Nap Seminar Reflection
Nap Seminar Reflection
Nap Seminar Reflection
disrespectful of other perspectives. This inquiry provided me not only with the basic historical
knowledge of our nation, but also the skills on how to analyze and notice biases.
After all of our research had concluded, we participated in a seminar where we shared what
knowledge we gained throughout the inquiry and what questions still remained. Our group
landed on the controversial topic of affirmative action. Does it really give Native Americans a
higher chance of success? Does it promote a stereotype that Indians are unable to have a
successful life on their own? Is there a better way to assist the Native Americans besides
affirmative action? Is affirmative action necessary? Many people had different opinions about
this topic, and the questions go on, yet our answers began to whittle down. At this point, I
began to realize this seminar didnt necessarily help clear up questions I had about the content,
it just brought more unanswered questions into sight. However, I now know that the point of
this project wasnt to figure out what went well and what didnt, but to recognize different
perspectives and understand where they come from. Additionally, during seminar, I made a
connection between Columbus methods concerning Native Americans and how that technique
is still used today. Ever heard of imperialism? Imperialism of third world countries is very similar
to how the colonists discovered the Americas, and how they treated the Natives of that land.
This made me think about how this process may never end because, for the intruders, its
working pretty well. I feel our groups general perception of Native American History was
wisely stated by JJ in saying, Its crazy.
Now, its the end of the Native American Historical Inquiry, and I have yet to address my
opinion on the essential question: How can an examination of multiple sources and
perspectives lead to a more enlightened understanding of history AND contemporary, social,
cultural and political realities? I think the main discovery I made was that there will never be
one right way to do something. Throughout my evaluation of the given sources, I noticed how
each perspective had its own right way to do things. Yes, some might be more humane than
others, but everyone thought they were doing the right thing one way or another. With that,
how are we supposed to evaluate historical events and decide on who was good and who was
bad? My answer to that question is that we dont necessary have to know who the bad guys
are, but it is necessary to acknowledge the different perspectives so we can become more
conscious of our actions. As the saying goes, those who do not learn history are doomed to
repeat it.