Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 43 views

    Percentage Error V/s Noise Variance

    Uploaded by

    Anonymous 8pCXXs
    This document shows percentage error rates for BPSK and QPSK modulation schemes with different noise variance levels, using both traditional and Sato-based receivers. The percentage error increases as the noise variance increases, ranging from under 1% for low noise to over 90% for high noise. Sato-based receivers generally perform better than traditional receivers for BPSK, while traditional receivers perform better for QPSK except under very low noise conditions.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as XLS, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Percentage Error V/s Noise Variance

    Uploaded by

    Anonymous 8pCXXs
    43 views2 pages
    This document shows percentage error rates for BPSK and QPSK modulation schemes with different noise variance levels, using both traditional and Sato-based receivers. The percentage error increases as the noise variance increases, ranging from under 1% for low noise to over 90% for high noise. Sato-based receivers generally perform better than traditional receivers for BPSK, while traditional receivers perform better for QPSK except under very low noise conditions.

    Original Description:

    RSIM 7680

    Original Title

    rsim78

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    XLS, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This document shows percentage error rates for BPSK and QPSK modulation schemes with different noise variance levels, using both traditional and Sato-based receivers. The percentage error increases as the noise variance increases, ranging from under 1% for low noise to over 90% for high noise. Sato-based receivers generally perform better than traditional receivers for BPSK, while traditional receivers perform better for QPSK except under very low noise conditions.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as XLS, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as xls, pdf, or txt
    43 views2 pages

    Percentage Error V/s Noise Variance

    Uploaded by

    Anonymous 8pCXXs
    This document shows percentage error rates for BPSK and QPSK modulation schemes with different noise variance levels, using both traditional and Sato-based receivers. The percentage error increases as the noise variance increases, ranging from under 1% for low noise to over 90% for high noise. Sato-based receivers generally perform better than traditional receivers for BPSK, while traditional receivers perform better for QPSK except under very low noise conditions.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as XLS, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as xls, pdf, or txt
    of 2

    Percentage Error V/s Noise Variance

    100
    90
    80

    Percentage Error

    70
    BPSK / Trg
    BPSK / Sato
    QPSK / Trg
    QPSK / Sato
    BPSK / Trg
    BPSK / Sato
    QPSK / Trg
    QPSK / Sato

    60
    50
    40
    30
    20
    10
    0
    Noise Variance

    B / QPSK
    Sato / Trg based
    Raised
    Cosine
    Ch
    Narrow
    Band
    Ch

    BPSK / Trg
    BPSK / Sato
    QPSK / Trg
    QPSK / Sato
    BPSK / Trg
    BPSK / Sato
    QPSK / Trg
    QPSK / Sato

    % Error
    N Var =0.01

    % Error
    N Var =0.05

    % Error
    N Var =0.08

    % Error
    N Var =0.1

    0.4
    42.9
    0.6
    80.5
    44.1
    54
    64.2
    78

    0.4
    50.3
    0.7
    84
    44.4
    55.1
    66.8
    76.5

    0.7
    92.3
    1.5
    79
    43.7
    52.6
    65.7
    76.7

    1
    45.8
    2.4
    65.5
    44.5
    55.5
    66.6
    79.9

    You might also like