhichthevital
interestsofathirdGreatPowerareaffected(viz.oftheBritishEmpire),aswellasthe
interestsoftwootherGreatPowerswhicharenotmembersoftheLeague(viz.theUnited
StatesandSovietRussia).Inotherwords,theLeagueisconfrontedwithaproblemoftruly
worldsignificance.
DuringitsearliereffortstodealwiththisconflicttheLeague,supportedbytheUnitedStates,
accomplishedsomething.Afterafewweeksofopenwarfareitbecomepossibletoarrestthe
firingofgunsandcannon,theJapanesetroopswereatlastrecalledfromtheterritoryof
Chinaproper,andanumberofdisputedquestionsweretransferredtothesphereof
diplomaticnegotiation.TheLeaguedemonstratedthatitisamoralfactorinthecauseof
peacewhichnoGreatPowercanaffordtoignore.
AtthesametimeitisnecessarytoemphasizethatthesuccessoftheLeagueofNationsin
thiscaseasfarasweareinapositiontodaytojudgewasonlyapartialsuccess.The
wholeprocedureadoptedbytheLeaguewastooprotracted,itwasnotabletopreventthe
actualoutbreakofhostilitiesinwhichseriouslossesoflifeandpropertyoccurred,ithasnot
beenabletorestorethewholepoliticalsituationasitexistedbeforetheconflict,andithasleft
theorgansoftheLeagueconfrontedwiththeserioustaskofarranginganhonorable
settlementofthenewsituationgrowingoutofthecreationofanindependentManchuria
underthedirectinfluenceofJapanesepolicyandunderJapaneseleadership.
AlthoughafriendandadherentoftheLeagueofNations,Iamconstrainedtoadmitopenly
thatinthisflagrantcasetheGenevainstitutionhasnotmusteredupsufficientcouragetocall
certaineventsandactionsbytheirpropernamesandtoresorttotheapplicationof
appropriatearticlesoftheCovenant.Ittriedtoavoid,andactuallydidavoid,carryingoutthe
sanctionswhichinthiscasewerejustified,anditrefrainedfromusingalltheforcesand
methodsappertainingtosovereignexecutivepowermorethanwasnecessaryandmorethan
wasprofitablenotonlyfromthepointofviewofajustandspeedysettlementofthewhole
conflict,butalsofromthepointofviewofthereputationandauthorityoftheLeagueitself.
ThefactremainsthatthecasebetweenChinaandJapanhasbeensolvedneitherbythe
CouncilnorbytheAssembly.Aboutthetimethisstudyappearsinprinttherewillbea
meetingofthecompetentCommission,consistingofnineteenmembers,tohearthereportof
theCommissionofInquirywhichwassenttoManchuriaandwhichwillpreparedefinite
proposalstolaybeforetheAssembly.
ThesituationoftheLeaguewillcertainlynotbeeasyifthereportrecommendsthenon
recognitionoftheexistingstateofaffairsinManchuria.WhatanswerwillJapanthengive?
AndwhatanswerwillbegivenbyGenevaifJapanannouncesthatitdoesnotintendto
changeitspolicy?AssuredlytherearemanyofusinGenevawhowilluncompromisingly
defendtheauthorityandtheprerogativesoftheLeagueofNations.Thismeansthata
https://www.foreignaffairs.com/print/1112997

