Supreme Court: Republic of The Philippines Manila en Banc

Republic of the Philippines
SUPREME COURT
Manila
EN BANC
Adm. Case No. 1392 April 2, 1984
PRECIOSA R. OBUSAN, complainant,
vs.
GENEROSO B. OBUSAN, JR., respondent.
Roger Castuciano for complainant.
Roemo J. Callejo for respondent.
AQUINO, J.:+.wph!1
This is a disbarment case filed in 1974 by Preciosa Razon against her husband Generoso B.
Obusan, Jr. on the ground of adultery or grossly immoral conduct. He was admitted to the bar in
1968.
In 1967, when Generoso B. Obusan, Jr. was working in the Peoples Homesite and Housing
Corporation, he became acquainted with Natividad Estabillo who represented to him that she was
a widow. They had carnal relations. He begot with her a son who was born on November 27,
1972. He was named John Obusan (Exh. D). Generoso came to know that Natividad's marriage to
Tony Garcia was subsisting or undissolved.
Four days after the birth of the child or on December 1, 1972, Generoso, 33, married Preciosa, 37,
in a civil ceremony. The marriage was ratified in a religious ceremony held on December 30,1972
(Exh. C and C-1)
The couple lived with the wife's mother at 993 Sto. Cristo Street, Tondo, Manila for more than one
year. In the evening of April 13, 1974, when his wife was out of the house, lawyer Obusan asked
permission from his mother-in-law to leave the house and take a vacation in his hometown, Daet,
Camarines Norte. Since then, he has never returned to the conjugal abode.
Preciosa immediately started looking for her husband. After much patient investigation and
surveillance, she discovered that he was living and cohabiting with Natividad in an apartment
located at 85-A Felix Manalo Street, Cubao, Quezon City. He had brought his car to that place.
The fact that Obusan and Natividad lived as husband and wife was corroborated by Linda Delfin,
their housemaid in 1974; Remedios Bernal, a laundress, and Ernesto Bernal, a plumber, their
neighbors staying at 94 Felix Manalo Street. The three executed the affidavits, Exhibits A, B and F,
which were confirmed by their testimonies.
Romegil Q. Magana, a pook leader, testified that Obusan introduced himself as the head of the
family (25-30 tsn Nov. 26, 1976). His name is at the head of the barangay list (Exh. E, G and H).
Nieves Cacnio the owner of the apartment, came to know Obusan as Mr. Estabillo. She Identified
five photographs, Exhibits I to I-D where respondent Obusan appeared as the man wearing
eyeglasses.
Respondent's defense was that his relationship with Natividad was terminated when he married
Preciosa. He admitted that from time to time he went to 85-A Felix Manalo Street but only for the
purpose of giving financial assistance to his son, Jun-Jun. Lawyer Rogelio Panotes, the ninong of
Jun-Jun, corroborated respondent's testimony.
He denied the testimonies of the maid, the laundress and the plumber. He claims that they were
paid witnesses. He declared that he did not live with Natividad. He resided with his sister at
Cypress Village, San Francisco del Monte, Quezon City.
On the other hand, he claimed that he was constrained to leave the conjugal home because he
could not endure the nagging of his wife, their violent quarrels, her absences from the conjugal
home (she allegedly went to Baguio, Luneta and San Andres Street) and her interference with his
professional obligations.
The case was investigated by the Office of the Solicitor General. He filed a complaint for
disbarment against the respondent. Obusan did not answer the complaint. He waived the
presentation of additional evidence. His lawyer did not file any memorandum.
After an examination of the record, we find that the complainant has sustained the burden of proof.
She has proven his abandonment of her and his adulterous relations with a married woman
separated from her own husband.
Respondent was not able to overcome the evidence of his wife that he was guilty of grossly
immoral conduct. Abandoning one's wife and resuming carnal relations with a former paramour, a
married woman, fails within "that conduct which is willful, flagrant, or shameless, and which shows
a moral indifference to the opinion of the good and respectable members of the community" (7
C.J.S. 959; Arciga vs. Maniwang Adm. Case No. 1608, August 14, 1981, 106 SCRA 591).
Thus, a lawyer was disbarred when he abandoned his lawful wife and cohabited with another
woman who had borne him a child. He failed to maintain the highest degree of morality expected
and required of a member of the bar (Toledo vs. Toledo, 117 Phil. 768).
WHEREFORE, respondent is disbarred. His name is stricken off the Roll of Attorneys.
SO ORDERED.1wph1.t
Makasiar, Actg. C.J., Concepcion, Jr., Guerrero, Abad Santos, De Castro, Melencio-Herrera,
Plana, Escolin Relova, Gutierrez, Jr. and De la Fuente, JJ., concur.

Supreme Court: Republic of The Philippines Manila en Banc

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Supreme Court: Republic of The Philippines Manila en Banc

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Supreme Court: Republic of The Philippines Manila en Banc

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Republic of the Philippines

You might also like