The Sturmgeschütz III (StuG III) assault gun was Germany's most produced armoured fighting vehicle during World War II. This is the restoration story of one of these successful german tank destroyers
The Sturmgeschütz III (StuG III) assault gun was Germany's most produced armoured fighting vehicle during World War II. This is the restoration story of one of these successful german tank destroyers
The Sturmgeschütz III (StuG III) assault gun was Germany's most produced armoured fighting vehicle during World War II. This is the restoration story of one of these successful german tank destroyers
The Sturmgeschütz III (StuG III) assault gun was Germany's most produced armoured fighting vehicle during World War II. This is the restoration story of one of these successful german tank destroyers
The document discusses the restoration of a German StuG 40 assault gun by the Weald Foundation in Kent.
A StuG 40 assault gun that was originally manufactured in December 1943 by MIAG and later acquired by Canadian Captain Farley Mowat in 1945.
Very little is known about the vehicle's history between it leaving the factory and being surrendered to Allied forces in 1945. Its original unit is also unknown.
I
t is perhaps fortunate that military vehicles
can be appreciated in various ways. Some have technical aspects that impress, while others are more orthodox in design but are historically interestng by virtue of having played a key role in an acton, campaign or war. Then there are the few vehicles that interest because of a connecton with a notable individual Montys sta car, for instance, but while there are plenty of types that tck the rst two boxes to some degree, very few tck all three... However, the newly restored 7.5cm Sturmgeschtz 40 Ausf G (Sd.Kfz. 142/1) that has just rolled out of the Weald Foundatons workshops in Kent is, I would argue, one. Although the concept behind the StuG family didnt nd much favour among the western Allies, the Germans wholeheartedly adopted the idea of mass-producing assault gun and/or tank hunter versions of tanks. It was an eectve way of shoe horning a powerful gun (albeit with limited traverse a mere 24 degrees in the StuG IIIs case) into a compact, low prole vehicle that was more economical to manufacture than a conventonal turreted tank. Such was the success of the StuG III that conceptually similar vehicles followed, but it was the Panzer III- based StuG that led the way. The example newly restored by the Weald Foundaton was manufactured by Mhlenbau und Industrie AG (MIAG) of Braunschweig in 14 MILITARY MACHINES INTERNATIONAL OCTOBER 2014 John Blackman gets an exclusive look at the Weald Foundations latest restoration StuG Survivor 14-22_stug2.indd 14 07/08/2014 21:27 Lower Saxony. The chassis number indicates that it lef the factory in December 1943, but that is not really where our story starts. We would like it to, but nothing whatsoever is known about the vehicles history between it leaving MIAG and its surrender to the Allies in May1945. Speculaton that it survived Normandy and/or Arnhem is just that, speculaton. Given the life expectancy of German armour at that tme it is indeed remarkable that the StuG survived so long, OCTOBER 2014 MILITARY MACHINES INTERNATIONAL 15 StuG Survivor ABOVE... The gun only had 12 degrees traverse each side of dead centre so the driver would frequently have had to swing the entre vehicle to bring the weapon to bear, and his vision was extremely limited. RIGHT... The StuG arrives at the Weald Foundatons workshops. (Courtesy Weald Foundaton) 14-22_stug2.indd 15 07/08/2014 21:27 but the only thing we know with absolute certainty is that it was acquired by Canadian Army Captain, Farley Mowat, who in June 1945 appointed himself commanding o cer of the First Canadian War Museum Collecton Team, a unit of his own inventon. We relate some of his story separately, but essentally he set himself the task of collectng as much of the German war machine as possible and shipping it back to Canada. Mowats own paperwork regarding his more-or-less uno cial project conrms that a 7.5cm StuG G 40 (L/43) assault gun, chassis number 96105 that had been assigned to the defence of Amsterdam and was recovered from the Seaforth Highlanders of Canada afer the German surrender in the Netherlands. What is not noted is the unit to which the StuG belonged. And, by the way, at that stage of the war there would have been no identfying markings on the vehicle beyond the Balkenkreuz. WEALD FOUNDATION Mike Gibb, principle of the Weald Foundaton, is entrely commited to researching every aspect and detail relatng to the vehicles in his charge, and in the case of this partcular StuG, he has been assisted by David Ridd and valuable input from noted Canadian military historian and author, Harold Skaarup, however, ascertaining the StuGs parent unit has proved partcularly problematc. Weve traced the existng strength reports of the German units in the Netherlands that had StuGs at the tme, he explains, and weve basically taken the biggest and most well- known out of the equaton because there is an existng photo of the StuGs it surrendered, none of which are middle or late-period StuG Gs. A good candidate