RSD (Tyler Durden) Blueprint
RSD (Tyler Durden) Blueprint
RSD (Tyler Durden) Blueprint
By Tyler
Growing up, we dont really give this stuff much thought. We just
take it for granted.So maybe we see other guys buying girls drinks,
and we buy into the idea that thats how things work.And there is
nothing necessarily wrong with buying a girl a drink. But then,
theres nothing thats necessarily right about it either.
After all, buying a girl a drink is a played-out approach that could
slot you in with every other guy. It could even place you among
the hordes of guys that lay themselves at her feet, and who cant
have a normal conversation without needing something from her.
Buying a drink might conveniently open a conversation, and the girl
might even turn out to be attracted to you. But even so, the act of
buying her a drink didnt actually do anything to make her feel that
way.If anything, she ignored the played-out approach and found
the good stuff beneath the surface. She was attracted to you for
you, and she would have been attracted either way.
Girls usually form their impression of a guy as theyre exposed to
his personality.So if you try to offer a girl favours before youve
conveyed your personality, its more likely that shell reflexively
make a snap judgement of not interested before shes even
gotten to know anything about you. Congratulations youve just
become the next man of the night.
DEFINITION: SUPPLICATION
The act of doing something for a girl that you wouldnt normally do,
in the hopes of getting affection from her in return is called
supplication. Supplication is something that occurs when being
too nice sets up a dynamic between the two of you where its
implied that she has a higher social value than you do, because you
cant attract her based on your personality. That could include
performing any kind of favour-with-an-agenda for a girl with whom
youve not already had sex, from drinks, to compliments, to
flowers, to gifts, to any of the other behaviours already
mentioned.To avoid supplicating does not mean that you can never
do these things.In fact, to deliberately not supplicate as a tactic of
getting a girl to like you could be viewed as a form of supplication
in itself.Rather, to determine whether or not youre supplicating,
you can ask yourself, Why would I want to do these things? Am I
having fun or just trying to get her to like me? Wouldnt she have
liked me anyway? Even if I was brought up to act this way, is it an
essential part of who I am, or am I just attached to the imagery of
it?If the answer is yes, then you are supplicating.
Not supplicating is something that must be a part of who you are.
It comes from having a clear boundary inside of yourself, as to
what behaviour you will and will not accept, both from yourself and
others. It can be something that you do to challenge a woman,
and to set yourself apart from other guys. But it also must be
something that you do because it is an expression of your
worldview that you dont need a womans validation to feel
comfortable with yourself, and that you dont need to do the things
that other guys think they need to do in order to be attractive.
Most guys just dont understand what makes a girl attracted. And
because they dont get it, they look to the absurd media
representations that theyre continually exposed to in movies,
magazines, and television which leave them absolutely convinced
they need to have a lot of money or good looks to get girls.In fact,
none of these things are necessary.When a man dwells on his
wealth or his looks, it is a weakness and an excuse to rationalize a
larger shortcoming of his personality that needs to be worked
out.Of course, hell hang onto his rationalizations so he doesnt
have to face the things he needs to work out despite continually
seeing all sorts of guys who arent considered wealthy or good
looking doing better with women than the guys who seem to have
it all.The same principle holds true for old guys, short guys, bald
guys, fat guys, ugly guys, poor guys, disabled guys, and whatever
other type of guy that you can tag a self-limiting label onto.These
things do not matter.
To understand attraction, you have to let go of your socially
conditioned beliefs.
Attraction, sexual chemistry, infatuation,
desire and all forms of attraction are powerful emotional responses
that are caused by entirely different things.You cant allow yourself
to make presumptions on how well a man does with women based
on these things. It must come as no surprise to you when you see
guys who do well despite not having any of them.Otherwise, youll
still be thinking under the same old patterns of social conditioning,
and you wont be able to tune into whats going on beneath the
surface.So if these socially conditioned ideas about attraction arent
really what are causing it, then what is?
RULE:Attraction is an emotional reaction and not a logical one, and
what a woman logically thinks she wants is rarely what she
emotionally responds to.To attract women, you have to
communicate to their emotions, not their logic.That is the first
fundamental shift in thinking.
Beneath the surface, when you really get to the root of it, both men
and women respond emotionally to the same thing. Value.
DEFINITION: VALUE
Value or social value or status can have many forms. Many
are universal, and found in all societies. Others are specific, and
found only in a particular culture or even a particular
situation.Value can be anything that one person provides to
another that improves that other persons chance of survival or
reproduction.And beyond that, value can include anything that
offers another person good emotions, because in general, the
things that trigger good emotions align with the things that
improve odds of survival and reproduction.
At the same time, our emotions can also compel us towards things
that are irrational and do not help us, and so value is imperfect,
because it can include things that trigger good emotions whether
they help our chances of survival and reproduction or not.There is
an evolutionary purpose to all of this.For the academically inclined,
there is a wealth of scientific research that explains these premises
in excruciating detail. But for our purposes what we need to know
is this
RULE:Women respond emotionally to that which they perceive will
produce offspring with the highest likelihood of survival and
reproduction.Whether or not a womans prospect is a really nice
guy who supplicated her has very little to do with that. Except of
course, that an unusually nice guy might be more inclined to stick
around and take care of his offspring. But theres a loophole in
that, too.Women have evolved a menstruation cycle that allows
them to hide their period of fertility from their partner, and to be
impregnated by whatever man that they see fit. That way, they
have the option to enjoy what is essentially the best of both worlds
sex and the best offspring from the most attractive man, while
being taken care of by the most overcompensating caretaker.
RULE:Typically, a woman will screen her long term caretaker
logically and slowly, while she chooses her casual sex partners
emotionally and more quickly.Women are capable of knowing if a
man is attractive in an instant, but to determine if he will be a good
caretaker is something that takes more time.There is a loophole for
men as well, however.
If a man initially sub-communicates a high social value, and later
after having sex he sub-communicates a high value as a caretaker,
(or perhaps he even learns to sub-communicate a bit of both,
depending on what the woman is looking for), then like the woman
he will have the option to enjoy what is essentially the best of both
worlds sex with many women more quickly, while being able to
shift gears into a relationship with any one of them down the line.
All of this can seem disturbing at first, but neither gender is
obligated to exercise their options. And there is a traditional
happily ever after ending for those inclined to find it, both for the
man who finds the girl that he really likes, and for the woman who
enjoys the man that is both a loving caretaker and phenomenally
attractive as well.Ideally, for the fortunate couple, there will be
continued attraction, a strong connection, lots of great sex, and
less inclination towards infidelity down the line.Now moving
forwardWhat constitutes value for a man is different than what
constitutes value for a woman. To assume that looks are a primary
form of a mans value is to wrongly project how you perceive
women onto how women perceive men.
RULE:In society, men and women are judged by different socially
established standards.Men are typically seen as having value for
their ability to accomplish and dominate, whereas women are
typically seen as having value for their appearance and social
savvy.Because humans evolved as gregarious animals whose
survival and reproduction depended upon their social success, it is
natural that both men and women have tendencies to cultivate
aptitudes that increase their social value.Their cultivation of
aptitudes happens naturally, as their minds focus in on what they
perceive as being valuable to them and filters out what they
perceive as unimportant.For that reason, men commonly have
aptitudes in logical or competitive areas such as sports, mechanics,
force, and learning about how they can increase their power and
security in the world. Women, likewise, commonly have aptitudes
in emotional or social areas, like beauty, body language,
relationships, romance, socializing and learning about how their
characteristics affect their interaction with the world and their
emotional experience of it.
DEFINITION: SUB-COMMUNICATION
Because its more important to them, women are usually better at
reading subtle social cues than men are.They can infer a lot about a
person by observing their subtle body language, eye contact, facial
expressions, vocal tonalities, the way they move, the things they
say, and the way that they say them all in relation to the other
people involved in the interaction. The communication that takes
place through these channels is called sub-communication.
In prehistoric times, if a mans status was lost within his group,
then the blow to his confidence would be sub-communicated by his
after the fact. That way we can feel like we thought and acted
logically, even when we were emotionally compelled. This process
is called backwards rationalization.Backwards rationalization is an
ongoing process that occurs to varying degrees in the minds of all
people.Whats important about it is that its a process that leads us
to an absolutely fundamental principle of attraction
RULE:Our minds are naturally driven to rationalize our opinions of
people (how attractive they are, how fun they are to be around,
etc) based on their value to us.
This occurs by our selective focus. While logically there is always
an entire person that we can perceive, emotionally there are always
particular qualities of that person that were compelled to focus on
to rationalize how we feel.What that means is that whenever we
interact with someone, we selectively focus in on specific qualities
that we can use as our reason for how we feel about them, and
then filter out any of their qualities that would contradict that view.
Lets think about the consequences of thisIf youre like most guys,
you probably get so caught up focusing on the superficial details of
how you come across to people that you overlook whats often
most responsible for their reactions to you your value to them.For
example, you could be a high value guy with bad manners, and
most women would rationalize that youre a free spirit who makes
his own rules. Or you could be a low value guy with great manners
and a sweet temperament, and most women would rationalize that
youre not her type. Either way, your value primarily determines
the way women respond to you.
Now a girl might think that she doesnt care whether or not a guy
has social value. She may well think that she prefers a guy who
she feels a connection with or who can make her laugh.But most of
the time, it was the guys value that framed the context where his
humour was cool and not clownish. And it was the guys value that
framed the context where she was even receptive to feeling a
connection with him in the first place.Thinking back to high school
(a classic example of raging social value exchanges), you might
remember the cool kids who could say anything and have
everyone think it was funny. You might also remember instances
where a girl would think she had a connection with a guy more
popular than her, who didnt know that she existed.Building a
connection with a girl and making her laugh is virtually automatic
when you have enough value. Whether you have a connection with
someone or find them funny is a very subjective thing.
DEFINITION: SOCIAL ALLIANCES-As social creatures, we are
hardwired to create social alliances, especially with people who
can increase our probability of survival and reproduction or give us
good emotions. In our social environment, there are people with
whom we are socially allied, people with whom we are socially
neutral, and people with whom we are socially opposed.
Because there is only enough time and energy for us to create a
limited number of alliances, our emotions guide us towards the
people we think can benefit us the most.
We are generally
disposed to be neutral towards most others, and will even create
conflict under some circumstances with those people who we
perceive as a threat.People create alliances for all sorts of different
reasons. A relationship can be based on status, sex, money, or
just relating and having fun (anything involving survival and
replication or good emotions). But relationships come and go, and
their longevity usually depends on the value that people continue to
get out of them.
