Original Article

J Nepal Health Res Counc 2009 Apr;7(14):25-8

Pregnancy Outcome of Single Previous

cesarean Section
Jha M1
1

Paropkar Maternity & Women Hospital, Kathmandu, Nepal

ABSTRACT
Background: The main aim of this study is to determine the maternal and fetal outcome of pregnancy among
women with one previous caesarean section at term in relation to vaginal delivery, post partum complication,
neonatal complication like low Apgar score, fetal weight and admission in special baby unit.
Methods: This is a prospective and descriptive study done in a sample size of 100. Inclusion criteria were term
pregnancy, single live fetus with cephalic presentation with one previous caesarean section. During study period total
number of obstetric admissions was 3546 and 115 cases were admitted with previous one caesarean section.
Result: Out of 100 cases, 31 cases had vaginal delivery and 69 cases had caesarean section. Among 31 vaginal
deliveries, 24 cases had spontaneous vaginal delivery and 7 had assisted delivery with vacuum, main indication of
vacuum delivery was to cut short the second stage of labor that was in 5(71.43%) cases.
Among 69 caesarean section cases, 51 had emergency caesarean section and 18 had elective caesarean section and
cephalopelvic disproportion was the main indication in both the groups. Most common complication was scar
dehiscence and postpartum hemorrhage. There were two still births in each group and one minute APGAR score was
slightly better in caesarean section.
Conclusions: Patients with previous caesarean section are at high risk of repeat emergency or elective caesarean
section. About one in three patients with previous caesarean section delivered vaginally. In the present study
postpartum hemorrhage was the commonest complication, which was found in caesarean section, and only one
puerperal pyrexia was seen in case of vaginal delivery.
Key words: Cephalopelvic disproportion, Premature rupture of membrane, Septicemia, Vacuum delivery

INTRODUCTION
It is hoped that by promoting vaginal birth after caesarean
section, we will reduce the incidence of caesarean
section. The term caesarean for abdominal delivery

of a child by cutting through the abdominal wall and the

uterus is believed to be derived from Greek word lex
regia which later became known as lex caesaria.1
Caesarean section may be life saving for the baby, or
the mother.2

Correspondence: Dr. Meena Jha, Paropkar Maternity & Women Hospital,

Kathmandu, Nepal. Phone: 9851055673, Email: [email protected]

25 JNHRC Vol. 7 No. 1 Issue 14 Apr 2009

Pregnancy Outcome of Single Previous cesarean Section

In USA the rate of caesarean has risen in the past twenty
years to a rate of approximately 20% to 25%.3 A study
shows that 63% of women delivered vaginally whose
previous caesarean section was done for cephalopelvic
disproportion or non progress of labor. Trial of labor
should be encouraged after a previous caesarean section
provided that there is no absolute contraindication
of vaginal birth such as placenta praevia and pelvic
contraction.4 A patient with caesarean section is at high
risk and poses a challenging problem to the obstetrician.
Craigins dictum Once a caesarean section always a
caesarean section has now been modied into Once a
caesarean section always a hospital delivery.5
This study was done to determine the maternal and
fetal outcome of pregnancy with previous one caesarean
section, to estimate the rate of vaginal delivery and
repeat caesarean section, to study the indication of
repeat caesarean section and to study the maternal
complication and fetal outcome in terms of Apgar score,
fetal weight, fetal morbidity and mortality.

METHODS
It was a prospective study conducted at Maternity
Hospital, Thapathali, Kathamand for a period of three
months from February 23 to April 28, 2005. Data was
collected every day of the week, except Saturday from
the admission room. The enrolling criteria were term
pregnancy with one previous caesarean section, cephalic
presentation and single live fetus. The gestational age
was conrmed by the last menstrual period (LMP) and
ultrasonography in patients who did not remember or
were unsure of date. This was followed by general,
abdominal and vaginal examination to conrm that
the patient fullled the criteria to be enrolled in the
study. Maternal outcome in terms of mode of delivery
and postpartum maternal morbidity like postpartum
hemorrhage, injury to the genital tract, genital tract
infection, urinary tract infection, pyrexia, wound
dehiscence were noted. Fetal outcome was measured
in terms of fetal heart rate, me conium stained liquor,
Apgar score, still birth and admission in the neonatal
intensive care unit, birth weight.
Permission was taken from hospital authority and the
consultant of each unit. Verbal and written consent was
taken by the patients before preceding the study.
After collection of all the data they were analyzed and
results presented in table and graph. Final statistical
analysis of the data was done by using EPI-INFO-6
program.