at the moment is the 6th Fallschirmjger Division, which had a StuG unit atached. Where it surrendered is in the area that we believe the StuG was recovered. Unfortunately, while there are many photos of German Fallschirmjger units surrendering their kit at Soest, photos of the vehicle park they are not in the sequence. Luckily, to determine what the StuG looked like at the tme of capitulaton, we can refer to photos taken of it on a Canadian base. On November 15 1945 Mowats collecton including the StuG steamed into Montreal harbour aboard the SS Blommersdyke. It arrived to a less than rapturous recepton 16 MILITARY MACHINES INTERNATIONAL OCTOBER 2014 FAR LEFT... The broken cylinder head. Any other engine in this state would almost certainly be scrapped, but the fact that it was a rare Maybach engine ensured it was saved. (Courtesy Weald Foundaton) LEFT... The cylinder is seen here partally welded during the restoraton process that resulted in a successful rejuvenaton of what could very easily have been a scrap engine. (Courtesy Weald Foundaton) 14-22_stug2.indd 16 07/08/2014 21:28 but at least the StuG avoided being sold for scrap, and spent many a year sit ng outside various Canadian Army bases. It then went to US collector Fred Ropkey in return, so the story goes, for his having restored a Sherman on behalf of the Canadian government. According to informaton gleaned from the internet, the StuG was subsequently purchased by Perry Kehr around 1990 and then, in 1999 afer having been restored to some degree, sold on to Joe Fazio in California where it was used for batle re-enactments by the Midwest-based 2nd Panzer Division living-history group. Short clips uploaded to YouTube in 2008 show that the StuG had been ted with Schutzen (armour side skirts) or at least the brackets to support them and, judging by the speed of its progress, the original Maybach HL120TRM had by then been replaced by the GMC V12 engine that was stll in place when the StuG arrived in the UK. A year later the StuG was spoted at a Brent Mullins open day and then, in February 2010, sit ng on the dockside at Galveston, Texas, awaitng shipment to Southampton. A certain amount of speculaton followed as to the vehicles destnaton but, as some suspected, it was headed for the Weald Foundaton for restoraton. And where beter? The Weald Foundaton (or Sdkfz Foundaton as it was beter known at the tme) had already executed a quite remarkable StuG III restoraton. PREVIOUS EXPERIENCE That previous StuG, also an Ausf G manufactured by MIAG in late October/early November 1943 and ted with a Topflende gun mantlet (widely known as the Saukopf, or sows head, mantlet), also had a remarkable back-story. It was one of 12 aboard the SS Sante Fe, which was sunk by a Russian submarine on 24 November 1943 while en route to Sevastopol on the Crimean Peninsula. It was nally recovered in 2002 and, as you can imagine, 60 years immersed in the Black Sea had taken its toll; a dense mass of crustacea had penetratng every nook and cranny of the vehicle... or those elements of it that had not simply rusted away, however, the point is, it was a di cult restoraton that provided the Weald Foundaton with valuable experience. Of course, with the arrival of the Mowat StuG, Mike Gibb and his team were able to compare the two vehicles in detail. There wasnt an intact MIAG StuG around for us to have a look at, Mike Gibb points out, referring to the period when the Black Sea StuG was being restored. There was a MIAG in a Canadian museum but that had taken a lot of shell re afer serving as a range target. I believe it was an April 1943. Thats the one we used in terms of colour reference. Then we had a wonderful series of photos from the Tank Museum of a captured MIAG, now destroyed, from January or February 44, but then this one came along and we were able to compare step-by-step the research which we had conducted initally for our November 1943 MIAG StuG with one that was built just a month later. The point about this StuG is that although well-travelled and somewhat used, not to say abused on occasion, it was remarkably complete as Mike Gibb testes. It was the most intact vehicle Id ever come across. Unless exceptonally lucky and its almost unheard of now to nd something in a barn one usually has to contend with a vehicle OCTOBER 2014 MILITARY MACHINES INTERNATIONAL 17 ABOVE... The lack of a turret meant that the StuG had a low prole that made it hard for enemy tanks to see, and perhaps more importantly, hit it when on the batleeld. LEFT... The StuGs fully restored Maybach engine seen here in situ before the rear engine cover was replaced. (Courtesy Weald Foundaton) LEFT... The two StuG IIIs restored by the Weald Foundaton. The most recent, on the right of the photo, was acquired in 1945 by a Canadian Army intelligence o cer, Captain Mowat, during a largely self-motvated crusade to collect as much German war material as possible. 