RULE:Any time a person senses that theyd benefit by directing
their time and energy towards a new alliance over an old one, their
mind will seek out reasons to rationalize how they feel about
it.People can choose to act on their impulses or not to. Oftentimes
they dont.But when they do, what often happens is that the person
will re-evaluate their relation to the old alliance, by shifting the
emotional focal points of how they remember their experiences
with them.Theyll focus on the bad aspects about the person (or
their relationship to them) that theyd previously ignored, as a way
of justifying themselves.People can sustain friendships by focusing
on the positive emotions that they get from it. Thats how theyd
justify that it is a good friendship.But if investing into a new
friendship is more beneficial, they can then re-focus on less positive
aspects, and justify that theyd "drifted apart."
Whereas the old focal points of their emotions might have been on
the best times that they spent together, the new focal points might
be focused on the occasional disappointments that occurred over
the course of the relationship. That way the transition will be
smooth. Some people will even create conflicts with each other, to
emotionally justify an action they want to take.This process doesnt
just account for how we remember our past experiences. Its a
process by which we perceive our ongoing interactions as well.
RULE:While our minds have the ability to be aware of everyone
around us, we are inclined to filter out the people who have less
value to us, and to focus in and fixate on those who have more.
situational value would drop, and they might not feel the same
sense of having acceptance that they had in their preferred
environments. They wouldnt feel the same confidence, and its for
that reason that most guys who do well with women in their regular
stomping grounds wont do as well in a new environment.
DEFINITION: SITUATIONAL CONFIDENCE
Situational confidence is a confidence thats reinforced by
anticipated social acceptance from having something going for
you in a particular situation that guarantees a high social value
relative to the other people there.To illustrate situational
confidence, lets imagine a guy who feels insecure about his body
at a pool party. Lets say that its a swimming pool filled with
children, whose acceptance has no any bearing on him whatsoever.
Now lets change that. Instead, hes swimming at a family gettogether where he knows that everyone accepts him. Now lets
change the scene once more. This time hes swimming at a party
of his peers whose acceptance is more tentative.
Visibly, as his expectation of acceptance in the situation changes
from neutral to supportive to tentative, he will experience a strong
internal shift going from indifferent, to confident, to insecure.So
going back to the guys with strong situational value that we spoke
of What did they have in common?All of them had a high level of
social proof.
DEFINITION: SOCIAL PROOF
Social proof is any external, visible demonstration of high social
value or social alliances.
So for example, if you see a guy
surrounded by a group of people listening attentively to everything
he says, your mind will perceive and feel his high social value by
the visible social proof from the people who are reacting to
him.What does it mean to say that people are reacting? Whats
the difference between people feeling reactive around you, versus
just knowing that youre there?
DEFINITION: REACTIVE (II)
To be reactive towards someone means that your normal sense of
balance is being affected by them, so that the usual rhythm of how
you think and feel and act is being thrown off.Being reactive is not
just a specific behaviour its any behaviour that comes from a
reactive state of mind.When people feel reactive towards you, it
could be manifested in a variety of ways.
The way they feel about themselves might be tied up in your
responses to them. They might feel a sort of underlying alertness
towards you, and find themselves a little bit more tuned in and
aware of you than the other people in the room. They might value
your acceptance, approval, and touch and find themselves
emotionally deflated at the possibility of losing it.
Usually theyll speak with a weaker and less steady voice than you
do, and they laugh more at your jokes than they would laugh at the
jokes of others. Internally, theyll feel a bit more analytical about
infringing on your space and time, and they will consider more
carefully as to whether or not what theyre saying is important or
interesting enough to warrant your attention.Obviously, when
someone is being reactive to you they are giving you the position of
having higher value.So how do we avoid being reactive?
DEFINITION: UNREACTIVE
To be unreactive means that on an internal level, your actions
arent coming primarily from a place where youre reacting to
another person.That doesnt mean to not act at all. To not act at
all can even be reactive in and of itself, because a guy might want
to do something but not follow through because he fears
judgement from others.
Being unreactive is more about coming from a place of authenticity,
where your actions are expressing your personality without being in
reaction to outside pressure of how other people might want you to
be.
Now even if a guy isnt wealthy or physically attractive, as long as
he has people reacting to him in a particular situation (or if he has
behaviours that sub-communicate that people would be reacting to
him if they were around) and he remains unreactive himself, then
he will have girls attracted to him in that moment.
The only difference between him and the wealthy or good looking
guys is that they have the tangible demonstrations of their value
that they convey via their wealth or looks, which tends to give
them a bit more confidence. Regardless of that though, most
women wont stay attracted any man if he doesnt project himself
well. Its for this reason that we can find all sorts of absurd
stereotypes, such as the out of shape restaurant manager who
drives a run down car and lives in his parents basement, but who
still winds up having sex with half of his female staff. Despite the
fact that his social status is not unusually high in a traditional
sense, he still has a value that is visible within the confines of his
environment.
In his situation, the people around him are reacting to him. Their
emotional states are reacting in relation to his approval of their
work. Theyre always aware of his presence and they feel a bit
different than if he wasnt there.
They pay attention to his
conversational threads, they laugh at his jokes, and they even
follow his orders.He is socially proofed in his environment, and his
confidence is reinforced because of the guaranteed acceptance.
And because his acceptance is guaranteed, he feels entitled to
assume the more confident behaviours that women respond to.
RULE:A fundamental principle of attraction is that in any social
interaction, there is always a person reacting more to the other
person than the other person is reacting to them.And this is where
we introduce the absolutely fundamental principle of attraction.
DEFINITION: ATTRACTION
The person who has the most people reacting to their acceptance
and who is the least reactive in return projects the highest value
and draws the focus of social energy in their direction. On a
primitive level, women observe this kind of sub-communication and
respond to it emotionally, moment by moment.
Womens emotional responses are built to pick up on these subcommunications and to fixate on them like a magnet in real time.
They feel the emotion of attraction and are drawn towards this
energy regardless of whether or not a guys value is high in a
superficial sense.That is exactly how attraction works.
The principles applies for all the stereotypes the attractive bad
boys, the popular guys who act a bit cocky, and even the
mysterious guys who convey a genuine vibe because their
indifference sub-communicates a lack of agenda.
What these types have in common is that they arent reacting to
how others want them to be, and that theres something compelling
in their personalities that gets other people reacting to them.
Regardless of their overall social status, they communicate with
women on an emotional level. They dont need to have met the
superficial standards of society to feel confident drawing the flow of
social energy in their direction they feel entitled to it by their
personalities alone. What they have is core value.
To think about core value, lets imagine one final configuration of
our pool scenario.Were at the same party by the pool where the
tentatively accepting peers are hanging out. Theres another guy
there, whose body is actually even less attractive than the one of
our insecure friend.Unlike the shy guy though, who seems rigid and
self-aware, this other guy is splashing around and joking with
everyone and generally having the time of his life. He seems like
the coolest guy there. People are certainly treating him like it.
What social reinforcement is giving him the confidence to act this
way?Well, maybe hes the host of the party. Maybe hes friends
with everyone there.
Maybe he has a bestselling book in
publication.
Maybe hes smarter and funnier and a better
conversationalist than anyone else there. Maybe hes a good
dancer. Maybe he runs a modelling agency. Maybe hes read a
shelf full of books on sexual techniques and knows how to use
them. Maybe he has five girlfriends who are all jealous of each
other. Maybe he was the president of his fraternity in college.
Maybe hes the president of a Fortune 500 Company.Or Maybe
Hes just a guy.Some guys are just like that. On a core identity
level, they feel a sense of acceptance regardless of what situation
theyre in. Theyre just cool guys, so to speak. Some people would
call them naturals.
DEFINITION: CORE VALUE (I)
Core value is a value that you carry with you everywhere because
of your personality.It comes from having a sense of acceptance
that isnt predicated on the relative value that you perceive in the
people around you when your confidence comes from a powerful
sense of who you are, and not from external reinforcement.
That confidence gives you a feeling of entitlement, which allows
you to assume the kinds of behaviours that sub-communicate a
high social value. Whether or not you feel an increase in your
status because of a situation, you just assume your value and have
people reacting to you regardless.
Many guys will spend their whole lives trying to build a situation
that gives them confidence. They might work for the perfect job or
the perfect body or the perfect woman. But ultimately, what
theyve built are walls and limitations a prison in their own minds.
To write your own ticket in life, your sense of who you are has to
be deeper than that.
BOOK III LOVE
A poor guy has an identity crisis.Maybe the problem starts when he
gets a feeling that a girl might like him. He imagines a connection
with her and all sorts of shared experiences that dont exist yet.
He thinks that theres all this unspoken sexual tension going on
beneath the surface. He even pictures his girl when he listens to all
the romantic songs on the radio. But inevitably, he figures out that
his projection doesnt exist in any shared reality that includes the
girl.To realize that its all in his head that the girl doesnt actually
reciprocate the way that he feels or think about him while hes
thinking about herIts a hard pill to swallow.
Lets imagine instead that our poor guy already has a girlfriend.
The problems start for him when he finds out that shes been
cheating.Hed idealized the relationship. It felt good. In order to
stay infatuated with his girl, he had screened out any sketchiness
and focused on her best attributes and the most fun times that
theyd had. Together, he and his girl had come up with all sorts of
shared idealizations that had made their relationship strong.
There were many things that theyd expressed to one another as a
way of reinforcing their love. They remembered the first place that
theyd met, gone out, and had sex. They had a special reason for
why theyd met and were still together, that other couples didnt
have. Their thing. It wasnt something that they could get from
anyone else, so they could feel totally secure to feel their love
without fear of loss. It was not replaceable.
And to make it even stronger, they had continually re-articulated to
one another that it would last FOREVER.
Whats funny is that when it ends, all of these special feelings
might still be there. Its just that there are now all of these new,
bad feelings that go along with them. He wants to feel like he did
before. His reality comes crashing down around him. He reaches
out for his girl to validate their old shared reality, but she is gone
from him. The girl that existed for him no longer exists. She was a
figment of his imagination. The face that he saw was one of many
faces that she had.
He doesnt realize it, but he has many such faces himself. We all
have different faces for people who have a different value to us.
Are you the same person when you talk to a pushy vagrant asking
for spare change as you are when you talk to your mother? How
would a persons experience of you differ, depending on their value
to you?What he saw in her was the face that a person shows to
someone who has value to them. It is such an easy face to look at.
Like looking into the mirror, and seeing the most beautiful face in
the entire world.
