Hogge Et Al v. A.W. Chesterton Company - Document No. 22

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 2

Hogge et al v. A.W. Chesterton Company Doc.

22
Case 3:07-cv-02873-MJJ Document 22 Filed 06/07/2007 Page 1 of 2

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
9 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11 EVERETT HOGGE AND PRISCILLA HOGGE, No. C07-02873 MJJ
United States District Court

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’


For the Northern District of California

12
MOTION FOR AN ORDER
13 v. SHORTENING TIME FOR BRIEFING
SCHEDULE AND HEARING OF
14 A. W. CHESTERTON COMPANY, MOTION FOR REMAND
15 Defendant.
/
16
17
18 Before the Court is Plaintiffs Everett Hogge and Priscilla Hogge’s (“Plaintiffs”) Motion for

19 Order Shortening Time For Briefing Schedule and Hearing of Motion to Remand.1 Also before the

20 Court is Plaintiffs’ Request for Intervention of the General Duty Judge.2 Upon good cause shown,

21 the Court GRANTS Plaintiffs’ Motion for an Order Shortening Time for Briefing Schedule and

22 Hearing of Motion to Remand. The Court DENIES Plaintiffs’ Request for Intervention of the

23 General Duty Judge.

24 Defendant John Crane Inc.’s (“Defendant”) Opposition brief, if any, shall be filed not later

25 than 11:00 a.m. on June 8, 2007, and shall not exceed ten pages in length. Plaintiffs’ Reply brief,

26 in any, shall be filed not later than 3:00 p.m. on June 8, 2007, and shall not exceed five pages in

27 length.

28
1
Docket No. 17.
2
Docket No. 18.

Dockets.Justia.com
Case 3:07-cv-02873-MJJ Document 22 Filed 06/07/2007 Page 2 of 2

1 The Court will deem the matter submitted on the papers and will set the matter for a hearing
2 only if necessary.
3
4 IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
6 Dated: June 7, 2007
MARTIN J. JENKINS
7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
8
9
10
11
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

You might also like