14-22_stug2.indd 17 07/08/2014 21:29 18 MILITARY MACHINES INTERNATIONAL OCTOBER 2014 that has been pulled out of a river or the like, but what you normally nd are bits thereof. You never get something that has all of its drivetrain components, all of the original castngs, all of the original road wheels, the swing arms everything. There was even an engine, albeit with serious problems, and a gearbox, although that was chewed up. And although many parts had been completely cleaned of any original paint, there were other parts that hadnt been sand blasted quite so thoroughly. That said, the Weald Foundaton team then had to ascertain to what extent the vehicle had been tampered with afer its arrival in North America, the replacement of the engine was obvious, but what else? We were looking at this vehicle when it rst arrived, Mike Gibb recalls, and couldnt understand why there were all these, lets say, modicatons, and we automatcally concluded that they must be wrong; that is not how it lef the factory. But remember, this thing lef the assembly line as determined by the chassis number around December 1943, but there are others things on the vehicle that point to very early 1944. Steel return rollers came into use just at that tme the return rollers on our October/November vehicle were rubber so it was just at the cusp of the change. There were also retaining bars for track links added for additonal protecton and a rain guard that went between the gun and hull. Where normally there would be a canvas skirt, this vehicle had a metal plate that went on top, and which was lot more sensible than a bit of canvas that, between January 1944 and May 1945, would have worn out, however, because we were provided with a series of photos of it at various bases in Canada, we could see that these genuinely were eld modicatons and the vehicle had not been meddled with afer reaching Canada. MACHBACH REVIVED Weve already mentoned that the StuGs original engine had been replaced by a late-sixtes GMC V12, but it stll came along with the vehicle. There was no queston that the GMC had to come out, but, as the ABOVE... Both of these StuG III were manufactured by MIAG only a couple of months apart during late 1943. The most obvious dierence is that the right-hand vehicle has a Topflende gun mantlet, perhaps beter known as the Saukopf, or sows head, mantlet. ABOVE LEFT... This photo shows the spare sectons of track stowed on the vertcal wall at the rear of the ghtng compartment. LEFT... The gun sight aperture seen here in the raised positon. Note that the sight itself retains its original wartme nish and has not been restored or repainted. 14-22_stug2.indd 18 07/08/2014 21:30 OCTOBER 2014 MILITARY MACHINES INTERNATIONAL 19 original Maybach was severely damaged, what replacement optons were there? Thats a queston you could answer yourself very few, and not just because the world isnt awash with Maybachs. As Mike Gibb explained to me, nowadays its not just the problem of nding an incredibly rare engine of component, which is di cult enough in itself, there must also be no queston as to origin or ownership, partcularly in light of recent cases. As a result, the decision was taken to see if they could resurrect the original engine. That task largely fell on the shoulders of Paul Duncan and Andy Gardner. The original engine was in a very bad state; a big end cap had come o, Andy explains. There was a smashed and mangled big-end shell and a lot of debris in the engine. It seems that the con rod had come round with the cap hanging o, or it had got trapped between the crank and the sidewall of the crankcase. Although it hadnt broken a piece out, it had eectvely swollen and cracked a porton on the lower side of the engine and several cracks had broken through the main bearing housing. We also found that someone had wound bolts in and pushed out the botoms of the bolt pockets. The repair was my rst task afer joining the Weald Foundaton in March 2012 and took about three weeks. It involved pre-heatng to MOWATS PRIVATE ARMY Farley Mowat was born in Ontario on 12 May 1921. Despite being encouraged by his father, Angus, a veteran of the Great War, to join the Army, Farley was set on joining the Royal Canadian Air Force and learning to y. Unfortunately for him (but perhaps fortunately for us) the RCAF was not as keen on him as he was on them. Therefore, falling back on his fathers advice, young Farley enlisted with the Hastngs and Prince Edward Regiment, known as the Hasty P and by 10 July 1943, he was a subaltern in command of a rie platoon and found himself partcipatng in the inital landings of Operaton Husky, the Allied invasion of Sicily. In his book, My Fathers Son, Mowat remarks that in its inital stages the campaign in Sicily was an exhilaratng if exhaustng experience for those that escaped death or mutlaton. But as the acton moved into Italy and there began a long and biter struggle, the experience became more exhaustng that anything else. Following a partcularly stressful period during the Moro River campaign at the tail end of 1943, Mowat departed the front line and was appointed to the sta at Brigade HQ. Although the aforementoned My Fathers Son provides a very good account of Mowats service in Italy, we must fast-forward to April 1945 when the now Captain Mowat, based at Eindhoven in the Netherlands was serving as a Technical Intelligence O cer. His task was, as he puts it: to scour the batleelds and beyond