Wait Shes not seeing things clearly. What about our thing?
Doesnt she realize that she cant get it from him? Nobody can love
her like I can. Hang on. She fucked this new guy the first time
they hung out? OK, that just doesnt make sense because she said
that she always waited three months with a guy to make it special.
What?! She fucked him on the couch where we had our first time
together?! No. That was the special couch.Doesnt this bitch
remember that that was the SPECIAL COUCH?!?!
He rationalizes that shes just confused. He wont give up on love.
He resolves to win her back. But he has gone from being her
boyfriend to being more like all those other guys from her fan club.
He is everything that her new guy is not.
And she feels a little bad for him, for sure. But as she walks out
the door from the one last meeting that he begged her for, her
face of pity turns into a beaming smile for her new guy waiting
outside to pick her up.
She goes on and enjoys her life without a thought. He sits around
thinking about her, pining for a girl who doesnt share his reality
anymore. And though he will never admit it to himself, deep down
he sees the worst of himself in her. Because under different
circumstances, he knows that he might have done the same thing.
Maybe if their relationship had staled. Or if he had met a certain
other girl.So he mopes around for a while, until the feelings of
emptiness start to subside. Then, once hes ready, he begins the
process of re-establishing himself.
He shifts his focus from his loss to superficial areas in which he can
improve himself. He focuses on his status conveying intermediaries
such as his credentials, career, property, vehicle, clothing,
jewellery, and so on. Hes a together guy. Hell get it under
control.Time passes. His life improves to an extent. But he is still
alone.
Through our social conditioning, we come to understand love in a
way thats often more focused towards idealism than it is towards
accurately defining the phenomenon. Writers and philosophers
have long debated the meaning of the term, without ever coming to
any consensus. In some cultures, there are even multiple words
used to define love.
Many people conceive of love as having supernatural properties.
They might believe that every person has only one perfect soul
mate. Or that true love will always last forever. Or that people can
fall in love only a certain number of times. They might even
believe that fate will cause love to just happen when the time is
right. With faith that there are such powerful forces at work, it isnt
surprising that people will often intensify their feelings with the
belief that they are following their hearts.
Think back to the last time that you felt that you were in love. How
did you know? Was it a feeling of attraction? Was it a feeling of
connection? Was it a feeling of lust? Was it feeling of physical
Though you dont realize the extent of it, you are always processing
the world through that little seed in your mind that is your identity.
As social creatures, we have the capacity to dominate and dictate
the energy of any social environment. But as a rule, it is our belief
about who we are that dictates how much of that capacity we
actually use.
Identity can be thought of as a mental construct that gives you
both power as well as limitations. It can give you confidence in
some situations because you know what youre worth and you act
accordingly. But in other situations it can also hold you back from
doing things that would help you, because you think Thats not
who I am.
You can often recognize it when a guys identity is holding him back
by the zombie-glazed-over puppy dog look in his eyes, and the
irrational thats not me or Im too busy excuses whenever you
talk about anything that would go beyond the behavioural
constraints of his identity. His mind is literally blocking out and
rejecting anything that might force him to take on a higher value
identity than he thinks he deserves.
Identity is one of those concepts that you must recognize in
yourself, because to get good with women (or to get even better)
you are continually required to evolve on a deep identity level.
Almost invariably, what marks the difference between a guy who
can only hold a conversation for as long as hes entertaining and a
guy who can really draw a girl into his world, is his deep, identitylevel sense of whether or not hes entitled to it.Thats because a
woman does not have sex with you just because of the way that
you act. She has sex with you because of who you are.
When a woman first meets you, she screens you by waiting to have
sex until shes spent enough time with you to judge your character.
That is, whether or not youre really the man who you project
yourself to be your sense of value, entitlement, and individuality.
If your personality keeps her enthralled until she is satisfied that
you are indeed that attractive man, both in your actions as well as
your sense of who you are, then she will want sex. However, if she
senses even the slightest incongruence, she will lose attraction
instantly and walk away.So, if you want to be attractive, and not
simply entertaining, you must evolve both your social skills as well
as your sense of who you are to a point of complete congruence.
RULE:Your identity can be high-value or low-value, or anything in
between and the value of your identity is something that you
cultivate based on how entitled you think you are to have a
dominant impact on your social environment, and how well you
think you can handle both the good and bad reactions that go along
with that.
Whether you realize it or not, theres an idea in your mind about
how much success you deserve out of life or how much value
youre entitled to cultivate as the guy who you identify yourself as
being. How much success you think that youre entitled to have
with women is a part of that self-concept as well.
Entitlement is a multi-layered concept, in the sense that feeling
entitled to success with women is tied to feeling entitled to success
in life. Many people note that the best part of studying to become
good with women that is their drive for female companionship
motivates them to become a better person. The confidence that
they develop to get girls winds up extending into all other areas of
their lives.
A guy who feels confident with women is the same guy who feels
entitled to start conversations, to say whats on his mind, to be the
centre of attention, to socialize with other charismatic people, to
dictate the vibe of interactions, to set the trends of whats cool, and
to express his personality freely.
His sense of being entitled doesnt make him obnoxious or a
conversation tyrant. Rather, it makes him confident that when he
takes on a high-value identity people will enjoy it like when a
musician takes the stage and everyone likes it because he offers
value.
RULE:A high-value guy with a strong sense of who he is basically
has free run with women (with people in general, actually). By
most peoples standards, its almost absurd to see how quickly
women respond to this kind of confidence.When a woman meets a
guy who feels completely confident to talk to her, joke around with
her, tell stories, and generally lead the interaction, she responds
well automatically. Hes in.
But if a guy isnt comfortable doing these things, she usually blows
him off. Thats why the way that women respond to you (how
much value you have) starts from your identity.So where does your
identity come from?
Its crucial to realize that your self-concept is always evolving
through your interaction with the world often in reaction to the
social feedback that you get from other people.
Lets say that you try to take on a more high-value role and youre
accepted for it. All of a sudden, your identity is reinforced as being
of higher value.
But lets say that you try to take on a more high-value role and
youre not accepted for it (maybe people make fun of you).
Suddenly you realize that you shouldnt try anymore, and your
identity winds up holding you back in the future.As human beings,
we are hardwired to be social. And as social creatures, we are
always engaged in the process of eliciting social feedback, which
influences us to react by adapting our identity for better or worse.
DEFINITION: SOCIAL FEEDBACK OR PINGING
Our minds exist in a state of perpetual pinging with the people
around us.What that means, is that our minds are continually
engaged in a sub-process of cross-referencing and validating our
knowledge with the knowledge of others.
Through this subtle and constant process, our minds elicit social
feedback, ranging from the most exceedingly subtle subcommunications to the most blatantly obvious responses all of
which are continually shaping and re-shaping our ideas about who
we are and the world that we live in.Whether you realize it or not,
your interpretation of reality is very subjective, and massively
influenced by the feedback that you get from your social
environment.
Thats why for a person visiting a foreign land, there might be an
experience of what is known as culture shock, where they feel a
surreal disconnection from their environment. And likewise, for a
person isolated too long from society, there might be lapses in
sanity, where they can no longer relate themselves to the social
norm.We can conceptualize social feedback as a mirror through
which the ways we act are cross-referenced and validated.
Because of social feedback, we have an idea of how to act normal
to recognize our status and how to act in a way that aligns with
that.Through our interaction with the world, we gain some concept
of the behaviours that signify who people are, what roles they play,
and their social value within a group.On both a conscious and
subconscious level, we have an idea of what a guy of high status
and a guy of low status looks like.Weve all seen people of both
high status and low status. Whether were conscious of it or not,
our minds recognize the differences and responds emotionally.
So here is why social feedback is important.
RULE:If in the ongoing process of pinging you get social feedback
that tells you your status is increasing or diminishing, your mind
will feel social pressure to react by assuming the identity that you
understand to be most suitable to the situation at the time.As social
creatures, we are adaptive. If were in an environment where we
have or lack status, we will feel it, and feel pressured to step into
the behaviours that our minds recognize as being suitable to the
role.Its for that reason that a girl from a small town where shes
popular will often take on a totally different persona when shes in a
larger town where she doesnt know anybody and pretty girls are
everywhere in sight. Her confidence will change, the types of jokes
that shell laugh at will change, and the types of people who shes
willing to hang around with will change as well.
Now, before we go too far down this path, it has to be understood
that all people react to social pressure differently. Some people
react very obviously while others dont react at all. It depends on a
concept in their minds called their entitlement criterion.
DEFINITION: ENTITLEMENT-CRITERION
Your entitlement-criterion is the criterion that you think you need
to meet in order to feel allowed to take on a high-value identity,
and act in a way that women find attractive.Depending on how
your mind is wired, your entitlement-criterion will be made up of
one or several of the following:
Superficial social standards: When you think that youve met the
typically unrealistic standards of social conditioning (looking good,
making money, having success, owning nice things, etc)
Alliances:
When you have guaranteed acceptance because of
alliances (being friends with high-status people, having a hot
girlfriend, having a lot of friend around, etc)
Cmpetencies: When you have anything that makes people want
something from you (having access to something exclusive, having
knowledge or expertise that people want to learn from, having
entertaining jokes or stories or skills that engage people for a
period of time, etc)
Role-plays:
When a temporary circumstance calls for you to
assume a role that doesnt reflect who you normally think you are
(being the teacher in a teacher/student situation, being in a
respected or professional role, being surrounded only by people of
lesser status so filling the role of high-value by default, etc)
Identity: When you have an internal belief of entitlement as being
a part of who you are.
When your entitlement-criterion is met, your mind tells you You
are now allowed to take on all the subtle high-value behaviours
SUPERFICIAL
SOCIAL
STANDARDS:Think back a few years, to when you got a new
haircut or shirt.You knew that you looked sharp. Girls looked over
at you and people seemed to give you more respect. Naturally,
that made you feel good and you even played up the role.
At the time you probably thought that it was the new haircut or the
clothes that got you the positive responses.But think about it: time
has passed and your style has changed. If you were to wear the
same clothes you wore a few years ago, would you feel the same
confidence?Probably not.
People would respond differently to the exact same clothes,
because the way that the clothes made you feel has changed.
At the time, you felt like youd met one of the socially conditioned
criterions of entitlement looking good.
As a result, your
anticipation of social acceptance threw you into state, and your
behaviours flowed from there. The way that people responded to
you was just a self-fulfilling prophecy.
Lets imagine an alien from another planet coming to visit to Earth.