6/11

1/11/2016

TheLeagueofNations:SuccessesandFailures

seriouscrisisofthewholeinstitutioncannotbeaverted.ItwillbeagreattrialoftheLeague's
strengthandauthority.IconsiderthattheLeaguewillneverbeabletorecognizeastateof
affairscreatedbymethodsnotcountenancedbytheCovenant.
Despiteouranxietyoverthisgravecase,wemustnotbeledintominimizingtheactivitiesof
theLeagueastheguardianofpeace,oritstheoreticalworktoimprovethemachineryforthe
peacefulsettlementofdisputes,oritsrecordinthepracticalcasesinwhichithastakeneither
adirectorindirectrle,oritsgeneralpropagandainbehalfoftheideaofpeace,whichis
impliedinitsverybeingandinallitsactivities.
Take,forexample,thegrowthonallsidesofthemoralconvictionthatviolenceasan
instrumentofinternationalpolicyshouldbeabolishedandthatwarisacrime.Thewellnigh
universalsignatureoftheKelloggPactshowsthatthisconvictionispenetratingevenofficial
circlesandisbecomingadominatingaxiomintheforeignpolicyofcountries.Thatinitself
representsanenormousprogressovertheprewarmentality.Theoldmilitaryconceptions
andmethodsaresteadilyretreatingintothebackgroundandwhentheyareused,itoftenis
onlyasasortofemergencyexit.Inofficialtreaties,inthepronouncementsofdiplomatsand
politicians,eveninthemindsofthemasses,theprinciplethatwarisacrimeisgradually
gainingground,andwithittheconsciousnessoftheparamountmoraldutyofworkingfor
peaceandofmaintainingpeace.
Wemaygoevenfurther.Thepeacefulsettlementofinternationaldisputesisbecomingthe
officialmethodofpoliticalprocedureitisbecomingthenormalrule,therecognizedduty.
Settlementbywarisbeginningtobeconsideredimmoralandabnormal.Almostallcountries
arenowlinkedtogetherbybilateralormultilateraltreaties,orbygeneralpactsand
declarations,stipulatingindetailthepeacefulproceduretobeadoptedintheeventof
disputes.Furthermore,thereisageneralwilltoimprovetheprocedurelaiddowninthese
treatiesandintheCovenant,soastoinsureapeacefulsettlementatallcostsandmake
certainthatifoneinstitutionorinstrumentfailsanotherwillberesortedtoautomatically.The
originatorsofthisendeavorarenotindividualspacifistsorpacifistgroupsbutthestates
andgovernmentsthemselvesandtheirdiplomaticandpoliticalrepresentatives.
IfaskedtobemorepreciseindefiningthepresentweakpointsoftheLeagueofNations,I
wouldsaythefollowing:
1.AstheconflictbetweenChinaandJapanshows,thegreathandicapontheefficacious
functioningoftheLeagueliesinthefactthatthetwolargestnationsoftheworld,theUnited
StatesandSovietRussia,arenotmembers.Thisdeterminestoagreatextentthepolicyof
GreatBritaininallquestionstouchingtheLeague,inasenseunfavorabletotheLeague.
2.ThepossibilityofsuccessfulactionbytheLeagueofNationsisfurtherlimitedbythefact
thattheGreatPowersofEuropeoftensubordinatetheirpolicyatGenevatotheneedsof
theirrespectiveinternalpolitics.OfthefiveEuropeanGreatPowers,threeareinthethroesof
revolutionaryferment:GermanyisundertheinfluenceofHitler'srevolutionarymovement,
ItalyunderthatoftheFascistrevolution,andRussiaunderthatoftheCommunistrevolution.
ThemoreabnormalthesituationofthechiefmembersoftheLeague,themoredifficultitis
fortheLeaguetofunction,itsmembersbeingsovereignnations.
3.ThefactthatcertainGreatPowers,notablyGermanyandItaly,thinkoftheirparticipationin
theLeagueaboveallasamediumoffurtheringtheirownwishesandaspirations,regardless
oftheclaims,wishesorevenrightsofothernations,isclearlythecauseofacrisisinthe
https://www.foreignaffairs.com/print/1112997