RESULT
Out of the 100 study cases, 31% had vaginal deliveries
as shown in (Fig-1). Among the vaginal delivery, 24 were
spontaneous vaginal delivery while 7 were assisted with
vacuum. Main indication of vacuum delivery was to cut
short the second stage of labor that was in ve cases
(71.43%).
In the age group 25-29 yrs vaginal delivery cases were
11(35.48%) and caesarean section was 34(49.28%).
The caesarean section was slightly higher in the same
age group. But this difference was not statistically
signicant. P=0.891. Majority of patients were of 3739 wks of gestation. In this gestational age group
17(54.83%) had vaginal delivery and 36(52.17%)
had caesarean section. But this difference was not
statistically signicant. Among 69 caesarean sections,
51 (73.91%) had emergency caesarean sections and
18(26.08%) had elective caesarean sections. The repeat
caesarean section is also high whose previous caesarean
section was done for fetal distress (Table-1). The most
common indication of repeat caesarean section in both
groups (elective and emergency) were cephalopelvic
disproportion in emergency caesarean section 49.01%
and in elective caesarean section 88.88%.(Table-2).

Figure 1. Mode of delivery among women with previous

one caesarean section
SVD: Spontaneous vaginal delivery (77.5% of vaginal
deliveries which is 31% of all deliveries)
VACU: Assisted vacuum delivery (22.5% of vaginal
deliveries which is 31% of all deliveries)
CS: Caesarean section (69% of all deliveries)

JNHRC Vol. 7 No. 1 Issue 14 Apr 2009

26

Pregnancy Outcome of Single Previous cesarean Section

Table 1. Indication of previous caesarean section and mode of delivery in the index pregnancy
Normal delivery
n = 24

Instrumental
Delivery n =7

no

no

no

Fetal distress

25.04

14.28

14

20.28

Breech

16.66

14.28

11.59

Indication of previous caesarean section

Caesarean
section n =69

Cephalo pelvic disproportion

8.33

13

18.84

Non progress of labour

8.33

14.28

7.24

Antepartum haemorrhage

16.66

8.69

Transverse lie

7.24

Failed Induction

4.16

28.57

11.59

Severe pre-eclampsia

14.28

Obstructed labour

14.28

Intrauterine growth retardation

8.33

Prolong pregnancy

4.16

Cord prolapse

2.8

Oligohydramnios

1.4

Anencephaly

1.4

Not known

8.33

8.69

24

100

100

69

100

Total

Table 2. Analysis of indication of repeat caesarean section in the index pregnancy

Indication of repeat caesarean
section

Emergency caesarean section

n=51

Elective caesarean section

n=18

no

no

Cephalopelvic disproportion

25

49.01

16

88.88

Non progress of labour

10

19.61

Prolong pregnancy

3.93

5.56

Scar tenderness

14

27.45

5.56

Total

51

100

18

100

Out of 69 cases of repeat caesarean section most

common indication of repeat caesarean section was
cephalopelvic disproportion in both the groups. This is
statistically signicant P=0.01.
Maternal morbidity was seen in nine cases in
which postpartum hemorrhage was the commonest
complication. Five cases of the postpartum hemorrhage
were due to extension of angle in cesarean section done
for CPD and only one puerperal pyrexia was seen in case
of vaginal deliveries.
One minute Apgar score is slightly better in caesarean
section that is >7 among 60% of cases, but it is statistically
not signicant. The total neonatal admission was 24 in
which nine were in the vaginal delivery group and 15

27 JNHRC Vol. 7 No. 1 Issue 14 Apr 2009

in the caesarean section group, six of the caesarean

delivery neonatal admission were due to septicemia.
Caesarean section done for non progress of labor and
premature rupture of membrane baby had increased
incidence of septicemia.

DISCUSSION
Vaginal birth after caesarean section has been advocated
as a safe and practical means of reducing the overall
caesarean delivery rate. More than 20,000 women with
a history of caesarean delivery undergoing a trial of
labor have been studied with successful vaginal delivery
rate ranging from 50% to 80%.6 In October 26,1998 the
American College of Obstetrician and Gynecologist
updated there guidelines concerning vaginal delivery