This alien looks and talks just like a regular human being, except
that hes only three feet tall, bald, and flat broke.Now whats
interesting about this alien is that on his planet, being smaller is
viewed as superior because it doesnt require you to eat as much
how to be the person that they want to be, they look to others to
determine it for them.
Life is full of pressures pressures to act in a certain way,
pressures to appear like a certain type of person, pressures to
adopt the tastes and values of other people.There is always a
temptation to be drawn in by these pressures and place more value
on what other people think of you than on what you think of
yourself. But ultimately, when you give away your power like that
you sell yourself out.
You are an individual. Your value starts from there.
Core confidence comes from the knowledge that there is only one
you, and therefore there is only one person who has access to your
outlooks and experiences.You are unique, and for that reason
nobody can strip you of your value. You can only forfeit it by your
own decision. And that decision is made when you succumb to the
easiness of living life as a generic and a conformist.
Your identity your entitlement, your value, your authenticity
can only be determined by yourself. Other people can pressure you
with their roles and their standards all they want, just as you can
do to them. But there is nobody who can tell you who you are
unless you decide to operate on their interpretation.
Thats why when you decide that your outlook is fascinating, it
becomes fascinating. And when you decide that your story is cool,
it becomes cool Its not the particular outlook or story, but the
authenticity behind them thats fascinating and cool.People are
interested to find out what you think is interesting what your
outlooks and experiences are not what you think will impress
them. Your ability to express your personality from a place of
authenticity is impressive in and of itself.
RULE:You dont need things like superficial approval or alliances or
competencies or role-plays to feel entitled. Your value lies in your
ability to be unique and express it.Value comes down to attitude.
As an individual who thinks for himself, your story and your
humour and your outlooks are fascinating and worthwhile. When
youve cultivated a personality that you think is authentic and you
convey this with power and conviction, others will think so too.
It just depends on how strongly you believe youre entitled not
just to play the role but to be the guy whose identity it is to
dominate and express your personality freely. Because when you
carry that kind of powerful attitude with you, your confidence
projects outwardly and draws people in.
That is how social dynamics work.
It isnt just an ideal or a way that things ought to be. Its the real
way that things actually go on between people.Lets look at why its
so important to have strong sense of who you are and an
unwavering state.
DEFINITION: FRAME
A frame is another word for an interpretation or a belief. It is a
window through which people view and interpret reality.Your
frame is your interpretation of reality. And the strength of your
frame is how fixed your interpretation of reality is the extent to
which your beliefs about yourself and the world can or cannot be
affected by other people.Peoples frames (or interpretations) are
entirely subjective, and they are always up for grabs.
As social creatures, we are always engaged in a process of pinging
each other to see whose frame of reality is more certain, and our
tendency is to adopt the beliefs of the person who projects the
most unwavering certainty and the least emotional reaction to
other peoples conflicting frames.
You can think of the pinging as being a web of electric currents,
and people as fuses all interconnected to one another. The person
with the strongest fuse (strongest frame) can take the most
external pressure and direct the current in any direction they
please, while the weakest fuse gives wayburns out as the current
flows right through them.Whoever has the strongest frame will
usually have the most social influence the most people reacting
to their frame. That is why having strong sense of core value and
entitlement is so important.
RULE:A strong frame is self-fulfilling. The world is whatever you
think it is.To illustrate, well consider the following.
If youre complimented and your frame is that youre entitled to it,
youll probably take it as praise. But if youre complimented and
your frame is that youre not entitled to it, youll probably take it as
condescension or manipulation.Either way, your interpretation (or
frame) will determine the way you react, and people will be drawn
into whatever beliefs you have about yourself.
If they were being condescending but you took it as a compliment
regardless, theyll start to accept your frame because youre more
certain of who you are than they are your frame overpowers theirs.
Likewise, if youre teased and your frame is that you have nothing
to be insecure about, then youll probably take it as a joke and joke
back. But on the other hand, if you take it as a reminder of how
bad you feel about yourself, then youll react and the people who
teased you will see that they were right.The funny way that all this
works, is that even if the teases werent meant as a joke, as long
as you interpret it that way and joke back then youll control the
frame so that everyone thinks it was a joke anyway.
And because your interpretation acted as a self-fulfilling prophecy,
it further reinforced your already existing frame making the world
whatever you think it is.
RULE:When you have the strongest frame, you get to determine
your own value and where you stand in relation to others. You
determine who you are.Peoples frames are always conflicting with
one another to various degrees. As hierarchical creatures we are
always engaged in a process of subtle frame-conflict to determine
who is entitled to assume the higher value roles, and whoever has
the strongest frame wins.
Like two people walking towards a water fountain for a drink, the
person who is more certain that its their turn will walk straight
towards it and take the first sip, while the other person reacts by
slowing down to wait.An example of a conflicting frame between
you and a girl with two different beliefs could be:
HER: Im a hot girl, and youre the next guy of the night who
places me on a pedestal and tries too hard to get sex from me. Im
too hard for you to get. But feel free to entertain me if you like.
YOU: I have no shortage of options, and Im chatting with you
because women are silly and adorable and fun to be around. If you
turn out to be different from all the other girls I already know then
maybe well hang out. But for now Im just having fun talking.
These sorts of conflicting frames are unspoken.
People of value dont talk about who has the strongest frame or the
higher value.
They sub-communicate it naturally by their
behaviours.You can feel who has the stronger frame, not by who
says they have it, but by the underlying context of who is reacting
to the other person more?
1-Who is screening, and who is trying to impress?
2-Who is emotionally affected by other persons acceptance, and
who is indifferent?
3-Who is straining to keep up conversationally, and who is setting
the tone?
4-Who is losing confidence in their idea of whats cool, and who
feels no change?
5-Who would be having just as much fun if the other person
werent there, and who would feel like theyve been kicked out of
the warm end of the pool?
Ultimately what all of this comes down to, is who is changing the
way that they act to try to gain value from the other person, and
who is being more themselves?
Some people confuse the idea of frame conflicts as being a battle of
some sorts. That is not the case at all. In fact, needing to control
the frame all the time to feel good is obnoxious and reactive in and
of itself.Having the stronger frame is not about asserting
dominance over other people. Its about asserting dominance over
yourself being comfortable with who you are and not giving away
your power to gain approval.
RULE:You only experience emotional reactions to people who you
perceive as having some kind of bearing on how you feel about
yourself (often when you think that you need them more than they
need you). When you have too strong of a reaction to someone,
you situate them as having a higher value than you and give away
your power.As was said your mind has access to the awareness
of everyone around you, but youll be inclined to filter out those
people who have less value to you and to focus in on those who
have more.
When you have too strong of an emotional reaction towards
someone, it is a sign that that person is such a forefront part of
your reality that you perceive them as having more value to you
than you have to them.
Otherwise you wouldnt have been
sufficiently aware of them to have felt a reaction.
Thats why its important to live in your own reality to never give
someone else the power to dictate your identity to you.Your frame
has to be stronger than that.
A belief about who you are or what youre entitled to thats built on
superficial standards or who you know, or who youve had sex
with, or what people want from you, or how entertaining you are,
or the roles people give you, or how well people have reacted to
you on that particular day is a belief about yourself that is
inauthentic.These things are not who you are.
You will never base a solid sense of self on these things, and you
will spend your life giving away your power and scrambling to get it
back.Your power lies in your authenticity your deeper, core sense
of who you are.That is not just when people ask you about your
best qualities or values and you have some kind of logical answer
like most people do. Its when your authenticity truly clicks in
your mind so that its not something you have to consciously think
about, and it becomes more a part of your ongoing and everpresent emotional reality than what anyone else thinks of you.
It is at that point that your state stabilizes, and you can express
who you are with the kind of attitude that makes people love you
for itAnd it is at that point that people are drawn in by your frame
because you dictate your identity and thats something that they
naturally want to make space for in their world.
Your identity is the seed that influences your thoughts, which
influences your behaviours, which influences the social feedback
that you get from the outside world.Your interpretation of that
social feedback will influence what you feel youre entitled to, which
in turn will influence how you formulate and revise your identity,
which influences your thoughts and behaviours even further.
It is a recursive feedback loop that interfaces between internal and
external reality, and through which your overall reality is built up
and reinforced over time.
VERSION2:
Your identity is the seed that determines your sense of entitlement,
which influences how you act, which influences the social feedback
you get from the outside world.Your interpretation of that social
feedback will further influence what you think youre entitled to,
which will further formulate and revise your identity, which will
further influence how you act.It is a recursive feedback loop that
interfaces between internal and external reality, and through which
your frame is built up and reinforced over time.
BOOK V COOLNESS AND CONGRUENCE
There are all sorts of subtle communication channels that tell you if
someone is acting in a way that they think is in alignment with
their identity, or if theyre just reacting to
pressures from
others.You can sense it in their subtle rhythms the way that their
patterns of thought flow into their behaviours. Theres a certain
vibe that all people give off that tells you if their actions are an
expression of how they feel or if theyre trying to convince
themselves and the people around them that theyre something
theyre not.This vibe is called congruence.
DEFINITION: CONGRUENCE
Congruence is when your internal feeling of identity and your
external ways of acting are in alignment with each other, both on
the obvious and extremely subtle levels.When youre congruent,
you get away with things that other people don`t.
At one point, you might have known someone who had the oddest
of mannerisms, but who you still thought of as being totally
likeable. There was sort of natural vibe about them that subcommunicated, Im comfortable with myself and my interaction
with the world. I wont react to how others might try to get me to
be, because this works.When people acts congruently, it places a
sort of an implicit social proof that the group accepts them for who
they are. After all, they wouldnt be able to act so congruently
unless other people accepted them for the personality and roles
theyve taken on, which pressures you to accept them too.
So for a guy who likes to start conversations and meet new
people or who likes to express whats on his mind or who likes
to date a lot of women because thats just the way he is there
wont be much social resistance to it because people will just sense
that its a part of his personality.
People can feel it by the way he moves, speaks, and carries
himself By the way that his voice projects and resonates, and how
the things he says falls into alignment with his overall personality.
Theres a comfort that he has with himself and the way that he
interacts with others. He has a sort of ease with the world and the
way that he has reached equilibrium with it.He might be subtly
pressed or even hassled about the way he acts. But to be any
other way is just so far outside of his reality that he doesnt show
any emotional response to it.And because its not a part of his
reality, other people cant get in any external acknowledgement or
ping that their questions about him have any validity which
places any thoughts of not going along with him outside of their
reality as well.
DEFINITION: INCONGRUENCE
Incongruence is the opposite.
