G.R. No. 152589 & 152758 January 31, 2005 People of The Philippines, Appellee, Antonio Mendoza Y Butones, Appellant
G.R. No. 152589 & 152758 January 31, 2005 People of The Philippines, Appellee, Antonio Mendoza Y Butones, Appellant
G.R. No. 152589 & 152758 January 31, 2005 People of The Philippines, Appellee, Antonio Mendoza Y Butones, Appellant
On the night time of March 18, 1998,while the mother of the victim was not in the house
appellant's unclothed and being which he rubbed against the torso of his daughter
whom he had also stripped of clothing, his acts of kissing and touching the victim's
breasts while the latter was flat on the bed and rendered purposely unconscious by
appellant, evidently demonstrate the intent of appellant to have carnal knowledge of her
against her will. The victim vividly narrated the she was threatened to kill her if she tell
to somebody the overt act of his father after which the appellant boxed her stomach that
cause her unconsciousness and when regained consciousness she saw blood in her
thigh coming from his vagina.
In the case at bar, the alleged inconsistencies in private complainant's
testimonies pertain to the number of times when she was raped by accused-appellant
and the date when her mother, Leonida Mendoza, actually came back from San
Narciso, Quezon, to their house at Barangay Lakip, Atimonan, Quezon. In her testimony
on 29 March 2001, private complainant claimed that her mother returned to their house
on 19 March 1998 - the day after the first incident of rape. On the other hand, Leonida
testified that she stayed in San Narciso for one week.
ISSUE: W/N inconsistency of testimony weaken the allegation of rape case to the
accused?
HELD : No. " Inconsistencies on matters of minor details do not detract from the actual
fact of rape." Verily, private complainant's consistent retelling of the relevant details
regarding the violation of her person by her own father far outweighs the latter's
persistent assault on her credibility and candor.
In any case, it is a doctrine in criminal law that minor inconsistencies in
testimonies strengthen rather than weaken the witness' credibility for they eliminate the
impression of a rehearsed testimony. Particularly in rape cases, this court does not
expect a rape victim to recall every minute detail that occurred during her horrible
ordeal.
case no. 10