7/11

1/11/2016

TheLeagueofNations:SuccessesandFailures

LeagueandleadstoskepticismregardingtheLeague'sefficacy.
4.TheLeaguesometimesfindsitdifficulttoadjusttherelationsoftheGreatPowerswiththe
smallormediumsizedPowers.TheGreatPowersdonotliketobeoverruledbythevotesof
alargegroupofsmallnationswhilethelatterarereluctanttotoleratethepressureofthe
GreatPowers.Thismutualdislikeisoftenexaggeratedonbothsides.Anuncompromising
enforcementofinternationaldemocracyatGenevawouldjeopardizetheLeague'sexistence.
AsIsaidbefore,friendsoftheLeaguemusthavethecouragetorecognizethatthosewho
havegreaterdutiesandresponsibilitieshavearighttodemandgreaterinfluenceinthe
formationofdecisions.Butthatmustnotmeanthatthevotesofthesmallernationsare
ignored,andespeciallyitmustnotmeanthatdecisionsaffectingtheirinterestsshallbetaken
withouthearingtheiropinionandwithouttheirconsent.
ThisfrankstatementoftheweakpointsoftheLeagueofNationsdoesnotmeanthatitis
bankrupt.Tostateitsperplexitiesanddifficultiesisnottocondemnit.Idonotwanttobe
eitherthejudgeortheadvocateoftheLeague.Ionlywishtostatethefactsastheyappearto
me.TheexistenceoftheweakpointsanddifficultiestowhichIhavereferredisthefaultof
themembernationsthemselvesandnotoftheinstitutionassuch.
IV.THELEAGUEANDDISARMAMENT
ThetaskoffindingasolutionofthedisarmamentproblemwassettheLeagueinArticle8of
theCovenant.Itsprogressinthisfieldisoftentakenasacriterionofitssuccessorfailure.
Nowitispossibletocontinueforeverthetheoreticaldiscussionofthequestionwhether
disarmamentisthepreliminaryconditionofsecurityoritsconsequence.Theexperienceof
thepasttwelveyearsshowsdistinctlythateffectivedisarmamentcanbeandwillbecarried
outonlyasanaturalresultofageneralvictoryofthenewpoliticalmethodsinstitutedafterthe
war,andofthesincereapplicationofthenewinternationallegalsystemdescribedinbroad
outlinesabove.Inaperiodofconstantstrugglebetweentheoldandthenewsystems,inan
erawhichinthemainhasbeendevotedtocollectingexperienceofthenewinternational
method,theredoesnotasyetexistthemeasureofconfidenceandassurancenecessaryfor
areductionofnationalarmamentscorrespondingtoourwishesanddesires.Eventhosefifty
sixsignaturestotheCovenantandthosetwohundredtreatiesofarbitrationandconciliation,
theconstituentfactorsofthenewpolicy,cannotprovewhetherornotthewholemechanism
ofpacificmethodexistsmerelyonpaper,whetheritfunctionsonlyinspecialcases,and
whetheritwillfunctionalsoinextraordinaryanddifficultcases.
Letmeputthematterstillmoreexplicitly.Effectivedisarmamentdoesnotdependonthe
solemndeclarationofthegovernmentsconcernedthattheydespisewarandwishtosettleall
theirdisputessolelybypacificmethods.Itdoesnotrequireonlythateffectiveinstruments
existtobringaboutsuchpacificsolutions.Itrequireseffectiveandrealguaranteestocover
thecontingencythatthesaiddeclarationisnotkept,thattheawardsofthearbitralorgansare
notrespected,andthatdespitealltheprestigeofthenewlegalsystemsomegrossviolence
neverthelessoccurs.Inotherwords,effective,farreachingdisarmamentnecessitatesthe
completionofthewholestructureofthenewinternationallegalorderandtheorganizationof
internationalsecuritytoguaranteetheexecutionofArticles10,11and16oftheCovenant.
Iamnotemphasizingsomeonesidedthesisofsecuritysuchassometimesispropoundedin
France.Ilaystressonasystem,validforall,andsafeguardingthesecurityofcountriessuch
asGermany,HungaryandBulgariaaswellasofcountrieswhichwereintheAlliedcampin
https://www.foreignaffairs.com/print/1112997