Incongruence occurs when a
person feels that their behaviours are not in alignment with the
identity that gained them acceptance in the past.So because their
psychology is constricting them from the new behaviour that has an
uncertain outcome, they exhibit a subtle discomfort a lack of
alignment between how they perceive themselves and how theyre
trying to make others perceive them.
Perhaps theres a sort of disconnected unnaturalness to their
rhythm or a lack of flow within their social environment. Theyre
trying too hard. Theyre too eager. Or theyre not eager enough.
Theres just something thats not quite right.They might show a
slight hesitance in their voice or a slight jitteriness in their
speaking. Perhaps theyre too quiet or even too loud. There might
be an aversion in their eyes, a tension in their facial expressions, or
they have good reasons for being the way they are, and that they
are just being themselves by being the way they are.A low value
identity does yield certain short-term benefits to the person who
assumes it.
To project a high value identity could demand a higher level of
charisma than the person perceives themselves as being capable of
handling. People want their identities to be questioned as little as
possible. Often, to be the most visible means to be in line of the
most criticism and few people want to risk appearing incongruent.
To project a low value identity demands very little exposure to
social pressure or people trying to takeover the role. And while it
yields no substantial social advantage, it guarantees acceptance
within the group.So for example, it is easy to understand why a
person would be apprehensive about wearing a clothing style that
is less fashionable than they are accustomed to. And yet, it would
seem bizarre that many people are even more apprehensive about
wearing a clothing style that is more fashionable than they are
accustomed to. But they are.
Their fear is a rational extension of their worldview. They do not
perceive themselves as having the personality that would be
expected of them if they wore more fashionable clothes. They are
more inclined to stay within the range of what they are accustomed
to in terms of their style, environment, status, and other social
roles, because by doing so they ensure that people will be there to
reinforce their sense of acceptance.
On some level they might resent the limitations. But they benefit
by avoiding any temporary bad emotions in the short term.When a
person enters into a new social situation, they again find
themselves in a struggle to project their frame onto others to get
others to accept, react, and adapt themselves around their identity.
To project a high value identity within a group requires a person to
expend energy. They will be subjected to more attention and social
pressure, and they will have higher expectations demanded of them
in order to keep their status.
It isnt unusual that people will be addicted to positive social
feedback. In the same way that a person might avoid looking at an
unflattering picture of themselves or might angle their face in a
way that looks good when they look in the mirror, people will
unconsciously pick up behaviour patterns that make them feel as
though they are being perceived in the way that they want to be
perceived.An example of this could be their need to always have
people around them, such as friends, admirers, or a co-dependent
relationship. Or, they might need to be dressed in a certain way.
They might even need to tell people about their accomplishments
or their social connections or their areas of expertise before it is
naturally brought up in conversation. And on a more subtle level,
they might need to assume behaviours that are thought of as
proactive, such as controlling the frame, but in a way that is
actually reactive because it is too overdone and extreme.
There are people who will not go to a movie or a restaurant or a
club by themselves. If they go to a movie theatre, they might
scurry in and out so that people wont notice that theyre alone. If
they go to a restaurant, they might feel the need to talk on their
cell phones or to have some work with them so that they look busy.
If they go to a club, they might drink or bop their heads when they
arent in the mood. And if they want to meet girls, then they might
need friends to be there so that they can look over and get
reassurance from them if it doesnt go well.Of course, it is healthy
that people want to go out to social gatherings with their friends
and enjoy each others company. But many people cant go out
alone even when they want to. They cant tolerate the nakedness
of just being there and not caring what other people think.
What they have is situational confidence, not core confidence.
Most people will do well socially in a situation where everyone likes
them. But many of those same people will do poorly in a more
neutral environment, because they feel as if their identity is up for
grabs.A person with core confidence will not feel as though their
identity is in question, whether it is socially reinforced or not. They
neither need to project their frame onto others nor to supplicate to
them in order to feel comfortable. Instead of relying on social
acceptance to feel entitled take on a certain identity, core
confidence is when a person feels a conviction about their identity
that gives way to a sense of social acceptance automatically.
When a person has a strong sense of core confidence, they will be
able to take on a situational confidence (competence) more easily,
because it only requires them to assume and internalize a few new
behaviours. But when a person with situational confidence lacks a
sense of core confidence, they will often be required to completely
overhaul and internalize a new worldview.In terms of meeting
women, the guy who is strong in core confidence but weak in
situational confidence could be characterized as the guy who is
comfortable and confident around women in general, but who does
A man who has the choice to be with many women will have
offspring who have that same choice as well. And while a guy can
quickly assess a girl by her looks, for a girl to assess a guys social
value takes more time. So instead, she can consider how she
thinks other girls perceive him as a reliable indicator of his value.
Women are not necessarily attracted to men who are known to be
promiscuous. Rather, they are attracted to men of high social
value. And because a high social value means that a man will have
many options when it comes to women, women will often be
attracted to men who convey that know how to handle the opposite
sex.Sex can be seen as a womans ultimate act of giving a man her
acceptance.
When a girl gives it up to a guy, it can be interpreted as her
willingness to risk lowering her own value in the eyes of others, to
gain value from him. That value could be in the form of sexual
pleasure, the validation of his acceptance, or the belief she will gain
his alliance. The expression giving it up is a phenomenon of
social conditioning. It means that when a girl has sex, she is
essentially giving up her most highly valued social asset.
Imagine a guy with a great girlfriend. Hes in love, and he invests
his time and emotional energy into their relationship. But one day
he discovers an unusual detail about her sexual past. As it turns
out, she had sex with a member of the football team in the locker
room after the game. Though its not rational, he feels a bit
insecure. So he probes more deeply. And he discovers that it
wasnt exactly an isolated incident.Because his girlfriend didnt just
have sex with a football player after the game. She took on the
entire team. At the same time.
He gets upset and looks for ways to rationalize how he feels. If
she had sex with all of those guys, then how can I trust her in a
relationship? Of course what hes not focusing on is that she was
not in a relationship at the time. Or that what she did in the past
has nothing to do with the great relationship that they have in the
present. He cant see any of that.
All that he can focus on is that he no longer feels validated by his
girl. His knowledge of her sexual past has devalued the meaning of
her sexual approval, and he doesnt get that same emotional boost
from her that he did before. Her validation is no longer meaningful
to him. If any random guy could have had sex with her without
having to invest anything, then how could she be girlfriend
material?
The absurd structure of social value can be traced back to social
conditioning. If a girl is perceived as being easy to get, then she
wont her validation will no longer be meaningful to a man who is
interested in her for the long term. Her social value will decrease
because men will feel as though any other guy could have her. For
that reason, most women will learn to act as though they arent
attracted to most guys they meet. They will learn to behave as
though they are hard to get, to project a frame that they have a
high social value.
Men, on the other hand, have no such
constraints. If they have sex with a lot of women, it will be
accepted as a social norm. And moreover, because they have their
choice of women, their validation will be more meaningful to the
woman.
For some people, there are insecurities at work here. The man isnt
disappointed that his girls actual physical value is lower than he
had originally perceived. Rather, he is insecure that the most
passionate night of sex in her life might have been with another
man. And the girl doesnt believe that she has actually become
less of a person. Rather, she is insecure that guys might only value
her if shes hard to get.
Interestingly, their insecurity is not entirely unfounded. While a
person may have an inherent value, social value by definition is a
value that is both relative and conveyable to others. In the case of
the man, he wants to create the perception that he is the only one
who can give her powerful sexual experiences. And in the case of
the woman, she wants to create the perception that she is hard to
get and that she is the only one who could make the man feel so
strongly validated.This comes back to our fundamental principle,
that we will only experience emotional reactions towards those
people who we perceive as being higher value than us, or who have
the capacity to increase or decrease our value. Both men and
women feel an emotional reaction of attraction towards the people
who they perceive as offering the biggest boost to their state.
When a girl has sex with a lot of guys, the sub-communication is
that she perceived many guys as having a higher value than her.
So if thats the case, then she will project a low social value and
thus be a low source of potential validation to men. But when a
guy has sex with a lot of girls, the sub-communication is that many
girls perceived his value as being higher than theirs, and that he is
a high source of potential validation.
When a man represents a source of validation to a woman he then
becomes attractive to her.The attraction that the woman will feel
for a man of higher value is not always exactly the same as what
she will feel for a guy who is physically attractive. When a woman
sees a man who is physically attractive, she will be physically
aroused by him and feel sexually aggressive. But when a woman
sees a man whose value is high, she will be lead by him and buy
into his frame and allow his advances and feel sexually receptive.
When a man projects higher value, women will find themselves
reacting to him and taking on his frame. Their attention will be
very focused towards him and they will feel a strong emotional
reaction. That reaction is attraction, which means several things.
Firstly, they will perceive him as a source of validation. Secondly,
they will want to be around him. Thirdly, they will be more
receptive to his advances. While the being sexually aggressive or
receptive are distinct concepts, they can also be non-exclusive or
even causal. Either or both can lead to sex.
When a man is physically attractive he will draw a level of attention
because of his looks. If from that he derives a strong sense of
confidence, then he will project a high value by his behaviours and
girls will become sexually receptive.And whether or not a man is
physically attractive, when he has a high value he will elicit an
emotional reaction from women. So because contact discharges
emotions, girls will feel a stronger physical chemistry for his touch,
and will they become sexually aggressive in response to the
physical sensations that they feel from him.
The womans logical mind is conditioned by society to believe that
she should be attracted to a man who will want a relationship with
her. But the womans emotional mind recognizes that when a man
who she just met wants a relationship with her, it is in many cases
a sub-communication that he does not have many options. So, we
find an irony here because the woman will not feel attraction for
the very men who she is socially conditioned to believe are her best
choices.
It is amazing to watch as men will spar with each other for
dominance, as the woman stands there oblivious to whats going
on. But while her logical mind is not processing it, her emotional
mind is. And when one man is determined to have a higher value,
her attention fixates onto him and the man of lower value fades
out. As she walks off with her guy, she even says to him, Wow,
that guy was so weird. He was hitting on me, and I wanted to get
out of there. My stupid friends wanted me to stay.Of course, the
guy who she left with might not be the nicest guy. But there is
always something about him that she can focus on so that she can
backwards rationalize her attraction in terms of her social
conditioning. Perhaps he threw his tissue in the garbage after he
blew his nose. Wow, he really respects the environment. This guy
is great.
Theres definitely a sensitive side to him in there
somewhere. Maybe fate brought us together so that I can help to
bring it out of him!