Pregnancy Outcome of Single Previous cesarean Section

after previous caesarean section. The committee on
obstetrics, maternal, fetal medicine stated that the
concept of routine repeat caesarean birth should be
replaced by specic indication for subsequent abdominal
delivery and in the absence of a contraindication, a
woman with one previous caesarean delivery, with low
transverse incision should be counseled and encouraged
to attempt labor in her current pregnancy.7
In the Maternity Hospital, Thapathali, trial of labor is
given after one previous caesarean section, if there is
no recurrent indication for previous caesarean section
but for women with previous two caesarean sections,
routine elective caesarean section is done.
Incidence of vaginal delivery after previous one
caesarean section was 31% which is very much less than
70% reported as by Jones et all, 1991 USA.8
A study shows the incidence of forceps delivery to be
about 6% of all women delivered vaginally and vacuum
extraction was used in 5% of vaginal delivery.9
In the present study there was no forceps delivery
and incidence of vacuum delivery was 22.5%. In the
present study CPD clinical diagnosis was made by senior
obstetrician, X- ray pelvimetry was not done. Patients
with duration of labor more than 24 hours had 3.5 times
more risk of developing post operative complication
than patient with labor pain less than 12 hours.10 One
study showed that risk of scar dehiscence was more
among misoprost and induction of labor with oxytocin.11
Retrospective data shows risk of scar dehiscence was 2.5%
who had taken vaginal prostaglandin.12 In the Maternity
Hospital Thapathali induction of labor is not performed
in patient with history of previous caesarean section
but augmentation of labor with oxytocin is judiciously
performed in selected cases of previous one caesarean
section. In the present study scar dehiscence was seen
in seven cases, in which six scar dehiscence were seen
in patients with trial of labor and baby was bigger than
3.5 kg delivered by emergency cesarean section. Birth
weight more than 4 kg was associated with four fold
higher risk of caesarean section, nding similar to that
of present study.13 A study shows that 5% of the babies
whose birth weight was more than 2.5 kg was admitted
in NICU.14 Whereas in the present study 2% of the babies
with similar birth weights were admitted in the neonatal
care unit.
There was no maternal death during study period.

of labor is allowed under careful patient selection and

supervision, the rate of vaginal delivery after caesarean
section can be increased safely.

REFERENCE
1. Meehan FP, Rafia NM, Bolaji IJ. Delivery following previous
caesarean section. In: Studd J, editor. Progress in Obst and Gyn.
London: Churchill Livingstone; 1993. P. 213-28.
2. Thomas M, Khan GQ. Outcome of pregnancy in patients with one
previous LSCS. J Obstet Gynecol 1994;14:416-9.
3. Dickinson JE. Previous caesarean section. In James DK,Weiner CP,
Gonik B, ed. High risk pregnancy. 2nd ed. London; W.B.Saunders;
1999. P. 1205-12.
4. Nwokoro CA, Njokanma OF, Orebamjo T, Okeke GC. Vaginal
birth after primary cesarean section: the fetal size factor. J Obstet
Gynaecol. 2003 Jul;23(4):392-3.
5. Cunningham FG, Gant NF, Leveno KJ, Gilstrap III LC, Hauth
JC, Wenstrom KD, editors. Caesarean delivery and postpartum
hysterectomy. In: William Obstetric 21st ed. New York: Mcgraw
Hill; 1997. P. 538-53.
6. Zelop CM, Shipp TD, Repke JT, Cohen A, Caughey AB et al.
Uterine rupture during induced or augmented labor in gravid
women with one prior caesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol
1999;181:882-6.
7. Joseph GF, Stedman CM, Robichaux AG. Vaginal birth after
caesarean section: The impact of patient resistance to a trial of
labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1991;164:1441-7.
8. Alamia V, Meyer BA, SelioutskI O, Vohra N. Can a VABAC scoring
system predict uterine rupture in patients attempting a trial of
labour? Journal of Obst and Gyn 1999;94:64.
9. Sing, Justin CW, Haloob RK. An audit on trends of vaginal
delivery after one previous caesarean section. Journal of Obst and
Gyn 2004;24:135-8.
10. Kumar A, Thakur S, Premi HK, Gupta KB, Randhawa I, et al.
Maternal complication in caesarean section deliveries. Journal of
Obstetrics and Gynaecology of India 2003;1:36-38.
11. Wing DA, Lovett K, Paul RH. Disruption of prior uterine incision
following Misoprostol for labour induction in women with
previous caesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 1998;91:828-30.
12. Emmons SL, Krohn M, Jackson M, Eschenbach DA. Development
of wound infection among women undergoing caesarean section.
Am J Infect control 1984;12:19-25.
13. Ilesanmi AO, Odukogbe A, Olaleye DO. Vaginal delivery after one
caesarean section in Nigerian women. Journal of Obst and Gyn
1997;17:139-42.
14. Ziade SM, Abu-Heija AT. Reducing caesarean section rates and
perinatal mortality. Journal of Obst and Gyn 1995;15:171-3.

CONCLUSION
Patients with previous cesarean section are at high risk
of repeat caesarean section. About one in three patients
with previous cesarean section delivered vaginally. If trial
JNHRC Vol. 7 No. 1 Issue 14 Apr 2009

28