8/11

1/11/2016

TheLeagueofNations:SuccessesandFailures

thewar.Disarmamentinthissensecanandwillbecomethecrowningmasterpieceofthe
workcarriedforwardbytheLeagueduringthesefirstyearsofitsexistence,aimingasithas
donetogiveeffectiveapplicationtothepoliticalmethodsandinternationallegalorderofthe
newday.
ItisclearthattheLeagueofNationshasalreadyaccomplishedsomethingusefulinthefield
ofdisarmament.Itsdeliberationshavecontributedgreatlytothegeneralelucidationofthe
problemandhavepreparedthegroundforitstechnicalsolution.Butthemostimportant
resultofthesedeliberationshasbeenthattheyhaveimprinteduponthemindsofthosein
powertheideathateventhequestionofnationalarmamentsisnotcompletelyaprivate
nationalaffair,thatitisdestinedtobecomeaninternationalaffair,thatassuchitwillhaveto
besettledinaccordancewiththecommoninterestsofallstates,andthatsoonerorlater
nationswillhavetoconcedetoaninternationalconferencetherighttodeterminetheextent
ofvariousnationalarmamentsandsystematicallytoinspectandcontrolthosearmaments
throughorgansappointedforthepurpose.
TheInternationalDisarmamentConference,whichhasjustconcludedthefirstphaseofits
workinGeneva,achievedapartialyetimportantsuccess.Iamoftheopinionthatifthe
Conferencewillcontinuetoworkwiththesamesinceritythatithasworkedhitherto,the
secondphaseoftheConferencewillseefurtherstepsforwardincarryingoutsocalled
"qualitativedisarmament,"inreducingeffectivearmedforcesandmilitarybudgets,ascalled
forintheconcludingresolutionoftheConference,andthusbringingintoeffectthefirst
internationaltreatyofdisarmamenteverdrafted.IftheConferencesucceedstothatextent,it
willmeanatremendoussuccessfortheLeagueofNations,whichhasbeenbusilypreparing
thegroundduringalltheserecentyears.
V.LEAGUEACTIVITIESINECONOMICS,SOCIALWELFAREANDCULTURE
Precedingpageshavemadeitclear,Ihope,thatIdonotoverratethesuccessesofthe
LeagueofNationsinthepoliticalsphere,andthatIamawarethatthegreatprogressofthe
ideaofpeace,representedespeciallybytheincreasingpopularityoftheideaofarbitration
andbytherejectionofwarasameansofnationalpolicy,doesnotyetmeantherealizationof
alivingandcompleteinternationallegalordereitherinEuropeorintheworldasawhole.I
willnotbeaccusedofpartiality,then,ifIemphasizesomeachievementsinother
departmentsinwhichtheLeaguehasbeenbusy,namelytheinternationaleconomicand
financialcoperationorganizedwithremarkablesuccessbytheLeagueduringthepast
twelveyears,andalsothecoperationwhichithasfosteredinhumanitarian,social,
intellectualandculturalmatters.Thereishardlyadepartmentofhumanornationalactivity
whichhasnotbecomeanobjectoftheLeague'ssolicitude.Asaresult,theLeaguehas
becomeanimportantinternationalcenterforcordinatingworkinallthesequestions.
IneedonlyrecalltheLeague'scoperationinthetaskofbringingeconomicandfinancial
relieftosuchcountriesasAustria,HungaryandBulgaria,anditsefforttopromotecloser
economiccollaborationbetweennationsandtoremovevariousobstaclesinthewayof
internationaltradeandtransport.Thisworkatpresentisundertheshadowofagravecrisis.
Butinthefutureitsurelyisgoingtobeextendedandmadeevenmorecomprehensive.
NormustIomittomentiontheextensiveactivitiesoftheLeagueinthesocialand
humanitariansphere,includingthecareofrefugees,thestruggleagainstepidemics,the
protectionofwomenandchildren,andthefightagainstdrugs,especiallyopium.Useful
resultshavealsobeenachievedinthecentersofintellectualcoperationfoundedbythe
https://www.foreignaffairs.com/print/1112997