Ultimately, there are many women who understand and embrace
their tendencies.
They enjoy dating a man who excites and
challenges them, because when he is nice it actually has meaning
unlike the fake nice that is so common of other guys. They will
even talk about it openly and directly with most of the men they
meet.But it is only the men who are ready to hear it that will even
understand what it means. And those men are usually the ones
who do it naturally anyway. Most men will be too preoccupied with
getting her validation. To really see the absurd structure of social
value would bare implications that they are not prepared to deal
with.
BOOK VIII BLIND SPOTS
Few people can see themselves as they really are.
Lets imagine a guy who every morning wakes up and scrutinizes
over his collar and his tucked in shirt and other little details of his
appearance. He gets nervous about how people will see him, think
of him, and talk about him. But deep down, what he wont
acknowledge to himself is that nobody cares.
Hes invisible.
Nobody even notices him, let alone the details that he worries
about.What if something happened that made him realize that he
had been wasting all of his time and energy investing into a ritual
that was completely meaningless?
He has a close female friend for whom he has a secret crush.
Every weekend they get together, and he puts on his best cologne
and cleans up his room just in case.Someday hes going to make
a bold move. She always says that she wants friendship first. And
shes always complaining about how the guys that she dates dont
treat her right. But he would. Hes the nice guy shes been waiting
for.Tonight, they have a hot date. Shes been having boyfriend
problems, and hes the only one that she can trust to talk about it
with. He takes her out and treats her to shopping and dinner, and
then they go out for a few drinks. Then some random guy that
neither of them ever met comes over and strikes up a
conversation.
-Assumption that most girls are attracted, and if you find out about
it its not a big deal.
-Assumption that there is an abundance of people to meet and
connect with.
-Indifference to losing rapport with people.
-Indifference to approval.
And when you are inside your head, you may tend to experience:
-Feeling the need to self-monitor and view your self through the
eyes of others.
-Feeling so stuck in your own mind that you cant pay attention to
other people.
-Feeling that you need to fit in.
-Feeling that you need to impress and entertain.
-Feeling flustered by all of the things that you think you need to be
doing.
-Feeling that an interaction must work or you may not have
another chance.
-Feeling lack of deservedness, and that an attractive woman
couldnt be attracted to you.
-Fear that what you have to say isnt adding to the vibe of the
interaction.
-Fear that you are being judged.
-Fear that you are boring.
-Fear that you appear insincere.
-Fear of expressing passion, confidence, or sexuality.
-Fear of losing your composure because people won't like what they
see.
-Fear that you need to impose your personality onto people or they
wont like you.
-Fear that you need to entertain everyone or they wont like you.
-Fear that you are being judged for acting higher value than you
perceive yourself.
-Fear that you are being judged for approaching women.
-Fear of breaking rapport with other people.
-Fear of rejection or failure.
-Fear that if you accept feedback from other people that you will
lose status.
-Fear that people who compliment you are insincere.
-Fear that if a woman shows interest that she might be the only
one who likes you for a while and so you have to make sure it
works out.
If a guy tends to be focused outside of his head, it is often because
his reality is reinforced by internal pillars and so he has no need to
focus inside his head. And if he tends to focus inside his head, it is
often because his reality is reinforced by external pillars, and he
needs to focus internally because hes pre-occupied trying to make
people like him and rationalizing the times when they dont.
So what, then, are internal and external pillars?
To determine a criterion for how we should feel about ourselves, we
create reference points. These reference points act as our pillars
of reality, and serve as our chosen criteria to determine how we
should feel about ourselves and the world.
If a guys sense of reality is founded on the pillar of how other
people respond to him, then he will always be comparing him self
to others, and be at the mercy of their responses in order to feel
good. If someone calls him a loser, then hell think Oh no, Im a
loser, and his sense of acceptance will be diminished. If a girl
rejects him, then hell think Oh no, Im not good enough to get
girls, and his sense of acceptance will be diminished.
Hell be pushed back into his head, and his emotional state will be
shot. The reality of the other people will have become his reality,
and hell take on the characteristics of a loser by becoming
awkward and shy. He wont be able to socialize naturally until
someone is nice to him or until he shakes it off, and when someone
is nice to him and he becomes more dominant, hell be at the
mercy of their continued responses to keep to feeling and acting
that way.
Sometimes a guy who founds his reality on acceptance from others
will actually respond a better than the shy guys, because he is
super motivated to do well.
He picks up on ways to gain
admiration that are more proactive and creative than average, but
he has his downfalls because his neediness becomes tacky and
transparent over time.He will always need for the social energy to
be flowing in his direction. If another guy is dressed in a way that
gets attention, hell have to make fun of it. If another guy has a
girl with him, hell have to hit on her and try to get her attention.
If another guy is the center of attention, hell have to get the focus
away from him or at least talk to somebody else or leave the room.
And if hes in a monogamous relationship hell have trouble being
faithful, because he feeds on continual admiration from new girls.
A guy whose pillars of reality are too externalized will have to
create blind spots towards the external to rationalize when things
dont go his way. And as new facts inevitably arise to reveal his
are not the key pillars that stabilize the entire construct, their
impermanence can be enjoyed so long as they are not crucially
needed.
And with internal pillars in place, a guy can truly
appreciate the external pillars, without the perpetual fear of loss.
At the same time, if a guys sense of reality is determined too
internally, then there can be problems as well. Because while he
might always feel secure, he may also feel unmotivated and
uninspired to achieve anything because he feels fine no matter
what.Like the guy who understands that its all a game and never
feels beneath anyone, but who takes it too far. He thinks he has it
all figured out, but deep down he feels an incongruence and
bitterness for never having done anything that does himself justice.
There needs to be a balance between the two.
And beyond that, there needs to be a belief in the inherent value of
actual results as being beyond the acknowledgement of others or
as they say, Doing it for your self.Most people have pillars of
reality that are both internally and externally founded.
And
likewise, most people have times when they are more internal and
times when they are more external. The question is whether or not
the person has found the right balance.Both aspects of our
psychology exist for good reason, and the strongest structure is
founded upon moderation not excess. Of course, few people can
ever be perfect with this. But truly, perfection is not an ideal that
is ever attained, but an ideal that is striven for by continually
improving and doing as best is as possible at the time.
BOOK X ATTRIBUTION AND STATE
-focus and conditioning
-randy, geoff, woody description
-importance of positivity
-more on the THEME of ATTRIBUTION, as throughout the entire
chapter
To lead a woman, you must first be able to lead yourself.We are all
responsible for our own states of mind.A guy who is internally
strong attributes himself as being responsible for his state of mind.
A guy who is internally weak attributes the world as being
responsible for making him feel all sorts of different things.The way
that we feel internally will project outwards and have an affect on
the people around us.Moods are infectious, and if you want people
to be in a good mood around you then the way to do that is to be
in a good mood yourself.
If being centered comes from having a balanced sense of reality,
then being positive comes from conditioning yourself to feel that
way in your every day life. So lets look at how we condition
ourselves.
As adaptive beings, we condition ourselves to our circumstances by
learning to access our most important states of mind. The more
often that we access a particular state, the more track is laid down
to strengthen our mental pathways to it, and the more easily we
can access the state again.Over time, the states of mind that we
access the most often will become habituated. They may or may
not feel good, but they feel familiar. So we become accustomed,
and to some extent addicted, to our most familiar states of mind.
Our minds are wired so that many of our thought patterns loop.
So if were upset, our thoughts might loop on the stream of, I feel
really bad. Why? Because of events x,y,z. And because of those,
probably even more things will happen to make me feel even
worse. Wow, that sucks. I feel really bad. Why? Because of
x,y,zPeople will road rage for example, might be accustomed to
being angry and manifest it by putting themselves into situations
where they can get mad. Logically, they know that they that they
can't control everyone elses driving. But emotionally they are
familiar with the state of anger, so they will tail people and yell at
them to get out of the way, knowing full well that when they pull
up to tail the next car that it will be exactly the same.
Workaholics can be the same. Theyre always in a rush, and
somehow always have a never ending workload on their plate that
must be attended to now! Likewise, couples in rocky drama filled
relationships. They always seem to be able to find something to
bicker about. And when finally their relationship starts to go
smoothly for a while, they wind up breaking up because they don't
get their fix of drama from it anymore.Negative people will always
have something to complain about to backwards rationalize how
they feel. Over and over, their conversations will come back to
topics that reflect their inner state. They will tend to talk about
their problems and the problems that they see in others, and
continually gossip about all the people that they think are bothering
them.
What they misunderstand is the causality or sequence of the
events. First, they have a tendency to fall back into a familiar
state, and when they do they will seek out ways to rationalize how
they feel. And second, because memory is state access dependent,
they will be more likely to access the old memories that they felt
when they were in that same state.They believe that there was
something external that made them feel that way, when in fact
they were using the thing that frustrated them in the past in order
to keep themselves feeling that way.One of the most common
states that people become addicted to is depression. They get
caught in the loop of feeling depressed by their situation, which
leads to apathy and inaction, which gives them a justification to
feel even worse.
Some people will become depressed as a way of numbing
themselves from feeling helpless or abused.
Depression,
particularly, can work as a thought looping pattern that drives
emotions in a downward spiral to a point where they are numb and
thus re-stabilized.Dwelling on problems can be a way of disavowing
responsibility for them. Cases of clinical mental illness aside,
depression can be used as an excuse to disavow accountability.
Life can feel much easier when something is not your fault.
A person with a little kid mentality will dwell on why it isnt fair
that they didnt get the outcome that they feel that they deserved.
In doing so, theyll put themselves through an array of emotions in
order to avoid dealing with the emotions that come with
accountability.Our upbringing can nurture our confidence as well as
indoctrinate us with beliefs that hold us back. Many of us were
raised to believe that if we did our best that things would always
work out. And in an unfair world it can be difficult to reconcile the
beliefs of our upbringing to the reality that we are thrown into. It
can be tempting to emotionally resist a situation and to get caught
up in dwelling on whats fair, instead of working to take progressive
action within the parameters of the given circumstance.
But to be caught up in whats fair is a little kid mentality. To let
that part of yourself go means to accept that not everything can be
controlled, and yet at the same time, to accept responsibility for
your outcomes. You cannot control the situation or attributes that
you were born into. But no matter who you are, there is someone
out there who started in a worse situation than you thats outgaming you.When a person requires permanence and certainty to
feel comfortable, they are setting themselves up for failure and
bitterness. They might feel that it is unfair that they cant meet a
permanent girlfriend right now. They complain about not being
able to find quality women, and that they cant trust girls not to
cheat or break up with them. But the man who looks for the
qualities in a woman that he can fall in love with is different from
the man who looks for the qualities in a woman that he can control.
