Engineering experiments differ from other experiments in terms of experimental control and informed consent. Codes of ethics serve roles such as support, deterrence and discipline, education and mutual understanding, and promoting business interests, but they also have limitations. The Space Shuttle Challenger accident is classified as a case study because it involves describing the shuttle, how it operated, what went wrong, and includes a diagram. Engineers have responsibilities to society as experimenters such as conscientiousness, providing relevant information, moral autonomy, accountability, and industrial standards serve the purpose of standardization and quality control.
Engineering experiments differ from other experiments in terms of experimental control and informed consent. Codes of ethics serve roles such as support, deterrence and discipline, education and mutual understanding, and promoting business interests, but they also have limitations. The Space Shuttle Challenger accident is classified as a case study because it involves describing the shuttle, how it operated, what went wrong, and includes a diagram. Engineers have responsibilities to society as experimenters such as conscientiousness, providing relevant information, moral autonomy, accountability, and industrial standards serve the purpose of standardization and quality control.
Engineering experiments differ from other experiments in terms of experimental control and informed consent. Codes of ethics serve roles such as support, deterrence and discipline, education and mutual understanding, and promoting business interests, but they also have limitations. The Space Shuttle Challenger accident is classified as a case study because it involves describing the shuttle, how it operated, what went wrong, and includes a diagram. Engineers have responsibilities to society as experimenters such as conscientiousness, providing relevant information, moral autonomy, accountability, and industrial standards serve the purpose of standardization and quality control.
Engineering experiments differ from other experiments in terms of experimental control and informed consent. Codes of ethics serve roles such as support, deterrence and discipline, education and mutual understanding, and promoting business interests, but they also have limitations. The Space Shuttle Challenger accident is classified as a case study because it involves describing the shuttle, how it operated, what went wrong, and includes a diagram. Engineers have responsibilities to society as experimenters such as conscientiousness, providing relevant information, moral autonomy, accountability, and industrial standards serve the purpose of standardization and quality control.
PART - B 1. What are the aspects in which Engineering differs from other standard experiments? a. Experimental Control b. Informed Consent The knowledge gained from the above.
2. What are the different roles and functions of codes?
1. Codes of Ethics. 2. Support 3. Deterrence and discipline 4. Education and mutual understanding 5. Promoting business interest 6. Limitation of the codes of Ethics. 3. How do you classify the Space shuttle Challenger accident? Why? 1. Description of the shuttle 2. Operation of the shuttle 3. Why does it went wrong 4. Case study with diagram. 4. What are the responsibilities of the engineers for serving the society as responsible experimenters? 1. Conscientiousness 2. Relevant information 3. Moral autonomy 4. Accountability 5. 5. Explain with sample the purpose of Industrial standards. 1. Types of standards