Tech LP
Tech LP
Tech LP
Teacher: Anna
Date: December
Average
11-16 pts.
Good
17-21 pts.
Excellent
22-25 pts.
Word
Problem*
Group member
did not write his
or her own word
problem.
Group member
was able to
demonstrate
basic concepts
but the word
problem does
not describe the
equation.
Group member
wrote his or her
own word
problem, but did
not receive input or
feedback from
group members.
Group member
wrote and
submitted his or
her own work.
He or she also
received
feedback from
group members.
Method for
Solving*
Group member
did not present
their method for
solving to the
teacher before
presenting.
Group
members
method for
solving was
unclear and
information was
missing.
Group members
method for solving
was unorganized
and required
further
explanation.
Group members
method for
solving was clear
and organized.
In Group
Participation*
Group members
worked
independently.
One partner did
significantly more
work than the
others.
Group members
worked
together, but
with several
reminders from
their teacher.
Responsibility
was not equally
shared.
Group members
worked together,
but with some
reminder from
their teacher.
Responsibility was
shared, but not
equal.
Group members
worked together
and each took
equal
responsibility.
OVERALL
SCORE
75 pts.
possible
Rubric: Presentation
Word
Problem*
Needs Work
0-10 pts.
Average
11-16 pts.
Good
17-21 pts.
Group was able to
demonstrate basic
concepts, but the
teacher or
classmates had to
Excellent
22-25 pts.
Group visually
presented a word
problem and fully
explained its
relationship to an
OVERALL
SCORE
help explain.
equation.
Method for
Solving*
Groups method
for solving was
unorganized and
required further
explanation.
Visual*
No visual
presentation.
Visual included
word problem, but
did not show
method for solving.
Visual included
both, but method
for solving is not
written so that it
can be taught.
Visual included
word problem and
method for solving
written in concise
steps.
*You can
earn up to 25
points for
each category
75 pts.
possible
Rubric: Submittal
Needs Work
0-10 pts.
Average
11-16 pts.
Good
17-21 pts.
Excellent
22-25 pts.
Word
Problem*
Word problem
and method for
solving is not
submitted for
approval.
Equation and
method for
solving is
submitted for
approval, but not
a word problem.
Word problem is
submitted for
approval, but not
a method for
solving.
Word problem
and method for
solving are
submitted for
approval prior to
creating a Prezi.
Graphic
Organizer*
Student turns in
no graphic
organizer.
Student turns in
graphic organizer
with only one
task complete.
Student turns in
graphic organizer
with two tasks
complete.
Student turns in
graphic
organizer with
all three tasks
complete.
Visual*
Visual (i.e.
Prezi) is
submitted the
day before the
presentation.
In Group
Participation
Survey*
Groups worked
independently.
One partner did
Groups worked
together, but with
several reminders
Groups worked
together, but with
some reminder
Groups worked
together great.
They all took
OVERALL
SCORE
significantly
more work than
the others.
from their
teacher.
Responsibility
was not equal.
equal
responsibility
and were
engaged.
100 pts.
possible
Lesson Summary/Closure:
The entire lesson follows a WebQuest that helps students write mathematical
models of word problems and vice versa. At the end of the lesson I will
expect students to be able to teach the material to their classmates. It will
not be a regular presentation in that students explain the problem, but rather
they will lead their classmates to understand by writing out their method for
solving in concise steps. The Prezi they create will also prove their process of
learning and understanding, so that the rest of the class can participate in
the same thinking process. The technology utilized in this lesson will
motivate students, lead students to investigate topic, and provide resources
for students to create a presentation. Though this process could be done
without computers, technology increases motivation and speeds up the
research process.
References:
Photo Story: https://www.youtube.com/watch?
v=rI_vVVH713U&feature=youtu.be
2. Technology Standards for Students: http://www.iste.org/standards/istestandards/standards-for-students
3. WebQuest: http://utahmathematics.weebly.com/webquest.html
4. Prezi: https://prezi.com/business/
1.