9/11

1/11/2016

TheLeagueofNations:SuccessesandFailures

League,suchastheInternationalInstituteforIntellectualCoperationinParisandthe
InternationalInstituteforEducationalCinematographyinRome.Possiblymuchofthiswork
couldhavebeenundertakenwithequalsuccessbyprivateenterprisebutthepartofthe
resultwhichcannotbeminimizedisthefactthattheworkasactuallyorganizedhasbrought
thenationsintoofficialcontactperiodicallyandevenpermanently.Thisisnomean
psychologicalachievement.Theseactivitieswillnotbethesalvationoftheworld,andtheir
importancemustnotbeoverrated.Butthemerecreationofaclosenetofeconomic,cultural,
socialandhumanitarianrelationsbetweenmostofthenationsoftheworlddeservesour
sincererecognitionandgratefulsupport.
VI.THEFUTURE
AllthatIhavesaidinfavoroftheLeagueofNationsdoesnothidethefactthatitisnota
perfectinstrumentformaintainingpeaceandthatitdoesnotfulfillalltheexpectations
originallybuiltuponit.Ihavetriedtopointoutthechiefreasonsforthis.Someofthese
reasonsareofatemporarycharacter,othersgodeeperperhapstheyevenarepermanent.
TheConstitutionoftheLeague,thatistosayitsCovenant,needsimproving.Itshouldbe
broughtintofullharmonywiththeideasandmoralbasisofinternationalpeacepolicy.In
otherwords,anattemptshouldbemadetoprohibitwaraltogether,whichmeansharmonizing
theCovenantwiththeKelloggPact.Somemayalsodemandthatanattemptbemadeto
harmonizenotonlythesentimentsofthenations,butalsotocordinatetheirvitalinterests,
i.e.,togivegreaterexecutivepowertotheCouncil,sothattheprincipleofunanimous
decisionsmaybeabolishedandreplacedbymajoritydecisions.Thatwouldmeanthe
creationofasuperstate.Idonotthinktheworldisripeforthis.
TheLeagueofNationsisnotsomethingabstract.Itisaconcreteorganizationofnations
whichhavevoluntarilyassumedthedutiesofmembershipandwhichhavejoinedtogetherin
agreatcommontask.Thistaskcanbefulfilledonlyifallmembersremainactuatedbythe
desiretopursuethecommonaimandtorenounceonitsbehalfaimsandinterestsoftheir
own:thatistosay,ifallmembersseektoharmonizetheirspecialnationalinterestswiththe
interestsofothernationsontheplatformoftheCovenant.Whatmustbesoughtisacommon
denominatoroftwo,orthree,orevenofallfiftysixdivergentnationalintereststhis
denominatorcorrespondingtothecommonhigherinterestsofmankind.
Ifacrisisoccursthereasonwillnotbefartoseek,foritisnoeasymattertofindineachcase
thissynthesisofnationalinterestsnoristherealwaysadequategoodwilltofindit,so
easilydoegotisticalnationaltendenciesandaimsgainpredominanceoverthewillto
internationalcoperation.TheproblemoftheLeagueofNations,then,issimplyaproblemof
furtherinternationaleducation.Imyselfbelievefirmlyintheeventualsuccessofthisprocess
ofeducation.ConsequentlyIbelieveinthefutureoftheLeagueofNations.Whatwouldan
idealisticpoliticianwhobelievessincerelyingoodness,truthandtheprincipleoftheconstant
ifslowprogressandimprovementofthehumanrace,otherwisedoinpoliticsandinpublic
lifeingeneral,ifhedidnotcherishthisfaith?
[i]IshouldperhapsmentionatthispointthesuccessfulinterventionofAristideBriand,as

PresidentoftheCouncil,intheconflictbetweenBoliviaandPeruin1930,whichintheend
ledtoapeacefulsettlementofthewholedispute.
Copyright2016bytheCouncilonForeignRelations,Inc.
Allrightsreserved.Torequestpermissiontodistributeorreprintthisarticle,pleasefilloutand
https://www.foreignaffairs.com/print/1112997

10/11

1/11/2016

TheLeagueofNations:SuccessesandFailures

submitaPermissionsRequestForm.Ifyouplantousethisarticleinacoursepackor
academicwebsite,visitCopyrightClearanceCentertoclearpermission.
SourceURL:https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/19321001/leaguenationssuccessesandfailures

https://www.foreignaffairs.com/print/1112997

11/11

You might also like