The document summarizes key arguments against legalizing assisted suicide and euthanasia. It argues that (1) requests for assisted suicide are often cries for help rather than true desires to die, as suicidal thoughts are often transient, and depression can be treated; (2) pain is controllable with modern medicine; and (3) legalizing assisted suicide could lead to legalizing non-voluntary euthanasia for incompetent patients or those without terminal illnesses, as has occurred in the Netherlands.
The document summarizes key arguments against legalizing assisted suicide and euthanasia. It argues that (1) requests for assisted suicide are often cries for help rather than true desires to die, as suicidal thoughts are often transient, and depression can be treated; (2) pain is controllable with modern medicine; and (3) legalizing assisted suicide could lead to legalizing non-voluntary euthanasia for incompetent patients or those without terminal illnesses, as has occurred in the Netherlands.
The document summarizes key arguments against legalizing assisted suicide and euthanasia. It argues that (1) requests for assisted suicide are often cries for help rather than true desires to die, as suicidal thoughts are often transient, and depression can be treated; (2) pain is controllable with modern medicine; and (3) legalizing assisted suicide could lead to legalizing non-voluntary euthanasia for incompetent patients or those without terminal illnesses, as has occurred in the Netherlands.
The document summarizes key arguments against legalizing assisted suicide and euthanasia. It argues that (1) requests for assisted suicide are often cries for help rather than true desires to die, as suicidal thoughts are often transient, and depression can be treated; (2) pain is controllable with modern medicine; and (3) legalizing assisted suicide could lead to legalizing non-voluntary euthanasia for incompetent patients or those without terminal illnesses, as has occurred in the Netherlands.
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 1
Key Points for Debating Assisting Suicide
Brief summary of arguments against legalizing euthanasia/assisted suicide. For more
detailed information, you can go to Frequently Asked Questions or email us 1. A request for assisted Suicide is typically a cry for help. It is in reality a call for counseling, assistance, and positive alternatives as solutions for very real problems. 2. Suicidal Intent is typically transient. Of those who attempt suicide but are stopped, less than 4 percent go on to kill themselves in the next five years; less than 11 percent will commit suicide over the next 35 years. 3.Terminally Ill patients who desire death are depressed and depression is treatable in those with terminal illness. In one study, of the 24 percent of terminally ill patients who desired death, all had clinical depression. 4. Pain is controllable. Modern medicine has the ability to control pain. A person who seeks to kill him or herself to avoid pain does not need legalized assisted suicide but a doctor better trained in alleviating pain. 5. In the U.S. legalizing "voluntary active euthanasia [assisting suicide] means legalizing nonvoluntary euthanasia. State courts have ruled time and again that if competent people have a right, the Equal Protection Clause of the United States Constitution's Fourteenth Amendment requires that incompetent people be "given" the same "right." 6. In the Netherlands, legalizing voluntary assisted suicide for those with terminal illness has spread to include nonvoluntary euthanasia for many who have no terminal illnesses. Half the killings in the Netherlands are now nonvoluntary, and the problems for which death in now the legal "solution" include such things as mental illness, permanent disability, and even simple old age. 7. You don't solve problems by getting rid of the people to whom the problems happen. The more difficult but humane solution to human suffering is to address the problems.