Final Shadowassessment
Final Shadowassessment
Final Shadowassessment
No Shadow
Four friends in New York City were wondering if there was ever a time during the
day when they would have no shadow. They each had different ideas about daytime
shadows. This is what they said:
Paige:
Olive:
I will have no shadow at noon because the Sun will be directly overhead.
Kami:
Vince:
It depends on where you live. Only people who live near the equator will
have no shadow on certain days.
Which friend do you agree with the most? _______________ Explain why you agree.
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
47
No Shadow
Teacher Notes
Purpose
Related Concepts
Explanation
48
N a t i o n a l S c i e n c e Te a c h e r s A s s o c i a t i o n
Copyright 2012 NSTA. All rights reserved. For more information, go to www.nsta.org/permissions.
Related Research
Indicates a strong match between the ideas elicited by the probe and a national standards learning goal.
49
50
References
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS). 2009. Benchmarks for science literacy online. www.project2061.org/publications/
bsl/online
Driver, R., A. Squires, P. Rushworth, and V. WoodRobinson. 1994. Making sense of secondary
science: Research into childrens ideas. London:
Routledge.
Keeley, P., F. Eberle, and C. Dorsey. 2008. Uncovering student ideas in science, vol. 3: Another
25 formative assessment probes. Arlington, VA:
NSTA Press.
Mant, J., and M. Summers. 1993. Some primaryschool teachers understanding of the Earths
place in the universe. Research Papers in Education 8 (1): 101129.
National Research Council (NRC). 1996. National
science education standards. Washington, DC:
National Academies Press.
Plummer, J. 2008. Students development of
astronomy concepts across time. Astronomy
Education Review 7 (1): 139148. http://aer.aas.
org/resource/1/aerscz/v7/i1/p139_s1
Plummer, J., and J. Krajcik. 2010. Building a learning progression for celestial motion: Elementary levels from an Earth-based perspective.
Journal of Research in Science Teaching 47 (7):
768787.
Zeilik, M., C. Schau, and N. Matter. 1998. Misconceptions and their change in universitylevel astronomy courses. The Physics Teacher 36:
104107.
N a t i o n a l S c i e n c e Te a c h e r s A s s o c i a t i o n
Copyright 2012 NSTA. All rights reserved. For more information, go to www.nsta.org/permissions.