for examples of new military horrors being deployed by the Jerries against our lads. You might have thought that such a task would have kept him fully occupied, but he found tme to become involved in what was sold to senior sta as a liaison group between the NBS (the Dutch underground forces), HQ 1 Canadian Army and the HQ of General Johannes von Blaskowitz, commander of the German forces in the Netherlands who, it was thought, was interested in a separate armistce with the Allies. That this involved a somewhat nerve-wracking trip behind enemy lines to visit the German HQ has no partcular bearing on our story except to show the calibre of the man. With the liberaton of the Netherlands came a period of inactvity for Mowat and a sense of unease concerning the developing situaton. There was a growing sense that the Americans and Britsh were hoovering up as much as possible of the German war machine so they alone could benet from its technical advances such as the V-2 rocket. Prior to the liberaton, Mowat had formed an excellent working relatonship with the commander of the NBS, Colonel Michel, who was no more impressed with the Netherlands being excluded from the race to benet from German military science than Mowat was about Canada being likewise sidelined. So they came to arrangement whereby Mowat contnued searching for interestng German war material but instead of sending it back through channels, he deposited it at a barracks taken over by the NBS at Ourderkerk, near Amsterdam. The NBS would supply warehousing, vehicles, labour, technicians and guards and, in return, Mowat would collect two of everything, one for Canada, one for the Dutch. Then, when it seemed likely that Mowat might be re-absorbed into the general pool of intelligence o cers, he convinced senior sta that he should collect some of the most fearsome weapons in the German arsenal for shipment back to Canada where they could be displayed to show the Canadian people what their Army had been up against. Having got some measure of agreement, Mowat appointed himself commanding o cer of the First Canadian War Museum Collecton Team, which was ostensibly put under the command of Lieutenant-Colonel Harrison of the Historical Secton, 1 Canadian Army. He wisely made it clear that the less he heard from or about Mowats actvites the beter. The collectng spree commenced in the Netherlands but Mowats unit was soon ranging far and wide to acquire, purloin and, technically at least, steal an incredible amount of material. On 10 July 1945, Mowat reported that he had at Ouderkerk 14 tanks and self-propelled guns including a Tiger II and Panther (and presumably the featured StuG), 23 special-purpose vehicles ranging from a Schwimmer to a 15-ton armoured half-track, 40 artllery pieces and an enormous amount of ancillary items and small arms. By 22 July he had also got hold of, among other things, a Jagdtger and a V2 rocket. The later was stolen from under the noses of its Britsh Army guard whom the Canadians had liberally dosed with Dutch gin. While they were three sheets to the wind, Mowats team rolled the V2 o its railway at car onto a one-man submarine trailer hooked up to a Mack tractor unit and made o with it. When the proverbial hit the fan shortly afer V2 technology being highly secret Mowat had his men build a fake wooden conning tower onto the missile and paint the whole thing blue to further the illusion that it was a submarine prototype. Incredible though it may seem, on 26 October 1945, Mowats private army around 700 tons apparently was loaded aboard the SS Blommersdyke at Antwerp. Canada had itself a fantastc collecton of German war material. But there was a problem. The Canadian command didnt know it had it, and when it found out, didnt want it or the C$76,000 shipping bill incurred get ng it to Montreal. In the event, the artllery and lesser vehicles were sold for scrap o of the dockside while the armour went to Camp Borden. Much of that was subsequently destroyed by a re a few years later. A few items, such as the StuG, survived. As for Farley Mowat, an incredible individual and perhaps the worlds rst, and most aggressive, collector of military vehicles, he lef the Army shortly afer returning to Canada and became a best-selling author and a treless environmentalist. He died on 6 May 2014, six days short of his 93rd birthday. The book referred to here, My Fathers Son (ISBN 978-0-395- 65029-5) was published in the early ninetes is an account of his wartme service drawing upon leters between himself and his father. It is a fascinatng read and, although the book does not appear to be widely available new in the UK, can be found on the used market. 