This is a default pattern of weakness of men who dont want to
admit to themselves that their girlfriends have more options than
they do if the relationship fails. And what they dont admit to
themselves is that if they had those options themselves, then those
things would be the last on their minds. And their only reason for
seeking permanence so desperately was because they dont feel
secure to find another girl if their relationships were to fail.
It is easy to blame this on women. And for a born loser, there is
always something that they can blame. But in the end, our
emotional states are our own responsibility. Our capacity to be
internally adaptive allows us the ability to transcend external
circumstance.A guy who believes himself to be at the cause of his
life will look at the choices that lead him to where he is in the
present and look at how he can improve it in the future. He
believes that the world responds to him, so if he doesnt like it,
then he can do something to change it. The guy who believes
himself to be at the effect doesnt do anything about it, and instead
looks to attribute the problem to something outside of him self so
that he doesnt have to feel any bad emotions.
The proactive guy believes that he is responsible and in control of
his own state of mind.
The reactive guy blames external
circumstances.
There is an entirely different thought process for people who do
what they want, as opposed to people who hesitate. People who do
well will see a situation and automatically focus on how to handle
it. Or they may not focus at all, and just do it. People who
hesitate see a situation, and allow their focus to be exhausted by
thinking about everything that could go wrong and how bad that
might feel.While the guy who worries about how people will think of
him just sits there, there is another guy who couldnt care less
because hes more in touch with his instincts and is just having fun.
He sees what he wants and immediately just goes in and takes it.
Hes being playful and isnt weird about it like the other creepy
guys who make the girl feel like its a big deal if she doesnt react
the right way. He is congruent to it, and whether or not the girl is
receptive to it, she can tell that thats just the way that he is. So
she giggles, and even if she rejects him, on some level she finds
those qualities attractive.
The guy who hesitates cant do that. Hes thinking of it as a
situation, instead of just socializing with women as a part of who
he is.
Hes thinking about how he could possibly avoid the
situation, or how he could handle the situation if he could just work
up the nerve.
Half of his mental energy is focused on the
downside, and so half of his cognitive capacity is diminished.At
some point in his life, the reactive guy made a decision that he was
not in control of his circumstances, and that he would do whatever
was necessary to avoid bad emotions. He does not know that he
made this choice. But he did.So he does not socialize well with
women. He knows that he will base how he feels about himself by
how they react to him, and he will only approach if he is assured
that it will feel good.
BOOK X STRONG BEHAVIOUR PATTERNS
Preface with beliefs, and change weak behaviours to be prefaced
with beliefs, then include mini prefaces with dashed-lists of the
exact behaviours.
BOOK X WEAK BEHAVIOUR PATTERNS
Thought patterns and behaviour patterns have a relationship that is
symbiotic.Your thought patterns are always sub-communicated by
your behaviours, even in the most subtle ways. Whether you feel
weak or strong, your behaviours will flow naturally from that state.
Women are sensitive to this sub-communication, and will gauge
your value based on your behaviours as well as how other people
respond to you, or how she feels that they would respond to you.
You can consciously take control of your behaviours in order to
convey value.
In doing so, social feedback towards you will
improve. And with improved social feedback, the strong thought
patterns that you endeavour to internalize will come to match your
experience and become your reality over time.
In social dynamics, not doing the wrong things is just as important
as doing the right ones. Among the worst social errors that a
person can make to lower their value is to qualify them selves.
When you qualify yourself, you are trying to logically convince
other people to see your value, but instead create the opposite
effect by inadvertently polluting the vibe of the interaction with
your insecurities.There are identifiable patterns of behaviour that
are commonly indicative of people qualifying themselves. Looking
at these behaviours is a thought exercise that helps us to examine
our own behaviours. But to get caught up in them, can lead to an
over-analysis that will do more harm than good. Because when
you feel natural, natural behaviour will be automatic. And when
you feel analytical, natural behaviour will come awkwardly.
A caveat emptor is that behaviour is not a digital science, and if
someone is congruent, they could have many weak behaviour
patterns and have no problems at all. The general rule of thumb is
that whatever is done from a position of emotional neediness will
appear uncool. And likewise, a behaviour that is typically needy
can be cool, as long as it is done from a position of power. The
sub-communication behind behaviours has more to do with the
emotions that are behind them than the behaviour itself.
Look at other people in social situations to understand these things.
Observe these distinctions for yourself. A person who tries to just
copy the mannerisms from the book without understanding them
risks looking robotic. As a rule, if you feel reactive when you
exhibit a typically weak behaviour pattern, you probably are being
reactive. And in general, if you feel fine, then you can often break
the rules. It is a matter of common sense.There are four principle
ways that guys will convey lower value. They are conveying
nervousness, conveying neediness, trying too hard to gain
approval, and trying too hard to convey value.
CONVEYING NERVOUSNESS
If you feel too much nervous energy, you might feel your heart
pounding, your palms sweating, and your mouth drying up. You
will tend to discharge nervous energy through a variety of weak
behaviour patterns.
-Talking too fast. This can make you appear as though you believe
that if you just says one more thing, that you will gain acceptance.
-Moving your hands around in a weird and over-animated way.
This can make you appear as though you desperately need
attention. Being animated isnt bad. Being animated from a place
of discomfort is. If you find yourself flailing your arms to discharge
nervous energy you would be better off just keeping them at you
sides.
-Pacing back and forth.
-Fidgeting.
-Rabbiting around in conversation. Jumping from topic to topic,
frantically trying to keep the conversation going.
-Confined, closed umbrella body language.
-Standing with your legs sewn together. This can make you appear
as though you fear that you arent entitled to comfortably take up
space.
-Not sitting in a way that is comfortable
-Holding your shoulders with tension.
-Using a cracking, feeble voice.
-Mumbling.
-Freezing up, holding posture statically, or even not blinking.
CONVEYING NEEDINESS
If you feel needy, you will tend to be unnaturally eager to have
rapport with others. You might believe that you are being friendly,
when in fact, you are being overly friendly. It can be seen in the
way that you hold yourself, the way that you respond when people
talk to you, and in the way that girls walk away from you.
-Leaning in, or hen pecking. Appearing as though you are too
eager in conversation. If you find yourself too eager, you would be
better to just lay back, and allow people to lean into you. Almost
all guys will tend to lean in unnaturally. You will be fine if you lean
in normally, but not unnaturally. Even if youre tall, or in a venue
with loud music.
-Snapping to attention when someone speaks. Snapping your head
or body around whenever someone speaks or comes up along side
you can appear too eager and reactive. Its fine if you turn your
head normally, but if you are unnaturally eager it will appear
submissive. Slow down and take your time. Feel comfortable
finishing your own sentences before jumping onto someone elses
thread, and pause to allow people to wait for your answers if you
feel inclined.
-Eagerly nodding your head or constantly raising your eyebrows to
acknowledge every single thing that the other person is saying.
Being friendly is not the same as being a yes-man. If you feel
more like the latter, then instead of always saying Yeah, yeah,
yeah, awesome! try pausing and saying Cool, or Sounds good,
or Makes sense.
-Going too far out of your way to hear what the other person is
saying. If you cant hear the other person (in venues with loud
music, for example), and you keep saying What? over and over,
you can convey too much need to have rapport. Rather than
asking over and over, you could just jump to another
conversational topic and use the opportunity to appear less needy
rather than more. Or, you could reframe it authoritatively as if the
other person is entertaining you, by saying with a strong tonality,
Please repeat that. I want to hear what youre saying.
-Being too willing to reply to everything with well thought out
answers, even to nonsense. So if someone were to ask you to
qualify yourself to them with something like Why are you asking
me this? its not always necessary to give a well thought out
answer. You could just say ...I'm talking, as if the other person
isnt making sense, and then keep going as if you didn't give it
much thought.
Even more powerful can be to just ignore
conversational threads that you arent inclined to respond to.
-Remembering too many details from past conversations. If you
remember too much, it can sub-communicate to the other person
that you viewed them as having a higher value than you. If the
conversation came to a point where the person had done
something that impressed you, then that is fine. But if it was just
another encounter, and the only reason that you remembered it
was because the person was particularly attractive, then you can
wind up sub-communicating that it meant more to you than it did
to them.
-Getting sucked into traps of rapport seeking. Sometimes, youll
find yourself talking to someone, hoping that theyll be impressed.
And if things dont go well, you may be instinctively inclined to keep
talking and talking until you feel like theyre impressed. But the
more you talk, the less theyll be impressed. If you find yourself
doing that, just stop.
-Waiting for people who arent coming back. If a girl in a club says,
I have to go to the bathroom, it often means that she isnt
coming back. Even if she does, and youre waiting like a puppy
dog, your value will be lowered. It is better is to be chatting with
someone else, and have her come back and find you having fun.
There is no reason that you can't always re-initiate the
conversation later. Only if you have reason to believe that she is
serious, or if she leaves you with one of her belongings, should you
consider waiting.
-Always trailing instead of leading. If you always follow somebody,
then you can create a dynamic where they expect that you will
always follow, and they will take you for granted. If you are
walking somewhere with a girl, and she wanders away from your
side, don't chase her unless you believe that she won't come back.
If you dont believe that she will come back, you can go and get her
because you have nothing to lose. But if she'll probably follow,
then just do your own thing and be secure that she'll come back.
However, if a girl is obviously in your frame and wants to introduce
you to her friends or drag you somewhere private, that is not a
problem at all.
-Being unaware of needy body language. If a persons body
language hasnt yet conveyed an interest in having rapport with
you, and your body language is more interested than theirs, then
you have created a value disparity in their favour. The direction
that you point your feet is an indicator of where you are most
You dont know whether you want to talk to each other briefly or to
hang out for a while longer.
The casual banter at the beginning of an interaction is what
demonstrates to people that you are really in the conversation and
not using them to pull yourself up. It shows them that you can
socialize properly, that you are probably a link to other interesting
people, and that youre someone that theyd want to get to know
more.In a social setting, the people are there to have a good time.
The value in the situation is having fun and meeting cool people,
and the women are screening the men to see what emotions they
can get by being around them.The way that you first interact with a
girl her is preview of how shell feel being around you over a longer
period of time whether for that night or for her whole life. If you
cant vibe with her, then shell usually screen you out. So its not
the time to be too analytical or to try to impress anyone. If you
can vibe well, then people will assume that you have other things
going for you, and the girls will naturally respond.