14-22_stug2.indd 19 07/08/2014 21:31 20 MILITARY MACHINES INTERNATIONAL OCTOBER 2014 ABOVE LEFT... Looking across the breech guard at the loaders positon. ABOVE RIGHT... Looking up from the commanders positon at his periscope. It is incredibly cramped inside the StuGs ghtng compartment, partcularly to the lef of the breech. BELOW... Spare track links were carried on the hull front and rear, and beneath the idlers, as shown in this view of the nished StuG. 14-22_stug2.indd 20 07/08/2014 21:31 get the area up to temperature and then welding an inch and peining it, welding another inch and peining it, and so on. It was quite an involved repair, and something new for the Foundaton to start with an engine that badly damaged and to resurrect it. The peining (or peening) process that Andy refers to involves tapping the new weld down with a ball-pein hammer, causing it to expand and help relieve the tensile stresses that develop both in the weld and the surrounding area on cooling. Preheatng the area to be welded and preventng it cooling too fast afer welding by the use of an asbestos blanket or similar, likewise helps to prevent stress cracks occurring. That the process was worth the eort as evidenced by an engine that runs very well indeed, in fact somewhat beter than that in OCTOBER 2014 MILITARY MACHINES INTERNATIONAL 21 ABOVE RIGHT... From the loaders positon showing some of the ammuniton racks plus a machine pistol and gas mask holder directly within reach. RIGHT... To the lef of the breech showing the gun sight and controls, some of the radio equipment and, top lef, the commanders periscope. ABOVE... The breech and rear wall of the ghtng compartment. ABOVE RIGHT... The drivers compartment, which he could only have accessed via the ghtng compartment afer rst dropping the back of his seat. 14-22_stug2.indd 21 07/08/2014 21:31 the Black Sea StuG did at rst! Mind you, a lot has been learnt about the ner points of set ng up these rare engines since then. The process is a lot more thorough now, Mike Gibb conrms. When we put an engine or gearbox together using parts from multple sources we make sure that those parts are actually in tune with each other. Experience wasnt the only thing gained during the restoraton of the Weald Foundatons own StuG. A useful stock of parts was also accumulated. We didnt have to go out to anybody or anywhere to get missing items because we had everything required following our previous project, Mike Gibb explains. When you try to collect the parts for a vehicle you always end up buying multples. So we already had what we wanted, for instance internal drivetrain components, radio and intercom-related parts and instrumentaton. What was partcularly interestng for the team was to note the dierences between StuGs built only months apart by the same manufacturer let alone by dierent companies. The Germans appear to have been constantly changing things for no obvious reason, dashboard layout and illuminaton for instance. Of course, requests for changes might be acted upon faster by one manufacturer than another, a good example being the track guard retainer brackets on the MIAG StuG, which were fabricated in contrast to an Alket-made vehicle from the period that would have had pressed brackets. You can see from photos of the StuG during its tme in Canada as a gate guardian that it sat slightly nose down. As a consequence a signicant amount of water had pooled in the forward part of the hull resultng in the wrecking of some torsion bars and corrosion of the original gearbox casing. The oor plate was also damaged by corrosion but what was saveable revealed some of the original colour and also oered a reminder that the two major StuG manufacturers, MIAG and Alket, used plates with a dierent patern the former used a diamond patern while the later employed a square-patern plate. CAMOUFLAGE SCHEME In terms of nishing the vehicle with an accurate paint scheme, the fact that its service history is, at the moment, unknown isnt so much of a hindrance. As we have already indicated, unit markings would not have been present on a vehicle at that stage of the war and the paint scheme would have been dictated by the theatre of acton rather than being unit-specic. Despite the fact that the StuG had been sand blasted at some stage, there were stll traces of Zimmerit around various components. Once stripped down it became clear that what the team had rst suspected might be dried mud was the remains of a coatng of the non-magnetc paste applied to many German armoured vehicles between December 1943 and late 1944. To maintain the as found by Farley Mowat look, the team have applied their own suitably batle-scarred layer. By the way, lest you think for one moment that the new layer of Zimmerit is ller, tle grout or something similar, it isnt. The team went to the trouble of mixing the paste to the correct chemical formula. Proof if any were needed that the amount of tme and eort that the Weald Foundaton puts into researching every detail of the vehicles it restores is quite astounding, but then the results are astounding. It maters not whether the viewer will ever realise that the colour of paint on a component is shade perfect, or that the Zimmerit was mixed to the original formula. Mike Gibb and his team know, and they wont setle for anything less. At the tme of writng it isnt clear where the StuG will be appearing but there are no plans to ship it back to the US in the near future. 22 MILITARY MACHINES INTERNATIONAL OCTOBER 2014 BELOW... Rear three-quarter view of the nished StuG showing the spare wheels located on the engine deck, rear exhaust shrouds and the startng handle on the rear hull plate. 14-22_stug2.indd 22 07/08/2014 21:32