Most guys will try to engage women with boring, interview-like
topics that wont hook their attention. Theyll do what the other
guys do pressure the girl when the vibe isnt there, show too
much interest despite not knowing anything about her, try too hard
to get to know her as an excuse for why theyre interested, and
come from a place of lower value where sex would mean more to
them than it would to her.
A guy who does better will tend to be more confident, outgoing,
and good at creating vibes. People will be responsive to him, which
will give him status and social proof. And when he speaks to a
woman, hell know how to engage the emotional side of her mind,
show interest from a place of higher value, and sometimes even
flirt by playfully screening her as she tries to get to know him.
All of this comes naturally, and he knows what to say not because
he always has the perfect thing prepared, but because hes having
fun and acting without outcome and that makes the girl more
receptive to whatever he brings up. Being outside of his head and
in the moment is what allows him to access the emotional side of
his own mind, and thats what gets him the emotional response
from the girl.To be playful is not analytical it comes from and is
responded to on an emotional level. To be playful and spontaneous
you have to just let your mind vibe. You have to be comfortable in
the situation so that you feel a kind of relaxed excitement where
you can just run through all sorts of combinations and images in
your mind, feel them, and convey them. Like leading a persons
mind along a certain path, and then diverting it when they dont
expect it. And when you divert it, it is your way of creating a vibe
with them. So they laugh and show their acceptance, and it is
rhythmic.
Playfulness is a synergy of many emotions, connections,
recognitions, and rapport. The way you use humour is more
important than your content though good content certainly never
hurts. One guy can say the same thing as another, and get a
totally different response.
Your humour comes from your
confidence, your conveyance of your internal state, and the
imagery that you use to play with people and connect with them.
To be playful you must believe in what youre doing. You must feel
the same energy spike that you want the others to feel. If youre
giving the key piece, and for even one second you fall back into
your head and doubt that it will hit, then you will trail off and it
wont work. But if you believe in it, and you feel it the whole way
through, then it will always hit.What does it mean to be playful?
The range is pretty wide. It could include anything that plays with
the imagination, the emotions, or the social dynamics of a
situation.To joke around about imaginary situations, going back
and forth and adding spins and expansions and consequences to it
that is playful.
To misinterpret in a way that spikes emotions, like making silly
comparisons or accusations or making funny impressions that is
playful.To send mix messages, cross hot and cold signals, both
verbal and non-verbal that is playful. Like saying I hate you
while smiling at the girl and touching her shoulder. Or like saying,
Youre very energetic. You could be my bodyguard. We could
work something out. Or going back and forth with teasing, letting
her win and pouting so she feels bad, and then surprising her by
turning it back around when she doesnt expect it. Like a little kid,
you can just play. You can pick her up and spin her around and put
her down behind you and talk to her friends. And when she jumps
back out in front of you, you smile and say, Where did you go?
Its like when you say, Youre amazing. I cant talk to you
anymore, and you turn away so that she has to pull you back and
find out why. Or when you refuse to answer her questions, and
give silly answers that make her even more curious. Perhaps you
even stay totally serious, and you wait for her to laugh first before
you laugh along with her. Or perhaps you dont answer at all but
just tickle and poke her and smile.
more about your own validation than the validation of others. And
you know that no one individual has value to offer because you can
get anything you want (ie: girls meet celebs and say he could
have anyone and because of that he is so real)
Not coming across like youre trying to take value from somebody.
Tom Cruise bit about being at a point where youre not able to take
value from anybody anymore, so you are purely just there..
Being able to listen to someone without judging everything theyre
saying or waiting to say your piece or viewing it through your own
world view.
It isnt the content that the guys saying thats impressive. Its his
ability to communicate with the women on a level where hes
totally open, despite that this girl is standing right in front of him.
Its not his MATERIAL that shes interested in as much as it is
getting to know whats interesting to HIM.. shes interested in him,
not his material.
Guys will pinch girls asses or try to take value from successful
people or criticize them because they dont identify with them.
They feel like they have so much relative value that they wouldnt
be fazed by anything. But in the process of doing this, they are
reinforcing their own status to themselves, because they dont
identify or relate with cool people.
It is not just what hes saying that draws the girls interest, but also
the way that hes able to ease out of his logical constraints and
communicate in a way thats interesting to him. A guy who can
talk to a girl on an authentic level is fascinating, regardless of what
he has to say, because his communication style says so much
about him. When he can open up despite all the social pressure, it
shows that hes someone of truly high value.
When you can perfectly balance your identity, your thoughts, and
who you are, you can convey such authenticity. That requires you
to consider all your old identities and where they come from. To
consider whether or not who you are is really authentic, or just a
reaction from past experiences. Like the uptight guy who cant
have fun or be sexual because he thinks hell be rejected.
Authenticity is a dominant characteristic, because if you are
inauthentic then the sub-communication is that you cant project
your real personality because you have something to hide
(betaness usually). Whenever an AMOG reframes you as trying
or inauthentic, you lose value. So to be truly dominant, you have
to be authentic. It is similar to the cool/congruence dichotomy.
Often, when people are learning to add to their personalities, they
will fall into a rut of trying too hard, and losing sight of their actual
goals. They cultivate personalities that are geared towards getting
a reaction of attention, rather than interest. Many become bold
instead of confident. Think about a construction worker howling at
a girl walking by. He isn't confident. He's just being bold. He is
self-sabotaging his chances by playing a character that isn't who he
really is. Nobody can say he "got rejected", because he played a
character to hedge that off. But if he really didn't care, then why
did he even howl at her in the first place? People do this all the
time. They create exaggerated personas in order to hedge off the
feeling of rejection. In reality, if they'd have just been themselves,
people would have thought they were cool and not rejected them
anyway. That is the essence of playing a character. Some no-no's
are:
-Being entertaining instead of interesting, and transforming from
entertaining to interesting to desirable.
-Insecurely ballbusting instead of being playfully challenging.
-Being cocky to the point of overcompensating instead of being
playfully confident.
-Trying too hard to be aloof, to the point that people actually think
you are arrogant.
-Trying too hard to put on a sophisticated persona. Sophisticated
personas, like those adopted by doctors and other professionals,
are designed to put up walls of professionalism that are necessary
within a professional organization. Their purpose is to put up walls,
so that the personal element does not get in the way of efficiency.
To bring this attitude to your interactions with women conveys that
you are uptight, not professional.
-Being obnoxiously macho to the point of where it is obvious that
you just want attention. Give me the biggest sports jock in the
bar, and I'll walk in cool and confident and interesting. I'll have
taken the female attention away from him in seconds. And when
he gets even more obnoxious, I'll roll my eyes to the girls, and
they'll giggle and nod in understanding.
-Being inexpressive, quiet, and too nice. The opposite personality
of the macho guy is also trying too hard. If you offer something to
someone, and they don't show very strong immediate appreciation,
don't keep pushing it on them. They will usually just view it as
supplicating them, and it actually lowers your value. They will
appreciate you less than if you'd done nothing.
If you do
something nice, do it from a position where people are
appreciative. That means being a cool guy, and so that people are
compelled to earn your attention. When that's not the case, don't
mention that there's something you could do but aren't. Just avoid
it altogether, and let your personality do the work in creating a
good impression. If someone is trying to use you, don't even
address it. Just change the topic or say nothing, either way as if
you didn't hear them.
Experiment with not acknowledging
conversational threads that you don't like, as if they don't exist.
It is for that same reason that girls are often turned off at the idea
of guys trying to pick them up. They dislike anything contrived
that is not natural and spontaneous because they feel as though
the value that he is conveying is inauthentic.
You dont make excuses. You hold yourself to the same high
standards as the guys who have everything going for them. You
are one of those guys now. Come to think of it, you always have
been. And in order to hold your self to a standard that is in
alignment with that, it is necessary to be accountable.
Aiming for your personal best is not something that you do for
social validation. You do it for yourself, because the process of
creating a life of excellence is an end of inherent value. That
doesn't necessarily mean that a person always has to feel
emotionally secure. It just means that they have made a choice to
aim for their best.Youre not the kind of guy to aim for your best to
get validation from others. You do it for yourself. You do it
because the process of creating a life of excellence is an end of
inherent value. You dont need to always feel emotionally secure.
Youve just made a choice to aim for your best.You dont need to
micromanage because you dont care.To know victory you must
know defeat.You value the many not the few.
MODERN DATING MISCONCEPTIONS:
-social conditioning:
-it takes multiple dates instead of flipping switches
-you can take a phone number and STAY THERE
-a phone number is a bridge not a close
-you dont need to spend money (you could hang out instead)
-nice gestures and how they can bring you down
-how parties lead to sex
-day time and night time are often the same girls
-madonna/whore complex (no correlation between a girls
personality and her sexual preferences and it takes a long time to
learn someones personality)
STICKING POINT: Many guys who need to build value are unable
to be in the moment or funny until the girl has heard their value
building bits. Theyre funny after the initial bits, but they cant be
that way unless the person has heard their bit. They substitute
qualifying themselves with cars or money for strategized
structured-vibing, but they cant feel comfortable without the other
person having seen that bit first.
Building value common SPs:
-thinking that it was just the way I ran my set all the time leads
to fear when you actually put YOURSELF on the line.
-conditioning yourself to be continually reaction seeking.
-substituting qualifying yourself and supplicating for demonstrating
value more creatively still leaves you feeling like if people dont see
you as that guy who did the cool stories that they dont know how
cool you are, and without THEM to confirm it in your mind you dont
feel that way yourself.
Assuming value common SPs:
-refusal to improve.
-belief that congruence is cool.
-continually rationalizing to feel cool, eventually leading to not
being willing to approach because it could break the
rationalizations.
PERILS OF THE GAME:
-social robot (thinking everyone is trying to socially manipulate
you, thinking you need to do it to others)
-thinking that everyone is a hater and rationalizing against you
(you will seek it and find it)
-thinking that all girls are state-junkie sluts (you will seek it and
find it)
-becoming a value chaser yourself
-not being able to listen to people
-the pua identity and basing your validation on how well women
respond
-thinking that women are replaceable, and always finding a new girl
when you could have fixed it with the other one (going too far in
the other direction, since most guys do the opposite and stay too
long)
The problem with traditional dating
When you try to date her, she is the selector and you are reacting
to her. Its the worst way to spark attraction.When your concept
of reality is steady enough that other people are reacting to it, you
determine what constitutes high value in that environment and